E-Exchanges on the Catholic Church and other issues

E-Exchanges on various issues

 

*This section of our website (which is updated daily) contains some less formal – and short – e-mail exchanges that we’ve had which we feel may be of value to our readers.  We will include those portions of the exchanges we deem relevant and valuable.  We often add bolding and underlining which are not necessarily that of the other party.  This section also frequently includes, not only e-exchanges we have, but also our notes, updates and comments.  Section containing some important recent posts.*

 

New Video Posted

 

MHFM: This is a new video.

 

The Latin Text of the Oldest Surviving Papal Decree Rejects “Baptism of Desire” [video]

 

Schools

 

Subject: “Gay” history in CA schools

 

Dear Brothers,

That's an interesting story of Kelly's about the homosexual indoctrination in public schools.  In 2011 California signed a law that "gay" history be part of the school curriculum: California to Require "Gay" History in Schools -
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/15/us/15gay.html?_r=0

They obviously avoid the historical fact that Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed by fire by God for homosexuality.  Then there is Francis who said, "A gay person who is seeking God, who is of good will -- well, who am I to judge him?"  A homosexual is fundamentally of bad will.  Next they will be signing into law the history of pedophilia.  What an outrageous abomination!

Luke 17:29 - "And in the day that Lot went out of Sodom, it rained fire and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them all."

God Bless,

Mr. & Mrs. White

 

Attest

 

In commenting on your latest e-exchange, I can attest to what she said.  It is the same here at the elementary schools.  One of my 'jobs' was that I picked up two children from school from last September through June; and while I did this I was obliged to go inside the first school to the classroom to get the little boy.  His teacher was nice, but most of them often wore the "Superman 'S' shirt" because they claimed the name of their school began with the letter 'S'.  Really?  Then how do they explain the 'Superman', 'Spiderman' and others plastered on the sides of the hallways?  And what Kelly said about the 'anti-bully' posters and signs everywhere: ditto.  The schools have "anti-bully rallies"…

 

My Last Day

 

Subject: My Last Day

 

Dear Brothers

 

Recently, I quit my job as a supply teacher (public school board) as I realized that I would lose my soul if I didn't. I planned to finish the school year and then quit; as I don't have anything else lined up.  However, it was evident that I should quit immediately.   My job entailed going to different schools on an on call basis.  I was required to teach whatever the regular teacher left.  I never knew what I might be getting into and dealt with sinful occurrences as they came.  

 

For many of my teaching years, I was attending SSPX (no longer attending as their false 'doctrines' disgust me).  I would often ask the SSPX priests for advice on how to deal with various situations at work.  I don't ever recall anyone telling me that I should get out of this job.  Your website has been very helpful in aiding me to make this decision.  

 

I have been jobless now for a few months and don't regret quitting… Sin was being committed and promoted on a daily basis.  The kids constantly blasphemed God, anti-bullying homophobia posters scattered the walls, homosexual extracurricular clubs were formed, homophobia free classrooms were common (tagged by signs on doors), elementary school books introducing young children to same sex parents were being promoted, children as young as grade 2 or 3 were learning about street drugs (makes me wonder if this encourages them to try drugs, as sex education promotes early sexual behaviour).  Even sitting in the staff room with the teachers was best to be avoided as this was also an occasion of sin.  

 

Every school subject seemed to be sinfully warped.  In gym children changed into revealing outfits and sometimes dance was incorporated.  For library, the children had vast pickings of occult books to choose from (witches, magic, sorcerers, demons.....).  For science there were ample teachings to create atheist beliefs (the big bang, evolution, the earth millions of years old...).  For social sciences they sometimes learned of the various 'beautiful religions' and customs of the world.  For english they may be debating on the topic of abortion… Children are not properly being educated, but brainwashed and molded to accept the new incoming order.  Many children are being pushed to take various meds, they are being taught about the 'benefits' of immunizations, genetically modified food, nanoparticles, becoming 'global citizens'.  The beginning of the day is often started off by the whole school chanting "I am a Canadian, a free Canadian, free to ....... free to worship God as I like......" (I forget the whole chant).

 

I keep thinking of the quote in the bible...... "and whosoever shall scandalize one of these little ones that believe in me; it were better for him that a millstone were hanged around his neck, and he were cast into the sea"  and this scared me; as I was a part of this.   Students often look up to teachers as role models.  As a Catholic you need to set a good example.   If you see heresy or sin, which will lead children astray, you need to stand up and say something (even if this is occurring elsewhere in the school and not in your classroom).  If you are not willing to do this you should not be teaching.  On the other hand, if you do stand up, you're likely to be heavily persecuted, and will most likely lose your job and/or be put in prison.  Also, to ignore such issues is to put human respect above being a child of God.  Teaching in mainstream schools is very dangerous to one’s soul.

 

My last day of work was horrible.   I was in a behaviour class and there was a social worker present who took control for the day (she supposedly does this when the regular teacher is away).  A student made a negative remark about homosexuals.  The punishment from the social worker was to have him review the lyrics of a specific song.  This song was then played (song saying that homosexuals can't help it and are being discriminated against… The song even began to blaspheme 'the church').   I am very sad to say that I handled this by silence.  I left the room and flipped through a book.  I talked this over with my sister, when I got home, and it was quickly decided that I should quit as soon as possible.  

 

Recently, the schools have started to celebrate a day against bullying.   The teachers and students wear pink t-shirts and the kids spend the day, or week, listening to lectures, and doing activities that promote a stance against bullying.   Some activities may focus on cyber-bullying, while others on homophobia.......  Sure, I could just not accept work on this day/week of the year.  However, the slogan was something like "everyday is a no bully day".   I remember going to work after this bully week just to be surprised to see teachers parading around the school in pink t shirts and finding out it was yet another day against bullying. 

 

In schools, students typically work on computers to gather information for projects.   After talking to a student, it was revealed that they were warned about many 'bad' websites with lots of 'misinformation'.   Therefore, it was suggested they do their research on selected sites (which of course promoted positive information on such things as GMO’S, and other 'topics of interest' to brainwash the kids).   I'm pretty sure that many sites, containing truth, are blocked in schools.   However, the kids are easily able to access… inappropriate music videos..... but are usually told to stay away from things which contain guns or blood.  Immodesty flourishes in schools.  Some schools had dress codes, however nobody seemed to enforce them.  Kids… often participated in activities which portrayed the United Nations as being wonderful, participated in yoga, swimming, learned about the various 'wonderful' religions of the world, and many schools participated in pizza fridays (with pepperoni of course) and sometimes with no option for vegetarian.  Funny enough, the teachers loved to preach about respecting all religions.   To top it off, there was recently an article in a union magazine introducing the idea of unisex bathroom stalls (in order to not 'discriminate' against children with 'gender identity issues')…

 

Thank you Most Holy Family Monastery for your invaluable work.  I now pray to make better use of myself before it's too late

 

Kelly

 

MHFM: That’s an interesting and revealing account of the darkness of the school system.  We’re glad that you came across the information on the website.  You made the correct decision to leave that job.  If someone were teaching a class and a person in it blasphemed, that person should be corrected.  The same would apply to the situation in which the social worker was promoting homosexuality.  As you realize, some of the things you mentioned would need to be confessed once a person is convinced on all the issues.

 

Prayer

 

Subject: Prayer, the Great Means of Grace

 

Dear Brothers,

Thank you for posting: Prayer, the Great Means of Grace.

 

http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/audio/prayer32.mp3 

 

I'm glad I listened to this great sermon. Everything in it is true and inspiring, and very sobering. Sobering, because he who does not pray is certain to be damned…

 

St. Alphonsus: "We can do all things with God's help, which is granted to everyone who humbly seeks it; so that we have no excuse when we allow ourselves to be overcome by a temptation. We are conquered solely by our own fault, because we would not pray. By prayer all the snares and power of the devil are easily overcome. 'By prayer all hurtful things are chased away,' says St. Augustine."

St. Alphonsus: “He who prays is certain to be saved; while he who prays not is certain to be damned. All the saints were saved, and came to be saints by praying; all the accursed souls in hell were lost through neglect of prayer; if they had prayed, it is certain that they would not have been lost.  And this will be one of the greatest occasions of their anguish in hell, the thought that they might have saved themselves so easily; that they had only to beg God to help them, but that now the time is past when this could avail them."

In Jesus through Mary,
Elisabeth

 

Note

 

MHFM: We hope to post a new video in the next few days.

 

Comment

 

Dear Brothers:

 

In reading about Buffett's donation to the Gates Foundation (and his expressed intention to give away more of his wealth), it occurred to me that many Protestants would see this as a commendable, or at least positive, action on the part of Buffett.   They would conclude that Buffett is at least being "charitable", and might even expect that God would reward him for it… These false views are yet another proof that Protestantism is false faith, false hope, and false charity.  The false hope which deceives protestants, as MHFM has pointed out, is its embrace of the "faith alone" heresy.  Christ told men they must believe all things that He taught to be saved, and it is this specific collection of doctrines (expressed as dogmas) which constitutes "the faith once delivered to the saints".  Rejecting Christ's truth and preferring the doctrines of men, Protestants blatantly deny Christ's words; they deny the one and only Church Christ founded; they deny the Papacy which Christ established as the only means for preserving and transmitting His truths until the end of time.  Thus, Protestants are hypocrites who deny the Bible while claiming their religion is Bible-based!   Protestants deny the Mass, the only true form of acceptable worship to God -- and they do all they can do destroy it.  They also reject the rest of the system of Sacraments instituted by Christ through which the Precious Blood of Jesus is applied to mankind. 

 

Protestants know that they are not in the Catholic Church but are in "churches" founded by men.  Similarly, every adherent of the Counterfeit Catholic Church knows, or can readily determine, that his V2 "church" is different from the traditional Catholic Church.  This is an inescapable fact, because the Vatican 2 sect never ceases to broadcast the fact that it is "new and improved".  It often refers to itself as "the Vatican 2 Church", and goes out of its way to point out that the Catholic doctrines (taught by the true popes) are now out of date, as Antipope Rat did when he declared that Protestantism is no longer heresy.  Protestants (including V2 heretics) remind me of scavengers, picking over what they are pleased to imagine is outdated Catholicism, choosing what they think they can "reform" or "update".  But there is nothing new about heresy; it's the same Satanic lie, as old as the hills.  No wonder God calls such persons who pretend to be Christians workers of iniquity, and decries their satanic efforts to divide His indivisible Church into sects of perdition.  The "Jesus" which the Protestants and other heretics love to sing and talk about is not the historical Jesus of Sacred scripture and not the Savior of the World.   We can certainly see how, as MHFM has long maintained, the Great Apostasy began when people calling themselves "Catholic" while rejecting the true Catholic faith, decided that Protestantism was acceptable in the eyes of God and that non-Catholics no longer needed to convert to the Catholic faith for salvation.  The denial of the Salvation dogma was truly the beginning of the end.

 

Lee Ann

 

Punishing

 

Dear MHFM

 

It seems God is punishing this culture so that it might wake up to the reality that its socialist government is evil and that it does not help them. He is trying to make them realize that only bitter fruits can come from idolizing the state… The middle class is being wiped out. God is letting this debauched culture face the music. It is sinking deeply into poverty for it supports the sodomites and child murder. God is allowing the culture to go down the toilet/drain economically and financially speaking: to thus correspond with its moral descent…

  

“Gender dysphoria”

 

Subject: Arch-heretics promote "gender dysphoria policy"

 

Brothers,

 

Now the heretics in Vancouver are supporting and endorsing gender confusion among children. The boys will soon be using the girls’ restrooms in this area:

 

http://rcav.org/wp-content/uploads/PR-Dysphoria-Policy.pdf

 

Howard

 

MHFM: That is truly an outrage.

 

Live

 

Hello,


In response to AJ's post, I too agree with you. I live in Sarasota and they closed the streets downtown here one day to honor a gay mayor in California who was born here. It's absurd what's happening and I think you are right. The whole state will cave in to this abominable law. I pray for conversion.  Jesus have mercy, pray for us Most Holy Mother of God

Em

 

Considered normal

 

Subject: Protestants can’t go to Purgatory

 

Dear Brothers,

It's interesting to note that in the book, Charity for Suffering Souls (Nageleisen), the heresy that Protestants can go to Purgatory is promoted:

Charity for Suffering Souls (1895), p. 265-266: "A Scotchman, whose brother was stricken with a sudden death, was greatly affected by the sad loss.  Though he was a Protestant, he knew that into Heaven "there shall not enter anything defiled." (Apoc. 21:27).  As the religious denomination to which he belonged did not recognize a middle state, he was greatly concerned about his brother's condition in the next world, so much so, that he abandoned himself entirely to melancholy.  God... led this loving brother to the true faith... On All Soul's Day the good man visited the priest [Abbe Paume] and said to him, "I am resolved to ask admission into the Church from love of my brother.  I shall find great relief in being able to pray for him, and your Faith not only permits, but directs me to do so, teaching that thereby I shall greatly benefit him... Perhaps my brother is sentenced to it [Purgatory], and to release him I wish to become a Catholic..."  And he was received into the Church." 

This is outrageous heresy, yet it was probably considered normal "Catholic teaching" in the years leading up to Vatican II.  It is impossible for a Protestant to go to Purgatory because they are outside the Catholic Church where there is absolutely no salvation.  It is reminiscent of the false visionary, Maria Simma, who claimed to see Jews, Protestants, "Orthodox" and suicides in Purgatory.  It shows how much effort the Devil puts into the idea that one can be saved outside the Catholic Church.  Another example is the Near Death Experience of those who claim to go to Heaven for a little while and then come back to life, while they are Protestants.  It also demonstrates how the heretics who obstinately hold to "baptism of desire" and/or the "saved at death" heresy are doing the Devil's work.  They are part of the shadow that has eclipsed the true Church and which is blocking the light of the true faith from shining in all its brilliance.

God Bless,

Mr. & Mrs. White

 

Found

 

Dear brothers…

 

I found your web site about 4 years ago. I had recently lost my husband and was looking for answers why GOD took him.  I was looking on YouTube and your channel came up. I started watching and the more I watched the answers were clear. The Catholic Church is not the same as the one my parents and grandparents went too. I did stop going to church I didn't like the changes but when my husband became ill I returned to church. I had a mass for him and he was cremated. When I watched and read everything on your web site I know my feelings about what was happening were correct…

 

Maria

 

MHFM: We’re glad that you found the material.  However, it’s not accurate to say that the Catholic Church is not the same as it was before.  The truth is that the Vatican II sect is not the Catholic Church, and the true Catholic Church (which is separate from the Vatican II sect) still exists in a remnant of traditional Catholics.  Also, cremation is forbidden under pain of grave sin.  It’s crucial that you increase your interest level, look at the material on the site, pray the Rosary, and become convinced on all the issues.

 

Recorded

 

Brothers,

 

After viewing your news links and reading your post, Kind David's Census and His Sin, my thoughts began to dwell on Our Lady of Fatima's messages and warnings as well as the three children's recorded words and actions resulting from their visits by the Blessed Mother and the extraordinary graces they received.  You often quote, understandably, the scene where little Jacinta is sitting, pensive; Lucia asks her what she is thinking of and she replies:  "The war that is coming.  So many people will die, and almost all of them will go to hell."

 

Thank you for the valuable updates and spiritual helps.

 

Comment

 

Dear Brother Dimond,

 

I've received most of my answers to my questions by further exploring your website. I now understand that we… must adhere to Vatican I teachings and practices, and remove ourselves in all ways from Vatican II and the anti-church today…

 

May God Bless You and Keep You from now to Eternity

Gretchen Tresch

 

Increase

 

Subject: The Third Secret of Fatima (3rd edition) (video)

 

While rewatching this video I had a sudden thought. I have read in interviews and seen in videos many Exorcists, including Fr. Amorth, tell journalists that in recent years there's been a massive increase in Demonic Activity, both oppression and possession, all over the world, but especially in "catholic" countries. Could this be a consequence of the changes brought forth by antipope Paul VI in the Consecration and Baptism rite (esp. the removal of the Solemn Exorcisms)?...

 

Marco

 

MHFM: It’s a consequence of the emergence of the Vatican II sect, the replacement of the true sacrifice of the Mass with the invalid Novus Ordo, and the eclipse of the true Catholic Church.  Since grace was removed from large portions of the world with the advent of the Vatican II sect and the changes it ushered in, evil rushed into the vacuum.  It’s not just a coincidence that the culture dramatically changed in the 1960s and 1970s, shortly after Vatican II.  However, people make themselves vulnerable to evil influences when they sin gravely, and more and more people were doing that after Vatican II.

 

Amorth is an apostate, by the way.  He accepts false ecumenism and the heresies of Vatican II.  He also believes that Antipope John Paul II (an idolater) was “a saint”.

 

David’s Census

 

MHFM: This is a new post.

 

King David's Census and His Sin [post]

 

Homosexuality


Subject: Homosexuality

 

Dear Brothers,

Our culture is sinking more and more into deeper levels of depravity as more and more people are accepting the abominable sin of sodomy… A Florida Supreme Court judge in the Florida Keys has ruled that the state's ban on gay marriage is unconstitutional.  Gay "Marriage" is now legal in the Keys at this time.  I believe it is a matter of time before the entire state legalizes this abomination and joins the other states which have already done so. Homosexuals are everywhere.  On occasion I have seen them holding hands in public.  Some of them even dress like the opposite sex and do whatever they can to their bodies to look like the opposite sex and it is quite obvious.  They are very abundant here in Orlando.  I see them practically every day coming to the emergency room in the hospital where I work.  It is such a danger to the welfare of children who are exposed to views of these possessed people.  Even people who are not homosexual are becoming more tolerant of this wicked lifestyle.  Reprobates abound in our society and how few there are who are pleasing to God.  Our world truly deserves a chastisement.  Nuclear war?  God knows and may He help those who are faithful to Him and His holy Catholic Church and devoted to the Blessed Virgin Mary.

AJ

 

Questions

 

Hello,

 

I have watched many of your videos, I am 47…

 

I was baptized Catholic I attended Church as a child with my neighbors not my parents, the Catholics in my family were not good examples so I turned, I ended up being rebellious… I became a drug addict I had two children, I destroyed a total of 4 children in my life, I finally ended up divorcing, my exs family are JWs and Baptists I never really quite grasped their beliefs…  so for a good 6 years i was a single mother still not right in my eyes or God’s, I started a long distance relationship that ended up me being used for his gambling habits so I ended that… after two years i met my boyfriend we ended up moving together immediately, we lived together 10 years and just married this February, well this last 3 years we had started attending Mass on a regular basis, I was confused entering the Church because things seemed different than what I had remembered as a child <such as Communion in the Hand, Standing upon consecration of the host, the tabernacle off to the side, women giving communion, the Creed is the Nicene creed and not the Apostles Creed, I'm so desiring to be dedicated now, and have suspected that John Paul 11 was anti due to the other religions that i would see on TV attending the Vatican...We are Portuguese and Fatima is very sacred to my husband’s family and now mine...My question is are we still to attend Mass at the Church knowing that so much is different are we going to be punished for attending these apostate gathering now?? Can you please advise...

 

God Bless You

Stefanie 

 

MHFM: Stephanie, we're glad that you are looking at the material.  No, one must not go to the New Mass.  It's invalid and non-Catholic.  It must be avoided under pain of grave sin, as the material explains.  You should pray the Rosary each day, all 15 decades if possible.  It's also recommended to pray the Hail Mary frequently.  You will get powerful graces if you do that. 

 

There’s a question about your first ‘marriage.’  If you were married to another baptized Catholic in a ‘Catholic form,’ then that marriage was valid.  In that case, you would not have been free to marry again and your current 'marriage' would be invalid.  One would have to know the details of your first ‘marriage’ (e.g., was the man a baptized Catholic? where were you married? etc.) to assess its validity. 

 

Also, you say: ‘the Catholics in my family were not good examples so I turned, I ended up being rebellious.’  Although bad parents and bad family members contribute to people departing from the practice of the faith, the person who rebels bears ultimate responsibility for his or her actions and decisions.  Sinful choices cannot be blamed on others. 

 

You detail things from your past life.  When you are convinced on all the issues and you are ready to make a confession, obviously those things need to be confessed in a general confession.  God is giving you graces to be interested in your salvation and the true faith.  It’s crucial that you act upon them. 

 

Faith

 

MHFM,

 

I'm still quite new to my conversion from VII Catholic to being a True Traditional Catholic… I have ordered and listened to and read much of your material… I talk to everyone I know about it and what the true faith is, and referring them to your website.  As soon as everything comes in, I plan on distributing the material to family, friends, and the community that I live in.  So, I would like to say Thank You for putting the Truth out there.  I do still have questions about a lot of things.  Everyone has their own personal situations in life, and it is impossible to cover every situation in life.  I have learned so much from what you have provided that it has led me to question how I am now to think and feel about everyone in my life.  It has literally changed my relationships with everyone I know.  If you can help me out with some of the things that are weighing heavily on me right now.

 

1.  How am I supposed to feel or think of people I have known and loved in my life that have died, and now know because of my belief are in hell?

 

2.  How am I to know for sure if people I loved and cared about made it to Purgatory or Heaven?

 

3.  How do you continue to not break the Commandment of Honoring your Mother and Father when they are clearly heretics and are condemning you for your Faith in the one and only True Church?

 

If you can help me out on these for now, it would be greatly appreciated. 

 

Thanks, Laura.....

 

MHFM: We’re glad to hear about your interest.  To your questions: 1.  They made their choices.  They wanted to reject God’s law and/or His truth.  2.  With people who did not have the true Catholic faith, they cannot be thought to be in Purgatory or Heaven.  However, if someone did die as a true Catholic dedicated to the practice of the faith, and without the manifestation of any grave sin, then there can be an excellent hope.  3.  Admonishing heretical parents, and avoiding or rejecting them insofar as God’s law and the teaching of the Church dictates, is not contrary to the commandment to honor one’s father and one’s mother.  Rather, telling them the truth, and informing them of what they need to do for salvation, is how one fulfills that commandment.   

 

Comment

 

Subject: Can a Christian Lose Salvation? – 1 Corinthians [video]

 

This is one of best refutations of Protestantism…

 

Bombardus

 

Antipope Francis

 

Subject: Antipope Francis’ Bombshell Interview (video)

 

Unbelievable heresy.

Most Protestants are better than this "pope".


 

Marco Arecibo

 

MHFM: Since Protestantism involves a rejection of Catholic teaching, one obviously cannot be good or saved as a Protestant.  Yet, it’s true that Protestants are typically not as bad as Antipope Francis.

 

Purgatory

 

Subject: Why Hell Must Be Eternal (video)

 

Thanks for explaining that point. I have often said, "if I make it to purgatory, then I made it". I am not sure if that is the right way to think, but I know purgatory is a safe place that ends.

 

Rob

 

MHFM: We’re glad you viewed the video.  Those who reach Purgatory will of course be saved.  However, if someone were to adopt the attitude that, “I’m just going to make it to Purgatory,” it would be a dangerous one. 

 

St. Alphonsus (1760): “Every Christian who, because he desires only to do what is necessary for salvation, commits habitually deliberate venial sins, is, as we have seen, in danger of being lost.”

 

St. Alphonsus means that with people who sin that way, God will pull His grace and they will be more vulnerable to falling into mortal sin.

 

Guilty


Please, if you can, give me a cogent/pithy defense for the argument made by my mother that "the young men today don't know that they are being hood-winked and brought into an invalid rite of ordination, and are innocent. But the anti popes and bishops will be the ones to pay. We were hood winked and are not guilty." 


I said to her, now that I know the truth I must not support the vat II sect.  Still I did not address her argument. So what about the men who try to become catholic priests?  I told her they could have found the true faith if they were of good will etc...That we are to work out our faith in fear and trembling. That they must not have been of good will not to see the contradictions in the vat II sect. That the church teaches about "the elect" and that not all will go to heaven. She stared blankly for that time as if not recalling her catechism.  She is 93…. At one point she said, "they don't make it easy to go to mass, so what are we supposed to do?!!"  I answered that question, but the one about the men today who choose to become catholic priests and are instead led into the devils-den, I had no good answer. I must have true explanations for questions like that or else I will lose my chance to help her.   So what can I tell her about the men who go into the seminary intending to become true priests but come out heretics?   I will see her next week and want to give her a logical and indisputable answer in order to help her convert.  Thank you.

 

MHFM: The response is that any young man who enters a Novus Ordo seminary will necessarily be confronted with the false ecumenism and religious indifferentism of the Vatican II sect, among many other evils.  He cannot avoid the false ecumenism/religious indifferentism or be unaware of it.  Yet, even a cursory look into the history of Catholic teaching will inform him that the Vatican II sect’s views about non-Catholic religions and the eternal destiny of non-Catholics are contrary to traditional Catholic dogma.  Therefore, there’s no excuse for the Novus Ordo seminarians to embrace, join and support a group, organization or body which holds those views: e.g., promotes false ecumenism, accepts Protestantism as essentially good and salvific, doesn’t condemn non-Christian religions, etc.  Hence, their toleration of salvation outside the Church, the endorsement of Protestantism, etc. at the seminary will be the primary reason for their condemnation, in addition to the dishonesty and the lack of charity they display in their daily lives.  That serves as another reason they are left in such a situation.

 

Moreover, adult Catholics cannot be know-nothings.  They have to possess a basic knowledge of Catholic teaching, pray, and be interested to learn more.  If they have even a basic familiarity with historic Catholic teaching on the issue of salvation, they will discover that the Vatican II sect teaches blatant heresy.  At that point they should be troubled and want to learn more about what has happened.  Then, if they are sincere and of good will, they will search more actively for information that explains the crisis.  God will then give them the grace to find the information that gives them the full picture.  But the reason they remain in Novus Ordo seminaries is that they are not of good will.  That’s precisely why they’re there.  They’re not of the truth.  They are more interested in status and community than the faith of Christ, saving souls and doing God’s will. 

 

Also, your implication that you must satisfy every complaint your mom makes for her to accept the truth is not correct.  She should be convinced by the facts and information you should share with her.  If she’s not convinced, then she’s simply of bad will.

 

Census

 

Subject: King David’s Census and His Sin

 

Brothers,

 

I appreciate your article, King David's Census and His Sin, in which you made some very important Catholic points.  Your article, including the Biblical verses, was a delight for those who savor Biblical truths that also highlight Catholic dogma; such as those so stunningly and grippingly portrayed in this scene of events… David had to choose either to impose three years of famine on his entire 'kingdom'; or three months of persecution at the 'mercy' of his mortal enemies; or three days of persecution from the Lord to be administered by His Angel… I find myself agreeing wholeheartedly with David's decision:  “I am in great distress. Let me fall into the hand of the LORD, for his mercy is very great, but do not let me fall into the hand of man.”

 

Yes, the mercy of God is indeed great, while we still have time to call upon it. But "because iniquity hath abounded, the charity of many [hath grown] cold" (Matt. 24:12), falling "into the hand of man" is not a desirable option…

 

Your article goes up to verse 17: showing David's sin and his repentance; and also how he chose the mercy and will of God, not the will of man; and finally how he interceded for his people, as a prefigurement or 'type' of Christ.  This is more clearly affirmed by the following verses 18-30 where we see David building an altar to God over the threshing-floor of Ornan, and God's approval of that particular site, instead of Gabaon, by His sending fire upon the altar.  The commentary for verse 26 reads: "Fire, to testify his approbation....This altar represented the cross, on which the Victim of our reconciliation was offered."

 

Bergoglio

 

Subject: New Mass “Communion”

 

… Should Bergoglio confess that the new mass was a Luciferian celebration welcoming the New World Order, I dare say the bulk of the "faithful" wouldn't skip a beat ! Keep up the great work !

 

Richard Sawyer

 

Since

 

… I come from Poland. I was baptized in the novus-ordo sect. I was a member of SSPX but now, since a year, I am a sedevacantist…

 

Albert Polak

 

Scapular

 

Brothers,


I have some questions concerning the Brown Scapular:
 
Firstly, knowing that the Brown Scapular must be Blessed by a validly Ordained Priest before it can be worn, but now that we are in time of necessity that it is hard to get a validly Ordained priest to Bless it for us, can we still wear the Brown Scapular?...

THANK YOU AND GOD BLESS YOU. AMEN.

Yours in Christ and The Blessed Virgin Mary,
Remnant Vanafara Pio (NIGERIA).

 

MHFM: Yes, you can just wear it.  You don’t have to worry about having it blessed.

 

Reading

 

Brothers:

 

I have been reading the disturbing information on your website… I have been attending Latin Tridentine Mass… in San Antonio, Texas which also celebrates the New Mass…

 

I have not received Holy (?) Communion anywhere, and am putting off receiving the sacraments until I know for sure that I will not be offending God.

 

Thank you for your time and attention on this matter…

 

Respectfully yours,

Carolyn Norton 

 

MHFM: We're glad to hear about your interest.  One must not go to the New Mass or the 'Indult Mass' (i.e., where they have the New Mass and the traditional Mass in the same church).  It's important to realize the situation today (during the Great Apostasy).  It is one in which basically all the churches are either heretical Vatican II churches or 'traditionalist' churches where the priest is heretical in some way.  Thus, there aren't any churches that are fully Catholic, where one can join, regard the priest as Catholic and support the church.  There are very few options for receiving the Eucharist today, but there are some options for receiving the sacrament of confession (which is obviously crucial).  We can help a person with these issues once he or she is convinced on all the issues.  Thus, you should stay home on Sunday and pray the Rosary until you are fully convinced and it’s clear what options for receiving sacraments there might be for you. 

 

Jorge

 

Dear Mhfm,

 

Jorge Bergoglio… promoted his hatred of Christ by telling the Protestant leader of a worldwide federation that he is not interested in converting them to Catholicism. Jorge Bergoglio is a far darker individual than many people can imagine. Since 1994 to 2012 he has been holding official ‘memorial’ ceremonies with the Independent Order of the B’nai Brith inside the most prominent Novus Ordo ‘churches’ within his pseudo-archdiocese. Representatives of many Protestant denominations, rabbis, and leaders of other false religions also attended these annual ceremonies and took a prominent role leading this abomination and each of them lit a candle on the menorah. The Argentine president of the Independent Order of B’nai Brith (with the B’nai Brith head responsible for interreligious dialogue) always put out a press release mentioning how they were working with the pseudo-cardinal Jorge to organize and hold the “commemorative liturgy” concerning Jews of WWII. The official inter-religious worship book of the memorial service always had the symbol of the B’nai Brith and the coat of arms of Jorge Bergoglio prominently displayed on the left side corner. Jorge is a wolf in sheep’s clothing and it is no surprise that Jewish representatives of the Grand Lodge from Argentina were officially present during the inauguration ceremony of Mr. Jorge Bergoglio as antipope including the Director of B’nai Brith-Committee for UN Affairs… and prominent Eastern Schismatic leaders (who were probably communists) on the 19th of March last year. Also the Cathedral of Buenos Aires which Jorge pretended to lead has been occupied by Marxian-Socialist political groups. In fact during his pseudo-conclave there assembled 200 activists of the communist group Movimiento Popular La Dignidad (MPLD). The ridiculous thing is the communist groups (including Madres de Plazo de Mayo) when they protest in the Cathedral it always concerns government cuts in funding for projects that affect the communist groups but the Novus Ordo ‘cathedral’ was not associated with those cuts in any way. Jorge Bergoglio is the leader of a social club. It is the kind of club in which truth is irrelevant. Sentimentality and false ecumenism and the acceptance of sins are the highest ideal. He has never once condemned these communist protests. 

 

New Post

 

MHFM: This is a new post.

 

Can a Christian call someone a "fool"? [post]

 

Reading

 

… I have been reading your book and watching many videos and feel pretty confident that the Catholic Church is the only Christian church.  I am considering baptism but have questions.

 

The book says aborted fetuses go hell. Will you please tell me how God can justify taking a soul that never breathed a breath and giving it Hell for eternity?... Thank you for your consideration and work.

 

Jim Daneke

 

MHFM: We’re glad that you are going through the material.  It's crucial that you become convinced and take the steps to become a traditional Catholic. 

 

The Steps to convert to the traditional Catholic faith and for those leaving the New Mass – Baptism and Conditional Baptism – the Council of Trent’s Profession of Faith for Converts

 

To your question: unbaptized infants don't go to the fires of Hell, but to a part of Hell where there is no fire. 

 

Second, it's our job to accept God's revelation, and understand how it makes sense later on.  As St. Anselm put it:

 

For I do not seek to understand that I may believe, but I believe in order to understand For this also I believe, that unless I believed, I should not understand.” (St. Anselm, Doctor of the Church, Prosologion, Chap. 1.)

 

However, one explanation could be that God knew that if they lived, they would have died in mortal sin and gone to the fires of Hell.  Thus, it was quite merciful for Him to allow them to die before they reached the age of reason.  Yet, they are still not saved without Baptism.  St. Augustine made a similar point about people who die without having heard the Gospel. 

 

St. Augustine (428): “… God foreknew that if they had lived and the gospel had been preached to them, they would have heard it without belief.”

 

However, all those who die in mortal sin go to the fires of Hell.  Only those who die in original sin only go to the part of Hell where there is no fire. 

 

If you aren’t yet praying the Rosary, it’s crucial that you begin to do so.  Also, praying the Hail Mary frequently will give you the graces to become fully convinced and follow through with conversion.

 

Vatican II

 

I am 63 years old and was aged around 12 when Vatican II took place, and I remember wondering why my relatives and neighbors who were catholic stopped going to church after Vatican II, so I asked my mother and father and they never gave me an answer.  They beat around the bush and never told me anything…

 

P

 

Which

 

Brothers,

 

I am in need of prayer… Mostly, that I always have a “ready answer” when I am witnessing on the streets, including at Planned Parenthood’s Killing Place which they call a Health Center.  They kill unborn babies on Fridays and Saturdays mostly. I was there during the slaughter… from 12-3. Satan unleashed his “fiery darts” even more than usual. There have been some, Brothers, who actually seem to be possessed - glassy eyes, drool, and wicked blasphemies. “Out of the heart the mouth speaks. Pray that I always don the “whole armour of God” to ward off the sneak attacks and sucker punches.

 

What a wonderful blessing that the Lord put you in my path. That’s because while I was foundering, I continued to search with all my heart and mind and spirit…

 

David

 

MHFM: If you show up there, it’s good to bring the 7-in-1 DVD to distribute to other people.  Recommending the website is also important.

 

Comments

 

Dear Brothers,

Francis' comments that he's "not interested in converting Evangelicals to Catholicism" is diabolical.  He then says, "I want people to find Jesus in their own community," as if one can find Jesus Christ outside the Catholic Church, which is impossible. Evangelical Protestants reject Christ's truths in Catholic dogma, they reject Christ's merits in Catholic sacraments, and they reject Christ's authority in the Office of the Papacy…


God Bless,

Mr. & Mrs. White

 

Noticed

 

Dear Brothers,

 

I have noticed deafening silence in the false traditionalist movement, since the last few acts of apostasy and heresy of Antipope Francis… also the SSPX doesn’t believe in papal infallibility.  

 

In Our Lady of Fatima.

 

From Mark V

 

Another Major Heresy from Francis

 

MHFM: In a recent meeting with a Protestant named Brian Stiller (The Global Ambassador of the World Evangelical Alliance), Antipope Francis stated this:

 

I’m not interested in converting Evangelicals to Catholicism.  I want people to find Jesus in their own community.  There are so many doctrines we will never agree on.  Let’s not spend our time on those.   Rather, let’s be about showing the love of Jesus.” (Link to News Report)

 

Antipope Francis has taught this heresy numerous times before, as proven in the videos below.  But this is another very bold expression of his complete rejection of Catholic teaching. 

 

What Francis Really Believes (3rd edition) – video

Why Francis Must Not Be Considered The Pope – video

 

Francis’ latest heresy is more good news for true Catholics.  It further exposes the Counter Church and reveals the true position.  It also shames the obstinate defenders of the Vatican II sect.

 

After

 

Brother Dimond,

 

… After much reflection, I have come to agree with your belief that Pope Pius XII was the last valid pope of the Catholic Church…

 

Thank-you,

 

Eric

 

Haydock

 

Hello!

 

What is your opinion on the Haydock Bible? Are the notes reliable?

 

Thank you and God Bless!

 

Louis

 

MHFM: It contains some good notes and some valuable information.  However, it’s not as if the commentary is always definitive, infallible or correct. 

 

John 3:16

 

Brothers,

 

Your video, The Key to John 3:16, is simply wonderful!  I confess I hadn't paid close enough attention to it until your recent posts, refuting Protestantism, on Ephesians 2:8 and I Corinthians.  Already believing all things taught by holy Mother Church, and prayerfully striving to obey, I have not given as much thought to defending what I believe and obey as I ought.  Your little bytes of true Biblical teachings are very great in value.  Catholicism = pisteuon and Protestantism = apeithon.

 

Francis

 

Thank you for the information you put out in exposing the false Vatican II Church. Thanks to antipope Francis, the sham is becoming more and more obvious every day…

 

God bless,

Sean McGrath

 

Souls

 

Subject: The End Draws Near

 

One cannot deny or turn their head away from what is taking place now.  We have seen signs in the Heavens.  We have civil unrest like never before, therefore implying the distress of nations.  The best thing we can do is preserve our souls in the state of grace and try to win as many souls as possible to the Traditional Catholic Faith.  May God find us all worthy through the intercession of the Blessed Virgin. 

Brandon

 

Article

 

Subject: article on fools

 

Dear Brothers:

 

A few days ago, I was going through old papers and came across copies of some correspondence I had with an SSPX priest.  When I was still going to the SSPX, I emailed him about the dogma of No Salvation Outside the Church, and gave some papal quotes.  He responded by email to assure me that I was mistaken, and he quoted the usual saints who were not popes (and who, in fact, never held or taught what the false traditionalists contend they did). I wrote back and explained why these men were not sources of infallible dogma -- that only a pope was -- and that, in fact, saints (including the ones he mentioned) have often made mistakes about doctrinal matters.  Then, the SSPX priest got angry and nasty.  He said that although he had tried to set me straight (a great act of magnanimity on his part), one "can lead a horse to water but can't make him drink" .   So I was the horse, while he was the ass.  And he essentially said I was not to write to him anymore unless I came to see things his way.  Once upon a time, I would have deferred to people such as this man who I thought knew the Catholic faith, because I recognized that I did not.  But since learning the faith thanks to MHFM, I now see these people for what they are:  obstinate heretics and hardcore defenders of a Counterfeit Church.  And while I would have once mistaken their characteristic self-assuredness as confident knowledge, I now recognize it as pride, pomposity and feigned holiness.  Heretics always love to appear humble, righteous and virtuous -- proving that even a heretic's demeanor and comportment is fake and deceptive! 

 

When persons such as these cannot refute the substance of MHFM's arguments they, too, often get angry and nasty.  And sometimes, as your article pointed out, these phonies will try to preserve the thin veneer of their imagined magnanimity by criticizing MHFM for informing a bad-willed,  truth-despising fool that he is a  fool.  To point this reality out to a person who reveals to you his bad-will is not just being truthful -- it is being charitable and we are obliged to do this.   Unlike the members of the true Church who are the Church Militant, heretics would rather flatter and deceive people (beginning with themselves).  Heretics are liars who call evil good, and good evil.   Their goal is to be "nice" and accepted by men, all the while marching themselves and others to hell.

 

Any person who prefers man's truth over God's truth is indeed a fool.  Every person that seeks his own and others' damnation is indeed a fool…

 

Lee Ann

 

Reminder

 

Subject: Can a Christian call someone a fool

 

Dear MHFM,
 
You hit the nail right on the head with this article. It is a clear reminder that mortal sin is foolish and faithless towards the sacrifice of our Lord Jesus Christ on the Cross.
 
Sincerely,
 
Henk

 

Comment

 

Dear Mhfm,

 

Heretics and other enemies of God who complain when justly condemned adhere to the 'you-can't-judge-heresy.' They also usually adhere to the 'baptism of desire’… 'invincible ignorance', 'salvation outside the Church,' and 'saved by your conscience' heresy. It reminds me of when you went to the C2C radio show and called a moronic heretic a moron after he commenced his unjust accusations against you and was accusing you of being moronic. A number of persons whom you would expect to be appreciative of the fantastic soul-saving/winning information you put out there in the videos and articles etc: were for some reason 'bothered' by your factual statement against the heretic. These persons just have a problem with the condemnation of sins and sinners. Their reprobate world view requires that sin and evil should never be condemned and that mortal sinners be not condemned/admonished. They have been corrupted by the liberal spirit of the world. They are truly worshippers of man/humanity and this is anti-Christ. The SSPX features on the slide show of their website a picture of the reprobate John Paul II and they call him a "saint" and Fellay had pretended he would resist the pseudo-canonizations. They are just a bunch of schismatic morons that change their positions as they see fit. Pope Pius IX calls schismatics 'sons of darkness, wicked, and deplorable;' Pope Pius IX, Graves ac diuturnae (#'s 1-4), March 23, 1875: "… the new heretics who call themselves 'Old Catholics'... these schismatics and heretics... their wicked sect... these sons of darkness... their wicked faction… this deplorable sect… This sect overthrows the foundations of the Catholic religion, shamelessly rejects the dogmatic definitions of the Ecumenical Vatican Council, and devotes itself to the ruin of souls in so many ways."

 

Pope Pius IX in his Encyclical 'Beneficia Dei' June 4, 1871 (#4) says: "We are horrified and tormented by the murder of the Archbishop of Paris which has filled the whole world with fear and horror." He labeled the murderers as "beastly, God-forsaken scum" since they committed "quite unheard-of excesses." Yes he labeled notorious sacrilegious murderers as God-forsaken beastly scum. This crushes the man worshipers who pretend to be followers of the Church. Your article was tremendous and moreover the heretic would deny the entire lives of the Saints and the Church Fathers since they pull no punches in condemning mortal sinners and heretics and infidel. Yes these are just judgments. It would be an unjust judgment to refrain from condemning when the situation calls for it. 

 

Saint Alphonsus De Liguroi (Doctor of the Church) "Preparation for Death": "But He [God] cannot refrain from hating sinners. Psalms 5:7 'Thou hatest all the workers of iniquity' Yes; God cannot but hate sin, which is diametrically opposed to his will; and in hating sin he must necessarily hate the sinner who is united to his sin. Wisdom 14:9 'But to God the wicked and his wickedness are hateful ALIKE.'"

 

Faith

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Your latest article on δι τς πίστεως “through the faith” and not “through faith” is great and undeniable, I totally agree when you say that… the concept of being saved “through faith” fits more easily into their reformed theology in which personally accepting Jesus as the Savior is the extent of faith’s obligations and on the other hand, the concept of being saved “through the faith” implies that “the faith” is something broader involving incorporation into something with more facets, components and requirements.

 

Most Protestants, including “Catholic” liberation theologians seem so naive and hardheaded they wish to be their own masters thus making it difficult for them to possess “the faith”.  Even the apostle John says in 1 Jn 5:4: "For whoever is born of God conquers the world; and this is the victory that has conquered the world – our faith…

 

In J.M.J.

M.Fernanda da Silva

 

New Article Posted

 

MHFM: This is a new article.

 

Does Ephesians 2:8 say “saved through faith” or “saved through THE FAITH”? [article]

 

Francis & the ‘Televangelist’

 

Brothers,

 

Your news post about Francis' meeting with the demonic 'evangelicals' is yet another proof that he is one with those who reject Catholic dogma.  The picture of him 'lunching with' and 'high-fiving' the Texas televangelist-heretic is evidence that Francis enjoys conversations with devils.

 

The behavior of the Vatican II Antipopes is in stark contrast to the behavior of the true and Catholic Popes of Church History.  It is amazing to see how many defenders the antipopes have, no matter how ridiculous, heretical or apostate their actions.  What is still further amazing is that you receive e-mails, from persons who have watched one or more of your videos detailing the undeniable abominations of the Antipopes of the Great Apostasy; falsely criticizing you for making the video, falsely accusing you of being anti-Catholic and falsely asserting that you are outside the Church!... The universal bad-will is almost entire, but there are also many who do appreciate your work of defending the Catholic faith and exposing the false post-Vatican II counter church.  The remnant of faithful is small, scattered and suffering, but united by the holy bond of charity - which is stronger than death;  holding the one faith of the one Lord Jesus Christ, in His one, holy, Catholic, Apostolic Church, the only ark of salvation.  May almighty God grant His remnant final perseverance, through the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

 

Comment

 

Dear Brothers,

Your work refuting Protestantism is extremely critical and vital, especially for our times, since the Vatican II apostasy is essentially Protestantism on steroids (spiritually speaking).  It is sad to see so many true Catholics who don't recognize the high value our Lord places on peoples' efforts to evangelize.  In fact, many Protestants have more zeal for their false religion than do some true Catholics for the true faith.  It is a disgrace.  It's why people lose the faith, because they don't care about the salvation of souls, instead being content to go the way of false traditionalists, wearing a veil of 'traditionalism' while being unwilling to sacrifice anything in order to alert others to the dogmas of the Catholic faith.  There are also tremendous graces that God gives to those who evangelize.  It appeases God's wrath.  Your research is thorough and focuses on the most important points.  It should inspire others to do their own research, such as for Protestants to research the Catholic faith.  The fact that so many Protestants are so wilfully ignorant demonstrates how effective the Devil has been in blinding people to the glorious truths of the Catholic faith.  The tremendous value of your work stands on its own merit, and should not be judged by how bad-willed heretics react to it.

God Bless,

Mr. & Mrs. White

 

Russia Letter

 

Subject: Russia Letter

 

Dear Most Holy Family Monastery,

I read with interest Lee Ann's letter on Russia, because it has been something I have been thinking about lately, too.  As evil as Russia still is in many ways, the ex-communist country appears to be the only one with any sanity in the domestic and international spheres (e.g. rejecting homosexuality and the US/EU takeover of Ukraine).

I often think about the efficacy of the prayers at the foot of the altar Pius XI prescribed for Russia.  And I wonder how God may in some way use Russia, a non-Catholic country, to defend the Faith, or at least some principles of divine or natural law.

In Mary,
Curtis

 

Protestantism

 

Brothers,

 

You have amassed a great volume of true teachings which do refute Protestant heresies, and these are of special interest to defenders of the true Word of God; however, these true teachings which prove Protestants are liars, such as your latest study on Ephesians 2:8, will be hopelessly lost on almost all of them.  They do not want it.  God does not hide His truth from those who seek it with a single heart.  It is impossible to read Sacred Scripture and believe it entirely without also being enlightened to believe in the holy Catholic Faith.  Protestantism is a hollow darkness, an illusion of the devil.

 

You are very good-willed to make such efforts toward helping those heretics to see their errors, and surely God will not forget to reward you; you have most probably also made a number of converts in the process.  It is clear that you are making extraordinary efforts to reach even one:  the woman who made the erroneous effort to oppose you; for if they are not lukewarm, but hot or cold, there is something to work with.  The 'hot' or 'cold' are at least willing to debate! I would not have you give up your work for anything, but pray for your success in converting souls to the holy Catholic Faith.  It is just heart-piercing when one sees the great lengths you are going to… being met with such culpable indifference.  There will be no excuses on Judgment Day.

 

MHFM: We’ve pointed out that what summarizes the situation with Protestants in general is that they simply don’t want the truth.  There is an incredible amount of bad will operating among them.  The dishonesty which characterizes the acceptance of Protestantism is obviously a huge obstacle to a Protestant accepting the Catholic faith.  Those among them who decide to follow truth will become Catholic.  The fact that they are typically so hostile to Our Lady’s role cuts them off even more from the graces to convert. 

 

Yet, there are so many millions of false Christians out there – and so many Protestant heresies, lies and errors to refute and expose – that the sheer numbers of Protestants represent an important opportunity for evangelization, even if the percentage of them interested in hearing truly biblical and consistent argumentation is extremely small.  It’s also true that among the Protestants, there is an incredible amount of willful ignorance.  Through their own fault, they have simply ignored or blinded themselves to many facts which disprove their false position and beliefs.  Bringing these facts to their attention in even more specific and detailed ways – putting those facts directly in their faces in interesting and powerful presentations – gives them a chance to get off the path to Hell, even if few will take it.

 

Furthermore, with the eclipse of the true Catholic Church by the Vatican II sect in these final days, more and more people (again through their own fault) are simply defaulting to the position that Catholicism cannot be biblical Christianity, let alone the one true Christian faith.  As a consequence, they embrace some form of Protestantism.  For example, when they look at Antipope Francis and all of his anti-Christ apostasy – or a typical Novus Ordo ‘church’ for that matter – they won’t even consider Catholicism.  That’s why it’s not only crucial to expose the Vatican II sect and show how it’s the fulfillment of prophecy, but expose Protestantism in its various forms as well. 

 

Protestants have also littered the world and the internet with a mountain of anti-Catholic propaganda.  It’s all over the place.  Protestant heretics of all types are constantly on the attack against the Catholic faith.  Well, we plan to go even more on the attack against Protestantism.  There is some very interesting new and powerful information to cover, as time permits.  It will further demonstrate that Protestantism is a lie of the Devil, and that the Catholic Church and its teachings alone are truly biblical and Christian.  Such issues also deal with the core truths about God, Our Lord Jesus Christ, His Revelation, the Bible, the Gospel and the Church.  Therefore, the truth on such matters holds great value for true believers in understanding the proper way to believe and live according to the Christian faith, in addition to exposing heresies, heretics and their sects.

 

(By the way, some time ago we contacted the anti-Catholic Calvinist James White and challenged him to a debate.  We provided a number of possible topics.  We did not receive a response.  Having read a number of his books, there are some very interesting things to expose and refute, when time permits.  Such points will further demonstrate that Protestantism is one of Satan’s biggest lies ever.)

 

Faith Alone

 

Dear MHFM,

Excellent presentation on refutation of "faith alone heretics."… Faith alone advocates are really telling the world to sin and sin profoundly, as Luther taught, and no matter, you are saved by the blood of Jesus only!  Hideous, wishful thinking.  Lucifer and his cohorts, "faith alone advocates," in the fiery pit of hell will never celebrate but be tortured and suffer for eternity for such contrary beliefs from Catholic teaching as handed down through the centuries… Thank you MHFM...

 

Comment


Dear Mhfm,

 

Thank you for the new Ephesians article. I liked it very much and printed it out. The in-depth research methodology you engaged in reminds me of how you just thrash the BOD heretics and they always get so ticked off the more you refute the BOD heresy…

 

A.

 

Faith Alone

 

Dear MHFM,

 

Salvation by 'faith alone' is a vicious attack against the holy Bible and, as MHFM has exemplified, plentiful Bible quotes crush this great lie.  Someone either adheres to truth or hates truth.  In short, followers of 'faith alone' claim to love Jesus, but act deaf to His teachings, hereby proving their love to be purely superficial. 

 

… Also, consider Jesus' statement, "But yet the Son of man, when he cometh, shall he find, think you, faith on earth?" (Luke 18:8).  From the protestant mindset, this quote indicates the apocalypse is not of the present day, as this world has millions of people who verbally profess a 'love' of Christ.  Also interesting is when Jesus said, "Many will say to me in that day: Lord, Lord, have not we prophesied in Thy name and cast out devils in Thy name and done many miracles in Thy name?  And then will I profess unto them: I never knew you.  Depart from me, you that work iniquity" (Matthew 7:22-23)… Moreover, St. Paul (who Holy Scripture identifies as a true believer and an apostle of Christ) affirmed he could be disqualified!  Faith alone is a seed of Satan that suffocates the meaning of life, which is to know, love and serve God, hereby accomplishing His will and entering the Kingdom of Heaven.  According to protestantism, it seems having 'faith' automatically accomplishes God's will and, in this respect, life becomes a mere pre-party for Heaven.  This mangles the Bible and prepares one for Hell.  The Gospel clearly teaches that a justified person can commit grave sins, lose justification and be barred from the Kingdom of Heaven.  

 

It was disheartening to hear the protestant Elizabeth state, " .... I detest Roman Catholicism ...."  In other words, Elizabeth hates the saints, hates the teachings of Christ, hates Catholic miracles, hates St. Peter, hates every Catholic evangelizer, hates confessors and, above all, hates truth.  Logically speaking, Elizabeth would not despise something she thinks Jesus loves and likewise, it seems she believes Jesus hates Catholicism.  This is diabolical and makes me wonder if she has a problem accepting that most souls are damned and that this damnation is their own fault.  If Elizabeth doesn't convert, she, among millions, will proudly gallivant the broad road to Hell…

 

There is no other path to Heaven other than the Catholic Church.

 

"Amen, amen, I say to you:  He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold but climbeth up another way, the same is a thief and a robber" (St. John 10:1).

 

Shawna

 

Hail Mary

 

Brothers,

 

Thank you for teaching me The Powerful Hail Mary Prayer. My life has changed since I started praying the Hail Mary slowly. Nobody could understand how powerful that Hail Mary Prayer is.

Silmer Calas

 

Abortion

 

Hi, Brothers. 

 

… Apparently a ruling was recently passed which allows companies to deny abortion coverage to employees…  However, what's particularly nauseating, were statements made by Hilary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi attacking this measure.  Pelosi, as usual, is especially outrageous.  She is such a satanic individual.  May God bless.

 

Nations

 

Dear Brothers:

  

… The nations of the world by now (and by design) are sinking fast into the abyss… The only kingdom that has any semblance of decency in many ways, thanks to Our Blessed Mother, is Russia.  It is truly astonishing to consider how Russia now is a far cry from its days of Soviet control --  while the so-called free and democratic West has been turned into one impoverished slave camp established to serve the ruling elite.  All of this is proof indeed that MHFM's analysis of the "conversion" of Russia is correct, and that what we are seeing today is a result of the Consecration which Our Lady said would be performed by a Pope, and was indeed performed by Pope Pius XII.   As you have shown, Our Lady did not mean that Russia would convert to the Catholic faith, but would convert from its antichrist and murderous system of Communism… What an important demonstration -- right before our eyes -- that Our Lady is mightier than the Powers of Hell.  

 

Just as the false traditionalists deny the obvious when it comes to Antipope Francis -- even though he shoves it right in their faces -- they continue to ignore the truth about Fatima.  And what's most important is that by promoting the false message of Fatima, these tools of Satan are actually promoting the end-times Counterfeit Church and keeping people attached to it… In this way, the false traditionalist (like every false Christian) is Satan's most useful of "useful idiots". 

 

Lee Ann 

 

Antipope

 

Subject: Antipope John Paul II was a satanic Judaizer

 

Antipope John Paul II incredibly said that Auschwitz is the "Golgotha of the modern world".

'I kneel on this Golgotha of the modern world"

http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/homilies/1979/documents/hf_jp-ii_hom_19790607_polonia-brzezinka_en.html

That means that he compares the so called Holocaust to the crucifixion of Christ.

Furthermore Antipope Benedict explains… how the Vatican II declaration on other religions was really just meant for the Jews and then had to include the other religions.

The whole Vatican II church is a sect of satanic Judaizers.

Sincerely,

Christian.

 

John XXIII, Vatican II

 

Do you contend that (St.) Pope John XXIII was validly elected Pope? If so, his Vatican II Council would then be legit and its teachings would then be protected by a legit pope's infallibility, as granted by Christ, in matters of faith and morals. Is that not correct?

Thank You,
Kathleen Finney Becnel

 

MHFM: No, John XXIII was not validly elected pope.  He was a heretic.  A heretic is not eligible to become pope.  We strongly encourage you to consult the files on our site which cover these issues.  In addition to his ineligibility, there is evidence that John XXIII wasn’t even legitimately chosen. 

 

The Church’s official teachings are infallible and protected.  That’s a major reason we know that John XXIII and the other post-Vatican II claimants were not true popes, but antipopes.  To discover that belief in Catholic dogma is incompatible with following John XXIII and the Vatican II ‘Church,’ all you need to do is consult the information below about the heresies in Vatican II.  The false doctrines taught by Vatican II, which blatantly contradict defined Catholic teaching, could not have emanated from the Catholic Church or been authoritatively promulgated by true popes.

 

Vatican II’s Protestant Heresy [video]

Vatican II’s Jewish Heresy [video]

Vatican II’s Intercommunion Heresy [video]

Was Vatican II Infallible? [video]

 

These files explain the Vatican II apostasy, and the role of the Freemasonic apostate John XXIII.

 

The Third Secret of Fatima (3rd edition) (video)

The Heresies of Antipope Francis, Benedict XVI, John Paul II, John Paul I, Paul VI, and John XXIII – Antipopes of the Vatican II Counter Church

 

Sola Fide

 

Subject: Can a Christian Lose Salvation? – 1 Corinthians [video]

 

Yeah that pretty much destroys Sola Fide.

 

Xm

 

Comment

 

Subject: The Remnant and Robert Siscoe Refuted on Sedevacantism (video/article)

 

Thank you for taking the painstaking time and effort to refute and disprove the article by Mr. Siscoe. When I read his article a few months ago I went for it all hook, line and sinker. Thank you for thoroughly and kindly explaining all the discrepancies in the article he posted, you are doing the proper thing and we all appreciate your efforts. Thanks again…

 

David

 

Ephesians 2

 

… it is by grace through faith in Jesus that we are saved, not of works lest any man should boast, but I also believe God when HE tells me through the Apostle Paul that after HE saves me by HIS grace through faith in HIS SON, that HE creates in me a clean new heart to do the works HE HAS PREPARED for me.  Go read Ephesians 1 & 2 inclusive, paying close attention to Eph 2: 8-10…

 

Elizabeth

 

MHFM: This is an e-mail we received yesterday from a Protestant (before we posted our most recent article on Ephesians 2:8).  Her e-mail is a prime example of how the Protestant misunderstanding of Ephesians 2:8 is central to their false salvation theology.  It shows why the points covered about Ephesians 2:8 in our recent materials are so important.  The woman is anti-Catholic and she had written to us previously.  In a previous e-mail she stated, among other things: “… I detest Roman Catholicism…”

 

Obviously she’s not familiar with our recent materials on Ephesians 2:8 (such as the two items below), which address and completely refute her heretical misconceptions.  Ephesians 1 and 2 are also discussed in the recent Justification Debate (video).

 

Does Ephesians 2:8 say “saved through faith” or “saved through the faith“? (article)

Can a Christian Lose Salvation? – 1 Corinthians (video)

 

We responded to Elizabeth (as we did the previous time) by directing her to the truth.  We informed her of the necessity to abandon her heretical views and embrace the traditional Catholic faith if she doesn’t want to be lost.  We also gave her links to the materials which are most relevant to the issue addressed in her e-mail. 

 

Solitude

 

Subject: Solitude

 

Dear Brothers,

Thank you for posting the article and comments about how most people cannot stand to be alone. It is a situation where they can't see the forest (of grace in solitude) for the trees (of sin with others).  Most people cannot stand to be with God, and they flock especially to the internet to escape from God: Solitude: Behold where God is found, 5:49: "This problem in our day is compounded by the internet where people can remain essentially around or hang out with others all the time.  Many waste much of their day in chat rooms or on forums or on blogs of little value.  It is in these places that sinful, heretical and evil people abound; people who haven't ever found God in solitude, and corrupt others by their wickedness or their liberalism or their heresies.  These can often be subtle and this is why it's so dangerous.  They waste people's time.  They confuse them.  They distract from their peace, and they keep them from finding God or doing something more productive.  And it's no surprise that these forums and chat rooms and Youtube commenting and Facebook commenting are so corrupting because evil people flock there; people who need to be constantly around others and pacified by others and in companionship with others because they shun God in solitude.  That is not to say that everyone who has ever commented is evil, but the super-majority of those who flock to these places are evil."  It is shocking how bad-willed so many people are in such places… It reminds one of the video, Why Drug Addicts and Alcoholics So Frequently Relapse, where you state: "They are bound by demons as a result of their sin." (0:29)  These internet sects are tools of the Devil.  They don't have the faith, and so they are blind to God's will, instead giving full vent to their own bad-will, self-will and self-absorption.  From the rule of St. Benedict: "The second degree of humility is, when a man loveth not his own will, nor is pleased to fulfill his own desires but by his deeds carrieth out that word of the Lord which saith: "I came not to do My own will but the will of Him that sent Me" (Jn 6:38). It is likewise said: "Self-will hath its punishment, but necessity winneth the crown.""

God Bless,

Mr. & Mrs. White

 

All Across

 

MHFM: This provides even more examples of Novus Ordo “churches” giving “special observance” status to Ramadan:

 

“Catholic” churches all across America give “special observance” status to “Islamic month” of Ramadan

 

Blasting

 

Subject: Condemned out of their own mouths

 

Brothers,

 

The media is full of news articles blasting the supreme court's having waived (albeit temporarily), for certain employers, the government mandate on employers to provide their employees with insurance coverage, including coverage for abortion, abortifacients, etc.  There are literally hundreds of news stories about it, with 99.5% of the stories vehemently disagreeing with the ruling. 

 

There are also many media reports of children being left in hot vehicles, often resulting in the child's death.  The media and the 'justice' system reportedly condemn the negligent, and in one reported case homicidal, parent who 'forgot' their child left locked up in the suffocating heat to painfully die of hyperthermia.  I'm not faulting the media or the 'justice' system for reporting or for investigating and judging; however, they are heretics against their own satanic creed, for they demand infant death by abortion on the one hand and condemn infant death by hyperthermia on the other.  In the one reported case where it appears the father planned for his 22-month old son to die by hyperthermia, they are talking of giving him the death penalty!  It seems a little hypocritical of them since they report that he simply wanted a child-free life; isn't that why they promote abortion?  They're satanic hypocrites and they are antichrist heretics!  They are doubly condemned out of their own mouths.  But all that is left for one who has departed from the Divine and Holy Catholic Faith is endless contradictions:  it is unavoidable for them.  "Every man is become foolish by his knowledge..." (Jer. 51:17).

 

The archeological evidence supporting Jeremias 50:40 contradicts them also:  "As the Lord overthrew Sodom and Gomorrha, and their neighbor cities, saith the Lord: no man shall dwell there, neither shall the son of man inhabit it." The charred remains of the cities of the plain are uninhabitable.  Jericho has been rebuilt; Jerusalem has been rebuilt.  How many ancient cities have been rebuilt?  But not the cities of the plain.  The Lord said "no more" and therefore no man can ever dwell there again.  Yet the same heretics quoted above will not admit this evidence.

 

New Vatican Document

 

Subject: New Vatican Document says avoid "extreme" reaction to same sex "marriages"

 

"On the whole, the extreme reactions to these unions, whether compromising or uncompromising, do not seem to have facilitated the development of an effective pastoral program which is consistent with the Magisterium and compassionate towards the persons concerned." 

 

No comment is necessary.  But I will point out the obvious that this is exactly what the world did not need to hear.

 

Michael Rudnicki

 

Time Alone?

 

MHFM: This is interesting: “Many people would rather inflict pain on themselves than spend 15 minutes in a room with nothing to do but think, according to a US study out Thursday. 

 

Time alone? Many would rather hurt themselves

 

That makes perfect sense.  It fits precisely with what is covered in this video: Solitude: Behold Where God is Found.

 

People who live pagan lives or reject God or don’t know God or fail to do His will cannot stand to be by themselves.  As St. Alphonsus stated:

 

“Worldlings shun solitude, and with good reason; for in solitude they feel more acutely the remorse of conscience, and therefore they go in search of the conversations and tumults of the world, that the noise of these occupations may stifle the stings of remorse.”

 

Kings

 

Dear MHFM,

 

   The quote of the day for Wednesday, July 3rd is really poignant when considering some of the findings today's archeologists are making. NOVA just aired a program about the ancient human bodies preserved by the peat bogs of Ireland and other parts of northern Europe. Using CT scanner machines archeologists are discovering knife and ax marks on the bodies. Pulling together data from various sources they are concluding that at least some of these people were deposed kings (pagans) who had reigned during times of very low agricultural yield. 

 

   In order to appease the false gods (devils) these societies worshipped, the people would murder the king and offer his body to the false gods by throwing it in the bog. So if the land you controlled as a king was not fruitful you could be killed by your own people.

 

   Obviously, this is an example of a law which stands in stark contrast to God's Ten Commandments. St. Francis Xavier was trying to convert people to the Catholic faith and steer them away from the moral depravity of their societies. He successfully managed to show them how ugly their former ways were.

 

T.

 

Continuing Darkness

 

Subject: Continuing Darkness

 

It is very apparent and sad that the apostasy continues to worsen everywhere.  More individuals are engulfed in major spiritual darkness.  It can't be long before the FINAL trumpet blows.  The Catholic Faith is the only light that can dispel this supernatural darkness and it is so unbelievably sad and frustrating that souls in our families, work places, and spiritual places are oozing with bad will and will not the hold the immortal Catholic Faith of all time. 

 

Please keep the material and the videos coming and God bless you all for the work that you continue to do. 

 

God Be with us All.

 

Brandon

 

Come

 

Brothers:

 

… I have finally come to bear a full, firm and inalterable conviction of the Catholic faith and have been striving to pray the Rosary with full devotion on a daily basis as recommended ever since. … I want to help people but Satan is terribly hindering my attempts for I am yet somewhat detached from God. I am yet under a state of indecision but God's gift is this: my realisation so as for me to act upon it. Oh how strong is the perception of Christ's generosity unto men when contemplating upon such bestowals: discernment and free will. Most scoff at this, they are truly lost, for, as Christ told us, they have preferred darkness over the light come into the world, how sad.

 

… All this aside, it still strikes me how, now almost two years ago, I came to learn about your website: as a comment on a video about Latin diction by a user who ceased existing shortly afterwards… I am convinced (in light of past experiences recounted in my first email) the Holy Spirit has been wanting me to come to light. Sincere gratitude for all you've done hereto brothers: may Christ assist you evermore. 

 

Gesù Cristo è Re.

 

Alessandro

 

Interested

 

Brothers,

 

I have been watching some of your videos on line.  I am very interested in what you are saying.

 

But you bring very important questions to my mind.  Vatican II opened and closed before I was born (I was born in '67).  So if the Vatican II Catholic Church is counterfeit, then aren't all of the Vatican II-style masses I've gone to over the course of my life and all of the sacraments I've received, being at the hands of priests established in the counterfeit tradition and submitting themselves to it, also counterfeit?

 

How then am I supposed to receive true and valid communion and holy penance?  Is that topic treated at some length in your materials somewhere?

 

Hopefully you can help with those questions.

 

Yours in Christ,

 

Jeff C.

 

MHFM: We’re glad that you are looking at the material.  Yes, all the Novus Ordo ‘Masses’ are invalid.  All absolutions given by ‘priests’ ordained in the New Rite are invalid as well.  (Baptisms and marriages do not require a valid priest, but adherence to the basic matter, form, etc.)  There are few options for receiving the Eucharist today, but numerous options for making a confession (which is obviously crucial).  It’s important for you to review the material and come to agreement on all the issues.  When a person is convinced on all the issues, we can help him or her with options for confession, etc.  We also recommend that people pray the Rosary each day (all 15 decades if possible).

 

The Steps to convert to the traditional Catholic faith and for those leaving the New Mass – Baptism and Conditional Baptism – the Council of Trent’s Profession of Faith for Converts

 

The Dead

 

… It’s so hard sometimes to go through a day without grieving or feeling horrible at the thought of the death of a loved one. This is even harder when there is strong reason to believe that the decedent is now Hell.  I’m sure that Satan uses the death of a family member or friend to ensnare souls into falling further into sin, whether it be by depression, drunkenness, self-pity, rage, spite, malice, etc..  But my main concern is not about “learning to cope” or coddling oneself, -as if I must somehow get over the death. I am only concerned and very pained by the fact that I most definitely believe that some of the dead that I knew are in Hell.

 

I don’t at all wish to intervene with their just punishments, I am only grieved by the fact that they lead a bad life and are suffering in Hell. Is it offensive to God to still pray for mercy for the soul of someone who almost certainly is in Hell?

 

… I want to be sure whether it is okay to pray for the dead if they died a sinful death and most likely are in Hell… Thank you for all of the hard work, time and effort that MHFM has done throughout the years.

 

-Alex

 

MHFM: To your question: it's forbidden to pray for people who die outside the Catholic faith or in a clear state of mortal sin. 

 

St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, Suppl. Q. 71, A. 5: “Gregory says (Moral xxxiv. 19): There is the same reason for not praying then (namely after the judgment day) for men condemned to everlasting fire, as there is now for not praying for the devil and has angels who are sentenced to eternal punishment, and for this reason the saints do not pray for dead unbelieving and wicked men, because, forsooth, knowing them to be already condemned to eternal punishment, they shrink from pleading for them by the merit of their prayers before they are summoned to the presence of the Judge.”

 

New Video Posted

 

MHFM: This is a new video.  This video also covers some very important information about water baptism.

 

Can a Christian Lose Salvation? – 1 Corinthians [video]

 

Comment

 

I'm glad that I have the opportunity to say thank you… about being a true catholic. It has turned my life around…

 

I'm from Colombia.  

 

Sincerely, Julio

 

Salvation

 

Did the Catholic Church ever before Vatican II teach there was salvation outside the church. I heard they changed that too. Thanks…

 

Michael

 

MHFM: No.  The Catholic Church did not and could not contradict its defined dogma on that matter.  However, before Vatican II many priests were denying the dogma.  They taught their errors and heresies in fallible books, such as theology manuals.  To fully understand the post-Vatican II apostasy and what led up to it, people need to be aware of that fact.  We cover it in our salvation book.  The fallible books published in the period shortly before Vatican II, which deal with Outside the Church There is No Salvation, are generally heretical.  They are not trustworthy on the issues of salvation, the Church’s necessity, and Baptism.  We will post even more examples of that in the future.

 

The denial of the dogma by alleged Catholic priests began around 1850.  By the beginning of the 20th century, it was very widespread.  In the 1940s and 1950s, just before Vatican II, almost all the priests who purported to be Catholic completely rejected the Church’s salvation dogma as it has been defined.  Their theology on salvation was simply diabolical, and very similar to how Novus Ordo ‘priests’ today would ‘explain’ the dogma.  The denial of the necessity of the Catholic faith for salvation, and the loss of faith that accompanies such a heresy, was the prime cause of Vatican II.  It’s why so few opposed false ecumenism, etc.    

 

Scourge

 

Subject: Francis the Communist

 

Dear Brothers,

Francis' comments about communism are diabolical.  Communism is intrinsically opposed to Jesus Christ and the Catholic Church.  Communism is not Christianity and it never will be.  It is based on evolution and is totally materialistic.  Communists attempt to “simplify” those parts of life that are irreducibly complex, such as the family, the State and the Church.  Compare antipope Francis' remarks that “communists have stolen our flag. The flag of the poor is Christian,” to the true popes who referred to the 'errors and perils,' the 'scourge,'  and the 'snares and attacks' of communism. The true popes condemned communism's 'violent and deceptive tactics,' said that it's a 'fatal plague,' 'anti-religious,' and they exposed its 'perverted, wicked and execrable theories.' Real popes said communism is a 'fallacy;' they referred to its 'pernicious fictions,' its 'inimical, pseudo-scientific and poisonous doctrines,' and said that it's 'intrinsically wrong,' a 'most fatal error,' an 'infamous doctrine' and a 'system full of errors and sophisms.'  The Successors of St. Peter said communism is 'in opposition both to reason and to Divine Revelation,' that it 'subverts the social order,' that 'it considers religion as "the opiate of the people.”' Pope Pius XI said 'the monstrous emanations of the communistic system flow with satanic logic.' (Divini Redemptoris #77)  The numbers of “Christians” killed in communist Russia alone are estimated to be between 12 and 20 million, while the numbers of people who passed through the Russian Gulag slave labor camps some estimate to be up to 50 million.  This is not even taking into account the destruction communism has wrought in other parts of the world.  It is not hard to see why the Bible calls communist Russia the Red Dragon.  Yet we hear constantly about the “6 million Jews exterminated” in World War II, the “holocaust,” in camps that had entertainment such as swimming pools, shops and musicians.  This is no surprise since communism is boasted to be a creation of the Zionists, founded by Theodor Hertzl, whose gravestone Francis recently visited in Israel.  Francis is totally Satanic. How tragic for the bad-willed, deluded false traditionalists who imagine that Russia has yet to be consecrated to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, and who cling to Francis the heretic.  He is like Judas Iscariot who said: “Why was not this ointment sold for three hundred pence, and given to the poor?”  Our Lord replied: “Let her alone, that she may keep it against the day of my burial. For the poor you have always with you; but me you have not always.

God Bless,

Mr. & Mrs. White

 

Mutter Vogel

 

I have a Pieta book that says on page 68, Our Lord's revelations to Mutter Vogel, "If you see a priest who celebrates the holy Mass unworthily then say nothing about him, rather tell it to me alone! I stand beside him on the altar!"…

 

God Bless,

All for Jesus Through Mary

Vanessa

 

MHFM: The alleged revelations to Mutter Vogel are false and must be rejected.  She was also allegedly told: “One should NEVER attack a priest, even when he's in error, rather one should pray and do penance that I'll grant him My grace again. He alone fully represents Me, even when he doesn't live after My example!"  That’s exactly the false message the Devil wanted people to hear and spread in the final days – when refuting, denouncing and rejecting false or heretical priests would be more necessary than ever before. 

 

2 Corinthians 11:13-14- “For such men are false apostles, deceitful workmen, disguising themselves as apostles of Christ.  And no wonder, for even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light.” 

 

The false message of Mutter Vogel is sometimes cited by people in the Vatican II sect as one of their reasons for remaining under the apostate ‘priests’ who lead it.  Every alleged private revelation or apparition must be judged by the standard of Catholic principles and the teaching of the Church.  Those coming up short must be rejected.

 

Communism

 

Subject: There is nothing noble about satanic Communism

 

"...Francis said:  "I can only say that the communists have stolen our flag. The flag of the poor is Christian. Poverty is at the center of the Gospel," he said...."Communists say that all this is communism. Sure, twenty centuries later. So when they speak, one can say to them: 'but then you are Christian'," he said, laughing.

 

This man's statements are so unbelievably stupid that it's hard to imagine how anybody could take him seriously.  Communism is NOT about taking care of the poor. Communism is about oppression, mega-control, persecutions, power. Communism created poverty, but mainly created enormous persecutions (especially persecutions of Christians), blatant  abuse of power, terror, fear, unjustice, etc.  The poverty, which the Gospel teaches and the Catholic Church recommends is based on a free choice of every individual.  In Communism people are forced by other people, who are in power, to do what those people in power demand. There is nothing noble about satanic Communism. Millions of its victims could testify to that.

 

St. Simplicius on Catholic Doctrine

 

Subject: St. Simplicius on Catholic Doctrine

 

Hi Brothers,

 

Here's an interesting quote from an epistle of Pope St. Simplicius who reigned in the fifth century. This citation, in my opinion, destroys the position that a lot of modern heretics hold on approaching a dogmatic statement and on the evolution of dogma.

 

St. Simplicius, "Cuperem quidem": "Those genuine and clear [truths] which flow from the very pure fountains of the Scriptures cannot be disturbed by any arguments of misty subtlety. For this same norm of apostolic doctrine endures in the successors of him upon whom the Lord imposed the care of the whole sheepfold (...) Let no approach to your ears be thrown open to the perni­cious plans of undermining, let no pledge of revising any of the old defini­tions be granted..."

Rafael Centeio

 

MHFM: It’s a good quote.

 

Francis the Communist

 

Subject: Francis the Communist

 

Brothers,

 

RE Francis' comments in the following link:  http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/06/29/us-pope-communism-idUSKBN0F40L020140629

 

In his interview on the feast of Ss. Peter and Paul, Francis said:  "I can only say that the communists have stolen our flag. The flag of the poor is Christian. Poverty is at the center of the Gospel," he said...."Communists say that all this is communism. Sure, twenty centuries later. So when they speak, one can say to them: 'but then you are Christian'," he said, laughing.

 

What he said, basically, is that Communism was founded on the Gospel.  What an outrageous apostate!  I'd like to see the false traditionalists finally wake up with this one!  They, for the most part, make a pretense at least of devotion to the Blessed Mother.  They at least profess that they believe in her apparition at Fatima and in her message.  They also say they believe in her warning that "Russia" (meaning Communism) would spread her errors throughout the world.  But now their bogus, apostasy-spewing 'pope' is basically saying he's okay with Communism, that he's of one mind with communists.  He said communists carry the Christian flag of the poor, who are at the center of the Gospel, and that "one can say to them [communists]: 'but you are Christian'."  Therefore, his 'Church' is a Communist Church.  That is definitely what he is saying.  This has to be the single most evil thing he has ever said.  And almost no one in his Sect will bat an eyelash.

 

Francis and Islam

 

Subject: Francis and Islam

 

This is one of the worst acts of apostasy of the whore of Babylon (Vatican 2 sect). The level of abomination is almost unbelievable.

 

http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/truthreport/francis-recent-interfaith-event-imam-chanted-prayer-allah-grant-muslims-victory-infidels/#.U7FUVxz26O0

 

D

 

Francis’ latest

 

Subject: Francis' latest

 

Antipope Francis has stated that Communists stole Christian ideals.   He argues that you may call it Communism, twenty centuries later, but helping the poor really makes you Christian.  He is even worse than a run-of-the-mill heretic.  He is purely Satanic and anyone who knows about this or a million other statements he has made has not the right to call himself Christian, because Francis is simply unreal.  

 

Tens of millions of East Europeans were slaughtered by… Bolsheviks in the 20th century.  But Communism is just another Jewish ideology that Francis subscribes to (the other being Judaism).

 

Every 15 minutes is a new nightmare for false-traditionalists who so desperately wish he would just shut up, put on the robes, keep quiet, and play the part.  It used to be every day brought a new nightmare, now it is every 15 minutes.

 

Sincerely, Michael Rudnicki

 

Another One

 

MHFM: This is another Novus Ordo church that includes Ramadan as a “special observance.” 

 

“Catholic Church” in Naples, FL lists “Ramadan (Islamic observance) for “special observance” on “parish bulletin”

 

Bulletin Announcement

 

Dear Brothers:

 

After seeing your post about the beginning of Ramadan being announced in the so-called "Catholic" church bulletin, I checked to see if I could find another "church" which made this announcement.  Found one… in Naples, Florida.  Just when you think you've seen everything.  These disgusting people go out of their way to blaspheme God and to treat our Creator and Redeemer with as much contempt as they possibly can.   We can bet that such Ramadan notices have probably appeared in many branches of the Vatican 2 sect in this country and throughout the world.  But because truth means nothing to the heretical and apostate adherents of the Vatican 2 sect, they will just shrug it off -- as they have shrugged off every other abomination.  This world will understand soon enough what the Trumpets being heard all over the world are announcing -- and it's certainly not the beginning of Ramadan.

 

Lee Ann 

 

Donohue

 

Subject: Bill Donohue - "Catholic League"

 

Dear Brothers:

Bill Donohue is the President of the so-called "Catholic League", whose stated purpose is to defend Catholicism from secular attacks.   In reality, Donohue is an ineffectual fool who cannot see the connection between the false V-2 sect (of which he belongs) and their complicity (by action and inaction) in the very attacks on the Catholic faith and natural law.

I found this outrageous comment from Donohue from March 2014 (the context was the St. Patrick's Day Parade in New York and how "gays" protest their exclusion from marching in it). 

"Let me make it clear: most gay people are good people....That there's an element of gay fascism, there's no question about it.  It's visited against the Catholic Church with alacrity."

http://www.newsmax.com/NewsmaxTv/Bill-Donohue-gay-pride-parade/2014/03/26/id/561975/

Donohue was not talking about the small minority of so-called chaste "homosexuals" who personally struggle against unnatural and evil urges.  He was referring to "out and proud" "homosexuals" - the type who show up at "gay pride" "parades" - almost all of whom engage in such abominable acts and 100% of whom approve of such acts.

It's clear that Donohue has fully embraced the V-2 apostasy, while deluding himself that he is some sort of traditionalist.  What an amazing fool.

Regards,

Mike

 

MHFM: Yes, he’s a thoroughly wicked apostate.

 

RCIA

 

Subject: The Glossary of Terms and Principles [PDF]

 

Dear Brothers:

 

The e-mailer ftc should also read the Glossary of Terms and Principles which you included in your response to Edward from Nigeria.  This… should be read by (or taught to) people of all ages.  This collection of vital information is like the heart of the Catholic faith -- and its removal produces the corpse that is any form of false Christianity, including the Vatican 2 sect. 

 

This Glossary is the conceptual "infrastructure" of the Catholic Faith -- there is no Catholic faith without it.  Thus, it is the precise information the devil does not want people to know and to accept.  That's why in the Counterfeit V2 Church, you will never find this information being taught in any schools, colleges or universities.  You will never hear these points mentioned in their so-called "RCIA" programs, "Bible studies" or "faith formation" and other catechetical frauds.   It will never be taught from the pulpit, or by any of its fake bishops or cardinals or it parasite anti-popes.  It can never be found in any of the books they allow in circulation -- not even in those books that traditionalists might judge to be free of heresy.   Such books, while free of heresy, are also devoid of that key which would cast the light of God over their confused minds and allow them to recognize truth and understand it correctly.   If, in the V2 sect (as in other forms of Protestantism), a person were to come across the word "dogma", his question might be:  What's a dogma and is there a book that lists all the dogmas of the Church?  I've asked this question myself, and have heard others ask it as well.  Of course, now I understand why it is impossible to find the true answer to that question in the Counterfeit Church, and why truth is not just hidden there but blatantly perverted and inverted.  While all false "Christian" sects are Satan's, the Counterfeit Catholic Church is his masterpiece. 

 

… For the typical V2 adherent, such terms as "magisterium" or "dogma" are meaningless buzz words -- just as their robes, rites and other externals are a meaningless sham and affront to God…

 

Lee Ann

 

Found

 

Hello, Brothers.

 

My name is Angelo, I'm from Brazil… First of all, thank you so much for all material that you've been putting out to help our souls. 

 

I found your website three or four months ago (i watched "is the world about to end...") but I was involved with so-called "Resistance" movement and in a middle of doctrinal fog, so I didn't want to realise all that Catholic Church teaches. It’s been three weeks since I'm reading/watching your material and I'm fully convinced but, wow!…

 

Thanks to Our Lady, I've been praying the Rosary everyday since I converted last year… May the Holy Trinity bless you guys for such wonderful work!

 

Deo gratias!

 

Angelo

 

Comment

 

Brothers,

 

Your news links show the extreme depravity of the world today: the result of rejecting almighty God and His holy Church.  Biden's money is in his wife's name, as was reported by one journalist, so I guess he thinks that makes it okay for him to claim poverty.  He's such a fraud -- like the Islamic Vatican II Sect…

 

The Islamic V2 sect

 

MHFM: This is incredible apostasy.

 

“Catholic Church” in San Antonio, TX lists “Ramadan (Islamic observance) begins” for “special observance” on “parish bulletin”

 

See

 

I appreciate you helping me see the errors of Vatican II, and for spreading the truth of the Holy Catholic Church…

 

Michael

 

Protestant ‘Reformers’

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Further to your video, Can a Christian Lose Salvation, I found it to be… tremendous… it only requires people to be honest and of good faith and God will give them the grace of understanding and the acceptance of all that the traditional Catholic Church has taught.

 

When reading about the Protestant Reformers one comes to realize that these men actually don’t believe in the Son of God of the Bible or His only Church so like cancer apostasy and heresy spreads giving rise to so many false churches and doctrines of convenience which leads millions of the fallen away to the fires of Hell…  how sad.

 

In JMJ

M.Fernanda da Silva

 

Whatever

 

Subject: Why Francis Must Not Be Considered The Pope (video)

 

Being Catholic is accepting the changes that the Pope makes . We had 268 popes Good and bad…


Mathew 16 17And Jesus said to him, "Blessed are you, Simon Barjona, because flesh and blood did not reveal this to you, but My Father who is in heaven. 18"I also say to you that you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build My church; and the gates of Hades will not overpower it. 19"I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; and whatever you bind on earth shall have been bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall have been loosed in heaven."… This means whatever the Pope Good or bad changes is changed in our Lords eyes.   GOD BLESS YOU ALL !!!!!


 

ftc

 

MHFM: No, the idea that a pope can change a dogma is heresy.  Your comment proves that you accept Antipope Francis and the New Church (i.e., the Counter Church) at this time simply because you don’t understand and believe in Catholic principles.  The faith was delivered by Christ.  Popes set it forth.  Dogmas cannot be changed.  You need to familiarize yourself with Catholic teaching.  It’s covered on our website. 

 

Moreover, since he’s not a Catholic, Francis is not a pope but an antipope.  Yes, there can be good and bad popes; but there cannot be a non-Catholic pope.  Francis is a non-Catholic.

 

Pope Pius IX, First Vatican Council, Session 4, Chap. 4:
For, the Holy Ghost was not promised to the successors of Peter that by His revelation they might disclose new doctrine, but that by His help they might guard sacredly the revelation transmitted through the apostles and the deposit of faith, and might faithfully set it forth.”

 

Pope Pius IX, First Vatican Council, Session 3, Chap. 4, Canon 3:
“If anyone says that it is possible that at some time, given the advancement of knowledge, a sense may be assigned to the dogmas propounded by the church which is different from that which the Church has understood and understands: let him be anathema.”

 

Pope Pius IX, First Vatican Council, Session 3, Chap. 4, on the true progress of knowledge: “For, the doctrine of faith which God revealed has not been handed down as a philosophic invention to the human mind to be perfected, but has been entrusted as a divine deposit to the Spouse of Christ, to be faithfully guarded...”

 

Corinthians

 

Subject: Can a Christian Lose Salvation? - 1 Corinthians - video

 

Dear Brothers,

Thank you for the excellent video, Can a Christian Lose Salvation? - 1 Corinthians.  It's interesting that the word, corinthian, can mean "luxurious or licentious."  Ancient Corinth was renowned for extravagant lifestyles and temple prostitution.  It is easy to see why St. Paul so zealously counselled the Christians in Corinth.  He could see that they were surrounded by temptation, much like the world today.  Yet according to Protestants, there would have been no such temptation for the true believers, since they could never lose their salvation.  It is outrageous and absurd…

God Bless,

Mr. & Mrs. White

 

From

 

Dear MHFM,

 

I was further introduced to the catholic faith by my teacher that is VATICAN I. I am Edward B. Rajah from Nigeria, Adamawa, Yola. I am previously a PROTESTANT. But the truth is both my parents are protestants but I rejected the church years back.  Please as a new person to the faith what do I need to know?

 

Thank You.

 

MHFM: We’re glad to hear about the interest.  The steps to convert are here.  It’s crucial to pray the Rosary each day and the Hail Mary frequently.  Obviously it’s essential to understand and believe in the basics about the Trinity, the Incarnation, etc.  (Prayers and creeds are attached.)  A basic catechism is available from our online store.  This file also covers some important Catholic principles. 

 

The Glossary of Terms and Principles [PDF]

 

But following the steps to convert, and reviewing the materials on the website, will provide you with the information you need to know. 

 

Regarding

 

Subject: The Remnant and Robert Siscoe Refuted on Sedevacantism (video)

 

I have viewed your powerfully convincing video… and have likewise reviewed most of your Site's other resources: they are all exceptionally well constructed and I routinely avail others to them as well in my own everyday apologetic endeavors… Indeed, such information is crucial to all souls in genuine search of eternal life… 

 

Mark Stabinski

 

So Many

 

Subject: New Video

 

Dear Brothers:

 

Thank you for the new video which crushes the eternal security heresy propagated by so many these days.  It's amazing that someone can hold this view in the face of the many passages that call for obedience to God's commandments, and the punishments that await anyone who transgresses them.  As you have pointed out many times, even St. Paul knew that he could become a castaway--a reprobate--if he did not obey God…!

 

Joseph Ramirez


Information

 

Subject: Can a Christian Lose Salvation? – 1 Corinthians [video]

 

Great video on Corinthians 1, also especially when we watch this video after the videos 'Catholic vs. protestant view of God' and 'The agony of Jesus in the garden'.
 
Thanks to God for the grace of this incalculable valuable information.
 
Sincerely,
 
Henk

 

Foundations

 

Dear Brothers in Christ,


Thank you for the newest video about "once saved-always saved" heresy. I would like to make a few comments about this heresy. The mindlessness of the supporters of this pestilent heresy is astounding. From the logical point of view this heresy destroys the very foundations of the Protestantism. If "once saved-always saved" (OSAS) is true (which it isn't) then what would be the reason to hate The Catholic Church, to hate Catholics and to hate The Pope (the true pope, not the Devil's servants posing as "popes")? For, these people also have been once saved, at least when they were baptized. According to OSAS heresy, it doesn't matter how evil The Pope was, what he did he or said, he was once saved. There is no doubt about it. The same applies to each and every Catholic. The conclusion is--all the popes and all other Catholics in the history are saved.  Furthermore, what would be the reason to have any church at all? Anybody may baptize anybody else, anybody can be once saved, anybody can accept Jesus and believe in Him at least for a nanosecond when he/she is saved. Why then institute any "religious community", why then go to the "church" each Sunday, why sing "happy songs" and "praise The Lord", if a person is already saved no matter what he/she does or says? Why are the Protestants protesting, and against whom they are protesting?

Against the people who are saved? Wasn't Satan, a.k.a. Lucifer, once saved? Didn't he also once believe in Jesus, even for a nanosecond?

May The Most Blessed Mother of God bless all true Catholics in the world.

Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia

 

Video

 

Brothers,

 

Re your newest video 'Can a Christian Lose Salvation?'

 

Excellent addition to your Refuting Protestantism series!

 

Video

 

Subject: Can a Christian Lose Salvation? – 1 Corinthians [video]

 

Great video! God bless you brothers!

 

Jorge Clavellina

 

Comment

 

Subject: Can a Christian Lose Salvation? – 1 Corinthians [video]

 

Powerful and undeniable refutation of the Protestant heresies of once saved, always saved and faith alone

 

Aurelius

 

Cremation

 

Dear Brothers:

 

Does the traditional Roman Catholic Church allow cremation?...

 

Sincerely,

 

Georgiana Wilson

 

MHFM: No, the faithful are forbidden to be cremated under pain of grave sin.

 

Homeschooling

 

Brothers,

 

I have read comments on your website (and others) about the virtues of home schooling and totally agree with them, mostly because the modern education system here in Ireland - and probably most of the western world is mainly a training ground for the appreciation of filth. I am in my fifties now and would never consider getting into debt for a university education at my age, apart from the age factor - I don't think I would learn much of any worth there…

 

Thank you

 

Jim

 

Talking

 

Dear Brothers,


I have derived knowledge and benefit from many of your videos and writings.  Please keep up the great work.

 

In talking with a Novus Ordo priest and a Novus Ordo nun, I have discovered the need to provide proof that all documents released by the Council of Trent (in particular its Canons and Decrees) are indeed still entirely valid in the 21st Century.

What is the best way to prove that all Council of Trent documents are still legally in force?

 

Thank you for your help.

 

Arthur

 

MHFM: Their argument (that the dogmatic decrees of Trent on faith and morals may not be valid) is another sad example of the apostasy of the Vatican II sect and its members.  The Council of Trent’s canons and decrees on faith and morals fulfilled the requirements for ex cathedra teaching.  It’s a dogma that such decrees are unalterable. 

 

Pope Pius IX, Vatican Council I, 1870, Session 4, Chap. 4: “…the Roman Pontiff, when he speaks ex cathedra [from the Chair of Peter], that is, when carrying out the duty of the pastor and teacher of all Christians in accord with his supreme apostolic authority he explains a doctrine of faith or morals to be held by the universal Church, through the divine assistance promised him in blessed Peter, operates with that infallibility with which the divine Redeemer wished that His Church be instructed in defining doctrine on faith and morals; and so such definitions of the Roman Pontiff from himself, but not from the consensus of the Church, are unalterable.”

 

Obviously the individuals with whom you are conversing do not understand or believe in basic principles of dogmatic teaching and the deposit of faith.

 

When a pope defines a dogma, he doesn’t make a dogma true from that point forward.  Rather, he solemnly declares without erring that which has always been true since the death of the last apostle.  That’s why dogmatic proclamations on faith or morals could never be reversed or cease to be valid.  Dogmas are to be believed as the Church has “once declared” them, without any recession from that meaning to a “deeper understanding.”

 

Pope Pius IX, First Vatican Council, Sess. 3, Chap. 2 on Revelation, 1870, ex cathedra: “Hence, also, that understanding of its sacred dogmas must be perpetually retained, which Holy Mother Church has once declared; and there must never be a recession from that meaning under the specious name of a deeper understanding.”

 

Pope Pius IX, First Vatican Council, Session 3, Chap. 4, Canon 3: "If anyone says that it is possible that at some time, given the advancement of knowledge, a sense may be assigned to the dogmas propounded by the church which is different from that which the Church has understood and understands: let him be anathema."

 

There are many quotes from popes after Trent which confirm that its canons and decrees on faith and morals remain valid and represent the unchanging faith.  Here’s just one from a recent pope that deals with the issue of marriage.

 

Pope Pius XI, Casti Connubii (#’s 4-5), Dec. 31, 1930: “In so doing We follow the footsteps of Our predecessor, Leo XIII, of happy memory, whose Encyclical Arcanum, published fifty years ago, We hereby confirm and make Our own, and while We wish to expound more fully certain points called for by the circumstances of our times, nevertheless We declare that, far from being obsolete, it retains its full force at the present day.

     5. And to begin with that same Encyclical [Arcanum], which is wholly concerned in vindicating the divine institution of matrimony, its sacramental dignity, and its perpetual stability, let it be repeated as an immutable and inviolable fundamental doctrine that matrimony was not instituted or restored by man but by God; not by man were the laws made to strengthen and confirm and elevate it but by God, the Author of nature, and by Christ Our Lord by Whom nature was redeemed, and hence these laws cannot be subject to any human decrees or to any contrary pact even of the spouses themselves. This is the doctrine of Holy Scripture; this is the constant tradition of the Universal Church; this the solemn definition of the sacred Council of Trent, which declares and establishes from the words of Holy Writ itself that God is the Author of the perpetual stability of the marriage bond, its unity and its firmness.”

 

If the issue of contention is justification, these quotes are important.

 

Council of Trent, Decree on Justification, Introduction: “… the holy, ecumenical and general Council of Trent… intends, for the praise and glory of Almighty God, for the tranquility of the Church and the salvation of souls, to expound to all the faithful of Christ the true and salutary doctrine of justification, which the Son of justice, Jesus Christ, the author and finisher of our faith taught, which the Apostles transmitted and which the Catholic Church under the inspiration of the Holy Ghost has always retained; strictly forbidding that anyone henceforth presume to believe, preach or teach otherwise than is defined and declared in the present decree.

 

Notice, the Council of Trent declares that it is setting forth what Jesus Christ Himself taught about Justification, and what the Catholic Church always retained.  Obviously that’s unalterable.

 

Council of Trent, Decree on Justification, Chap. 16: “After this Catholic doctrine on justification, which whosoever does not faithfully and firmly accept cannot be justified, it seemed good to the holy council to add to these canons, that all may know not only what they must hold and follow, but also what to avoid and shun.

 

Agree

 

Subject: Antipope Francis’ Bombshell Interview (video)

 

… I agree, he is the ANTI-POPE and he is a Heretic and an evil deceiver… Scary.

 

Judith Butchko

 

Comment

 

Hi:

 

I am 61 yrs old… Thank you so much for all that you are doing to bring us back to THE ONE TRUE CHURCH…  I am a Flight Attendant based in Denver…

 

Thank you,

Janis Marie

 

Antipope Francis

 

Dear Brothers,

 

I have been struck… in formerly Catholic Ireland how many followers of the Vatican II sect have told me that their main defence of Pope Francis is his humility. They feel that his simple life as they see it, his simple living in the ($20,000,000) Domus Sanctae Marthae guest house outside the Vatican, his non-use of the papal limousine, his Christ like washing of the feet of the laity, his taking of the name of one who was humility itself, his selfless adoration of the Jews, his prostration almost like a flagellated victim to receive a blessing from protestant clergy, seeking oneness with all and all faiths, publicly embracing and kissing a disfigured man, placing the most handicapped children in wheelchairs at the head of the queue to see him, all trump any issues of Catholic dogma and tradition, and that his actions speak for themselves and any consideration of any alleged heresy is disingenuous as surely this man is greater than the old and restrictive body of the church he inherited and which he constantly shames by his humble and simple actions…

  

Yours sincerely,

Bob Quinn,

 

MHFM: That’s because the typical members of the Novus Ordo couldn’t care less about the Catholic faith or what the Church teaches.  They don’t have the true faith, and without it people are blind.  Antipope Francis is obviously a complete Christ-rejecting heretic and apostate, as these materials prove. 

 

http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/catholicchurch/anti-pope-francis-videos-heresies-evidence/

 

One should also not refer to him as ‘Pope.’

 

SSPX-SO

 

Subject: SSPX-SO

 

Dear Brothers,

Re: Your video: Exposing the Society of St. Pius X of the Strict Observance.

If this new outfit under Fr Joseph Pfeiffer had to go sedevacantist would they be assured of funds from their followers? I doubt it. They have always been anti-sedevacantist and anti-eens.

Their hopes of having loads of supporters doesn't seem to have materialized. In fact, some have returned to the SSPX for regular Mass and community.

Yours truly,
SF

 

MHFM: That group is far worse (in regard to their doctrinal views) than most people can imagine.  We have new information which further demonstrates how they completely reject Catholic teaching.  We might cover it soon.  They are basically Protestants. 

 

Exposing the Society of St. Pius X of the Strict Observance

 

The Jesuits

 

Subject: The Jesuits

 

Dear Brothers,

I'm reading a book called 'The Progress of the Jesuits'.  I am so touched in learning of the heroic deeds and sacrifices made by these men for the love of God.  It's one of the biggest lies of history when certain Protestants accuse them of everything from sedition to murder.  What an outrage.  Fr. Jose De Anchieta gave his whole life to converting Indians who often wanted to kill and eat him and the same could be said about many other Jesuits, like St. Issac Jogues.  This book is very well-written and I just wish that some of the haters of the truth in our day would look at the facts instead of believing the anti-Catholic lies of crackpots and fools.  May God bless.

 

Metal Bands

 

Subject: Satanic Metal Bands

 

Dear Brothers,

 

I wanted to mention something that your recent news post about that satanic band Watain splashing pig's blood on the crowd.  I knew of a person who was a big metal fan.  I tried to talk to this person about the faith and your site and how evil the music industry is, but they didn't want to listen.  This person told me that they went to this concert of the Black metal band known as "Behemoth" and that at the concert the band chopped the heads off of two live poor sheep and threw their heads into the crowd.  This person said when they first walked into the concert area the feeling of evil in the place was so overwhelming that they could feel it.  The music industry is so evil that it’s hard to comprehend.  It’s all part of the end times deception.

 

Hello

 

Hello Brothers,

 

Thank you for sending me the book I requested and so much more… Thank you so much for helping my son and I become fervent Catholics,

 

Isabella Piacevole 

 

Presbyterians

 

Subject: Sect of John Knox says homos can "marry" and are "Christian"

 

Presbyterian assembly: Gay marriage is Christian

 

Brothers,

 

What's interesting is that only less than 5% of this sect's members have broken ranks, which means 95% are staying right where they are.

 

Howard

 

MHFM: It’s very revealing and significant.  It’s another example of how Protestantism is the lie embraced by people who don’t want the real Christian faith.  The top legislative body of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) has voted by large margins to recognize same-sex marriage as Christian in the church constitution, adding language that marriage can be the union of ‘two people,’ not just ‘a man and a woman.’”  This is truly outrageous.  The level of dishonesty and self-deception involved in describing homosexual perversion as “Christian” is astounding.

 

Francis

 

Subject: Francis’ bold heresy

 

Brothers,

 

… This recent 'blessing' from the Anglican is proof enough (as have been millions of examples from the V2 antipopes) to have him thrown out of his Vatican Hotel apartment and stripped of the title 'Bishop of Rome'.  But all prophecy must be fulfilled.  It is utterly incomprehensible that so many are without care or concern over these matters.  Does nothing disgust them?!  And what about the False Traditionalists?  Are they going to say, "Uh-oh", and pull the wool back down over their eyes? Yes, they will.  They have proven it for far too long now that we should not expect otherwise.  We can hope and pray, but Sacred Scripture doesn't lie.  I have at my fingertips a wealth of refutations of this bold act of heresy by Francis, but I do not meet anyone who cares to hear even one of them!...

 

Entire Truths

 

Subject: false 'baptism of desire/blood', invincible ignorance and "Father" Kramer

 

The audio on "Father" Kramer firmly exemplifies that… Kramer's wayward intellect has received the word of God, rejected it and welcomed evil into his heart.  And now, his entanglement in lies just keeps heaping buckets and buckets of hot coals on the pit of heresy.  In a nutshell, Kramer's arguments are fermented hogwash that can't even pretend to seep truth and which view infallible truths as formal heresy… Likewise, these cohorts of heresy have not grasped the true meaning of Catholic infallibility.  For them, dogmas are not truths fallen from heaven, but just a vague outline of what may or may not be enforced by God and they understand dogma only in a practical sense, without any norms for truly believing… Kramer, among other blasphemers, reiterates a philosophy that embraces a bogus objective-subjective heresy that attests God has not given man the knowledge to undoubtedly conclude someone is in hell.  According to this logic, the doctrine of the Blessed Trinity might have a subjective component that includes a fourth person!  Sound preposterous?  With heretics, any apostasy is plausible.         

 

Apart from Catholic common sense, when pondering the Old Law, it becomes even clearer that God's words are to be taken as 'entire truths'.  In the Old Testament, He gave very specific laws and commands and the people were bound to obey.  When the covenant of circumcision was explained, Abraham and others obeyed.  When God explained how to build the ark, Noe obediently built the ark.  When God told Abraham to offer his own son as a holocaust, he obeyed.  When God said, "But if thou wilt not let them go, behold, I will strike all thy coasts with frogs", He was faithful to His word and frogs covered the land of Egypt.  When God relayed details about making the tabernacle and the ark, His directions were followed.  When God was not happy with a man collecting sticks on the sabbath day, the Lord told Moses to let the man die and hence, Moses complied.  When Mother Mary gave birth to Jesus, she followed the law of purification of women after child birth.  In all these cases, and many more, God's words were not philosophically dissected as harbouring an unsaid subjective meaning.  What would God think if Noe made the ark 600 cubits in length, as opposed to 300?!  God, in the Old Testament, was very clear with His commands.  Likewise, when God speaks to the faithful through the Chair of St. Peter, His words are to be taken as wholly true.  'Baptism of desire' ..., etc. advocates attest the opposite, affirming dogmatic words are not absolute, but subject to unwritten exceptions.  From this standpoint, it seems the Old Law was more exact than the New Testament!  This is absurd, as the Holy Gospel is greater and full of Christ's wisdom.  To protest real and natural water is not necessary for baptism is a great revolution against the words of Jesus Christ.  According to Kramer, 'anyone' can be saved because God can extraordinarily debunk His own laws and open heaven for non-Catholics.  This mindset is abominable and labels God a deceiver.  Now, of course, God allows certain heresies to arise, but never have such heresies been taught by the magisterium in any document of faith or morals and applied to the Universal Church.  To defend these heresies is to place a statue of a fallible man in front of almighty God.      

 

Even worse, Kramer attests that recipients of 'baptism of desire' are actually reborn by water and the Holy Ghost.  This assertion is braindead and comparable to Noe building the ark with his imagination, as opposed to using wood.  It's also like witchcraft, where one waves a magic wand of 'desire', hereby invoking God to descend real and natural water that is completely imperceivable to the human senses!  Kramer is a demonic warlock and hates truth as the devil shuns the Holy Rosary.  

 

Jesus Christ did not become man to relay a foggy route of salvation, but rather, clearly taught what is required to enter heaven.  If Catholic dogma is not absolute, then how does dogma compare to the 'laws of physics'?  Does the law of gravity hold more weight than the words of Jesus Christ?  Of course not !  Haters of truth have phantasmagorically rewritten Catholic tradition, edited the Holy Gospel and made the straight road to heaven very twisted.

 

I can't imagine how such a heretic, like Kramer, will react during his judgment (if he doesn't convert).  Perhaps he, like Pontius Pilate, will mutter, "What is truth?"

 

St. John the Baptist, please pray for us.

 

Shawna                                      

 

Rebirth

 

Subject: Kramer anathematizes himself    

 

Dear Brothers,

Thank you for exposing "Fr." Paul Kramer anathematizing himself.  He clearly implies that "baptism of desire" gives a metaphorical "laver of regeneration," or water of rebirth, i.e. baptism.  What a heretic!!  St. Gregory Nazianzen shows how absurd it is to equate the desire for baptism with the reception of the sacrament: St. Gregory Nazianz, 381 AD: “If you were able to judge a man who intends to commit murder, solely by his intention and without any act of murder, then you could likewise reckon as baptized one who desired Baptism, without having received Baptism.  But, since you cannot do the former, how can you do the latter?  I cannot see it.  If you prefer, we will put it like this: if in your opinion desire has equal power with actual Baptism, then make the same judgment in regard to glory.  You will then be satisfied to long for glory, as if that longing itself were glory.  Do you suffer any damage by not attaining the actual glory, as long as you have a desire for it?”  It's also interesting to note that in Session 21, Chapter 4 of the Council of Trent, it speaks of being "regenerated by the laver of baptism."  This is interesting because it proves that only the waters (laver) of baptism regenerate/give the spiritual rebirth.  The Magisterium usually refers to the "laver of regeneration," not the "laver of baptism."  Session 21 of Trent makes it abundantly clear that the regeneration/rebirth is by the laver/water of baptism.  Kramer and the "baptism of desire" heretics mock baptism.  They attempt to reduce baptism to being merely symbolic or metaphorical, like Protestants.  The only "effect" of "baptism of desire" is a Hollywood style "special effect" or delusion - BOD is not real and it never will be because it lacks real and natural water - and all the logodaedaly (verbal sleight of hand) of Kramer and other BOD heretics only serve to emphasize that fact. 

God Bless,

Mr. & Mrs. White

 

Perusing

 

Dear Brothers:

 

Not too long ago I was perusing A Textual Concordance of the Holy Scriptures by a Father Thomas David Williams.  Copyright 1908 by Benzinger Brothers (Chicago).  On page 652 of this book, in typical heretical/protestant style, a number of bible quotations are given which are supposed to prove baptism of desire.  The heading for those quotes is "Baptism of Desire, though only implicit, can supply the place of sacramental baptism when the latter is impossible".  Of course, it does not explain how sacramental baptism could ever be impossible for someone desiring baptism.  But what is really slick about this section is this:   in attempting to prove that the bible teaches baptism of desire, the first several passages it quotes are from the Old Testament before the Sacrament of Baptism was even instituted.   That page also has two entries (Matthew 10:32 and 39) listed under the "Baptism of Blood - Martyrdom - Can Supply the Place of Sacramental Baptism".   One can certainly understand why God entrusted the receipt and transmission of the faith to the papacy and not to theologians.

 

Another book published around the same time does not, as far as I am aware, teach baptism of desire although the former editor of Tan (Nelson) injected it into the book via a footnote.  That book is Bishop Knecht's  A Practical Commentary on Holy Scripture

 

On page 447 of the book, Bishop Knecht clearly states that water baptism is necessary for salvation.  But Thomas Nelson of Tan added a footnote (which he identified as his and dated 2003) in which he proceeds to teach baptism of desire and quotes all the usual false claims which misquote the Council of Trent.  Nelson also quotes the Baltimore Catechism as teaching Baptism of Desire -- and perhaps this was one of the heretical trailblazers, dating back to (I think) 1885… This Nelson quote business is, to me, a great illustration of how heresy spreads like the cancer it is.  It spreads like wildfire because people no longer have a horror of heresy… I'm really glad MHFM started this discussion with Tanquerey since many people believe (as I once did) that a book was probably safe if it was written prior to Vatican 2.  Apostasies are a long time in the making, and there were probably many whispered heresies floating around long before the excommunication of Martin Luther and the rise of Protestantism.  The examination of this issue also demonstrates the astuteness of the true popes in issuing solemn declarations when they did -- often seeing what the majority of the world could not yet see.

 

Lee Ann

 

Antipope Francis ‘blessed’ by Welby

 

MHFM: In a vacuum, this would be an incredible act of heresy.  After all, it is to repudiate in deed the Church’s teaching on the invalidity of Anglican orders.  It is to clearly signify that a notorious heretic, who rejects Catholic teaching in many areas and leads a sect, is in the Church of Christ.  But with Antipope Francis and the Vatican II sect, it’s basically just another day.  It’s ridiculous that anyone regards this guy as a Catholic. 

 

Antipope Francis receives “blessing” from layman Justin Welby – the heretical and schismatic leader of the Anglican “Church”

 

New Post

 

MHFM: This is a short new post.  It covers another example of a pre-Vatican II ‘theologian’ who greatly erred on ‘baptism of desire’ and fed people a false doctrine.  These examples are significant because the enemies of the necessity of the Catholic Church in our day base their positions on the views of fallible pre-Vatican II theologians.  In many cases, they were the men whose errors and heresies paved the way for the Vatican II apostasy.

 

The False Doctrine of ‘Baptism of Desire’ on Display – Adolphe Tanquerey [post]

 

Held

 

Subject: False doctrine of 'Baptism of Desire' - Fr. John Laux

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Re your latest posting on theologians before Vatican II spreading the false doctrine of 'Baptism of Desire,' I recently picked up a book by Fr. John Laux, titled "Catholic Apologetics" God, Christianity and the Church.  A Course in Religion Book IV, (published in 1928 Benziger)... I thought it would be an interesting read, as I recall having, as part of our religious reading in High School /College, 1959-1962  a book with a similar title, but don't recall the author of that book.

 

I was somewhat surprised (as I presumed Fr. Laux was a pretty orthodox Catholic theologian of that period}.  I quickly skipped to Chapter VI. p.123 -129, "Outside the Church there is no Salvation,"and after explaining the Church's teaching on the necessity of the Catholic Church for salvation, he then unashamedly preaches the direct opposite, especially on p.127, where he expands and expounds his false teaching: 4. Although those who are outside the Catholic Church through no fault of theirs can be saved, yet they are deprived of the inestimable advantage enjoyed by Catholics. - ...

 

In 3. But are not all non-Catholics and non-Christians condemned to Hell by this doctrine? -

 

The Catholic dogma, "Outside the Church there is no salvation," must be rightly understood....[and he goes on...with his heresy]

 

As you can imagine by now the alarm bells were ringing!

 

I don't know if you are familiar with this particular book, but thought it would make a good article for MHFM to expound upon and expose yet another pre-Vatican II 'theologian', preaching a false doctrine, which as you rightly commented paved the way for the Vatican II apostasy.

 

God Bless,

David

 

MHFM: That’s another good example of horrible heresy against the Church’s salvation dogma being put forward in a fallible text before Vatican II.  That’s what many false traditionalists, as a consequence of not possessing true supernatural faith, miss: the Vatican II apostasy did not happen overnight.  The bishops did not just show up at Vatican II and suddenly become heretics.  Almost all of them were heretics before they showed up there.  Yes, the apostasy took an official form with the election of the Freemasonic apostate Antipope John XXIII and the false Second Vatican Council.  Those developments eventually resulted in the construction of a Counter Church – an entity distinct from the true Catholic Church – but the doctrinal breakdown which led to its formation occurred before Vatican II.  The denial of the salvation dogma was the key issue. 

 

That’s why those who think they can just follow and trust the ‘theologians’ before Vatican II, or even what Pius XII (a horribly weak pope, and a bridge to the apostasy) allowed in his fallible capacity, and ignore what the infallibly-protected dogmatic teachings of the Church proclaim, greatly err.  They trust in man over the teaching in the Church – they trust in man over the office of the Papacy – and they lose.  And they will lose for all eternity, if they don’t convert.

 

Heretical

 

Thanks for exposing Tanquerey’s heretical ravings… I also noted that Tanquerey held that Baptism does not remit Original Sin and infuse sanctifying grace for many (if not most) baptisees, because they had ‘probably’ already obtained these through Desire alone!

 

Where does this nonsense stop? Confirmation of Desire? Extreme Unction of Desire? Holy Matrimony of Desire? Ordination of Desire?!

 

Timothy

 

MHFM: With regard to his false teaching that Baptism does not remit Original Sin for many, because it supposedly already happened prior to Baptism, this canon is also interesting:

 

Council of Trent, Sess. 5 on Original Sin, #5: “If anyone denies that by the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ which is conferred in baptism, the guilt of original sin is remitted, or says that the whole of that which belongs to the essence of sin is not taken away, but says that it is only canceled or not imputed, let him be anathema.

 

False Doctrine

 

Subject: False Doctrine of Tanquerey

 

Brothers,

 

It does, indeed, appear that many heretical priests have read Tanquerey; for who among 'Catholics' has not perused The Spiritual Life?  I remember a Franciscan priest that gave Sunday afternoon talks on Tanquerey's writings, back in the late 1990s - right before I received your material (which I thank God for). 

 

It also appears that, in particular, Anthony Cekada has taken this false idea of Tanquerey's, quoted in your article, as part of the infallible ordinary magisterium, and has extended it beyond perhaps even Tanquerey's erroneous notions.  When I telephoned Cekada, he told me the same things that Tanqueray wrote:  "...perfect charity, along with at least an implicit desire for Baptism, supplies for the forces of Baptism of water as to remission of sins..." "It is certainly sufficient in one who is invincibly ignorant..." " Perfect charity, together with the desire for Baptism, indeed remits original sin and actual sins, and in like manner infuses sanctifying grace..."

 

… I told him that a person cannot have charity until that person receives the sacrament of baptism, for that is how we receive faith, hope and charity: the three theological virtues (should I have to tell a 'priest' of this truth?).  The faithless heretic Cekada simply fast-talked his way out of answering me.  But Cekada made it clear that he believes in 'invincible ignorance'… he believes that the heresies held and taught currently by almost all the false traditionalist priests - against the dogma that sacramental baptism is absolutely necessary for salvation - are part of the 'infallible ordinary magisterium' since 'theologians' taught and published it in catechisms -  even though it doesn't agree with the infallible extraordinary magisterium (which Cekada and others ignore on this issue); and he believes in, and applies 'baptism of desire' to: Jews, Muslims and other pagans (as long as they're "nice" Jews, Muslims and pagans). 

 

I counted at least five contradictions in the paragraph you quoted from Tanquerey…

 

Tanqueray's errors are really, as you say, false doctrines… It demonstrates that those who obstinately adhere to this particular heresy (in fact, any heresy) do not believe in Jesus Christ.  They don't.  For if they did, they would not render the words of Jesus Christ, the acts of His apostles, the works and martyrdoms of Catholic missionaries meaningless!...

 

Assertion

 

Dear MHFM,

 

Adolphe speaks of, perfect charity... satisfying the requirement for the sacrament of baptism… That's an unbelievable assertion that sinners can possess this 'perfect charity', and desire for baptism and from there, bam, you're in the church, and saved if one died immediately after desiring this baptism.  Who believes this stuff?  Thanks MHFM! 

 

Comment

 

Dear Brothers:

 

… the reason the false Sister Lucia wore lipstick is that, along with lip liner, it gives the impression of fuller lips, which the True Sister Lucia clearly had without the aid of cosmetics...

  

God Bless you,

 

Georgette

 

FSSP - Terra

 

Subject: Joseph Terra

 

… I know that Joseph Terra is not a Catholic as I have listened many times to your short debate with him. This shooting was a great tragedy but I believe the larger tragedy is what is not seen by most; that these men with the FSSP are leading people to hell with the anti-Christ and his Vatican II sect. It is too bad that he hung up on Brother Peter.  He may have heard the truth that would have saved Kenneth Walker and lead him to the true faith, the Catholic faith.

Mary Jo Marceau-Hawthorne

 

MHFM: Yes, it’s quite true that they lead people to Hell.  They are completely Novus Ordo in their theology – they fully accept the apostasy and the heresies of Vatican II – yet they hide it behind ‘traditional’ garb.  They are complete heretics.  The short conversation showed that Terra didn’t care one bit about the facts, Catholic teaching or even the person he was talking to.  He’s just an utterly bad-willed heretic, like all of their ‘priests.’

 

Accepted

 

Dear Bros. Peter and Michael,

 

My name is Jordan Legere and I live in Texas. I am a frequent visitor to your website and YouTube channel. I accepted the Sedevacantist postion around November 2013. To make a long story short, I stopped attending the novus ordo mass in September 2013…

 

Regards,

 

Jordan Legere

 

Sedevacantist grounding and arguments

 

Subject: Sedevacantist grounding and arguments

 

More and more i learn about my faith. First i was a typical novus ordo charismatic. But when i was 16 or so, i discovered Tradition, and started to move towards it. I was 19 when i declared myself to be a traditionalist. It was in my room when i took my copy of Denzinger-Hönerman and read the Tridentine Creed and Anti-modernist Oath. Ironically it was during the first year of theological college which i still attend. I am a layman, and the college is modernist. I attend it still so i may denounce any heresy i hear there. I attend it and i study modernist theologians in the "know thy enemy" fashion.

 

Recently (a few days ago really - now i'm 21) i subscribed to the opinion that the New Mass of Paul VI was invalid in vernacular translations where the words "for all" are used. It is the same in my language, Croatian, where the translation is "for all men". So what we have here is not only a substitution, but an addition also. And the "in remissionem peccatorum" is correctly translated to "unto remission of sins" so it expresses act and not potency as "so that sins may (could) be forgiven" would, and it is therefore definitely heretical. Major help in this was your debate with William Albrecht…

Now to the real point. I have been researching the sedevacantist issue and it seems very logical….

 

I also see you're very strongly against baptism of desire. On this i would point out that i side with the Angelic Doctor and i hold that it is possible to receive the effect of this sacrament without administering the sacrament itself…

 

Cu

 

MHFM: First, the material proves without any doubt that Francis and the other claimants are/were antipopes.  It really comes down to whether a person has supernatural faith; for it’s certain that heretics cannot be popes and that the Vatican II claimants are/were heretics.  You should watch these videos on the issue:

 

What Francis Really Believes (3rd edition) (video)

Why Francis Must Not Be Considered The Pope (video)

Was Vatican II Infallible? (video)

False Traditionalists Refuted on Sedevacantism (video)

 

In your case, we don’t recommend reading modernist theologians.  We don’t think that would benefit you.  We recommend that you look more carefully at the materials we’ve put out.  If you do, and if you are honest and sincere, you will be convinced of the true positions.  You should also pray the Rosary each day, all 15 decades if possible.

 

With regard to ‘baptism of desire,’ you need to see this video.  It explains why your view is definitely incompatible with Catholic teaching.  St. Thomas was simply wrong on the matter and his view cannot be held, as this video covers.  In fact, you say that he held that people receive the ‘effect of this sacrament’ without the sacrament.  Actually, he didn’t, as the video proves.  That’s one of the big problems with his position on the issue, and the false doctrine in general.  You should also see our salvation book and the other materials on the matter.

 

The Best Argument Against “Baptism of Desire” (video)

 

Menorah

 

Subject: Question About Menorah Displayed at Mass

 

The Roman Catholic Mass celebrated on Saturday, June 14 in my town featured something that disturbed me.  During the homily, Father brought out a pedestal (an approximately 3 foot high column) and placed a Jewish menorah on it.  Then he directed two (pre-selected) girls and a boy to surround it while holding hands.  They were said to represent the Holy Trinity.  I couldn't understand what a menorah was doing on a Catholic altar surrounded by two females and one male representing the Holy Trinity.  Note:  Father had also displayed a menorah on the altar during the Christmas season a few years back.

 

Our Priest is a former Evangelical and Baptist.  I'm having trouble trying to determine what this display was meant to convey.  The actual homily was very respectful.  Is there something in the new Mass that supports this type of a display?  I seemed to be the only one disturbed by it and therefore may be ignorant of something newly acceptable in the Mass.

 

Respectfully,

 

Byron Lang

 

MHFM: He did it because he’s an apostate who accepts the Novus Ordo theology of religious indifferentism and salvation outside the Catholic Church.  It’s crucial that you get out of the New Mass.  It’s invalid, non-Catholic and must be avoided under pain of grave sin.  Please see the material on our site which proves that the Vatican II sect is not the Catholic Church.

 

“Fr.” Paul Kramer anathematizes himself

 

*Note: We’ve added an interesting update to the recent post on Paul Kramer.  You will find it as an addendum near the end of the post.  It’s copied here as well:

 

ADDENDUM: PAUL KRAMER ANATHEMATIZES HIMSELF

 

MHFM: There’s an interesting update to our recent post on Paul Kramer.  Kramer was apparently arguing with someone about the necessity of Baptism.  He attempted to address the teaching of Jesus, Scripture and Catholic dogma, that one must be “born again of water and the Holy Ghost” to enter Heaven.  It’s always interesting when “baptism of desire” heretics attempt to explain their position.  If they even begin to interact with the dogmatic arguments which refute it (a rare occurrence), they always wind up contradicting themselves and/or falling into new errors and heresies.  That’s why they typically choose to ignore all the arguments which obliterate their position – preferring, instead, to talk endlessly about objections for “baptism of desire” that have already been completely refuted.

 

Pope Eugene IV, The Council of Florence, “Exultate Deo,” Nov. 22, 1439: “Holy baptism, which is the gateway to the spiritual life, holds the first place among all the sacraments; through it we are made members of Christ and of the body of the Church. And since death entered the universe through the first man, ‘unless we are born again of water and the Spirit, we cannot,’ as the Truth says, ‘enter into the kingdom of heaven’ [John 3:5]. The matter of this sacrament is real and natural water.”

 

So, in attempting to explain how “baptism of desire” is compatible with the dogma that one must be “reborn of water and the Holy Ghost” to be saved, Paul Kramer falls into another significant and very revealing heresy.

 

Supporters of “baptism of desire” typically admit that “baptism of desire” is not a sacrament and does not provide the “rebirth of water and the Spirit.”  “Baptism of desire”, by definition, lacks the “water” of Baptism (the matter of the Sacrament).  To assert that it is a sacrament would be theologically absurd and heretical.  While admitting that “baptism of desire” isn’t a sacrament, supporters of “baptism of desire” will generally contend that the “true understanding” of John 3:5, and the Church’s teaching on it, is that being “reborn of water” is not absolutely necessary.  That contention is of course false and inconsistent with Catholic teaching, as the passage from Florence above and many other arguments prove.  Kramer, however, has invented his own heresy on the matter.  He actually argues that the recipients of “baptism of desire” are “reborn by water and the Holy Ghost”! 

 

Faced with the evidence in Trent and Florence, that the Church teaches that no one enters Heaven without being reborn of water and the Spirit, Kramer writes:

 

“Fr.” Paul Kramer: “I have already theologically demonstrated previously, by way of a critical analysis of the Latin texts of the Decree on Justification (and related canons), that Chapter 4 defines that one who has been justified by the laver of regeneration or the votum of it, to have been reborn by water and the Holy Ghost.”

 

“Fr.” Paul Kramer: “First, it must be noted that Chapter 4 of the Decree on Justification already defined that those who have been justified by the laver of regeneration or the votum of it, have been reborn by water and the Holy Ghost…”

 

This is an incredible assertion.  He even makes it twice.  His statement is completely heretical.  Many supporters of “baptism of desire” might even agree.  Kramer truly doesn’t know what he’s talking about.  In taking such a position he proves, once again, that he has been anathematized.

 

It’s dogmatically defined (by both Florence and Trent) that the rebirth of “water and the Holy Ghost” involves REAL AND NATURAL WATER in the Sacrament of Baptism.  In Exultate Deo, Florence states that the rebirth “of water and the Spirit” refers to the Sacrament and that “the matter of this sacrament is real and natural water” (Materia huius sacramenti est aqua vera et naturalis).  It uses the demonstrative adjective “huius” (of this) connected with “sacramenti” (sacrament) to define the “rebirth of water and the Spirit” mentioned by Jesus as the one which involves “real and natural water” (vera et naturalis) “of this sacrament” (huius sacramenti).

 

Primum omnium sacramentorum locum tenet sanctum baptisma, quod vitae spiritualis ianua est : per ipsum enim membra Christi ac de corpore efficimur Ecclesiae. Et cum per primum hominem mors introierit in universos (cf: Rom 5, 12), nisi ex aqua et Spiritu renascamur, non possumus ut inquit Veritas, in regnum caelorum introire (cf. Jo 3, 5 ). Materia huius sacramenti est aqua vera et naturalis.

 

If that weren’t enough proof that it’s heretical to assert that one can be “reborn of WATER and the Spirit” without real and natural water in the Sacrament of Baptism, we have Canon 2 of Trent on Baptism:

 

Pope Paul III, The Council of Trent, Can. 2 on the Sacrament of Baptism, Sess. 7, 1547, ex cathedra:

 

"Si quis dixerit, aquam veram et naturalem non esse de necessitate baptismi, atque ideo verba illa Domini nostri Iesu Christi: ‘Nisi quis renatus fuerit ex aqua et Spiritu Sancto’ [Io 3, 5] ad metaphoram aliquam detorserit: A.S."

 

“If anyone should say that real and natural water is not necessary for baptism, and on that account should distort those words of Our Lord Jesus Christ: ‘Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit’ [John 3:5], into some metaphor: let him be anathema.”

 

Here we see that to assert that the rebirth of “water and the Holy Spirit” does not mean real and natural water, but spiritual water or metaphorical water, as Kramer does, is specifically anathematized heresy!  Kramer has fallen into this embarrassing and outrageous heresy, which would put him outside the Church if he weren’t already outside of it, because he is arrogantly, obstinately and pertinaciously defending heresy.  In the same piece in which he teaches the aforementioned heresy, he again condemns people who hold the Catholic position that everyone must be born again of water and the Spirit in the Sacrament to be saved (Council of Florence).  When heretics rail against the truth, God often allows them to fall into even bigger mistakes.  That’s clearly what happened here.

 

By the way, it should be noted that Canon 2 on Baptism would not be the first passage to bring forward to demonstrate that one must be baptized to be saved.  Exultate Deo from the Council of Florence, Can. 5 of Trent on the Sacrament of Baptism, and many other arguments should be mentioned first.  However, when “BOD” heretics attempt to circumvent the teaching of the Church, that one must be “reborn of water and the Spirit,” they can sometimes fall into heresy against Canon 2 on the back end of the argument, if you will.  That is to say, if, in desperation, they assert that “baptism of desire” somehow satisfies the requirement to be “born again of water,” at that point they fall into heresy against Canon 2 on what “the water” of John 3:5 necessarily and dogmatically means (real and natural water).

 

It’s also noteworthy that certain “baptism of desire” supporters, oblivious to the heresy being fed to them by Kramer, were applauding his response.  That’s truly an exercise in self-condemnation.  In their blindness, they were only cheering a man for rejecting a defined dogma, distorting the words of Jesus Christ in direct opposition to Catholic teaching, and paving their own path to damnation.  They are truly sons of Hell (Mt. 23:15), enemies of Christ and His Church.

 

Another reason Kramer fell headlong into heresy on this point is that Sess. 6, Chap. 4 of Trent declares that Jesus’ declaration in John 3:5 is true “as it is written” (sicut scriptum est).  That is of course directly incompatible with “baptism of desire,” which posits salvation without rebirth of water and the Spirit.  If “baptism of desire” were true (and it’s not), then the proper understanding of John 3:5 would not be “as it is written.”  But in every single dogmatic text on John 3:5, including Sess. 6, Chap. 4 of Trent, those words of Jesus are understood as they are written.  It would of course make no sense at all for Trent to be teaching that one can be saved without rebirth of water by “baptism by desire,” while in the very same sentence declaring that Jesus’ declaration in John 3:5 is to be understood “as it is written.”  That’s another proof that Sess.  6, Chap. 4 of Trent did not teach that one can be justified by desire, as our article on that matter, a careful examination of the text, and a clear grammatical and dogmatic precedent proves.

 

Perceiving the problem, namely, that the Church (and the very passage of Sess. 6, Chap. 4) understands John 3:5 “as it is written,” Kramer chose to adopt the novel heresy that people who aren’t baptized are somehow “born again of water and the Spirit.”  In doing so he fell under the anathema of the aforementioned dogma against twisting Jesus’ words, and adopted a position that’s rejected by almost all of his fellow “baptism of desire” heretics.  Just as the more Antipope Francis talks the more proof we have that the Chair of St. Peter is vacant, the more “baptism of desire” heretics attempt to explain their position the more evidence we have for why it’s false.

 

Finally, the reader should remember that the inconsistency and the outrageous heresy articulated by Kramer on this issue arose from his attempt to address just one angle of the argument.  The number of contradictions and errors would only grow in direct proportion to the number of attempts he made to address dogmatic arguments against his position.  There is of course the distinct but related matter of whether “baptism of desire” (putting aside what they think “born again of water” means) even grants the grace of Baptism.  Their attempts to answer that question only yield more heresies and contradictions.  The same could be said of their responses to numerous other dogmatic arguments against their position.  That’s because “baptism of desire” is an utterly false, completely indefensible false doctrine of man.  Only bad-willed individuals and heretics obstinately adhere to it in the face of the irrefutable dogmatic arguments against it.

 

New Audio Posted

 

MHFM: A so-called “priest” named Paul Kramer recently called the Catholic Church’s dogmatic teaching, that no one can be saved without the Sacrament of Baptism, “heretical.”  Kramer also says that those who hold the Church’s teaching on this point, and reject the false doctrine of “baptism of desire,” commit mortal sin and are “formal heretics.”  A new audio contains comments about the heretic.  You will find the audio in the file linked below:

 

“Fr.” Paul Kramer denies Catholic salvation dogma (new audio)

 

Kramer

 

Subject: Kramer

 

Dear Brothers:

 

Thank you for the expose of Kramer the pompous fraud.  And thank you as well for exposing -- and naming -- one of Satan's most sophisticated tricks which his malice toward God and his long experience with men have allowed him to perfect:  the demonic objective/subjective slicing of God's revelation which insists that God speaks lies…

 

… Double-speaking is the signature mark of Kramer and his ilk… they say the exact same lies, speech after speech, book after book, year in and year out.   I guess it is not surprising that men like Kramer know that, were they to embrace and teach the truth, their admiring and generous supporters would quickly disappear.  As Christ knows His people and they know Him, false and heretical "priests" know their flocks as well.   They recognize that the man of today, including the false traditionalist, loves many of the "goodies" that the false Vatican 2 religion has to offer and would not appreciate certain dogmas of the Catholic Church.  Such dogmas are "hard sayings" to such persons, and would necessitate their having to change their manner of living or their relationships with others…

 

Lee Ann      

 

Heresy

 

Brothers,

 

RE: Your new post on Paul Kramer

 

Great audio!  I'm not surprised, in the least, by his manifest public heresy and schism and apostasy.  Kramer spent many years deceiving people alongside Nicholas Gruner.  They have been lying to people around the world for years: promoting a false Fatima message; a false Sr. Lucia; a false Church; and pretending to be priests… demanding that the baptized accept the possibility of salvation for those who die unbaptized is blatant hypocrisy and a total denial of Jesus Christ.  How despicable!

 

Instead of Kramer being converted by studying the dogmas, by reading the infallible teachings of the true popes throughout history, he has gone in the opposite direction and has 1) denied the salvation dogma - heresy; 2) declared those who hold union with Divine Truth to be outside of his Church -schism; and 3) has aligned himself with the same teachings expressed by the false, apostate 'bishop of Rome' he has recently supposedly rejected-apostasy.  The further along in the Great Apostasy, the more clearly seen are the lines which separate the Elect from the Reprobate.  The Church is truly in eclipse and the Darkness hates the Light more than ever.  How few there are who love the Light, who are not afraid to be seen in the Light, nor afraid to shine it upon anyone. May God give us all a courageous heart to be among the children of Light - the lightsome children of Mary Immaculate.

 

Comment

 

Subject: Mr. Kramer

 

Good audio on Paul Kramer. He truly is a diabolical tool of Satan…

God bless,
Wesley Brittain

 

Contraceptives

 

Subject: Contraceptives

 

This is interesting.

 

I am a physician and they are trying to fire me (in many vicious ways) because I refuse to prescribe contraceptives or exams aimed to perform artificial insemination… it is really revealing how these devil-driven individuals attack those who act in a truth-consistent way.

 

D

 

“Fr.” Paul Kramer

 

Subject: “Fr.” Paul Kramer

 

Dear Brothers,

Thank you for the audio and article denouncing the abominable, disgraceful, disgusting and diabolical heretic, "Fr." Paul Kramer.  He proves himself to be a schismatic for calling true Catholics "heretics" and Magisterial teaching "heresy."  Paul Kramer is condemned out of his own mouth, for in the very same book that he states: "only God knows whom He will save (in some extraordinary manner) from among the great mass of humanity which has not exteriorly professed the Catholic religion," he also states: "Not all the learning in the world, nor all the rank of office, can substitute for the truth of one infallibly defined Catholic teaching."  Kramer is a mass of contradictions.  For anyone who professes to be Catholic, dogmatic Papal teaching should end the debate, yet for modernist heretics like Kramer, Papal teaching is something to debate.  His idea of God saving someone "in some extraordinary manner," i.e. outside the sacrament of baptism, is a demonic joke.  "Some extraordinary manner" sounds like he is describing a magic trick, as if "baptism of desire" were akin to David Copperfield "flying" through the air! It is impossible for God to lie. Jesus Christ commanded His followers to baptize in water and in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Ghost. He said no one can enter Heaven without being born again of water and the Spirit (John 3:5).  Kramer and the "baptism of desire" heretics are tools of Satan.  They refuse to obey our Lord's commands, and they lie against His truths.  Paul Kramer… chose to adore Satan for the world and its friendship, knowing full well it is seated in wickedness, and is now an enemy of God and will lose his soul barring a super-miraculous conversion.  Kramer knows the world hates those who deny themselves, carry their cross and follow Jesus Christ.  He knows that embracing Catholic teaching… would entail him being rejected on a massive scale, and so he chose to keep his apostate friends and heresy-endorsed pay check, but to deny our Lord Jesus Christ and walk the road to hell.  What a reprobate fool!!!

God Bless,

Mr. & Mrs. White

 

Learning

 

Hello Bro. Dimond,

I am recent catholic revert less than two yrs ago. I am now just learning about the difference post and pre vatican 2 tradition and the scandals of heresies mentioned on your web site. I am pretty disturbed by it and thank God for his grace to bring such things to my attention. I live in Massachusetts and have researched what was available local or even just in my state for traditional catholic churches… What are your thoughts?

Thank you,

In Christ the King.
Dan

 

MHFM: We’re glad that you came across the material.  Please see the response below.  [We also sent a response to him directly.]

 

Article Posted

 

MHFM: The recent video, The Remnant and Robert Siscoe Refuted on Sedevacantism, is now available in article form.  You will find the article below the video in this file:

 

ARTICLE

 

New

 

Subject: Church questions

 

I am new to your web site and am shocked at all of have learned, scary.  Where might I find a church that I can go to in kittanning ,pa…

 

Dn

 

MHFM: We’re glad you are consulting the material.  It's important to realize the situation today (during the Great Apostasy).  It is one in which basically all the churches are either heretical Vatican II churches or 'traditionalist' churches where the priest is heretical in some way.  Thus, there aren't any churches that are fully Catholic, where one can join, regard the priest as Catholic and support the church.  There are few options for receiving the Eucharist today, but there are some options for receiving the sacrament of confession (which is obviously crucial).  This file also covers important principles on this issue, and the positions one must hold before receiving sacraments.  We can help a person with these issues once he or she is convinced on all the issues. 

 

Comment

 

Subject: Baby with fatal heart defect miraculously kept alive until Baptism (video)

 

I’m speechless but in wow.

 

Isabella A. Rossellini

 

Baptism

 

Subject: Baby with fatal heart defect miraculously kept alive until Baptism (video)

 

I am so touched by this story… I will never forget this wonderful story. God Bless you

 

Jim O’Connor

 

Catholic Church

 

The Catholic Church is coming down soon...please don’t go down with it…. The Bible describes the false Church and tells His Christians to "come out or her my people".

 

Patricia Sunday

 

MHFM: You are referring to the Whore of Babylon mentioned in the Apocalypse.  That’s not the Catholic Church, but the Vatican II sect – the end-times Counter Church.  You need to see these videos:

 

Is the World about to End? – The Apocalypse Explained?

The Third Secret of Fatima (3rd edition) – An Overview of the Entire Vatican II Apostasy

 

The fact that the prophecies deal with what’s happening in Rome proves, rather than disproves, the authenticity of the Catholic Church.  The Catholic Church is the one true Church of Christ.  You cannot be saved as a Protestant.

 

Obelisk

 

Then why is there an obelisk in the Vatican… You are saved through faith in Christ. No "good work" will give you salvation.

 

Jaroslaw Sobinski

 

MHFM: One is saved through Christ’s faith and obedience to His commands, not faith alone (see James 2:24).  You need to consult these materials. 

 

Justification Debate with a Reformed Protestant (Calvinist) – Refutes Protestantism

The Key to John 3:16 (video)

http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/catholicchurch/bible/

 

The Catholic faith is the one true faith, outside of which there is no salvation.  Also, there is a cross on top of the obelisk in the Vatican.  It was put there by Pope Sixtus V to signify Christ’s victory over paganism.

 

Agree

 

Subject: What Francis Really Believes (3rd edition)

 

I think Pope Francis is a Universal Pope, the peoples Pope, a living Saint, we are lucky witnessing a living Saint, I agree to all his doing:)

 

Mario Magsaysay

 

MHFM: Wow, what an apostate.

 

More Lies

 

Subject: What Francis Really Believes (3rd edition)

 

The childish insistence of calling the Pope over and over again the "anti-Pope" "apostate Francis" and the implication that if you have good relationships with other faiths you are anti -Catholic…

 

AJA Deacon

 

MHFM: First, he should be called “Antipope Francis” because that’s what he is: a heretical, non-Catholic antipope.  It must be made clear that he in no way occupies the Papacy.  Second, you reveal why God leaves you deceived.  You are not honest.  You know that Francis’ heretical teaching that non-Catholics can be saved, and his participation in non-Catholic worship (among other things), is not equivalent to having ‘good relationships’ with people.  Denying Catholic dogma is not the same as introducing yourself cordially, or how one might typically define fostering ‘good relationships.’  He’s a heretic.  He rejects Catholic teaching and promotes a false religion.  That’s what the video proves.  That’s what you ignore because you are dishonest.  You don’t care about Jesus Christ or His truth. 

 

Scripture

 

Subject: The Key to John 3:16 (video)

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Thank you for once again setting the record straight with one of the countless constantly misinterpreted verses of Sacred Scripture… Protestants and their lies about "sola scriptura" and "faith alone" have no merit whatsoever… I grew up as a Protestant. Excellent video

 

Tanner Wintters

 

Keeping

 

Dear MHFM,

 

The Remnant, and their ilk are nothing more than a sub-branch of the fruitless V2 sect with the express purpose of keeping the lost flock… in the realm of the V2 sect with an overriding impression of being saved even if the flock know something is not right with what's transpired because of this heinous council from the deathly pit of Lucifer… Mind-boggling!  Thanks MHFM!

 

One Heresy

 

Subject:  Mr Siscoe spreads one heresy after another

 

This below mentioned heresy spread by many false traditionalists is very similar to the Protestant's heresy, "once- saved always- saved"… There is a place in the "Soul of the Church" for unbaptized non-Catholics, there is a place in the "Body of the Church" for open/manifest/formal heretics.  And those who are baptized of water and profess True Catholic Church are simply "in the Body and in the Soul of the Church ". This way everybody is happy, not too many complaints. The problem is this IS the HERESY. An absolute denial of the Teaching of the Holy, infallible Magisterium of the Catholic Church.

 

Many false traditionalists hold on to the heresy of "Soul of the Church".   ".. The Soul of the Church heresy is that which teaches that one can be saved in another religion or without the Catholic Faith by being united to the Soul of the Church, but not the Body..."  According to them, those who believe in Baptism of Desire, Baptism of Blood or Invincible Ignorance, one can be saved in another religion or without the Catholic Faith by simply "being united to the Soul of the Church".  Mr. Siscoe claims that manifest/open heretics who were, however, not formally declared as such by Ecclesiastical Authority are still a part of the Body of the Church, but NOT a part of the Soul of the Church.  So, continuing his way of reasoning, one may say that those who had Baptism of Water, have the TRUE Catholic Faith are part, both, of the Body and of the Soul of the Church.  According to Mr. Siscoe, then (and many other false traditionalists) there are, supposedly, three ways one can be saved.

1. Being a part of the Soul of the Church

2. Being a part of the Body of the Church

3. Being a part of the Body AND of the Soul of the Church.

 

Well, interesting idea, but COMPLETELY untrue and TOTALLY HERETICAL.  As Brother Peter in his excellent book:   "Outside the Catholic Church there is absolutely no Salvation" wrote :  "... A man can be either inside the Church or outside the Church. He can be either inside or outside the Body. There isn’t a third realm in which the Church exists – an invisible Soul of the Church. Those who say that one can be saved by belonging to the Soul of the Church, while not belonging to her Body, deny the undivided unity of the Church’s Body and Soul, which is parallel to denying the undivided unity of Christ’s Divine and Human natures..."

 

A man CANNOT be either in the Body of the Church OR in the Soul of the Church.  Mr Siscoe claims that there is some kind of invisible Soul of the Church, which extends far beyond the Mystical Body and "which includes the unbaptized".  He also claims that there is a visible Body of the Church, separated from the invisible Soul of the Church, which includes manifest/open heretics.  So, if one follows his reasoning one may say that those who were baptized of water, who profess the True, Catholic Faith are part of the Body of the Church (along with manifest/open heretics) AND are part of the Soul of the Church (along with unbaptized non-Catholics).  What a terrible travesty of the True Catholic Teaching. Mr Siscoe spreads one heresy after another. 

 

Heretics

 

Subject: The Remnant and Robert Siscoe - video

 

Dear Most Holy Family Monastery,

 

Thanks so much for this excellent video.  Robert Siscoe, an obstinate heretic, has lost the debate and reiterates a whirlwind of evil nonsense.  People are not Catholic because they declare themselves Catholic, nor do they remain Catholic because no Church authority has declared them a heretic.  If this was true, then all those who lived and died during the arian heresy (before it was declared heresy), and believed it, were Catholics.  Likewise, all those who blasphemously assert Jesus Christ is two persons are also Catholic.  Likewise, all those who assert that Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, Catholics… etc. pray to the same God are also Catholic.  This is sheer idiocy.  Further, I can't imagine how many Church authorities we would need, in the year 2014, to declare people as heretics.  

 

I'm incredibly glad Brother Peter Dimond made a distinction between divine law and canon law.  The effects of each law is what firmly reinforces that once a person pertinaciously denies or doubts something to be believed from the truth of divine and Catholic faith, they are separated from the Body of the Church without any declaration.  Apart from automatic expulsion (which both laws do), ecclesiastical law also determines exactly 'what to do' with the heretic and/or how to punish them.  It does not prove them a heretic, as they are already excommunicated by their own anti-Catholic act/belief before the punishment is decided.  Moreover, God has made such truth even clearer when Pope Leo XIII stated " … can it be lawful for anyone to reject any of those truths without thereby sending himself headlong into open heresy? without thereby separating himself from the Church ...."      

 

Another example that amplifies the stupidity of Siscoe is that if his position were true, then, for a pope to be expelled from his duty, a lower official would have to judge him.  Henceforth, the pope could then issue his own judgment and declare himself innocent.  Oh ...... how ridiculous!  Catholic faith clearly teaches one cannot judge the pope.  In other words, it is not 'man' who expels a pope from his office, but divine law, which is above man's conscience.       

 

This video provides an exuberant goldmine of information.  Siscoe is a prime example of someone who bases religion on his own conscience, hereby taking sides with the devil and, in his pride, still attests he is a soldier of Christ.  But he's not the only fool, as the world has millions who, instead of embracing truth, idolize human respect… This is truly the apocalypse.  In fact, this reality reminds me of Moses when he spoke with God on the mountain.  When Moses came down from the mountain, the people had fallen into idolatry.  Likewise, when Jesus Christ is going to be seen in the clouds with great power and majesty, the people will (like before) be entangled in idolatry.  But this time, their state will be worse than the first.  "... their latter state is become unto them worse than the former... The dog is returned to his vomit; and: The sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire" (2 St. Peter 2).  

 

Siscoe's 'god' is not God, but the devil.  As for Melinda Gates, it was horrific to hear her state, "There are amazing things about this religion.  Amazing moral teachings that I believe.  But I also have to go to 'how do we keep women alive?'  I believe in not letting women die' [with regards to supporting contraception]".  PARDON ME?  Melinda Gates verbalizes a concern for not letting women die, but publicly supports the murder of babies?!!  Doesn't it faze her that preventing life is to be guilty of murder?  Melinda Gates, like Lucifer, has made her own conscience a 'god' and, by no means, believes and professes the Catholic faith.

 

I thank God for His great mercy in providing people with the necessary knowledge to discern between evil and truth… Thanks Mother Mary for your constant intervention of withholding the iron rod of God's justice.

 

Shawna

 

Recognize

 

Dear Brothers,

Thank you for posting the important quote and comments from the article refuting Siscoe and the Remnant on Sedevacantism.  It is also great to see the article posted, since it contains many new quotes that prove the true position, as well as crystal clear explanations to understand the difference between Catholic teaching and the heretics' vain lies.  The quote of Pope Innocent III is particularly striking because, as you said, it contains all the elements the false traditionalists demand on the position.  It proves that laypeople can recognize others as heretics, that people become and are considered heretics before being officially warned or declared and that people who purport to be Catholic can be identified as heretics prior to a declaration. Indeed, it
constitutes a thrashing of their false position.  It proves that Catholics not only can judge, but must judge, condemn and reject heretics.  There could not be an external unity of faith, a visible Church, if a lay Catholic could not recognize and reject heresy and heretics.  It is very similar to the quote from Pope Leo the Great's dogmatic tome to Flavian proving the absolute necessity of the sacrament of water baptism for salvation.  We know by the dogmatic teaching of the Catholic Church that the Catholic faith and water baptism are absolutely necessary for salvation.  The Catholic faith and water baptism go together and are inseparable.  It shows how absurd the false traditionalists' position is when they accept as leaders of the "faith" the Vatican II antipopes who profess a false faith…  As you said previously, the false traditionalists hold a position that is equivalent to the Old Catholics who denied Papal Infallibility.  In accepting salvation outside the Catholic Church, just like Protestants they simply prove that there are many ways to deny Jesus Christ.  We know that the Lord Jesus Christ, the Catholic faith and water baptism is only Way, Truth and Life.

God Bless,

Mr. & Mrs. White

 

Fatima

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Nicholas Gruner is still deceiving people with his false consecration of Russia.  Now they expect Bergoglio to do it. A false priest peddling a false Fatima message.   Thank you in St Benedict.  

 

From Mark V

 

Comment

 

… Robert Sungenis… I have listened to all of your debates with him where you slapped down his weak arguments…

 

Mark Taylor

 

Antipope Bergoglio

 

Antipope Bergoglio is just mocking and ferociously attacking the Papacy through his deeds…

 

P       

 

Revealing

 

Subject: Statement from Innocent III

 

Dear Brothers:

 

That is a very revealing quote from Pope Innocent III/Fourth Lateran Council.  It indicates very clearly that lay people not only can -- but are expected to -- identify a heretic as a heretic whenever someone is professing heresy in word or deed.  Furthermore, the statement proves that such singling out of heretics was a common (and obviously praiseworthy) practice.  Innocent III was directing his bishops to keep on top of the job, and to respond as quickly as possible whenever they were alerted to the existence of heretics within their dioceses.  The Pope was doing this to ensure that such persons who were identified as heretics by anyone either renounced their heresy, or were officially taken care of as church law required.   Just as the religious orders were always careful about persons joining their ranks, true Catholics always knew that one rotten apple endangered the salvation of the rest.  They had a true horror of heresy, recognizing it as a cancer that needed to be routed out as quickly as possible.  To the mind bent by modernism/liberalism (i.e., the false Vatican 2 religion of Protestantism), that whole process would seem like a witch-hunt.  In their imagined sense of self-magnanimity, these false Catholics would despise such action in the same way that they despise the dogma of No Salvation Outside the Church. (It also explains why they deny the true Catholic teaching on the role and duty of the State, which recognizes that heresy is an enemy of the state and of every society it worms its way into). 

 

In reality, to a heretic the terms "dogma" and "heresy" are meaningless.  To a heretic, the idea of labeling someone a heretic is a kind of sin.  When it comes right down to it, heresies and dogmas are meaningless to such people because, by their own admission, they can't judge.   Their religion is not about the reception of God's truth, but about devising what's most pleasing to man.  That's why they accept the antipopes and the counterfeit church.   If the false traditionalists themselves can embrace heresy, why can't the false popes do likewise?...

  

Lee Ann

 

MHFM: It’s a very interesting quote.  By itself, it contains all the elements the false traditionalists demand on the issue.  If they want proof that laypeople can recognize others as heretics, it makes it clear.  If they want proof that people become and are considered heretics before being officially warned or declared, it makes it clear.  If they want proof that people who purport to be Catholic can be identified as heretics prior to a declaration, it makes it clear.  It constitutes a thrashing of their false position. 

 

We don’t think it’s an accident that all of those elements – which so thoroughly refute the adherents of heretical antipopes in our day – just happen to be contained in one passage.  No.  God leaves things like that in the Church’s official teaching and decrees for the defense of the Catholic faith and the refutation of heretics.  It’s similar to how He left a use of sine with aut in an inclusive sense in Pope St. Leo the Great’s dogmatic tome to Flavian to refute future arguments for ‘baptism of desire’.  In that dogmatic decree (the tome to Flavian), which specifically contradicts the concept of ‘baptism of desire’, by declaring that in sanctification from sin, the spirit of sanctification is inseparable from water baptism, God made sure to leave a grammatical precedent of the use of sine with aut in an absolutely and necessarily inclusive sense.  That grammatical precedent in a dogmatic decree (sine with aut in a necessarily inclusive sense) was left there to thoroughly refute false claims people would make in the future about the Council of Trent, Sess. 6, Chap. 4 and the use of sine.  (That’s explained in this article and in the first twenty or so minutes of “Baptism of Desire” Buried).

 

People sometimes talk about the case of Nestorius and how it constitutes proof that Catholics may reject people as heretics before any declaration.  The point about Nestorius certainly has value.  Many other points on the issue do as well.  But the passage from the Fourth Lateran Council (and the other quotes covered) proves the point much more powerfully and specifically.  For it comes from a pope and an ecumenical council, and the language spells out each of the elements in detail. 

 

Article

 

Dear MHFM:

 

RE your article: THE REMNANT AND ROBERT SISCOE REFUTED ON SEDEVACANTISM

 

After reading - even just one time! - Siscoe's 'main-line' argument, I could think of only one word:  PATHETIC!

 

Why can't these False Traditionalists stop the insanity?!!!  In just a handful of lines that bad-willed 'author' named Robert Siscoe committed most amazing analytical blunders and, of course, according to his own brilliant theological analysis, declared himself to be a publicly manifest heretic!

 

It's like you always say:  Against the truth there is no argument.  If any persons foolishly attempt to 'refute' the infallible and the obvious, those persons will necessarily contradict themselves, make blatantly false statements without any documentation, conflate the statements of others; there is no lie they have conceived that they would not tell.  What did you recently call it? Oh, yes:  "incredible dishonesty", "profound blindness" and "absolute idiocy"

 

After learning from you, I could see Mr. Siscoe's errors very quickly:  we know that soul and body are connected in life and separated at death, but Mr. Siscoe apparently failed that class.  And his 'explanations' about heresy/internal/external are like babbling madness…

 

Thank you so much for making the entire article available…

 

Important Quote

 

MHFM: One of the most important quotes from the newly-posted article (which was obviously also covered in the video) is below.  Like numerous other quotes that were covered, it serves to destroy the false traditionalists’ claim: that a professing Catholic cannot be considered an actual heretic until that person is considered a heretic according to the strict letter of canon or ecclesiastical law. 

 

Pope Innocent III, Fourth Lateran Council, 1215, Constitution 3, on Heretics: “We add further that each archbishop or bishop, either in person or through his archdeacon or through suitable honest persons, should visit twice or at least once in the year a particular parish in which according to report heretics were living [in qua fama fuerit haereticos habitare], and there he should compel three or more men of good testimony, or even the whole neighborhood if it seems expedient, to swear to it.  That if anyone should know of heretics there [si quis ibidem haereticos sciveritor of any persons who hold secret conventicles or who differ in their life and habits from the normal way of living of the faithful, then let him take care to point them out to the bishop.  The bishop himself should summon the accused to his presence, and they should be punished canonically if they are unable to clear themselves of the charge or if after compurgation they relapse into their former errors of faith.  If however any of them with damnable obstinacy refuse to honour an oath and so will not take it, let them by this very fact be regarded as heretics [tamquam haeretici].”

 

In this passage the Fourth Lateran Council says that each bishop or archbishop should visit parishes “in which according to report heretics were living” [in qua fama fuerit haereticos habitare].  The Council thus refers to these people as “heretics” before they have ever been declared heretics or officially warned about their heresies!  Moreover, it states that “if anyone should know of heretics there” [si quis ibidem haereticos sciverit], then he can point them out.  Therefore, anyone – including a layperson – is able to recognize people as “heretics” before they have been declared heretics, officially warned or pointed out to the bishop.  The Council applies this principle to people in Catholic parishes who purport to be Catholic.  The Council is thereby recognizing the divine law principle (and the dogmatic teaching of the Church) that anyone who clearly dissents from Catholic teaching can and must be recognized and rejected as a heretic, even if that person is not yet considered a “heretic” according to the procedures and requirements of the ecclesiastical law in place at the time.

 

Indeed, the Council refers to these people as “heretics” before they have been declared or warned according to the procedures of its own ecclesiastical law, and in the very same context in which it explains how such people can later be considered “heretics” in the Council’s ecclesiastical law.  It says that if these people it already called “heretics” at some later point in time refuse an oath they are to be reputed as “heretics”.  In other words, if they refuse an oath after having been officially warned or censured, they are to be considered heretics according to the strict letter of the Council’s canon law; but it states that any of the faithful could already have recognized them as “heretics” before that even occurs (by virtue of the divine law).

 

This completely refutes the false traditionalist claim – made by the SSPX, The Remnant, Robert Siscoe and others – that a professing Catholic cannot be considered an actual heretic until that person is considered a heretic according to the strict letter of canon or ecclesiastical law.  Their position is totally wrong, as numerous other quotes also prove.

 

Osteen

 

MHFM: Antipope Francis also recently met with the Protestant heretic Joel Osteen.  Francis asked Osteen to ‘pray’ for him.  Osteen likes how the Antipope makes things ‘inclusive.’

 

Antipope Francis and Joel Osteen

 

Religions

 

Subject: Antipope John Paul II was satanic

 

Hello,

In his Angelus address 21 September 1986 John Paul II said, that the other religions need "radical fidelity" towards their religious traditions:

"The men and women who have an "animus religiosus" may in fact be the leaven of a new consciousness of all humanity regarding its shared responsibility for peace. Every religion teaches us to overcome evil, commitment to justice and openness to others. Today, this common radical fidelity to their religious traditions is more than ever a need for peace."

http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/angelus/1986/documents/hf_jp-ii_ang_19860921_it.html

Sincerely,

Christian.

 

Videos

 

Brothers,

 

I am greatly inspired by your videos on "The Shroud of Turin", "Information Proves God” and "The Third Secret of Fatima".

 

… God bless you.

 

Andrzej Niedzielski, Warsaw, Poland

 

Wondering

 

Subject: “Saint” John Paul II

 

I was wondering if you're seeing more people jump into the sedevacantism camp with all of the recent craziness of “Pope” Francis? Canonizing John XXIII and JP2… Aaargh!!!... I believe we'll only know on judgment day the millions of souls they've both harmed!  And, no I don't consider "Pope" Francis (the hippie pope) a real Pope.


In Christ and Mary,

Ron D'

 

MHFM: As the information has been circulated over the years, more and more people have consistently come to the true Catholic position on the issue.  That’s why it’s important to evangelize, recommend the website and the videos, distribute the materials, etc. 

 

However, we must say that with the evidence currently available, with the presentations that make that evidence available, with easy access to information through the internet, with Antipope Francis’ actions, with the ‘canonization’ of Antipope John Paul II, etc. the fact that ANYONE who claims to be ‘traditional’ or even ‘conservative’ (and thus opposed to the V2 religion in some way) still regards the V2 antipopes as true popes, and does not hold that the Chair of St. Peter is vacant, is absurd.  The fact that ANY GROUP still acknowledges the fraudulent, apostate antipopes as ‘Catholic popes’ is a sick joke.  The fact that ANYONE familiar with the facts holds the position of the SSPX or a similar false traditionalist group is simply a commentary on the astounding bad will and faithlessness of people.  In response to the facts and the evidence, the entire ‘traditionalist movement’ should already have taken the position that they are not valid popes but antipopes.  Everyone familiar with the arguments should of course have been convinced, and all those people should have spread the truthful information to those under their influence and on their path who had not yet been exposed to the facts on this matter.  The result would (and should) have been that everyone who claims to be ‘traditional’ or even ‘conservative’ would already have rejected the apostates as antipopes.  Only bad will, faithlessness, dishonesty and evil has stopped that from being the case. 

 

Also, heretics (such as priests of the SSPX and other false traditionalists) did a very effective job for the Devil over the years in completely lying to people on this matter.  For years they continually and obstinately fed people distortions, false arguments, heresies and lies – all the while hiding and omitting true Catholic teaching on the matter.  As a result, large numbers in those groups were thoroughly brainwashed to believe that ‘sedevacantism’ is a rejection of the Papacy, when of course it’s the truly Catholic position and a defense of papal teaching. 

 

Their years’ worth of lies and omissions are still taking their toll to this day: large numbers of people still hold the ridiculous position of the SSPX or similar groups.  It’s outrageous.  As a fatal consequence, those people have fallen into a position that acknowledges complete public apostates as Catholics with the true faith (a rejection of Christ and the Catholic faith); they venerate the Antichrist as a “saint”; they hold a position on papal authority that’s equivalent to the “Old Catholics” (who rejected papal infallibility); and they hold that the Catholic Church has officially contradicted itself in Magisterial teaching, to name just a few.  They have fallen into a position that’s thoroughly evil, heretical and anti-Catholic, as a result of the obstinacy, lies and wickedness of false traditionalist leaders and their own disinterest in the truth on the matter.

 

The true faithful know what the correct position is without any doubt: the V2 claimants are heretical, non-Catholic antipopes.  However, for those who needed a sign, Antipope Francis’ reign is a clear sign from God that sedevacantists are and have been correct on this issue.  It’s extremely merciful for God to make it so obvious for people shortly before the end of the world.  Countless false traditionalists don’t deserve such a second chance.  For their resistance to the truth, they deserve to remain in the deception they have embraced.  Nevertheless, in His great mercy, by allowing Antipope Francis to be so obvious in his apostasy, God is essentially calling to them a final time: WAKE UP and embrace the truth before it’s too late.  Accept the truths of the Catholic faith before you are cast into the eternal lake of fire – where people never have rest, but are tormented day and night, forever and ever.

 

More Apostasy from Antipope Francis

 

MHFM: On Sunday June 8, Antipope Francis will host Israeli President Shimon Peres (a Jew) and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas (a Muslim) in an interreligious prayer meeting for peace.  Such an event constitutes false worship, religious indifferentism and an endorsement of false religions.  It is without any doubt apostasy in deed.  It proves again that Antipope Francis is a public heretic and an apostate.  Such an action demonstrates that Antipope Francis professes a false faith.  Those who obstinately accept him necessarily do as well.

 

Islamic prayers to be held at the Vatican

 

Islamic prayers and readings from the Quran will be heard at the Vatican on Sunday…”

 

Antipope Francis will even hold the prayer meeting with the unbelievers on Pentecost Sunday.  Pentecost is the day on which Catholics commemorate the descent of the Holy Ghost.  So, Antipope Francis will pray with members of false religions who reject the true God.  He will enable their false worship in the Vatican.  And he will do so on a day specifically dedicated to the Holy Ghost Whom Jews and Muslims deny. 

 

The ‘fruit’ of such a diabolical prayer-event will necessarily be the descent of the evil spirit.

 

Children

 

Subject: age of reason

 

Dear Brothers:

 

Regarding Jackie's question, I sometimes wonder if one of the reasons why Our Lady chose the young seers at Fatima was because she wanted to alert us to the fact that children would be reaching the age of reason quite young.  I can recall hearing false Christians express their dangerous belief that one shouldn't "frighten" children by telling them about hell -- but Our Lady didn't hesitate to show hell to the three children including little Jacinta… It precisely because children are not taught about hell that the devil is able to lead them there in droves.  These are the pagan children of an apostate world, "passing on what they have received".  All lies.  The world (and usually even their own families) make it difficult for children to find truth, and will mock or attempt to erase even the external symbols of the true Catholic religion… young people living today who have reached the age of reason, like all other persons who has ever lived, are obligated to seek God and His truth and -- if they have good will -- God will help them.   God does not require of men that which is not possible.  The dogma of No Salvation Outside the Church reminds us that every man was created by God to know Him and His truth, and any person can do so if he wishes to…

 

Lee Ann

 

“Franciscan Sisters”

 

Subject: “Franciscan Sisters”

 

Dear Brothers,

Thank you for pointing out how the "Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate Conception" false traditionalists are reaping what they've sown.  They are of extreme bad will and are obsessed with externals and with having a man in Rome they call "pope."  What do they expect of a man who thinks the Traditional Mass is a "fashion": "When I search more thoroughly - the Pope said - I find that it [the Traditional Mass] is rather a kind of fashion. And if it is a fashion, therefore it is a matter that does not need that much attention. It is just necessary to show some patience and kindness to people who are addicted to a certain fashion."  This is ironic given that Francis' favorite painting is Marc Chagall's, White Crucifixion which contains the blasphemous words: "May his name and his memory be blotted out."  It is a huge tragedy to see people following the spiritual chaos Francis leaves in his wake.  "The Francis Effect" is simply the influence hell that is granted when people consent to Francis' apostasy and sin.  This was graphically illustrated when the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem broke out in a fire within two days of Francis' having visited there recently.  He also showed he denies Christ when he hid the Pectoral Cross when meeting with the two Chief Rabbis of Israel.  What an outrageous apostate!!!

God Bless,

Mr. & Mrs. White

 

Vietnamese

 

I go to traditional mass… and lately through you videos I find out some heresy at this church… My husband is novus ordo "mess" mass but we don't follow him.

 

I now understand "sede" position.  I will become sede.  I love your videos on "the truths".  I am still learning.  

 

My children are learning a lot...now they're understanding why we have to be sede…

 

I am vietnamese… May God and Mary keep and protect and bless you and keep you safe.

 

Thank you so very much, 

 

Tracy Hoang

 

MHFM: We’re very happy that you are looking at the material.  For a number of reasons, the church you attend is not an option for the sacraments.  It's important to realize the situation today (during the Great Apostasy).  It is one in which basically all the churches are either heretical Vatican II churches or 'traditionalist' churches where the priest is heretical in some way.  Thus, there aren't any churches that are fully Catholic, where one can join, regard the priest as Catholic and support the church.  There are very few options for receiving the Eucharist today, but there are some options for receiving the sacrament of confession (which is obviously crucial).  We can help a person with these issues once he or she is convinced on all the issues.  The guidelines on this matter are also explained on the website. 

 

Comment

 

Subject: The Remnant and Robert Siscoe Refuted on Sedevacantism [video]

 

I love your video… please make more videos. Thank you so much.

 

Vincent Luong

 

Scary

 

Subject: Antipope Francis on Non-Catholic “Saints” and “Martyrs” (video)

 

[expletive deleted]… you people are scary.

 

Alex S

 

MHFM: Obviously you find Catholic dogma (Christian truth) to be frightening.

 

Question

 

Subject: The Remnant and Robert Siscoe Refuted on Sedevacantism [video]

 

Unbelievable that we are living in such times now… Where can one get a Catholic Catechism before the Vatican II, John Paul II 'approvals' ?

 

Z

 

MHFM: You can order a catechism on our online store.  The material on the website, in the videos, etc. also covers the points of faith people need to know.

 

Broken

 

… the RCC has broken my heart. The heartless Archdiocese of Philadelphia has broken my heart by closing our church. It just turned 50, and it's the only church I've ever belonged to. They forced its failure because the land it sits on is the most valuable in South Philadelphia. They will sell it to developers. They closed a number of churches in suburban counties, and these were more successful ones--financially solvent and well-attended. They are forcing these churches to merge with others. I'm sure it's because they can get millions for the land. If my church had surplus cash and full pews, we'd still be merging. Unlike the God they purport to worship, RCC leadership does not reward good behavior.

 

Sandra Lavini

 

MHFM: Your concern needs to be having the Catholic faith and saving your soul, not whether a particular church building has been closed.  As the material on the website proves, the ‘Archdiocese’ of Philadelphia is not truly Catholic.  It’s part of the Vatican II sect, the end-times Counter Church.  The organization under Antipope Francis (and the ‘bishops’ in communion with him) is not the Catholic Church.  The New Mass is invalid and must be avoided.  That’s true regardless of what buildings they close or keep open.  It’s crucial that you consult the information, become convinced on all the issues, get out of the New Mass, and reject the Vatican II sect.

 

Spanish, French

 

Dear Brothers

 

I recently came across a french version of your website. It was by pure accident… It has a number of your videos translated, one of the most important ones being "The Third Secret of Fatima." This is great! I live in a French province of Belgium and there are a number of people that i'm trying to convert by having them watch your videos, but until now, all i've come across is English and Spanish.

 

Now that I have this information. I can help spread your message in my area. I hope that the person responsible for this French site keeps up the good work and continues adding to it. Please put this info out on your main site, for there are a lot of French speaking people out there in need of conversion.

 

Thanks

George

 

MHFM: Yes, there are materials available in other languages.  There is a Spanish version of our website and YouTube Channel:

 

www.vaticanocatolico.com - Spanish Website

Spanish YouTube

 

As you noted, important materials (including videos) are also available in French on this website:

 

http://la-foi.fr French

 

Here are versions of the website and materials in Portuguese, Romanian and Italian:

 

www.igrejacatolica.pt – Portuguese

www.bisericacatolica.org – Romanian

www.vaticanocattolico.com – Italian

 

These sites should be spread to those who speak those languages.

 

Homosexuality

 

I recently watched a video on youtube regarding your opinion on homosexuality. I agree that it isn't normal but to say it happens because of mortal sin is a little strange. Some cases yes but how do you explain that to a 7 year old child who goes to their Mother and says I think God made a mistake. I have really been trying to understand this but I have seen too many children that felt this way. Please explain.

 

Jackie Pattison

 

MHFM: In response we would point out that many children today are being raised in a totally godless and extremely wicked environment from their earliest days.  They can reach the age of reason at a young age.  Drinking in the wicked environment which surrounds them, they can choose to embrace evil and reject the natural law.  As a result, they can fall into such perversions (such as boys thinking they are girls and vice versa). 

 

This video proves that people can make choices about their life at a very young age.

 

“Gay” NFL Prospect Michael Sam Makes A Revealing Admission (video)

 

Refutation

 

Brothers,

 

In your refutation of GJC you stated something that really popped out at me when I re-read it:  "His paragraphs are a clear example how inept and (one must say) actually stupid evil people become as a consequence of hating the truth and hating those who promote it."

 

Yes, it's very sad, but you are quite correct…  People become stupid because of their (frankly, insane) attraction to evil… Yet, as you mentioned in another place, "the incredible dishonesty and profound blindness of heretics" makes them think themselves exceptionally wise, whilst they are, in fact, losing their ability of discernment, not to mention love of humility.  It's an infinite tragedy, of course, for it results in the loss of their soul; but even worse than that, they almost always take many souls down with them.  It's all so needless when they could so easily have the truth… "Their dishonesty results in absolute idiocy." And, tragically, damnation…

 

New Mass

 

Brothers…

 

My name is David… I am a student at law and I live in Québec. On the West Island of Montréal. I read your page, read your news features and watch your videos…

 

If I stop going to Mass, at my local «novus ordo» church; what am I going to do?...

  

I would appreciate your advice with regard to this matter.

 

Sincerely Yours,

David

 

MHFM: Before receiving sacraments, one must be convinced on all the issues.  That includes a commitment to never attend the New Mass again.  It’s invalid and non-Catholic.  It must be avoided under pain of grave sin.  You should realize that from the facts in the material.  There are very few options for receiving Communion today, but more options for confession.  We can help a person with specifics once he or she is convinced on the issues.

 

Body

 

Subject: The Remnant and Robert Siscoe Refuted on Sedevacantism [video]

 

Great video! Siscoe and fake 'traditionalists' don't believe in the living Mystical Body of Christ. For if its Body and Soul are severed, it is dead! These heretics might protest that they are only making a logical distinction, not an actual division. But that doesn't work. For if someone can belong to the Soul of the Church but not its Body, then Soul and Body are not merely distinct, they are split, divided, cleft asunder. The 'church' of the fake 'traditionalists' is a lifeless corpse, a cadaver, a putrid carcase oozing heresy, fit only for those who would prey on externals.

 

Timotheos

 

Fake Lucia

 

Subject: Fake Lucia

 

Dear MHFM,

 

   What I find fascinating about the fake Lucia's facial features is that the fake Lucia's squared jaw, it's so distinct, and when you see the classic picture of the three children of Fatima posing for that hard, serious stare into the camera way back when, these three blessed children have these distinct oval shaped heads and oval chin lines.  Clearly markers of their genetic/hereditary characters.  Fascinating how the blind sheeple can so easily be taken by the prince of darkness, Lucifer!  Ave Maria gratia plena...

 

 

Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (First 2014 Archive –beginning around January)

 

Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (Third 2013 Archive –beginning around September)

Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (Second 2013 Archive –beginning around May)

Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (First 2013 Archive –beginning around Jan.)

Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (Fall 2012 Archive)

Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (Summer 2012 Archive)

Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (Spring 2012 Archive)

Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (Fall 2011 Archive)

Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (Summer 2011 Archive)

Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (Spring 2011 Archive)

Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (Winter 2010-2011 Archive)

Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (Summer-Fall 2010 Archive)

Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (Winter 2010 Archive)

Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (A)

Next Archive for E-Exchanges is Here (B)

 

www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com