*This section of our website (which is
updated daily) contains some less formal – and short – e-mail exchanges that
we’ve had which we feel may be of value to our readers. We will include those portions of the exchanges
we deem relevant and valuable. We often
add bolding and underlining which are not necessarily that of the other
party. This section also frequently
includes, not only e-exchanges we have, but also our notes, updates and
comments. Section containing some important recent posts.*
MHFM: This is a new video.
The Latin Text of the Oldest Surviving Papal
Decree Rejects “Baptism of Desire” [video]
Subject: “Gay” history in CA schools
That's an interesting story of Kelly's about the homosexual indoctrination in
public schools. In 2011 California signed a law that "gay"
history be part of the school curriculum: California to Require "Gay"
History in Schools - http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/15/us/15gay.html?_r=0
They obviously avoid the historical fact that Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed
by fire by God for homosexuality. Then there is Francis who said, "A
gay person who is seeking God, who is of good will -- well, who
am I to judge him?" A homosexual is fundamentally of bad will.
Next they will be signing into law the history of pedophilia. What an
Luke 17:29 - "And in the day that Lot went out of Sodom, it rained fire
and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them all."
Mr. & Mrs. White
In commenting on your latest
e-exchange, I can attest to what she said. It is the same here at the
elementary schools. One of my 'jobs' was that I picked up two children
from school from last September through June; and while I did this I
was obliged to go inside the first school to the classroom to get the little
boy. His teacher was nice, but most of them often wore the "Superman
'S' shirt" because they claimed the name of their school began with the
letter 'S'. Really? Then how do they explain the 'Superman',
'Spiderman' and others plastered on the sides of the hallways? And what
Kelly said about the 'anti-bully' posters and signs everywhere: ditto.
The schools have "anti-bully rallies"…
My Last Day
Subject: My Last Day
I quit my job as a supply teacher (public school board) as I realized that I
would lose my soul if I didn't. I planned to finish the school year and
then quit; as I don't have anything else lined up. However, it was
evident that I should quit immediately. My job entailed going to
different schools on an on call basis. I was required to teach whatever
the regular teacher left. I never knew what I might be getting into and
dealt with sinful occurrences as they came.
many of my teaching years, I was attending SSPX (no longer attending as their
false 'doctrines' disgust me). I would often ask the SSPX priests for advice
on how to deal with various situations at work. I don't ever recall
anyone telling me that I should get out of this job. Your website has
been very helpful in aiding me to make this decision.
have been jobless now for a few months and don't regret quitting… Sin was
being committed and promoted on a daily basis. The kids constantly
blasphemed God, anti-bullying homophobia posters scattered the walls,
homosexual extracurricular clubs were formed, homophobia free classrooms were
common (tagged by signs on doors), elementary school books introducing young
children to same sex parents were being promoted, children as young as grade 2
or 3 were learning about street drugs (makes me wonder if this encourages them
to try drugs, as sex education promotes early sexual behaviour). Even
sitting in the staff room with the teachers was best to be avoided as this was
also an occasion of sin.
school subject seemed to be sinfully warped. In gym children changed into
revealing outfits and sometimes dance was incorporated. For library, the
children had vast pickings of occult books to choose from (witches, magic,
sorcerers, demons.....). For science there were ample teachings to create
atheist beliefs (the big bang, evolution, the earth millions of years old...).
For social sciences they sometimes learned of the various 'beautiful
religions' and customs of the world. For english they may be debating on
the topic of abortion… Children are not properly being educated, but
brainwashed and molded to accept the new incoming order. Many children are being pushed to take
various meds, they are being taught about the 'benefits' of immunizations,
genetically modified food, nanoparticles, becoming 'global citizens'. The beginning of the day is often started off
by the whole school chanting "I am a Canadian, a free Canadian, free to
....... free to worship God as I like......" (I forget the whole chant).
keep thinking of the quote in the bible...... "and whosoever shall
scandalize one of these little ones that believe in me; it were better for him
that a millstone were hanged around his neck, and he were cast into the
sea" and this scared me; as I was a part of this. Students
often look up to teachers as role models. As a Catholic you need to set a
good example. If you see heresy or sin, which will lead children astray,
you need to stand up and say something (even if this is occurring elsewhere in
the school and not in your classroom). If you are not willing to do this
you should not be teaching. On the other hand, if you do stand up, you're
likely to be heavily persecuted, and will most likely lose your job and/or be
put in prison. Also, to ignore such issues is to put human respect above
being a child of God. Teaching in mainstream schools is very dangerous to
last day of work was horrible. I was in a behaviour class and there was
a social worker present who took control for the day (she supposedly does this
when the regular teacher is away). A student made a negative remark about
homosexuals. The punishment from the social worker was to have him review
the lyrics of a specific song. This song was then played (song saying
that homosexuals can't help it and are being discriminated against… The song
even began to blaspheme 'the church'). I am very sad to say that I
handled this by silence. I left the room and flipped through a book.
I talked this over with my sister, when I got home, and it was quickly
decided that I should quit as soon as possible.
the schools have started to celebrate a day against bullying. The
teachers and students wear pink t-shirts and the kids spend the day, or week,
listening to lectures, and doing activities that promote a stance against
bullying. Some activities may focus on cyber-bullying, while others on
homophobia....... Sure, I could just not accept work on this day/week of
the year. However, the slogan was something like "everyday is a no
bully day". I remember going to work after this bully week
just to be surprised to see teachers parading around the school in pink t
shirts and finding out it was yet another day against bullying.
schools, students typically work on computers to gather information for
projects. After talking to a student, it was revealed that they were
warned about many 'bad' websites with lots of 'misinformation'.
Therefore, it was suggested they do their research on selected sites (which of
course promoted positive information on such things as GMO’S, and other 'topics
of interest' to brainwash the kids). I'm pretty sure that many sites,
containing truth, are blocked in schools. However, the kids are easily
able to access… inappropriate music videos..... but are usually told to stay
away from things which contain guns or blood.
Immodesty flourishes in schools. Some schools had dress codes,
however nobody seemed to enforce them. Kids… often participated in
activities which portrayed the United Nations as being wonderful, participated
in yoga, swimming, learned about the various 'wonderful' religions of the
world, and many schools participated in pizza fridays (with pepperoni of
course) and sometimes with no option for vegetarian. Funny enough, the
teachers loved to preach about respecting all religions. To top it off,
there was recently an article in a union magazine introducing the idea of
unisex bathroom stalls (in order to not 'discriminate' against children with
'gender identity issues')…
you Most Holy Family Monastery for your invaluable work. I now pray to make
better use of myself before it's too late
MHFM: That’s an interesting and revealing account of
the darkness of the school system. We’re
glad that you came across the information on the website. You made the correct decision to leave that
job. If someone were teaching a class
and a person in it blasphemed, that person should be corrected. The same would apply to the situation in
which the social worker was promoting homosexuality. As you realize, some of the things you
mentioned would need to be confessed once a person is convinced on all the
Subject: Prayer, the Great Means of
Thank you for posting: Prayer, the Great
Means of Grace.
glad I listened to this great sermon. Everything in it is true and inspiring,
and very sobering. Sobering, because he who does not pray is certain to be
St. Alphonsus: "We can do all
things with God's help, which is granted to everyone who humbly seeks it; so
that we have no excuse when we allow ourselves to be overcome by a temptation. We
are conquered solely by our own fault, because we would not pray. By prayer
all the snares and power of the devil are easily overcome. 'By prayer all
hurtful things are chased away,' says St. Augustine."
St. Alphonsus: “He who prays is certain to be saved; while he who prays not
is certain to be damned. All the saints were saved, and came to be saints
by praying; all the accursed souls in hell were lost through neglect of prayer;
if they had prayed, it is certain that they would not have been lost. And
this will be one of the greatest occasions of their anguish in hell, the
thought that they might have saved themselves so easily; that they had only to
beg God to help them, but that now the time is past when this could avail
In Jesus through Mary,
MHFM: We hope to post a new video in the next few
In reading about Buffett's donation to
the Gates Foundation (and his expressed intention to give away more of his
wealth), it occurred to me that many Protestants would see this as a
commendable, or at least positive, action on the part of
Buffett. They would conclude that Buffett is at least being
"charitable", and might even expect that God would reward him for it…
These false views are yet another proof that Protestantism is false
faith, false hope, and false charity. The false hope which
deceives protestants, as MHFM has pointed out, is its embrace of the
"faith alone" heresy. Christ told men they must believe all
things that He taught to be saved, and it is this
specific collection of doctrines (expressed as dogmas)
which constitutes "the faith once delivered to the
saints". Rejecting Christ's truth and preferring
the doctrines of men, Protestants blatantly deny Christ's words; they
deny the one and only Church Christ founded; they deny the Papacy
which Christ established as the only means for preserving
and transmitting His truths until the end of time. Thus, Protestants
are hypocrites who deny the Bible while claiming their religion
is Bible-based! Protestants deny the Mass, the only
true form of acceptable worship to God -- and they do all they can do
destroy it. They also reject the rest of the system of
Sacraments instituted by Christ through which the Precious Blood of
Jesus is applied to mankind.
Protestants know that they
are not in the Catholic Church but are in "churches"
founded by men. Similarly, every adherent of the Counterfeit
Catholic Church knows, or can readily determine, that his
V2 "church" is different from the traditional
Catholic Church. This is an inescapable fact, because the
Vatican 2 sect never ceases to broadcast the fact that it is
"new and improved". It often refers to itself as "the
Vatican 2 Church", and goes out of its way to point out that the
Catholic doctrines (taught by the true popes) are now out of date, as
Antipope Rat did when he declared that Protestantism is no longer
heresy. Protestants (including V2 heretics) remind me
of scavengers, picking over what they are pleased to imagine is
outdated Catholicism, choosing what they think they can "reform"
or "update". But there is nothing new
about heresy; it's the same Satanic lie, as old as the hills.
No wonder God calls such persons who pretend to be Christians workers
of iniquity, and decries their satanic efforts to divide His
indivisible Church into sects of perdition. The
"Jesus" which the Protestants and other heretics love to sing
and talk about is not the historical Jesus of Sacred scripture and not the
Savior of the World. We can certainly see how, as MHFM has long
maintained, the Great Apostasy began when people calling
themselves "Catholic" while rejecting the true Catholic faith,
decided that Protestantism was acceptable in the eyes of God and
that non-Catholics no longer needed to convert to
the Catholic faith for salvation. The denial of
the Salvation dogma was truly the beginning of the end.
seems God is punishing this culture so that it might wake up to the reality
that its socialist government is evil and that it does not help them. He is
trying to make them realize that only bitter fruits can come from idolizing the
state… The middle class is being wiped out. God is letting this debauched
culture face the music. It is sinking deeply into poverty for it supports the
sodomites and child murder. God is allowing the culture to go down the
toilet/drain economically and financially speaking: to thus correspond with its
Subject: Arch-heretics promote "gender
the heretics in Vancouver are supporting and endorsing gender confusion among
children. The boys will soon be using the girls’ restrooms in this area:
That is truly an outrage.
In response to AJ's post, I too agree with you. I live in Sarasota and they
closed the streets downtown here one day to honor a gay mayor in California who
was born here. It's absurd what's happening and I think you are right. The
whole state will cave in to this abominable law. I pray for conversion. Jesus have mercy, pray for us Most Holy
Mother of God
Subject: Protestants can’t go to Purgatory
It's interesting to note that in the book, Charity for Suffering Souls
(Nageleisen), the heresy that Protestants can go to Purgatory is promoted:
Charity for Suffering Souls (1895), p. 265-266: "A Scotchman, whose
brother was stricken with a sudden death, was greatly affected by the sad
loss. Though he was a Protestant, he knew that into Heaven
"there shall not enter anything defiled." (Apoc. 21:27). As the
religious denomination to which he belonged did not recognize a middle state, he
was greatly concerned about his brother's condition in the next world, so
much so, that he abandoned himself entirely to melancholy. God... led
this loving brother to the true faith... On All Soul's Day the good man visited
the priest [Abbe Paume] and said to him, "I am resolved to ask admission
into the Church from love of my brother. I shall find great relief in
being able to pray for him, and your Faith not only permits, but directs me
to do so, teaching that thereby I shall greatly benefit him... Perhaps my
brother is sentenced to it [Purgatory], and to release him I wish to become a
Catholic..." And he was received into the
This is outrageous heresy, yet it was probably considered normal "Catholic
teaching" in the years leading up to Vatican II. It is impossible
for a Protestant to go to Purgatory because they are outside the Catholic
Church where there is absolutely no salvation. It is reminiscent of the
false visionary, Maria Simma, who claimed to see Jews, Protestants,
"Orthodox" and suicides in Purgatory. It shows how much effort
the Devil puts into the idea that one can be saved outside the Catholic
Church. Another example is the Near Death Experience of those who claim
to go to Heaven for a little while and then come back to life, while they are
Protestants. It also demonstrates how the heretics who obstinately hold
to "baptism of desire" and/or the "saved at death" heresy
are doing the Devil's work. They are part of the shadow that has eclipsed
the true Church and which is blocking the light of the true faith from shining
in all its brilliance.
Mr. & Mrs. White
I found your web site about 4 years
ago. I had recently lost my husband and was looking for answers why GOD took
him. I was looking on YouTube and your channel came up. I started
watching and the more I watched the answers were clear. The Catholic Church is
not the same as the one my parents and grandparents went too. I did stop going
to church I didn't like the changes but when my husband became ill I returned
to church. I had a mass for him and he was cremated. When I watched and read
everything on your web site I know my feelings about what was happening were
MHFM: We’re glad that you found the
material. However, it’s not accurate to
say that the Catholic Church is not the same as it was before. The truth is that the Vatican II sect is not
the Catholic Church, and the true Catholic Church (which is separate from the
Vatican II sect) still exists in a remnant of traditional Catholics. Also, cremation is forbidden under pain of
grave sin. It’s crucial that you
increase your interest level, look at the material on the site, pray the
Rosary, and become convinced on all the issues.
viewing your news links and reading your post, Kind David's Census and His Sin,
my thoughts began to dwell on Our Lady of Fatima's messages and warnings as
well as the three children's recorded words and actions resulting from their
visits by the Blessed Mother and the extraordinary graces they received.
You often quote, understandably, the scene where little Jacinta is
sitting, pensive; Lucia asks her what she is thinking of and she replies:
"The war that is coming. So many people will die, and almost all of
them will go to hell."
you for the valuable updates and spiritual helps.
received most of my answers to my questions by further exploring your website.
I now understand that we… must adhere to Vatican I teachings and practices, and
remove ourselves in all ways from Vatican II and the anti-church today…
God Bless You and Keep You from now to Eternity
The Third Secret of Fatima (3rd edition) (video)
While rewatching this
video I had a sudden thought. I have read in interviews and seen in videos many
Exorcists, including Fr. Amorth, tell journalists that in recent
years there's been a massive increase in Demonic Activity, both oppression and
possession, all over the world, but especially in "catholic"
countries. Could this be a consequence of the changes brought forth by antipope
Paul VI in the Consecration and Baptism rite (esp. the removal of the Solemn
MHFM: It’s a
consequence of the emergence of the Vatican II sect, the replacement of the
true sacrifice of the Mass with the invalid Novus Ordo, and the eclipse of the
true Catholic Church. Since grace was
removed from large portions of the world with the advent of the Vatican II sect
and the changes it ushered in, evil rushed into the vacuum. It’s not just a coincidence that the culture
dramatically changed in the 1960s and 1970s, shortly after Vatican II. However, people make themselves vulnerable to
evil influences when they sin gravely, and more and more people were doing that
after Vatican II.
Amorth is an apostate,
by the way. He accepts false ecumenism
and the heresies of Vatican II. He also
believes that Antipope John Paul II (an idolater) was “a saint”.
MHFM: This is a new post.
King David's Census and His Sin [post]
Our culture is sinking more and more into deeper levels of depravity as more
and more people are accepting the abominable sin of sodomy… A Florida Supreme
Court judge in the Florida Keys has ruled that the state's ban on gay marriage
is unconstitutional. Gay "Marriage" is now legal in the Keys at
this time. I believe it is a matter of time before the entire state
legalizes this abomination and joins the other states which have already done
so. Homosexuals are everywhere. On occasion I have seen them holding
hands in public. Some of them even dress like the opposite sex and do
whatever they can to their bodies to look like the opposite sex and it is quite
obvious. They are very abundant here in Orlando. I see them
practically every day coming to the emergency room in the hospital where I
work. It is such a danger to the welfare of children who are exposed to
views of these possessed people. Even people who are not homosexual are
becoming more tolerant of this wicked lifestyle. Reprobates abound in our
society and how few there are who are pleasing to God. Our world truly
deserves a chastisement. Nuclear war? God knows and may He help
those who are faithful to Him and His holy Catholic Church and devoted to the
Blessed Virgin Mary.
have watched many of your videos, I am 47…
was baptized Catholic I attended Church as a child with my neighbors not my
parents, the Catholics in my family were not good examples so I turned, I ended
up being rebellious… I became a drug addict I had two children, I destroyed a
total of 4 children in my life, I finally ended up divorcing, my exs family are
JWs and Baptists I never really quite grasped their beliefs… so for a good 6 years i was a single mother
still not right in my eyes or God’s, I started a long distance relationship
that ended up me being used for his gambling habits so I ended that… after two
years i met my boyfriend we ended up moving together immediately, we lived
together 10 years and just married this February, well this last 3 years we had
started attending Mass on a regular basis, I was confused entering the Church
because things seemed different than what I had remembered as a child <such
as Communion in the Hand, Standing upon consecration of the host, the
tabernacle off to the side, women giving communion, the Creed is the Nicene
creed and not the Apostles Creed, I'm so desiring to be dedicated now, and have
suspected that John Paul 11 was anti due to the other religions that i would
see on TV attending the Vatican...We are Portuguese and Fatima is very sacred
to my husband’s family and now mine...My question is are we still to attend
Mass at the Church knowing that so much is different are we going to be
punished for attending these apostate gathering now?? Can you please advise...
MHFM: Stephanie, we're glad that you
are looking at the material. No, one
must not go to the New Mass. It's invalid and non-Catholic. It must
be avoided under pain of grave sin, as the material explains. You should pray the Rosary each day, all 15
decades if possible. It's also recommended to pray the Hail Mary
frequently. You will get powerful graces if you do that.
There’s a question about your first
‘marriage.’ If you were married to
another baptized Catholic in a ‘Catholic form,’ then that marriage was
valid. In that case, you would not have
been free to marry again and your current 'marriage' would be invalid. One would have to know the details of your
first ‘marriage’ (e.g., was the man a baptized Catholic? where were you
married? etc.) to assess its validity.
Also, you say: ‘the Catholics in my
family were not good examples so I turned, I ended up being rebellious.’ Although bad parents and bad family members
contribute to people departing from the practice of the faith, the person who
rebels bears ultimate responsibility for his or her actions and decisions. Sinful choices cannot be blamed on
You detail things from your past
life. When you are convinced on all the
issues and you are ready to make a confession, obviously those things need to
be confessed in a general confession.
God is giving you graces to be interested in your salvation and the true
faith. It’s crucial that you act upon
I'm still quite new to my conversion
from VII Catholic to being a True Traditional Catholic… I have ordered and
listened to and read much of your material… I talk to everyone I know about it
and what the true faith is, and referring them to your website. As soon
as everything comes in, I plan on distributing the material to family, friends,
and the community that I live in. So, I would like to say Thank You for
putting the Truth out there. I do still have questions about a lot of
things. Everyone has their own personal situations in life, and it is
impossible to cover every situation in life. I have learned so much from
what you have provided that it has led me to question how I am now to think and
feel about everyone in my life. It has literally changed my relationships
with everyone I know. If you can help me out with some of the things that
are weighing heavily on me right now.
1. How am I supposed to feel or
think of people I have known and loved in my life that have died, and now know
because of my belief are in hell?
2. How am I to know for sure if
people I loved and cared about made it to Purgatory or Heaven?
3. How do you continue to not
break the Commandment of Honoring your Mother and Father when they are clearly
heretics and are condemning you for your Faith in the one and only True Church?
If you can help me out on these for
now, it would be greatly appreciated.
MHFM: We’re glad to hear about your
interest. To your questions: 1. They made their choices. They wanted to reject God’s law and/or His
truth. 2. With people who did not have the true
Catholic faith, they cannot be thought to be in Purgatory or Heaven. However, if someone did die as a true
Catholic dedicated to the practice of the faith, and without the manifestation
of any grave sin, then there can be an excellent hope. 3.
Admonishing heretical parents, and avoiding or rejecting them insofar as
God’s law and the teaching of the Church dictates, is not contrary to the
commandment to honor one’s father and one’s mother. Rather, telling them the truth, and informing
them of what they need to do for salvation, is how one fulfills that
Can a Christian Lose
Salvation? – 1 Corinthians [video]
This is one of best
refutations of Protestantism…
Antipope Francis’ Bombshell Interview (video)
Protestants are better than this "pope".
MHFM: Since Protestantism involves a rejection of
Catholic teaching, one obviously cannot be good or saved as a Protestant. Yet, it’s true that Protestants are typically
not as bad as Antipope Francis.
Subject: Why Hell Must Be
Thanks for explaining
that point. I have often said, "if I make it to purgatory, then I made
it". I am not sure if that is the right way to think, but I know purgatory
is a safe place that ends.
MHFM: We’re glad you
viewed the video. Those who reach
Purgatory will of course be saved.
However, if someone were to adopt the attitude that, “I’m just going to
make it to Purgatory,” it would be a dangerous one.
St. Alphonsus (1760): “Every
Christian who, because he desires only to do what is necessary for salvation,
commits habitually deliberate venial sins, is, as we have seen, in danger of
St. Alphonsus means that with
people who sin that way, God will pull His grace and they will be more
vulnerable to falling into mortal sin.
if you can, give me a cogent/pithy defense for the argument made by my mother
that "the young men today don't know that they are being hood-winked and
brought into an invalid rite of ordination, and are innocent. But the anti
popes and bishops will be the ones to pay. We were hood winked and are not
I said to her, now that I know the truth I must not support the vat II
sect. Still I did not address her argument. So what about the men
who try to become catholic priests? I told her they could have found
the true faith if they were of good will etc...That we are to work out our
faith in fear and trembling. That they must not have been of good will not to
see the contradictions in the vat II sect. That the church teaches about
"the elect" and that not all will go to heaven. She stared blankly
for that time as if not recalling her catechism. She is 93…. At one point
she said, "they don't make it easy to go to mass, so what are we supposed
to do?!!" I answered that question, but the one about the men today
who choose to become catholic priests and are instead led into the devils-den,
I had no good answer. I must have true explanations for questions like that or
else I will lose my chance to help her. So what can I tell her
about the men who go into the seminary intending to become true priests but
come out heretics? I will see her next week and want to give her a
logical and indisputable answer in order to help her convert. Thank you.
MHFM: The response is that any young man who enters
a Novus Ordo seminary will necessarily be confronted with the false ecumenism
and religious indifferentism of the Vatican II sect, among many other evils. He cannot avoid the false ecumenism/religious
indifferentism or be unaware of it. Yet,
even a cursory look into the history of Catholic teaching will inform him that
the Vatican II sect’s views about non-Catholic religions and the eternal
destiny of non-Catholics are contrary to traditional Catholic dogma. Therefore, there’s no excuse for the Novus
Ordo seminarians to embrace, join and support a group, organization or body
which holds those views: e.g., promotes false ecumenism, accepts Protestantism
as essentially good and salvific, doesn’t condemn non-Christian religions,
etc. Hence, their toleration of
salvation outside the Church, the endorsement of Protestantism, etc. at the
seminary will be the primary reason for their condemnation, in addition to the dishonesty
and the lack of charity they display in their daily lives. That serves as another reason they are left
in such a situation.
Moreover, adult Catholics cannot be
know-nothings. They have to possess a
basic knowledge of Catholic teaching, pray, and be interested to learn
more. If they have even a basic
familiarity with historic Catholic teaching on the issue of salvation, they
will discover that the Vatican II sect teaches blatant heresy. At that point they should be troubled and
want to learn more about what has happened.
Then, if they are sincere and of good will, they will search more
actively for information that explains the crisis. God will then give them the grace to find the
information that gives them the full picture.
But the reason they remain in Novus Ordo seminaries is that they are not
of good will. That’s precisely why
they’re there. They’re not of the
truth. They are more interested in
status and community than the faith of Christ, saving souls and doing God’s
Also, your implication that you must satisfy every
complaint your mom makes for her to accept the truth is not correct. She should be convinced by the facts and
information you should share with her.
If she’s not convinced, then she’s simply of bad will.
King David’s Census and His Sin
appreciate your article, King David's Census and His Sin, in
which you made some very important Catholic points. Your
article, including the Biblical verses, was a delight for those who savor
Biblical truths that also highlight Catholic dogma; such as those so stunningly
and grippingly portrayed in this scene of events… David had to choose
either to impose three years of famine on his entire 'kingdom'; or three
months of persecution at the 'mercy' of his mortal enemies; or three days of
persecution from the Lord to be administered by His Angel… I find myself
agreeing wholeheartedly with David's decision: “I am in great distress.
Let me fall into the hand of the LORD, for his mercy is very great, but do
not let me fall into the hand of man.”
the mercy of God is indeed great, while we still have time to call upon
it. But "because iniquity hath abounded, the charity of many [hath grown]
cold" (Matt. 24:12), falling "into the hand of man" is not a
article goes up to verse 17: showing David's sin and his repentance;
and also how he chose the mercy and will of God, not the will of man; and
finally how he interceded for his people, as a prefigurement or 'type' of
Christ. This is more clearly affirmed by the following verses 18-30 where
we see David building an altar to God over the threshing-floor of Ornan, and
God's approval of that particular site, instead of Gabaon, by His sending
fire upon the altar. The commentary for verse 26 reads: "Fire, to
testify his approbation....This altar represented the cross, on which the
Victim of our reconciliation was offered."
Subject: New Mass “Communion”
… Should Bergoglio confess that the new
mass was a Luciferian celebration welcoming the New World Order, I dare say the
bulk of the "faithful" wouldn't skip a beat ! Keep up the great work
I come from Poland. I was baptized in the novus-ordo sect. I was a member of
SSPX but now, since a year, I am a sedevacantist…
I have some questions concerning the Brown Scapular:
Firstly, knowing that the Brown Scapular must be Blessed by a validly Ordained
Priest before it can be worn, but now that we are in time of necessity that it
is hard to get a validly Ordained priest to Bless it for us, can we still wear
the Brown Scapular?...
THANK YOU AND GOD BLESS YOU. AMEN.
Yours in Christ and The Blessed Virgin Mary,
Remnant Vanafara Pio (NIGERIA).
MHFM: Yes, you can just wear it. You don’t have to worry about having it
have been reading the disturbing information on your website… I have been
attending Latin Tridentine Mass… in San Antonio, Texas which also celebrates the
have not received Holy (?) Communion anywhere, and am putting off receiving the
sacraments until I know for sure that I will not be offending God.
you for your time and attention on this matter…
MHFM: We're glad to hear about your
interest. One must not go to the New Mass or the 'Indult Mass' (i.e.,
where they have the New Mass and the traditional Mass in the same
church). It's important to realize the situation today
(during the Great Apostasy). It is one in which basically all the churches are either
heretical Vatican II churches or 'traditionalist' churches where the priest is
heretical in some way. Thus, there aren't any churches that are fully Catholic,
where one can join, regard the priest as Catholic and support the church. There are very few options for receiving the
Eucharist today, but there are some options for receiving the sacrament of
confession (which is obviously crucial).
We can help a person with these issues once he or she is convinced on
all the issues. Thus, you should stay
home on Sunday and pray the Rosary until you are fully convinced and it’s clear
what options for receiving sacraments there might be for you.
Bergoglio… promoted his hatred of Christ by telling the Protestant leader of a
worldwide federation that he is not interested in converting them to
Catholicism. Jorge Bergoglio is a far darker individual than many people can
imagine. Since 1994 to 2012 he has been holding official ‘memorial’ ceremonies
with the Independent Order of the B’nai Brith inside the most prominent Novus
Ordo ‘churches’ within his pseudo-archdiocese. Representatives of many
Protestant denominations, rabbis, and leaders of other false religions also
attended these annual ceremonies and took a prominent role leading this
abomination and each of them lit a candle on the menorah. The Argentine
president of the Independent Order of B’nai Brith (with the B’nai Brith head responsible
for interreligious dialogue) always put out a press release mentioning how they
were working with the pseudo-cardinal Jorge to organize and hold the
“commemorative liturgy” concerning Jews of WWII. The
official inter-religious worship book of the memorial service
always had the symbol of the B’nai Brith and the coat of arms of Jorge
Bergoglio prominently displayed on the left side corner. Jorge is a wolf in
sheep’s clothing and it is no surprise that Jewish representatives of the Grand
Lodge from Argentina were officially present during the inauguration ceremony
of Mr. Jorge Bergoglio as antipope including the Director of B’nai
Brith-Committee for UN Affairs… and prominent Eastern Schismatic leaders (who
were probably communists) on the 19th of March last year. Also the
Cathedral of Buenos Aires which Jorge pretended to lead has been occupied by
Marxian-Socialist political groups. In fact during his pseudo-conclave there
assembled 200 activists of the communist group Movimiento Popular La Dignidad (MPLD).
The ridiculous thing is the communist groups (including Madres de Plazo de
Mayo) when they protest in the Cathedral it always concerns government cuts in
funding for projects that affect the communist groups but the Novus Ordo
‘cathedral’ was not associated with those cuts in any way. Jorge Bergoglio is
the leader of a social club. It is the kind of club in which truth is
irrelevant. Sentimentality and false ecumenism and the acceptance of sins are
the highest ideal. He has never once condemned these communist protests.
MHFM: This is a new post.
Can a Christian call someone a "fool"? [post]
I have been reading your book and watching many videos and feel pretty
confident that the Catholic Church is the only Christian church. I am considering baptism but have questions.
book says aborted fetuses go hell. Will you please tell me how God can justify
taking a soul that never breathed a breath and giving it Hell for eternity?...
Thank you for your consideration and work.
MHFM: We’re glad that you are going
through the material. It's crucial that
you become convinced and take the steps to become a traditional Catholic.
The Steps to convert to the traditional Catholic faith and
for those leaving the New Mass – Baptism and Conditional Baptism – the Council
of Trent’s Profession of Faith for Converts
To your question: unbaptized infants
don't go to the fires of Hell, but to a part of Hell where there is no
Second, it's our job to accept God's
revelation, and understand how it makes sense later on. As St. Anselm put
“For I do not seek
to understand that I may believe, but I
believe in order to understand. For
this also I believe, that unless I believed, I should not understand.” (St. Anselm, Doctor of the Church, Prosologion, Chap. 1.)
However, one explanation could be that
God knew that if they lived, they would have died in mortal sin and gone to the
fires of Hell. Thus, it was quite
merciful for Him to allow them to die before they reached the age of
reason. Yet, they are still not saved
without Baptism. St. Augustine made a
similar point about people who die without having heard the Gospel.
Augustine (428): “… God foreknew that if they
had lived and the gospel had been preached to them, they would have heard it
However, all those who die in mortal
sin go to the fires of Hell. Only those
who die in original sin only go to the part of Hell where there is no
If you aren’t yet praying the Rosary,
it’s crucial that you begin to do so.
Also, praying the Hail Mary frequently will give you the graces to
become fully convinced and follow through with conversion.
I am 63 years old and was aged around
12 when Vatican II took place, and I remember wondering why my relatives and
neighbors who were catholic stopped going to church after Vatican II, so I
asked my mother and father and they never gave me an answer. They beat
around the bush and never told me anything…
I am in need of prayer… Mostly, that I always have a
“ready answer” when I am witnessing on the streets, including at Planned
Parenthood’s Killing Place which they call a Health Center. They kill unborn babies on Fridays and
Saturdays mostly. I was there during the slaughter… from 12-3. Satan unleashed
his “fiery darts” even more than usual. There have been some, Brothers, who
actually seem to be possessed - glassy eyes, drool, and wicked blasphemies.
“Out of the heart the mouth speaks. Pray that I always don the “whole armour of
God” to ward off the sneak attacks and sucker punches.
a wonderful blessing that the Lord put you in my path. That’s because while I
was foundering, I continued to search with all my heart and mind and spirit…
If you show up there, it’s good to bring the 7-in-1 DVD to distribute to other
people. Recommending the website is also
Francis' comments that he's "not interested in converting Evangelicals to
Catholicism" is diabolical. He then says, "I want people to find
Jesus in their own community," as if one can find Jesus Christ outside the
Catholic Church, which is impossible. Evangelical Protestants reject Christ's
truths in Catholic dogma, they reject Christ's merits in Catholic sacraments,
and they reject Christ's authority in the Office of the Papacy…
Mr. & Mrs. White
I have noticed deafening silence in the
false traditionalist movement, since the last few acts of apostasy and heresy
of Antipope Francis… also the SSPX doesn’t believe in papal infallibility.
In Our Lady of Fatima.
From Mark V
Another Major Heresy from Francis
MHFM: In a recent meeting with a Protestant named
Brian Stiller (The Global
Ambassador of the World Evangelical Alliance), Antipope Francis stated this:
not interested in converting Evangelicals to Catholicism. I want people to find Jesus in their own
community. There are so many doctrines we will never agree on. Let’s not spend our time on those. Rather, let’s be about showing the love of
(Link to News Report)
has taught this heresy numerous times before, as proven in the videos
below. But this is another very bold
expression of his complete rejection of Catholic teaching.
Francis Really Believes (3rd edition) – video
Why Francis Must Not Be
Considered The Pope – video
Francis’ latest heresy is more good news for true
Catholics. It further exposes the Counter
Church and reveals the true position. It
also shames the obstinate defenders of the Vatican II sect.
… After much reflection, I have
come to agree with your belief that Pope Pius XII was the last valid pope of
the Catholic Church…
What is your opinion on the Haydock
Bible? Are the notes reliable?
Thank you and God Bless!
MHFM: It contains some good notes and some valuable
information. However, it’s not as if the
commentary is always definitive, infallible or correct.
Your video, The Key to John 3:16, is simply
wonderful! I confess I hadn't paid close enough attention to it until
your recent posts, refuting Protestantism, on Ephesians 2:8 and I
Corinthians. Already believing all things taught by holy Mother Church,
and prayerfully striving to obey, I have not given as much thought to defending
what I believe and obey as I ought. Your little bytes of
true Biblical teachings are very great in value. Catholicism
= pisteuon and Protestantism = apeithon.
Thank you for the information you put
out in exposing the false Vatican II Church. Thanks to antipope Francis, the
sham is becoming more and more obvious every day…
Subject: The End Draws Near
cannot deny or turn their head away from what is taking place now. We
have seen signs in the Heavens. We have civil unrest like never before,
therefore implying the distress of nations. The best thing we can do is
preserve our souls in the state of grace and try to win as many souls as
possible to the Traditional Catholic Faith. May God find us all worthy
through the intercession of the Blessed Virgin.
Subject: article on fools
A few days ago, I was going through old
papers and came across copies of some correspondence I had with an SSPX
priest. When I was still going to the SSPX, I emailed him about
the dogma of No Salvation Outside the Church, and gave some papal quotes.
He responded by email to assure me that I was mistaken,
and he quoted the usual saints who were not popes (and who, in fact,
never held or taught what the false traditionalists contend they did). I
wrote back and explained why these men were not sources of infallible dogma --
that only a pope was -- and that, in fact, saints (including the ones he
mentioned) have often made mistakes about doctrinal matters.
Then, the SSPX priest got angry and nasty. He said that although he
had tried to set me straight (a great act of magnanimity on his
part), one "can lead a horse to water but can't make him
drink" . So I was the horse, while he was the
ass. And he essentially said I was not to write to him anymore unless
I came to see things his way. Once upon a time, I would have
deferred to people such as this man who I thought knew the Catholic
faith, because I recognized that I did not. But since learning
the faith thanks to MHFM, I now see these people for what
they are: obstinate heretics and hardcore defenders
of a Counterfeit Church. And while I would have
once mistaken their characteristic self-assuredness as
confident knowledge, I now recognize it as pride, pomposity
and feigned holiness. Heretics always love to
appear humble, righteous and virtuous -- proving
that even a heretic's demeanor and comportment
is fake and deceptive!
When persons such as these cannot
refute the substance of MHFM's arguments they,
too, often get angry and nasty. And sometimes, as your article
pointed out, these phonies will try to preserve the thin veneer of their
imagined magnanimity by criticizing MHFM for informing a bad-willed,
truth-despising fool that he is a fool. To point this
reality out to a person who reveals to you his bad-will
is not just being truthful -- it is being charitable and we are
obliged to do this. Unlike the members of the true Church who
are the Church Militant, heretics would rather flatter and deceive people
(beginning with themselves). Heretics are liars who call evil good,
and good evil. Their goal is to be "nice" and
accepted by men, all the while marching themselves and others to hell.
Any person who prefers man's truth over
God's truth is indeed a fool. Every person that seeks his own and others'
damnation is indeed a fool…
Subject: Can a Christian call someone a fool
You hit the nail right on the head with this article. It is a clear reminder
that mortal sin is foolish and faithless towards the sacrifice of our
Lord Jesus Christ on the Cross.
Heretics and other enemies of God who
complain when justly condemned adhere to the 'you-can't-judge-heresy.' They
also usually adhere to the 'baptism of desire’… 'invincible ignorance',
'salvation outside the Church,' and 'saved by your conscience' heresy. It
reminds me of when you went to the C2C radio show and called a moronic heretic
a moron after he commenced his unjust accusations against you and was accusing
you of being moronic. A number of persons whom you would expect to be
appreciative of the fantastic soul-saving/winning information you put out there
in the videos and articles etc: were for some reason 'bothered' by your factual
statement against the heretic. These persons just have a problem with the
condemnation of sins and sinners. Their reprobate world view requires that sin
and evil should never be condemned and that mortal sinners be not
condemned/admonished. They have been corrupted by the liberal spirit of the world.
They are truly worshippers of man/humanity and this is anti-Christ. The SSPX
features on the slide show of their website a picture of the reprobate John
Paul II and they call him a "saint" and Fellay had pretended he would
resist the pseudo-canonizations. They are just a bunch of schismatic morons
that change their positions as they see fit. Pope Pius IX calls schismatics
'sons of darkness, wicked, and deplorable;' Pope Pius IX, Graves
ac diuturnae (#'s 1-4), March 23, 1875: "… the new heretics
who call themselves 'Old Catholics'... these schismatics and
heretics... their wicked sect... these sons of darkness... their wicked
faction… this deplorable sect… This sect overthrows the foundations of the
Catholic religion, shamelessly rejects the dogmatic definitions of the
Ecumenical Vatican Council, and devotes itself to the ruin of souls in so many
Pope Pius IX in his Encyclical
'Beneficia Dei' June 4, 1871 (#4) says: "We are horrified and tormented by
the murder of the Archbishop of Paris which has filled the whole world with
fear and horror." He labeled the murderers as "beastly, God-forsaken
scum" since they committed "quite unheard-of excesses." Yes
he labeled notorious sacrilegious murderers as God-forsaken beastly
scum. This crushes the man worshipers who pretend to be followers of the
Church. Your article was tremendous and moreover the heretic would deny the
entire lives of the Saints and the Church Fathers since they pull no punches in
condemning mortal sinners and heretics and infidel. Yes these are just
judgments. It would be an unjust judgment to refrain from condemning when
the situation calls for it.
Saint Alphonsus De
Liguroi (Doctor of the Church) "Preparation for Death": "But He
[God] cannot refrain from hating sinners. Psalms 5:7 'Thou hatest all the
workers of iniquity' Yes; God cannot but hate sin, which is diametrically
opposed to his will; and in hating sin he must necessarily hate the sinner who
is united to his sin. Wisdom 14:9 'But to God the wicked and his wickedness are
latest article on διὰ τῆς πίστεως “through the
faith” and not “through faith” is great and undeniable, I totally agree
when you say that… the concept of being saved “through faith” fits more easily
into their reformed theology in which personally accepting Jesus as the Savior
is the extent of faith’s obligations and on the other hand, the concept of
being saved “through the faith” implies that “the faith” is
something broader involving incorporation into something with more
facets, components and requirements.
Protestants, including “Catholic” liberation theologians seem so naive and
hardheaded they wish to be their own masters thus making it difficult for them
to possess “the faith”. Even the apostle John says in 1 Jn 5:4:
"For whoever is born of God conquers the world; and this is the
victory that has conquered the world – our faith…
MHFM: This is a new article.
Does Ephesians 2:8 say “saved through faith” or
“saved through THE FAITH”? [article]
Francis & the ‘Televangelist’
Your news post about Francis' meeting with the demonic
'evangelicals' is yet another proof that he is one with those who reject
Catholic dogma. The picture of him 'lunching with' and 'high-fiving'
the Texas televangelist-heretic is evidence that Francis enjoys conversations
The behavior of the Vatican II Antipopes is in stark
contrast to the behavior of the true and Catholic Popes of Church
History. It is amazing to see how many defenders the antipopes have,
no matter how ridiculous, heretical or apostate their actions. What
is still further amazing is that you receive e-mails, from persons who have
watched one or more of your videos detailing the undeniable abominations of the
Antipopes of the Great Apostasy; falsely criticizing you for making the
video, falsely accusing you of being anti-Catholic and falsely
asserting that you are outside the Church!... The universal bad-will is
almost entire, but there are also many who do appreciate your work of defending
the Catholic faith and exposing the false post-Vatican II counter
church. The remnant of faithful is small, scattered
and suffering, but united by the holy bond of charity - which is
stronger than death; holding the one faith of the one Lord Jesus
Christ, in His one, holy, Catholic, Apostolic Church, the only ark of
salvation. May almighty God grant His remnant final perseverance, through
the Immaculate Heart of Mary.
Your work refuting Protestantism is extremely critical and vital, especially
for our times, since the Vatican II apostasy is essentially Protestantism on
steroids (spiritually speaking). It is sad to see so many true Catholics
who don't recognize the high value our Lord places on peoples' efforts to
evangelize. In fact, many Protestants have more zeal for their false
religion than do some true Catholics for the true faith. It is a
disgrace. It's why people lose the faith, because they don't care about
the salvation of souls, instead being content to go the way of false
traditionalists, wearing a veil of 'traditionalism' while being unwilling to
sacrifice anything in order to alert others to the dogmas of the Catholic
faith. There are also tremendous graces that God gives to those who
evangelize. It appeases God's wrath. Your research is thorough and
focuses on the most important points. It should inspire others to do
their own research, such as for Protestants to research the Catholic
faith. The fact that so many Protestants are so wilfully ignorant
demonstrates how effective the Devil has been in blinding people to the
glorious truths of the Catholic faith. The tremendous value of your work
stands on its own merit, and should not be judged by how bad-willed heretics
react to it.
Mr. & Mrs. White
Most Holy Family Monastery,
I read with interest Lee Ann's letter on Russia, because it has been something
I have been thinking about lately, too. As evil as Russia still is in
many ways, the ex-communist country appears to be the only one with any sanity
in the domestic and international spheres (e.g. rejecting homosexuality and the
US/EU takeover of Ukraine).
I often think about the efficacy of the prayers at the foot of the altar Pius
XI prescribed for Russia. And I wonder how God may in some way use
Russia, a non-Catholic country, to defend the Faith, or at least some
principles of divine or natural law.
have amassed a great volume of true teachings which do refute Protestant
heresies, and these are of special interest to defenders of the true Word
of God; however, these true teachings which prove Protestants are liars, such
as your latest study on Ephesians 2:8, will be hopelessly lost on almost all of
them. They do not want it. God does not hide His truth from those
who seek it with a single heart. It is impossible to read Sacred
Scripture and believe it entirely without also being enlightened to believe in
the holy Catholic Faith. Protestantism is a hollow darkness, an illusion
of the devil.
are very good-willed to make such efforts toward helping those heretics to see
their errors, and surely God will not forget to reward you; you have most
probably also made a number of converts in the process. It is clear that
you are making extraordinary efforts to reach even one: the woman
who made the erroneous effort to oppose you; for if they are not lukewarm, but
hot or cold, there is something to work with. The 'hot' or 'cold' are at
least willing to debate! I would not have you give up your work for
anything, but pray for your success in converting souls to the holy Catholic
Faith. It is just heart-piercing when one sees the great lengths you are
going to… being met with such culpable indifference. There will be no excuses
on Judgment Day.
We’ve pointed out that what summarizes the situation with Protestants in
general is that they simply don’t want
the truth. There is an incredible amount of bad will operating among
them. The dishonesty which characterizes
the acceptance of Protestantism is obviously a huge obstacle to a Protestant
accepting the Catholic faith. Those
among them who decide to follow truth will become Catholic. The fact that they are typically so hostile
to Our Lady’s role cuts them off even more from the graces to convert.
there are so many millions of false
Christians out there – and so many Protestant heresies, lies and errors to
refute and expose – that the sheer numbers of Protestants represent an
important opportunity for evangelization, even if the percentage of them
interested in hearing truly biblical and consistent argumentation is extremely
small. It’s also true that among the
Protestants, there is an incredible amount of willful ignorance. Through their own fault, they have simply
ignored or blinded themselves to many facts which disprove their false position
and beliefs. Bringing these facts to their attention in even more specific and
detailed ways – putting those facts directly
in their faces in interesting and powerful presentations – gives them a
chance to get off the path to Hell, even if few will take it.
with the eclipse of the true Catholic Church by the Vatican II sect in these
final days, more and more people (again through their own fault) are simply
defaulting to the position that Catholicism cannot be biblical Christianity,
let alone the one true Christian faith.
As a consequence, they embrace some form of Protestantism. For example, when they look at Antipope
Francis and all of his anti-Christ apostasy – or a typical Novus Ordo ‘church’
for that matter – they won’t even consider Catholicism. That’s why it’s not only crucial to expose
the Vatican II sect and show how it’s the fulfillment of prophecy, but expose
Protestantism in its various forms as well.
have also littered the world and the internet with a mountain of anti-Catholic
propaganda. It’s all over the
place. Protestant heretics of all types
are constantly on the attack against the Catholic faith. Well, we plan to go even more on the attack
against Protestantism. There is some
very interesting new and powerful information to cover, as time permits. It will further demonstrate that Protestantism
is a lie of the Devil, and that the Catholic Church and its teachings alone are
truly biblical and Christian. Such
issues also deal with the core truths
about God, Our Lord Jesus Christ, His Revelation, the Bible, the Gospel and the
Church. Therefore, the truth on such
matters holds great value for true
believers in understanding the proper way to believe and live according to the
Christian faith, in addition to exposing heresies, heretics and their
the way, some time ago we contacted the anti-Catholic Calvinist James White and
challenged him to a debate. We provided
a number of possible topics. We did not
receive a response. Having read a number
of his books, there are some very interesting things to expose and refute, when
time permits. Such points will further
demonstrate that Protestantism is one of Satan’s biggest lies ever.)
Excellent presentation on refutation of "faith alone heretics."…
Faith alone advocates are really telling the world to sin and sin profoundly,
as Luther taught, and no matter, you are saved by the blood of Jesus
only! Hideous, wishful thinking. Lucifer and his cohorts,
"faith alone advocates," in the fiery pit of hell will never
celebrate but be tortured and suffer for eternity for such contrary beliefs
from Catholic teaching as handed down through the centuries… Thank you MHFM...
you for the new Ephesians article. I liked it very much and printed it out. The
in-depth research methodology you engaged in reminds me of how you just
thrash the BOD heretics and they always get so ticked off the more you
refute the BOD heresy…
by 'faith alone' is a vicious attack against the holy Bible and, as MHFM has
exemplified, plentiful Bible quotes crush this great lie. Someone either
adheres to truth or hates truth. In short, followers of 'faith alone'
claim to love Jesus, but act deaf to His teachings, hereby proving their love
to be purely superficial.
consider Jesus' statement, "But yet the Son of man, when he cometh, shall
he find, think you, faith on earth?" (Luke 18:8). From the
protestant mindset, this quote indicates the apocalypse is not of the present
day, as this world has millions of people who verbally profess a 'love' of
Christ. Also interesting is when Jesus said, "Many will say to me in
that day: Lord, Lord, have not we prophesied in Thy name and cast out devils in
Thy name and done many miracles in Thy name? And then will I profess unto
them: I never knew you. Depart from me, you that work iniquity"
(Matthew 7:22-23)… Moreover, St. Paul (who Holy Scripture identifies as a true
believer and an apostle of Christ) affirmed he could be disqualified!
Faith alone is a seed of Satan that suffocates the meaning of life,
which is to know, love and serve God, hereby accomplishing His will and
entering the Kingdom of Heaven. According to protestantism, it seems
having 'faith' automatically accomplishes God's will and, in this respect, life
becomes a mere pre-party for Heaven. This mangles the Bible and prepares one
for Hell. The Gospel clearly teaches that a justified person can commit
grave sins, lose justification and be barred from the Kingdom of Heaven.
was disheartening to hear the protestant Elizabeth state, " .... I detest
Roman Catholicism ...." In other words, Elizabeth hates the saints,
hates the teachings of Christ, hates Catholic miracles, hates St. Peter, hates
every Catholic evangelizer, hates confessors and, above all, hates truth.
Logically speaking, Elizabeth would not despise something she thinks Jesus
loves and likewise, it seems she believes Jesus hates Catholicism. This
is diabolical and makes me wonder if she has a problem accepting that most
souls are damned and that this damnation is their own fault. If Elizabeth
doesn't convert, she, among millions, will proudly gallivant the broad road to
is no other path to Heaven other than the Catholic Church.
amen, I say to you: He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold
but climbeth up another way, the same is a thief and a robber" (St. John
Thank you for teaching me The Powerful
Hail Mary Prayer. My life has changed since I started praying the Hail Mary
slowly. Nobody could understand how powerful that Hail Mary Prayer is.
… Apparently a ruling was recently
passed which allows companies to deny abortion coverage to employees…
However, what's particularly nauseating, were statements made by Hilary Clinton
and Nancy Pelosi attacking this measure. Pelosi, as usual, is especially
outrageous. She is such a satanic individual. May God bless.
… The nations of the world by now
(and by design) are sinking fast into the abyss… The only kingdom that has
any semblance of decency in many ways, thanks to Our Blessed Mother, is Russia.
It is truly astonishing to consider how Russia now is a far
cry from its days of Soviet control -- while the
so-called free and democratic West has been turned into one
impoverished slave camp established to serve the ruling elite. All of this is proof indeed that MHFM's
analysis of the "conversion" of Russia is correct, and that what we
are seeing today is a result of the Consecration which Our Lady said would be
performed by a Pope, and was indeed performed by Pope Pius
XII. As you have shown, Our Lady did not mean that
Russia would convert to the Catholic faith, but would convert
from its antichrist and murderous system of Communism… What an important
demonstration -- right before our eyes -- that Our Lady is mightier
than the Powers of Hell.
Just as the false
traditionalists deny the obvious when it comes to Antipope Francis --
even though he shoves it right in their faces -- they continue
to ignore the truth about Fatima. And what's most
important is that by promoting the false message of Fatima, these tools of
Satan are actually promoting the end-times Counterfeit Church and keeping
people attached to it… In this way, the false traditionalist (like every
false Christian) is Satan's most useful of "useful
Subject: Antipope John Paul II was a satanic
Antipope John Paul II incredibly said
that Auschwitz is the "Golgotha of the modern world".
'I kneel on this Golgotha of the modern world"
That means that he compares the so called Holocaust to the crucifixion of
Furthermore Antipope Benedict explains… how the Vatican II declaration on other
religions was really just meant for the Jews and then had to include the other
The whole Vatican II church is a sect of satanic Judaizers.
John XXIII, Vatican II
you contend that (St.) Pope John XXIII was validly elected Pope? If so, his
Vatican II Council would then be legit and its teachings would then be
protected by a legit pope's infallibility, as granted by Christ, in matters of
faith and morals. Is that not correct?
Kathleen Finney Becnel
No, John XXIII was not validly elected pope.
He was a heretic. A heretic is
not eligible to become pope. We strongly
encourage you to consult the files on our site which cover these issues. In addition to his ineligibility, there is
evidence that John XXIII wasn’t even legitimately chosen.
Church’s official teachings are infallible and protected. That’s a major reason we know that John XXIII
and the other post-Vatican II claimants were not true popes, but
antipopes. To discover that belief in
Catholic dogma is incompatible with following John XXIII and the Vatican II
‘Church,’ all you need to do is consult the information below about the
heresies in Vatican II. The false
doctrines taught by Vatican II, which blatantly contradict defined Catholic
teaching, could not have emanated from the Catholic Church or been
authoritatively promulgated by true popes.
Vatican II’s Protestant Heresy [video]
Vatican II’s Jewish Heresy [video]
Vatican II’s Intercommunion Heresy [video]
Was Vatican II Infallible? [video]
These files explain the Vatican II
apostasy, and the role of the Freemasonic apostate John XXIII.
The Third Secret of Fatima (3rd edition) (video)
The Heresies of Antipope Francis, Benedict XVI, John Paul II, John Paul
I, Paul VI, and John XXIII – Antipopes of the Vatican II Counter Church
Can a Christian Lose
Salvation? – 1 Corinthians [video]
Yeah that pretty much
destroys Sola Fide.
The Remnant and Robert
Siscoe Refuted on Sedevacantism (video/article)
Thank you for taking the painstaking
time and effort to refute and disprove the article by Mr. Siscoe. When I
read his article a few months ago I went for it all hook, line and sinker.
Thank you for thoroughly and kindly explaining all the discrepancies in the
article he posted, you are doing the proper thing and we all appreciate your
efforts. Thanks again…
… it is by grace through faith in Jesus that we are
saved, not of works lest any man should boast, but I also believe God when HE
tells me through the Apostle Paul that after HE saves me by HIS grace through
faith in HIS SON, that HE creates in me a clean new heart to do the works HE
HAS PREPARED for me. Go read Ephesians 1 & 2 inclusive, paying close
attention to Eph 2: 8-10…
MHFM: This is an e-mail we received yesterday from
a Protestant (before we posted our most recent article on Ephesians 2:8). Her e-mail is a prime example of how the
Protestant misunderstanding of Ephesians 2:8 is central to their false
salvation theology. It shows why the
points covered about Ephesians 2:8 in our recent materials are so important. The woman is anti-Catholic and she had
written to us previously. In a previous
e-mail she stated, among other things: “… I
detest Roman Catholicism…”
Obviously she’s not familiar with our recent
materials on Ephesians 2:8 (such as the two items below), which address and
completely refute her heretical misconceptions.
Ephesians 1 and 2 are also discussed in the recent Justification Debate (video).
Ephesians 2:8 say “saved through faith” or “saved through the faith“? (article)
a Christian Lose Salvation? – 1 Corinthians (video)
responded to Elizabeth (as we did the previous time) by directing her to the
truth. We informed her of the necessity
to abandon her heretical views and embrace the traditional Catholic faith if
she doesn’t want to be lost. We also
gave her links to the materials which are most relevant to the issue addressed
in her e-mail.
Thank you for posting the article and comments about how most people cannot
stand to be alone. It is a situation where they can't see the forest (of grace
in solitude) for the trees (of sin with others). Most people cannot stand
to be with God, and they flock especially to the internet to escape from God:
Solitude: Behold where God is found, 5:49: "This problem in our day is
compounded by the internet where people can remain essentially around or hang
out with others all the time. Many waste much of their day in chat rooms
or on forums or on blogs of little value. It is in these places that
sinful, heretical and evil people abound; people who haven't ever found God in
solitude, and corrupt others by their wickedness or their liberalism or their
heresies. These can often be subtle and this is why it's so
dangerous. They waste people's time. They confuse them. They
distract from their peace, and they keep them from finding God or doing
something more productive. And it's no surprise that these forums and
chat rooms and Youtube commenting and Facebook commenting are so corrupting
because evil people flock there; people who need to be constantly around
others and pacified by others and in companionship with others because they
shun God in solitude. That is not to say that everyone who has ever
commented is evil, but the super-majority of those who flock to these places
are evil." It is shocking how bad-willed so many people are in such
places… It reminds one of the video, Why Drug Addicts and Alcoholics So
Frequently Relapse, where you state: "They are bound by demons as a
result of their sin." (0:29) These
internet sects are tools of the Devil. They don't have the faith, and so
they are blind to God's will, instead giving full vent to their own bad-will,
self-will and self-absorption. From the rule of St. Benedict: "The
second degree of humility is, when a man loveth not his own will, nor is
pleased to fulfill his own desires but by his deeds carrieth out that word of
the Lord which saith: "I came not to do My own will but the will of Him
that sent Me" (Jn 6:38). It is likewise said: "Self-will hath its punishment, but necessity
winneth the crown.""
Mr. & Mrs. White
This provides even more examples of Novus Ordo “churches” giving “special
observance” status to Ramadan:
“Catholic” churches all across America give “special
observance” status to “Islamic month” of Ramadan
Condemned out of their own mouths
media is full of news articles blasting the supreme court's having waived (albeit
temporarily), for certain employers, the government mandate on employers
to provide their employees with insurance coverage,
including coverage for abortion, abortifacients, etc. There are
literally hundreds of news stories about it, with 99.5% of the stories
vehemently disagreeing with the ruling.
are also many media reports of children being left in hot vehicles, often
resulting in the child's death. The media and the 'justice' system
reportedly condemn the negligent, and in one reported case homicidal,
parent who 'forgot' their child left locked up in the suffocating heat to
painfully die of hyperthermia. I'm not faulting the media or the
'justice' system for reporting or for investigating and judging; however, they
are heretics against their own satanic creed, for they demand infant death by
abortion on the one hand and condemn infant death by hyperthermia on the
other. In the one reported case where it appears the father planned for
his 22-month old son to die by hyperthermia, they are talking of giving him the
death penalty! It seems a little hypocritical of them since they report
that he simply wanted a child-free life; isn't that why they promote
abortion? They're satanic hypocrites and they are antichrist heretics!
They are doubly condemned out of their own mouths. But all that is
left for one who has departed from the Divine and Holy Catholic Faith is
endless contradictions: it is unavoidable for them. "Every man
is become foolish by his knowledge..." (Jer. 51:17).
archeological evidence supporting Jeremias 50:40 contradicts them also:
"As the Lord overthrew Sodom and Gomorrha, and their neighbor cities,
saith the Lord: no man shall dwell there, neither shall the son of man inhabit
it." The charred remains of the cities of the plain are
uninhabitable. Jericho has been rebuilt; Jerusalem has been
rebuilt. How many ancient cities have been rebuilt? But not the
cities of the plain. The Lord said "no more" and therefore no
man can ever dwell there again. Yet the same heretics quoted above will
not admit this evidence.
New Vatican Document
Subject: New Vatican Document says avoid
"extreme" reaction to same sex "marriages"
the whole, the extreme reactions to these unions, whether compromising or
uncompromising, do not seem to have facilitated the development of an effective
pastoral program which is consistent with the Magisterium and compassionate
towards the persons concerned."
comment is necessary. But I will point out the obvious that this is
exactly what the world did not need to hear.
MHFM: This is
interesting: “Many people would rather
inflict pain on themselves than spend 15 minutes in a room with nothing to do
but think, according to a US study out Thursday.”
Time alone? Many would rather hurt themselves
That makes perfect sense. It fits precisely with what is covered in
this video: Solitude: Behold
Where God is Found.
People who live pagan lives or reject God or don’t
know God or fail to do His will cannot stand to be by themselves. As St. Alphonsus stated:
The quote of the day for Wednesday, July 3rd is really poignant when
considering some of the findings today's archeologists are making. NOVA just
aired a program about the ancient human bodies preserved by the peat bogs of Ireland
and other parts of northern Europe. Using CT scanner machines archeologists are
discovering knife and ax marks on the bodies. Pulling together data from
various sources they are concluding that at least some of these people were
deposed kings (pagans) who had reigned during times of very low agricultural
In order to appease the false gods (devils) these societies worshipped, the
people would murder the king and offer his body to the false gods by throwing
it in the bog. So if the land you controlled as a king was not fruitful you
could be killed by your own people.
Obviously, this is an example of a law which stands in stark contrast to God's
Ten Commandments. St. Francis Xavier was trying to convert people to the
Catholic faith and steer them away from the moral depravity of their societies.
He successfully managed to show them how ugly their former ways were.
is very apparent and sad that the apostasy continues to worsen everywhere.
More individuals are engulfed in major spiritual darkness. It can't be
long before the FINAL trumpet blows. The Catholic Faith is the only light
that can dispel this supernatural darkness and it is so unbelievably sad and
frustrating that souls in our families, work places, and spiritual places are
oozing with bad will and will not the hold the immortal Catholic Faith of all
keep the material and the videos coming and God bless you all for the work that
you continue to do.
Be with us All.
… I have finally come to bear a full,
firm and inalterable conviction of the Catholic faith and have been striving to
pray the Rosary with full devotion on a daily basis as recommended ever since. …
I want to help people but Satan is terribly hindering my attempts for I am yet
somewhat detached from God. I am yet under a state of indecision but God's gift
is this: my realisation so as for me to act upon it. Oh how strong is the
perception of Christ's generosity unto men when contemplating upon such
bestowals: discernment and free will. Most scoff at this, they are truly lost,
for, as Christ told us, they have preferred darkness over the light come into
the world, how sad.
… All this aside, it still strikes me
how, now almost two years ago, I came to learn about your website: as
a comment on a video about Latin diction by a user who ceased existing shortly
afterwards… I am convinced (in light of past experiences recounted in my first
email) the Holy Spirit has been wanting me to come to light. Sincere
gratitude for all you've done hereto brothers: may Christ assist you
Gesù Cristo è Re.
I have been watching some of your
videos on line. I am very interested in what you are saying.
But you bring very important questions
to my mind. Vatican II opened and closed before I was born (I was born in
'67). So if the Vatican II Catholic Church is counterfeit, then aren't
all of the Vatican II-style masses I've gone to over the course of my life and
all of the sacraments I've received, being at the hands of priests established
in the counterfeit tradition and submitting themselves to it, also counterfeit?
How then am I supposed to receive true
and valid communion and holy penance? Is that topic treated at some
length in your materials somewhere?
Hopefully you can help with those
Yours in Christ,
MHFM: We’re glad that you are looking at the
material. Yes, all the Novus Ordo
‘Masses’ are invalid. All absolutions
given by ‘priests’ ordained in the New Rite are invalid as well. (Baptisms and marriages do not require a
valid priest, but adherence to the basic matter, form, etc.) There are few
options for receiving the Eucharist today, but numerous options for making a
confession (which is obviously crucial).
It’s important for you to review the material and
come to agreement on all the issues.
When a person is convinced on all the issues, we can help him or her
with options for confession, etc. We
also recommend that people pray the Rosary each day (all 15 decades if
The Steps to convert to the
traditional Catholic faith and for those leaving the New Mass – Baptism and
Conditional Baptism – the Council of Trent’s Profession of Faith for Converts
It’s so hard sometimes to go through a day without grieving or feeling horrible
at the thought of the death of a loved one. This is even harder when there is
strong reason to believe that the decedent is now Hell. I’m sure that
Satan uses the death of a family member or friend to ensnare souls into falling
further into sin, whether it be by depression, drunkenness, self-pity, rage,
spite, malice, etc.. But my main concern
is not about “learning to cope” or coddling oneself, -as if I must somehow get
over the death. I am only concerned and very pained by the fact that I most
definitely believe that some of the dead that I knew are in Hell.
don’t at all wish to intervene with their just punishments, I am only grieved
by the fact that they lead a bad life and are suffering in Hell. Is it offensive to God to still pray for
mercy for the soul of someone who almost certainly is in Hell?
I want to be sure whether it is okay to pray for the dead if they died a sinful
death and most likely are in Hell… Thank you for all of the hard work, time and
effort that MHFM has done throughout the years.
MHFM: To your
question: it's forbidden to pray for people who die outside the Catholic faith
or in a clear state of mortal sin.
St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, Suppl.
Q. 71, A. 5: “Gregory
says (Moral xxxiv. 19): There is the same reason for not praying then (namely
after the judgment day) for men condemned to everlasting fire, as there is now
for not praying for the devil and has angels who are sentenced to eternal
punishment, and for this reason the
saints do not pray for dead unbelieving and wicked men, because, forsooth, knowing them to be
already condemned to eternal punishment, they shrink from pleading for them by
the merit of their prayers before they are summoned to the presence of the
New Video Posted
This is a new video. This video also
covers some very important information about water baptism.
Can a Christian Lose Salvation? – 1 Corinthians [video]
I'm glad that I have the
opportunity to say thank you… about being a true catholic. It has turned my
I'm from Colombia.
Did the Catholic Church ever before
Vatican II teach there was salvation outside the church. I heard they changed
that too. Thanks…
MHFM: No. The Catholic Church did not and could not contradict
its defined dogma on that matter.
However, before Vatican II many priests were denying the dogma. They taught their errors and heresies in
fallible books, such as theology manuals.
To fully understand the post-Vatican II apostasy and what led up to it,
people need to be aware of that fact. We
cover it in our salvation book. The
fallible books published in the period shortly before Vatican II, which deal
with Outside the Church There is No Salvation, are generally heretical. They are not trustworthy on the issues of
salvation, the Church’s necessity, and Baptism.
We will post even more examples of that in the future.
The denial of the dogma by alleged
Catholic priests began around 1850. By
the beginning of the 20th century, it was very widespread. In the 1940s and 1950s, just before Vatican
II, almost all the priests who purported to be Catholic completely rejected the
Church’s salvation dogma as it has been defined. Their theology on salvation was simply
diabolical, and very similar to how Novus Ordo ‘priests’ today would ‘explain’
the dogma. The denial of the necessity
of the Catholic faith for salvation, and the loss of faith that accompanies
such a heresy, was the prime cause of Vatican II. It’s why so few opposed false ecumenism, etc.
Subject: Francis the Communist
Francis' comments about communism are diabolical. Communism is
intrinsically opposed to Jesus Christ and the Catholic Church. Communism
is not Christianity and it never will be. It is based on evolution and is
totally materialistic. Communists attempt to “simplify” those parts of
life that are irreducibly complex, such as the family, the State and the
Church. Compare antipope Francis' remarks that “communists have stolen
our flag. The flag of the poor is Christian,” to the true popes who referred to
the 'errors and perils,' the 'scourge,' and the 'snares and attacks' of
communism. The true popes condemned communism's 'violent and deceptive
tactics,' said that it's a 'fatal plague,' 'anti-religious,' and they exposed
its 'perverted, wicked and execrable theories.' Real popes said communism is a
'fallacy;' they referred to its 'pernicious fictions,' its 'inimical,
pseudo-scientific and poisonous doctrines,' and said that it's 'intrinsically
wrong,' a 'most fatal error,' an 'infamous doctrine' and a 'system full of
errors and sophisms.' The Successors of St. Peter said communism is 'in
opposition both to reason and to Divine Revelation,' that it 'subverts the
social order,' that 'it considers religion as "the opiate of the people.”'
Pope Pius XI said 'the monstrous emanations of the communistic system flow with
satanic logic.' (Divini Redemptoris #77) The numbers of “Christians”
killed in communist Russia alone are estimated to be between 12 and 20 million,
while the numbers of people who passed through the Russian Gulag slave labor
camps some estimate to be up to 50 million. This is not even taking into
account the destruction communism has wrought in other parts of the
world. It is not hard to see why the Bible calls communist Russia the Red
Dragon. Yet we hear constantly about the “6 million Jews exterminated” in
World War II, the “holocaust,” in camps that had entertainment such as swimming
pools, shops and musicians. This is no surprise since communism is
boasted to be a creation of the Zionists, founded by Theodor Hertzl, whose
gravestone Francis recently visited in Israel. Francis is totally
Satanic. How tragic for the bad-willed, deluded false traditionalists who
imagine that Russia has yet to be consecrated to the Immaculate Heart of Mary,
and who cling to Francis the heretic. He is like Judas Iscariot who said:
“Why was not this ointment sold for three hundred pence, and given to the
poor?” Our Lord replied: “Let her alone, that she may keep it against the
day of my burial. For the poor you have always with you; but me you have not
Mr. & Mrs. White
I have a Pieta book that says on page 68, Our Lord's revelations
to Mutter Vogel, "If you see a priest who celebrates the holy Mass
unworthily then say nothing about him, rather tell it to me alone! I stand
beside him on the altar!"…
All for Jesus Through Mary
MHFM: The alleged revelations to Mutter Vogel are
false and must be rejected. She was also
allegedly told: “One should NEVER attack a priest, even when he's in error, rather one should pray and do penance that I'll grant him My grace
again. He alone fully represents Me, even when he doesn't live after My example!" That’s exactly the false message the Devil
wanted people to hear and spread in the final days – when refuting, denouncing
and rejecting false or heretical priests would be more necessary than ever
Corinthians 11:13-14- “For such men are false apostles, deceitful workmen,
disguising themselves as apostles of Christ.
And no wonder, for even Satan disguises himself as an angel of
The false message of Mutter Vogel is sometimes cited
by people in the Vatican II sect as one of their reasons for remaining under
the apostate ‘priests’ who lead it. Every alleged
private revelation or apparition must be judged by the standard of Catholic
principles and the teaching of the Church.
Those coming up short must be rejected.
Subject: There is nothing noble about satanic
"...Francis said: "I
can only say that the communists have stolen our flag. The flag of the poor is
Christian. Poverty is at the center of the Gospel," he
said...."Communists say that all this is communism. Sure, twenty centuries
later. So when they speak, one can say to them: 'but then you are
Christian'," he said, laughing.
This man's statements are so
unbelievably stupid that it's hard to imagine how anybody could take him seriously. Communism is NOT about taking care of the poor. Communism is about
oppression, mega-control, persecutions, power. Communism created
poverty, but mainly created enormous persecutions
(especially persecutions of Christians), blatant abuse of power, terror,
fear, unjustice, etc. The poverty, which the Gospel teaches and the
Catholic Church recommends is based on a free choice of every
individual. In Communism people are forced by other people, who are in
power, to do what those people in power demand. There is nothing
noble about satanic Communism. Millions of
its victims could testify to that.
St. Simplicius on Catholic Doctrine
Subject: St. Simplicius on Catholic Doctrine
an interesting quote from an epistle of Pope St. Simplicius who reigned in the
fifth century. This citation, in my opinion, destroys the position that a lot
of modern heretics hold on approaching a dogmatic statement and on the evolution
Simplicius, "Cuperem quidem": "Those genuine and clear [truths]
which flow from the very pure fountains of the Scriptures cannot be disturbed
by any arguments of misty subtlety. For this same norm of apostolic
doctrine endures in the successors of him upon whom the Lord imposed the care
of the whole sheepfold (...) Let no approach to your ears be thrown open to the
pernicious plans of undermining, let no pledge of revising any of the old
definitions be granted..."
MHFM: It’s a good quote.
Francis the Communist
Francis' comments in the following link: http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/06/29/us-pope-communism-idUSKBN0F40L020140629
his interview on the feast of Ss. Peter and Paul, Francis said: "I
can only say that the communists have stolen our flag. The flag of the poor is
Christian. Poverty is at the center of the Gospel," he
said...."Communists say that all this is communism. Sure, twenty centuries
later. So when they speak, one can say to them: 'but then you are
Christian'," he said, laughing.
he said, basically, is that Communism was founded on the Gospel. What an
outrageous apostate! I'd like to see the false traditionalists finally
wake up with this one! They, for the most part, make a pretense at least
of devotion to the Blessed Mother. They at least profess that they
believe in her apparition at Fatima and in her message. They also say they
believe in her warning that "Russia" (meaning Communism) would spread
her errors throughout the world. But now their bogus, apostasy-spewing
'pope' is basically saying he's okay with Communism, that he's of one mind with
communists. He said communists carry the Christian flag of the poor, who
are at the center of the Gospel, and that "one can say to them
[communists]: 'but you are Christian'." Therefore, his 'Church' is a
Communist Church. That is definitely what he is saying. This has to
be the single most evil thing he has ever said. And almost no one in his
Sect will bat an eyelash.
Subject: Francis and Islam
This is one of the worst acts of
apostasy of the whore of Babylon (Vatican 2 sect). The level of abomination is
Subject: Francis' latest
Antipope Francis has stated that Communists
stole Christian ideals. He argues that you may call it Communism, twenty
centuries later, but helping the poor really makes you Christian. He is
even worse than a run-of-the-mill heretic. He is purely Satanic and
anyone who knows about this or a million other statements he has made has not
the right to call himself Christian, because Francis is simply unreal.
Tens of millions of East Europeans were
slaughtered by… Bolsheviks in the 20th century. But Communism is just
another Jewish ideology that Francis subscribes to (the other being Judaism).
Every 15 minutes is a new nightmare for
false-traditionalists who so desperately wish he would just shut up, put on the
robes, keep quiet, and play the part. It used to be every day brought a
new nightmare, now it is every 15 minutes.
Sincerely, Michael Rudnicki
This is another Novus Ordo church that includes Ramadan as a “special
“Catholic Church” in Naples, FL lists “Ramadan
(Islamic observance) for “special observance” on “parish bulletin”
After seeing your post about the
beginning of Ramadan being announced in the so-called
"Catholic" church bulletin, I checked to see if I could find
another "church" which made this announcement. Found one…
in Naples, Florida. Just when you think you've seen
everything. These disgusting people go out of their way to
blaspheme God and to treat our Creator and Redeemer with as much contempt as
they possibly can. We can bet that such Ramadan
notices have probably appeared in many branches of the Vatican 2
sect in this country and throughout the world. But because truth
means nothing to the heretical and apostate adherents of the
Vatican 2 sect, they will just shrug it off -- as they have
shrugged off every other abomination. This world will understand
soon enough what the Trumpets being heard all over the world are announcing --
and it's certainly not the beginning of Ramadan.
Subject: Bill Donohue - "Catholic League"
Bill Donohue is the President of the so-called "Catholic League",
whose stated purpose is to defend Catholicism from secular attacks.
In reality, Donohue is an ineffectual fool who cannot see the connection
between the false V-2 sect (of which he belongs) and their complicity (by
action and inaction) in the very attacks on the Catholic faith and natural law.
I found this outrageous comment from Donohue from March 2014 (the context was
the St. Patrick's Day Parade in New York and how "gays" protest their
exclusion from marching in it).
"Let me make it clear: most gay people are good people....That
there's an element of gay fascism, there's no question about it. It's
visited against the Catholic Church with alacrity."
Donohue was not talking about the small minority of so-called chaste
"homosexuals" who personally struggle against unnatural and evil
urges. He was referring to "out and proud"
"homosexuals" - the type who show up at "gay pride"
"parades" - almost all of whom engage in such abominable acts and
100% of whom approve of such acts.
It's clear that Donohue has fully embraced the V-2 apostasy, while deluding
himself that he is some sort of traditionalist. What an amazing fool.
MHFM: Yes, he’s a thoroughly wicked
The Glossary of
Terms and Principles [PDF]
The e-mailer ftc should also read the Glossary
of Terms and Principles which you included in your response to Edward from
Nigeria. This… should be read by (or taught to) people of all ages.
This collection of vital information is like the heart of the Catholic faith --
and its removal produces the corpse that is any form of
false Christianity, including the Vatican 2 sect.
This Glossary is the
conceptual "infrastructure" of the Catholic Faith -- there is no
Catholic faith without it. Thus, it is the precise information
the devil does not want people to know and to accept. That's why in
the Counterfeit V2 Church, you will never
find this information being taught in any schools, colleges or
universities. You will never
hear these points mentioned in their so-called "RCIA" programs,
"Bible studies" or "faith formation" and
other catechetical frauds. It will never be taught from the pulpit,
or by any of its fake bishops or cardinals or it parasite
anti-popes. It can never be
found in any of the books they allow in circulation -- not even in those books
that traditionalists might judge to be free of
heresy. Such books, while free of heresy, are also
devoid of that key which would cast the light of God
over their confused minds and allow them to recognize truth and understand it
correctly. If, in the V2 sect (as in other forms of
Protestantism), a person were to come across the word
"dogma", his question might be: What's a dogma
and is there a book that lists all the dogmas of the Church? I've asked
this question myself, and have heard others ask it as well. Of
course, now I understand why it is impossible to find the true answer to that question
in the Counterfeit Church, and why truth is not just hidden
there but blatantly perverted
and inverted. While
all false "Christian" sects
are Satan's, the Counterfeit Catholic Church is his
… For the typical V2 adherent, such
terms as "magisterium" or "dogma" are meaningless buzz
words -- just as their robes, rites and other externals are a meaningless
sham and affront to God…
My name is Angelo, I'm from Brazil…
First of all, thank you so much for all material that you've been putting out
to help our souls.
I found your website three or four
months ago (i watched "is the world about to end...") but I was
involved with so-called "Resistance" movement and in a middle of
doctrinal fog, so I didn't want to realise all that Catholic Church teaches.
It’s been three weeks since I'm reading/watching your material and I'm fully
convinced but, wow!…
Thanks to Our Lady, I've been praying
the Rosary everyday since I converted last year… May the Holy Trinity bless you
guys for such wonderful work!
news links show the extreme depravity of the world today: the result of
rejecting almighty God and His holy Church.
Biden's money is in his wife's name, as was reported by one journalist, so
I guess he thinks that makes it okay for him to claim poverty. He's such
a fraud -- like the Islamic Vatican II Sect…
The Islamic V2
This is incredible apostasy.
Church” in San Antonio, TX lists “Ramadan (Islamic observance) begins” for
“special observance” on “parish bulletin”
I appreciate you helping me see the
errors of Vatican II, and for spreading the truth of the Holy Catholic
to your video, Can a Christian Lose Salvation, I found it to be… tremendous… it
only requires people to be honest and of good faith and God will give them the
grace of understanding and the acceptance of all that the traditional Catholic
Church has taught.
reading about the Protestant Reformers one comes to realize that these men
actually don’t believe in the Son of God of the Bible or His only Church so
like cancer apostasy and heresy spreads giving rise to so many false churches
and doctrines of convenience which leads millions of the fallen away to the
fires of Hell… how sad.
Why Francis Must Not Be Considered The Pope (video)
Catholic is accepting the changes that the Pope makes . We had 268 popes Good
Mathew 16 17And Jesus said to him, "Blessed are you, Simon Barjona,
because flesh and blood did not reveal this to you, but My Father who is in
heaven. 18"I also say to you that you are Peter, and upon this rock I will
build My church; and the gates of Hades will not overpower it. 19"I will
give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; and whatever you bind on earth
shall have been bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall have
been loosed in heaven."… This means whatever the Pope Good or bad changes
is changed in our Lords eyes. GOD BLESS YOU ALL !!!!!
No, the idea that a pope can change a dogma is heresy. Your comment proves that you accept Antipope
Francis and the New Church (i.e., the Counter Church) at this time simply
because you don’t understand and believe in Catholic principles. The faith was delivered by Christ. Popes set it forth. Dogmas cannot be changed. You need to familiarize yourself with
Catholic teaching. It’s covered on our
since he’s not a Catholic, Francis is not a pope but an antipope. Yes, there can be good and bad popes; but
there cannot be a non-Catholic pope.
Francis is a non-Catholic.
Pope Pius IX, First Vatican Council, Session 4,
“For, the Holy Ghost was not promised to the
successors of Peter that by His revelation they might disclose new doctrine,
but that by His help they might guard sacredly the revelation transmitted
through the apostles and the deposit of faith, and might faithfully set it
Pius IX, First Vatican Council, Session 3, Chap. 4, Canon 3:
“If anyone says that it is possible that at some time, given the
advancement of knowledge, a sense may be assigned to the dogmas propounded
by the church which is different from that which the Church
has understood and understands: let him be anathema.”
Pius IX, First Vatican Council, Session 3, Chap. 4, on the true
progress of knowledge: “For, the doctrine
of faith which God revealed has not been handed down as a philosophic invention
to the human mind to be perfected, but has been entrusted as a divine deposit
to the Spouse of Christ, to be faithfully guarded...”
Subject: Can a Christian Lose Salvation? - 1
Corinthians - video
Thank you for the excellent video, Can a Christian Lose Salvation? - 1
Corinthians. It's interesting that the word, corinthian, can mean
"luxurious or licentious." Ancient Corinth was renowned for
extravagant lifestyles and temple prostitution. It is easy to see why St.
Paul so zealously counselled the Christians in Corinth. He could see that
they were surrounded by temptation, much like the world today. Yet
according to Protestants, there would have been no such temptation for the true
believers, since they could never lose their salvation. It is outrageous
Mr. & Mrs. White
I was further introduced to
the catholic faith by my teacher that is VATICAN I. I am Edward B. Rajah from
Nigeria, Adamawa, Yola. I am previously a PROTESTANT. But the truth is both my
parents are protestants but I rejected the church years back. Please as a new person to the faith what do I
need to know?
MHFM: We’re glad to hear about the
interest. The steps to convert are here. It’s
crucial to pray the Rosary each day and the Hail Mary frequently. Obviously it’s essential to understand and
believe in the basics about the Trinity, the Incarnation, etc. (Prayers and creeds are attached.) A basic catechism is available from our
online store. This file also covers some
important Catholic principles.
The Glossary of
Terms and Principles [PDF]
But following the steps to convert, and reviewing the materials
on the website, will provide you with the information you need to know.
The Remnant and Robert
Siscoe Refuted on Sedevacantism (video)
have viewed your powerfully convincing video… and have likewise reviewed
most of your Site's other resources: they are all exceptionally well
constructed and I routinely avail others to them as well in my own everyday
apologetic endeavors… Indeed, such information is crucial to all souls in
genuine search of eternal life…
Subject: New Video
you for the new video which crushes the eternal security heresy propagated by
so many these days. It's amazing that
someone can hold this view in the face of the many passages that call for
obedience to God's commandments, and the punishments that await anyone who
transgresses them. As you have pointed
out many times, even St. Paul knew that he could become a castaway--a
reprobate--if he did not obey God…!
Can a Christian Lose
Salvation? – 1 Corinthians [video]
Great video on Corinthians 1, also
especially when we watch this video after the videos 'Catholic vs. protestant
view of God' and 'The agony of Jesus in the garden'.
Thanks to God for the grace of this incalculable valuable information.
Brothers in Christ,
Thank you for the newest video about "once saved-always saved"
heresy. I would like to make a few comments about this heresy. The mindlessness
of the supporters of this pestilent heresy is astounding. From the logical
point of view this heresy destroys the very foundations of the Protestantism.
If "once saved-always saved" (OSAS) is true (which it isn't) then
what would be the reason to hate The Catholic Church, to hate Catholics and to
hate The Pope (the true pope, not the Devil's servants posing as
"popes")? For, these people also have been once saved, at least when
they were baptized. According to OSAS heresy, it doesn't matter how evil The
Pope was, what he did he or said, he was once saved. There is no doubt about
it. The same applies to each and every Catholic. The conclusion is--all the
popes and all other Catholics in the history are saved. Furthermore, what would be the reason to have
any church at all? Anybody may baptize anybody else, anybody can be once saved,
anybody can accept Jesus and believe in Him at least for a nanosecond when
he/she is saved. Why then institute any "religious community", why
then go to the "church" each Sunday, why sing "happy songs"
and "praise The Lord", if a person is already saved no matter what
he/she does or says? Why are the Protestants protesting, and against whom they
the people who are saved? Wasn't Satan, a.k.a. Lucifer, once saved? Didn't he
also once believe in Jesus, even for a nanosecond?
May The Most Blessed Mother of God bless all true Catholics in the world.
Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia
your newest video 'Can a Christian Lose Salvation?'
addition to your Refuting Protestantism series!
Can a Christian Lose
Salvation? – 1 Corinthians [video]
Great video! God bless you
Can a Christian Lose
Salvation? – 1 Corinthians [video]
undeniable refutation of the Protestant heresies of once saved, always saved and faith
Does the traditional Roman Catholic
Church allow cremation?...
No, the faithful are forbidden to be cremated under pain of grave sin.
I have read comments on your website
(and others) about the virtues of home schooling and totally agree with them,
mostly because the modern education system here in Ireland - and probably most
of the western world is mainly a training ground for the appreciation of filth.
I am in my fifties now and would never consider getting into debt for a
university education at my age, apart from the age factor - I don't think I
would learn much of any worth there…
I have derived knowledge and benefit from many of your videos and
writings. Please keep up the great work.
In talking with a Novus Ordo priest and a Novus Ordo nun, I have
discovered the need to provide proof that all documents released by the
Council of Trent (in particular its Canons and Decrees) are indeed still
entirely valid in the 21st Century.
What is the best way to prove that all Council of Trent documents are still
legally in force?
Thank you for your help.
Their argument (that the dogmatic decrees of Trent on faith and morals may not
be valid) is another sad example of the apostasy of the Vatican II sect and its
members. The Council of Trent’s canons
and decrees on faith and morals
fulfilled the requirements for ex
cathedra teaching. It’s a dogma that
such decrees are unalterable.
Pope Pius IX, Vatican Council I,
1870, Session 4, Chap. 4: “…the Roman Pontiff, when he speaks ex cathedra
[from the Chair of Peter], that is, when carrying out the duty of the pastor
and teacher of all Christians in accord with his supreme apostolic authority he
explains a doctrine of faith or morals to be held by the universal Church,
through the divine assistance promised him in blessed Peter, operates with
that infallibility with which the divine Redeemer wished that His Church be
instructed in defining doctrine on faith and morals; and so such definitions of
the Roman Pontiff from himself, but not from the consensus of the Church, are unalterable.”
Obviously the individuals with whom you are conversing
do not understand or believe in basic principles of dogmatic teaching and the
deposit of faith.
When a pope defines a dogma, he doesn’t make a dogma
true from that point forward. Rather, he
solemnly declares without erring that which
has always been true since the death of the last apostle. That’s why dogmatic proclamations on faith or
morals could never be reversed or cease to be valid. Dogmas are to be believed as the Church has “once
declared” them, without any recession from that meaning to a “deeper
IX, First Vatican Council, Sess. 3, Chap. 2 on Revelation, 1870, ex
cathedra: “Hence, also, that
understanding of its sacred dogmas must be perpetually retained, which Holy
Mother Church has once declared; and there must never be a recession
from that meaning under the specious name of a deeper understanding.”
IX, First Vatican Council, Session 3, Chap. 4, Canon 3: "If anyone
says that it is possible that at some time, given the advancement of knowledge, a sense may be assigned to the
dogmas propounded by the church which is different from that which the
Church has understood and understands: let him be anathema."
are many quotes from popes after Trent which confirm that its canons and
decrees on faith and morals remain valid and represent the unchanging
faith. Here’s just one from a recent
pope that deals with the issue of marriage.
Pius XI, Casti Connubii (#’s 4-5),
Dec. 31, 1930: “In so doing We follow the footsteps of Our predecessor, Leo
XIII, of happy memory, whose Encyclical Arcanum, published fifty years
ago, We hereby confirm and make Our own, and while We wish to expound more
fully certain points called for by the circumstances of our times, nevertheless
We declare that, far from being
obsolete, it retains its full force at the present day.
5. And to begin
with that same Encyclical [Arcanum],
which is wholly concerned in vindicating the divine institution of matrimony, its
sacramental dignity, and its perpetual stability, let it be repeated as an
immutable and inviolable fundamental doctrine that matrimony was not instituted
or restored by man but by God; not by man were the laws made to strengthen and
confirm and elevate it but by God, the Author of nature, and by Christ Our Lord
by Whom nature was redeemed, and hence
these laws cannot be subject to any human decrees or to any contrary pact
even of the spouses themselves. This is the doctrine of Holy Scripture; this
is the constant tradition of the Universal Church; this the solemn
definition of the sacred Council of Trent, which declares and
establishes from the words of Holy Writ itself that God is the Author of the
perpetual stability of the marriage bond, its unity and its firmness.”
the issue of contention is justification, these quotes are important.
Council of Trent, Decree on Justification,
Introduction: “… the holy, ecumenical and general Council of Trent… intends,
for the praise and glory of Almighty God, for the tranquility of the Church and
the salvation of souls, to expound to all the faithful of Christ the
true and salutary doctrine of justification, which the Son of justice, Jesus
Christ, the author and finisher of our faith taught, which the Apostles
transmitted and which the Catholic Church under the inspiration of the Holy
Ghost has always retained; strictly forbidding that anyone henceforth
presume to believe, preach or teach otherwise than is defined and declared in
the present decree.”
Notice, the Council of Trent declares that it is
setting forth what Jesus Christ Himself taught about Justification, and what
the Catholic Church always retained.
Obviously that’s unalterable.
Council of Trent, Decree on Justification, Chap.
16: “After this Catholic doctrine on justification, which whosoever does not
faithfully and firmly accept cannot be justified, it seemed good to the holy
council to add to these canons, that all may know not only what they must hold
and follow, but also what to avoid and shun.”
Antipope Francis’ Bombshell Interview (video)
… I agree, he is the ANTI-POPE and
he is a Heretic and an evil deceiver… Scary.
I am 61 yrs old… Thank you so much for all that you are doing to bring
us back to THE ONE TRUE CHURCH… I am a Flight Attendant based in Denver…
I have been struck… in formerly Catholic
Ireland how many followers of the Vatican II sect have told me that their main
defence of Pope Francis is his humility. They feel that his simple life as they
see it, his simple living in the ($20,000,000) Domus Sanctae Marthae guest
house outside the Vatican, his non-use of the papal limousine, his Christ like
washing of the feet of the laity, his taking of the name of one who was
humility itself, his selfless adoration of the Jews, his prostration almost
like a flagellated victim to receive a blessing from protestant clergy, seeking
oneness with all and all faiths, publicly embracing and kissing a disfigured
man, placing the most handicapped children in wheelchairs at the head of the
queue to see him, all trump any issues of Catholic dogma and tradition, and
that his actions speak for themselves and any consideration of any alleged
heresy is disingenuous as surely this man is greater than the old and
restrictive body of the church he inherited and which he constantly shames by
his humble and simple actions…
MHFM: That’s because the typical
members of the Novus Ordo couldn’t care less about the Catholic faith or what
the Church teaches. They don’t have the
true faith, and without it people are blind.
Antipope Francis is obviously a complete Christ-rejecting heretic and
apostate, as these materials prove.
One should also not refer to him as
Re: Your video: Exposing the Society of St. Pius X of the Strict Observance.
If this new outfit under Fr Joseph Pfeiffer had to go sedevacantist would they
be assured of funds from their followers? I doubt it. They have always been
anti-sedevacantist and anti-eens.
Their hopes of having loads of supporters doesn't seem to have materialized. In
fact, some have returned to the SSPX for regular Mass and community.
MHFM: That group is far worse (in
regard to their doctrinal views) than most people can imagine. We have new information which further
demonstrates how they completely reject Catholic teaching. We might cover it soon. They are basically Protestants.
Exposing the Society
of St. Pius X of the Strict Observance
I'm reading a book called 'The Progress of the Jesuits'. I am so touched
in learning of the heroic deeds and sacrifices made by these men for the love
of God. It's one of the biggest lies of history when certain Protestants
accuse them of everything from sedition to murder. What an outrage.
Fr. Jose De Anchieta gave his whole life to converting Indians who often wanted
to kill and eat him and the same could be said about many other Jesuits, like
St. Issac Jogues. This book is very well-written and I just wish that
some of the haters of the truth in our day would look at the facts instead of
believing the anti-Catholic lies of crackpots and fools. May God bless.
Subject: Satanic Metal Bands
I wanted to mention something that your
recent news post about that satanic band Watain splashing pig's blood on the
crowd. I knew of a person who was a big metal fan. I tried to talk
to this person about the faith and your site and how evil the music industry
is, but they didn't want to listen. This person told me that they went to
this concert of the Black metal band known as "Behemoth" and that at
the concert the band chopped the heads off of two live poor sheep and threw
their heads into the crowd. This person said when they first walked into
the concert area the feeling of evil in the place was so overwhelming that they
could feel it. The music industry is so evil that it’s hard to comprehend.
It’s all part of the end times deception.
Thank you for sending me the book I
requested and so much more… Thank you so much for helping my son and I become
Subject: Sect of John Knox says homos can
"marry" and are "Christian"
Presbyterian assembly: Gay marriage is Christian
interesting is that only less than 5% of this sect's members have broken ranks,
which means 95% are staying right where they are.
It’s very revealing and significant. It’s
another example of how Protestantism is the lie embraced by people who don’t
want the real Christian faith. “The top legislative body of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) has voted
by large margins to recognize same-sex marriage as Christian in the church
constitution, adding language that marriage can be the union of ‘two people,’
not just ‘a man and a woman.’” This is truly outrageous. The level of dishonesty and self-deception
involved in describing homosexual perversion as “Christian” is astounding.
Francis’ bold heresy
This recent 'blessing' from the Anglican is proof enough (as have been millions
of examples from the V2 antipopes) to have him thrown out of his Vatican Hotel
apartment and stripped of the title 'Bishop of Rome'. But
all prophecy must be fulfilled. It is utterly incomprehensible that
so many are without care or concern over these matters. Does nothing
disgust them?! And what about the False Traditionalists? Are they
going to say, "Uh-oh", and pull the wool back down over their eyes?
Yes, they will. They have proven it for far too long now that we should
not expect otherwise. We can hope and pray, but Sacred Scripture doesn't
lie. I have at my fingertips a wealth of refutations of this bold act of
heresy by Francis, but I do not meet anyone who cares to hear even one of
Subject: false 'baptism of desire/blood', invincible
ignorance and "Father" Kramer
audio on "Father" Kramer firmly exemplifies that… Kramer's wayward
intellect has received the word of God, rejected it and welcomed evil into his
heart. And now, his entanglement in lies just keeps heaping buckets and
buckets of hot coals on the pit of heresy. In a nutshell, Kramer's
arguments are fermented hogwash that can't even pretend to seep truth and which
view infallible truths as formal heresy… Likewise, these cohorts of heresy have
not grasped the true meaning of Catholic infallibility. For them, dogmas
are not truths fallen from heaven, but just a vague outline of what may or may
not be enforced by God and they understand dogma only in a practical sense,
without any norms for truly believing… Kramer, among other blasphemers,
reiterates a philosophy that embraces a bogus objective-subjective heresy that
attests God has not given man the knowledge to undoubtedly conclude someone is
in hell. According to this logic, the doctrine of the Blessed Trinity
might have a subjective component that includes a fourth person! Sound
preposterous? With heretics, any apostasy is plausible.
from Catholic common sense, when pondering the Old Law, it becomes even clearer
that God's words are to be taken as 'entire truths'. In the Old
Testament, He gave very specific laws and commands and the people were bound to
obey. When the covenant of circumcision was explained, Abraham and others
obeyed. When God explained how to build the ark, Noe obediently built the
ark. When God told Abraham to offer his own son as a holocaust, he
obeyed. When God said, "But if thou wilt not let them go, behold, I
will strike all thy coasts with frogs", He was faithful to His word and
frogs covered the land of Egypt. When God relayed details about making
the tabernacle and the ark, His directions were followed. When God was
not happy with a man collecting sticks on the sabbath day, the Lord told Moses
to let the man die and hence, Moses complied. When Mother Mary gave birth
to Jesus, she followed the law of purification of women after child birth.
In all these cases, and many more, God's words were not philosophically
dissected as harbouring an unsaid subjective meaning. What would God
think if Noe made the ark 600 cubits in length, as opposed to 300?! God,
in the Old Testament, was very clear with His commands. Likewise, when God
speaks to the faithful through the Chair of St. Peter, His words are to be
taken as wholly true. 'Baptism of desire' ..., etc. advocates attest the
opposite, affirming dogmatic words are not absolute, but subject to unwritten
exceptions. From this standpoint, it seems the Old Law was more exact
than the New Testament! This is absurd, as the Holy Gospel is greater and
full of Christ's wisdom. To protest real and natural water is not
necessary for baptism is a great revolution against the words of Jesus Christ.
According to Kramer, 'anyone' can be saved because God can
extraordinarily debunk His own laws and open heaven for non-Catholics.
This mindset is abominable and labels God a deceiver. Now, of
course, God allows certain heresies to arise, but never have such heresies been
taught by the magisterium in any document of faith or morals and applied to the
Universal Church. To defend these heresies is to place a statue of a
fallible man in front of almighty God.
worse, Kramer attests that recipients of 'baptism of desire' are actually
reborn by water and the Holy Ghost. This assertion is braindead and
comparable to Noe building the ark with his imagination, as opposed to using
wood. It's also like witchcraft, where one waves a magic wand of
'desire', hereby invoking God to descend real and natural water that is
completely imperceivable to the human senses! Kramer is a demonic warlock
and hates truth as the devil shuns the Holy Rosary.
Christ did not become man to relay a foggy route of salvation, but rather,
clearly taught what is required to enter heaven. If Catholic dogma is not
absolute, then how does dogma compare to the 'laws of physics'? Does the
law of gravity hold more weight than the words of Jesus Christ? Of course
not ! Haters of truth have phantasmagorically rewritten Catholic
tradition, edited the Holy Gospel and made the straight road to heaven very
can't imagine how such a heretic, like Kramer, will react during his judgment
(if he doesn't convert). Perhaps he, like Pontius Pilate, will mutter,
"What is truth?"
John the Baptist, please pray for us.
Kramer anathematizes himself
Thank you for exposing "Fr." Paul Kramer anathematizing
himself. He clearly implies that "baptism of desire" gives a
metaphorical "laver of regeneration," or water of rebirth, i.e.
baptism. What a heretic!! St. Gregory Nazianzen shows how absurd it
is to equate the desire for baptism with the reception of the sacrament: St.
Gregory Nazianz, 381 AD: “If you were able to judge a man who intends to commit
murder, solely by his intention and without any act of murder, then you could
likewise reckon as baptized one who desired Baptism, without having received
Baptism. But, since you cannot do the former, how can you do the
latter? I cannot see it. If you prefer, we will put it like this:
if in your opinion desire has equal power with actual Baptism, then make the
same judgment in regard to glory. You will then be satisfied to long for
glory, as if that longing itself were glory. Do you suffer any damage by
not attaining the actual glory, as long as you have a desire for it?”
It's also interesting to note that in Session 21, Chapter 4 of the Council of
Trent, it speaks of being "regenerated by the laver of baptism."
This is interesting because it proves that only the waters (laver) of baptism
regenerate/give the spiritual rebirth. The Magisterium usually refers to
the "laver of regeneration," not the "laver of
baptism." Session 21 of Trent makes it abundantly clear that the
regeneration/rebirth is by the laver/water of baptism. Kramer and the
"baptism of desire" heretics mock baptism. They attempt to
reduce baptism to being merely symbolic or metaphorical, like
Protestants. The only "effect" of "baptism of desire"
is a Hollywood style "special effect" or delusion - BOD is not real
and it never will be because it lacks real and natural water - and all the
logodaedaly (verbal sleight of hand) of Kramer and other BOD heretics only
serve to emphasize that fact.
Mr. & Mrs. White
Not too long ago I was perusing A
Textual Concordance of the Holy Scriptures by a Father Thomas
David Williams. Copyright 1908 by Benzinger Brothers (Chicago). On
page 652 of this book, in typical heretical/protestant style, a number of
bible quotations are given which are supposed to prove baptism of desire.
The heading for those quotes is "Baptism of Desire, though only implicit,
can supply the place of sacramental baptism when the latter is
impossible". Of course, it does not explain how sacramental baptism
could ever be impossible for someone desiring baptism. But what is really
slick about this section is this: in attempting to prove that
the bible teaches baptism of desire, the first several passages it quotes
are from the Old Testament before the Sacrament of Baptism was
even instituted. That page also has two entries
(Matthew 10:32 and 39) listed under the "Baptism of Blood - Martyrdom -
Can Supply the Place of Sacramental Baptism". One can
certainly understand why God entrusted the receipt and transmission of the
faith to the papacy and not to theologians.
Another book published around the same
time does not, as far as I am aware, teach baptism of desire although
the former editor of Tan (Nelson) injected it into the book via
a footnote. That book is Bishop Knecht's A
Practical Commentary on Holy Scripture…
On page 447 of the book, Bishop Knecht
clearly states that water baptism is necessary for salvation. But Thomas
Nelson of Tan added a footnote (which he identified as his and dated 2003)
in which he proceeds to teach baptism of desire and quotes all the
usual false claims which misquote the Council of Trent. Nelson also
quotes the Baltimore Catechism as teaching Baptism of Desire -- and perhaps
this was one of the heretical trailblazers, dating back to (I
think) 1885… This Nelson quote business is, to me, a great illustration of
how heresy spreads like the cancer it is. It spreads like wildfire
because people no longer have a horror of heresy… I'm really
glad MHFM started this discussion with Tanquerey since many people believe (as
I once did) that a book was probably safe if it was written prior to
Vatican 2. Apostasies are a long time in the making, and there were
probably many whispered heresies floating around long before the
excommunication of Martin Luther and the rise of Protestantism. The examination of this issue also demonstrates
the astuteness of the true popes in issuing solemn declarations when they did
-- often seeing what the majority of the world could not yet
‘blessed’ by Welby
In a vacuum, this would be an incredible act of heresy. After all, it is to repudiate in deed the
Church’s teaching on the invalidity of Anglican orders. It is to clearly signify that a notorious
heretic, who rejects Catholic teaching in many areas and leads a sect, is in
the Church of Christ. But with Antipope
Francis and the Vatican II sect, it’s basically just another day. It’s ridiculous that anyone regards this guy
as a Catholic.
Antipope Francis receives “blessing” from layman Justin Welby – the
heretical and schismatic leader of the Anglican “Church”
This is a short new post. It covers another
example of a pre-Vatican II ‘theologian’ who greatly erred on ‘baptism of
desire’ and fed people a false doctrine.
These examples are significant because the enemies of the necessity of
the Catholic Church in our day base their positions on the views of fallible
pre-Vatican II theologians. In many
cases, they were the men whose errors and heresies paved the way for the
Vatican II apostasy.
The False Doctrine
of ‘Baptism of Desire’ on Display – Adolphe Tanquerey [post]
Subject: False doctrine of 'Baptism of Desire' - Fr.
Re your latest posting on theologians
before Vatican II spreading the false doctrine of 'Baptism of Desire,' I
recently picked up a book by Fr. John Laux, titled "Catholic
Apologetics" God, Christianity and the Church. A Course
in Religion Book IV, (published in 1928 Benziger)... I thought it
would be an interesting read, as I recall having, as part of our religious
reading in High School /College, 1959-1962 a book with a similar title,
but don't recall the author of that book.
I was somewhat surprised (as I
presumed Fr. Laux was a pretty orthodox Catholic theologian of that period}.
I quickly skipped to Chapter VI. p.123 -129, "Outside the Church
there is no Salvation,"and after explaining the Church's teaching on
the necessity of the Catholic Church for salvation, he then unashamedly
preaches the direct opposite, especially on p.127, where he expands and
expounds his false teaching: 4. Although those who are outside the Catholic
Church through no fault of theirs can be saved, yet they are deprived of the
inestimable advantage enjoyed by Catholics. - ...
In 3. But are not
all non-Catholics and non-Christians condemned to Hell by this doctrine? -
dogma, "Outside the Church there is no salvation," must be rightly
understood....[and he goes on...with his heresy]
As you can imagine by now the alarm
bells were ringing!
I don't know if you are familiar with
this particular book, but thought it would make a good article for MHFM
to expound upon and expose yet another pre-Vatican
II 'theologian', preaching a false doctrine, which as you rightly commented
paved the way for the Vatican II apostasy.
That’s another good example of horrible heresy against the Church’s salvation
dogma being put forward in a fallible text before Vatican II. That’s what many false traditionalists, as a consequence
of not possessing true supernatural faith, miss: the Vatican II apostasy did
not happen overnight. The bishops did
not just show up at Vatican II and suddenly become heretics. Almost all of them were heretics before they
showed up there. Yes, the apostasy took
an official form with the election of the Freemasonic apostate Antipope John
XXIII and the false Second Vatican Council.
Those developments eventually resulted in the construction of a Counter
Church – an entity distinct from the true Catholic Church – but the doctrinal
breakdown which led to its formation occurred before Vatican II. The denial of the salvation dogma was the key
why those who think they can just follow and trust the ‘theologians’ before
Vatican II, or even what Pius XII (a horribly weak pope, and a bridge to the
apostasy) allowed in his fallible
capacity, and ignore what the infallibly-protected dogmatic teachings of
the Church proclaim, greatly err. They
trust in man over the teaching in the Church – they trust in man over the
office of the Papacy – and they lose.
And they will lose for all eternity, if they don’t convert.
for exposing Tanquerey’s heretical ravings… I also noted that Tanquerey held
that Baptism does not remit Original Sin and infuse sanctifying grace
for many (if not most) baptisees, because they had ‘probably’ already obtained
these through Desire alone!
does this nonsense stop? Confirmation of Desire? Extreme Unction of Desire?
Holy Matrimony of Desire? Ordination of Desire?!
With regard to his false teaching that Baptism does not remit Original Sin for
many, because it supposedly already happened prior to Baptism, this canon is
Council of Trent, Sess. 5 on Original Sin, #5: “If anyone denies that by the grace of
our Lord Jesus Christ which is conferred in baptism, the guilt of original sin
is remitted, or says that the whole of that which belongs to the essence
of sin is not taken away, but says that it is only canceled or not imputed, let him be anathema.”
Subject: False Doctrine of Tanquerey
It does, indeed, appear that many heretical priests
have read Tanquerey; for who among 'Catholics' has not perused The Spiritual
Life? I remember a Franciscan priest that gave Sunday afternoon talks
on Tanquerey's writings, back in the late 1990s - right before I received your
material (which I thank God for).
It also appears that, in particular,
Anthony Cekada has taken this false idea of Tanquerey's, quoted in your
article, as part of the infallible ordinary magisterium, and has
extended it beyond perhaps even Tanquerey's erroneous notions. When I
telephoned Cekada, he told me the same things that Tanqueray wrote:
"...perfect charity, along with at least an implicit desire for Baptism,
supplies for the forces of Baptism of water as to remission of sins..."
"It is certainly sufficient in one who is invincibly
ignorant..." " Perfect charity, together with the desire for
Baptism, indeed remits original sin and actual sins, and in like
manner infuses sanctifying grace..."
… I told him that a person cannot have
charity until that person receives the sacrament of baptism, for that is
how we receive faith, hope and charity: the three theological virtues (should I
have to tell a 'priest' of this truth?). The faithless heretic
Cekada simply fast-talked his way out of answering me. But Cekada made it
clear that he believes in 'invincible ignorance'… he believes
that the heresies held and taught currently by almost all the false
traditionalist priests - against the dogma that sacramental baptism is
absolutely necessary for salvation - are part of the 'infallible ordinary
magisterium' since 'theologians' taught and published it in catechisms
- even though it doesn't agree with the infallible extraordinary
magisterium (which Cekada and others ignore on this issue); and he
believes in, and applies 'baptism of desire' to: Jews, Muslims and other
pagans (as long as they're "nice" Jews, Muslims and pagans).
I counted at least five contradictions
in the paragraph you quoted from Tanquerey…
Tanqueray's errors are really, as you
say, false doctrines… It demonstrates that those who obstinately adhere to this
particular heresy (in fact, any heresy) do not believe in Jesus
Christ. They don't. For if they did, they would not render the
words of Jesus Christ, the acts of His apostles, the works and martyrdoms of
Catholic missionaries meaningless!...
speaks of, perfect charity... satisfying the requirement for the sacrament
of baptism… That's an unbelievable assertion that sinners can possess this
'perfect charity', and desire for baptism and from there, bam, you're in the
church, and saved if one died immediately after desiring this
baptism. Who believes this stuff? Thanks MHFM!
the reason the false Sister Lucia wore lipstick is that, along with lip liner, it
gives the impression of fuller lips, which the True Sister Lucia clearly
had without the aid of cosmetics...
FSSP - Terra
I know that Joseph Terra is not a Catholic as I have listened many times to
your short debate with him. This shooting was a great tragedy but I believe the
larger tragedy is what is not seen by most; that these men with the FSSP are
leading people to hell with the anti-Christ and his Vatican II sect. It is too
bad that he hung up on Brother Peter. He may have heard the truth that
would have saved Kenneth Walker and lead him to the true faith, the Catholic
Yes, it’s quite true that they lead people to Hell. They are completely Novus Ordo in their
theology – they fully accept the apostasy and the heresies of Vatican II – yet
they hide it behind ‘traditional’ garb.
They are complete heretics. The
short conversation showed that Terra didn’t care one bit about the facts,
Catholic teaching or even the person he was talking to. He’s just an utterly bad-willed heretic, like
all of their ‘priests.’
Bros. Peter and Michael,
name is Jordan Legere and I live in Texas. I am a frequent visitor to your
website and YouTube channel. I accepted the Sedevacantist postion around
November 2013. To make a long story short, I stopped attending the novus ordo
mass in September 2013…
grounding and arguments
Subject: Sedevacantist grounding and
More and more i learn about my faith.
First i was a typical novus ordo charismatic. But when i was 16 or so, i
discovered Tradition, and started to move towards it. I was 19 when i declared
myself to be a traditionalist. It was in my room when i took my copy of
Denzinger-Hönerman and read the Tridentine Creed and Anti-modernist Oath.
Ironically it was during the first year of theological college which i still
attend. I am a layman, and the college is modernist. I attend it still so i may
denounce any heresy i hear there. I attend it and i study modernist theologians
in the "know thy enemy" fashion.
Recently (a few days ago really - now
i'm 21) i subscribed to the opinion that the New Mass of Paul VI was invalid in
vernacular translations where the words "for all" are used. It is the
same in my language, Croatian, where the translation is "for all
men". So what we have here is not only a substitution, but an addition
also. And the "in remissionem peccatorum" is correctly translated to
"unto remission of sins" so it expresses act and not potency as
"so that sins may (could) be forgiven" would, and it is therefore
definitely heretical. Major help in this was your debate with William Albrecht…
Now to the real point. I have been researching the sedevacantist issue and it
seems very logical….
I also see you're very strongly against
baptism of desire. On this i would point out that i side with the Angelic
Doctor and i hold that it is possible to receive the effect of this sacrament
without administering the sacrament itself…
MHFM: First, the material proves
without any doubt that Francis and the other claimants are/were antipopes. It really comes down to whether a person has
supernatural faith; for it’s certain that heretics cannot be popes and that the
Vatican II claimants are/were heretics.
You should watch these videos on the issue:
What Francis Really Believes (3rd edition) (video)
Why Francis Must Not Be Considered The Pope (video)
Was Vatican II Infallible? (video)
Traditionalists Refuted on
In your case, we don’t
recommend reading modernist theologians.
We don’t think that would benefit you.
We recommend that you look more carefully at the materials we’ve put
out. If you do, and if you are honest
and sincere, you will be convinced of the true positions. You should also pray the Rosary each day, all
15 decades if possible.
With regard to
‘baptism of desire,’ you need to see this video. It explains why your view is definitely incompatible with Catholic
teaching. St. Thomas was simply wrong on
the matter and his view cannot be held, as this video covers. In fact, you say that he held that people
receive the ‘effect of this sacrament’ without the sacrament. Actually, he didn’t, as the video
proves. That’s one of the big problems
with his position on the issue, and the false doctrine in general. You should also see our salvation book and
the other materials on the matter.
The Best Argument Against “Baptism of
Question About Menorah Displayed at Mass
Catholic Mass celebrated on Saturday, June 14 in my town featured something
that disturbed me. During the homily, Father brought out a pedestal (an
approximately 3 foot high column) and placed a Jewish menorah on it.
Then he directed two (pre-selected) girls and a boy to surround it while
holding hands. They were said to represent the Holy Trinity.
I couldn't understand what a menorah was doing on a Catholic altar
surrounded by two females and one male representing the Holy Trinity.
Note: Father had also displayed a menorah on the altar during the
Christmas season a few years back.
Priest is a former Evangelical and Baptist. I'm having trouble trying to
determine what this display was meant to convey. The actual homily
was very respectful. Is there something in the new Mass that supports
this type of a display? I seemed to be the only one disturbed by it and
therefore may be ignorant of something newly acceptable in the Mass.
He did it because he’s an apostate who accepts the Novus Ordo theology of
religious indifferentism and salvation outside the Catholic Church. It’s crucial that you get out of the New
Mass. It’s invalid, non-Catholic and
must be avoided under pain of grave sin.
Please see the material on our site which proves that the Vatican II
sect is not the Catholic Church.
“Fr.” Paul Kramer anathematizes himself
*Note: We’ve added an interesting update to the recent post on Paul Kramer. You
will find it as an addendum near the end of the post. It’s copied here as well:
ADDENDUM: PAUL KRAMER
an interesting update to our recent post on Paul Kramer. Kramer was
apparently arguing with someone about the necessity of Baptism. He
attempted to address the teaching of Jesus, Scripture and Catholic dogma, that
one must be “born again of water and the Holy Ghost” to enter Heaven.
It’s always interesting when “baptism of desire” heretics attempt to explain
their position. If they even begin to interact with the dogmatic
arguments which refute it (a rare occurrence), they always wind
up contradicting themselves and/or falling into new errors and heresies.
That’s why they typically choose to ignore all the arguments
which obliterate their position – preferring, instead, to talk endlessly about
objections for “baptism of desire” that have already been completely refuted.
Pope Eugene IV, The Council of Florence, “Exultate
Deo,” Nov. 22, 1439: “Holy baptism, which is the gateway to the
spiritual life, holds the first place among all the sacraments; through it we
are made members of Christ and of the body of the Church. And since
death entered the universe through the first man, ‘unless we are born again of
water and the Spirit, we cannot,’ as the Truth says, ‘enter into the kingdom of
heaven’ [John 3:5]. The matter of this sacrament is real and natural
So, in attempting to explain how “baptism of desire” is
compatible with the dogma that one must be “reborn of water and the Holy
Ghost” to be saved, Paul Kramer falls into another significant and very
Supporters of “baptism of desire” typically admit that “baptism
of desire” is not a sacrament and does not provide the “rebirth of water and
the Spirit.” “Baptism of desire”, by definition, lacks the “water” of
Baptism (the matter of the Sacrament). To assert that it is a sacrament
would be theologically absurd and heretical. While admitting that
“baptism of desire” isn’t a sacrament, supporters of “baptism of desire” will
generally contend that the “true understanding” of John 3:5, and the Church’s teaching
on it, is that being “reborn of water” is not absolutely
necessary. That contention is of course false and inconsistent with
Catholic teaching, as the passage from Florence above and many other arguments
prove. Kramer, however, has invented his own heresy on the
matter. He actually argues that the recipients of “baptism of
desire” are “reborn by water and the Holy
Faced with the evidence in Trent and Florence, that the Church
teaches that no one enters Heaven without being reborn of water and the Spirit,
“Fr.” Paul Kramer: “I have already theologically demonstrated
previously, by way of a critical analysis of the Latin texts of the Decree on
Justification (and related canons), that Chapter 4 defines that one
who has been justified by the laver of regeneration or the votum of it, to have
been reborn by water and the Holy Ghost.”
“Fr.” Paul Kramer: “First, it must be noted that Chapter 4 of
the Decree on Justification already defined that those who have been justified
by the laver of regeneration or the votum of it, have been reborn by
water and the Holy Ghost…”
This is an incredible assertion. He even makes it
twice. His statement is completely heretical. Many supporters of
“baptism of desire” might even agree. Kramer truly doesn’t know what he’s
talking about. In taking such a position he proves, once again, that he
has been anathematized.
It’s dogmatically defined (by both Florence and Trent) that the
rebirth of “water and the Holy Ghost” involves REAL AND NATURAL WATER in
the Sacrament of Baptism. In Exultate Deo, Florence states
that the rebirth “of water and the Spirit” refers to
the Sacrament and that “the matter of this sacrament is
real and natural water” (Materia huius sacramenti est aqua vera et naturalis). It
uses the demonstrative adjective “huius” (of this) connected with “sacramenti”
(sacrament) to define the “rebirth of water and the Spirit” mentioned by Jesus
as the one which involves “real and natural water” (vera et naturalis)
“of this sacrament” (huius sacramenti).
Primum omnium sacramentorum locum tenet sanctum baptisma, quod
vitae spiritualis ianua est : per ipsum enim membra Christi ac de corpore
efficimur Ecclesiae. Et cum per primum hominem mors introierit in universos
(cf: Rom 5, 12), nisi ex aqua et Spiritu renascamur, non
possumus ut inquit Veritas, in regnum caelorum introire (cf. Jo 3, 5 ). Materia huius
sacramenti est aqua vera et naturalis.
If that weren’t enough proof that it’s heretical to assert that
one can be “reborn of WATER and the Spirit” without real and natural
water in the Sacrament of Baptism, we have Canon 2 of Trent on
Paul III, The Council of Trent, Can. 2 on the Sacrament of Baptism,
Sess. 7, 1547, ex cathedra:
quis dixerit, aquam veram et naturalem non esse de necessitate baptismi, atque
ideo verba illa Domini nostri Iesu Christi: ‘Nisi quis renatus fuerit ex aqua
et Spiritu Sancto’ [Io 3, 5] ad metaphoram aliquam detorserit: A.S."
anyone should say that real and natural water is not necessary
for baptism, and on that account should distort those words of
Our Lord Jesus Christ: ‘Unless a man be born again of water and
the Holy Spirit’ [John 3:5], into some metaphor: let him be
see that to assert that the rebirth of “water and the Holy
Spirit” does not mean real and natural water, but spiritual water or
metaphorical water, as Kramer does, is specifically anathematized
heresy! Kramer has fallen into this embarrassing and outrageous heresy,
which would put him outside the Church if he weren’t already outside of it,
because he is arrogantly, obstinately and pertinaciously defending
heresy. In the same piece in which he teaches the aforementioned heresy,
he again condemns people who hold the Catholic position that everyone must be
born again of water and the Spirit in the Sacrament to be saved (Council of
Florence). When heretics rail against the truth, God often allows them to
fall into even bigger mistakes. That’s clearly what happened here.
way, it should be noted that Canon 2 on Baptism would not be the first passage
to bring forward to demonstrate that one must be baptized to be
saved. Exultate Deo from the Council of Florence, Can. 5
of Trent on the Sacrament of Baptism, and many other arguments should
be mentioned first. However, when “BOD” heretics attempt to circumvent
the teaching of the Church, that one must be “reborn of water and the Spirit,”
they can sometimes fall into heresy against Canon 2 on the back end of the
argument, if you will. That is to say, if, in desperation, they assert
that “baptism of desire” somehow satisfies the requirement to
be “born again of water,” at that point they fall into heresy against Canon 2
on what “the water” of John 3:5 necessarily and dogmatically means (real and
also noteworthy that certain “baptism of desire” supporters, oblivious to the
heresy being fed to them by Kramer, were applauding his response. That’s
truly an exercise in self-condemnation. In their blindness, they were
only cheering a man for rejecting a defined dogma, distorting the words of
Jesus Christ in direct opposition to Catholic teaching, and paving their own
path to damnation. They are truly sons of Hell (Mt. 23:15), enemies of
Christ and His Church.
reason Kramer fell headlong into heresy on this point is that Sess. 6, Chap. 4
of Trent declares that Jesus’ declaration in John 3:5 is true “as it is
written” (sicut scriptum est). That is of course directly
incompatible with “baptism of desire,” which posits salvation without rebirth
of water and the Spirit. If “baptism of desire” were true (and it’s not),
then the proper understanding of John 3:5 would not be “as it is
written.” But in every single dogmatic text on John 3:5, including Sess.
6, Chap. 4 of Trent, those words of Jesus are understood as they are
written. It would of course make no sense at all for Trent to be
teaching that one can be saved without rebirth of water by “baptism by desire,”
while in the very same sentence declaring that Jesus’
declaration in John 3:5 is to be understood “as it is written.” That’s
another proof that Sess. 6, Chap. 4 of Trent did not teach that one can
be justified by desire, as our article on that matter, a
careful examination of the text, and a clear grammatical and dogmatic precedent
Perceiving the problem, namely, that the Church (and the very
passage of Sess. 6, Chap. 4) understands John 3:5 “as it is written,” Kramer
chose to adopt the novel heresy that people who aren’t baptized are somehow “born
again of water and the Spirit.” In doing so he fell under the anathema of
the aforementioned dogma against twisting Jesus’ words, and adopted a position that’s
rejected by almost all of his fellow “baptism of desire” heretics. Just
as the more Antipope Francis talks the more proof we have that the Chair of St.
Peter is vacant, the more “baptism of desire” heretics attempt to explain their
position the more evidence we have for why it’s false.
Finally, the reader should remember that the inconsistency and
the outrageous heresy articulated by Kramer on this issue arose from his
attempt to address just one angle of the argument. The
number of contradictions and errors would only grow in direct proportion to the
number of attempts he made to address dogmatic arguments against his
position. There is of course the distinct but related matter of whether
“baptism of desire” (putting aside what they think “born again of water” means)
even grants the grace of Baptism. Their attempts to answer that question
only yield more heresies and contradictions. The same could be said of
their responses to numerous other dogmatic arguments against their position.
That’s because “baptism of desire” is an utterly false, completely indefensible
false doctrine of man. Only bad-willed individuals and heretics
obstinately adhere to it in the face of the irrefutable dogmatic arguments
MHFM: A so-called “priest” named Paul Kramer
recently called the Catholic Church’s dogmatic teaching, that no one can be
saved without the Sacrament of Baptism, “heretical.” Kramer also says
that those who hold the Church’s teaching on this point, and reject the false doctrine
of “baptism of desire,” commit mortal sin and are “formal heretics.” A
new audio contains comments about the heretic. You will find the audio in the file linked
“Fr.” Paul Kramer denies Catholic salvation
Thank you for the expose of Kramer the
pompous fraud. And thank you as well for exposing -- and naming --
one of Satan's most sophisticated tricks which his malice toward God and his
long experience with men have allowed him to perfect: the demonic objective/subjective slicing
of God's revelation which insists that God speaks lies…
… Double-speaking is the signature mark
of Kramer and his ilk… they say the
exact same lies, speech after speech, book after book, year in and year out.
I guess it is not surprising that men like Kramer know that, were they to embrace
and teach the truth, their admiring and generous supporters would
quickly disappear. As Christ knows His people and they
know Him, false and heretical "priests" know their flocks
as well. They recognize that the man of today,
including the false traditionalist, loves many of the
"goodies" that the false Vatican 2 religion has to offer and would
not appreciate certain dogmas of the Catholic Church. Such
dogmas are "hard sayings" to such persons, and would necessitate
their having to change their manner of living or their relationships with
Your new post on Paul Kramer
audio! I'm not surprised, in the least, by his manifest public heresy and
schism and apostasy. Kramer spent many years deceiving people alongside
Nicholas Gruner. They have been lying to people around the world for
years: promoting a false Fatima message; a false Sr. Lucia; a false Church; and
pretending to be priests… demanding that the baptized accept the possibility of
salvation for those who die unbaptized is blatant hypocrisy and a total denial
of Jesus Christ. How despicable!
of Kramer being converted by studying the dogmas, by reading the infallible
teachings of the true popes throughout history, he has gone in the opposite
direction and has 1) denied the salvation dogma - heresy; 2) declared those who
hold union with Divine Truth to be outside of his Church -schism; and
3) has aligned himself with the same teachings expressed by the false, apostate 'bishop
of Rome' he has recently supposedly rejected-apostasy. The further along in the Great Apostasy, the
more clearly seen are the lines which separate the Elect from the
Reprobate. The Church is truly in eclipse and the Darkness hates the
Light more than ever. How few there are who love the Light, who are not
afraid to be seen in the Light, nor afraid to shine it upon anyone. May God
give us all a courageous heart to be among the children of Light -
the lightsome children of Mary Immaculate.
Subject: Mr. Kramer
Good audio on Paul Kramer. He truly is
a diabolical tool of Satan…
am a physician and they are trying to fire me (in many vicious ways) because I
refuse to prescribe contraceptives or exams aimed to perform artificial
insemination… it is really revealing how these devil-driven individuals attack
those who act in a truth-consistent way.
Subject: “Fr.” Paul Kramer
Thank you for the audio and article denouncing the abominable, disgraceful,
disgusting and diabolical heretic, "Fr." Paul Kramer. He proves
himself to be a schismatic for calling true Catholics "heretics" and
Magisterial teaching "heresy." Paul Kramer is condemned out of
his own mouth, for in the very same book that he states: "only God knows
whom He will save (in some extraordinary manner) from among the great mass of
humanity which has not exteriorly professed the Catholic religion," he also
states: "Not all the learning in the world, nor all the rank of office,
can substitute for the truth of one infallibly defined Catholic
teaching." Kramer is a mass of contradictions. For anyone who
professes to be Catholic, dogmatic Papal teaching should end the debate, yet
for modernist heretics like Kramer, Papal teaching is something to
debate. His idea of God saving someone "in some extraordinary
manner," i.e. outside the sacrament of baptism, is a demonic joke.
"Some extraordinary manner" sounds like he is describing a magic
trick, as if "baptism of desire" were akin to David Copperfield
"flying" through the air! It is impossible for God to lie. Jesus
Christ commanded His followers to baptize in water and in the name of the
Father and the Son and the Holy Ghost. He said no one can enter Heaven without
being born again of water and the Spirit (John 3:5). Kramer and the
"baptism of desire" heretics are tools of Satan. They refuse to
obey our Lord's commands, and they lie against His truths. Paul Kramer… chose to adore Satan for the
world and its friendship, knowing full well it is seated in wickedness, and is
now an enemy of God and will lose his soul barring a super-miraculous
conversion. Kramer knows the world hates those who deny themselves, carry
their cross and follow Jesus Christ. He knows that embracing Catholic
teaching… would entail him being rejected on a massive scale, and so he chose
to keep his apostate friends and heresy-endorsed pay check, but to deny our
Lord Jesus Christ and walk the road to hell. What a reprobate fool!!!
Mr. & Mrs. White
Hello Bro. Dimond,
I am recent catholic revert less than two yrs ago. I am now just learning about
the difference post and pre vatican 2 tradition and the scandals of heresies
mentioned on your web site. I am pretty disturbed by it and thank God for his
grace to bring such things to my attention. I live in Massachusetts and have
researched what was available local or even just in my state for traditional
catholic churches… What are your thoughts?
In Christ the King.
We’re glad that you came across the material.
Please see the response below.
[We also sent a response to him directly.]
The recent video, The Remnant and Robert
Siscoe Refuted on Sedevacantism, is now available in article form. You will find the article below the video in
Subject: Church questions
I am new to your web site and am
shocked at all of have learned, scary.
Where might I find a church that I can go to in kittanning ,pa…
MHFM: We’re glad you are consulting the
material. It's important to realize the situation today (during the
Great Apostasy). It is one
in which basically all the churches are either heretical Vatican II churches or
'traditionalist' churches where the priest is heretical in some way. Thus, there aren't any churches that are
fully Catholic, where one can join, regard the priest as Catholic and support
the church. There are few options for
receiving the Eucharist today, but there are some options for receiving the sacrament
of confession (which is obviously crucial).
also covers important principles on this issue, and the positions one must hold
before receiving sacraments. We can help a person with these issues once
he or she is convinced on all the issues.
Subject: Baby with fatal heart defect miraculously kept
alive until Baptism (video)
I’m speechless but in wow.
Isabella A. Rossellini
Subject: Baby with fatal heart defect miraculously kept
alive until Baptism (video)
I am so touched by
this story… I will never forget this wonderful story. God Bless you…
The Catholic Church
is coming down soon...please don’t go down with it…. The Bible describes the
false Church and tells His Christians to "come out or her my people".
MHFM: You are
referring to the Whore of Babylon mentioned in the Apocalypse. That’s not the Catholic Church, but the
Vatican II sect – the end-times Counter Church.
You need to see these videos:
Is the World about to End?
– The Apocalypse Explained?
The Third Secret of Fatima (3rd edition) – An Overview of the
Entire Vatican II Apostasy
The fact that the
prophecies deal with what’s happening in Rome proves, rather than disproves,
the authenticity of the Catholic Church.
The Catholic Church is the one true Church of Christ. You cannot be saved as a Protestant.
Then why is there an
obelisk in the Vatican… You are saved through faith in Christ. No "good
work" will give you salvation.
MHFM: One is saved
through Christ’s faith and obedience
to His commands, not faith alone (see James 2:24). You need to consult these materials.
Justification Debate with a Reformed Protestant (Calvinist) –
Key to John 3:16 (video)
The Catholic faith is
the one true faith, outside of which there is no salvation. Also, there is a cross on top of the obelisk
in the Vatican. It was put there by Pope
Sixtus V to signify Christ’s victory over paganism.
What Francis Really Believes (3rd edition)
I think Pope Francis
is a Universal Pope, the peoples Pope, a living Saint, we are lucky witnessing
a living Saint, I agree to all his doing:)
MHFM: Wow, what an
What Francis Really Believes (3rd edition)
insistence of calling the Pope over and over again the "anti-Pope"
"apostate Francis" and the implication that if you have good
relationships with other faiths you are anti -Catholic…
MHFM: First, he
should be called “Antipope Francis” because that’s what he is: a heretical,
non-Catholic antipope. It must be made
clear that he in no way occupies the Papacy.
Second, you reveal why God leaves you deceived. You are not honest. You know that Francis’ heretical teaching
that non-Catholics can be saved, and his participation in non-Catholic worship
(among other things), is not equivalent to having ‘good relationships’ with
people. Denying Catholic dogma is not
the same as introducing yourself cordially, or how one might typically define
fostering ‘good relationships.’ He’s a
heretic. He rejects Catholic teaching
and promotes a false religion. That’s
what the video proves. That’s what you
ignore because you are dishonest. You
don’t care about Jesus Christ or His truth.
The Key to John 3:16 (video)
Thank you for once
again setting the record straight with one of the countless constantly
misinterpreted verses of Sacred Scripture… Protestants and their lies about
"sola scriptura" and "faith alone" have no merit
whatsoever… I grew up as a Protestant. Excellent video…
Remnant, and their ilk are nothing more than a sub-branch of the fruitless
V2 sect with the express purpose of keeping the lost flock… in the realm of the
V2 sect with an overriding impression of being saved even if the
flock know something is not right with what's transpired because of this
heinous council from the deathly pit of Lucifer…
Mind-boggling! Thanks MHFM!
Mr Siscoe spreads one heresy
below mentioned heresy spread by many false traditionalists is very similar to
the Protestant's heresy, "once- saved always- saved"… There
is a place in the "Soul of the Church" for unbaptized
non-Catholics, there is a place in the "Body of the Church" for open/manifest/formal
heretics. And those who are baptized of
water and profess True Catholic Church are simply "in the Body and in the
Soul of the Church ". This way everybody is happy, not too many
complaints. The problem is this IS the HERESY. An absolute denial of
the Teaching of the Holy, infallible Magisterium of the Catholic Church.
false traditionalists hold on to the heresy of "Soul of the
Church". ".. The Soul of the Church heresy is that which
teaches that one can be saved in another religion or without the Catholic Faith
by being united to the Soul of the Church, but not the Body..." According to them, those who believe in
Baptism of Desire, Baptism of Blood or Invincible Ignorance, one can be saved
in another religion or without the Catholic Faith by simply "being
united to the Soul of the Church". Mr. Siscoe claims
that manifest/open heretics who were, however, not formally declared as such by
are still a part
the Body of
the Church, but NOT a part of the Soul of the Church. So, continuing
his way of reasoning, one may say that those who had Baptism of Water, have the
TRUE Catholic Faith are part, both, of the Body and of the Soul of the
Church. According to Mr. Siscoe, then
(and many other false traditionalists) there are, supposedly, three ways one
can be saved.
Being a part of the Soul of the Church
Being a part of the Body of the Church
Being a part of the Body AND of the Soul of the Church.
interesting idea, but
COMPLETELY untrue and TOTALLY HERETICAL.
Brother Peter in his excellent book: "Outside the Catholic
Church there is absolutely no Salvation" wrote :
"... A man can be either inside the Church or outside the Church. He
can be either inside or outside the Body. There isn’t a third
in which the Church exists – an invisible Soul of the Church. Those who say
that one can be saved by belonging to the Soul of the Church, while not
belonging to her Body, deny
the undivided unity of the Church’s Body and Soul, which is parallel
to denying the undivided unity of Christ’s Divine and Human natures..."
man CANNOT be either in the Body of the Church OR in the Soul of
the Church. Mr Siscoe claims that
there is some kind of invisible Soul of the Church, which extends far beyond the
Mystical Body and "which includes the unbaptized". He also
claims that there is a visible Body of the Church, separated from the invisible
Soul of the Church, which includes manifest/open heretics. So, if
one follows his reasoning one may say that those who were baptized of water,
who profess the True, Catholic Faith are part of the Body of the Church (along with
manifest/open heretics) AND are
part of the Soul of the Church (along with unbaptized non-Catholics). What a terrible travesty of the True Catholic
Teaching. Mr Siscoe spreads one heresy after another.
Remnant and Robert Siscoe - video
Most Holy Family Monastery,
so much for this excellent video. Robert
Siscoe, an obstinate heretic, has lost the debate and reiterates a whirlwind of
evil nonsense. People are not Catholic because they declare themselves
Catholic, nor do they remain Catholic because no Church authority has declared
them a heretic. If this was true, then all those who lived and died during
the arian heresy (before it was declared heresy), and believed it, were
Catholics. Likewise, all those who blasphemously assert Jesus Christ is
two persons are also Catholic. Likewise, all those who assert that Jews,
Muslims, Buddhists, Catholics… etc. pray to the same God are also Catholic.
This is sheer idiocy. Further, I can't imagine how many Church
authorities we would need, in the year 2014, to declare people as heretics.
incredibly glad Brother Peter Dimond made a distinction between divine law and
canon law. The effects of each law is what firmly reinforces that once a
person pertinaciously denies or doubts something to be believed from the truth
of divine and Catholic faith, they are separated from the Body of the Church
without any declaration. Apart from automatic expulsion (which both laws
do), ecclesiastical law also determines exactly 'what to do' with the heretic
and/or how to punish them. It does not prove them a heretic, as they are
already excommunicated by their own anti-Catholic act/belief before the
punishment is decided. Moreover, God has made such truth even clearer
when Pope Leo XIII stated " … can it be lawful for anyone to reject any of
those truths without thereby sending himself headlong into open heresy? without
thereby separating himself from the Church ...."
example that amplifies the stupidity of Siscoe is that if his position were
true, then, for a pope to be expelled from his duty, a lower official would
have to judge him. Henceforth, the pope could then issue his own judgment
and declare himself innocent. Oh ...... how ridiculous! Catholic
faith clearly teaches one cannot judge the pope. In other words, it is
not 'man' who expels a pope from his office, but divine law, which is above
video provides an exuberant goldmine of information. Siscoe is a prime
example of someone who bases religion on his own conscience, hereby taking
sides with the devil and, in his pride, still attests he is a soldier of
Christ. But he's not the only fool, as the world has millions who,
instead of embracing truth, idolize human respect… This is truly the
apocalypse. In fact, this reality reminds me of Moses when he spoke with
God on the mountain. When Moses came down from the mountain, the people
had fallen into idolatry. Likewise, when Jesus Christ is going to be seen
in the clouds with great power and majesty, the people will (like before) be
entangled in idolatry. But this time, their state will be worse than the
first. "... their latter state is become unto them worse than the
former... The dog is returned to his vomit; and: The sow that was washed to her
wallowing in the mire" (2 St. Peter 2).
'god' is not God, but the devil. As for Melinda Gates, it was horrific to
hear her state, "There are amazing things about this religion.
Amazing moral teachings that I believe. But I also have to go to
'how do we keep women alive?' I believe in not letting women die' [with
regards to supporting contraception]". PARDON ME? Melinda
Gates verbalizes a concern for not letting women die, but publicly supports the
murder of babies?!! Doesn't it faze her that preventing life is to be
guilty of murder? Melinda Gates, like Lucifer, has made her own
conscience a 'god' and, by no means, believes and professes the Catholic faith.
thank God for His great mercy in providing people with the necessary knowledge
to discern between evil and truth… Thanks Mother Mary for your constant intervention
of withholding the iron rod of God's justice.
Thank you for posting the important quote and comments from the article
refuting Siscoe and the Remnant on Sedevacantism. It is also great to see
the article posted, since it contains many new quotes that prove the true
position, as well as crystal clear explanations to understand the difference
between Catholic teaching and the heretics' vain lies. The quote of Pope
Innocent III is particularly striking because, as you said, it contains all the
elements the false traditionalists demand on the position. It proves that
laypeople can recognize others as heretics, that people become and are
considered heretics before being officially warned or declared and that people
who purport to be Catholic can be identified as heretics prior to a
declaration. Indeed, it
constitutes a thrashing of their false position. It proves that Catholics
not only can judge, but must judge, condemn and reject heretics. There
could not be an external unity of faith, a visible Church, if a lay Catholic
could not recognize and reject heresy and heretics. It is very similar to
the quote from Pope Leo the Great's dogmatic tome to Flavian proving the
absolute necessity of the sacrament of water baptism for salvation. We
know by the dogmatic teaching of the Catholic Church that the Catholic faith
and water baptism are absolutely necessary for salvation. The Catholic
faith and water baptism go together and are inseparable. It shows how
absurd the false traditionalists' position is when they accept as leaders of
the "faith" the Vatican II antipopes who profess a false faith…
As you said previously, the false traditionalists hold a position that is
equivalent to the Old Catholics who denied Papal Infallibility. In
accepting salvation outside the Catholic Church, just like Protestants they
simply prove that there are many ways to deny Jesus Christ. We know that
the Lord Jesus Christ, the Catholic faith and water baptism is only Way, Truth
Mr. & Mrs. White
Nicholas Gruner is still deceiving people with his
false consecration of Russia. Now they expect Bergoglio to do it. A false
priest peddling a false Fatima message. Thank you in St Benedict.
From Mark V
… Robert Sungenis… I have listened to
all of your debates with him where you slapped down his weak arguments…
Bergoglio is just mocking and ferociously attacking the Papacy through his
Subject: Statement from Innocent III
That is a very revealing quote
from Pope Innocent III/Fourth Lateran Council. It indicates very clearly
that lay people not only can -- but are expected
to -- identify a heretic as a heretic whenever someone is
professing heresy in word or deed. Furthermore, the statement proves
that such singling out of heretics was a common (and obviously praiseworthy)
practice. Innocent III was directing his bishops to keep on top of
the job, and to respond as quickly as possible whenever they
were alerted to the existence of heretics within their dioceses. The
Pope was doing this to ensure that such persons who were
identified as heretics by anyone either renounced
their heresy, or were officially taken care of as church law
required. Just as the religious orders were always careful about
persons joining their ranks, true Catholics always knew that one rotten
apple endangered the salvation of the rest. They had a true horror of heresy, recognizing
it as a cancer that needed to be routed out as quickly as possible. To
the mind bent by modernism/liberalism (i.e., the false Vatican 2 religion of
Protestantism), that whole process would seem like a witch-hunt. In their
imagined sense of self-magnanimity, these false Catholics would despise
such action in the same way that they despise the dogma of No
Salvation Outside the Church. (It also explains why they deny the true
Catholic teaching on the role and duty of the State, which recognizes that
heresy is an enemy of the state and of every society it worms its way
In reality, to a heretic the terms
"dogma" and "heresy" are meaningless. To a
heretic, the idea of labeling someone a heretic is a kind of sin. When it
comes right down to it, heresies and dogmas are meaningless to such people
because, by their own admission, they can't judge. Their
religion is not about the reception of God's truth, but about devising what's
most pleasing to man. That's why they accept the antipopes and
the counterfeit church. If the false traditionalists themselves can
embrace heresy, why can't the false popes do likewise?...
MHFM: It’s a very interesting
quote. By itself, it contains all the
elements the false traditionalists demand on the issue. If they want proof that laypeople can recognize others as heretics, it makes it clear. If they want proof that people become and are considered heretics before
being officially warned or declared, it makes it clear. If they want proof that people who purport to be Catholic can be identified
as heretics prior to a declaration, it makes it clear. It constitutes a thrashing of their false
We don’t think it’s an accident that
all of those elements – which so thoroughly refute the adherents of heretical
antipopes in our day – just happen to be contained in one passage. No.
God leaves things like that in the Church’s official teaching and
decrees for the defense of the Catholic faith and the refutation of
heretics. It’s similar to how He left a
use of sine with aut in an inclusive sense in Pope St. Leo the Great’s dogmatic tome
to Flavian to refute future arguments for ‘baptism of desire’. In that dogmatic decree (the tome to
Flavian), which specifically contradicts the concept of ‘baptism of desire’, by
declaring that in sanctification from sin, the spirit of sanctification is
inseparable from water baptism, God made sure to leave a grammatical precedent
of the use of sine with aut in an absolutely and necessarily
inclusive sense. That grammatical
precedent in a dogmatic decree (sine
with aut in a necessarily inclusive
sense) was left there to thoroughly refute false claims people would make in
the future about the Council of Trent, Sess. 6, Chap. 4 and the use of sine.
(That’s explained in this article and in the first twenty or so minutes of “Baptism of Desire”
People sometimes talk about the case of
Nestorius and how it constitutes proof that Catholics may reject people as
heretics before any declaration. The
point about Nestorius certainly has value.
Many other points on the issue do as well. But the passage from the Fourth Lateran
Council (and the other quotes covered) proves the point much more powerfully
and specifically. For it comes from a
pope and an ecumenical council, and the language spells out each of the
elements in detail.
article: THE REMNANT AND ROBERT SISCOE REFUTED ON SEDEVACANTISM
reading - even just one time! - Siscoe's 'main-line' argument, I could
think of only one word: PATHETIC!
… Why can't these False
Traditionalists stop the insanity?!!! In just a handful
of lines that bad-willed 'author' named Robert Siscoe
committed most amazing analytical blunders and, of course, according to
his own brilliant theological analysis, declared himself to be a
publicly manifest heretic!
It's like you always say:
Against the truth there is no argument. If any persons foolishly
attempt to 'refute' the infallible and the obvious, those persons will necessarily
contradict themselves, make blatantly false statements without any
documentation, conflate the statements of others; there is no lie they
have conceived that they would not tell. What did you recently call
it? Oh, yes: "incredible dishonesty", "profound
blindness" and "absolute idiocy"…
After learning from you, I could see
Mr. Siscoe's errors very quickly: we know that soul and body are
connected in life and separated at death, but Mr. Siscoe apparently failed that
class. And his 'explanations' about heresy/internal/external are like
Thank you so much for making the entire
One of the most important quotes from the newly-posted article (which was
obviously also covered in the video) is below.
Like numerous other quotes that were covered, it serves to destroy the
false traditionalists’ claim: that a professing Catholic cannot be considered
an actual heretic until that person is considered a heretic according to the
strict letter of canon or ecclesiastical law.
Innocent III, Fourth Lateran Council, 1215, Constitution 3, on Heretics: “We
add further that each archbishop or bishop, either in person or through his
archdeacon or through suitable honest persons, should visit twice or
at least once in the year a particular parish in which according to report
heretics were living [in qua fama fuerit haereticos habitare], and
there he should compel three or more men of good testimony, or even
the whole neighborhood if it seems expedient, to swear to it. That if
anyone should know of heretics there [si quis ibidem haereticos
sciverit] or of any persons who hold secret conventicles or who
differ in their life and habits from the normal way of living of the
faithful, then let him take care
to point them out to the bishop.
The bishop himself should summon the accused to his presence, and they
should be punished canonically if they are unable to clear themselves of the
charge or if after compurgation they relapse into their former errors of
faith. If however any of them with damnable obstinacy refuse to honour an
oath and so will not take it, let them by this very fact be regarded
as heretics [tamquam haeretici].”
In this passage the Fourth Lateran Council says that each bishop
or archbishop should visit parishes “in which according to report heretics were
living” [in qua fama fuerit haereticos habitare]. The Council thus
refers to these people as “heretics” before they have ever
been declared heretics or officially warned about their heresies!
Moreover, it states that “if anyone should know of
heretics there” [si quis ibidem haereticos sciverit], then he can point
them out. Therefore, anyone – including a layperson – is able to
recognize people as “heretics” before they have been declared heretics,
officially warned or pointed out to the bishop.
The Council applies this principle to people in Catholic
parishes who purport to be Catholic. The Council is thereby
recognizing the divine law principle (and the dogmatic teaching of the Church)
that anyone who clearly dissents from Catholic teaching can and must be
recognized and rejected as a heretic, even if that person is not yet considered
a “heretic” according to the procedures and requirements of the ecclesiastical
law in place at the time.
Indeed, the Council refers to these people as “heretics” before
they have been declared or warned according to the procedures of its own
ecclesiastical law, and in the very same context in which it explains
how such people can later be considered “heretics” in
the Council’s ecclesiastical law. It says that if these people it
already called “heretics” at some later point in time refuse an oath they are
to be reputed as “heretics”. In other
words, if they refuse an oath after having been officially warned or censured,
they are to be considered heretics according to the strict letter of
the Council’s canon law; but it states that any of the faithful could
already have recognized them as “heretics” before that even occurs (by virtue
of the divine law).
completely refutes the false traditionalist claim – made by the
SSPX, The Remnant, Robert Siscoe
and others – that a professing Catholic cannot be considered an actual heretic
until that person is considered a heretic according to the strict letter of
canon or ecclesiastical law. Their position is totally wrong, as numerous
other quotes also prove.
Antipope Francis also recently met with the Protestant heretic Joel
Osteen. Francis asked Osteen to ‘pray’
for him. Osteen likes how the Antipope
makes things ‘inclusive.’
Antipope Francis and Joel Osteen
Subject: Antipope John Paul II was satanic
In his Angelus address 21 September 1986 John Paul II said, that the other
religions need "radical fidelity" towards their religious traditions:
"The men and women who have an "animus religiosus" may in fact
be the leaven of a new consciousness of all humanity regarding its shared
responsibility for peace. Every religion teaches us to overcome evil,
commitment to justice and openness to others. Today, this common radical
fidelity to their religious traditions is more than ever a need for
I am greatly inspired by your videos on
"The Shroud of Turin", "Information Proves God” and "The
Third Secret of Fatima".
… God bless you.
Andrzej Niedzielski, Warsaw, Poland
“Saint” John Paul II
was wondering if you're seeing more people jump into the sedevacantism camp
with all of the recent craziness of “Pope” Francis? Canonizing John XXIII and
JP2… Aaargh!!!... I believe we'll only know on judgment day the millions of
souls they've both harmed! And, no I
don't consider "Pope" Francis (the hippie pope) a real Pope.
In Christ and Mary,
As the information has been circulated over the years, more and more people
have consistently come to the true Catholic position on the issue. That’s why it’s important to evangelize,
recommend the website and the videos, distribute the materials, etc.
we must say that with the evidence currently available, with the presentations
that make that evidence available, with easy access to information through the
internet, with Antipope Francis’ actions, with the ‘canonization’ of Antipope
John Paul II, etc. the fact that ANYONE who claims to be ‘traditional’ or even
‘conservative’ (and thus opposed to the V2 religion in some way) still regards
the V2 antipopes as true popes, and does not hold that the Chair of St. Peter
is vacant, is absurd. The fact that ANY
GROUP still acknowledges the fraudulent, apostate antipopes as ‘Catholic popes’
is a sick joke. The fact that ANYONE
familiar with the facts holds the position of the SSPX or a similar false
traditionalist group is simply a commentary on the astounding bad will and faithlessness of people. In response to the facts and the evidence,
the entire ‘traditionalist movement’ should already have taken the position
that they are not valid popes but antipopes.
Everyone familiar with the arguments should of course have been
convinced, and all those people should have spread the truthful information to
those under their influence and on their path who had not yet been exposed to
the facts on this matter. The result
would (and should) have been that everyone
who claims to be ‘traditional’ or even ‘conservative’ would already have
rejected the apostates as antipopes.
Only bad will, faithlessness, dishonesty and evil has stopped that from
being the case.
heretics (such as priests of the SSPX and other false traditionalists) did a very
effective job for the Devil over the years in completely lying to people on
this matter. For years they continually
and obstinately fed people distortions, false arguments, heresies and lies –
all the while hiding and omitting true Catholic teaching on the matter. As a result, large numbers in those groups
were thoroughly brainwashed to believe that ‘sedevacantism’ is a rejection of
the Papacy, when of course it’s the truly Catholic position and a defense of papal
years’ worth of lies and omissions are still taking their toll to this day:
large numbers of people still hold
the ridiculous position of the SSPX or similar groups. It’s outrageous. As a fatal consequence, those people have
fallen into a position that acknowledges complete public apostates as Catholics with the true faith (a
rejection of Christ and the Catholic faith); they venerate the Antichrist as a
“saint”; they hold a position on papal authority that’s equivalent to the “Old
Catholics” (who rejected papal infallibility); and they hold that the Catholic
Church has officially contradicted itself in Magisterial teaching, to name just
a few. They have fallen into a position
that’s thoroughly evil, heretical and anti-Catholic, as a result of the
obstinacy, lies and wickedness of false traditionalist leaders and their own
disinterest in the truth on the matter.
true faithful know what the correct position is without any doubt: the V2
claimants are heretical, non-Catholic antipopes. However, for those who needed a sign,
Antipope Francis’ reign is a clear sign from God that sedevacantists are and
have been correct on this issue. It’s
extremely merciful for God to make it so obvious for people shortly before the
end of the world. Countless false
traditionalists don’t deserve such a second chance. For their resistance to the truth, they
deserve to remain in the deception they have embraced. Nevertheless, in His great mercy, by allowing
Antipope Francis to be so obvious in his apostasy, God is essentially calling
to them a final time: WAKE UP and embrace the truth before it’s too late. Accept the truths of the Catholic faith
before you are cast into the eternal lake of fire – where people never have
rest, but are tormented day and night, forever and ever.
More Apostasy from Antipope Francis
On Sunday June 8, Antipope Francis will host Israeli President Shimon Peres (a Jew) and Palestinian
Authority President Mahmoud Abbas (a Muslim) in an interreligious prayer
meeting for peace. Such an event
constitutes false worship, religious indifferentism and an endorsement of false
religions. It is without any doubt
apostasy in deed. It proves again that Antipope Francis is a
public heretic and an apostate. Such an
action demonstrates that Antipope Francis professes
a false faith. Those who obstinately
accept him necessarily do as well.
Islamic prayers to be held at the
“Islamic prayers and readings from the Quran will be heard at
the Vatican on Sunday…”
Antipope Francis will even hold
the prayer meeting with the unbelievers on Pentecost Sunday. Pentecost is the day on which Catholics
commemorate the descent of the Holy Ghost.
So, Antipope Francis will pray with members of false religions who
reject the true God. He will enable
their false worship in the Vatican. And
he will do so on a day specifically dedicated to the Holy Ghost Whom Jews and
‘fruit’ of such a diabolical prayer-event will necessarily be the descent of
the evil spirit.
Subject: age of reason
Regarding Jackie's question, I
sometimes wonder if one of the reasons why Our Lady chose the young seers at
Fatima was because she wanted to alert us to the fact that children would be
reaching the age of reason quite young. I can recall
hearing false Christians express their dangerous belief that one
shouldn't "frighten" children by telling them about hell --
but Our Lady didn't hesitate to show hell to the three children including
little Jacinta… It precisely because children are not taught about
hell that the devil is able to lead them there in droves. These are
the pagan children of an apostate world, "passing on what they have
received". All lies. The
world (and usually even their own families) make it difficult
for children to find truth, and will mock or attempt to erase even the
external symbols of the true Catholic religion… young people living today
who have reached the age of reason, like all other persons who has
ever lived, are obligated to seek God and His truth and -- if they have good
will -- God will help them. God does not require of men that
which is not possible. The dogma of No Salvation Outside the Church
reminds us that every man was created by God to
know Him and His truth, and any person can do so if he
Thank you for pointing out how the "Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate
Conception" false traditionalists are reaping what they've sown.
They are of extreme bad will and are obsessed with externals and with having a
man in Rome they call "pope." What do they expect of a man who
thinks the Traditional Mass is a "fashion": "When I search more
thoroughly - the Pope said - I find that it [the Traditional Mass] is rather a
kind of fashion. And if it is a fashion, therefore it is a matter that does not
need that much attention. It is just necessary to show some patience and
kindness to people who are addicted to a certain fashion." This is
ironic given that Francis' favorite painting is Marc Chagall's, White
Crucifixion which contains the blasphemous words: "May his name and his
memory be blotted out." It is a huge tragedy to see people following
the spiritual chaos Francis leaves in his wake. "The Francis
Effect" is simply the influence hell that is granted when people consent
to Francis' apostasy and sin. This was graphically illustrated when the
Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem broke out in a fire within two days of
Francis' having visited there recently. He also showed he denies Christ
when he hid the Pectoral Cross when meeting with the two Chief Rabbis of
Israel. What an outrageous apostate!!!
Mr. & Mrs. White
I go to traditional mass… and lately
through you videos I find out some heresy at this church… My husband is novus
ordo "mess" mass but we don't follow him.
I now understand "sede"
position. I will become sede. I love your videos on "the
truths". I am still learning.
My children are learning a lot...now
they're understanding why we have to be sede…
I am vietnamese… May God and Mary keep
and protect and bless you and keep you safe.
Thank you so very much,
We’re very happy that you are looking at the material. For a number of reasons, the church you
attend is not an option for the sacraments.
It's important to realize the
situation today (during the Great Apostasy). It is one in which basically all the
churches are either heretical Vatican II churches or 'traditionalist' churches
where the priest is heretical in some way. Thus, there aren't any churches that are
fully Catholic, where one can join, regard the priest as Catholic and support
the church. There are very few options
for receiving the Eucharist today, but there are some options for receiving the
sacrament of confession (which is obviously crucial). We can help a person with these issues once
he or she is convinced on all the issues.
The guidelines on this matter are also explained on the website.
The Remnant and Robert Siscoe
Refuted on Sedevacantism [video]
I love your video…
please make more videos. Thank you so much.
Antipope Francis on Non-Catholic “Saints” and
you people are scary.
you find Catholic dogma (Christian truth) to be frightening.
The Remnant and Robert Siscoe
Refuted on Sedevacantism [video]
Unbelievable that we
are living in such times now… Where can one get a Catholic Catechism before the
Vatican II, John Paul II 'approvals' ?
You can order a catechism on our online
The material on the website, in the videos, etc. also covers the points
of faith people need to know.
… the RCC has broken
my heart. The heartless Archdiocese of Philadelphia has broken my heart by
closing our church. It just turned 50, and it's the only church I've ever
belonged to. They forced its failure because the land it sits on is the most
valuable in South Philadelphia. They will sell it to developers. They closed a
number of churches in suburban counties, and these were more successful
ones--financially solvent and well-attended. They are forcing these churches to
merge with others. I'm sure it's because they can get millions for the land. If
my church had surplus cash and full pews, we'd still be merging. Unlike the God
they purport to worship, RCC leadership does not reward good behavior.
MHFM: Your concern
needs to be having the Catholic faith and saving your soul, not whether a
particular church building has been closed.
As the material on the website proves, the ‘Archdiocese’ of Philadelphia
is not truly Catholic. It’s part of the
Vatican II sect, the end-times Counter Church.
The organization under Antipope Francis (and the ‘bishops’ in communion
with him) is not the Catholic Church.
The New Mass is invalid and must be avoided. That’s true regardless of what buildings they
close or keep open. It’s crucial that
you consult the information, become convinced on all the issues, get out of the
New Mass, and reject the Vatican II sect.
I recently came across a french version of your website.
It was by pure accident… It has a number of your videos translated, one of the
most important ones being "The Third Secret of Fatima." This is
great! I live in a French province of Belgium and there are a number of people
that i'm trying to convert by having them watch your videos, but until now, all
i've come across is English and Spanish.
Now that I have this information. I can help spread your
message in my area. I hope that the person responsible for this French site
keeps up the good work and continues adding to it. Please put this info out on
your main site, for there are a lot of French speaking people out there in need
MHFM: Yes, there are materials
available in other languages. There is a
Spanish version of our website and YouTube Channel:
www.vaticanocatolico.com - Spanish Website
As you noted, important materials
(including videos) are also available in French on this website:
http://la-foi.fr – French
are versions of the website and materials in Portuguese, Romanian and Italian:
www.igrejacatolica.pt – Portuguese
www.bisericacatolica.org – Romanian
www.vaticanocattolico.com – Italian
sites should be spread to those who speak those languages.
I recently watched a video on youtube regarding your opinion
on homosexuality. I agree that it isn't normal but to say it happens because of
mortal sin is a little strange. Some cases yes but how do you explain that to a
7 year old child who goes to their Mother and says I think God made a mistake.
I have really been trying to understand this but I have seen too many children
that felt this way. Please explain.
In response we would point out that many children today are being raised in a
totally godless and extremely wicked environment from their earliest days. They can reach the age of reason at a young
age. Drinking in the wicked environment
which surrounds them, they can choose to embrace evil and reject the natural
law. As a result, they can fall into
such perversions (such as boys thinking they are girls and vice versa).
video proves that people can make choices about their life at a very young age.
“Gay” NFL Prospect Michael Sam Makes A
Revealing Admission (video)
In your refutation of GJC you stated something that really
popped out at me when I re-read it: "His paragraphs are a clear
example how inept and (one must say) actually stupid evil people become as a consequence of hating the
truth and hating those who promote it."
Yes, it's very sad, but you are quite
correct… People become stupid because of their (frankly, insane)
attraction to evil… Yet, as you mentioned in another place, "the
incredible dishonesty and profound blindness of heretics" makes them think
themselves exceptionally wise, whilst they are, in fact, losing their
ability of discernment, not to mention love of humility. It's an infinite tragedy, of course, for it
results in the loss of their soul; but even worse than that, they almost always
take many souls down with them. It's all so needless when they could so
easily have the truth… "Their dishonesty results in absolute idiocy."
And, tragically, damnation…
name is David… I am a student at law and I live in Québec. On the West Island
of Montréal. I read your page, read your news features and watch your videos…
I stop going to Mass, at my local «novus ordo» church; what am I going to
would appreciate your advice with regard to this matter.
Before receiving sacraments, one must be convinced on all the issues. That includes a commitment to never attend
the New Mass again. It’s invalid and
non-Catholic. It must be avoided under
pain of grave sin. You should realize
that from the facts in the material.
There are very few options for receiving Communion today, but more
options for confession. We can help a
person with specifics once he or she is convinced on the issues.
The Remnant and Robert Siscoe
Refuted on Sedevacantism [video]
Great video! Siscoe
and fake 'traditionalists' don't believe in the living Mystical Body
of Christ. For if its Body and Soul are severed, it is dead! These heretics
might protest that they are only making a logical distinction, not an actual
division. But that doesn't work. For if someone can belong to the Soul of the
Church but not its Body, then Soul and Body are not merely distinct,
they are split, divided, cleft asunder. The 'church' of the fake
'traditionalists' is a lifeless corpse, a cadaver, a putrid carcase oozing
heresy, fit only for those who would prey on externals.
What I find fascinating about the fake Lucia's facial features is that the fake
Lucia's squared jaw, it's so distinct, and when you see the classic picture of
the three children of Fatima posing for that hard, serious stare into the
camera way back when, these three blessed children have these distinct oval
shaped heads and oval chin lines. Clearly markers of their
genetic/hereditary characters. Fascinating how the blind sheeple can so
easily be taken by the prince of darkness, Lucifer! Ave Maria gratia
Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (First
2014 Archive –beginning around January)
Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (Third 2013 Archive –beginning
Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (Second 2013 Archive –beginning
Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (First 2013 Archive –beginning
Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (Fall 2012 Archive)
Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (Summer 2012 Archive)
Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (Spring 2012 Archive)
Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (Fall 2011 Archive)
Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (Summer 2011 Archive)
Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (Spring 2011 Archive)
Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (Winter 2010-2011 Archive)
Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (Summer-Fall 2010 Archive)
Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (Winter 2010 Archive)
for the E-Exchanges is Here (A)
Next Archive for E-Exchanges is Here (B)