Summer-Fall 2010 E-Exchanges Archive
Results
Subject: Interesting video on polls and
elections
Thanks for your latest thought-provoking
video about polling and election results. While you note some plausible
reasons to be suspicious about the last two major elections, your passing
reference to the fact that polling has already started on the 2012 race raises
a point that is probably worthy of a video of its own. I marvel at the
fact that, in every election cycle, months before the first presidential
primary, the major news media and their favorite pollsters have already decided
who are the "serious candidates" for president -- generally no more
than three or four from each major party, each with solid Establishment
credentials. (And, of course, almost never do they consider anyone from
outside of those two parties.) Then, in a sort of self-fulfilling
prophecy, the voters are subtly conditioned on a daily basis by the mainstream
media to believe that voting for anyone but one of those "anointed"
by the media and the pollsters would be a "wasted vote", no matter
how much they may believe that an announced candidate not on the pre-approved
list would be a far better president.
It's astounding how many voters have been programmed to think of casting their
vote as being comparable to a trip to the racetrack or the stock market, where
they, in effect, bet on a winner, and cash in only if their chosen candidate
wins. They become fixated on the media's tacit decree that Candidate X
"has no chance of winning", so they fail to note that their one vote
(even if it is counted honestly) will add only one to any candidate's vote
total, whether that candidate is considered a front-runner or not, and, as a
single vote, is very unlikely to make the difference in the election, no matter
who the oddsmakers' favorite is. And, as such, like sheep, they let the
media and the pollsters herd them into choosing the perceived least
objectionable Establishment puppet from a pre-set tiny list of
candidates. That's a profound manipulation of the civics-class concept of
a free election even if there isn't subsequent deception in the count on
election day, and you make a good case for the latter being a strong
possibility as well.
If you look at the media/pollster pre-set list of early 2008 in light of my
point here, I think the public's dissatisfaction with Establishment politics
was reflected in the voters' choices of Obama and McCain as the major party
nominees. One could argue that neither Obama nor McCain was truly an
anti-Establishment "principled man of the people", but, given the
short list of media-approved "serious" candidates, those two at least
presented the most anti-Establishment image, and, thus, got at least a
half-hearted nod from voters who were fed up with Establishment politics in
general. (That's even assuming those primary elections themselves weren't
blatantly rigged, which, as your material suggests, they may have been.)
Had the voters not been manipulated from the outset into believing that Ron
Paul and Dennis Kucinich "couldn't get nominated", who knows how many
would have voted for them instead of the perceived least evil person on the
unofficial "approved list"? And, given the fact that there's
nothing in the U.S. Constitution about a two-party system, how many people
would vote for a third party candidate if they weren't distracted by daily
media focus on the polls over and above the candidates' positions on the
issues?
Your contention of massive election-rigging would also provide a rational
explanation for some otherwise baffling election results at the state and local
level. In my home city of Phoenix, the current and previous mayors have
implemented extremely unpopular "public-private partnerships" in
which as much as $100 million in tax money has been given to rich developers to
build hotels and shopping malls obviously not demanded by the marketplace; the
city government then runs a massive deficit, and the citizens are sternly told
that they must approve large tax increases or lay off large numbers of police
and fire fighters. Even the pollsters admit that the vast majority of the
public is outraged by these shenanigans, yet the offending mayor(s) get
"re-elected" by a wide margin every time. Since, as you have
noted, it's outlandishly easy for voting machines to be electronically rigged,
when additional evidence exposes anomalies of this nature, this is one possible
explanation for them that should be seriously investigated.
Thanks again for being a source of little-known information that deserves our
attention. I'll look forward to your ongoing insights.
Lyndon Olson
Hoax
Subject:
Hoax videos
After
watching both of these, when they were posted; the one question that
still comes to mind is, why didn't (or don't) they wait the proper amount
of time (before announcing results) to make the whole "thing"
look more realistic? Well, everyone knows patience is a virtue. And what's most
apparent here is that we're not dealing with virtuous men. They're
busted!
RBS
MHFM: They have a vested interest in
announcing the results early. It helps
ratings; it programs the public to believe that the media is essentially
all-knowing; and it enables them to wipe away most possible future opposition
to their desired results by convincing the people early on that things have
been decided and that further work for their desired candidate is therefore
futile. There is also the element of
arrogance: they don’t believe people will realize and/or do anything about it.
Wondering
Subject:
could use some help
Hi brothers
michael and peter,
I was wondering if you could help me find a legitimate priest to go to
confession to and maybe receive the eucharist if possible. I'll give you some
background. I was born and raised in the Novus Ordo sect all my life up until a
couple of years ago i was going there. So I've never been to a real mass or a
real priest. Thats when i discovered your website, wow the best thing that
has ever happened to me. Can’t thank you brothers enough for the work that you
are doing. If I remember correctly I think i was on catholic [forum] and
someone was arguing in favor of your site saying you brothers hold the true
position. I saw that and went over to your site. Have to admit i was pretty
blown away by what i saw. I continued to attend the novus ordo church for a
while, still looking more and more at your site everyday. Long story short I
became convinced of all the things you were saying because it’s backed up by
the truth and i finally saw it. On a different topic thought this was
pretty telling too, I was trying to tell my mom about the salvation dogma and
what it really means and that if the church were a remnant of people it would
be the true church, (arguing the sedevacantist position) she kept arguing
saying well where's the hierarchy, we have to have a pope, etc. The point I'm
getting at is she even went on to say that she would go to a protestant church
if she had to, if there were no so called "catholic" ones to go to.
It made me sad, this is my mom. On the positive side though I have convinced my
brother to check out your material and he seems to be really receptive to it.
Hoping and praying to convince my mom and dad though because i have a lot of
family members left that are still young like 11 or 12 that look up to them and
there not providing any spiritual guidance for them right now. Sorry for the
long winded email. If you brothers could help me find a priest I would really
appreciate it… Thank you again for all that you do.
God Bless you
Aaron
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. That’s an interesting story. Your mom is arguing against the truth on the
basis of her false understanding about the hierarchy, but she is willing to go
to a Protestant church. That’s quite
revealing. It demonstrates again that
for most people who profess to be Catholic today, it’s not about the
faith. Their only concern is about a
religious community feeling or following their local leader. For them, it’s about showing up at a
church. As we’ve said before, as long as
a man in Rome dresses up in robes and claims to be pope, they will accept him
no matter what he believes.
With regard to confession, if you
contact us here we can help you with that issue. But it is addressed specifically in this
file: Where to go to Mass or confession today? It discusses how,
if there isn’t a better option, one may go to an old Novus Ordo priest for
confession, if the priest says the proper words and has been ordained in the
traditional rite. That’s an important
option to acknowledge today simply because there are so few priests and
essentially all of them are heretics, including the “traditionalists.”
Whoever
Whoever is against the pope is against the
catholic church and is heretic. if you don't want to fallow the pope is as
martin luther the heretic. take good look and don't be heretic. have a nice
day.
Richard
MHFM: You follow an antipope who has praised Luther and agrees
with him on Justification. See our
heresies of Benedict XVI section. Take a
good look at what the Church teaches, stop being a liar, and begin to believe
in Catholic teaching; for you do not at this time. If you start to be honest, you will see that
Benedict XVI is not a Catholic and therefore not a pope; and that by defending
him you reject all the popes and attack the Church.
Video
Subject:
Election night video
Dear
Brothers,
Great
video on the election night hoax. It's beyond doubt that the major media
corporations have secret information that enables them to make such amazingly
accurate claims at such impossibly early times in the election. I think it may
also be a trick to make people put more trust in those media stations than they
deserve, because "if they can predict the elections so early, they're
probably right about EVERYTHING!!!"… Thank you for exposing such a
horrendous hoax!!!
God
Bless,
Chris
White
Calendar
Good evening Brother,
You used to put the calendar at
this address : http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/calendar.html I have notice that it is still the calendar
of October 2010. Could you please tell me if there is a new link so that i
could update my bookmark? …
Sincerely,
Philippe
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. It has been updated at that link.
Medjugorje
Subject: Mother, Medjugorje
Dear Brother Michael and Peter,
Hi. I was the person who emailed the other
day about my mom who took the trip to Medjugorje last week. Well, I was talking
to her last night and I asked if anyone else in her tour group had their
rosaries turn to gold. Only one other person out of 60 in her group did it
happen to. That tells me that the devil is working very hard to keep her in
lockstep with Vatican II. He knows your information is of the truth and that
I've been praying hard for her conversion to the true Catholic faith. But I
won't give up, just like St. Augustine's mother didn't give up on her son, I
won't give up on my mother. She was asking me over and over last night to watch
her Medjugorje dvds she brought back from her trip. I tried to strike a deal
with her. I said I'd watch her dvds if she would watch your dvds. She didn't
agree, but she's strongly considering it. If she does agree to watch your
material, then it could be my opening to get her to listen with an open heart
about the true faith. Please keep my mother, Carol, in your prayers.
God Bless,
Josh
Statues
Subject: Weeping Statues
Dear MHFM,
Maybe I am wrong but it seems that statues
of the Blessed Virgin began to weep tears and tears of blood since the
introduction of the new mass. I don't recall any of this activity prior to
1969. It may also be a sign of the hand of God being ready to be released on
this corrupt world in which we live and Mary is saddened by the fact that she
can no longer hold back His wrath. But then again it could be another ploy from
the devil. Just imagine if one of the statues somehow spoke and told the
listeners that the Vatican II church is the true church and must be followed in
all of it's teachings. The videos I watched were fascinating, especially the
one that showed the Mother's eyes appear to open and close.
What is your take on this activity?
Your ardent supporter,
Bob
MHFM: It’s either a false sign and wonder
from Satan (2 Thess. 2) to confirm people in the new religion or it represents
the Virgin Mary weeping over the apostasy and manifold abominations of the
Vatican II sect.
Bad will
Subject: Bad Will
Dear Mhfm,
Don't got alot of time to write this. But was having a quick look at your
e-exchange section. Just wanted to say spot on Bill. The novus ordo always use
that excuse. Certain "traditionalists" who attend masses they
shouldn't attend use it too. So mhfm would love to see you publish something on
this issue if you get a chance.
God Bless
Sean
Question
Subject: Question regarding the Luminous
Mysteries of the Rosary
Hello Brother,
Is it true Pope John Paul II added the
Luminous Mysteries to the Rosary? Seeing as he was an anti-Pope, should we
recite this part of the Rosary? What is the reason he felt it was necessary to
add this?
Thank you.
Sandy
MHFM: No, one should not recite the Luminous Mysteries. They are not part of the true Rosary. The reason Antipope John Paul II felt it was
necessary to add them is that he was a non-Catholic revolutionary who wanted to
change everything.
New Video
MHFM: This is a new video. It’s a follow-up to our recent video, Our Lady of Guadalupe overcomes the Mexican
Serpent.
Cortes' Amazing Conquest of the Aztec Empire [video]
Bad Will
Subject: Bad Will
Dear Brothers:
Can you publish something about one of the
main things I run into with Novus Ordo people and that is various versions of:
"It's OK for me to go there because if they are wrong it's not my fault
and they may suffer but not me!"
THANK YOU!
GOD BLESS YOU!
Bill
Anglican false converts
Subject: Five Anglican Bishops join
Catholic Church
Dear Brothers,
I thought you might be interested in this.
Two items are of particular note, one is the statement by the Vatican that
”groups of Anglicans can join Catholicism, but maintain a distinct religious
identity”. The other is in the analysis which tells of how the Church of
England has had bishops for over 2,000 years.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11709148
Best Wishes,
Derek
MHFM: Yes, they are false converts. They are not “converting” because they
believe in Catholic teaching, but simply because the Anglican Sect has become
too radical for them to maintain a warm community feeling within it. If the Anglicans weren’t allowing
homosexuality, women “priests,” etc. these people would almost certainly remain
Anglicans. To cement their place as false
converts within the New Order Counter Church, the Vatican II sect and Antipope
Benedict XVI are even allowing them to continue to use their heretical Anglican
liturgical books.
Benedict XVI, Apostolic Constitution Anglicanorum Coetibus, #5, III, Nov. 4,
2009: “Without excluding liturgical celebrations according to the Roman Rite, the Ordinariate has the faculty to
celebrate the Holy Eucharist and the other Sacraments, the Liturgy of the Hours
and other liturgical celebrations according to the liturgical books proper to
the Anglican tradition, which have been approved by the Holy See, so as to maintain the liturgical, spiritual
and pastoral traditions of the Anglican Communion within the Catholic Church,
as a precious gift nourishing the faith of the members of the Ordinariate and
as a treasure to be shared.”
Attitude
Dear
Brothers:
The
email from Todd got me thinking again about the attitude of the SSPX.
They are very fond of quoting --again and again -- that Lefebvre "passed
on what he received." I think they even put this quote on his
tombstone. And when they say it, they say it in a breathless sort of way
- like maybe people are supposed to have a moment of silence to venerate this
"profound statement" from a man whose canonization they have taken
upon themselves to pronounce.
But no
one doubts that Lefebvre passed on what he received - that is the problem in a
nutshell. The question is: from whom did he receive it?
Passing on what one receives is the way of all flesh; generations of
protestants have been doing it for centuries.
The
Dimond Brothers do not pass on what they have received; they pass on what
Holy Mother Church has
received. That and only that is the Deposit of
Faith.
The
SSPX claims to oppose "false ecumenism" but, like their other claims,
this is false - for this "ecumenism" is nothing more than
baptism of desire a hundred years later, come to full
fruition. Passed on by Lefebvre and embraced by his followers who
are more interested in proving him right than examining the truth. The
SSPX makes absurd claims to oppose the MHFM but will never address
the issue at hand, which is the authentic teachings of the Popes…
The
very reason the SSPX cannot see that the V-2 gang of thugs are false popes is
because they and their followers have obstinately denied the teachings of the
true popes.
If
the SSPX were in good will - and actually believed the truth of their
position - it would be a simple matter to say: "I will read
these MHFM materials with red pen in hand and indicate any errors I might
find". And then
they would make an important discovery. But I have never
heard of any SSPX priest doing this or expressing a willingness to do
this. And that to me is most telling. Perhaps they know what they
will find.
Lee
Ann
Can’t
I
purchased a St. Pius X picture of the net and hung the picture on my wall
in a picture frame. My mom, someone who prays the Rosary every night, asks me
who that is. I tell her it’s Pope St. Pius X… She replies by saying that John
Paul II is the greatest Pope ever. She's someone you just can't get through to.
What’s also irritating is the only Saint she knows about is St. Anthony. But I
bet she doesn't know a clue about St. Anthony.
Daniel
Authority
Thank you very much for your kind response.
Please forgive me if I ask one brief follow-up question: If Vatican II HAD BEEN
a legitimate Council (and I, as you, maintain that it was NOT) would it have
had the authority to declare that Islam was NOT a pagan religion and that Pope
Callixtus' declaration was overturned and that the Muslims' god Allah was the
same Deity as our Holy Trinity? Thank you.
Ricardo Parks
MHFM: No, it would not be possible
for a true ecumenical council to contradict the declaration that Islam is a diabolical
and pagan religion. That is an
unchangeable truth; for it flows from what Christ revealed to the Apostles
about the true faith, the true God and how people must consider non-Christian
religions that reject the true God. The
very fact that Vatican II did contradict Catholic teaching on this matter
proves that it was not a true council of the Catholic Church.
V-2 Seminarian
Subject:
V-2 seminarian
My
friend a v 2 seminarian has accepted the catholic faith. Though he is still
there in 4th year philosophy about to write his final exam. He hopes to
infiltrate the place with catholic teachings until he is sent out. Is that a
nice option ? What again must i tell him. Thanks for answering some of my
questions….My parents are on my neck. Pls remember me in your prayers.
Ta…
MHFM: No, a Catholic can’t remain at
a V-2 seminary. It’s critical that you
inform him that he will not save his soul unless he leaves the seminary and
completely rejects the Vatican II sect and the New Mass. He should also be informed about the website
and the information that covers the Vatican II sect.
Comment
Dear Mhfm,
Excellent historical
description of the savages and their cultural and demonic practices nowadays
endorsed as good by the Vatican II sect led by the head heresiarch Benedict
16. 10,000 to 1 and MHFM defends the faith against such odds. Ave
Maria, gratia plena...
Dea…
SSPX
Subject:
Rebuked by the SSPX
Hi
Brothers,
Well I was finally rebuked by Father Jordan Fahnestock at St. Anthony of Padua
SSPX Church in Caldwell, New Jersey. I arrived 15 mins. before the herd
was to be let out and I was able to hand out a few of your books on,
"Outside the Catholic Church there is Absolutely no Salvation".
I was pleasantly surprised by one father with little children, he said he was a
fan of Brother Michael, I just don't know why he would be going to this
church? After that I went back to my car parked by the walkway so I could
be ready to hand out your material, then all of a sudden one of the ushers threw
open the door and was high stepping it toward me, he was such a good soldier
and I told him just that, he asked me with attitude, if I was
distributing material at the church and I said yes, he told me that Father
Fahnestock didn't want me to do that unless he saw the material first, I said
ok I'll wait for Father and show him what I am distributing! As he walked
away I said, such blind faith! Well, just before the people
were to come out, all three ushers came out and stood right by my car as if to
protect the people from me, can you imagine. While still waiting for
Father, an older couple came out, who I had breakfast with the week before,
there was a group of them, they asked me to join them while I was trying to
hand out material, while at breakfast last week a conversation came up about
people who were not catholic who prayed to God and I said that their prayers
are not pleasing to God because they don't have the faith, they all gasped at
me. So I sent her an email when I got home from breakfast last week
citing Hebrews 11:6. Getting back to this week, the older couple came out
after the ushers and the lady who was at breakfast the week before walks over
to me with an attitude and says, "don't email me anymore I don't need you
for my spiritual advisor," she was offended because I gave her the proof
against her error, what Pride! Then Father came out and
walked over to me and shook my hand and the first thing he asked me was did I
go to Mass this morning and I said no. I showed him the book and I stated
that the book contained dogmas, encyclicals, statements made by true popes and
saints regarding the salvation dogma, one baptism, refuting invisible ignorance
, etc. He looked at it very quickly and stated, wow, this is heavy stuff and I
said it's not heavy at all, its simple stuff! He went on to say that the
society is suspicious of the Dimond Brothers and the fact that they are off on
they own and not part of the church, basically trying to make the connection,
"you don't have jurisdiction for your mission! He also stated there
is an issue with the sedevacantist position that the brothers hold. He
also stated that you are somewhat prideful to say the least because you are off
on your own! Well needless to say, I'm finished with this
church!!! Here is Father Fahnstock's email… I would love for you to
sledgehammer him with the faith!
Todd
MHFM: Interesting story… It’s so true
that so many supporters of those groups don’t think for themselves and they aren’t
interested in the truth. They just
follow whatever their priest or local community says, to their own
damnation.
Islam
Subject: Islam
Dear Brothers Dimond: Citations on your
website indicate clearly a strong condemnation of "the diabolical sect of
Mahomet" by popoe Eugene IV and Callixtus III. I maintain that the
"god" that they worship, Allah, is in fact, based on extensive
historic archaeological research, el-Alilah, who is "the moon god" -
in other words, Satan. I submitted this matter as a reader inquiry to
"This Rock" Catholic apologetics magazine and my response, in no
uncertain terms from Fr. Vincent Serpa, O.P., at This Rock was that I am wrong
- Islam worships Allah and Allah is the same as our God. I believe that Fr.
Serpa is wrong and have told him so, but I seem to be getting nowhere with my
argument. Can you please tell me what the official teaching of the Church is
and has been since the founding of Islam in the 7th Century, concerning who or
what Allah really is? Thank you!
Ricardo L. Parks
MHFM: Certainly it’s not a surprise
that you would receive such a response from an antichrist and apostate group
that couldn’t care less about traditional Catholic teaching. The traditional teaching of the popes on Islam
is found in this video we did:
It cites numerous popes who, while obviously
desiring the conversion of Muslims, describe Islam and Muslims as “diabolical,”
“abominable,” “faithless,” “sacrilegious,” and more. It also covers an extremely important quote
from Pope Callixtus III. He officially
classified the Muslims with the “pagans.”
That’s extremely significant
and pertains directly the question you ask.
Since the Church officially classifies Muslims with the pagans, that
proves that they do not worship the same God as Catholics, contrary to what
Vatican II heretically teaches. It
destroys Vatican II’s teaching in that regard, and the many heretics who defend
it. Although, it’s true that papal
citations shouldn’t be necessary to demonstrate that Muslims reject the Trinity
and therefore don’t worship the same God as Catholics who believe in the
Trinity.
Lying Sign
Subject: Medjugorje “Miracle”
Dear MHFM,
Hello, I hope you have been doing well. I
want to tell you of my mother's recent trip to Medjugorje. First I will preface
that she knows that I hold the sedevacantist position, and despite my numerous
attempts over the past 4 years to get her to open her eyes to the imposter
church, she remains staunchly Vatican 2. Before she went on the trip I tried
expaining how the "Mary" of Medjugorje cannot be the same person
as Our Lady because the real Mary woudn't praise other religions. Again,
in one ear and out the other. So last week she took her trip to
Medjugorje and got back yesterday. She was so excited because the metal
crucifix of her rosary turned from silver to gold while she was
there. This is so sad, she is so easily deceived all the more now. Yet it is my
mother's love of the lies of Vatican 2 that makes her fall for lying signs and
wonders of the devil. I can't tell you how sad and depressed and frustrated I get
over family members, especially my own mother, who unless by the grace of God
to shed light into their souls, will not be saved.
Sincerely,
Josh
MHFM: Thank you for the e-mail.
It’s a prime example of a lying sign and wonder that St. Paul predicted.
He prophesied that they will come in the
final days to deceive those who receive not the love of the truth (i.e., the
traditional Catholic faith). The example
you give from Medjugorje, deceiving a person who doesn’t want the truth, is
exactly what is foretold. It shows that
we are living in those times.
2 Thessalonians 2:9-12: "Whose coming is according to the working
of Satan, in all power, and signs,
and lying wonders, And in all seduction of iniquity to them that
perish; because they receive not the love of the truth, that they might
be saved. Therefore God shall send them the operation of error, to believe
lying. That all may be judged
who have not believed the truth, but have consented to iniquity."
False Apparitions (Divine Mercy, Bayside, Medjugorje) [Link to Section]
Medal
Dear Brothers,
I just thought this was interesting. Have you ever looked at the congressional
medal of honor? It is the upside down star. The pentagram
Paul
Confession
Subject: Confession
Dear Brothers,
I am a recent "prodigal" catholic, who feels very much in danger of
losing his soul… i firstly would like to thank you for your work and your
direction, as well as your testament to the true church, and to live without
fear, and to demand the changes most desperately needed in our house. Having said that, my problem enters here. I
want to make a good confession, but Novus Ordo is rampant through our area…
[and] has become laughably drunk with the "do what you FEEL is
right" mentality. Now, i haven’t confessed there for some time….
Brothers, I want to make the right confession and sin no more… I
have re-found my God, my mother, and the rest, and love it, feel it, but cannot
partake in communion for my mortal sin.
Knowing i am walking in danger everyday is beyond un-settling. I
desperately need to know what to do, Brothers. If you can help me in anyway…
In the Name Of The Father and Of The Son and Of The Holy Ghost
Thank You my friends.
Sincerely Yours…
MHFM: It’s great to hear about your
interest. First, you should pray the
Rosary each day. Second, you need to
stop going to the invalid New Mass if you still go there. Before
receiving sacraments, it's necessary for a person to be convinced of all the
traditional teachings of the Catholic Church.
That includes a complete rejection of the Vatican II Church. It also includes holding the correct Catholic
positions on the various issues that are relevant today. Once a person is
convinced, he or she needs to make the traditional profession of faith from the
Council of Trent. That’s found in the
file below. At that point, a person can
go to confession to a priest ordained before 1968 or in the Eastern Rite. We can help you with options in that
regard. Confessions made to “priests”
ordained in the New Rite of Ordination are not valid.
Where to go to Mass or confession today?
Machine
Subject: Documentary Spain
Dear MHFM, Wow! I just watched this program
that showed how Christians of Spain persecuted the Muslim and the Jew. I'm not
saying Spain was populated with one saint after another but the program was so
pro Muslim and pro Jew it was sickening. All the "scholars"
were from US universities and they were very good at explaining the beauty and
tolerance of the Muslim culture. The Jewish scholar was exceptional at
explaining how the Europeans were barbarians and not really smart enough to
govern themselves thus the need for the Jew. Surprisingly, the Catholics
were never defended for anything (except the broken treaty in Grenada) and
Isabelle was a fanatic. It was a good example for my kids to see the
Anti-Christ propaganda machine in action, on prime time America.
Matthew
Belgian
Subject:
Belgian V-2 Sect
Hello,
I've read on your website the section
concerning mass sexual scandal in the V2 sect, and I think something can be
added there.
It
is quite illustrative that even at least one "bishop" is directly
involved in the scandal.
"Belgian Catholic bishop admits molesting boy"
"Belgian Catholic offices raided in sex abuse probe"
Best
regards,
Patrick
Cortes Video
Subject:
Cortes Video
What
a superb video on Cortes---fascinating----but the part about the faces kind of
grossed me out-----keep up the wonderful work for Our Lord and Our Lady!!...
also I wanted to say a big THANK YOU to MHFM for sending me the… audios…
I think I know just the person to send them to...a 14 year old who claims
he'll read any Catholic books I send him… Please pray for us!...
Anne
Wow
Subject:
Queen of Heaven Parish Buffalo, NY
Bro
Michael Dimond
Bro
Peter Dimond
I was speaking… about Queen of Heaven
Parish in West Seneca, Buffalo NY… I heard about a rock band giving a concert
at this Parish gym this Saturday. I found the website to the church and
was not suprised to find that they have had previous carnivals with live rock
music, magic acts and beer tents. I have included the link to their
page. I think you will find this very interesting.
May our Lord Jesus Christ and our Holy
Mother Mary protect us and save us in these last days of the world.
Kieran
http://qofhchurch.org/pages/001Parish/Carnival%202010.php
MHFM: Wow, that’s really
something. “Magic” Shows, A Beer Tent, A
Gambling Tent… it’s surprising even for the Novus Ordo.
Form
MHFM: For those it might interest, we have a new
order form: Order Form (PDF). We also have a new edition of our mp3: MP3 Disc (7th edition).
Ecumenical Council
Dear Brother Dimonds,
I was researching the word
"Ecumenical" and came upon this:
"Ecumenical Councils are those to
which the bishops, and others entitled to vote, are convoked from the
whole world (oikoumene) under the presidency of the pope or
his legates, and the decrees of which, having received
papal confirmation, bind all Christians.
A council, Ecumenical in its convocation, may fail to secure
the approbation of the whole Church or of the pope,
and thus not rank in authority with Ecumenical councils. Such
was the case with the Robber Synod of 449 (Latrocinium
Ephesinum), the Synod of Pisa in 1409, and in part with
the Councils of Constance and Basle."
… Could you please explain what the
underlined bold statement above means?
Thanks,
T.N. Le
MHFM: First, you are citing a
definition of “ecumenical councils” given in the Catholic Encyclopedia. It’s basically correct but is not infallibly
precise (as a dogmatic definition would be).
The statement means that if a council is convoked in a manner that would
be ecumenical, but is not confirmed by the pope after it sets forth its
teaching, it does not have the force of a binding ecumenical council. The confirmation must be given by the
pope. The statement that it needs the
approbation of the “whole Church” might be confusing because if a pope confirms
an ecumenical council in an authoritative fashion, it becomes the teaching of
the Church and is binding on the whole Church.
This fact about ecumenical councils,
by the way, shows that the position of those who reject parts of Vatican II,
but accept Paul VI, John Paul II, Benedict XVI as valid but bad popes, is
ridiculous and completely opposed to traditional Catholic teaching. Paul VI authoritatively and solemnly
confirmed Vatican II. It was, therefore,
in their sect, an “ecumenical council” which must be accepted. If they can reject it, then one could reject
past ecumenical councils.
“Each and every one of the things set forth
in this Decree has won the consent of the fathers. We,
too, by the Apostolic Authority conferred on us by Christ, join with the
venerable fathers in approving, decreeing, and establishing these things in
the Holy Spirit, and we direct that what has thus been enacted in synod
[council] be published to God’s glory… I,
Paul, Bishop of the Catholic Church.” (Paul VI, solemnly closing every
document of Vatican II)
Since Vatican II was clearly heretical and must be rejected,
this fact proves the sedevacantist position.
Conclusion
AP have you ever
considered the scenario that you are wrong? It's amazing how bad-willed people
will cleverly reason around the truth while being unable to be ignorant of the
truth. Your only digg your grave deeper as you reject the truth.
Brothers, I've often wondered what happened to the elder family members during
the inception of the Great Deception in the early 1960's as they slaved away to
have their children attend Catholic Schools. How they could be so
deceived and turn away from the true faith. The conclusion is that they were
never real Catholics, just going with the flow every Sunday, while chasing the
American modern dream during the week as seen today.
While observing the senseless behaviors of parents this past Halloween, you can
see the product of the last couple generations. It will be no-wonder, what this
un-Godly generation of kids will be passing on to their children.
God Bless,
Tom Miles
Individual
This individual AP love's Mr. Corapi like
someone loves a rock star, Mr. Corapi makes AP's life very easy for him.
I think Mr. Corapi is possessed by Aleister Crowley because they both say the
same thing; it doesn't matter if you are muslim, protestant, jewish etc. just
practice it, live it, do what thou wilt! I would pay a 1000.00 dollars
for a front row seat to see the Dimond Brothers debate "Mr". Corapi,
it would be like taking candy away from a baby!!!!!!!!!
Todd
MHFM: It is remarkable how devoted these people are to the
heretic Corapi. They obviously don’t
care about the fact that he accepts false religions and renders Christ and the
faith meaningless. He’s a true false
shepherd, one of the many leading people astray in this apostasy.
False Law
Dear
Brothers,
How
does AP explain the fact that even in most Pagan cultures they know
that murder, theft, lying, adultery, etc. is evil. AP reminds me of the
radical schismatics who try to multiply the things that are necessary for
salvation, such as by making up their own false laws and dogmas. AP's
false law, that one doesn't sin unless they know it is sinful, contradicts
both the natural and Divine laws:
Romans
2:14-16 - "For when the Gentiles, who have
not the law, do by nature those things that are of the law; these having not
the law are a law to themselves: Who shew the work of the law
written in their hearts, their conscience bearing witness to them, and their thoughts between themselves accusing, or also
defending one another, In the day when God shall judge the secrets of men
by Jesus Christ, according to my gospel."
Pope
St. Pius X, Iucunda Sane - '36. And since, for our moral discipline, the Divine
Redeemer proposes as our supreme model of perfection His heavenly Father
(Matthew v. 48), that is, the Divine goodness itself, who can
fail to see the mighty impulse thence accruing to the ever more perfect observance
of the natural law inscribed in our hearts, and consequently to the greater welfare of the individual,
the family, and universal society? The ferocity of the barbarians was thus
transformed to gentleness, woman was freed from subjection, slavery was
repressed, order was restored in the due and reciprocal independence upon one
another of the various classes of society, justice was recognized, the true
liberty of souls was proclaimed, and social and domestic peace assured."
God
Bless,
Chris
White
Soon
MHFM: We hope to have some new videos posted soon.
Mortal Sin
[Note: this is a response from the person
who e-mailed and argued that a mortal sin is not mortal unless a person knows
it’s a mortal sin]
You offer a good argument. But here is
another. Lets say a mentally retarded person beats to death another mentally
retarded person, it has happened before. Would this be a mortal sin against
this person?
Of course the average person knows this is a sin. But one of the requirements
of a sin being mortal, for us Catholics, is the knowing and willful violation
of God's law. It is much like telling a child you may not play in the street.
He then has the ability to CHOOSE whether to break this law or not.
If the child was never told, "Don't play in the street", of course he
never made the choice against his parent, he simply did not know it would be a
grave danger, thus not having a willful violation of his parent.
CHECK OUT THIS LINK: EWTN IS LEGIT. It should clear up this matter…
AP
MHFM: By presenting this argument, you demonstrate that your
understanding of this issue is false.
Describing someone as “mentally retarded” is somewhat vague. Most mentally retarded people can distinguish
basic right from wrong, but are simply mentally slow. In that case, a mentally retarded person who
beats to death another person knows the action is wrong and does commit a
mortal sin, even if he doesn’t know about the concept of “mortal sin.” He knows he shouldn’t beat his neighbor to
death. The action is gravely wrong in
and of itself. Thus, it’s another
example of how a person can commit a mortal sin if he deliberately commits an
action that is gravely wrong in itself, even if he doesn’t care about or
understand the concept of “mortal sin.”
If you posit a “mentally retarded” person who doesn’t know right
from wrong at all, then you make him equivalent to an infant. Infants cannot commit actual sins. Hence, the person you posit (if such a person
existed) would not be guilty of mortal sin – not because the commission of an
act by a reasoning person without specific knowledge of “mortal sin” renders it
non-mortally sinful, as you and Corapi heretically maintain, but rather because
infants and those lacking the use of reason cannot commit actual sins. Therefore, your examples do not in any way
contradict the Catholic truth that we expressed. They serve only to demonstrate the specious
and desperate nature of your avoidance of Catholic teaching. People who deliberately commit acts that are
inherently and gravely wrong, such as fornication, murder or contraception,
commit mortal sin, even if they don’t know about the concept of “mortal
sin.” They know that what they are doing
is gravely opposed to the right use of reason and the natural law and they
deliberately decide to do it.
Your second example also fails miserably. You give the example of a child who was never
told not to play in the street. The fact
that you would bring this up reveals that you completely lack an understanding
of the points we’ve made. Playing in the
street is not inherently evil. So, there
would be no sin if the child played in the street. On the other hand, using contraception –
which is really what you are defending as possibly not mortal – is inherently
evil. One who deliberately uses it knows
it’s opposed to the natural law and the right use of reason. Therefore, that person always commits mortal
sin when using it, as Pius XI teaches.
As we can see, your false theology, which you’ve adopted from the likes
of EWTN and the apostate Corapi, is a house of cards. EWTN is not Catholic, by the way, but utterly
heretical and modernist: EWTN and the
Charismatic Movement [link to section]
Flood
Subject: The Biblical Flood Explained - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X16SE-N-8ys
I find it highly immoral when people are
spreading lies made up by individuals like the particular video about a global
flood. This video does not represent what we know today…
I used to be a Christian but these things make me feel a deep disgust inside…
Think about it.
Thinking…
MHFM: The video is true and it’s based in scientific facts. You are very upset about it because it shakes
your worldview. If the flood occurred,
which it did, then you have a major problem.
You have an obligation to God and to accept the true religion; otherwise
you go to Hell. That’s the only reason
for your vitriol: deep down you are very scared. By the way, the man who did the video is an
accomplished scientist who has written a large book documenting his points in
abundant detail. As any careful and
honest consideration of this issue shows, it is the evolutionists who are
spreading lies and have convinced the gullible world of a massive fraud. You should look more honestly into the presentations against evolution and those for
creation science according to the biblical record. We have a few of those, including the book
which further proves the video you disliked so much: In the Beginning - Compelling
Evidence for Creation and the Flood.
But God doesn’t force the hand of those who are liars at heart.
Kennedy
Subject: Kennedy
Thanks for O'Malley and your understanding.
I was one of your First subscribers and still look every now and then. You guys
seem to be busy and are not wanting to get to involved with me. Understandable.
BUT
I was the right hand man of JFK and friend of Bobby. Neither of these men
believed as their brother, so WHY would Teddy be so much different???
The men who killed both Jack and Bobby actually got to Teddy through Hypnotism
without him Knowing(of course when you are Hypnotised you Never Know). Its the populace that never found out. I
tried to stop this but was unable to. There was NO reason to try and tell
anybody about this(FBI;etc) for they would Not believe this. Just like you are
having a hard time accepting that a person can be controlled this way.
Teddy NEVER believed this in his earlier career and NEVER came to understand
why he believed it later. The AntiChrist that Ruleth the World right Now USED
Teddy for ITS purpose and MANY have succomed.
I can Still identify the murderers and give their names UP But NO ONE Listens..
MHFM:
That’s not an e-mail you get every day.
Temperature
MHFM: Here’s an interesting fact
about one of the many miraculous features of the Image of Our Lady of
Guadalupe.
“The image even rejects insects and dust. Fr. Mario Rojas has told me that according to
LaValle, no matter what the surrounding
temperature is, the Image itself remains at an even 36.5 degrees C, or 98.6
degrees F., the normal human body temperature.” (Janet Barber, “The Tilma and Its Miraculous Image,” A Handbook on Guadalupe, The Academy of
the Immaculate, 1997, p. 62.)
Mercy
We
were called to patiently persevere through all trials. That our actions
must be based on the fruit of love and not condemnation. "What you
desire is mercy, not sacrifice." You should remember yourself that
Paul changes his stance in view of the times ahead, first calling for patient
endurance and then refusing to feed those that did not work. The keys
were given so that we might apply God's infinite mercy accordingly and not
stuntingly in opposition to the true message that was to be given.
Yes, i know it is written, "All have fallen away, there is no one that
does good" "Even our righteous acts are like filthy rags"
But there is good to those who can see it. You are right in many ways and
I can't argue with the truth. But the law doesn't give way either...only
mercy does. I humbly accept your rebuke, but the time of testing will
come with or without our help to separate those who are sincere from those who
are not. I'll look into your videos... I don't have any, but i will
leave a psalm. 116.
In
faith,
Hugo
MHFM: We’re glad that you will look
into the information. But your
understanding of mercy is not correct.
Strictly adhering to the apostolic faith and denouncing those who
deviate from it or corrupt it is not incompatible with the charity or mercy of
the Lord. On the contrary, only those who fall into the category of
the former can understand or truly display the latter. The fear of the Lord is the beginning of
wisdom (Psalm 110:10). The idea that
mercy means being open to exceptions to God’s truth, or that there might be
salvation or goodness where God has revealed there is none, is a corruption of
mercy and a deception.
In fact, the Scripture you cite – “I
will have mercy, and not sacrifice” – comes from Matthew 9:13. The context is not about considering as good
people who are not, or accepting deviation from the faith. Rather, it’s a rebuke to the Pharisees who
criticized Jesus for how He communicated with publicans and sinners. Jesus was of course trying to convert them to
Himself. He was not, as you imply,
teaching that sinners are fine where they are, or that people should consider
as saved those who are not converted. He
declares in that very context that those people are “ill,” meaning spiritually
dead and in need of salvation. That’s
why He approached them. Thus, your
understanding of that passage is incorrect.
“Orthodox”
Dear
Sirs,
I found your "Debate
on Papacy and the Bible" fascinating, but, being in the Eastern
Orthodox church, found the constant divergence onto "reformed issues"
(Sola Scriptura, visible church, etc.) somewhat disappointing. I would be very
interested in hearing what you all would have to say against an Orthodox
position on the Papacy (which would focus more on issues like the Filioque and
the exact historical position of the Roman See among the patriarchates). I'm
contacting you directly because I have been unable to find much on your sight
even mentioning the Orthodox (though your mention of Meyendorff in the above
debate greatly piqued my interest!) never mind systematically addressing their
views on Catholicism. If you do have such content, please forgive my
overlooking it and be so kind as to direct me to it, and if you do not
have such content, I would like to urge you to consider making some!
Yours,
David Dietrich
MHFM: That debate you mention was a
debate with a Protestant on the biblical merits of the Papacy; it therefore
dealt with that topic and the related topics a Protestant would bring up. As far as the evidence for the Papacy in the
ancient Church goes – and specifically the information that refutes the claims
of the Eastern “Orthodox” – that’s covered in a separate section of our website. You will find numerous audios dealing with
that topic in this section: The Bible teaches that Jesus made St.
Peter the first pope [link to
section]. This
section, by the way, is found under our “Refuting Protestantism” section.
New Video
Posted
MHFM: This is a new video:
Sean O'Malley, Counter Church "Bishop" [video]
Read
Subject: Comment on Watched
Good Day,
As I've read AP's comment I have concluded
that he thought that ignorance can save someone of mortal sin which is
basically no. The defense that the brothers gave is very detailed and
informative and also I would also like to add that there is a saying in law
(which my teacher drilled to our thick skulls) about ignorance I'm sure many of
you are familiar with this: "Ignorance of the law excuses no one."
Also AP's comment on the Catholic faith looking bad backs up his position of
tolerating lies, a saying goes that truth really hurts.
TB
Regarding
Subject:
Heretic
Hello…
Brothers:
Regarding "zema" - just another one who denounces the idea of
exposing heretics or calling heretics out, who in the same breathe feels free
to call you a heretic! Why do these totally evil fools not see the
thorough self contradiction in their crass relativism. It is always the same
with them - "nobody can be called evil, because that it against our
inclusivism - by the way, you are evil for not being inclusive"! They say
there are absolutely no absolutes/ it is morally wrong to say
anything is wrong/ they dogmatically state that there are no dogmas/ It
is absolutely true for them that there are no truths. It is a circus of
mental tomfoolery from start to finish. Thank you again and again brothers for
the good work and know that there is much good fruit from MHFM. God bless you
all.
-Michael
Heretic
Subject: heretic
I've listened to a few of your videos and
read a little on your home page. But, I'm curious in your extreme
convictions of heresy. What would you do with the example of Paul?
If there were no mercy as in your logic, would we have the epistles?
You cry heresy! without any reservation, but you are the hateful heretic.
You are the roaming lion that accuses day and night. How can you
ever sit at peace with the diversity God willfully created?
Zema…
MHFM: No, you are mistaken.
As the quote of the day said:
Pope Clement V, Council of Vienne, 1311-1312, Decree #
26: “… it is a grave offense not to work for the extermination of heresy when
this monstrous infection requires action...”
A true Catholic must denounce heresy
and heretics, and there is no shortage of either in our day. Can you name one person whom we have labeled
a heretic who is not? If you tried to,
you would be refuted. It is charitable,
just and necessary to denounce heretics who lead others astray. It is uncharitable and evil to do nothing to
combat such an evil. You obviously don’t
understand the doctrine of St. Paul and the Apostles. In addition to imploring non-Catholics to
enter the Church, they condemned all those who deviated from the true
faith. You heretically believe, and
imply in your e-mail, that heresies are to be accepted as part of a “diversity”
willed by God. No, God does not will
that people reject His truth and go to Hell.
St. Paul, Galatians 1:8-9: “But though we, or an angel from heaven,
preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be
anathema. As we said before, so now
I say again: If any one preach to you a gospel, besides that which you have
received, let him be anathema.”
St. Paul, 2 Thessalonians 3:6: “And we
charge you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you withdraw
yourselves from every brother walking disorderly, and not according to the tradition which they have received of us.”
2 John 1:10: “If any man come to you, and
bring not this doctrine, receive him not into the house nor say to him, God
speed you.”
Pray
Dear Brother Peter Dimond,
I am not a Catholic even though my heart
has always felt that I was. I taught myself to pray the rosary because I
understand the importance and feel it is the right thing to do. Is the Blessed
Virgin Mary, our Mother, "insulted" to receive prayers from a
non-Catholic? I would never, ever purposefully do or say anything to upset Her.
I just love Her so much and want to pray for others… Thank you for taking the time to listen.
God bless you.
Sandy
MHFM: The Blessed Virgin is not insulted to receive prayers from
a non-Catholic. If a person is sincere,
he or she will be led by such prayers to accept the Catholic faith and to take
the steps to join the Catholic Church.
That’s what you need to do: continue to pray the Rosary for the grace of
the true faith and to immediately act upon your interest. The Devil will labor hard to get people to
stall, to put off the most important steps of their spiritual conversion. You must act, and follow the steps to convert
to the (traditional) Catholic faith.
It’s not clear what you mean by your statement that you feel you have
always been Catholic. You might mean
that you were inclined to Catholicism; for everyone who is honest with himself
realizes, deep down, that Jesus Christ is the center of history and that His
original Church is the Catholic Church.
But you are not a Catholic until you are baptized, accept the Catholic
faith, and take the steps to join the Church.
That’s necessary for salvation.
Pelagian
Hello brothers Peter and Michael. Grace and
peace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you.
I watched your video, "Why most pro-lifers are not truly pro-life,”…
Contrary to public opinion, the aborted babies are not in a better place…
Thanks for your video on this. I can see the connection with the Pelagian
heresy more clearly now. I think you could categorize pro-lifers into
pro-temporal-life and pro-eternal-life. Those who are pro-eternal-life are able
to see that abortion is an even greater sin than the typical murder.
Thanks,
Daniel
Recently
Subject: canonization of Brother Andre
Dear Brothers,
Thank you for the CD and other reading
material you have sent me last. Really Most Holy Family monastery is very
generous. Thank you for helping us (who search) for knowing the truth and
how to protect ourselves during these darkest of times.
Just wanted to share with others of the
True Catholic Faith, how tired I am of the hypocrisy of the Vatican 2 Church.
Other than my children, and in prayer , I have no one else to share this news
with since I have not encountered others of the Faith. It comforts me to
share this with you.
Recently Ben 16 has canonized Brother André
a Saint. I am sure you are aware of it by now. How blind does
Ben 16 think we are. Brother André during his life on earth, did not
share their false doctrines, since he passed away before the Vatican ll
council. Why are they masquarading in making him a Saint.
John Paul ll is more their type. I can tell you that they are
trying to make themselves look like the legitimate all time Catholic
Church. Brother André cured many people of health and faith.
What must Brother André think
now. Anyone can come in now into the Oratory. Free for
all, everyone of every false religion and false Christians are welcomed into
his Oratory. What a disgrace. I used to go there at least once a
year to honor Brother André and St. Joseph and to pray, etc. I am sure
now neither Brother André or St. Joseph , nothing Holy is present. Brother André… offered sacrifices and hours
of praying all that for the sake of saving souls from hell in the name of St.
Joseph and Our Lord. Surely he believed strongly in the dogma outside the
church there is no salvation.
Brother André I am sure is already a Saint and
weeping tears over the Oratory who worked hard to bring it up which started
with a little Chapel. I believe still stands with a beautiful altar as it
was when it was built. I have not returned since I left the false Vll
church. Your comments are always welcomed.
Pat.
MHFM:
Thanks for the e-mail. Of course,
Benedict XVI’s “canonizations” have no validity since he is an antipope.
Follow up
Subject: phony terror follow up
Following up on Todd’s point about the ease
with which these silly terror plot stories are planted; I find it especially
galling when some pundit or government guy talks about how “good” they have to
be to keep foiling all of these clever plots. They’ll say stuff
like “the enemy only has to get lucky once, but we have to be perfect all of
the time”. I hear this and think to myself, how hard is it to
fed-ex a package? Or they’ll talk about where someone like the 19
year old so-called “underwear” bomber “trained”. I’ll think how much
training does it take to put on one’s underwear and buy a plane ticket?
And how would anybody detect such bombs if the bombers had any level of
sophistication at all? In other words if these plots were real, they
would never be detected.
Of course there are better, even easier
ways to create massive carnage, but it doesn’t happen. In an open
society, it would be impossible to detect such plots if there were a truly
determined “plotter”. But then this is probably the point.
The only real logical reason for these transparent hoaxes is to condition
people to accept more war and more draconian “security measures” targeted at
themselves. I think a couple of generations of dumbed down
education, a corrupted public morality and a debased culture, all of which
really accelerated after Vatican II (which people have to understand effected
the world profoundly even beyond the real Church), have come together to make
such transparent deceptions possible.
Bill Mulligan
MHFM: Yes, and each fake scare is calculated to achieve a new
end. The underwear bomber was intended
to bring in the most invasive searches possible. This latest scare, concerning the supposed
explosives that were supposedly intended for Chicago’s Jewish centers, involved
cargo planes. As even this Sky News clip
mentions, that will lead to more stringent measures for searches of such
planes. Civilians and their baggage were
already subject to outrageous security measures. This hoax will give them greater liberty to
go through all the cargo on the cargo planes.
It’s also interesting that in this clip, on a major news network, they
mention that this occurred right when people in Europe were talking about
getting rid of the burdensome airport security measures. The newest fake terror alert aims to convince
the public that the measures should remain in place and even be
strengthened. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7tRRXusKZA&feature=player_embedded
O’Malley
Subject: Heretic O’Malley
… the utter evil that envelopes the likes
of this pure filth, O'Malley, regurgitating adulation to the likes of further
filth, Kennedy, in a false church is clearly beyond any human
description. Bless you Most Holy Family Monastery for the strength of
truth which emanates from your persistent wisdom of God's truth in Jesus Christ
Our Savior.
Dea…
Britain
Dear
Brothers,
The news about "Mohammed" being the number one baby name in Britain is
not surprising given that the author of the Anglican schism, King Henry VIII
was a polygamist, just like Muslims. Also, he put to death his wives for the
"honor" of the kingdom (as if any honor were left after his
adulteries) as do Muslims in their so-called "honor-killings."
England has been in schismatical "la-la-land" for the last 500 years
or so it's a natural progression for it to become "Allah-allah-land."
"Islam is here to stay," says the Muslim. What an outrageous
disgrace!!!
The video on the computer programmer who used to work for NASA, and how he made
a poll fixing program is astounding! To speak so matter of factly about such
political crime shows how comfortable and protected the criminals are. Also,
for only one person to be able to change the entire course of a nation’s
history by a flick of a switch is really bad. What a shocking expose on the
true status of American politics!!!
The story on babies being found in dumpsters is really heart-breaking. How can
people be so callous and cruel is beyond me. It has to be demonic because
everyone has the natural law written on their hearts, such as that killing is
wrong. Mothers are abandoning their children in unprecedented numbers, and then
they wonder why the Muslims are gaining ground in the west! What a foolish
culture the west has created, and all because it has rejected the Catholic
Church, and Catholic faith, outside of which there is ABSOLUTELY NO
SALVATION!!!
God Bless,
Chris White
Fake terror garbage
Subject: false flag latest terror garbage
It’s getting to the point now that they
don't even need to destroy anything or any buildings anymore, the people are so
brainless, all the new world order cronies have to do is just announce
their false flag in the news and it becomes real to the herd!
Todd
MHFM: That’s right. We
could not agree more. They don’t even
need to pull more fake terror attacks (at least not as frequently), for they
can accomplish their goal with fake news about supposed plots. What a surprise that the supposed explosives
were supposedly addressed to Jewish synagogues.
What a load of complete nonsense.
It might also be part of a build up to a fake terror attack for election
time.
Contradicting
Subject:
From the Jerusalem Post
I
just read this article… A couple of excerpts are interesting:
1)
The title of the article is: "Vatican Synod call for end to Israel's
'occupation'"
2) “The Holy Scriptures cannot be used to justify the return of Jews
to Israel and the displacement of the Palestinians, to justify the occupation
by Israel of Palestinian lands,” Monsignor Cyril Salim Bustros, Greek Melkite
archbishop of Our Lady of the Annunciation in Boston, Massachusetts, and
president of the “Commission for the Message,” said at Saturday’s Vatican press
conference.
“We Christians cannot speak of the ‘promised land’ as an exclusive right for a
privileged Jewish people. This promise was nullified by Christ. There is no
longer a chosen people – all men and women of all countries have become the
chosen people.
3) Mordechay Lewy, Israel’s ambassador to the Holy See, told The
Jerusalem Post that Bustros, in saying that Jesus nullified God’s covenant with
the Jewish people, was “returning to successionist theology, contradicting
Second Vatican Council teaching and Pope Benedict himself – who has
welcomed the return of Jews to their ancient homeland.”
I bolded the print for emphasis.
Paul
Archbishop
Brothers:
Melkite Archbishop Cyrille Bustros, presumably a validly consecrated bishop, has
recently restated authentic Catholic teaching regarding the fact that the Old
Covenant was abrogated by Almighty God with the birth, death and resurrection
of Our Lord Jesus Christ. The people of Israel are no longer the so called
"chosen people," ergo have no rights related to that. The chosen
people of God are now the true followers of Jesus Christ which is the true
Catholic Church. Archbishop Bustros is to be supported for his remarks even as
Ratzinger and his Vatican II nonchurch rush to distance themselves from him and
Catholic teaching.
EJP, MD, DD
MHFM: The fact that a bishop under Benedict XVI says something
correct on Catholic teaching is not a reason to applaud. It’s to be expected that one who purports to
be Catholic promotes authentic Catholic teaching. The bishop you mention is still
heretical. He accepts Vatican II and the
antipope.
Letter
Hello,
I just got a letter from the American Life League urging me to act against
Obama's threat to unborn babies. Obama, as you know, is a hard core baby
killer advocate. From this letter it seems as though this group will
really try to do something. The problem is that the President of this
organization, Judie Brown, is a hard core John Paul II advocate also. I
really want to help the unborn with something more than just my prayers.
Do you think God would frown down on donating to this group?
Jim
MHFM: Yes, God would frown on
donating to such a heretical group. The
person who runs it is a darkened, wicked, disgusting apostate who is not really
against abortion. She professes
communion with those who are pro-abortion, in addition to being a supporter of
heinous Vatican II antichrist apostasy.
By professing communion with those who accept abortion, she shows that
she’s not really against it. She is the
epitome of false conservatives whom God abominates. We know first-hand that she’s not at all
interested in the truth but loves the lie.
Comment
Interesting Video on the mark of the beast…
Christ said my kingdom is not of this world… As St John states, "love not
the world neither the things that are in the world. If any
man loves the world the love of the Father
is not in him." Insightful video you have. Feel free to watch my series
when you have the chance. Have a great day.
Ricky…
Watched
Hello,
I have watched many of your videos and have come to a conclusion. With some
things you are right, and some things you are wrong. I am a practicing
Catholic. I think you really need to talk to your local priests and bishop. It
seems you come to your own conclusions based on nothing. The video
"exposing" father Corapi is pretty horrible. The devil likes to pit
brother against brother. Father Corapi is not a fluke. He simply does things to
better get through to people. In that same video you give an example of Corapi
stating what is a mortal sin. YES, a mortal sin is a mortal sin ONLY if the
person knows it is. If he or she does not KNOW it is a mortal sin, it is not
then a mortal sin. Many of your videos make the Catholic faith look bad. If you
really are a Catholic, I suggest you removing them. Thanks
AP
MHFM: We have read your e-mail and come to the conclusion that
you don’t know what you are talking about and that you are attracted to the
lie. What you say about mortal sin is
heretical. According to you, if a person
goes out and commits murder, but knows nothing of “mortal sin,” he doesn’t
commit a mortal sin. Your false position
forces you to come to that absurd conclusion.
You might respond, “no, a person who
commits murder obviously knows it’s wrong.”
Exactly, that’s the point.
Certain actions constitute grave matter in and of themselves. Among those actions are murder, fornication, using
contraception, etc. Therefore, a
person who willingly commits such an action, even if he or she doesn’t know or believe or care about the concept of
mortal sin, commits a mortal sin.
Corapi teaches heresy when he states that contraception is only a mortal
sin if you know it’s a mortal sin.
That’s equivalent to saying that murder is only a mortal sin if you know
it’s a mortal sin. It also directly
contradicts Pope Pius XI, who teaches that whoever perverts the use of
matrimony in the way he describes are, by that very fact, branded with the
guilt of a grave sin.
Pope Pius XI, Casti Connubii (#’s
53-56), Dec. 31, 1930: “ “Since, therefore, openly departing from the
uninterrupted Christian tradition some recently have judged it possible
solemnly to declare another doctrine regarding this question, the Catholic Church, to whom God has
entrusted the defense of the integrity and purity of morals, standing erect in
the midst of the moral ruin which surrounds her, in order that she may preserve
the chastity of the nuptial union from being defiled by this foul stain, raises her voice in token
of her divine ambassadorship and through
Our mouth proclaims anew: any use whatsoever of matrimony
exercised in such a way that the act is deliberately frustrated in its natural
power to generate life is an offence against the law of God and of nature,
and those who indulge in such are branded with the guilt of a grave sin.”
The
Errors of Peter Abelard, Condemned by Innocent II,
July 16, 1140, #10: “That they have not sinned who being ignorant have
crucified Christ, and that whatever is done through ignorance must not be
considered sin.” – Condemned (Denz.
377)
Corapi clearly denies this truth. He says that people can use matrimony in such
a way (e.g., contraception) but not be branded with the guilt of a grave sin,
if they “don’t know it’s a mortal sin.”
Since you are attracted to falsehood, we wouldn’t expect you to care
about any of these Catholic teachings which refute Corapi. Corapi is also a false ecumenist. What part of that don’t you understand? He believes that souls can be saved in false
religions. He denies Catholic dogma on
the necessity of the Church, heresy, Protestants being heretics, etc. He’s not a Catholic, and neither are you.
Picture
Subject: Wisdom
Brothers,
Interesting video on Sean O'Malley. The
picture of O'Malley and all the other non-catholic Government officials sitting
up front says quite a bit about the Vatican II Counter-Church.
Their leader, anti-pope Benedict XVI is being somewhat quiet about the upcoming
devil night celebration, I'm sure Benedict XVI is busy touching up his costume
for his father Satan's feast day...Halloween.
I thank God every day for the mercy he showed when he led me to the wisdom of
your site. Knowing that I too was lost in this great dark deception for the same
reasons those that remain outside the truth (Church) today. Due to their
prideful account of following this evil world and it's slavery agenda do they
remain outside for all eternity.
Wisdom 7:24-30. For wisdom is more active
than all active things: and reacheth everywhere by reason of her purity. For
she is a vapour of the power of God, and a certain pure emanation of the glory
of the almighty God: and therefore no defiled thing cometh into her.
For she is the brightness of eternal light,
and the unspotted mirror of God's majesty, and the image of his goodness. And
being but one, she can do all things: and remaining in herself the same, she
reneweth all things, and through nations conveyeth herself into holy souls, she
maketh the friends of God and prophets. For God loveth none but him that
dwelleth with wisdom. For she is more beautiful than the sun, and above all the
order of the stars: being compared with the light, she is found before it. For
after this cometh night, but no evil can overcome wisdom.
God Bless,
Tom Miles
Snapshot
Subject:
Snapshot
Dear
Brothers:
Thanks
for the video on O'Malley. Not only is it loaded with food for thought,
it is a most effective "snapshot" of the fake V2 church.
I
recommended this video to a relative who told me that he had heard that
Kennedy "made his peace with God" before he died (along with the
usual admonition about not judging). Another happy, snappy slogan of
liberalism like that given by O'Malley who told people "to comfort one
another with assurances of faith." Advice from hell.
When
liberals say "don't judge" what they really mean is: don't
judge evil to be evil; judge evil to be good. No wonder most have no problem
with Halloween: it's their high holy day. Their wearing of costumes
is, however, superfluous since these individuals masquerade as Christians all
year long.
A
wonderful video - thanks for the good work as always.
Lee
Ann
Kennedy
Subject: Kennedy
KENNEDY, IF HE WERE THE "AVERAGE
JOE" WOULD STILL BE LOCKED UP FOR MURDER OF A YOUNG WOMAN AND FOR BEING A
WEASEL COWARD . THE MURDER OF THE INNOCENTS WILL BE IN GOD'S HANDS AND ALL HIS
WONDERFUL CONTIBUTIONS TO OUR SOCIETY, ONE THING IS FOR SURE ,ONLY WHEN THE USA
GETS ITS MORAL PRIORITIES IN LINE IT WILL BE DOOMED. I AM NOT A WRITER AS YOU
CAN TELL -THESE ARE MY THOUGHTS WE ARE NO BETTER THAN CHINA ,
CHARLES
Baptism
Hello Brothers,
I came across this quote from St. Augustine
of Hippo entitled "On the Creed: A Sermon To Catechumens"… You
probably have already seen this, but I thought it would be a good one to add to
your section called IMPORTANT NEW QUOTES AND POINTS ON THE SALVATION DOGMA AND
REFUTING “BAPTISM OF DESIRE”......
"16. In three ways then are sins
remitted in the Church; by Baptism, by prayer, by the greater humility of
penance; yet
God does not remit sins but to the baptized. The very sins which He remits first, He
remits not but to the baptized. When? When they are baptized. The sins which
are after remitted upon prayer, upon penance, to whom He remits, it is to the
baptized that He remits. For how can they say, Our Father, who are not yet born
sons? The Catechumens, so long as they be such, have upon them all their sins.
If Catechumens, how much more Pagans? How much more heretics? But to heretics
we do not change their baptism. Why? Because they have baptism in the same way
as a deserter has the soldier's mark: just so these also have Baptism; they
have it, but to be condemned thereby, not crowned. And yet if the deserter himself,
being amended, begin to do duty as a soldier, does any man dare to change his
mark?"
St. Augustine of Hippo states empatically
over and over that God will NOT remit sins to those who are not baptized and
those who are baptised but are heretics he points out that they are like
deserters form the Army who, even though they are baptised, will be condemned.
-Will W.
MHFM: Yes, it’s a good quote. It’s one that we did cite in our book, Outside the Catholic Church There is
Absolutely No Salvation, in the section on St. Augustine. We cited this portion of it:
St Augustine, 395: “… God does not forgive sins except to the baptized.”
It’s another example of how the universal tradition of the
fathers is that no one (including an unbaptized catechumen) can be saved
without baptism. Even though not all of
the fathers were always perfectly consistent with their own writings on this or
other topics, the universal tradition that no one can be saved without the
Sacrament of Baptism is clear. And most
importantly, it’s backed up by the dogmatic teaching of the Church.
Chemtrails
Subject: Chemtrails
Hi Brothers,
They are spraying like crazy in New Jersey, I noticed my first black beam along
with the chemtrails that I have been reading about. They are really
implementing their commandments {guidestones}. It makes me mad to see it
right in front of your face!
Todd
Mystery
Just
heard the Guadalupe and new hell videos great job. For years and years I
asked the Holy Ghost to reveal to my mind the meaning of Simeon's words to
Mary (4th Joyful Mystery though I always found it tinged with great
sorrow) about the sword of sorrow piercing her own soul so that the thoughts of
many would be revealed. Maybe it refers to those who are privileged to
share in the incomparable grace of sharing in Mary's sorrowful immaculate
heart…. I do not know, however, I've been pondering the meaning of
Simeon's words a while now, still wondering. Another thing I just
do not "get" still is how some seem to miss the opportunity to
experience the truth even when it put right before their face. I know it
is the mystery if iniquity…
A
Listen
…as for halloween my mom won't listen to me
that it is evil and she is going to celebrate it and drag my sister into hell by
doing so this is urgent if you said something it would help…
E…T
MHFM: It sounds like you’ve already tried to convince her. If you haven’t, you should tell her that a
Catholic may not celebrate a pagan holiday.
That’s especially true with one that has its roots in pagan religions
and involves dressing up like ghosts (evil spirits), goblins, etc. in order to
scare (or horrify) people. It should be
obvious why a Catholic should have nothing to do with such a pagan celebration;
but you can’t force a person to do the right thing.
New Video
Posted
MHFM: This is a new video:
Why Hell Must Be Eternal [video]
Novus Ordo Halloween
Subject: How to have a Novus Ordo Halloween
This guy is a convert from Anglicanism to
Novus Ordo. He gives hints on how to have a "Catholic"
halloween.
http://cantuar.blogspot.com/2010/10/top-ten-ways-to-have-catholic-halloween.html
Talk about playing with the devil...
CK
Fr. Damien
Subject: Father Damien of Molokai
Dear Brothers,
I just watched a movie about Fr. Damien who
volunteered in to set up a mission in a leprosy colony in the late
1800's. There were a couple of scenes which I wished they hadn't
included because of immodest dress even though they were pertinent to the
story line, but other than that the movie seemed very
good from a purity standpoint and excellant as an example of
Christian charity and humility.
The real question that I had though
involves about 3 or 4 instances where the Fr. Damien did or said some things
that were not in line with Catholic teaching. For instance, he gave
a Catholic burial to a man who died as an avowed Anglican
denying the Sacraments right up to his death and later in the movie, Fr.
Damien was telling a new Priest who had arrived about the natives who were
singing in the distance to their gods and he stated that he felt it gave them
(the natives) peace, as though it were OK.
I was wondering if you knew much about this
mission Priest and if these were Hollywood fabrications or not. I
want to make note that had I not read your materials, I would have
never caught the modernist ideology of those few moments in the
movie.
Thank you and God Bless
-Will Weigand
MHFM: We are familiar with the priest. However, we would have to research whether
the statements attributed to him in the movie are rooted in fact or whether
they are editorial additions on the part of the movie’s creators. If he did say or do the things you mention,
it is problematic. It would reveal that
he didn’t have the true Catholic faith, but held heresies relating to the
Church’s necessity. That was a problem
that unfortunately became common near the end of the 19th century,
around the time he died.
Regarding
Subject: Temple/Johnson
Regarding the possible ignorance of the
people (or followers) of the Aztec Empire. On finding that Cortes was still on
his way to Mexico City, Montezuma was terrified and said starkly: "We will
be judged and punished. And however it may be, and whenever it may be, we can
do nothing but wait." These people knew exactly who they served and knew
one day there would be an accounting and not by the serpent their master. Even
the most simple of men as the bible says have no excuse. Infused in our nature
is the ability to know God and right and wrong. The concept of evil,
judgement and punishment was not foreign to Montezuma or his followers. I think
the concept of evolution has so corrupted peoples mindset they believe humans
"way back then" were more like animals in their capacity to think and
therefore are less culpable for their crimes (unless they were Christians).
Matthew
Contraceptive
Subject:
New Contraceptive
Hello
Brothers
Heard about this on the news about a new form of contraceptive today so thought
I'd share it with you. What worries me is what evil will they come up with
next?
Satan must be laughing hard at how far people have fallen away from God.
http://www.torontosun.com/life/healthandfitness/2010/10/26/15833666.html
Lil…
Personal
Subject: God’s Vindictive Justice
Dear
Brothers,
In your video on why hell is forever I enjoyed your point about how God's
justice is vindictive towards those who die in mortal or original sin. It's amazing
how so many people think, "why is this happening to me?!" when in the
throes of some calamity, as though there is no personal Almighty God who
governs the universe by His Providence. No doubt such an attitude is a result
of the freemasonic push to make eastern religions popular in the west, such as
Buddhism, Hinduism, Tao, Zen, etc., because in those wicked eastern religions,
there is no one true God, but either a myriad of false gods (Hinduism) or
simply an impersonal nothingness - "ohm," "self," "nothing,"
"Nirvana," etc. In reality, that impersonal nothingness is Satan and
his malice, pretending to be powerful when he's powerless and chained to hell.
There is no middle ground/path, sitting-on-the-fence place that is
neutral, because God is personal, and any sin is an offence directly against
Him personally. Either one is for Jesus or against Him, like Sr. Lucia said
about being either for God or for the Devil, there is no other way - Jesus
is Justice! Also, when a person sins, it's not just against one Person,
but against all three Divine Persons of the Holy Trinity, though One God. So it
is easy to see how malicious sin is, especially in light of all the daily
graces and miracles of existence, plus the superabundant provisions He provides
in the Catholic Church (only) for salvation..
God Bless,
Chris White
Voodoo
Dear Brothers,
I found this news item in France: http://www.20minutes.fr/article/611979/societe-yvelines-differents-scenarios-defenestration
The article describes the events has
follows:
A
family, originally from Central Africa, held a Voodoo ceremony at 3 AM during
the night.
A
man became possessed by a demon, the man's wife, began calling him the
Devil,
leading
the others to jump from a second story window.
One
of the men who jumped, was carrying an 4 month old baby girl, who died from the
fall. The others are all hospitalized! Investigators have been assigned to
determine the exact cause.
Richard Cardet
Bordeaux, France
MHFM: That’s Voodoo, a religion for which John Paul II, Benedict
XVI and the Vatican II sect have great admiration.
Acts
…I do have one question if could help me
understand what was meant in Acts 8:16, it seems just a little confusing and
your help would be greatly appreciated.
Amanda
MHFM: It refers to how the Holy Ghost
would come upon those new converts in Confirmation. That was a grace they had not received,
having only been baptized. The Holy
Ghost is of course received at baptism, but it’s received in a special way in
Confirmation. Each sacrament has its own
special grace attached to it. The
context of that passage concerns their reception of the unique strengthening of
the Holy Ghost provided by that sacrament.
Fatima
Subject: Fatima:
Dear People of God-
Why is it, with the exception of those in
North America, that nobody in the Vatican wants to talk about Fatima? You
have a lot on your web site… They want all catholics to forget about it,
including anything prior to 1960. I am
so fed up!!! I pray to the seers,
Francisco, Jacinta & (the real) Lucia to intercede for the remnant of
catholics who are still holding on to what is right-- the Latin Mass.
Thanks & God Bless,
Jean Szumega
MHFM: Some people discuss
Fatima. However, one of the big problems
is that many false Catholics provide incorrect and deceptive conclusions on the
topic, especially concerning Sr. Lucia, the Third Secret, etc. False analysis and wrong information on
Fatima issues is a major reason why many are deceived. That’s why our DVD on Fatima is so
important. It deals with what Catholics
need to know about Fatima, in addition to covering the other main aspects of
the Vatican II apostasy: The Third Secret of Fatima, the
Impostor Sr. Lucia, and The End of the World
Mexico
Subject: Mexico is not immune to the Great
Apostasy, here’s why
Dear MHFM,
That's very interesting about Jeanne's personal visit to the temple where they did
their sacrifices.
I wanted to comment briefly why Mexico, once a very Catholic country (compare
to USA), has also fallen in this Great Apostasy.
About a few months ago, I emailed a sedevacantist group (which is also in
working communion with the CMRI) named "Sociedad Sacerdotal Trento"
and I asked one of their priest 3 simple questions: 1) Did they [Sociedad
Sacerdotal Trento] believe in "baptism of desire and of blod"; 2) Did
they believe in "invincible ignorance"; and 3) What is their position
on the dogma: Outside the Catholic Church There Is Absolutely No Salvation.
Here is how the priest, who claims to be "traditionalist"
sedevacantist, answered these questions:
"Yes, we believe in the first two
questions, based absolutely in the Catholic Church's position and in studied
theology way before Vatican II. We also believe in what's indicated on
the third question, [enphasis is mine] BUT it should be noted that it is NOT
A DOGMA and that is not believed in the absolute manner; there are exceptions
to it somehow."
This
is outright heresy! I couldn't believe my eyes when I read this. He
says that the dogma Outside the Catholic Church There Is No Salvation which has
been defined infallibly 7 times by the Catholic Church, IS NOT A DOGMA!!
This is what this priest, named Fr. Jiménez of the "Sociedad Sacerdotal
Trento", holds as " the Catholic Church's position and in studied
theology way before Vatican II"... No, I'm sorry, that is not the Catholic
Church's position.
But it’s just to show how even in Mexico, these sedevacantist priests (which
have many different churches throughout Mexico) hold the same heresy which
caused this Great Apostasy, that souls can be saved outside the Church.
If this is what a sedevacantist holds, how much worse will the Novus Ordo
Church be in Mexico?
Thanks for your apostolate MHFM and God bless you.
Sincerely,
Bernardo
Temple
Dear Brothers Dimond:
Thank you for posting the video regarding
the times before the Virgen de Guadalupe in Mexico. I grew up in Mexico City and
visited the Tenochtitlan temple a few times as a family outing. My dad always
bragged about his obsidian knife collection as these are/were found
prolifically all along the roads within the temple grounds.
Growing up, the mantra everywhere was that
the Aztecs were wrongly accused. And I will say that the alternative history of
the Aztec Indians, called "Vision de los Vencidos" or "vision of
the beaten", which narrated the conquest from their point of view, is very
eye opening as well. I believe that although the Aztec high-priests did commit
these atrocious crimes, the population as a whole was victim to these priests,
not only literally, as objects of sacrifice, but figuratively and
philosophically, by living in that society.
Having said this, however, I will tell you
that there is a denial that the Aztec culture was this grotesque, or in fact,
grotesque at all. I have visited the Templo Mayor, a temple in the southern
part of Mexico City which was discoverd by a construction worker who was
drilling through to build an extension of the underground Metro (subway). There
are stone skulls everywhere, and you can see the actual masonry with skulls
there for all to see.
How can that NOT be evidence of these death
ritual sacrifices? We are told growing up that the accusations by Spaniards are
not true, that they made up these stories or exaggerated things in order to
justify their conquest and avaricious search for gold. But in the end, the
Mexicanos cannot prove that they did NOT commit these horrendous acts.
I know that were it not for Franciscan
monks at the time of the Conquest, who were brought over to prevent the
genocide that the crusades caused on the islands first "discovered",
the conquest itself would have been more horrendous than it was. Let's face it,
greed runs rampant in every culture and the Spanish men on horseback prove to
have been no exception. HOWEVER, the Franciscan monks did a tremendous job in
converting the Aztec indians to Christianity and in assuring their survival
during this tumultuous time. And for this I am personally grateful as I have
seen the most humble and faithful Catholic people in Mexico, more so than in
the USA. Perhaps it is because Protestantism did not take a strong foothold in
Mexico, that the Catholic faith has been more intact than elsewhere even after
V2. The Mexicans are a deeply faithful nation, who eschew attending Church as
proof that they are faithful, understanding that faith is internal, real and
not dependent on the actual church for its manifestation. I pray for all of us
in these dark times.
Thank you for all the work you do and for
unveiling the truth.
N. Jeanne Johnson
MHFM: Your personal visit to the
temple is another interesting confirmation of what occurred during that period
in Mexico. There is no doubt that the
Aztecs engaged in that activity. It’s a
well-documented fact of history. You
mention that you believe the people were victims of the Aztec priests. We must say that the people cannot be
excused, for they were immersed in the diabolical culture and the ritual. Even if they were influenced by the priests,
they were guilty for having condoned it or supported it. They also fought vigorously to defend the demonic
empire and its capital during the final battle.
Defeat in that encounter would have meant the end to the diabolical and
bloody cult of their devil gods, but they fought with all their might to
maintain it. Soon we hope to soon
discuss more about this very interesting period of history.
With regard to modern Mexico, it can’t
be considered faithful. The Great
Apostasy has extended everywhere, leaving only a few true Catholics. Mexico is not immune to the Vatican II
apostasy.
People
Subject: hell video
Very interesting insight regarding the
eternity of Hell.
People want to deny it, but your principle is implicit in many common
expressions everywhere, such as "best friends forever", as well as
numerous romantic songs and expressions, which is an implicit admission that
even present happiness has no meaning unless it will continue forever.
By the same token, even complete pagans will express, for example when reading
about some notorious criminal, that "even the death penalty would be too
easy for him" because they (incorrectly) view death as an end even to the
worst punishment, and any punishment which ends isn't enough for someone, so
they admit, even with their heathen mentality.
-- Bruce
Scary
Subject: Scary website you have!
Greetings to you Bros Michael and Peter
Dimond, I'm Margaret…
I recently came across your website. I have listened to many of your talks and
debates regarding Vatican II, the new Mass and Sacraments. It gives voice to
many of the changes I have seen in the church in the past 20 years. I
have some questions that I hope you can help with (surprised? LOL)
A brief intro *might* help you understand where I am coming from, but if it
doesn't, feel free to bypass it :) I was raised Roman Catholic, moved away from
the church to pursue several false religions… After realizing the Catholic
church was really the one true church that Jesus Christ founded and ordained, I
went back to the Catholic Church. I had more supernatural experiences which led
to a fervent love for Jesus Christ that I did not know ever before… I have
begun to pursue an annulment so that I can follow up in the idea of a religious
vocation.
Two weeks ago, I was at a weekday Mass where the priest stated in his homily
that we should emulate the Buddha and seek non attachment - but
never once mentioned Christ. I was horrified, and instantly wanted to flee the
church in tears. It was perverse to advocate another religion on Christ's own
altar and not mention Jesus! But this was coming from a priest who, although
new to the parish, is usually outwardly devout - with the exception of his wearing
a coconut bra on the altar at the teen Mass. (yeah, I know)… Many people
understood my outrage - especially protestants, but quite a few… saw nothing
wrong with it and started telling what the church teaches. I stopped short of
calling it what it is - heresy - but it made me sick. It has made me wary of
the Catholic Church - but I figured all the more reason to pray fervently to
our blessed Lord Jesus for His church. (I also had inadvertently
exorcised my sister during a house blessing - and the monsignor at my parish
screamed at me because he did not believe in demons or that Christ heals. Sigh.
You guys are right - it is a very sad state in the church!)
Anyway, somehow I came across your website, and I've been listening to many of
your talks and debates on Vatican II, the Mass and Sacraments. I have
some questions:
1) … my sins were recently 'forgiven' by the same priest who advocated buddhism
rather than Christianity. It happened interestingly enough after I prayed to
God that I would never be able to confess all my sins but that I would try
anyway, and that I was in His hands. When I got there and started to confess
something that happened 20 years ago, the priest told me to stop confessing my
old sins, that they were all forgiven - every one of them. At the end he did
the standard absolution, but I don't remember his specific words - whether it
was 'absolve' or 'forgive' or 'cleanse', but it was done in the name of the
Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
Q: Was this priest validly ordained to
absolve me of sins even if he did say the proper 'verbiage'? Am I condemned to
die in my sins because there are no priests who are validly ordained?
What on earth am I to do? I will surely perish if not absolved and can in no
way remember every sin committed in 40 years!
2) My son… He is now going through RCIA because he has never made his first
communion or confirmation…
Q: Should I continue to advocate his religious training in the RCC? Is there a
better way to make his first communion and confirmation? Is the RCIA program
valid in light of what you are saying in your talks?
3) The Mass. If it is true that if we eat the flesh and drink the blood of
Christ we will have eternal life, then indeed, the Mass is very
important.
Q: Do all Latin Mass' use the extraordinary or tridentine form?...
4) In general, what do you propose that we do to train our children and
participate in worship? Find only a church with EF Mass and pre-Vatican II
priests? What if there aren't any in my area?
Thanks for any guidance you can provide…
Best Regards,
Margaret
MHFM: Margaret, you have many questions and they are answered in
the material on our website and in our books and DVDs. Regarding the priest, it depends upon when he
was ordained. All past mortal sins must
be specifically confessed to a priest
ordained in the traditional rite of ordination.
His statement that they are all taken care of, even if they have not
been specifically confessed, is outrageous and false. Priests who were ordained before 1968 were
certainly ordained in the traditional rite of ordination. However, there is some doubt about his
ordination and what he said in giving absolution. Thus, the confession of those sins should be
made to a different and clearly valid priest.
That’s explained in this file. Where to go to Mass or confession today? You are required to confess past
mortal sins that you recall. To your
concern about having forgotten something, that’s why people should add at the
end of their confession: “I also ask forgiveness for any sins I forgot and did
not confess.”
Next, it’s critical that you realize the Vatican II Church is
not Catholic. The New Mass is invalid
and must not be attended for any reason.
You must be convinced of that before even going to confession. Obviously your son should not go to
RCIA or have anything to do with the Novus Ordo parish. They are instructing people in the false
Vatican II religion, which Catholics must completely reject. You and your family must be convinced that
the Vatican II Church is not Catholic.
Yes, the true Mass is important, but
having the Catholic faith is more important.
One can’t be saved without the true Catholic faith, even if one attends
a true Mass; and the New Mass is not a Mass at all. The parishes to which you refer do not
represent the true Catholic faith. Our
material gets into the options for traditional sacraments in this time, but one
must first completely reject the Vatican II Church and the New Mass. One must believe in all Catholic dogmas,
including Outside the Church There Is No Salvation. Your story about the priest who advocated
Buddhism is not surprising when we consider the Vatican II Church, but it is
nevertheless revealing and interesting.
Please look carefully at the material and we believe the answers to your
many questions will become clear. We
should add that no Novus Ordo priest is “outwardly devout.” They are all modernists and heretics. Pray the Rosary each day, all 15 decades if
possible.
Continue
AGBO
Dear brothers,
I got to know about you through a small catholic group in Nigeria and i also
went to your web and have accepted the catholic faith against all odds in the
family. i have the following question to ask. Can i continue to pray in the
house with my family that are still in v 2?...
MHFM: You shouldn’t pray with
them. You could still pray in the house,
but just pray by yourself or somewhere else.
Interest
Subject: A link of interest
Dear Brothers:
First, thank you for the video on Our Lady of Guadalupe and what the Spaniards
found in Mexico. Information and history I did not know. It is good
to be reminded of Christ's victories. The story of Our Lady of Guadalupe
and Juan Diego are so very interesting and really beautiful.
I wanted to send you this link. Brother Michael is on a masonic hitlist
found here: http://www.masonicinfo.com/people.htm
This is very serious. I do not know if you were aware of this. This
is a most evil Website. I found the link through "The Occult Masonic
Temple God ," an eBook which barely makes any sense to me. It is a
study compiled by Christopher Newcomb which I downloaded online. There were
some links in there which I followed. I think this work is pro masonry,
but I cannot tell, it is so badly written and confused…
God bless you always,
DH
Comment
Comment
on "One thousand in Britain and Ireland are children of priests: Celibacy
an issue for pope’s visit"
Dear Brothers Michael and Peter:
I think St Paul said it best in his epistle to the Philippians (chp. 3):
"For many walk ... that are the enemies of the cross of Christ; whose end
is destruction; whose god is their belly; and whose glory is in their
shame." I think any reasonable individual would agree that celibacy
is not the problem. But so what? I suppose celibacy has no place in
the Vatican 2 church anyway.
This approach to celibacy seems to be the approach to standards in general:
"Well, no one can live up to these standards, so it is the standards that
must change."
Incidently, that mug shot of Benedict shown in the article...he's frightening.
PC
Video
Subject:
New video on Hell
Great
video, I was smiling while listening to the clip, how a simple explanation
{truth} with common sense blows away the most lofty lectures on some complex
subject, it's amazing!!!
Todd
Totally
Subject:
Outrage - Vatican says Simpsons are Catholic
Dear
MHFM,
… "I believe, the Vatican is indeed right, stating, that Simpsons are
Catholic, because current "catholics" in current false "Catholic
church" can indeed behave and believe these horrible things as Simpsons
do, and still be fully "catholic" in "Catholic church"...
Thx for your interest, it does prove beyond any doubt, that Vatican is totally
mad even in the eyes of all non-catholics....
God bless you!
Josef
Priest, NFP
Dear Brother Dimond,
Permit me to introduce myself to you. My
name is Jennifer Barber and I am from Ireland… I am expecting my thirteenth
child and I homeschool the children to make sure that they receive a
traditional Roman Catholic education. I
was converted from the V2 anti-church in 2006 and went to the SSPX. At that time I did not understand the
sede-vacantist position as I had very little information on that subject
(I did not have access to the internet.) but I was acutely aware of papal
heresy. I did not go there for long
until I realised that there were major flaws in the SSPX thinking and
their bullying tactics towards those who questioned the validity of the
Novus Ordo sect was alarming. I was fortunate to make the acquaintance of an
elderly gentleman who was very vigilant.
We would regularly discuss the illogical Rosary crusades , the SSPX
hostility to those who refused to pray for the modernists and the lifting of
the so-called excommunications.
Gradually, I became educated in the
sede-vacantist position which initially under the SSPX influence I
hesitated but eventually knew that it was the only correct position to
hold. I immediately left the society on Easter Sunday 2009 with
a friend, Catherine, and we both stayed at our respective homes
without the Holy Sacraments until September 2009. Catherine is also
sede-vacantist but cautions my reading of your site as she thinks you are
extreme since you refer to almost everyone as heretics to which I reply
that everyone that you mention on your site are heretics.(I mean those whom you
expose as heretics.) So as not to labour
you Brother Dimond,I shall jump on to September 2009 when Catherine made
contact with the CMRI and two independent traditionalist Roman Catholic Priests
in Germany under Bishop Pivarunas. I
agreed to have them come to stay at my home every two months to offer the Holy
Sacrifice and provide us with the sacrament of Penance. This continued
until a fortnight ago. I noticed that when the superior came that it seemed
like he was trying to break down our resistance to certain worldly practices
such as the wearing of feminine clothes (namely skirts) mixed summer camps
which he would show us videos of on the laptop...
At this point I should not forget to
mention that the elderly man whom I talked of earlier in this letter had met
the priest in question, Fr Rissling, and decided that he would not be back but
opted to stay with Bishop Williamson. He was angry at the bare-faced liberalism
of Fr Rissling. There are many things which I can describe to you but it would
take too long. The final straw for me
was on the last visit he discussed the use of NFP for no real apparent reason
as I did not bring this topic up. As it turned out he was out of his depth, as
he had wrongly surmised that I was uneducated in this field. I had studied and
was qualified to teach NFP (sponsored by the local anti-bishop years ago when I
was prominent in the pro-life movement and still in the anti-church) Thankfully
and by the grace of GOD I never practiced nor taught this contraceptive method
to anyone. I told him that I thought it was a vile, evil practice and the NFP
movement was anti-catholic. He did
not show too much opposition and the visit passed without further episodes.
However when I sent Catherine an e-mail to let her know that I was distraught
at the recent visit (I didn't give any details on the mail) She lost control of
herself and went into a fit of a rage. The reason I contact you is to ask you
if you know of a priest of absolutely NO_COMPROMISE who would be willing to
come to Ireland. I have children who need the sacrament of Confirmation as
well. Bishop Pivarunas also holds the
same heresies as Fr. Rissling. Therefore it would not be an option for him to
come to us… I will keep you
informed.
Ave Maria, Jennifer Barber.
MHFM: Thanks for the interest. Unfortunately, basically all of the priests
are heretics and have problems. You are
not going to find a priest in your area who is 100% Catholic and can be
supported. There are options to receive
sacraments, if the priest falls within certain guidelines, but the priest
should not be looked to for guidance or support. That's explained in the file on our
site. The biggest problem with the CMRI, in addition to their support for
NFP, is that they believe souls can be saved outside the Church. They are
not Catholic; in fact, they believe the same as the Counter Church on salvation. One should not have those priests in his or
her home.
Pilot
Hi
Brothers,
While writing an e-mail to Michael Roberts, the pilot who refused to enter the
body scanner and to be frisked, I was thinking about the simple causes of the
present situation of the world just like the past 6000 yr. history of man, how
every time man falls under slavery {satan's slavery} just like the jews before
the exodus, the cause is man turning his back on God and disobeying HIS
commands! With the norvus ordo mass, man literally turned his back on
Jesus in the tabernacle and now is following the command of Aleister Crowley
{satan}, do thou what thou wilt, I don't think it can be made any more
elementary than that!!!
Todd
MHFM: Yes, it’s true. Also, perhaps you already did, but please
tell him to check out the website.
Listened
…
Recently I listened to your clips on interracial marriage, and although I agree
with the basic result (that it is not forbidden or a sin as such), I would like
to give a short statement on the issue. In these days we see nations being
destroyed, wiped out within just a few generations. All European nations loose
their identidies. The interesting thing about this is that race mixing plays a
huge role in it. Anti-racist-laws put you in prison if you dare to feel like it
is a good thing to stay among your own kind, i.e. to marry one of your people
rather than an alien. The government makes not only propaganda for the
acceptance of sodomy ("homosexuality") but especially for interracial
marriage. We are forced to fallow the freemasonic American model that a mere
document makes you belong to a people, and not the blood and the history. The
One-World-Fanatics want all races to mix up (except for the ones who see
themselves as the chosen master race...) and children have to read books that
claim that in a globalized world it is the best thing to mix with other races,
because that would make us more beautiful and more original to the first human
beings. They hate white people (so parts of them hate their own origin), and I
think they hate it because of its Christian past that shaped the whole
world. The more racially different a
person is, the more problems it causes to marry him or her for the own
children, because their identity is damaged "thanks" to the parents.
Interracial marriage won't damage a people when it stays an exception (which it
would be if there was no propaganda; for it is rather natural to marry one of
the own kind.) Today the words of Daniel 2,43 are very fitting, which say that
people mix up by marriage, but they won't stick together just as iron and clay
won't mix.
All the best
Alexander
MHFM: It’s not an issue of preserving
racial or even national identity. It’s
an issue of the Europeans losing their faith and departing from God into a
general apostasy. Catholics marrying
people of a false religion has definitely contributed to the decline you
lament. But marriages between people of
different countries or races are not a problem if the faith is left
intact.
New Video
Posted
MHFM: This is a new video:
Our
Lady of Guadalupe crushes the Mexican Serpent [video]
Unacceptable
Hello!
Is it unacceptable to God to attend a
vatican II mass? If so, what do I do (and my children) for Church?
Isn't it better to go to one of those masses than none at all?
Thank you for your time.
Karen
MHFM:
No, it’s a grave sin to go to such an invalid and non-Catholic service. It is better to not go anywhere than to go to
one of those invalid “Masses.” Going
there will send a person to Hell. There
are some options for receiving sacraments.
That’s explained in this file: Where
to go to Mass or confession today?
However, one must be convinced on all issues of the faith first. That includes never attending the New Mass
again for any reason.
Interesting
Brothers,
Interesting is the article on how Clinton's aid wanted to let Saddam to shoot
down one of U.S. planes to initiate an act of war. As conspiracy theories go,
in 1945 the U.S. had the weapon of mass destruction with no one to test it on
as the war with Germany was at an end. With advance knowledge, the Japanese
were allowed to bomb Pearl Harbor in order to get the American people behind
the invasion of Japan that eventually lead to the dropping of the atomic bomb.
Now, the Muslim named, so-called christian president wants the recent ban on
homosexuals in the military to be dropped again. In some circles, the acronym
DADT is being generated to water down the Don't ask, Don't tell program, just
like the acronym LGBT was generated. This end time Great Deception has not only
infiltrated Rome at the top with its Jewish infiltrators, Muslims have
infiltrated one of the greatest so-called christian nations and is injecting
its immoral beliefs into the strength that protects this country. All part of
God's will for the sins of this world.
God Bless,
Tom Miles
Interest
Wow. I'm blown away at the truth i have
just heard in your videos. I am interested in learning more about what you talk
about. My parents are from Mexico and I
was born in Chicago. I'm a Proud Catholic. But I'm so interested in what you
say i like it and believe it.
Joaquin.
Urban
"O
what a disgrace if such a despised and base race, which worships demons, should
conquer a people which has the faith of omnipotent God and is made glorious
with the name of Christ! With what reproaches will the Lord overwhelm us if you
do not aid those who, with us, profess the Christian religion! " - Pope
Urban II (On the muslim invasion).
Why?
Subject: I enjoyed watching your videos
i have been among (christian) people for a
while. when i was a baby i was baptised as catholic and went to a Catholic
church. but i dont really remember it. since you say there is no salvation
outside the (traditional) Catholic faith, may i ask why? i would love to hear
your argument of how it is more true than a fellowship christianity, that is
the church i go. i am not acknowledging this for an arguement (fight) so to
say, i am genuinely interested. i will check out this website you sent to me,
and i hope to hear from you again soon.
thank you for your response.
Sarah
MHFM: Sarah, there is no salvation outside the Church because
there is no salvation outside of Christ and following all of what He
commanded. He instituted Confession, the
Eucharist, the Papacy, etc., all of which the non-Catholic denominations
reject. Simply put, one is not a true
Christian unless one is a Catholic.
That's what the material and the book we have show.
Vatican II
Subject: Vatican II Exposed
The false council, Vatican II, should be
identified for the real travesty that it was and re-named Reformation II. It
sought to continue the traditions of destroying the Catholic Faith that were
begun during the Protestant Reformation…
Thanks and God Bless.....
Ricardo Parks
Divide
My name is Joaquin, at first i feel didn't
like you, but as i listened to you i did begin to like what you had say, i
still do. Leave Father Corapi alone, why fight were a family. i relate to him.
don't divide The Catholic Family with what you are saying please....
MHFM: Joaquin, Corapi is not part of the Catholic family. He claims to be Catholic, yes, but he’s
actually a modernist heretic. He
believes in salvation outside the Church, false ecumenism, and offers the
invalid New Mass. You need to look
carefully at the material on our website to find out what the Church really
teaches and how the Vatican II Church is not Catholic.
Rosary beads
Subject: Regarding the rosary and the
“fake” rosary
Hello brothers, i have a few
questions. First, I would like to thank
you for your videos, "Is the world about to End?"… My Question is,
what are your thoughts on the explosion of people who wear the rosary, but more
importantly, this new thing I am seeing, where obvious non-catholics are
wearing something that mimicks the rosary in appearance, but is not. For a time, and even
still now, I thought it might be the blessed mother or the holy spirit crying
out in these dark days, to make the catholic faith visible, or possibly as a
chance for conversion. But now I think that this is just another deception.
That satan is attempting to make non-catholics look catholic to convince people
that there is no difference as to what church you belong to. I would appreciate
your thoughts. Your website has helped me greatly. I spent a good amount of
time as a teenager and as a young adult feeling outcast, because I believed in
the Catholic Church and faith, but never liked, or agreed with what the church
or its popes. Your website has helped me validate a lot of questions in my life
and faith. Thank you.
Patrick M
MHFM: Thanks for the interest.
Perhaps you are referring to beads that people wear around their necks
that look similar to rosary beads but are not.
We do believe that such items are a deception. They detract from the true meaning of the
Rosary. Since they look similar, they
turn the wearing of actual rosary beads into a fashion statement, and thus
detract from the Rosary’s real purpose and spiritual value. There are also people in popular culture who
wear actual rosary beads because they like the way they look, not out of any
devotion. Certain gang members even wear
them. This is part of a diabolical
deception to subtly turn the Rosary into an external item that doesn’t require
any devotion, belief or change in one’s life.
In short, it renders it meaningless.
It further cements the false religiosity of our day: that God and the
elements of His true faith are purely external and devoid of any real power,
meaning or impact. We also agree with
your point: that the popular practice of non-Catholics wearing rosaries fosters
religious indifferentism and false ecumenism.
It’s excellent, however, for true Catholics to wear rosaries.
Comment
Subject:
Our Lady of Guadalupe crushes the Vatican II sect
Dear
Brothers,
Thank you for the extremely interesting video, Our Lady of Guadalupe crushes
the Mexican Serpent. According to the Vatican II sect and its 5 Antipopes,
the Aztec human sacrificing "priests," because they were zealous for
their religion, could possibly have been erring in good faith, invincibly
ignorant, and thus saved, because there is no such thing as demons, the Devil,
or hell in the V-2 religion. The sickening thing is that, like in the days of
the Roman Coliseum, the common people would likely have become desensitized to
the evils that were happening so that constant sacrificial murder to the
"Sun god" became commonplace, even expected or enjoyed! Similarly
today, the destruction of souls (not bodies - apart from abortion) in
sacrifice to Lucifer the Devil, who is now reigning in the Vatican, is more
commonplace and widespread than ever before, so much so that almost everyone
has been numbed to the eternal consequences of their sins. How grateful that we
have such a powerful and caring protectress in the Blessed Virgin Mary who can
preserve her children in the state of grace while the Great Apostasy rages
everywhere! Just as the conversion of the Mexicans to the Catholic faith was
miraculous, so being truly Catholic today requires the constant supernatural
help of grace, especially from praying the 15 decade Rosary each day. If Our
Lady can preserve the paint on her picture from Guadalupe for centuries, then
she can keep faithful Catholics safe from heresy and sin to the end,
provided we cooperate with the grace she gives us. Our Lady of Guadalupe
crushes the Vatican II sect!!!
God Bless,
Chris White
Outrage
Subject: Total Outrage: the Vatican says
the Simpsons are Catholic
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/hottopics/detail?entry_id=74842
Dear MHFM,
i am sending you link to an artikle about newest statement of Vatican about
that most ridiculous cartoons of Simpsons… That is most ridiculous heresy I
have ever heard... Let me write down some reactions from mostly non-catholics
to this topic:
"Why is the vatican proud the dumbest character (homer) is catholic while
the smartest (lisa) is atheist?"
"Lisa's more of a skeptic than a hard line atheist."
"The Simpsons DID make Catholic heaven look a lot more fun that the
Protestant one!"
"This is pretty ridiculous, considering that the Simpsons have
specifically identified themselves as NOT Catholic.
Bart: "Mom, can we go Catholic? At least they get bread to eat during
church."
Marge: "Nobody's going Catholic! Three kids is enough, thank
you.""
"Actually, I think The Simpsons skewers Christianity pretty well, making
fun of Flanders and his over-the-top Jesus love, and also Flanders' children,
who are effeminate, wimpy saps."
"Good grief, the Vatican can't tell fantasy from reality. No wonder people
eschew religion."
"Not sure the Catholic church could miss worse on this... It's like a
bunch of the church seniors got together and, in trying to make Catholicism
seem 'cool for the kids', decided to associate themselves to this show...
incorrectly... and several years past the Simpsons prime..."
"Lol - my comment about Homer not being Catholic got deleted because I
said he wasn't molesting Bart.
The Pope is on this like a cheap suit."
"Their creative interpretation of the show matches their creative
interpretation of the bible."
God bless you!
Josef Svitak
Recently
Subject:
Freemasonry Property
In
response to Richard who asks about Freemasonry buying up property. I
recently went to visit the Pine Barrens in NJ. They hold 17 trillion
gallons of water underneath enough water to cover NJ in a 10 ft. lake. It turns out a division of the UN has
purchased property in the Pine Barrens under the name UNESCO.
Could this be a possible example?
Kathleen
Watched
Subject: Rock and Roll Sorcerers of the New
Age Revolution
Hi Brothers,
I watched the video that you offer on rock
and roll sorcerers of the new age revolution, very eye opening as to how many
of the music performers or rather the shamans, truly are possessed by the
devil. Even though the man doing the presentation was protestant he
brought out a lot of points on the music industry and how they follow Aleister
Crowley, who is a satanist, who wrote the book called The Book of the
Law, one of his most famous quotes is "do thou what thou wilt. In
other words be disobedient to Gods laws, if it feels good do it! God says
thou shalt not do it! My 10 yr. old daughter watched the video with me
and she got the passage that the guy was quoting right away about Ephesians
6:12 For our wrestling is not
against flesh and blood; but principalities and power, against the rulers of
the world of this darkness; against the spirits of wickedness in the high
places. My daughter understood the tremendous advantage that satan
would have if he could possess people in high places { people of great
influence } like rock stars because they go all over the world on tour playing
their satanic music, just like the pied piper! I strongly recommend
parents to buy this video and show it to their children, the only thing is you
need to have a VHS tape player to see it, even if you had to spend 50 dollars
to get a new player its worth doing it for your children, please!!!
Todd
Mysteries
Brothers
in Christ,
When saying the 15 Rosary, is there any specific way to recite them? Can it be Sorrowful, Glorious, Joyful? Is it
any preference?
John
MHFM: The normal method would be
Joyful, then Sorrowful, then Glorious.
Souls
Dear Brothers
Great video about Our Lady of Guadalupe and
the Aztecs. I, too, did not realize how satanic and evil they were!
Looking forward to Part 2 ! With the
coming of the month of November and the Holy Souls in Purgatory… I love praying
for the Holy Souls, since I was a little girl and we were told to say the 6
Hail Marys, 6 Our Fathers, and 6 Glory Be for them on Nov 2…
June
Clip
Subject: Our Lady of Guadalupe overcomes
the Mexican Serpent
Hello,
The new clip about Our lady of Guadalupe
was awesome; I hope it is to be continued.
All the best
lxnv…
Video
Brother Peter Dimond,
I enjoyed your last video on Our Lady of Guadalupe overcomes the Mexican
serpent.
I think you chose a great topic and it is most interesting. You did a great
job! Please continue with it.
Elijah…
SSPX
Dear Brother Michael & Brother Peter
Many thanks for your reply. As i have said before, i have read your website
with great interest, and your expose on the heretics Pope John Paul
II & Benedict XVI as teaching falsehoods and doctrines, was absolutely
brilliant. Would like to ask you a few more questions.
1. Am a big supporter of the Sspx,and I attend Sspx traditional latin mass
here in London, but you dont support them. Why?
2. Is sedevancantism a sin?
Many thanks Brother Michael & Brother Peter. If only our church could have more men
like you, and restoring all things tradition to God's church and to Our Lord
Jesus Christ.
In Domine
Mr Gerald Purves
MHFM: Thanks for the interest.
This file explains why the positions of the SSPX are not Catholic and
why their group cannot be supported.
The
Society of St. Pius X [Link to Section]
The sedevacantist position is definitely not a sinful one, but
rather the only true Catholic position at this time. That’s because the Vatican II antipopes
are/were heretics, and the Church infallibly teaches that heretics are not true
popes. The Chair of Peter is therefore
vacant. To obstinately resist that
position, and embrace the one held by the SSPX, is a sin. All of the documentation for the
sedevacantist position is covered on our website. As covered in the file above, the SSPX also
believes that souls can be saved in false religions, which is heretical.
Shocked
Subject:
Comment: Guadalupe crushes Mexican Serpent
Dear Most Holy
Family Monastery,
I recently listened to your new video on the demonic Aztec empire. I am
so shocked by the information in this video. I want to know more of what
happened next with Our Lady's appearance to the takeover of the demonic empire,
please do continue the series. I can't wait for any following parts.
… I was just so overwhelmed with the new video on Guadalupe that I actually
didn't realize that 11 minutes had passed… It’s actually the first time I've
ever heard something so detailed of what these evil Aztecs did. It's very
sickening and actually very hard to believe such civilization existed, but it
really did. Also, the reference to the snake connected with these pagan
religions form the east, it's also interesting that Chinese cultures and other
parts of Asia use that dragon which definitely has the looks of a snake.
Those conquistadores were very brave and those who persevered till the
end in the grace of God are now happy that they have received eternal glory for
believing in Christ, in His Church, and in practicing the True Catholic
Faith. These conquistadores weren't saying to the Aztecs, "We
can't judge if what you're doing is evil" like how many people hold
now-a-days with the whole We Can't Judge heresy.
You know, a while back I was talking with this Mexican Novus Ordite and we got
talking about the Aztecs, and so he then brought up that the Europeans came and
destroy the culture of Mexico. He was arguing that the atmosphere and
environment was cleaner and more peaceful before the Europeans came to the New
World. And then I told him that the Aztecs killed thousands and thousands
of people, sacrificing them to demons, and that this was sending thousands of
souls to damnation because they had not yet received the Light of Truth, Jesus
Christ, and so it was actually profitable that God willed to put an end to this
through the Catholic conquistadores. But no..., this apostate
person, who by the way when explained what a dogma is, and when cited and
explained Eugene's dogmatic bull "Cantate Domino" and the Scriptural
evidence of the necessity to believe in Jesus Christ to be saved, and finally
when asked if a Jew who rejects Christ could be saved if he died in rejecting
Christ, the man simply stated that he didn't know and would not judge because
that's between God and the Christ rejecting Jew, basically throwing out the
window all the time spent in trying to explain to him the necessity of the
Catholic Faith, well, he argued that the Europeans only brought unrest,
war, and sickness. THIS WAS A PERSON WHO CLAIMED TO BE CATHOLIC! He
later said that pregnancy of Our Lady of Guadalupe represented the new raza
[new race]. I have no idea what he meant by that but the impression I
got, from what he was basically describing, was John Paul II's antichrist
gospel: man as God. Also, I was told that he liked to read different
books of different beliefs (like at the time he was reading some stuff about
buddhism) and so I told him that I could give him your material so he can read
it and study the Catholic Faith... well you know what he said? That he
didn't have time and needed to spend time to work and support his family.
A true liar to heart, unfortunately.
Our Lady of Guadalupe is one of my most favorite apparitions. Here you
have a whole civilization in darkness, then the devil takes millions of souls
with him through Luther and his rebellion. So what does God do to get
those 5 million back? He sends His mother and converts almost double the
amount by crushing the Mexican serpent. And let's not forget the
miraculous tilma of Our Lady of Guadalupe. To know that San Juan
Diego's tilma still remains colorful and beautiful, after more than 450 years
have elapsed since the apparition, is in itself miracle!
God bless you MHFM for your dedicated work.
Sincerely,
Bernardo
Statue
… Always Appreciate your good work and new
Aztec video.....how gruesome they were. How Dare Christians come and Stop
that (Says our… Dept. of Education.) Also, just caught a TV documentary
thing about some Sculptor in New Mexico/ Arizona (?) who the Indians were
ANGRY with for daring to sculpt a beautiful Spanish conquistador statue on
a horse. So now he's going to sculpt a Big Indian statue for Them...
Carol D.
Sr. Lucia
Dear Brother Michael & Brother Peter
Would like to know why you consider Sister Lucy an imposter and fraud?
In Domine
Mr Gerald Purves
MHFM: Of course, the original Sr. Lucia was not an
impostor. However, at a certain point
the enemies of the Church definitely utilized an impostor. All of that is covered in detail in these
videos:
The Impostor Sr.
Lucia – 1 of 3 - When and Why
The Impostor Sr. Lucia - 2 of 3 - The Proof and Her
Contradictions
The Impostor Sr. Lucia - 3 of 3 - Her Heresies
Overthrew
Subject: Our Lady of Guadalupe Video
Dimond Brothers,
Thank you for the new video. Yes that is a
wonderful book. A few hundred brave Catholics overthrew an entire civilization.
The battles they won against the most incredible odds were purely supernatural.
The Aztecs were horrible satanists and the Europeans were the best thing that
ever happened to them. Only a fool or a dishonest person would doubt Mary came
to clean house and institute Holy Baptism and the Catholic Faith. When Our Lady
first introduced herself to Juan Diego she explained she was "the Serpent
Crusher". The magnitude of that statement and all that it means to every
living creature in the universe is sadly not understood. Ave Maria!
Matthew
Pagans
Subject: Pagans
Dear Mhfm,
Excluding diseases, famines, the last
century has to be the most violent against man-on-man in the history of
A.D. Just placing WWI, and WWII, in perspective, the multi-millions of
human beings slaughtered, butchered, mangled, maimed-souls sent to
hell-according to Our Blessed Holy Mother at Fatima, boggles
the mind in comparison to the savage world of paganistic death south
of the border. Now, in the early 21st century-Armageddon is at
hand! There is no way out accept the Rosary of the Blessed Mother.
Truck on, Mhfm! I suppose satan seethes with envy at your task at hand.
Dea…
Freemasonry
Subject:
Bernanke says U.S. on brink
In
your video about exposing freemasonry, their goal is to replace religion,
law,& property with masonic religion, masonic law, & masonic property.
Well, the first two are most apparent, for those who have eyes to see; but how
do you change property into masonic property?
What these CAFR's show is that "composite government investment
funds" through association in reality own virtually everything. The
media, for their part, has created a deliberate void in comprehension, to this
fact. Remember, G. Edward Griffin's audio tape on the Fed says the first thing
they did after starting the Fed was buy up the media. That's why Bernanke can
say "whatever", to propagate the whole "budget" lie.
Richard
Comment
Dear Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,
The Devil is obviously 'MAD as
Hell, and he can't take it anymore', so all he can do is send out his
'dupes', like LF, to try and annoy and wear down the MHFM, with their ravings
and ad hominem attacks, rather akin to pesky mosquitoes, who as soon as
you brush them off, return with a few more of their fiends, in a vain attempt
to undermine the operation of salvation...
God bless,
David
Rock
Dear Brothers,
We've had our comments about some of the
British superstars of rock. There is always speculation about selling their souls.
I thought this was a little creepy. When doing an interview for his new book:
"Well, I'm not putting death on the agenda," he told the Times.
"I don't want to see my old friend Lucifer just yet".
The Beatles (Lennon), Led Zeppelin
(purchased Alister Crowley’s castle) and many others had close ties with
Darkness.
When Richards says "old friend" I
assume he started the relationship a long time ago when these superstars were
consorting with prominent satanists. When he says "I don't want to
see" him I assume he understands there is a debt he isn't looking forward
to paying. What's sad is, even a man who signs a contract in his blood can have
it revoked by our Dear Lady if only he pursued more important secrets.
Matthew
Sensed
Subject: Thank you
Brothers Michael and Peter Dimond
About a week or so ago I purchased a few
books and DVD’s from you and I can say justly that I have been truly blessed
and enlightened by them. For the longest time I sensed such a feeling of
despair in our Holy Church and I could not figure it out. To that extent when I
saw your website and a few of your videos on YouTube I began to do my own study
and it led me into complete despair when I thought of how far astray our church
has gone. In upholding Vatican II, the church has sacrificed itself to the
secular world and betrayed Christ with its attempt to “fit in” with everyone
else. The horrible time of the reformation was to me when the church was the
strongest because in the face of heresy and apostasy it remained resolute and
strong in the faith of Christ and in His Holy Church. Yet in this modern time,
the church bows and recognizes schismatic’s and defilers as holy and followers
of the faith.
When Christ ascended into heaven, he
charged the apostle Peter with the care and leadership of the church. He was to
be the new shepherd who commissioned by Christ would grow and expand the Gospel
to all lands. Yet today we see our church in disarray, our traditions
considered out of date and our teachings archaic. The role of the pope
diminished to a figure of nothing more than a secular preacher, and the Holy
Scriptures reduced to nothing more than fables and good stories. To me it was
better when the common people were unable to read the scriptures themselves.
Now to some this is a very strong statement to make but it is very true,
because the Popes and priests all knew that if the common man would have the
chance to read them the gospel would be destroyed by conflicting views,
schismatic’s and free thought would been allowed to trample the teachings of
Christ. There was a time in Holy Mother Church that we were in the ship of St.
Peter and yet when the time of trial came many leaped out of the ship because
the waves became too high and their testimonies shaken because of fear and
polluted ideas. They relied on their own ideas to save them instead of
remembering the gospel story of Christ calming the angry sea. In leaping out of
the ship of St. Peter, they have allowed themselves to drown in the sea of
heresy, thus as a result have torn asunder the seamless coat of Christ. Which
stood as a symbol of unity and salvation.
Yet even in this darkness, there is light
and it shines brightly from heaven in the figure of the Blessed Virgin. Christ
calls to his lost sheep to come home, and yet they are too distracted by the
notion of the grass being greener on the other side concept of earthly life and
the hereafter.
I thank you both for the great work that
you do for Christ and Holy Church, you will be blessed for your labors and your
work will speak to many. I ask you to pray for me and for my family, as we will
join you in prayer for the lost. We will always remember to say a rosary for
you and I hope you will do the same for us. The fight continues and the banner
of Christ will one day fly again over the Vatican and a true shepherd will step
forward and lead the church back to Christ and salvation.
David Robertson
MHFM: Thanks for the interest. It’s important for people to recognize that
the church which has engaged in all the things you mention is actually not the
Catholic Church, but a counterfeit construct.
The true Church still exists, infallible and unblemished, but in a
remnant. The heretics to whom you make
reference automatically ceased to be part of the Church and her representatives
when they denied the faith.
Soon
MHFM: We have a new video that we hope to post very
soon.
Rise
Subject:
The rise of Islam
Hi
Brothers,
You
posted a news story a week ago about the Muslim praying in the streets of
France. I found this really shocking, as I have been seeing a lot of this kind
of thing where I live in CA. I was shocked the other day when I saw a man passing
out Korans and other Islamic reading material on our college campus. I have been doing a lot of research on this
topic. It's really hard to find information on there faith that isn't twisted
in their favor. I was wondering if you could do a video on this topic. It
really is unbelievable, they are taking over the world!
This
video has a lot of good information, but I want to know more: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pHK_2TvU94&feature=related
God
Bless,
HW
Holy Days
Dear Bros. Dimond,
As the Vigil of All Saints Day approaches, I'm once again reminded of the horribly
far-reaching grasp Lucifer has on the world.
In his hatred and cunning, Lucifer has successfully replaced all the Holy Days
with "holidays". . . He has successfully turned people's attention
away from the observation and celebration of God on these Holy Days (days
entirely necessary to observe in order to obtain preservation from sin as well
as honor the Good Creator) by replacing them with such horrible mockeries as
"halloween", "xmas", and "easter" to name the most
obvious ones.
How grotesquely displeasing it must be for God to see countless people annually
celebrating death and Lucifer on "halloween" by dressing as demons
(bearing in mind demons appear not only in their hideous forms (traditionally
"scary" costumes) but in disguised forms of beauty too (princess,
fairy, etc. costumes)… Unfortunately, as a child I grew up watching
horror movies and I can't think of a single horror movie that didn't blaspheme
or mock God.
The Holy Day of Christmas when the Holy Father gave the ultimate gift of His
only begotten Son who was born in blessed poverty. . . has been replaced
with not only the grotesque celebration of man (where people's only concerns
are giving and receiving base material gifts, and leisurely spending time with
"loved ones"), but with the added insult of removing Christ's title
from Christmas to "xmas" while deranged people decorate a tree (the
very thing on which our Lord Christ Jesus was crucified).
The Holy Day of Resurrection Sunday has been replaced too with the celebration
of man. Lucifer has succeeded once again in turning people's attention away
from God and their duty of reverent vigilance by eclipsing the celebration of
Eternal Life (made possible by and through Jesus' resurrection) with the
grotesque mockery of the celebration of temporal life as symbolized by the
pagan depiction of the "easter bunny" and "easter eggs"
(the celebration and veneration of creatures/reproduction/temporal life as
opposed to the celebration and veneration of the Creator/resurrection/eternal
life).
My grief and shame is only intensified by the fact that during these days of
the great deception- where one does not have the convenience and comfort of
going to a legitimate Catholic Church- I don't even know the True
Catholic way of properly observing these Holy Days. . . especially the Vigil of
All Saints. So I'm writing to ask you if there is a book that I can read
concerning the proper way of observing the Holy Days. . . or if there isn't,
would you please instruct me on the matter?
Thanks be to God for blessing us with MHFM. . . a most ardent preserver
and propagator of the One True Holy Catholic Faith without which no one at all
is saved.
Please pray for me…
Kristine
Regarding
Subject: Regarding: L F
Brothers Peter and Michael,
Well so much for "L F". He is not only spiritually blind, but he must
be completely deaf. I have a number of
your DVD's. The good, the bad, the ugly that you discuss in the DVD's always
has the name of the Encyclical,letters,news items,magazines, the dates ,who
said it when it was said etc..etc..etc.. I know because I have looked up a lot
of these articles to prove my point.
Not to mention, if one doesn't suffer from sloth, you can even purchase
Encyclicals or use the inter-net to get the information. So, sorry, no
excuse, no such thing as" justifiable ignorance." Oh yes, and
one more thing: All of your books pertaining to the FALSE popes, FALSE mass,
FALSE church-v2, my books have an "appendix" which means I can look
up( for myself) the references used. The references are also
given after each chapter in the one book.
Thank you very much for all of your tedious work. May God Bless you and our Most Holy Mother
protect you always.
Jennifer
LF Responds
MHFM: LF wrote a short response to
our recent response. Not surprisingly,
he ignored our request to discuss the matters in a recorded conversation.
Bull. You are a bunch of nut jobs who
feel free to slander the legitimate authority of the Church. If you don't
like the popes, you can be Orthodox, or even Eastern Rite. Instead, you
spread BS all over the you tube. I usually ignore it, but, b/c I was
attracted by your deceptive techniques, I got sucked into your delusions, and I
am angry about it. Better stay behind your fenced in funny farm, there, in
Fillmore.
[From LF]
MHFM: By your first short statement,
we suppose you are implying that our assertion that your antipopes praise false
religions and heretical sects is nonsense.
No, it’s a fact and well-documented.
You are a liar at heart and a mortal sinner who doesn’t seek after
truth, but runs from it when it is presented to you. That’s why God blinds you and gives you the
horrible punishment to believe you are right when you are so wrong. You don’t like the popes. You spit on them by defending an antipope who
denies what they authoritatively taught.
Clearly
Dear
Brothers,
LF
is clearly tormented by his own mortal sins and heresies, otherwise the truth
wouldn't be so painful for him. LF calumniates the popes by saying the 5
Antipopes are Catholics, rather than the heretics, schismatics and apostates
that they are. To say that the Antichrist Antipopes are Catholics is to
calumniate the Lord Jesus Christ! He accuses you of deception, when the fact is
that he himself is deceived - by the V-2 sect! LF wrote: "You repeat inflammatory words, but you give no
evidence for it." It appears that LF is actually accusing you of what he
himself is guilty of, because like so many bad-willed-lying-heretics today, he
cites no authoritative Church teaching to prove his position, because he
can't. Instead, like an immature fool, he attacks you personally, rather than
debate the position! His own "POV" (point of view) is full of holes
because he assumes that just because he witnessed something, that he could not
have been deceived by it, and that "it's proof" of Our
Lady's intervention, because "Totus Tuus" was formed from the
JPII's satanic recovery. That means nothing - one may as well say that
Protestantism is thus a legitimate form of Christianity, and not heresy,
which it is, because it developed from the Arch-heretic Martin
Luther. What pathetic nonsense and modernism! But one need only look at
his comment about the salvation of souls to see the fruits of obstinately
defending the Vatican II sect. Catholic saints and martyrs endured unimaginable
tortures for the salvation of souls. Compare that reality with a "kook,
zealot and malcontent" such as LF, and his comment: "It would be
comical if the end result wasn't the loss of souls for people…" So, according
to LF, the salvation of souls is "comical." That's one of the most
evil things I've ever read. LF, in his satanic stupidity, defines his own
method: "you pretend to be Catholic, and use many words that resemble it,
then lead people subtly away from the heart of the Church and isolate
them." And in daring desperation, he thinks he can contradict himself in
the same paragraph, and that people will be so frightened of phrases like
"Where Peter is, there is the Church.": "We fully
expect an apostasy by the leadership of the
Church during the reign of the antichrist. Or,
at least a false pope. These
things are speculation, of course, and
we may be way off track." So LF fully expects things that are speculative!
That really sums up how shakey his ground is - how uncertain his
"faith" is. From there, the mental deterioration is evident in every
sentence: "John Paul VI was
physically unable to sanction
contraception against his will.
That, to me, is proof of the Holy Spirit right there." Firstly, there was no "John Paul VI"
- I assume he means Paul VI. And someone who is "physically unable to
do something against their will," is physically able to do something for
their will - the double negatives, "unable" and "against,"
cancel each other out to make the sentence positive. And if it is proof of
the activity of the Holy Spirit that someone can physically do something for
their will, then one may as well say that everyone is in the state of grace or
that everyone will be saved, i.e. the heresy of Universal
Salvation. I suppose LF picked up that heresy from his beloved
"John Paul VI"!!! Lf is chasing pots of gold at the end of
rainbows and listening to the "elves" he's possessed by.
Then, with the "Dutch courage" of a drunken person, he boldly
asserts: "Good grief, get some discernment gifts, if you are truly
Catholic, as you say you are, which I am beginning to doubt," which
contradicts his opening line of the paragraph where he says you're worse than
people to lead souls to hell - "In any case, to me, you are worse than
those..." The discernment is lacking in LF, not in MHFM. He follows
up again by explaining his own method: "You use deception to
lure them in, and mesmerizing repetition and half-truths to entice and hold
interest, then, wham, you lower the hammer and attmept to smash the faith. Right out of satan's playbook, I
must say." That's what LF is doing: he repeats the methods he's using
to criticize MHFM, to "hold interest," and than wham he tries to
smash the Catholic faith by attacking MHFM. And again, imagining people
will be too scared to see through his tactics, he writes: "It is the
techniques, used by cultists the world over, that give you away." So,
quoting Catholic dogmas in defense of the Catholic faith and against
heresies, schisms and apostasies, even if it means the world will hate them,
according to LF, are "techniques, used by cultists used the world
over." No, cultists use flamboyant and inaccurate statements designed to
incite intense emotion which will override the ordinary person's reasoning
ability, so as to leave them a) confused, b) scared of the cult person, and c)
desperate for any answer - which the cult member is equally desperate to
supply. That's exactly how the Vatican II sect operates, and it works on people
who are bad willed, because bad willed people are willing to compromise the
"little things," which it is obvious LF is willing to
do. And finally, the only one displaying evidence of
irrational paranoia is LF, who thinks MHFM is deceptive. MHFM is the
most uncompromising defender of the Catholic faith on the planet today -
no heresies, no schisms, no apostasies ever from MHFM, and if one needs proof
other than their work, just look at the bizarre, insane and deceptive reactions
they receive in emails from apostates like LF. Perhaps if LF wasn't so worried
about who his father thinks is a "paranoid schizophrenic," then he
might be able to think more clearly. Though, even that might be a stretch! What
a sad and frustrating road the path to hell must be!
Proverbs
10:14 - "Wise men lay up knowledge: but the mouth of the fool is next to
confusion."
Proverbs
12:16 - "A fool immediately sheweth his anger: but he that dissembleth
injuries is wise."
Proverbs
28:26 - "He that trusteth in his own heart, is a fool: but he that
walketh wisely, he shall be saved."
God
Bless,
Chris
White
Idols
MHFM: This is an interesting quote
from the life of Hernán Cortés, the famous explorer and
conquistador who overthrew the Aztec Empire.
As his group came upon lands in the New World, they discovered the idols
of the natives.
“Assisting their wounded, [and] bleeding, the
Spaniards limped uphill to seek refuge in a cluster of low stone buildings that
were prayer-houses. But inside the houses they came upon idols of baked clay – hideous,
monster-faced figures, some figures obviously female and some male figures in
the act of sodomy.” (Richard Lee Marks, Cortes – The Great Adventurer and the Fate of Aztec Mexico, Alfred
A. Knopf, New York, 1993, p. 26.)
This is another quote which
demonstrates that homosexuality is connected with idolatry. It is not natural, as many today would have
people believe; but rather, as Romans 1 teaches, it is caused by a demonic
takeover that results from apostasy and idolatry. We also discussed this in the section of our
book called: The Idolatry of the Vatican II sect
is connected with its rampant homosexuality [PDF File]. The culture which used these idols was
thoroughly demonic and engaged in mass human sacrifice.
Respond
Subject:
Your Book: The Truth about What Really Happened…
Most
Holy Family Monastery,
I have just recently read your groundbreaking book, The Truth about What
Really Happened to the Catholic Church after Vatican II. The facts you
present are absolutely shocking! It's amazing, horrifying and deeply convicting
of just how evil the Vatican II sect is. The information you provide is
eye-opening and surely compels every true and honest Catholic to recognize this
phony, counter-Church for what it is, have nothing whatsoever to do with its
abominable apostasy, and flee into the wilderness where the one, true Church of
Christ remains. In the final days we are told of the decisive battle between
the elect and the reprobates. Your book successfully and abundantly proves how
all the rise of the counterfeit church only further shows the authenticity of
the true Church.
I would also like to respond to LF, whom you correctly recognized as being
"a living example of why Jesus told us not to cast pearls before
swine."
LF, you are so fully of bad will; so full of the sinful pride that blinds you
from seeing the simple truth. It's in your desperate and futile attempts to
undermine MHFM's witness to these truths that you demonstrate your utter
contempt for the truth. You reveal yourself to be nothing more than the Devil's
slave.
Thank you for your material.
Regards,
Sotto…
The words of Christ: "Blessed are ye when they revile you, and persecute
you, and speak all that is evil against you, untruly, for my sake."
Matthew 5:11
Since
Dear MHFM,
Since coming to your website approximately
3 years ago, I have learned what the Catholic Faith really is and that my past,
in what I considered to be Catholicism, was simply founded in man-made
religion. I found a Byzantine priest for confession and made an
initial general confession as well as others since then. As I had
not confessed for a long time and only sporadically over the timeframe from age
12-40 you can well believe there were a MOUNTAIN of sins that needed
confessed. My question is this: If one makes a general confession
and then is following a regular routine of confession but remembers something
that he did not confess from the past (and I am remembering many now), should
these then be confessed or would the general confession have remitted them?
The Monastery is truly a light in the
darkness of this vile world… Without finding your website (through our Lord and
Lady's grace), I would have been allotted to that heap of filth and condemned
to Hell for all eternity. I cannot thank you enough for your help and
guidance over the years. Perhaps one day I can truly thank you for all
you have done for this poor soul.
God Bless you for your works......
Bruce
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.
If one made a general confession, but then recalls a mortal sin that was
not confessed, it would be necessary to mention that sin in a new confession
when you can go. However, it would not
be necessary to repeat the general confession.
Swine
Member of the Most Holy Family Monastery,
I was most
intruigued with the video series you put out entitled, Is the World About to
End?. I was with you, of course, until you began to calumniate the
popes. You accused John Paul II of
blasphemy and deception, yet, you began your series with deception.
Leading the viewer in by pretending to be legitimate, calling your self vaticancatholic, and
starting with Fatima…
You repeat
inflammatory words, but you give no evidence for it. For instance, you
imply that JPII"s healing was not a miracle brought about by prayers to
Our Lady, which it was. In spite of the obvious signs, and his utter
devotion to her, and the development of Totus Tuus, a family apostolate of
the highest order, from it, you imply that satan had a hand in it. Sorry,
but I witnessed it. Your POV is full of holes.
You accused the
pope of blasphemies, but gave no example. You gave your opinion of
why you think what you think, but, it is too "out there" for any sane
person to take seriously. You realize that, don't you? You appeal
to kooks, zealots, and malcontents. It would be comical if the end result
wasn't the loss of souls for people…
In any case, to me, you are worse than
those because you pretend to be Catholic, and use many words that resemble it,
then lead people subtly away from the heart of the Church and isolate
them. The Church is not a bunch of Latin sayings. Where Peter is,
there is the Church. We fully expect an apostasy by the leadership of the
Church during the reign of the antichrist. Or, at least a false
pope. These things are speculation, of course, and we may be way off
track. But, the gentlemen you described are not the culprits. John
Paul VI was physically unable to sanction contraception against his will.
That, to me, is proof of the Holy Spirit right there. Good grief, get
some discernment gifts, if you are truly Catholic, as you say you are, which I
am beginning to doubt.
You use deception
to lure them in, and mesmerizing repetition and half-truths to entice and hold
interest, then, wham, you lower the hammer and attmept to smash the
faith. Right out of satan's playbook, I must say. Had you been
straightforward about your views from the get-go and just came out and said
why, you may have been more convincing. It is the techniques, used by
cultists the world over, that give you away.
My father thinks
you are just a colony of paranoid schizophrenics, or some other form of kook,
but, this video shows too much cunning for that. I think you are, perhaps,
enemies of the Church operating under the guise of well-meaning
people.
I just wanted you to
know that some of us are "on to you".
Sincerely,
LF
MHFM: Allow us to respond to your
e-mail. First, your e-mail is filled with false accusations and it
demonstrates your profound bad will. There is no deception in our video
series. We are Catholic. That requires us to reject things which are
opposed to the Catholic faith.
To be Catholic means to accept all
the teachings of the popes throughout history, which you do not. You
accept salvation outside the Church (which is heresy), and that Protestants are
in the Church (heresy). You must accept all of that because it’s the official
teaching of Vatican II, Benedict XVI and John Paul II; but it contradicts the
infallible teaching of the Catholic Church. You must also accept false
ecumenism, prayer with pagans, the idea that Protestants and schismatics don't
need conversion, the heresy of religious liberty, the teaching that
non-Catholics may receive Communion, etc. – all of which are taught by Benedict
XVI, John Paul II and Vatican II.
You say that the video series didn't
give any proof of John Paul II's blasphemies and heresies. It did, but it
was not meant to be a comprehensive presentation on his doctrinal
heresies. That video series was about prophecy and how the Vatican II
sect, John Paul II, etc. fit into it. We wouldn’t expect a blind heretic
like you to appreciate the points made on that front, for they are for those
who possess the basic honesty to recognize the obvious: that the post-Vatican
II sect is a departure from Catholic tradition.
For a strict doctrinal expose of his countless heresies, on everything
from various pagan religions to all men are saved to Protestants don't
need conversion, see the file below. We would also love to debate you
on the issue, and expose you for the fraud you are. It would demonstrate that you are clueless about
the Catholic faith, about John Paul II's actual teaching, and about how a
Catholic must consider men who purport to be popes but teach heresy. We
could get into the matters you bring up in your e-mail. Are you willing to have such a debate?
If not, you prove the falsity of your words. Did you know that there have
been over 40 antipopes in Catholic history? Did you know that the doctors
of the Church teach that a pope who would become a heretic would lose his
office and cease to be pope? Did you know that John Paul II signed joint
declarations with the leading members of non-Catholic sects, in which he
denounced trying to convert the non-Catholics (which is complete apostasy from
the Catholic faith)?
The Heresies of
John Paul II - a comprehensive presentation [PDF
file]
You say that our material appeals to
kooks. That means nothing coming from someone like you. Your nonsense only appeals to faithless
losers who don't believe one bit in the necessity of Jesus Christ, and are too
stupid and bad willed to figure out that Vatican II, John Paul II and Benedict
XVI have contradicted what all the popes in history have taught and are,
according to any Catholic assessment, not valid popes. You are without a
question a blind dupe of Satan, headed for Hell and the eternal fire you deserve.
You are too dumb to realize that your antipope praises non-Catholic religions
every week, and that John Paul II preached a new gospel. You are a living example of why Jesus told us
not to cast pearls before swine, and not to give that which is holy to dogs
(Matthew 7:6).
Unecumenical
MHFM: We recently posted some quotes
from a book called, Rodrigues the
Interpreter – An Early Jesuit in Japan and China. This book is about a Jesuit interpreter in
Japan and China in the 16th and 17th centuries, and his
experiences during the missionary work in those two countries. It was written by a post-Vatican II “Jesuit”
named Michael Cooper. In the following
quote, we see another interesting example of how ecumenism, as taught by
Vatican II and implemented by Benedict XVI and the New Church, is a complete
repudiation of Catholic teaching on heresy.
Keep in mind that the quote comes from a learned post-Vatican II
“Jesuit”:
“But the annalist goes on to mention that this
Jesuit met in Edo a group of half a dozen Dutch traders and an Englishman (who
must have been Will Adams), and did his
best to convert them to Catholicism.
The leading member of the party was the Englishman, and to him the
Jesuit offered a safe-conduct from Bishop Cerqueira if he wished to travel down
to Nagasaki and sail from Japan. The Englishman, or ‘obstinate heretic’ as
Girao unecumenically labels him, politely turned down the offer... both
[the] Jesuit and Englishman began to cite Scripture in an effort to convince
the other of his error and win him over.
Neither succeeded in this theological tussle. Adams remained a good Protestant (but with
many Catholic friends) to the end of his life, while Rodrigues (if the Jesuit
in question was indeed Rodrigues) remained a good papist.” (Michael Cooper, Rodrigues the
Interpreter – An Early Jesuit in Japan and China, Weatherhill, 1974, p.
206)
Notice that he says it’s unecumenical
for Girao (a Catholic priest at the time) to describe the Protestant Englishman
as an “obstinate heretic.” It’s another
example of how Catholic dogma on heresy, and the related Catholic teaching that
Protestants are in fact heretics because they obstinately reject Catholic
dogma, was indeed repudiated by Vatican II and by the Vatican II antipopes. It is beyond dispute. Protestants are now considered Christians and
part of the Church, not heretics. To
reinforce his false opinion that the Protestant Englishman was not a heretic,
Cooper also describes him as “good.”
Considering that Cooper embraces the teaching of Vatican II and false
ecumenism, which renders the Catholic faith meaningless, it’s a mystery why he
even wasted his time entering/remaining in religious life, and spending the
time to do detailed research on the history of the Jesuits and the mission to Japan
and China.
Videos
Subject: Videos
Just wanted to say that I found your
11-part series Is the World about to End very interesting. Thanks for sharing!
Will be watching more of your videos.
~auntb…
Mentioned
I mentioned the revelation theory to plenty
of people and apparently it's getting around. It really opened my eyes to see
your video…
Parsley…
Encyclicals
Dear Brothers,
Do you know when Encyclicals become infallible?
Where could I go to find this answer.
God bless,
Tien Le
MHFM: One discovers the answer to that question by applying
Church teaching on the magisterium and papal infallibility. The answer is that it depends upon how a pope
says something in an encyclical (the language he uses), as well as to whom it
is addressed.
Resource
Dear Brothers,
You recently commented that the current
Catechism is a bad resource to learn about the Catholic Faith. What would you
recommend in order to learn what the Catholic Church really believes and
teaches? For example, would you recommend the Baltimore Catechism? Thanks.
Steve
MHFM: For a basic catechism, we would recommend the Penny
Catechism we offer. To learn more about
the Catholic faith and what one needs to know today, we would recommend our
other books and materials.
Confession
Subject:
Confession
I
prayed to St Therese today to help me find a validly ordained
catholic priest so that I can make a confession. Yes, I did find one… who
was ordained before 1968. I confessed all my… sins. We were both in tears
when I finished my confession because of the gravity of my sins. Before
absolving all my sins he asked me what can I do to do penance. I told him that
I pray the 15 decade Rosary everyday. He told me to pray the whole 15 decade
Rosary at home (he knew that I was a traditional catholic because I told him
before my confession) and he absolved my sins…
Disrespect
Subject: Hello
Now i know that true catholic fallow the pope.
if you don't respect the pope you don't respect the catholic
church. so please comback home to true faith. catholic church is the true
church so i beg you come home a accept the pope. thank you very much for
understanding and i know you looking for the truth. your friend richard in
christ. love.
MHFM: If you accept a heretic as pope, you disrespect the
Catholic Church and follow an antipope.
St. Francis De Sales (17th century), Catholic Doctor of the
Church, The Catholic Controversy, pp.
305-306: "Now
when he [the Pope] is explicitly a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his
dignity and out of the Church..."
Benedict XVI, Milestones, 1998, pages 53-54: “I have
ever more come to the realization that Judaism…
and the Christian faith described in the New Testament are two ways
of appropriating Israel’s Scriptures, two
ways that, in the end, are both determined by the position one assumes with
regard to the figure of Jesus of Nazareth.
The Scripture we today call Old Testament is in itself open to both
ways…”
Comment
Dear Brothers:
The Evangelicals' opposition to the display
of the Crucifix in Italy is yet another revelation of fake Christian
religions of which the V2 sect is simply the ultimate. I believe the
fake Christian "church" is the deception of which Our Lord spoke.
Bill's review of the Masonic/communist
assault on the world in the 20th century has reminded me of how clever
Satan is (the greatest created genius ever). The evil assaults on the
Church and the world has yielded Satan an even greater victory than their
direct hit on the Catholic Church.
With the enemies of Christ firmly situated
in the Church, Satan's real victory seems to have been this: that with
these unspeakably horrible movements, the Catholics' love affair with
Protestantism especially in the 20th century seems to have been
bolstered. While the real enemy of masonry etc. is the Catholic Church,
these evil movements seemed to have caused in people's perception a realignment
or shifting of sides, and confusion as to who "they" are and who
"we" are. Even when I was still in the NO and knew virtually
nothing, it always seemed to me that the real problem was the man who called himself
"Christian". (I never guessed at the time how right I
was.) We see this same perception-shifting phenomenon with the pro-life
movement today. The dissolving of the true Faith, the rejection of Truth
and the embrace, instead, of a cause which on its surface is a good one.
Always is.
Having rejected the papacy and the true
faith, the only principle of unity among fake Christians is their hatred for
dogma. That's why what passes for Christianity in the world today is no
threat to Islam, communism, masonry or anything else (Glen Beck not
withstanding). There are some 25,000 (plus One) fake
"religions" in the world calling themselves by the deceptive
title of "Christian". But they are not Christian; they
are Legion. Will the real enemy please stand up?
Thanks for helping us understand all of
this.
Lee Ann
Comment
You conclude that NFP is as evil as any
other form of contraception. Well, if you are to believe that then you
would have to say any Catholic husband ans wife that do not have conjugal sex everyday
would also have to be evil and if you take it a step further the married couple
should perform the act several times a day or be in a state of mortal sin
because marriage is for procreation and if a husband and wife are not trying to
procreate daily then that would also be a form of contraception. I have
spent a lot of time reading your articles on your web site and for me they are
not very convincing at all…
RW
MHFM: We wouldn’t expect the articles
to be convincing for someone like you.
Your argument demonstrates that you fight against the truth and that you
cannot, at this time, grasp basic logic.
Saying that NPF is sinful would not require one to hold that husband and
wife must engage in marital relations each day.
NFP does not consist of a couple simply refraining from the use of
marital rights. Portraying it in that
way shows how dishonest one must be to defend NFP. Rather, NFP is an organized scheme to refrain on days when it is believed
conception will occur but use marriage rights when it is believed conception
will not occur. It is thus a carefully
constructed plan to use marriage rights while avoiding the primary purpose of
marriage. That is why it’s sinful. The sin is in the intention.
Turquoise
MHFM: The following quote is from Dr.
Callahan. He was a research biophysicist
at the University of Florida, as well as a painter, photographer and scientific
writer. Analyzing the miraculous image
of Our Lady of Guadalupe, which first appeared in 1531, the following quote
briefly explains why the dark turquoise blue color on Our Lady’s mantle is just
one of the image’s many miraculous
features.
“The mantle is of a dark turquoise blue… This presents an inexplicable phenomenon
because all such pigments are known to be subject to considerable fading with
time, especially in hot climates.
The Indian Mayan blue wall paintings are already badly faded. The
blue mantle [on the Tilma of Guadalupe], however, is bright enough to have been
laid last week.” (Philip S. Callahan, “The Tilma under Infra-Red
Radiation,” CARA Studies on Popular
Devotion, Volume II: Guadalupan Studies, No. 3, Washington, 1981, pp.
14-15.)
Horror
Thank you for your website. I thought my
gradual lapse toward my religion was due to growing older and more worldly wise
etc. My earliest childhood was spent
during the Pontificate of Pius XII... I felt trust for and strength from my
religion every day.
I went to a Papal Audience, the General type, when I was eighteen and was very
excited, of course. When Paul VI was carried by he fixed his gaze on me for a
good seven to ten seconds. My reaction was one of instant revulsion and almost
horror. I surely didn't expect that. It was one of the creepiest experiences I
can call to mind to this day.
Thank you for waking me up. I didn't even know I was sleeping.
Sincerest thanks and God bless.
Greg Green
New Video
MHFM:
This is a new video and article on Benedict XVI’s astounding recent
heresies. It discusses one of the most
heretical speeches he has given.
Benedict
XVI's most heretical speech? [video]
Benedict XVI's most heretical speech and other recent heresies
[article]
Catechism
Brothers,
What is your view of the current Catechism
of the Catholic Church? Thank you for your time.
In Christ,
Frank
MHFM:
The new catechism of the Vatican II Church teaches all of the primary heresies
of Vatican II. This file covers The Heresies in Vatican II [PDF File]. The
catechism repeats and teaches the major Vatican II heresies, including:
religious liberty; non-Catholics may receive Communion; Protestants and
schismatics are united to the Church; Jews are not rejected by God; salvation
outside the Church; the Church has a bond with non-Christian religions; all men
are united to Christ; and Muslims worship the one true God, just to name a
few. It’s a large catechism, so it of
course contains some Catholic truth. But
it’s the heretical catechism of the New Church.
Moreover, even in certain parts where it doesn’t necessarily teach
heresy, you can see a weakness, an anthropocentrism, and a spirit of man that
is repulsive.
It was also solemnly promulgated by Antipope John Paul
II. That means that if he was the pope,
the new catechism represents the authoritative and magisterial teaching of the
Catholic Church. That is impossible, and
thus it’s another proof that he was an antipope.
Discovered
Hello,
I discovered your website and youtube channel this week and have been listening
to your videos and studying scripture. I was once a Muslim convert who left Islam
due to discovering truths about the Bible, but have been involved with a
variety of Evangelical Protestant Churches over the past 6 years. I was hoping
you could please help me with further discovering Biblical truth, and truth
about the Catholic Church.
I do not believe that the current Catholic Church being lead by the Vatican can
be the earthly Church authority of our Lord Jesus Christ. I see that you
believe the same thing, yet retain your Catholic identity and allegiance - can
you help me to understand this? How can Catholics still participate in the
Catholic body of believers (Church) yet the leadership and so many are corrupt;
is it still possible to find a Catholic Church that adheres to the traditions
and beliefs of the true Church that the Apostles founded?
Your help is GREATLY needed in this time!
Kind Regards,
Brian
MHFM: It’s tremendous to hear about your discovery of the
website and your interest in the Catholic faith. We are Catholic. It’s the one true faith. It’s necessary to convert to it. As explained on our website, the post-Vatican
II structure, which purports to be Catholic, is not the Catholic Church. That’s why we are traditional Catholics who reject
the post-Vatican II sect. All the
information for how to convert is on our website. As is explained in our file on where to go to
Mass, there are some places to receive sacraments but the priests are heretical
and cannot be supported. The Church still
exists in a remnant of traditional Catholics.
We would also recommend our book, The
Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church, for the information on
why only Catholicism is authentic Christianity.
Comment
I very much liked Joey’s take on the
current situation in which there are no violent persecutions of “Catholics”
today (that is real Catholics). Even Communist China sanctions a
state controlled version of the Vatican II sect which operates openly.
There is no need for violent suppression, because the Vatican II
sect is so compliant; and when obligingly positioning itself against a few
moral outrages, (albeit timidly), it undermines that position with its own
hypocritical scandals. To the worldly it is a pathetic joke. It is
a sea of contradiction in both its public prescriptions and its public behavior.
Joey’s take on world history is true enough. But the case can
be made, that if the United States had been founded for the purpose of
destroying the remnants of Christendom (and perhaps it was) it could not have
done a better job than it has.
To reinforce his point, all of the major
wars of the US (and this case can even be made about the so-called Civil War,
but it is more complicated) going back to the 19th Century served to
undermine Catholic societies. The US supported the forces that overthrew
Maximillian, the last Catholic Monarch to rule Mexico. However for the
time, Mexico remained nominally Catholic. So in the Mexican War, totally
contrived, the US stole her territories. Then in the Spanish
American War, also totally contrived, practically fomented by one man (William
R. Hurst), the US stole Catholic Spain’s Empire including the Philippines (now
largely protestantized, Muslimized, liberalized) and Cuba (now Marxist).
The US then entered WWI in time to save the “Allies” and destroy the last
great Catholic Monarchy in Europe, the Austro-Hungarian Empire. This
demilitarized and impoverished the center of Europe and allowed communism to
succeed in Russia and for a time Spain, while communist revolutions nearly
succeeded in Germany, Poland, Italy, etc. Counter Revolutionary forces
temporarily succeeded in reversing leftist gains in these countries, so a
second world war was necessary to finish the job. At the end of WWII
communism claimed the entire center of Europe from the Baltic to the Mediterranean
and nearly succeeded in Greece. With out US military intervention, the
Axis powers (which despite contemporary misconceptions were predominately
Catholic) would have destroyed soviet communism. Of course it took Vatican II to finish off
the Church in Spain (which Franco, with the assistance of the German Luftwaffe,
had restored) because Franco had the wisdom to stay “neutral” in the war
(though he sent soldiers to fight with Germany on the Russian Front, the
Spanish Blue Brigades).
And these are just the major wars.
How many people know about the massacre of the Cristeros in Mexico in the 20th
century by another US supported Masonic Mexican government? The facts of history, recent history, are
astounding when viewed through a Catholic lens. The apparent rollback of
communism in the last couple of decades is illusory, as is the peace, because
there is no real “church” anymore. These nations are just as decadent (as
is ours) and the communist ideals still animate them only under different
names.
So the job is so thoroughly done now, that
the nation’s “enemies” have to be contrived, hence 9/11, while the Vatican II
sect just plays along like some kind of circus clown.
I think just as the real Christ, did not
come to give the Jews the military leader, the temporal Earthly kingdom they
desired, neither is anti-Christ a violent destroyer of bodies. Rather he
is the wolf in sheep’s clothing that destroys souls, what really matters. The Protestants get this wrong because they
see everything carnally. If you understand that the warfare is spiritual
you see that anti-Christ is already here, consolidating his reign.
Bill Mulligan
Creat
Subject:
Creat, Divine Mercy, Justification
Dear
Brothers,
Clearly
it is "Creat," who wrote in asking whether you have a problem with a
voice that has authority, that has a problem with a voice of authority,
because not everyone who sounds authoritative, confident or strong truly is. As
you mentioned in your video on Fr. Corapi, his whole image is a theatrical act
designed to seduce and manipulate unsuspecting minds. If a loud
and confident-sounding voice were all that is required to be a Catholic,
then Adolf Hitler would be a saint, which is ridiculous! Obviously Fr. Corapi's
get-up is designed for one thing: to intimidate a person into fearing
man more than God. That's the whole essence of the Vatican II sect's
apostasy, i.e. to replace God with man and the Creator with creatures. The
"peace" that the world gives is no such thing but rather a paralyzing
fear of creatures. Also, Creat says, "the people of the world need a
voice of authority." So, the authority of Catholic dogmas evidently
doesn't convince Creat. What would he do if he met a beggar who turned out to
be St. Francis of Assisi. Or what if Creat met a crying woman who turned out to
be the Blessed Virgin Mary. Or what if he met a man who was condemned to be
crucified, as was the Creator of the universe, Jesus Christ. Authority consists
not in the voice but in the truth and meaning of the words themselves. However,
someone who is so pumped up by their own bad will is not going to be
enthralled by the Eternal King or His Kingdom of peace, humility and
meekness. Those who are in communion with abortionists, homosexuals and heretics,
even though they themselves might not say they support those things, are
in fact supporters, because of the principle of the Church's unity of
faith, which is the Papacy. Those who want an adrenaline rush won't be
happy with Jesus Christ and the Catholic faith. Fr. Corapi is an antichrist
apostate…
"DivineMercy"
who wrote in saying you need God's forgiveness for your "lies and
blasphemy against the Church" actually needs God's true mercy and
forgiveness! How is it that one comes to the point where they call light,
darkness, and good, evil?!! It's by sin, heresy and bad will. There is
absolutely no mercy in Sister Faustina's "Divine
Mercy" false apparitions because they make a complete mockery of Jesus Christ's Passion and sufferings and the
Catholic Church, i.e. Jesus did not suffer and die to justify
sin…
Council of
Trent, On Justification - "CANON VIII.-If any one saith, that the fear of
hell,-whereby, by grieving for our sins, we flee unto the mercy of God, or refrain from sinning,-is a sin, or makes sinners worse; let him be anathema."
Council of
Trent, On Justification - "CANON XII.-If any one saith, that justifying faith is nothing else but confidence in the divine mercy which remits sins for Christ's sake; or, that this confidence alone is
that whereby we are justified; let him be anathema."…
God
Bless,
Chris
White
Church
Subject: Forgiveness
May Our Merciful Lord Jesus grant his Mercy
upon you for your lies and blasphemy against the Church. Your channel is nothing
more than slander and gossip under a veil of truth.
TRUE believers in Christ will pray for you.
DivineMercy…
MHFM: No, it’s rooted in facts and
irrefutable Catholic truth. That’s why
you can’t point to anything specific, but rather you can only make empty and
unsupported accusations. You don’t care
about the truth or the facts.
Problem
Subject: Corapi
Dear Brother,
Do you have a problem with a voice that has authority? The people of the world
need a voice of authority. Do you think God is going to have a 'flowery' tone
in the last days?You haven't seen nothing yet. I believe Father Corapi has been
placed in the programming of EWTN to give warning to the masses, especially the
Catholics. I would also like to say that there is no "Change" in the
doctrine of the faith and never will be. Every single part of Catholicism
matters. All that was given 2000 years ago is to stay.
God Bless and may God give you true wisdom.
Creat….
MHFM: We have a problem with a voice that speaks heresy, denies
the Catholic dogma Outside the Church There is No Salvation, accepts
Protestantism and false ecumenism, and celebrates the invalid New Mass, as
Corapi does. It’s pretty obvious that
the facts presented in that video, concerning what he believes and how it contradicts
Catholic truth, simply bounce off most of you as irrelevant.
False Peace
Subject: False
Peace – the Last Scourge of God
Dear
MHFM Brothers,
Being
updated in your website on a regular basis on matters of faith, morals and current events affecting Faith
has sharpened my mind. I’ve enjoyed very
much your input on historical events affecting our Catholic Faith like your
video on demonic French Revolution,
articles on the Great Western Schism,
Fatima Apparition that has something
to do with World War I and II and the End Days … People who are correctly
familiar with the World and Church
History will agree with me that there seems to be an apparent PEACE nowadays reigning over us after the Vatican II
Church successfully implemented the heretical
ecumenism of all faiths. The entire Catholic world prior to the birth of
abominable Vatican II Church has suffered an endless persecution
from the start Christ established His
Kingdom on Earth (Catholic Church).
We saw the persecution and mass murder of the first Christians and their
followers, century after century Catholics who profess union with Christ and
the Catholic Church suffer all sorts of persecutions and martyrdom like the murder of all Apostles of Christ and
almost all the early Popes, persecution of early Christian during the Roman Empire, the Diocletian Persecution and during the Middle Ages, the rise of
thousand heretical ideologies especially Islam
and Reformation, the
de-Christianization of France during French
Revolution, Bolshevik Russian
Revolution, Vietnam War, Philippine War, Mexican and Spanish War, the World
War I and II that sent million
Catholics to the grave, Communist State
Empire in China that slaughtered millions of Catholics … almost all of
these wars if one is truly aware is the war against God and His Church on earth
– The Catholic Church. No other religion
suffers endless persecution except the Catholic Church and now that the
Freemasons has penetrated the Vatican and now posing as the “Catholic Church”
before the entire world … the most cunning and final deception Satan can
employ against Christ’s Church on earth was done through Vatican II Church
under the venomous veil of “ecumenism – union of all faiths”. When this evil and heretical ideology of the
Whore of Babylon has been announced
to the world and accepted by millions of deceived Catholics – the
use of force is no longer necessary. The main objective of the use of violence and
death for those following Christ thru His Church, the Roman Catholic Church, is
for these Catholics to renounce their Faith and live in peace with the
wicked world … this paved the way for continuous wars and revolutions for
more than 2000 years. And now that
deceived Catholics unconsciously renounce their Catholic Faith, the use of arms
is futile and we now see a very “peaceful world”. However, this false peace is the greatest deception and last means of Satan in
boasting against God that he could crush God’s Church on earth. I am of the opinion that we won’t be seeing any
violent war in the future against the paranoia of nuclear war … and this
situation would persist until the Second Coming of Christ. The Second Coming of Christ is preceded by
almost NO faith among inhabitants on planet earth and I don’t think that there
would be worse punishment than Vatican Council II Church and abominable New
Mass …
Brothers
Michael and Peter, I want to know your input on the above ideas of mine. Now, I wonder not why there are no more
true persecutions of the Catholics since most of the Catholics are no
longer Catholics as they are ipso
separated from the Mystical Body of
Christ with their embracing heresy, schism and apostasy.
In
Jesus and Mary,
Joey from the Philippines
MHFM: We think you make good points, and
we agree with you in general about how we are currently living through a false
peace. That is definitely part of the
deception of the Great Apostasy. What’s
most important has been taken away from people.
The world and what people think is the Church are being spiritually
transformed while people are oblivious to it.
Events happen and the world takes notice, but only for a short
time. After a bit, they return to their
godlessness as if nothing has occurred.
This coincides with the two realities: 1) that signs and events will
happen in fulfillment of biblical prophecy; and 2) somehow most of the world
will fail to recognize what’s happening.
The true faith and salvation are the only things that really matter in
the end. Hence, everything must be measured
by them. For that reason, what’s
occurring in Rome, which has affected the spiritual makeup of the rest of the
world, is the biggest indication of where we are. If Satan removes the true faith from nations
and church buildings, and if he organizes the fall of most into moral depravity
and mortal sins of the flesh, he has what he desires and physical persecutions
become unnecessary.
Shocked
MHFM
… great job on the Heresy of the
Week. I was shocked as well on how heretical this antichrist has lately
been speaking. I thought last week's HOW on praising Jewish feast days
was bad enough, but nooo... he had to follow up and mention it on another
speech. WHAT MORE COULD PEOPLE WANT?!? Is right there in your
face!! Maybe he should
just tell the whole world that he is Jewish since he recognizes and believes
it’s okay to celebrate Jewish feast days.
Also that quote on the missionaries to Japan, my comments are: We truly are in
need of more laborers, all the time, as Our Lord taught us. If these holy
missionaries who went to Japan to convert the pagan Japan were in so much
need of more laborers to help out with the Evangelization... how much more are
we in need today when people have now apostasized from the Faith? We need
Catholics to start spreading the Catholic Faith amongst the modern-day pagans,
heretics, and all non-Catholics…
Thank you MHFM for you time. God
bless you and Mary protect you.
Let us Catholics (for those who have the time) pray an extra Rosary for the
Feast of the Most Holy Rosary. Through this powerful weapon we will
conquer our enemies and convert non-Catholics. Let us take advantage of
the increased efficacy and graces which God has granted us Catholics for these
end of times, so that we may glorify God the more, save our souls and convert
non-Catholics so they can also save their souls. This is it! We are
at war with the Antichrist! Let's go into battle with our most powerful
weapons, the Saving Crucifix on the right hand and the Most Holy Rosary on our
left.
Holy Mary, Mother of God and Queen of the Holy Rosary, pray for us.
Sincerely,
Bernardo
Quote
Dear Brothers,
I recently read a TAN book called "St. Michael and the Angels" and,
in it, I found a very interesting quote from St. Charles Borromeo regarding the
Catholic Church and salvation. In a prayer entitled "Recommendation to
One's Guardian Angel for a Happy Hour of Death," St. Charles says:
"...In the full freedom of my will today, I come to charge you to speak
for me at that fearful moment. You will say to Him, then, O my good angel: That
*I wish to die in the Roman Catholic Apostolic Church in which all the saints
since Jesus Christ have died, and out of which there is no
salvation*..."" I think it's safe to say that St. Charles Borromeo
/did not/ believe in universal salvation. Thank you.
Michael Dougherty
MHFM: He certainly didn’t believe in
the heresy of universal salvation. But
he also didn’t believe that souls could be saved in false religions, which is
what most “traditionalists,” including those who would claim to reject
universal salvation, hold.
Harvest
MHFM: In Matthew chapter 9, Jesus
Christ tells us that the harvest is great but the laborers are few.
Matthew 9:36-37- “Then he saith to his disciples, The harvest indeed is great, but the
labourers are few. Pray ye therefore the
Lord of the harvest, that he send forth labourers into his harvest.”
We find an example of this in the 16th
century mission to Japan. At the time,
Japan was a pagan nation and the Jesuit missionaries were having some success
making converts in the pagan land.
However, there weren’t enough missionaries to fill the needs.
“There were scarcely enough priests to tend to the
needs of the baptized Christians, let alone concentrate on the work of converting
non-Christians, and Valignano himself observed: ‘It will never be possible to
send as many laborers to Japan as are needed.’
Vice-Provincial Coelho substantiated this statement with concrete
figures. Writing in 1581 he noted that
there were some sixty thousand Christians in Omura alone, but only four priests
could be spared to work among them, although five times as many men would
hardly be sufficient to administer to their needs adequately. The missionaries were so few that they could
not hear the confessions of even one-sixth of the Christian population in the
fief every year, and consequently many of the faithful died without the
consolation of receiving this sacrament.
The shortage of manpower also meant that the missionaries could not visit
the Christian communities regularly, and some of the converts were not so well
instructed in their religion as might be desired.” (Michael Cooper, Rodrigues the
Interpreter – An Early Jesuit in Japan and China, Weatherhill, 1974, pp.
120-121)
Incredible
Subject: Benney and his apostates
It's simply incredible how openly
the Vatican II sect, through apostate Benney openly declares the morals and
dogmas not of the Roman Catholic Church, but the morals and dogmas of
masonry. "...Ever since the Second Vatican Council ..." Benney
states. That clearly means that the previous 20 councils spoke a
different language. Which means sacred tradition is out the window,
folks. It really doesn't take much insight to see what's happening here,
does it? Jesus Christ in present Rome dialoguing with Belial.
Present day Rome is not of Jesus Christ. All true Roman Catholics have to
know is that for 1900+years dialogue meant CONVERSION to the ONE true
faith and His Roman Catholic Church. Period! The language of Benney
leads to Armageddon, folks. Bless you Mhfm for opening our minds to the
truth of Jesus Christ and His Church.
Dea…
Obliteration
Subject: Obliteration
Thank you for all of your recent video
posts and especially the one on that agent of Satan, B16 and his Church of the
Obliteration of Jesus Christ. As you have demonstrated time and time
again, the adherents of the V2 sect need not be mental giants or
theologians to figure it all out. Said members of the Church of
the Obliteration who recognize these Satanists as "popes" are totally
without excuse.
Lee Ann
What way?
Dear Brothers,
I visit your website everyday since you
alerted me to the fact that Vatican 2 is fake of which I am very
grateful. It is not easy to discover that most of your life has been a
lie and is also very upsetting. I think this is why most people resist
the truth and no matter how much evidence you present they will still reject
what you say.
I watched your video 'Is this the end
of the world' which I enjoyed a lot. You
mentioned the attempted assassination of John Paul 2 and said that
the meeting between JP2 and his assassin was part of the
deception. In what way?...
God bless
Christie
MHFM: Our video Is the
World about to End? explains in detail how the assassination attempt was
part of the deception. The meeting after
the fact with Ali Agca, the one who attempted to assassinate John Paul II, was
also part of the deception. That’s
because the footage showed an up close, apparently heart to heart meeting
between the two. The story was that John
Paul II forgave his attempted killer.
Hence, members of the Vatican II sect became further convinced that John
Paul II is a “saint” and is “holy”; for, they said, “look at how he forgave the
one who attempted to kill him.” “Look at
how John Paul II persuaded that man to change or reconsider.” It enhanced the false reputation of the
beast, and confirmed (in the minds of the deceived) what the false apparitions
were telling them: that is, that John Paul II is “Mary’s pope” – a story which
those with the true faith know is a lie beyond comprehension.
New Video
MHFM: This is a new video about the CNN host who
was just fired for saying that Jews run CNN and the other news networks:
Analysis of CNN's firing of Rick Sanchez for saying Jews
control CNN [video]
How
Subject: How
Brothers,
How discouraging to read some of the
E-Exchanges on your site of those that slander the true word of God. Accusing
you of actually going out of your way to make all this up. How very true the
fact that these lost souls are merely following a figure-head (anti-pope) of a
false religion orchestrated by Freemasons. How these two-faced anti-popes
are ultimately responsible for the condition of the world today as they sit on
their hands and do nothing except praise all the other false religions in order
to please their father Satan, and then try to act Catholic by some false means.
How deceived and brainwashed they all have become in these modern (last) times
as they fail to recognize the times we are in. How convenient your material is
available in print, audio and video for ease of understanding, though the
bad-willed have closed off all means of understanding, due to their pride
(sin).
How Noe ever got the ark built at the age of 600, after having to deal with all
the daily visits from all the slanderers is a miracle in itself. A shame
that when the rain came it was to late for the non-believers that missed the
boat.
God Bless your work,
Tom Miles
Wrote
Dear Brothers,
Richard who wrote in about the Jews
obviously has no idea that it is the Jews who have tricked him into believing
that the Jews are still special in God's eyes, i.e. by still having a covenant
with God - No, the covenant with the Jews was ended when Jesus Christ -
the Messiah, God made flesh - died on the Cross. It's another example of
the profound and dark influence the Jews with power control. Of course, a person
of bad will will be inclined to believe lies too.
JJG who wrote in needs to listen to Fr.
Corapi (Fr. Crappy) and realize that the lies and heresies that he (Fr.
Corapi) declares are from Satan. JJG is obviously a member of Fr. Corapi's cult
since he resorts to insults and intimidation to "pursuade" people,
rather than the facts and truth. Surely MHFM is Catholic, as is easily proven
by simply a momentary glance at only their website's Home-page, but
followers of Fr. Corapi's crap wouldn't bother using their eyes or brain
since they are members of a pedophile's sect (V-2 sect). JJG is truly weak and
pathetic. What a shame and embarrassment.
Thank you for posting the videos on how the
Jews control the media and on the phony art students who are actually Iraeli
spies. It's more proof of Jewish control issues that honest people love to
see exposed, but that liars hate and want to hide. It's also shocking to see
the burka being enforced in English schools - not surprising when their
"Archbishop" Rowan Williams says Shariah (Islamic) law is
"unavoidable":
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7232661.stm (BBC, 2008)
God Bless,
Chris
Corapi
The bullcrap you posted about Father Corapi
on you tube sounds like it came from the mouth of satan...........are you people some
kind of a cult? Surely you people are not Catholic, or do not understand
what it means to be Catholic. I think you are actually protestants posing
as Catholics on a bogus website. How pathetic.
JJG
MHFM: It’s interesting that you can’t bring up anything specific
from our videos on Corapi which you think is false. That is cowardly and dishonest. If you tried to bring up something specific,
it would be demonstrated that what we said is true and that you are completely
wrong. You are actually a Protestant
posing as a Catholic. You accept Vatican
II, Corapi and Antipope Benedict XVI who all profess communion with
Protestants. They all believe that
Protestants have salvation (contrary to Catholic teaching) and that Protestants
are not in heresy. If you were not so
spiritually blind and of bad will, you would realize that Corapi denies
Catholic teaching just like the Protestants do. Speaking about the conflict between Protestants and professing Catholics
in Ireland, “Fr.” John Corapi declared: “I
don’t care if you’re Baptist or Catholic; you are Christian. Just practice it.” That is blatantly heretical.
You are a complete disgrace and an enemy of God headed right for
Hell. You should carefully consider the facts
we bring up, learn Catholic teaching and convert.
Comment
Subject: Another response to “Don’t”
Oinky...
If you want your opinion heard then call Most Holy Family Monastery and
challenge them to a debate that can be placed on youtube. I am sure that
your challenge, of your opinion versus the truth, will be accepted. Then
thousands of people will be able to hear your opinion, as well as the truth.
Paul
Package
MHFM,
I just want to say THANK YOU!!! I just got
my package in today and I am just amazed at how much my eyes are open to the
TRUE Church now! I went to the Traditional Latin Mass for the first time ever
this past Sunday and wow how different the true Mass is... Bella Dodd was
absolutely right when she said "you will not recognize the Catholic
Church". I use to think my grandfather was so harsh when he use to say
"if you aren't Catholic you're going to hell" Well I couldn't agree
more now and now I know why because that is what the true church has always
taught. Thank you so much, my God bless you in all your research and spread of
the TRUTH!!
Amanda
Deceptive
Subject: Deceptive V-2 “priest” comments on
‘Outside the Church’… dogma
MHFM,
We are truly living in the time of the
Great Apostasy. I recently had a short conversation with a “priest” in
the Novus Ordo in which I had pointed out to him the dogma “Outside the Church
there is no salvation.” I demonstrated (thanks to your material) how Vatican II
flatly rejects this dogma and, therefore, cannot possibly be Catholic. He
responded with the following:
“Unfortunately, you have gotten ahold of
literature which seeks to cast doubts on the legitimacy of Vatican II, by
sowing the seeds of confusion concerning the doctrine of "outside the
Church there is no salvation."
The teaching of Florence was addressed to those who obstinately hold fast to
error regarding the true nature of Christ and that of the one, true Church.
Those who are obstinate and refuse to embrace the truth will not be saved.
However, please remember that most Jews and most Muslims are not obstinately
holding fast to error. Rather, their conscience tells them that their doctrines
are true, and they sincerely hold fast to the dictate of their conscience.
The Catholic Church preaches the true Faith with the understanding that we must
convince people in their conscience they must understand the faith. If you look
up all the traditional teachings about conscience, you will read quite clearly
that the Catholic Church does not want people to violate their conscience.”
His response is truly evil.
By the way, I have noticed how common it’s
become for followers of the Vatican II sect, when presented with Catholic dogma
which clearly contradicts the many heresies of Vatican II sect, the antipopes,
etc., they excuse these heresies by bringing up so-called “doctrinal
development.” They say “our understanding of doctrine develops” and no longer
means what it used to mean. How utterly deceptive and diabolical!
Thank you for opening our eyes to the Truth
and exposing the phony church for what it is.
Sincerely,
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.
What he says about the Church’s teaching and the dogmatic definitions on
that issue couldn’t be more untrue.
Understand
i don't understand why are you against
jew.they are chosen people and god said thourgh jew people everyone will
be blessed . true catholics love jews. have a nice day.
Richard
MHFM: First, we don’t hate Jews.
We desire the conversion and eternal happiness of all the Jews. When we discuss Jews or Muslims or members of
any other religion, we deal with facts and reality. If we discuss the influence of a particular
group, it’s because it’s rooted in fact and it should be known.
Second, you err when you say that Jews are the chosen people and
that through them God will bless everyone.
That’s not the case since Christ has come. Those who don’t accept Christ are no longer
the chosen people. Regarding the
“blessing,” you are obviously referring to God’s promise to Abraham. As Galatians 3 teaches, only those who accept
Christ (not Jews) are heirs to the promise.
Galatians 3:14- "That the blessing of Abraham might come on the
Gentiles through Christ Jesus: that
we may receive the promise of the spirit by faith.”
Pope St. Gregory the Great (c. 590): “… if you be Christ’s then you are the seed of Abraham (Gal. 3:29). If we
because of our faith in Christ are deemed children of Abraham, the Jews
therefore because of their perfidy have ceased to be His seed.”
Pope St. Leo the Great, Dogmatic Letter to Flavian (449), read at
Council of Chalcedon (451): “The promises were spoken to Abraham and his
seed. He does not say “to his seeds”
– as if referring to multiplicity – but to a single one, ‘and to thy seed,’ which is Christ (Gal.
3:16).”
Respond
I would like to respond to Jose regarding
babies who die without baptism, my wife and I also lost a baby due to
miscarriage but yes that is the teaching of the church because all things are
always before God, past, present and future God knows you before you are born,
he knows how you will turn out before you are born. Obviously God saw
that this baby would not be saved anyway if He allowed the baby to be born, he
or she would have suffered hell with fire but instead the soul of the baby
suffers hell without fire, one can see God’s mercy in that!!! I
understand how you feel Jose but you are looking at it from an emotional level
and not the reality of Jesus' teaching on baptism. If you also look at
what Jesus says about how many are saved {few} then you can have a better
understanding about how things really are, especially in these
endtimes. Please spend a lot of time studying the Brothers website
because there you will find the teachings of the church before the evil vatican
ll council.
Todd
Outside
Subject: Outside the Church There is No
Salvation
Hi, my name is Jose and I'm 29 years old. I
attened an SSPX chapel. I have a concern about what I've heard you teach on
outside the church there is no salvation. I'm not writting to argue with you
for I Agree with you in almost all topics. I still have some concerns
obviously. we are living in a time of great confusion. I have always had doubts
about the validity of the modernist pope(s). In watching your videos there is
no question in my mind that these modern popes are teaching and commiting
heresies, thus resulting in the chair of Peter to be vacant. I do not believe
and hold as the SSPX that the popes are heretics and still hold the chair. A
heretic cannot be pope period. thus comes my next concern, why are we not
electing a true pope. couldn't we gather all the traditional bishops of the
world that reject Vatican II into a (mini) council and discuss the differences
and try to come to some kind of an agreement and then elect a pope who would
guide the true Catholic Church?
Back to my original question.It seems to me that your point of
"outside the church there is no salvation" a little bit radical.
Don't get me wrong, this is a doctrine that i Firmly believe. I am married to a
non-catholic and I tell her that she will not be saved if she is to die outside
the church. But in the matter of infants that are not baptized are they
condemned? I haven't heard you say directly that they will go to hell. but if
you do believe that what about Limbo? I ask because there are always exeptions
with what scripture says like for instance, an scripture says all have sinned
there is not one just, yet we believe that our Lady was an exeption to this. We
had a misscarriage and I wonder about the soul of my unborn child, is it
condemed to hell? There was nothing that child could do and the same for me.
Even if I wanted to baptize my child it was imposible for me to do that. if the
child would have been born it would have baptized. I don't think that if the
child would be in danger of damnation God would make it imposible to save him
with the waters of baptism and beliebe me this was an imposible situation. So
there has to be exeptions on this teaching as well. I don't think they go to the
kingdom of heaven but neighther do I think they go to hell. isn't this where
Limbo comes in?...
MHFM: First, we are allowed to recognize that there is no pope,
but we aren’t able to elect a new pope.
That’s because the pope is the bishop of Rome, and only the college of
cardinals or the clergy and people of Rome can elect a true bishop of
Rome. Therefore, the “election” of
someone in the U.S. by people in the U.S. would have no validity, even if that
person were fully Catholic and a bishop.
Moreover, the independent “traditionalist” bishops you refer to are not
fully Catholic. They believe the same as
the Novus Ordo: that souls can be saved in any religion and even while
worshipping any false god one can imagine.
You obviously have a problem with faith. Contrary to what you say, there are no
exceptions to dogmatic definitions. If
there were, papal infallibility would be false and God would be a liar (which
is a blasphemous assertion). Scripture
tells us that it’s impossible for God to lie (Heb. 6:18). Your argument that the Bible teaches that all
men have sinned misses the mark. It’s
something we’ve addressed before. In
Romans, St. Paul is speaking in the context of all the nations. Thus, he is
not saying that all men without exception have sinned, but rather that all the
nations (both Jews and Gentiles) are under sin.
In addition, the analogy fails because dogmatic definitions and
magisterial teachings (not Scripture passages) are our proximate rule of faith. That means that while Scripture and dogmatic
definitions are both infallible, dogmatic definitions set forth what we must
believe about Scripture in precise and literal formulas of faith. These admit of no deviation or departure from
their declared meaning (Vatican I).
You also reject the notion that unbaptized babies can’t be
saved. You need to read our salvation
book. The idea that they can be saved
has been condemned by numerous dogmatic councils (Florence and Trent). Limbo is a part of Hell where there is no
fire. It’s a blatant heresy to believe
what you believe, and you can’t be saved holding it. At this time, one must say that you really
doubt God’s revelation and His protection over the infallible teaching of the
Church. That’s very serious, and going
to the Latin Mass will not be of any benefit until you have the faith.
Series
Your video series in "Is the world
about to End?" is really well done. It's really amazing that you were able
to connect the biblical prophecies with the past and current events. I just
want to know your opinion if the recent wildfires that occurred in different
places simultaneously such as portugal, and others are mention in the
Apocalypse. I watched it all over the news, some of them I already forgot what
places did the wildfires and "heat waves" occur.
And in Siberia and known cold region is having a heat waves, and high-temp
climates that the ice starts to melt. I think these events is the fulfillment
of the prophecy that "the sun will be given power to scorch people with
fire" in the book of Apocalypse. They say that these events never happened
before. It is amazing that it happened right after or before the gulf of Mexico
oil spill.
I am looking forward for your next videos. God Bless.
Glenn
Response
Subject: Response to “Don’t”
MHFM youtube videos bring extremely
important commentaries out in the open, commentaries which you will find
nowhere else in the world. These commentaries are instrumental in leading souls
to a knowledge of the one, true faith. They get people interested in what that
have to do right now in these times in order to hold the traditional Catholic
faith.
MHFM wants youtube viewers to focus on the videos and not the
outside opinions that would otherwise accompany them. MHFM does not want
anything to distract people from watching and listening to their videos. It is
critical to get as many people as possible to see these videos.
MHFM is trying to get the word out about what is really going on
with the Church today. Since it is such a unique situation certain measures
should be taken to ensure that nothing gets in the way. The truth of Jesus
Christ and His one, true Church is what matters. Saving one's soul is what
matters. Opinions can be set aside for the moment. The traditional Catholic
faith is of a higher priority.
TD
New Video
MHFM: This is a new video:
Benedict XVI's Role in the Sex Abuse Crisis [video]
Read
Dear
Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,
It's great to read some of your readers happier experiences, amid the confusion
and blindness of the times....people who are not afraid to stand up for what
they truly believe in, when everyone else is 'losing their heads'.
And so, to people like , Christina, thank you for sharing your moment...you are
an inspiration and an encouragement for other parents out there, in the
raising of their children in the Cathoilc faith at a very early age...
As the Jesuit motto has it, " give me the child before he is seven, and I
will show you the man”…
God bless,
David
Don’t
Hello,
You seem to think you know everything that there is to know about the World.
But you do not!
You dont let people have an opinion on your Youtube channel means to me you're
no better than a Hitler
Oinky…
Comment
Brothers:
I want to reply to the reader who posted the account of her daughter singing
the words to the Our Father. I offer a similar incident. My son James is 4.
Recently we were watching the Third Secret DVD from MHFM and when Brother
Michael made the point that anti-pope John Paul II believed that "every
man is God," James immediately piped up with a bit of indignation, saying,
"Every man is NOT God! There is only ONE God!" It was great. What an
apostle!
Take care and God bless you all.
Joseph Ramirez
EENS
Brothers,
I was recently discussing EENS with a Novus
Ordo "conservative" who believes that at the moment of death, Jesus
can give anyone that one last chance to convert. I pointed out to him
that that makes the idea of missionary work meaningless since there would be no
reason to go to pagan lands to convert them. His reply still
has my head spinning.
He said, "No authentic missionary
thinks about converting a person. Conversion is the work of the Holy
Spirit...."
There was a quote you gave from a Pope
around the time that the New World was being settled that expressed the
absolute necessity that missionary work was being done to spread the Gospel in
the Americas thereby saving souls. I can't remember where I saw it
in your material so could you possibly send me that quote or post it with this
email on your webpage.
Thank you
-W. J. W.
MHFM: Thanks for the
e-mail. It’s true that a person could
convert just before death, but that would require an actual conversion: a real reception of the faith and baptism,
combined with a repudiation of that person’s previous false religion. What he probably meant is that anyone at the
moment of death (even without proof of conversion) might be counted as possibly
having been converted; for “we can’t plumb the mysteries of what occurs in the
human conscience” or some kind of similar nonsense. His statement that no missionary thinks about
converting a person is astounding and of course quite heretical. It reveals that once the salvation dogma is
denied, it’s over. Everyone who believes
in “baptism of desire” denies that dogma and, in the process, the entire
Catholic faith. Perhaps the quote below
is the one you had in mind. It’s also
cited in our book, Outside the Catholic
Church There is Absolutely No Salvation.
In his Bull Sublimus Dei,
Pope Paul III addresses the question of the Indians in the “recently
discovered” New World. Speaking in the
context of those above the age of reason, Pope Paul III declares that they are
capable of receiving the Faith, and he reiterates the teaching of tradition
that not one of them can be saved without faith in Jesus Christ.
Pope Paul III, Sublimus Dei, May 29, 1537: “The sublime God so loved the human race
that He created man in such wise that he might participate, not only in the
good that other creatures enjoy, but endowed him with capacity to attain to the
inaccessible and invisible Supreme Good and behold it face to face; and since man, according to the testimony of the
sacred scriptures, has been created to enjoy eternal life and happiness, which
none may obtain save through faith in our Lord Jesus Christ, it is
necessary that he should possess the nature and faculties enabling him to
receive that faith; and that whoever is thus endowed should be capable of
receiving that same faith. Nor is it credible that any one should possess so
little understanding as to desire the faith and yet be destitute of the most
necessary faculty to enable him to receive it. Hence Christ, who is the Truth
itself, that has never failed and can never fail, said to the preachers of the
faith whom He chose for that office 'Go ye and teach all nations.' He said all, without exception, for all are
capable of receiving the doctrines of the faith…By virtue of Our apostolic
authority We define and declare by these present letters… that the said Indians
and other peoples should be converted to the faith of Jesus Christ by preaching
the word of God and by the example of good and holy living.”
These quotes are
also relevant.
Pope
Leo XIII (1902): “By his (Christopher
Columbus’) toil another world emerged from the unsearched bosom of the ocean:
hundreds of thousands of mortals have, from a state of blindness been
raised to the common level of the human race, reclaimed from savagery to
gentleness and humanity; and, greatest
of all, by the acquisition of those blessings of which Jesus Christ is the
author, they have been recalled from destruction to eternal life.”
(Encyclical, Quarto Abrupto)
Pope Gregory XVI, Probe Nostis (#6), Sept. 18, 1840: “We are thankful for the success of apostolic missions in America, the
Indies, and other faithless lands…They search out those who sit in darkness
and the shadow of death to summon them to the light and life of the
Catholic religion… At length they snatch
them from the devil’s rule, by the bath of regeneration and promote them to
the freedom of God’s adopted sons.”
Watched
Subject: Catholic faith versus others
I just watched all 11 parts of Is the world
about to end, This was very well done, But I have some questions,I am not
trying to put you or anyone elses down just want to know the truth in Christ.
Now you say that the Catholic Church is the true Church. And You put down what
the Pope has said. Do you not have to follow him? or any other Catholic Church.
I just want to understand, I dont go to any Church at this time, But I do
belive in Jesus and his word through faith, I just want to get to the church
that teaches christ. I just want the true Jesus, The father of Abraham,
Issaac,Jacob.The true God, That is the journey that I am on at this time before
we see the end. Sorry for a long e-mail just need some answers and for you to
pray for me,
Thanks Mike C.
MHFM: Mike, according to the teaching
of the Catholic Church, Benedict XVI is proven to be an antipope, not a true
pope. That's why we don't follow him. Also, it's not enough for
salvation to claim to believe in Jesus. Jesus founded a Church, and
taught many things. Those things are only kept in the traditional
Catholic faith. To be saved it’s necessary to accept that faith and
become a Catholic. We would recommend our book, The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church.
Revelation
Dear Brothers:
Consideration of the Feast of St. Michael
should really drive home to Catholics (and others of good will) why there can
be no salvation outside of the true Catholic Church, as the true Popes have
always assured us. And as St. John also
makes clear, it's simply a question of free will. In John I, in speaking
of the Word of God, he says of Him: "That was the true light, which
enlighteneth every man that cometh into this world". Notice, he says
"every" man.
And who imagines that he is like unto
God? All those men do who, imitating Lucifer, reject God's Revelation to
creatures, and make themselves - or other men - the Source of Revelation.
Lucifer was the first Protestant, and the founder of all man-made/creature-made
"religions".
That's why the degree of rejection doesn't
matter: one obstinate denial of one dogma is enough. Either you hold that
Revelation is from God, or it's not - and, practically speaking, adherence to
one heresy always leads to the embrace of others. Either God reveals or
the creature reveals (often by "editing" or
"explaining away" the Revelation of God, as we have seen so many try
to do). And the creature "revealing" could be oneself,
Martin Luther, Jacob Amman, or any one of a thousand others.
Even Archbishop Lefebvre. See
how false "traditionalists" keep digging themselves in deeper and
deeper - denying more and more of Church teaching - simply because they will
not admit that Archbishop Lefebvre was wrong. Wrong about his holding of the
dogma-denying and man-made "doctrine" of BOD, and wrong about his
failure to apply authentic Church teaching (as you have) to declare the V2 gang
of thieves to be heretics and antipopes. No doubt, the Lefebvrites will
now call upon their people to pray for the "pope" whom (they will
say) is being attacked by the media, while Gruner assures people that this B-16
is the "suffering pope" who, along with the abuse of children by
"priests", was foretold in the secret of Fatima! Sickening.
God bless you for teaching us the true
Catholic Faith.
Lee Ann
Distortions
Subject: The liar John Salza
Thank you, Brother Peter, for unmasking the
distortions of John Salza, as well as explaining (almost by a reverse
engineering method) the way he acts.
Too bad he was careful enough to avoid a
confrontation, since it would have been tremendous to see him and his
falsehoods falling down in a live talk.
I don´t think I can say much, aside from
what you and your readers have said so far. The only relevant fact that comes to
my mind is the realization that the contortionist Salza uses in fact a method
similar to the Salvation heretics. The denial of the Salvation dogma is indeed
the grand-mother of all modern heresies. Once you can explain "Outside the
Church there is NO SALVATION" as meaning that people outside the Church
can be saved, there´s salvation for them (emanating from the Church), in
essence, that there is in fact Salvation outside the Church (the complete
opposite of the misleading title), then you can get away with just about
anything. Just like he did, and you exposed.
It´s only because people were able to
digest the Salvation Fraud (or at least in large part thanks to it) that John
Salza manages to be effective in deceiving people
In one of your old radio shows, Brother
Peter explained how the Faithful (on their own) anathematized the
heretical Bishop Nestorious (realizing that he in fact had anathematized
himself) after he gave clear and unmistakable signs of deviation from the True
Faith.
According to the Catholic authorities, the
people at the time acted in legitimate Catholic manner, gave the True Catholic
Response to the situation. But for the amazingly dishonest contortionist Salza,
the people acted very wrongly. They should have waited, otherwise they would be
"lunching the dinner". Again, according to Salza, even if
Nestorious (or Benedict XVI) decided to spit on a picture of Our Lady, or a
Crucifix, or the Gospel, of the Eucharist, and after that teared off his
clothes and started to run around in circles with fingers pointing up like
horns in his head while screaming "I´m the Devil´s Son!!!!!" he would
still retain jurisdiction (not to mention his office intact) and people would
have to wait for an official declaration regarding his status before jumping to
any conclusions.
Give me a break. What a sick joke...
CK
MP3
Dear
MHFM,
… Also I used to have a CD of yours with hours of audio including debates and
talks on the important topics regarding Catholicism…
Also on this topic I wanted to say that I enjoyed the
audio CD greatly and even more than the DVDs. I would listen to
that all time and it really helped me memorize the arguments and
facts regarding the important issues. I deeply hope that
you compile another CD that is very long like the first one- with new material
and deep discussions regarding all your issues.
Thanks most sincerely,
Ed O Donnell
Comment
TO MOST HOLY FAMILY MONASTERY:
All of the SSPX
Chapels this Saturday, October 2nd, are having a Mass (the local chapel here a
procession, picnic, etc.) for the intention of the "Consecration of
Russia" to Her Immaculate Heart. In the book "What Happened to
the Catholic Church Since Vatican II", the chapter on Fatima is
brilliantly explained… how the Consecration already took place on July 7, 1952,
by Pope Pius XII.
When explaining
this to a friend, he said, "Oh yes, I remember the nuns of Charity taught
us the same thing, that the Consecration was made, by Pope Pius
XII". This man went to grade school in the 1950's.
Yet, one
of the many false slanders against Most Holy Family Monastery is
"they're making their own rules up".
Well it seems as
some of these major "traditional" groups, who hurl the same calumny
toward them, as the SSPX, are actually the ones making up their own rules,
going against what the True Catholic Church teaches, and manifesting this on
Saturday.
May God continue
to bless your work at Most Holy Family Monastery.
- Nancy
Part 5
Posted
MHFM: Part 5 of this discussion has been
posted. There are only a few more parts
to go. Part 5 gets into more of his massive contradictions.
John Salza's Errors on
Sedevacantism - Part 5 [video]
John Salza's Errors on
Sedevacantism - Part 4 [video]
John
Salza's Errors on Sedevacantism - Part 1 [video]
John
Salza's Errors on Sedevacantism - Part 2 [video]
John
Salza's Errors on Sedevacantism - Part 3 [video]
Share
Subject: Joy
I just wanted to share my joy from two
nights ago. I was putting laundry away in my daughters room while she happily
played with her toys. I was in the mood to sing some prayers and received a
great surprise. After I finished the Our Father, she sang it back at me.
So beautiful! She will be 3 this Saturday and I feel very blessed that Our Lord
let me find the truth about what happened to the Catholic Church before I had
her baptized by a counterfeit priest in the counterfeit church of Satan, and
that i will be able to raise my daughter right! Soon I think she will be
saying other prayers from memory and am excited to see what will be next.
Sadly, of all the people I know directly, I'm the only person teaching
their child to pray at a young age. I know many who are choosing to
"not push religion on my child". Even more disgusting, many are
teaching their children to be flirty and "check out" the opposite sex
at this tender age! These kids have no chance! It is horrible and I
don't care if they're so called "good people" or family members
- I can't expose my daughter to them or their children….
Also, picking up where the letter from
"convert" left off, I have to also testify to the power of the Holy
Rosary. This prayer can absolutely work miracles... Thank You MHFM, for
defending the One True Faith!
Christina Kalix
How far
Brothers,
The YouTube video series on "What the Pope Knew" goes to show how far
people without any knowledge of the faith or backbone will go to protect and
support these anti-popes. What justice is being provided by the 'Vatican-II
Protector of Justice', other than to protect the criminal anti-popes? No
concern at all for the victims or the fact the anti-pope has done nothing to
correct the problem. Any good-willed person should be hearing bells and
whistles going off that something is wrong. The "Sheep's Clothing"
(the human skin) that protects these beasts from being recognized for what they
really are, will one day disappear when Jesus Christ reveals their wicked souls
and sends them back to their Hellish Father Satan.
God Bless,
Tom Miles
Ship
MHFM: This is a somewhat interesting
story about the 16th century sea voyages from Portugal to Asia. Missionaries, as well as others looking for
prosperity in distant lands, would make the extremely long, difficult and
hazardous trip. The conditions on board
these ships were excruciating for a variety of reasons. This is a somewhat interesting (and humorous)
quote about one such voyage:
“It would be a mistake,
however, to assume that every voyage to Asia was a nightmare of storms,
disease, and starvation, and there are not a few contemporary accounts
reporting a fair and prosperous passage to India. During the voyage of Sebastiao Gonclaves in
1562, only two men died of illness and two others fell overboard and were
drowned; apart from the standard overcrowding, plus a storm and a fire on
board, the Jesuit had little to complain about what he termed ‘one of the best
voyages to India so far.’ In fact, some welcome relief to the general
tedium on board was afforded by a zealous missionary who threw into the sea a
worldly book belonging to one of the passengers; on being attacked by the irate
owner, he defended himself by biting the man in the arm, but then happily
effected a reconciliation by compensating the passenger with three spiritual
books in exchange.” (Michael Cooper, Rodrigues
the Interpreter – An Early Jesuit in Japan and China, Weatherhill, 1974, p.
32)
Spain
Hail
Mary Dimond Brothers
First of all thanks for the very good work of your monastery in spreading the
Faith and unmasking these "wolves in sheep´s clothing" so called
"traditionalists" like John Salza.
I would like to share with you my own witnessing of the end signals that everyday
assault our former Catholic world.
In my country Spain which was in ages past one of the most catholic countries,
we witness as the Socialist Government, not content with corrupting the young
with a signature which promotes homosexual lifestile, religious indifferentism,
etc, is going to slowly demolish the Basilica where the martyrs of the spanish
civil war remain buried!!
You can check the images on this site, but it’s in spanish:
http://www.elvalledeloscaidos.es/ (scroll down a bit to see the images of Our
Lady being prepared to be demolished)
Not only that, but they also pretend to will kick off the (novus ordo of
course) 'beneditine monks' of the monastery annexed to the Basilica.
Altough the faith has long departed from these lands (as a result of the V-2
apostasy), nevertheless the symbolism of the tearing down of this gigantic
cross-monument and the violation of the dead people who gave their lives in the
past to prevent the Christian faith to be erased by marxism is very
significative!!
It´s as if it is a clear sign that we are in the end times, and the powers of
hell will be set loose upon the face of the earth (permitted by God as a
punishment of sin) until the Second Coming of Christ!!
In front of scenarios like these, and the total immorality and indifference of
GOd in the lifestyle of the people, it´s no wonder it the Apocalypse it is
written that the martyrs "...cried out a loud voice, saying: How long, O
lord dos thou not judge and revenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?" much of people who enjoy the pace times they
had thanks to the sacrifice of the Cristians of the past, but instead of being
grateful, they swear, get drunk, fornicate, and live a life like nothing
matters!!
Blessings brothers, I will keep you in my prayers, which is the most powerful
weapon all we catholics have in these times!
Marco
Study
Brothers,
According to this AP news story I
found on Yahoo, "Forty-five percent of Roman Catholics who
participated in the study didn't know that, according to church teaching, the
bread and wine used in Holy Communion is not just a symbol, but becomes the
body and blood of Christ."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_rel_religious_literacy_poll
Sadly, in the Novus Ordo Church, it's the
other 55% that actually got it wrong. Of course, either way you look at
it, it's a MESS.
-Will
Comment
Subject:
St. Alphonsus, Salza heretic
Dear
Brothers,
That's a great new section with quotes from St. Alphonsus Liguori's book, The
History of Heresies and their Refutation. Thank you. It shows all
those liberal heretcs, schismatics and apostates who believe in the heresies of
"baptism of desire/blood" and "invincible ignorance" out
there that true Catholics judge and denounce heresies - and St. Alphonsus
Liguori did so well before he was made a saint - he wrote books refuting
heresies!!! He doesn't pull any punches when it comes to condemning Mohammed
and the Muslims, and neither should he. Anyone can see how satanically
aggressive Islamists are, as well as their sympathizers. Islam is a carnal and
murderous religion which believes that suicide is "noble" when in the
cause of Jihad ("holy war"). So Muslims are like Judas, though
Muslims have never even believed that Jesus is God. It proves that Antipope
John Paul II's act of heresy, kissing the Koran, was the kiss of Judas
- and that the Vatican II sect is the religion of Judas, Judaism, which
accepts any religion that's not Catholic.
Thank you also for the videos refuting the heretic John Salza. To say that the
heresies of the 5 Vatican II Antipopes are not public would probably even
offend the Antipopes themselves because they go out of their way to show the
world that "the Catholic Church no longer condemns Non-Catholics,"
and that "Finally! There is salvation outside the Catholic Church!"
John Salza’s argumentation is specifically designed to pull the reader into a
jungle of Canon laws to trick the average reader into missing the
whole point of the Gospel, that God Incarnate (Jesus Christ) died for our sins
and that one must be a member of His Church (the Catholic Church) in order
to be saved from hell. Also, Salza'a blatant contradictions are
so bold that the average reader would not pick them up - but they're there!
It's like 9/11 where the evidence that it was a controlled demolition is
everywhere, but most people don't care. To say a pope who excommunicates himself still
keeps the Papal jurisdiction might intimidate the average person into thinking,
"Wow! This guy really understands the finer points of canon law because
what appears to be a blatant contradiction is actually a legitimate fact."
- WRONG! It's John Salza who's an undeclared contradiction because he prints
lies faster than the Devil flies! It appears that John Salza wants glory and
fame in this life now, but at the expense of soul. Very sad, Salza.
Matthew 22:11-14 - "And the king went in to see the guests: and he saw
there a man who had not on a wedding garment. And he saith to him: Friend, how
camest thou in hither not having a wedding garment? But he was silent. Then the
king said to the waiters: Bind his hands and feet, and cast him into the exterior
darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. For many are called,
but few are chosen."
God Bless,
Chris White
Story
Subject: Story about a V2 priest
Hi Brothers,
My friends are getting their baby baptized
in the V2 anti-church, and I have explained to them that I will have nothing to
do with the event and have declined to be the Godfather. But that's not
the interesting part, so the mother is going to nursing school and she learned
there that anyone can validly baptize because the nurses used to do it to
the babies who they thought weren't going to make it. It turns out that
the "priest" who is going to be baptizing their baby argued with the
mother about this point - he's fresh out of seminary - and he thought that only
priests could baptize. Furthermore, he then proceeded to argue that
Lutherans are in the same church as Catholics.
And then he argued that the only person who was born without original
sin was the Virgin Mary, according to this guy "Christ had to
be baptized to get rid of his original sin" - this is what a newly minted
v2 "priest" sounds like. Just thought I'd share.
Patrick
MHFM: That’s very interesting.
Thanks for the e-mail.
Comment
Brothers,
Thank-you for the sending the latest audio edition #7. I was surprised to
see the new audio compact disk contains 343 audio segments along with two
versions of the contents list in both word and excel formats. Great
things come in small packages.
I'd also like to comment on the wickedness of this world. Ex-Pres. and NWO Bush
once said that, "If you’re not with us you’re against us!" This seems
to be the theme of this wicked world as both secular and false religions
(including the VII sect) place themselves on the same level playing
field. We are beginning to see more and more groups of people being added
to their terrorist lists for ridiculous reasons. Eventually, (The
Faithful Remnant) who stand firm in God's protection and do not give into the
ways of the world, will be the few that are once again the so-called terrorists
as seen in history. Without the mark of the beast on their heads (the secular
wicked way of thinking), they will not, nor want not, to make a living along
side these wicked beasts.
John 3:17-21. "For God sent not his Son into the world, to judge the
world, but that the world may be saved by him. He that believeth in him
is not judged. But he that doth not believe, is already judged: because he
believeth not in the name of the only begotten Son of God. And this is
the judgment: because the light is come into the world, and men loved darkness
rather than the light: for their works were evil. For every one that doth
evil hateth the light, and cometh not to the light, that his works may not be
reproved. But he that doth truth, cometh to the light, that his works may
be made manifest, because they are done in God."
God Bless,
Tom Miles
“Franciscans”
Subject: “Franciscans”
Dear Most Holy Family
Monastery:
In contemplating the mocking of Christ of the
Third Sorrowful Mystery—Jesus is Crowned with Thorns—here is what Fr. von
Cochem has to say in his Life of Christ:
“Each insult was received with shouts of
laugher. Every clumsy joke made at His
expense and every piece of coarse buffoonery played upon Him excited still more
their rude hilarity, and their cruel desire to plague and ridicule Him…HIS EYES
WERE FILLED WITH BLOOD, HIS FACE PALE WITH THE INTENSE AGONY OF THE THORNY
CROWN, HIS WHOLE BODY SEAMED AND TORN WITH THE THONGS OF THE SCOURGES; yet in
spite of this, they ceased not to add to His sufferings and to insult Him with
vile words and vulgar jests till they wearied of their sport.”
Now go look at the Franciscans on You
Tube. Go see these modern-day Roman
soldiers mocking Christ 2,000 years later.
See it. See how the soldiers
danced. See them. Do not mistake it. This is the dancing that Christ saw done
before Him 2,000 years ago. It is
IDENTICAL. It is the identical movements
done in the mocking of Christ.
And this evil was performed in front of the
Basilica of Santa Maria degli Angeli e dei Martiri. That’s right, St. Mary of the Angels and the
Martyrs. Holy Mary, our Blessed Mother,
whom, by the way, saw how the soldiers danced in front of her Son. Our Blessed Mother witnessed it as Ven. Mary
of Agreda has written.
These Franciscans have gone off the deep
end. That performance was rehearsed too;
it wasn’t spontaneous. Apparently, they
want to spend eternity in the company of Salome.
Brothers, thank you for your continued work
in bringing about the reign of Christ the King.
Your analysis of the writings and speeches perpetrated by masons (B16
and Salza)teaches people to think clearly, thereby enabling God the Holy Ghost
to work more easily among us.
Ad Jesum per Mariam,
Deidre Howard
Question
Subject: Hello
MHFM,
My name is Amanda and I have a quick
question. I don't know if I am wrong to do this but sometimes I feel compelled
to email or blog to Protestant Church Pastors in my area and question their
church teachings/beliefs. Am I wrong in doing this? I guess because their
"churches" lead so many sheep to damnation I have a right to question
it. Please email me back and give me your opinion, it would be greatly
appreciated. Thank you and God Bless,
Amanda
MHFM: It depends on why you are
writing to them. If you are writing to
them in order to find out more about their beliefs so that you can refute them,
then it could be acceptable. In a
similar way, if you are writing to them with the goal of giving the person who
will answer the chance to see the falsity of his or her position, then it could
be acceptable. However, if you are
writing to them because you actually entertain some internal doubt about
whether their Protestant beliefs are false – and you are therefore curious to
see their responses – then it’s not acceptable.
It would reveal a problem with faith.
Frustrated
Subject: Disgusting
Good afternoon brothers!
Not sure if you have seen this article or not. Just reading it gets me so
frustrated. These people are just so evil and ridiculous. They aren't even
remotely catholic. They don't bother to seek the truth. Always just
trying to push there human agenda, whether or not it contradicts Catholic
teaching. Anyways here is where i found the article. God Bless and keep up
the great work.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/20100927/us_time/08599202151900
Aaron
Basel
What's this I'm hearing that the Council of
Basel was not all approved? That only the first 25 sessions are considered
ecumenical/approved?
JAG
MHFM: That’s correct. Not all of its sessions were approved. Therefore, those sessions are/were not
binding. That council occurred during a
period in which the heresy of Conciliarism was somewhat widespread. That heretical idea, which gave rise to
schismatic tendencies, held that councils are superior to popes.
Mark
Subject: Is the World about to End?
Hi
I was re-watching your video series, "Is the World About to End" and
thought some more about the mark of the beast. Could it be that the mark
refers to the wafer or blessing given out at V-II masses? The wafer is
distributed in the hand, and I seem to recall that persons who are not
receiving can stand in line and receive a blessing - which I have seen being
given on their head. Just thought this was interesting.
Ann
MHFM: We believe the evidence is very strong that the mark of
the beast is a spiritual mark or character, received in the hand or forehand,
which is meant to be the antithesis to the spiritual mark or character given in
Baptism, Confirmation and Holy Orders.
There is overwhelming biblical evidence that the mark of the beast is
spiritual. The parallel to the true
spiritual mark or character given in those sacraments indicates, in our view,
that the beast holds a position in an ecclesiastical structure that apes the
true Church and the true sacraments (i.e., the Counter Church). To your point, we do believe that the
abomination of the New Mass and its invalid host would be lumped in with the
false ecclesiastical structure to which those verses point.
Mark of the
Beast - Spiritual Mark
St.
Alphonsus on Mahomet
MHFM: This is an interesting new quote from St.
Alphonsus on Mahomet (Muhammad), the founder of the false religion of
Islam. We’ve added this quote to a small
section called: Interesting quotes in St.
Alphonsus’ book, The History of Heresies
ST. ALPHONSUS CONDEMNS ISLAM AND THE KORAN, AND HE SAYS THAT MAHOMET
(MUHAMMAD) IS IN HELL
The following quote is particularly interesting
because in it St. Alphonsus says that Mahomet is in Hell.
St. Alphonsus, The History of Heresies & Their
Refutation, Chap. 7, Article I, On Mahometanism (Islam): “The impious sect of Mahometanism sprung
up in this century [the 7th]… Mahomet,
the founder of this destroying sect… was born in Arabia, in 586… He
[Mahomet] pretended to have long
conversations with the Archangel Gabriel, in the cave of Hera… In the year 608,
being then forty years of age, he began to give out that he was a Prophet,
inspired by God, and he persuaded his relatives and domestics of this first,
and then began to publicly preach in Mecca, and attack idolatry. At first, the people did not very willingly
listen to him, and asked him to prove his mission by a miracle; but he told
them that God sent him to preach the truth, and not to work miracles. The
impostor, however, boasts of having wrought one, though ridiculous in the
extreme: a piece, he says, fell off from the moon into his sleeve, and he fixed
it on again; and it is said that this is the reason for the Mahometans adopting
the half moon as the device of their Empire…
“He composed the Koran… It is a collection
of precepts, taken from the Mosaic and Christian Law, together with many of his
own, and interspersed with fables and ridiculous revelations…. He professes
that there is but one God; but in his Alcoran [the Koran] he relates many
trivialities unworthy of the Supreme Being, and the whole work is, in fact,
filled with contradictions, as I have shown in my book on the ‘Truth of the
Faith.’… The Mahometan Paradise, however, is only fit for beasts; for filthy
sensual pleasure is all the believer has to expect there… The Mahometans shave the head, and leave only a lock of hair on the
crown, by which they hope Mahomet will take them up to Heaven, even out of
Hell itself.”
This is another good quote to refute the “you can’t
judge” heresy. According to those who
espouse the “you can’t judge” heresy, we cannot say that people who die outside
the faith are lost because “we can’t judge.”
The truth is that God has already judged. God has revealed that those who are saved
must fall within a certain category: they must be baptized and have the
Catholic faith. Hence, those who have
the faith (i.e., true Catholics) believe and can profess that people who have
died outside the Church are lost. As we
see, St. Alphonsus did not subscribe to the “you can’t judge” heresy. Also notice how vigorously he condemns Islam
and the Koran; he speaks of them with no respect whatsoever. This is a stark contrast to the apostate
manner in which Benedict XVI and his sect members speak of Islam, the Koran,
etc.
New Video
and Heresy on Benedict XVI
MHFM: This new video and short article concern a
recent significant heresy from Benedict XVI.
Benedict XVI expresses gratitude
for the Synagogue, and uses the Jewish Calendar [video]
Benedict
XVI's expresses gratitude for the Synagogue, and uses the Jewish Calendar [Article]
Imploding
Dear MHFM,
It’s truly amazing, the amount of subterfuge and trickery going on with each
passing day. Thank you for your grinding article which leaves Salza’s
supposed refutation of Sedevacantism in a heap on the floor.
Every day the prideful IllumMasonic Counter Church and her heretical, apostate,
false popes with her, moves closer to spiritually imploding in the sight of
all, and the evil False Traditionalists would defend it with a pickaxe laden
with venom, while those who hold the true Faith of Jesus come to the fight with
Canons. Afraid of losing whatever grip they suppose they have, they must
fight from a distance hence Salza. On the one hand they attempt to
maintain their catch by lying, hypocrisy, and defense of false doctrines and on
the other hand they ensnare the weak and thereby widen their net with their
intellectual magic as you call it. The legs they use to support their
argument is rotted and crumbles with each new day that Benedict XVI thumbs his
nose at God. They lack the faith, courage and humility needed to face the
unvarnished truth. They make 2 Timothy 3:5 glaringly obvious.
True to the pride of their rebellious father, Satan, these heretics defend
antipopes who say that man is God and refuse the see or hear the truth.
Since they are true to these “popes,” at the cost of their soul, they don’t
realize they have indeed adopted their twisted thinking and have made of
themselves gods. They bend and twist the truth every which way in order
to make the wrong pieces fit their puzzle which is still full of holes.
And they are puzzled; their reaction to you, the Sedevacantist position one
must hold in these dangerous times in order to save our souls, and the state of
the world with its outrageous denial, and/or attack of Jesus Christ on every
front shows it. They imagine they stand secure but have created for
themselves a false cocoon in which they mentally and spiritually retreat.
When confronted they switch back and forth between a myriad of predictable
processes such as intellectual hocus pocus, hanging up the phone on you, they
become irate and try to intimidate, or resort to bribery, emotional blackmail,
or run and hide, any and all methods are used, anything but the truth, to get
you to come to the same wrong, illogical, deformed conclusion they hold. They
say there are enough problems in the Church already why add to it? They don’t
want anymore problems; they want it smooth and easy, they want peace. It
seems that they want to be safely nested, with their false idea of truth, peace
and security (1 Thes. 5:3). Like children they close their eyes and put
their hands over their ears, when it suits them (Matt. 13:15). Misguided,
they insulate themselves to their own spiritual destruction and become
intoxicated. They refuse to do the necessary work of reforming themselves
spiritually as Sr. Lucia said we need to do. They forget that Our Lord said
that he came not to bring peace but a sword (Matt. 10:34).
It’s sad that they just cannot accept the truth, really, really sad.
Thank you for doing the immense amount of research you have done in defense of
the truth which the true Church of Jesus Christ has carefully and lovingly laid
out for our salvation. Thank you, for teaching us how to debate and keep them
on point. May you and the entire monastery continue to be richly
blessed as only Our Lord and Lady know best how to.
Comment
Subject: Salza= Sir Dupe of Vatican II
Dear MHFM,
What is clear, and so true in this wicked world
is that Vatican II is the council of all councils, and the previous dogmatic
and magisterial councils preceding Vatican II, 20 of them, spanning 1900+ years
were a period of total fruitlessness and are absolutely null and
void. The Modernist machine-false pontiffs, crooked cardinals, and their
rag, Observatore Romano, and ancillary rags spread throughout the civilized
world has spent billions of Catholic donations to foster this belief
relentlessly. As a logical consequence truth of Vatican II is now before
us mortals, and because of this Great council the Christian world is
seeing the wonderful, and grand results. The world is truly at peace in
Christ and Mary because of Vatican II. Great work
MHFM.
Dea…
Errors
Dear Brothers,
What an excellent article against the diabolical errors of one John Salza.
Thank you very much… I have always been interested in any information against
the SV position and in looking at such information, have only ever been more
confirmed in its truth.
God bless.
Ido…
Books
Dear
MHFM:
I am confused. What is the best deal to get the material back in my hands? I
loaned the two big books to people and they have never returned them. Also I am
very interested in learning about the truth of Padre Pio and UFOs. God bless you.
My name and address is as follows:
Scott Metz
MHFM: We have two versions of the
special offer package. For what you have
described, we would recommend the larger special package. You will find the options at our online store.
Whore
Do
you realize that the Catholic Church is the whore and Beast of Revelation?
Slobadan…
MHFM: No, it’s not. The post-Vatican II Counter Church is the
Whore of Babylon. The Catholic Church is
the one true Church. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sbnpyOWbv0
Comment
Subject: Comment on Sedevacantism Debate –
Dimond vs. Albrecht
This Albrecht guy is one of the worst debaters
I have ever heard. Simply awful.
Joeah…
Convert
I
just wanted to take a moment to thank you for your work. I was at a point in my
life not a month ago where I did know what I was going to do. I had fallen into
some deeply wrong mortal sins to pile on top of the habitual ones I already
committed. About that time I received in the mail free of charge Bro. Peter's
book "The Bibles proves the Teachings of the Catholic church." At one
time I had been somewhat interested in the catholic church and in your work but
I fell away from it. After going over
the book some, especially concerning the Matthew 16 and the Papacy, i began to
acknowledge that the Roman Catholic Church was truly the church founded by
Jesus Christ himself. After realizing that I went on your website and inquired
about baptism and following your instructions I ordered a copy of the penny
catechism and began praying the rosary everyday.
After
that a miracle happened! My interest in
those mortal sins diminished significantly and I’ve found I’ve cut out a
particular sin of the flesh almost completely. I never thought i could do that
and i know still that i can't it was not my power…
It was the power of God with the intercession of Mary that caused me to end
those vial mortal sins. Upon receiving the penny catechism and studying it
reading it through a few times I felt I was ready to be baptized and so finally
I have been! After I made the profession of faith and rejected my heretical
Mormon background I could and I can rightly call myself a Catholic!... This
email is primarily a thank you and I cannot thank you enough. I promise to
continue to pray all 15 decades of the Rosary every day and try my best to be
as good a catholic as I can!
MHFM: It’s great to hear about your
interest. We must emphasize, however,
that to be saved or profit from the sacraments it’s of course necessary to cut
out all mortal sins completely. Once a
person does so, we can help him or her with where to receive sacraments.
New
Article Posted
MHFM: This is a link to a new article. We hope that all those who are interested in
this matter will print it out and read it.
This new article examines and refutes an attack on the sedevacantist
position that recently appeared in a false traditionalist publication. This attack apparently convinced some people
that the sedevacantist position is not the true position. By carefully examining the arguments, one can
see which position is true.
John Salza's Arguments Against Sedevacantism Crushed [article]
This and our other recent feature articles will be
found permanently at the link called “Recent Feature Articles” which is found
in our “Traditional Catholic Issues” section.
Fixed
Subject: No Fixed Morality
Dear Brothers,
Thank you for all your hard work in
educating people all over the world on the one true faith. I had always
known there was something wrong but couldn't figure out what and it led me for
some time along false ........ but having read almost everything you have put
on your website my eyes have been opened, so much so at times that it has
brought tears to my eyes.
However, one subject I don't think you
have written about is the whole nonsensical argument that some propose of
there being "no fixed morality", which in my opinion, in
itself proves the necessity of A God, if not even in fact the truth that
Jesus Christ is God. I would love to read your considered thoughts/arguments on
the matter.
I work at my computer everyday and the
first thing I do everyday is to check out your website, to know most of all
that there are others who share my beliefs as there are few living or working
near me who do.
You are always in my prayers.
God bless
Niall Walshe
Ireland
New
Subject: “New Franciscans”
Dear Brothers,
It looks like the Village People of the
1980's have been replaced by the New Franciscans. They too dress up in
"costumes" that have nothing to do with their music. I could not
believe my eyes when I saw them prancing around and the crowd loving every
minute of it having no clue that it is a total abomination in the eyes of God.
Was this Monastery out in California? Most Vatican II Catholics would probably
enjoy this and think it is a healthy way of getting people to participate. This
video may take the cake for the most outrageous behavior for so called "
religious."
Your ardent supporter,
Bob
Think
Hello Brothers:
I applaud your trouncing of John Salza's arguments against sedevecantism. He
makes me think of all those Protestant heretics who are so obstinate and
hard-hearted whenever I have had the good fortune to speak to them on the
Catholic faith. Their premise always seems to be, "The Roman Catholic
faith is, and must necessarily be, wrong--period." They then go to very,
very great lengths to debunk the truth with endless misapplied Scripture
quotes, twisted reasoning, and flights from reality. John Salza appears to
embrace the same kind of principle: "MHFM is and must necessarily be
wrong--period." And then he went to absurd lengths in the Remnant piece to
show sedevecatism to be wrong, only to make himself look deplorably foolish in
his contradictions and twisted thinking. He does show, however, a certain
consistency with his fellow false-traditionalists: when challenged to debate
they run, hide, or remain silent. Scared is a very appropriate word.
Thanks for the great work.
Joseph Ramirez
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.
We should probably mention that the article and videos are not dedicated
to refuting this individual for the reason that he is overly significant. Rather, by carefully refuting and exposing
his attempted refutation of sedevacantism, it serves to illuminate the truth
and refute all of the non-sedevacantists together.
Comment
Subject: Salza buried
Your case against Salza is so complete, so
total, you buried him. Paul IVth could not have been more clear. I
mean there is no other possible meaning, and because it is a teaching of the
Chair, no other argument or refutation is necessary. Nevertheless,
because Salza so junked up an issue that should be so straightforward, with
almost sophomoric misapplications of principle, you did a great service by
patiently unraveling it and refuting it point by point. The contradiction
you caught (within the same article!) is a real stunner. It is also hard to
believe that he could not see that the notion that a Catholic might licitly
receive sacraments from an excommunicate (because of few alternatives), but not
one who had been formally judged (except in danger of death), actually worked
against his argument that a formal judgment is required.
Unlike some of the others who actually
debated you, this guy pretends to take on the fundamental sedevacantist case
head on. He knows what the case is, and sets out to construct an argument
against it. And this is hard work; I think only a lawyer, and a prideful
one, would attempt it. Because to any honest person, the correctness of
the sedevacantist case is obvious.
I don’t believe that this guy is in good
faith at all. He is lying to himself. He is too well educated, and
too skilled in argument, not to realize that he was defending a false
proposition. He probably enjoys the challenge, without regard for any
notion as trite as “truth”.
It is interesting that a fairly major
publication would give publicity to the question. Perhaps it is evidence
of your growing influence? But understand he will never take you on in public
(when you are allowed to talk back). I think his article is about damage
control. They seek to dissuade those who are perhaps beginning to ask
questions along the sedevacantist path. But they will not get into a
fight that 1) they know they will lose and 2) would serve to elevate your
status.
Bill Mulligan
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.
It should probably be pointed out that our website is significantly more
active than both the publication that carried the article and the individual
who wrote it. According to Alexa, our
website is currently ranked more than 550,000 spots higher than the false
traditionalist publication, and more than 700,000 spots higher than the author
of the article. According to
ranking.com, our website is ranked 23,396 in the world. There were 234 million websites in the world
as of December 2009: http://royal.pingdom.com/2010/01/22/internet-2009-in-numbers/ These facts are worth
mentioning because the false traditionalist publication recently referred to us
pejoratively as a tiny little group (implying little influence), when the fact
is that our website is much more active than theirs.
Eusebius
Subject:
Eusebius
Thank
you, Brother Peter, for your article refuting John Salza's
"arguments" against sedevacantism. Your article is a gem,
not only because it refutes the content of the claims used by Salza, but it
also exposes the stratagem which you have very aptly described as black
magic. It's the same diabolical sleight of hand used by the various false
traditional groups to first seem to be admitting - and then end up denying - an
important truth. Yes, Pius XII consecrated Russia; but no, Pius
XII did not consecrate Russia. No, there's no salvation outside of the
Church, but yes, there is salvation outside of the Church. And so on.
This
is the same technique used by the Scribes and Pharisees to deny Our Lord Jesus
Christ. And we know what Our Lord had to say about them.
In
Volume 4 of the Liturgical Year, page 379 we read the following:
"It
was then that Satan produced Nestorious, crowned with a fictitious halo of sanctity
and knowledge".
On
Christmas Day 428, Nestorious preached that "Mary did not bring forth God;
her Son was only a man, the instrument of the Divinity. The multitude
shuddered with horror. Eusebius, a simple layman, rose to give expression
to the general indignation and protested against this impiety. Soon a
more explicit protest was drawn up and disseminated in the name of the members
of this grief-stricken Church, launching an anathema against anyone who should
dare to say: "The Only-begotten Son of the Father and the Son of Mary
are different persons.' This generous attitude was the safeguard of
Byzantium and won the praise of Popes and Councils. When the shepherd
become a wolf, the first duty of the flock is to defend itself. It is
usual and regular, no doubt, for doctrine to descend from the bishops to the
faithful and those who are subject to the faith are not to judge their
superiors. But in the treasure of revelation there are
essential doctrines which all Christians, by the very fact of their
title as such, are bound to know and defend. The principle is the
same whether it be a question of belief, or conduct, dogma or morals.
Treachery like that of Nestorious is rare in the Church, but it may happen that
some pastors keep silence for one reason or another in circumstances when
religion itself is at stake. The true children of Holy Church
at such times are those who walk by the light of their baptism, not the
cowardly soul who, under the specious pretext of submission to the powers that
be, delay their opposition to the enemy in the hope of receiving
instructions which are neither necessary nor desirable."
Today,
treachery is the norm and the true Children of Holy Church are rare. And
they won't be found amongst the false traditionalists like Salza who, had
they lived in the time of Nestorious, would undoubtedly have attacked
Eusebius!
Thanks
for all you do.
Lee
Ann
Arguments
Subject: Salza Arguments
This was by far, better than watching
a boxing match or watching the yankees win the world series, John Salza got put
through a paper shredder and then set on fire. I absolutely had fun
reading the entire article, I can see John cringing and squirming in his seat
as he reads Brother Peter’s response to his arguments, talk about being
stripped naked, wow! For me the fight was over in the first
paragraph, "tell it to the church"!
Todd
Refutation
Dear Brothers,
Your refutation of Salza's attack is very
thorough, complete and effective! His silence, would
indicate that he accepts your arguments!...
Thank you once again for defending the
one, true faith! In these trying times, your work is
greatly appreciated!
Richard Cardet
Bordeaux, France
Critique
Subject: Critique
So, if a building(s) (i.e. NO
"church") is engulfed in flames (from Hell) the people should
wait for the "alarm" (from the heretics who started the fire) to
sound before exiting? John Salza probably wouldn't debate you because his
advice is so ludicrous, he knew he couldn't control himself from laughing. He
has, in effect, tried to twist this tragedy (The Great Apostasy) into
a comedy.
Rick
Apostate
Dear Brothers,
Thank you for the great article against the
modernist heretic and false traditionalist, John Salza. It really is a
crushing defeat to the entire anti-sedevacantist movement because Satan
clearly enrolled one of his highest devotees in choosing John Salza to attack
us, and he has some legal credentials. However, the humble simplicity of the
Truth of the Catholic faith always shines through in the end, regardless of how
much time such heretics waste. His key magic trick, as Bro. Peter explained,
was to set up an apparent contradiction in Canon Law (where there is none), in
that #1: He stated that heretics lose their office without a declaration, and
#2: That Catholics can recognize such heretics as excommunicated, even when no
declaration has been made, but only when the Church declares such to be
heretics! He tried to, by use of his freemasonic magic, make it seem as though
the words, “without a declaration,” mean “with a declaration,” in that
Catholics can only recognize an undeclared heretic once a declaration has been
made by the Church. An “undeclared declaration” - it’s outrageously absurd, but
the lying heretics love it! John Salza needs to stop declaring heresies. It’s
memory-replacement-mind-control whereby what you have seen and heard from the
Church, apparently becomes something that it is not: an illusion. For the
modernist heretic, John Salza, it’s all just a big long process of figuring it
all out, rather than a simple belief in what Christ revealed. He probably
thinks that the collective whole of humanity, if they magnified their
concentration intensely enough, could remove Original Sin simply by desiring it
– like a massive “baptism of desire.” That’s what Antipope John Paul II’s
Antichrist heresies of Universal salvation and “Universal Incarnation”
erroneously declare, and that’s the (diabolical) essence of concelebration,
i.e. that the faithful confect the Eucharist along with the Priest, and not the
Priest only. Heresy is merely controversy for Mr. Salza! His article is in
reality, “The Errors of John Salza.” Speaking of illusions, Mr. Salza tries to
trick us from the very start: “The Errors of...Ecclesiastical Law.” There are
no errors in Ecclesiatical Law. His goal, like Antipope Benedict XVI, is to
make a mockery of the Catholic Church by attacking its foundations, but he’s
only securing his own eternal destruction!
His second key error was that: a heretic
who is apparently “elected” pope (apparently but not really) loses his office
(the Papacy) but does not lose jurisdiction… It boils down to the infallible
authority that Jesus Christ instituted in the Office of the Papacy – once a man
walks out of that Office, whether by death or heresy, then he loses the
authority to govern – he loses jurisdiction. It’s as though John thinks the
Papacy is a sacrament, not like Holy Orders that is conferred once, but like
confession or communion that a Catholic keeps receiving, because he seems to
think that a heretic can exercise the function of a Pope (like receiving a
sacrament repeatedly) but without holding the office, i.e. without having the
authority of the Papacy (or the authority to administer the “papal sacrament”).
The authority of the Papacy stems directly from Jesus Christ Himself, not any
man, which is why no matter how hard V-2 “Catholics” may try to “mind-meld” or
imagine a heretic to be a pope (as Mr. Salza seems to think he and others are
capable of doing), the truth doesn’t change, and a heretic cannot be a pope,
ever!... The Vatican II sect is like a cheaply made toy – good for nothing, has
no true value, and is made with toxic chemicals (heresies) – and thus leads
souls to hell - a Protestant can see it, a child can tell you it, but the
obstinate defenders of the Vatican II sect will write books to prevent you from
acknowledging it. The Vatican II sect and its 5 Antipopes main heresies revolve
around the clear and manifest rejection, by word and deed, of Jesus Christ and
the Trinity. Antipope Benedict XVI is a warlock and a heresiarch!!! John Salza
dances around the Catholic dogmas like a voodoo witchdoctor, but continuously
trips over his own feet… John Salza is a schismatical modernist, a Pharisee,
and an Antichrist apostate!!!..
Pascendi, On the Doctrine of Modernists, Pope
St. Pius X – “They are ready to admit, nay, to proclaim that Christ Himself
manifestly erred in determining the time when the coming of the Kingdom of
God was to take place; and they tell us that we must not be surprised at
this since even He Himself was subject to the laws of life! After this what
is to become of the dogmas of the Church? The
dogmas bristle with flagrant contradictions, but what does it matter since,
apart from the fact that vital logic accepts them, they are not repugnant to symbolical truth.”
Matthew 5:13 –
“You are the salt of the earth. But if the salt lose its
savour, wherewith shall it be salted? It is good for nothing any more but
to be cast out, and to be trodden on by men.”
God Bless,
Chris White
Message
While driving on
a rural end of the roadway on Thursday morning, I saw an infant carseat on the
side of the road with a blanket draped over it. For whatever reason, I did not
stop, even though I had all kinds of thoughts running through my head. But when
I got to my destination, I called the PD and they were going to check it out.
But, this is what the Police advised even before they went out there to
check....
"There are several things to be aware of
... gangs and thieves are now plotting different ways to get people (mostly
women) to stop their vehicle and get out of the car.
"There is a gang initiation reported by the local Police Department where
gangs are placing a carseat by the road...with a fake baby in it...waiting for
a woman, of course, to stop and check on the abandoned baby. "Note that the location of this carseat
is usually beside a wooded or grassy area and the person --woman-- will be
dragged into the woods, beaten and raped, and usually left for dead. If it's a
man, they're usually beaten and robbed and maybe left for dead, too.
DO NOT STOP FOR ANY REASON!!!
… REPORT WHAT YOU SAW, BUT DON'T EVEN SLOW DOWN.
"IF YOU ARE DRIVING AT NIGHT AND EGGS ARE THROWN AT YOUR WINDSHIELD, DO NOT
STOP TO CHECK THE CAR , DO NOT OPERATE THE WIPER AND DO NOT SPRAY ANY WATER
BECAUSE EGGS MIXED WITH WATER BECOME MILKY AND BLOCK YOUR VISION UP TO 92.5%,
AND YOU ARE THEN FORCED TO STOP BESIDE THE ROAD AND BECOME A VICTIM OF THESE
CRIMINALS. THIS IS A NEW TECHNIQUE USED BY GANGS, SO PLEASE INFORM YOUR FRIENDS
AND RELATIVES. THESE ARE DESPERATE TIMES
AND THESE ARE UNSAVORY INDIVIDUALS WHO WILL TAKE DESPERATE MEASURES TO GET WHAT
THEY WANT." Please talk to your loved ones about this. This is a new
tactic used. Please be safe. Get started
NOW -- SEND THIS MESSAGE TO ALL YOUR FRIENDS AND LOVED ONES TO BE CAREFUL AND
AWARE OF EVERYTHING AROUND THEM SO AS NOT TO BECOME A VICTIM.
Altar girl
MHFM: During Benedict XVI’s “Mass”
for the “Beatification” of John Henry Newman, there was at least one altar
girl.
Pope Benedict XIV, Allatae
Sunt, July 26, 1755: “Pope Gelasius in his ninth letter to the bishops of
Lucania condemned the evil practice which had been introduced of women serving the
priest at the celebration of Mass. Since
this abuse had spread to the Greeks, Innocent IV strictly forbade it in his
letter to the bishop of Tusculum: ‘Women should not dare to serve at the altar;
they should be altogether refused this ministry.’ We too have forbidden this practice in the
same words in Our oft-repeated constitution...”
Trip
… all the crazy books that those two wrote,
Catholicism for Dummies, Catholicism Answer book, (which has NO
answers!) how can they get away with such garbage? And YOU had a
problem with You-Tube when a lot of the stuff on You-tube is horrible! (I
got an email from a Traditional Family Values list I am on and they are
always fighting for morality, and one of the things they wanted was to email
You-Tube to take off the desecration of host-and it looked like it was a black
mass) And again, You tube had a problem with YOU???
Re: Muslim article
U.S.
kids bow to "Allah" on Mosque school field trip
They want everyone to be a Muslim! How can
they indoctrinate our children with such garbage? What will they be like
when they are adults with absolutely NO values whatsoever? I feel that we
are going to die defending our true Catholic Faith. And that man being arrested
for burning the koran! How many people got arrested for burning our
Bible!?
RE: Benedict’s trip to England: On
the Today show this morning, Benedict celebrated "mass" in the
Anglican Cathedral and the journalist did mention that England killed
countless Catholics, but acted like it was no big deal!
I cannot understand all this acceptance for
the gays! Why didn't they just stay in the closet??? Why are WE
wrong when we say it is a sin? What part of Sodom and Gomorrah don't they
understand? If everyone accepts this immorality, aren't we in worse shape
than Sodom and Gomorrah?
God bless you for all of your good work!
June
New Video
& Article, You Tube
Latest Update: You Tube removed our first version
of the video, that had many more views.
Now it only allows the second version.
MHFM: These are links to a new video and a new
article. Note: our new You Tube video
(which is below) on The Catholicism
Answer Book was being deliberately delayed by You Tube. For that reason, we had to re-upload the
video and we decided to slightly modify the title. That didn’t work. You Tube is still deliberately messing with
our video, so we are just linking to the original. If you
fight through the first five or so stalls in the first thirty seconds, it
seems to play smoothly. It seems that
You Tube will allow people to listen to our video from that point on.
The Catholicism Answer Book Exposed [video]
Article: The Catholicism
Answer Book Exposed [article]
Comment
Not only should the Koran be burned, but so
should the Talmud and all Protestant versions of the Bible, for the translators
are putting lies in the mouth of God, which is Blasphemy. Speaking of this topic reminded me of
something my son told me not long ago. This event happened while we were living
in California. He rode his bicycle near a V2 church that was next to our
house and he saw something that drew his attention. It was a bonfire.
My son went over out of curiosity and asked one person what was going on.
Apparently, the church was holding a burning to "get rid of the old
to make room for the new". He saw people throw Bibles, missals,
rosaries etc into this fire.
The truth becomes more obvious with every
horrifying tale that emerges. Keep up the great work!
Brenda Roy
Mess
Subject: Novus Mess priest blesses Koran
I may not always agree with the stances of
the mhfm but as you can see in the article things are getting out of control
and something must be done. The state of affairs in the church make me
want vomit.
Peace Brother.
Calif…
MHFM: Perhaps that should tell you that we are correct.
Today
MHFM: Note: There’s a chance that an
important new article will be posted today.
JP2 Musical
Subject: JP2 the Musical
A bit of funny/weird news:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/vaticancityandholysee/7803727/John-Paul-II-the-Musical-to-open-next-week.html
The rock-star "pope" lives on...
On the reign of the Antichrist, his reign.
As one could expect, it features a lot of
rock music. I don´t know about the presentation, but at least during the
rehearsals it´s possible to see a man with his chest naked, and women with
revealing clothes. It´s appropriate when one considers the subject matter, the
AntiMoral AntiChrist AntiPope Wojtyla.
Now that´s what I call a truly tragic
symphony...
Lunacy
Subject:
Shocking
This
past week has been pretty shocking regarding the garbage being said in the
media and by the apostate Mccarrick and the Rat, I have such a hatred for
benedict arnold XVl. How is it the more blatant the lies, the more blind
the people get, I truly don't have any words to describe what is going on it’s
pure lunacy .
Todd
MHFM: Yes, his current trip to
England is a veritable course on how to mock the English martyrs and deny the
necessity of the papal office.
Satan
http://edition.presstv.ir/detail/139422.html
I just
read this entire article and was so upset, I called my mother. I related to her what the article was about.
I had remembered something from the mid-sixties that was told to my father by a
priest who was a very good friend of our family. I did not know at that time
the substance of the information related by the priest to my father. When I read this to my mom, today, there
was a dead silence on the phone. She then said to me, "Jennifer, don't you
remember what Father S....... told your dad about this supposed
fishing trip that he went on up in Michigan. The things he told your dad were
horrible. Father....S said
he was so shocked, he'd never go anywhere with those people ever again."
I remember something being very wrong,BUT, I never knew what it was. What
I did know was, this was a fishing trip with fellow priest and a few laymen. I
was 12 or 13 at the time. I'm now 59. That article struck a nerve with my mom.
She said and I quote.." That's exactly what Father S.... told to your
dad."
"The smoke of satan"
Please keep this between us. The Priest is now deceased and so is my father.
This just re-confirms to me the truth and goodness of Most Holy Family
Monastery.
May God Bless and Keep you safe. We need you two more than ever.
Jennifer
Cathedral
Subject:
Koran blessed at Cathedral
Dear
Bros. Apostasy! The V2 church lifts up man and the human condition "of
can't we all just get along". Catholics in this false church refuse to
read about the lives of the saints who dealt with the pagans. They refuse
Christ’s own call to Baptize and Preach the gospel of Christ to these
pagans! Bro's what do you see coming for Catholics in this country concerning
these Muslims that are living here and building mosque's. Do you foresee a holy
war coming one day? May God embolden us all with the Holy Spirit to preach the
gospel everywhere! Holy Mary Pray for us!
Debra
Ames
Koran
Subject: E-Exchanges on Burning the Quran
Dear Dimond Brothers,
About four days ago I sent out an e-mail to
all my contacts concerning the Florida "pastor's" intention on
burning the Quran. I got one reply back from someone who demonstrates
such an astounding level of bad will that I thought it worthy to send to
you. I don't know if you will consider it good enough to post in your
e-exchanges, but just in case here it is. I copied and pasted it in my
e-mail to you in chronological order to make it easier to follow because had I
just forwarded it the last reply would appear at the top and the original at
the bottom.
Sylvestre
MY E-MAIL:
As most of us
know, Benedict XVI and the Vatican
II sect have condemned a Florida pastor's intention on burning Qurans to mark
the ninth anniversary of the September 11th attacks. On Wednesday,
September 8th, the Vatican issued a statement denouncing the Florida pastor's
plan as "outrageous and a grave gesture".
Well here's
something to ponder. The following represents the Church's true position
on book burning. It was issued from a true pope long before the Vatican
II apostasy :
Pope Pius VII, Diu Satis (# 15), May 15,
1800: “Books which openly oppose the teaching of
Christ are to be burned. Even more importantly, the
eyes and minds of all must be kept from books, which do so more steathily and deceitfully… So the sheep of Christ should
consider safe and eat cheerfully the food to which Peter’s voice and authority
directs them; but despite any beauty and charm, they should shun as harmful and
plague-ridden, what this voice forbids them. Those who do not comply are
certainly not to be counted among the sheep of Christ.”
HIS RESPONSE:
… Wow, I respect you for voicing
your beliefs, but couldn't possibly agree with you less. I will always side
with any man who seeks God in his own way without regard to the
"rites" or "icons". The average truly devout Muslim is no
more a servant of the devil than the average truly devout Jew or Christian. As
with so many who seek to be the "better" example, you quote from
selections that are contrary to the whole body of scripture. Just as radical
Muslims can find a phrase or two in their Holy Book to justify horrific
actions, so can radical Christians. God makes the same demand on all of us. We
either serve him or we will be cast away from him. That is all I need to know.
He will deal with us justly and we have no right to pass judgement on His
behalf.
May you find peace in your search for
the truth,
Eddie
ME:
It's obvious that you know hardly anything about God. It's ridiculous and
defies common sense that God could approve of just any religion, all of which
profess different beliefs. Most christians believe that Christ IS God.
If you truly loved God then you would reject those religions which deny
Christ. Protestantism rejects Christ also
because although they claim to believe in Him, they only accept His teachings
which are likable to them and reject all others. This is an abomination
before God and they will all have to answer to it on Judgment Day. You
are so blinded by the Devil that the truth is right in front of you so plainly
and you cannot see it. You are one of countless souls that God allows to
remain in the dark because of your pride and bad will. Unless you wake up
and become a TRUE Catholic you will find yourself being cast into the
everlasting fiery pits of Hell when you stand before the Judgment seat.
HIS LAST RESPONSE (Which I
don't find necessary to reply to):
I will stand beside you on Judgement
Day and God will tell us who was wrong. I respect that you believe in
your way and am saddened that you don't have that same respect for me. Time and
God will tell. Until then, please refrain from personal attacks or write me off
for a loss.
Eddie
V-2
Subject: Vatican II ratbags
Dear Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,
All I can say in regards to your recent videos, "Catholicism of
Dummies" and "The Catholicism Answer Book" - you are doing a
Trojan job in exposing these Vatican II Ratbags!
God bless,
David
Excommunication
Subject: Catholicism Answer Book Revealed
Dear Brothers,
Great work exposing the "Catholicism Answer Book." The book is full
of heresies! The sufferings of Jesus Christ are treated as completely valueless
by such apostates. It is a total rejection of the necessity of the Catholic
faith for salvation, and an embracing of every false religion that ever
existed. To say that Jews and Muslims who have died during war or for their
false "faith" are martyrs is outrageous to the extreme! Martyrs are
Catholics only, who have died for the faith because they are witnesses to the
Truth: to Jesus Christ. To say that a person who continually commits mortal sin
is not in state of mortal sin and that people rarely become possessed because
of their own actions is ridiculous and atrocious. To say that there are graces
in Non-Catholic religions is outrageous too. The book is one huge summary of
Vatican II apostasy. I thought it was interesting that they call Fr. Feeney's
"excommunication" famous, when almost no one knows about it, let
alone what the real facts are. Also, why would they cite such an
"excommunication," but not cite truly famous excommunications such as
of the Protestant heretics, Martin Luther and King Henry VIII?! They were
pivotal excommunications because of the immense destruction that such heretics
were causing!... Thank you again for showing so clearly what an evil and
outrageous book it is.
God Bless,
Chris White
Corapi
Subject:
listend [sic] most of one of your youtube videos
Peter
Diamond.
And
I have easily come to the conclusion that you are in a state of ignorant
grandeur when it comes to Father Corapi.
…You
are not doing the Lords work under the seemingling holy named website.. Seems
more like satan in sheeps clothing.
Remember
whose toes you tred on.... and that the gates of hell will not prevail
against the church the Lord built. You church and teaching will fail, but sadly
you will take many with you. You are a
brother to know one.
Rose…
MHFM: We are certainly not ignorant
of what “Fr.” Corapi believes. On the
contrary, you are the one who is blind to the truth and wilfully ignorant of
what he stands for. We even played his
words and quoted him in the video you saw.
The problem is that you don’t care about the facts. It doesn’t bother you that he accepts false
ecumenism and salvation outside the Church.
His denial of Catholic dogma is not a concern to you because
unfortunately you are not a Catholic.
Below is a quote from “Fr.” Corapi which should dispel your ignorance on
the matter of what he really believes.
Unfortunately, it probably won’t because you are not inclined to hear
the truth.
Speaking about
the conflict between Protestants and professing Catholics in Ireland, “Fr.”
John Corapi declared: “I don’t care if
you’re Baptist or Catholic; you are Christian.
Just practice it.” That is
blatantly heretical. It’s just a small
example of why he is not a Catholic, but rather a modernist phony who deceives
people who don’t care about the Catholic faith.
If you were of good will, you would figure out that you and he hold the
Catholic faith to be meaningless.
Shriner
Subject:
You Tube video Shriner worships Lucifer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2OXuXTkBNQ
Also, I wanted to add a related comment. Please pray that I convert my
wife to the true Catholic faith. Except for me, she is completely
surrounded and influenced by the "we all worship the same god",
"we have the right to think what we want" , "we can't
judge" nonsense. This type of thinking is exactly what the
Masons-Shriners promote. If we take that nonsense to the extreme, we have
to support whatever anyone thinks and then does. e.g. If you believe in the "official" 9-11
story and take the indifferent thoughts to its conclusion, you have to support
19 Muslims killing 3000-12000 people and be happy about it. If you
believe in the conspiracy theory of 9-11, you have to support a government
killing its citizens. Something is right or wrong; it is not both at the
same time. Christ laid out clearly right and wrong; it is simple to
follow His rules. God bless you and thank you. Also, please have
another radio program if you can make the time.
Comment on a Sedevacantism Debate
Subject: Comment
on Sedevacantism Debate
Well the Bro Dimond guy clearly won. There
was a lot more substance to his side of the debate, and it was disappointing
that gnrhead didn't seem at all concerned by the things Bro Dimond brought up,
but instead suffered from the most severe case of tunnel-vision sola scriptura
I think I've ever witnessed. He also wasted time arguing over greek grammar,
which I always find to be a manipulative tactic in debates. This would've been better had both sides kept
the personal attacks to a minimum.
Nym…
Swallowed
Hi Brothers,
I am deeply concerned about my father
because he has been swallowed up by Luisa Picaretti and her
supposed revelations of Jesus explaining Divine Will. Could you
please explain why she is a false seer or heretic because someone recently
wrote that her writings were put on the Forbidden Books list in
1938.
John T.
Talk
In
regard to all this talk out there about God esteeming everyone as on the same
level, and the Lord hates the sin but loves the sinner, well those people
thinking that need to consider these verses…
(Psalm
5:6) "the Lord hates the bloody and deceitful man."
(Proverbs
6 : 16 & 19) "The Lord hates... a false witness..."
(Wisdom
14:9) “But to God the wicked and his wickedness are hateful alike.”
(Proverbs
1: 26) I also will laugh at your disaster. I will mock when calamity
overtakes you.
Steve
Imagine
Subject: Koran burner Derek Fenton booted
from his job at NJ transit
Can you imagine being detained by the
police for burning the koran and also being fired from job, but the jews in
Israel can burn bibles, outrageous!
Todd
Latest
Subject:
Latest Video
How
on earth do these people who write such books even sleep at night??? What
a load of rubbish! Thank you Brother Dimond for being an island of sanity
in an ocean filled with evil and corruption unimaginable outside of hell.
One
of the "suggested" videos listed beside yours on YouTube was someone
named "Marywasnotavirgin" and the title of her video was
"Catholicism is the same religion as Islam". I sometimes wonder if
you wouldn't be better producing your videos privately, putting them on your
website rather than YouTube so that weak and curious souls won't be exposed to
someone else's antiCatholic ravings.
Great
job, as usual. God bless you always,
Brenda
Roy
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail, but it
is definitely better to have them in such a forum because the goal is to make
the truth available to those searching in those areas. The people who already have access to the
truth should be mature and strong enough to not delve into, or be swayed by,
heretical sources and productions.
Note
Latest Update: You Tube removed our first version
of the video, The Catholicism Answer Book
Exposed, that had many more views.
Now it only allows the second version (link is below).
Beyond Insane
Subject: Beyond Insane
The Catholicism Answer Book, Page 383: “…
the Catholic Church does not mean that Catholics are somehow better than anyone
else, since they’re not. All men and women are equal in terms of their
human dignity, worth, and value in the eyes of God and the Church.”
Great, so, if I'm standing on top of a
Aztec pyramid with some guy’s heart in my hand, I have, in God's eyes, the same
value as St. Teresa of Avila or St. Benedict.
Thanks for your work MHFM,
Matthew
MHFM: Yes, the article also covers
the quote in which they state that those who are faithful to their religion
(whatever it may be), according to their held beliefs, can be saved. So, if they are dedicated to their practice
of ripping hearts out, and follow it meticulously according to the rites of
their religion, they will be dear to God and will get to Heaven. These are the “priests” and individuals who
are featured on EWTN and fully approved by what most people (wrongly) think is
the Catholic Church.
Answer Book
Subject: Answer Book
Brothers,
Thank you for taking the time to read, review and expose the heretical,
"The Catholic Answer Book." All part of the great deception, by
means of packaging and labeling their lies with the false pretense of having
answers and also being Catholic. I suppose that at the end of the wide road
that the multitude follow, the sign at the Gates of Hell will also have some
mention of their heretical false beliefs.
1 Machabees 7:42, "Even so destroy this army in our sight today, and let
the rest know that he hath spoken ill against thy sanctuary: and judge thou him
according to his wickedness."
God Bless,
Tom Miles
Paused
I paused the video, waited until it fully
loaded and then it played all the way through with no problem.
WJ
Catholic Answers
Subject: Catholic Answers
Dear MHFM,
St. Pius X said it best.
"Modernism is the synthesis of all heresies..." This cancer of
modernism has enveloped the world, for sure. The operation of error
permitted by Our Lord clearly points to end times. Your monastery elicits
sacred historical and present day truths toward that finality. The
stench of modernism has to end much like Sidon, Sodom, etc., etc.
Thanks! Holy Mother of God, pray for us.
Utopia
Subject: Utopia
Dear Brothers:
The number of bizarre actions and speeches
by V2 "Bishops" is big enough to choke a dinosaur. Someone gave
us a gift subscription to [a newspaper] and in their latest issue, they talk
about a "bishop" who is praising the effort/desire to build houses in
space!! It all boils down to this: does one place one's hopes in a utopia
here on earth (space!!) and ignore the fact that we are destined to leave this
earth eventually or do we place our hopes on heaven with God. Too many
people are placing their hopes on a utopia on earth; the repugnance of
suffering and doing penance for one's sins are proof of this. This may be
the reason there is so much bad will among people, even traditional Catholics.
Nicholas Gruner would have his readers believe in a "paradise"
of sorts after the "consecration", but it is evident that he is just
another utopian.
Brenda Roy
Video
MHFM: This is a new video:
The
Vatican II Sect encourages Muslims to Celebrate Ramadan [Video]
Recent Significant Vatican II Counter Church Heresy [Short Article]
Tauran
Dear Brothers,
That's a great new section of your website:
The Most Recent Significant Vatican II Counter Church Heresy. Thank you for the
short video too. The heretic and apostate, "Cardinal" Jean-Louis
Tauran appears to be a seasoned Freemason given that he is espousing
Freemasonry's highest "ideals": fraternity, equality, reconciliation,
etc. Apart from the heresies you outlined, one line I thought was particularly
sickening was this: "There are important recommendations also given in the
above mentioned text: to open our hearts to mutual forgiveness and
reconciliation." In other words, he calls on Catholics to
"forgive" the Koran for its blasphemies against the Holy Trinity and
the Incarnation of Jesus Christ, and to reconcile Christ with Mohammed. What an
outrage! Another abomination is this: "Teaching by religious leaders, as
well as school books which present religions in an objective way, have, along
with teaching in general, a decisive impact on the education and formation of
younger generations." So he thinks that the rejection of God Incarnate is
"objective." To say that one should have no bias based on religious
affiliation is Antichrist and satanic. "Cardinal" Jean-Louis Tauran
is a demon in human form!!!
God Bless,
Chris White
Bible
Hello
In your youtube video "Chosen People, Mary and updates" you brought up
the quote from Daniel 9:26. In the video it is written "And after sixty
two weeks Christ shall be slain: and the people that shall deny him shall not
be his." I looked up the passage in different versions of the Bible and I
could not find this part "(...) and the people that shall deny him shall
not be his."
Can you please write a fast reply and say
from what version of the Bible the quote from your video is?
Thank you very much. God bless
Eduard
MHFM: It’s found in the Catholic Bible, the Douay-Rheims and the
Vulgate. You won’t find it in Protestant
versions.
Connecting
Subject:
Connecting the dots
From your video
Abortion, Rock Music, & Freemasonry Exposed: During the initiation
ceremonies of The Shriners (the 'cream of the crop' from both the Scottish
& York Rites) they, "seal their solemn oath in the name of Allah, the
god of our fathers." A little later on in the ritual they acknowledge,
"Islam as the one true faith."
R
Fundamental
Subject: “Fundamental Christians”
Hey Brother Peter,
I recently got into a debate with one of
these people that refers to them self as a fundamental Christian. This person
went on to tell me that Catholicism is heresy, claiming that we pray to false
gods (saints), and that we do not follow the true teachings of Jesus
Christ. Was wondering if you could shed
some light on this. Who are these
people, and how could they possibly think praying to saints is an occult
practice? We've been doing it for almost 2000 years!
God Bless
Hillary Waddell
MHFM: There are countless Protestants out there who hold similar
false views. Misunderstanding and
perverting the Scriptures, they believe that praying to saints is
idolatrous. We recommend our section
called “The Bible on Praying to and Venerating Saints” in our book The Bible Proves the Teachings of the
Catholic Church.
Not a place
Dear Bro. Michael and Peter Dimond,
Sorry if I ask many questions from you, I am a bit worried because I can't find
any traditional mass celebrated by a priest ordained in the Old Rite, I want to
confess, and I can't find a valid priest that can hear my confessions, what
should I do? I am maintaining devotions to the Blessed Virgin Mary and the
Rosary.
I quit attending the new mass a few months ago, because I finally realize their
heresies, I didn't even hear priest saying sermons about hell, I do hear one
but he says that hell is not actual place! it is when you are in a state of
loneliness, sadness and poverty that is hell he says, I was shock to hear this.
Your website is full of information that's really worth reading, and I am
sharing your information to my friends.
I am a Catholic from the Philippines, thank you for your time, God Bless.
Sincerly,
Glenn
MHFM: That’s very interesting that the “priest” repeated the
heresy that Hell is not a place. It’s an
example of how the false teaching of the antipopes filters down to their
subjects. There should be a priest
ordained before 1968 somewhere in your area to whom you could go to
confession. Even if it requires driving
some distance once in a while, it’s important to get to confession. If someone is in mortal sin (which hopefully
is not the case), then obviously it’s even more necessary to get to confession;
but if there is definitely no option, then a person must focus on prayers and
having contrition for his or her sins.
Perfect contrition and the desire to confess the sin can restore a
person to justification before the Sacrament of Penance is received. Our guidelines on Where to Go to Mass contain
some principles that concern those who are leaving the Novus Ordo.
Remind
Subject:
“Cardinal” McCarrick
The apostate "Cardinal" McCarrick
(who refuses to criticize the Koran) can´t even claim the he accepted the
Gospel. Someone should remind this heretical coward that Saint Paul, under the
Direction of the Holy Ghost, wrote in Ephesians 5. 11: "And have no
fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove
them."
This is true even for the lowest layman.
How can a man be considered Catholic, hold a title of "Cardinal" or
even "Pope" and yet call evil good, have fellowship with false
religions created by the devil and say it´s not up to him to criticize and
condemn Islam?
They clearly teach those heretics worship
God in a pleasing manner, when the Church has already defined that It´s
impossible to worship God except INSIDE Her, that Islam ins an abominable
infidel and faithless pagan sect, that all of it´s members are lost in their
current state (as well as any member of a false religion or anyone who´s not
Catholic) and that those who reject the Son also end up rejecting the Father.
That book Brother Michael reviewed and
utterly destroyed, "Catholicism for Dummies" is simply shocking in
it´s declaration that Synagogues, Protestant and Orthodox "Churches"
and even Mosques are (true, one can presume by the reading) Houses of
Worship.
These fools even help to gather funds for
the building of more mosques. More places in which souls are lost, God is
denied, Christ is rejected and people are taught to hate Christians and rejoice
in killing them.
Frankly, to defend this thing, this
Apostate Vatican II sect after witnessing all this garbage, and to voluntarily
sell one´s own soul to the Devil are essentially the same thing. There can´t be
much difference.
Thank you, for teaching me so much.
Please, keep up the fine work.
1 John 5
MHFM: This is an important verse that was incorporated into our
recent video, Do You Believe ? It’s especially important in this age of
apostasy. That’s because no adherent of
Vatican II and the theology of the Counter Church could really say that he (or
she) believes this verse. With their
“respect” for various false religions – and their position that one can’t
“judge” all the members of such religions to be excluded from salvation – 1
John 5:19 is foreign to their belief system.
Nor could those who believe in the “invincible ignorance” heresy
honestly say they believe and internally understand the verse; for they hold
that many people outside of Christ can be justified (if they are innocent
“through no fault of their own”) and therefore are not necessarily in
wickedness (or darkness).
1 John 5:19- “We know that we are of God, and
the whole world is seated in wickedness.”
What?
MHFM,
What do you think of Atila Sinke Guimaraes
and his book “In the Murky Waters of Vatican II”?... I’d like to know what are
your thoughts on his position and also what you think of this book.
Thanks so much for your work. GREAT
JOB on the conversation with that annoying chatter box from Wales. I
couldn’t believe this guy’s mouth how it just would close! I honestly
didn’t hear half of what he was saying, and when he did speak only LIES blurted
out. He sounds so much worse than the “apologist” from Chicago whom you
talked with a few years ago. May God bless your braveness to defend His
Church.
Sincerely,
Bernardo
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.
With reference to the book you mention, we think it’s a massive waste of
time. He examines theologians who
promote the “new theology,” yet he believes the representatives of this new
heretical theology are Catholic (e.g., Benedict XVI and his “bishops”). It’s actually the epitome of stupidity. It’s also not to the point because the horror
of the Counter Church is most effectively exposed by analyzing its leaders and
their writings (Benedict XVI, JP2, etc.), rather than the wacko theologians who
are far less significant. In short, the
individual you mention is a seared heretic who unfortunately and amazingly
still regards the Counter Church (with all of its filthy apostasy) to be the
Catholic Church.
Comment
Dear
Brothers,
I
totally understand you and your positions. How exhausting to go as long
as you did with Robert from Wales. You
did a great job defending the true Faith.
Can you help me I am looking for any background on the author Fr. Pierre
Loret a one time author of the book "The Story of the Mass" All
I know is that he died in 1983 and was a French Redemptorist. I can not
find one thing on who he actually was.
I am
trying to refute this book.
Kathleen
Conversation
Subject:
Reference “The Conversation”
You are a wonderful example of "PATIENCE"........ I just listened to
the "conversation" between you and Robert from Wales… By the end of
the first part I was ready to pull my hair out.
May God Bless you and keep you safe…
Jennifer
“Cardinal”
Subject: anti-Cardinal Tauran
Dear MHFM,
You must be kidding? What a masonic
infiltrator to think this trash is actually believed by Roman Catholics who are
wedded to sacred tradition. The sainted popes in Heaven have to be puking their
guts out if they do so there. This is simply outrageous! The end of
the world has to be around the corner, as they say. God Bless MHFM for
that miniscule island of truth left in this twisted, and sick world.
Dea…
|
Counter Church
Hi Brothers,
I didn't know if you saw this yet or
not. More Horror regarding the "Counterfeit Church of
Conciliarism" -
http://edition.presstv.ir/detail/139422.html
If you haven't seen it yet - go to
www.lifeofluisa.com - looks like the false seer of "Divine Will" is
up for Beatification. Her books were put on on the Forbidden Books
list in 1938.
Respectfully,
Kathy Carson
McCarrick
Reverend
Brothers:
The article about McCarrick the heretical "cardinal archbishop
emiritus" of Washington was disgusting. This man must be filled with hate
for he promotes the acceptability of people accepting the Koran, ergo
condemning themselves to hell for eternity.
EJP, M.D., D.D.
MHFM: It’s another good example of
how the Vatican II sect and its hierarchy are a sick joke, and the same is true
of those who obstinately defend such ridiculous apostates. Come on, the guy claims to be a Catholic
bishop while saying that he can’t say “Don’t embrace the Koran” – and all those
who accept Benedict XVI must accept this guy as a Catholic!
Ramadan
Subject: Ramadan
Brothers,
While attempting to find a suitable show to
watch on television, I no sooner started watching the Thursday night football
game, when the announcers started boasting of one of the Minnesota Viking players
religious beliefs. It seemed almost planned ahead of time and the
announcers were waiting for the player to make some sort of great play in the
game. The player has evidently changed his name to reflect his new belief in
the false Islamic faith. The announcers couldn't praise the player enough for
having fasted through Ramadan during the pre-season training, while going
without food and water. Remarking how strong he was both as an athlete and in
his Islamic beliefs. The whole scenario stunk of the Jewish liberal media
thinking to use their "trusted" personalities for appeasing the
muslims over the FL Quran burning and NY Islamic Mosque incidents. This whole
Muslim situation reminds me of the motto, "If you don't stand for
something (truth), you'll fall for anything."
God Bless,
Tom Miles
Gruner
Dear
Brothers:
When
I began to learn the truth about Fatima, I thought that Gruner was simply a
useful idiot. But you were right; the man is an out-and-out deceiver
whose mission is to keep people locked in the false V2 sect while swearing
allegiance to its antipopes.
In
the autumn issue of his "Crusader" magazine, the first article is his
and is entitled "Is the Antichrist Coming Next?" In this
article Gruner states: "So, in this time of the worst apostasy
the Church has ever seen, which is just apparently before the coming of the
Antichrist, when even the elect would be deceived if that were possible, Our
Lord says we must inform ourselves." - something Gruner
is doing everything in his power to prevent.
Gruner
is well aware that the Scriptural prophesy runs thus: The Great Apostasy
opens the door to the Man of Perdition, and this is what precedes the Second
Coming of Christ. There are no predictions of the conversion of Russia or
any other nations to the Catholic Faith during the Apostasy - despite the
insistence of John Salza and the other stars of Gruner Propaganda, Inc.
And
just in case any of his donors are alert to this fact (of no conversions),
Gruner adds what seems to be a somewhat useful and new twist. As a result
of this yet to be made Consecration of Russia, Gruner says: "It would
not be paradise on earth such as Adam and Eve had before they sinned, but if
would be hundreds, if not thousands, of times better than what this world is groaning
under today. The Message of Fatima also says: If you don't obey, if
My requests are NOT granted, then the whole world - every country in the world,
with no exception - would be enslaved; not in a benign slavery, but under the
rule of the Antichrist."
Now
where did that come from? Sounds like another way of saying "send
cash fast" - and of getting people to start wondering which political
leader might be Antichrist.
Another
thing that annoys me is their use of Our Lady of Guadalupe to try to prove that
the conversion of Russia must happen. No doubt, Our Lady assists and
answers prayers but, recall, the Spanish missionaries had been in Mexico for
some years trying to do what Our Lord commanded the Church to do: teach all
nations. There is virtually no effort of (or desire for) Catholic
evangelization in Russia or anywhere else in the world; in
fact, Catholic evangelization is outlawed by the V2 sect.
Furthermore, the Catholic world in the 1600's was not in Apostasy. Many heretics
did leave the Church via Protestanism, but the true popes made it clear that
Protestantism was a revolt against God and that the heretics were out, not
in. There are big differences between the situation that existed at the
start of the Revolt, and now at its culmination.
Funny
how, according to Gruner, a "certain period of peace" has now become
not quite paradise - but almost.
Lee
Ann
“Invincible Ignorance,” Exorcism
Dear MHFM,
I gladly study your material as often as I can.
Recently I came to the topic "baptism of desire". I'd like to shortly
mention a story/saga of an unwilling Frisian who lived around 700 anno domini,
i.e. when Bishop Willibrord and soon later St. Boniface missionized his land.
He was about to receive baptism when he asked what happened to his pagan
ancestors. The missionaries' answer was: All heathen souls went to hell. So
obviously it was no subject of discussion whether those pagans lived a life as
honest and good as they could; as nonchristians they just cannot come to God.
This may be an indicator against the theory of baptism of desire, at least the
version that says people can desire baptism even "unconsciously".
I'm writing this letter because of another topic: exorcism, or rather: the
origin of the fruits of any work. When Christ freed demonically possessed
people, the scribes claimed He did it with the help of Beelzebub and the
highest demon. Christ, however, responded: "How can Satan cast out
Satan?" and "If Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he
cannot stand, but hath an end."
Now, these statements seem to tell that
good deeds always come from a good source. They surely do if considered merely
abstract, but factually the source can be diverse, for instance if heretics do
the exorcisms (I have no doubt that there are competent and "eastern
orthodox" exorcists. Yet sometimes American sectarians show in their
strange modern "religious service shows", in which there are
allegedly blind, crippled, possessed etc. people who get healed by the
"priest" during the show; but to me this always looks like fake) -
can one really say the source was good, even if these exorcists error in
relevant matters of faith? Also there are pagan "exorcists", even
though their "exorcisms" work in a different way (satisfy
"Gods"/ghosts/demons to receive help, otherwise being additionally
cursed by them). The last mentioned issue is what makes me the biggest problem
regarding the aforementioned words of Christ. Can't a stronger demon "cast
out" a weaker one? I always thought yes, he can, and in my understanding
this is why occult practice may "help" people, for example in African
voodoo garbage which is becoming more and more popular in my country. This is
also what a former astrologer and esoteric said who converted to catholicism.
But when reading e.g. Mark 3,23 it really sounds like if everything that
"helps" is good. Which would mean that the satanic voodoo man gets
his power from a good source when he "helps" a person to become free
from a demon. And those who are into esoteric "medicine" would be
right saying "He who heals is right!", to which I used to reply:
"So he who casts out a demon with Satan is right?". Maybe you could tell your opinion on this, I
would appreciate it very much.
Thanks for your time and attention.
All the best
Alexander
MHFM: Thank you for the e-mail.
The story you bring up is another example that “invincible ignorance”
(i.e., the idea that souls can be saved without the essential mysteries of
Catholic faith) is an untraditional, anti-Christian heresy.
With regard to exorcism, your question is discussed in our
two-part discussion of The True Story
Behind the Exorcism of Anneliese Michel.
You will find that on Our You Tube Channel. In it, we discuss how there’s an interesting
two-fold dynamic in exorcism. In one
way, exorcism is effective by the power of the priesthood or by the power of
the name of Christ. In other words, it’s
independent of the faith or the merit of the minister. We learn that in Matthew 7:22 ff., where it
is made clear that people can cast out devils even though Christ never knew
them. This is also demonstrated by the
many heretics who are able to cast out certain demons by the power of the
priesthood or by the name of Christ. In
this way, exorcism can be (but not always is) similar to the principle at work
in the sacraments, ex opere operato
(by the work that has been worked) – in the sense that it can be effective
independently of the merit of the minister.
On the other hand, we also learn from Scripture that with some
demons, the merit and faith of the exorcist are required for exorcism to be
successful. We see that in Matthew
17:18, where Jesus rebukes the Apostles for failing to cast out demons as a
result of their unbelief. In Matthew
17:20 & Mark 9:28, we also see that the dedication and faith of the
exorcist play a role in whether an exorcism is successful.
Hence, it is clear that there is a two-fold dynamic at work in
exorcisms: some of them can be successful simply by virtue of the invocation of
the name of Christ or by the power of the priesthood (probably exorcisms of
weaker demons); but others require faith, good will and devotion on the part of
the exorcist to be successful.
You also say that you thought a stronger demon could cast out a
weaker one. That’s a false idea directly
contradicted by Our Lord (Matthew 12:26).
He condemns the idea that Satan could cast out Satan. It’s an idea one must reject. You also mention the man who practices Voodoo
and tries to cast out demons in that way.
Since he does not utilize the name of Christ or the valid priesthood,
but rather the practices of a non-Christian demonic religion, such an
individual could not truly cast out a demon.
If a wicked heretic using the name of Christ or the priesthood does apparently
cast out a demon, it is not by virtue of his merit, but rather by the name of
Christ and/or the power of the priesthood.
San Francisco
“This world is reaching a new low, and San
Francisco has to be one of the most evil places on Earth:"
Dear MHFM,
This commentary is SO appropriately placed, SO correct, and so
necessary for everyone to see. When people start to think about how laws are
changing in ways which reflect increasing immorality, how brazen thefts go
unpunished, and how accommodations are being made for people with sinful
intentions, a general idea of the end times described by St. Paul can be more
easily formed:
"Know also this, that in the last days shall come dangerous
times. Men shall be lovers of themselves, covetous, ... , ungrateful, wicked,
without affection, without peace, ... , incontinent, unmerciful, without
kindness, stubborn, puffed up, and lovers of pleasures more than of God: ...
these ... resist the truth, men corrupted in mind, reprobate concerning the
faith. ... evil men and seducers shall grow worse and worse: erring, and
driving into error." (2 Timothy 3:1-13)
San Francisco used to be known as a Catholic city.
How sad it is to know that today San Francisco has to be labeled
as "one of the most evil places on Earth." How sad for people who
live in San Francisco to realize this about their city and its leadership. How
sad I feel, having grown up in the San Francisco area, and yet how relieved I
am to have my worst suspicions confirmed by a true Catholic source.
God bless the work of Most Holy Family Monastery.
Sincerely,
TD
Concerned
I am concerned
about the salvation of my family and friends who profess faith in the Post
Vatican II church. They believe
that the Vatican II church is the same Church that they were born into through
Baptism and the sacraments;especially the Eucharist. My question is If they are sincere in their
belief that Vatican II church is guided by the Holy Spirit; and that they
firmly profess the Triune Godhead in the working out of mankind's salvation can
they realize this salvation through the Great Mercy of God Whether they
are deceived or merely obstinate in their blind faith that Vatican II is still
the true Church; they point to the establishment of the Church in scripture
They point out to scripture these arguments:: I know that the scriptures state
that God can neither deceive or be deceived Jesus told Peter that he who
hears you hears Me and He who rejects you rejects me and Him Who sent Me Thou
art Peter and upon this rock I will build my Church and the gates of hell shall
not prevail against it. I realize that
they are shallow in their understanding of scripture This is their fault. They
need to study their Faith as taught through the CATHOLIC CHURCH MAGESTERIUM AND
TRADITION of the ONE, HOLY, CATHOLIC APOSTOLIC CHURCH ON EARTH Then
can we judge that they condemn themselves because of their obtuse spirit to
seek the truth in sincerity and truth PLEASE RESPOND TO THIS CONCERN I know what mhfm monastery teaches but how do
I help them SEE THE TRUTH.
Anthony
MHFM: It’s not clear what your
concern is. From what you have said, it
seems that they obstinately reject the information which demonstrates that
Vatican II was not Catholic, and that the sect which emanated from it is not
the Catholic Church. By rejecting that
information, they demonstrate bad will and place themselves on the path to
damnation. A Catholic cannot consider
them to have the faith or to be true Catholics.
You can present the truth to them, and encourage them to pray the Rosary
for the grace to see the truth, but many people are simply of bad will. There’s nothing that will convince them. That’s why St. Paul tells us to avoid the
heretic after the second rebuke.
Vatican II
Subject: Summary of Vatican II
Dear Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,
I think your comment to Rachel, is an excellent summary in the attempt to
explain the confusion that resulted in the wake of Vatican II, to people who
have not woken up at this late stage of the Great Apostasy
It would not do any harm to copy it out, carry with you, as a ready reference,
hand it out, when the opportunity presents itself for people to do further
research, adding the MHFM link , of course.
God bless,
David
Don’t Understand
My name is Rachel am catholic but i dont
understand you dont believe in the 2nd vatican .. whats going on .. sorry but
this kind of confusing cause i did not know that in our church would be any
kind of separation.
thank you can you explain
God bless you
MHFM: Rachel, we don’t believe in Vatican II because it directly
contradicts defined Catholic dogmas and the teaching of the past popes. It was clearly a false council, predicted in
Catholic prophecy and Scripture, that brought in the Great Apostasy. The men who called it and confirmed it were
manifest heretics. It can be
demonstrated that they were antipopes.
To follow Vatican II is to reject all the past popes and past
councils. In fact, it is to accept
Judaism. See: The Most Specific Heresy in Vatican II. Also, please consult our full section on
Vatican II.
St. Joseph
I
really like the quote from Amos someone wrote in today about "the remnant
of Joseph": wow! That is SO timely! Just today as I
finally had a day off from work I was both reading and listening to the Gospel
of Luke and it is so interesting how Jesus asks about who is the good and
faithful servant who is found feeding his flock when the master returns?
then he talks about Joseph and this reminds me so much of Joseph of the
OT who we of course know prefigures the NT-----and I have been thinking a lot
lately about Saint Joseph and how in a very silent and mysterious and mystical
way he is TODAY feeding Christ's flock, during this Great Apostasy, of how
GOD really truly highlighted Saint Joseph's role when the latter appeared with
the Child Jesus at Fatima…
A
New Video
MHFM: This is a new video:
The
Pakistan Floods and the 9/11 Ground Zero Mosque Controversy [video]
Novus Ordo
Video on ground zero mosque- A good
presentation and a good angle on the inside job discussion. I would add that
it is good that people are waking up a little to find out the abomination that
the Muslim religion is. Assuming that one belives that Muslims did it
line, this is certainly not the first time that they have built a
"victory", "in your face" mosque and it is good becuase of
this controversy, that people are starting to understand how radical the Muslim
faith is to do such a thing.
My NO brother came for a visit with the
family for Labor Day. He is the only member of my family with even a
whiff of good will to listen to the issues, a. Benedict is not the pope, NO
priests arent priests, etc., to have any interest in the Latin Mass. He
came to Mass with me and we had a good talk. I pray that I may convert
him to the true Catholic faith. We got to talking about the rite of
ordination.
I told him the defects with it. He
responded, "Jesus is not a (paraphrasing,) "rule freak").
I told about the DE DEFECTIBUS bull of St. Pius V. I asked him if he said
Mass and used the right words of concentration, would he confect the
sacrament? No, of course not. So words mean things, like the
butchered right of Ordination and these men are nothing more than ministers
with fancy uniforms.
Also, as far as valid Holy COmmunion, of
course, they stand in his NO church and take communion in the hand. I
asked him if he believed in the Real Presence. He said yes. I said
if Jesus appeared to you in a vision, would you stand or kneel? He said
kneel of course. Then I said why would you do anything other than kneel
before Jesus in the Blessed Sacrament? He got it. I hope he gets all of
it.
Heretics
Dear
Brothers,
Greg who wrote in is a hypocrite. He says your website is "hate-filled and
bilious," says to "turn from your sin-filled ways," and then
quotes Matthew chapter 7 which is about not judging (hypocritically). So, if we
cannot judge anything at all, because according to Greg that is to disobey
Jesus, then how does Greg judge that your website is "hate-filled and
bilious" and that you are walking in "sin-filled ways"?!! How
does Greg even determine what sin is, if one cannot judge? How does he even
read the Bible, since that it to judge between the black of the letters and the
white of the spaces in between, as well as judging the meaning of the words and
phrases themselves. And how does Greg judge which websites are good or bad,
according to him?!! Perhaps Greg is unemployed because having a job
requires judging prudently what the best decisions are in relation to one's
field of work. I hope Greg is not starving to death because he can't judge
where his mouth is so as to put the food there. No, in reality, Greg is
"hate-filled and bilious" and walking in "sin-filled ways,"
because he hates the Truth of the Catholic faith, like so many bad-willed liars
out there today. Like so many of your critics, Brothers, he cites not one
single thing that you've written to prove that you're wrong - because he can't,
since you're right. Greg has put his foot in his mouth, and it's probably not
the first time. Perhaps Greg should think about Amos 5:15 and sincerely weep
over his own sins.
Amos 5:15 - Hate evil, and love good, and establish judgment in the gate: it
may be the Lord the God of hosts may have mercy on the remnant of Joseph.
Glenn Dickerson, like Greg, cites no authoritative Church teaching to prove you
are in error. Instead he says "according to the Catechism," etc. I
would be surprised if the Vatican II Catechism even has the words heresy or
heretic in it! Most V-2 "Catholics" don't even know what a heretic
is. From MHFM's Recent Heresies of Benedict XVI section: "A Heretic is a
baptized person who rejects an authoritative teaching of the Roman Catholic
Church." Heretics are not Catholics and Catholics are not heretics - never
have been, never will be.
Second Council of Constantinople, Pope Vigilius - "...we bear in mind what
was promised about the holy church and him who said that the gates of hell will
not prevail against it (by these we understand the death-dealing tongues of
heretics)."
The bad-willed liars and heretics can't quote anything that the Church teaches
authoritatively to refute MHFM, because all of MHFM's teachings are based on
the same infallible teachings of the Catholic Church. In reality, Glenn is not
in communion with the true Catholic Church because he rejects her infallible
teachings, as do the Vatican II sect's Apostate Antipopes, such as Benedict
XVI, as well as her members!...
God Bless,
Chris White
Quake
[A friend from New Zealand wrote in about the recent Earthquake]
Dear
Brother Michael and Peter Dimond,
Thought you might be interested in these pictures of a big 'quake which woke us
up at 4.30a.m… Saturday 4th September, 2010
One of the biggest to hit N.Z. for many many years, and the strongest I have
ever felt....a lot of structural damage in the centre of Christchurch, as
pictures show...no loss of life so far...
We O.K. here, power is back on....no water....but neighbor has a artesian well
next door, so we are alright for drinking water, as the city supply is expected
to be out for a number of days..
We have some structural damage to house, mainly doors jamming and windows out
of alignment; conservatory has moved northward about 3/4 inch!.....
God bless,
David
Interesting
On the
ninth anniversary of the 9/11 World Trade Center terrorist attack hoax,
protestant "Pastor" Terry Jones of Florida will burn Korans, the
blasphemous Holy Books the false, evil religion of Islam. General David
Petraeus has condemned this imminent act, saying it will result in the deaths
of many American troops stationed in Afghanistan (a Jew/ Warmongering Neo con
war we shouldn't be fighting). However, the skunk Petraeus had
nothing to say about the incident when an art museum in NY featured a disgusting,
diabolical "artwork" of our Lord a few years back. No matter
how heinous and despicable the affronts to Christ are in the media and
elsewhere in this country, nobody has a word to say about it. But
when this protestant wants to express his 1st Amendment right to burn the evil
Koran (rather than kiss it like JPJew did), the whole country is up in arms
ready to destroy this man. On Fox News, that light in the loafers heretic
"priest" with his girly voice, "Fr." Jonathan Morris, has
the audacity to say this act "offends" God and is an act of
"sacrilege". Sacrilege?! It is not offensive to God to
burn the blasphemous Koran! Shame on these phonies! How practically
the whole world could be so blind...
-Michael
Rudnicki
MHFM: That’s very interesting that
another Novus Ordo “priest” went on TV to say that burning a Koran is
“sacrilegious.” They are not remotely
Catholic. It’s another clear example of
the apostasy of the Counter Church on the local level, and why the teaching of
Vatican II (which this “priest” has clearly imbibed) cannot represent the
teaching of the Catholic Church. Here’s
a devastating quote to refute the heretical “priest,” Benedict XVI and the
Vatican II sect.
Pope Pius VII, Diu Satis (# 15), May 15, 1800: “Books
which openly oppose the teaching of Christ are to be burned. Even more importantly, the eyes and minds of
all must be kept from books, which do so more steathily and deceitfully… So the
sheep of Christ should consider safe and eat cheerfully the food to which
Peter’s voice and authority directs them; but despite any beauty and charm,
they should shun as harmful and plague-ridden, what this voice forbids
them. Those who do not comply are certainly not to be counted among the sheep
of Christ.”
Actualize
I live in San Antonio Tx. Where might I be
able to go to a church that meets all of the requirements you set forth on your
website? It's really great reading with an impressive array of data presented,
however, if one cannot actualize the information and make a practical
application of it in their own life, the only benefit I see to it can only be
had on a merely intellectual level. While this may be an indespensable start,
it is not enough to bring one all the way to salvation. I imagine, among other
things, one has to come into regular contact with the valid Mysteries of
the True Church. If you know of how this can specifically be done outside your
monastery, please let me know. Moving to New York is not an option at this
time.
I'm Catholic (1975). Never Confirmed.
Thank you
Eric
MHFM: Before receiving the sacraments, one must be in full
agreement on all issues pertaining to the traditional Catholic faith. That includes a firm commitment never to
attend the New Mass again for any reason.
You seem to have the misconception that the faith is defined by, or only
practiced during, attendance at church on Sunday. On the contrary, the faith is lived each
day. Catholics in various periods of
Church history were in situations that precluded them from attending
church. Therefore, one doesn’t always
have to attend church to have his faith “actualized.” Moreover, without the faith whole and
undefiled, attendance at church will not be of any benefit. If you are in agreement on all core issues,
please consult this file and the principles discussed. Where to go to Mass or confession today?.
After that, a person can contact us and we can help him with where to possibly receive
sacraments.
Comment
Re: Our Lady Did Predict a
Sedevacante Period
Our Lady in her appearances to Mother
Marianna in Quito, Eucador in the 16th century (a Church approved
apparition/message) did in fact predict a period in the twentieth century
where the Church would go through a "dark night for lack of a Prelate and
Father....). She mentioned again at LaSalette (again, an approved
apparition) that "Rome will lose the Faith and become the seat of the
antichrist....) How is it possible for John Salza not to be aware of
these messages??
Glenn Dickerson, catechisms are NOT
infallible documents!! They are guidelines only. If you don't
bother to investigate questionable topics and just use the catechism for your
information, then you are guilty of spiritual sloth, which is a most dangerous
sin. How many people are in hell today because they couldn't be bothered
to learn and study their faith!! Papal encyclicals are a better source of
information for people who are interested.
Your video "Do You Believe" is
excellent; please keep putting out these most interesting videos.
God bless,
Brenda Roy
Matthew 7
Greg,
MHFM is dedicated to delivering the truth
of Catholicism as it was once told. You imply that the Dimond brothers are judging.
That is incorrect in that they are explaining "The Church’s"
position, which as you know is infallible. If I had to guess you don't like
judgment at all. If God was so tolerant he wouldn't have created the ten
commandments etc. Since you believe so firmly in Matthew 7v3 you must also
believe in Matthew 7v14 that few are saved which of course means most people go
to hell.
Matthew
Mother Teresa
Dear Bros. I came across this article of
Mother Teresa saying she had asked a rich man in a muslim country to build
another mosque for the people there. This proves beyond a shadow that she is
exactly like you said she was. How very sad for the souls that were lost to
hell under her care!
Sincerely,
Debra Ames
Comment
Yours is by far the most hate-filled,
bilious website I have ever encountered in 15 years of surfing the Web!
Read Matthew 7:1 AND OBEY JESUS, or Matthew
7:2 will surely befall you.
Read Matthew 7:3 - 7:5, take it to
heart, and forsake your sinful ways!
.... Excuse me, I must withdraw and
cry for you now.
Love,
Greg.
According
Dear Most Holy Family Monastery,
According to the Catechism you are not in communion with the Pope and the
Catholic Church.
Regards,
Glenn Dickerson
MHFM: No, according to the teaching of the Church, they are not
true popes and they don’t represent the Catholic Church. They don’t even believe in the concept of a
pope.
St. Francis De
Sales (17th century), Doctor of the Church: "Now when he [the Pope] is explicitly a
heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church..." (The
Catholic Controversy, pp. 305-306)
Process
Dear Most Holy Family Monastery,
Thank you for your efforts. I
particularly appreciate the free book I received recently, which I hope to pass
on to an Anglican friend. I am myself in the process of converting to the
Faith…
Thanks again,
Curtis
Conceived
Subject: Arian Trinity Issue
Dear Brothers,
There is a section in the Bible Proves
booklet that talks about some of the issues the Arian apostates had with the
Church. I believe one had to do with Jesus being an original part of the Holy
Trinity. In the Apostles Creed it says when talking about Jesus says "who
was conceived by the Holy Ghost." Does this mean was conceived as in a
thought or conceived in some way to how Jesus was conceived or
brought about in a Godly way by the Holy Spirit in the Blessed Virgin? God
knowing all was aware that man would sin and have need of a Savior from the
beginning so this would point to the second type of conceived listed above.
Could you give me your thoughts on this?
Your ardent supporter,
Bob
MHFM: It means that when the Son of God assumed human nature and
became man, He was not conceived in the same manner as other men, from the seed
of man; but rather it occurred in a way that surpasses the natural order, that
is, by the Holy Ghost.
John Salza
In
1917 our lady came to fatima to warn the church of the crisis of faith we are now
experiecing she also revealed that the holy father would have much to suffer in
none of her reported communications did she say the pope would lose his office
for heresy just wondering why she didnt and john salza an apolgist and
lawyer had a debate on his website with a sedevacantis it seems he refuted
every thing the other person defended just wonder have you seen his website
thank you a.l.
MHFM: Allow us to address your points. Your objections are without merit.
First, even if Our Lady didn't specifically
warn people about antipopes at Fatima, that wouldn’t preclude the possibility
of a line of antipopes in the Great Apostasy.
Our Lady of La Salette did say that Rome will lose the faith and become
the Seat of the Antichrist.
Second, we don't have all of what Our
Lady said at Fatima because the Third Secret wasn't revealed to the whole
world. However, the information that can be gathered about the real Third
Secret points us directly to the conclusion that it does in fact predict antipopes
and the Vatican II Apostasy. See: The Real Third Secret of Fatima.
Third, John Salza has refuted
nothing. His arguments are false.
They are filled with distortions, errors and perversions of Catholic
principles. On August 23, 2010, we
wrote to John Salza and challenged/invited him to a telephone debate on the
topic. We sent him the e-mail that you will find below, and we
followed it up with a certified letter. He did not respond to either
one. We believe that he is avoiding us because he's afraid to engage us
in such a debate. Considering that John Salza says sedevacantists should
be called “empty heads,” he should have no problem doing such a debate; but
he’s obviously afraid to do it. He
probably realizes that such an encounter would not go well for him, and that
it’s better to continue to promote his false arguments and distortions of
Catholic principles to a captive false traditionalist audience that’s not
really interested in the truth. In a
debate, his arguments would be shown to be false, and of course (like the rest
of his fellow Vatican II heretics) he would have no response whatsoever to the
mountain of heresies in Vatican II and in the writings of the antipopes.
Here’s the e-mail that was sent to
John Salza on August 23, 2010. The same
e-mail was sent to him a few days later by certified letter. It was received and signed for at his address
on Aug. 30, 2010. To this date, we have
received no response to the
e-mail we sent on August 23 or to the letter that followed a few days
later.
Hi John,
My name is Brother Peter Dimond. I'm a member
of Most Holy Family Monastery. You're probably familiar with us or with
some of our material. I was wondering if
you would be interested in a recorded telephone conversation/debate on the
issue of sedevacantism, i.e., whether Benedict XVI is the pope? I realize
that you consider Benedict XVI to be a valid pope, and that you believe
the sedevacantists are quite wrong. I think a conversation on this
matter would be very valuable and interesting for people. Please let me
know if you are interested.
Thanks,
Bro. Peter Dimond
We will have more to say on this topic.
Pervades
Subject:
“Pervades”
Chris
White has commented on his experience with SSPX Holy Cross Seminary rector
Vicente Griego. In his commentary Chris states that it requires humility rather
than theology to be a Catholic.
I ask whether it is at all possible to find many graduates of the SSPX seminary
at Winona (Griego's stable) who have humility? Or for that matter, simple good
manners?
Francis…
MHFM: The first problem is that they
don’t have faith; they don’t believe. In
fact, it’s a mystery that they even bothered to enter any kind of seminary, considering
that they all believe that souls can be saved in any religion.
Beast
Hi, you sent
me a video recently about the end times. European Union as the beast and,
I admit that those are excellent points and so was the mark of the beast which
I thought was definitely a microchip, which still could be but I doubt it now.
… anyways great video brother dimond. It was truly a work of God’s grace and
wisdom and helped me a lot with understanding about these times.
Matthew.
God bless you brothers.
New Video
MHFM: This is a new video:
DO YOU BELIEVE ? [VIDEO]
“Lord’s Supper”
Subject: Pot
Luck
Dear
Brothers:
I
want to mention that I really like the new look of the website. Thank you
for that update and for all of your recent videos. In addition, I
appreciate the emails sent to you by your readers; they are very
informative. I have recently been
reviewing the "Discovered the Exodus" video which you offer and have
been thinking much about the true worship and sacrifices ordered by God, all of
which prefigured Christ and the Holy Mass. Only a liar could deny
it. I've also spent some time with
Chapter 11 of First Corinthians and the accompanying footnotes (Haydock Bible). Chapter
11 really drives home the horror of the false worship of
Protestantism and of the V-2 sect, both of which have been referred to as
"the Lord's Supper". Chapter 11 is also a great
example of how heretics wrest St. Paul's writing (and also the other
Scriptures) to their own perdition -- just as St. Peter warned.
When
many Catholics hear the term "Lord's Supper" their minds
automatically turn to the "Last Supper" and its significance.
It was at that particular Passover supper (or strictly speaking, immediately
after it) that Our Lord instituted the Priesthood and the Mass. The term "Lord's Supper" apparently
confuses a lot of people (especially V2'ers) but they would not be
confused if they were willing to hear the Church. In Chapter 11 of Paul's
letter, St. Paul is quickly referring to (rather than treating in-depth) a
problem which apparently was becoming serious and which he intended to
fix when he would visit the Corinthians in person. Two entirely
separate events were going on at the ancient church of Corinth: the
celebration of the Eucharist and the practice of what appears to have been, in
modern terminology, the custom of pot luck suppers.
Now,
having heard about the abuses, St. Paul apparently didn't like what was going
on and asks: don't you have homes in which to eat? St. Paul
was always cautious not to scare off new converts who were not fully formed in
the Faith. So he didn't condemn the practice outright since these pot
luck suppers or Agape were not sinful in themselves (at the time), and were
ostensibly done in imitation of the meal Christ had shared with the Apostles prior
to His implementation of the Mass and Priesthood. These dinners
(around which abuses were creeping in) were "extracurricular" -- that
is, they were not part of the celebration of the Divine
Mysteries. And St. Paul is clearly trying to refocus the
Corinthians' attention on what was truly important: the celebration
of the Divine Mysteries and the proper disposition for receiving the
Eucharist.
If a
person were to read Chapter 11 without the direction of the Church, it would be
very confusing and dangerous (just as St. Peter notes). But listen
to what the representatives of the true Church have pointed out to us (as
found in the Haydock footnotes):
*
The charity feasts [pot luck suppers] were called Agape and were practiced in
some places in the infant Church as a token of peoples' friendship and
union. These suppers took place prior to the celebration of the Holy
Mysteries.
*
It is the common belief (although St. Augustine thought otherwise) that when
Paul used the term "Lord's Supper" he was referring to these charity
feasts or pot luck suppers. St. Paul "reprehends the abuses of the
Corinthians on these occasions: which were the more criminal because these
feasts were accompanied by the Eucharist sacrifice and sacrament".
*
In Chapter 11:23 etc., Paul reminds the Corinthians of the true Divine
Mysteries. He repeats the words of Consecration verbatim - as Our Lord
had spoken them 24 years earlier - fully and clearly expressing a true and real
presence of Christ's Body in the Eucharist - without one word to signify that
this was to be taken in a metaphysical or figurative sense as the Protestants
would later claim.
*
The Sacrament of the Lord's Body and Blood had been called the Eucharist even
from the first ages of the Christian religion, as evident from the epistle of
St. Ignatius, St. Irenaeus and Tertullian. "The late pretended
reformers found it called by this name in the Catholic Church. Why
then do they who pretend to nothing but Scripture, affect to give it the
name The Lord's Supper when these words in Scripture signify a different
supper?"
*
"We find these Agape forbidden to be made in the Churches, in the 28th
canon of the Council of Laodicea, a little before the General Council of
Nice."
In
the Novus Ordo sect, one of their favorite words is "Agape", the
meaning of which nobody really seems to know. However, for
them it does seem to connote something where a good time can be had
by all - except for those who have a problem with heresy and irreverence
with what they believe is supposed to be the Mass. And V-2
"churches" teach ad nauseum about V-2's alleged return to the pure
and unadulterated practices of the early Church - which no doubt was the
same line used to lure (or at least assuage the consciences of) the first
Protestants. What a sham.
"The
Lord's Supper" is not only not worship (and was never the
worship of Christians), it isn't even a true commemoration of the real
Last Supper - because it has been shorn of its true
significance. "The Lord's Supper" seems, rather, to be a parody
of the true Last Supper.
And
a commemoration of the Church-outlawed pot luck suppers! Little wonder
why at these V2 ceremonies people behave like they
are worshipping the golden calf. They are!
Many
thanks to you for always keeping the Light before our eyes in the wilderness of
these last days.
Lee
Ann
Women “priests”
I have two questions:
1. What is all the written proof that the Roman Catholic Church cannot have
married priests?
2. What is all the written proof that the Roman Catholic Church cannot have
female priests?
Thank You,
Dick Gray
MHFM: 1. The Church doesn’t absolutely forbid married priests. Celibacy is the discipline in the Roman Rite,
and it’s rooted in Christ’s teaching that celibacy is superior to
marriage. However, the Church has
allowed married men to be ordained in the Eastern Rites.
2. Sacred Scripture makes
it quite clear that women are excluded from such ministry (1 Tim. 2:12; 1 Cor.
14:34). Jesus also instituted His
priesthood in His Apostles and He did not include women. Moreover, priests act in the person of
Christ. Women are thus excluded from
acting in that capacity. The fathers of
the Church also condemned the concept.
The idea was so foreign to the traditional Christian faith that it
didn’t have to be elaborately or repeatedly condemned. Nevertheless, when the practice of altar
girls cropped up in certain places, numerous popes specifically condemned
it. By extension, the condemnation
constituted a condemnation of the idea of women “priests.”
Pope Benedict XIV, Allatae Sunt, July 26, 1755: “Pope
Gelasius in his ninth letter to the bishops of Lucania condemned the evil
practice which had been introduced of women serving the priest at the
celebration of Mass. Since this abuse had spread to the
Greeks, Innocent IV strictly forbade it
in his letter to the bishop of Tusculum: ‘Women should not dare to serve at
the altar; they should be altogether refused this ministry.’ We
too have forbidden this practice in the same words in Our oft-repeated
constitution...”
Mass
Dear Bro. Peter & Michael Dimond
Hi, I just want to ask if I need to learn Latin in order attend the Latin mass?
I recently downloaded a video of the Latin mass and I can't understand a thing
they are saying I can only understand our own language and english. I am a
Catholic from the Philippines and I don't attend the new mass now, sadly there
are no traditional masses here, so just in case I will have an opportunity to
attend traditional mass somewhere I know what to expect. And one more thing, do
I need to confess before receiving the Eucharist? Thank you for your time and
God bless.
Sincerely,
Glenn
MHFM: If a person is in mortal sin, it is necessary for him or
her to confess before receiving the Eucharist.
Also, one doesn’t need to know Latin in order to attend the Latin
Mass. Moreover, since basically all the
priests in our day are heretical, if one finds an option for receiving the
Eucharist, one wouldn’t be going to attend Mass but only to receive the
sacraments. That’s explained in our file
on Where to go to Mass.
Comment
Dear Brothers,
What can I say but EXCELLENT video on Pakistan
and 911 Mosque! I thought about that too, that Pakistan is all Muslim and it
was no surprise to me that the floods happened. Sad that so many souls are
lost, but people will not listen to the truth, how evil Islam really is and
their history of trying to destroy Christan as in Fez Moracco, Or how Our
Lady helped the Christians at the Battle of Lepanto! And I do believe
that they are making the Mosque on NYC a 'distraction' from the truth that they
are hiding, as you stated in the video (and the video about Kurt Sonnenfeld the
FEMA cameraman saying 911 was an inside job). Also not allowing the Greek
Orthodox church to just REBUILD their church on the site where it was destroyed
is most suspicious. Also, on the front page of Aug 31 Wall Street Journal
was a story about how Col Gadhafi is converting Italian women to muslims!
God bless you!
June
Malachias
Dear Brothers Dimond,
Thank you again for the important work you
are doing... crying out the truth in the wilderness! I pray for you both every
night when I say my rosary which is doing amazing things in my life... one of
which was to be led to your website which has explained everything I have gone
through with the Norvus Ordo church in the last 5 years.
I have taken to reading scripture... and
this morning reading was Malachi 1 and it jumped off the page:
"A son honors his father, and a
servant his master. If I am a father, where is the honor due me? If I am a
master, where is the respect due me?" says the LORD Almighty. "It is
you, O priests, who show contempt for my
name. ... 7 "You place defiled food on my
altar.
11 My name will be great among the nations,
from the rising to the setting of the sun. In every place incense and pure
offerings will be brought to my name, because my name will be great among the
nations," says the LORD Almighty.
12 "But you profane it by saying
of the Lord's table, 'It is defiled,' and of its food, 'It is contemptible.' 13
And you say, 'What a burden!' and you sniff at it contemptuously," says the
LORD Almighty.
Yes! Not only relevant to the day of
Malachi but to our counterfeit Catholic Mass as well!
Keep up the great work!
Colleen Urban
Found
Subject: Rosary and Mass
Good afternoon Brother,
First i would like to say thank you for your
great site.
I am catholic and i used to go to the v2 church until i found your video about
the invalid new mass. It aroused my curiosity and i went to your web site to
read all your material. Thank you for you helped me a lot. There are only V2
"mass" where i live (the Netherlands) and as i do not want to
go there any more i would like you to tell me what to do on Sunday.
Also as you suggested, I try to pray the full rosary every days at three
different times following your guide. My question is, should i pray the creed,
our father and the three hail Mary before I start a new set of mysteries?
… thank you very much brother.
God Bless you.
Philip
MHFM: We’re really glad to hear about
your interest. This section covers those
questions about receiving sacraments: Where to go to Mass or confession today? [link to section].
With regard to the Rosary, one does not need to pray the Creed and the
three Hail Marys before each new set of mysteries, if one is praying all 15 or
more than one set of mysteries in a day.
B-16
Subject: B-16 + Gay “Marriage”
Brothers, did you see the news?
AntiPope B16 just granted the highest order
a layman can receive in the Church to the President of Portugal, even though
this devil just allowed gay "marriage" in his once blessed
country.
I don´t know if this is suitable material
for a Heresy of the Week, because it´s more of moral scandal than a Faith
issue. But nevertheless, like so many scandals, it´s connected to the bad faith
the V2 sect professes, if one can connect the dots. Just like when Ratzinger
gave (novus ordo) "communion" to Protestants, Abortists and his sect
commemorated Ted Kennedy.
After this incident, you can safely and
reasonably state that the V2 not only is pro-abortion (since it allows its
members to held this position), but also pro-gay civil unions, since one can
legalize gay "marriage" and yet receive the highest commendations.
That´s actually the second time they praise a pro-gay politician, since the
U.S. Senator Kennedy was also in favor of this aberration.
It will be really funny (if not tragic) to
see the Portuguese President being celebrated both by the Novus Ordo Sect and another
gay group, the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence (who mock the Catholic Faith).
They often "canonize" persons who in the public sphere fight for gay
rights, or politicians who pass on laws giving them additional rights or
protections.
CK
Not sure
I’m a new Catholic, Did Catholicism last
year. I thought I was in a God fearing Church but from what your books say I’m
now not so sure. If the Church is wrong
how do we make it right? I’m working on getting my health up so I can go to the
Philippines and help. I’m retired Army and on disability. The Leadership of the Church makes those
calls so how do I as a member know if I’m right or wrong...
Dan Martin
MHFM: The local churches which have the “Mass” in English are
not authentically Catholic. Please
consult the material and you will find the proof that the Vatican II “Church,”
which most people think is the Catholic Church, is not the real Catholic
Church. Please look at the information
which explains why one must avoid the invalid New Mass. The Catholic Church is not wrong. The people you think are representatives of
the Catholic Church are in fact not even Catholic. You need to consider what the Church has
taught throughout history, and that’s what our material covers.
Ramadan
Dear Brothers,
For Antichrist
Antipope Benedict XVI to say that God will reward Muslims for their Ramadan
fasting is beyond outrageous. Unless a person is water baptized, has the full
Catholic faith, and is in the state of grace, then their sacrifices are
extremely offensive to God:
Proverbs 21:27 -
“The sacrifices of the wicked are abominable, because they are offered of
wickedness.”
The Vatican II
sect and its 5 Antipopes have literally made a meal of (destroyed) the notion
of acceptable sacrifices to God by installing the invalid New Mass, where Jesus
Christ's Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity has never been present and never will
be because, a) they're ususally not even a validly ordained priest doing the
“ceremony” to begin with, and b) the words of consecration have been changed so
as to render the entire “sacrament” invalid, i.e. the “sacrament” no longer
signifies what it effects – the union of the Catholic faithful with Christ. The
New Mass is a Protestant meal, not the Holy Eucharist! Yet the V-2 Antipopes
always go completely out of their way to show honor, respect, devotion,
veneration and worship for any Non-Catholic religion and the sacrifices they
make. The importance of making acceptable sacrifices to God is made crystal
clear at Genesis 4:3-5:
Genesis 4:3-5 -
“And it came to pass after many days, that Cain offered, of the fruits of the
earth, gifts to the Lord. Abel also offered of the firstlings of his flock, and
of their fat: and the Lord had respect
to Abel, and to his offerings. But to Cain and his offerings he had no respect:
and Cain was exceedingly angry, and his countenance fell.”
A Catholic never
respects Non-Catholic sacrifices, such as Muslim fasting during Ramadan.
Muslims fast in order to destroy all non-Islamic religions and their adherents,
such as the Catholic Church! Muslims fast for their Jihad, or “holy-war”
against all non-Muslims!! Muslims are like Cain who, as a result of his anger,
killed his brother - the first murder of the human race. Antipope Benedict XVI
(and the other 4 Antipopes), the Vatican II sect, and anyone else who
obstinately respects or follows them are murderers of Jesus Christ and of the
Mystical Body of Christ, the true Catholic Church. By the Vatican II sect's
apostasies with Islam, Judaism, Buddhism, Hinduism, Protestantism, schismatics,
etc. they commit murder in their hearts and minds!! Benedict XVI's latest
praise of Muslims with their Ramadan fasting is the latest case in point. Islam
blasphemes God, the Holy Trinity. Islam kills God's Son, Jesus Christ, by their
rejection of Him. Islam constantly seeks the destruction of the only true
Church of Christ, the Holy Roman Catholic Church. Benedict XVI kills anew all
the Holy Catholic martyrs that Muslims have put to death over the centuries:
Apocalypse 6:9,
10 - “And when he had opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of
them that were slain for the word of God, and for the testimony which they
held. And they cried with a loud voice, saying: How long, O Lord (holy and
true) dost thou not judge and revenge our blood on them that dwell on the
earth?”
The Vatican II
sect (Whore of Babylon) and its Antipopes (Beast) are completely drunk on the
blood of the martyrs of Jesus, and of the saints of Jesus:
Apocalypse 17:6 -
“And I saw the woman drunk with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of
the martyrs of Jesus.”…
God Bless,
Chris White
Videos
Dear Br. Dimond:
I must also sing the praises of
"Incredible Creatures", and I wonder how many people realize that Darwin
himself admitted that the evidence for evolution simply doesn't exist.
Most, if not all mutations are detrimental
to the survival of the individual, and that fact alone would make
evolution impossible. It's sad that people would rather believe a fairy
tale than the truth.
Another set of videos that we bought some
years ago (produced by Questar) is "Wonders of God's Creation" and
this series of videos describes not only the animal kingdom, but other things
as well, such as storms, heavenly bodies (outer space) and I think it is a good
supplement to any homeschool science program.
God bless you always,
Brenda Roy
Creatures
Subject: Incredible Creatures
Greetings Brothers!
I too would like to add a comment to the video series Incredible Creatures that
Defy Evolution.
I watched two of three so far and it’s tremendous. There is quite a lot I would
have never thought these animals were capable of. If I'm not mistaken, the
series is great in explaining that all these great unique features could not
have simply evolved because it would all have to have evolved at
once. Basically the animal would have to have been like this, like today, from
the beginning. If some of these features from the beginning began to evolve,
they would serve no purpose until they evolved to their present state.
A lot of it is dependent on other features of the animals uniqueness. So
if you had one of these parts evolve without the other one(s), it would be
useless and the animal wouldn't be able to perform what it needs and requires
to survive. And some of these animals are born with this knowledge, with these
features that they need right from the start to survive. If they did not have
these features from the beginning they could not survive. That means an animal
like this could never evolve. I'm not the best at explaining it but I recommend
that people get it. I enjoy watching videos on evolution and creationism
and this series certainly satisfies me.
Part one of the series begins with the professors explanation of evolution. In
a sense it's quite humorous. The professor openly states that our school
text books still contain a lot of the evolutionary lies that have been proven
of being false, yet they're still in the text books.
I also wanna say thank you for all the free stuff that you always send me with
my orders. It is very gracious of you and I thank you.
God Bless you!
Danijel Filipovic
Comment
Greetings!
I just wanted to compliment you on your website! SUPER FANTASTIC!...
Thank you so very much for the hard work
you do. It is really helping me in these dark times.
God Bless
mark thimesch
Vatican-Moscow
Good
morning,
In your most humble opinion, how much has the Vatican Moscow Treaty hurt the
voice of the church and how much does this treaty interfere with her
teaching?
Mrs. A
MHFM: It was something that had significance back at the time of
Vatican II. However, at this time, it’s
not really relevant when compared to the widespread acceptance of false
ecumenism, indifferentism, salvation outside the Church, and other
heresies. The heretical teaching of
Vatican II (and the Vatican II antipopes) is what directs the heretical voice
of the Counter Church.
New
conversation posted
MHFM: This is a new conversation with Robert from Wales.
He called in to attack our beliefs and defend Antipope Benedict XVI and Vatican
II.
Conversation
with Vatican II supporter from Wales - 1/3
Conversation
with Vatican II supporter from Wales - 2/3
Conversation
with Vatican II supporter from Wales - 3/3
Altar
Subject: “Beatification Altar”
Dear brothers:
The vatican just finished posting pictures
of the "altar" where Cardinal John Henry Newman will be
"beatified."
http://www.thepapalvisit.org.uk/News-and-Media/Latest-News/Images-of-the-Beatification-Altar
Is there anything about this weird
"sanctuary" (other than the crucifix) that looks even remotely
Catholic?
-RDS
Incredible
Subject:
Incredible Creatures that Defy Evolution
Awesome
videos!!! I finished part two of three and I found the part where they
talk about the incredible engineering it took to design a fighter jet and the
things that it can do in flight but when it comes to the evolutionist the birds
evolved, I find that simply astounding…
Todd
Beck
Glenn Beck stands on the platform at the
"Restore Honor Rally" in Washington DC, with some leaders of all
religions. With Imam's and Rabbi's and a priest...and Protestant
ministers....just as did John Paul II...at Assisi....
Nothing but lies...deceit and
trickery....just wondering what your take on Mr. Beck is?
Sincerely
CD
EU
… I have re-watched your video End of
the World. And in that you show the paper from Pravda Russia Nov 3, 2009
(I think) where they say that the EU is Another form of communism. I have
tried to look it up on the Pravda website but cannot find it. I would
like to send it to everyone because I believe it is important that people know
how evil the EU is. So you have a link to this? Thank you and God bless
you for all of your good work.
June
MHFM: Thanks for the interest. This is one of a number of links one could
consult: http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/4157
Feel
I feel the same way Brenda Roy feels
regarding the conversation between brother peter and robert or anyone else like
him for that fact, forget all the torture techniques that one could apply to a
human being, just lock a true catholic in a room with a person like Robert and
make the catholic person debate this obstinate lunatic for a short period of
time, it will drive you crazy. It’s like watching someone try to put a
square block in a round hole and he just doesn't see that it won't
work.
Todd
Comment
Dear Brothers:
Thank you for sending the new
4-in-1 DVD with "Is the World About to End?" and the book, "The
Bible Proves the Teaching of the Catholic Church." So very generous of you to send them to me,
and they arrived on the feast of St. Monica!
Bro. Peter's book is well written and very easy to understand. The sequence of logic he uses is superb. I have been unable to correspond for several
weeks, though I have been reading the Website, and I am so glad to see you've
been doing your usual marvelous work. I
am thinking especially of Joseph Ramirez, a man who has admirably lived up to
the responsibility of bearing the name "Joseph," by confronting the
dangerous and spiteful Bp. Williamson.
I would ask Mr. Mulligan if the person he is corresponding with is truly
Bp. Williamson and not one of his lackeys or factotums. If Williamson has forgotten, then he needs to
be reminded: "The floor of hell is paved with the skulls of
bishops." —St. Athanasius
It is wonderful to hear Bro.
Michael again in his new video discussing the latest heresies of the masonic
usurper of St. Peter's Chair. When B16
writes, "In these days when we remember the return to the *Father* of dear
Brother Roger," people assume B16 is referring to our Father in
Heaven. We must not be fooled by this
verbal manipulation. If Ratzie meant
God, then he should have used the proper designation: GOD. But he did not. There is another father, the father of
lies. So what B16 actually wrote is:
"In these days when we remember the return to Lucifer of dear Brother
Roger..." And for these people,
there is great joy in that. They cannot
wait to join lucifer! They adore
satan and serve him. Really, these
masons are becoming so obvious.
Thanks to Bro. Peter for the
discussion with Robert from "Wales".
Bob's arguments were so absurd that I did laugh out loud; the way Bob
changed topics constantly was comical.
Of course, being invincibly ignorant, Bob jumped right into the
invincible ignorance song-and-dance yet again!
Robert must be pals with Mr. Windy from the Archdiocese of Chicago.
This quote from the invincibly
ignorant Robert found on Audio 3 at 05:51 is typical of his babble: "Well,
I believe in Heaven everyone is a Catholic, wherever they were in this
life. So if someone has got to Heaven
under invincible ignorance, they will be Catholic in Heaven. So Heaven, in that sense, is full of all
Catholics!" Robert continued to
chatter and natter on nonstop like a pot full of bubble-and-squeak while Bro.
Peter tried to speak! As it turns out,
Robert's rudeness is actually the least of his problems.
It is obvious Bob is
spiritually lost. But he also physically lost. Literally.
He does not know where on earth he is located. When he said, "It's getting late here in
Great Britain," he gave himself away.
Fie-fi-fo-fum. I have been
friends with actual Welshmen born and bred.
From Cardiff. No true Welshman
says, "Here in Great Britain."
Great Britain? Only an Englishman
says that. "Jolly good, old
chap!" In any case, Bobby's accent is decidedly Brit; he sounds like
he just left a meeting with Queen Lizzie Rothschild at BP:
Buckingham Palace, of course. (Bet you thought I meant BP as in British
Petroleum. Why, what a peculiar
coincidence! How odd.)
Bob a Cymry? Doubtful.
The only connection Bob has to Wales is that he tells lies the size of a
school of whales.
Robert cares not one whit,
not a farthing, not one pence for the ultimate destination of his
soul. Mired in the bog of Novus Ordo
muck, what remains of his brains numbed by the fluoride of Vatican2,
missing his beloved JP2, and living in the land of QE2, there is no room for
logic in poor Bob's head. It is
sad to listen to someone like Robert.
Though he does not sound it—because he uses a soft, somewhat quivering,
and sibilant voice—Bob is actually terribly arrogant. As he proved when he said, a tad peckishly,
to Bro. Peter, "I don't like your tone of voice."
Robert needs to understand that
if he continues on this path, he will neither be allowed to meet nor stand
beside the Recusants in eternity for he has thrown his lot on the side of that
stinking Cromwell and fat Henry…
God bless you always,
Deidre Howard
DVDs
Dear Br. Peter and Michael,
A heartfelt thank you for all you have done and continue to do for souls…. Have
you done any research on any of the apparitions of Our Blessed Mother, other
than Fatima, i.e. La Sallete, Lourdes, Garabandal... We just finished watching
the video on the "end of the world" and enjoyed the format (no music)
Sometimes it is hard to hear the message with the background music, something
to consider if you re-do any of the DVD's/CD's, especially for us "older
folks" Our heads are full, our hearts sad, but we persevere knowing that
the Church established by Jesus Christ will prevail, even if it is only a
remnant!
You remain in our prayers.
In His Will,
Jim & Linda
Williamson
… Bp. Williamson is indeed a most
intelligent but foolish man to deny EENS. Instead, he analyzes the dogma,
which he no doubt was forced or influenced to do by the blind, foolish evil
organization, the SSPX. He does not have the faith of a child.
Children will blindly believe anything their parents tells them, and not
try to analyze it. The dogma of EENS is supposed to be accepted and not
in the slightest way questioned or analyzed to render it meaningless.
That could be done to make any dogma worthless, but it cannot be done, for it
is heretical. If a child is told uncompromisingly the truth from age 5 on
up, the simple sentence: "All non-Catholics go to Hell.", they will
never question it. It's just that simple. A short sentence that
Williamson should have been taught without compromise, the immutable truth: All
non-Catholics go to Hell. It can be more thoroughly explained to Catholic
youth by their parents as they get a little older, such as dying a
Catholic with no unconfessed mortal sins is the only way to ever hope to go to
Heaven and a more thorough explanation of the Latin "Extra Ecclesiam nulla
salus" (Such as it contradicts infallible bulls to say that it is possible
for a man to be saved if he is not a member of the physical Church on Earth.)
It could have saved the hell-bound fool, Williamson… But his faith just isn't
strong enough to accept something so simple as what all toddlers should be
told: "All non-Catholics go to Hell." And there is no
"however" or "but" at the end of that sentence.
-Michael Rudnicki
Gruner
Fr. Gruner… has an article about the 3rd
Secret of Fatima in which it is declared that the secret revealed on June 26,
2000 was a perfidious hoax. Yet it was revealed by the Vatican with under
Pope JP II. Well, how could any Pope et al in good standing deliver a perfidious
hoax upon the entire world? Why does Fr. Gruner still deny the whole
sedavaticanism or whatever it's called?
Perhaps I'm overly simplistic, but if someone lies to my face I don't
trust him anymore, and I'm sure not going to send him any money. It was
either the real message or it wasn't. If it isn't, then whatever is
sitting is the vatican is a dreadful liar.
Karl
MHFM: Gruner is, one must say, a most wicked heretic and a false
prophet. His soul is far darker than
most people could ever imagine. He spent
his life misleading those who consider themselves conservative Catholics with
dishonest defenses of the Vatican II sect and a promotion of the most wicked
heretics in the world (JP2, etc.). He
led them right back to the Vatican II Counter Church and its Antichrist leaders
whom Our Lady wanted them to reject. He
still frequently quotes Antipope John Paul II in a positive light! The fact that anyone would even consider
supporting such a despicable phony heretic, once that person is familiar with
the facts about what’s happening, reveals the profound spiritual fog in which
people remain. He’s a complete heretic
headed for Hell and he’s leading others there as well. The notion of “two third secrets” or two
texts of the third secret was all part of their compromised position to not
accept the official version but at the
same time not really condemn it.
It’s a microcosm of their larger compromise on the Vatican II sect.
Gruner,
"Fr." Nicholas – Why would you say that he is a schismatic?
Heretic, Baptism
Brothers,
Bro.
Peter's debate with Robert!!! from Wales brought a question to my mind. I
thought I was familiar with all the materials MHFM has put forth regarding the Church's
teaching on baptism. But Bro. Peter was asked if a non-Catholic was baptised,
is he a Christian and Bro. Peter said "no." I think I know the proper
context of what Bro. Peter meant, but I was hoping you could expound on this
point in greater detail, mainly so I do not fall into error.
Regarding
the "heavy-metal monk," I thought this guy was retiring, at least
according to the last article posted on your website? Did the Vatican cut his
retirement benefits or did the "monk's demons miss the music?
God
bless you all there,
Howard
MHFM:
A heretic who is validly baptized does not become a member of the
Church. This also touches upon a finer
theological point. The Church teaches
that a heretic can be validly baptized if he is baptized with water in the name
of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost. But if
a person is baptized as a heretic – for instance, if he rejects the dogma
Outside the Church There is No Salvation – then his baptism, though valid,
would confer no grace and would not unite him with the Church. His heresy is an impediment to his reception
of the grace of baptism. He receives the
character or the mark of baptism validly, but he does not receive the grace of
baptism. He doesn’t have his sins
remitted and he is not justified, since he is outside the church. Outside the Church there is no remission of
sins.
Pope
Boniface VIII, Unam Sanctam, Nov. 18, 1302, ex cathedra:
“With
Faith urging us we are forced to believe and to hold the one, holy, Catholic
Church and that, apostolic, and we firmly believe and simply confess this
Church outside of which there is no
salvation nor remission of sin… Furthermore, we declare, say, define,
and proclaim to every human creature that they by absolute necessity for
salvation are entirely subject to the Roman Pontiff.
This
is the express teaching of Pope St. Gregory the Great.
Pope
St. Gregory the Great, Quia charitati,
June 22, 601: “From the ancient institution of the Fathers we have learned that
those who are baptized in the name of the Trinity, although amid heresy,
whenever they return to holy Church, may be recalled to the bosom of their
mother the Church either with the anointing of chrism, or the imposition of
hands, or with a profession of faith alone…because the holy baptism, which they received among the heretics, at that time
restores the power of cleansing in them when they have been united to the holy
faith and the heart of the universal Church.” (Denz. 249)
Here
we see Pope Gregory the Great explaining that those baptized as heretics are
not cleansed, i.e., their sins are not remitted. They are not cleansed by the baptism they
received among the heretics until they remove the heresy and are united to the
true faith. The baptism they received is
valid; they don’t need to be rebaptized, but it’s not efficacious for them
until they remove the heresy. At that
point, they become justified by the power of the baptism they already
received. We also see this principle
illustrated in Sess. 7 of the Council of Trent on the Sacraments in General:
Pope
Paul III, Council of Trent, Sess. 7
on the Sacraments in General, Can. 6.: “If
anyone shall say that the sacraments of the New Law do not contain the grace
which they signify, or that they do not confer that grace on those who do
not place an obstacle in the way, as though they were only outward
signs of grace and justice… let him be anathema.” (Denz. 849)
Here
we see that the sacraments do not confer the grace which they signify on those
who place an obstacle in the way, such as heresy. The above is also the teaching of Doctors of
the Church. This teaching does not
contradict any of the other definitions of Trent, of course, such as Sess. 5 on
Original Sin:
Pope Paul III, Council of Trent, Session 5:
"If anyone denies that by the grace
of our Lord Jesus Christ, which is conferred in baptism, the guilt of original
sin is remitted, or even asserts that the whole of that which has the
true and proper nature of sin is not taken away, but says that it is
only touched in person or is not imputed, let him be anathema."
(Denz. 792)
Notice
that this anathematizes anyone who says that original sin is not remitted “by the grace” conferred in
baptism. Whenever grace is conferred in
baptism, original sin is infallibly remitted, as in the cases of the baptism of
infants and others who don’t place an obstacle in the way. However, in the case described above (i.e.,
the baptism of a heretic) no grace is conferred at all. As a result, original sin is not
remitted. Hence, we can see that the
clause “by the grace” is very important.
It’s an example of the infallibility of dogmatic definitions and the
protection the Holy Ghost gives to the teaching of the Church.
Empty Solutions
As I saw the Glenn Beck "take back
America" rally this past Saturday, I couldn't help but think how SAD that
there were about 100,000 people at this rally (and although Beck is a Mormon
and it seemed that the rally was more of a 'protestant ' rally). Wouldn't
it have been better to have those 100,000 people saying the ROSARY and REALLY
praying for a solution to this problem, to the one person Our Lady, who could
help us, just has she helped at the Battle of Lepanto! People just do
not understand the trouble we are really in, and are always reaching for
'empty' solutions, that will not help.
Hum…
MHFM: Yes, and while he says some
true things, he’s very ecumenical and totally pro-Israel. Getting his view on Israel is like listening
to an Israeli cabinet member. He realizes
who’s in charge and the line he must take on that issue to remain in the
mainstream.
Truth
Subject: Robert from Wales
Dear Brothers,
Robert is just another person among all the
billions of souls since the time of Our Lord that are not willing to live
up to something that the Church teaches. The rejection of truth always
comes down to the fact that there is something that the man or woman does not
want to accept or is not willing to submit their will to. Because
such a person cannot either give up something sinful or does not want to
think that someone they love within their family or friends may be lost
to Hell forever, they will go anywhere to avoid the truth of it all.
Robert and all the others who reject truth, will talk
endlessly without meaning... they will go anywhere to keep the race
of running from truth going...so they don't have to really do anything or
change anything… It is only bad will and ego that will ramble on as Robert
does, going nowhere and making no sense whatsoever. Anything to keep the
illusion alive that everything is ok. So very sad.
CD
Videos
Subject: Is the World about to End?
Thank you for all of your work and effort
in putting these videos together. I feel like I have learned a lot with a fresh
new perspective on the book of revelation. Like other Christians wanting
further understanding of the book of Revelation/Apocalypse, I have heard a few
different explanations of the beast, trumpet judgements etc and yours seemed to
make a lot of sense. Anyway, I believe your work should not go unrecognized and
you should know you're not unappreciated. God bless.
Rigotto
MHFM: Thanks for the interest.
We hope you look into the material we have which demonstrates that the
Catholic Church alone is Christ’s true Church; for it’s necessary for salvation
to be a part of the one Church He established.
Search
Brother Peter Dimond, I am writing to you
in my search for Truth.
God has been calling me to Him over the past 5 years (all my life actually, but
significantly in these past five years). He has called me out of the world, and
into holiness. However, although the call is strong, I am still not entirely
sure to what place in Christianity He is calling me too.
I am currently fellowshipping with three Protestant churches of different
denominations and I am working closely beside Anglicans, Presbyterians, and
Catholics at a local Drop-in Centre.
I am in search of the One True Catholic Church, but I can not find Her!
I would appreciate any and all information you can give me.
And although I have NO INTENTION to settle for lukewarm mediocre Christianity,
I would appreciate if you could share with me, what is the FOUNDATIONS of the
Catholic Faith? That is to say, what is the absolute minimum required to
receive Salvation, according to the Catholic Faith? Again I do NOT INTEND TO
SETTLE at this level, God is calling me to holiness, and demanding 100% of
myself to Him. But I would like to know what is the basic fundamental beliefs
needed to be part of the One True Catholic Church.
May the Blessed God and Father of Our Lord Jesus Christ Bless you and Keep you
and yours!
…Manasseh
MHFM: You will find the information about the true Catholic
faith, and how one would convert to it, on our website and in the materials we
have available. You must get out of
Protestantism or any affiliation with similar denominations. There's only one true Church, and that's the
Catholic Church. The traditional faith
is covered and explained on our site and in our materials. You really need to look at them, and begin to
pray the Rosary. Please consult our
section on how to convert.
Vatican II
Subject: … and we will not serve Lucifer
I understand if JPII was a madman, and all
his 'teaching ' is nothing but open insults to God and Church, this Benedict is
more dangerous and cunning; he uses ambiguous statements always leaving room
for manipulating the truth. Any TRUE CATHOLIC POPE, if he claims to be a real
Catholic, should PUBLICLY declare Vatican II VOID and NULL, invite a new
Vatican II council banning all new theological 'editing' of Holy RCC dogma and
traditional teaching, restoring the Gregorian Mass with High altars, restoring
all Liturgical text of pre-Vatican II, reestablishing a NEW Inquisition for
reevaluating all priests, clergy from bottom to top, excommunicating all who
are NOT CATHOLIC. Unless pope does this- he is a heretic, he is an ENEMY to
Christ, and we DEMAND the resignation of Benedict! No dialogue with this
hateful people, who have a poison of snake in their hearts and sugar on their
mouth, who kill Christ with 'washing of hands'- who are BLOODY and responsible
for this universal paganism, sin, catastrophe and perpetual troubles mankind
goes through in our modern time. We
,'the spotless dove' of Christ, will NOT SERVE LUCIFER, wherever he is- even in
the pretended RCC. In fact Holy Roman Catholic Church is there intact and
all-powerful, as it is, as long as people like you are there...
Woody…
New Video
& Article
MHFM: We have a new video and article on Benedict
XVI’s recent heresies.
Benedict
XVI's Recent Heresies, Late August 2010 [video]
Benedict XVI's recent Heresies,
Late August 2010 [article]
Heavy Metal
Subject:
Heavy Metal Monk
Brothers
in Christ,
I
think it was amazing & quite telling that in the beginning it shows him
flashing the satanic sign.
John
Christian
Subject: Alex Jones Non-Christian Video
I agree with you about alex Jones. Also he
is buddies with David Icke who has called himself the son of God. You can find
David making these statements if you look it up youtube. I followed Alex's
channel and agree with his political views but if he is best buddies with a man
that into reptilians and who calls himself the messiah I no that Alex is a non
believer. I love the Lord and I am a Christian myself but I do take offense
that you say the one true religion is Catholic. Honestly, I know it is a
powerful religion but separating christians based on doctrinal belief and
religion is not what we need today. We need to all go back to what Jesus wanted
us to be. Christ Like hense Christian. I don't see any religion mentioned in
the Bible and I don't believe I need a priest to intervene for me to be
forgiven of my sins...
…Dezzy…
MHFM: Thanks for the interest, but your views on Christianity
are not correct. Christ founded one
Church upon Peter (Mt. 16:18-20), and said you must hear it to be saved (Mt.
18:17). He also taught baptismal
regeneration (John 3:5), His real presence in the Eucharist (John 6),
confession (John 20:23) and many other things that non-Catholics and Protestants
reject. By doing so, they reject the
Gospel. We have a book called The Bible Proves the Teachings of the
Catholic Church which demonstrates that the Catholic Church alone is the
biblical faith. You really should
consult the sections on our website that are dedicated to refuting Protestantism. You cannot unite with people who have
different and contradictory beliefs on core issues of the Gospel. To say that everyone should unite, despite
such differences, is to render what Christ revealed on those matters
meaningless. One must say in charity
that you can't be saved believing what you do.
With
Subject: Exchange with Robert
Dear brothers:
I found this section of your exchange with
Robert quite extraordinary:
---
MHFM: "Since we can't judge and we don't
know how God works, is it possible that God incarnated himself in one of the
figures of a different religion without our knowledge?"
Robert: "Absolutely not."
MHFM: "On what basis do you exclude
that possibility?"
Robert: "Because of the promises to St.
Peter."
---
You had helped to lift him out of the
darkness and muck and for those few seconds he seemed to stand upright on the
dry ground where the sun was shining, but sadly (and almost certainly due to
bad will) he slid back in and then went under.
-RDS
Revealing
Subject: Comment
on your new conversation with Robert.
And 9/11
How is Robert going to say that he knows
what the Catholic Church teaches when he doesn't even believe in the most basic
laws of physics regarding 9/11? People
who are confronted with the laws of physics regarding the scientific
impossibility of a "pancake" collapse choose not to believe the truth
because of the reality it reveals to you. The individual lies to himself to
believe in a reality based off of what he/she finds comfortable to believe in.
The same case goes with people who are confronted with basic dogma
because they know it contradicts what they have been programmed to
believe, so they choose to lie to themselves.
You can definitely call these people out as liars.
It was revealing that Robert Chose to attack what you believe about 9/11
"theories" because he couldn't attack you at the clear definitions of
Catholic dogma.
I also have a suggestion. I think you should make a video series about what
really happened on 9/11 and the spiritual warfare connection. If people can't
believe something so massively a lie on the secular level such as 9/11, what
makes them think they will not fall for a greater spiritual deception such as
Vatican II? Also I believe if you make a youtube series on 9/11, it can be
pushed to reach alot more people to bring them into the knowledge of the One
True Faith.
Keep up the great fight!
-Isaac
Read
Bro.
Michael and Bro. Peter
The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church is the best book I have ever read. It made a lot
clear that I did not know.
Mary
Ciaccio
Conversation
Robert’s conversation was a clear
demonstration of an unwillingness to listen to the truth. As a modernist,
Robert regurgitates the same puke over and over with a severe case of diarrhea
of the mouth that spews the lies that were force fed to him by the Vatican II
abomination during these last days. Robert is clueless of what the Church
teaches, while unable to take a stand in his beliefs, he jumps around in the
conversation like a Mexican jumping bean. Amazing the bad-will amongst Robert
and his fellow Vatican II sect members, while playing the Saint and refusing to
judge anything except going against the truth. God has already laid down the
future consequences and judgment of those outside the True Faith through the
Bible, the Popes and the Saints. I think the main point that Robert and other
modernists fail to recognize is the seriousness of the end times we are
currently in (that have been predicted throughout Catholic Church history) and
the role that the Vatican II unusual suspects play in these last days.
God Bless,
Tom Miles
Shocking
Subject: Guy from Wales Shocking!
Dear Mhfm,
You ask the guy "Do you believe jewish rabbis who reject Christ could be
in a state of Grace?" His answer "I'll leave that to God". What
kind of an answer is that. First off he questions your salvation somewhere in
that conversation/debate because you’re a traditionalist but a Jewish Rabbi he
can't judge. But he has no problem judging you Bro Dimond. He didn't answer
your point on Abortion. I can't understand it how people could be that stupid
that’s what it is along with bad will. Truly drunk with the wine of the whore
of babylon. Let’s hope the Mother Of God converts him to the Catholic Faith.
But when he says things he knows "great Christian people" who don't
believe the Catholic faith his conversion is slim.
God Bless
Sean
Meaningless
Subject: Wales V-2 man and radio show
This man was horrible with his bad
will. He knows that there is no salvation outside the Church and knows
that Benedict-Ratzinger does not teach it. As Bishop Dolan did (in his
sermon you dissected about 3 years ago), he reduces the dogma to a meaningless
formula. The man is smart enough to understand the truth. But his
bad will gets in the way. I cannot blame you, Brother Peter, for getting
so irritable with the man.
Also, I really enjoyed listening to your
archived radio shows. I encourage you to have more and ask you to please
make time to do them around your other activities. Thank you.
“I.I.”
Re:
Robert
You
are not only a heretic and apostate, you are an idiot. There is no such
thing as invincible ignorance. If people are sincerely interested in God,
it is extremely easy for them to have access to information to save their souls
in this age of internet. If people die in ignorance of the Faith, it is
because they were not interested in God, which is why God sends such people to
hell. What you and others like you are saying is this: God is not
powerful enough to lead people of good will to the Faith. This is not
only blasphemy, it is a complete lack of faith. This heresy is worse than
a cancer devouring one's body; this heresy is a cancer devouring peoples' souls.
Wake up!
Brenda
Roy
MHFM: The conversation was another
example of how “baptism of desire” and “invincible ignorance” are, at this
time, the foundation and attempted justification for all heresies and every
rejection of Christ and His necessity.
We see again that even the most liberal and unbelieving heretic, such as
Robert, invokes them in a futile attempt to put a “Catholic” face on religious
indifferentism and apostasy.
Comment
Subject: B16 & his heresies
Please, do a follow-up DVD on him. Some
very deluded people try to convince themselves (and even more sadly, others)
that Ratzinger´s heresies are from a long forgotten (and forgiven) past. It´s
always good to have at hand a new pack of recent heresies, in order to show
that he did not change for the better at all. In fact, he seems to be getting
worse. This new incident involving Brother Roger is really a card in the sleeve
I´m going to use several times in future discussions. It´s as if B16 sent the
heresy of the week as a gift package to you.
I am aware that your Fatima DVD covers him
and some of his most recent heresies, but the man really deserves personal
treatment. JP2 needed almost 30 years of Anti-Papacy to award him the dubious
honor of having his heresies denounced on 2 DVDs, but B16 is managing to do
what seemed impossible: To outrun JP2 in terms of heresies and apostasy... in
half a decade! The guy is factory of heresies. And at the same time, creating
the illusion that he´s a staunch defender of Catholic Doctrine, Moral and
Discipline. What a deception.
I´m really starting to think he uses some
form of Black Magic in order to deceive people. How can anyone with eyes to see
not realize he´s a heretic? Or worse, to even believe he´s going to promote
"the big restoration"? He could not care less about the necessity of
the Catholic Faith.
Brother Michael´s reasoning is just
perfect. Ratzinger does not believe that the Faith of Rome is to be held. To
him, a person can be outside the Church, found his Own Church/Community, lead
them astray from the True Faith, and yet be a role model, die in the state of
grace and be a Saint in Heaven. - Pause for throwing up - One does not have to
read between the lines to find a deeper hidden meaning at all! This is just
scandalous heresy, as manifest as one can get. A "pope" who believes
that Protestants (as well as the Orthodox) are free to reject the Papacy and
yet can achieve Salvation and Sainthood.
To me, that was the most explicit denial of
the Catholic Faith and demonstration of religious indifference EVER. And the
bad will from the false trads and the defenders of V2 is beyond comprehension.
Over the past months I´ve been trying to convince people. Most of the times,
it´s a big frustration. One can see by their attitude how a Merciful, Loving
and Caring God would still send them to Hell. They don´t really care about
Jesus (despite what they may claim), so in similar fashion Jesus won´t care
about them at Final Judgment. They will reap what they sow. They don´t give the
slightest importance to the Truth and dismiss the facts without any
concern.
What´s worse is that they constantly try to
scare me by saying that I am going to Hell (as if Hell was reserved only for
sedevacantists, and in some cases, traditionalists). I had to borrow your
argumentation. I always state something like: "Well, so what? According to
your so called Popes, every religion creates Saints and Martyrs, I could be a
Sedevacantist Saint, for all you know. You should also never try to convert a
Protestant, by your logic, since he could be well on his way to sainthood,
perhaps being even more saintly than you and I. Even if you were right, and
don´t get me wrong, you AREN´T, I still accept all the dogmas about the papacy,
unlike the protestants, who deny the papacy as a whole and yet can be saved and
become Saints, according to your "popes". To say that Sedevacantists
are going to Hell for being "out of the church" or "against the
papacy" (when they only question the validity of the last FALSE claimants)
and yet call Protestant Brothers, attend their services and believe they can be
saved is just astonishing pharisaical hypocrisy."
Conversation
Dear MHFM,
I recently
downloaded audio clips of the recitation of the rosary so that i could listen
to it while travelling, since I spend a lot of time traveling to college. Is this ok? Is it equivalent to praying the
rosary provided I meditate on the mysteries when they are being recited?
With Best Regards
Sam
MHFM: Thanks for the question. No, listening to the Rosary being recited by
others is not equivalent to praying it.
It’s necessary for you to recite the Rosary yourself. Also, we do not recommend that people pray
the Rosary while listening to a recording of others who are praying it. It’s important for people to foster
individual interior lives, and that comes with individual prayer to God and
solitary time. We would recommend that
you pray the Rosary yourself while you are traveling.
New Video
MHFM: This is a new video.
Bishop Richard Williamson Exposed - 1/2
Bishop Richard Williamson Exposed - 2/2
Conversation
Dear MHFM,
A few weeks ago I had a conversation with my mother and my sister
(both Novus Ordo) about my decision to not attend a reception being given for a
deceased friend of the family, the same individual from the e-exchange
"Tea." I explained to them that I had no evidence that this
individual had died holding the traditional Catholic faith. I said it would be
uncharitable for me, a Catholic, to attend.
My mother then asked, "Does this mean you would not attend
the funerals of your own mother and sister?" I said, "Yes." My
mother persisted, "Not even your own mother and sister?!" I tried to
explain to her that the Novus Ordo service is not Catholic and the Church
teaches that Catholics must not attend non Catholic services under pain of
mortal sin. She expressed her unwillingness to believe that the Church had
taught (and still does teach) this.
My sister gave her own reply: "That just does not look
good." I did not respond to this. My sister had already displayed negative
sentiments toward the Salvation dogma when I presented it to her as a true
Church teaching about two years ago (my mother also does not believe this core
dogma). I probably should have tried to explain to my sister that not
compromising the faith is of a higher priority than what looks good. It seems
pointless to try to talk to her about this, however, if she's not going to
believe that the Church teaches absolutely no salvation without baptism in
water and the Spirit.
Sincerely,
TD
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. Yes, one should explain to her that what
“looks good” is not what determines how a Catholic must act. Moreover, those who form their decisions upon
“what looks good” will not get to Heaven.
Comment
Subject: A Gulf Coast Article
Brothers,
I don't know if this has any interest or if
it relates to the Apocalypse at all, so here is the headline:
Portions of the Gulf are So Toxic that
Dolphins, Fish, Crabs, Stingrays and Other Animals are "Trying to Crawl
Out of the Water"
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=20744
Take care and God bless you all there at
MHFM,
Howard
Comment
Dear Brothers,
Notorious heretic Bp. Williamson's attack
on sedevacantists and “Feeneyites” is outrageous but is easily refuted. He
wrote to Bill Mulligan: “One's all too frequent experience with sedevacantists
and with Feeneyites is that the mind has shut down, and emotion, blocked
emotion, has taken over.”
Three weak points are worth exposing in
this sentence. 1) He cites his experience, rather than dogmas as his nexus. 2)
He assumes mental relaxation is mental dysfunction (or "shut down" -
it also could be reverse speech for "mouth: shut up"). 3) He talks of
blocked emotion like a New Age psychoanalyst, i.e. that negative emotions, if
suppressed, cause psychosomatic disorders. Each of these points are refuted
very easily:
1) Pope St. Pius X, Pascendi - “For the
Modernist believer, on the contrary, it is an established and certain fact that
the reality of the divine does really exist in itself and quite independently
of the person who believes in it. If you ask on what foundation this assertion
of the believer rests, he answers: In
the personal experience of the individual.”
2) Catechism of the Council of Trent,
Article I, Faith excludes Curiosity: “For when God commands us to believe He
does not propose for us to search into His divine judgments, or inquire into
their reason and cause, but demands an
unchangeable faith by which the mind rests content in the knowledge of eternal
truth.”
3) Pope Leo XIII, Exeunte Iam Anno -
“...even the philosophy of the ancients
taught that every man should restrain his evil desires, and still more and
with greater care those who from daily contact with the world have the greater
temptations...For man has been born under this law, that the mind should rule
the body, that the appetites should be restrained by sound sense and reason;
and hence it follows that putting a curb
upon our masterful passions is the noblest and greatest freedom.'
Pope Pius XI, Ad Salutem - “Here indeed is
an ideal protrait of a Christian sovereign, nor will you find anywhere a nobler
or more perfect one. But it cannot be reproduced by the man who trusts the
guidance of human wisdom, which often is slowwitted, oftener blinded by the emotions.”
He then quotes Confucius, as though he were
some kind of Church authority, and not in fact a pagan! It's a typical
invincible ignorance heretics' tactic to cite some famous non-Catholic
philosopher as though their natural wisdom is proof of their attaining the
state of grace without having received the sacrament of baptism! Also, his
reference to “Gordian knots” is mysterious. He seems to be implying that the
Catholic faith is a Gordian knot (an extremely complicated problem that needs
solving) rather than an extremely simple set of dogmatic truths that require a
peaceful acceptance and belief. Also, the legendary Gordian knot was actually
“solved “ by being cut by Alexander the Great, so that's how Catholics are to
deal with occasions of sin such as heresies – cut them off! By implying that
the Catholic faith is a Gordian knot, Bp. Williamson is saying that a) the
Catholic faith is a problem, and b) it can only be “solved” by being cut off –
such is what Vatican II tried to do – cut out the heart of the Catholic faith
by dissecting and removing the dogmas. In reality, being the heretic and
schismatic that he is, Bp. Williamson is cut off from the Body of Christ. Bp.
Williamson is a Gordian knot of heresies! The sedevacantist "feneeyite"
mind simply rests confidently and peacefully upon that rock which is Christ:
the Truth. There is no need for a Catholic to be constantly wound up like a
cockoo clock, trying to unblock emotions and untie Gordian knots!!! Both
scripture and Tradition make it clear that there is no rest for the wicked, but
there is abundant peace for the good…
Wisdom 3:9 - “They that trust in him, shall
understand the truth: and they that are faithful in love shall rest in him: for
grace and peace is to his elect.”
Isaias 57:2 - “Let peace come, let him rest
in his bed that hath walked in his uprightness.”
Luke 10:6 - “And if the son of peace be
there, your peace shall rest upon him; but if not, it shall return to you.”
There is no rest or peace for heretics,
schismatics and apostates such as Bp. Williamson.
God Bless,
Chris White
Share
Subject: Mind Control
Hi MHFM,
If I may share a thought or two. Bishop Williamson is, hypothetically, learned
in the ways of manipulating thoughts and feelings of people, by the use of his
own words and actions. This is proven by his discussions with Joseph and Bill.
First, the discussion with Joseph Ramirez. The bishop referred to him as
"my dear boy", even though he clearly is not a young child. Why?
Other heretical clergymen have done this before. They do this in order to
revert grown men back to a child like docility and sense of comfort. (Let us
recall 1 Corinthians 13:11) The more docile the flock, the easier for them to
be controlled. Heretics are not backed by the Lord's dogmas, so they need other
means to keep their heretic trained flock in line: erroneous obedience.
Second, the letters to Bill Mulligan. The bishop discussed
"emotions", a quote from Confucius, closed mindedness, and the
Gordian knot. That is lot of things to talk about, if taken seriously. I may
have to get my copy of the Analects (Confucius), and perhaps a biography of
Alexander the Great (Gordian Knot). There are no dogmas to be found in those
documents. If another manipulative man would say similar things, one would
argue that he is speaking stylistically in order to sound smart, while avoiding
the dogmatic definitions. Keep them busy, look under my left sleeve, then under
my right sleeve, until they forget the dogma that is in question to begin with.
This trick is similar to a performer's trick in a magic act, but has the same
effect: intellectual diversion.
The Lord wants us to discuss His dogmas. The devil wants to keep us busy with
something else, such as useless trivialities. True Catholics use dogmatic
definitions to teach. Wicked heretics use the people's own thoughts and
feelings to manipulate them. The question is, putting aside whatever good the
Bishop has done, is he being manipulative intentionally, by training or by
chance? We must equip ourselves against these tricks nonetheless. I hope he
converts too. If not, at least it would do some good for SSPX and other like
minded groups if he confronts the dogmas head on in a debate with one of the
Dimond Brothers. Assuming he wins, it would be another feather on his cap, If
he loses, he can find the true faith not only for himself but for others like
him. What does he have to lose?
Finally, to control another person's mind one must first analyze it.
Psychoanalysis therefore is a basis of mind control.
Ave Maria.
Sanjiv
Protestant
Subject: Protestant near death worship of
man
A sad story
A networking acquaintance of mine posted on
her facebook page that her friend was dying. I said is she catholic and
would she like a priest.
Answer was "No thank you, she has made
peace with her minister" Not interested in making peace with God, but with
the Protestant minister. And these Protestants believe in universal
salvation like v-2 Catholics. "God is ready to take her to
heaven" Very sad.
MHFM: Yes, the bad will remains to the end. It’s at those moments that the seriousness of
these issues comes into focus.
Discussions
Brothers:
Thank you for the video exposing Bishop Williamson. I thought the use of the
word "charade" was absolutely right on, but unfortunately, too many
people are playing along with their game. Over this past weekend, I came to a
decision: I'm no longer attending their Armada chapel and watch their heretical
priests play this game of deception.
As I related in my last email, several discussions at the Armada, MI parish
recently landed me a call from the prior, the now notorious heretic Steven
McDonald. He called me about my promotion of the true dogmas on salvation and
Holy Water Baptism at "his" parish, and my warning to one 17-year-old
boy, who I knew was considering the priesthood with the SSPX, to put his
possible vocation in God's hands and to NOT vow yourself to this heretical
Society. The lad cried to his mama, Mama called Steven, and Steven was
"rather disturbed" by this activity on my part. After a long phone
conversation with Bishop Williamson the Second, he attempted to offer me a
deal: Steven would read my (i.e. Bro Peter's Salvation book), and I would read
a book of his chosing, and then we would talk. In exchange for this agreement,
I would promise to refrain from telling "his" flock the truth about
what is required to save their souls. He agreed that he would not formally
impose his heresy on me by making some announcement or denying me Holy Communion.
At first I agreed but the next day cancelled the agreement since it's wrong to
obey men, rather than God, and his book would be dangerous to my faith. No
deal, Father.
Please know, I have challenged this man to debate me publicly on three seperate
occasions, which he refused. He doesn't want to "draw attention" to
the issue. Translate: He wants to keep the Charade going. I've challenged two
other men to debate me, both long-term false traditionalists, one of whom is a
veteran lawyer. Decline, decline. I've offered these folks, including their
"pastor" to play fair and debate me like gentlemen before the eye of
the public, and they run and hide! All except for Steven--he chose at
yesterday's Sunday Mass to play dirty, cowardly, and notoriously heretical from
the pulpit.
The Gospel spoke of the ten lepers, and Steve remarked that Jesus wanted to
teach us about "hierarchy and order." Great, no problem. But Father
went on and on about how much confidence the people should have in him as their
prior and the Society priests and bishops in general. He was almost claiming to
be infallible, not even a hint that he could fall into error, or that we should
always judge everything in light of Catholic dogma. The people, he seemed to be
saying, don't need dogma, since they have the great SSPX priests such as
himself. Have perfect confidence, Fr. Steve will bring you safely to glory.
This "little messiah" complex of his then got stepped up as he
lavished praise on Marcel Lefebve as the Great Hero who saved the true Mass AND
Catholic tradition--where would we be without him?--as if God cannot raise up
thousands of Champions of the Catholic faith at any time. But this was the last
straw. Marcel Lefebvre was a manifest heretic,
McDonald loudly-praised this heretic as the Saviour of Catholic Tradition.
Conclusion: Fr. McDonald is a manifest heretic. Goodbye SSPX, I'll pray for
your conversion to Jesus Christ and the Roman Catholic Faith. He also quoted
St. Bernard as saying something like, "the man who will not be led or guided
is a fool." I saw that as a weak, cowardly shot at me and you. What
a gutless heretic.
Joseph Ramirez
Materials
… Your web site and WRITTEN materials and
audio/visual resources are excellent media to provide the TRUTH about
the ONE, HOLY, CATHOLIC, and APOSTOLIC CHURCH OF JESUS CHRISTJESUS IS THE
ONLY WAY TO THE FATHER THE ONLY WAY, TRUTH AND LIFE No one
comes to the FATHER EXCEPT THROUGH THE SON. No one knows the Father except the son
and he to whom he reveals Him. Your web
site provides the magisterial teaching of the church through the true popes;
THE WRITTEN WORD OF GOD THROUGH THE BIBLE and APOSTOLIC
TEACHING which hands down the teaching of JESUS CHRIST. YOUR WEB PRESENTS THE POPES TEACHING THROUGH
PAPAL ENCYCLICALS AND DOGMATIC TEACHINGS, EX-CATHEDRA AND
PAPAL BULLS. ALL TRUE CATHOLICS
NEED TO KNOW THESE TEACHINGS DIVINELY INSPIRED THROUGH THE HOLY SPIRIT AS
CHRIST PROMISED THAT THE GATES OF HELL SHALL NOT PREVAIL AGAINST THE CHURCH
WHICH CHRIST ESTABLISHED THROUGH PETER.
PLEASE CONTINUE TO PRESENT MORE OF THESE PAPAL DOCUMENTS SO THAT
CATHOLICS WILL HAVE THE TRUTH. YOUR YOU
TUBE CHANNEL IS EXCELLENT SOURCE OF INSTRUCTION
Anthony
Perhaps
Subject: Open Letter to
Confused Catholics
Brothers,
Perhaps the SSPX should change
the name of that document, "An Open Letter To Confused
Catholics". It should actually be called "An Open
Letter - To Confuse Catholics"
Wj…
Comment
I
was very pleased to see you´re taking a more active role in exposing the false
traditionalists. It was about time for you to place Richard Williamson in his
proper place and expose him (in all his absurdity) for what he truly is. You
did an article on him years ago, but it was "buried" among other
articles in one of the sections. A person had to deeply explore your material
to find it. I hope someday you do something similar about Fellay. If I may be so bold, and since you´re
reformulating your main page, why not place a link to the BEWARE section in a
window too, like you did to the youtube channel? That section is a must read,
and I don´t think it gets the attention it deserves.
The
FFSPX, like so many other groups, realize there´s a real problem. However, they
not fully perceive it for what it is, and end up offering false solutions and
hope. The devil probably knew that at one point the Apostasy was going to be so
manifest that he would have to establish a controlled opposition of his
own. When I was a "traditionalist" (non-sedevacantist) I always
knew the Tradition was going to be only a temporary home, a spiritual hotel
shall we say, before I could study the matters more deeply and sort things out
before finally deciding what to do with my life, and where to entrust my soul.
After all, they had reverence and a good approach to the moral life (ok, aside
from NFP, as I later found out through you)
While
I would not say the FSSPX was bad from day one, nowadays the people there are
heterogeneous. It´s really a grey field. There are tares, but also potential
wheat. Some are of good will, seeking refuge from the V-2 and searching for
answers. Others are just accommodated. While others are moved just by thrill
about the group promoting the Old Mass, opposing ecumenism and denouncing the
Jews. At least that´s what they used to do. When Hell broke loose with
Williamson and the Holocaust, they quickly removed most (if not all) of their
online material exposing the Jewish Zionist propaganda. How blessed I was to
discover your works and finally be instructed on the real problem and how a
Catholic should deal with it.
While
Bishop Williamson advocates for many true causes, he´s indeed a hypocrite of
ridiculous proportions, plus a coward in some areas. I guess the reason so many
people follow him is because they see pure evil around them, so they settle for
someone who´s offering 25% or 50% of the Truth and they don´t know (of) any
better. Williamson is learned, and all his knowledge was for nothing at the end
of the day. It only served to feed his pride and typical FSSPX´s elitism
(another reason why I could not stand them for very long).
In
your video Death and the Journey to Hell, there´s a part (among others) I can
never forget. When you talk about the reality of many people going to Hell not
because they were totally evil in an almost cartoonish caricature manner, but
more of the case that they were not sufficiently good. Like the people in Hell
saying "forever, and ever, and ever..." when I examine my conscience
and reflect on my sins and faults I always repeat to myself (as a way of
correction and warning) "not good enough, not enough, not enough...".
I used to think that Williamson and his Society were good, but not good enough.
But he reached such a low point, that a sincere Catholic must reject him as a
bad and evil person, like he disgustingly fails to do in regards to JP2 and now
B16.
A
failure to reprove them, after seeing what they did, is indeed theological
vomit. But to actually go in their DEFENSE as if they were GOOD is nothing less
than a severe case of mental diarrhea. The false Resistance is really the
devil´s assist plan.
All
in all, another fine audio file. Keep up the good work. One last thing. There´s a gossip circulating
that RW is suffering from a neurodegenerative disease. I don´t know for how
long (in case the rumor is true), or how advanced it may be (he can still say
Masses, that´s for sure). I don´t know if he was always a bad willed person (he
certainly is for a few years), but this clinic condition could help explain his
absurd and aberrational declarations.
CK
Videos
Subject: Williamson videos
Very nice job with your Williamson
videos. I think you nail the essential problem of Williamson; that is
intellectual pride, very well.
Not to bore you but I had some follow-up
with him since I shared the recent line about “Gordian Knots” with you. I
pointed out to him that his line, that SdV and ENS “cut Gordian knots”, while
“theology only unties them as best they can be” represented a concession to SdV
and ENS. His answer to me was basically to tell me that I don’t know what
theology is. That I don’t know what I don’t know, and that I have a slow
mind but a quick tongue.
Well I paraphrase; the actual words of the
bishop are below. While I am no “theologian”, his entire “argument”, all
he has written against Sedevacantism can be reduced to a psychological
prescription, that is: “these Romans are insane”. However their insanity
shields them from their otherwise manifest heresies, because they are not
obstinate (they can’t be obstinate because they are insane, essentially innocent
but crazy). If you point out to him their high level of education,
he will say that indeed that is precisely what made them insane; (presumably
therefore they are less guilty than an otherwise ignorant person would
be). As far as I can discern, this is his entire case. He will not
touch “Feeneyism” other than the comments he made to Mr. Ramirez.
And he will not counter any dogmatic citations with argument.
He will gently tell you that it is cute that you are trying to tackle such
weighty issues, you know, because you can’t possibly understand these matters,
and then he’ll go back to psychoanalyzing the Roman offenders, and never answer
your argument. It is truly amazing that the shell can be that
empty. But sadly it appears to be.
Bill Mulligan
Valid
Dear
MHFM,
Hi, I just want to ask if the 4th mystery of the Rosary is valid? as far as I
know it was promulgated by anti-pope JP II right? thanks
Glenn
MHFM: No, the “Luminous Mysteries” are
not part of the real Rosary and shouldn’t be included with it.
Questions
Subject:
Comment - Stephen’s Questions
Dear
Brothers Michael and Peter,
I
would like to thank you for the straightforward reply and charitable act you
made on Stephen's questions … Your
answers [assist] him that is confused, wary and scared on the presented
affairs of his soul, should he apply the remedies you recommended. I find his email and questions very
interesting and may prove helpful to others who are in similar situation. I would like to comment and forward some of
my insight, if I may:
1 - "Am
I damned for all eternity because of the actions of the church leaders" C - First, you
have to clear the air by defining who these church leaders you refer to, if you
refer to the Vatican II Sect and if you follow their actions – the answer is
categorically yes, the reasons for this had been well explained by MHFM
Brothers;
2- "…
Is this the plan of God?" C -
To indicate God to plan evil situations is blasphemous and tantamount to
ignorance of God's attributes … evil (absence of good) situations as mentioned
by Stephen (invalid Mass, worthless adoration hours & devotion etc) are
allowed by God to satisfy the just Justice of Almighty God that has been
disrespected by unacceptable prayers and sacrifices to Him;
3-
"Why would the Lord and through him the Holy Spirit, allow for entire
populations to be duped and worship in an invalid way" C – Since you refer
to this worship done in Vatican II Church arena, this worship is in no way
acceptable to God, hence God does not allow Himself to be worshipped in an
invalid way as all abominable acts or worship and prayer go straight to him
that asked for it – the devil. God could
never stand the slightest imperfection (the main reason why Purgatory was created)
how much more invalid and sinful prayers?;
4- "…
I just don’t think that God would allow so many of us who try to be devout to
be duped or intentionally depraved of our worship and devotion" C – "To be
devout", this phrase in the Catholic sense should be understood as a
soul following the Commandments of God through His established church on earth
– the Catholic Church (not the Vatican II), hence if the soul deviates in the
path by jumping out of the safe haven of the Catholic Church through apostasy,
heresy or schism – that "to be devout" claim loses its dignity
before God! … that soul regardless how sincere his devotions he thought he had
… can never be considered devout at all.
Stephen,
Brothers Michael and Peter have given you the best advice you can ever solicit
on this planet earth and make sure that you remember this resounding command
from Heaven through them – "Regarding
the effort you’ve employed, that’s surely why you’ve come across this
information. God is giving you the grace
and the opportunity to see the full truth.
It’s up to you to accept it. If
you don’t, one must say in charity that you will go to Hell." And
I concur that you will go to Hell if you do the opposite.
If a
sincere Catholic dissects this email, the questions presented stem from the
fact that Stephen indeed has very little knowledge on the attributes of God,
the history of the Catholic Faith and the Catholic Church … should he be
familiar with the history of many ancient heresies, apostasies and schisms of
the past – somehow his questions would be narrowed to just a few and not be
complicated. In these most turbulent
times of the world, the End of Days, I should say … one must not only content
himself in various devotions and prayers he practices, but one MUST also feed
his soul that is terribly hungry by spending enough time to study Catholic
Faith. I can safely say that if Stephen
is familiar with the accounts surrounding the Catholic Church like preceding
historic moments that paved the way for the birth of a number of heresies,
apostasies and schisms he won't be surprised with the present situation of the
Church. The abominable bishop Arius was
"holy", intelligent and very ascetic that's why numerous souls marched
with him to wage war (with their heresies) to the death against St. Athanasius
and the very few that hold the Catholic Faith; the founder of Islam in the 6th
century did observe 40 days strict fasting and prayers in the desert before he
claimed to have received visions from God to establish a new religion; how the
great Christian Constantinople country fell and became the Islam Turkey; the great Western Schism that paved the way
for the three antipopes who ruled the Catholic Church for more than 40 years;
the deChristianization of France with the evil French Revolution in the 18th
century; the founder of Protestantism was a former monk; the persecutions of
Catholics around the world that hold the traditional Catholic Faith … in the 20th
century, thousands of our Catholic brethren where slain in Russia, Spain and
Mexico by not complying with the Communist ruling states in fact the then Pope
Pius XI cried against these atrocities and condemned the "Conspiracy of
Silence" of the Western and European world for not joining the Catholic
Church in condemning these evil acts in persecuting and murdering the Catholics
- these are just a few of them …
God
was pleased to wake me up on the Sedevacantism position and from that moment on
I never turn my eyes again to Novus Ordo Sect and I had nothing to do with
them; I came across with lots of "traditional catholic" sites until I
discovered MHFM. After that, I did not
check other sites except one time… I was just reading a few lines of the works
of [a] heretic… my head ached so hard that I could not continue reading it…
Yours
in Jesus and Mary,
Joey
from the Philippines
Heretic
Thanks for great job exposing this noxious
pestilent heretic and arch-enemy of Christ the Lord… Sure he believes
antichrist JPII and False Prophet B16 are "good [puuuuuuuuuke!]
men" [gag] because isn't that the freemasons' motto:
"making good men better men"? or some other garbage..........?
This nefarious evil-doer has got to be right up there with the likes of
JPII whose body was probably possessed by some super high-powered DEMON........you
know, the same game of deception-------and how about those
"vessels" I think it was of the Catholic religion he so enjoys
filling with: THE NEW POISONOUS FUMES OF EVERY MODERNIST
HERESY?... that is what the battle is all about-------all about poisoning the
would-be Catholic faithful to make sure they go to hell..........what a crying
shame it seems to be working on so many people. It's unbelievable today
and completely OUTSIDE THE PALE that anyone who has even the
tiniest modicum of rationality still falls for this after it's been SO
THOROUGHLY EXPOSED. There ARE no excuses: period.
A.
Padre Pio
[On a recent] morning… while preparing to
pay some bills, the check book couldn't be found… Thus, the hunt for the check book
went into serious mode, lasting several hours, superseding all other plans on
the "to do list" for the day.
While searching for the checkbook, I came
across Padre Pio's booklet depicting his religious and miraculous life. I
asked him to please help me locate my missing item. To my amazement, my
prayer was answered almost immediately, within 20 minutes of my request, and
the checkbook found exactly at the same place in my desk I had previously
searched. I am amazed and humbly grateful, as never before has my prayer
been answered sooner. I wish to acknowledge my thanks to God and Padre
Pio, along with Brother Michael Dimond for writing the booklet...
Sincerely,
Kathleen Ryan
EENS
Dear Brothers,
Just to let you know that I told a 'traditional priest' that
baptism of desire/blood was a heresy, as I thought he was an advocate of
it. I gave him little by little some of your arguments in your excellent book
'Outside the church there is absolutely no salvation' (I actually translated
those parts). The first time he was like shocked and said how scandalous and
anti-traditional that idea was. So you see he didn't appreciate already your
work. I convinced him to read it (the translated parts) by saying that I would
like to have his opinion; and hoping that he would convert.
I gave him 3 parts, given separately every week ;
and what was astounding to see was that his arguments given to me each of these
weeks refuting our position, was a different
"objection/response" which you cover up in your book.
It didn't help a bit as he still remains
obstinate and says that I am a heretic and that you are totally wrong and
making this up. He tried to convince me and debate by saying that all the
theological teachings are for baptism of desire… that all of the catechisms
were perfect. He said that all the saints were right..... (he contradicted
himself many times)…
Thank you for what you do.
Sincerely
Austin…
Heretic
Subject: Heretic Williamson
Dear MHFM,
How profound the truth, and how well and
simple you explain the double-talking St. Pius X group, especially Bishop
Richard Williamson and his bountiful, gibberish liberalism. How he
and his group embrace the sheer lies of heretical antipopes of Vatican
II. What does it matter to this bunch of heretics what a real pope,
Boniface VIII proclaimed in Unam Sanctam in early 14th century upon the whole
world-past, present, and future 'til the Son of Man cometh at the
end? What hypocrites of the cloth! Keep up the militancy… God Bless
You!...
Dea…
Hindrance
Subject:
Hindrance
Dear
MHFM, thank you for the new DVD. Today’s quote by St Thomas Aquinas and the
story of St Francis converting the Sultan, they both use the exact term
"provided there is no hindrance" the grace of God will come to those
seeking the truth of God. What a gift this grace is! How many people are alive
today that have no hindrance? What mercy God has shown me! I think this grace
to pursue the truth was gifted to me by Our Lady after you encouraged me so
strongly to pray the Rosary everyday. I try to pray as much of the Rosary
everyday and each day I feel more and more like an alien. Remember when
we were kids, you used to hear the term "Oh he or she is such a
saint"?
Now
you would hear "oh that poor guy is crazy or some fanatic". I'm sure
you know what compounding is. It's like a snowball going downhill. This is how
fast the hearts of men are turning away from anything saintly. I think
it's this evil momentum Our Lady has been warning us about and why it's Our
Lady that we must constantly turn to, for we have been commanded to have
recourse to her…
God
bless you MHFM,
Matthew
Comment
Dear Brothers,
Thanks for the book and the DVD with the 4
features! The one about the end of the world, I can't put into words; I tell
people, you just have to see it…
Also, I was wondering, the St. Jude
prayer that someone sent into your web-site, about 1 or 2 months ago,
wouldn't that be in the category of "chain" prayers, the way the man
wrote in, about answer to prayer must be posted (something to
that effect). Thanks
Sincerely,
Nancy
St. Francis, Baptism
Brothers,
This is an excerpt from one of the famous books on St Francis of Assisi. If
having the desire alone could save, St Francis need not send his friars, isn't
it?
God bless,
Jerome
CHAPTER XXIV (from Little Flowers of St
Francis)
HOW ST FRANCIS CONVERTED TO THE FAITH THE
SULTAN OF BABYLON
St Francis, urged by zeal for the faith of Christ
and by a wish to suffer martyrdom, took with him one day twelve of his most
holy brethren, and went beyond the sea with the intention of going straight to
the Sultan of Babylon. They arrived in a province belonging to the Saracens,
where all the passes were guarded by men so cruel, that no Christian who passed
that way could escape being put to death. Now it pleased God that St Francis
and his companions should not meet with the same fate; but they were taken
prisoners, and after being bound and ill-treated, were led before the Sultan.
Then St Francis standing before him, inspired by the Holy Spirit, preached most
divinely the faith of Christ; and to prove the truth of what he said, professed
himself ready to enter into the fire. Now the Sultan began to feel a great
devotion towards him, both because of the constancy of his faith, and because
he despised the things of this world (for he had refused to accept any of the
presents which he had offered to him), and also because of his ardent wish to
suffer martyrdom. From that moment he listened to him willingly, and begged him
to come back often, giving both him and his companions leave to preach
wheresoever they pleased; he likewise gave them a token of his protection,
which would preserve them from all molestation.
At length St Francis, seeing he could do no
more good in those parts, was warned by God to return with his brethren to the
land of the faithful. Having assembled his companions, they went together to
the Sultan to take leave of him. The Sultan said to him: "Brother Francis,
most willingly would I be converted to the faith of Christ; but I fear to do so
now, for if the people knew it, they would kill both me and thee and all thy
companions. As thou mayest still do much good, and I have certain affairs of
great importance to conclude, I will not at present be the cause of thy death
and of mine. But teach me how I can be saved, and I am ready to do as thou
shalt order." On this St Francis made answer: "My lord, I will take
leave of thee for the present; but after I have returned to my own country,
when I shall be dead and gone to heaven, by the grace of God, I will send thee two of my friars, who
will administer to thee the holy baptism of Christ, and thou shalt be saved,
as the Lord Jesus has revealed to me; and thou in the meantime shalt free
thyself from every hindrance, so that, when the grace of God arrives, thou
mayest be found well disposed to faith and devotion." The Sultan promised
so to do; and did as he had promised. Then St Francis returned with his company
of venerable and saintly brethren, and after a few years ending his mortal
life, he gave up his soul to God. The Sultan, having fallen ill, awaited the
fulfillment of the promise of St Francis, and placed guards in all the passes,
ordering them if they met two brothers in the habit of St Francis to conduct
them immediately to him. At the same time St Francis appeared to two of his
friars, and ordered them without delay to go to the Sultan and save his soul,
according to the promise he had made him. The two set out, and having crossed
the sea, were conducted to the Sultan by the guards he had sent out to meet
them. The Sultan, when he saw them arrive, rejoiced greatly, and exclaimed:
"Now I know of a truth that God has sent his servants to save my soul,
according to the promise which St Francis made me through divine
revelation." Having received the faith of Christ and holy baptism from the
said friars, he was regenerated in the Lord Jesus Christ; and having died of
his disease, his soul was saved, through the merits and prayers of St Francis.
Received
Dear
Brothers,
I
Just received your Book and DVD you sent me, what a Nice Surprise
! I'm especially excited about seeing the whole Fatima one…
This
Book is just Amazingly Filled with more information than I could have possibly
guessed by just its size…. I'm constantly shocked by what passes as
Christianity with most people these days...and the level of hate towards the
Catholic Church. This is Most Appreciated, can't wait to read it!...
Carol
Delger
Questions
Dear Brother Michael:
I have visited your site and have reviewed many of your articles. First,
I appreciate your efforts to educate and found most of your material very
illuminating but I must confess, I also found some of it most disconcerting.
Let me explain by way of questions for your review and comment if possible:
1. I live in Rhode Island, the most Catholic State in the USA - per
capita of our residents; and there are many churches but only one church
in the whole State that offers a Latin Mass on Sunday. I go to
daily mass at my local Parish and of course the Vatican II mass is
celebrated. You claim the mass is invalid, if that is true, then why
would the Lord permit that every single mass said throughout my State every
morning is invalid? Does the Lord not want my salvation? If there is no
daily Latin Mass offerred throughout the entire State, what is a Catholic to
do? This is the case in most States in the USA. Am I damned for all
eternity because of the actions of the church leaders. How does obedience play
into the equation. Do I just stop going to mass every day? Forgo
all the hours of eucharistic adoration, with the invalid consecrated
host?
2. Is every confession I go to invalid, every mass, every
adoration?, If the answer to these questions is yes because
a Vatican II priest consecrated the host or performs the sarament,
then most of the sacraments that are offerred are invalid thereby making
my devout worship and dedication worthless. Is this the plan of God?
3. Why would the Lord and through him the Holy Spirit, allow for entire
populations to be duped and worship in an invalid way when most of us are
just trying to be obedient to the church and its' leaders?
4. Are you also suggesting that the Holy Spirit has permitted or
ordained that the last 50 years of Popes would all be invalid? Is it
becuase of end times? When would a valid Pope be elected?
Benedict has been very supportive of allowing the Latin Mass to come back and
he refuses to distribute communion in the hand, etc....What is a lay person
to do? If everything you propose is correct then 99% of all Catholics in
the world are worshipping incorrectly under the guise of obedience. I
just dont think that God would allow so many of us who try to be devout to be
duped or intentionally depraved of our worship and devotion.
5. Regarding the imposter Sister Lucia. I agree
that the person pretending to be her is clearly someone different. How
was the conspiracy played out? How could the real Sister Lucia die or be killed
and that information be kept a secret? There are those who
claim that Paul VI also had an imposter. When you look at the pictures of
the early Paul VI and the later years Paul VI they are also
clearly different people. What does all this mean with
all these antipopes, invalid mass, imposters?
I personally was a very bad sinner. Over the last year or so, I have
truly changed my life made amendments. I say the rosary everyday,
volunteer, go to daily mass, go to confession weekly, sometimes twice a week. I
have spent literally hundreds of hours before the Blessed Sacrament. I
have consecrated myself to the Blessed Mother. I observe First Fridays, First
Saturdays, I pray about 2-3 hours every day, read scripture,
etc.... I can say that I feel the change in myself. I have
read the Imitation of Christ by Thomas Kempis, the Dark Night of the Soul,
etc... I have experienced some form of purgation. I believe that I am or try to
be in a state of grace. How would this be possible if I am worshipping
under false masses, etc?... I am just trying to reconcile what is going
on in the church and how I proceed.
Thank you and God Bless,
Stephen
MHFM: To your questions… 1. The Lord
permits the invalid Masses as a punishment for people’s sins and for their bad
will. He sees that very few care about
the faith itself; for that reason, He has allowed the real priests, Masses,
etc. to disappear. To give an example,
we had to go out recently. One of us got
into a conversation about the faith with a person, which we sometimes do. This individual claimed to be Catholic. In giving her a DVD and discussing what’s
been happening, the issue of false ecumenism and John Paul II’s prayer with
idolaters and pagans came up. The woman
flatly denied that John Paul II could have possibly engaged in such an
action. In response, one of us explained
that it’s a fact. We also said that we
have the proof on the DVD we just gave her.
All she needs to do is watch it.
She was obstinate, and she refused to believe that John Paul II did
anything like that. It wasn’t even clear
if she would watch the DVD to see the proof.
The point is that, if this encounter had not occurred, she might not
have heard about the Vatican II apostasy or what is really going on. Through this encounter, she received a
special opportunity to hear the truth.
However, whose fault is it that she hadn’t found out? It’s obvious that God left her in the dark
because He saw that she didn’t care about the truth and that she is of bad
will. For upon hearing the truth, she
was not receptive; but rather she fought against it vigorously. She even tried to deny an indisputable fact,
and balked at looking at the visual proof.
That’s why God leaves countless people in the dark of the Novus
Ordo. They may seem nice on the outside;
they might attend “Mass,” but inwardly their hearts strenuously rebel against
His truth. God sees all of it, and He sees
that they are not of the truth. Hence,
there’s no need for Him to give them a special message concerning the full
extent of what’s happening; for almost all of them would reject it anyway. Everyone who is of the truth hears His voice
(John 18:37). Those who really care and
have interest will be brought to the knowledge of the truth. This is not to suggest that people shouldn’t
try to aggressively evangelize or spread the truth to these individuals. It is merely to point out that few of them
will be inclined to search for the truth on their own, and thus it is often
only through the special efforts and encouragement of others that they might
investigate what’s happening.
2.
Every mass you go to (assuming it’s the New Mass) is definitely
invalid. The same is true for every
“adoration” session. The confessions are
invalid if they were made to priests ordained in Paul VI’s invalid new rite of
ordination. You ask if this is the plan
of God. We ask, do you believe in
Outside the Church There is No Salvation, as the Church has taught? Do you believe that people who engage in false
ecumenism, such as Benedict XVI and his bishops, deny the faith? Do you believe that all pagans, Jews,
Muslims, heretics, etc. are lost? If
not, then you reject His faith. Perhaps
then you can see why God would allow you and many others to be deceived.
3.
The answer is that almost all of them are of bad will. In addition, we are living through the Great
Apostasy and the great spiritual deception.
Jesus said that the deception would be so profound that even the elect
would be deceived, if that were possible (Matthew 24). It’s clearly predicted in Scripture that the
Mass will be taken away, and that there will be a profound deception. So how can you think that it’s not
possible? This is covered in our
material. The Great Apostasy and a
Counterfeit Church predicted in the New Testament and in Catholic Prophecy. You need to look at it.
4.
These questions are addressed in our articles, DVDs, book and
debates. Please look at them. You need to realize that few are saved even
in Catholic times, and extremely few are saved today. Here’s what Jacinta said about the time of
World War II, which is nothing compared to the darkness of today:
“Lucia found Jacinta sitting alone, still
and very pensive, gazing at nothing.
‘What are you thinking of, Jacinta?’
‘Of the war that is going to come. So
many people are going to die. And almost
all of them are going to Hell.’” (Our
Lady of Fatima, p. 94; p. 92 in some versions)
5.
Our video on Fatima and the Impostor Sr. Lucia addresses your questions
on this topic. Regarding the effort
you’ve employed, that’s surely why you’ve come across this information. God is giving you the grace and the opportunity
to see the full truth. It’s up to you to
accept it. If you don’t, one must say in
charity that you will go to Hell. You
must never go to the invalid New Mass again.
You must also keep in mind that spiritual works or time spent without a
pure intention or a submission to His faith lose all merit. God wants obedience, rather than
sacrifice. In other words, if you accept
heretics or reject His dogmas, your spiritual works will be worthless in His
sight.
1
Kings 15:22-23: “And Samuel said: Doth
the Lord desire holocausts and victims, and not rather that the voice of the
Lord should be obeyed? For obedience is better than sacrifices:
and to hearken rather than to offer the fat of rams. Because
it is like the sin of witchcraft to rebel: and like the crime of idolatry, to
refuse to obey. Forasmuch as thou hast rejected the word of the Lord, the Lord hath
also rejected thee from being king.”
If one rejects God’s truth, he cannot
please Him. To accept the Vatican II
sect, in light of all the facts, is to deny God.
Effect
Hi, I just want to share something of
interest. My family was in the v2 until I became aware of the
heretical teachings of the nun leading the religious ed. I removed my kids from
the class and tried to teach the faith at home. It was not easy.
Sadly they were already in their teens. I am still very
angry that my kids were exposed to the false teachings. They
are in their mid twenties now. The effects of the v2 teachings
apparent. I have been sharing information from your web site
and other sources with them, when
possible . Hoping they will do some research of the faith on
their own. One of them called me a couple of weeks ago. He said he
was on his way to work and said a short prayer for discernment. He was
researching something and by chance (?) he was led to articles on
freemason, among others . He said he had read these types of
articles before , but that day the information all of a sudden started to
fall in place and he got a deeper understanding of the Catholic
church and other things that he had questions about , concerning his
faith. He was very excited, and said he wanted to talk to me in person
about some other things that were revealed to him .I told
him that the Lord answers prayers but sometimes in a way we
don't expect. Discernment on his faith was not on his mind when he said
his short prayer. I am looking forward to his visit. I am
hopeful and thankful for this turn of events. What books or dvds do
you have that would be good for me to get for him. ( Errors of v2,
freemasons, evolution. ) Thank you for your website and the
information that you share.
Bw…
MHFM: That’s good news.
We would recommend the DVDs and books in our special package. Death
and the Journey into Hell is especially important for him to see, so that
he seriously considers the necessity of getting his soul in order. Lives of the saints are also important, in
addition to of course encouraging him to pray the Rosary. The life of St. Francis Paola (which we
offer) is quite good for people who are new or coming into the faith. His life is filled with extraordinary
miracles and can get people excited about the power of the Catholic faith.
Response
Response to Stepup
If you think an MHFM video was some sort of a joke you really need
to back away from your own self confidence, consider that you may not know
everything God wants you to know, and pray that God will give you the grace to
convert to the one, true faith. You need to start taking an interest in the
Rosary and the idea of reciting the Rosary.
Do you care about saying the Hail Mary prayer? "Listen to
what Our Lady revealed to Blessed Alan de la Roche, as he has recorded in his
book on the dignity of the Rosary: 'Know, my son, and make all others know,
that it is a probable and proximate sign of eternal damnation to have an
aversion, a lukewarmness, or a negligence in saying the Angelical Salutation
[Hail Mary prayer], which has repaired the whole world.'"
(St. Louis de Montfort, True Devotion to Mary, Trans. Fr. Frederick
Faber, Rockford, Illinois, Tan Books and Publishers, Inc., 1941, 157.)
If you attend the Novus Ordo "mass" ask yourself if this
"mass" makes you care about saying the Hail Mary prayer.
TD
9/11 Mosque
Dimond brothers,
Did you see ABC Nightline yesterday ? There was a Vatican II Priest
pushing for that Muslim Mosque to get built at Ground Zero.
The name of the Priest is Father Kevin Madigan. You might want to put that on
your latest news section on your website.
God bless
H
MHFM: Wow, what a scandal… What apostasy.
Pervades
Dear Brothers,
That's a very interesting story from Joseph Ramirez on the heretic Bishop Williamson.
It reveals the intellectual pride that pervades their whole organization. I
remember when I was kicked out of the SSPX for distributing two small EENS
flyers. The Rector of the Seminary (Holy Cross, Australia), imposing heretic
Fr. Vincente Griego, said that the information on the flyer was "all
twisted," or "taken out of context" - something to that effect.
It doesn't require a theology degree to be a Catholic, but it certainly does
require humility! Catholic dogmas are to believed as they are written.
Mark 10:15 - Amen I say to you, whosoever
shall not receive the kingdom of God as a little child, shall not enter into
it.
Proverbs 15:33 - The fear of the Lord is the lesson of wisdom: and humility
goeth before glory.
John 12:40 - He hath blinded their eyes,
and hardened their heart, that they should not see with their eyes, nor
understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them.
God Bless,
Chris White
Damage
Hello I have been watching your videos
on YouTube I am a Conservative Catholic. I had no idea what damage Vatican
II has done until I watched your videos of the Heresies of Popes
abominations of the new mass etc. Could not believe my eyes when
I saw the Mass video I have never seen anything like that in my life…
But my question to you is what am I meant to do, where am I meant to go and
Worship and where to go for Confession? I live in the England.
Also this a problem for me as I have believe that I am called to
the Priesthood and have been considering joining the Priesthood and
going to seminary but after watching these videos you have shown I am like so
kind of confused of what to do now.
I have been telling people about this in my Church they too had no
idea of these heresies and abominations taking place.
Looking forward for hearing from you.
Regards
Ste
MHFM: We’re glad to hear about your interest. The first thing is to get out of the invalid
New Mass and become convinced on all the issues. A Catholic must never go to the New Mass
again for any reason. Pray the Rosary
each day, and please continue to review the material. You will see clearly that the Vatican II sect
is not the Catholic Church. Once
convinced, a person can apply the guidelines on where to receive sacraments to
the available options in their area (only considering certain priests ordained
in a traditional way, of course). A
profession of faith, a good confession, etc. are all important. But the first thing is to continue to
familiarize yourself with the traditional Catholic faith and what a Catholic
must know and believe about what is happening.
Saw
Subject: Hello
Hi there. I saw your video on BP oil spill
and tried to thumbs up it, and as you know, I couldn't. I then visited your
channel and watched some more videos, (all of which I found extremely
interesting). I really like your channel and the way you present the
information. While I’m not Catholic, I believe the only way to salvation is
through Jesus Christ, too. I'm really looking forward to watching your series,
Is the World about to End?. Thanks in advance for the information you're
putting out there.
Thepart…
MHFM: Thanks for the interest.
We hope you continue to look at the material. We must emphasize that it's critical to
embrace the one true faith of Christ.
Jesus taught that one must hear His Church and accept all of His
teachings for salvation. We have a book
called The Bible Proves the Teachings of
the Catholic Church. It demonstrates
that the Catholic faith is the only true Christian faith.
Question
I have
a question about your videos you have for sale (like the ones on JPII, Paul VI,
The New Mass, JPII preaching antichrist, Council of apostasy, and benedict
XVI). Are the videos the newest versions (like 2nd edition and final
edition. Like the ones you can watch for free on your website)? I'd like
to know before ordering (I hope they are the newest versions). Thank you.
Sincerely, Ryan
MHFM: Yes, the videos/DVDs we offer are
the newest versions.
Williamson vs.
Subject: Williamson vs. Ramirez
I had written you in the past, and shared
some exchanges I had with Bp Williamson. As was Joe Ramirez’s experience;
I found in argument the Bishop skirts core issues and goes adhominum whenever a
concrete Truth is cited.
However I think Mr. Ramirez touched a nerve
in the Bishop. It had been nearly a month since I heard from the Bishop,
then out of the blue, yesterday morning, I got this:
Dear Bill,
Arguing is fine, as long as the mind is not
being governed by emotions. One's all too frequent experience with
sedevacantists and with Feeneyites is that the mind has shut down, and
emotion, blocked emotion, has taken over. With such, argument is a waste
of time.
Confucius he say, "He who speaks to a
fool, wastes his words. He who does not speak to a wise man, wastes his man.
The wise man wastes neither his words nor his man."
I don't know why minds shut down on
sedevacantism or Feeneyism, but I know that they easily do. Both cut
Gordian knots. Theology unties them as best hey can be untied.
God
bless,
Bishop W.
The timing of the note, I mean after so
much time, and sort of disconnected from the chain of our most recent
dialogues, probably wasn’t a coincidence. Maybe his conscience was
tweaked? Maybe he is arguing more to himself than to me.
Anyway, thought it was interesting.
I think such as Bp. Williamson are worthy of your prayers (as I suspect
your prayers have great efficacy). Prayer for his total conversion of
course…
Bill Mulligan
Revealing
Dear brothers in Christ,
The letter from the reader Joseph Ramirez, about bishop Williamson, is quite
revealing. The bishop's very phrase "to understand dogma correctly"
is provocative enough to accuse bishop for heresy and mocking God. For how
would it be possible to have a true Faith and at the same time suggest that God
has spoken His Eternal Truth in a way that it is logically possible to
understand it incorrectly? If it would
be possible, there would be no sin at all, for then every sinner could rightly
say that he/she acted upon his/her own understanding of The Truth, and didn't
break The Law according to this understanding. This would constitute modernism
in extreme, and this is what bishop Williamson is promoting. In that respect he
is indeed more dangerous than Novus Ordo heretics who openly accept modernism.
Bishop Williamson obviously is very fond of
with playing with words. I would like to ask him what is the correct meaning of
the word "correct"? If it is possible to understand the statement
"no pagans, or heretics, or Jews would be saved unless..."
incorrectly, to the point that it has the meaning "it is possible for
pagans, heretics and Jews to be saved even if they die outside the
Church", then it is obviously possible to understand the word
"correctly" incorrectly. So
the bishop Williamson is pushing his flock to "deeper understanding".
Well, I suppose I am allowed to think that "the deeper" has its
extreme, that there is "the deepest". If the bishop Williamson has
the true charity, why then he doesn't say this "deepest
understanding" of the dogma, and thus make the end of discussion. Let him
just translate each and every dogma to its "deepest understanding",
and order each and every member of his flock to forget altogether the
"shallow understanding" of the dogmas. For, what would be the use of
"shallow understanding" at all? We don't need "shallow
understanding", do we?
For example, I firmly believe the dogma
that there is ONE God, and THREE Divine Persons, and each and every of the
THREE Persons is The ONE and same God. I never pretended that I UNDERSTAND this
dogma in a way as I understand many truths of the natural world. So, I suppose
that bishop Williamson would like to give me the deepest understanding of this
dogma, and other dogmas as well, and thus make an end to my quest of
understanding.
To summarize: Bishop Williamson is just one of the countless Novus Ordarians
wannabe traditionalist. He is representing the masonic doctrine of salvation,
just like his fellow co-workers in Vatican. For, it is the masons who have the
"circles of understanding", the "degrees", and all such
satanic mumbo-jumbo doctrine, in order to confuse the people who long for The
Truth, which is God. The truth is that the dogmas will always mean what they
say. And according to the dogmas, the bishop Williamson is on the road to
Hell. Unless he embraces the dogmas as
they are, he would perish eternally.
God bless MHFM
Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia
1 Timothy 4
Subject: 1 Timothy 4
Hello
brothers,
I had a quick question, I was trying to convince this protestant woman… I was
using the bible proves the teachings of the Catholic Church. She was more
interested in convincing me of her scripture alone view. She pointed out
first timothy chapter 4 where it talks about the insincerity of liars whose
consciences are seared, who forbid marriage and require abstinence from foods
God created. She says Paul is talking
about priests. I think she took this scripture out of context but wanted to
know what it meant could you please explain it to me. I have been giving out
your dvds and I hope the people that i gave them to will listen. I find
protestants very hard to convince. I got baptized and am working on living the
full true faith... Thanks for all you do for us.
Veronica.
MHFM: Thanks for the interest.
There’s a lot of bad will out there.
The woman is completely wrong about the passage she brings up. We should quote the passage, so that your
question is clear to our readers.
1 Timothy 4:1-5 “Now the Spirit manifestly
saith, that in the last times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to
spirits of error, and doctrines of devils, Speaking lies in hypocrisy, and
having their conscience seared, Forbidding to marry, commanding to abstain
from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving by the
faithful, and by them that have known the truth. For every creature of God is good, and
nothing to be rejected that is received with thanksgiving: For it is sanctified
by the word of God and prayer.”
There is a very definite meaning to this passage. The passage speaks of the various dualist
sects throughout Christian history.
Examples of these were the Gnostics, the Manicheans, the Cathars,
etc. These people believed in two gods:
one evil and one good. They held that
the evil god was the god of matter, and the good god the god of the
spirit. These groups developed a
theology which was destructive to any use of material things, to a greater or
lesser degree depending upon the sect and their zeal for it. Hence, they forbade marriage, abstained from
meats, and preached poverty (for they believed that to own material things was
evil). The most devoted would even kill
themselves to put an end to their material existence.
There is no doubt that this is what the passage is referring to,
as a careful study of Christian history will show. These types of dualist heretics popped up
again and again. They became such a
problem in the Middle Ages that the war against Cathar-dualist heretics in 1208
was called a crusade by Pope Innocent III (Carroll, A History of Christendom, Vol. 3, p. 175.) So the passage is not remotely forbidding
celibacy, which the Bible clearly teaches is superior to marriage. See this file:
Refuting the Protestant rejection of the Catholic and
Biblical teaching on celibacy
Some ask, why does the Church prohibit priests from
marrying? Catholic priests in the Roman
Rite are forbidden to marry because the Bible teaches that the celibate state
is superior to the marital state. But
it’s important to recognize that in the Eastern Rite married men can be
ordained to the priesthood, but once ordained a man can’t be married. So a celibate clergy is a disciplinary law,
but one which is rooted in doctrine and biblical truth. This discipline began to be enforced in the
early Church.
Book, DVD
Dear
Most Holy Family Monastery:
Thank you for the book and resources that you sent me. "The Bible
proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church" is an excellent resource - it
is well-written and easy to understand - exactly what I've come to expect of
MHFM. The DVD is also very good especially "Is the World About to
End" and "The Third Secret of Fatima"…
Thank you for all your hard work.
Sincerely
PC
E-mail
I watched one of your videos. I really hope
it was some sort of joke. If not, you are undoubtedly insane to the point of no
return...
Stepup…
New YouTube Design
MHFM: For those it might interest, we have a new
design for Our You Tube Channel.
Williamson
Brothers:
Greetings. I met Bishop Williamson of the SSPX today at their priory in Armada,
MI. My family and I came to the 7:15 am Mass and to my surprise he was the
celebrant. I didn't think I would get a chance to talk to him, but after Mass
he was calmly strolling the grounds, so I thought I would just go up and
introduce myself, and let God lead from there. We exchanged small talk for a
few minutes, and then I asked him bluntly, "Bishop, do you believe in
salvation by invincible ignorance?" I asked him this question because I
had heard that he "privately" holds the Church's dogma that outside
the Church there is no salvation. His answer was a literal crash course in
heresy, sophistry, and ad hominem attack. First, he clearly and forcefully DOES
NOT hold the Church's dogmatic teaching that only water baptized believing
Catholics can enter heaven. He took no time at all to reply to my question in
the affirmative, and that, to him, the Catholic Church has always taught this
idea. I then asked him to explain to me how invincible ignorance squares with
Pope Eugene IV's dogmatic definition in Cantate Domino concerning Jews, pagans,
heretics, and schismatics departing into everlasting fire unless they first
reconcile with the Catholic Church before death, and that even shedding blood
for the name of Christ cannot save them. His response can be summarized as the
classic "you have to understand dogmas correctly," which, after his
long-winded explanation, contained little if any understanding or correctness.
I politely, with all respect, told him that he was wrong. The Bishop then
became noticeably agitated and told me that "just reading the Dimond
Brothers" does not make me some sort of expert, or some such thing. When I
asked how he knew that I read your material, he said, "Oh, it's quite
obvious!" He went on to condemn you as dangerous and wrong. "But
Bishop" I said, "the Dimond Brothers simply point people back to the
Church's infallible dogmas..." He cut me off, and tried to give some types
of analogous commentary to support his position which made no sense to me.
He also felt the need not only to bash you
for doing what he as a Bishop should have been doing all along, namely,
holding, proclaiming, and defending Catholic dogma, but he went after me (in so
many words) by emphasizing that since he and his priests are so well-trained
and educated, I must be a dummy. (I almost stated that Catholicism is For
Dummies like me, but I refrained for fear that he might think I was endorsing the
heretical Novus Ordo book you recently exposed). He also referred to me as
"my dear boy, as in "My dear boy, you really must be careful to not
tell a Bishop that he is wrong!" Since I'm 52, I took it as a compliment,
thanked him for his time, and left.
Brothers, these men are for real! Do we not have in the SSPX the
"traditional" counterpart to the Vatican II sect? They claim to be
the Catholic Church, just like the Vatican II sect, and even resemble the true
Catholic Church more realistically with the Latin Mass, cassocks, devotions,
and so on, but if they and their supporters die embracing their heresies, what
will it all be worth? Pope Eugene IV specifically included heretics among those
who will be consigned to eternal fire unless they reconcile with the Church.
What a diabolical deception! So many generous people having lots of children so
that they can be placed in the hands of false-traditionalist priests at SSPX
schools and parishes, seminaries and novitiates, just to be raised up in heresy
and fit for hell! This is truly atrocious!
I thank you again for your defense of holy Dogma, and I am honored to be so
"obviously" associated with you.
Joseph Ramirez
MHFM: That’s a very interesting
e-mail and story. Thanks for sending
it. Perhaps the most revealing part of
the exchange is when you made reference to the Bull Cantate Domino. You asked
him how his view could possibly conform to that dogmatic definition. He responded by arguing essentially that one
must “understand” the dogma if one is to conform it to his (heretical)
position. It is classic modernism, and
it’s precisely what Vatican I condemns: departing from the definition once
declared by the Church under the specious name of a “deeper understanding.” His “understanding,” of course, clearly
contradicts the actual words of the text.
All of this serves to expose their heretical unbelief; it demonstrates,
once again, that they reject the dogma as it has been taught by the Church.
Pope Pius IX, First Vatican Council, Sess.
3, Chap. 2 on Revelation, 1870, ex cathedra: “Hence, also, that understanding
of its sacred dogmas must be perpetually retained, which Holy Mother Church has
once declared; and there must
never be a recession from that meaning under the specious name of a deeper
understanding.”
2 Tim.
3:5
Subject: 2 Tim. 3:5
Dear Brothers:
Might not the scripture to which you
referred, (paraphrasing) "In the last days there will be the
appearance of religion, but the power thereof will be denied," also
indicate the appearance of the Catholic religion via the Novus Ordo, which
denies the true efficacy of the sacraments? For example, to the world,
the Catholic Church still appears to be the Church; the buildings are the same,
there is still a "pope", cardinals, bishops, gregorian chant,
pseudo sacraments, etc., however, all the sacraments, including the Mass,
and even the doctrines have been changed just enough to be merely empty
ceremonies posing as the real ones -- fooling, if possible, even the
"elect?"
God Bless,
Perry
MHFM: We think that it probably has a
number of applications. However, we
definitely think it applies to public figures, celebrities, etc. who say they
are “blessed” or thank God yet live in a manner that’s completely incompatible
with His most basic morality. For
example, they talk about how they are “blessed” yet go to immoral clubs or live
lascivious lifestyles or participate in the production of impurity, etc. They have the appearance of godliness, i.e.,
they mention His name, but deny His power or influence over the actions and
lives of people and how they should conduct themselves.
Bible references
Your teachings, showing with Bible
references, the validity of Mary, Peter, and the Eucharist is beyond price.
Respectfully, Michael Holbrook
Comment
To the Drummer's comment:
Promise given made to St. Benedict regarding the destiny of his enemies:
"3) Everyone who persecutes his
order and does not repent will see his days shortened or
meet with an unfortunate end."
Let's pray that Drummer repent before
it's too late because desiring the death of the Truth (the Catholic Faith)
spread by Most Holy Family Monastery is a very evil thought.
I thought the person Seesyou who called you an "antichrist" was bad
enough but considering this fool's comment, I might reconsider and say that
this might have superceded it. Why? Well because he/she not only hates
the Truth, who is Christ (which in a sense would make him/her an antichrist),
but also desires the death of… sound doctrine (the true Catholic Faith given by
Christ) which is taught and spread by MHFM. Drummer and all those who
hate MHFM's wonderful work are fools and have nor fear nor love for God.
2
Timothy 4:3 "For there shall be a time, when they will not endure sound
doctrine; but, according to their own desires..."
Proverbs 1:7 "The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom. Fools
despise wisdom and instruction."
Galatians 6:7 "God is NOT mocked."
Sincerely,
Bernardo
Comment
Dear Brothers Michael and Peter Dimond,
Subject :"you need to die''
...and you will need tomorrow, "Drummer," to eat those words with
regret - is it because you 'march to the beat' of a different drum, than the
rest of us Catholics who belong to the one true Church of Jesus Christ [
Outside of which There is No Salvation] - that you make such a flippant comment
?
...they say 'what goes round, comes round' - so be careful, drummer, your
wish doesn't come true - cf., to those who persecute the Benedictine
Order and do not repent, will see their days shortened or meet with an
unfortunate end! 8 - [
God bless,
David
Die
Subject: you need to die
Seriously…
Drummer…
USA
I see you never considered that USA might
be the beast of hell? That is fine. I listened to most of your speeches, very intelligent
and interesting. I used to be a believer. I think that USA has more points to
win the place of, foretold by Bible, beast of doom. First nuclear attacks were
made by US, the oil spill -USA, North American continent also comes out of the
Sea; even more so than European.
Regards!
Esaul…
MHFM: We believe Europe is the beast out of the sea. That’s because the Apocalypse connects the
beast out of the sea with the fourth beast predicted by Daniel and its ten
horns. We discuss that in the
video. Daniel’s fourth beast was the
Roman Empire. It arose out of the
Mediterranean Sea. The new beast (which
is a new form of the previous beast) is therefore the new Roman Empire (the
European Union). It also arises out of
the Mediterranean Sea. Moreover, as the
video shows, many other things fit with the European Union. You need to become a believer in God’s one
true faith. Salvation is the most
important thing, and unless you embrace the true Catholic faith you can’t be
saved.
B-16
Hello.
I saw this at euronews channel. "Pope" Benedict XVi celebrates a
"mass" for the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary in St Thomas of
Villanova in Italy where he spends his summer. The novus ordo priests that were
handing out "communion" were giving it in the hand of the people. It
didn't show benedict xvi doing this, but he was there too so it means he allows
this. Grotesque show. Here is the link:
http://www.euronews.net/nocomment/2010/08/16/pope-celebrates-assumption-mass/
God bless
I
forgot to mention. Watch also the novus ordo "nun" in the
background. She also receives
""communion" in the hand
Eduard
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. There are numerous pictures of Antipope
Benedict XVI giving “Communion” in the hand as well.
Comment
Dear brothers in Christ,
The image player on the top of your website
is a good idea. It is very useful for reminding the readers of the many
excellent videos you've produced, which uphold and nourish the Catholic Faith.
In response to a reader who wrote about ex-governor "Catholic"
funeral, you wrote:"Could they indicate any more clearly that they hold
the Catholic faith to be completely meaningless and unnecessary?"
To answer your rhetorical question-- I'm 100% sure they can. I have no idea
what will it be, but I'm sure they'll think of something. The V2 sect is an
inexhaustible fountain of wickedness. A believer in God is incapable to imagine
the innumerable ways of mocking God coming from the pit of Hell.
May The Queen of Heaven protect the true Catholics.
Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia
Share
Hello Brothers Dimond,
Regarding the article: The day Metallica came to "church"
I want to share the following video of a
motorcycle "catholic" mass in Schweinfurt/Germany, which featured even
a metallica song for communion, to show it's not a distinct "feature"
of non-catholic sects.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hWnayzMzSI starting at 5:15 (but the
rest is also pretty abominable)
Greetings from Germany
Stefan
MHFM: That’s incredible.
Thanks for the e-mail.
Ex-Governor, “Mass
Subject:
Ex-Governor dies & receives “Catholic” funeral “Mass”
Dear Brothers,
A few weeks ago there was a televised Novus Ordo (New Order) funeral service
full of ceremony for what looks to be a high ranking Freemason. Ex Nevada
Governor Kenny Guinn was a “Catholic” and served the state of Nevada for many
years. The N.O. church was packed and the “Mass” was presided over by the
effeminate sounding “Bishop” Pepe, who never once said that Guinn went to heaven,
but rather said that Guinn was, “a man who had no denomination per say but like
Abraham was a man of faith and belief.” The service/ceremony was full of
symbolic meaning, including the display of Military with the Honor Guard,
Flags, the 21 Gun Salute and Scottish Bagpipes whenever the body was in
“procession”. All this was a tribute to their man who did his Freemasonic
duty in spite of his “Catholic” façade. He died keeping the secrets of
the “Craft”. His official burial was to take place in California!
Despite being a native Californian he ended up with a lot of fingers in the
pies of Nevadans. He was a past Superintendent of Schools; he was CEO of
the Gas Company, and CEO of a bank among many other things. From the
varied sources, reference was made to the fact there was even still more work
that lay ahead for him even though he was 72 years old!
As press reports of his death came in it was speculated that he was on the roof
of his house (he has two in Nevada) possibly fixing the air conditioning or
brushing leaves off during the record breaking high temperatures in July and
may have suffered a stroke or heart attack while up there and fell off.
What in the world would a wealthy old man be doing fixing his own air
conditioning or sweeping leaves off his sharply angled roof? There wasn't
wind, it was heat and the aerial photos of the house in question clearly showed
a sloping rooftop with no wind or leaves. The official autopsy which
eventually came out stated: “The Clark County Coroner’s Office has released the
autopsy results on former Nevada Governor Guinn. The coroner says Guinn
died from blunt force trauma to the chest and head after he fell from the roof
of his home July 22. The report also says the fall caused his heart to stop,
and he was pronounced dead at University Medical Center at 11:07 am. The
cause of his death was ruled accidental.”
The links from Part I and part II of the disgusting display of a “Mass” along
with the comments by the "Bishop" (and many other press releases) are
here if you are interested in taking a look:
http://www.ktnv.com/Global/searchresults.asp?vendor=ez&qu=guinn
Reference to the bagpipes are here: http://www.mynews3.com/story.php?id=23900
and a brief video reference to them and the gun salute are here:
http://www.8newsnow.com/global/story.asp?s=12876475
By this very public and abominable display it would appear that he was indeed a
Scottish rite 33rd degree Freemason and that his "Catholic" name was
a ruse for the benefit of his wife and family and to keep up pretenses for
covert activities as instructed by his fellow comrades. His associates
tell on themselves by publicly paying their respects and so doing, the “high
ranking dignitaries” ally themselves to him and to Freemasonry. (Will they be
wearing full insignia including their Aprons at the other service in
California?)
These Freemasons and their incessant in our face slight of hand, out and out
lying and fixation on symbols and numerology (note the publication of date and
time of death) make me more furious and sickened by the day. Grown men
keeping secrets and playing with numbers and symbols, how stupid and ignorant
can “smart men” be? If they die in this atrocity they fully deserve what
the Lord Jesus Christ gives them for their betrayal of Him and their true duty
to their families and true countrymen. Poor Novus Ordo family, if they stay
where they're at, they will not fare much better.
Anon.
MHFM: That’s very interesting.
It’s especially interesting that the Novus Ordo “bishop” explicitly
identified him as a man of no
denomination (i.e., he wasn’t Catholic), yet gave him a “Catholic” funeral
anyway. It’s another example of the
almost never-ending stream of apostate actions by the Vatican II sect. What a complete mockery of the faith. Could they indicate any more clearly that they
hold the Catholic faith to be completely meaningless and unnecessary?
Interest
Respected Brothers,
Greetings!
I think some of us are missing important youtube videos. I go to Internet
parlour once a month to download MHFM pages and any new audio files I find. I
tried to install youtube downloader in the parlour computer, didn’t succeed,
maybe because of some restrictions. It would be kind of you to provide also the
audio files for the videos you post. Also, right now I cannot order the books
you sell… but I’ve downloaded the PDF files. I think you’ve provided most of
the chapters of the book “The Truth about What Really Happened to the Catholic
Church after Vatican II” in PDF. I read them, print them and share photocopies
of them with at least one uncle in our village, who is serious about the Faith,
may be more serious than me, I guess. I share what I read with my younger
brother, also with my Godmother, who spontaneously speaks out many of the
things I’ve read and which I’ve not told her before. I guess it is intelligence
face to face with Faith. Example: I was talking about the invalidity of the new
sacrament of ordination, she just said, “that’s why there is no grace in the
sacrament of confession, and people fall again into the same mortal sins which
they confess.” Also what Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre said about the salvation of
pagans, she said something like, “when Catholics will have such difficulties in
saving their souls, how much more difficult it will be for pagans… it was just
wrong for him to say that.”
Brothers, we pray for you. May many souls be saved through you and
through everyone who is with you in the Apostolate.
With kind regards,
Sanjay.
From Orissa, India.
Interview
Subject:
“Fr.” Breen interview – you tube [regarding item in News & Commentary]
NOXIOUX
VILE TOXIC HERETIC for explaining to "all of us where we can
go"..........well, it is straight to hell, according to these people,
with their un-Godly beliefs they are spouting! How sad that so late in
the day of human history they are still so seemingly HOPELESSLY
LOST!!! It's obvious they could not care ONE FIG about souls,
the Truth, The Catholic Faith: this "Breen" is an
ABSOLUTE POSTER CHILD for someone who has so thoroughly intoxicated himself on
the wine of the fornication of the "new [counter] mass" of Vatican 2
and all its evil heresies......well, there really is NO EXCUSE AT ALL for
people like this: talk about wolves in sheep's clothing! MHFM
has made the truth abundantly available… and yet these blind guides still lead
their hapless "flocks" STRAIGHT into the pits of hell, with
NO MERCY AT ALL! I guess severe, profound spiritual blindness and
deception has punishments all its own: like a further increase in that
blindness... Saint Jude pray for us
MHFM: Since his story got a lot of
attention, he will probably receive some very mild and insignificant discipline
only as part of a public relations ploy to appease people who are upset by what
he said. However, he won’t be
excommunicated, even though he supports contraception and all the rest. Thus, it’s another example of how the Vatican
II sect is not Catholic.
Note
MHFM: Readers of our website probably
noticed the new image screen/player near the top of our website. We will begin to update it with new content
hopefully toward the middle or end of next week. The News & Commentary and E-Exchanges
will continue to be updated as usual.
Troubled
Dear Brothers:
I am very troubled by the fact that my
local grocery store sells immoral products such as contraceptives and very
perverse novels. It’s troubling too because I am a cashier at this store. As a
Catholic I feel morally obligated to find another job rather than continue
selling these things. Please advise me on this matter.
Sincerely,
Anonymous
MHFM: A Catholic must not sell those things.
Comment
Hi Brothers,
I just received your book “The Bible Proves
the Teachings of the Catholic Church.”
This is the best thing I’ve ever seen!
I’ve seen other books like it, but nothing this complete and convincing
and backed up with facts. All your stuff
is good, but you really take the cake with this book. This ought to show all the Protestants and
other religions that they’re in the wrong boat.
I’m going to need to order a few hundred because we want to start
handing these out to people. I still
like the Padre Pio book, but this is the best thing even for fallen away
Catholics. Thank you Brothers and
MHFM. God bless you!
Don Primi
Austrians
Subject: 100,000 Austrians
The news article you published about
100,000 Austrians leaving the V-2 church is very revealing. Even though most of
these people probably cannot identify all of the multiple issues about which the
conciliar church has entered into heresy and apostasy, they know something is
wrong. Besides, the conciliar church teaches that one may obtain salvation even
if one is not a member of the Catholic Church. The same thing is happening in
Latin America and in the United States and Canada where millions are leaving
the conciliar church only to end up in false evangelical, pentecostal or other
protestant sects or cults.
The V-2 church and its leaders, especially Roncalli, Montini, Wojtyla and
Ratzinger have proven to be a disaster for the world.
EJP, M.D., D.D.
New Video
and Article
MHFM: Bro. Michael Dimond checks in with a new
video and article on the best-selling book, Catholicism
for Dummies. This video and article
expose the heresies in Catholicism for
Dummies. Catholicism for Dummies was authored by “Fr.” John Trigilio, a
featured speaker on EWTN. It has also
been promoted by Novus Ordo “apologist” Jimmy Akin and “Catholic Answers.” For those reasons, the outrageous heresies in
the book are all the more revealing about the apostate Vatican II sect.
Catholicism for Dummies Exposed [video]
Catholicism
for Dummies Exposed [article]
SSPV
I was listening to Father Jenkins of the
St. Pius V Society… [someone] asked him… whether or not it was correct to say that
no one could be either in heaven or purgatory without sanctifying grace.
Father Jenkins responded that that was correct, that no one could be saved and
be in either purgatory or heaven without having been in the state of
sanctifying grace. Then the [person] asked if the means of obtaining
sanctifying grace was through the sacraments only. Father Jenkins first
said yes, then hesitated and changed his mind and said, "That would be
denying the baptism of the blood and of desire, though. God can save a
person through any means." I got so disgusted that I… did not listen
further. It is so upsetting because Father Jenkins, in most all other
instances appears to be so orthodox in his beliefs. He speaks of modesty,
family, against indifferentism and the new ecumenism, having a prayer
life, the sacraments, sanctity, etc... It occurred to me that it could be
that this caller was merely trying to get Father Jenkins to see the incongruity
of his beliefs. They are vehemently against what they call the
heresy of "feeneyism."
I, too, used to be an attendee of their
masses until I read their publication and saw their endorsement of the heresy
of BOD. Also, I was shocked to discover they did not even object to
sending Catholics to public school. When I confronted them about the two
of you, [a supporter of theirs] Wes Steele warned me off of you, saying your
monastery was illegitimate and that the two of you "appeared" out of
nowhere and had gotten your degrees from secular universities in California.
I mention all this because this society
rejects John Paul II and Benedict XVI, and all the other antipopes; and rightly
calls the Novus Ordo a sect, not the Catholic Church. Their followers
really believe they have found a safe-haven, and feel secure and happy because
they receive the sacraments regularly. It is just like a family.
They have a bishop, priests, monastery, schools, nuns, picnics, pancake
breakfasts, prayer support -- all the things the Church used to provide for
everyone…. In a sacrament-starved environment, it appears as an oasis in the
desert…. And yet, the poison of this BOD and BOB heresy undermines the entire
faith and they are all oblivious to the fact that this heresy, particularly
BOD, is the foundation for Vatican II and the basis for the very ecumenism they
say they reject. It is like sitting in someone's parlor and having tea
and cakes with a huge, wild, "white elephant" standing next
to the white wall.
Perry
MHFM: Misinformation and lies are
standard when such heretics mention us.
With regard to the question he answered, that’s mild compared to what
they really believe. If the questions
got into specific religions and members of those religions, the wholesale
apostasy would become apparent. They
believe that souls can be saved in any religion. They also accept NFP. It’s true to say that they essentially
believe in universal salvation. They
couldn’t say that any person, or any number of people in any spiritual
situation, is definitively in the state of damnation or lost. Except for the Latin Mass, they are almost
the same as the Novus Ordo. It’s a
massive façade, like Protestant false Christianity, with the darkness lurking
within their false salvation message. It
springs up to rip apart true faith in Christ and His dogmas, rendering the
entire Gospel and faith meaningless and empty.
Follow-up
Subject: Shark follow-up
Your points on the situation regarding the
Baptism on the Beach story are valid. However I think that prima fascia, the
story is so extraordinary, that the boy was probably saved. Having
reached 18 years of age in 1959, in the US, it is almost certain that the boy
was aware of the Incarnation and the Trinity. In fact the Trinity is
implicit in the form of Baptism. So his consent to Baptism and his Act of
Contrition seem evidence of cooperation and acceptance.
There are other facts of the case to which
the story as printed in TIME don’t really do justice. O’Neill’s courage
(the girl rescuer) was almost supernatural. The Shark, estimated from the
bite radius was a great white some 18 feet long. It was literally
chomping him when she approached. If you have ever seen video footage of
these sharks attacking a seal or feeding on a dead whale, you’ll have some idea
of what she confronted. She pulled him away as the shark was
repositioning for a better grip. And then the shark, which never showed
any interest in her, left.
It took her several minutes to drag him to
shore through two foot swells. Though there were other people, presumably
men, on the beach, no one entered the water to help her.
The other fact is that his wounds were
massive and gruesome. One leg was completely gone, one in shreds,
and half his torso bitten through, shoulder to hip. O’Neill’s courage and
fortitude aside, it seems miraculous that he was alive long enough, and
conscious, to consent to the baptism. I think it speaks to
election. “I know mine and mine know me”. Some souls, through the
mystery of Grace, God just loves. Perhaps it was some aspect of Kogler’s
(the victim) interior disposition? Anyway, I think it is OK to win one
once in a while. Maybe this was a win for God. I know we can’t know
anything with certitude about a particular soul (unless the real Church speaks
through canonization), but I also think that some cases lead to probably
conclusions. Hard to imagine this happening today, 50 years and 45 years
into Vatican II.
Bill Mulligan
MHFM: Yes, it makes sense that the article wouldn’t give all the
details. It also makes sense that, at
that time, he was aware of the core truths of the Trinity and the
Incarnation. In the lives of the
missionaries, there are many refreshing and amazing examples of how people were
preserved just long enough to receive water baptism. They serve to further contradict the lie of
salvation without actual incorporation into the Church through baptism. This shark story might very well have been
another example.
Abomination
Subject: “Catholicism for Dummies” –
abomination!
Dear Brothers,
That's a great video and article on the
diabolical and outrageous book, “Catholicism for Dummies.” Thank you. It's one
of the biggest selling books on the subject of “Catholicism,” and combined with
the brand name, “...for Dummies,” its circulation is massive… Even a simple
glance at the cover picture speaks volumes: 1. An old lady's hands – with
arthritic joints, and 2. Holding Rosary beads – the hidden message is that
Catholicism is a dying tradition, and that the Rosary is only for old women!
It's like a catechism of Vatican II apostasy. Page 100 gets in the heresies of
invincible ignorance (i.e. ”anonymous christians”) and baptism of desire in one
hit, while page 94 says that all baptized, even heretics, are in the Catholic
Church - heresy and schism! Page 9 opens a heretical can of ambiguous worms by
stating that “all people are basically good.” Even though we are made in God's
image, and man's fallen nature is not fundamentally or irredeemably evil (as
Protestants believe), i.e. we still have free will, original sin has weakened
our nature and will so that we are constantly inclined toward evil, and so most
people will be lost to hell. Jesus said only “One is good, God.” (Matt. 19:17)
It's the V-2 heresy of, “all 'good' people go to heaven” - it's universal
salvation, religious indifferentism, apostasy! The book says “it's nice” to go
to the gates of hell, i.e. Protestant services. That Judaism and Islam are
“great religions,” when they are more guilty for spilling Catholic blood than
any other religions. That NFP is sophisticated, when it's actually another New
World Order population reduction tactic (viz. genocide). And that homosexuals
are treated equally to heterosexuals by the Church, when God ionized Sodom and
Gomorrah for their [homosexual] sins… 1+1=2, ask any 1st grader. If people
can't see that the teachings in such trash as the book, “Catholicism for
Dummies” are the same teachings that have produced unprecedented numbers of
child molesting pedophile “priests,” then they'll enjoy being called dummies
too! The End of the World has arrived – hold on to the true Catholic faith
above everything else! Outside the true Catholic Church there is absolutely no
salvation!!!
God Bless,
Chris White
NOPOPE
Brothers, I was watching a documentary on the Titanic called "Titanic: Secrets Revealed." There is talk of all the omens associated with the ship, with the biggest omen mocking God by saying the ship was unsinkable. At the 12:30 minute point in the film it talks about how in the Irish shipyard during construction, the Catholic workers saw in dismay the identity number (406063) on the massive ship hull reflecting in the water. The upside down reflection in the water looked like the word "NOPOPE". The workers wondered if the ship was unholy as well.
I find this an amazing coincidence that after 75 years the Titanic was
discovered and photographed in 1985. That this photo and message of
"NOPOPE" would be discovered during the reign of the Anti-Christ
Anti-Pope John Paul II.
God Bless,
Tom Miles
Athanasius
MHFM: We thought this was a somewhat
interesting quote.
“Besides, he [St. Athanasius] did not study what in
itself constitutes the divine Persons, nor how they are distinct and how
differentiated, one from another, nor how we can, by means of remote analogies,
represent to ourselves the mysterious operations which give them their
being. A polemicist always in the heat of battle, Athanasius had neither the
leisure nor, probably, the taste to treat these questions of profound religious
philosophy.” (Tixeront, History of
Dogmas, Vol. 2, p. 75.)
The point is that, in the opinion of this author,
Athanasius didn’t necessarily get bogged down by deeper philosophical
considerations or reasoning about secondary issues. He focused on the core truths and the
primary arguments to refute the heretics.
The wisdom in such an approach is that the best arguments are always, in
the end, simple. It’s certainly true
that, in refuting the multi-faceted objections and distortions of heretics,
deeper understanding and deeper analysis are often required and extremely
effective. In the end, however, the
refutation returns to the simple point and the core divine truth. Countless heretics deceive themselves by a
vain dedication to their own thoughts and analysis – not in order to further
expound the simple divine truths – but instead to consume their focus and move
them away from the simple facts. In this
way, countless people are deceived. The
quote is not meant to suggest that Athanasius didn’t believe in or understand
the distinction between the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost, which of course
he did; nor, of course, is it in any way to suggest that deeper study and
analysis are incompatible with true wisdom – not at all. Rather, it is to comment on a mindset that
must prevail in a defender of truth, even when he acquires a deeper
understanding of a topic or deals with issues which some deem to be more
involved.
Flooded
Subject:
Brenda’s comment
THIS IS WHY IN
1966 PAUL VI ABOLISHED THE INDEX OF FORBIDDEN BOOKS, SO THE WORLD COULD BE
FLOODED WITH THESE HERETICAL PUTRID BOOKS LIKE CATHOLICISM FOR DUMMIES.
IT ANGERS ME SO MUCH THAT PEOPLE JUST THROW AWAY THEIR GOD GIVEN COMMON
SENSE TO BECOME PARROTS FOR THESE EVIL SNAKES!
TODD
Salvation issue
Dear Brother Dimond,
I have visited your web page because my
friend, Juan… showed me the text you kindly sent him related to the salvation
dogma. I recognize to have fallen into this error - thinking that some
"special cases" of "which baptism "might occur - because of
being ignorant myself. Thanks to Our Lady now I have learned the truth, always
taught by the Holy Church and now shown in your web page. Thanks God.
Please subscribe me to your newsletter…
In Jesu et Mariae
Jorge Zamora
Tea
Subject: Tea
Dear Brother Dimond,
About two years ago I visited the home of an elderly couple with
my mother and my sister. The husband was the son of someone who was a friend to
my mother's relatives.
Somehow, while I was speaking with the wife, she happened to
mention that she had attended some sort of "Christian" school as a
youth. I asked her if she had ever learned the Hail Mary prayer. She revealed
to me that she had attended a protestant school but had still learned to say
the Hail Mary. I asked her if she used to recite it often. She said that her
teacher taught it to her class, and she would say it along with the class; but
this was the only time she said it. She indicated that after a certain grade
she stopped saying it, and she stopped saying it because her later teachers would
no longer have the class recite this prayer.
About a year later I again visited this same couple at their home.
This time I asked the wife if she would like to receive some literature about
the Bible and the Catholic Church in the mail. She said yes to that, gave me
her address, and indicated that she would take a look at the material. I mailed
her The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church along with my own
note informing her that this book proves its main thesis in many areas using
the King James Version of the Bible, a Protestant translation.
Just last month I learned that she had passed away due to an
illness. I had not heard from her since I mailed the book to her. I never got
the chance to ask whether she had read the book or what she thought of it. I do
not know if this book caused her to convert to the traditional Catholic faith.
The husband has invited my mother and myself to a tea in his
wife's honor. As far as I am aware the husband is not a Catholic. Considering
the fact that I do not know if this lady died as a Catholic, I believe I should
not go. I believe this tea (reception), even though not immediately following a
non Catholic funeral, is something that a Catholic should not attend. Brother Dimond, any comments you might have
on this matter would be appreciated.
Sincerely,
TD
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. No, you should not attend. Since there is no evidence that she embraced
the Catholic faith, one cannot consider her to have died as a Catholic. In responding to the invitation, we would
recommend telling the husband exactly what your thoughts are in a charitable
way. In other words, as a Catholic, you
cannot have tea in honor of someone who did not die in the true faith; and you
invite him to embrace the true faith to obtain his own salvation.
BOD
Subject: Shark
Story
With it being “Shark Week” on DSC Channel,
I remembered as a kid reading about the fatal attack of a great white in San
Francisco Bay in the 1950s. I remember the victim was a guy named Kogler,
and his girlfriend, named Shirley O’Neill had pulled him away from the shark
and onto the beach. Because it was witnessed by a soldier, the girl was
given a medal by President Kennedy. So these general details
I remembered, so I thought I’d google the name Kogler to refresh my childhood
memory of reading this story. However this part of the story I did not
read in the Time Life book article. However this story appeared in
TIME, the Magazine in 1959.
Miss O’Neill, in addition to possessing
tremendous physical courage, apparently did not suffer from Baptism of Desire,
or the “Soul of the Church” heresies:
Baptism on the Beach
Monday, May. 18, 1959
It was a sunny afternoon in San Francisco. Shirley O'Neill and Albert Kogler,
18-year-old freshmen at San Francisco State College, went for a swim off
Baker's Beach, near the Golden Gate Bridge.
They were treading water about 50 yds. offshore when Al Kogler cried out.
"I turned around," Shirley said later, "and saw this big grey
thing flap up into the air. I don't know if it was a fin or a tail. I knew it
was some kind of fish. There was thrashing in the water. He screamed again. He
said, 'It's a shark! Get out of here!'"
Looking down on the ocean from the Presidio, San Francisco's history-encrusted Army
post, Master Sergeant Leo P. Day saw what happened next. "I could see the
boy in the foaming red water, shouting and signaling someone to 'go back, go
back.' Then I saw the girl, swimming toward him, completely ignoring his
warning. It was the greatest exhibition of courage I have ever seen."
Shirley reached Albert and seized his hand, "but when I pulled, I could
see that his arm was just hanging by a thread." She slipped her arm around
him and began to swim for the beach. When she was near enough, a fisherman
threw her a line. After they were on the sand, Shirley, a Roman Catholic,
scooped up some sea water and let it run over the head of her friend (who had
never been baptized and belonged to no specific faith). "I baptize thee in
the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost,"* said Shirley, making
the sign of the Cross, and whispered to Albert, "Is that all right?"
"O.K.," he gasped.
She told him to repeat after her the act of contrition: "0 my God, I am
heartily sorry for having offended thee. I detest all my sins because I dread
the loss of Heaven and the pains of Hell, but most of all because they offend
thee, my God, who art all good and deserving of all my love."
Just before Albert Kogler lapsed into unconsciousness, he whispered: "I
love God, and I love my mother and I love my father. Oh God, help me." Two
hours later, in the Presidio's Letterman General Hospital, he died.
Bill Mulligan
MHFM: That’s a very interesting
story. There are only two comments we
would make. First, public swimming
(almost certainly in immodest attire) in front of others is not an appropriate
activity for people. Second, in addition
to having willingly received baptism, it would have been necessary for him to
have accepted belief in the core mysteries of the Catholic faith (e.g., the
Trinity and the Incarnation). Since the
young man seemed to have willingly and enthusiastically embraced baptism, as
well as the act of contrition, it’s likely that he accepted core belief in the
essential Catholic mysteries. Therefore,
he could have been saved by dying after baptism.
Comment
Subject:
Brother Michael Dimond’s review/expose of the stupid book “Catholicism for
Dummies”
It
seems that this book is indeed aptly named: for anyone would have to be a
REAL DUMB-DUMB to actually fall for the stupid heresies in this book, and
even BEGIN think they are Catholic! My goodness! It's as if the
authors/publishers/promoters of this book are, by this horrendous outrage
against THE FAITH, are literally BEGGING God Almighty to strike and decimate
theml Wow! Truly satan is bold as he stalks the earth looking
for his ill-fated prey, today, most of whom just tumble so easily into his
grasp......
I've
heard of "Father Trigilio"--(gag)---of EWTN "fame"---or
infamy---did you realize he has notoriously supported one of the very many FAKE
V2 'Fatima' organizations, "Tradition, Family,
Property" … Thankfully, I have never even heard of the other
"priest" involved in authoring this "book" and I thank God
too I have never-ever even heard of this "Chris Brown" creep ----
must be some hideous vile "pop-culture" freak-- However I am
praying for that poor girl who emailed MHFM about her pathetic addiction to him
(whoever he is)---it is truly awful to witness the extremely dark evil the
"youth culture" of today involves itself in!! It makes you
think that satan sure has it easy--------for now.
A.
Papal Infallibility
Subject: Papal Infallibility
Dear Brothers:
If the modernist heretics only accept dogmas defined the Vatican Council in
1870, they would be denying the dogma of the Immaculate Conception that was
defined in 1854 by Pope Pius IX, well before the Vatican Council.
EJP, M.D., D.D.
MHFM: Yes, their position doesn’t make any sense.
To do?
… I am not even Catholic. I am a seeker
from Sweden, raised much like you in a "non-religious family" as you
defined it some video I watched "the belief that God *probably* exists
(and usually some holistic version) but no one cares and what matters is living
a good life and only that." I am sure you can imagine and perhaps identify
with the confusion of first realizing the truth of a higher being and beginning
the search for truth, going through buddhism, sufism, Islam, Christianity,
eastern Orthodoxy (which I halted for a good while) and then finally understand
that the Catholic Church is the one true Church - and when delving deeper into
that I find the Second Vatican Council, the catastrophic state of the Church
and mass, the Tradionalists, which I immediately identified with, and then
later the sedevacantists... Sigh, well, it's most confusing. I feel as if I am
walking on a web of small lines hanging over the Abyss - blindfolded. And
there's practically no Catholic (or Second Vatican Council sect if you wish)
presence except for some Polish immigrants, and that's all lukewarm such and
there's not a hint of traditionalism...
I don't really know why I am writing this... I just, what should I do?
MHFM: You should obtain a rosary and start to pray it. The file on how to pray it is on our
website. We would also recommend reading
some lives of the saints, to see the miraculous power of the one true faith
(the Catholic faith). We offer some of
those books. Jesus Christ was true God
and true man. That’s indisputable. He founded one true Church; that’s
indisputable. There’s nothing more to
think about. You need to become
Catholic. Start to pray and familiarize
yourself with the basic Catechism. When
convinced, take the steps to convert that are on our website. But if you don’t start praying the Rosary
each day and doing spiritual reading, you won’t have the grace to follow
through with your conversion or be convinced of the faith. We hope you take the steps. Today is the day to act.
Anti-Catholic
Greetings!
Your expose on "Catholicism For
Dummies" was right on the mark. We had bought and briefly looked at
an abridged copy; and promptly threw it away. We might as well have been
looking at an antiCatholic tract. Another set of books you may want to
warn people about is "Radio Replies"; it is a written account of a
radio program run by three priests back before Vatican II. They are set
up in a question and answer mode; and yes, they do promote baptism of desire
and universal salvation, even way back then. They also mentioned that
Noah's flood was a locallized event !!! These books are very old, and
they do have some valuable insights in them, but I cannot recommend that anyone
buy them because they are heretical.
Brenda Roy
Read
Subject: Catholicism for Dummies
mhfm,
I read your article exposing the Catholicism for Dummies fraud and you
did a very good job. When you mentioned the fact that they taught there
are only two ex cathedra pronouncements it shows how misinformed they are.
The idea that there are only two ex cathedra's is actually very common (at
least in the state of Illinois). That was taught in my RCIA back about
two years ago, I was taught that at another parish and out of a book called The
Complete Idiot's Guide to Catholicism when I was still Lutheran at the
age of 14. From what it seems the (flawed) rationale for this
teaching is that ex cathedra was formally defined in 1870. There were
only two ex cathedra pronouncements after this date so those two are the only
ones that count (so they say). Every V-2 person I talk to doesn't see the
illogic of having two infallible definitions on the Blessed Virgin but having
no infallible definitions on such things as the Trinity, the incarnation,
etc. (The two infallible Novus Ordo definitions are Immaculate Conception
and the Assumption, they are extremely important of course since they belong to
the Deposit of Faith, however it would be strange if there were no other
dogmatic definitions, especially on such things as the nature of God
himself.)
Kenneth Connelly
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.
In our experience with people in the Novus Ordo, we’ve also noticed that
this is a common misconception. However,
we thought it was remarkable that the egregious error was promoted by one of
EWTN’s “most respected” theological teachers.
The misconception betrays a completely modernist view of divine
revelation. Since they only believe that
dogmas become true after they are
proclaimed – for example, according to them, the definition on ex cathedra
pronouncements only became true after it was proclaimed in 1870 – they only
apply them to times after the definition in 1870. A Catholic, however, understands that a
dogmatic definition sets forth a truth of revelation that was given to the
Church by Jesus Christ. Thus, when a
pope proclaims a dogma in 1870, or in 1441 (e.g., Outside the Church There is
No Salvation), he is declaring that it was true without exception since the
promulgation of the Gospel and the founding of the Church. In other words, it was true throughout all of
Church history.
That means that every time in Church history before 1870, when
the criteria for an ex cathedra pronouncement were met, the pope spoke
infallibly from the Chair of Peter. The
divine protection did not come into existence in or after 1870. In the same way, these modernists don’t believe the dogma Outside the
Church There is No Salvation was true before its definition. They actually don’t believe in it at all, but
they will say things like: that statement at the Council of Florence was before they discovered this country,
etc. By such arguments they reveal their
completely modernist understanding of dogma.
The dogma is a truth of revelation.
It was true before the first definition; the definition simply told us
in a clear and authoritative fashion what
Christ had already revealed about reality.
We also recognize that some of the modernists conclude that there have
only been two ex cathedra pronouncements based on an arbitrary view of what words
must be said for something to be infallible.
They believe that since the wording of the definitions of the Immaculate
Conception and the Assumption were very similar and, in their view, more
formal, only they fulfill the requirements.
This view is held by some in the traditionalist movement, including SSPX
supporters, and it is not supported by the teaching of Vatican I.
Finally, we will point out that the modernist position on this
issue entails a further inconsistency.
If there were only two ex cathedra pronouncements in Church history (the
Immaculate Conception and the Assumption) – and they are basing that on the
language set forth at Vatican I in 1870 – they must exclude the very definition
of Vatican I from what constitutes an ex cathedra pronouncement! Otherwise, they would have three: 1) The
Immaculate Conception, 2) Vatican I on papal infallibility and ex cathedra
pronouncements, and 3) the Assumption.
Since they exclude the text in Vatican I, on what basis do they declare
that the other two are indeed ex cathedra pronouncements, since Vatican I was
the place where the criteria for what is ex cathedra were set forth? It’s a mass of contradictions and illogical
nonsense.
Outrageous
Subject: Outrageous
Dear Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,
To say that both John Paul II and Benedict XVI, are, and have been, ' very holy
men' and 'staunch defenders of the teachings of the Catholic faith' is simply
ridiculous and outrageous!
Has Christine never read the… Heresies of both John Paul II and Benedict
XVI?... - She needs to, before she starts hopping onto her novus ordo
'high horse'- and attempting to preach to and correct the converted, the
few true Catholics who remain in the world today, who remain faithful to Christ
and His Church, and are more than capable of rebuffing mindless,
unsubstantiated accusations of "blasphemy"...
And, once having acquainted herself with the numerous heresies of her
"popes", AND she refuses to budge - she becomes the blasphemer!
...having just put her foot in her mouth - the boot now appears to be on
the other foot!
A 'sister in Christ' to me, she most definitely is not - as long as she remains
stubbornly with the church of the Apostasy, and its Antipopes, which lacks ALL
four marks of the Catholic Church, outside of which there is no salvation, and
whose prayers God does not heed!
God bless,
David
Latest
Subject: Latest review of Catholicism for
Dummies
Dear Brothers,
Good job on exposing a largely distributed book that is probably hurting
already countless souls. They don't even care! I think they just
want to sell books. All of the heresies were terrible! But, the one that
got me the most was the one on Hell and purgatory, not being real places!
How could they in right conscience put out such obvious lies. The Dogma
of hell is what saves so many sinners right at the beginning of their
conversion. Because they're not pure enough yet to avoid sin simply for
the love of God but the fear of Hell keeps most of them from committing sins.
Now, take away the reality of hell and what do they have to fear? This
book is so dangerous it's ridiculous. It’s simply a religion of the world
it’s spelling out, where everyone is of God no matter what they do and whatever
you do, don't offend anyone.
Nathan
How can?
Subject:
Catholicism for dummies
Excellent
video!
Their book should be called PROTESTANT Catholicism for dummies!! How can they get away with such
heresy!! Saying jews and muslims are the same etc!!
And the GAYS!!! and now it is legal practically everywhere! What happened
to Sodom and Gomorrah??...
Hum….
Abominable
Subject: B-16 and Anti-Semitism
My compliments to Brother Michael Dimond
for his recent article/audio. The "apologists" from Catholic Answers
are simply clowns able to digest the most abominable heresies.
The V-2 sect´s respect for the false
and apostate Jewish religion is really sickening. I don´t know if you are aware
of Father Dehon´s case. Simply put, Ratzinger put his canonization process on
hold (not that the rat had any power to canonize him anyway) because some of
his writings were discovered, in which he demonstrated "anti-semitic"
ideas.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/15/AR2005061502305.html
CK
Comment
Subject: Christine
I think your answer to the shocked
Christine was a slam-dunk. However as she claimed that she could “go on
and on for a very longtime”, I would like to invite her to do so.
People such as she seem to prefer unity, or
consensus, or harmony, no matter how contrived or artificial to either truth or
justice. They are often quite disturbed by conflict, but they can
rarely (never) cite a single fact (article of truth) or even a coherent idea in
support of their position. So Dear Christine do tell us something,
and it doesn’t even have to be a very longtime, of why say John Paul II is good
and holy.
In addition to His prayer for unity, Jesus
also warned, “think ye not that I came to bring Peace on Earth, but rather the
sword, to divide father against son etc…” In isolation this verse, and
Christine’s favorite verse seem contradictions. In context they are
perfectly harmonious.
Bill Mulligan
John 17
Response
to Christine Pineault
Christine you stated that Jesus said "That we may all be one." This is
a misrepresentation of Jesus' words. Even John Paul II and Benedict XVI
misuse these words of Jesus.
Let's take a look at what is going on in Chapter 17 of St John's Gospel.
First off this is about Jesus' prayer to His Father in Heaven. He was
praying for for His Apostles as stated in John 17:6-11:
(6)"I have manifested thy name to the men whom thou hast given me out of
the world. Thine they were, and to me thou gavest them; and they have
kept thy word. (7) Now they have known , that all things which thou hast
given me, are from thee: (8) Because the words which thou gavest me, I
have given them,; and they have received them, and have known in very deed that
I came out from thee, and they have believed that thou didst send me. (9)
I pray for them: I pray not for the world, but for them whom thou
hast given me: because they are thine: (10) And all my thifs are
thine, and thine are mine; and I am glorified in them. (11) And now I am
not in the world, and these are in the world , and I come to thee, Holy Father,
keep them in thy name whom thou hast given me; that they may be one as we
also are one".
As you can see Jesus was not praying that His Apostles and the world were to be
one but that the apostles were to be one. You can even see that Jesus is
speaking strictly about those who believe.
The prayer of Jesus in the 17th Chapter of St John is nothing like the prayer
of JPII and Benedict XVI, who are praying a diabolical and twisted version of
Jesus' prayer.
So you see the, "they" in Jesus' prayer is for His Apostles, NOT
for unity for His Church and the world.
Paul Smith
Comment
Subject: pride, predestination, free will
Dear Brothers,
I was thinking that one of the main sources
of pride today is an unfounded confidence in one's own salvation. For example,
the Novus Ordites are taught that there is no hell, that those outside the
Catholic Church can be saved, that all men are saved, etc. and so they have no
fear of God punishing them for their sins. Radical schismatics seem to believe that,
since the number of the elect is few, and there are only a few radical
schismatics, then they must be of the elect, which makes them believe like many
of the heretical sects, that all Catholics are of the elect. As a result they
have no fear of God since they imagne they know for sure who is saved. The
Church simply tells us how to judge things by the external forum, which helps
to determine who definitely cannot be saved, such as Non-Catholics, but it
cannot tell who is saved for sure, except for the saints. If anyone knew they
were saved with 100% surety, unless by a special revelation from God, then they
would lose all fear of God, be overcome by pride, and end up in hell! Since we
all have free will which can resist grace or concupiscence at any time, and
which can go from bad will to good will or vice versa whenever the person wants
it to, then it's hard to tell who will be lost or saved amongst Catholics,
unless they have some outstanding qualities, whether they be good or bad, but
even then it may not be possible to judge whether such a one is saved or lost
(I think this is how the Church views predestination, etc.).
Council of Trent, On Justification, CANON
IV.-If any one saith, that man's free will moved and excited by God, by
assenting to God exciting and calling, nowise co-operates towards disposing and
preparing itself for obtaining the grace of Justification; that it cannot
refuse its consent, if it would, but that, as something inanimate, it does
nothing whatever and is merely passive; let him be anathema.
Council of Trent, On Justification, CANON
XV.-If any one saith, that a man, who is born again and justified, is bound of
faith to believe that he is assuredly in the number of the predestinate; let
him be anathema.
Council of Trent, On Justification, CANON
XVI.-If any one saith, that he will for certain, of an absolute and infallible
certainty, have that great gift of perseverance unto the end,-unless he have
learned this by special revelation; let him be anathema.
God Bless,
Chris White
Heard
Dear Dimond Brothers:
It´s been almost 4 years since your now
classic debate against the novus ordo apologist William Golle. To tell you
the truth, at the time I first heard the debate, I was cheering up FOR HIM,
since I described myself as a Traditionalist (even though I still regarded the
crippled Liturgy as valid and somewhat acceptable, and the conciliar leaders as
legitimate Popes). This was the second material from you guys that I saw, the
first being your video on the New Mass, which shocked me deeply. I was hoping
that someone could stand up and prove you wrong, that the situation was not so
dire, and that even if you´re not wrong, there was a great deal of
exaggeration.
What I saw during the next 3 hours was just
astonishing. He felt right into your traps, proving his position to be simply a
tower of sand that you gladly kicked. At the say time, all of his objections
against the sedevacantist thesis and reality were quickly and effectively
disproved with clear examples and in total conformity with the Church´s
Teaching and the Promises of Christ.
That debate was crucial in changing the
tide of my life and position. I´m sure there are many people with similar
stories. After that, I´ve immersed myself deeply in the study of Sedevacantism,
and of your material in particular.
To this day, I´m in debt to the 2 of you.
And in a certain way, to Mr. Golle as well for his inept defense of the
indefensible V2 AntiPopes and their sect´s heresies and apostasy. As GnrHead´s
defeat played a major role in some people´s conversions, I know that the debate
against Golle was pivotal in my case.
Don´t you think it´s about time he gets the
rematch he´s been asking for? After all, nobody seems to be interested anymore
in stepping in a debate with you. Even when they seen to be giving the green
light, for some reason they all give up, probably very much afraid of being
exposed as the inconsistent liars they deep down know they are.
If he´s still willing, why not give him a
chance? What´s to lose? A fair amount of people had their shots at you, and
none of them performed any better.
Frankly, at this point, aside from a
highly, extreme, clinical case of bad-will, the only reasonable motive for a
person who have listened to your debates to not be convinced would be the
supposition of the possibility that all of the V2 apologists you´ve face so far
were somehow unaware of what V2 really teaches and misrepresented it´s true
position. That´s why I´ve urged you to try to find a recognized authority
inside the Novus Ordo structure (like that Franciscan) willing to debate.
But since it´s highly unlikely any of them
will accept, why don´t you bring Mr. Golle back (and down) again?
Apologia
Dear Bros;
I read Archbishop Lefebvre’s book ‘Apologia
Pro’ earlier this year. Anyone who reads this will not be surprised of
the current state and attitude of a large number of SSPX supporters.
Despite the bishop’s fight to keep the true mass and sacraments, his lax
attitude towards new church and its members who want to destroy the true faith
have become the foundation upon which the SSPX is built. I have a good
friend who doesn’t even like to use the term ‘SSPX’ since of course St. Pius X
was a true saint. ‘Lefebvreists’ is a more fitting term for SSPX members.
MG
Debate
I'd just like to clarify: Is your debate with "P…W…" just delayed? I
look forward to your next debate because your past debates are gems of Catholic
training and are very useful reminders. Debate is preferred over posting videos
back and forth between the two parties… It clears away the fog, once and for
all. Facts can no longer be buried under so many lies, and the Truth, from
whomever it comes from, becomes obvious just as the day is separate from the
night. We will eventually all learn from it.
On your recent discussion with a SSPX supporter: A reasonable and concerned
person would think as follows: "Is there a possibility that he is making a
point and I am in error? I should investigate his answers to all my
questions." He probably did not think of that. Not one bit of concern from
him at all. He was so sure of himself, he even said that he'd pray for you to
join SSPX! What would have been decades of difficult prayer and investigation,
you just summarized in minutes. You already made it so easy for him, but still
he does not want to dig in deeper. Maybe, SSPX and other similar groups are
traps for traditionalists?
On your last conversation with Greg, may we know how it ended? Has he changed
his mind after your explanation? Did good will prevail? Even Saint Paul, a
persecutor of the early Church, was converted by Jesus Christ. Let us all pray
then: may the Lord bless Greg so that he may complete his journey to finding
the Truth, as many of us who were once deceived have also done. Amen.
… have you considered writing Catholic children's books? There are lots of
children's stories out there that are not spiritually helpful for them. Have
you also heard about the theory that "Santa Claus" does not really
refer to a saint but could be an anagram for "Satan Lucas" (for the
English speaking world). This was an old trap to deceive children so that they
would commit idolatry on the feast day of the nativity. Do you think this is
true?
May God continue to bless MHFM,
Sanjiv
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. After originally agreeing to have the
debate-conversation, he backed out. He
stopped responding to our e-mails. Just
recently he admitted that he is no longer interested. He is clearly afraid of having his heretical
position exposed. After we refuted his
false assertion on Dominus Iesus, he
obviously concluded that a debate wouldn’t be a good idea. He had declared that Dominus Iesus makes it clear that Benedict XVI holds that the
Eastern “Orthodox” are not part of
the true Church, and that Protestant religions are not means of salvation. We refuted that from the very document
itself. It teaches the opposite: it says
the schismatics are part of the Church and that the Protestant religions are
means of salvation. At that point, he
decided that he didn’t want to do the debate.
What’s most disgraceful is that he was still posturing as if he was
willing to do it when in fact he had backed out.
Regarding the SSPX conversation,
there were a few things that struck us.
One of the interesting things was the fact that he was extremely
unfamiliar with solid Catholic principles, yet had memorized some of the
responses which are commonly (and wrongly) used to deny the true
positions. For instance, he didn’t know
what schism is; yet, when confronted with Catholic principles which lead to the
conclusion that the SSPX’s position is wrong, he immediately replied with all
the common (and false) objections: St. Athanasius (misunderstood); era of peace
(misunderstood); consecration of Russia (misunderstood); Padre Pio (misunderstood);
etc. This reveals that they are not
interested in solid Catholic truth, but only those things which keep them
comforted in their false positions. They
have those memorized (even though they lack a detailed understanding of them),
but they couldn’t care less about Catholic principles or dogmas. For that reason, when it is demonstrated that
their arguments on those matters aren’t correct, they don’t care. The conversation was another example of a
so-called traditionalist who is not remotely Christian. There is no other way to put it: he rejects
core faith in Christ, His necessity for salvation and a true belief in His
dogmas. All they care about is
community, going to a church, externals, and the Latin Mass.
On the matter of the conversation
with Greg, he did communicate with us afterward. He continued to send us e-mails which
demonstrated outrageous obstinacy in his false positions. It was one distortion and misunderstood
argument after another. It was truly
appalling. Anything these heretics think
they can use to deny Catholic teaching is brought up. That’s why the conversation with him was
valuable; it brings those distortions to light.
So, he is unfortunately as hardened in his heresy as he was before the
conversation. That’s why we described
him, in post-debate posts, as a complete liar.
Is the
World about to End? – Part 11
MHFM: We have posted part 11 of the video, Is the World about to End?
Is the World about to End ? - Part 11
Is the World about to End ? - Part 1
Is the World about to End ? - Part 2
Is the World about to End ? - Part 3
Is the World about to End ? - Part 4
Is the World about to End ? - Part 5
Is the World about to End ? - Part 6
Is the World about to End ? - Part 7
Is the World about to End ? - Part 8 - Mark of the Beast
Is the World about to End ? - Part 9 - Mark of the Beast
Is the World about to End ? - Part 10
RCIA
Subject: RCIA
Dear Brothers:
Your video on JP2's teaching the gospel of
Antichrist brought many things to mind, one of which follows.
Years ago my spouse and I attended an RCIA
program. Soon after, I began reading some pre-Vatican II books and
wondered why the points in those books were never mentioned during the
so-called RCIA program. At the time, I concluded that the RCIA had been a
great waste of time.
Of course, I was wrong: the RCIA was
no waste of time - the RCIA was one of the counterfeit church's many shuttle
trains to hell. RCIA should be called RIDD: Rite of
Indoctrination into the Diabolical Disorientation.
By the time the program finishes, their
victims are indeed diabolically disoriented: they don't know up from
down, or in from out. And this - as your video makes clear - is precisely
the gospel and goal of Antichrist, as the real Sister Lucy warned.
Satanic doctrine and a counterfeit church with people all the while thinking
they are holding God's Revelation and are in the Catholic
Church. Diabolical disorientation indeed!
RCIA creates the monstrous and
difficult-to-dislodge belief in people's minds that to be a Catholic depends on
what you call yourself, what your friends think you are, where you park
yourself on Sunday, or what your grandmother was. Nowhere in the false
church (understandably) is it ever taught that to be a Catholic depends first
and foremost on holding the true Faith and being baptized.
It's amazing how you've made all of the
pieces of the puzzle fit together.
Thanks for all you do,
Lee
Duty
I had a quick question about the Easter
duty required of Catholics. I had thought that (under normal conditions)
a Catholic must worthily receive Holy Communion once during the Easter Season
(which ends on Pentecost). Someone told me one must also go to confession
once per year as well, but I was thinking if one commits only venial sins, they
are not required to go to confession - the worthy reception of the Eucharist
implies being in the state of grace, and the Church does not require that
venial sins be confessed. I realize the usual disclaimers - if one is not
near a valid mass, one need not worry, and frequent (valid) confession is a
very good practice. I just wanted to make sure I understood this
correctly.
God bless you,
John
MHFM: Even though it’s an excellent
idea to go frequently, there is no strict obligation to confess venial sins
alone. Yet, there is an obligation to go
to confession once a year (canon 906, 1917 Code). Therefore, in normal times, to fulfill that
obligation, the Catholic in the state of grace would confess the venial sins
alone.
Moreover, there is also an obligation
to receive Communion at least once during Resurrection time (canon 859). However, in this situation, when basically
all the priests are heretics, there is no obligation to go and fulfill that
duty. It’s a church law which does not
bind in this situation. The same is true
of the normal obligation to go to confession.
However, we believe there are options for confession and Communion for
many people, and those are explained in our Where
to go to Mass file. The point is
that there is no strict obligation to go in this situation.
Excommunication
Subject: Excommunicated persons
Dear Brother Peter Dimond,
I am studying your paper "The Heresies of Fr. James Wathen". I am
pleased with your opinions. I see that you implied that excommunicated persons
are outside the Church. The actual statement was an implication that
excommunicated "heretics" are outside the Church. I believe that the
Church teaches that heretics are outside the Church by their own act: their
heresy puts them out of the Church. Excommunicated persons, on the contrary,
are still members of the Church, but are under punishment, called remedial, or
some such term (I remember this from Pietro Parente's Dictionary of Dogmatic
Theology, 1951). They are still members of the Church, but are under
sanctions. If such an excommunicate happened to be a heretic, he would no
longer be excommunicated, he would become a heretic and would not in any way be
a member of the Church. It is splitting hairs, but I submit to the Church and
what the Church teaches without judging it.
It is quite true that the Modernists are heretics, and know that they
are in contradiction to the teachings of the Church. They know; and I suspect
that many of the Modernist leadership, if not most of them, are directly linked
to the Freethinkers. I am not trying to
deflate you, I just wanted to make a comment on your paper.
Robert Gregory
MHFM: First, you are completely wrong. You say that “excommunicated persons… are
still members of the Church.” You also
say that if an excommunicated person happened to be a heretic, he would no
longer be excommunicated. According to
you, heretics are not excommunicated persons.
That is wrong. Second, you imply
that we said that all excommunicated
persons are outside the Church. No,
we did not. We very clearly explained
that those who are excommunicated for
heresy, schism or apostasy are outside the Church. However, one could receive a minor
excommunication for something else and still remain a member of the
Church. Your principal error, which
demonstrates your lack of understanding of the issue, is that heretics are not
excommunicated. It is contradicted by
the following things, among others. All
heretics are automatically excommunicated.
Pope Benedict XIV, Ex Quo Primum (#
23), March 1, 1756: "Moreover heretics and schismatics are subject
to the censure of major excommunication by the law of Can. de Ligu. 23, quest. 5, and Can. Nulli, 5, dist. 19.
But the sacred canons of the Church forbid public prayer for the excommunicated
as can be seen in chap. A nobis, 2, and chap. Sacris on the sentence of
excommunication. Though this does not forbid prayer for their conversion, still such prayer must not take the form of
proclaiming their names in the solemn prayer during the sacrifice of the
Mass."
Canon 2314, 1917
Code of Canon Law: “All apostates from the Christian faith and each and every
heretic or schismatic: 1) Incur ipso
facto [by that very fact] excommunication…”
Interest
Dear Peter and Michael,
I am a Easter Orthodox Christian, living in
Toronto Canada. Over the last two months I have spent a considerable amount of
time watching your videos, and reading your articles. I am very impressed! I was wondering what non-VaticanII Catholic
churches you would recommend I attend in my area, as I have tried looking via
internet. It seems there are very few, in fact I don't really know, should I go
to a Byzantine rite Catholic church? Your help would be very appreciated.
Thank you so much,
Goran Petkovski
Exploring
Dear Brothers,
I have recently been exploring the Traditional Catholic faith. I have
come across a church in my area which offers the Tridentine mass. It is
given by a priest with the letters FSSP after his name. I have done some
research but was wondering what your thoughts were on this type of
ordination. Would this be a mass option for me?? I realize that I
would not be able to support the priest financially due to his support of the
current antipope.
Thank you for your time, God Bless,
Amanda
MHFM: Thanks for the interest. No, the FSSP would not be
an option. Most of their priests are ordained by bishops who were made
bishops in the invalid New Rite of Episcopal Consecration. That's
mentioned in the articles on our site dealing with the new rites.
Therefore, they wouldn't be an option for confession or Communion or
anything. Our file on “Where to Go to Mass” deals with those issues.
Posting
Dear
Brothers:
Thank
you for posting your conversation with the man from the SSPX. It made me
tremble, and made me thank God yet again for finding the MHFM.
The things
the SSPX supporter said are repeated ad nauseum in the cult calling itself
"Tradition". In cult-like fashion, the spirit of inquiry and
investigation (i.e., the search for truth) is beaten down to the point of
death. We have been warned of this by St. Paul who tells us to test all things
and keep what is good.
Thus,
they keep their subjects imprisoned in the whore of Babylon, swearing
allegiance to Antichrist John Paul 2 and his blaspheming cohorts who have put
the worship of the true God on the same level as the worship of Satan.
In
the Sept. '09 issue of the SSPX's Angelus Magazine, there is recorded an
interview with Bishop Fellay. At the end
of that interview Fellay is asked; "What do you think of Benedict
XVI?"
Fellay responds:
"He is an upright man, who regards the situation and the life of the
Church most seriously."
Enough
said…
I
wanted to also thank you for the video on JP2 teaching the Gospel of
Antichrist. If anyone has not seen it they should; make a nice
complement to the end of the world series. And the wrap-up that you make
at the end of that video is absolutely superb.
Thanks
again. Lee
Conversation
Subject: Conversation with SSPX supporter
Dear Br. Michael and Peter Dimond,
Regarding your "Conversation with SSPX supporter" when you asked him
if he had the same faith as Ratzinger. He could not answer that question. For a moment the truth dawned in his mind but
of course he refused to accept it. He could not refute a single thing you said
and totally amazing after such a poor display of understanding the Catholic
Faith he wanted you to join the SSPX. Hard to believe there are such foolish
and deluded people. I am sure he will be happy if Fellay joins the SSPX to the
Seat of the Anti-Christ.
You are right in the early days the SSPX would be okay but as time went on and
it became obvious what was going on and the heresy very clear then they were
responsible to act as a Catholic. The SSPX leaders will be held accountable by
Our Lord.
God Bless,
Maria
Incomprehensible
Dear Brothers,
It is so incomprehensible how the
anti-popes, who have willingly led to the destruction of so many
souls, could possibly not fear God's wrath. Perhaps there is a special
place in hell just for them.
Alpha…
Comment
Dear Brothers,
If Benedict is the "beast" of the
Apocalypse in the form of a "rat" that comes out of the earth, is
this story an indication that Obama, with his leftist, pro-abort, New World
Order agenda is fully in league with him?
http://www.aolnews.com/nation/article/rat-scurries-past-obama-during-rose-garden-speech/19485782
FH
Names
Subject: Names, Games
Dear Brothers,
That's a very interesting Part 11 to your
End of the World series. You prove very clearly the connection between a
Biblical person's name and their role, characteristic or qualities. Antipope
Benedict XVI is the Devil's rat - a betrayer of Christ. He's a rodent scuttling
about in the sewers of the world (synagoges, mosques, Protestant Churches,
etc.) hissing and screeching blasphemies against God and His One
Catholic Church. Rats are sneaky, deceptive and carry disease. What
an appropriate description of Benedict XVI! Also, Antipope John Paul II's real
name, Karol is derived from Charles, which means "man" and his last
name Wojtyla is connected with war (also sounds like woe...), which is
interesting that he spread the Antichrist gospel that "man is God" in
a war-like, i.e. extremely aggressive manner - like a Beast - more than
anyone ever before or since!
The news article on how Israel plays war
games is very revealing. It shows how blood-thirsty they are. If Iran made a
big public show of playing a war-game like that can you imagine the uproar that
would ensue?!! It's all part of the process to condition the public mind into
accepting lies, such as that Iran has nuclear weapons, which it doesn't. Yet no
one worries about Israel having nuclear weapons, as though the fact that they
are Jews justifies the imbalance. Also, it's a common tactic of those who are
corrupt and in power to antagonize their enemies, wait for a reaction, and then
use the enemies’ reaction to justify going to war with them. It's called
"flushing them out," in police jargon. So Israel is trying to
"flush out" Iran by mocking them and teasing them, so that after
Iran says something (even one little thing against Israel), then Israel will
turn around, stones in their hands, crying "See!!! We told you they have
nuclear weapons. Now we have to attack before they do! Don't think!
Just do what we say now before it's too late!!!!!" Israel thinks
war is a game, that's how dangerous they are!
God Bless,
Chris White
Rats
Subject: About Rats
Once again, a brilliant presentation!
Nicely done! I don´t know if you´re going to remain on the "rat" issue
during the next videos, but there are a lot of things that could be said:
For instance, it´s widely (if not
universally) accepted that some animals have a symbolic value. Many theologians
and philosophers even believe this was intended by God. This is even in the
Holy Bible. Many Air Forces use the Hawk, because it symbolizes boldness
and courage. The pig, uncleanness. The dove, peace. The lion, majesty (many
monarchies through history used it as symbol). The scorpion, treachery. The
snakes, the devil and evil in general.
As for the rat, at least in idioms derived
from Latin (like French, Portuguese, Spanish) you can find expressions
identical to "are you a man or a rat?". I know that at least in
Chinese zodiac the rat is considered good, but in most cultures it appears to
be widespread the notion that rats or mice are representatives of COWARDICE.
What better way to describe Joseph
Ratzinger?... He assumed the old Holy Office, even though during Vatican II he
was the writer of the controversial text (read by his master) demanding the
very end of the Holy Office. And in a sense, that´s what he did, by reducing
its effectiveness to nearly zero, like a rodent destroying wood. This is pretty
much like inviting some PETA eco-terrorist to be the head of a slaughterhouse,
some pacifist hippie as the country´s Minister of Defense, or the little
Red Wood hiring the hungry wolf as grandmama´s nurse. I guess everything is
possible in a sect which allows a Rosicrucian to screen candidates to the
priesthood.
"Pope" Paul VI stated (in his
typical cynical fashion) that by SOME FISSURE the smoke of Satan entered the
Church. In a sense, this could be attributed to Antipope Paul VI himself or the
modernism in general present at Vatican II. But I don´t think it´s too much of
an extrapolation to suppose that the fissure from which the beast emerges is a
mouse-hole.
… Heretics are the sons of the devil. True
Catholics are the lineage of the woman. These two spiritual races are natural
enemies… Since there´s no Pope to safeguard the Church, the rats are now
celebrating and spreading a spiritual Black Plague. By the way, rats were the
main vector of the Plague that afflicted Europe in the Middle Ages. It´s
fitting that a rat plays such a large role now.
… His sect is marked with his cowardice. He
does nothing to extirpate liturgical abuses on the new mass. He once made a
remark about Islam that backfired on him. So he retracted the statement and
said it was only something he was quoting, not necessarily his own view on the matter.
It´s ok to him to be pro-abortion. Since his sect would make far too obvious
that they´re not the catholic church if they endorsed abortions, his solution
is to remain silent and sin by omission instead of excommunicate everyone who
supports it in any sense.
Parents afraid of their children. Priests
afraid of the faithful. Bishops afraid of the priests. And now
"popes" scared of Bishops. But in reality, instead of a frail old
man, he´s a fearsome beast, perhaps the deadliest enemy of the Church and
mankind ever. Rats are so small, so fragile, so easy to kill. Any domestic cat
can hunt them down. And yet, they can be a plague, can cause immense
destruction. They can fool people led by appearances that they´re harmless.
Just like Ratzinger does, while he promotes an enormous destruction by his
action, and perhaps even more by his coward inactions…
Keep up the good work. It´s really great
news that you will be releasing this series on DVD. I personally believe you´re
uncovering the greatest lie in the entire History of human civilization. This
Vatican II apostate sect is such a major fraud…
This series is not only an excellent warning to wake up the
Neo-Conservative and "Traditionalists", but I suspect it could be
great to use as an instrument of apologetics and proselytism with Protestants
who wrongfully regard the Catholic Church as the Whore. Once again, thank you
for defending the Faith and Spreading the Light of Truth.
CK
After
Dear Bro. Michael and Peter Dimond,
After listening to that SSPX apologist, my
only reaction was to say, "What a complete 'no hoper', an 'ignoramus 'and
a totally dishonest person!!"
God bless,
David
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. It's an interesting example of how they are
all programmed with the same responses, which they regurgitate on call to
dismiss infallible Catholic truth: e.g., “pastoral council”; “era of peace”;
consecration of Russia; etc. All of
their misconceptions on these matters can be and have been refuted, but it's an
interesting illustration of their bad will.
They really don’t care about Catholic teaching and the truth. His heresy on salvation is also quite
revealing – another example of how for them “baptism of desire” = salvation in
any religion.
Appears
Subject:
rat in the White House
Talking
about rats...guess they are leaving the sinking ship
Rodent scurries by as Obama
lauds Wall Street vote
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hqGxY_MkXAPzC5gh7_SDZd8qB9oAD9FQQR400?index=0
WASHINGTON — '' In his battle with the titans of Wall Street, President Barack
Obama almost got upstaged by a rat. But
he didn't even seem to notice. Assuming that's what it was, scurrying in front
of his podium Thursday in a sun-drenched Rose Garden...''
V.
--
Subject:
rat appears at White House conference
I
thought this was interesting considering your latest video content.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100520/ap_on_re_us/us_obama_rodent
Ms…
Lucia
Thank you for your postings, especially
about the Lucia imposter.
Ad Jesum Per Mariam
Dan
UFO
Subject: Comments on the UFO book
Hi there,
Just want to say the UFO book you have written is great.
I suggest in the 2nd edition of the book you include an expose of the film
called The Fourth Kind.
It is a Hollywood film and supposedly based upon a true life story. Though it
is biased it supposedly contains real life footage and it shows people going
under hypnosis to relive their "alien abduction" experiences.
The people who under hypnosis in some scenes levitate and demonic voices come
out the people speaking ancient Sumerian.
The messages the "aliens" bring are summarised:
1. Pray no Help
2. I am God
If the real life scenes in the film are true it’s the best expose on the
"aliens" for whom they really are ......Demons!
regards,
Ivan
EENS
Hello,
You have a wonderful site! I love
your writings on EENS…
Blessings,
Don
Saying
I like how you put into perspective the
information in the latest series, concerning the "Rat" and the false
Prophet B-16 and bring it to an undeniable conclusion . One saying comes to my
mind as well, "Rat Fink" concerning the beatification of the
anti-Christ JPII. To think of all the miracles, hard work, and suffering
that Padre Pio had performed over 50 years, and no real mention of his
accomplishments or beatification. A lot of Vatican II Sect members know nothing
of Padre Pio, nor anything else of the true Chruch prior to Vatican II. A
complete brainwashing as we see also today with the actions of world
governments.
The (2007) childrens Pixar cartoon movie "Ratatouille" about Remy the
young RAT in Paris who is portrayed as such a sweet lovable almost human
character who loves cooking came into view at a seemingly appropriate time. The
movie was produced only a couple years after Ratzinger came into the public
eye. Interesting in comparing the two, that the food dish Ratatouille
(Ratzinger), from which the movie name comes, is usually served as a side dish
(along JPII), but also may be served as a meal on its own (B-16 False Prophet).
These last days will ultimately show God allowing the serpent snake Lucifer who
also lives in a hole in the ground (Hell), to attack and swallow the rodent
(RATzinger) that plagues this world. I look forward to the release of
this new series "Is the World about to End" onto DVD. What a
package should it contain the other three movies; The Third Secret of Fatima,
Death and the Journey to Hell, and Creation & Miracles. As fishers of
Men, your bound to fill your nets with a big catch!!
God Bless,
Tom Miles
Comment
I wanted to thank you for posting that
creation past and present video. That was one of the best videos I have ever
watched in my life. Praise Jesus and please put more of those videos up!
Jo…
Writing
Dear Brothers,
I´m writing you from Brasília, Brazil. I
really enjoy reading your website, listening to your audio debates, videos and programs.
It´s the first time i ever heard about the theory councerning the phony sister
Lucia, and as a coincidence, some weeks ago, a good known brazilian philosofer
Olavo de Carvalho metioned your theory and website in his online radio program…
But i have a question on an other issue:
we actually know that Pope Benedict XVI (i´m not a sedevacantist, so i don´t
call him an anti-pope) ordered everyone to shift the New Mass "for
all" consecration words to "pro multis" one. Therefore
i ask you: if every parish attend this order on the Novos
Ordo consecration form, isn´t your main argument against the validity
of the New Mass going to loose it´s significance?
Although the new mass isn´t catholic
at all , it´s really possible that using the "pro multis" form, turns
the consecration valid. Isn´t it?...
Thank you for all your great work on
catholic teaching,
With best regards,
Claudio Chad
MHFM: Regarding some Novus Ordo
“priests” returning to pro multis
(“for many”), it wouldn’t make the New Mass valid. That’s because almost all the priests who are
offering it were ordained in the invalid New Rite of Ordination. They aren’t priests, so they can’t say a
valid Mass. Further, the consecration is
still missing mysterium fidei. When words that were used by Christ – which
were part of the Roman Rite form since apostolic times – are deliberately
removed, that demonstrates an intention contrary to that of the Church. For that reason, the deliberate removal of mysterium fidei from the Roman Rite by
itself renders the New Mass doubtful.
Nevertheless, the absolutely invalid “for you and for all” form is still
widely used.
At this stage of the Great Apostasy,
it was a calculated move by the Devil to allow the Latin Mass and to make minor
liturgical concessions to conservative-minded people. He knew that it wouldn’t make a real
difference because almost all the priests are invalid and the apostasy is so
firmly entrenched. Therefore, he had his
False Prophet make these rather insignificant concessions in order to deceive
the people who love not the truth but only the externals. They were insignificant in terms of their
real practical effect, but extremely significant in terms of the impression and
the psychological impact: to keep people inside the Counter Church. You really need to become convinced that he’s
not the pope. How much proof do you need
to see that he’s a heretic and outside the Church? Come on, now.
DVD
Gentlemen -
Very captivating videos... I am truly
astonished with your way of connecting the dots, thanks for all the hard work
you have put into the series.
I would love to get these videos out to my
family, unfortunately not all of them have access to the
Internet. Are you considering, or would you consider compiling the series
on to a DVD?
Thank you for your work and dedication to
the truth,
Andrew
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. The Is
the World about to End? video is in the process of being put on to
DVD. It should be available for order
very soon.
Video
AND PEOPLE SAY GOD DOESN'T HAVE A SENSE OF
HUMOR, HE LOOKS LIKE A RAT!!! GREAT JOB BROTHERS, FITS JUST LIKE A
GLOVE. KEEP THE VIDEOS COMING AND PLEASE MAKE THESE INTO DVD'S.=
NK
Makes sense
Great job on the new video about the
rat-man B16---very observant! Makes sense too that St. John would also
describe this rat-beast as speaking like a dragon, like the "great RED
dragon" of Apocalypse 12------because arguably, B16 is the most
vociferous and powerful mouthpiece for communism in the world today
A.
Interesting
Dear Brothers,
Interesting, as I have been calling him
Rat-Zinger ever since the first minute I laid eyes on him. I remember
Running down my stairs as they were announcing the New Pope on TV....and coming
face to face with what I thought was about the most horrific demonic man I'd
ever seen! Those sunken demonic dark eyes are just chilling.
Yet, when I went to Mass (in my past
life) I was Shocked to hear a couple of women go on and on about how
Beautiful his Eyes were ???? This was about the Last straw for me,
I left Vatican II shortly afterwards. We don't know from what
vantage point John was shown this 'Beast'; perhaps Jesus made him look bigger
and more terrible than just a mere rat? In my book it's insulting to rats
to compare them to Rat-Zinger.
The Last point is well taken, this pushing
of John Paul II towards sainthood certainly matches with the old Roman
emperors. I just can't get over how Subtle this all is, in contrast to
the Big Show we have all been programmed to expect. Without all your hard
work and insight from God, we would never be aware of all this.
Thank you so much,
Carol D.
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.
Lots of people have insulted him by referring to him as the Rat. Their goal was to draw attention to his shady
character. However, we believe that the
real significance of his name is not just that he has a shady character, but
that it connects him again directly with the second beast coming out of the
earth.
Reminded
Dear Brothers:
My mother just reminded me that rats are
disastrous plague carriers that brought death to great numbers of people - a
threat to entire communities and nations in Europe. Likewise, in
the plague of Apostasy the "Rat" has a very important role to play.
Section 11 provides much food for
thought.
Thanks, Lee
Smell
Dear MHFM,
Your last observation about antipope B16 is
quite interesting. Some people might find it funny that you make a connection
between his last name and a rat but just think about some idioms used in
English...off the top of my head: ''to smell a rat''...now isn't that an appropriate
expression to describe the Vatican 2 sect and the man presently leading it?
Hopefully, in the time that is left, more people will smell a rat and come to
the knowledge of the real truth.
God bless,
V. from Croatia
Note
MHFM: A new video will be posted probably tomorrow.
Came Across
Thank you for protecting the truth. I just came across your website, my name is Louise
from Ireland, i have been led astray for so long, i knew something was
wrong but i didn’t have the words to explain it. May God enlighten me more,
Louise.
Padre Pio
I need to bring your attention to a matter,
you obviously over-looked? I will not mention the many other lies you
perpetrate on you site.
In your mag "A Voice Crying In The
Wilderness", you state that Padre Pio only used the traditional missal?
You must know that this is a complete lie? Have you never scene the videos of
him celebrating THE NEW MASS?? That man said the new mass until his dying
day! What liars!
You better confess your mortal sins of
lying & slander!
Uk
MHFM: No, you lie and you are wrong. Padre Pio died in 1968. The New Mass wasn’t promulgated until April
of 1969. In the 1960s, there were
priests who were implementing a table which faced the people as part of the
initial stages of the liturgical revolution.
There were also priests who were using the vernacular to celebrate the
traditional Mass. Padre Pio, however,
always said the traditional Mass in Latin.
In your comments, you are referring to his final Masses and you don’t
know what you are talking about. In the
last few years of his life, Padre Pio was in extremely poor health and his
vision was failing. He had to be helped
to the altar to even say Mass. During
that period, they assisted him to a table which was facing the people; and from
there he celebrated the traditional Mass, not the New Mass. As a result of Padre Pio having been brought
out to a table, many have wrongly concluded (like you) that he said the New
Mass; but he did not.
So, your comments were not only
arrogant and completely wrong, but in them you falsely accused us of lying when
in fact we stated the truth. That’s very
bad. That’s surely not the first time
that has happened to us, however. We
address many of the points people bring up concerning Padre Pio in this audio: Answering Objections Against Padre Pio [42 min. audio discussion] We discuss and respond to the claims that
Padre Pio endorsed the heresies of Vatican II, Humanae Vitae and
salvation outside the Church.
Russia and EU
Subject: Russia and the EU
Dear Brothers,
Thought you might find this interesting as
it shows a connection between Russia and the EU:
http://www.city-journal.org/2010/20_2_soviet-archives.html
Thanks for all your excellent works,
LM
E-Mail
Dear Brother
in the name of god and peace i will start
My name is anas 26 years old male , syrian
citizen but i life in saudi arabia
i am not Christian but i study Christian religion in lebanon , and i like what
i read i am searshing for true , i need some help to study religion and
get in touch with , or even go to anyware and study it , i cant change my
religion in my country because i will kill , i already leave my country
and familly because my faith
and i reall wana advice from you , i need some help… is it what religon tell to
do ???!!!
please can you help me or advice me what to do
God bless you
A.H
MHFM: You need to make sure you
believe in Jesus Christ, the Trinity and the Incarnation and all the teachings
of the Catholic Church. You also need to reject all other religions,
including Islam, Judaism and Protestantism.
You need to make sure you are
baptized in water in the name of the Father, and of the Son and of the Holy
Ghost. You need to pray, especially the Rosary each day. You will
find out how to do that on our website. Please continue to look at it.
End Times Purgatory
I´ve just read Joey´s letter about the End
of Times, and I think he makes total sense.
In many prophecies, the level of horror is described in such a way that
the living would actually envy the dead.
Isn´t it already happening? Wouldn´t you
say that Padre Pio was fortunate of being spared by God of witnessing the Great
Apostasy as it later developed? He cared so much for the Mass, he loved so
intensely the Holy Sacrifice. If someone could use a time machine, travel back
in time and show him a copy of your video on the New Mass, he would certainly
burst into tears and indignation. He would probably die on the spot during the
first 4 or 5 minutes, taking into account what those devils did with their
infernal Reforms, reducing the Most Holy and Sublime event into an ineffective
and empty Protestant Abomination.
In the last days, life will be like (is?) a
Hell on Earth. And Purgatory is very much like Hell (even though it shares
similarities with both Heaven and Earth). The torments are similar, the fire is
the same as Hell´s. The difference is: In Purgatory, you have real hope.
Because sooner of later, your torment will cease. Someday, your Salvation will
be fully accomplished, when you pay all your remaining debts.
Purgatory is like Earth in the sense that
our trials and sufferings shall finish one day. In fact, even on Earth whenever
we face hardships or obtain indulgences we pay a bit of our temporal debts due
to confessed and forgiven sins, if we manage to avoid Hell. In Purgatory,
the souls can get a small taste of Heaven, during a few breaks when they have
relief. They benefit from our prayers, they receive visits from the Saints and
Angels. According to (some) Saints, it seems that some of the Purgatory souls
(when they are close to being fully cleansed) can also intercede towards others
and cooperate in their Salvation.
On Earth, we also get small glimpses and
tastes of Heaven. Whenever we pray, or assist Mass, receive Sacraments, or study
the Divine Revelation. Joey´s idea seems
to be in conformity with everything the Church has taught. Since the last days
(at least by the Just´s standards) will be Hell on Earth (while the wicked will
enjoy it as if it was their distorted paradise). Most of the things that
connect us to Heaven will be cut off (like Masses, the reigning Papacy, good
catechisms, theology manuals, dedicated priests). Maintaining the faith and
avoiding sin will be harder than ever. Life will mostly resemble Hell for those
who sincerely love Truth.
… Not even the children are spared. In
fact, they seem to be the biggest target. And nowadays they can´t even take
refuge in the "Church" thanks to all those perverts whose crimes cry
out to the Heavens to wreak revenge. What kind of women are these kids
going to be like? Today´s women "wear" clothes that even prostitutes
in Europe not so many decades or centuries ago would consider too revealing.
Can it really get any worse? It´s everywhere. Pornography, sensuality,
arrogance, fornication, adultery, no respect for authority, intemperance,
vanity, greed, dishonesty, acceptance of homosexuality, abortion,
heresies, indifference, bad will, profanations...
Several months ago, a letter I sent to you
was posted in the e-exchanges. In it, I described the city I live in as a Hell.
As the months passed, we had the worst carnival in Rio´s history, this time
with the full approval of the Novus Ordo church. The "cardinal"
personally blessed it, and a pop-star "priest" even composed the theme
song ("samba enredo") of one of the clubs. There was something really
ominous in the air, a tragedy waiting to happen, as if we were begging for a
chastisement. And I believe that´s exactly what we got. But all that
water that flooded Rio was not sufficient to wash away the sins of this
modern-day Sodom. We were reduced to mud. It´s altogether appropriated, because
God allowed us to see materially that the souls on this city (most of
them) are not just in a fog, but a sewage of immoralities.
Even the Blessed country of Portugal has
now approved abortions and gay "marriages". All sorts of profanations
take place on the very spot the Dearest Mother of God appeared. And it will
escalate. One after another, all countries accepting unnatural laws. With each passing
day, the faith becomes weaker, and the Devil grows stronger. For the
people living in the very last days (and they don´t seem too far away) this
outrage will be totally revolting. I´m pretty sure you understand me. Because I
know that´s the way you felt when you saw the Anti-Christ´s Church create the
Assisi meetings, or treat a pro-abortion and pro-gay dead Senator as if he were
a Saint of sorts, or when you had to deal with the irrational bad-willed
behavior of Father Corapi´s fans.
In the days to come, keeping the Faith will
be so hard, and living surrounded by so much mess and perdition so unspeakably
disgusting, that each day will be like a small living martyrdom, and a good
chance to pay fully in life for all sins. This could explain the lack of a
Purgatory for the last generation.
CK
Comment
Dear
Brothers,
Nancy
Pelosi is a monster and a demon. How else could one describe such an evil
individual who is doing so much harm?!... Any Catholic who procures an
abortion, or aids such actions, is to be excommunicated. The Church's teachings
are unambiguous. Nancy Pelosi is a prime example of a person with a heart as
hard as a rock - charity will never impregnate it without it shattering! She's
like the quintessential product of the Vatican II sect - power hungry,
demonized, and influential. What an apostate.
The
devil is really whipping up support for the two Beasts recently, Antipopes
Benedict XVI and John Paul II. It is utterly astounding that so many people
support Benedict XVI, when he is to blame for so much inactivity, apathy, and
indifference to evil. It's simple, stop the apostasy, schism and heresies. But
Benedict XVI wants to destroy the Catholic Church. He thinks it's an impediment
to the advancement and progress of mankind - to the "evolution" of
man. It's no wonder he's so giddily happy about the abuse scandals because he's
in the perfect position to draw down even more Anti-Catholic sentiment than
ever. He tells the world that it's just another sin. No, there is a pattern, it
is chronic. The cause is not just human weakness, it is Antichrist Apostasy
that is the root of their perversion. But the world goes on cheering their
Antipope. Cheering for the pedophile hiders. The truth is a rare commodity
these days!
The
movie The Messenger, though obviously a big budget film, with good actors, does
seem to have a modernist and even gnostic undercurrent. The modernism is
revealed when St. Joan tells her helper that God uses her own voice to speak to
her and that he could hear God's voice too, if he tried. This mocks the fact
that God really did send St. Joan to lead the defense of France against the
English. Also, the gnosticism shows itself in the ambiguous character in her
visions - a boy, Jesus, and the older man in a black hood. He is portrayed as
being both good and evil. The first voice she hears is one example -
it sounds diabolical, not the comforting voice of God. I suppose it's not
surprising given that the people who fund such blockbusters have Antichrist
agendas, most of them being Jewish and/or Illuminati.
God
Bless,
Chris
White
All Eternity
A
sign of the wicked times: Comedy Central is soon to air a new blasphemous
animated series with Jesus as the main character, who moved to NY to get away
from his Father. Can you believe... why does God even allow these
[people] to get away with this?! It is interesting to note that a few
weeks ago, comedy central censored the image and then the very audible mention
of the name Mahomet from the 200 and 201st episodes of South Park (the first
time in American history a non-obscene word was censored out in American
history) ... AND YEY THEY PERMIT AN ENTIRE BLASPHEMOUS SERIES… ABOUT OUR
LORD! THINK OF ALL THE MILLIONS OF SAINTS AND MARYRS WHO DIED FOR
CHRIST'S NAME! It is also worth pointing out one would never see such
horrific abominations on radio or television before the abominable clearly
heretical, robber 2nd Vatican Council. It really boggles the mind as to
why there are not more sedevacantists!
-Michael
Rudnicki
MHFM: He lets them get away with it
because He has all eternity to punish them.
Deuteronomy 32:35- “Revenge is mine, and I
will repay them in due time...”
Interesting
Dear Brothers,
I must tell you something you may find
extremely interesting. Over eleven years ago, I read your magazine, A
Voce Crying In The Wilderness… I read it many times; it changed my
life. Recently, I was trying to remember where I got it from. Now I
remember! When I believed in the Vatican II church, I was watching Mother
Angelica on EWTN. She was interviewing Joey Lamaengelo. I am sure
you know this is the man who is mentioned in the demonic Garabandal
apparitions. At the end of the interview, he mentioned if anyone
wanted information (a medial, magazine, etc.) write to his ministry. When
the information arrived, the magazine that they sent was yours! So
someone there knows the truth and is sending it out. Maybe you are aware
of this already, but if not, I think you should know.
Serv…
Confession
Hi Brothers,
I had a question for you, could you tell me what the Church teaches regarding
confession: Does true contrition and genuine tears in the confessional remove
forgotten mortal sins of the past? That is true contrition for having
offended Jesus throughout ones life, knowing the ingratitude one has showed
through his mortal sins all his life toward Jesus and Mary! I hope you
can help.
MHFM:
Tears are irrelevant. Sorrow is
demonstrated by the determination to stop sinning. As St. Ambrose said, “True repentance
is to cease to sin.” Many people who show emotion as if they are sorry don’t
have the firm commitment to change; whereas others who don’t show emotion
sometimes do change. (That can also
apply to issues of charity, by the way.
Some who appear very friendly and soft do not have true charity. Not infrequently they are phonies who will
abandon their friends when the going gets tough or when they receive
criticism. On the other hand, others who
might appear more serious sometimes are more truly charitable, forthright and
enduring when difficult situations arise.
We’re not saying this is
always the case, but it’s not uncommon.)
For
a mortal sin to be forgiven, confession and absolution are required. The only exception is if one has perfect
contrition and the desire to confess. In
that case, a person can be forgiven before confession. We assume you are asking about a person who
is in mortal sin. When a person
confesses all mortal sins of which he or she is aware, that person should add:
“I also ask forgiveness for any sins which I forgot and did not confess.” If a person makes that confession and
sincerely tries to confess all un-confessed mortal sins, that person is
restored to justification. If later on
that person remembers a mortal sin that was not confessed, he/she needs to
confess it at that point. That person
would only sin mortally if he or she failed to confess it at the first
reasonable opportunity.
Purgatory
Dear
Brothers Michael and Peter,
Ave
Maria!
I would
like to ask your opinion regarding Purgatory on the Last Days. It’s written in the Holy Scriptures that on
the Second Coming of Christ, He will judge both the living and the dead. On the Last Judgment Day, the dead (both the
elect and the damned) would inhabit their human bodies and render an account of
their lives to God to be witnessed by all (e.g. God, the Blessed Mother,
Angels, Devils and Men). In this scary
moment, the Almighty God would show how just His judgments are for everyone. I am of the opinion that at this point, I
think the Church Suffering would finally be released and be admitted to
Heaven. In the last Days, the Holy
Scriptures also expresses ‘woe to the inhabitants of the earth’ (of
course with the exemption of the remnant Elect) my question now is … will
there be Purgatory after the Final Judgment? … I don’t know if I sound
correct, I think in the Last Days, men who are living on earth would face the
toughest and last trials of the Faith which will serve as their purgatory [the most vigorous revival of all
execrable heresies especially of Arianism and Modernism, the abolition of the
Holy Sacrifice to God, the Great Apostasy of Faith, the abolition of sacerdotal
sacrament, the invalidation of some sacraments, the denial of Kingship of
Christ on Earth, the insurrection of the worst version of Sodom and Gomorrah,
the apparent unstoppable appearance of false Marian apparitions, the birth of
false prophets and seers bearing the name of 'catholics', the worst kind of pagan
and hedonistic lifestyle known to men, the highest form of immoralities abound
left and right, just to name a few of these punishment reserved to our
generation] … - the Saints (the Elect) of the Latter Days would come face
to face with the Anti-Christ and would wage toughest final wars (spiritual)
reserved prior to the End of the World … and the Saints of the Latter Days
would no longer be acknowledged on earth since there would be no Pope, no
structured building occupied by the Remnant Elect, no more canonization, no
more miracles to bear witness to their holiness, no more Catholics to admire
them, and why? … because it would be Christ Himself who would vindicate His
Remnant Elect and with both body and soul enter the eternal bliss given to them
that loved followed the Will of the Father … is there any sound basis to give
credence to these thoughts?
… Is there a basis to conclude that
Purgatory would no longer exist after the Final Judgment? … Is there a
basis to support the idea that the Elect would indeed experience purgatory on
earth (on the last days) to expiate remaining punishment due to forgiven sins? Brothers,
your opinion on these would be highly appreciated as usual
By
the way… I just finished reading the entire E-Exchange Archives A and B … and I
learned a ton of traditional catholic knowledge and many of my questions have
been answered. A million thanks for
archiving relevant email exchanges that occurred in the past - they are of
tremendous help to anyone seeking the truth like me.
May Our
Lady of Fatima guide and bless MHFM in these final days.
In
Crucified Christ and Immaculate Mary,
Joey from the Philippines
MHFM: We believe those are valid points.
Church
Subject: “Church” of Hypocrisy
Dear Brothers:
There's a chilling and undeniable parallel
between the Church of the Old Testament that existed at the time of Our Lord's
first coming, and the "church" that exists today.
The Scribes and Pharisees were the
Hierarchy of that church which professed to be the Church of the true God
and His Christ, i.e., the Church of the Christians-in-Expectation.
As such, that hierarchy was the official Custodian of the many
unmistakable Scriptural prophecies that would enable mankind to recognize its
Redeemer.
Yet, despite all of those prophesies - and
despite all of His miracles - the Hierarchy of that church rejected Christ, as
did most of their followers. They knew who He was, but this kind of
Messiah and the Religion He preached was not to their liking.
Our Lord told them many things, and in
no uncertain terms. First, that they were hypocrites pretending to
be what they were not, and to believe what they did not. He told them
that they were following in the footsteps of their forebears who had killed the
prophets. He told them that they despised Moses and had rejected
the Revelations of God. He accused them of having substituted man-made
doctrines for these revelations and foisting them on the people.
He further told them that they brought people
into this church only to ultimately rob said people of the Faith and
salvation, making them children of hell. In addition, Our Lord said that
their sacrifices were not pleasing or acceptable to God, and that their Father
was Satan.
What a description of the Christ-rejecting,
Faith-rejecting counterfeit church we have today! Strictly speaking,
those who openly deny Christ today are not "hypocrites" in the
strict sense of the word; they despise Christ and make no bones
about it. It's the one calling himself "Christian" and,
especially, "Catholic" that is the true hypocrite today. The
counterfeit church (like all protestantism) is the Church of Hypocrisy.
And to think that then as
now (now, with the denial of EENS and the demise of Christendom) both
Christ-rejecting churches officially began with the cry: We
will have no king but Caesar!
Thanks so much for the End of the World
series - along with your instruction on hypocrisy and bad will. Really
helps to put everything in perspective.
Lee
Afar
JPII came "from
afar", alright: like, the pits of hell!
A
Earrings
… I
would say I do not see how wearing earrings has ever helped me gain any merit
nor virtue whatsoever indeed it has probably only led me on the wrong
path, since it wreaks of vanity…
Still
I just saw that Benedict XVI is
still condemning abortion & homosexuality. If he was going the other way on
these issues then I might believe you have some points.
Uk…
MHFM: That’s ridiculous.
It’s the same thing that one “apologist” for the Vatican II Church said
to one of us once. There are Muslims,
Jews and many Protestants who oppose homosexuality and abortion. Benedict XVI is totally antichrist and an
antipope because he denies the Gospel and the Catholic faith. Antichrist is that which opposes and denies
the truth of Christ, even if it might oppose the unnatural evil of
homosexuality and abortion. Your
attitude, one must say, is heretical and faithless. As long he says something on some moral
evils, he can deny the rest of the Gospel and the Catholic faith. You have fallen for the trap. The faith is what is necessary for salvation,
not just making a few weak statements against obvious moral evils.
Additionally, he doesn’t truly condemn abortion. In fact, he accepts it and celebrates
it. That’s because he obstinately and
knowingly keeps within his communion the most wicked and notorious supporters
of abortion in the world (pro-abortion “Catholic” politicians). His sect even commemorated Ted Kennedy as
“the servant of Christ.” He doesn’t
oppose abortion, but only makes a few mild and inconsequential statements
against it to deceive faithless people like you. See our video:
Benedict XVI is pro-abortion video
[10 min.
video]
Comment
Dear Brothers:
In response to that writer who was confused
about the so called Jewish messiah, I want to mention something I remember from
the time shortly after the death of John Paul II. This was the headline
in the Jerusalem Post "John Paul II: The best pope the Jews ever
had". One doesn't have to bow down in adoration in order to
"worship" someone or something. I believe as you do, that JPII
fulfilled the part of the Apocalypse which mentions the messiah that the jews
will accept.
Brenda Roy
MP3
MHFM: The mp3 of our recent debate discussion with
Greg Rossi on salvation-sedevacantism has been posted
MP3 of
Sedevacantism-Salvation Debate [2 hrs. 8 min.]
This will be found permanently under Traditional
Catholic Audios.
Good Thief
The
thief on the cross must have been bummed. Obviously he went to hell because he
wasn't baptised. Oh wait,there must be a "teaching" from
tradition of rome that explains that situation. Baptism is what the
bible says it is: symbolic of true faith,not of pagan Rome, but of Jesus! Throw
away heretical traditions and keep what is true: The Bible. Repent and turn to
Christ!!
Dg
MHFM: It’s interesting to see that even
Protestant heretics such as yourself, in addition to heretical false
traditionalists, wrongly use the Good Thief to attack the necessity of water
baptism. The following refutes your
misunderstanding from the Bible itself (since you don’t accept Catholic
teaching). You are also not a Christian
and you don’t believe in the Bible; for the Bible clearly proves the Catholic
Church.
The Good Thief
cannot be used as an example of baptism of blood (or salvation without baptism)
primarily because the Good Thief died under the Old Law, not the New Law; he died
before the Law of Baptism was instituted by Jesus Christ after the
Resurrection. For that reason, the Good
Thief, like the Holy Innocents, constitutes no argument against the
necessity of receiving the Sacrament of Baptism for salvation.
Catechism of the Council of Trent, Baptism
made obligatory after Christ’s Resurrection, p. 171: “Holy writers are
unanimous in saying that after the Resurrection of our Lord, when He gave
His Apostles the command to go and teach all nations: baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the
Holy Ghost, the law of Baptism
became obligatory on all who were to be saved.”
In fact, when Our Lord said to
the Good Thief, “This day you will be
with Me in paradise,” Jesus was not referring to heaven, but actually to
Hell. As Catholics know, no one entered
heaven until after Our Lord did, after His Resurrection. On the day of the Crucifixion, Christ
descended into hell, as the Apostles’ Creed says. He did not descend to the Hell of the damned,
but to the place in Hell called the Limbo
of the Fathers, the waiting place of the Just of the Old Testament, who
could not enter Heaven until after the Savior came.
1 Peter 3:18-19 “Christ also died once for our sins… In which also coming he preached to
those spirits that were in prison…”
To further prove the point
that the Good Thief did not go to Heaven on the Day of the Crucifixion, there
is the fact that on Easter Sunday, when Mary Magdalene met the Risen Lord, He
told her, “Do not touch Me, for I have not
yet ascended to My Father.”
John 20:17- “[On the Day of the
Resurrection] Jesus saith to her; Mary.
She turning, saith to him; Rabboni, (that is to say, Master). Jesus saith to her; Do not touch me, for I have not yet ascended to my Father…”
Our Lord hadn’t even yet ascended to Heaven on
the Sunday of the Resurrection. It is
therefore a fact that Our Lord and the Good Thief were not in Heaven together
on Good Friday; they were in the Limbo of the Fathers, the prison described in
1 Peter 3:18-19. Jesus called this place
Paradise because He would be there with the just of the Old Testament.
Receive
I've
just finished watching your 3 new videos. I feel MUCH calmer now, knowing
that (#8 ) the "Mark" has little to do with buying and selling.
I didn't realize how much stress I had over that until you
released us from that notion. All that
you're saying sounds amazingly logical and free from the Terrible images many
of us have had for a long time, through popular media etc.
My
only frustration is with the fact that Jesus told the Pharisee Jews he
would send THEM
someone they Would call the Messiah and
worship. I don't see how ANY of this fits with a Jewish
leader. I know that both these antipopes are Jews, but they are not
anybody all of Israel would call Their Messiah. Instead, it seems
Jesus has sent wayward Catholics someone They would follow
?? What does All This have to do with the Jews?
You
have managed to answer all my little questions up till now, so I trust you will
explain that as well. I'll just sit here impatiently and wait. ; )
Thank
you for ALL
this work you have done! Just showing us
the many sites where the Mark is talked about has been a great help to me,
trying to explain this to others. I realize you have to be thorough, so
everyone will understand. Is it possible that the Expectation of
all this, is More than the Actual thing?
You're
Much Appreciated!
Carol
D.
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. The passage that you are probably referring to
(John 5:43), where Our Lord says to the Jews “if another will come in his own
name him you will receive” may refer to the Antichrist, but it is not
certain. If it does, all it necessarily means is that the Jews will
embrace him or receive him. And, in fact, if this passage refers to the
Antichrist, then Antipope John Paul II has fulfilled it, because Antipope
John Paul II was literally “received” by the Jews in the Synagogue in
1986. He was the first claimant to the Papacy to go there; he was received
cordially; he prayed with them for the coming of their “Messiah”; and the event
was filled with significance.
To do
I watched one of your videos and you talked
about what one must do to prepare for judgment. You mentioned wearing a
brown scapular. From what I know, the first scapular must be blessed. My
question, given the modern incarnation of the church as novus ordo, how
does one receive the most valid blessing? Who does one turn to?
Thank you Brothers
Cquinn…
MHFM: Pray the full rosary each day. Read and then make the True Devotion to Mary as explained by St. Louis De Montfort. Get out of the New Mass and the Vatican II
“Church,” if you are in it. Be convinced of all traditional Catholic
dogmas. Practice, spread and hold the
faith whole and undefiled. Make the
profession of faith which is given on our website for those leaving the Novus
Ordo or converting. Do spiritual reading
and make sure that, once the other things are done, you have confessed all
un-confessed mortal sins.
Article
MHFM: We have posted the beginning of a new article
on the modernist errors of Cardinal John Henry Newman. The article will be added to as time
permits. We have also done two videos on
that issue, with more to come. The first
installment covers one of Newman’s main modernist errors:
The
Modernist Errors of Cardinal John Henry Newman [first installment
of article]
This
will be found in our “Traditional Catholic Issues and Groups” Section.
Kings
Dear brothers in Christ,
Thank you for the very revealing videos
about the end of the world. There is one thing that bothered me; namely,
amongst seven kings there are two true popes--Pius XI and Pius XII. Somehow
they are mixed with the five antipopes leading the satanic counterfeit church.
But, as I thought about the Old Testament, where the lines of God fearing kings
were frequently interrupted with the line of "antikings", the fact
that the line of two true king (i.e. popes) is succeeded with the line of five
false kings (antipopes) shouldn't be
a problem for your interpretation of the Book of the Revelation. I like the idea that the mark of the beast is
predominantly a spiritual mark, thus putting all the stuff about RFID and
similar devices, so popular amongst the innumerable false, secular, prophets on
the level where it belongs, and that level is the level of seduction by the
scientific-materialistic mumbo-jumbo. In short--the Book of Life, mentioned in
the Revelation (and in other places in the Bible) is a spiritual thing, not
material.
I want to add one more comment. It is very interesting that the Europe [was]
covered with (volcanic) ashes. I am compelled to believe that this is a sign
from God--Europe, the beast, is inhabited by hundreds of millions extremely
sinful, spiritually dead, people who should make the atonement by covering
themselves with the ashes. But, they are not willing to do the right thing, the most important thing. So, they
should taste some of the ashes from
the bowels of hell.
God bless you and your holy works.
Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. We have some additional thoughts on the
kings, which concern some of those points.
We hope to share them soon.
St. Joan
Dear
Bros, Michael and Peter Dimond,
In
response to Joey, I have not seen the St. Joan of Arc movie version "The
Messenger" that he is referring to, but I have seen
and have the version made in 1999, starring Leelee Sobieski as Joan, with
supporting cast including Peter O'Toole and Shirley Maclaine, entitled "Joan
of Arc", a pretty moving story and
movie by all accounts.
From
what I have read of comments, so far, many prefer this latter version,
starring Leelee Sobieski....
You
can actually watch this movie on the Youtube channel, and if you spot it in the bargain bin, snap it
up....it is well worth the watch! I think I paid only nine dollars
( $9. 00 ) for my copy!
Now,
back to the Apocalypse videos, which
seem to be having an ever growing captive audience, which is no surprise !
God
bless,
David
Wonder
I know that you warn about false
apparitions, and that we should beware.
I wonder why the Blessed Mother Herself never warned about false
apparitions ?
That some other entity would have the
audacity to impersonate Her? In other
words, no apparition ever refuted or condemned any other apparition as false or
heretical, even though they had every opportunity to do so.
So, people fall for this jazz hook, line
and sinker. And Hell is filling up daily as a result of this. I say this because all the writings and
messages of "legitimate" visitations are circulated widely.
Yet, there is not one "legitimate"
message that warns that there are "illegitimate" appearances of the
Blessed Virgin Mary. Imposters.
Imposter Mary's that take poor souls to
Hell.
What can we do ?
Alan
MHFM: Sacred Scripture clearly warns
about false apparitions. Other prophecies
do as well.
2 Thessalonians 2:9-12: "Whose coming
is according to the working of Satan, in all power, and signs, and lying
wonders, And in all seduction of iniquity to them that perish; because they receive
not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. Therefore God shall send them the operation
of error, to believe lying. That all may
be judged who have not believed the truth, but have consented to
iniquity."
Prophecy of Marie
Julie Jahenny, Briton Stigmatist (1891): "During the time of the approach of the
punishments announced at La Salette, an unlimited amount of false revelations
will arise from Hell like a swarm of flies; a last attempt of Satan to choke and destroy the belief in the true
revelations by false ones."
Matthew 24:24-25: "Then if any man shall
say to you: Lo here is Christ, or there, do not believe him. For there shall arise false Christs and false
prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if
possible) even the elect. Behold I have
told it to you, before hand. If
therefore they shall say to you: Behold He is in the desert, go ye not out:
Behold He is in the closets, believe it not."
But even without any warnings, a true
believer can recognize an apparition to be false if it contradicts Catholic
truth. The problem with so many is that
they refuse or hesitate to believe something unless it is specifically
confirmed by Our Lady in an apparition, even if the conclusion flows from
Catholic truth. That is not a faithful
way of considering the issue. It is
actually a faithless way of looking at it.
Perhaps the reason there aren’t more prominent warnings about false
apparitions in the well-known apparitions of Our Lady is that God specifically
wants to test people to see if they will be guided by the light of faith or by
the light of signs and wonders.
Intense?
What
happened to B16's intense message at Fatima, Portugal??
Karl
MHFM: During his trip to Fatima he
talked about the importance of the assassination attempt on John Paul II. That fits with our Is the World about to End? series.
If John Paul II is the Antichrist, and Benedict XVI is the false prophet
who will cause people to worship him, and the assassination attempt on May 13,
1981 is a crucial part of the final deception, it makes sense that Benedict XVI
(the false prophet) would again emphasize it.
See the aforementioned video, specifically part 5.
Is the World about to End ? - Part 5
Is the World about to End ? - Part 6
SSPX
Subject:
SSFX Priests Protesting Fellay
On April 5, 2010 yet another SSFX priest has left that order in protest.
Fr. Juan Jose Turco in Bogota, Columbia, has released publicly his letter to
Bishop Bernard Fellay, stating that the SSPX has not only betrayed the
principles of Archbishop Lefebvre, but that the late Archbishop's statements
have been misrepresented. In particular, following up on a series of complaints
dating from October of 2009, Turco claims that Fellay is trying to
"present a false image of Benedict XVI as if he would be regularly
favoring Tradition." Turco tells Bishop Fellay he is abusing his
authority by threatening priests who refuse to keep silent. He quotes
Fellay as writing: "A renewal of the Church has started. It is very
difficult, but authentic." Turco, as others before him, cannot agree
to the Modernism of Benedict XVI.
Personally, I feel it is unfortunate that priests like Turco did not recognize
the problems with SSPX years ago, but at least now their eyes are becoming open
to the many heresies being accepted in mainstream Catholicism today. At MHFM,
there are excellent articles about the deceptions undertaken by the leaders of
SSPX, from the very beginning of their organization…
Cheryl Helena Thomson
MHFM: That priest’s eyes might be
opening to the modernism/apostasy of Benedict XVI. However, he thinks that the principles of
Lefebvre should be followed. That
includes the belief that souls can be saved in any religion. Therefore, even though the priest rejects
Benedict XVI, he’s still not a true Catholic because he rejects the dogma
Outside the Church There is No Salvation.
The
Society of St. Pius X [Link to Section]
False apparitions
Subject: Signs and Wonders – to deceive if possible
even the elect
Dear Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,
In response to 'Flo' and her query about
the popes and Garabandal, also confirmed by the MHFM - let it be known that
some of the things the four girls at Garabandal, Spain claimed the Virgin Mary
told them, have proven to be false and as a consequence cannot possibly have
emanated from her, but from the Father of Lies, Satan himself, so as to even
deceive the elect - if it were possible....
One of the girls, Conchita, claimed, in
1962 , 'Mary' said there would be only THREE more 'popes' after the
death of John XXIII, and then the end of time .....WRONG ! We are up
to 'pope' number four, unless of course, they reckon Benedict XVI is an
antipope - I don't think so!.... And, my clock is still ticking!
Russia will be converted as a result of the
miracle ( yet to come ) .....WRONG! Russia was consecrated by Pope
Pius XII in 1952, and as a result, as we know ,was 'converted' ( end of
persecutions)
The Council would be a GREAT Council (
Vatican II) according to 'Our Lady' ....WRONG! For the true Catholics it
was bad news and a sign of the beginning of the End Times in line with Fatima
-Great news however for the anti - Catholic element already inside the Church
at that time - and so for Satan,and the enemies of the Catholic
Church, it truly was a Great Council!
Both Paul VI and John Paul II, met with the
seers and praised Garabandal, and said that "the Church blesses
them."... enough said!
Mari Loli died in 2009, aged 60 years
of age....three 'seers' left ...all of whom adhere to the 'whore of
Babylon' and attend the "Abomination of Desolation" - the new mass.
Conchita will announce the date of the
"promised miracle'' 8 days in advance - so she is
the one to be watching out for - of course, it will never happen!
Joey Lomangino to receive new eyes at the
miracle to occur in Spain - Joey will be 80 years old this year, and a sick man
apparently.....again, as above!
Followers of the false apparitions of
Garabandal tend to be of the "conservative" Novus Ordo type, who are
generally concerned about abuses that are rampart in the Vatican II Church, but
in reality know little about the teachings of the Catholic Church, because of
bad will on their part in general!
God bless,
David
Why bother?
I just listened to your debate with Greg
Thomas Rossi - to me, he sounded like he was so desperate to be in the right
that he was grasping for anything. As an aside, I teach mathematics and I
see this frequently, that is, students who write down anything even though they
obviously have no idea how to solve the problem.
It seems to me that the whole "debate" about salvation can be summed
up in the following question: "If the Catholic Church is not necessary for
salvation, then why bother?" Even when faced with the most bizarre
scenarios, I think this question would still show up. For example, the
individual on the isolated island who has never heard of Our Lord, the Faith,
etc - can this individual be saved? If the answer is yes, then why bother?
PC
B-16
Hello Brothers:
I thought you might find this interesting:
Benedict XVI says -
" "For a society made up mainly
of Catholics, and whose culture has been profoundly marked by Christianity, the
search for truth apart from Christ proves dramatic", he added. "For
Christians, Truth is divine; it is the eternal 'Logos' which found human
expression in Jesus Christ. ... The Church, in her adherence to the eternal
character of truth, is in the process of learning how to live with respect for other 'truths' and for the truth
of others. Through this respect, open to dialogue, new doors can be opened to
the transmission of truth".
"The Church must enter into
dialogue with the world in which she lives", said Pope Benedict
quoting Pope Paul VI. "Dialogue, without ambiguity and marked by respect
for those taking part, is a priority in today's world, and the Church does not
intend to withdraw from it. ... Given the reality of cultural diversity, people
need not only to accept the existence of the culture of others, but also to
aspire to be enriched by it and to offer to it whatever they possess that is
good, true and beautiful".
He is an antichrist - this is certain. His
speech does not even make sense.
-Thanks always for the good work,
Mike
Stand
Subject: how traditional Catholics stand on
these two popes
Hello Father my name is Florencia and I am
from Argentina, what you said regarding John Paul II and Benedict XVI really
scares me. I am not a traditional catholic, in fact, not long ago I was a
liberal one (if that exist) but my father is in accordance with Lefebvre and he
says that we are in our most darkest moments and that the devil entered the
Vatican after the SVC. This obviously scared me and because of that I came
closer to the Church and her VALUES of life and how to live it But nowadays
within the catholic church one can get so confused because everyone has a
different opinion… If you can guide me here I would be in you debt. , I am
really devoted to Garabandal and Padre Pio, and they speak of apostacy in the
Church, of a warning a miracle and of a punishment. The girls also speak of the
popes but I do not really grasp the meaning of that. i wanted to know if you
knew anything on this and if possible enlighten me!! I know that there are terrible
priests, bishops and cardinals..but some how i can not think that the holy
fathers are also diabolical!! If you have information I can read so that I
might know more I would appreciate it. And also...what about San Malachias???
And also Father Malachy Martin...I love the latter… Thank you very much
God bless
Flor…
MHFM: The Message of Garabandal contains predictions which did
not come to pass. It also recognizes
Paul VI as a valid pope, and he was not.
It is a false message. The
children of Garabandal also recognize the apostate Vatican II “Church” as
authentic. Once you see the evidence of
what John Paul II and Benedict XVI did, it should not be hard to believe that
they are evil. It’s so obvious! You need to become convinced of Catholic dogmas,
and judge things by that standard. Then
everything will become more clear to you.
That’s why looking at our material is important. As a Vatican insider, Malachi Martin had some
interesting information; however, he was sadly heretical. He believed in salvation outside the Catholic
Church and recognized the heretical antipopes.
Problem
… I disagree with you that only Catholics
can go to Heaven. I never did believe that. I disagree with the new
Liberation Theology. I disagree with Padre Pio. If Jesus died for my sins
and diseases, why should I have to suffer? I'm not a masochist. I
see nothing good about suffering and I think it is a bit narcissistic for
someone to be into suffering, knowing who Jesus was. Besides, I
suffered more than Jesus anyway. It has to be about Whom He was.
Who'd want to be beaten up by devils. We've enough problems
already. The church should have put a stop to that. And how can you
talk about the infallibility of the Pope when you admit that 42 of them were
Apostates, which I am now…
Anyway, that's what I have to say. I
hope you get my e-mail and that I've made myself understood.
Blessings,
Clare
MHFM: Your problem is pride.
That is demonstrated by your false statement that you have suffered more
than Jesus. Pride is why people like you
unfortunately don’t receive the grace to come to the knowledge of the
truth.
Unity
Sadly, I do understand. Are you really
concerned about those who are, according to you, being misled by Vat II or are
you concerned about being part of an exclusive club. Jesus came for all. Though
our non-catholic brethren are missing out on the fullness afforded us by the
True Church and all its graces toward salvation, who but God himself can
determine worthiness? If indeed you are concerned for these misled souls, how
can bashing the earthly authority help them? You have to trust Jesus' words
that "the gates of hell will not prevail" (Mt 16:18) and "there
is no authority except from God, and the authorities that exist are appointed
by God" (Rom 13:1). I fear that you have fallen into your own trap. I pray
you will ask humbly for guidance in this matter. It seems you have been
overcome by the letter of the law and have lost the essence, which is mercy,
kindness, compassion, patience....and love.
Vsheff…
MHFM: First, there is no love without truth. If truth is not present (i.e., the full truth
of Christ) a false hope and a false charity replace true charity. Love then becomes hate: a hatred for God and a
hatred for the only way man is to obtain real happiness. Second, the Church of Jesus Christ is an
exclusive club. It excludes all who do
not accept all of Christ’s truth. Your
problem is that your notion of Jesus Christ is a misguided one. Your notion of Jesus is incompatible with the
true Jesus Christ of the Gospel and the Catholic Church. Jesus and His Church exclude all who don’t
accept all of His truth.
Pope Leo XIII, Satis Cognitum (# 9):
"The Church, founded on these principles and mindful of her office, has
done nothing with greater zeal and endeavor than she has displayed in guarding
the integrity of the faith. Hence she
regarded as rebels and expelled from the ranks of her children all who held
beliefs on any point of doctrine different from her own. The Arians, the
Montanists, the Novatians, the Quartodecimans, the Eutychians, did not
certainly reject all Catholic doctrine: they abandoned only a certain portion
of it. Still who does not know that they were declared heretics and banished
from the bosom of the Church? In like manner were condemned all authors of
heretical tenets who followed them in subsequent ages."
Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence,
"Cantate Domino," 1441:
"Therefore the Holy Roman Church condemns, reproves, anathematizes and
declares to be outside the Body of Christ, which is the Church, whoever holds
opposing or contrary views."
Pope Pelagius II, epistle (1) Quod ad
dilectionem, 585: “If anyone, however, either suggests or believes or presumes
to teach contrary to this faith, let him know that he is condemned and also
anathematized according to the opinion of the same Fathers.” (Denz. 246)
To accept the modernist ideas you promote, and identify them
with the Catholic faith, is to hold that the gates of Hell have prevailed
against the Church. See our material on
that topic.
Revelation
Subject:
Contradiction, Newman, Watchtower Society
Dear
Brothers,
That's
a really keen observation of TD in regard to the Vatican's tolerance of the
"Orthodox" schism, but intolerance of the SSPX's schism. Sadly, the
Vatican's bad will is so extreme that such a fact, if presented to
them, wouldn't faze them even one little bit.
Thank
you for the article on the modernist errors of Cardinal John Henry Newman.
Cardinal Newman's assertion that we can't find a fixed point in time at
which Revelation stopped growing is really quite outrageous. One need only
think of all the Protestant cults that have arisen around some charismatic
leader based on the idea that they have been given some new
revelation which then constitutes an article of their heretical faith. For
example, the Watchtower Society teaches that in 1914 Jesus Christ returned to
earth invisibly because He was enthroned at that time
in Heaven. That teaching contradicts scripture and Catholic dogma which states
that angels said Jesus would return in the same way He ascended
into Heaven, i.e. visibly (Acts 1:11); and that Jesus immediately was
enthroned in Heaven after he ascended there (Mark 16:19, Apostles Creed). The Watchtower's
teaching on 1914 is absolutely fundamental to their other
teachings (heresies) such as that only 144,000 go to heaven, that all
religions except their own make up Babylon the Great (which leads into their
rejection of the Trinity, Incarnation, Immortality of the soul, Hell, Grace,
Merits, Papacy, etc.). The 1914 date is based on a false
interpretation and confusion of the 1260 days/3 1/2 times from the book of
Apocalypse (verses 11:3, 12:6, 12:14) with the 7 times in the book of
Daniel (verse 4:13). They hold the dishonest position that Jerusalem fell to
the Babylonians in 607 B.C, rather than the 586 B.C. which the Catholic
Encyclopedia states. They teach that the 607 B.C. date is
absolutely certain, a "fixed date' which no one of any merit
calls into question, which is totally absurd. They do so because without that
date being true (which indeed it is not), their whole watchtower falls like
Babylon the Great! Even if for arguments sake it were true, their conclusions
about it are false. For one, the 7 times refers specifically to the Babylonian
King Nebuchadnezzar. They calculate the 7 times (Dan. 4:13) by 360 (days per
year; see Apoc. 11:3, 12:6, 12:14) to arrive at 2520 days. They then apply the
"day for a year" prophecy principle from Ezechiel 4:6 to get the
2520 years. If one counts 2520 years from 607 B.C. they will arrive at 1914
A.D. if allowing one year for the year "0" between B.C. and A.D. They
hold that the "anointed class," the 144,000, received special
insight into the Scriptures from 1914, especially in regard to the times they
were living in. They teach that between the Apostles and 1914 there were only a
few true believers (such as the Arch-heretic Arius, millenialists, etc.) but
that even most of them were lacking the whole truth. Ultimately they place
absolute importance on the use of the Divine Name, Jehovah. They teach
that the Divine Name must be used, especially vocally/audibly in
order to worship God acceptably and that all that is really necessary for
salvation is to "call on the name of Jehovah" (i.e. by praying to
Him, worshipping Him, etc.). This heresy is taken from a misinterpretation of
Acts 2:21 and Joel 2:32, by substituting interpreting it to mean that
the Lord means Jehovah but not Jesus Christ! The Watchtower
Society has put the name Jehovah into the Old Testament about 200 times
where the meaning of the original Greek word is actually
"Lord." They claim their doing so to be a "correction."
Along with countless other changes to their version of the Bible, the New
World Translation). What's interesting is that Christ means "anointed
one" - The Watchtower Society explicitly teaches that the 144,000,
their "anointed class," are other Christs, which is Antichrist -
1 John 4:3!!! So a rejection of just one Catholic dogma, such as that
revelation was completed with the death of the last apostle, is a rejection of
Jesus Christ, thus leading to countless heresies, errors and loss of
salvation to those who are obstinate in such errors. I'm looking forward
to the next part of the article. Thanks again.
God
Bless,
Chris
White
Dreams
My questions are not on the basics of
catholic dogma(by catholic i mean non vat 2 catholic dogma) anyway, not sure
the best way to do this or ask this, but is there someone who can take a look
at 3 dreams i had.. I’m not trying to delve into
"heresies" and so forth, but i had a most perplexing dream that
really stands out- sort of like a cat at a mouse convention. and I don’t trust
the doctrinal integrity of those in my neck of the woods enough to seek help
from... again, before God i promise I’m not claiming or trying or seeking
to be anything… nor am i trying to venture into heretical areas, etc
etc.. I guess I’m sort of looking for a modern joseph.-- I believe
strongly enough that perhaps God was trying to speak to me, that i should seek
some input from appropriate sources, as of yet God has not provided much in the
way of an answer.
there are 3 dreams (2 very short ones, one
medium), if you would be willing to look them over, ill send them..
God bless you and keep up the good work!
~Jeff
MHFM: Thanks for the question. One should focus on accepting the true
Catholic faith, praying the Rosary, and getting into or maintaining the state
of grace. One shouldn’t put much focus
on interpreting dreams, for people can be sidetracked or deceived that
way. If God has delivered a clear
message in a supernatural way, it would be so powerful that there would be no
question. To speculate about one’s
dreams is not what one should do.
Video
Church
I don't know you, but as a Catholic who
used to be an anti-Catholic Jack Chick Tract promoter, YOU SOUND JUST LIKE THE
ENEMIES OF THE CHURCH.
YOU SAY THE SAME THINGS THEY DO-- ROME IS THE WHORE OF BABYLON. Hmmm ARE YOU OF
THE SAME SPIRIT AS THE FUNDAMENTALIST ANTI-CATHOLIC SECTS???????
dfincher
MHFM: You understand and believe as little about the Catholic
faith now as you did then. You are in
communion with Protestants and the defenders of Protestants. Heretics cannot be popes. Learn Catholic teaching.
Why Rome is now The Whore of
Babylon
Gospel
Hello Brothers
Have you ever said anything about the modern 'Q' Gospel? I was talking to a
fellow about the validity of Islam and I tried to explain to him what you said
about Islam having illogic at the heart of its teaching. When I said Christ
said he was God, he retorted that Jesus said no such things, and that NT
authors did. He said the speaker of 'Q' does not.
He seems to be a staunch defender of 'Q'.
Does the Church endorse this 'Q' source?
Regards, Neil
MHFM: The idea of a “Q Gospel” is a
false modernist notion that attempts to undermine the authenticity of the four
gospels. There is overwhelming evidence
in the early Church and from the earliest fathers that there are four authentic
gospels and that Jesus Christ claimed to be God. There is no evidence for the “Q Gospel.” Those who hold that Jesus did not claim to be
God, and that the passages in the Bible which declare that He did are
fraudulent, pit themselves against the early Church, the early Church fathers
and the indisputable record of history.
For example, in about 108 A.D., St. Ignatius of Antioch (one of the
apostolic fathers) made it clear that Jesus Christ is God and that He claimed
to be God.
Where does the Bible teach that Jesus is God?
Baptism
… Is it possible for you to clarify the
following: is a baptism performed by a pre-Vatican II ordained priest using
the Vatican II rite of baptism valid?... Thank you for your assistance in
these matters.
Thomas Hudec
MHFM: It can be valid if water is poured correctly and the
proper words (“I baptize you in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of
the Holy Ghost”) are said. One issue is
whether the water properly strikes the forehead and skin. That seems to be a problem with some baptisms
in the Vatican II sect, including those performed by Antipope Benedict XVI.
Contradiction
Dear Dimond Brothers,
There appears to be a striking contradiction between the Vatican's
efforts to bring the SSPX under antipope Benedict XVI and the Vatican's lack of
effort to do the same with the eastern "Orthodox" schismatics.
Antipope Benedict XVI tells the eastern "Orthodox" schismatics that
they are "pastors in the Church" and then turns around and tells the
SSPX schismatics that "[their] clergy will not be recognised as Catholic
priests" unless they are doing things the way Benedict XVI wants them
done:
"Without an accord, the group [SSPX] will have no official
status and its clergy will not be recognised as Catholic priests or allowed to
exercise their ministry."
(http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idINIndia-48261220100505?pageNumber=2&virtualBrandChannel=0&sp=true)
According to Benedict XVI, if you are a schismatic because you
reject Benedict XVI's "primacy," you are in the Church. If,
however, you are a schismatic because you accept Benedict XVI's
"primacy" while publicly rejecting the Vatican II changes, you are
not in the Church.
TD
Visible
MHFM,
… I have been checking different
things out on your site. The biggest obstacle for me might be the visibility
issue, but on the other hand is what we have seen publically demonstrated for
us at Assisi etc., really the Church visible? I suppose that if Our
Lord wondered when He returned if He could find the faith, it isn’t
unreasonable to assume that it might be difficult for us to find now. I
will continue researching. One thing that I appreciate is your desire for
truth, that is the biggest thing that is missing from the discussion. In
the meantime, I thought you might be interested in the following article
concerning the talks between the Vatican and the SSPX. Cardinal Kasper
apparently thinks it is funny that they think he is a heretic, and I believe
that he purposefully obfuscates on why they are opposed to Ecumenical dialogue.
http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idINIndia-48261220100505?sp=true
Rob…
MHFM: The Church is visible in her members, in the remnant of
traditional Catholics. It’s visible in
the same way it was during the Arian crisis.
Furthermore, the Vatican II sect officially denies that the Church is
visible. It does so by teaching that the
Church’s visible unity is damaged. In
fact, Vatican II specifically teaches that the one truly visible and universal
Church of Christ does not yet exist! We
pointed this out in our book, article and video on Vatican II’s heresies: The Heresies in Vatican II [PDF File]
Vatican II document, Unitatis Redintegratio # 1:
“Yet almost all, though in different ways, long
for the one visible Church of God, that truly universal Church whose
mission is to convert the whole world to the gospel, so that the world may be
saved, to the glory of God.”
At the very beginning of its Decree
on Ecumenism, Vatican II teaches that almost everyone longs for a truly
universal Church, whose mission is to convert the world to the Gospel. What is the truly universal Church whose
mission is to convert the world to the Gospel?
It’s the Catholic Church, of course, which alone is the one true Church
of Christ. So what is Vatican II talking
about, then? Why is Vatican II teaching
that almost everyone longs for the
truly universal Church of Christ when we already have it? The answer is that Vatican II teaches that
people must long for the true
Catholic Church because it teaches that it does not yet exist! For those who doubt that Vatican II was here
denying that the Catholic Church exists, we will quote John Paul II’s own
interpretation of this passage.
John
Paul II, Homily, Dec. 5, 1996, speaking
of prayer with non-Catholics: “When
we pray together, we do so with the longing ‘that there may be one visible
Church of God, a Church truly universal and sent forth to the whole
world that the world may be converted to the Gospel and so be saved, to the
glory of God’ (Unitatis Redintegratio,
1.).”
Here we see that John Paul II himself confirmed that the longing
for the one visible Church of Christ is a longing on both sides – Catholic and
non-Catholic, which means that in its Decree
on Ecumenism (from which John Paul II was quoting), Vatican II was indeed
longing for the one universal Church of Christ.
Vatican II was therefore denying that the Catholic Church is the one
universal Church of Christ.
Whatever dogma one brings up, that dogma is used to prove that
Benedict XVI is not the pope and that the Vatican II sect is not the Catholic
Church.
Follow-up
Thank you for the generous reply but I am a
little confused as to how this is consistent with what jesus said in scripture
about divorce:
Matthew 5:32
"But I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for marital
unfaithfulness, causes her to become an adulteress, and anyone who marries the
divorced woman commits adultery."
I am confused as to what he means. He says "except" for martial
unfaithfulness. Please help me understand what he is saying.
Sincerely and God bless,
Ed
MHFM: He is saying that a divorce, in
the sense of a separation or a split, can be justified for that reason. However, He is not saying that a second
marriage is justified. There can be a
divorce, but not a divorce and remarriage.
Mark 10:9-12- “What therefore God hath
joined together, let not man put asunder.
And in the house again his disciples asked him concerning the same
thing. And he saith to them: Whosoever shall put away his wife and marry another, committeth adultery
against her. And if the wife shall put
away her husband, and be married to
another, she committeth adultery.”
Meant
Dear Brothers,
My brother asked me to find out
about this. Can you tell us what is
meant by our blessed Lord's words?
21 Jesus saith to her: Woman, believe me,
that the hour cometh, when you shall neither on this mountain, not in
Jerusalem, adore the Father. 22 You adore that which you know not: we adore
that which we know; for salvation is of the Jews. 23 But the hour cometh, and
now is, when the true adorers shall adore the Father in spirit and in truth.
For the Father also seeketh such to adore him. 24 God is a spirit; and they
that adore him, must adore him in spirit and in truth. 25 The woman saith to
him: I know that the Messias cometh (who is called Christ). Therefore, when he
is come, he will tell us all things.
Thanks for all that you do.
Tom
MHFM: He is saying that with His coming, the establishment of
the Church and the New Covenant, the Old Law will cease. He is also prophesying the destruction of
Jerusalem as part of the end of the Old Law.
Additionally, He is indicating that, with His coming, the worship of the
true God will become universal. With the
incorporation of the gentiles into His true faith, the worship of the true God
will not be confined to one place, temple or people; but will be spread all
over the earth.
Isaac
Subject: Ref. Letter from Isaac
If these vatican ll people would just research
and search the true faith they would know what is going on but they don't care
enough and they are lovers of this world! These people live a life of
contradiction!!!=
I'm afraid doing thousands of pages of research for many will amount to little
as the truth doesn't fit what they want, therefore they cannot see or hear. The
first deadly sin is pride and being unwilling to humble oneself, God doesn't
give one the grace to see. If one expects to find when they seek I think they
have to bring themselves very low…
Matthew
Two new videos
MHFM: The first is a video response to
a person who e-mailed us and argued that it’s ridiculous to claim that John
Paul II taught that man is God. The
second is a related new video.
John Paul II
did preach that man is God [video]
John Paul II's Anti-Catholic Mission [video]
Punishment?
Dear Brothers,
Over three months ago I sent you an e-mail
on the subject of my mom attending my nephew's "First Communion" in
the NO. Around the same time my brother, whose son is the one receiving
"First Communion" was seeing a doctor about some discomfort in his
stomach. It was finally determined that he has stomach cancer. He
has since had a gastrectomy. He has been depressed for a long time and I
had gone to visit him for a week. During my stay he and I had a short
conversation which he initiated about why this had to happen to him since it is
rare for someone his age to have stomach cancer. I will not state his age
here but he is rather young. He asked me if I think God is punishing
him. I was not sure how to answer his question. I told him that it
is possible. I've tried in vain in the past to get him to be a
traditional Catholic and to renounce worldly things. Also this event in
his life coincides with his son's "First Communion". That
leaves me to wonder whether God may in fact be punishing him for being
bad-willed. Additionally, the doctors say his prognosis is good if he
takes care of himself. So I wonder if God is allowing a good
prognosis so he lives long enough to have plenty of time to ponder
about his state in life.
I'd appreciate your take on the matter.
Sylvestre
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. As you indicate, your brother has rejected
the truth for some time. He also lives
in a fashion that’s incompatible with the state of grace. It’s certain that God is displeased with
him. It’s probable that it’s a
punishment. At the same time, however,
it’s a special blessing. For we can see
that the cancer is causing him to re-assess his spiritual situation. When people are struck with calamities, it’s
not uncommon that they are humbled and forced to evaluate themselves. That’s when we hear that most people turn to
God. More often than not, however, they
don’t fulfill what God wants.
If your brother had not been struck
with this cancer, it seems that he would have continued merrily on his heretical
path and ended up in Hell. But now he’s
getting a serious warning, and at the same time a chance to convert. So, what would be the answer to give him if
he poses that question again? We would
recommend saying: Yes, it’s probable that you are being specifically punished
by God, and it’s certain that He is displeased with you. At the same time, He’s giving you a special
chance to wake up, to start being honest, and to convert. It should be emphasized that it’s an outrage
not only to reject the true faith, as he currently does, but to arrange for his
child to receive the invalid host at the abominable New Mass.
Civil War
Subject:
Civil War?
Hello,
I don't know if I missed it, but I didn't see this article on your news page and
I thought that it might interest you.
http://beforeitsnews.com/story/120/796/First_Signs_of_Civil_War_begin_in_the_US:_Sheriff_Tony_DeMeo_Threatens_Force_Against_Federal_Agents.html
- DC
MHFM: Yes, it’s an interesting
video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yoYtnoFn09Y&feature=player_embedded
Shocked
Peace be with you,
I just took a look at your website, and am very saddened and shocked by your
teachings. The prayer of Jesus before He died was "That we may all
be one." Everything your organization says and does is divisive,
contrary to the prayer of Jesus. Pope John-Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI
were and are very holy men, staunch defenders of the teachings of the Catholic
faith. For you to call them anti-popes is blasphemous. I could go
on for a very long time, but I will simply say: I will be praying for
you. God bless you.
Your sister in Christ,
Christine Pineault
MHFM: We can’t say that we are
shocked or saddened by your bad will. Of
course we wish you were not as you are, and that you cared about truth. However, when confronted by someone like you
who displays no concern whatsoever for the facts and information presented, it
stirs a Catholic more to righteous indignation than sympathetic pity. The blasphemous thing is not a Catholic’s
rejection of Antipopes John Paul II and Benedict XVI. No, what is blasphemous is their endorsement
of false religions that reject Jesus Christ.
Your blind acceptance of such apostasy, without the least consideration
for the Catholic teachings backing up our position that they are antipopes who
must be rejected, is also very blasphemous.
We would tell you to wake up, but you may be beyond that point.
http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/heresy_of_antipopes_john_paul_ii_and_benedict_xvi.php
Typical of modernists, you also quote John 17 with the usual
false signification, that Catholics should have communion with heretics to
truly fulfill the Church’s unity.
Pope Pius XI, Mortalium Animos (# 7), condemning false ecumenism, Jan. 6, 1928: “For the
authors who favor this view are accustomed, times almost without number, to
bring forward these words of Christ: ‘That they all may be one… And
there shall be one fold and one shepherd,’ (Jn. 17:21; 10:16) with this signification however: that
Christ Jesus merely expressed a desire and prayer, which still lacks its
fulfillment. For they are of the opinion that the unity of faith and government,
which is a note of the one true Church of Christ, has hardly up to the present
time existed, and does not today exist.”
Why?
Hello. I'm noticing that I have some
questions as I am listening to your very informative clips. I am going to write
them all down as I go along here, and hope you'll be able to come back to me
and have patience with me. Some may be answered later, and some may not, some I
may remember to change, others not, as said, I hope you can have patience with
me. Thank you very much…
… Who are the 40 plus anti-popes in Church
history and what did they do?
… Why, really, would God create this ruse and condemn "believers" to
hell when they could be a great counterbalance for the very evil in the world
he wishes to punish it for? I mean, if anyone is standing up against the
European suicide, war, abortion, gay marriage and so on, it is the Catholic
Church... I don't get it. And don't give me something like "It's God,
you're not supposed to get it….
Hampus…
MHFM: You will find the names of the antipopes in our Antipopes
Section. We recommend that you take a look
at it. We assume you are asking why God
would create the deception of the Vatican II “Church.” He didn’t create it; He allowed it. He saw the bad will of men, their denial of
the faith and His dogmas, and how they didn’t care about His truth or His commands. So, He allowed it to be almost completely
taken away in a massive deception; but He made sure the Church remained in a
remnant. When you consider the almost
universal bad will out there, it makes perfect sense why He has allowed this
situation to occur. The dearth of good
will is simply remarkable. With regard
to your claim that the “Catholic Church” stands up to abortion and gay
“marriage,” you are obviously referring to the Vatican II sect and you are
mistaken. They facilitate abortion by enabling
pro-abortionists to remain within their ranks.
If years ago they had excommunicated in a vigorous fashion every public
supporter of abortion, it never would have been passed into law. The Vatican II sect is responsible for
it. They also facilitate the homosexual
abomination, by perverting the truth about the evil orientation. They only mildly criticize the homosexual
act. They also allow homosexual perverts
to run rampant in their perverted seminaries, and they give the supporters of
the abomination a prominent place in their churches and universities. Most importantly, however, even if they were
thoroughly Catholic on these issues, it wouldn’t matter. They deny Christ and embrace false
religions. Once you do that, nothing
else matters. That’s what you need to
realize.
Community
How does one overcome pride?
Also, I'd like to share something I've noticed, the V2 "Catholic"
Churches around here are replacing all of their signs, they no longer say
"St. X's Catholic Church", they now say "St. X's Catholic
Community". I suppose the official line will soon be "there are
Catholic communities, Lutheran communities, etc, but only one Church".
Patrick
MHFM: Have a true devotion to Mary and regularly say three Hail
Marys for the specific intention of true humility. St. Louis De Montfort’s renewal of true
devotion to Mary also has a week dedicated to self-knowledge. Pride blinds people, especially by rendering
them unable to see themselves. Grace, on
the other hand, gives one the ability to see things (including himself) as they
are. That’s why St. Louis’ first week of
preparation for true devotion to Mary (the second period) deals with the issue
of self-knowledge. Accurate
self-knowledge is crucial. It enables
one to see his faults, shortcomings, limitations, etc. While it’s true that nothing good can be done
without grace, a person who is interiorly humble almost instinctively refers
good things to God. It’s immediate and
fluid. He is not consumed with or
focused on himself, even if he maturely recognizes his involvement in something
good; whereas the prideful person is weighed down by himself. It becomes his focus and burden, consuming
his outlook, operation and thoughts. He
has trouble doing things without both the right and left hands knowing what he
is doing (Matthew 6:3). Certainly,
spiritual reading can assist people in this area; however, if a person
seriously struggles with this he really needs to reorient his spiritual focus
and prayer life, with a special emphasis on the full Rosary. Even though most don’t realize it, pride is
the biggest problem today, including in countless heretics who might exteriorly
be considered meek or patient or humble.
Their interior pride (a misguided view of their own spirituality or
holiness or intellect) keeps them falsely confident in their dark spiritual
plight; whereas if they possessed humility, they would accurately assess
themselves, what they believe, how they compromise God’s truth for friends,
etc. We can’t tell you how many members
of the Novus Ordo have called our monastery over the years. The number of them that think they are
extremely knowledgeable (experts) and dedicated Catholics, while in reality
they know almost nothing about the real Catholic faith, is staggering. Pride is their problem and it keeps them
deceived. That’s why the Fourth Lateran
Council said that all heretics are tied together by pride. Everyone who commits clear mortal sins is
weighed down by pride, not primarily weakness.
They lack the first degree of humility, which causes a person to fear
God enough to avoid what He forbids.
That’s very interesting about the Community signs.
Changes
Subject:
Latin vs. English
Quote
from article,
“You
can call it whatever you like, but it's not English,” said Father David Cooper,
president of the Milwaukee Archdiocese Priests Alliance. “The language of
prayer is supposed to be evocative, graceful, uplifting. This reads like
clunk-clunk-clunk-bang-boom.” “Anytime
there are changes, people...angry and sad,”
Brothers,
if he doesn’t like changes, then how come he didnt speak up during the 2nd Vat
council when changes were taking place?? But what do you expect from
a member of a religion where everyone just joins hands and sings a happy
happy joy joy song and everyone can be saved regardless of where they
are..
http://www.catholicculture.org/news/headlines/index.cfm?storyid=7115
Steve
New
Note: Very soon (perhaps within the
next week or so) we hope to have a special new addition to our website. We also have a new article and video that
should be posted very soon.
If
I
have been seen your webpage a several times and sometimes I visit your youtube
channel. If you have the truth
and Catholic Church is full of heresy that mean that there is no any other
Church, there is no Church any more... Where I and another
believers, have to go now? I do not want join protestants or pentacostians
clowns. Where can I go if I want see the Sunday Mass?? Where I can
get the Eucharistia, if there is no Church???
Maybe
I can join the Old Catholic Church (Staroktolicka Cirkev), they refuse the
First Vatican Council in 1868 and they possibly keep rules as been
before the Vatican I., so they're maybe original untouched Church.
Or can I join the Orthodox Catholic Church? They are
practise the same (unchanged) rituals for 2000 years, as
is their affirmation. They had in history a many miracles too.
So WHAT NEXT? Where Can I follow the Lord Jesus Christ if his Church is no
longer on Earth?
I am Roman Catholic and I should be respect the Pope without any
questions, he's got "the key of heaven" and what he change on Earth
will be changed in Heaven too. If he (the Pope) bring a new rules to
Earth will be this rules accepted in Heaven too......? I hope that your answers come soon.
Yours Faithfully
Peter Zmajkovic
MHFM: We must say that your question
is indicative of a larger problem among alleged “Catholics” today. You seem overwhelmingly and almost
exclusively concerned with where you can go to church on Sunday. That’s not what it means to be Catholic: just
showing up at a church. Your outlook
displays a misguided focus: one that’s more concerned with fellowship with
others than on God and His faith. The
Catholic faith is much more significant than where one goes on Sunday. The faith is something that must be lived
every day. It’s not defined by a trip on
Sunday. First and foremost, you must
accept the Catholic faith and all of its dogmas whole and undefiled. Without the full Catholic faith, receiving
the sacraments will not lead you to Heaven or to please God (Hebrews 11:6).
Your willingness to join the
schismatic Old Catholic sect reveals that, at this time, you don’t have a firm
belief in the Catholic faith. Why would
you do that if you believe, as the Catholic Church teaches, that there is no
salvation outside the Church? The Old
Catholic sect is a non-Catholic sect that leads people to damnation. Its followers have been excommunicated by the
Church. And if you dissent from the
Catholic dogma Outside the Church There is No Salvation, while claiming in some
way to adhere to Catholic truth, what makes you think that showing up at any
church will please God, since you reject a dogma He has revealed?
Not even a valid pope can change a
Catholic dogma. Matthew 16 does not
grant a pope the power to overturn a truth of revelation. The revelation of Jesus Christ cannot be
changed. You need to convert to the
Catholic faith (i.e., come to a firm faith in all Catholic dogmas, so that you
would never even consider leaving the Catholic Church) and completely reject
the Vatican II sect. That involves never
going to the New Mass again, for any reason.
Once you are convinced, then we can assist you with where to receive
sacraments; but one should not receive them until he has the proper faith and
has made the profession of faith. Please
see our section on those converting or leaving the Novus Ordo. Also, we recommend that you review the The Glossary of Terms and Principles [PDF], in addition to our
other material.
It will assist you with key principles that contradict your current
mindset; they demonstrate that your current ideas are incompatible with the
Catholic faith of Christ. Finally, we are not saying that the Catholic Church is
full of heresy, but that the Vatican II “Church” is not the Catholic
Church. Our material makes that very
clear.
Cannot
Dear Mr. Dimond,
Your lesson about the thief and where he went after his death also cannot be
true and here is why. Paradise is where the tree of life is and that's in
heaven with God. How do I know? Because of Rev. 2: 7 - it reads as
follows:
"Revelation 2:7 (New American
Standard Bible)
7'(A)He who has an ear, let him hear
what the Spirit says to the churches (B)To him who overcomes, I will grant to
eat of (C)the tree of life which is in the (D)Paradise of God.'"(NASB)
The Lord Jesus Christ said this to the
thief:
"Luke 23:43 (New American
Standard Bible)
43And He said to him, "Truly I
say to you, today you shall be with Me in (A)Paradise."(NASB)
Blessings!
Anita Hiltz
MHFM: No, you are not correct. Your points are addressed and refuted in this
video: The Good Thief, the Old Testament
Saints, and the Necessity of Baptism [video]
Never
Dear Brothers,
I have never understood this story and some
others like it in the Bible. It appears to me that the Church is talking
out of Both sides of its mouth when it comes to Communism vs. Capitalism
? On one hand we are told to give up EVERYTHING and follow God.......and on the
other hand we are told that would be stupid to not be able to support ourselves
and fall into poverty, where we could never be Able to give to
Charity?
I'm sure there Must be More to the story than
we see on the surface here, but we Never get the Details.
If it was Their (God given)
land, why did God kill
him,
and yet, tells us Private Property rights is a good thing ??
Thanks for any light you could shine on
this,
Carol D.
“Ananias, with Saphira his
wife, sold a piece of land, And by fraud kept back part of the price of the
land… But Peter said: Ananias, why hath Satan tempted thy heart, that thou
shouldst lie to the Holy Ghost, and by fraud keep part of the price of the
land?... Thou has not lied to men, but to God. And Ananias hearing these
words, fell down, and gave up the ghost. And there came great fear upon all that heard
it.” (Acts 5:1-5)
MHFM: We think you’re overreacting. People should not come to such conclusions
when presented with a verse they don’t immediately understand. It’s not an endorsement of Communism. Rather, the fathers believe that the
Christians of that period had agreed
to share their possessions and give all to the community. The Haydock commentary explains it well. It is believed that “the resolution which the faithful made of selling their property, and
laying the price at the feet of the apostles, implied a vow of reserving
nothing for themselves, but giving all to the community; and that the crime of
Ananias and Saphira consisted in the violation of this vow; on which account
they regarded them as sacrilegious, and plunderers of sacred things.”
---“Ananias, and his wife Saphira, had made a
promise or vow, to put into the common stock the price of what they had to
sell. When they had sold the field, they
resolved by mutual consent to keep for their private use part of the money, and
to bring in the rest, as if they had received no more. The whole price being promised, and by that
means consecrated to God, St. Augustine calls it a sacrilegious fraud, and St.
Chrysostom a theft of what was already made sacred to God.”
Found
Hello my name is René Pelchat… I am 47
years old single convert to what I thought was the catholic faith when I was
30. After reading a lot of catholic books, lives of saints, books on
freemasonry and their infiltration into the church, etc, I felt that there was
something wrong with the vatican II catholic church (I believed during many
years in Medjugorje, marian movement of Priests, etc,).
In the last couple of years, I didn't understand
why there was so much chaos in that church and so few people attending masses
(most of them old people). For instance,
I was wondering why the catholic vatican II church was not talking and
promoting the unbelievable miracles we have in our history (Our Lady of
Guadalupe, the Saint Shroud of Turin -we know now by science that this is the
Shroud of Jesus Christ, numerous Eucharistic miracles, etc.). I was asking Jesus and the Virgin Mary in my
prayers where is the Real Truth. Well,
thanks for your site and your discoveries I am beginning to be at peace now.
I would like to congratulate you and thank
you for the immense effort you did by creating your site.
(Rene)
Comment
After listening once again to your talks
with Greg Rossi and Will Golle, one sad thought stroke me: Both the radical
schismatics (who cast down Saints, depose real pre-vatican II Popes and misread
Church Law) and the radical defenders of the V2 apostasy suffer from the same
problem that blinds them in similar fashion, even though they are on 2 extreme
opposite sides: Pride.
The radical schismatics pride themselves on
their knowledge and make a fool of themselves. While most of the V2 defenders
(aside from [Albrecht] and the pseudo-intellectual with the pipe) actually
pride themselves on their IGNORANCE. This problem plagues the (fake?) V2
defender from Chicago, Lewis, Golle and Rossi. They can´t even tell who goes to
Hell, or who is and who isn´t a Catholic, or when a Catholic ceases to be
Catholic.
I know it´s hard to find good help
nowadays. But for you, it seems even harder to find worthy opponents.
Question one
Question one:
Are you supposed to be afraid of God?
Ow…
MHFM:
Yes, the most common theme in the Bible is that the fear of the Lord is the beginning of
wisdom (Psalm 110:10), and that His mercy
is only upon those who fear Him (Psalm 102:17; Lk. 1:50; 2 Cor. 5:11;
etc.). Therefore, those who don’t have a
sufficient fear of God to obey His commandments and avoid gravely offending Him
will not receive His mercy or forgiveness.
The fear of God is what causes sinners to turn from the broad road and
begin to live a life of grace. After
people become more advanced in the spiritual life, their actions become
motivated by the love of God, though a salutary fear of the Lord remains.
Interesting
Thought this was an interesting
article. Even though they imbibe the V2 apostasy and are totally
ignorant of the true faith they have correctly stated that, "Islam is
of the devil". This has been taught throughout the history of the
Catholic Church. They however seem to be doing this more in retaliation
for what they falsely believe about 9/11 being an Islamic attack. What is
even more diabolical is the CNN reporter, "Rick Sanchez" and how he
defends not only Islam but man in general and how we must respect all people.
-Bruce
“Christians To Burn Quran”
This is an outrageous story - but true. And
it can only lead to the sort of narrow-minded anger and violence that peaceful people
(of any religion) want no part of.
A CNN interview reveals that a US church
has sparked off a huge controversy by mulling an ‘International Burn a Quran
Day’ to observe the anniversary of the 9/11 terror attack. The Dove World
Outreach Centre in Gainesville, Florida, will be hosting the event to remember
the victims of the Sep 9, 2001 attack and has extended an invitation to all
Christians to burn the Muslim holy book at its premises from 6 pm to 9 pm. “We believe that Islam is of the devil, that it’s
causing billions of people to go to hell, it is a deceptive religion, it is a
violent religion and that is proven many, many times,” church pastor Terry
Jones told CNN.
MHFM: Yes, the complete apostate Rick Sanchez actually claims to
be a Vatican II “Catholic.” What a sick
joke.
Talking
Dear Mhfm,
I know you got a recent e-mail from someone about Chris Brown. I found this video about him. It shows how one of his songs is talking
about Lucifer. [“Fallen Angel”]
God Bless
Sean
Note
MHFM: Our combo DVDs containing the
new video, Is the World about to End?,
are now available to ship from the monastery.
Orders for them will be shipped starting tomorrow. We had previously made them available for
order.
A few pictures of
the Monastery
Question
Since you have done a good job of showing
how recent popes are anti-popes, I was wondering, does your movement have an
alternate pope?
Do you have a list of anti-popes? Also the black popes (Jesuits) and your view
of these?
Since people's salvation depends on much of this and adhering to the truth of
scripture, are you trying to reform the Catholic Church or are splitting from
it?
I would appreciate your reply.
Thank you.
Courag…
MHFM: We are Catholics and we adhere to the traditional faith
that the Church has always taught. The
true Catholic Church still exists, but in a remnant of traditional
Catholics. The Church doesn’t need to be
reformed, but rather a massive apostasy has occurred in which almost all who
claim to be Catholic are in fact non-Catholic.
They have left the Catholic Church.
What most people regard as the Catholic Church (the Vatican II sect) is
in fact a counterfeit sect. Our view of
the Jesuits is that non-Catholics are deceived when they think that modern
“Jesuits” run a world conspiracy. That’s
nonsense. The modern so-called “Jesuits”
are in fact heretics and apostates because they adhere to Vatican II and false
ecumenism. Traditionally, however, the
Jesuit Order produced some of the greatest saints and missionaries. They did an invaluable service in spreading
the true faith and bringing the Gospel all over the world.
People’s salvation depends on hearing, accepting, and following
all of what Christ commanded. You can’t
do that as a non-Catholic. That’s why
it’s necessary for salvation to become a traditional Catholic.
JP2
Brothers,
The recent video on JPII is a clear message
to those willing to listen. The only problem is that there are not too
many people willing or able to listen in this evil world today with all the
modern technological distracting noise. By externals, their worlds are
conceived by many false signals and a spirit of "Jumping on the Band
Wagon". JPII's "New Truth" is just one of those false
signals that is accepted in the V-2 Sect's "New Mass". The
"New Truth" is but "Another Lie" that adds fuel to the fire
that has engulfed the Vatican II sect. "Learn not the way of the
heathen," Jeremiah 10:2…
When JPII died, he was first placed into a
cedar coffin. His face was covered with a white silk; this was the first
time this was done... Next the cedar coffin was sealed in an 800-pound
coffin...then finally it was placed in another wooden coffin before being
buried beneath St. Peter's Basilica. "...bearing a skull and
crossbones.." Los Angeles Times. Interesting to note is that JPII
was buried in a trapezoidal-shaped coffin, the same seen in many vampire
movies.
"The trapezoid has long been regarded in by occultists as the most satanic
of shapes, especially adapted to enhance demonic manifestation. This type
of coffin is built to draw in and preserve evil, dark energy. The idea
was to attract enough vampire dark demonic energy, to draw sufficient
quantities of energy, and to store that evil energy, so that, at a right
moment, the dead man can come out of the coffin, as demonic resurrection,"
former satanist, Bill Schnoebelen…
God bless,
Tom Miles
Videos
Dear MHFM,
Thanks for the prompt shipment of the
Incredible Animals that Defy Evolution and other videos we received
today-----WOW!! these are ABSOLUTELY RIVETING!! Our puppy Jesse was
similarly glued to the TV screen, particularly enjoying the baby chick
peeping as it emerged from its awesome shell---(he kept barking and moving his
head around at all kinds of angles and listening carefully with his little ears
perked up!) ---personally I enjoyed the section on the hummingbirds the most as
they are --- like all these animals---totally MIRACULOUS creatures of
God!
Great new videos on arch-evil JPII---great
point in that yes he very carefully, methodically, made certain all
his extreme-hell-inspired-antichrist-anticatholic program was explicitly put ON
THE RECORD!! [kind of like a serial killer]. He did this again and
again as MHFM has so correctly pointed out. Hindsight is 20/20----could
what he was really up to (pure evil) possibly be any MORE OBVIOUS!...
Comment
Very nice clips you posted about on the
'God of Wonders' video… The verse that hits home in it was:
"For since the creation of the world
God's invisible qualities—His eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly
seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without
excuse." Romans 1:20
What a slap in the face it is to God who
shares his creation with us, and hear some say there still isn’t a
God. Those people don’t want there to be a God, so that way they
can attempt to dupe themselves to live immorally without following God’s
law along with trying to find some cheap way to cover their guilty
consciences…
On the flip side, it’s nice for me to
hear things during astronomy star gazing sessions while viewing the
heavens, when someone says something like, 'How can there not be a
God?' Also Astronomy magazines cover story about 2-3 months
ago had an article about our Sun, on how science and astronomers are struggling
to find another star unique like our own sun. Out of the billions upon billions
of stars out there, our sun is unique...Try to explain that one Darwin ??
Steve
Wonders
Subject:
Wonders of God
Great
videos, although I never believed in evolution, watching these videos really
made me feel small. St. Alphonsus Liguori uses the word, "worm"
a lot in his writings to describe our nothingness in comparison to the Blessed
Trinity. The other thing that comes to my mind is His love and care for
all of us, all these creations that God made were out of love for us. The
next and final reality to consider is our salvation, God closed the gates of
heaven by his word, He could have done the same to open them but to show us His
indescribable love for us, Jesus chose to suffer the most ignominious
death possible… Can you imagine, Jesus does all this for Love of us and we slap
Him in the face and run from Him, such ingratitude…
Todd
God of Wonders
MHFM: This is a link to an excellent
video called God of Wonders. It was our intention to carry this video. However, the end contains heresy: the false
salvation message of Protestantism. So,
we have linked to the first seven parts.
They deal with refuting evolution and demonstrating God’s power. The footage is tremendous.
1) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWH7uVc0S4Y&feature=related
2) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7D4QD7lS9o&feature=related
3) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73QQ3XJWmmw&feature=related
4) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQH26-lDW3s&feature=related
5) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8J5MygZiRcM&feature=related
6) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIJMC8CAKKs&feature=related
7) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYRwpTEvVfc&feature=related
Posting
Subject: God of Wonders video – amazing !
Dear Brothers,
What an amazing video, God of Wonders. Thank you for posting it. God's creation is such an
endless source of natural miracles that it's no wonder St. Paul said people
have no excuse for not believing in God (Romans 1:20). The series destroys the
idea that the universe came about by chance because every single thing that
exists is built in an organized way – that doesn't happen by accident! The
footage is superb and if there is so much beauty coupled with practicality in
nature, then one cannot even begin to imagine what heaven is like:
1 Corinthians 2:9 - But, as it is written:
That eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither hath it entered into the heart
of man, what things God hath prepared for them that love him.
I particularly enjoyed the section on snow
flakes in video 3. It reminded me of how many servants of the Blessed Virgin
Mary, when given the grace of seeing her up close, remarked that she glittered
with a snow-like light. It also reminded me of the vision of hell that the children
of Fatima were given and about how so many souls would fall into hell “like
snow flakes.” It is remarkable that Protestants can see such glories in
creation, but cling obstinately to their heresies, as though God, who so
clearly demonstrates His love in nature, would abandon His creatures to a
man-made system of salvation, such as is protestantism, and not build a
permanent structure of salvation – the Catholic Church only. If we want to make
it to heaven these days during the Antichrist Antipope Vatican II Great
Apostasy, then we really need to put the Catholic faith first by holding
uncompromisingly to Catholic dogmas, and to have a strong and consistent
devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary and the Rosary. May Jesus and Mary help all
Catholics to love God wholeheartedly, to be humble, and to walk the narrow path
to life all the way to the end.
God Bless,
Chris White
Convert
I was looking into your site. I have been
looking to convert from protestantism to the Holy Catholic Church in order that
my soul might be saved. First is that possible? If it’s possible what would you
recommend. I live in Florida and there
are no traditionalist organizations that teach extra ecclesiam nulla salus…
please advise.
Thanks,
F...M….
MHFM: That’s great to hear. What a person in your situation would do is
follow these steps to convert: The Steps to convert to the
traditional Catholic faith and for those leaving the New Mass - Baptism and
Conditional Baptism - the Council of Trent's Profession of Faith for Converts. Begin to pray the Rosary each day,
do spiritual reading, and familiarize yourself with the basic catechism. When one is fully convinced and prepared for
a profession of faith, we can help you further with where to make a confession.
New Video
MHFM: This is a new video about the
Great Western Schism and the Gates of Hell.
The Great Western Schism and the
Gates of Hell - 1/4
The Great Western Schism and the
Gates of Hell - 2/4
The Great Western Schism and the
Gates of Hell - 3/4
The Great Western Schism and the
Gates of Hell - 4/4
Soul
Dear MHFM,
I was reading St. Gertrude's current bulletin
(July 25, 2010) just now and read in a reprint of St. Anthony's Messenger from
October 1936 that someone with a sincerely held non-Catholic belief is really a
member of the soul of the Catholic Church and will be saved. I was surprised to
find this… Any comments?
Valerie Duffy
MHFM: Yes, it’s blatantly heretical.
They deny Outside the Church There is No Salvation, just as we’ve pointed out
all along. Those who support, accept or
agree with such heretical priests are not true Catholics. The heresy was also being spread by priests
in fallible sources prior to Vatican II.
See our book for a full discussion of these issues.
BOD
Dear MHFM,
Council of Elvira completely debunks
baptism of desire. "Canon 4-Flamens who have been catechumens for three
years and who have abstained from sacrifices may be baptized. Canon
42-Those with a good reputation who seek to become Christians shall remain as
catechumens for two years before being baptized. Should they become
seriously ill, they may request and receive baptism earlier."
Baptism, early 4th century Roman Catholicism was never an issue of desire
saving those outside the Church unless baptized prior, properly, in the
Church. That would have been ludicrous thinking and totally insane.
Furthermore, the idea of salvation outside the Church could save you
somehow, equally as ludicrous and outrageous. Thank you MHFM. May
your ministry bear great fruit.
Pop star
Subject:
Pop star made a “Saint”
Hello
Brothers!
Reading the e-exchange about that one female who loves Chris Brown so much, I
decided to share another story with you. A student in Serbia decided to paint a
religious icon, or picture, of the turbo-folk star Ceca Raznatovic, widow of
the hypocrite Zeljko Raznatovic Arkan. It’s sad to see who the young people
consider to be Saints these days. Words suchs as whore, prostitute, Turk,
demon, sinner are all words that can be used to describe her. Not much
different from the female pop stars in North America (Lady Gaga, etc.) I have
attached the picture of the icon.
God Bless!
Daniel
New Church
I wanted to comment on Carlos' conversation
with his fellow new church catholic regarding his understanding of americanism,
the problem is these people don't use common sense and logic. They also
apply this so called blind faith to what Vatican ll teaches instead of applying
critical thinking to the matter at hand. Once the True Catholic Church
solemnly declares a Truth {dogma} it can't be changed and it can't be changed
because they are the teachings of Jesus Christ. Could you imagine saying
to Jesus, "you need to get with the times"! The Church solemnly
declares these truths so that the faithful become bound by these truths.
They have to hold these truths whole and inviolate to be a member of the catholic
church. This is the function of the Teaching Magisterium!
These people have a misunderstanding on what Jesus said to Peter
regarding, "what you bind on earth will be bound in heaven and what
you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven", this teaching doesn't apply
to a divine truth, you can't change a truth because the truth is not subject to
anything, it’s a rock!
Todd
Repeating
Subject: Catholic Inquisition Myths Busted
… This is such a hot topic for so many
protestants, to throw that at your face when the person knows so little about
it – and is just repeating what that person’s minister or false opinion is
about that time in the Church’s history. In William Thomas Walsh’s book
about Isabella, Queen of Spain, He details the problems that the Spaniards had
to deal with regarding Muslim invasions and Jewish “false” converts once that
rule was enacted (that all non-Catholics had to leave…)
Thanks…
Melanie and Bill
Regarding
Dear MHFM,
Regarding canon 16 of Council
of Elvira, "...they are to be given neither to Jews nor to heretics,
because there can be no companionship between faithful and
infidel..." By this holy synod of holy early times antipope Benedict 16
stands condemned as obstinate heretic in 2010 of salvation history by visibly
and openly kowtowing to the Jews in their condemned faith… As a Roman
Catholic I condemn antipope Benedict 16, HERETIC! St. Michael the
Archangel, avenge us we pray most fervently.
Dea…
Schism
Could you please also make a video about
The Great Schism of 1054? It would help a lot of people here from Eastern
Europe.
Thank you and God Bless!
Eduard
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.
In our Papacy section, there are audios that deal with the primary issue
involved in the schism, the rejection of the Roman Pontiff’s primacy of
jurisdiction. The Bible teaches that Jesus made St. Peter the first pope [link to section]. The audios cover
how the ancient Church, and the East, recognized the pope’s primacy of
jurisdiction.
Impression
Your
latest videos are spectacular, as always.
The Western Schism has left me with the distinct impression that God, in
his infinite wisdom and careful planning, allowed this disgrace to happen
exactly in order to prove that what would come to pass in the Great Apostasy
that we are living through is plausible.
The
coincidences are so striking, it´s even scary.
Just like in Siri´s election and later conspiracy by the college of
cardinals…
CK
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. Yes, the coincidences are striking. It seems that God arranged it so that there
would be a precedent during the Middle Ages for what would happen during the
Great Apostasy.
Mythology
Dear brothers in Christ,
I'd like to add some comments about anti-Catholic mythology of these last days
of the world. First, the Inquisition. One reader, obviously a brain-washed
protestant, wrote about millions of so-called victims of the Inquisition. I
have nothing to add to your answer to this accusation (i.e. about the number
of the real victims of judicial errors of the Inquisition); I would
like just to ask the protestants promoting the lies about the Inquisition the
question: If the number of victims, and "victims", counts in
millions, how so that your "saint", Martin Luther, did not mention
this "slaughter" not only once in his 95 (ninety five) theses? I
repeat--there are 95 theses that Martin Luther brought up against the Catholic
Church, and did not mention the Inquisition in none of those almost hundred
theses. Why is that, if the alleged crimes of the Inquisition were so brutal
and widely spread as you claim it was?
For example, Sir Isaac Newton, the founder of physics as an exact science, was,
as far as it is known today, an adherent of arianism, but he kept his views in
secret. Publicly, he was an adherent of anglicanism, and as such a violent
enemy of the Catholic Church. What do you think would have happened to him if
he had publicly doubted the Trinity within the anglican church?
Second, the mentioned reader wrote: "The catholic church from its
inception and enforcement by the Roman government under Constantine has been
illegitimate and false."
The inception of The Catholic Church is in Christ's words: "Thou art
Peter...". So the reader blatantly say that Our Lord Jesus Christ is an
"illegitimate" and a liar. No wonder that the "fellow
protestants" so much love the antipopes ruling from the Rome for the last
52 years. Perhaps the satanic antipope would "canonize" Luther
together with countless "martyrs" from every other damned false
religion of the world. I agree--Martin Luther, Henry VIII., Calvin, and other
protestants are indeed of the same kind as muslims, buddhists, hinduists,
animists, etc.
It is true--the "huggy-huggy christianity" of these last days cannot
withstand the satanic lies. These "huggy-huggy" followers of Satan
would love to put God on the international judicial trial for the many
genocides, atrocities and other "illegal" killings of the human
beings we find described throughout The Old Testament, and confirmed by Jesus
in The New Testament (" For amen I say unto you, till heaven and earth
pass, one jot, or one tittle shall not pass of the law, till all be
fulfilled.").
Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia
Conciliarism
Subject: new videos
Thank you MHFM for your new videos on Great
Western Schism/Gates of Hell. "Conciliarism"--thanks for
teaching me a new word with its meaning being SO very highly significant for
our day! "Conciliarism"--it reminds one of a chronic disease
--- which basically the whole post Vatican 2 (false council of heretics)
Catholic-in-name-only "church" has contracted! It
reminds one of a spiritual disorder which makes humans abandon God,
His True Church, His Truly Catholic teachings........(as clearly defined
by DOGMA). This "conciliarism" falls in right along with the
other sicknesses of the modern era---DarwinISM, MarxISM, feminISM, etc etc
however, it is even more toxic, and worse!!
"Indefectibility"--that God
will NEVER abandon His bride the True Church (and in turn she, never
having contracted "conciliarism", or, "modernism”… so that
the Gates of Hell (lying mouths of heretics, like at vatican 2 and in
the V2 sect) will NOT prevail against God's True Church------this is
beautiful. Yes, some things STILL remain unchanged, untouched and
perfect---like our ancient Catholics dogmas…
Inquisition
Dear
Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,
"BloodTa" is a pathetic joke!! .. .and here's why, and why he
needs, in future, to 'engage his brain before he opens his mouth' ...
The BBC produced a documentary entitled "The Myth of the Spanish
Inquisition," in the 1990's, which puts to rest the lies perpetrated and
spread by anti-Catholic forces, particularly after the Protestant Reformation/
Revolution....the Spanish Inquisition was set up under Queen Isabella and King
Ferdinand to oppose and uncover the Jews who had infiltrated the Church and
State by 1492, false Marrano Jews as they were called, whose main object was to
destroy Christianity and society as a whole.
The trials were fair and no torture was used, and the numbers of incalcitrants
accused and eventually burned was very small in number. For instance between
3000 and 5000 were killed in the 350 years of the Inquisition (that's about 10
every year ). Meanwhile in that same period, the BBC documentary reveals
that between 1450 and 1750, in Protestant Europe, 150,000 persons were
persecuted for crimes of witchcraft and perhaps half that number were condemned
and executed.
In one year alone, (1692 ), The Protestant Salem Witch Trials executed 20
"witches"...
.In Spain and Spanish America, 40 - 50 were executed during the 350 years of
the Spanish Inquisition, while in comparison, during the reign of Mary and
Elizabeth, (1553 -1603), during the Protestant English Inquisition, 400 were
executed, and in the general anti - Catholic persecutions, 72,000 souls.
The Papal Inquisition was set up in the 13th century, basically in response to
the Albigensians who were teaching heresy and were a threat to both the Church
and society in general, and was directed at Catholics and lapsed Catholics
only. They too, were fair and most accepted the penances imposed by the
ecclesiatical courts.... Only incalcitrants were handed over to the State for
trial, which considered heresy a crime of treason, undermining the State.
William T. Walsh, as well, has written an interesting treatise on the
Inquisition, in his "Characters of the Inquisition," which
"BloodTa" would do well to consult, before committing 'pen to paper!'
God bless,
David
When
Subject:
Inquisition
Dear
Brothers:
When
I was thirteen, one of my so called friends said to me "You're a Catholic?
How nice! How would you like to be a Christian?" She went
on to accuse the Church of murdering millions in the inquisition, basically the
same sort of accusation in the one letter you just received. At the time,
I was novus ordo, and didn't know how to respond except to say that Christ
didn't found any Protestant sect, He founded the Catholic Church so that was
the Church I wanted to belong to. After doing some research on the
subject I came to several conclusions: Spreading heresy is a far worse
crime than murder, since the guilty party is killing souls which is more
serious than killing someone's body, so the Church and state were perfectly
justified in executing notorious, unrepentant heretics who were spreading their
filth and leading souls out of the Church. Secondly, the entire
population of Europe could not have been more than a few million people, so the
number of executed was greatly exaggerated. The protestants take some
abuses by a minority of Catholics and exaggerate their number and importance
and use these things to justify their rebellion against Rome. Of course,
when protestants commit crimes, they ignore or downplay those sins like the
hypocritical nitwits that they are. It started with Martin Luther and
still hasn't stopped. Some things never change. I did view your
video on the subject some time ago after finding it on YouTube; I'd like to see
a full one hour DVD video on the subject, perhaps combining it with the
Crusades, which is another area vastly misunderstood by most people. Keep
up the good work. God bless you all,
Brenda
Roy
Isabella
Dear MHFM,
Bloodta, what is that short for? Brothers,
I guess you respond to things like that for the benefit of others. I just read
Isabella of Spain the Last Crusader by WT Walsh… 1930. What a wonderful
book! I also scanned a book by Benjamin Netanyahu's father (Benzion)
"The Origins of the Inquisition in Fifteenth Century Spain",
Netanyahu's father is a very influencial professor in the N.E. and very popular
also in Israel. He would also be considered "right wing" and
obviously has no love for the Holy Roman Catholic Church. I would go so far as
to say he has a deep hatred of the Holy Roman Catholic Church and his writings
are just a repeat of the same lies (plain and simple) we've seen throughout
church history. I'm glad Isabelle started the inquisition and I'm glad I
actually know why. Queen Isabelle of
Spain...I'm not sure why she isn't a saint.
Matthew
Promise
Subject: Western Schism video
Dear Brothers,
That's a truly brilliant explanation of the
Great Western Schism and how it does not contradict Jesus' promise that the
gates of hell will not prevail against the Church. In fact, it proves that
Christ's promises are absolutely unalterable, because only satan himself could
conjure such a ridiculously confusing situation where there are 3 claimants to
the papacy, but only one true pope, and for the Church to stay her course
throughout 3 successive elections. The fact that one of the true popes, Gregory
XII, had the least support proves that it was of the devil because otherwise God
would have given him more support, as He did eventually. The parallels between
the two Antipopes named John XXIII are not to be taken lightly either, i.e. one
reigning during the Western Schism, and the other reigning during the current
Vatican II apostasy. It demonstrates how saints and theologians are not
infallible, and can be horribly wrong even about who the true pope is! Probably
most importantly is the great jurist of the time, Baldus, who remarked that a
pope who is openly and persistently heretical is (self-)deposed. It shows that
the hierarchy of the Church is not infallible – infallibility was only promised
to St. Peter and his successors, not to the body of cardinals or to any other
Catholic. It proves that it is patently absurd to reject the notion that such a
situation cannot be the case today, especially when even Protestants can
recognise the apostasy of antipopes John Paul II and Benedict XVI. So what if
there has been a papal interregnum for over 50 years?! Do non-sedevacantists
even think about how impossible it is for planet earth to sustain life in the
midst of such a huge cosmic garbage dump? Impossible for man, but not for God.
Such dogma doubting heretics imagine that the world will never end, and
especially not in our time. What a severe surprise when they see Jesus coming
on the clouds of heaven in glory to judge the living and the dead. What a
horrible reality to know that one has rejected Him who is life itself. What a
sad fact that the heavens and earth will be dissolved by fire but that only a
few will be saved. Thank you for the encouraging video.
Luke 18:14 - “...because every one that
exalteth himself, shall be humbled: and he that humbleth himself, shall be
exalted.”
God Bless,
Chris White
Convenient
Subject: How Convenient
In your video "Why Rome is now the
Whore of Babylon", I noticed that among your list of martyrs that you
conveniently left out the 500 years of Inquisitions in which the Catholic
church still under your precious pre-Vatican II, killed in upwards of millions
of non-catholics according to historians. Is there some reason you didn't add
these martyrs? I'm sure there was and I'm sure we both know why, don't we? The
reason you did not add these martyred millions is because it does not fit into
your paradigm of having to believe that the pre-Vatican II Catholic church is
Christs "true church" and so you will continually attempt to justify
or cover up/ignore any history that does not show your church in the light that
you wish to view it in.
I'm sure you daily suffer from cognitive
dissonance due to history that you have chose to ignore. You need to wake up.
The catholic church from its inception and enforcement by the Roman government
under Constantine has been illigitimate and false, and it is this false church
that you are protecting and promulgating. You need to look at history with a
non-biased point of view. Your videos show that you are biased and with an
agenda and are not actually looking at what is but rather what you want to believe
is…
Take your blinders off and start looking for truth rather than what you have
been told and believe is truth.
- BloodTa…
MHFM: No, you don’t have any idea what you are talking
about. You really need to watch our
video on that issue. It specifically
addresses and refutes the very lies you are promoting about the
Inquisition. Do you even know what the
Inquisition was? The idea that millions
were killed is pure nonsense: anti-Catholic mythology. Among other things, the video examines the
work of a renowned Jewish historian.
He’s certainly not partial to the Catholic Church, but rather quite
critical of it. He’s an expert on the
Inquistion and puts the many myths about it to rest, including the ridiculous
lies about the number of people killed.
See our video: Catholic Inquisition Myths Busted. The evidence shows that a few thousand were
killed by the Inquisition over its whole history; and the reason for those
deaths should be understood after one has a better grasp of the period and the
intention behind the Inquisition.
You need to wake up and realize that there’s only one biblical
faith, and that’s the Catholic faith.
Obviously you have been brainwashed by the propaganda you’ve seen
against the Catholic Church.
Redemptoris Missio
Dear Brothers,
I'm not sure if you ever emphasized this,
but while looking this morning at John Paul II's encyclical "Redemptoris
Missio" # 10, one thing struck me:
"The universality of salvation means
that it is granted not only to those who explicitly believe in Christ and have
entered the Church."
In other words, Antipope John Paul II is
saying, without the slightest doubt, that salvation is available outside the
Church! No matter what version of the salvation dogma you adhere to, John Paul
II is denying here, in the most explicit fashion, its very simplest expression!
Of course, in the same paragraph, he goes
on to say that those who have not entered the Church have already been united
to it in a "certain way". What a waste of time.
God bless you,
Jakub Eisenbruk
MHFM: Yes, it’s covered in our file on The Heresies of John Paul II - a comprehensive
presentation [PDF file]. There are a number of outrageous heresies in
that encyclical, including universal salvation and others dealing with false
religions.
E-mail
Subject: Brian’s e-mail
As for Brian's email…: it seems that the
whole matter simply boils right down to this: does one choose Faith in
GOD, as HE has so clearly revealed through DEFINED Catholic
DOGMA, over the past 2,000 years? Or does one choose faith in
puny tiny fallible measly man---that is, to believe whatever anyone
"feels like" believing?...
Freemasonry
Subject: Freemasonry
Really Good videos on Freemasonry but the
same way you can trace freemasonry being an occultist religion you can also see
the Roman Catholicism practice such occultist things and why the bible
contradicts the Roman Catholicism practices
Adrian…
MHFM: No, the Catholic Church doesn’t practice anything
occultic. If you tried to give an
example (which you didn’t), your misconception could be refuted. See our book, The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church for the
biblical evidence for Catholicism.
New video on Baptism
MHFM: This video covers some important new points and angles to this issue.
The Good Thief, the Old Testament Saints, and the
Necessity of Baptism [new video]
This video discusses how water baptism can be absolutely
necessary in light of the Good Thief. It
also covers the Old Testament saints and the necessity of water baptism. There
will probably be a part 2.
Prayer
Dear Brothers:
What is the best way to recite Rosary? I
wonder how the Saints said their Rosary? Did they say Rosary after a working
day, or they say it before go to work?
And if they forgot, or were distracted, did
they begin anew, restart it again or did they just keep continuing their Rosary
until the finish.
I have a lot of problems of distraction,
distress, and being forgetful. I keep
restarting again and again, sometimes it takes me a whole morning or afternoon
or night just to try to finish the 3 decades.
I’m afraid my praying is not worthy at all. Maybe God wants me to work, get the job done
first, then, whatever time is left then pray. I am not sure this is the best
way or not, I wonder how the Saints conducted their works and their prayers.
… God bless.
Kim
MHFM: In regard to when one should pray, that depends upon the
person and what works for him or her.
There’s no set time. Concerning
distractions that can arise when one is trying to pray, the saints tell us to
simply continue praying. By continually
stopping and starting, you can actually give more attention to the distraction
and interrupt your prayer more significantly.
One saint basically said: when dealing with a distraction, it’s not
recommended to make a violent move of the mind away from the distraction, for
in such a violent move away from it, the distraction can receive more focus and
be increased. Rather, one should simply
and calmly continue to pray while moving the focus back to the prayer. In this vein, one should not fret if his or
her prayer is not perfect or less than 100% recollected. St. Louis De Montfort also says that
continuing to pray while dealing with involuntary distractions can increase the
merit of prayer. Continue to try to pray
the full Rosary each day. An easier way
to get that done is one set of mysteries at three different times.
Comment
Subject: bad-willed heretics
Dear Brothers,
The bad-willed heretics sure are on fire recently with all their attacks
against Catholic dogmas! I went to a priest that was saying that when Jesus
walked on water and Peter got out of the boat and started walking on water to
Jesus, that the reason Peter started sinking was because, "he left his
friends - he tried to do it alone - he should have stayed in the boat." So
it doesn't matter to such pathetic heretics that Peter has SUPREME JURISDICTION
in the church, or that he was walking to Jesus but started to doubt! He then
went on to say that it doesn't matter if you start doubting the faith, but to
just keep going. Well, that's exactly what such V-2 apostates are trained to do
- doubt dogma. At least he said that one needs to stay inside the boat, i.e.
the Church. It's so pathetic how bad willed people are today. The martyrs
didn't flinch when it came to defending Jesus Christ against the idol
worshiping emperors of Rome - in fact they were happy to suffer for Christ.
Nowadays, the local "bishop" would back out of any confrontation with
a true Catholic like lightening. By rejecting the EENS salvation dogma, they
are saying to Jesus, "yeah, thanks for dying for us, but you didn't really
have to." It's shocking!!! It's all about love of man rather than love of
God for the heretics. It's the Antichrist Apostasy with their… "baptism of
desire."
God Bless,
Chris White
Luther
Subject: Martin Luther, the Devil and
Denominations video
Finally, it’s like for 100 protestants that
attack the catholic church, 1 catholic decides to defend himself. Good video
Chiv….
Sedevacantists
The one thing I have always wondered about Sedevacantists
is this: why debate… some other apologist about what Benedict XVI said or
meant? Benedict XVI is still alive. When will sedevacantists develop a
definitive list of concerns/ charges of heresy for Ben XVI to respond to
directly? Supporters of Ben XVI say that
a Pope must be confronted directly
Sulkow…
MHFM: There’s no question about what
Benedict XVI is saying. His writings,
actions and promotion of Vatican II make it quite clear. People have written to him about his false ecumenism,
how it contradicts Tradition, and the general apostasy of Vatican II. Stop making excuses for the public heretic,
demonstrate some good will, and accept the obvious.
Regarding
Greetings; and hoping all goes well for
you.
Regarding the sacrament of Baptism: Those
who are Traditional Orthodox Catholic, Like myself, know that baptism is the
required sacrament for gaining church membership after accepting what the
church teaches for salvation. Seems to
me this issue of desired baptism should be considered the Exception to the rule
for Extreme circumstances. This should not be accepted as being normal or
regular principle since it contradicts what Christ taught. Hope this makes
sense to you.
John Moyna
MHFM: No, it doesn’t make any sense and in fact it’s totally
contradictory. You begin by saying that
baptism is required for membership in the Church, as if you believe that no one
is saved without it. However, you then
contradict yourself and declare that people can be in the Church and saved
without baptism by way of exception. You
are speaking out of both sides of your mouth.
At this time, you do not accept the Church’s teaching on the necessity
of the Sacrament of Baptism. The
contradiction articulated in your e-mail is typical of those who depart from Catholic
truth on the salvation and baptism dogmas.
They have no problem saying one thing, and then declaring exactly the
opposite. The comfort you display while
speaking two contradictory things is problematic and perhaps illustrative of
why you haven’t yet seen the full truth on this issue.
SBC
It appears that
the St. Benedict Center/Brother Andre Marie have reached rapprochement with the
Vatican II church and the Diocese of Manchester….
Bill
MHFM: They are truly disgraceful
apostates who couldn’t care less about any Catholic dogma. Despite their claims to the contrary, they
definitely do not believe Outside the Church There is No Salvation is a dogma
one must accept to be inside the Church.
That can be easily proven. They
also accept pro-abortionists as inside the Church, as they must to hold
communion with the Vatican II sect. To
accept Antipope Benedict XVI and his apostate bishops at this point, with all
the evidence they’ve seen, shows that they truly serve Satan. As long as a man in Rome dresses up in papal
robes and claims to be pope, they would accept him no matter what he did,
including “canonizing” Luther, John Paul II and probably even Satan himself
(there’s not much difference between the second and third on that list, by the
way). We are dealing with dark spiritual
zombies who claim to be dedicated Catholics – complete and utter phonies. This is the dark spiritual plight of our
age. What a disgraceful example of bad
will. They talk about Our Lady and Our
Lord, as if they care about them. They
don’t care one bit about them, which is why they profess communion with a man
who trashes them and denies the whole faith.
Barring a miraculous conversion, they will find their spot alongside
their father Lucifer in the fires of Hell.
Perhaps you can ask one of the heretics from their group if they’d want
to have a phone debate with us, in which they’d have to address the many
heresies of their spiritual leaders that they constantly ignore. Only in such an encounter would the full
depths of their unbelieving, satanic, heretical malice be shown to the world,
as it was in the encounter with Vin Lewis.
During that exchange, it was clearly demonstrated that all of those who
obstinately cling to the Counter Church are forced to believe in nothing.
Update
Dear MHFM,
Well I suppose this day was coming. Last Sunday Fr. Talcott sent an individual
(Eric Hoffman) to "talk" to me after Mass concerning me staying
outside of Mass. I was sitting in our van… when he approached me. He was at first
courteous (we had met before), but grew rather disturbed when I told him Fr.
Talcott is a heretic. In any case he told me that he was giving me a warning
from Father, that if I don't come in to Mass, Father has the right to kick me
out. I argued with this heretic for awhile, he ended up "tuck tail and
running...or walking rather fast" because I think I caught him off guard
with my blunt responses. There is more to the argument, but as you have heard
it all before I won't go into great detail. One thing that was amazing, and
sad, was his level of spiritual blindness. He told me, in a very strong
and confident manner, that "NO pope has ever said anything
infallible!!!...none of the last 268 popes have ever done such a thing!" I
said, "oh really, how about the Immaculate Conception?" He responded,
"Oh, well yeah that was an infallible statement." And yet he
still stuck to his original claim!! He could not even see such a stark
contradiction himself. It was unbelievable!
Anyways, I got a call from Fr. Talcott on Tuesday that "You are to be in
mass the entire time. You must all stand when I walk down the aisle, stay the
entire time until the last song is sung." I told him that it wasn't going
to happen, that he is a heretic for what he believes, his adherence to
Benedict, etc. He had nothing to say. He acted like an immature person. This
was his response, "Oh yeah, okay Robby, I'm a heretic, okay you got the
word in!" I said he was correct! Then he said if we think he is a
heretic, and we won't listen to him, we are not to come anymore.
So unfortunately we have run out of "Traditional" priests in the area
to go to. Fr. Zapp kicked us out for adhering to water baptism. Fr.
Morrison...well I slapped my hand down in disgust when he was preaching heresy
from the pulpit, and declared he was preaching heresy and walk out. And now Fr.
Talcott kicked us out.
Please pray for us brothers. This was obviously God's Will, and we understand
that (which actually is always comforting to know God is protecting us from people
like Fr. Talcott), and I know there is a lot of people out there in the same
situation, but it is always hard to make the transition from mass every Sunday,
to no mass at all.
There are still some options for confession, so we should be okay for awhile in
that regard. Take care.
Robby Hansen
MHFM: Thanks for the information
about your experiences defending the faith and dealing with certain
“traditionalist” priests who impose their heresies and thus must be avoided.
Heretics
Hello,
I was wondering why you call some Priests "heretics" for allowing the
possibility of baptism of desire and not refer to St. Alphonsus Ligouri as a
heretic? Why the double standard? And be honest... If I were to tell you that I
knew of a Priest who said baptism of desire is de fide you would call him a
heretic - yet St. Alphonsus said this very thing.
Thank you,
Brian
MHFM: We’ve already addressed that in
our book, debates, etc. The real
question is why you heretics don’t bother to check our responses to these
issues before writing in your bad-willed questions. Perhaps the answer is that you don’t care
about truth but only about looking for ways to continue to believe your
heresies. There’s a separate section on
that issue in the book, in fact. The
truth is that you couldn’t care less about what St. Alphonsus said except in so
far as he defends “baptism of desire”; for you almost certainly reject his
position on the damnation of all pagans, Muslims, etc. In short, the priests you regard as Catholics
(who are actually antichrist apostates) believe in salvation for members of any
religion. St. Alphonsus did not.
As wrong as he was on “baptism of
desire,” St. Alphonsus only believed in explicit “baptism of desire” for people
who believe in the essential mysteries of Catholicism: the Trinity and the
Incarnation. Second, we have said that
people could be mistaken in good faith on explicit “baptism of desire,” as St.
Alphonsus believed, until they have
seen all of the arguments; but to persist in that position, once they’ve seen
the array of dogmatic arguments against it, is definitely heretical and shows
extreme bad will. At that point, a
person runs inescapably into heresy and a denial of various dogmatic
principles. St. Alphonsus’ statements on
the so-called “baptism of desire” – the false theory which, once expanded,
became the heresy of all heresies for our age, because it justifies every
antichrist form of apostasy – are filled with errors. Among other things, he misquotes Trent,
teaches that one can be born again but not receive the remission of the
temporal punishment due to sin (directly contrary to Trent), and cites as
infallible a letter attributed to Innocent II or Innocent III (they’re not even
sure), which we know, from Vatican I, is certainly not infallible. That’s why we don’t go by saints, but by the
popes and the Magisterium. However, we
recognize that for heretics who don’t believe in papal infallibility but only
in man, that’s incomprehensible. Perhaps
if you consider St. Gregory Nazianzen, another man (saint, doctor of the
Church) who explicitly rejected “baptism of desire,” your “faith” in man will
be shaken a bit.
Americanism
Subject: Americanism
Hello Brothers Dimond,
I am a Catholic who is beginning to understand the importance of Dogma in
relation to the Catholic Church. Your websites and you tube channel have been
very effective in teaching these items of importance. However, this past week,
I was engaged in a conversation with a fellow "new church" catholic
and told him of the topics and evidence presented by your website. When
debating the validity of Vatican II with modernizing the church, he referenced
a papal bull, I believe was written by Pope Leo XIII named Americanism. To his
understanding, he thought this bull gave the Church the authority to change
doctrine in order to "get with the times". I read this bull and
believe it was misunderstood on his end. I believe your insightful
clarification on this matter would be greatly appreciated by those who will
misunderstand this papal bull. In addition, it would be great if you give on
your website, any recommended readings for example, a source page with all
books you reference in your works.
Thanks,
Carlos
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail and the interest. Your acquaintance has completely
misrepresented the letter of Pope Leo XIII on Americanism. Pope Leo XIII teaches exactly the opposite of
what your acquaintance said. In the
letter, Leo XIII expressly condemns modifying doctrine or its presentation to
fit with the times. In the following
very interesting and important passage, we find a striking condemnation of what
the entire Vatican II sect represents.
Pope Leo XIII, Testem Benevolentiae, Jan. 22, 1899: “The underlying principle of these new opinions is that, in order to
more easily attract those who differ from her, the Church should shape her
teachings more in accord with the spirit of the age and relax some of her
ancient severity and make some concessions to new opinions. Many think that
these concessions should be made not only in regard to ways of living, but even
in regard to doctrines which belong to the deposit of the faith. They contend that it would be opportune,
in order to gain those who differ from us, to omit certain points of her
teaching which are of lesser importance, and to tone down the meaning which the
Church has always attached to them. It does not need many words, beloved son,
to prove the falsity of these ideas if the nature and origin of the doctrine
which the Church proposes are recalled to mind. The Vatican Council
says concerning this point: "For the doctrine of faith which God has
revealed has not been proposed, like a philosophical invention to be perfected
by human ingenuity, but has been delivered as a divine deposit to the Spouse of
Christ to be faithfully kept and infallibly declared. Hence that meaning of the
sacred dogmas is perpetually to be retained which our Holy Mother, the Church,
has once declared, nor is that meaning ever to be departed from under the
pretense or pretext of a deeper comprehension of them." —Constitutio de Fide Catholica, Chapter
iv.
It’s also interesting that he reiterates the teaching of Vatican
I on how dogmas are to be understood as
they were once declared, condemning any departure from that understanding
under the false name of a deeper one.
The V-2 homosexual problem
Subject: The homosexual problem in the
seminaries and news that V-2 "priest" scandal as reporter films them
at gay clubs
Dear
MHFM,
When we used to go to the Vatican II church we met a very nice family who had
befriended us. They had a son who was very sincere in his calling to
become a priest. We had chosen this young man to become the Godfather to
our baby boy who is now 19 years old. There was much joy in the parish
when he graduated high school because it was known that he would soon be
attending a seminary in the U.S. We were afraid for him having heard
stories of the homosexual troubles in the seminaries and based on our experience
with our liberal parish "priest" since he was the one who made the
arrangements for which seminary the young man would be sent to. We
questioned the parents and tried to alert them but they were totally trusting
of the "priest" and ended up in spiritual disaster. Before our son's
Godfather was finished with his one year novitiate he was back home with his
parents and was in seclusion and an emotional basket case. He would not
speak to his parents why he would not become a priest and what had happened to
him at the seminary. His family was heartbroken and worried for their
son, especially because they received no explanations. We left this
parish soon afterwards and never found out what happened to him. The
family became distant and if we ever ran into them in public they wouldn't talk
about him. We eventually lost all touch with them.
We also were friends with a woman who had a calling to become a Carmelite nun
and lived a cloistered life in the U.S. for several years. In the
correspondence I enjoyed with her she would send us newsletters which carried
photos of events of the lives of the nuns and it could clearly be seen that
Mother Superior wore lipstick! Later, it was said that Mother would leave
the convent far too often. My friend is now in the health care field
somewhere and we have heard nothing from her or her family since shortly after
she left the convent.
The face of our world could be literally changed by the faithful, prayerful
observance of these loving servants of Christ, but the world as it is now will
have none of it. My dear friends were not only spiritually starved but abused
by those whom they trusted in this false church, the Novus Ordo Vatican II
religion of the Antichrist. The terrible scandal that the world sees of a
church that pretends to be the Catholic Church is not only abusing children but
takes… adults as well.
You did mention (in your astounding video series, the 3-in-1 DVD Second Edition
of Why John Paul II Was Not the Pope) in the Final Edition segment on The
Amazing Heresies of Paul VI that there was a mass exodus of religious and in
Holland the seminaries were completely closed down and this was, I believe in
the 60's and through the 70's. What horrors and abuse must be going on in the
places that are operating today! Perhaps the "new order"
seminarian has to be brought low and through "sensitivity training"
and to become better at "understanding" he ends up becoming
effeminate and a homosexual. Maybe this false church thinks that it would
be better if the "new order" nun becomes "knowledgeable" in
the ways of the world through the constant barrage of confusing, evil and
terribly anti-christian books she is required to read in order to become
"enlightened".
Our friends gave up their lives to receive Light from God and pray for the sins
of the world, but rather, received error and "a song and a fiesta" as
Dr. James Wardner so aptly puts it in his talk on your DVD -The Communist and
Freemasonic Infiltration of the Catholic Church. The devil tried to tear
down the Church and has rebuilt his evil version of it in his own Satanic
image, hating real men and real women, religious and lay persons because we are
heirs to what he has lost. Catholic religious give the very best of themselves
to God and this of course has received his wrath on so many levels, so much so
that it is really hard for the ordinary person on the side-lines to comprehend.
Any God-fearing person would have to take this into account with an honest look
at the vast evidence you have presented us with, especially regarding
Freemasonry and their utter hatred for the Catholic Church specifically…
You have laid it all on the line for the Honor of Christ and His Blessed Mother
and for Christ's Church. If anyone can't see that then they are the
dishonest, "mean-spirited" foolish ones who will be like the unwise
virgins (Matthew 25, 1-13) who didn't bring enough oil in their lamps and soon
they will find themselves in an outer eternal darkness, totally unprepared for
the reality that will be their lot for all eternity.
Much Peace and Blessings,
Marie
MHFM: Those are very interesting
stories. Thank you for the e-mail. This file pertains to some of your comments: The Seminaries of the Vatican II sect are unspeakable
cesspools of homosexuality and heresy [PDF
File]
Vatican
http://www.cleveland.com/religion/index.ssf/2010/07/vatican_sets_off_controversy_w.html
The vatican puts women priest controversy in same category as pedophile
priests. Why doesn't the vatican just
say OK to women priests as they are so protestant anyway and loves the
Angelicans and Episcopalians who have women ministers? What is the
difference? Is this there way of staying "conservative'?? like
we believe that one!
I am looking forward to part 2 on the Good Thief etc. Excellent
video! God bless you.!
MHFM: Yes, as long as they reject
women “priests,” the false conservatives don’t care if they deny the rest of
the Catholic faith.
Columbus
Subject: Comment on the Knights of Columbus
Brothers,
I just looked through a picture book of the
history of the Knights of Columbus. In this book the "knights" are
attending the unveiling and dedication on Aug. 21, 1920 in France of a
statue of Lafayette, which they also funded.
I found two brief comments regarding
Lafayette:
There is no question that Lafayette was a
freemason, for the Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania received him with distinguished
honours during his last visit to the USA, and the Grand Lodge of Tennessee made
him an honorary member when Andrew Jackson, seventh USA president (1829-1836),
introduced him to that Grand Lodge in 1825. Where he was made a freemason
though, remains an unanswered question.
General Lafayette and General Washington
shared not only a close friendship but membership in the Craft, a commonly used
name for Freemasonry. On two occasions General Lafayette presented Masonic
aprons to Washington (see Figure 4). One of these aprons, embroidered in
colored silks by Madame Lafayette, bore the emblems of the Holy Royal Arch
degree. The fact that this apron was especially made for George Washington has
led to much speculation that he was raised to that degree. This may be of
considerable importance, for the "Royal Arch degree is the salient,
spiritual degree of Freemasonry, not excepting the degree of Master Mason"
(Steinmetz, 1946, 67).
It seems almost incredible that the K of C
back in 1918-1920 could not or did not know that Lafayette was a freemason. Or perhaps
they did not care that he was a mason.
Sincerely,
Howard
Circular
I have viewed your videos for about a year
now, and first allow me to thank you for your efforts to educate the public. I
only wish I had the time and skills to do the same. But I enjoyed much of your
work and have sent links to your videos to friends. However I do see a problem with your logic.
You no doubt have heard of cyclical logic. It is present in the argument for
evolution where they date a fossil by the surrounding layer, and they date the
layer by the fossils contained within.
I feel you are using this kind of logic in
your argument against the current Pope. If you claim the current pope is
fallible by the infallibility of another pope, then you undermined the whole
Church. For if the current pope is fallible, then so can the previous ones.
Now, we all know that they were some bad popes, ie Pope John XII. I also know that the outcome of Vatican II
was truly tragic in our history. But, we
are still here, and Benedict seems to be on the right tract. Though we have been sick, we did not
die. Jesus said the gates of hell will
not prevail" By claiming the current pope is anti pope, you call Jesus a
liar and again, undermined the whole Church.
I welcome your arguments as I always want the truth.
Gdost…
MHFM: No, you are quite mistaken. Your argument is actually circular and
completely illogical. Your argument
assumes to be true (i.e., that Benedict XVI is a valid pope) exactly what you
need to prove. That’s called begging the
question, a logical fallacy. You can’t
argue that he is the pope by assuming it’s true to begin with. The argument that he is not the pope is not circular and it’s not illogical. It’s completely logical.
Let’s begin from a point on which we can both agree. The popes who presided over the Councils of
Florence, Trent and Vatican I were true popes.
All professing Catholics agree with that position. Therefore, operating from that basis and
applying the teaching of those valid popes and the popes in between (such as
Pope Paul IV), we are forced to conclude that a man who demonstrates public
apostasy is not a legitimate successor of St. Peter. That’s the teaching of the past popes we all
claim to accept. The rule, the teaching,
the standard that was already laid down by popes whom we all agree were indisputably valid force us to conclude that
Benedict XVI is not and could not have been elected a true pope. It’s not a circular argument, but one that
flows directly and inescapably from a premise that all professing Catholics
accept.
The other part of your e-mail that’s extremely problematic is
your (frankly) outrageous statement that Benedict XVI is on the right
track. Are you serious? Have you watched this video or carefully
consulted the material available on our website? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Z7qqqtXktQ By obstinately asserting that
Benedict XVI is the pope, you actually call Jesus a liar and deny the whole
Catholic faith.
Solemn
Is there a solemn Magisterium pronouncement
that today's independent Priests are in obedience to the Church (thus
obedient to God) in today's crisis? I'm aware of Quo Primum & St.
Paul's clear instruction. I'm asking for someone who has doubts
& wants more.
Also; what Scripture can I refer a Prot. to showing that the old testament
saints had to wait in Limbo till our Lord's Ascension?
Thanks,
jd
MHFM: Basically all of the
independent priests deny Catholic dogma, especially Outside the Church There is
No Salvation. For that reason, they are
not in obedience to the Church. As far
as how an independent priest can have jurisdiction to hear confessions and
administer sacraments in this situation, please consult our article and audios
on that issue. Your question about the
Old Testament saints is covered in our recent video: The Good Thief, the Old Testament Saints, and the
Necessity of Baptism [new video]
Chris Brown
[MHFM:
We post this as an example of the astounding idolatry of popular culture
figures, and how they lead people to Hell.
We know very little about Chris Brown, but we do know that he is a pagan
musical performer who is said to have demonic messages in his music.]
Hi
I'm Lisa I need your help a singer name Chris Brown got arrested last year for
beating up his girlfriend it was a singer name Rihanna and I need to know that
what's an excellent prayer that you can say to the singer Chris Brown to make
sure that he does not beat on the singer Rihanna again and that he becomes a
better person,a changed man,to calm down his anger problems,that he treats
women with respect,so they can go back to constantly playing his music and to
also say that violence is not the answer to solve problems because I really
care about the singer Chris Brown and I also need the singer Chris Brown to be
safe at all times please help me.
LisaluvsChris…
MHFM: Chris Brown is a wicked pagan
and you shouldn't want him to sing anymore.
You shouldn't say you love him. You need to convert to the
Catholic faith. It's necessary to avoid hell.
[HER
RESPONSE]:
excuse
me no you didn't just say to me that I shouldn't love him how dare you say that
to me I'm allowed to love Chris Brown and listen to his music when ever I want
and you can't tell when I can listen to his music you are not the boss of me
I'm allowed to love Chris Brown and listen to his music whenever I want and you
can't stop and when he comes back out again I'm going to listen to his music
forever and ever and ever you should apologize to me because that wasn't very
nice to me you hurt my feelings I love Chris Brown alot he's a handsome man and
he's an excellent singer and no Chris Brown is not a wicked pagan he
was just angry that's all.
MHFM: Yes, it appears that you will
be listening to Chris Brown’s music forever and ever in the pits of Hell.
Re-uploaded - explanation
MHFM: About two days ago, we posted our
video discussion of the DVDs Incredible
Creatures That Defy Evolution.
However, the video was not playing smoothly for people. It was stalling throughout making listening
to it very difficult. We thought it
might be a problem on our end, so we decided to re-upload the video after it
had been up for about 5 hours. We also
deleted the first version. However, the
same problem occurred. We then suspected
that Youtube might be automatically or deliberately slowing the video because
it had an anti-evolution title. So, we
re-uploaded it again and decided to remove the anti-evolution title. We called it “Astounding Creatures,” and now
it’s playing smoothly!!! Here’s the
video for those who tried to listen but couldn’t:
Click here to play it
Here’s the previous video, with the
anti-evolution title, that stalls repeatedly: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TB__MD9iAI8
Here are just a few clips from the
actual DVDs:
Absurd
Dear
MHFM,
Great work on those new points on the Good Thief. I believe you when you
said that you receive this Good Thief objection perhaps more than any other
objection because I, and probably all true Catholics who have dealt with people
on this topic, have encounter this same objection. The illogical sense of
these people is very disturbing. It's also interesting that about a year
ago, I was talking with this Protestant and he didn't believe in that necessity
of water baptism, so he brought up the argument of the Good Thief. Lucky
for me, I remember that I had studied that topic about a few weeks prior before
meeting this Protestant. Well... if this is a Protestant who doesn't
believe water baptism is necessary for salvation, wouldn't that make, in some
way, Baptism of Desire/Blood advocates also Protestants since they are
protesting against the dogmatically defined dogma that WATER BAPTISM is
absolutely necessary for salvation (de fide, John 3:5, Council of
Trent "AS IT IS WRITTEN [John 3:5]" and its Canons on Baptism, Pope
Eugene's bull "Exultate Deo", etc.)? In a sense, it could
be said that, but obviously in a different degree. All in all, they're
all heretics who reject the absolutely necessity of water baptism for
salvation. It's very interesting that when it comes to this topic, Protestants,
false "Traditionalists", and Novus Ordites alike AGREE ON THE SAME
ABSURD ARGUMENT: "The Good Thief wasn't baptized and he went to
paradise."…
As always, thank you very much for your work. If it wasn't for your
material, I wouldn't have known what it meant to be a Traditional Catholic.
Jesus and Mary always protect your Monastery.
Sincerely,
Bernardo
Information
Dear Brothers:
I truly do appreciate the wonderful
information you post on your vast informational website and also think it is
great that you are doing your information in Spanish as well. However, I
would REALLY appreciate if you could give "options" on your numerous
videos and make them available to the hearing impaired population via closed
captioning or even to give an option to "read" what the video is
about. I get SO disappointed when you make videos and leave us no options
to catch the "news" you are reporting about. The vast
number of deaf and hard of hearing population in the US today would certainly
appreciate the gesture as well, I'm sure!
God Bless You MHFM!
Sincerely,
JC
Baptism
Wonderful work on the new baptism
video, looking forward to part 2… and thanks for explaining more fully the
meaning of the Old Testament Just arising from their graves upon the huge earthquake
as Christ died and the curtain in the temple was rent----always wondered
what that meant I think your explanation makes a lot of sense.
Knights
Dear Brother Michael and Brother
Peter,
I'm no defender of the Knights of Columbus,
especially with this push to canonize their founder Michael J. McGiveney.
However, I need to ask why you didn't comment on the part of that recent e-mail
where the writer stated that their pledge of allegiance included a part for
abortion. I was a member of a Right to Life group and we always inserted that
part "born and unborn", in our "Pledge of Allegiance"
recital, (at every meeting), as a rememberance against abortion,(not for
abortion). You should have taken issue with that comment. Thanks for all your
efforts. God Bless you in all your work.
C. Peyton
MHFM: We didn’t comment, and had no obligation to do so, because
it wasn’t clear to us what he meant by that particular statement or what went
on at the particular meeting he was referring to. If we knew he was misrepresenting something,
then we would have commented. Whatever
he meant by that statement, it was not the focus of his larger e-mail, which
primarily concerned the secretive nature of the group and the skull & bones
on the table. We obviously post many
e-mails which promote discussion, and we do not necessarily agree with
everything in a reader’s comments.
Facts
I
just saw the new video on The good thief, the old testament saints and the
necessity of baptism, simply amazing, the divine insight that the Triune God
gives you is astounding! Putting aside the glaring facts that are brought
up before the atomic coma, it’s just incredible how a little coma can obliterate
these obstinate people. This should prove to people that the simplest
truths and insights of God are infinitely powerful!
Todd
Hail Mary, interesting
Subject:
possible power of Hail Mary
MHFM,
I
wanted to share a story with you about what happened to me at work today. I am
a police officer and today something very different happened to me.
I was going to a radio call for a naked man on the street bothering
people. I saw the man that was naked and noticed he had an evil look in
his eye and was extremely confused.
After
he was apprehended by myself we were driving to my HQ to do the arrest
paperwork. He started cursing at me and cursing my family, which he has
never met before. He did this for about 5 minutes straight and me being
foolish bought into his comments and starting saying bad things back to him.
This
enraged him and made him even more intrusive in his words. At one point i
looked back in my rear view mirror and his face was 1 inch from the glass that
protects me from him and his eyes were as wide as they could go, and one
word popped in my head "DEMONIC". At this point i decided to change
my approach. I decided to make satan angry and started saying two Hail
Mary's out loud and told him to join me. Needless to say he did not join
me, but a complete calmness came over him and he just sat back and actually
looked like he was at peace. Right then and there i felt something different
happen and i really can’t explain it, but it was nice.
As
soon as i stopped the Hail Marys he started right back up again. I felt
that him doing that was proof that the Hail Mary helped intervene in that
car ride. If i never read the secret of the rosary, i never would have
done that.
Thank
You for helping me save my soul
Joe
Vatican II
Hello, Brothers,
I was listening to your debate with the Vatican II zealot… As you said he
confuses it in a fog. Having a spirit of the devil, these apostate Catholics
will play with words, confuse all in their ambiguous formulas, because they are
'flavorless salt.'… In 1990 I was invited to France for Vatican II document
courses (I used to be a Christian program redactor in State TV , Armenia,
USSR), and during retreats they taught us OPENLY and CLEARLY- that all which is
connected to pre-Vatican II Roman Catholic Church is wrong- dogma, doctrine,
ritual, that the real Catholic Church is started from Vatican II. To my
question why then all these great saints could reach perfection, if they were
in erroneous church, they did not have an answer. I was stunned seeing these
'Catholics' who were bitter, fake, without essence...
JPII has a book 'Crossing the Threshold of
hope'- where he clearly exposes his teaching, that he is not a Vicar, all
bishops are equals, same way all Christians are Christ. And when he for pure
formality indicates something dogmatic, like penance and redemption- every time
he says 'Church says...' That is the
Devil.
Absolutely… by God we will remain faithful to Christ to the end.
Woodya…
Clear
Subject: it isn’t just NO ‘Catholics’
It is clear that the N.O. religious, etc.,
are heretics & apostates, and they have brought more Protestants into the
stew, as well. Since JP2's ecu-mania, a former friend of mine from
Protestant days, who always longed for the Mass, the Rosary & other Catholic
essentials, has found the perfect solution.
She continues to be a Protestant minister & preaches to her
congregations, but goes to the Benedictines in Twin Falls, ID for her
"Catholic fix" [if you will].
I have told her it was sacrilege for a Protestant
to receive the Eucharist [which the NOs don't have, but the action of the two
parties involved - are sacriligeous by INTENT]. I've shown her relevant
documents. Eventually, a friendship of
30+ years was dissolved. I could not be party to this, even to being
associated with her.
She is also an adulteress who doesn't have
the Holy Sacrament of Confession. Nothing to ease her conscience... no
way to feel peace. I am not defaming
her, either, for she lived in public concubinage before her "marriage"
to the man who has recently died. All the while, she continued as pastor
of 2 churches. Her former husband, a
Prot pastor, as well, was on his 2nd marriage when he married her &, upon
their divorce, married again. He, too, is actively ministering to his
congregation.
When he decided to remarry, I who was in
error in my adherence to protestant teaching, at the time, still dug up
Catholic dogma & documents to show him that you cannot marry three times w/
your spouse still living, but that it was a form of serial polygamy. He
didn't speak to me for 30 yrs. & that has not been a problem for me, at
all!
There's more & it's worse for it affects their adopted children, etc.
Error breeds error. I have seen this
pattern become more & more prevalent in 'mainline protestant churches'
& that is exactly where the NO is going. They set everyone up with
their homosexual "clergy" & will "solve" the problem w/
married clergy and with women priests & with husband & wife clergy
teams. It's all been done before &
that is the road which the putative 'Catholic' church is treading.
Jennifer Hill
Modernists
Subject: Benedict XVI - antipope
St. Pius X said it best, "No venerable
brethen...the city of the world shall not be built otherwise than as God has
built it. Society shall not be set up unless the Church lays the
foundations and supervises the work...It has only to be set up and restored
continually against the unremitting attacks of insane dreamers, rebels and
miscreants..." The insane dreamers, rebels and miscreants clearly
point to antipope Benedict and his Modernist/end of time thugs in Rome under
the aegis of a false Vatican II council whose rotten walls are crumbling before
them. St. Michael, Most Powerful Angel of the Lord, avenge us, we pray
most fervently!
Dea…
Heresy Spill
Subject: Benedict XVI’s Massive Heresy
Spill Disaster
Regarding your excellent article on
Benedict XVI's recent Heresies against the Catholic Church and the Benedict
XVI’s Massive Heresy Spill Disaster.
Unfortunately Benedict XVI is just following the edict of JPII's Decologue of
Assisi, the "ten commandments" of the antichrist. When you
read and actually see something like this, what comes out of Benedict's mouth
and it is accepted, it hurts to see that this is the exact same spirit that
pervades even the so-called traditional Catholics who still hold that he is the
pope. Why can't they see this? What will it take for them to remove
the scales from their eyes? When John Paul II is finally "beatified"
and they accept this, it will be a huge slap in the face of Our Lord.
When this happens we will know exactly where anyone who claims to be Catholic
stands and there will be no turning back for them. The battle lines will be
clearly marked. God knows how to defend His own and punish His enemies. For our
part, as you so often have reminded us, we need to hold tightly to this Holy
Faith we profess, show charity by helping those we can to see the truth as you
have done and pray our Rosary during this and other coming manifestations of
Our Lord's plan.
A
Evilution
Subject: Evilution
Dear Brothers,
Thank you for the video detailing some
examples from the DVDs of amazing animals in God's creation which destroy
evolution. The truth is that evolution contains the seeds of its own
destruction. It is a peculiar characteristic of information that facts are
self-sustaining, whereas lies are self-destructive. Evolution is a lie. At its
core, the motivating principle of evolution is survival (of the fittest). If an
evolutionist were asked to explain why people lie, then he would reply that it
is a survival instinct. So, according to evolutionists, lying is necessary, and
so, it doesn't really matter to them whether evolution itself is true or false
– so long as it “survives” then it has value (in the evolutionist's mind). But
therein lies the contradiction. Once an evolutionist has embraced the principle
of survival at all costs, then he is trapped in an unending quest to perpetuate
that very myth (survival at all costs), and in doing so, according to the same
myth, it is necessary to lie and dodge the truth. A creationist on the other
hand, knows that God is the beginning and source of all truth and creation, and
so knows that everything begins and ends with God. The fact is that, for an
evolutionist, the truth of the “theory” is not so important as how long the
theory can “survive.” However, the theory of evolution must constantly mutate
or “evolve,” in order to survive, which proves that evolution is already dead.
Modernism, the synthesis of all heresies, is founded on the false theory of
evolution:
Pascendi, Pope St. Pius X - “In this way
they pass to what is practically their principal doctrine, namely, evolution.
To the laws of evolution everything is subject under penalty of death -- dogma,
Church, worship, the Books we revere as sacred, even faith itself.”
Evolution is Antichrist, and was the first
step towards the denial of the dogma, outside the Catholic Church there is no
salvation and of the absolute necessity of water baptism and the Catholic faith
for salvation. Thus, evolution created the Antichrist Vatican II Great
Apostasy, which will eventually destroy itself too.
1 Corinthians 10:12 - Wherefore he that
thinketh himself to stand, let him take heed lest he fall.
God Bless,
Chris White
Comment
Subject: “Sai Baba”
This whole "Sai Baba" thing is
nauseating---it is amazing HOW MANY stupid Westerners FALL for this
gargage-amungo --just because it is (supposedly) from "the
East!" I think this may in part happen because the V2 sect has
nothing to offer and particularly young people can sense the emptiness of it
and look elsewhere for God then again when you had the anti-christ anti-pope
JPII aka "Mr. Katz" sporting around Assisi and the whole world
with every imaginable religious abominationist…
I went through this as a
youth, when I was doing my Jr. Year abroad at U. Edinburgh, Scotland
studying history. I was a radical liberal at the time, an
animal-rights activist, ardent "vegan" vegetarian,
the whole nine. A "nun" from one "Throssel Hole
Priory" a "zen" Buddhist monastery in Northumberland England
came to speak to our University Buddhist society (to which I belonged). I
ended up spending lots of time there and even planned to stay there permanently
and become a "nun" there -- I had moved in (my family FREAKED!!) and
the thing I like there was the absolute SILENCE at all times (and the
vegetarian food!)-----but one day they had me reading/studying their "sutras"
and then kept telling me "all else is heresy, all else is
heresy" which I guess the tiny flicker of the Holy Spirit still remaining
in my darkened soul reacted to cause I just KNEW this was wrong, it was
NOT TRUE, they were definitely wrong (course at the time, 1985 I
had NO IDEA who was "right") anyway I ran away immediately and GOT
OUT OF THERE! People fall for this stuff maybe because they are already
in a grave state of mortal sin and the truth is NOT easy to find, at
least, it was not, for me. We still know people like this. I give
them your literature/DVDs. Please pray for me.
Videos
Dear Brothers:
This weekend I viewed all six of the new
videos you offer; I highly recommend them. I always knew there were
no proofs for the fake science of evolution, but I did not realize how many
specific empirical proofs there are for Creation - including the
scientific proof that the universe had a beginning. These videos
really help to demonstrate the enormity of the lie that has been foisted on
mankind in the name of science and education.
As the Creation Scientists (true
scientists) point out, nature (from the lowest cell on up) is characterized by
a complexity of interrelated parts and procedures -- and that the removal of
just one of these parts would make the organism nonexistent. These
scientists have named this all-or-nothing principle "irreducible
complexity."
It occurred to me that as God reveals
indirectly through nature, so He reveals directly in what we call Divine
Revelation or the Deposit of Faith. The Catholic Church has been teaching
the principle of irreducible complexity since She was founded. Only
instead of calling it irreducible complexity, Holy Mother Church has simply
termed it "whole and inviolate."
Wonderful videos. Thank you for making
them available.
Lee Ann
Questions
Dear Brothers,
I have been told that concerning baptism of
desire:
If someone really desires to be baptised,
yet dies before receiving the sacrement of baptism, as he is part of the
Soul of the Church (not its Body), he can be saved. Is this heretic ?
Also, If a martyr dies for Christ but didn't received the baptism of water, can
he be saved ?
Austin…
MHFM: What you have been told is wrong. Those issues are specifically addressed (separate
sections are even dedicated to them) in: Outside the Catholic Church There is No Salvation [link to section and book]. A man can’t be
saved without water baptism, even if he claims to die in the name of
Christ. If someone of good will intended
to die for Christ, he would be brought to water baptism prior to death. The idea that one can be saved who is part of
the “soul” of the Church, but not part of the body (which only comes with water
baptism), is definitely contrary to Catholic teaching. It has been dogmatically defined that one must belong to the body of the
Church to be saved, and that the Church itself is a body. Moreover, the idea that one can be part of the
“soul” of the Church without belonging to her body has been specifically
condemned. There is much more
information on both of your questions in the section that is linked to
above. We strongly encourage you to
obtain an actual copy of the book. It’s
included in our larger special package and it can be obtained separately.
Pope Pius XI, Mortalium
Animos (# 10), Jan. 6, 1928: “For since the mystical body of Christ, in the
same manner as His physical body, is one, compacted and fitly joined together,
it were foolish and out of place to say that the mystical body is made
up of members which are disunited and scattered abroad: whosoever
therefore is not united with the body is no member of it, neither is he in
communion with Christ its head.”
Prayer
May the sacred Heart of Jesus
be adored, glorified, loved: preserved throughout the world now and
forever. Sacred heart of Jesus have mercy on us. St. Jude worker
of miracles pray for us. St. Jude help of the hopeless pray for us. Say this prayer 9 times
a day; by the eighth day your prayer will be answered. Say it for 9 days. It
has never been known to fail. Publication must be promised.
Dear Brothers,
Can you post this prayer, I said it and my
prayer came true on the 8th day…
Thanks –Steve
India
Subject: India
Dear MHFM,
Last week I met a person who just returned from India this year.
He had spent about a year living at a guru's ashram--in this case, the living
quarters of a guru named Sri Sathya Sai Baba. This person indicated that he
would have much to say about his experience with Sai Baba. This false prophet
is teaching that with love man is God, God has many different names, and all
religions are true. This reminded me of John Paul II preaching the doctrine of
antichrist and religious indifferentism.
I gave this individual The Bible Proves the Teachings of the
Catholic Church and explained the Essential Mysteries of the Catholic religion,
the Holy Trinity and the Incarnation. I told him he must believe those
Mysteries and accept all the teachings of the Catholic Church. I explained the
absolute necessity of water baptism in the name of the Holy Trinity. I told him
he needed baptism because it is the only way one gets the Catholic faith, and
one must hold the Catholic faith and be in a state of grace in order to be
saved when one dies. I told him he would have to have the desire for the
Catholic faith, specifically ask for baptism, and actually receive it in order to
have a chance at being saved. I also told him anyone could validly baptize as
long as moving water strikes the forehead and the name of the Holy Trinity is
invoked.
I said I would be willing to baptize him if he would reject the
Sai Baba organization (and all other false religions), express his desire for
the Catholic faith, express his desire to not compromise the Catholic faith,
and ask for the Sacrament. I met him again yesterday, and he showed me a book
he had: A Catholic Priest Meets Sai Baba by Mario Mazzoleni. I went through the
book with him pointing out passages which proved that the author was not
Catholic and did not know what the Church teaches.
He asked me who Sai Baba really was and what he was really doing.
I told him Sai Baba was an agent of the devil, someone the devil was using to
spread false doctrines and ideas about religion. I recounted the Genesis
narrative of the fall of Adam and Eve emphasizing how the serpent (the devil)
had lied to Eve when he told her she would become like God if she ate the fruit
from the tree of knowledge of good and evil. I made it clear that Sai Baba was
trying to deceive people (bad willed people) into thinking they can become like
God if they follow Sai Baba. These people are being lured away from investigating
the one true faith of Jesus Christ and His one, true Church on earth.
This person does not have easy access to the internet and has not
yet seen vaticancatholic.com although I did inform him of it. He said he would
try to get to the library to see the site.
God bless the work of Most Holy Family Monastery.
Sincerely,
TD
On Mars
I
read the e-exchange of S about Mars and did a search… and found three places
where it talks about a blood moon {red}, Joel 2:31, Acts of Apostles 2:20 and
Apocalypse 6:12… Mars would explain a blood moon being it is red in
color.
Todd
Evolution
Brothers,
What a shame it is to read about all those
that visit your site (Mr. Anderson) and not recognize the truth of the Catholic
Faith. The following bible verses remind me of all those that have come to your
site and have reognized the truth, the true faith, Jesus Christ. Genesis
18:1-5. "And the Lord appeared to him in the vale of Mambre as he
was sitting at the door of his tent, in the very heat of the day. And when he
had lifted up his eyes, there appeared to him three men standing near him: and
as soon as he saw them he ran to meet them from the door of his tent, and
adored down to the ground. And he said: Lord, if I have found favour in thy
sight, pass not away from thy servant: But I will fetch a little water, and
wash ye your feet, and rest ye under the tree. And I will set a morsel of
bread, and strengthen ye your heart, afterwards you shall pass on: for
therefore are you come aside to your servant. And they said: Do as thou hast
spoken.
Also, I'm enjoying the series of DVD's on refuting Evolution. It's Clear that
the "Devil was in the details" when Darwin, with his limited
biological machines tied to refute God. Amazing, is how after some 600 modern
scientists and professors have signed an affidavit renouncing Darwin's Theory,
and thanks to the mainstream media, his theories are still in the school's
textbooks and being taught today. Darwin's tree of life is ridiculous, to
think that over time, all the little intricate parts of a cell gradually formed
into the workings of a cell. His theory refutes itself, as without the entire
parts of the cell, the cell would die off and be non-existent to begin
with. His theory, more than anything shows how certain life-forms were
destroyed, not how life is created.
God Bless You,
Tom Miles
E-mail
Subject: Reddy’s e-mail
Dear Mhfm
Just wanted to add a few quick points to Reddy.
"I also dont see how a small campfire that only looks like a photo of JP
II can be associted with calling fire down from heaven."
People have said the same thing to me. Or they say it didn't fall from Heaven.
But I think you got to look at it the way the Novus Ordo does for a spilt
second. Some sedevacantists use the picture to say it shows John Paul II is in
hell. But novus ordo "catholics" say it was John Paul II giving a
blessing from HEAVEN. Therefore they look at it as if it was fire coming down
from Heaven in their sight.
As far as Antipope John Paul II being antichrist the work the Dimonds have done
makes it quite clear. Another point to consider would be if an antipope is
somebody who claims to be pope but is not. A true pope is Christ's vicar on
earth. So if an antipope is someone who claims to be pope but is not, then
antichrist will claim to be christ or put man in place of Christ. What better
way for antichrist to fool people then claim to be Christ's vicar on earth. I
think it makes perfect sense that it would be an antipope. The work the Dimonds
have done is the final nail in the coffin… If there was a true pope this
apostasy would not be as bad as he would lead people the right way the only way
which is the Catholic way and therefore Christ's way. However you had the
Antichrist JP2 teach that every way leads to God doesn't matter what you are
Hindu, Muslim, protestants every religion under the sun was true in some way
according to him.
"BY THEIR FRUITS YOU SHALL KNOW THEM"
I ask what are the fruits of Vatican II?
Here’s the horrible answer: http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/29_Figures.pdf
God Bless
Sean
Former Knight
Dear Brothers,
I just read the letter from the lady whose
husband quit the Knights of Columbus. First off thank you MHFM for showing us
light in this world of darkness. Congratulations for leaving the KoC. I will expose why the meetings are
secret. There are 4 degrees before you
can become a full fledged Member of KoC.
After the member has received the first 3 degrees the 4th Degree is the
Big One. Mine was done in a “Catholic”
church where I was a member. It was done
in a secret Room hidden way in the back of the church. There were no Services and the church was
empty and locked. I had been researching the KoC before I would make that life
long commitment. The Holy Spirit I believed had shown me via the internet that
there were Masons in the Executive leaders and members. I knew something was
wrong.
Then they wanted us to change the words of
the Pledge of Allegiance. At the end of reciting it ,With liberty and justice
for all, "born or unborn" I was not going to praise abortion with
them. As a Veteran this also bothered
me. Something was wrong. So the big day comes and we all quickly walk
through the passage ways and halls and enter the room.
There were many men there in KoC costumes or uniforms and a few others
wearing nice suits and ties. We enter
this dark room and in the center of the table there is a human sized,
"Skull and Bones" The 2 bones were crossed in a X.I asked what is
this? They said that what was going to happen today in this meeting must remain
Secret for the rest of my life. I could
never tell anybody. Well no thank
you. Me and my Guardian Angel, Ralphie
boy left and never went back. Praise GOD
from whom all blessings flow. As far as
the other problem of them never stopping the mail to you. Insurance is one of their largest money
makers. And you know they offered it to you.
Just put on the envelopes that their computer will send you these few
words: “REFUSED and also RETURN TO SENDER.”
The computer will stop when they are losing money through the postage
they are spending.
GOD Bless
X knight
MHFM: Wow, that’s a very interesting e-mail – a skull and bones
on the table. Combined with the
secretive nature of the group, those facts demonstrate that it’s
semi-Freemasonic. Obviously, no Catholic
should have anything to do with it.
Mars
Dear bros.
Read recently there's something big
happening with the planet Mars in august, it's being drawn really close to
earth by Jupiters gravitational pull. It says it will be as big as the moon to
the naked eye. It says that they don't know if it's ever happened before or
will again.
Question is; with everything that's been
going on, that is with the Church, earth quakes, flooding, etc, is there anything
biblical about this??
S
Abstinence
Your page on the rules of fasting and
abstinence says that it is forbidden to eat meat on a Friday only on days of
complete abstinence, that you can eat only 1 meal with meat on days of partial
abstinence.
So when is it a day of complete abstinence, and when is it partial? Your
calendar doesn't specify that. All Fridays only say "Abstinence",
they don´t say whether it's complete or partial
MHFM:
“Abstinence” always means complete abstinence.
Days of fast are always days of at least partial abstinence. Therefore, if it’s listed as a day of fast,
but not of abstinence, it’s still a day of partial abstinence.
Reviewing
I've been reviewing the information on your
site about the Latin rite Mass comparison to the Novus Ordo.
I was told by a priest that one is to believe the Novus Ordo is valid,
promulgated and approved by the Holy See. He was a priest who also
celebrated the Latin Mass.
In all your writings, have you any information concerning the Fraternity of
Saint Peter order of priests?
Id…
MHFM: The fact that a priest celebrates the Latin Mass doesn’t
mean he’s a true Catholic or that he will give you sound advice. The priest who said that the New Mass is
valid is completely wrong. Please
consult our material on that issue. The
Fraternity of St. Peter is a heretical order of “priests” in full union with
the Vatican II sect. They accept the
heresies of Vatican II, the New Mass, false ecumenism, salvation outside the
Church, etc. They are also ordained by
“bishops” who were themselves ordained in Paul VI’s new doubtful rite of
Episcopal Consecration. That means that
the “priests” of the Fraternity of St. Peter, who were ordained by such
bishops, cannot be considered valid priests.
See our section on the Vatican II Counter Church for the article on the
new invalid liturgical rites of Paul VI.
See our section on Vatican II and Benedict XVI’s heresies for all the
heresies that the FSSP swallows while falsely claiming to hold the Catholic
faith.
Comment
Dear Brothers,
In regards to the person who called you the
antichrist I would just like to say that those who attack your work obviously
can't stand the truth. I believe their troubled conscience eats away at them
like a gnawing worm. For if they loved the truth, which is found only within
the true Catholic religion, they would be… thanking God for what your monastery
has done to witness to the truth. They can't stand the fact that few are saved,
that other religions and "Christian" denominations are demonic. They
can't stand the fact that they would have to put in some effort to save their
souls, therefore, these pitiful heretics attack you and what you stand
for.
Proverbs 17:15: He who justifies the
wicked and he who condemns the righteous, Both of them alike are an abomination
to the LORD.
Alpha…
MHFM:
Thanks for the interest.
World End? series
Hello
I am finding your "Is the world about to end?" series interesting and
informative but when it came to part 5.. I started getting confused. I have a
few questions and I hope you can help me better understand so I
can continue viewing your series without confusion.
I understand clearly the EU being the beast and that which is which was not. I
understand the kings or emperors being the popes since Vatican City became its
own little kingdom.. but.. If the Vatican is separate from or not a part of the
EU than how can it's emperors/kings/popes be interchangeable with the beast if they
are not physically part of the beast? Also.. How can Pope Jon Paul II 1981
wounding by gunshots be the wounded head of the beast? The beast did not form
until 1993, so the beasts' head could not be wounded at the time because it
didnt emerge yet, a beast would have to already been emerged to be struck.
Going back to my first question I still dont see how JP II can be the head of
the beast when the Vatican is separate from the beast. It seems the creator or
head of the EU would be the head of the beast.
I also dont see how a small campfire that only looks like a photo of JP II can
be associted with calling fire down from heaven.
I do see the grave mistake should there be a canonizing of JP II because I
believe he was very worldly and far too liberal of a pope and that many things
he did were going against Christs' church, I also agree as do many that he
twisted the 3rd Fatima secret.
I understand the damage caused by the liberal Vatican II and it is paramount in
my life to remain in the true Catholic Church: Christ's church. I try to
educate myself on the true faith as much as possible realizing that no one
person has all the answers but I do want to understand any valuable points they
are making.
Thank you for your videos. It is refreshing to hear a presentation on the
Apocalypse from a Catholic perspective.
God Bless,
Reddy
MHFM: The first part of your question is addressed in detail in
Part 7 of Is the World about to End? Perhaps you didn’t get to that part?: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g3YCnraGes0 St.
John is not only describing the political entity, but Europe (Europa) as one
big ecclesiastical whore. Thus, the
spiritual center of Europe (Rome) is inextricably bound up with the beast; for
the beast is not merely a political organization but apostate Europe as a
whole. That’s why Apocalypse 17 says
that the city of seven hills is riding on the beast, and it specifically
connects the seven kings affiliated with Rome to that dominion. The spiritual entity and the political
organization flow together. In fact, the
spiritual reality of the new godless Europe is the most important thing to God
and to St. John. That’s why the kings in
Rome, the antipopes who become the active heads of the beast (kings 6 & 7),
are truly said to be heads of the beast.
They were/are the guiding forces of the new godless Europe, which
simultaneously possesses a political formation in the European Union
(Empire).
With regard to how John Paul II’s wounding could be a wounding
of a head of the beast since the EU didn’t come into existence until 1993,
there are a few points to consider.
First, the Bible says that St. John saw one of the heads of the beast wounded
and he recovered. If, at any point, John
Paul II became a head of the beast, as we believe, then this indeed
happened. He (a head of the beast) was
wounded and recovered. It doesn’t say
when that wounding occurred. Moreover,
St. John describes the wounding, the recovery and the subsequent adoration at
the behest of the second beast in one stream.
He is describing the entire period.
Thus, if all of these things are predicated of the man who eventually becomes the head of the
beast, it is true to say that all of it happened to the head of the
beast. You are, in our view,
inaccurately and unnecessarily splitting hairs.
For example, in Apocalypse 18:4, God says to those who are in
the great harlot: “And I heard another
voice from heaven, saying: Go out
from her, my people; that you be not partakers of her sins, and that
you receive not of her plagues.” If
the harlot is a false Church, as the evidence indicates, then why is God
describing its members as “my people”?
He isn’t necessarily saying that, but rather could be referring to those
who were His people but who are
entrapped in the false Church. He could
also be referring to people who are entrapped in the false Church but who will become His people. He could be referring to them as “my people”
from the eternal present point of view, that they will eventually be His people
by coming out of the harlot. In the same
way, in John 2, Jesus turned water into wine; yet it is said: “And when the chief
steward had tasted the water
made wine, and knew not whence it was, but the waiters knew who had drawn the
water; the chief steward calleth the bridegroom.” It is called “water”
by the sacred word, even though it is no longer water. One could, as you are trying to do, split
hairs and say: that’s not accurate: it should say wine that was formerly water
because it’s no longer water…
Obviously people can hold different opinions on the Antichrist; but if you don’t see how John Paul II could be significant enough to be the antichrist, then you misunderstand what is important to God. The rest of the non-Catholic world is already on the path to Hell. What matters is God’s Church and those who claim to be part of it. John Paul II was the culmination of evil and apostasy. He overthrew the entire Gospel and every Catholic dogma with calculation and completeness. His “canonization” will be the ultimate insult to God. It makes complete sense that he was the guy. This is especially true when we consider what he was preaching, how it fits with the other prophecies, and how the false conservatives in the Vatican II Church would come to worship him by virtue of their attachment to Antipope Benedict XVI.
Thoughts
I was just wondering what your thoughts
were about Our Lady of the Roses in Bayside New York. I've seen many of your
videos on youtube. You have very interesting beliefs. I have no wish to debate
on any matters, I just want to know if you believe in these apparitions or not.
Thank you for your time.
Matthew
MHFM:
Thanks for the e-mail. We do not believe
in them. We have a section on Bayside
which demonstrates that the apparitions are definitely false: The
False Apparitions at Bayside, NY [PDF File].
Brainwashing
Dear
Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,
Boy, the devil has sure 'dupped' these clueless N.O. Vatican II apostates ...
there is so much one could say about people like '"catholic" Karl' ..
the brainwashing has been so successful that his comments only want one to, for
a better expression ... 'papa uniform kilo echo'
I had a similar experience with one of these people, a few brief years back, he
having denied the Church's teaching on salvation; this supposedly conservative,
pious individual, as his parting shot, said, " I will pray for you."
- meaning that his prayers were for my return to the vomit of the novus ordo
sect. I replied, " Don't bother, it won't work, I can assure
you of that!".
God
bless,
David
Papacy
Subject: Papacy
Dear Brothers,
The man who wrote in telling you to repent, Karl Anderson, needs to realize
that, "The Church in respect of its unity belongs to the category of things
indivisible by nature, though heretics try to divide it into many parts...”
(Satis Cognitum, Pope Leo XIII), and that we should, “bear in mind what was
promised about the holy church and him who said that the gates of hell will not
prevail against it (by these we understand the death-dealing tongues of
heretics)” (Second Council of Constantinople, Pope Vigilius), because, “not
every sin, however grave it may be, is such as of its own nature to sever a man
from the Body of the Church, as does schism or heresy or apostasy,” (Mystici
Coporis Christi, Pope Pius XII), and that, “In this way, by unity with the
Roman pontiff in communion and in profession of the same faith , the church of
Christ becomes one flock under one supreme shepherd” (Vatican I, Pope Pius IX).
So, Benedict XVI is not a pope because he wants a Church without a supreme head
– a pope – which is why he believes and teaches that schismatics, such as the
“Orthodox” and the Anglicans, who reject the uniting principle of the Church,
i.e. the Papacy, are actually members of the Church, when they are not.
Benedict XVI is a schismatic and works feverishly to scatter Christ's sheep
(Matt. 12:30).
Vatican I, Pope Pius IX - “So, then, if anyone says that the Roman pontiff has
merely an office of supervision and guidance, and not the full and supreme
power of jurisdiction over the whole church, and this not only in matters of
faith and morals, but also in those which concern the discipline and government
of the church dispersed throughout the whole world; or that he has only the
principal part, but not the absolute fullness, of this supreme power; or that
this power of his is not ordinary and immediate both over all and each of the
churches and over all and each of the pastors and faithful: let him be
anathema.”
Karl Anderson's sorrow arises from him being in a state of mortal sin because
he's outside the Catholic Church and thus separated from Her Unity of faith.
It's the pain of loss – the pain of separation from Jesus Christ. It should
come as no surprise to such heretics that they are confused since they believe
the Church has more than one head: “Nor against this may one argue that the
primacy of jurisdiction established in the Church gives such a Mystical Body
two heads. For Peter in virtue of his primacy is only Christ's Vicar; so that
there is only one chief Head of this Body, namely Christ, who never ceases
Himself to guide the Church invisible, though at the same time He rules it
visibly, through him who is His representative on earth” (Mystici Corporis
Christi, Pope Pius XII).
So, even though there is no visible head of the Catholic Church today (nor for
the last 50+ years), Jesus Christ never ceases to be its invisible head.
God Bless,
Chris White
Union
Subject:
Union
Dear
Brothers:
I
would like to ask Karl Anderson - and all the other "must be in union with
the pope" people: 1) Do you know what it means to be "in
union with the pope"? 2) Do you think men claiming to be popes
must be in union with all other popes beginning with St. Peter?
3) Do you know what an Antipope is, and how many there have
been in the history of the Catholic Church? 4) Are Catholics
supposed to be in union with Anti-popes? Above all, do you understand
that the Papacy was founded to preserve the deposit of Faith?
And
since Karl mentioned Our Lady, I would remind him that the only words
of Our Lady recorded in Scripture (other than the Magnificat) that I am
aware of are: do whatever He tells you. Therefore, I would
also ask Karl: can a man be a pope if he contradicts or distorts the
words of Our Lord (or the teachings of His Apostles), or otherwise renders
their teachings meaningless? Can a man be a pope if he
denies the inerrancy of Sacred Scripture?
The
most bizarre and frightening characteristic of all false versions of
Christianity (whether Protestant, Schismatic, or V-2 Catholic) is that words
have no meaning. How many "Catholics" will readily nod their
heads in agreement when you mention "dogma" or "heresy"
- but actually embrace heresy and refuse to consider anyone a heretic!
The loss of the horror of heresy among Catholics (or the love of the lie) is
the essence of the Great Apostasy…
Lee
Ann
New Items
MHFM: We are offering some extremely important new
DVDs for sale at our online store. These
are some of the best DVDs we have seen, and they are definitely worth
obtaining. Click on the links for
descriptions and pricing information.
Incredible Creatures That Defy Evolution - 1 - $15.00
Incredible Creatures That Defy Evolution - 2 – $15.00
Incredible Creatures That Defy Evolution - 3 - $15.00
The Privileged Planet - $3.00
The Case for a Creator - $3.00
Intelligent Design - Unlocking the
Mystery of Life - $3.00
Our
video, Is the World
about to End?, is also now on DVD and available for order. Note: it’s available for order, but it will
not be available for shipment until late July.
There are two combo DVDs we offer which contain Is the World about to End?
The two DVD options are:
4 in 1 DVD: Creation and Miracles; The Third Secret of Fatima,
the Impostor Sr. Lucia and the End of the World; Death and the Journey into
Hell; Is the World about to End? - $2.00
(see bulk pricing info)
2 in 1 DVD: Is the World about to End?; The Third Secret of
Fatima, the Impostor Sr. Lucia, and the End of the World - $2.00 (see bulk pricing info)
New Videos
MHFM: Below are two new videos. They deal with certain errors against the
Catholic faith that were recently promoted.
From time to time, we will be focusing in on the arguments and errors
made by various heretics. The second
video is a somewhat related video.
Errors in "Rejecting Sedevacantism" [video]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUru8Y2QP_A [video]
Listened
Dear sir;
I have listened to your youtube commentary with
a troubled and sorrowful heart. Pease ask Our Lady, your Mother and mine
to form you into the likeness of Christ, bringing you into the true fold, under
the true shepard divenly chosen. Please do not cause further division in
the Church, but please see us as a family; as such, resolving its problems
within the structure of the family. Please be obedient to the Holy
Father. Why do you speak so terribly against him? Please pray!
Please repent! Be my true brother, and please do not grieve our Heavenly
Father by your disobedience.
Sincerely yours in Christ with our Mother
Mary,
Karl Anderson
MHFM: It’s amazing that you don’t care one bit about what
Benedict XVI believes or what the Catholic Church teaches. He denies the necessity of any obedience to
Catholic teaching, Catholic dogma or the papal office; and that’s why he’s an
antipope.
Grave sins
Dear Brothers,
I'm a bit confused about this. I found this
in your archives:
"As far as eating meat on Fridays, it’s
forbidden under pain of mortal sin. But if one was not aware that this is the
law of the Church then it’s not necessarily a mortal sin, unless one was
sinfully negligent in acquiring this information. But once one knows that this
is the law, it’s forbidden under pain of mortal sin."
At the same time, this seems to contradict
the Catholic teaching on what constitutes mortal sin, because knowledge is not
required, only the grave matter counts. Or is my logic flawed, because this
deals only with a disciplinary law?
God bless you,
Jakub Eisenbruk
MHFM: Your understanding of the issue is not correct. Certain actions are inherently evil because
they are directly opposed to the right use of reason and nature. Eating meat on Friday is not one of those actions. People do not know from nature that they must
not eat meat on Fridays, and in fact
there are exceptions to the prohibition of eating meat on Fridays. If someone is starving, he may eat meat on
Friday. If a solemn holy day falls on
Friday, such as Christmas, one is not required to abstain from meat. As we can see, eating meat on Friday is not
inherently evil. The grave matter in
doing it – what constitutes the mortal sin – is actually the direct violation of the Church’s law on a matter that binds under
pain of mortal sin. In other words,
it is for directly violating the Church’s law that one commits mortal sin when
eating meat on Friday.
But in the case of actions such as fornication, drunkenness or
artificial contraception, for example, they necessarily entail activity that is
known to be gravely disordered and opposed to the right use of reason and
nature. If people use artificial
contraception, they know that they are thwarting the natural purpose of the
activity and thus it is gravely and inherently disordered. Such actions cannot be performed without
knowledge that they are wrong. The very
commission of such actions necessarily entails grave matter and thus they are
always mortally sinful, even though the people committing them might not care
about the meaning of mortal sin or believe in it.
Protestants
Dear Brothers,
I recently read somewhere that Protestants
are in good faith. If they were in good faith they would not : 1) Reject
Jesus Christ in the Eucharist, 2) Reject the teaching of the Catholic Church
instead of relying on sola scriptura, 3) Reject the teaching that you have to
persevere and die in a state of grace while at the same time they all believe
they are saints and living in a state of grace without confession to a true
priest (No humility or truth and ridiculous) 5) Reject a true pope and
apostolic succession and one faith, one Lord, one baptism 5) Reject the fires
of purgatory as outlined in Machabees 6) Reject our Lady when there is
overwhelming proof that she was always in a state of grace 7) Reject asking
saints to intervene for us as they reject the communion of saints. They
are completely without true discernment as to the faith as they believe they
are all saints here, but they at the same time reject the saints in heaven
(they won't ask them to intervene on their behalf), thus they are truly of
double mind. How could a person believe that there is no communion of
saints, while thinking they and all their Protestant "brethren" are
saints now? Isn't that a communion of saints?? 8) Many are rejecting
baptism as necessary 9) Reject five sacraments 10) Reject that only priest can
teach in the church as many women are now Protestant "ministers" 11)
Reject the teaching that you can only marry once and cannot marry again if you
are divorced (Vatican II has blurred the lines on this in such a disgusting way
that annulments, which MHFM has clearly shown are not valid and that there is
no such thing save nullities for very few reasons). There are I am sure
many more.
As Vatican II has dissolved the faith in
most of these areas Protestants can so easily seem to retain or proselytize as
they also call Vatican II teaching on not converting the Jews apostasy, which
it is obviously. (Vatican II makes it so easy to enable Protestants to
make Catholicism look like apostasy especially with this teaching). The problem
is that when the source of truth has been taken over by the wolves the sheep
are scattered and then the sweet talkers and vain deceivers tear up the pieces
left by the wolves.
Finally, we should ask Protestants if they
believe our Lady was a saint. Who could not? If she is a saint -are
dead saints in heaven? Since dead saints are alive in heaven and they
have proven their love for Jesus Christ wouldn't it be more efficacious to ask
them to intervene for us rather than a living person who isn't in heaven and
hasn't shown final perseverance? Then ask them if they are saints and
living in a state of grace of which they will all readily agree which may seem
like a joke to most Catholics however I have spoken to enough of them and many
truly believe they do not sin at all . If they don't believe she is a
saint-they are ridiculous. If they don't believe saints are alive in
heaven they don't really believe. If they think that one of their living
persons is a saint, which they do believe that they are all saints, then they
prove the point that saints are to be asked for prayer, (what is the difference
if they are living or in heaven, really what is the difference if Protestants
think they are saints now), and thus prove that the Catholic teaching is and
always has been correct.
Paul R.
Hell
Dear Brothers,
Hell's been on my mind lately. I recently
viewed your video on "Death and the path to Hell" and frankly, it
scared the hell out of me. A couple of nights ago, the syndicated radio show
"Coast to Coast" had a gentleman on who claims that in 1998 he
had an out of body experience where our Lord gave him a vision of hell. I
listened to him carefully and couldn't find anything he said that contradicts
catholic dogma. The only problem I have is that this man isn't catholic.
Although, he did admit on the air that all people who deny Jesus as the Christ
are automatically condemned.
I have two questions. First, did you listen
to "Coast to Coast" to hear this man and if so, please comment on it.
Secondly, have you ever read "The Letter From Beyond"? A fascinating
story of a german catholic nun who had a dream about a friend of hers who died
earlier that morning and conveyed to her (in a letter) her condemnation and the
reasons why she was condemned to hell.
I've been reading and studying your
materials for quite some time now… God Bless.
Steve
MHFM: We did not listen to it.
The experience is not necessarily false because, based on what you said,
there’s nothing in the story that contradicts the Catholic faith. God might grant non-Catholics special graces
so that they more aggressively search out His spiritual truths and evaluate
their eternal salvation. If they respond
to it with good will, they will be led to the Catholic faith. But the “experience” could also be a
deception.
Sufferings
I just thought of something Brothers,
Do you believe that one can suffer for
sinners and that one's tribulations, if offered up for poor sinners by a soul
in the state of grace (ie Padre Pio) can help to save those people? Would they
(the poor sinners) all necessarily have to convert to Catholicism in order for
the sufferings of those Saints to help save them? So in other words, do the
great sufferings of the saints only bring about converts or can non-catholics
be admitted into heaven based on their sins being atoned for by great suffering
of someone else? I'm not sure what Catholic Dogma says on this matter so if you
could shed some light that be very helpful!
Go with God,
Alex,
MHFM: A Catholic should already know the answer to that
question. No one can be saved outside
the Church. That’s a dogma. Therefore, the sinners who would truly
benefit from such sufferings would have to convert to the Catholic faith.
Knights
Dear
Brothers:
I
read the email regarding the Rotary Club and I'd like to know what your
feelings are, whether they are another form of freemasonry. Same with the
Knights of Columbus. My husband was a member of the Knights for a long
time before we converted; he has sent multiple letters to the head office
renouncing his membership. He has not paid dues to them for a number of
years now, yet they still send him their literature. My husband has told
me that the initiation rites are secret(!!!) which is stupid if they are in
accord with Catholic teaching.
To
the protestant who thinks praying to Mary is unchristian, I have a question:
Do you really think you're pleasing Jesus by ignoring, hating, and
despising the assistance and prayers she offers on our behalf?? Doesn't
one of the ten commandments include "Honor your father and mother"?
Mary is our spiritual Mother, and Jesus is a very good Son, and He will
not leave unpunished those of you who insult her in any way.
Brenda
The Virgin
Hi… I was wondering and I know how your
videos say otherwise but I was thinking are you a Christian or do you pray to
the virgin mary? Please answer if you have the time thanks.
Global…
MHFM: Yes, we pray to the Blessed
Virgin. She is the new Ark, and we
invoke her just like the Israelites utilized the Ark of the Old Testament to
defeat the enemies of God (Joshua 6), for miracles (Joshua 3 & 4), for protection
(Numbers 10), etc. You need to see our book, The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church.
Joshua
6:13-20."… and they went before the ark of the Lord walking and sounding
the trumpets: and the armed men went before them, and the rest of the common
people followed the ark, and they blew the trumpets... So all the people making
a shout, and the trumpets sounding, when the voice and the sound thundered in
the ears of the multitude, the walls forthwith fell down: and every man went up
by the place that was over against him: and they took the city..."
Numbers
10:33-35- "So they marched from the mount of the Lord three days' journey,
and the ark of the covenant of the Lord went before them, for three days
providing a place for the camp. The
cloud also of the Lord was over them by day when they marched. And when the ark was lifted up, Moses said:
Arise, O Lord, and let thy enemies be scattered, and let them that hate thee,
flee from before thy face.”
1
Samuel 5:10- “And when the ark of God was come into Accaron, the Accaronites
cried out, saying: They have brought the ark of the God of Israel to us, to
kill us and our people.”
Curious
Brother Dimond,
After I posed my first question to you a week or more ago, I became curious if
indeed Revelation 8:7 (yes, I am protestant) had potentially occurred and we,
as Americans, being so involved in our own "little corner of the
world," failed to see it happen.
Here is what I found:
Article from 10/8/03 from the Food and Agriculture Organization "Fires are
Increasingly Damaging the World's Forests,"
http://www.fao.org/english/newsroom/news/2003/21962-en.html And this is old
data. When I searched for information I found the numbers of forest fires
worldwide, which are damaging entire forests, to be staggering! Here are more
references (I could post reference after reference, after reference). My point
is, I do believe 1) the oil DISASTER is, indeed the second trumpet and 2) the
first trumpet was blown while Americans, and others worldwide, focused only on
their little part of the world, forgetting there is much more to prophecy
fulfillment than what will blatantly and obviously occur before our eyes.
Thank you for all of your videos. Once I start watching, I can barely stop!
K.
MHFM: Thanks for the interest and the e-mail. You really need to become Catholic.
Message
Subject: Message
Dear brothers,
Excellent way in which you nailed the heretic William Gollie. It was great. I
especially enjoyed your after comments. Also great video on the heretic Paleocrat.
This guy never had the catholic faith. It is the problem you constantly point
out… Great work as always.
Thanks
Mrs. Stewart
Comment
You are the antichrist.
Seesyou…
Abjuration post
Subject: Abjuration Post
I just read the recent post on your
e-exchanges from "PM" regarding abjuration, and I just wanted to add:
You say that the Trent Profession of Faith (which is in itself also an
abjuration), plus Confession/act of perfect contrition is enough to get back
into the Church if you were a Novus Ordinarian or if you belonged to another
sect (and also specifically mentioning whatever other heresies one held), so my
question is: is it enough to make the Profession by yourself? Or do you need
the 2 witnesses and their signature? Who do you make this Profession with?
Doing it by yourself is enough?
<<They turn the ecclesiastical law about abjuration into a necessity of
means for salvation, as necessary as belief in the Trinity.>>
That's exactly right, that's what they do.
Iug…
MHFM: Yes, it would be.
The law for normal times not only requires that it be done in the
presence of two witnesses, but also in front of the ordinary. Since there is no ordinary, obviously one
can’t adhere to the letter of that law.
Thus, making it by yourself would be sufficient in this situation. The core of the issue is that the individual
has the Catholic faith, makes the profession, and rejects the heresies. It’s not that he conforms to every particular
requirement of a Church law intended for a normal situation.
Falsity
Subject: Comment
Dear Brothers:
Thank you for informing us about
Paleocrat. This is yet another proof of the falsity of the V-2
"church". Instead of producing the Church Militant, it produces
the Church Effete.
All the works you post (and offer)
are always so valuable -- Faith-affirming as well as practical
in helping us to fight the Good Fight. Thank you for all of
them.
Lee Ann
Dutch
Subject: Dutch Church Goes Orange for WC
Final
Dear Mhfm,
Watching that video I realised orange is the perfect color for the Vatican 2
"church". The reason is because here in Ireland the protestants up
north who hate Catholics or anyone who has the name Catholic their
"trademark" color is orange, they are known as the "orange
men" who are actually affiliated with the freemasons. These "orange
men" originally came from Holland. So since Protestants use the color
orange I think it’s a perfect fit that the Novus Ordo would use orange after
all they are no better than protestants.
God Bless
Sean
Debate
Brothers,
Your debate with William Golle is once
again a clear demonstration of kicking the can down the street. William
starts off with his only truth when he states "he has an issue".
William then tries to divert the debate with a bunch of irrelevant
mumbo-jumbo. The "issue" that William is referring to, is what
a spiritually blind liar he is, as he shows up to the debate without
knowing the question at hand while trying to pass off irrelevant information.
William, proselytizing is the act of attempting to convert people to another
opinion and, particularly, another religion. Therefore
Proselytizing=Evangelism! Knowing the truth is like a math problem...there's
only one right answer.
Brother Peter, great job of providing valuable information concerning the
debate, while you sum up the debate with your strong remark, "...the
Devil's Dupes will always do his dirty work, he will use them and spin them
around like a top, arguing one thing then the other, as long as that which is
false and evil, namely Vatican II and its anti-popes is defended".
I look forward to receiving your new selection of DVD's.
God Bless Your Work,
Tom Miles
Watched
Watched your oil spill video and i was just
wondering why you refer to Revelation as apocalypse? Isn't the book called
revelation? i do agree with everything stated in the video and I believe we are
living in the last days. The oil rig could be the "mountain"
described in the Revelation...
MHFM: Apocalypse (apokalypsis) is the Greek word for “revelation” or “lifting of the
veil.” It’s the original title of the
Bible’s final book, and what the Catholic Church calls it.
Beasts
Great work MHFM. The beasts are
without a doubt the Vatican II antipopes and the cave they dwell in is the
temple of God in Rome at the present time.
Dea…
Listened
I just listened to your conversation on the
oil spill and how it may relate to the Book of Revelations. I thank you for
it. Perhaps the most important message that
is lost out there is that this is America's oil that we are watching. It feels
as though God is saying, "You choose to buy oil from dictators that use
the money to propagate the message of a False Prophet; yet you refuse to use
the oil I have freely given you. Therefore, even what you think you have will
be taken from you and be as a curse to your land and sea.."
While I don't subscribe to many Catholic
teachings (and left Catholicism when I was young because of them), I find it
remarkable how Jesus is drawing all of his followers into deeper fellowship in
these last days.
One such experience of deep spiritual
intimacy occurred for me in Bangkok. I was at St. Louis Hospital undergoing
surgery at a time of great sorrow and faithlessness. Catholic sisters came by
my room and I felt compelled to ask them what they did when God was nowhere to
be found. The next day, and totally unexpected, a sister came by and gave me
When the Well Runs Dry by Father Green. I hardly want to speak about the moment
because its beauty would be tainted by imperfect words; but there it was: a
time when God came near. Perhaps we could be friends too? I wish you ever
deepening insight and revelation of the Lord's presence in this troubled world.
Fight the good fight!
In His Grip,
Duane
MHFM: The Catholic faith is the only true Christian faith. Jesus makes it clear that one must accept all
of His teaching to be saved. Please
consult the material in our refuting Protestantism section. It demonstrates that, as a non-Catholic, you
do not accept all of His teaching and in fact reject His original and only
faith. Without the true faith, moments
that you consider to be of great spiritual importance prove rather to be
deceptions. They are deceptions that
keep a person comforted and confident in a life devoid of Christ’s full truth
and the knowledge of God’s will that comes with adherence to it.
Mel
Brothers in Christ,
What is your assessment of Mel Gibson's
behavior? It seems like he is in the grip of Satan & is in total ruination.
He left his wife of many years, after fornication with this Russian girl
now has a baby out of his marriage, is caught on tape ranting like a lunatic
etc.
John
MHFM: It’s obviously outrageous, but unfortunately not
surprising when we consider that he wholeheartedly believes in the “baptism of
desire,” salvation-for-members-of-any-religion apostasy that countless
“Catholics” and supposed “traditional Catholics” hold. We do have some more comments, and we will
probably share them soon.
Non-denominational
First of all, I FULLY enjoy your videos.
VERY good. May God bless you for all days to come.
I have a question though: while watching your video titled, "Like Martin
Luther, the Devil and Denominations" you talk about denominations and then
end with, "And if you are Catholic. . ." I consider myself non-denominational.
Although, it seems that today, that has become a denomination in and of itself.
I go to a Calvary Chapel…
What are you thoughts and/or views on non-denominational churches? What do you
think about people who say, "It's not about a religion, it's a
relationship?" And. . . and this
may be a BIGGIE (maybe not). . . What do you think about aliens being fallen
angels (and the subject of aliens in general)?
Thank you very much,
Dan
MHFM: We are glad that you came across the information. However, Christ only founded one Church. You
really should get our book on that issue: Refuting Protestantism from the
Bible and Eastern "Orthodoxy" (audios and articles). That means that you can’t have a relationship
with Him unless you accept His entire faith and the one Church He
established. You can’t be saved
remaining “non-denominational” or going to such a church. You need to come into the traditional
Catholic faith, the only true faith of Christ.
Rotary Clubs
Brothers:
Do you know if the Rotary Clubs are affiliated with the Masons? I have seen
things from my own research that would indicate a connection. Would you
recommend any materials for further research on my part? I have watched your
DVD's on the masonic influence of America and don't recall any mention of the
Rotarians. Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
Joseph Ramirez
Debate
Debate: Does Vatican II teach that
non-Catholics may receive Communion - 1/4
Debate: Does Vatican II teach that
non-Catholics may receive Communion - 2/4
Debate: Does Vatican II teach that
non-Catholics may receive Communion - 3/4
Debate: Does Vatican II teach that
non-Catholics may receive Communion - 4/4
Abjuration
Do you have any information on the
necessity of abjuration? Some of these cults insist that unless we sign
an abjuration (that they have written) from the Vatican II heresy, in front of
two witnesses, we will go to Hell, and that the Profession of Faith and perfect
Act of Contrition is not enough.
PM
MHFM: The profession of faith from the Council of Trent, which
is given to converts from heresy, is also an abjuration. They are completely wrong. The Steps to convert to the
traditional Catholic faith and for those leaving the New Mass - Baptism and
Conditional Baptism - the Council of Trent's Profession of Faith for Converts
It includes a formal renunciation of heretical beliefs that are
opposed to the Catholic faith. If one
held a specific heresy, he should mention that heresy when making the
profession of faith from Trent. The
radical schismatics misunderstand the Catholic faith. They turn the ecclesiastical law about
abjuration into a necessity of means for salvation, as necessary as belief in
the Trinity. They are very
deceived. No one can be saved without
rejecting a heresy that he once held obstinately. However, suppose someone converted to the
true faith on his deathbed. If he
rejected the false belief/heresy he previously held, and had time to make a
confession for the sin against the faith he committed, he could be restored to
justification. He could be saved if he
did not have time to sign or make a formal abjuration. He rejected the heresy internally, and
confessed the sin. The specific form in
which the rejection of the heresy is manifested, in an abjuration in front of
two witnesses and the ordinary (normally speaking), is an ecclesiastical law
intended for normal situations. Other
schismatic errors that those non-Catholics hold are refuted in detail in our
sub-section to E-Exchanges, under “Traditional Catholic Issues and Groups.”
Religions
Subject: JP’s Exchange
I read JP's e-exchange and went to the
video on sedevacantist priests deny catholic salvation dogma and found it
amazing that all these priests don't see the glaring and obvious problem with
how the world accepted and loved and worshiped these five anti-popes especially
JPll and Benedict XVl. The world {jews} killed Jesus, they rejected HIM
and the saints and martyrs also! Why? Because of the rock solid and
unwavering TRUTH and what is this truth: JOHN 15:18 If the world hate
you, know ye, that it hath hated me before you. 19 If you had been
of the world, the world would love its own: but because you are not of the
world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.
20 Remember my word that I said to you: The servant is not greater than
his master. If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you:
If the priests just understood or cared about these truth's of Jesus they
would have to ask why does the world love these men who sit in the Chair of St.
Peter. If these evil men were true popes, all of the false religions in
the world would have hated, attacked and persecuted these men but what we have
with these men is just the OPPOSITE, they were and are loved and excepted by
all these false religions. This is spiritual fornication on behalf of
these anti-popes because they esteem, respect and actively participate in these
false, despicable and demonic man-made religions!!!...
Todd
BOD
Hello
again Dimond Brothers,
I know you are not proponents of the Baptism
of Desire belief, but I just discovered a definition of it in the back of my
Bible which is copyrighted 1954, 1953, 1952, 1950 by The Catholic Press, Inc.
It has an Imprimatur from Samuel Cardinal Stritch June 4th, 1953, then
Archbishop of Chicago. It is: The Family Rosary Commemorative Edition of the
Catholic Bible issued to celebrate the Marian Year. It goes along with the
announcement made by Pope Pius XII on September 26, 1953, that the year 1954
would be a Marian Year to mark the 100th anniversary of the proclamation
of the Immaculate Conception as a dogma of the Church.
In the back of this Bible, under Catholic Encyclopedia it lists Baptism
of Desire and defines it as follows:
One of the two possible substitutes for Baptism
of water (the other being Baptism of Blood). When it is not possible thus to be
baptized, an act of perfect contrition or pure love of God will supply the
omission. Such acts are a perfect and ultimate disposition calling for the
infusion of sanctifying grace, and at least implicitly include a desire and
intention to receive Baptism of water should occasion offer. Infants are not
capable of Baptism of desire. A heathen, believing even though in a confused
way, in a God whose will should be done and desiring it to do that will
whatever it may be, probably has Baptism of desire. It may reasonably be
assumed that vast numbers of persons unbaptized by water have thus been
rendered capable of enjoying the Beatific Vision.
If you could shed some light on the
subject, that would be great. You're arguments against Baptism of Desire seemed
legit, but this seems to contradict your stance. I checked out Samuel Cardinal
Stritch, and as far as I can tell, he was a true Catholic Archbishop. Ordained
around 1910 and died in 1958, so before the Counter-Church was instituted. I am
at odds as to what to believe now, so please, I know you are busy, but if you
could look into this matter and tell me what you think I would be most
grateful!
God Bless you Brothers!
Alex, a concerned Catholic
MHFM: You really need to read our book. You seem to be under the impression that a
book with an imprimatur is somehow infallible.
That’s quite wrong. You also seem
to think that anything published before Vatican II was orthodox. That is also quite wrong. The heresies were being taught in fallible
books, such as the one you reference, prior to Vatican II. The book you cite is blatantly
heretical. The clerics who read and
agreed with it were heretical. It
teaches “baptism of desire” and that heathens can be saved. It even says that “vast numbers” of such
heathens are saved! That contradicts
infallible Catholic dogma. It’s a prime
example of evil pre-Vatican II heresy.
It was precisely heresies like that which led to the Great Apostasy
after Vatican II.
Infallible
Hi Brothers,
Sorry, disregard the last e-mail on BOD. I
see your answer on your website.
My… question is: How does one determine if
a document is dogmatic, and/or infallible?
I am surprised that the council of Trent is not dogmatic because I
always thought it was.
-C
MHFM: It depends on the language used by a pope in promulgating
it, and the form in which it is promulgated.
Counter Church
Hello Dimond Brothers,
My name is Alex, and I'm a Traditional
Catholic in Ohio. I have an important question: For the last week, I have been
having very strong urges to share information about the Vatican II
Counter-Church with my "catholic" friends, and I have passed it on to
some. I just wanted to know, if there are any tips or words of advice you may
have to help me successfully convert my friends? I know that most of them will
not believe, because they simply will not be able to rationalize or admit that
the Church has been infiltrated, but I may be able to convert some. Any
strategies you recommend? I have known about the false Vatican II for several
years now, but have not said anything to my friends out of fear of offending
them, sloth, and just plain forgetfulness. Your website has helped to awaken me
from a sleep, I have always been Traditional Catholic, but I had become lax in
my prayers and would not stand up and bear witness to the Truth. But now I feel
compelled by God to proudly proclaim my Catholic heritage and to undeniably say
that Catholicism is the one true faith, instituted by Christ. I want to thank
you for the great work you do, you have the courage to speak the truth when no
one else will. God is working through you, and working well. I just purchased
several books and writings from your website, and I am about to begin reading
your book, The Truth About What Really Happened to the Catholic Church After
Vatican II, which was given to me by my grandmother. Over the last 4 days, I
have immersed myself in your videos online, and your writings, and in my heart
I know them to be true. We truly are in the last days, as the Chair of St.
Peter sits vacant.
One final point, I stumbled upon this verse
when I opened to Bible to this exact page (funny how frequently that happens)
and it was Matthew 10:34 "Do not think that I have come to send peace upon
the earth; I have come to bring a sword, not peace." Yet Anti-Pope John
Paul II and his "meeting of religious figures" prayed for world peace
amongst religions. Yet another fact proving the Novus Ordo to be utterly false
and not of God, but of Satan.
Thank you so much for your time Brothers,
and may God Bless you!!
Sincerely,
Alex
MHFM: Thanks for the interest.
We would recommend having them watch the entire DVD, The Third Secret of Fatima, the Impostor Sr.
Lucia and the End of the World.
Additionally, one should familiarize himself with the main heresies of
Vatican II and the Vatican II antipopes.
Since you are looking at the videos and The Truth about What Really Happened after Vatican II book, you
will see those covered. A good way to
cover them quickly would be to read out loud for them the section headings or
bullet points covered in the detailed Table of Contents of the aforementioned
book. After explaining some of those
heresies to them, you should explain the primary dogmatic principles which
demonstrate that heretics cannot be popes.
Apostate Debate
Subject: Golle Apostate Debate
Dear Brothers,
In listening to the debate with the V-2
apostate, William Golle, on whether Vatican II teaches that non-Catholics may
receive Communion (which it does), it is clear that he uses three main tactics:
The first is to speak with conviction – it makes no difference what he says (to
him). The second is to lie – particularly by avoiding any acceptance of the
obvious facts. The third is to repeat himself constantly - which gives him more
confidence. The Vatican II apostates think that to say things with heartfelt
conviction makes them speak the truth, when in fact they are just passionate
liars. Listening to Golle dance around the facts makes it obvious why the
Vatican II sect mass produces production line pedophiles – his dishonesty and
avoidance of the truth is obese!!! William Golle doesn't understand what
“properly disposed” means because he himself is in a state of mortal sin – he's
blinded by his own guilt! John Paul II's quote devastates Golle's position, by
stating (falsely) that non-Catholics may receive communion, but Golle just uses
the V-2, “I-don–know” if it's true, to avoid it. Q - Where's the Church,
William? A - “I-don-know.” An interesting moment occurred after Bro. Peter
called Golle a liar (vid. 3, 5:15 mins.) because William then says, “Ok then,
fine! I'm not gonna, you know, call you a liar – I don't know; I can't read
your heart.” The Vatican II apostates believe in nothing and know nothing as
well. A liar is someone who doesn't tell the truth. A person only needs the
ability to understand words in order figure out if someone's a liar or not –
one doesn't need to read hearts to see that someone is lying! It's amazing that
he admitted he was wrong in the debate but now flip-flops over to the Vatican
II teaching even more. That's obstinacy and bad-will for you!!! Gee golly gosh,
William's a white-wash! William Golle is properly disposed towards hell!!!
There is no peace for the wicked.
ARCANUM, ON CHRISTIAN MARRIAGE, Pope Leo
XIII - “But these are extreme cases; and they would seldom exist if men and
women entered into the married state with proper dispositions, not influenced
by passion, but entertaining right ideas of the duties of marriage and of its
noble purpose; neither would they anticipate their marriage by a series of sins
drawing down upon them the wrath of God.”…
God Bless,
Chris White
MHFM: Thank you for the e-mail.
Yes, it’s so true that it makes no difference to him (and to many
similar heretics) what he says.
Moreover, it’s equally true and even more common to find that the
supporters of the Novus Ordo Church, when listening to such an exchange, don’t care at all about what is actually
said by the Vatican II “apologist.”
As long as it defends the antipope and contradicts the sedevacantist, no
matter how illogical, unfounded, distorting or wrong it might be, they don’t
care. This is not an exaggeration:
someone could literally do a lecture or produce a Youtube video against
sedevacantism and say anything. As long
as it purports to refute the sedevacantist position, people will find it
persuasive and even praise it. We are
truly in dark times.
To give an example of what we’re talking about: one of us
recalls hearing one exchange between a defender of the Vatican II Church and a
sedevacantist. The two were arguing
about the New Mass. The defender of the
Vatican II Church (not the sedevacantist) quoted Pope Benedict XIV on the many
vs. all distinction and the form of consecration. He cited the same passage that we quote. This passage doesn’t help his position. It actually refutes it. The passage is below. It demonstrates that “ALL” is not acceptable
in the form of consecration, as anyone can see.
It does so by teaching that the form is expressing the efficacy aspect
of Christ’s blood. Since it’s expressing
efficacy, Jesus specifically said “for
you and for many” (not all) when giving us the form. The passage also agrees with St. Thomas, who
taught the same on many vs. all.
Pope Benedict
XIV, De Sacrosancto Missae Sacrificio: “And so, having agreed with the same Angelic doctor, we
explain those words “for many” accordingly, though it is granted that (sometimes) the word "many", after
a manner of speaking in the Holy Scriptures, may signify "all".' 'Therefore
we say that the blood of Christ was shed for all, shed for all however as
regards sufficiency (Benedict's emphasis: quoad sufficientiam) and for the elect only as regards
efficacy (Benedict's emphasis: quoad efficaciam) as the Doctor Thomas explains correctly:
"The blood of Christ's passion has its efficacy not merely in the elect among
the Jews, ... but also in the Gentiles ... and
therefore He says expressly, for you the Jews, and for many,
namely the Gentiles”.”
So, in the exchange we’re talking about, the defender of Vatican
II read the above words. He read them with
special emphasis and voice tone as if they prove his point (when
the words actually completely disprove his point). He read the words and he didn’t make a
comment about them. He then moved on to
talk about other things. Later in the
conversation, however, he argued (with words to this effect): “You did not respond to my refutation of your
position from Pope Benedict XIV. You
obviously have no response to what I proved.” So, he was acting as if the passage from Pope
Benedict XIV, and what he covered about it, proved his position on “all” in the
consecration and refuted the argument of the sedevacantist! All he did was quote something (without
commenting, but with special emphasis) that completely refutes his own
position; and minutes later he acted as if what he covered on that point
completely refuted the sedevacantist and proved that “all” is acceptable in the
consecration! It’s really
something. This kind of distortion
happens all the time in the presentations of heretics. What’s most outrageous, however, is that the
bad-willed heretics who abound in the Counter Church are persuaded by such lies
and distortions.
After hearing this exchange, the dumbed-down (through bad will)
and blind adherent of the Vatican II sect (who yearns in his heart for the lie)
probably said: “Yeah, he refuted the
sedevacantist. He completely refuted him
on Benedict XIV.” We know this is
true because people even praised the defender of Vatican II for his performance
in the aforementioned exchange. Their
self-imposed spiritual fog is such that they cannot follow the points carefully
or they simply refuse to; for the truth is that he didn’t even comment about
Benedict XIV’s passage or make any argument about it. He simply quoted it with special emphasis and
PRETENDED like it proved his position, when the truth is that it does not. That’s why we say frequently, and IT’S 100%
TRUE: we are battling with liars all over the place – complete and total
liars. Pretending like they’ve made an
argument is all they need to do to reinforce the false faith and confidence of
those who love the Vatican II lie.
Confirmed
Hello
Brothers:
I just wanted to alert you, in case nobody has picked it up, that William Golle
had clearly stated in part one of your debate (at 8:08) that it would be a
"clear
heresy" on the part of the Vatican II
church "if it was saying that non-catholics could indeed receive Holy
Communion". This is very, very important,
as you have him admitting to the heresy of the Vatican II church which he is now, of
necessity, defending. He is then an admitted heretic, and is also admitting that
the Vatican II antipopes are heretics!
When
he contacted you to say that he was "wrong" did he admit to you that,
if according to his church, it is a dogmatic conciliar statement that
non-catholics may receive communion, then he argued for a personal heresy
vehemently for almost an hour? Does he care at all? No, of course not. And
further, just listen to that discussion again. No matter how plain the Vatican
II church makes it, he argues against you and the facts. Does he apologize to you and say "yes, I
must humble myself, I acted very wickedly. I clearly lied."? It is
doubtful that he said such a thing to you.
At 1
minute 22 sec. of part one he is "amazed" that you would have the VII
quack on instead of him - as if you hadn't already had him on for approximately
5-6 hours of previous intolerable tomfoolery (on his part) - as if you
were afraid of him. It is more demonstration of how infatuated with their own
voices these VII defenders are.
Every
heretic is a complete and absolute confirmed liar, for God robs no man of His
Grace!
-Thanks
for the debates, the research, and all of the work. Good fruit and possibly the
last of the Benedictine exercise on the face of the earth –
Mike
Heretic
Subject: Bad “Will”
Dear Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,
I just couldn't resist this ....so please forgive me!
The guy's a joke...referring to Bad "Will," of course - he has no shame
or any pride, meaning self respect as opposed to the sin of pride - what an
embarrassment he must be to his family! ... And I thought he had been 'dealt
with' long ago!... I guess some people are just plain 'tigers for punishment!'
8 - D
God bless,
David
Listened
Dear brothers in Christ,
I've listened to the debate about V2
"holy" communion, i.e. whether V2 NO "catholics" could
receive communion from "orthodox" schismatic priests and
"orthodox" schismatics from V2 NO "priests". Your opponent,
as blind liar as he is, is stating that this inter-communion is, as a rule,
forbidden, and is allowable only in cases of emergency and necessity. The
teaching of V2 satanic documents regarding this problem is as clear as any
satanic lie could be clear. They invented so called partial communion, in full
opposition with the basics of Creed--The True Church of Christ is ONE, is
WHOLE, is HOLY etc. One is either a member of The Church, or is outside of Her.
So, when the antipope B16 calls some schismatic "bishop" a pastor in
The Church of Christ, this could only mean that that "pastor" has
full jurisdiction in The Church, and therefore he is allowed to minister the
communion to anyone who is a member of his church. By "partial
communion" invention--who isn't a member of the "pastor's"
church?
Of course, the answer to this rhetorical
question is simple--the true Catholics are not members of their satanic
churches. The true Catholics are the only people in ZERO "partial
communion" with the Devil and his legions now occupying V2,
"orthodox", Anglican, and innumerable other "Christian"
churches. Your opponent's lie--that the
V2 teachings forbid mutual "exchange" of "sacraments"--is
of the same kind as the lie that the false V2 council was
"only-pastoral-non-dogmatic" council.
If there is some hope for the people like
that your opponent, let them try to ask themselves, as honestly as they can,
some basic questions: what is the meaning and the purpose of 'emergency and
necessity' if anyone could be saved, even those who received not only one
sacrament in their whole life? what is the meaning and purpose of any kind of
Creed (whatever it would be) if anyone, who opposes that Creed, could be
accepted as an adherent of the Creed?
Partial communion is a contradiction in terms. The Teaching of The Catholic
Church says that anyone, ordinary layman or a pope, could eternally perish if
he/she commits just one mortal sin and dies in the state of condemnation. This
is a statement of a fact. There is no "partial pleasing of God", there
is no "partial salvation", there is no "partial condemnation by
God", there is no "partial Heaven", "partial Hell",
etc. etc…
Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia
Disposed
Subject: Properly Disposed
http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/archbishop_burke_public_figures_must_receive_holy_communion_worthily/
The above link from a Novus Ordo source,
quotes a Novus Ordo bishop on the reception of Communion. In the article
the “bishop” defines “proper disposition” (that exact phrase) for Communion as
being free of unrepentant mortal sin. So you see even real
Catholics must be “properly disposed”.
William’s argument was pathetic. He
might have been the worst yet. I think you should take him on regarding
Paul IVth and Sedevactantism though. He seems so eager.
Bill Mulligan
MHFM: Yes, it’s also interesting how the false conservatives of
the Vatican II sect only focus on the fewer than one percent of Novus Ordo
“bishops” who think that pro-abortion public figures should not receive
“Communion.” 99 percent of the apostate
“bishops” allow pro-abortionists to receive “Communion.” That apostate position is also backed up by
Benedict XVI and the Vatican. The
handful of “bishops” (well under one percent) who oppose it still do not
excommunicate the pro-abortion public figures.
Thus, all the Novus Ordo “bishops” without exception regard as
Catholics, and hold within their communion, people who are pro-abortion. See: One can be pro-abortion and part of the Vatican II sect
at the same time [PDF File]
Truths
Dear Brothers,
When you gave the update at the end of the debate I began getting overjoyed
that Mr. Golle saw the truth of what the Vatican II church was saying until you
mentioned that now he is defending what he was condemning.
It is unpopular to take the positions that
a lot of us Catholics take, i.e., sedevacantism, no salvation outside the
church with no exceptions, only one Baptism, etc. but once the decision is made
to hold to these TRUTHS there is a peace which only God can give and that no
one can take away. We will keep Mr.
Golle in our prayers.
Theresa
Bad will
Subject: Bad will
Dear Brothers:
Thanks for posting the debate with William
Golle. People (especially newcomers to your website) should be sure
to listen to the entire debate; parts 3 and
4 are especially important, as are Bother Peter's
afterthoughts at the end. Golle's remarks are one of the best examples yet
of outright dishonesty and bad will; a good snapshot of the typical novus
ordo defender. And don't these people love to hear themselves talk!
Thanks, Lee Ann
Comment
Subject: new debate
I feel very strongly that William at this point
is just debating out of amusement and is enjoying his notoriety on the…
brothers website and gets a fuzzy warm feeling out of reading the comments made
by everyone. While these are great opportunities to expose the heretics
and to educate and convert people I think William has grown to like the
attention. I really think he doesn't believe the garbage he is spewing
but just an opportunity to justify his existence. I would bet if no one
responded to his gibberish that would be more crushing than even the negative
attention he would normally get from everyone, any kind of attention is better
than none at all! May the Queen of Heaven, grant William the
light to see!!!
Todd
Priest
Subject: SSPV
I spoke today with a priest from Oyster Cove
Bay who claimed that Baptism by Blood and Desire was declared at the Council of
Trent. How do you respond to that?
Having read your position to NFP my wife
and I agreed to practice abstinence. What happens after she passes
through change of life? Are we still under the obligation to abstain?
I find my self choosing btwn traditionalist
camps which appear on the wrong side of several issues. I tend to favor the
SSPV over the SSPX because they reject the New Code of Canon Law. I expect the
Society's untenable position of accepting the New Code will continue to lead to
problems. But the SSPV will refuse me communion. Is it a sin to simply say
nothing and accept communion anyway?
Respectfully,
JP
MHFM: We respond by saying that it’s simply not true. All of that is addressed in great detail in
our book on the topic, as well as our section dealing with the salvation dogma,
our debates, etc. That’s why people need
to look at that information; they should obtain and read the book from us. Trent teaches that the Sacrament of Baptism
is necessary for salvation and that John 3:5 is to be understood as it is written (i.e., no room for
salvation without water baptism).
Pope Paul III, The Council of Trent,
Sess. 7, Can. 5 on the Sacrament of Baptism: “If anyone says that
baptism [the Sacrament] is optional, that is, not necessary for salvation (cf.
Jn. 3:5): let him be anathema.”
Pope Paul III, The Council of Trent,
Can. 2 on the Sacrament of Baptism, Sess. 7, 1547: “If anyone shall
say that real and natural water is not necessary for baptism, and on that
account those words of Our Lord Jesus Christ: ‘Unless a man be born again of
water and the Holy Spirit’ [John 3:5], are distorted into some sort of metaphor:
let him be anathema.”
Pope Eugene IV, The Council of Florence,
“Exultate Deo,” Nov. 22, 1439: “Holy baptism, which is the gateway
to the spiritual life, holds the first place among all the sacraments; through
it we are made members of Christ and of the body of the Church. And
since death entered the universe through the first man, ‘unless we are born
again of water and the Spirit, we cannot,’ as the Truth says, ‘enter into the
kingdom of heaven’ [John 3:5]. The matter of this sacrament is
real and natural water.”
Consult our material for the one passage of Trent they
misunderstand.
With regard to your question on NFP, the answer is no. The sin of NFP involves taking positive steps
to avoid conception, namely, deliberately
restricting marital relations to times believed to be infertile. When conception does not occur as a result of
NATURAL defects of time or of age, that’s not attributable to the action of the
married couple. They didn’t do anything
to positively prevent conception.
Therefore, it’s not a sin. People
can still use marital rights at those times, and Pope Pius XI makes this point
clear in his encyclical, Casti Connubii
(see below). And this is not at all
comparable to NFP, which is an organized
scheme to deliberately restrict marital relations to infertile
periods.
It should be emphasized that post-Vatican II heretics love to
MISUNDERSTAND the following passage from Pope Pius XI’s encyclical on
marriage. They quote it and wrongly apply it to NFP, when
it’s not teaching NFP at all! Rather,
it’s simply making the point we just explained.
For all of the passages in Pius XI’s encyclical that demonstrate that
NFP is condemned – for it subordinates the primary purpose of the marriage act
to secondary ends – see our article: Why
Natural Family Planning is Sinful Birth Control [PDF File]
Pope Pius XI, Casti Connubii (#59), Dec. 31, 1930: “Nor are those considered as
acting against nature who in the married state use their right in the proper manner
although on account of natural reasons either of time or of certain defects,
new life cannot be brought forth. For in matrimony as well as in the use of the
matrimonial rights there are also secondary ends, such as mutual aid, the
cultivating of mutual love, and the quieting of concupiscence which husband and
wife are not forbidden to consider so long as they are subordinated to the
primary end and so long as the intrinsic nature of the act is preserved.”
Moreover, women can and have become pregnant at times and at
ages when it is generally believed pregnancy will not occur (e.g., see
Elizabeth and Luke 1).
With regard to the SSPV, our material clearly proves that they
are heretics. They not only reject the
aforementioned teaching on water baptism, but they hold that souls can be saved
in any religion. They are not
Catholic. They are completely faithless,
wicked apostates who totally reject the Lord Jesus Christ. They don’t even believe in God. They do not believe in Outside the Church
There is No Salvation. They believe that
a Hindu, Christ-hating idolater can be in the state of grace. They believe that one can be of Christ and at
the same time antichrist. They also
obstinately promote sinful NFP. To
support them would be a grave sin. Since
they are imposing heretics, one must also not receive Communion from them. In fact, you shouldn’t even receive
sacraments from anyone until you are clear on this and completely reject such
heretics and the false doctrines of “baptism of desire,” salvation outside the
Church, NFP, etc. You should watch this video. Perhaps you are also not yet
convinced of the sedevacantist position?
If so, you need to become convinced before receiving sacraments. The SSPX priests are heretical on salvation
in the same way the SSPV is, and they also accept Antipope Benedict XVI.
Video
MHFM: This video discusses The French
Revolution.
The Demonic French Revolution [video]
Story
Bill's story about having dinner with
friends and the conversation at dinner reminded me right away of Pope Leo Xlll's
vision, hearing the devil ask Jesus for added power over the people who would
give service to the devil. This is exactly the power that the devil asked
for, to confound, blind, confuse the people with a sprinkling of indifference
on the top as the cherry!!!
Todd
Comment
Subject:
song
… I
think Matthew's comments on "Led Zeppelin"'s
"song" "Stairway to Heaven" are astute, very
accurate......in this case, Satan USED peoples' perceptions of Our Lady to
drag possibly countless souls into hell......forever......never to
escape......but then again, God's adversary has USED everything about
the Catholic Church, God, all the Saints, etc, to achieve
this goal, for at least the last 50 years now, seemingly quite effectively-----he
has USED… everything holy and pure to his own ends.......deceit and treachery
can't get any worse! (one hopes.....)
A.
Videos
Subject: Jews exposed videos
Dear Brothers,
Those two videos, one on the student painting swastikas and the other of the former
Israeli minister saying they Jews use "holocaust" and
"Anti-Semitic" as a trick to avoid criticism and "justify
everything they do to the Palestinians" are incredible and
outrageous. It adds further proof to the insane influence of the
Jews and Israel have in the world. Sadly, such clips would never be aired
on mainstream TV. Thank you for posting them.
God Bless,
Chris
MHFM: Yes, they are very interesting. It’s not an accident that they are shown only
or primarily on local programs or affiliates, and not on the mainstream
national programs.
Very interesting
Jewish Student caught painting Swastikas on her door and then
claiming Anti-Semitic attack [video]
MHFM: Consider two things: 1) If she
hadn’t been caught by the hidden camera, people would probably have never
known; 2) They didn’t even decide to charge her with a crime, but just let her
go! What an outrage.
Always
Israeli Minister: "We always use the Anti-Semitism trick
or bring up the Holocaust" [video]
Indifferentism
Subject: Indifferentism
Lee Ann’s comments on Jamie Worn are right
on. I like her comparison to thievery. But Worn is accurately
reflecting the teaching of the Novus Ordo religion. I was at dinner a
couple of months ago with an old friend, the best man at my wedding 25 years
ago, and our wives. These are “good” people by modern standards, who
wouldn’t dream of missing the Novus Ordo Mass on Sunday, have several children
in their schools, and have “conservative” (again by modern standards) views.
Yet in discussing religion, after I had
laid out an overview of the problems with Vatican II, the new mass, and the
invalid priesthood, my friend’s wife says “in the end I don’t think Jesus
is going to care what church you went to”. I asked her if ever she
were to commit a mortal sin did she think she’d have to seek absolution from a
priest. The answer was yes. So I followed up with: “well what about
the protestant, or say even a Jew?” “How are they restored to
Grace? Indeed what if one isn’t even baptized, you baptized your children
didn’t you? “
Blank stares, and my “friend” was
silent. It is the same all of the time. You don’t have to be
a trained philosopher to see the contradiction, but it is like they can’t even
think. So unfortunately Jamie Worn is a typical Novus Ordite.
Atheists are probably more honest, they don’t pretend to believe something they
don’t.
Bill Mulligan
Dylan
Subject: Dylan Part 2 of Mess
Dear Brothers, I explained my history with
rock n roll earlier.
When I saw the Dylan clip I thought of Led Zeplin
who obviously sold their souls to the devil and they admit it. Their music was
unbelievable. It was amazing when you
first heard a new album. I remember thinking, how could any human think this
stuff up? Tonight I looked at the lyrics of the most popular song ever
"Stairway to Heaven". I'm sure you have checked these lyrics but
tonight I almost cried as the hair went up on my arms. Could it be the devil
wrote a song about his greatest adversary? Think of the untold millions of
horrible sins committed during the playing of that song. While pulling millions
of souls straight to hell with sweet sounds, he seems to have acknowledged her
greatness.
Hasn't it been written that Mary is the
stairway to heaven? Is she not the
"May Queen"... "A Lady we all know who shines White
Light"...
Ave Maria!
Matthew
MHFM: The satanic lyrics in the song
you mention are exposed in our video, Abortion,
Rock Music and Freemasonry Exposed.
Theology of Body
Hi
Have you touched on JP2's extensive
writings of theology of the body? My aunt sent me a link to the Theology
of the Body. It is described as a
theological timebomb yet to go off in the church.
George Weigel, author of Witness to Hope:
The Biography of Pope John Paul II, calls this papal study of human sexuality
“one of the boldest reconfigurations of Catholic theology in centuries” – a
“theological time-bomb set to go off with dramatic consequences ...perhaps in
the twenty-first century.” At this point the Pope’s vision of sexual love “has
barely begun to shape the Church’s theology, preaching, and religious
education.” But when it does, Weigel predicts, “it will compel a dramatic
development of thinking about virtually every major theme in the Creed” (pp.
336, 343, 853).
I would be interested in your comments on
his extensive writings on this subject that is considered a timebomb yet to go
off. Please keep up the
great work. I watch all your videos. Your zeal for the truth is so
needed.
Kathleen
MHFM: Thank you for the e-mail. Perhaps we will have some more comments on it
at some point, but we feel the evil and perversion behind it are
self-evident.
Admitting
Subject:
Bob Dylan admitting to pact with the Devil
Dear
Brothers,
Here
is a video clip from the show 60 Minutes where Bob Dylan, being interviewed,
blatantly admitting he made a pact with the devil. Thought you'd find it
interesting.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqvvOD4bdRs
Keep
up the good work.
Alp…
MHFM: That’s very interesting. Thank you.
John Paul II invited Bob Dylan to perform at one of his events.
Agree
Hello all,
I have just returned to roman Catholicism
after many years away, I have discovered your website and would tend to agree
that there is something missing, I live in (Glasgow) Scotland...
Your brother in Jesus
Arthur jennings.
Reading
Dear Brothers:
In reading the comments sent to you by
Jamie Worn, I was reminded once again that liberalism is darkness trying to
pass itself off as light, and that the liberal is always a thief -- giving away
what is not his to give.
The false V-2 religion is the "religion
of luv" whose only virtue is "being nice"; its
adherents enjoy basking in the glow of their own imagined goodness
and generosity. But, despising Truth, they love only
themselves. These thieves attempt to rob God of His right
to be God; they deny Christ's instruction to believe all things that
He has taught; and they rob their hapless victims of eternal life by
destroying faith -- and hope. Always speaking of love, kindness and
charity, they are the very antithesis of charity. It never dawns on these
people that it's not "nice" to lead others to hell.
I believe it was Pope Pius IX who said
the liberal Catholic was the worst enemy of the Church. Who can doubt it?
Thanks for all you do,
Lee Ann
Cement
Dear
Brother Michael and Peter Dimond,
The comment from the N.O. heretic regarding the atheist Christopher Hitchens,
helps to cement and reinforce the fact that the N.O. crowd are likened to
people on a rudderless boat in their sea of confusion and blindness - just
fancy saying that an atheist should be allowed to 'tell his "truth"
as he sees it' - whereby acknowledging that truth is relative, and in this case
the LIE has now become the TRUTH !
That is all Satanic, and that such tripe comes mindlessly out of the mouths of
these N.O. ( Nervous order ) people, who have no firm or secure beliefs...is
not surprising, and I would guarantee that would be the response of most of
them. About 3 years ago, I did a random survey,which was not
specifically aimed at Catholics, but did include a small number of them - on
their understanding and acceptance of the Catholic Church's position on
E.E.N.S. Of course, most of the non - Catholics were unaware of any
such teaching, BUT the half a dozen or so of people claiming to be Catholic, I
questioned, ABSOLUTELY denied the doctrine that OUTSIDE THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
THERE IS NO SALVATION!
If you are happy to swim in this N.O. muck, when the signs are everywhere
- then God will abandon you.
This is no time for the lukewarm - and that is what they are, and so God aptly
rewards them accordingly...
- rubbish in - rubbish out!
God bless,
David
“Correction”
Subject: Correction
[To Most Holy Family Monastery]
There are those in Catholicism who say that
love and kindness will overcome anything. This Catholic however has some Old
Testament in him too, that says love and kindness have known boundaries.
There is no other way to speak to people
like you than the following way:
Re:
http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/christian_brotherhood.html
Peter when Jesus returns he will not be
pre-occupied with the finer ecclesiastical divisions regarding Reformation and
Catholicism, he will be pre-occupied in severely punishing ridiculous little
men who make themselves believe these issues are more important than just preaching
the good news, just tending to the sick and poor, just humbly turning the other
cheek, just worshipping Him with contrition and just carrying His cross. This
issue is for Jesus to resolve, not you. If both sides are basically
acknowledging the Creeds, the rest is just hatred.
You are the true enemy of the church.
Jamie Worn
MHFM: You obviously claim to be
Catholic and to believe in St. Peter’s authority. Yet, you say that the “ecclesiastical
divisions” are of no consequence. You also
argue that it’s outrageous to have a problem with Benedict XVI’s outrageous
heresy: that Protestantism is NOT HERESY.
You are truly an astounding apostate who doesn’t believe one bit in
Catholic teaching. If you understood or
believed in anything the Church teaches, you would realize that what you hold
has been condemned by many popes. To
reject the Papacy, or any dogma of the Church, is to put oneself outside the
unity of Christ and in a state of damnation.
What you argue is also condemned by Christ; He says that one must “hear
the Church” (Mt. 18:17). Yet, you argue
that this of no consequence.
What’s so astounding is not that you are such a faithless
heretic – for there’s a multitude of them out there – but rather that you
simultaneously seem to think you are a devoted Catholic. We suppose it’s part of the unique blindness
of this age: the most unbelieving apostates contend that they are the most
faithful believers.
Pope Leo XIII, Satis Cognitum (# 9),
June 29, 1896: "The Church, founded on these principles and mindful of her
office, has done nothing with greater zeal and endeavor than she has displayed
in guarding the integrity of the faith. Hence she regarded as rebels and
expelled from the ranks of her children all who held beliefs on any point of
doctrine different from her own. The Arians, the Montanists, the Novatians,
the Quartodecimans, the Eutychians, did not certainly reject all Catholic
doctrine: they abandoned only a certain portion of it. Still who does not know
that they were declared heretics and banished from the bosom of the Church? In
like manner were condemned all authors of heretical tenets who followed them in
subsequent ages."
Private Revelation
Subject:
Private Revelation
Dear
Brothers Michael and Peter,
Ave
Maria!
I
would like to comment on Ed’s email on his reading Ven. Anne Catherine Emmerich
visions of Purgatory that mentions presence of PROTESTANTS … If I may add, the
book also mentions JEWS as saved in Purgatory … I agree 100% with you Brothers
on your opinion of her visions … I too had same conclusions since the book
mentions that she simply dictated her visions and the messages were therefore
transcribed by the trusted soul … she may have had the correct visions from God
but when the messages were being written down there must have been mistakes
hence, the wrong written messages (regardless if the
original messages were true as granted ) must be treated as heretical as
written … and again should the messages really sound heretical –
there’s no other way to treat them but as coming from the Devil! ….. innocent
(or ignorant) souls who are not familiar with basic traditional catholic
catechism [much more with finer points] will definitely be led astray in
their beliefs reading her book … so how would one know if he can read a
revelation book (from approved sources)?? … You should answer a few
qualifying questions e.g. Do you believe in baptism of desire or blood? Do you
consider the Vatican II church as the Catholic Church? Do you believe the V2 “popes”
to be true popes? Do you believe in the New Mass? Do you believe that
Transubstantiation is effected in the New Mass? Do you consider the New Rite of
Ordination valid? Can souls who die as non-Catholics be saved? Can
non-Catholics be saved without the Catholic Faith? Do you consider Fr. Leonard
Feeney's invalid "excommunication" valid? Do you not believe in the
error (in good faith) of Fr. Feeney on Justification issues? Are sacraments
performed by heretics and wicked men invalid though they do as the Church does?
Do you consider the Catholic Church can restore to its former beauty and
resurrect itself in the future? Do you consider the Catholic Church to have
erred in any part of the history of the Catholic Church? Do you believe that
some of the canonized Catholic Saints are possible to be heretics and are not
in Heaven? Do you consider he Holy Scripture errs in some ways? Do you believe
in the separation of Church and State? … just to name a few of significant
Catholic beliefs … should your answer be YES to any
of these questions then YOU ARE IN NO WAY QUALIFIED to
read books that depict private revelation regardless if the said apparition is
approved by pre-Vatican II Church authorities or not …. Should you do
otherwise, not only you are putting your faith to peril but you are also
wanting in humility … lacking in faith.
If your answer is yes, you don’t know your Catholic Faith, you don’t
know how to read the "Mind of the Church", much more will you
comprehend and know your God … pray hard and do some penance to align your
orthodoxy to the correct one and yet still - do not read books of private
revelations.
Of
course no private revelations in the post Vatican II counter church is real …
we don’t need a genius to decipher their lies; a single heresy is enough
to consider the entire revelation as coming from Hell … but how would
you detect a heresy when you don't know your Faith? … study your faith very
hard, pray the 15 decades of the rosary daily and always start and end your
spiritual readings with prayers and Hail Mary's … and yet you still should
not be reading private revelation books … these Catholics who insist
reading these books are putting their faith in peril... in view of the
inconsistencies and some heretical accounts no one should endorse her book nor
recommend it …
The
Mother Church teaches us that God's Public Revelation to man ended with the
death of the last apostle … hence all revelations are labeled private
regardless of the urgency and significance of the messages (Lourdes, Fatima
etc) … because belief in Church approved private revelations IS NOT
necessary for salvation.
Approved private revelations (e.g. Lourdes, Fatima, Carmel) are sent to
us by God to show mankind of the Infinite Mercy God has on a human soul … He is
never content with His Passion, Death and Resurrection but has sent His Mother
from time to time on earth to warn us, guide us, strengthen us and save us from
the tyranny of the Devil while false apparitions would definitely do exactly
the opposite. You nailed your argument
by saying: "That’s why Catholics
(real Catholics) don’t go by visions, but by Catholic dogma."
May
the good Lord and Our Lady continue to bless MHFM!!!
In
Crucified Christ and Immaculate Mary,
Joey from the Philippines
Atheist
Christopher Hitchens has cancer of the
oesophagus
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2010/jul/01/christopher-hitchens-cancer
'''Christopher Hitchens, the iconoclastic
writer, is to undergo chemotherapy after being diagnosed with cancer of the oesophagus...I
regret having had to cancel so many engagements at such short
notice...Hitchens, 61, and a renowned heavy smoker until giving up several
years ago, made the announcement after cutting short a US tour promoting his
latest book, Hitch 22...In his 2008 book God Is Not Great, Hitchens put himself
on a collision course with major religions with his trenchant atheist
views...''
If
one scrolls down to the comments section of that same page there is one Novus
ordo ''gem'' : from alltalk--'''As a practising Catholic, very much on the
other side of the fence from Mr Hitchens, I wish him a complete and speedy
recovery and may he soon return to telling the truth as he sees it.'''
One should of course hope and pray for his
conversion to the One True Catholic Faith no matter how impossible that may
seem.
V. from Croatia
MHFM:
That’s a very interesting comment from the Novus Ordo heretic.
French Revolution
Dear
Brothers,
That
is an extremely powerful video exposing the demonic and Antichrist French
Revolution… The outlawing of Christianity there during that period reminds me
of the outlawing of Christmas in Schismatical England around 1650. The
Freemasons and Illuminati were certainly given temporal power to bring about
the overthrow of Catholic France. Their catch-cry,
"Liberty, Fraternity, Equality," has become a world-wide (false)
dogma today as we see homosexuals made "equal" to heterosexuals,
and abortion abattoirs more common than McDonalds!!! It is the replacement
of Almighty God with puny man - Antichrist - and the design is the same today
as it was in 1789 - revolution by blood. Of course, the Vatican II sect
either says nothing or actually promotes the New World Murder. The schismatical
oath imposed by King Louis XVI seems to parallel the abolition of the oath
against modernism by Antipope Paul VI. The V-2 Antipopes would probably call
the revolutionaries who died, "martyrs for the progress of humanity,"
by applying the heresy of baptism of blood. Today, the Freemasons have arrested
control of all available vehicles of information (T.V., radio, newspaper, etc.)
and then flood the public with naturalistic propaganda to deliberately create
chaos or anarchy - "liberty." Then they persecute those who
don't go along with their lies - "fraternity." Finally they
impose unjust laws to destroy the family and by consequence all of society
- "equality." The French Revolution was a genocide of France,
and if the New World Ordites get their way, it will be a global genocide…
It proves how essential it is to have an active Catholic faith by spreading and
defending it, staying out of mortal sin and in the state of grace, a strong
devotion to Mary, the Rosary and spiritual reading… Otherwise, when the tipping
point comes, we'll find ourselves too weak and cowardly to save our
souls, and lose God forever, like the pathetic coward and schismatic King Louis
XVI!!! May Jesus and Mary help all Catholics to remain in the state of grace at
all times.
I
listened to your debate/conversation with the radical schismatic,
heretic, and liar, Aaron, on the issues of Baptism, Heresy and
Schism (Part 1 - Part 2). His unwillingness to
accept the clear truths of the Catholic faith is incredible and outrageous! The
radical schismatics' position is Antichrist because they put the Papacy
(occupied by man) in the place of God by saying that the essential
mysteries which must be positively known in
order to be Catholic (along with being water baptized), are not only
the Trinity and the Incarnation, but also the Papacy. The Church doesn't teach
that, as Bro. Peter kept pointing out. Due to the schismatic's pride, they are
tools of the devil, and so fall into an idolatry of the
Papacy, because the essential mysteries which must be known and believed
in order to be Catholic and saved pertain to God only (Trinity and
Incarnation), not to man (Papacy). Obviously their error and schism is another
manifestation of the spirit of Antichrist - even though they reject Antichrist
Antipope John Paul II, for instance, they put a pope in the place of God by
basically declaring (falsely) that a pope must be known in order to be
saved. His heresy is manifested by his misunderstanding of
the term "subject to the Roman Pontiff," because baptism automatically makes a person subject to the Roman Pontiff, whether
they are an infant or an adult, but the radical schismatics think
that subjection to the Roman Pontiff is a separate action (especially
of the will) to being baptized. For example, a person who becomes an
American citizen, when they do so, i.e. they complete the procedure required
(the parallel to baptism), then they are automatically made subject to
the President of the U.S. - the person chooses to be subject to the
President by becoming a citizen of the U.S. - the subjection to the President
and the becoming a U.S. citizen are one and the same action, not two distinct
actions. However the radical schismatics appear to think that a person subjects
himself to the pope by a separate and conscious act (a choice) of
submission to, i.e. subjection to, the pope, before, during or after
baptism - but the Church teaches that baptism automatically subjects the person
to the Pope at the very moment of baptism, not by the
individual's choice at any time. It is no coincidence that the word heresy
is derived from the word "to choose," and that it is the heretical
and radical schismatics who think that subjection to the Roman Pontiff is a
matter of choice and not a matter of water baptism. Aaron's
position appears to be an inversed version of baptism of
desire because he separates water baptism from membership in the Church
(i.e. subjection to the Roman Pontiff), by making a distinction between baptism
and subjection to the Pope, when there is none. On all other matters aside from
the Trinity and the Incarnation, obstinacy is necessary for a baptized person
to become a heretic. Aaron was (and presumably still is) obstinate and is
therefore a heretic. Well done… for exposing his lies, hypocrisy and heresies…
God
Bless,
Chris
White
Convinced
Dear Brothers Dimond:
Thank you for the work you are doing on a
daily basis...
As a result of the videos, audios and
articles, I am convinced that Catholicism holds the answers to all my questions,
and that it is the true faith - I wish to convert.
I was already aware of the Masonic
influence on our culture and government… I grew up in Mexico. However, my
parents were foreigners, and thus I was baptized Methodist. But I grew up among
Catholics and I always longed to know more about it but I always felt somehow
left out, that there was nothing I could do. Now, at 44, I am finally
understanding better. I was under the impression that protestants believed in
faith and works, and that catholics did not!! No wonder I have not
sought to convert until now. I now know I was sadly mistaken but I rejoice
that I have learned about this during my lifetime, and to the benefit of my
children, whom I would like to baptize in the faith as well…
I look forward to answers to
my questions, and again, thank you for finally explaining to me personally
the difference between Catholicism and Protestantism. I see your points so
clearly, and they can be summed up as the workship of man vs. the worship of
God…
Sincerely,
Jeanne-Marie Johnson Bryan
Talk
Subject: French Revolution…
Dear Brothers,
Thank you for your Video!... We have had a
lot of talk about the origin and meaning of the Statue of Liberty, especially
since Rush explained it last week. But, of course, Rush did not get to
the Real Masonic meaning of it either, but was better than Glenn Beck and
others trying to make it into the Statue of Immigration. There is an urge
to Bull Doze it after reading the Masonic meaning, but as Catholics, aren't we
suppose to take the good and discount the bad as our fore fathers had to do
going into Roman society? I passed your Video on to friends as a
wake up...
Thanks again for all you do,
Carol D.
France
Dear Most Holy Family Monastery:
Most Holy Family Monastery is… casting
light into the darkness, illuminating evil and dispelling it, helping others
see the narrow path more clearly…
So glad you are continuing with the videos
and so apropos for the 4th of July to discuss France. When that young
fellow of 24 wrote you to say he never heard of V2, you are absolutely correct
about continuing to post historical discussions from the Catholic point of
view; which is the truth! People are very poorly educated today and
unless a parent tells their child important knowledge, Catholic history is
forgotten within one generation.
Monsieur Descartes had a pivotal role in
laying the foundation for the Reign of Terror. Because his, "Je
pense donc je suis," (cogito ergo sum) really means: I think therefore
I AM. Very clever use of the first person I AM, which is God's
Name. Rene was saying he was God, "I am God because I
think." It is a very easy matter to show that Rene Descartes
was not thinking, though he thought he was! (I am avoiding the obvious
comparison of Descartes to Galileo Galilei who also wrote in the vernacular.)…
Please continue with these marvelous
videos; they are informative and thought-provoking.
Ad Jesum per Mariam,
Deidre Howard
Comment
Dear
Brothers:
I
was so delighted to read Mike's rave reviews on your book Absolutely No
Salvation; this book could very well be the most important book
I've ever read. As I had not previously known this dogma (having been
taught just the opposite), by the time I finished reading the book I felt as
though I had been shot from a cannon. It was shocking for me to
learn this dogma. Every day for about a week I said to myself:
If this is what the Church teaches, then I must and will believe it -
and I prayed for help. (That's when I started the three Rosaries each
day.) It was almost like having a St. Paul conversion - although mine
wasn't immediate but took about a week. It's not possible for me to tell
you how grateful I am for this book.
… I
would like to second Mike's recommendation that this book is must
reading for everyone.
Thanks,
too, for the video on the French Revolution. Real food for thought
amidst all the sounds of fireworks.
With
gratitude,
Lee
Ann
Latest
Subject: Great
French Revolution video
Thank you for all
of the wonderful videos you have been posting...they are not only very
educational, but they do so much for my morale and perseverance.
The latest video on the French Revolution was very good - it relates so much to
the times we are living in right now. I think that demonic is a perfect
adjective for the French Revolution. (I was taught that King Louis XIV
and XVI were very good Catholic Kings).
May God reward you for your diligence,
Teri Thurman
Dogma
Hello Brother Peter:
I am again reading your book "Outside
the Catholic Church there is Absolutely No Salvation". It is true that
upon second and third readings, etc., one gleans more and more from a
particular work. I must say that this document is amazing, truly. I have read
hundreds of books, studied philosophy and Theology, and have written a great
deal as well. The scope of this book is not only good - comprehensive, but that
it propounds the absolute truth of Our Lord Jesus Christ on this issue, it has
an air of true blessedness to it (as sure Dogmas always do). It may well be the
very best manuscript I have ever read on any topic. This is the work
that every single true Catholic needs to read and learn. Even if one
believes the Dogma on the face of it, to read and learn this book is greatly
edifying. One cannot be a "traditional Catholic" and not believe
and assent to the truth contained in this book. The Novus Ordos
should, of course, read this work as well. Just the first few pages -
containing the Magisterial Declarations of the Dogma - prove how absolutely,
utterly dishonest any man is who even questions the Dogma. I have read all your
books and listened to all of your debates, and it is my personal conclusion
that this particular book is probably the single most important of all. Sad to say
(and this is true for likely the majority of Novus Ordos) that most of the
Novus Ordo laypeople have never, ever heard the truth on this matter
(Nevertheless, they should be at the very least questioning the crass
relativism of the Novus Ordo - but they don't care at all!), but have been
brainwashed by the anti-christ antipopes and their "bishops".
(The Vatican II "bishops" and "priests" are purely
vile and wicked through and through) What good popes we have
had in defining this Dogma in past centuries. This is the gospel of Our Lord
Jesus Christ, pure and simple. Good work and many thanks.
-Always, Mike
Book
Hi
Brothers,
I'm reading the book, Preparation for Death the abridgement, what a book it
helps a lot.
Todd
MHFM: It’s a tremendous book.
Faith
Dear Bros.,
Often lately, I have been searching for the
examples of orthodox christians that claim to hold catholic tradition… Knowing
that the issue here regards the highest intellectual pursuit of truth, via, the
Catholic Faith, one must wonder why these groups seem not to be so objective in
their concept of tradition and truth. That being said, the visual and practical
evidence of change, circa 1970, but more accurately 1958, now with hindsight,
should awaken any honest man to the dire circumstances we face as catholics
today.
Most members I have come across in these
groups seem to, "make people feel good, without these people actually
being very good". The money people who work at anti-catholic jobs are favored
amongst the priests without any rebuke or correction of employment. Still,
nothing is really done or accomplished at all. The only thing foremost in their
minds is
going to the latin mass. What about The
Faith that leads to the mass? In all truth and honesty, it should and must, be
the Mass of St. Pius V.!!!
St. Paul tells us that the household of the
faith is the priority!!! Then, our faithless neighbors!!! Why are some groups
so concerned about their neighbor before their own flock? BOD is a non issue!
i.e.nonsense…
The time is near when we all might just
resemble holy Job. Who in this material world will be blessing God when their
worldly "paradise" is lost in an instant?
Bros., it is a shame that you are having to
do what you do seemingly, almost alone!!! But I am thankful for your
charity!... I thank you for your catholic frankness!...
Sincerely, J R
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. Even though the salvation dogma deniers might
pretend to have a concern for their fellow man, they don’t. By rejecting what God has said about
salvation, they run from the truth concerning their neighbor. Without the true knowledge of how to assist
their neighbor, which only comes with belief in the dogmas of faith, they
cannot possess true charity. As a result,
they wind up hating their neighbor either by lying to him or by failing to work
for his salvation in the way that a person with the true faith would.
Pope Pius XI, Mortalium Animos (#9), Jan. 6, 1928: “…
the foundation of charity is faith pure and inviolate…”
Hebrews 11:6-
“Without Faith it is impossible to please God.”
Video
MHFM:
This is a brief video discussion of Benedict XVI’s recent heresies:
On Benedict XVI’s recent heresies,
June 2010 [video]
Connection
“My people are
destroyed from the lack of knowledge. Because you have rejected knowledge, I
also reject you as my priests; because you have ignored the law of God…” – Hosea 4:5-6
Hmmm. I wonder if there is a connection in
this verse to the scores of invalid priests of the end times we're living in.
Alpha…
Heretics
Dear brothers in Christ,
I've listened to first 30 minutes of the
debate "Is Benedict XVI the Pope?", and all I can say is that I
feel tormented by the legion of demons coming out of the mouth of your
opponent. Of course I deserve all the torment befalling me, so much so I can
experience infinite God's Mercy in being able to stop that for some time.
You've pointed out to him numerous times that a heretic is not a member of the
Church, that believing otherwise is equal to deny the Unity of the Faith etc.,
and what was his answer? As is usual with the heretics, he spews out a bunch of
contradictions; he is pathetically trying to get away with the apostasy of
V2-antipopes by saying that some translations are incorrect, that those
antichrists were not aware what they were doing, etc. etc. Of course, your opponent, being a heretic himself,
is not trying to meditate upon a simple question: Should I follow a man who is
constantly not aware what he is doing, who constantly on an hourly (not daily)
basis blasphemes Our Lord Jesus Christ? What about the words of Our Lord Jesus
Christs, and Teachings of the Church:
Matthew 15:14- Let them alone: they are blind, and leaders of the blind. And if
the blind lead the blind, both will fall into the pit?
No, these words, and all the infallible
words of all true popes mean nothing to the obstinate heretics and apostates.
They are constantly mumbling the phrases whose sole meaning is "true is
false, false is true". They are denying even the possibility of the
existence of good and evil, "yes" and "no", true and false,
faithful and unfaithful, etc.
Dearest and Most Holy Mother of God, thank you for your protection of True
Faith amongst the remnant of True Catholics.
Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia
Regarding
Hello: I came across a few of your videos
regarding the end of times and your websites articles regarding the Catholic
church. I have been a Catholic all my adult life, mind you not a very
practicing one but I was baptized in the Catholic church. Are you or the people
on your website saying that the Catholic church as I knew it does not exist
anymore? I have not had a chance to listen to all of your videos and tapes on
the subject yet, but I did want to ask you the question before I go any
further. It would not surprise me if this was the case with all the bad things
that have been going on with the church. If this is true, who are you and your
website? Where does a Catholic like myself go to worship?
Thank you,
Deric
MHFM: Thanks for the interest. No, we are not saying that the Catholic
Church doesn’t exist. It still exists,
but in a remnant of traditional Catholics.
We are pointing out and proving, from Catholic teaching, that the
mainstream “Catholic Church” (the organization under Benedict XVI) is not the
Catholic Church, but a false Counter Church.
This situation was predicted to occur in Catholic prophecy, and the fact
that we are in it is proven by the teaching of the past popes. The Church teaches that heretics cannot be
valid office holders in the Church, and we can demonstrate that the men who
brought in all of these changes were heretics and thus antipopes. We hope you continue to look at the
information, and especially our DVD on the Third Secret of Fatima. It really explains a lot to those who are
new. It’s also crucial to pray the Rosary
each day. Once a person is in full
agreement, we can help him or her with where to receive sacraments. One must never go to the New Mass, of course.
The Great Apostasy and a
Counterfeit Church predicted in the New Testament and in Catholic Prophecy
The Catholic Teaching that a heretic cannot be a valid pope [PDF file]
Re-Christianize
Hello
Brothers
I've just came across this information on the Vatican, and I'm not sure if
you've seen it yet. Benedict XVI will be attempting to rechristianize Europe
apparently.
http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/pope-creates-office-to-promote-a-renewed-evangelisation-in-europe-123755.html
Another thing that caught my attention was when my mother was attending a
novena, the Priest there revealed that prayers in the mass would be changing,
and that it was ordered by Rome. Have you heard anything about this?
Sincerely, Neil
MHFM: Yes, that’s the kind of stuff he
says frequently, as he simultaneously spreads complete religious indifferentism
and apostasy. A few bland words with no
practical effect, as he cuts the heart of the Gospel out from Europe by
promoting false religions and non-Catholic sects. They have spoken for years about “correcting”
egregious abuses and mistranslations in the New Mass. It’s almost always a lot of talk without
almost any practical effect. They win in
the media, while nothing really changes.
And even if they did correct certain things, it would not matter because
the entire “Mass” itself is invalid and non-Catholic. Hence, the effort is a sideshow, a
distraction, and a deception for those gullible enough to obstinately believe
that there is genuine Catholicism in the Vatican II sect.
When
MHFM,
Yes, of course, I also am sure that the
Church cannot break, I expressed myself wrongly, what I meant to say
was: "JPII had perhaps the intention to break the Church.
I have since a longtime a question that bothers
me a lot: When I still went to the Novus Ordo Mass, I had a Trentain said for a
very close family member. The thirty Masses were said in Latin, but it were
Paul 6 masses in latin (with the canon that resembles the most to the Pius V
Mass) Now, do you think this Trentain has been absolute useless?
I would appreciate your opinion,
C.Christiaanse
MHFM: The deliberate removal of
“mysterium fidei,” from the consecration form of Paul VI’s Latin version of the
New Mass, causes a grave doubt. It
cannot be considered valid. For that
reason, those Masses cannot be considered to have been effective.
Presbyterian Wedding
Subject: Presbyterian Wedding
Dear MHFM,
My cousin recently got engaged to a
Presbyterian. Unfortunately he and his fiance are going to have the
wedding at a Presbyterian church. He has asked me to be in the wedding,
but i would never walk in a not Catholic… building for a mass, let alone a
wedding!!
My cousin and i are only two weeks apart in
age and have done almost everything together since birth. I know what the
answer your going to give me...but my real question is how can i talk him out
of getting married at a Presbo church.
This decision will make a pretty big
impact on my family and friends but since i have starting praying the rosary
and reading the bible, i am petrified to commit a MORTAL sin again. I have been
working EXTREMELY hard in staying on the right course and this will only make
satan smile.
With this being said, he is also going to
get a Vatican II priest to preside in the mass which I thought was ridiculous
to begin with. I know you are extremely
busy and i don’t know how you do everything you do, but if you have an
answer for me please lt me know.
Thank You and God Bless You,
Joe
MHFM: First, a Catholic may not attend such a wedding – not the
service, and not the reception. There
are many reasons for this. The most
obvious is that your cousin is not a Catholic, even though it sounds like he
claims to be. Second, even if he were getting
married in a traditional Catholic setting, you still couldn’t attend. That’s because he’s obviously a heretic. That’s demonstrated by his willingness to be
married in a non-Catholic church. Third,
since we assume he claims to be Catholic, he can’t even marry the
Presbyterian. Mixed marriages are
normally forbidden, and they were only allowed in exceptional circumstances
with a dispensation and agreement that the children would be raised Catholic. The marriage would also have to observe a
Catholic form, and not be done in a Protestant church. As you can see, a “marriage” to her in a
Presbyterian church won’t even be valid.
For these reasons, this whole “marriage” is fraught with problems that
touch upon a denial of the true faith.
You shouldn’t tell him that he shouldn’t get married at a
Presbyterian church. Rather, you should
charitably inform him that he’s not a Catholic and shouldn’t be marrying this
woman at all. It would be a sin to
attend, or to send him a gift, a card or anything. Of course, this response will be criticized
by those who don’t care about the faith; but it will be completely understood
by those who do.
Can one passively attend non-Catholic
funerals, weddings? No.
Fourth Mystery
MHFM,
By praying the whole Rosary, one says 153
times "Ave Maria", number which represents the Church (The miraculous
fishing , so adding a "Fourth" mystery really makes no sense.
(St.John Ch. 21-11 Simon Peter went up, and drew the net to land,
full of great fishes, one hundred and fifty-three. And although there were so
many, the net was not broken.) Perhaps the "Fourth mystery
"breaks the the net??!! which is the Church.
En union de prières,
C.Christiaanse
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. It attempts to break it, but cannot
completely succeed, as the Church exists in a remnant.
Cartoon
Subject: Cartoon
Some company is producing a new cartoon
called Neighbors from Hell, in which an oil company invented a drill so
powerful it will penetrate into the depths of hell, thus exposing it to
people. Thus, the devil send demons to live in suburbia, work for the
company, and sabotage the drill. The
cartoon is profane in the extreme, and a few years ago would have received an X
rating. Ironic it went on the air just
after the drill disaster down south.
Karl
Vatican II
I appreciate your channel and the good work
you do. I'm a 24 year old roman catholic born and raised and i never even heard
of Vatican 2 so this is very interesting stuff!. God bless you.
Frank…
Most will not
Brother Michael: Your web site states that
most of us "Catholics" will not obtain eternal life ( Heaven). It is
frightening to consider that both of my parents, wife, relatives, etc. will
suffer eternal damnation. I am seventy two years old and have lost all of the
above, not counting many acquaintances. Most of the above people I spoke of,
were nominal Catholics and some never went to Mass, never mind confession or received
the sacraments. Even the most pious person would have this "sword"
hanging over there head. As a man of my age we get set in our ways and can not
see our own faults and I know I have many. Could you offer some insight into
this dilemma…
John
MHFM: Well, Scripture and Tradition
teach us that few are saved: Few are Saved- Most Adult Catholics are damned. Just look at the Old
Testament; look at how many of God’s people fell into idolatry, betrayed Him
and denied Him repeatedly. Consider even
the more Catholic ages of the Church.
King Louis XIV is just one example we discussed recently. Most of the Catholics at that time didn’t
have the attitude, the honesty, the intention or the interest that’s necessary
to be saved. If they held a public
position, again and again they fell into working against the Church if their
interests dictated it; those of other states of life did not engage their faith
actively, but were Catholics primarily in name or only when they showed up at
church.
It’s not that it’s that difficult to
be saved. It’s that most people, in
every age, don’t have the interior honesty, the interest or the detachment from
creatures to follow God. To have more
security, make sure you are free from any taint of heresy; and that you are
praying the full Rosary each day, doing spiritual reading, and engaging your
faith. This is demonstrated by a strong
prayer life, learning more about God and your faith and – this is crucial –
working to spread the true faith and convert others in the way that you
can. That demonstrates an active
faith. A truly pious person will not be
damned; however, false piety is frequently mistaken for true piety.
Comment
Dear Brothers Michael and Peter,
Good day, the two of you are to be
commended for the outstanding research and your persistent effort in spreading
the true faith of Holy Mother Church, many thanks on behalf of all your readers.
I've been searching around the internet a bit and following the oil spill
disaster in the gulf, a friend sent a link to me and I found one myself as well
I'm sending them to the two of you and would like to know your opinion on them
if you can find the time to view and listen to them. We all hear many
different scenarios as to what is truly happening in the gulf through main
stream media, so without a doubt none outside of the ones in charge
specifically the US government and BP really knows the truth...Jesus,
Mary, Joseph, please pray for us...
Doyle Maser
B-16
I am sorry but I have one more comment to
make about the excellent recent heresies of B16 update you just posted:
the words coming our of this chief heresiarch's mouth and indeed ALL the
V2 worst-nightmare-scenario mouths are SO SPIRITUALLY TOXIC SO LETHAL SO
DEADLY----it is literally so physically nauseating as to be way beyond words
but I may have to spend a lot of time puking today--------and the seemingly
endless pit of oil/benzene/toxic fumes now spilling out of the Gulf of
Mexico just seems to mirror or reflect this V2 deadly spiritual
apostasy----------it never ends, it will never end, until God puts
all these into the pits of hell!!--------may He come soon with His holy
Angels! Oh Mary Mother of God pray for us!
A.
“Life”
Subject: “Life”
Dear Brothers:
A question has been bothering me for some
time and I wondered if you had some thoughts on it: Jesus said, "Unless
you eat My Flesh and drink My Blood, you will NOT have life in you. If
you eat My Flesh and drink My Blood you WILL have life, and I will RAISE YOU UP
on the Last Day." In these dangerous times when one can hardly, if
not at all find a validly ordained priest or a true Mass, how is one supposed
to obey this? Also, does this not mean that, in order to be fair to the
"elect" Jesus MUST return almost immediately, or no one will have
"life"? Is this what He meant when He said, "For the sake
of the elect, the days will be shortened?" I believe it is also
mentioned in the scriptures that, "Unless those days are shortened,
no one will be saved." What happens if we cannot receive
"life"? Will those of us who have made a choice to follow Him
in truth be able to be raised up on the Last Day? Does this mean we are
not actually a part of the "elect" if the Lord does not provide an
opportunity to receive the Blessed Sacrament? I would very much
appreciate your thoughts on this…
In Christ,
Perry
MHFM: At various times we’ve discussed how the necessity of the
Eucharist is different from the necessity of water baptism. The necessity of water baptism is absolute,
for every man, and without exception.
The necessity of the Eucharist is for those who hear the command and can
fulfill it. It’s obviously a very
serious necessity, but there can be exceptions.
In addition to the teaching of the Church, that’s demonstrated by the
language of the two key biblical passages (John 3:5 and John 6:54).
If one absolutely cannot receive the Eucharist, then he could be
saved without it, if he maintains the true faith and the state of grace,
although presumably it would be more difficult.
Nevertheless, Jesus says that one must receive Him to have life. That’s serious. That’s why we’ve been of the opinion that if
there is a priest who might constitute an acceptable option, we believe one may
go, especially in this crisis where essentially every priest is heretical in
some way. That’s as long as one doesn’t
agree with or support the priest or his heretical positions. The priest would also have to fall within certain guidelines, as our file
on that covers. Yet, many today have
nowhere to go because all the options are priests who should not be approached, either because they
are notorious or imposing heretics or they are of questionable validity. In those cases, people could be saved if they
have the true faith, a strong prayer life and devotion to Our Lady, and if they
maintain the state of grace. However, we
do believe that there should be options for confession for almost everyone, as
the aforementioned file covers.
Luminous Mysteries, 666
Subject: 666 concerning the so-called
Luminous Mysteries
About the new set JP2 created, there are
some interesting considerations to be made.
1-Bugnini tried to do a similar thing while
under Paul VI. Even AntiPope Montini considered it too radical of a change and
said it was to remain untouched; It took decades of satanic innovations,
liturgical vandalisms and all kinds of aberrations in order for the V-2 sect to
feel sure enough that people, now accustomed to changes and the notion that
nothing is free of reform, would gladly embrace the new set.
2-One can see, however, the new plan
devised by the AntiChurch. They no longer try to impose the reforms. They just
offer it as a suggestion. People are free not to use it, as long as they
recognize its validity. They now do the same when it comes to the Mass. And
it´s all together appropriate to a time of perdition when people started to
hate dogmatic truths and rigid rules, but are open to ideas, opinions and
friendly suggestions. Or at least done in a way that appears to be friendly.
(the biggest the smile, the sharpest the knife).
3-There´s nothing wrong in itself if a person
wants to pray more than 15 decades. Some people with a strong prayer life enjoy
praying the full 3 sets of Mysteries, and then dedicate an extra set just for
the souls suffering in Purgatory. Saint Maria Goretti used to pray it 2 times.
One with her family, another one specifically for her deceased dad.
4-The problem with the new set id that it
takes away the attention from Our Lady, and try to focus more on Our Lord. Once
again, they try to please Protestants. It´s one more point of the wave of innovations,
just like Saint Joseph being introduced in the Canon of the Mass.
5-Each of the 150 Ave Marias has a
correspondent Psalm. When you pray 200, the connection is lost.
6-There´s another very interesting thing
regarding the fourth set. I think you´re going to enjoy this one because it´s
more evidence .that JP2 was total Anti-Christ. Perhaps even THE Anti-Christ, as
you´ve been saying for quite some time. When this information came to my
attention, I still regarded JP2 as a valid Pope. What you are about to read
gave me the creeps, scared me to death because it´s too much to be a
coincidence.
In some countries, like Portugal and
Brazil, the Rosary is popularly know as "O Terço". This would
translate into English as "The Third part". It´s because each Mystery
is 1/3 of the full rosary. When someone prays all 3 sets, we say that person
prayed "all of the third".
When Jp2, crazy by the wine of the
fornication of his Apostate Sect, tried to create (even though not imposing) a
new set of Mysteries, what he tried to do was to establish a 4/3. This is as
insane as a third-half.
Also, when you sum the 150 Hail Maries and
divide it by THE THIRD (3), you get 50. But if you add the 200, as proposed by
JP2, and divide it not by 4, but as usual by 3, guess what, Dimond Brothers?
You get 66,6!!!
Total Anti-Christ indeed. Even when he and
B16 try to do something that appears to be reverent, devoted or conservative,
it´s all an orchestrated ploy.
CK
Heresies
Subject: Benedict XVI’s Heresies and Oil
Spill and Rosary
MHFM,
Great videos on exposing that heretical evil man. I was recently finished
re-reading "Answers to Most Common Objections against Sedevacantism"
and now with your recent video on Benedict XVI's recent heresies, it just made
it all a complete short study on the heretical Vatican II sect. I have
learned a lot more and, of course, everyday I learn something new, whether it's
from the simple Quote of the Day or Heresy of the Week, or better yet, your
short clip video updates on the outstanding heresies of the Vatican II
sect. Thank once again.
… By the way, I noticed how you titled HOW: "Benedict XVI's Massive Heresy
Spill Disaster" [No pun intended! Right? :)]
Thanks for changing my life through your charitable and beautiful work.
May Our Lord and Mother Mary always protect you.
Sincerely,
Bernardo T
Exposing
Dear Brothers,
Thank you for the video exposing Antipope
Benedict XVI's latest heresies (June 29, 2010). The picture of him shaking
Anglican "Archbishop" of Canterbury's hand appears to be a concealed
freemasonic handshake. So, in Benedict XVI's mind, he is a "brother"
with all the other freemasons - according to him, one doesn't need to have the
Catholic faith to be his brother - what an Apostate! It's amazing how the
Vatican II sect and its Antipopes do actually understand that in order for them
to (try to) destroy the Catholic Church it is crucial for them to
undermine the Catholic faith and dogmas by promoting heresy, schism and
apostasy, i.e. they know how powerful the Catholic faith is and they
are desperate to stamp it out, especially by promoting religious
indifferentism. By their promotion of a New World Order, it's clear that their
highest priority is the salvation of the world, not the salvation of
souls. By means of ecumenism he (Benedict XVI) praises and prays with
schismatics and Protestants (such as Lutherans), calls their leaders
"brothers" and "Archbishops," and says they have the
Apostolic faith - in doing so he totally rejects the Papacy and Christ.
It's absolutely outrageous! He condemns intolerance but does not
even tolerate the simple, humble truths (dogmas) of the Catholic faith! He
promotes freedom of conscience and religion, which is in reality
"freedom" of evil. Benedict XVI is a slave to the Devil - the
Devil's pet Antichrist Beast!! Antipope Benedict XVI is a deceiver and deceived
- his is so proud of his heresies that if anyone tried to stop them
gushing out of his mouth he'd probably explode in a ball of poisonous gases!
What a foolish apostate.
The V-2 Pittsburgh
"Bishop," Apostate David Zubik being awarded the synagogue's
"pursuer of peace" award shows how the V-2 sect is at peace with the
Devil, i.e. by not condemning Judaism and other false religions or fighting for
the purity of the Catholic faith. Also, the fact that NYC's
"Archbishop" Dolan allows his parishioners to participate in a gay
pride march without excommunicating or stopping them shows
how extreme the Vatican II sect is with its apostasy. Likewise, the
Apostate Portuguese "Bishop" who thinks the Church's teachings
against contraception and homosexuality are a "little inflexible"
shows how far he's willing to compromise - probably just to keep his
job, but at the expense of his soul!
The Vatican II hierarchy almost never, if
ever, condemns the unjust treatment of those who are trying to spread the
Christian/Catholic faith. Though not a Catholic (or Christian) the youth
minister who was arrested for preaching (though he wasn't
preaching the true Christian faith) in the mall is shocking, but the V-2
sect says nothing and in effect endorses such outrages. Another example is
the article on the homosexual books that are very popular. The V-2
"bishops" could easily condemn such hideous perversion, but they just
carry on as if God's judgment on Sodom and Gomorrah were a myth!!! The Vatican
II sect's sins reach clear up to heaven. It's total Antichrist Apostasy!
God Bless,
Chris White
Removing
Dear Brothers,
May the good Lord be with you,
About removing Holy Catholic names from
universities etc, here in Portugal there are also rumours that the ungodly
forces are working on to eradicate all
Holy names from the Hospitals and other places.
They, the government are also seriously
working to change or even take away from the calendar all Catholic Holy
days of obligation with the exception of Christmas at this point, in the name
of the world crises.
I have heard the Current Vatican II
Sect of disgrace on the news that they are willing to compromise with this
horrible government.
May Our Lord protect us from these
monstrous evil people.
M. Fernanda Silva
Fourth
Dear MHFM,
I came across this on some websites on 'How to pray the Rosary'. They specify a fourth set of mysteries called
'Luminous Mysteries'. I know your
website only asks us to pray 15 decades(3 mysteries). What are Luminous Mysteries then?
Thank You.
Sam…
MHFM: The Luminous Mysteries were added by Antipope John Paul
II. They are not part of the
Rosary. The Rosary has 15
mysteries. The Luminous Mysteries should
not be prayed when praying the Rosary.
Oil Spill
Subject: Very informative regarding Gulf
Oil Spill… Thank You!
When I first saw the images coming in of
the "red" oil in the Gulf, I immediately thought of this passage.
Thank you for sharing this video and explaining the scripture. I do believe
that this may very well be what the scripture is referring to, and I believe
that we haven't even begun to experience the repercussions of this devastation.
Oh, and I agree that there are those who have certain greedy agendas that
include keeping us dependent on foreign governments, and also keeping us
dependent on government, in general. It is their desire to condition us to
depend upon government. . . for reasons that I shudder to think about!
"The LOVE of money is the root of all evil. . ." I say that this
disaster, as bad as I hate it for the fishermen and people who depend on the
ocean for their livelihood, is what BP gets for being so greedy! GOD is always
in control. He just lets people THINK they are, sometimes. . .
Thanks. Great video.
Carol
Posting
Subject: Oil Spill!!!
Dude!!!! Me and my folks came to the same
conclusion man!!! Totally cool! Man, scary but at the same time exciting!!!
Very good video man, like it a lot!!! Awesome! Thanks for posting that.
Kindest Regards,
GBlues…
Last Rites
Subject: Last Rites
Dear Brothers,
May God continue to bless you in your work.
My parents and family are all in the Novus
Ordo. I have shown them your videos and books, but to no avail.
Recently, my mother had a hip replcement. It was considered a very
simple surgery. Yet, she went to the Novus Ordo presidor, and received
the "Last Rites."
Unbelievable!!! Another example that the Novus Ordo is definetly
not Catholic.
Wayne C. Lang
Facts, Truth
Dear Br. Michael,
Your section reguarding Fr. Wathen and
other "trad priests" is, to me, the crucial topic of the human
element as regards holy orders today. These
men claim to be faithful priests of the One,Holy,Catholic,and Apostolic Church,
but if you start to show any signs of anti-lemming mentality, you no
longer are important as members of the particular mass center. Obviously, due
to the last 50yrs, normal parish life has been destroyed.
People are so lost in themselves, from what
I have seen and know myself, that they forget the Divine element in the whole
picture of what Catholicism really is. Therefore, they are only satisfied with
an external, thin veneer of the real faith.
Doctrine is the key to any real doors
opening for all in this fight. If we refuse to Know truth, and settle for our
own comfortable little "trad" pieces of tradition, we will continue
to see non-unity amongst our so-called, "traditionalists"!
It really is beyond belief that these
priests cannot instruct themselves and lead their sheep from this human
foolishness we have lived through since Pope Pius XII.
Thank you for calling things as they are
and reminding people that the Facts matter! Quality over quantity!
Sincerely, J R
P.S. What part of Daniel do they not understand?
Consecrate
Greetings in Jesus Christ,
I don't believe a priest who is gay even
though he ordained before 1968, consecrate a Tridentine Mass, and the mass and
the host is valid to be attended. Because if he is gay, that means he is under
Satan's possession. He is unclean and outside of the church, cut off from the
tree of life, Jesus Christ.
Then his duties or conduct acting as a
priest to perform the sacraments are null. Am I right or this is wrong to the
Catholic teachings?
May God bless your work for the Church.
Kim-Lan Vu
MHFM: You are not correct that such a priest could not validly
consecrate. You are right that such a priest
is in mortal sin and under demonic possession.
However, even evil priests can consecrate if they intend to do what the
Church does and observe the traditional rite of the Church. That’s not to say that one should go to such a priest, but merely
to analyze the theological question of whether such a priest could validly
consecrate. Even though you are not
correct on that point, we of course agree with your general sentiments opposing
and condemning homosexuality.
Video
For those it might interest, this is a
brief new video on King Louis XIV:
King Louis
XIV, the "Sun King" Disgrace
Regarding
Subject: Regarding New Haven CT High School
removing “Our Lord” from diplomas
Dear Brothers,
In the article, it mentioned that "This year, a Muslim
student at Trinity University in San Antonio petitioned to have the words
removed from diplomas."
If one were really offended by the words, "our
Lord" would they not stop there? What about "Trinity
University" or "San Antonio"? Will people one day
'realize' they are so offended that they will want to rename the
university? or maybe even rename San Antonio (and the many places with
saints names across our country)? Will I be expected to change my own
name from Michael to something more modern or meaningless?
In all honesty, if it were simply a matter of not offending
anyone, I would assume a simple answer would be to change the words to "in
the year of Jesus Christ" (that would be accurate -- yet not imply that
the institution necessarily considers Him our Lord -- just an historical
reference to the date).
But, what about the offended Catholics -- that are
"apparently" offending the world by our very thoughts and hopes: believing
that God is Our Lord, believing that God created everyone to be with Him if
only they will respond to His Will, praying that every man will allow God to
soften his heart in this world so that he may enjoy His reward in the next
world, praising the Lord for becoming one of us Himself to bring us to Him, and
welcoming the Holy Ghost in our hearts.
It's not okay to be passionate about God in our culture, but
passion about everything that isn't holy is held 'holy'. The true Passion
of Our Lord Jesus Christ is being constantly offended by these public actions
to remove every possible trace of Him from society -- and to replace Him with
the importance of His creations :(
I pray God to keep me from offending Him any more than I
already have by my own sins.
-Michael O.
Reading
Dear Brothers Dimond,
I was reading about Venerable Anne
Katherine Emmerich, In one of her vision she said that the PROTESTANTS in
purgatory are there the longest because there is no one to pray for them. After
reading your book I thought Protestants were outside the true Church. Am I
missing something? Of course at my age [82] I miss alot. God bless you
for opening my eyes. I have stopped going to the Novus Ordo Mess.
Ed.
MHFM: The statement is heretical. It’s not a vision from God. Either she never said it or it was
misunderstood or it’s a message from Satan.
Perhaps that’s why she hasn’t been canonized. Perhaps she never even said it. Her messages were edited; she didn’t read and
write. It could also have been
misunderstood. For example, if she’s
talking about people who are in Purgatory yet have Protestant family members,
she could have been referring to converts
to the Catholic faith from Protestantism.
Such Catholic converts (former Protestants), who died in the state of
grace, might be in Purgatory but would lack Catholic family members to pray for
them. In the process of transmitting
such a message, it’s possible that it was confused; and that the Protestant converts to Catholicism in Purgatory
were simply summed up haphazardly as Protestants, since the emphasis was on the
Protestant family members who aren’t praying for them. Regardless, it’s definitely 1) a false
message from Satan or 2) a misunderstood one or 3) one that was fabricated by
her editor. It conflicts with Catholic
teaching. That’s why Catholics (real
Catholics) don’t go by visions, but by Catholic dogma. Those who dismiss Catholic dogma, and instead
follow what they think is a vision from God, are very deceived (see Galatians
1:8-9).
BOD
Subject: BOD
Dear Brothers:
In this Octave of St. John Baptist, I am
reminded once again that the Jews of the Old Testament apparently believed in
the importance of water baptism far more than do the modern BOD'ers.
In St. John 1:25 we read: "And
they asked him, and said to him: Why then dost thou baptize, if thou be
not Christ, nor Elias, nor the prophet?" Although I may be mistaken
about this, I don't recall baptism being spoken of in the Old Testament.
Yet, the Jews apparently knew about baptism and its connection to the
Messiah. Perhaps they were taught about the future baptism by Moses after
their passage through the Red Sea?
Thanks for all your work. Your
website is like having a university at one's fingertips. Only your
university teaches truth!!
Gratefully yours, Lee
Popes
Subject: Popes
Brothers,
I find your new series on the Popes Against Islam quite fascinating. You’re
able to distinguish as day is to night between the True Faith and real Popes
and the false sect of Vatican II and their false Popes. As if someone
switched off the light in 1959 and left everyone in the dark, when Anti-Pope
John XXIII came about to implement the Great Deception. Clearly the work of the
Masons to unite the world religions for a one-world government. Thank-you for
shedding the light by which to see the truth in these final days of darkness.
Also, messages of Anti-Pope's Paul VI and JPII include:
Paul VI Message to President of a U.N. Conference in May 1976; "...this
new international economic order that has to be ceaselessly built up."
Paul VI Sept. 8th, 1977; "Stress is legitimately laid nowadays on the
necessity of constructing a new world order."
Paul VI May 24th, 1978 to the United Nations; "...we are aware that the
path which must lead to the coming of a new international order..."
JPII on November 27 1983 issued the Papal Bull which legalized secret society
membership for Roman Catholics.
JPII in December 1996, the Grand Orient Lodge of Italian Freemasonry offered
John Paul II its greatest honor, "the order of Galilee" as an
expression of thanks for the efforts he made in support of freemasonic ideals.
JPII, Los Angeles Times, December 12th, 1984; Quoted JPII as saying,
"Don't go to God for forgiveness of sins, come to me."
God Bless your work,
Tom Miles
Response
Subject: Response to article on women
choosing not to have children
Dear MHFM,
In response to the article of Women not
having children, I believe for many women its not a choice. I personally
know, several women who are trying to have kids but cannot have a successful
pregnancy. (I don't know anyone who choose not to have any).
Fertility clinics are full of women who can't conceive. I must say,
it is a desolation many wives and husbands feel. It's unspoken
in society because the couple thinks their is something "wrong", with
them. It's embarrassing to talk about and its terribly painful to admit
in public. I know for the average stranger it is easier to say,'we choose
not to have any' then to say "I don't ovulate, or my uterus is
toxic". It is a known fact fertility rates are decreasing
around the world due to many reasons, including plastic
linings contaminating our foods to GMO's.
Thanks,
C
MHFM: In posting the article, of course there was no suggestion that
every woman who doesn’t have children has chosen not to. However, your assertion that almost every
woman wants a child is simply wrong. As
godless lifestyles become mainstream, fewer and fewer women are having
children. Certainly they are not having
the number of children they normally would have. This is also directly connected with the
proliferation of contraceptives and birth prevention methods, and the facility
with which modern people obtain and use them.
In fact, with the exception of perhaps a few traditional Catholics,
Mormons, fundamentalists, etc., almost every married couple in the world is
probably using artificial contraception or sinful family planning methods to
avoid children.
You bring up the stigmas that are attached to married couples
that can’t have children. Of course, it
would be incorrect to conclude that in each case there is something wrong with
those who can’t have children. However,
it might be a sign of God’s displeasure.
Children are a biblical blessing.
God might leave a couple childless if the marriage is not pleasing in
His sight or if it wasn’t His will (e.g., if one of them had a vocation but
pursued marriage instead). At the same
time, He might do so for another reason that’s not attributable to the married couple
at all.
Part 2 Added
The Popes
Against Islam [video]
The Popes Against Islam - Part 2 [video]
MHFM: We have added Part 2 of this
video. Part 2 gets into the astounding
heresies of the post-Vatican II antipopes on Islam.
Impression
I get the impression that your site is
aware of the present day corruption of the catholic church, and you are possibly
trying to restructure it to its former glory (correct me if I'm wrong).
Your interpretation of what John wrote about the BP oil spill is correct, as
opposed to the history channel's misinterpretation of a volcano falling into
the sea. This tells me that you have received an enlightenment, and are
not a victim of the pressures of darkness prevalent in this world.
… From where do you think John gets his visions?
Regards,
Just a "regular joe".
MHFM: St. John got his revelation from God. You need to realize that the Vatican II sect,
which we expose, is not the Catholic Church.
It’s the prophesied Counter Church of the last days. The Catholic Church is the only Church of Christ,
the one true Church. It’s the original,
historical and biblical Church. You must
belong to it to be saved. We hope you
consult our section refuting Protestantism, and our book: The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church.
Sins
Subject: Habitual Sins
How does one overcome habitual sins…?
FS
MHFM: Avoid the occasions of sin, pray the full 15-decade Rosary
each day, do spiritual reading, and add
3 Hail Marys for the specific issue you are dealing with. Moreover, acquire some fear of God, for
that’s what a habitual sinner is missing.
Most chalk up falling into habitual mortal sin to weakness. The truth is that it’s pride. If the person had more humility, he would
fear God enough to abstain from what God forbids. If he had more humility, he wouldn’t treat
God like He’s something that isn’t to be taken seriously. If he had more humility, he would see himself
and the sorry state of his soul as he sins habitually.
Expose
… Novus Ordo "Catholics" are
willfully disobedient to the teachings of the Catholic Church, are promoters of
Catholic disunity, care more for human approval than God's approval and they
have truly become enemies of Catholicism and Catholic unity and teaching.
Protestants select the scriptures they like-and toss any verse that
allows for their pernicious private opinions to be bested.
Paul R.
P.S. While Vatican II has almost
completely dissolved everything of Jesus Christ, arguably, the promotion of
"annulments" has done more to destroy the family and the Faith than
anything else they've done. "Novus Ordo Catholics" think they
can remarry after divorcing, but in actuality, they are in a perpetual state of
mortal sin if they do. Millions of souls are going to hell by the granting of
annulments and the family structure so compromised by the fact that those married
or contemplating marriage think they can divorce and then remarry.
We expose as heretics, the anti-popes,
anti-bishops and anti-priests by name. The time is now for us to expose in
charity our own family members by name.
Fatima
Dear Dimond Brothers,
… This is what Fatima is first of all: the
most urgent reminder ever that the true religion that pleases God and saves
souls, is indeed this traditional religion, still faithfully lived in the
beginning of the century in many regions, where Christendom remained very much
alive". For me this is comforting
in that I try to practice the traditional faith but not so comforting when
looking for the beauty and happiness of Christendom here on earth.
May God bless MHFM,
Matthew
Louis
Subject: King Louis XIV of France
The very fact that he was called and is
remembered as "The Sun King" reeks of: idolatry.
Everything you describe and we learn about his life reeks of:
idolatry. I visited Versailles back in the 1990s (via bicycle!) and
everything about it was SO excessive in its extreme luxuriousness that it
was/is truly nauseating. Just goes to show how all selfishness is so
empty and meaningless----all the Saints of course knew this, turned their
backs on the world, and walked away.
Videos
Subject: Videos
Dear Brother Dimond,
Just a quick thank you for the videos that you post here and also for your web
site. They truly hold a wealth of information.
Thank you, Joe
Found
I have found your website several weeks ago
by accident. I have been looking for some validation of my catholic views
for years. I have argued for years much of what you espouse.
Especially, outside the church there is no salvation. I have felt for
years that this faith (Roman Catholic) my faith has been uninspired.
Thank you for your work it has meant so much to me… I am a practicing
catholic. I am married with 5 children. What am I to do ?
Thank you,
Francis Lally
MHFM: Thank you for the interest.
You need to make sure you don't go to the New Mass, and that you pray the
Rosary each day. You also need to be convinced of all Catholic dogmas
(e.g., no salvation outside the Church or without baptism, etc.), and that you
completely reject the Vatican II sect and its antipopes. Also, this file contains a profession of faith from the Council of Trent
that those who have been involved with the New Church should make. After that, we
can help you with where to receive sacraments. We would also recommend
our special package. Our file on where to receive sacraments also covers
that issue.
Earthquake
Subject: Earthquake and G8 Summit in
Toronto
ISN'T IT INTERESTING THAT THERE IS AN
EARTHQUAKE IN THE SAME CITY WHERE THESE EVIL MEN WHO GATHER TOGETHER TO PLAN
FOR THEIR NEXT WAR!!!
NK
Eucharist
Subject: Eucharist
Hi Brothers,
I was wondering if you could tell me whether or not you are supposed to chew
the Host when you receive it or if you are to let it sit in your mouth until it
is dissolved enough to swallow. I had read in a validly ordained priest's
Family Catechism that you are not supposed to chew but I had never heard that
before. Thank you for clarifying this issue. God bless you both.
Jodi P.
MHFM: One should try to avoid chewing the Eucharist if one can,
and let it sit until you can swallow it.
Annulment
… On the annulment issue, I was married in
the V2 sect in 1983, divorced in 2002 and received an annulment from the V2
sect in 2003. I re-married in 2004 in the V2 sect. I returned to tradition in
May 2009, and learned about your work in January 2010. I have read the
salvation book and The Truth About V2 book both twice, watched several of your
videos several times over, and check your website daily. In short, I agree with
all your positions that I know of: sedevacantism, the V2 antipopes, etc, etc,
etc.
Anyway, enough background. I have discussed the annulment fiasco with my wife
and have told her that I believe the best and safest course of action is to
live as brother and sister, since I have SERIOUS DOUBTS about the
decision/competence of the V2 tribunal in my case, and I am totally unwilling
to use the decision of the apostate counter-church as a justification for
offending God. We also have three children together….
Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
Joseph
MHFM: Thanks for the interest.
An annulment is a declaration that a marriage was never valid to begin
with. That means that an invalidating
impediment to the marital union must have been present at the beginning. As explained in the file, that’s very
rare. To form an opinion on a particular
case, one would have to know the precise reason the “annulment” was
granted.
The Annulment Fiasco - The Vatican II sect's De Facto acceptance of Divorce and
Remarriage [PDF File]
Fatima
Subject: Fatima
Dear Brothers:
I just stopped at a Korean religious goods store near my house. I had left them
the Fatima DVD about a month ago… Today, I was going to leave them some more and
they said that they had taken the DVD and were having it translated into
Korean! They said it would be done in about 3-4 weeks and promised me a copy.
I'm just praying it will be an accurate translation.
Your sister in Christ,
Gloria Howard
Realm
Subject: Debate
Dear MHFM,
I have only listened to the 1st segment so
far. When a man begins a sentence with "I believe" or "in
my opinion" or "I feel" in the context of this debate on the
faith, he immediately leaves the realm of dogma and straight to the church of
Vin Lewis….
Matthew
Comment
Subject:
…Is Benedict XVI the Pope?
'Is Benedict XVI the Pope?' Fabulous debate on Youtube! Fantastic!
Scarlett
Miller
Sunday
Greetings Dimond Brothers,
I wanted to know the traditional Catholic
view of Sunday. Is Sunday (the Lord's Day) the same as the Sabbath Day or is it
something different? Also, do all the Sabbath laws of resting and no work, such
as buying and selling, still apply or did this end with
the fulfillment of the Old Law? Thank you.
-DC
MHFM: That’s a good question.
Strictly speaking, the word Sabbath still refers to Saturday. Saturday is still referred to as the Sabbath
in liturgical books. However, in the New
Covenant, the prerogatives of the Sabbath have been transferred to Sunday. In the Old Testament servile works were
forbidden on the Sabbath, and now they are forbidden on Sunday. Unnecessary commerce (buying and selling)
should be avoided on Sunday. Since the
prerogatives of the Sabbath have been moved to Sunday, it’s also correct to say
that the Sabbath was changed to Sunday.
Islam
Dear Brothers,
What a shocking group of Antichrist
Apostates the Vatican II Antipopes are, showing respect for the diabolical
religion of Islam! They couldn't make it clearer how evil they are, because the
Catholic Church has made it so obvious that Islam is totally evil. For Antipope
Benedict XVI to express respect for Islam is to trample on all the blood
of the martyrs and saints who died at the hands of the Islamic infidels,
and is another expression of the heresy of baptism of desire! For
Antipope John Paul II to encourage Muslims to live their faith is to encourage
the same false beliefs that killed countless Catholic martyrs and saints by
Muslims, and is another expression of the heresies of "universal
salvation" and "invincible ignorance"! For Antipope Paul VI to
show high respect for "Muslim martyrs" is to show the lowest
disrespect for Catholic martyrs and saints slain by Muslims, and is
another expression of the heresy of "baptism of blood"! All of the
Antipopes totally reject Jesus Christ and the Holy Trinity in showing
any respect for Islam or Muslims, and so He rejects them! The
Antipopes keep adding to their vault of freemasonic sins - they imagine
that they are eternally secure, and that their evil works will have no
consequences!!! How wrong they are - to Hell they will go! The Catholic
Church teaches that outside the Catholic Church there is absolutely no
salvation, but look at how the Vatican II Antichrist Antipopes try to kill that
dogma by their apostasies!!!...
God Bless,
Chris White
Interest
Hello,
my name is Mark.i would really like to know more about the most holy family
monastery and about sedevacantism…
Deo
Gratias,
Mark
MHFM: We hope you continue to look at
the information. We would also recommend
our introductory DVDs and books.
Word
Dear MHFM,
You are probably aware of the following
historical fact but I just wanted to remind you since I saw it mentioned on
your website. The word wormwood in Russian/Ukrainian is Chernobyl or Chornobyl…
The city is named after the Ukrainian word for mugwort or wormwood (Artemisia
vulgaris), which is "chornobyl". The word is a combination of the
words chornyi (чорний, black) and byllia
(билля, grass blades or stalks), hence it
literally means black grass or black stalks. That may signify burnt grass,
perhaps prior to cultivation).
The Chernobyl nuclear fallout disaster that
happened in April of 1986 is considered to be the worst such disaster ever.
Besides killing many people on the site and causing an entire town to be
permanently evacuated it also produced a dangerous, deadly, poisonous
radioactive cloud that spread above almost the entire European continent at
that time. I remember that incident (although I was a little kid back then)
because we were camping somewhere in the woods when it started raining and
there was a warning issued on the radio and TV to avoid going outside or to use
some kind of cover because of the dangerous radioactive cloud from the fallout
that could produce acid rain. People were very scared and many people around
Europe died and were sick (developed cancer) due to the radiation.
In my opinion this incident could very well
be the fulfillment of Apocalypse 8: 10 And the third angel sounded the trumpet,
and a great star fell from heaven, burning as it were a torch, and it fell on
the third part of the rivers, and upon the fountains of waters: 11 And the name
of the star is called Wormwood. And the third part of the waters became
wormwood; and many men died of the waters, because they were made bitter.
There is much information on the Internet
about the aforementioned disaster and many people have made the apocalyptic
connection (just type in Chernobyl wormwood).
Besides that terrible event that was one of
the final nails in the coffin of the Soviet Union a.k.a. the Red Dragon, 1986 seems to have been
a pretty dark year. One of the most notorious (if not the most) apostasies in
history happened in October of the same year, namely, the Assisi ‘’peace’’
gathering lead by Antipope/Antichrist John Paul 2. In 1986 the European
Community (precursor of the EU a.k.a. the Beast from the sea) officially
accepted the flag that we now know as the EU flag (http://europa.eu/abc/symbols/emblem/index_en.htm)...etc.
P.S.
Your recent videos are great as usual, and it's also great to see that
you have a website in Spanish... good work.
Thank you and God bless,
V. from Croatia
Why?
Thank you for your honest (such a rarity today)
response to Margaret Breene about the very fact that all unbaptized babies
including aborted unbaptized babies will NOT GO INTO HEAVEN. Why is it
that people feel that their "pain" justifies their making up just any
old beliefs and then labeling those beliefs as "Catholic"? I
think that is a sin… Do they think their "emotional pain" over the
fallout of the mortal sin of committing the murder of abortion is bad, right
now? Think of how much worse will be the eternal pains of hell........and
repent, while one lives...........and the mercy of God is still offered, to
every living soul who fears Him........
Inquiry
Hello Brothers Michael and Peter,
Thank you very much for publishing your
website in Spanish language. It will benefit those faithful who are in
the far corners of the world and don’t know English at all, or well enough to
understand the unchanging teaching of the Catholic Church!
I have an unrelated question. Not
being brought up in this culture I simply don’t understand why is it that some
‘religious’ males in this part of the world have name of Mary as part of their
vocation name? Is this a new N.O. invention, or that’s been practice in
the Church beforehand? I was under impression that males would pick only
a male figure name and females would stick with females. You sometimes
see, ex. Sister Joseph Agnes.
If you don’t see it trivial enough, would
you please explain.
Thank you,
Renata.
MHFM: Thank you for your question. It’s an issue to which we have given some
thought. Our opinion is that a male
religious should not use Mary or any
other female name as part of his name (whether it’s for his religious name or
any other name). In the same way, we do
not believe that a female should use a distinctly male name. However, it’s something that has been done in
the history of the Church. It’s not a
Novus Ordo invention. In fact, numerous
male saints had Mary as part of their names out of devotion to the Mother of
God. Prominent examples of this would be
St. Louis De Montfort and St. Alphonsus Liguori. Nevertheless, in our opinion, we don’t agree
with it. We believe that males should
not use female names.
We would add that when those saints did have Mary as part of
their names, this was done in past ages which were much more Catholic. The people generally would have had a better
understanding of why this was done.
Additionally, in those days there was almost no question about the
masculinity of the priesthood or the male religious life. Suffice it to say, that’s not the case in our
day. Using a female name can add to the
confusion and the misconceptions which abound in our day. But we don’t like it for any period of Church
history, even though we understand that it was done out of devotion to the
Blessed Virgin.
Hello
Hello, my name is Lukasz i live in denmark,
i recently had confirmation in the vatican II sect church, but i have not
worshipped the anti popes since i woke up to how they’re false teachings are,
but pls can you explain to me how to be a true catholic, i have never been
preached by a true preacher
MHFM: It’s great to hear about your interest. First, be convinced on all the core issues
and wholeheartedly accept all Catholic dogmas.
We assume you are familiar with the basic catechism. Don't support any heresies, reject the New
Mass, and reject Vatican II. Follow the
steps in the Steps to Convert file.
Reject baptism of desire, salvation outside the Church, etc. Practice and live the faith each day, and try
to spread it to others. Pray the Rosary
each day, at least five decades but preferably all fifteen. After you’ve made the profession of faith,
consult the steps on where to receive sacraments to find options for a good
confession.
Comment
Why do people continually utilize the term
"hardship" to describe home-schooling? I've known several
mothers who have home-schooled, since they as a family were
SO unhappy about ANY other "education" (read:
freemasonic brainwashing) options available-------and yet these mothers and
may I add fathers who also helped in this process all considered it a great and
wonderful JOY! Did the non-home-schooling parent have to have two jobs or
something like that just to pay the bills? Look at Padre Pio's father who
had to leave his HOME COUNTRY ITALY and come over to a very difficult
manual-labor job in a FOREIGN country (U.S.) in order to provide......well I
would consider THAT a real hardship for the ENTIRE family maybe especially for
the mother but also for the kids------yet look at the fruit THAT family's
sacrifice bore for the glory of God!
I do NOT mean to belittle
the sacrifices involved in home-schooling because obviously it is not
"free"---nor do I wish to insult any of your readers---- it is
just that on balance it would seem that to a serious
traditional Catholic/sedevacantist, home-schooling would be a very joyful
"sacrifice"-----and a great blessing for all! I have taught in
Catholic schools and can vouch for their intolerance for anyone with the true Faith.
A.
Abortion
Dear Brothers,
I have just been on your website and am
living in the UK. I am a practising Roman Catholic married but separated
from my husband… I am also the mother of 5 children all of them raised Roman
Catholic.
Please allow me to tell you of my story of
Abortion. I see that you still claim all
unbaptized children will never enter Heaven. As we all know Abortion is
from Satan himself. You claim Satan would not be behind this horrendous
sin if these children unbaptised, went to Heaven. To me this is wrong,
and now on with my personal story of Abortion.
Three months after I left my husband and
when all my children were over 18 had University places and all settled,
education complete, my 21 year old daughter had a fast track abortion at 8
weeks of her pregnancy. She was in
London UK I was in Cardiff South Wales UK. I had no idea she was pregnant
or of her abortion. Six months later whilst with my grandchildren in
Ireland and daughters, my daughter broke down crying, and told me of what had
happened. Her words were .. I refused counselling. On the Monday I
was told I was pregnant, 2 days later on the Wednesday the baby was gone.
She was fastracked. On her way to the Hospital for the abortion she told me she
kept thinking .. I am going to Hell for this. On the bed whilst having
this horrendous procedure that took my infant Grandchild, she still kept
thinking I am going to Hell for this. Why she didn't stop the procedure
there and then I dont know. All I know is she was devastated and
repentant.
I have always been staunchly
Pro-Life. I walked the first anti-abortion march in this City during 1967
at the age of 15. When my children were older I was in Mass one Sunday
and saw some pictures at the back of the Church of aborted babies. I
brought them home left them on the kitchen table and told my children what they
were leaving them the option to view these pictures or not. Whether my
daughter viewed them or not I dont know. I also told me . if any pregnancy
should happen .... come to me I will support you 100 per cent but never ever
please ... choose the option of Abortion. Dont kill your baby and dont
break your Mothers heart. Satan still did his work .... and took my
Grandchild. Now .... the aftermath of the abortion. When my
daughter told me . my initial reaction was to strike my daughter, my older
daughter restrained me. After a nights sleep my daughter came to me and
said . Mammy you must hate me for this !! I told her I loved her unconditionally
which I do. I love my daughter dearly and always will no matter what.
Satan had tried to destroy the love in our
family .. he failed. Praise the Lord. I despise Satan and all
his sins all his acts all his temptations I abhor him despise him and his
Minnions. So you see once again through Gods love . he was overruled put
down. Satan maybe behind this sin . I truly acknowledge the act of
Abortion as Satanic. But Gods love protected my family. Sadly not
my little infant Grandchild
Since that Abortion I have had depression
and anxiety 2 very nasty episodes of this. One of which I am going
through now, but with Our Lord standing beside me, holding me gently, I am
recovering. But when I read your website on Abortion, I broke down.
You preach a hard God an unloving Jesus, Holy Spirt and Father. This was
the way I was raised, I remember being in Mass and our priest telling us
of this vengeful God. Being terrified. This is not the way.
The Holy Spirit is continually revealing to us. We are simply Man and
very often . all to often unable to hear what The Holy Spirit/Ghost is telling
us. We dont have the intelligence .... we are very often to simple.
I know that my aborted grandchild is in
Heaven. I feel that this darling infact was a little Girl so I
named her Kate, after her Mother. I hear The Lord telling me she is well
and safe in his arms, and that one day I shall be reunited with her.
Open your hearts Brothers, see his love
fully. How can you love him fully if you dont feel his love ? Im sorry for this email but I felt compelled
to write it.
Godbless you all
Margaret Breen
MHFM: You are simply not
Catholic. You say that we teach aborted
infants don’t go to Heaven. You ignore
that this is the infallible teaching of the Catholic Church. You reject that dogma, and original sin. You are a modern-day Pelagian heretic. You act as if your story, and the sadness
you’ve experienced, somehow proves your (false) belief that your aborted
grandchild is in Heaven. This only
reveals how blind you are, and how little you care about what God has
revealed. You have no faith; the dogmas
mean nothing to you. You only care about
emotions and making yourself feel comforted.
You need to be converted, for you don’t know God or believe in Him at all. You think that you are a devout member of the
Catholic Church, when in fact you are not remotely Catholic. It’s obvious that many of your comments
concern justifying the act of your daughter.
Your heretical belief that the aborted child is saved helps you try to
do that. However, you only deceive
yourself.
Infants
cannot be saved without baptism
Pope Eugene IV, Council
of Florence, Session 11, Feb. 4, 1442, ex cathedra: “Regarding
children, indeed, because of danger of death, which can often take place, when
no help can be brought to them by another remedy than through the sacrament of
baptism, through which they are snatched from the domination of the
Devil [original sin] and adopted among the sons of God, it advises that
holy baptism ought not be deferred for forty or eighty days, or any time
according to the observance of certain people…”
Pope Martin V, Council
of Constance, Session 15, July 6, 1415 - Condemning the articles of John
Wyclif - Proposition 6: “Those
who claim that the children of the faithful dying without sacramental baptism
will not be saved, are stupid and presumptuous in saying this.”- Condemned
Pope St.
Zosimus, The Council of Carthage, Canon on Sin and Grace, 417 A.D.- “It
has been decided likewise that if anyone says that for this reason the Lord
said: ‘In my Father’s house there are many mansions’ [John 14:2]:
that it might be understood that in the kingdom of heaven there will be some
middle place or some place anywhere where the blessed infants live who departed
from this life without baptism, without which they cannot enter into the
kingdom of heaven, which is life eternal, let him be anathema.”
Pope Paul III, The
Council of Trent, On Original Sin, Session V, ex cathedra: “If anyone says
that recently born babies should not be baptized even if they have been born to
baptized parents; or says that they are indeed baptized for the remission of
sins, but incur no trace of the original sin of Adam needing to be cleansed
by the laver of rebirth for them to obtain eternal life, with the
necessary consequence that in their case there is being understood a form of
baptism for the remission of sins which is not true, but false: let him be
anathema.”
Mass
Dear Brothers,
Not being able to support any priests these days what does a catholic do if he
wants a mass said for someone.
Thank You
Ken
MHFM: There are certain options for
receiving sacraments, but one shouldn’t have a Mass said by a heretical priest
for someone else. One would have to go
without a Mass being said.
Another
Subject: Debate…
Brothers,
Vin Lewis is just another "All Day Sucker" that starts his debate
with a stupid lie and then lies all the way through. His initial
statement shows the caliber of person your dealing with; someone who slithers
on his belly as he states, "how numbers mean nothing and how he wants to
concede that it is "his opinion" that MHFM holds the minority view
and that most of the people of the world would say your wrong. And, the fact
that "he thinks" he is on the majority side means nothing, so he's
not going to use that at all." (Didn't he just use it??) "He's
also heard your position, not from you but from others (hearsay), and have not
found it convincing." He's a double-tongued snake who is definitely in the
dark from the beginning as he's so afraid to even look at the truth of your
material on your website and make his own conclusion over everyone else's
conclusions. What a coward.
After all the years that the Masons boasted of how they would infiltrate the
Church and try to cause it's ruin, why is it so hard for the modern Vatican II
sect to believe even-now they succeeded? It's clear that God has allowed the
Anti-Pope Mason John XXIII to be the first of the last anti-Popes to rule over
what is now empty real estate. Once John XXIII forced his way in the
door, all his successors were brought in after-wards to continue the Great
Apostasy…
God Bless,
Tom Miles
“Catholic” School
Subject: Catholic School
Dear Brothers:
After reading the post from Kathleen about
being forced to homeschool because her "Catholic" school informed her
that her children would not be welcomed back next year, it struck me as
strange that it took the rejection of the school for her to decide to
home-school. Clearly, from her email, she could see the dangers of
exposing her children to the ideology of the Novus Order "Catholic"
school; yet she was willing to subject her children to other children and teachers
who obviously would influence her children to believe in harmful
religious/worldly pratices. I simply do not understand her
reasoning. It's as if she were willing to accept some amount of
indoctrination in order to keep her children in school, rather than having to
do the hard thing of home-schooling.
I only say this, because when I
first clearly saw the adverse consequences of Novus Order policies while I
was a CCD teacher at our local Catholic parish -- our newly
appointed "priest" refused to have a special day for
"penance" before Easter for the children as the former priest had
done because he didn't believe children committed grave sins -- I immediately
realized there was a serious problem regarding the salvation of those children.
For most of the children, this was the only time during the year in which they
received the sacrament of penance. This new liberal "priest"
was specifically appointed after parishoners complained that one of
the parish priests had dared express in a homily his opposition during a
national presidential election to the pro-abortion beliefs of one of
the presidential candidates. They were outraged by his stance against
abortion and birth control and that he dared to make it a "Catholic" issue.
They were already angry because another of the "priests"
held Corpus Christi processions, sang the "Kyrie" in Greek instead of
English, and encouraged Ambrosian hymns because the parish Church and school
were named after that saint.
You see, they absolutely "hated"
all Catholic traditions, and even Greek and Latin. They hated incense,
and wanted the altar boys to be altar girls. They wanted the homilies to
be done by women. These were mostly women who complained, although there
were men as well. These women were already giving out "holy
communion" in their jeans and tennis shoes as extraordinary eucharistic
ministers. So letters were written, the former conservative
"priest" was ousted, and a liberal "Novus Ordo" priest was
appointed who advocated joint prayers with the local Protestant Church with the
female minister. We in the choir were also told we would now begin to
serve in the local soup kitchen as part of our ministry (a forced sense of
charity - just like socialism) and we began to sing the chants of
"Taize." Our hymns for Holy Thursday changed from the Latin prayer of
the petition of the saints to a pop style with guitar music. We also sang
hymns in which WE were the "body of Christ broken and shared by
all." It seemed so blasphemous to me that I simply did not sing.
Immediately, the CCD classes took on a different emphasis. I quickly got
my child out of that environment, stopped teaching in that CCD program, and
began to home-schoo. First, however, I gave a priest who had served
with the previous ousted priest the articles written by John Paul II in
the Vatican newspaper which clearly expressed indifferentism, along with a
picture of him kissing the Koran. He got extremely angry with me, and
refused to believe what was right in front of his face. He preached a
public homily in which he used veiled accusations against all who
surfed evil, unreputable websites which attacked the "Holy
Father."
There comes a time when one simply can take
no more, and it becomes clear that the church one is attending is simply no
longer Catholic. So we got out of there, studied the traditional Latin
Mass and Catholic teaching, and became Traditional Catholics… In other words,
with all Kathleen's having to complain about the practices at her school,
it should have become clear that she was no longer dealing with the
Catholic Church and that she was instead dealing with a false religion;
and it should equally have become clear that she could not keep her children in
it. One should not wait until one is rejected by the false religion.
That's all I had to say, and I do not mean
to be judgmental, but it just seems that there are probably many more Catholic
mothers who have not been rejected by the false
religion's "Catholic" schools who will simply continue to
subject their children to them in order to not have to make the huge sacrifice
of home-schooling. They simply do not see the harm they are causing, or
the fact that they will have to give an account to God for how they
trained up their children. I hope I am not being too harsh, and I do
apologize if I am. I just feel our children would have more outlets and
friends, and we mothers would have more company if more of them recognized the
truth and took a definite stand. We should stand together and help one
another in these very difficult times to keep the faith.
Perry, a concerned mom
MHFM: We also believe it’s very
important to homeschool, but we think she has made the right decision and is on
the right track in that regard. We
encourage others to do the same.
Adhere
Subject:
debate
Regarding this
poor soul Vin Lewis, I think this is an example… of the trashing of the Papacy
and the misunderstanding of the office of the Papacy and of the
antipopes. We as christians {catholics}, are to adhere to the teaching
Magisterium of the True Church for one reason and that is because Jesus
promised the Holy Spirit as protection to the true pope and office regarding
FAITH AND MORALS {THE POPE CANNOT ERR ON THESE TWO THINGS}. Here we have
a man like Vin Lewis in this debate constantly saying, "in my
opinion", we don't get to give our opinion, who are we to supersede
God's truths for our own oh! I forgot the new teachings of JP ll, that man is
God. In order to have ONE FAITH we must mirror the teachings of the Magisterium
exactly and not add one word or take away one word because these are the words
of Christ, SUCH ARROGANCE!
NK
MHFM: It’s a prime example of how he
and those who obstinately accept the antipopes believe in nothing. Their heretical position requires them to accept
anyone as a Catholic, and blatantly reject dogmas concerning the unity of the
Church, the loss of membership through heresy, etc.
Rejecting
MHFM,
Vin Lewis was caught many times in just the
first 6 installments. It was clear that he is rejecting the teaching of
the Church for some reason or other, as is always the case with unbelievers -
heretics - protestants...something is too costly or something they don't want
to give up or human respect....or too much fame...many reasons....
his claim that the "popes" have
had their writings - tampered with and possibly changed...was of no impact
whatsoever because we see these same "popes" doing exactly what they
have written - with our own eyes ---Assisi....going into synagogues and so on…
thanks
CD
“Catholic” School- Homeschool
Dear Brothers
This year I had to say no to sex education
at my catholic school for my 5th grader and take my children out of school for
an African spiritual dancer assembly. I had to point out the socialism
and liberation theology in the religion curriculum and say no to
centered prayer that was modeled after a trappist monk. I had to point
out that John Lennon hated Jesus and his songs should not be played in music
class. So why am I shocked, humiliated
and upset that I have received a letter from the school principal that my
children are not allowed to return because I do not support the
curriculum. I know this must be Mary's guidance as I pray the
rosary to her faithfully. Please pray for me and the courage to home
school my beautiful three children. I will someday rejoice in this
rejection. But right now I am sad that there is no room for a
traditional catholic mother.
Kathleen
Debate: Is Benedict XVI the Pope?
Debate: Is Benedict XVI the Pope? - Part 1
Debate: Is Benedict XVI the Pope? - Part 2
Debate: Is Benedict XVI the Pope? - Part 3
Debate: Is Benedict XVI the Pope? - Part 4
Debate: Is Benedict XVI the Pope? - Part 5
Debate: Is Benedict XVI the Pope? - Part 6
Debate: Is Benedict XVI the Pope? - Part 7
Debate: Is Benedict XVI the Pope? - Part 8
Debate: Is Benedict XVI the Pope? - Part 9
Debate: Is
Benedict XVI the Pope? - Part 10
Debate: Is
Benedict XVI the Pope? - Part 11
Debate: Is
Benedict XVI the Pope? - Part 12
Material “Heretic”
Dear MHFM,
Suppose a person who was water baptized (in the name of the Holy
Trinity) as an infant dies as a "material heretic." Could he be
considered to have died as a Catholic?
TD
MHFM: There is no such thing as a material heretic. It’s just another name for an erring Catholic
who doesn’t obstinately reject a Catholic teaching. Therefore, a person who was baptized as an
infant and dies as what people call a material heretic (an erring Catholic)
would be Catholic.
Guy
That guy that you were debating is like
Clinton, "that depends on the meaning of what is is".
Charles
Few
Dear Brothers Michael and Peter Dimond,
I think that is a good move in making the website
available in Spanish for various reasons, the more obvious one having been
discussed - a lesser obvious reason or spin off with this move, could
be the downfall and demise of the false apparitions (and the movement as a
whole), said to have occurred at San Sebastian de Garabandal, in the 1960's -
and a chance for the Spanish speaking peoples of that region who were exposed
and so deeply involved with this hoax for many years, to be finally told the
truth about the Vatican II sect.
Your response to Paula on the fewness of
the saved, and Bible references using Psalms is a good example
of how the mercy of God is given only to those who fear the Lord - who try
not to offend God but please Him at all times, by obeying His Commandments -
sadly most do not keep His Commandments and so do not save their souls.
See what some of the Saints, have to say
about the fewness of the saved, which should cause those who think that
because God is all forgiving, His justice will not also prevail ...and should be
cause for serious reflection.
St. Augustine tells us that it is certain
that few are saved, while St. Thomas Aquinas states there are a select few who
are saved.
St Alphonsus says that the greatest opinion
is that the greater part of adults is lost, and St. Leonard of Port Maurice
tells us a great number of Christians are lost.
More on the adults who won't make it - St.
Regimus - Among adults there are few saved because of sins of the flesh with
the exception of those who die in childhood, most men will be damned.
The saints are so few, but we must live
with the few if we would be saved with the few. O God, too few indeed they are
, yet among those few I wish to be - St Alphonsus Maria Ligouri
And a good story to finish off - and think
about!
One day, St. Macarius found a skull, and
asked it whose head it had been. "A pagans!" it replied "And
where is your soul?" he asked.
"In Hell!" came the reply.
Macarius then asked the skull if its place
was very deep in Hell. "As far down as the earth is from
Heaven!" "And are there any other souls lodged even
lower?" "Yes! the souls of the Jews!" "And even
lower than the Jews?" "Yes! the souls of bad Christians (
Catholics) who were redeemed with the Blood of Christ and held their privilege
so cheaply!" - Blessed James of Voragine
God bless
David
Benedict
XVI’s Recent Heresies
MHFM: We’ve
updated our Benedict XVI's recent heresies file with some new heresies from Benedict XVI.
Main
Dear MHFM,
Perhaps I have overlooked it, but would it
be possible for you to include a link on the main webpage (in English) to the
Spanish site. Your material directs to the English site and for someone
receiving this who only spoke Spanish they would not know of the other
site. I recently had a woman, who only spoke Spanish, ask if your
material was available in Spanish (I understand a very small amount of
Spanish). Thank you for the consideration.
God Bless you for your works.
Bruce
MHFM:
There is a link to it on the mainpage.
Listened
Hi Vin,
Just listened to the debate you had with Bro. Dimond. I was disappointed
because I thought you would have had better arguments.
Not that I doubted that Bro. was going to win, but you could not
even refute one point of his, not one. All you had going for you was
your 'opinion', while he is rooted simply yet firmly in clearly
defined Dogmas, and Magisterial teachings.
This is your problem and many others for that matter, that instead
of submitting to clear and sound doctrine, it somehow has to
resonate with your own 'inner voice', which is tainted and has been
clouded by these heretical teachings for so many years.
I call it heretical mumbo jumbo they have down to a science and
have fooled the masses with. That
was how I got through it anyway, just thought I'd point that out.
Please don't wish me dead for your sake. :)
God Bless!
Michael
Release
Brothers
I just wanted to thank you, and show my most joyful gratitude for the release
of your website in spanish. For a long time I´ve been explaining catholic
doctrine and other issues to my wife, but her lack of knowledge in english
always was a problem. I for instance, came to the point of making subtitles and
translating them for two of your DVDs (Vatican II and John Paul II antipope),
but now I feel a greater happiness, for your apostolate is truly blessed!
And it will be something priceless for all the spanish people, from Spain and
all hispanic countries, which were always strongly catholic countries, but now
are like blind sheep following the apostate Vatican II sect and its antipopes
along with all their heresies. One needs only to see the immoral and
anti-catholic laws that each day are passed on (Spain mostly), without any or
in some cases very little protest from them people.
I see the articles of the website are being one by one translated, so I wanted
to ask, are you going to release your books or DVD in spanish too? If so, I´d right away purchase again all of
them, and even in larger quantities, for your books and DVDs are the most
precious material on catholic issues that I´ve come across in this time of
great apostasy that we live in, and they clearly are a great help for those of
good will and love of god who need to get out of the abomination of the novus
ordo.
So my wishes of greater success in this new phase, and many blessings upon your
monastery.
Viva Cristo Rey!
Marco
MHFM:
Thanks for the e-mail. A Spanish Youtube
channel with some videos has recently been created. It is here: Spanish
Youtube.
Material
Hi MHFM,
Thank God, your material is now more accessible to the millions of people of
South and Central America, as well as Spain. This is a major, major milestone
for MHFM. If I may add some info, the novus ordo tailor different errors in
different parts of the world so that their heresies can be accepted by the
local population. I think in the English speaking world it is their ecumenism;
but in the Spanish speaking world (South America), I think it is a veiled
communism that is actually materialism. The politically active novus ordo
priests far south are actually "struggling" to "liberate"
their peoples from "injustice". Sound familar? To some of them,
"sin" is associated to the governing authority, the more affluent
classes, the capitalist West, and even correct orthodoxy. I mean, there are
real serious secular problems that have to be solved, but because of their
unique approach to solving it, simple orthodoxy is often forgotten, or worse,
thrown out the window. Their priests are effective in spreading these ideas
among the people since many are vulnerable to this kind of thinking due to their
difficult worldly experiences. I hope MHFM will change this.
An official congratulations to you for getting your new Spanish language web
site up online.
Cheers
Sanjiv
Comment
Subject: Comment on your recent poster AP
Tell AP to go and learn spanish, and that
his way of thinking is one-dimensional and ignorant, just like so many
americans today. It's always better to know more than only 1 language. Plus all
the spanish-speaking people who come here learn english, they have to one way
or the other. It's not like they "refuse to learn it". If you don't
speak the language here you will be lost and probably starve, unless you go to
spanish-speaking areas of course. Of course bilinguals will have better offers
at certain jobs because it's obviously better than simply knowing english and
it's probably part of the job in the first place, what does he think.
Wear
I have been seeing people wear the Rosary
on their neck, is this okay? Some show it & others beneath their
shirt. Even celebrities have begun this
practice.
John
MHFM: It’s an excellent idea to wear
a Rosary, in addition to having one with you.
Of course, those who might do it for superficial reasons or because they
think it represents jewelry of some kind don’t have the proper intention; but
even in those cases, wearing such a powerful sacramental with a crucifix might
give them certain special graces to re-assess their improper lives and consider
what’s important.
Reading
Subject: Why B-16 was left out
I was reading your article at
http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/Machabees_NewMass_abomination.html
and at first I though it was strange to be
only four high priests when we know that the V2 sect will have at least 5 of 6
anti-popes. This seemed like a fundamental flaw in your logic, even though your
parallels fit precisely. Then I realized, I overlooked something. Holy
Scripture could be warning us about the invalidation of some of the Sacraments,
The first 4 anti-popes indeed had something
that Ratzinger (and likely any possible successor of him) did not possess. Even
though they all betrayed the Church, their
souls had the mark of the fullness of the priesthood, they were apostate
VALID CONSECRATED bishops. Ratzinger was not, since he was
"consecrated" using the revised Anglican-like formula.
This could be why God decided to foretell
this event by listing four HIGH Priests, in opposition to LOW priests. As
Bishops, those men, in a Judas Iscariot like fashion, were indeed Princes of
the Church, although they did not profess the true faith.
At times like this, it´s good to remember
the notion that some sacraments (Baptism, Confirmation and Holy Orders) do
leave a definitive mark on the soul of the recipient once validly received. The
same does not goes for the Papacy, which can be lost, or any other
office.
CK
Available
Dear Brothers,
You can do whatever you want with your website
but I don't like the fact that you make it available in Spanish. By doing
so you are discouraging these Spanish-speaking immigrants from learning
English. It's bad enough that so many of them come to our country and
refuse to learn our language. They demand that the government makes
everything available to them in Spanish. It has even gone so far that
there are some jobs that only English-Spanish speaking people can get.
What about all of us millions of Americans who were born and raised in this
land and speak English? It's not fair to us that the government pampers
to all of their needs. I'm strongly in favor of promoting the English
language in this country. It is an essential characteristic of what the
people of a nation have in common. I live in a part of the country that
has a very high Hispanic population and it annoys me when they come up to me
and speak Spanish. I have to repeat the same thing all the time : "I
don't speak Spanish". It happens almost everyday. I look Spanish but I'm not! I feel like
a stranger in my own country. I wish they could all go back to their
homeland unless they speak English. I could have a better job if this
evil government didn't have any "diversity" promoting nonsense.
AP
MHFM: We must say that we completely
disagree with your e-mail. Making our
website available in Spanish really has nothing to do with the issue of whether
people who reside in America should be encouraged to learn English. People look at our website all over the
world. It’s for those people, whether in
America or in another country, who know Spanish but do not know or struggle
with English. It’s obviously critical
for them to see the information. The
Church is universal. Having the true
faith and the information people need to be saved is what’s important, not
necessarily what language they speak or where they live. We also believe this country should retain
English as its language of use, but again that’s a separate issue. We would add that we believe that many
Spanish-speaking people in the U.S. would like to understand English if they
could. It would obviously make their
lives easier.
Defending Pope Leo XIII
For those it might interest, this video refutes
certain false accusations made against Pope Leo XIII and discusses Church
teaching on Church-State relations.
Heresiarch
Thanks for updating the recent heresies of
B16 file----well, there the chief heresiarch goes again, spouting the
"religion of freemasonry", again: what else could one expect
from the false prophet? But this rat is really THE WORST! He
can talk about "brotherhood" amongst all heretics since they are most
likely all freemason brothers anyway, all conspiring to do their utmost to
hoodwink the gullible, under-educated masses of the planet into their
global "one world order" under the "religion of
freemasonry", and above ALL, attempting to obfuscate the
truths of the authentic Catholic religion----their only real and actual enemy.
A.
Defense
Dear Brother Peter:
A strong and necessary defense of Real Pope
Leo XIII. I stumbled across… these radical schismatics recently and their
vicious and inaccurate attack of a good and strong Pope… it is good that
you put the issue to rest. You strongly showed the Church's "middle"
ground. The Church does not have to worry about secular matters such as
how many police officers to fund or where to put parking meters. But they
have to be involved in moral issues such as abortion, etc. "social
issues". These radicals think that the Church has to be involved in
everything versus many Novus Ordo laity and clergy who support pro-abort and
pro-gay candidates and say the Church should stay out of
politics. Leo XIII was a realist as far as the US
Constitution. While it is not a perfect document for the faith, it was
good that the Church was allowed to flourish from Washington until Vatican
II. I hope you do one on St. Pius X as well.
Bill
Comment
Your website is one of the most astounding
and honest of all catholic websites. Please keep up the good work for the
salvation of all poor souls out there.
Michael Mello
BOD
Dear Brother Dimond:
Your latest commentary on the oil spill
leaves me wondering about something, not that it matters. I'm not a
geologist and I assume you are not either, but is it just possible that this
massive oil leakage could initiate geologic events in places, oh like
Yellowstone??
To you stubborn people who still cling to
baptism of desire: Your time is running out; don't delay your conversion.
BOD is a one way ticket to hell, abandon your heresies while there is
still time. Thank you very much for
doing such a fantastic job of bringing people back to the Faith..
Brenda Roy
Lightning
MHFM,
Thought you might find this
interesting. An apostate "church" that is close to me..... God
is certainly telling people that he is NOT there and showing them with this
example. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_lightning_strikes_jesus_statue
Bruce
Forgiven
I recently I have talked to many who
believe, they will be forgiven at the end because we have a forgiving God, what
could I respond to those with those beliefs?
Paula
MHFM: You could respond by pointing out that the Bible says few
are saved (Matthew 7:13). Obviously,
therefore, God doesn’t just let anyone into Heaven or forgive things
unconditionally. You could also mention
that the most common theme in the Bible is that the fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom (Psalm 110:10), and
that His mercy is only upon those who
fear Him (Psalm 102:17; Lk. 1:50; etc.).
Therefore, those who don’t have a sufficient fear of God to obey His
commandments and avoid gravely offending Him will not receive His mercy or
forgiveness.
Plan
Dear brothers in Christ,
Thank you for defending the true popes from the attacks of some radical
schismatics. In these attacks every true Catholic can see the Devil's plan, and
that is to try to compromise the True Teaching by making unsubstantiated
attacks on true popes, as if they were antipopes who denied some dogmas of The
Catholic Church. Since we undoubtedly have (had) five demoniacal antipopes in
the last five decades, these schismatics have engaged themselves in a kind of
sport activity to hunt for the "antipopes" reigning before the antipope
Angelo Roncalli. The Devil's plan therefore is--if you can't make people to
accept the true antipopes as true popes, then try to make them to accept true
popes as true antipopes. This tactics is also visible in the realm of true
prophecies---try to deny true prophecies by producing numerous false
prophecies.
So, these radical schismatics are really
Devil's servants. I can add nothing new
to your words about the *true* pope Leon XIII. In essence the claims of the
radical schismatics are indeed ridiculous. However, your reaction to these
false claims is as it should be.
Most Holy Mother Mary, thank you for helping MHFM through your powerful
intercession.
Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia.
Comment
Brothers:
… I just found this article which appeared
online June 11th about absinthe. I find the timing of this story extremely
odd because it mentions the ingredient: wormwood. I cannot entirely
explain why I find this story so peculiar and disturbing, except that
the second and third angels, their punishments deal with water, and wormwood is
imbibed in the liquid absinthe, which has a green color;
chartreuse… You have to read about halfway down to get to the
mention of the bitter herb.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/7821341/Absinthe-could-be-legalised-in-France-after-100-year-ban.html
Many thanks always for your work,
Deidre Howard
Spanish
MHFM:
This is our website in Spanish (for those who only speak Spanish). It’s updated frequently.
http://www.vaticanocatolico.com/
Traditional
I am so very impressed with your interview
with the Chicago Archdiocesan "Apologist" in the Youtube archives!
Absolutely fascinating! I am a traditional Catholic and have learned so much from
the MHFM website. Thank you… for all you do!
Yours very sincerely,
Scarlett Miller
Infant Baptism
Now a question: have you ever had anyone
whom you were debating infant baptism with come back a day later and say
"I looked up the definition of households and in biblical days infants
weren't considered part of the household." Only a protestant could come up
with this! And how they hate the truth - that they're denying original sin. How
in an uproar that made this protestant. How can anyone think that God would
give infants a door to Him in His old covenant (circumcision) yet not in His
more perfected new covenant??
Thanks for all the work!... The end of
the world series is phenomenal! The latest debates are hard to listen to but
have much to offer. If only people could cast aside their pride you would be
able to reach so many more. I find that a majority of people I try to introduce
to your work only take a brief look and have an attitude like "why should
I listen to a bunch of monks" (in a negative way). It's so sad. Anyhow,
thanks again!
Christina Kalix
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.
That’s an interesting claim by the Protestant. If not substantiated with any evidence, his claim
is worthless, especially when we consider that the Bible links households with
children.
Gen. 18:19- “… he will command his
children and his household after him…”
Gen. 36:6- “And Esau took his wives, and his
sons, and his daughters, and all the persons of his house.”
Since households generally include children – and the Bible
repeatedly mentions that whole households were baptized – these passages by themselves make the case against
infant baptism extremely unlikely. In
fact, if a Protestant who rejects infant baptism believes in Scripture alone,
he would have to find an explicit teaching in the Bible that infants should not
be baptized. But there’s nothing like
that. Furthermore, we know that infants
should be baptized from Jesus’ teaching in John 3:5, the parallel with
Circumcision, the witness of the early Church, etc.
SSPX
The SSPX are heretics because they
differentiate Catholics according to the color of the skin. All their
unwanted priests from the West, whom they are reluctant either to defrock or
expel, are sent to the Asia zone of their Society, where they are actually
given positions of authority!. The local Asian priests have been playing second
fiddle to an array of misfits these past 20 years, and can only murmur
under their breath as they have made great sacrifices to become priests of a
Society shunned by their very own family, relatives and friends. Where can they
go and to whom can they turn?
RA
MHFM: We can’t comment on that claim because we haven’t seen any
proof in that regard. However, it’s a
fact that they are heretical in various ways.
A priest who is unhappy in the SSPX needs to focus on accepting the true
faith and rejecting their false positions on salvation and the Vatican II
Church. Once the priest becomes a true
believer and seeks the will of God in sincerity (which of course would mean
leaving the SSPX), all things would be added onto him. God would direct Him concerning what he is
supposed to do and where he should go (Matthew 6:33). But as long as he persists in their heretical
positions, he will not discover what God wants him to do.
Video:
The Fall of Constantinople
MHFM: For those it might interest, this is a
discussion of one of the more dramatic moments in Church history.
Inquisition
Dear Brothers,
In defending
the Church with conviction, they, not only the Protestants, immediately
throw to our face the Inquisition affair, how can one defend this situation?
They take pleasure in attacking this issue to denigrate the Catholic faith. Have
you any material in this respect in your site or elsewhere that I may
clarify?
In JMJ
M. Fernanda da
Silva
MHFM: Yes, we did a video on it.
Catholic
Inquisition Myths Busted
Two
Dear Brothers,
Thank you for the video defending Pope Leo
XIII against the false accusations of radical schismatics, i.e. that he taught
the heresy of separation of Church and State. The correct Church and
State Union is probably best illustrated by the relationship of Matrimony,
the Church representing the Husband, the State the Wife. The two are said to
become one, as Christ indicated. That doesn't mean that the husband becomes the
wife or that the wife becomes the husband, but merely that their two separate
and distinct wills unite toward the same purpose: child bearing. In a similar
way, Christ has two wills because He has two natures (human and divine) but the
human nature and will submitted to the divine nature and Will, toward the same
purpose: the salvation of mankind. The radical schismatics propose a
Church-State relationship that is like a hermaphrodite, i.e. that
both powers are not distinct but the very same power, rather than the
correct position that the two powers are distinct, but work for the same
purpose: the welfare of the region. It's similar to the Nestorian heretics who
confused Christ's two natures by cancelling out either the divine nature
or the human nature and thus tried to divide Christ into
two persons. Christ is one person with two natures and thus two
wills. The Church and State have one physical area, but
are two separate powers and two "wills". Their heresy, i.e. that
the Pope is [and must be] both temporal and spiritual ruler reminds me of the
Arian heretics of our day (the Watchtower Society) who claim that the soul is
the body - that we do not have an immortal soul. Also, the union of the
faithful with Christ in the Eucharist does not make the Catholics Christ
Himself, but unites them spiritually with Christ. God the Father, God the Son,
and God the Holy Ghost are three distinct persons with no confusion between
them, but they are all three of the same divine substance: One God. In refusing
submission to the mind of the Church, the radical schismatics have lost their own
minds, not that the Church and its members have the very same mind as the
Church, but that the members minds' are united toward the same purpose as the
Church's mind: the salvation of souls.
God Bless,
Chris White
Flag
Subject: On the don’t tread on me flag
Dear MHFM,
One of your readers wondered about the
''Don't tread on me'' flag. The picture... is the cover of the so called
''Black'' album from the group Metallica-- the album features the song ''Don't
tread on me'' and the cover has the snake from that flag...I just rotated the
picture so that it looks like a mirror image. The symbolism that comes out is
pretty obvious in my opinion.
Thank you and God bless,
V. from Croatia
Comment
Subject: The Fall of Constantinople
Thank you for your video. I like to learn about the history of the
Church so I think you did a great job! I
enjoyed it and I agree with you 100% regarding this video.
… I know some about the Orthodox Church… but could you do a video explaining
more about the Orthodox Faith I think it would be very informative for those
Catholics who are not well versed on it.
Thank you.
Elijah…
Arkansas
Subject: Albert Pike Rec Area Deaths
It's terrible what happened to those people
in Arkansas. I wouldn't go camping there just because the place is named after
a satanist.
It's interesting to see how much the
leadership of our country loves this satanist. “… Albert Pike (December 29,
1809–April 2, 1891) was an attorney, soldier, writer, and Freemason. Pike is
the only Confederate military officer or figure to be honored with an outdoor
statue in Washington, D.C..... Pike died in Washington, D.C., aged 81, and was
buried at Oak Hill Cemetery (against his wishes—he had left instructions for
his body to be cremated).[3] In 1944, his remains were moved to the House of
the Temple, headquarters of the Southern Jurisdiction of the Scottish Rite.”
Matthew
Benedict XIII
Subject: Benedict XIII Antipope
Hello Brothers
I write to you today to ask just why was Benedict XIII from the 14th-15th
century an Antipope. There is an anti-Catholic that I'm chatting with and he's
telling me it was simply because he didn't reside in Rome during the Western
Schism... He also said it was just to not look like complete fools that lost
most of their power. I assume it was not because of that, as I believe he is
talking with a total bias against the Catholic Church. Anyway I hope you're all doing well there at
MHFM, and well done on the Fall of Constantinople video as well. It was clear,
concise and very interesting. I
have also come across your file on the western schism so I'm going to give that
a read now.
Sincerely, Neil
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.
Benedict XIII was an antipope because Pope Urban VI was validly elected
by the cardinals in 1378. After the
election of Urban VI, the cardinals convinced themselves that his election was
invalid. They withdrew to Avignon and
proceeded to elect Clement VII. Clement
therefore became the first of the Avignon antipopes, as the validly elected
pope was already reigning in Rome.
Following Antipope Clement VII’s death, the cardinals of the Avignon
line elected Benedict XIII as his successor.
So, in short, Benedict XIII was an antipope because Urban VI was the
true pope, his cardinals elected Boniface IX as his successor, and Pope
Boniface IX was reigning when the Avignon cardinals elected Antipope Benedict
XIII.
Honeybee
"Colony Collapse Disorder"
- Maybe the "mysterious causes" he mentions is coming from the
chemtrails! It was really bad in 2006 and now, four years later it's
affecting 1/3 the world’s food supply. They abandon their hives and fly off to
die.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHRgdzwEPGA&NR=1
V-2 Church
I first heard bro. Michael Dimond on coast
to coast am with George Noory. At that time I thought that your organization
was anti catholic but when I checked your web site and got your books and
videos I saw the truth. I am trying to
help awaken my family and friends but they are so closed minded that
they refuse to see the truth and reality.
I am deeply concerned about their salvation if they don't get out of
this apostate Vatican II church and its false mass and teaching
They don't have the true body and blood of
Jesus Christ in their communion because they follow the anti-popes who
reject the apostolic tradition and dogmatic teaching of the True Popes who
followed the guidance of Holy Spirit to establish the True Mystical Body of
Christ. PLEASE KEEP ME AND MY
FAMILY IN YOUR PRAYERS THAT THEIR MINDS AND HEARTS MAY AWAKEN TO THE TRUE
CHURCH AND SALVATION.
Anthony
Comment
Dear Brothers,
Isn't it a strange coincidence… Back in the
1980's, both JP II and Ronald Reagan were highly charismatic leaders, both suffered
gun shot wounds that should have killed them around the same time and both were
highly popular with "conservatives". Another thing: I am
Canadian and I don't understand the "Do not tread on me" snake flag
that seems to be very popular with conservatives. Doesn't anybody see the
connection with the book of Genesis and God telling the serpent "I will
put enmities between thee and the woman, between her offspring and yours.
She shall crush thy head, and thou shall lie in wait for her heel".
Why on earth would supposedly Christian "conservatives" embrace
a flag that is clearly an act of defiance against God and His Holy Mother?
Very interesting video on the Fall of
Constantinople. Please keep putting out these videos; I find them very interesting
and informative.
God bless you always.
Brenda Roy
Haven’t
I really appreciated and was enlightened by
your series about the end of the world. I am a confirmed Catholic - confirmed
in 1982. But how can I become confirmed in the true church? I haven't practiced
Catholicism since the '80s. I believe in Jesus Christ, but have never been
attracted to or worshipped any of the Catholic tenets, popes, etc. I have
stayed clear of most churches and religions, but have tried to stay true to my
Christian heart. Could you please offer me some advice as to how this
post-Lateran Treaty, post-Second Vatican Council Catholic, whose mother was a
nun, by the way, back into the proper fold of the flock?
Very sincerely yours,
John S.
MHFM: We’re glad to hear that you are
interested. One of the most important
things you can do is begin to pray the Rosary each day. It’s critical that one cultivates a prayer
life and devotion to the Rosary.
Spiritual reading is also important.
Without these things, one won’t receive the graces to prepare himself
for the state of grace or remain in it.
Next, you should follow: The
Steps to convert to the traditional Catholic faith and for those leaving the
New Mass - Baptism and Conditional Baptism - the Council of Trent's Profession
of Faith for Converts.
Before doing so, however, one must believe in all Catholic dogmas,
including Outside the Church There is No Salvation. You also need to recognize that, in departing
from belief in and practice of the Catholic faith, you ceased to be Catholic.
Also, Confirmation is a
sacrament. It’s not valid in the Novus
Ordo Church, but receiving it is not your chief concern. Believing firmly in all Catholic dogmas,
praying, and making sure you are prepared to make a good confession is what you
need to focus on. Once you are on
convinced on all issues, we can help you further with where to make that
confession.
Ordination
Dear Br. Dimond,
Background; I came over from the NOM around 10 yrs back to the SSPX. Around 3
yrs back left the SSPX when their contradictions became apparent and today hold
the sedevacantist position. Even when I
was attending Masses of the SSPX and receiving Holy Communion, many a times I
would also go in between to… Priests who I was told were ordained before 1969. Now here in Bombay (India) there are no
Sedevacantist Priests and I continue to go the NOM Priest(s) for confessions
(only).
Problem;
There was one Priest (Fr. Benjiman S.J.)
who I would go almost always, as a Lady, also a sedevacantist told me that he
was a valid Priest i.e. ordained validly before 1969. However a few weeks back,
on enquiring was confirmed that this Priest (FR. Benjiman) was indeed ordained
in March 1970!
My questions are; what becomes of the confessions I made to this Priest for
almost 10 years in good faith? are they valid? Do I have to confess again
whatever I remember?
Whom do I go to to as there are no sedevacantist Priests? In future I will confirm and only then go to
Priests… ordained before 1969. There are
few of us sedevacantist who would go to this Priest, and many more of the SSPX
adherents who would go and maybe still do.
I would appreciate an elaborate answer which I would also convey to
others.
Thanking you!
Yours sincerely in JMJ!!!
Gilbert
MHFM: The New Rite of Ordination was promulgated in 1968, but it
wasn’t necessarily implemented everywhere right away. In some places, the traditional rite might
have stayed in use for a few years, but maybe not. That’s why, when considering those borderline
cases (1969-1972 approx.), it can become a thorny issue. It really comes down to how much you know
about the priest’s ordination, and whether you trust what he says about
it. Sadly, we’ve seen that most people
(including heretical priests) are not honest, and that includes when discussing
details about their ordinations. They
will often give themselves the benefit of the doubt, or even convince
themselves that their “ordination” was much more traditional than it in fact
was. They don’t want their whole
priestly identity called into question.
So, if there is some doubt, as there seems to be, about what rite he was
ordained in, then a person who confessed mortal sins to such a priest should
re-confess those he remembers to another priest who was definitely ordained in
the traditional rite.
V-2 Sect
Blessings Brothers! That is how I feel, you
two Brothers Dimond should receive an Award of Excellence, exposing the Vatican
II sect for exactly what it is, diabolically wicked, heretical and apostate not
to mention abominable as well.
That being said, a heartfelt Thank You for being very instrumental in my
reawakening…
God Bless!
Michael
Intrigued
Subject: numbers and years
I was intrigued by your video on the fall of
Constantinople by the length of time between the initial events of the Eastern
Schism in 1054 and the final fall of the schismatic empire in 1453. I
thought to myself that is 399 years. I wonder what happened of
significance 399 years prior to 1958 when we lost our last real Pope. The
arithmetic took me to the year 1559. I googled “1559 the year” and
discover that on January 15th, 1559, Elizabeth I was crowned Queen of
England. Also the Scottish Reformation was begun under John Knox.
The trouble of course began with Henry’s
divorce of the Saintly Katherine some 25 years earlier. But the Church
was briefly restored to England under Katherine’s daughter Mary. The
protestant victory was not cemented until Elizabeth became Queen, defected from
the faith, and began the incredible persecution of Catholics. Hence the
fall of the West began.
Bill Mulligan
Comment
Subject: video
Brother Peter,
Great video, right to the point, basically if you step outside the church God
withdraws His protection. How long before you put the end of the world
series on a dvd, I can't wait for that one!
Blast
Dear Brothers,
That is an excellent video on the fall of
Constantinople. It reminds me of how the enemies of the Catholic Church
(freemasons and heretics in particular) attempted to blast a hole in the
Catholic faith by persecuting Fr. Feeney and his stance on outside the Catholic
Church there is no salvation, so they could implement Vatican II. Obviously the
Catholic Church is indefectible and no one can destroy the Catholic Church or
faith, but in the eyes of many that is what happened. It also shows what will
happen to schismatics if they continue to reject the Papacy – like lifeless,
fruitless branches they will be thrown into the fire (John 15:6). It also shows
how evil Antipope Benedict XVI is when he praises the schismatics, and how he
went to the Mosque and prayed like the Muslims. I suppose if he is a freemason
then it should come as no surprise, since freemasonry is based in Judaism but
uses Islam to persecute the Church. Both Benedict XVI and freemasonry teach
that all dogmas are true!! What apostasy!!!...
God Bless,
Chris White
Video:
Oil Spill in the Apocalypse?
BOD
Hi,
baptism of desire, why does this always come up when our Lord never gave any
indication of it. Had it been so it would sure have saved time for the missionaries.
One could have gone into the villages, preached, seen the desire in the people
and left. Then on to the next - a much faster way to cover the vast areas they
had to get to. And since they were instructed to teach all nations, BOD would
have been the preferred means of baptism. How many examples of missionaries
have we seen that stayed many at the cost of their lives, to complete our
Lord’s instructions of Baptism - BY WATER...
W
Smith
Vatican II
Subject: Vatican II
I just wanted to let you know that I love
your youtube videos. I was a devoted Vatican 2 Catholic when I was
younger, I went to church all the time and I was an altar boy for years, I was
confirmed in 1996 and thought about becoming a priest. My mom and the
older Catholics at our parish were discussing the traditional Latin mass one
day and I asked father dave about it and he said that Vatican 2 had changed the
mass. My mom gave me a Latin missal dated 1958. After reviewing it for 10 minutes
I realized that the church I was attending was not Catholic and was not
teaching the true faith. I did a lot of research on Vatican 2 and other
councils, so I question father dave and he was not happy that I was looking
into Vatican 2, I told him that I wasn't interested in being a priest anymore
because I believed the church had been dismantled after Vatican 2. He had
trouble answering any of my questions about Vatican 2. It seems there is no
consistency in the church every Catholic believes something different and
priests seem more like Protestant ministers, very sad. I am happy there are
still Catholics out there. I hope the best for your monastery.
Sri…
Homosexuality
Subject: Homosexuality
Hello Brothers of the Most Holy Family
Monastery,
I was reading one section in your website
on FAQ, more specifically your answer to the question about homosexuality. I
agree with almost everything you had to say about except for one thing. I quote
from your website:
"Vatican “Congregation for the
Doctrine of the Faith” on Homosexual Unions: “Sacred Scripture condemns
homosexual acts “as a serious depravity... (cf. Rom 1:24-27; 1 Cor 6:10; 1 Tim
1:10). This judgment of
Scripture does not of course permit us to conclude that all those who suffer
from this anomaly are personally responsible for it, but it does attest
to the fact that homosexual acts are intrinsically
disordered”. This same moral judgment is found in many Christian
writers of the first centuries and is unanimously accepted by Catholic
Tradition.” (Considerations regarding proposals to give legal recognition to
unions between homosexual persons, approved by John Paul II March 28,
2003)
Here we see an
official Vatican document asserting that homosexual acts are wrong, but
that the homosexual orientation is not necessarily a result of grave
sin. This is evil, uncharitable and false."
I believe that the official Vatican
document is correct on this one. When a demon enters someone by reason of
mortal sin, it is not always the person possessed by the demon who committed
the mortal sin. You must be aware, for example, that demons may enter a
child immediately after one of his parents has cursed him. There are well known
cases of this. You cannot say that the child possessed is personally
responsible for the possession and by his own fault he has become possessed by
a demon, although the reason of the possession was a mortal sin (committed by the
parent in this case). I believe that you cannot rule out that some homosexuals may
have become demon obsessed or possessed by a similar situation. Also, if the
child was sodomized by an adult, it seems possible that they can become demon
possessed by this mortal sin being committed in their bodies. Again, not all
demonic possession occur by reason of the person being personally guilty of
mortal sin. But you seem to hold as true that in every single case, someone who
is afflicted by homosexuality has become demon possessed entirely through his
own fault.
Jll…
MHFM: No, Romans 1 is very clear that people are given over to
such an unnatural orientation as a result
of idolatry (“For this cause…”).
Romans
1- “Because that, when they knew God, they have not glorified him as God, or
given thanks; but became vain in their thoughts, and their foolish heart was
darkened... who changed the truth of God into a lie; and worshipped and
served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
For this cause God
delivered them up to shameful affections. For their women have changed the
natural use into that use which is against nature. And, in like manner,
the men also, leaving the natural use of the women, have burned in their lusts
one towards another, men with men working that which is filthy, and receiving
in themselves the recompense which was due to their error... they who do such
things, are worthy of death; and not only they that do them, but they also that
consent to them that do them.”
The Vatican’s document is not
correct. It contradicts Scripture, and
it’s evil because it opens the door to the justification of the perverse
orientation. After all, the acceptance
of homosexuality is exactly what we see in the Counter Church. It’s rampant there precisely as a result of
the aforementioned false teaching: that only the homosexual act, not the
orientation, is connected with sin.
Your attempt to compare this issue to
people getting possessed by demonic curses misses the mark. It diverts from the incontrovertible truth,
that Romans 1 identifies the precise cause of homosexuality. There’s also no proof that a person who’s in
the state of grace can be affected by a curse from another. However, those who are in mortal or original
sin are vulnerable to such demonic influences.
The Idolatry of the Vatican II sect
is connected with its rampant homosexuality [PDF File]
Sermon
Dear Brothers,
I just read a e-mail about Father Eugene Berry from Aurora Colorado. I have
been going to his church for a long time and I have never heard him mention BOD
or any other heresy that involves salvation. Just two weeks ago his sermon was
on how you had to belong to the catholic church to be saved. I also know that
he accepts the fact there is no pope right now.
Thank You
Ken
MHFM: The fact that you might not
have heard him mention it from the pulpit is irrelevant. It’s an undeniable fact that he believes in
the “baptism of desire”/invincible ignorance heresy. That of course means that he believes souls
can be saved in any religion. EWTN or
FSSP “priests” might only occasionally mention their heretical belief on
salvation in a sermon. That doesn’t mean
they don’t believe that souls can be saved in false religions. People need to start caring about the faith, and not just about where they
show up on Sunday.
We’re not trying to single this
priest out among all the countless heretics.
He’s unfortunately a heretic, but he’s just one of countless priests who
hold similar heresies. He should not be
supported; and, since he imposes support for his heresies on those who approach
him for the sacraments, he should also be avoided. Those who obstinately support him will go to
Hell, as will those who obstinately support other priests who accept “baptism
of desire”/invincible ignorance. That
includes basically all of them. Almost
all of those priests also accept NFP.
Frankly, we’ve also seen from
experience that most people have no clue what their priests believe. This usually arises from a lack of interest
in the issues of faith. We cannot tell
you how many times we’ve encountered people who say with “100% certainty”: “my
priest doesn’t believe that.” They will
vehemently argue and fight with us on this point. And then, to prove our claim, we cite the
publication or writing which their priest or his group produced. When that happens, they sometimes switch to
justifying the heretical position of the priest – THUS PROVING THAT THEY ARE
COMPLETE LIARS FOR DENYING THAT THEIR PRIEST COULD POSSIBLY HOLD WHAT THEY
THEMSELVES BELIEVE – or they continue to deny it, as you are. So, he might have mentioned it from the
pulpit; but since people are often oblivious to those things, most probably
missed it. Regardless, it doesn’t matter
because it’s definitely what he believes.
In addition, since we’ve been
prominently exposing heresies of this nature, more and more priests have
probably become reluctant to reveal their true views on this matter in a
sermon. Nevertheless, it’s what they
believe, promote and uphold in various ways.
You really should obtain and read our salvation book.
Refuse
Subject: SSPX
Thanks once again, this time for your
debate with the SSPX supporter. When I first realised that the institutional church
was no longer the Catholic Church, I started out with SSPX, but I soon enough
realised that JPII and his three predecessors were not Popes…
I am always dumbfounded when people, like the man you were talking to in the
debate, simply refuse to acknowledge the Truth as God has clearly revealed it…
It's really scary how readily so many people continue to adhere to their own
ideas after receiving that grace. Of course, everyone, including myself is
reluctant to leave their own particular comfort zones in whatever sphere, but
one would imagine that our duty towards our Creator and Redeemer would always
take precedence.
Nuff said! That's the reason the world is in the mess it's in.
Pddb…
Hello
Subject: Hello
Thank you for your (End of the world )
series, and the Gulf oil spill in prophecy. I found both very educational and
enlightening . But as far as calling protestants heretics well will just have
to disagree. Know I take the Holy Bible
very much as being the very mind of God.
So I'll never call anyone father but God.
Or will I ever pray to anyone but. To
father God, Or call anyone God But God the father, Jehovah,YAHWEH. God the son,
Jesus,YESHUA. And God the Holy Ghost.
The Comforter that the Lord Jesus Christ said he would seed to us. He is God and God alone The Great I'AM That
I'AM. I will die before I would bow to
or worship any other. Now please note
that I would never say that a catholic brother or sister in Christ is a
heretic. Christ tells us to love and
pray for all and I do and I will till my dieing day or his return. His word is clear many in the church that do
great things in his name. He will say depart, I never know you.
A servant of Christ Jesus,
MrMark…
MHFM: Mark, the Bible itself repeatedly calls people who are not
God “father.” Here are just two examples
of many:
Acts 7:2- “[Stephen] Who said: Ye men,
brethren, and fathers, hear. The God
of glory appeared to our father
Abraham, when he was in Mesopotamia, before he dwelt in Charan.”
Philippians
2:22- "Now
know ye the proof of him, that as a son
with the father, so hath he served with me in the gospel.”
The Protestants are unfortunately
heretics because they reject the clear teaching of the Bible. Their rejection of the office of the papacy (Mt.
16:18-20; Jn. 21:15-17; etc.) is one obvious example. See our Refuting Protestantism Section. The Bible says that those who don’t hear the
Church Christ founded upon St. Peter are to be considered as the heathen and
the publican (Mt. 18:17). Your other
misconceptions are addressed in the aforementioned section of our website, and
in our book, The Bible Proves the
Teachings of the Catholic Church.
Your position is also illogical, for you say that you would not call a
Catholic a heretic. But Catholics and
Protestants differ on matters that are central to the Gospel message. If both are acceptable, you are saying that
1) either the truth can’t be found or 2) what Jesus taught in those crucial
areas of salvation doesn’t matter. But
Jesus Himself commanded the Apostles to teach all the things He delivered to them
(Mt. 28:20). That should be another signal
for you that your beliefs aren’t correct, but please look at the
information.
Question
Dear MHFM,
Your video series 'Is the world about to end?' was amazing. Great work, God bless you. I also recently watched your video related to
oil spill in the gulf of Mexico. It was
great as always. I wanted to ask you…
What is the difference between the Catholic Bible and the Bible the protestants
use besides some inaccurate translations?...
On a lighter note, it seems you are getting a lot of e-mails related to
lotteries. I also would like to request
you to pray for me so that I do well in my exams which start on June 14th (13th
in US).
Glory be to God
Yours Sincerely,
Sampath
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. In addition to certain inaccurate translations,
the Protestant bible is missing seven books.
It’s also frequently accompanied by heretical commentary.
Video, Vatican II
Dear Brother Michael,
I wanted to thank you for your valuable video on Catholic miracles. I
can't begin to tell you how many Catholics and non-Catholics I sent it to... I
wish the whole world could see that video. Anyone who denies the truth of
our faith after seeing that video... simply needs prayer and only prayer will
do. I have a hard time understanding how people
can learn about the truths about our faith that you addressed in that clip, and
still doubt our faith.
I want you to know that I support your work, and I thank God for it.
I do have a question about your views on Vatican II, as you are far more
knowledgeable than I. Between you and I, one faithful Catholic to
another: We both know the Holy Spirit guides our Church, and only our Church,
thus, can we safely assume and trust that Vatican II is a result of the Holy
Spirit, whether we agree with it or not?
Personally, up until recently, I had a very hard time with the fact that our
former Holy Father, Pope John Paul II, was as open as he was to those who
practice other faiths. I worried that it might undermine the truth of our
faith, and mislead others into thinking "anyone can get to heaven"
outside the Catholic Church. I gave it more thought, and I realized that
if we believe the Holy Spirit is guiding our faith, then Vatican II can't
logical run contrary to that, ever – for that matter, our faith would be a lie.
Christ promised us that Satan wouldn't prevail against his Church. If
Vatican II was influenced by Satan -- how could this be true, I wondered.
I think that Christ wants us to be more of an example than anything else.
If we are more open to other people, and show them that we are open and we
aren't judging them, they will see something in us (Christ) that they don't
recognize in their religion. All religions claim to be true, but no other
religion except for ours has been responsible for creating saints. I
think that if we should them love that appears supernatural at all times (utter
patience (obviously, that is, the highest level possible considering our human
(sinful) condition)), and explain why we are the truth by working with our
Church, and never against it, I think that would be the most effective way to
change those around us who don't accept the truth…
I will narrow my question down: How do we reconcile the Holy Spirit's guidance
with opposing Vatican II, in a nutshell?
Your friend in Christ,
Justina
MHFM: Justina, we’re glad that you
liked the Creation and Miracles
video. Perhaps you haven’t yet consulted
the other information on our website. It
shows that Vatican II teaches many clear heresies against the Catholic faith. That’s also covered in our debates and
videos.
The Heresies in Vatican II [PDF File]
The Most Specific Heresy in Vatican II [10 min. video]
We know that Vatican II doesn’t come
from the Holy Ghost because its teachings are blatantly heretical. They render Christ and the Catholic Church’s
dogmas meaningless. John Paul II wasn’t
merely “open” to non-Catholics, as if he received them with a friendly
disposition whenever they had questions about Catholicism. No, he endorsed their false religions,
committed innumerable acts of heresy, apostasy and blasphemy, mocked the very
saints you make reference to, and trashed the Gospel before the world by
endorsing false gods.
John Paul II (manifest heretic who claimed to be pope
1978-2005) [link to section]
It seems that you might not be
convinced of the truth of the dogma Outside the Church There is No
Salvation. Those who aren’t have an
accompanying weakness in denouncing individuals who deny the truth of God, as
well as in recognizing the evil such a denial entails. Please consult the material we have on those
issues.
It’s inconsistent to say that since
Christ promised to be with His Church, Vatican II must be true. Christ’s promise doesn’t rule out a Great Apostasy,
false councils and antipopes posing as true popes. In fact, we’ve seen those very things in the
past. We know that Vatican II isn’t of
the Holy Ghost not only from the truly diabolical fruits that emanated from it
– wholesale spiritual desolation and destruction – but because it was promoted
and confirmed by heretics in addition to containing many heresies in its
documents. For all of those reasons, a
true believer should immediately recognize that Vatican II was a false council,
evil, orchestrated by Satan, and a mark of the Great Apostasy. Our file covering the many heresies in
Vatican II proves it.
Evil Cross
Subject: Evil Cross
Greetings, Brothers! I was just
browsing on E-bay and came across this listing: "inverted crucifix
necklace Satan upside down evil cross -- top rated seller". Indeed, it is a
crucifix turned upside down on a necklace. Why am I still shocked when I
see something like this? Such outrageous times we live
in.
God bless you.
Margaret Moore
MHFM: According to the foolish
defenders of Antipope John Paul II, they must be devoted to St. Peter.
Priest
Dear Brother Peter and Michael Dimond:
This is to let you know about my email
exchange with Father Berry here in Denver. He sent me a note reminding us
of our obligation to "tithe" and to support the Church with financial
donations. Well, I replied to him that we would be glad to support him if
he would give up his heresies (BOD and invincible ignorance). Otherwise
we could not in good conscience give him any financial support whatsoever.
He replied that we are no longer welcome at his chapel. This is
"Our Lady Of Victory" in Aurora, Colorado, just east of Denver.
For those readers of yours who live in this area or who will be visiting
Colorado, that chapel should be avoided. The priest in question is
Father Eugene Berry.
Brenda Roy
Common
Hi Brothers,
I think that "The Pope cannot say heresy ex cathedra" is the
most common rebuttal I get from V2ers, how would you respond if you only had
about 2 minutes?
Thanks for your work you've changed my
life.
Patrick
MHFM: The first thing to say is that
the argument is illogical because they are asserting exactly what they need to
prove (i.e., that he is the pope). That he
is the pope is precisely the point they would need to prove in the debate, and
they are assuming it to be true in their argument. That’s illogical; it’s called begging the
question. The second thing to say is
that we agree that a true pope can’t teach heresy ex cathedra. The fact that the Vatican II antipopes have taught things that are heretical in
documents that would be ex cathedra
if they were legitimate (e.g., Vatican II) serves to prove that they are not
true popes. Hence, it again gets back to
whether Vatican II is heretical or not, which of course it is.
Finally, you could add that popes
teaching ex cathedra have told us that heretics can’t be accepted as
popes. They did so long before the
post-Vatican II heretics ever claimed to be popes. If the people with whom you are conversing
really believe in what popes teach ex cathedra, they must conclude that these
obvious post-Vatican II heretics aren’t true popes. Since they weren’t true popes to begin with,
their false teaching was not protected by papal infallibility.
Obvious
Dear Brothers:
Greeting in Jesus Christ.
It was so obvious that whoever wrote that
email to you is afraid to sign their name, he says loud and clear that he has
no good intention nor the will of finding out the true faith. Don't even bother
to waste your precious time on those people.
God calls you to serve his people, his
church, his children, not otherwise. Don't even waste one word on those for
they are not seeking debate to learn about the truth. Everything on the website
is enough for anyone who wants to learn about the true church to come to know
at least all the fundamentals of the Catholic religion…
Glory to God,
Kim-Lan Vu
MHFM: We frequently post such e-mails
because it’s valuable to point out their errors and expose their
unwillingness/inability to defend their false positions in an open forum.
Mortal sin
Hello Brothers,
I've read statements by saints stating that
when a person is in mortal sins there is nothing that person can do to
please God. With that being said, would
it still profit someone to say fast or pray a rosary while they are
in mortal sin. Thank you and God
bless
Josh
MHFM: A person can’t gain any
supernatural merit while in the state of mortal sin. However, by praying and other works of
mortification, a person in mortal sin can receive certain graces to break free
from it. The Rosary, his other prayers
and spiritual exercises are crucial if he is going to receive the graces to
change his life, avoid the occasions of sin and make a good confession.
Dialogue
Subject: Anon
Anon does not even follow the practices of
his conciliar sect, one of which is "dialogue." They do not follow
the great commission of Christ which is to teach the Faith and baptize
non-Catholics. Instead they prefer this thing called "dialogue." They
dialogue with every heretic, schismatic, pagan, heathen and other devil they
can find. But they fear dialogue with Catholics such as your self.
EJP, M.D., D.D.
Whenever
Brothers..
Whenever the lottery gets real high into
the $250 Million dollar range or higher in our state, I run a lottery
pool here at work in which I have a sign up sheet at my desk in which
about 40 people here in the office pay me $5.00 each to increase our chances or
winning....Thus we would all go in on it together if we were ever to win the
jackpot,...--..If we did win, each person would probably net about around $4 to
$8 million after taxes ...Is this morally wrong for me to run
the pool ??
Steve
MHFM: There’s nothing wrong with it.
Recent
Dear Most Holy Family Monastery,
I found it very interesting among others,
your video on “Oil Spill in the Apocalypse?”
All these recent world disasters, numerous wars, disaccords between
nations, public relations and within family circles, religious organizations,
governments and societies in general, within the younger generation and the
older we can only see disaccord and unhappiness. It becomes clearer and almost
palpable or rather actually palpable according to my spirit, that as the days
go by our human race is being evermore oppressed by the works of existing evil
forces at this particular time in human history which is very much as you say,
in accordance with Biblical and Catholic revelations.
Even the faithful who fight to avoid this
world’s false morality, fight to live holy lives according to God’s will and
who cry out the dangers of the world, are also being put to test and the bar is
getting heavy, but as Our Lady reminded us that we must never lose sight of
Jesus our Saviour and His true teachings.
Sincerely
M. Fernanda da Silva
Lottery
Subject: Lottery
Brothers in Christ,
Is it God's will when people hit the
lottery for huge amounts of money? My 73 yo aunt who's dying of lung cancer
just hit the lottery for $64 million. i was just curious is it just luck
or is He the reason she won. Is it a test how they will
react to this life changing event?
John
MHFM: It could be a blessing, it could be a punishment or it
could be a test. It could be a blessing:
e.g., in the case of a person of the true faith who is thus given an
opportunity to use that event for the glory of God, the spread of the true
faith, and the salvation of souls. It
could be a punishment: e.g., in the case of a person outside the true faith
who, by winning it, will be more inclined to pursue an already godless
lifestyle and spurn considerations of eternity.
It could be a test because each person’s obligation, after satisfying
his or her state in life, is to use such a blessing for the purpose of God’s
will (Matthew 19:24).
If your aunt is a non-Catholic who is uninterested in the truth
(we assume you’ve tried to convert her), punishment
is the most likely answer to why she won.
She is close to death and winning the lottery is likely to cause her to
continue to put off considerations of what is most important (salvation) or
waste the money on unimportant or heretical causes.
Rosary
Brothers,
I apologise if this question has been covered
before.
Does a rosary need to be blessed by a
validly ordained priest before it can be used? (also other items such as
scapulars, religious pictures etc) If so, is there anywhere in europe
where they can be bought online?
Thanks, Jim
MHFM: They do not need to be blessed before being used.
Mentioned
I mentioned what MHFM discussed about oil
spill/Apoc. 8--8 and 9 to a couple gals I saw this a.m. at a shop and one
used the term "plague"… in re-listening to your Fatima DVD in the section
on Sr. Lucia's 1957 interview with the priest from Mexico Father
Fuentes, Sr. Lucia does mention that while it is her mission to warn
against the loss of our eternal souls if we do NOT obey Our Lord and Our
Lady's requests (at Fatima and of the true Catholic Faith overall) then
there would ALSO no doubt be some kind of physical chastisements----again she
emphasizes that those are NOT her mission to warn against, because Sr.
Lucia was focused on the spiritual not the physical message re: chastisement-----but
does say those physical chastisements are not ruled out (in so many
words, I think it is sort of implied). This sort of reminds one of
the Apoc. verses MHFM pointed out, on the physical level, what may
be a chastisement allowed by God in the final days, the waters turning red like
blood. Could it reflect the blood of all the innocent babies murdered by
abortion in our day as well as the blood of the martyrs trampled on and mocked
by the Vatican 2 sect? A reflection of innocent blood poured out on
the altars of greed and lust and every kind of treachery.
A.
Want to?
Dear sirs,
Your website makes
so many false claims, that I cannot refrain from addressing a few. First of
all, you insist that "no salvation outside the Church" means that
only formal Catholics are saved. Yet you haven't proved that
"outside" is the best translation of "extra", or at least
best expresses the meaning intended by the Church of the Middle Ages; nor
have you provided insight into how the word "joined to" [the Church]
was understood back in those days. The only theologian I have heard you
quote to support your meaning of that dogma lived way after Boniface VIII and
the other decrees you quote. Also, wouldn't the Church Fathers and Doctors of
the Church be the best interpreters of the language of Catholicism? Well,
if we turn to Jesus's life, we see that He says "unless a man is born
again of water...". Now the meaning that more likely comes to us upon
its first reading is: water baptism is necessary as a means for eternal
salvation. However, as many authors have proven, many Church Fathers and
Doctors of the Church believed in baptism by desires. These Church authorities
knew about Jesus's word in the Gospel of John, yet understood that Jesus was
speaking about his Jewish generation, who were not invincibly ignorant since
God Himself was among them. Therefore, Jesus's words about baptism can be
interpreted by the same principles as John 6; namely, he was preaching
about objective necessity, which is not interchangeable with "a
necessity of means". These sames principles can be applied to the dogma's
about "no salvation outside the Church", the Church Fathers
themselves providing the tools of interpretation, not the MHFM.
You have also argued that if water baptism was not absolutely necessary as a
means to salvation, then we would have three baptisms (water, blood, desire),
instead of "one baptism". This is not true however, since only water
baptism provides the sacramental imprint on the soul, which cannot be remove;
the other 2 take the place of the sacrament when the other is not available,
but baptism is objectively obligatory even after baptism by desire. Whether the
stain of original sin returns if one commits a mortal sin after baptism by
desire (but before baptism by water) is an open question. You
also quote Church teaching which states that baptism and God's lifegiving
grace are "inseparable", but you overapply the principle. Grace is
given by baptism, baptism is objectively necessary, and baptism by desire\blood
only takes the place of baptism in exceptional circumstances. Therefore there
is no separation of baptism and grace, but the providing of grace, through the
mercy of God, for those who don't have access to water.
Therefore the Diamond brothers are in
error, and have yet to find the Pearl of truth...
Anonymous
MHFM: Want to debate?
[HIS
RESPONSE]:
Since
you ask everybody and their gramma's cat to debate, you seem to have the some
complex as Protestant apologist James White. Besides, since you use so many
"debate tricks" (with phrasing, vocal emphasis, diversion, and
unnecessary namecalling), it is unwise for people to engage in recorded debates
with you; and if you were wise you would deeply consider what I and others have
written to you. Anon
MHFM: No, it's that you don't have a
clue what you are talking about and that would be shown in a debate. You
are a heretic, clueless and a coward on top of it... You are afraid to
debate. That's what we thought.
Your ridiculous comment that extra doesn’t mean outside (consult any
Latin dictionary or any translation of the texts which define the salvation
dogma) is sufficient to demonstrate the emptiness of your argument. It’s also irrelevant, by the way, because the
accompanying language and the other definitions declare that one must
positively have the Catholic faith for salvation. That’s what you deny. One could address every one of your
sentences, but since you ran from the concept of backing up your claims in a
debate, it’s unnecessary. It’s revealing
that despite your arrogance, you won’t engage in a debate. It’s amazing how the arrogance of heretics
like you so frequently and so quickly vanishes once the debate offer is
extended. The same thing occurred with
someone else who wrote in a few days ago.
We see it frequently.
We will, however, take the time to quickly refute a few of your
errors. They are addressed in our
debates and in our book. You say that
John 3:5 is to be understood the same as John 6 – wrong. Their language is not the same, and the
Church’s dogmatic definitions don’t understand them in the same way. So, you are completely wrong. You would have learned that if you had read
our book and listened to our debates.
You say that it is not true that the “baptisms of desire and
blood” (the “three baptisms”) contradict the truth of one baptism. In trying to explain it, however, you only
prove our point. You say: “Whether the stain
of original sin returns if one commits a mortal sin after baptism by desire
(but before baptism by water) is an open question.” According to you,
one can receive “the first baptism” (“baptism of desire”) and have his original
sin removed, and then come to baptism of water.
Thus, according to your belief, the same person can receive baptism
twice. You have therefore proven our
point: your false belief forces you to accept multiple “baptisms” for the same person.
Expanding upon this point, you assert that one can be forgiven
of original sin by “baptism of desire,” but that this original sin might return
if that person sins prior to receiving the baptism of water. (Where
is any of this taught by the Magisterium, by the way? Nowhere.)
Therefore, according to you, the person has two baptisms (the first of
desire, and the second of water) – both in the same person – and they both remove original sin. You have the same person being freed from
original sin (in other words, receiving the effect of baptism) possibly two
different times by two different “baptisms.”
That clearly denies the truth of one
baptism for the remission of sins.
To deny that is simply to be a liar, but that’s what you are. All of this serves to illustrate the falsity
of your doctrine, the falsity of “baptism of desire.” By the way, it’s not only a dogma that there
is only one baptism, but that the one baptism is of WATER and that it’s the
same for everyone.
Pope Clement V, Council
of Vienne, 1311-1312: “Besides, one
baptism which regenerates all who are baptized in Christ must be faithfully
confessed by all just as ‘one God and one faith’ [Eph. 4:5], which
celebrated in water in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the
Holy Spirit we believe to be commonly
the perfect remedy for salvation for adults as for children.”
St. Jerome (386): “The Lord is one and God is
one… Moreover the faith is said to
be one… And there is one baptism,
for it is in one and the same way
that we are baptized in the Father and in the Son and in the Holy
Spirit.”
Melbourne
Subject: Melbourne, Pelosi
Dear Brothers,
The article on the Melbourne V-2 abuse case shows to what great lengths the V-2
Church will go to cover their tracks, i.e. by hiring a private investigator.
Only it didn't work for them because the police could still gather enough
evidence to lay 8 charges of indecent assault!! It's yet another proof of the
fact that the V-2 sect is desperate to keep perverts among their ranks in order
to further destroy the image of the Catholic Church (though they are not the
Catholic Church!). The real Catholic Church would kick out such cranks the
first they got word of it, but the V-2 sect just keeps hiding them away.
For Nancy Pelosi to say that her policies are determined by Jesus is so
outrageous as to be almost beyond words!!! She talks about "the
Word," as though Jesus is just any old word that someone can say, and that
therefore her words (or anyone else's), even if they contradict Jesus' own
words, are justified - simply because they are words. It's the height of
stupidity! The clearest expression of this heresy of hers is in her statement:
"The Word. Isn’t it a beautiful word when you think of it? It just covers
everything. The Word. Fill it in with anything you want. But, of course, we
know it means: ‘The Word was made flesh and dwelt amongst us.’ And that’s the
great mystery of our faith." So Nancy Pelosi thinks that God the Word
"covers...anything you want." That's the Satanic dogma, "do what
thou wilt shall be the whole of the law"!!! So, according to Nancy, heresies,
because they are expressed in words, are part of "the great mystery
of our faith." It's yet another example of the corruption that results
from unrestrained freedom of thought (conscience) and speech so rampant in
western societies today, and by extension, a further expression of the
Antichrist spirit - man in the place of God!!! Nancy Pelosi will do anything to
get her say, even if it means abortionists can get their way. What a gross and
ugly abortion apostate!!!
God Bless,
Chris White
Comment
Subject: Video
Brothers,
Great video, it makes perfect sense, the
people don't see it as anything other than an accident just like in the past
with other oil catastrophes. St. Matthew tells us that in Noe's day the
people were living their evil lives as if nothing was going on around them, but
I'm sure there were signs happening all around them before that terrible day
happened.37 And
as in the days of Noe, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.38 For as in the days before the flood, they
were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, even till that day
in which Noe entered into the ark, 39 And they knew not till the
flood came, and took them all away; so also shall the coming of the Son of man
be.
NK
Apoc.
Subject: Apoc.
8:8
Again, excellent
work. I really enjoyed your video and respect your gift of discernment. Why are
so many people still blinded to the truth as to what happened on
911? Keep up the good work.
Rick
Spill
Subject: Spill
Brothers,
I liked your latest video on the oil spill in relation to the Apocalypse. So
true are the current signs of the times hidden from those that are waiting the
physical fulfillment over the spiritual fulfillment. The blind modernists whom
believe themselves so worthy of Heaven, can not entertain the idea that they
are living in the end times and would expect God to highlight the events on the
evening news, should those times be near. They did not listen to Noe nor any of
the other prophets over the history of this world and were overtaken by the past
chastisements. The rug is being pulled from under their feet in these last days
and they will descend into the depths.
God
Bless,
Tom
Miles
Every
Subject: Attack on every Catholic leader
In the beginning I used to watch your video
clips and felt as if you had a good message, however the more I watch your work
the more I begin to doubt your intentions. You have attacked all the latest
popes from Paul VI to Benedict XVI as antipopes or heretics and you do not stop
there you still go on to promulgate an antiCatholic view on charity and
humility. I believe as a practicing Catholic (if you truly are) you need to
pray more and attack others less. It is God's duty to judge His people not
'your duty'. You need to stop spreading this confusion to the faithful, stop
attacking the church's shepherds. As every Catholic knows, we do not judge and
condemn God's priests, should we feel that they are in error, we need to pray
for them…
Muz…
MHFM: According to you, the burning
issue is not whether they do in fact reject Catholic dogma; but rather it is
that our message isn’t tolerant enough for you.
You need to learn Catholic teaching on the obligation to reject heretics
and heresies:
Pope
Innocent III, Fourth Lateran Council,
1215, Constitution 3, On Heretics:
“We excommunicate and anathematize every
heresy raising itself up against this holy, orthodox and Catholic faith
which we have expounded above. We condemn all heretics, whatever names
they may go under. They have different faces indeed but their
tails are tied together in as much as they are alike in their pride.”
Pope Pelagius II, epistle (1) Quod ad dilectionem, 585:
“If anyone, however,
either suggests or believes or presumes to teach contrary to this faith, let
him know that he is condemned and also anathematized according to the opinion of the
same Fathers.”
First Council of Constantinople,
381,
“Every heresy is to be anathematized
and in particular that of the Eunomians
or Anomoeans, that of the Arians or Eudoxians, that of the Semi-Arians or
Pneumatomachi, that of the Sabellians, that of the Marcellians, that of the
Photinians and that of the Apollinarians.”
Paul VI, Benedict XVI, etc. are
clearly heretics and antipopes. Please
consult our files on them.
In addition, the Church teaches that a priest or bishop or one who
claims to be the pope must be rejected and considered outside the Church if he
shows himself to be manifestly heretical.
The fact of the matter is that you are a modernist. You don’t believe in Catholic dogmas, and you
don’t care when they are denied.
Angel
Thanks very much for the information. Very
interesting indeed...
I remember reading somewhere that according to St. Aquinas, if a
"bushman" was trying to follow the natural law, then God could send
him an angel to teach him the basics of the faith. So following from this, would
it be possible to say that all non-Catholics who are invincibly ignorant are
mystically (perhaps in another location through bi-location) baptized and
taught the faith by angels from their death beds?? For all things are possible
with God, and again, He could give them all the graces he chooses to based on
the natural efforts they made in life. At that point, the only difference
between your position of so-called "conservative Catholics" would be
WHEN they receive sanctifying grace and the removal or original sin, and of
course whether implicit faith is sufficient and water not absolutely
necessary... All of which are IMPORTANT theological questions, but who will be
saved vs. who will be damned would not be affected regardless of the
position one held. The End would be the same, and the question is simply a
theological one about the means God will use to save people. People will be
saved either way, so this question really doesn't seem to have a lot of
importance. Perhaps I am talking gibberish however.
Again, thank you.
Thomas
MHFM: Thanks for the interest.
However, we do not agree with your description of this issue. You belittle the importance of this dogma
(the most important issue in our day), as well as the significance of the many
heresies against it. A man (not an
angel) must baptize a person. The reason
is that the sacrament is necessary, and in order for a sacrament to be
confected there must be a person who
administers it (Council of Florence).
So, the true position is not at all comparable to the nebulous,
open-ended confusion of apostates who deny the baptism and salvation
dogmas.
Your attempt to find common ground between the pure re-statement
of defined dogma and the meaningless formula of unbelievers is wrong. The ignorant native you envision must also
have real faith in the mysteries of Christ, in addition to actually being
baptized. The heretics, on the other
hand, hold that those who even reject Christ and don’t believe in Him are in
the state of grace. That disproves what
you have argued. They also leave open
the possibility that anyone, no matter what his beliefs, can be counted as
inside the Church somehow. It’s
certainly true that an angel could miraculously instruct an ignorant
native. He could then direct him
concerning what he must do; but someone would have to baptize him.
The quote from St. Thomas to which you refer is referenced in
our salvation book. In it, he refutes
the false idea of “invincible ignorance.”
He teaches that faith in the Trinity and Incarnation is absolutely
necessary for salvation; and that, if a good-willed person were ignorant of
those truths, an angel would be sent to teach him.
Comment
I just watched your new video on B16
wearing Star of David mitre....words simply really do not express
the perverse extremity of this absolute DENIAL of any and all Faith
in Christ currently exhibited to all the world by the goblins in the
"vatican"---only one image keeps coming into mind, and that is
of Christ bloody, beaten, and tortured almost beyond
recognition as He lays dying on that terrible crucifix dangling between
earth and sky---for US. His mother is at the foot of the Cross, weeping,
praying… The enemies of Christ cannot change this reality of Christ's
Sacrifice---though they certainly are TRYING to. Thus the salient
importance of the continual fervent and ever-more loving prayer from our hearts
of the Rosary-----we will fight with this WEAPON------and WIN!! This
is a battle to the death, and beyond---thankfully, we have our weapons.......with
humility and prayer and chastity we will simply crush our enemy-------with
overwhelming force.
A
Rosary
Brothers,
With regards to the question on how the
Holy Rosary can save us, please inform the questioner Melissa that during the Apparition
in Fatima, Portugal, the Blessed Virgin Mary said to Francisco that he needs to
pray a lot of rosaries to make it to Heaven. For a young child to be told that
it only means that we, adults, have a lot of praying the Holy
Rosary to do. Keep up the good works,
Maria Juanita
Follow-up
Subject: Concerning Transubstantiation
Question
Thank you MHFM. I knew about form and
matter, but this was the first I heard of minister and INTENT. It makes more sense
to me now. I will continue to study and to pray about the present situation.
God bless you,
Daniel
Found
Brother Michael:
I found your website strictly by chance and
find it very compelling. I am a cradle Catholic and have more than a few years
under my belt. Your web site states that the two past Popes are not, and were
not the true Popes, and your do prove it to my satisfaction. No Pope would go into a Mosque and pray with
Muslims who deny the divinity of our Lord. My question to you is how do I
convince anyone that the Catholic Church is the true and only way to salvation
and then tell him or her that the last two Popes were not genuine? I will be
waiting for your response.
John
MHFM: We’re glad that you came across
the information. There are two main
points to stress when explaining it to them: 1) According to the teaching of
the past popes, the Vatican II “popes” cannot be true popes. That means that they are not legitimate on the basis of Catholic teaching which
existed long before their “elections.”
Therefore, there is no inconsistency in Catholic teaching at all. When applied, it eliminates them from
consideration. 2) It is predicted in the
Bible and in Catholic prophecy that there will be a Great Apostasy and a
massive falling away from the true faith in the final days. This apostasy will also feature an apostasy
in Rome. The fact that Rome figures so
prominently in the apocalyptic saga demonstrates that Rome was historically the
seat of God’s Church, and that the Catholic Church is the true Church. This video is very relevant:
Why Rome is
now the Whore of Babylon
The Great Apostasy and a
Counterfeit Church predicted in the New Testament and in Catholic Prophecy
Afflicted
Dear
Brothers:
Your work
has been going on for many years and the world is still afflicted with the
Vatican II Whore. Will this whore be with us until Jesus Christ comes
back? Is there any way to remove the false Vatican anti-popes,
anti-bishops and anti-priest or are we stuck with them?...
As regards the
false pope (Rat Zinger) making images of the beast JPII, it seems to me after
reading a book, the name escapes me, where JPII (surely he fits the
description of the antichrist in the following scripture verse "...so that
he sitteth in the temple of God, showing himself as though he were God"
(2nd Thess. 2:4) -by preaching that all men are Christ and by the authority as
a pope, even though he really doesn't possess that office because he is an
anti-pope, he in the same words makes himself a God and at one and the same
time deals lethal blows to the truth of: 1. that the only way to salvation for
men is to believe that by Jesus Christ's death on the cross and his
resurrection He made satisfaction for our sins, that we need to be baptized and
born of the Holy Spirit to even have the possibility of eternal bliss, and 2.
that faithfulness to the dogmas and doctrines of the Catholic Church are
required for salvation) gave two retreats in 1962 and 1972 where he
develops the thesis that all men were united with Christ at his incarnation
whether they know it or not which in effect says there is no original sin,
(universal salvation), God reveals man to himself instead of the true
revelation that God reveals to man Himself, in other words, all men are
Gods.
… Basically
that… Vatican II was the realization of this new truth: that all men are united
with Christ even though they don't know it, and that this reciprocates back to
Adam and Eve. Seems to me that Rat Zinger is following up with JPII's
anti-christ message with the constant references he makes about the need for
men to have "memory" or to remember who they are which ties in with
all men are united to Christ whether they know it or not…
St. Jerome
said, "To put it briefly, I have never spared heretics, and have always
striven to regard the church' enemies as my own" and as Pope Pius XI
said to lukewarm Catholics, "The two opposing camps are now clearly marked; each man
should choose his own. Men of good will and men of evil will face one
another. The uninterested and the cowards face their fearsome
responsibility. They will have their names changed if they do not
change their behavior: they will be called traitors."
Paul R.
Interesting
MHFM: This is an interesting interview concerning
Israel’s recent raid on the Gaza flotilla.
It provides perspective and information one won’t hear in the controlled
press. For those who are interested in
this issue which has been in the news recently, it’s worth watching.
Discussion of
Israel's raid on Gaza flotilla
Question
Subject: Question about Transubstantiation?
Hello brother Dimond. I'm a Novus Ordo
Catholic that agrees with you about the erroneous words of consecration over the
wine. I have a question on transubstantiation. As you know, the Novus Ordo
priest speaks accurate words to consecrate the bread. Does transubstantiation
occur at that second? If so, then what happens a few seconds later when he
speaks the erroneous words over the wine? Does reverse transubstantiation occur
on the previously consecrated bread?
I have my own thoughts about this, but I was curious about what the
sedevacantist position is on it.
Thanks,
Daniel
MHFM:
Before answering your question, we must say: how are you not yet convinced that
Benedict XVI is a heretic and therefore not the pope? You need to get out of the invalid New
Mass. With regard to your question, we
have discussed it in the past:
In order to confect a
sacrament, one must have matter, form, minister and INTENTION. The Church teaches that intention is
determined by intending to do what the Church does, that is, intending to use
the FORM that the Church uses. So, using
the proper form determines
whether one has the proper INTENTION. In the traditional Mass, since one intends to
use the WHOLE FORM, one has the proper INTENTION to do what the Church
does.
Therefore, when a priest who
is using the traditional form, and therefore has the proper INTENTION, says:
“This is my body,” the substance is immediately changed. That’s because he intends to do what the
Church does. He intends to go on to use
the rest of the Church’s form. That's
what the Council of Florence is discussing, someone with proper
"intention." However, when a
“priest” uses the new mutilated Novus Ordo form, he does not intend to use the
form prescribed by the Catholic Church but a mutilated and heretical form. Therefore, he has a defect of intention from the start.
This defect of intention is
present at the very moment the Novus Ordo "priest" says “This is my
body,” and thus nothing happens. So,
the defect of form in the wine portion of the New Mass gives rise to a defect
of intention which takes effect at the very moment he says the words for the
consecration of the bread: “This is my body.”
We
hope you continue to look at the information and become convinced.
Notice
You Brothers have done and are doing a
tremendous amount of work for the glory of God and of the True Faith. Be sure that
it is appreciated.
I notice that you have been excommunicated! From what, I wonder? It's
interesting to note that in the days that Our Lord walked the earth, His
followers were 'excommunicated' from the Synagogue (Jn 9:22).
May Our Blessed Mother carry you in Her arms and protect you with Her mantle.
pd
MHFM: Thanks for the interest. We’re not sure exactly what you are referring
to, but the Vatican II sect would have no authority to excommunicate anyone
anyway.
Baptized
Hello Brother Michael and Brother Peter,
You'll be pleased to know that after
looking at all your information and listening to your audios, I have been
baptized in the Conditional Form by my younger sister. She did this for me last
week. I had, beforehand, made absolutely certain I believed in all traditional
Dogmas, most especially "No Salvation Outside the Church."
So...I just wanted to say thank you for all your help and information and may
God and His Most Blessed Mother keep and protect you.
T…S….
Consecration
It's been said that Pius XII consecrated
Russia, so that it's been done but without the cooperation of his bishops in a
formal way. The message clearly states that it must be done with the
bishops, for a general marches at the head of his army - but not without them. An example from the world: when the
papers reported that Gen. Omar Bradley crossed the Rhein, it was understood
that he didn't go alone, but with his army.
If the consecration had been done and
accepted by Heaven then the age of peace would have begun and it would last
centuries. Am I wrong?
Karl
MHFM: You are wrong. We
covered this in detail in our videos on the topic and in the article. Our Lady requested
that the consecration be done with all the bishops, but only promised that the pope would do it. She also indicated that it would be “late”
and not in total conformity with her original request. The meaning of the certain period of peace
(which was fulfilled) is addressed in these videos and article:
The
Consecration and Conversion of Russia - Part 1
The Consecration and Conversion of Russia - Part 2
Fatima (the sign, the miracle, the Consecration of Russia, the
False Sr. Lucy) [Link to Section]
Debate
Debate about
Vatican II with Chicago Archdiocesan Apologist - Part 1
Debate about
Vatican II with Chicago Archdiocesan Apologist - Part 2
Debate about
Vatican II with Chicago Archdiocesan Apologist - Part 3
Debate about
Vatican II with Chicago Archdiocesan Apologist - Part 4
Debate about
Vatican II with Chicago Archdiocesan Apologist - Part 5
Preparation
MHFM:
Cannot thank you enough for the End of
World videos! At last I understand it all clearly. Will there be any more
after #11?
In preparation for the coming chastisement,
I have been looking for truly blessed bee's wax candles and holy water.
Are these available from you, or can you provide info about a reliable
source?...
Dominus vobiscum...
John
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. Holy Water, in normal times, is of course a
good thing to have. However, one doesn’t
need special candles to make it through a chastisement. That’s a misconception that some have. We believe that we are in the great
chastisement, which is the current Great Apostasy.
Had to
Dear MHFM,
I had to write in concerning so many people who have commented on E-Exchanges
(Paul R., Deidre Howard, Vladimir, and others). This winter, you had
responded to one person very accurately,
i've been listening
to some of your debates, i'm sorry but all of your opponents come off really
stupid, can you please get someone a bit more intelligent? these guys arguments
are some of the dumbest things i've ever heard
mp…
MHFM: They are not
stupid. It’s that the arguments and positions, when confronted with
strong truth, look stupid; and, in the process, their bad will and
inconsistency become apparent. We’ve debated a variety of individuals
and we are trying to set up more debates.
I think more people need to keep this point
in mind. It seems in their responses that they are lacking Catholic Charity
when they insult the person, i.e. "he is stupid", rather than
strictly assessing the person's argument. As you said above, "They are not
stupid. It’s that the arguments and positions, when confronted with
strong truth, look stupid; and, in the process, their bad will and
inconsistency become apparent."
You always give a good example and I haven't ever seen you simply reply to a
"stupid person" and say, "wow, you are stupid."
Another person people may want to take a good example from is Chris White. He
frequently writes in and from what I have read, displays the Catholic Charity that
you display. He never calls the person stupid, he simply points out the errors,
the lies, etc. This email is really in
response to Michael Rudnicki. Even though he had interesting points, I was very
much bothered by his email. It seriously lacked Catholic Charity, which you (in
effect) accurately pointed out. I think this is a very important point because
you have touched many people with your works. Many people are taking what you
say to heart and trying to apply it to their own situation. I think the thing
people should remember is that when you (MHFM) have a debate, or when you
denounce an individual, they frequently have already insulted you, told you
that you know nothing, etc.
So if a person comes across a N.O.
individual they should, as you commented, take time to explain some things to
them. Very frequently they have no idea about what went on in the 1960’s. They
simply grew up in the N.O., and that’s all they know. Thinking back, when I was
N.O., had someone asked me the same question, is the Catholic Church the one
true religion, I also would have hesitated and stumbled. People just don’t
speak like that in the N.O. I mean they are basically Protestants.
As an example, this past Sunday… I was
staying out of church as usual and an Asian woman approached me. She had
stepped out of church with her young children and she started asking me
questions about church etc. I could tell she had never been there before, and
later she told me she was a born and raised N.O. She decided to come because
the Latin Mass seemed more reverent. After she said why she decided to come I
jumped right in and told her why we were there. I explained that the new mass
is invalid and why. I also explained that Benedict isn’t the pope etc. She was
receptive to the information and in the end she took my phone number and email,
and she told me she would definitely check out your website!
I just wonder if the person Michael had
confronted would have responded the same way had he used a little more Catholic
Charity and sense!
Sincerely,
Robby
MHFM: We have a few thoughts about
your e-mail. First, in terms of people
insulting others strictly on the basis of
what they consider to be a lack of intelligence, we agree with your
comments. As you have quoted above, we
disagreed with a reader who wrote in and expressed his opinions in that
regard. We believe that God gives every
person the intelligence he or she needs to see the truth and fulfill His
will. Generally speaking, people should
not criticize others in that way, and it does display a lack of charity. It can also display a pseudo-intellectual
pride, which always begets spiritual blindness.
In fact, it’s quite often the case that those who consider themselves
the most intelligent are in fact the most foolish and bad-willed. Moreover, such individuals frequently savor
the unimportant wisdom of man and look down upon the simple truths of God.
However,
we do not believe that the readers’ e-mails to which you referred were
necessarily directing their insults purely at the Chicago “apologist’s”
intelligence or lack thereof. They were
commenting on his general stupidity, which
arises not from an innate defect of
reasoning capability, but rather from the perversity of his will. Heretics like him do become stupid by their
dishonesty, their hatred of the truth, and their obstinate rejection of
Catholic teaching. In addition, in their
demonic pride, they consider themselves learned while they simultaneously trash
Catholic teaching and fail to even consult pure sources of it. With all of that considered and on display in
a heretic who is willing to debate against Catholic truth – he also called us
“loons” before the conversation, after seeing our website – we do not have a
problem with those who labeled such a despicable and obstinate apostate as stupid and idiotic and ignorant, even if
personally we would usually stick to calling him evil, a liar, bad-willed,
etc. That is to say, we do not have a
problem with their comments when made in the context of what such a person has
become through bad will. The same words
could be applied to many other heretics we have debated with. Those heretics also spare no words in
throwing out their false insults against those who defend Catholic truth. Scripture likewise insults evil men:
Romans 1:22- “For professing themselves to
be wise, they became fools.”
Isaias 56:10: “His watchmen are all blind, they are all ignorant: dumb dogs not
able to bark, seeing vain things, sleeping and loving dreams.”
Ecclesiasticus 22:12- “For the wicked life
of a wicked fool is worse than death.”
Psalm 13:1- “Unto the end, a psalm for
David. The fool hath said in his heart: There is no God.”
With regard to your comment about staying with people and communicating
in a friendly manner until they have a chance to hear the truth, we of course
completely agree. That’s the whole point
and it should go without saying for a true Catholic. A Catholic’s goal is to try to convert
them. Those who would walk out and
condemn them without even giving them the information to hear the truth, or a
chance to respond, have a serious problem.
They miss the whole point.
Finally, we would add that we need more people who hate evil
today.
Psalm 96:10- “You that love the Lord, hate
evil…”
That’s why we do not find it offensive, but refreshing, when we
receive e-mails from individuals who say things which attack and insult
obstinate heretics and evildoers. When
it comes from a true motive of rejecting or exposing the evil they represent or
defend, it demonstrates a zeal for truth, a lively faith, a freedom from human
respect, and the hatred of evil which one must have if the Lord is to use
him.
Listened
I've just listened twice to the recent
"debate" with Rob, the phony "Catholic" apologist.
Had to add my two cents worth because it makes my blood boil! The
Catholic Church uses language which is simple, concise, and unfailingly clear,
leaving no wiggle room for weasels who will "interpret" dogma
away. He offered not one solid proof for any of his diabolical
musings. Apparently, the 2000 years of the Church previous to the Vatican
II era are meaningless to him. But of course, once again, the truth shone
brightly over the shifting sands of the lies and deceits of this
diabolical counterfeit Church. Brother Peter, you were unmistakably
speaking with a demon. God be with you and Brother Michael. You are
always in my prayers.
Sincerely in Christ,
Margaret Moore
Brief
Dear Bro. Michael and Peter Dimond,
Just a brief comment for Deidre:
"Good on you for giving that 'windbag'
from Chicago a 'blast of hot air' - which if he doesn't 'smarten up' soon -
will have to endure for all eternity!"
God bless,
David
Fatima Video
Subject: Fatima Video
I was watching the fatima video again and
the part where the brothers talk about the description of the sun where it was
fiery and then suddenly it descended to the earth towards the people, I was
thinking it was like our lady was playing charades with the world. I
think Mary chose this example to tell us the world is going to end and that the
second coming of Jesus is near. Everyone knows that an asteroid that big
would destroy the entire earth. Our lady also appeared in the miracle
as Our Lady of Mt. Carmel {scapular}, she was telling us to wear the
scapular. Our lady also told Lucia that the rosary was the last remedy or
weapon to be used during this last time. Great video guys!=
Nk
Novus Ordo
Maybe
something more sinister is going on, with the Vatican II apologist (apostates),
as one of your readers (Vladimir from Zagreb) suggests when he says: “...their stupidity (read: “drunk” in
the verse below) is of supernatural origin” and it could tie in with your article: “Is the Vatican II sect the Whore of
Babylon prophesied in the Apocalypse?” and specifically where you point out the
scripture verse: Apocalypse 17:1-2- "Come, I will show thee the
condemnation of the great harlot, who sitteth upon many waters, With
whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication; and they who
inhabit the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her whoredom."
In that article you go on to say “In one and the same verse, therefore, God
is revealing that the whore is conducting massive spiritual fornication in
areas which regard the Catholic Mass and the Catholic Church as a whole. It is
a startling description of the Vatican II sect: the end-time Counter-Church”.
Maybe
these novus ordo “Catholics” are “drunk” with this wine (novus ordo mass) of
her whoredom… doesn’t the whore try and mimic the true church? Maybe the
following scripture verses are prophetic in some way when, in Acts 2:12 some of
the Jews “...marveled” on the day of Pentecost and seemingly in opposition others
said: Acts 2:13: “But others deriding said, That these are full of new wine.”
And then St. Peter saying, Acts 2:15: “For these are not drunk.” The exact
opposite outcome, (the truly good one is the fruit of the Last Supper (Roman
Rite) which leads to eternal life and the other one the evil and death dealing
fruit of the novus ordo mass which leads to eternal damnation), of this demonic
“mimickry” is then either quite ironic (I don’t think so) or is foretold in a
way when tying together the scripture verses in The Apocalypse and Acts.
“And
I hear another voice from heaven, saying, Go out from her my people: that you
be not partakers of her sins, and receive not of her plagues.” (Apocalypse of
St. John 18:4.)
A
chilling reminder that a Catholic can in absolutely no way, and in no uncertain
terms, be associated with the Vatican II whore.
Paul
R.
Audio
Dear Most Holy Family Monastery:
Thank you for posting the audio
debate—which was actually an attack—from the Windy One of Chicago. I
found him amusing and laughed at him— at first, until I was scandalized by
him. Here is yet another man who cares nothing for his soul, and attempts
to drag others down into the pit with him; he compounds his sins by
scandalizing others. No coincidence, here is the reading for Saturday,
May 29 from the Epistle of St. Jude 17-21:
“But you, my dearly beloved, be mindful of
the words which have been spoken before by the apostles of our Lord Jesus
Christ, who told you that in the last time there should come mockers, walking according
to their own desires in ungodlinesses. These are they who separate
themselves, sensual men, having not the Spirit. But you, my beloved,
building yourselves upon your most holy faith, praying in the Holy Ghost, keep
yourselves in the love of God, waiting for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ,
unto life everlasting.”
If I could write a letter to Mr. Windy,
this is what I would say:
Dear Mr. Windy of the Windy City,
I neither know who you are, nor do I
care. As I am no one, my jeers at you will not bruise in any way your
overinflated sense of self for you are one of the hoi-polloi with the diocese
of Chicago. You sure are somebody. Gosh. Thanks so much for
sharing your astonishing stupidity with the world… you are filled with bad
will. Br. Peter was extremely patient with you, which I and others
witnessed…
I am appalled by your ignorance which, as
you so generously demonstrated, is invincible. You are a novus ordor
superhero; your ignorance is like a force-field. Everything bounces right
off. No amount of logic, no quotes, no words from the saints God sent to
His Church makes a dent in your arrogance. Indeed, you are Invincibly
Ignorant! You are another tiresome example of the rotten fruit of
V2. However, just so you know, God will not accept your ignorance, as
insurmountable as it is, as an excuse for your scandalizing me and others, Mr.
Windy.
Mr. Windy, I will tell you how I know you
are evil and the way in which you scandalized me: you equated Jesus to “the
deity”. You did it more than once; you did this several times. The
word “deity” is commonly used to refer to the demons worshipped by infidels and
satanists throughout history. You have given yourself away and revealed
yourself for what you are. How dare you conflate Jesus Christ with
lucifer! You are an evil man. Your attempt to foist that evil upon
me and others is scandalous and a mortal sin.
No wonder you did not give your name and
wished to remain anonymous. However, the true God, the Blessed Trinity,
knows who you are. And your deity, too, Mr. Windy. It knows who you
are and is waiting for you… No more chatter from you, Mr. Windy.
I will give my name for all to see, unlike
you, Mr. Windy.
Deidre Howard
Comment
A couple of thoughts occurred to me upon
reflection on the debate with the Chicago guy:
1)
At least twice, in trying to answer the question about the fate of
hypothetical persons (unbaptized infant, a rabbi) dying outside of the Church,
he used the expression “that would be up to the deity”. Maybe it is not a
big deal, but I think that people who use this term for God, at least when
otherwise speaking in colloquial English, view God as an abstraction, and not
as a Catholic would view Him. Its use is like a warning bell to me about
intentions or belief.
2)
In claiming that he cannot judge these circumstances, because as he says
“if a person has not been taught…”, what he is really denying, which is even
more basic than EENS, is Original Sin. If you think about it, this is
what all of Vatican II’s blather about the “dignity of man” is really
about. It undermines the doctrine of Original Sin. Denying EENS and
every other related heresy is just a natural development of denying
(unconsciously, or stealthily, because they never say it) this most basic fact
of our nature…
Bill Mulligan
Interest
Dear Brother Michael and Brother Peter
Dimond,
Thank you for your amazing website.
It is the best website that I know of. A great torrent of truth. I am an English Sedevacantist. One of the
very important things that you have said is that Benedict in Greek is
Benediktos and it equals 666. This will really help to convince
people…
Michael
Reminder
I very much appreciate the posting of
Brother Peter's attempted debate with the "Apologist" from
Chicago. While it was painful to listen to this, I'm sure it was much
more painful for Brother Peter to have undertaken it. It must have been
like trying to converse with a parrot.
And though painful, I may listen again -
because it's worthwhile and sobering. Our minds were made to know
God and His truth. Brother's conversation with the parrot is a stark
reminder that only the Enemy could have done this, and that the false
church (with its false religion) is the work of Satan and the worst
possible punishment of mankind.
During this past week of Pentecost, I was
reminded that obstinacy in heresy is the sin against the Holy Ghost.
Our Lord said that with repentance and true contrition all sins can be forgiven
- except the sin against the Holy Ghost.
Every "heresiarch" usurps the
role of the Holy Ghost by trying to replace God's truth with his own
"doctrine" and, thus, he assumes the position - The Satanic
Stance. And every follower of these heretics assumes the stance of the
fallen angels.
It seems that as it all began, thus will it
end. Many thanks for being an instrument
in our conversion to the true Faith and the true Church.
Lee
Dom
Subject: Dom Gueranger
Brothers:
Thank you for everything that you do on behalf of the truth of Roman Catholic
Dogma.
Were you aware that Dom Gueranger favors baptism of desire?... Thanks again,
and God bless you.
Joseph Ramirez
MHFM: Yes, we were aware.
He was simply wrong, dead wrong. The
false doctrine became widespread in that period, without an infallible leg to
stand on.
Considered
Dear Brothers,
If a Novus Ordo "Catholic" on
their death bed, when explained everything to them of the real Catholic Church,
and they agreed and did want a priest to come for Confession and Last Rites,
and the person died before the priest came, is that person presumed to have
died as a Catholic?
Or, being that it is a sin against the Holy
Ghost, is unforgiveable unless the Sacrament of Confession is received?
Also, speaking of "rats", a
friend once told me, rats are from Europe, and they got to America via boats
entering New York.
Thank you, and God bless
- Nancy
MHFM:
One thing that people should have such individuals make is the profession of
faith for converts from the Council of Trent.
It’s on our website. They should
add to it a rejection of the main heresies they held. Since the person you describe would have been
baptized and agreed with all the true positions, and presumably rejected the
heretical ones he or she previously held, then that person could be considered
to have died a Catholic. That of course
assumes that the agreement was sincere and not simply out of a desire to pacify
the family member or friend who was present.
It also assumes that the person ceased all previous heretical
activity. We would add that if there is
some doubt that a person will live until a priest can give absolution, he/she
should be counseled to pray for the grace of perfect contrition, and of course
the Hail Mary and the Rosary, in case the priest doesn’t make it.
Perfect
contrition, it should be noted, is sorrow for sin which arises primarily out of
love for God and for having offended Him.
Imperfect contrition is sorrow for sin which arises primarily out of the
fear of Hell, God’s punishments, the loss of Heaven. Though inferior to perfect contrition,
imperfect contrition is salutary and good.
As Trent teaches, imperfect contrition arises from an impulse of the
Holy Ghost, even though it cannot restore one to justification without the
Sacrament of Penance.
There
is no type of sin that is unforgivable.
After baptism any sin can be forgiven in (a sincere and complete)
confession or through perfect contrition and the desire for confession.
VII Apologist
Subject:
VII Apologist
Hello
Dimond Brothers:
I just listened to your debate with the Vatican II so-called
"Apologist" for the second time. All I can say is unbelievable, despicable,
demonic. But that is just what these people are - and it is really unthinkable
how deep the antichrist heresy goes until one hears it in the debate format. It
is really shocking how intent somebody like him is against Our Lord. He really
does not want to see Christ reign, but instead plainly shows how he wishes for
men to be exalted, to the extent that a Christ-rejecting Rabbi is saved is
saved in his mind and in his false religion. He believes that all men are
"worthy" of salvation - probably due to their "human
dignity". When he says "through no fault of their own"
he basically means that all men have such a dignity that they are beyond any
fault that God could have a right to judge them on. This is not an anomaly -
sadly, pretty much all of the Vatican II churchgoers believe this precisely,
though most have not the bold malice to admit it in such an explicit fashion as
he. This is what the antipopes have done, the fruit that Vatican II has
produced, and especially the Arch-heretic John Paul II. I, along with many
others, thank you for exercising the patience to tolerate these debates. The
debates are, to a great degree, countering the bad fruit of the VII church for
those of good will.
-Thanks,
Mike
Listening
Subject: Debate about Vatican II with
Chicago Archdiocesan Apologist
Listening to the person in your "Debate about Vatican II with Chicago
Archdiocesan Apologist" debate was very frustrating. The apologist seemed
to be an illogical idiot who argued against basic truth. The fact he could not
even understand what DOGMA means was simply amazing. The fact he said
"unbaptised infants could be saved" and then you pointed out Trent on
that very issue then he tried to get out of what he said. He said he was
against you being an arbiter but does not understand that the arbiter is the
Catholic Church and Dogmatic teaching. You were only stating the Catholic dogma
and not being an arbiter. The guy simply does not know his Catholic Faith and
his statements were often illogical.
God Bless,
Maria
Total
Subject: comment
Dear brothers in Christ,
I've just finished the listening of the
debate you've had with an "apologist". The "apologist" wasn't able to say
not even one coherent statement. It is just incredible how much these V-2
people are stupid and ignorant. Complete liars as they are, they so much love
their lies that they are not capable to grasp the meaning of
contradictions. I mean, every human being, even those who can be called
retarded for their lack of natural intelligence, are capable to realize that
"yes" is just the opposite of "no". But, V-2 adherents are
so stupid that they question even that--that "yes" is the opposite of
"no". And that proves that their stupidity is of supernatural origin.
The "apologist" would probably
say:"well, it depends what the OPPOSITE means", not realizing, due to
his unshakable love for satanic lies, that the OPPOSITE has no meaning without
"yes" and "no" at all.
Total darkness, total destruction of faith, total destruction of natural
intelligence given by God to every human being---these are some of the
expressions describing most fittingly the present state of V2 sect. Things are
going from bad to worse every second. I
admire your patience with these people. Most definitely this patience is a gift
from God.
Most Holy Heavenly Mother and St. Joseph, pray for us.
Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia
Just found
Dear Brother Michael,
I just found your website and haven't been
able to stop reading it. WOW! Where have I been all these years! What I'm
wondering is, what mass can I attend now?
In other words: How do I know which mass I
can attend? What if there are none in my area (or close enough for
driving distance)?
Thanks, God bless,
Camila
MHFM: It's great to hear about your interest. In that case,
there wouldn't be an obligation to go. You should try to find a priest
who was validly ordained to whom you could go to confession. That's
explained in our file on Where to go to Mass, under traditional Catholic
issues. If you contact us, we can also help you with potential locations
for receiving valid sacraments. Again,
it's great to hear that you found the site.
Remember
Subject: Corapi
I remember a few years back I was watching
Corapi, and I heard him say, "I have read the documents of the 2nd Vatican
Council, and I'm not against it, I'm for it." And he went on to
bring up what he said to a priest who was wondering why so many in Latin
American are leaving the true faith for Evangelical
Protestantism. The reason he gave was "They still believe that
there is a Ten Commandments, and they still believe you gotta follow
them." as opposed to the V2 sect, which does not.
-M. Rudnicki
Pope
Gregory vs. Vatican II
MHFM: This is a new discussion of the most
interesting parts of Pope Gregory XVI's 1832 encyclical, Mirari Vos. This video shows how this encyclical contradicts
various heresies in Vatican II, and other heresies which are prevalent today.
Pope Gregory XVI (Mirari Vos) Destroys Vatican II - part 1
Pope Gregory XVI (Mirari Vos) Destroys Vatican II - part 2
Debate
Dear Brothers,
The debate with the anonymous Vatican II apologist is absolutely smashing!!!
The ending is just classic! He couldn't refute you so, like a rat, he just hung
up… He couldn't even name the first Church Council… I think such heretics are
employed (by the Devil) to confuse people into staying in Babylon the Great
(the Vatican II sect) by mocking true Catholic teaching. Such modernists don't
even believe in the visible Catholic Church (i.e. One, Holy, Catholic and
Apostolic) so logically the teachings of the Church are rejected by them as
meaningless. Modernism, based on the false philosophy of agnosticism (i.e. that
is impossible to know if God exists), essentially proclaims that it is
impossible to know if anything is absolutely true, since God is the Absolute
Truth. He denies that dogma is dogma! He thinks Catholic dogma is arbitrary and
not based on Divine law. What a modernist. To deny dogma is to deny Christ. All
Jewish Rabbis knowingly reject Christ because the Talmud calls Jesus a heretic
and a sorcerer! Muslim Muftis knowingly reject Christ because the Koran
blasphemes the Trinity and Jesus! Yet the V-2 Antipopes (JP2, B-16, etc.) honor
such evil people and their false religions. He thinks one can honor devils and
please God!!! I get the feeling that he doesn't even believe that dogmas can be
written down. He thinks "to loose" means a dogma can be contradicted
by a later pope! He criticized you for understanding the teachings of the
Catholic Church "too literally," when there is no other way they are
to be understood:
Pope Pius IX, First Vatican Council, Sess. 3, Chap. 2 on Revelation, 1870, ex
cathedra: “Hence, also, that understanding of its sacred dogmas must be
perpetually retained, which Holy Mother Church has once declared; and there must never be a recession from
that meaning under the specious name of a deeper understanding.”
The debate is a very accurate snapshot of the Antichrist Apostate mindset of
the Vatican II Church in contrast to the true Catholic Church - clouds blocking
the sunlight. The main point that struck me is his demand to know the
definition of a dogma. Vatican I dogmatically defined the definition of a
dogma. There are three specific criteria for a teaching to be
dogmatic/infallible, i.e. a Pope teaching the Church, invoking authority (e.g.
Church, solemn, apostolic, etc.), on faith & morals:
Vatican I: "we teach and define as a divinely revealed dogma that when the
Roman pontiff speaks EX CATHEDRA, that is, when, 1. in the exercise of his
office as shepherd and teacher of all Christians, 2. in virtue of his supreme
apostolic authority, 3. he defines a doctrine concerning faith or morals to be
held by the whole church, he possesses, by the divine assistance promised to
him in blessed Peter, that infallibility which the divine Redeemer willed his
church to enjoy in defining doctrine concerning faith or morals.
The bull Cantate Domino is dogmatic because
it contains all three requirements:
Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence,
“Cantate Domino,” 1441, ex cathedra: “The Holy Roman Church firmly believes,
professes and preaches [1,2] that all those who are outside the Catholic
Church, not only pagans but also Jews or heretics and schismatics, cannot share
in eternal life and will go into the everlasting fire which was prepared for
the devil and his angels, unless they are joined to the Church before the end
of their lives. [3]"
Mr. Hang-up is just a total liar,
bad-willed and a heretic who is on the path to hell. Clearly he just didn't
want to hear the truth, which is why he kept interrupting you and eventually admitted
defeat in the most cowardly way possible - by hanging up the phone without
saying goodbye. Words are meaningless for such wicked and evil men - it's
impossible to reason with a liar. He accuses the Catholic Church, the
Immaculate Bride of Christ, of sin. It's outrageous!!! Heretics fight with
dirty tactics as can be heard in the debate…
God Bless,
Chris White
Concerned
Subject: You have me concerned
I was never confirmed catholic when i was
younger but i was baptized catholic... recently i wanted to have my
confirmation done now being 29 i thought it was good to chase it up and did so
at easter! but if what you say about the
pope is real pope then i have taken a mark of the beast !!! so what then is to
happen to me,,,, and what is your thoughts on brown scapular?
where do i stand i am from Australia and they say our pope Ben16th ..... so
what if you are saying is true can i be at a valid mass if he is not the real
pope at all and they say he is our pope what should i do then pray the rosary
and not go to mass, go to mass an keep praying to rosary
if i was at a invalid mass the rosary would be the only thing that saves me!...
and i do feel the great storm is coming very soon ww3 kind
Ekultec…
MHFM: You need to pray the
full Rosary each day. You need to stop
going to the New Mass. You need to
become convinced of the traditional Catholic faith, and all of its
teaching. Once that has occurred, follow
the steps on our site for a profession of faith, confession, etc. One should wear the Scapular.
Watched
I watched some of your videos on paul 6.0
and I feel really bad for you guys. I can tell you love Christ more than a
church-good for you. I think it's over though… I think that modern catholics
cannot because they are so apostate.
Always Christ
Always Scripture
God's love be with you,
Thomas S.
MHFM: You seem like a Protestant. Our book, The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church, is important
for you to see. Christ founded a Church,
the Catholic Church. It’s necessary to
belong to it to be saved. Our other
material also explains why those you call the modern “Catholics” aren’t
Catholic at all.
Message
MY MESSAGE TO YOU IS YOU MAY FOOL SOME OF
THE PEOPLE BUT… WHAT YOU SAY IS JUDGEMENT ON OTHERS AND IT IS SO WRONG ON
fATHER cORAPI AND WHAT hE SAYS ABOUT THE THIRD SECRET AND SISTER LUCY / YOU
NEED SOMEONE TO PRAY FOR YOU TO STOP JUDGING OTHERS, DO YOU HAVE A BLAMELESS
LIFE?
Neet…
MHFM: Corapi denies Catholic dogma. How hard is it to understand? It’s evil to defend heretics, but that’s what
you are doing. Every e-mail we receive
like yours is another example of why God leaves so many in the Novus Ordo
without a clue about what’s really going on.
It’s because, like you, they don’t want to grasp the truth.
Wanted
Dear, Sir,
I wanted to take a moment to comment on your presentation regarding Father
Corapi.
I believe that your taking his comments out of context, that is easy to do
since anyones words can be taking out of context. People even take the words
from the bible out of contexts, if this wasn't so then there wouldn't so many
denominations. Just because he isn't what he would do doesn't mean anything,
priest this day in age can't deny communion to anyone, it is the partakers
choice. You should spend more time bringing people to christ not attacking
other people.
Snakes…
MHFM: What’s out of context?
(Hint: nothing.) The truth is
that you don’t have any evidence that anything has been taken out of
context. It’s just a cheap response when
you have nothing else to say. Stop
lying. You talk about bringing people to
Christ. You can’t bring people to Christ
if you don’t have the true faith, if you don’t denounce heresies and
heretics.
Romans 16:17- “Now I beseech you, brethren,
to mark them who make dissensions and offences contrary to the doctrine which
you have learned, and avoid them.”
Baptism
Hello bro. Michael and members of the MHFM
community! Peace be to all of you!
I am Sherwin… I am a Filipino and baptized when infant in the Catholic Church.
I am more comfortable writing to you than calling. I believe that the 2nd
Vatican Council is not the True Catholic Church. I knew there is something
wrong with the teachings but i just couldn't figure out due to lack of
resources, until i found your videos and documents in the net. I ordered dvds
and books from you and i believed those are true. After being informed by you, i realized that
the priests in our Parish Church in the Philippines are ordained by the Vatican
II Council. DOES THIS REALITY MAKES MY BAPTISM IN 1978 VOID?
Baptism concerns me a lot because i believe
and i have been convincing my protestant friends, with the use of Bible verses,
that we need Baptism from the True Church of Jesus which is the Catholic. And i
have a baby born April 27, 2010 who needs to be Baptised. Paul wrote in
Ephesians 4:5 "One Lord, one Faith, one Baptism." and Jesus said in
John 3:3 "...unless one is born again he shall not see the Kingdom of
God." There is no other Baptism and Faith other than what Jesus handed
down to the disciples, apostles and early Church leaders. But the problem we have now is that Our
Church leader, who claims to be the Pope is already a heretic. This includes the
bishops and priests who follow the Vatican II Council. HOW CAN I HAVE MY CHILD BE BAPTISED? CAN I
HAVE HER BAPTISED BY ANY CATHOLIC PRIEST… Please help with this problem because
i believe this is very important.
MHFM: Thanks for the interest. The Church teaches that anyone can validly
baptize. So, the fact that your Novus
Ordo “priest” was not validly ordained doesn’t mean that your baptism was
void. As long as he said the proper
words and intended to do what the Church does in properly performing it, it was
valid. The form is on our website. You can baptize your own child, and we hope
you are convinced and committed to never attending the New Mass again.
One true religion
Subject: One true religion
At the public library, I asked an N.O.
attendee who sings in the choir if he believed that the Catholic Church was the
One True Religion. He paused, and said "Umm..." for a moment,
as he was having to think about it! Can you imagine that?! The
stupid heretic is not even remotely Catholic. And this can be known JUST
BY THAT ONE SIMPLE QUESTION made evident by the fact he had to think about
it! I did not even let him finish. I just told him, "You are
not a true Catholic. You are worse than Protestants for you claim to
belong to the True Faith!" and left. I don't know what he was
planning to say, no doubt that nonsense that there are "elements of truths
in other religions." Even if it were true, which it isn't, in the
minds of these young V2 little apostates, that means the Catholic Church is not
the One True Religion. If a true Catholic were asked that question, he
would not have to think about the answer for a fraction of a second. He
would give a quick, audible, affirmative "Yes!" But that is the
ambiance the world over the Vatican II sect has created, where these phony
apostate fake "Catholics" will not even say their religion is the one
true one! If that alone does not prove the apostasy of the VII sect,
nothing ever will!! Someone told me that he went to the reception after
the "Mass" of a man who was celebrating his 50th anniversary as a
priest that year. Serving him cake, the guy said, "Thank you for a
half a century of service to God and the one true religion. Some liberal
"Catholic" lady overheard this and laughed! She laughed!!!
And the priest said, "Whoah, you can get into a lot of trouble talking
like that."… Heretics! How dare they claim to be
Catholics!!!
-Michael Rudnicki
MHFM: That’s interesting.
However, one thing we would say is that you should have stayed a bit,
talked to him, and tried to convert him.
One should find out if he has any interest and try to direct him to the
website and the material. If he still
demonstrates obstinacy or a lack of interest at that point, then you should
leave.
Rosary
Subject: Rosary Prayer Style
Hello Brothers!
If I'm not wrong, I remember reading on your e-exchange a while back that you
said it’s better to pray the Rosary silently, rather then out loud. I have
recently started to pray silently, in my head, and I also close my eyes as that
helps me to meditate on and think of the mysteries I'm praying. Is there
anything wrong with this style of prayer? When I pray like this, it looks like
I'm asleep.
Thank you and God Bless!
D
MHFM: There is nothing wrong with mentally
praying the Rosary.
About
Subject: About the coming end of the world
You are so right brothers. I just saw
a report on the web news that a flood of frogs is blocking a major highway in
Greece. Our good Lord is giving every warning that he can because he is
merciful to save as many as possible.
In Christ,
Nathan
Encounter
Subject: Encounter with St. Michael
Hello MHFM,
Just read the article "Encounter with
St.Michael". Amazing story. What I really liked was the prayer. The prayer is so full of innocence of a
child. We all know Jesus said that
people should accept the kingdom of heaven like a child. Knowing that, it was not surprising that help
came so easily.
Yours Sincerely
Sam.
Diocese
For some reason I went to the website of the
Diocese of Galveston -Houston. At times I like to see what the impostors
are doing. What is written below are excerpts straight from the link on
that site under "About our faith". At the end of this article I
will make a few points...
"We participate in activities of
social justice, support the good works of persons in other countries, prepare our children and young people to be
responsible members of the community and we do all this in the name of our
Lord Jesus Christ."
"But just who are we? Catholics are the largest single
denomination among religions in the United States." “Many of our
beliefs can be found in other Christian religions but some are distinctively
Catholic.”
"Besides being people of the Bible we
are also a people of tradition. Tradition, for Catholics is more than a
long history; we base our teachings also
on the faith experiences of the many people who have made up the Catholic
Church over the past twenty centuries."
The following are excerpts from their
description of the 7 Sacraments: Baptism: This is an initiation rite which begins our journey by connecting us to
a community of faith. It is a ritual which includes pouring on of
water, lighting a candle for life and the presence of sponsors who promise to
guide the person on their journey of faith.
Eucharist: We celebrate a ritual enactment of Jesus’
Last Supper. The priest repeats the words of Jesus and the bread and
wine are changed into the actual body and blood of Christ. This
sacrament is sometimes referred to as Holy Communion.
Confirmation: “…It brings
additional strength for the journey and strengthens
the connection with the faith community. The candidate is anointed
with oil as a sign of strength as a Christian.
Penance: The sacrament is
also called Confession or reconciliation. Catholics are able to bring
themselves back into full grace through the forgiveness of their sins. A process of self-reflection to identify
some patterns of behavior which “miss the mark” leads Catholics to confess
their sins to a priest. Then the priest, in Christ’s name, offers
forgiveness for those sins.
Marriage: Marriage is a
lasting relationship between a woman and a man which is seen as an
extension of the covenant relationship between God and his people. In
Catholic marriages there are three persons involved: husband, wife and Jesus
Christ. Catholic teaching is that marriage is for life.
Just a few observations, of the many that
could be made. 1. They prepare "children and young people to be
responsible members of the community", no mention of preparing them
to be saints.
They state the Catholic Church is the
largest single denomination. The problem is that the Catholic Church is
not a denomination. All “Christian” sects are denominations. The
admission that there is more than ONE Christian religion. This is a
denial that there is ONE FAITH. As we all know. Regarding the explanation of Tradition they
say, "we base our teachings also on the faith experiences of the many
people who made up the Catholic Church..." I believe the use of the
term "faith experience" is used here to give credence to the modern
idea that faith is based on the faith experience of the
"believer", rather than the written account of the teachings of
Jesus Sacred Scripture and the oral account of the teachings of Jesus and the
apostles, which is Sacred Tradition.
Regarding Baptism: They say, "This is an initiation rite
which begins our journey by connecting us to a community of faith."
Nowhere do they state that baptism connects one to God or erases original
sin. But we will see in # 7 that they can't use the word sin.
Regarding "Eucharist": They
admit it is an "enactment of Jesus’ Last Supper." No mention
that it is a true and unbloody sacrifice, or that it is a re-presentation of
the crucifixion on Calvary. Regarding
Confession: Here they refer to someone coming “back into full grace”
rather than returning to the state of grace.
Regarding Marriage: Notice they say
that marriage is between "a woman and a man". This may seem
trivial but it shows the contempt for the order God has designed for the
family. The man is first, under Jesus, and then the woman. This is
equivalent to the scriptures mentioning Peter last in the naming of the
Apostles. As we all know Peter is named first for a reason. By
mentioning the "woman" first, it emphasizes that woman is higher in
the hierarchy of the family and creation. This is a complete rejection of
the Order of God.
Paul
M V
That is really an excellent video on Pope
Gregory XVI's encyclical, Mirari Vos, condemning liberalism and religious
indifferentism. Thank you. I am looking forward very much to the series you
plan to make on the encyclicals of true popes… Pope Gregory XVI's explanation
that dogma is to be understood as it is written is so fundamental to Catholic
faith and principles. Without such a simple and clear understanding of dogma,
the dogmas are rendered invalid, just as the Pharisees rendered the scriptures
invalid by their human traditions, and just like Protestants render the
scriptures invalid (though from the New Testament), by their human traditions
and systems of heresies. Heresy and heretics divide. Catholics and their
faith unite.
It's interesting that
Gregory XVI says that freedom of speech can never be sufficiently denounced,
because many western countries take great pride in such "freedoms",
when in fact it is probably the number one cause of the moral and
religious corruption (ruin) of the west (obviously no freedom of speech, such
as in totalitarian regimes, is worse). Such false freedoms are the seedbed of
indifferentism because it puts all opinions, good and evil, true and
false alike, on an equal plane. Catholics need to denounce heresy and
heretics again and again, especially today!!! The Vatican II sect and its
Antipopes believe and teach that denouncing heretics and asserting Catholic
dogmas is divisive - nothing could be further from the truth. It is Catholic
dogma that unites the Church making Her One. It is the denunciation of heresy
and heretics, the guns of hell, that keep Her Holy. If Christ is the rock, in
which is laid the second foundation, the Papacy, then it is the heretic who
chooses to depart from that stable foundation of the Church….
God Bless,
Chris White
Rev.
Subject: Revelation 16
Dear Mhfm,
"And the sixth angel poured out his vial upon that great river Euphrates;
and dried up the water thereof, that a way might be prepared for the kings from
the rising of the sun." Revelation 16:12
The river Euphrates has being drying up.
Check out these links.
http://www.1913intel.com/2009/07/14/the-euphrates-river-is-drying-up/
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601104&sid=abirKaZF0Wpc
Just thought it was quite interesting.
God Bless
Sean
B-16, Portugal
Dear Brothers,
Re: Benedict XVI’s visit to Portugal,
The little I heard of Benedict XVI speeches
which were all read out, were words without life and tiring to listen to. You are quite right about him confirming the
importance of the assassination attempt on John Paul II because I managed to
hear this on the news through a journalist who also stated that when Benedict
XVI was interviewed and asked about the 3rd Secret he also replied that the
third secret was not only limited to John Paul II, but also to the Magisterium
of the Church, how about that? Amazing don’t you think?
Many representatives of the Vatican II
Sect… charismatic pastors appeared on many programs throughout Benedict’s stay,
well you should have seen them and heard them, pathetic, they all loved him and
praised him so much, I know for a fact that these same people have always
refused openly to obey their beloved “Popes”.
I had never seen them dressed in Catholic canonical vestments before,
and suddenly out they come, posing as true Catholics, what a laugh, what hypocrisy,
their looked so promo, as if they were wearing it for the first time.
There
was a particular program, to discuss the difference between John Paul II and
Benedict XVI, guess who the guests were, a woman representative of the Jewish
community of Lisbon, the head of the Islamic Mosque and a Vatican II pastor. The Vatican pastor who was dressed as a
Catholic had only praises for Benedict XVI and made it quite clear that this
“Pope” was a more conservative “Pope”, but the head of the Islamic Mosque and
the Representative of the Jewish community quickly contradicted this, pointing
out that this was not at all the case because from what they understood of him
he was as open to other religions as John Paul II was, he just kept quiet for
the rest of the program.
At one point the commentator who is well
known to have close links with the Vatican II Church asked the Jewish
representative if she also agreed that the attacks made against the “Catholic
Church” on recent pedophile events were similar to the Jewish persecution. What a question, of course she skipped the
answer and condemned the situation in a vigorous manner as unacceptable, boy
how low can they go. In her comments she also criticized some Jews who have been
celebrating their Sabbath on a Sunday.
May the good Lord give us the grace of the
love of truth and protect MHFM.
M. Fernanda da Silva
Antichrist debate
Subject: Antichrist debate
Brothers Michael & Peter:
There is a recent "debate" that was
captured on video and this is how some of the press reported it:
“There
are few experiences more pleasing than watching Christopher Hitchens and
Stephen Fry utterly demolish their opponents in debate. Last night, in the
Methodist Central Hall, Westminster, they squared up to MP Ann Widdecombe and
Nigerian Archbishop Onaiyekan, who were tasked to defend the motion that: The Catholic Church
is a force for good in the world.”
I only saw the portion, where Stephen Fry
speaks. In Fry's (an anti-christ) speech he commits every sacrilege and
blasphemy against the church a reprobate is capable (so intellectually
dishonest and morally bankrupt an eight year catholic would have no
problem refuting) of. I don't know what
was more blasphemous though, the infamous rantings of an antichrist or the Novus ordo bishop and a nun clapping
(scandalous) for him when he was done.
This is standard fare now in all types of media except yours. In
the pretend debate they bring in a total apostate and heretic novus ordo
"catholic bishop", have them supposedly represent the catholic
church, and since they aren't catholic anyway, Jesus Christ and the
church are incessantly portrayed in the worst possible light both by the
attacker and the "defender". Mr. Fry happens to be
an extreme anti christ figure so his portion is as vile an attack as I have
ever seen.
Paul R.
B-16, Dalai Lama
Subject:
Benedict XVI – A New Dalai Lama
Hello
Brothers:
I do
not know if you saw this -
Benedict
XVI May 22, 2010:
"Today more than ever", he said,
"the human family can grow as a free society of free peoples so long as
globalisation is guided by solidarity and the common good, and by social
justice... In a global society made up of many different peoples and
religions, the common good and integral development must be achieved with
everyone's contribution. Religions have a crucial role to play in this,
especially when they teach fraternity and peace. The exclusion of
religion from public life - and, at the other extreme, religious fundamentalism
- hinders an encounter between persons and their collaboration for the progress
of humanity"
He
is manifestly a complete fraud - a "spiritual advisor" to the peoples
of the world. There is not one thing Christian about his approach, which is to
have a "human family" working for "peace" and "social
justice" without fidelity to Christ and His gospel. He plows on and on -
day after day - attempting to persuade the world to build a "human
community" where morality, in a completely secularized sense, and
"religions" play a crucial role in man's solidarity. This is itself a
humanistic, relativistic form of communism, where man "becomes"
united based on "human rights" communing apart from The One True and
Living God. And of course such a thing is totally impossible and there
will be no peace! I also note with him that he uses the same buzz words and
catch phrases all the time in his speeches, just like a manipulative journalist.
It's always a "profound" human experience he promotes, or a unity
that is "intrinsic" to men, etc. He is excessively transparent with
his program, and the heretics who support him have to be obscene liars to say
that BXVI does not do and say the things which he constantly does and says.
Further, they have to be excessively diabolically driven to fight so furiously in defending him and saying that he is a
Christian. He basically admits himself, and openly, that he is not. I admire
your endurance in dealing with these heretics in debate. Liars are very
difficult to tolerate and you consistently expose them. Good work all around
and spiritually discerned on every level.
Thanks,
Mike
SSPX
Conversation
with SSPX supporter - 1/3
Conversation
with SSPX supporter - 2/3
Conversation
with SSPX supporter - 3/3
Love and Hate
Subject: love and hate
Hi,
I recently visited your website too see your photos of pope John Paul II. with
your commentaries. There is one thing I cannot understand - being Christians,
how can you be so full of hate.
"God is love, and he who abides in love abides in God, and God abides in
him” (1 Jn 4:16) -this is the key to the
Kingdom, yet I did not manage to find an ounce of love on your website
“If I give away all I have, and if I deliver my body to be burned, but do not
have love, I gain nothing” - the key to the heaven is not fear but love and
every further command is tied to the command of love
I am a Christian and believe our faith to be the true one, but if someone wants
to help other people understand it, he should not be doing so by means of a
fear from hell and damnation but by love
John Paul II. knew this and never preached anything that would be in conflict
with God's word, he also loved others(no matter if they were Christians or not)
and always treated them with respect. It is blasphemic to say that he took part
on worshiping other gods, the only thing the photos show is his respect
and love for other people...when let's say your brother takes your toy and you
say: "I'll kill you!", it's quite obvious you do not have any
intentions of killing him, when someone lets a shaman write something on his
forehead but takes it only as an act of respect toward the beloved person he
doesn't take part on the ritual in any way. John Paul was an apostle of love
and faithful servant of God. May you love as strongly as he did
God Bless you,
Your Martin Kubena
MHFM: You are quite wrong, on every
front. John Paul II did engage in the
worship of false religions, as our file shows.
He also taught that false religions are a product of the Holy Spirit,
which is apostasy and blasphemy. He also
taught that souls can be saved in those false religions. He also facilitated the worship of idols and
demons at Assisi, which is apostasy. He
did much more. You are not being honest,
and you do not have true charity; for its foundation is the true faith which
you don’t care about.
John Paul II (manifest heretic who claimed to be pope
1978-2005) [link to section]
Cards
Brothers in Christ,
Where can I purchase valid Mass cards?
Also, I would like to leave instructions about my burial wishes, can I tell my
family to give me a burial mass in the Byzantine rite or Melkite Greek Catholic
rite?
John
MHFM: Since basically all the priests
are heretics, you shouldn’t give them Mass stipends. As far as funerals go, one shouldn’t use them
for that either. Since the priests are
heretics, you could arrange to be buried without the Mass, etc. People should focus on dying in the state of
grace. We believe some of those priests
might be an option for confession or Communion, but one should not use them for
requiem Masses.
“Monastery”
Here's a recent article on the Sacred Heart
"monastery" in Hales Corners, WI.
Sacred Heart congregation, fired executive
trade claims in lawsuits
http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/94639624.html
This is the place where the
"diocese" sends its seminarians for its "theology" classes
- it also appeared in the book Goodbye, Good Men, where they would
take field trips to the gay bars, and more recently… where among
other things, the first day of seminary, they hold a native american prayer
service and sing the Mickey Mouse song with the words changed to spell 'Sacred
Heart' instead of 'Mickey Mouse' [this is all presented by the author who finds
nothing wrong with anything. I read the book while in the bookstore so as
not to pay money for it].
D
Creation
Dear Neighbors,
I have watched many of your YouTube
videos. They are packed with much information that would be helpful. Say, would you have any similar teaching
about "Creationism" and Catholics ? Mp3's are best, but whatever you have
will do.
You see, my sister is a staunch Catholic.
But she is way too liberal as far as not believing the Bible and holding to the
theory of evolution.
The Lord Jesus holds the High Office of
Creator as much as Savior.
I think that this is important.
Thank you.
Alan
MHFM: Thanks for the interest.
If your sister doesn’t believe in the Bible and holds to evolution, she
is not a Catholic. That’s something you
must believe. We have our video, Creation and Miracles and the book we
sell, In the Beginning. We would recommend those in addition to some
of the other videos in our “Watch Our Videos” page.
UFO
Dear
Brothers Michael and Peter,
In
reply to Ivan's message on UFO referring to The Fourth Kind movie,
I agree with him for saying that this documentary film is the best expose
on "aliens" for their true nature ... Demons. I have not
yet read your UFO Book but I have read pdf file UFO Hoaxes Meant to deceive Mankind ... the UFO Book of MHFM has elucidly
reflected its veracity and truthfulness on this docu-film ... I have
watched one evening and literary I was not able to sleep until 4am ... the real
life camcoder accounts of people who were asked to recount what transpired
to their unusual experiences thru hypnosis were hair-raising! ... the
moment they fell into hypnosis the wacky events immediately occured
uncontrollaby leaving irrefutable proofs on the what really happened ...
the instance of the man who was scared to death even to fall asleep
was foolishly advised by Dr. Emily to fall into hypnosis hoping to
provide solution to the problem ... he immediately levitated above his bed
changing his physical appearance to demon-like vomiting curses .. and the
videocam recording the event has encountered electrical static problems causing
the video output to be blurred similar to what was described in the UFO Book .. of course since the high energy emitted from hell
visitor could not withstand the power of the videocam! ... this man
levitated so high that immediately after the hypnosis he fell back to
his bed with broken spinal column that led to his death as recounted by
the angry police ... the main character of the film named as Dr.
Abigail Emily Tyler was the first victim of UFO abduction when his psychiatrist
husband took his life to stop his suffering from his alleged same
"visitors" ... Dr. Emily, a psychiatrist by profession too, had a
burning passion who dedicated her life to find answers why her husband killed
himself and in the process she participated in the death of her patients and
the UFO abduction of her own daughter ... the movie has no special
effects, it simply tried to re-enact the series of events backed up by actual video and audio records available ... i must say that
this movie is the most scary real life story i have ever watched in my entire
life ... the movie's scariest account was when the Dr. Emily
herself willfully went to hypnosis to find answers to all her question ..
stupid as she was she hoped to regain her daughter back .. and the
camcoder was set ... As soon as she fell into hypnosis she levitated above the
sofa scaring all people present during the recording ... it was here where the
Devil (who possessed Dr. Emily) that says "I am God!" ... that
no more daughter to be returned, "Pray no help" as recounted by Ivan
... and again the recording was blurred due to electric static then the
camcoder fell to the ground as all present were abducted ... fortunately they
were returned back on earth that made the movie possible to produce. In
the last part of the movie you will see the unforgettable interview of Dr.
Abigail Emily Tyler ...
Brothers
you are perfectly correct in all facets of your explanation about UFO! People
do not understand that God allows these kind of phenomenon as punishment to
people who violate the First Commandment - Thou shall not have other gods
before Me! .. These people who resort to perverted science like Psychiatry
where they explain hearing demons whispering as "olfactory hallucinations"
... Psychology where pagan professionals explains perverted pursuit to
paranormal things as laudable and honorable as intelligent pursuit .. yes so
many people are putting themselves to the edge of diabolic possession thru the
practice of astral travel, yoga, spirit of the glass, fortune-telling in
crystal ball, producing horror films depicting demons etc .. yes most of these
people are diabolically possessed on a lesser degree unlike people who suffered
in UFO abduction…
In
Crucified Christ and Immaculate Mary,
Joey from the Philippines
Resent
[NOTE: this is a response to the
excommunicated post below, and our response.
This individual wrote in and told us that we are wrong on
excommunication. We responded by pointing
out that he is wrong. He responded again
by calling us evil for pointing out that he was wrong.]
I resent your hostile attitude. It is
uncalled for, and indicates some kind of flaw in your soul. I said that
heretics are not excommunicated persons, maybe, but the point was that they are
far beyond the penalty stage. They are severed from the body of the Church. I
do not like your attitude at all. You are hateful, proud, and evil. Go away.
Robert Gregory
MHFM: No, you are evil and
proud. If you had any humility, you would have checked out the issue
before arrogantly asserting that we are wrong. You should re-read your
original e-mail. You don't have any idea what you are talking about, yet
you act as if we don't. You even said that you are “not trying to deflate
us,” as if you were simply compelled to point out “an egregious error.”
In response, all we did was write that you are completely wrong, and you
are. What's wrong with that? It's the same thing you did in your
e-mail to us. You said we are wrong, and we responded by simply saying
the same thing: you are wrong and you don’t understand the issue. The only difference is that you are indeed
wrong and we are correct. So that proves that YOU are the problem. You like to dish it out (when you are not
correct, and when you try to correct others); but when others correctly point
out your error you not only don’t like it but call them evil. You have a big problem with pride. The fact that you conclude that we are evil
for simply responding to you by correcting your error proves that you are
actually evil. You pride is demonic, in
fact, and we are sick of it being exhibited by bad-willed people like you,
especially false traditionalists. It’s
one of the reasons this world is in the sorry state it finds itself. It’s one of the reasons that God doesn’t give
graces to people like you to see the truth and fulfill His will.
Discussing
At last the truth about the Catholic Church
that people are scared to put into words.
At last someone who tells people just what
sins are mortal.
At last someone who talks about feast days
as though they mean something.
So much of Catholic dogma has been brushed
aside by liberals and worse in the church that there is hardly anything left to
believe in.
When discussing a vocation to the
priesthood he found out that as an act of piety I kissed the crucifix above my
bed before sleeping. He thought this was idolatrous. If a catholic cannot be
reverent to our most precious symbol then I am afraid we are all doomed.
I decided not to go ahead with the vocation
as I feared I'd die a protestant.
Keep up your remarkable work
Yours in Christ
Mark
Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (Winter 2010 Archive)
Next
Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (A)
Next Archive for E-Exchanges is Here (B)
www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com