the bible | the catholic church

Desperation

Dear Brothers,

Your most recent debate with Gregory Thomas Rossi demonstrates the profound desperation Novus Ordites and heretics in general are in to avoid the truth. Every twisted and perverted tactic in the book is used by them to lie, distort, fabricate and generally create the illusion that they believe in Jesus Christ and His One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, without however having any faith whatsoever! It is not surprising at all that such evil-willed beasts, walking flames, meet their end with Hell. The only thing that would restrain me on this point is that we don't know what was said after the recording stopped or what he will do in the future. However, statistically speaking, he's lost forever. It's an infinite malice to reject God's Truth - Catholic Dogma - because He, in the form of a man, suffered more than anyone has, is, or will suffer for anything, so that we may know the Truth and be set free from sin. It is telling that Greg admitted, though reluctantly, that he had seen MHFM's material on the invalid New Mass, the Salvation dogma, etc. but still argued against all common sense on these issues. What does it take? Obviously nothing will budge the obstinate except a profound miracle of grace, which is only granted to very few …

Benedict XVI's blatant apostasy by writing to the Rabbi of Rome saying "The Lord... wished you to have... salvation," is insane. Nothing could be further from the truth. Obviously their lord is Satan, with whom there is no salvation whatsoever. When will they ever learn? (never) Also, "Cardinal" Walter Casper's honorary award form the American Jewish Community proves that he's a total apostate. The Vatican II sect's hierarchy just can't get enough of the Jews. Why don't they just come out of the closet and call the Vatican a synagogue?!! Added to that is "Archbishop" Dolan's encouragement to strengthen Catholic-Jewish relations, as though Heaven and Hell should dialogue! His statement that "to forget is heretical" is heretical itself! It's not a dogma of the Catholic faith that we must always remember things, especially not events that didn't even occur, such as the World War II "Holocaust." So they admit that it is an article of their Antichrist faith to "always remember the "Holocaust""...

God Bless,

Chris White

Hymn

To whom it may concern,

I am not a sede (yet). I came across your website a few weeks ago and have been checking it out. I had fled from the Novus Ordo to the Byzantine Church… Still I avoid the NO, but my family is still heavily involved in it, so I have the misfortune of going once or twice a year. Anyway, I thought that this hymn coincided with your understanding of John Paul II’s theology with regard to ‘dissolving Christ.’ This is in the 2010 Hymnal, and was sung yesterday at my niece’s First Communion. Not sure how it avoids being heretical. There were other questionable hymns, but they were merely ambiguous, this one was, I thought, blatantly heretical. Have you ever looked at the new hymns?

Yours,

Bob

Novus Ordo Hymn:

I myself am the bread of life.

You and I are the bread of life,

taken and blessed, broken and shared by Christ

that the world might live.

This bread is spirit,

gift of the Maker’s love,

and we who share it know that we can be one:

a living sign of God in Christ.

Here is God’s kingdom

given to us as food.

This is our body, this is our blood,

a living sign of God in Christ.

Lives broken open,

Stories shared aloud,

become a banquet, a shelter for the world:

a living sign of God in Christ. (http://www.printandpraise.com/songprint/file/11081/preview/252698/165469.img)

MHFM: Wow, that hymn is really something. It’s a prime example of how the Counter Church of the Antichrist has imbibed, on the local level, the doctrine that was taught by the Antichrist: the dissolving of Christ, that each man is Christ. You need to get out of the invalid New Mass and recognize that Benedict XVI is not the pope!

I.I.D

Subject: Invincible Ignorance Debate

Please read the short conversation below. The setting is a parallel universe, in the outskirts of 1st century Rome, all fictional.

St. Peter: Lord, Lord where are you going.
Jesus: I’m going to Rome, to be crucified a second time.
St. Peter: Why my Lord?
Jesus: Because my faithful sheep are being crucified there.
St. Peter: No, please do not go there.
Jesus: Why not?
St. Peter: There are no Christians there. We did not preach in the capital. I visited Rome just to see the games.
Jesus: Then tell me, where are my sheep being persecuted? Athens? Antioch? Alexandria? I must tend to my Holy ones.
St. Peter: There are no Christians there too, my Lord.
Jesus: What? Didn’t my Father and I send you the Holy Spirit? Didn’t I convert the heart of St. Paul so that he can preach my Gospel to the whole world? Where did you preach? And where are my sheep? (Jesus is visibly upset)
St. Peter: We indeed received the Holy Spirit. But we had a better idea. By a new ecumenical council, we decided not to preach at all, even in Jerusalem. Paul and James had to obey the council so they did not preach to the multitude as well.
Jesus: What better idea are you talking about?
St. Peter: From Greg Rossi. He suggested that we can save more souls by “invincible ignorance“. That's less work for me too! Genius!

I hope the egos of confused modernists are disarmed for just a moment. Please look at the ignorance idea really closely and sincerely. What are the consequences of "invincible ignorance" as an exception for and as a quantifier to salvation? Greg Rossi's entire defense of the Vatican II sect is based on "invincible ignorance" (indifferentism and relativism are his real personal beliefs). Both of which are condemned (Syllabus of Errors, Oath against Modernism.) If the ignorance argument is true, the initiative is to keep everyone lost and in the dark for they can say: "You can't condemn me, I didn't know any better!" This is clearly wrong. Its obviously one's duty to know what salvation requires and that is the Catholic faith held whole and inviolate. There is no excuse. And what was the initiative of the saints? To urgently spread the Gospel despite experiencing suffering or martyrdom. They died so that we may NOT live in ignorance anymore! And the Novus Ordo sect are spiritually killing them all over again. I pray the apostates get the picture. (And by the way, I'm just talking about the ignorant, what about the obstinate? That's even more obvious.)

Personally I think this "invincible ignorance" brouhaha is a joke, and so it should be treated like a joke.

With prayers,

Sanjiv

Core

Subject: Core

Dear brothers in Christ,

Regarding your recent debate I can only say that I'm shocked by the bad (ugly to the core!) will and incompetence shown by the V2 heretic Greg (I think it is his
name). I can take listening this debate only as a harsh (and too much deserved) punishment for my too many sins I've done in my sinful life. In essence these heretics and apostates are doing one and same thing all the time--they are repeating the words of their master, the father of all lies, spoken in Eden--"Surely, you will not die."

Let our Most Holy Mother Mary and St. Joseph pray for you, to keep your strength and patience in defending The Faith.

Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia

Town

You cannot worship an "Unknown God" and expect Christ to say you have done well in honoring me. If you have not known Christ you cannot know the Father.

FYI "Father" Corapi was in town Saturday doing some all day event at a large arena. I decided to take my MHFM books and Fatima DVD's and hand them out to folks entering in the morning. When I walked up the sidewalk and picked a spot where I could hand out books and materials I put the Fatima DVD inside the books and said would you like a free Padre Pio book and Fatima DVD. I was out of books in about 5 minutes…

Matthew

Comment

Subject: Comment about your recent debate

I just want to say I gotta hand it to you again, for dealing with these complete, utterly idiotic heretics that actually consider themselves Catholics and think they are defending the Church. What complete nonsense! I have only heard the first 2 parts and I just can't take it anymore. I can't keep hearing this nonsense. The level of ignorance, stupidity and bold heresy is just unimaginable and mind-boggling, these guys don't know a thing! I'm not saying that you're picking incompetents to debate them, not at all, but like you said, in truth they are all fools and incompetents and don't know a thing. What darkness! This truly is the Sect of Satan.

Good job, this debate just exposes - once again - the complete satanic, and heretical JOKE the Novus Ordo sect is and all of their unfortunate members. Like I said, it is just incredible how completely heretical they all are and how they don't know anything!

Heresy

Hello Dimond Brothers - I have listened to all of your previous debates. Regarding this one all that I am able to say is - unbelievable, truly. Heresy is really a horrible terrible thing. That guy is the prime example - the perfect spokesman for the VII false gospel - true universalism. Not even slightly reasonable or coherent. It is horrid and very sad, and hard to listen to. Thanks for all your exemplary work and faith.

- Mike

MHFM: Thanks for the comment. What we realized a long time ago – and we think that more are realizing it through such debates – is that, sadly, almost everyone out there is a liar. That’s why very few are saved – almost no one is of good will and attracted to truth. That includes almost all who claim to be Catholics.

Debate

Subject: Debate Part 7

BROTHER PETER, WHEN YOU BROUGHT UP THE OATH AGAINST MODERNISM, WHICH BY THE WAY WAS A KNOCK OUT PUNCH {HUGE}, THAT IT’S THE INTELLECT AND NOT FROM THE HEART GARBAGE, SHOULD HAVE AWAKENED HIM BUT IT’S LIKE HITTING SOMEONE STRUNG OUT ON DRUGS! I THINK WE CAN BLAME HIS WAY OF THINKING ON THE CHARISMATIC MOVEMENT OF THE SEVENTIES. THIS WHOLE FEELY, TOUCHY KIND OF FUZZY WARM FEELING. THAT’S WHY WE ARE NOT SUPPOSE TO MAKE A DECISION BASED ON EMOTION BUT BASED ON THE INTELLECT, APPLYING COMMON SENSE AND LOGICAL THINKING!=

Rossi

Nice work on Rossi debate sections 6-9...Rossi has both verbal as well as mental diarrhea, sounds like a mouse, and has the theology of the same. Rossi is bizarre, just another heretic..... Rossi has no Faith, period. We are enjoying the Shroud of Turin video, it is fantastic. Thank you for making this info. available.

Abortion

The article ends, "In 2005 a baby boy in Manchester was born alive at 24 weeks after surviving three attempts to abort him. He is now a five-year-old school boy." Yes...,it occurs to me that there was a day when I was a "five-year-old school boy". Truly, there is nothing more torturous than the human heart; beyond all description. Who can even begin to explain it? Most Sacred Heart of Jesus, have mercy on us!

Truth

I agree with Tom Miles, very well said especially about asking 500 vatican ll members the same question and getting 1500 different answers. One God, one faith, one baptism, I think it could be summed up with this:

2 Thess. 2: 10 And in all seduction of iniquity to them that perish; because they receive not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. Therefore God shall send them the operation of error, to believe lying: 10 "God shall send"... That is God shall suffer them to be deceived by lying wonders, and false miracles, in punishment of their not entertaining the love of truth. 11 That all may be judged who have not believed the truth, but have consented to iniquity

Loaded

Brothers,

The series on salvation and sedevacatism with Mr. Rossi reaffirms the teaching of Vatican II that, "man is God". Mr. Rossi and his fellow sect members are loaded with bad-will, pride and lack the knowledge of the Catholic faith. They have twisted the truth around so much, in their attempt to fool others that they are christian and that Vatican II is valid, that they have tied their brains in a knot. Their words are like a cesspool swirling around and round without clinging to anything, especially a valid thought. If you'd ask 500 Vatican II sect members the same question, you'd end up with 1500 or more different answers.

God Bless your work,
Tom Miles

MHFM: Yes, they are loaded with bad will. Something this debate really drives home (perhaps more than anything else) is what a complete liar he is, and the same is true of similar heretics. One thing we didn’t mention in the description of the debate (which we have added) is that he is an apologist for a Novus Ordo group which specializes in attempting to refute sedevacantists, etc.

Vatican II

Laudetur Iesus et Maria

To whom it may concern,

In your 38th PDF, you said the following:
EACH ONE OF THE 16 DOCUMENTS OF VATICAN II ENDS WITH THESE WORDS (OR WORDS BASICALLY IDENTICAL TO THESE): “EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THE THINGS SET FORTH IN THIS DECREE HAS WON THE CONSENT OF THE FATHERS. WE, TOO, BY THE APOSTOLIC AUTHORITY CONFERRED ON US BY CHRIST, JOIN WITH THE VENERABLE FATHERS IN APPROVING, DECREEING, AND ESTABLISHING THESE THINGS IN THE HOLY SPIRIT, AND WE DIRECT THAT WHAT HAS THUS BEEN ENACTED IN SYNOD BE PUBLISHED TO GOD’S GLORY... I, PAUL, BISHOP OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH.”7

Yet, I am unable to find these statements on the Documents on Vatican II:
http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/

Please explain. Thank you for your time.

In Corde Iesu,
Enrique M

MHFM: If you click on the Latin version of the Vatican II documents, you will find the ending there. For instance, if you click on the link, scroll to Dignitatis Humanae (Vatican II’s heretical document on Religious Liberty). Near the end you will find those words in Latin:

“Haec omnia et singula quae in hac Declaratione edicta sunt, placuerunt Sacrosancti Concilii Patribus. Et Nos, Apostolica a Christo Nobis tradita potestate, illa, una cum Venerabilibus Patribus, in Spiritu Sancto approbamus, decernimus ac statuimus et quae ita synodaliter statuta sunt ad Dei gloriam promulgari iubemus… Ego PAULUS Catholicae Ecclesiae Episcopus.”

“Each and every one of the things set forth in this decree has won the consent of the Fathers. WE, TOO, BY THE APOSTOLIC AUTHORITY CONFERRED ON US BY CHRIST, JOIN WITH THE VENERABLE FATHERS IN APPROVING, DECREEING, AND ESTABLISHING THESE THINGS IN THE HOLY SPIRIT, and we direct that what has thus been enacted in synod be published to God’s glory… I, Paul, Bishop of the Catholic Church.”

It’s also in some English translations. For example, see the version by Walter M. Abbott: The Documents of Vatican II. Perhaps the reason the ending is not found in the Vatican’s English version is because they figured it’s essentially a stock ending which comes after all the documents and didn’t need to be added.

New Mass

Dear Brothers Dimond.

I believe the introduction of the new mass was the final countdown to the end of the world and the second coming, but I am not sure exactly when the countdown began exactly. Was it advent NOV, 30 1969, or advent DEC, 1 1974 when it was made mandatory in its final form? What is your opinion about this? Possibly 40 years from these dates or maybe a little over would be a generation to the jews. The desolation would last a generation.

PAX CHRISTI MARK V

Debate

Good Evening Brothers,

It is very saddening after listening to your last debate that basic Catholic teaching is no longer believed in the world today. It is a very simple thing, as you know, one must be in a state of sanctifying grace to see God when they die… This is the reason for such strong language from the Church in regards to salvation. It is IMPOSSIBLE to find salvation outside of the Catholic Church… I believe this because I believe JESUS, my God, who says “You can do no good without me”, and “ I know mine, and mine know me”. Let us continue to pray the angel of Fatima prayer to God, and God will do as he has promised and add to the church daily.

Gary Craft

Conflict

Brother Dimond,

You really should watch this 1973 movie which is called "The Conflict" and it also went by the title "Catholics". This movie is almost prophetic in depicting just how far the Novus Ordo sect changed true Catholic teachings.

Bad

Subject: Greg bad-will

Dear Brothers,

That desolate landscape picture in the sedevacantism/Catholic salvation debate is very appropriate. Greg is really asking for damnation, sadly. He simply refuses to accept the dogmas of the Catholic faith and the necessity of having the Catholic faith for salvation. What a sad case. You’re doing a great job in trying to help him out, Bro. Peter. I'll be interested to know whether he turns the full 180 degrees though.

God Bless,

Chris White

Cardinal John Henry Newman Examined

MHFM: This is a discussion of the positive points, and the significant doctrinal errors, found in the work of the famous 19th century cardinal, John Henry Newman. For a variety of reasons Newman is an important figure to consider. It also discusses his ideas on “the development of Christian doctrine.”

Cardinal John Henry Newman Examined - 1

Cardinal John Henry Newman Examined - 2

Fr. Denis Fahey, The Kingship of Christ and the Conversion of the Jewish Nation, p. 52: “The Jews, as a nation, are objectively aiming at giving society a direction which is in complete opposition to the order God wants. It is possible that a member of the Jewish Nation, who rejects Our Lord, may have the supernatural life which God wishes to see in every soul, and so be good with the goodness God wants, but objectively, the direction he is seeking to give to the world is opposed to God and to that life, and therefore is not good. If a Jew who rejects our Lord is good in the way God demands, it is in spite of the movement in which he and his nation are engaged.”

Here we see the famous Irish priest Fr. Denis Fahey, whose writings are praised by many who call themselves “traditional Catholics,” teaching that Jews who reject Our Lord Jesus Christ may “have the supernatural life which God wants to see in every soul” (i.e., the state of grace) and therefore can be saved. This is truly an abomination. Notice how Fr. Fahey’s statement directly contradicts the word of God.

1 John 5:11-12: “And this is the testimony, that God hath given to us eternal life. And this life is in his Son. He that hath the Son, hath life. He that hath not the Son, hath not life.”

The word of God tells us that he that hath not the Son hath not life. Fr. Denis Fahey tells us that a Jew who rejects the Son hath life: “a member of the Jewish Nation, who rejects Our Lord, may have the supernatural life…” By making such a statement, Fr. Fahey reveals (unfortunately) that he wasn’t a Catholic, but a blatant heretic. Perhaps if Fr. Fahey had spent more time getting to know the truth of Jesus Christ, His Gospel and His dogmas, rather than writing large volumes on “the forces of organized naturalism,” he would have discovered that the core focus of the entire Gospel – and the very central truth of the universe along with the dogma of the Trinity – is that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, and that you must believe in Him to have eternal life.

“For God so loved the world, as to give His only begotten Son: that whosoever believeth in Him, may not perish, but may have life everlasting.” (John 3:16)

“He that believeth in the Son hath life everlasting: but he that believeth not the Son, shall not see life, but the wrath of God abideth on him.” (John 3:36)

To assert that one can attain salvation while rejecting Jesus Christ is to say that one can attain salvation while rejecting salvation itself. It is one of the worst heresies that one could utter.

“Now this is life everlasting, that they may know thee, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.” (John 17:3)

“And he said to them [the Jews]: You are from beneath, I am from above. You are of this world, I am not of this world. Therefore, I said to you, that you shall die in your sins: for if you believe not that I am he, you shall die in your sin.” (John 8:23-24)

“Amen, Amen, I say to you: he that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up another way, the same is a thief and a robber… I am the door.” (John 10:1, 9)

“Jesus saith to them: I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No man cometh to the Father, but by me.” (John 14:6)

“And when he [the Paraclete] is come, he will convince the world of sin, and of justice, and of judgment. Of sin indeed: because they have not believed in me.” (John 15:8-9)

“For this was I born, and for this came I into the world, that I should give testimony to the truth: every one who is of the truth, heareth my voice.” (John 18:37)

Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, Sess. 8, Nov. 22, 1439, ex cathedra: “Whoever wishes to be saved, needs above all to hold the Catholic faith; unless each one preserves this whole and inviolate, he will without a doubt perish in eternity.– But the Catholic faith is this, that we worship one God in the Trinity, and the Trinity in unity... Therefore let him who wishes to be saved, think thus concerning the Trinity.

“But it is necessary for eternal salvation that he faithfully believe also in the incarnation of our Lord Jesus Christ...the Son of God is God and man...– This is the Catholic faith; unless each one believes this faithfully and firmly, he cannot be saved.”

Horror

Dear Brothers:

I´ve been living in Rio de Janeiro city for almost 30 years (my entire life) and I never saw such horror. I don´t disregard the distinct possibility it´s connected with other cataclysmic events like the one in Haiti. One interesting fact is that just a few days before, I actually saw chemtrails in the sky. I wonder if it´s God punishing the world, or if somehow men has achieved control over the environment.

So far, over 130 people are confirmed dead, and the city looked more like Venice. and now is filled with mud.

I entrust myself to your prayers. God may be punishing us for our depravity. This city is marked with all sorts of immorality. It´s truly a spiritual sewage of sins overflowing with sins. It´s of fitting dignity that we are now reduced to a physical sewage as well. Too bad that most people here won´t recognize this signal from Heaven about what awaits them if they do not change their ways of perdition. Please, pray for us.

Concerning your most recent videos. i´m very curious to see the remaining chapters. So far I agree with everything… I´ve always wondered how Jesus would return by surprise "like a night thief" when everyone knows he comes after the Anti-Christ is empowered. It should be obvious to anyone. Unless of course there was a deception so big that even the Anti-Christ is not perceived by what he truly was until it´s too late…

God Bless You.

Recently

Hello Brothers,

I recently watched the 4 part series you have just posted, and want to say that this is a must see for all… The Fatima CD was sent to my mother back east and she stated this was very good, and gave some to my brothers and sisters, hoping they come around from their spiritual death.

Again thank you for all the hard work, as you our included in my Rosary everyday. If I can ask you to please remember me in your Rosary as well it is much appreciated.

God bless you and your work

Tim

Gather

Subject: Sheeple

Dear MHFM,

Now we know why the world is coming to an end when sheeple, in the thousands, gather at an apostates tomb, a wolf in sheeps clothing, placed in a holy place, amongst true pontiffs, and venerate this unholy Modernist, JP2, condemned by the "Greatest" pontiff of the twentieth century, St. Pope Pius X. Truly mindboggling!

Dea…

Mortalium

… Pius XI 1928 Mortalium Animos blows away any concept of a Catholic accepting any other "Christian" faith and the contemptible idea of ecumenism. The V2 position and promotion of it is outrageous heresy. If they believed in the faith and the primacy of the papacy this would not be another indisputable example of their total embrace of apostasy and hatred for Jesus Christ. How long will the blood of the saints have to wait?

Matthew

Comment

Absolutely wonderful, and thought provoking videos on the end of the world. I do not follow a lot of the EU news, so most of it was new to me - I had to rewind a lot to take in all of the information.

Like everyone else, I am looking forward to the next.

Thank you for these!

Teri Thurman

Managed

Dear Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,

… I have managed to watch all four of the blockbuster videos… there is much information in them, and a lot of it new, which needs to be sifted through to be fully appreciated and understood.

… There is so much one could comment on, (the EU and its inception at the Maastricht Treaty, the four beasts, the seven kings, and especially the reference to the seventh king and the shortness of his reign, which must be of some concern and should act as a wake up call for many! ) and most have done so already, and judging by what a masterful job you have done so far, we can only wait… for the sequel...

God bless,

David

Material

Subject: The new video on the Apocalypse

Dear Brother Peter and Brother Michael

I just wanted to congratulate you on such a fantastic video which provides the most powerful insight into the prophecies contained in the Apocalypse and how they are describing the times we live in. Brother Peter's analysis is clear and compelling. The material presented explaining the harlot riding the beast, and the pagan imagery of Europa riding a beast really made me sit up and consider just what evil times we are living in and how knowingly or unknowingly the architects of the EU empire are working for AntiChrist. I just wanted to ask what you consider Catholics should do who live in the EU but do not want to be complicit with this evil institution in any way?

Is even voting in European elections sinful as this legitimises this institution? It is near impossible not to be controlled or interact with the EU or other New World Order governments which are powerful and control more and more of our lives, but some advice on avoiding being morally complicit in the acts of such evil imperial bodies would
be welcome.

God Bless your very important work in saving souls and bearing witness to the Catholic Faith.

Best wishes

Gerard

MHFM: Thanks for the comments and the interest. Some of those questions will be addressed in the remaining parts, but the answer to your main question is no. We do not believe that voting for the best option – a person you think might have a chance to make some kind of positive difference – would be wrong.

Comment

Comment: Is the World about to End?

Brother Peter has done an outstanding job on the 4 part series. I can’t wait for part 5.

Chronological

Subject: Chronological happening in the Apocalypse

Hello Bro. Peter Dimond,

thanks for your believeable apocalypse interpretation from a catholic perspective. I agree with the godless EU will become really communist sooner or later (EUCCP resp. EUSSR, EUdSSR in german) and I will have the "fun" to be in the middle of it…

Greetings from Germany

Stefan

Children

Subject: Children Clueless on Christ

Hello Brothers!

Yesterday here in Canada, CBC showed the documentary "Supersize me". I'm sure you heard of it, the one about how McDonalds is fattening the American population. There was one part of this documentary that astonished me. At one point, the creator of the documentary is interviewing about 6-7 young kids and is showing them pictures of historical figures. The first picture was of George Washington and only one child knew about him. As he showed them the second picture, hiding it from the camera, all the kids were clueless who the person was. Then he showed the picture to the camera and it was our Lord Jesus Christ. These kids, our future, had no idea who Christ was. One of the kids took a guess with George W. Bush. I know American kids aren't very bright at some subjects, like geography, but not knowing who Christ is is really pathetic. It’s the masonic education system and the failure of the parents.

Daniel

Revelation

Subject: Revelation

Just wanted to express my thanks for the four-part revelation series which I watched on Easter. I was hoping that you would study revelation. I have been going to a study of Revelation hosted by the 7th day Adventists and I appreciate your info on them. I showed it to a Baptist and he quit and I am only going tonight to pass out some of your Bible proves the Catholic faith booklets as I am hoping your great study can make it clear to them. Thanks so much,

Rick McMahon

Comment

To MHFM,

Thank you… for yet another brilliant take on an extremely important and timely issue. Waiting in anticipation for the rest of your presentation.

V. from Croatia

Clear

Subject: Is the World about to End?

What a great new video. You made it so clear to understand and it all makes perfect sense i can’t wait for part 5! I also wanted to thank you for the debates that you do. As i never have thanked you for them.

Shuck…

Think

Your analysis of Saint John’s prophesy is stunning! The EU stamp and the sculptures so revealing. I think this will make some hardcore skeptics take notice. Let’s hope. I anxiously await more installments. Thank you.

Bill Mulligan

Tour

Excellent interpretation of the Apocalypse, !! I will never forget the words of our tour guide in Hungary about 8 years ago. She grew up in communist Hungary as a girl-her father was a freedom fighter, which she didn't know till she was an adult. She said the the 'EU was just another form of communism'!!! She saw that they were taking over all the nations. She said how they had control-even over the tomatoes that you buy-for instance, one country had an excellent tomato but could not export it because the EU had control to sell the bad tomatoes to the other EU countries! And that was just about a tomato!! At first, Hungary was not going to be part of the EU but now they are because of the pressure put upon them! Look at the Catholic countries of Spain and Portugal-how they have caved!!!
God help us all!! God bless you and looking forward to Part 5!

Kathryn

The World

Dear Brothers,

What a brilliant video series on the fact that the world is about to end. That is the only accurate explanation of what and who the Beast of Apocalypse chapter 13 is - the European Union. What a great job, Bro. Peter. Thank you. You have woven the facts from the Bible, history, and the present day to prove that the EU is the Beast which the Whore of Babylon, the Vatican II sect, rides upon. Your thorough research shows, and you've distilled it into a format that is interesting, persuasive and informative on the essential details. What a breath of fresh air when compared with all the confusing Protestant interpretations on the same scriptures. It proves again that the Catholic faith is the only true religion, because it enables a Catholic to see through the lies and get to the point, so as to understand what's really important - the truth! Also, it is very fear inspiring - we really, truly are living in the last days. We mustn't hesitate to do all within our power to spread the word on the Catholic faith and how MHFM is the only true source of light for Catholics today. What a God-send. Your prayers have been answered!. The clarity, simplicity and power of the truth shines through. Thank you for bearing witness to the truth so well!!

God Bless,

Chris White

Account

Dear Brothers,

Finally someone had put out a believable as well as fascinating account of the book of Apocalypse. I have been waiting for this for many years. Leave it to the MHFM to do it and do it right. It all adds up when you look at your presentation. The EU has basically replaced the old scenario around the sea. The harlot on the beast statues and the design of the new EU headquarters, to resemble the tower of Babel make it hard not to believe your take on this long, misunderstood book. Wow, have the heretical faiths ever got it mixed up. They are not even close. Great job! I am awaiting the completion of the series.

Your ardent supporter,

Bob Bohr

Comparison

Superb work on the new "Apocalypse" videos---I think you are RIGHT on the money---most stunning truly revelatory was the comparison of the image of the not-yet-completed Towel of Babel with the EU building in France---WOW! The Holy Ghost is guiding you and Our Lady is surely pleased by all MHFM's fine work… VERY timely for Easter. Sincerely,

John Paul II

Dear MHFM,

Reading about the early Church and the Nicolaitans, and how they were condemned by St. John for making sacrifices to idols, and committing fornications. It strikes me how Satan reveals himself through antipope John Paul II and his multitudinous heresies. In mocking St. John, Wojtyla took on St. John's holy name as John Paul II, and through his pontificate performing sacrilege, after sacrilege with identical ardor of the Nicolaitans. How John Paul II spoke often of the early Churches and their leaders, and praising them. What John Paul II was underhandedly referring to was the practice of heresies of the Nicolaitans, and their ilk, and how Vatican II had adopted this manner of controlling the Catholic contemporary anti-Catholic Church, and leading them right into the hands of Lucifer. Truly diabolical and from the bowels of Hell!

Dea…

Finding

Subject: Finding Catholicism

Dear Brother Dimond,

In my recent search for truth I came across you video's condemning the Vatican II Catholic Church, I was astonished to hear a Catholic so talk about the Pope.

As I was raised as a Protestant I had always had a distrust of the Catholic Church, and I saw many things (now exposed in your videos) that I thought to be heretical. This always kept me from investigating the Catholic Tradition. However now that I have discovered the SSPX and your videos etc. I am curious to find out what the Catholic Church REALLY is, that is, before the heresies of Vatican II…

I also plan to search your website and make a list of the heresies so I can differentiate between true Catholicism and the Vatican II heretical church.

God Bless you Brother Dimond.

MHFM: We’re glad that you came across the information, and we hope that you continue to look at the website. It’s critical to embrace the Catholic faith, the traditional authentic Catholic faith. We recommend our “Refuting Protestantism” section. Also, the SSPX is not fully Catholic, as our file on them explains.

Outside the Church

Subject: Outside the Church

Hello,

I heard in one of your videos that salvation outside of the Church is impossible by any means possible. But what happens with a person who never heard of Christ? Let's say an Indian living in American before it was discovered by the Europeans...

What happens to his soul? If there was no possible way for him to convert to the catholic faith, how is it possible to be sure that he is damned for all eternal life?

Why would God create a human being for eternal damnation?

Thank you very much

Mathieu

MHFM: This is addressed in our book: Outside the Catholic Church There is No Salvation. The answer is that a person who dies without hearing of Christ goes to Hell. This is the teaching of Scripture, Catholic Tradition and solemn dogmatic teaching. The person is not damned for not having heard of Christ, but for his or her other mortal sins. If that person had been of the truth, God would have made sure that he or she came into contact with the true faith and was baptized. The quotes below explain it (references are in the book).

Fr. Francisco de Vitoria, O.P., a famous 16^th century Dominican theologian, summed up the traditional teaching of the Catholic Church on this topic very well. Here is how he put it:

“When we postulate invincible ignorance on the subject of baptism or of the Christian faith, it does not follow that a person can be saved without baptism or the Christian faith. For the aborigines to whom no preaching of the faith or Christian religion has come will be damned for mortal sins or for idolatry, but not for the sin of unbelief. As St. Thomas says, however, if they do what in them lies [in their power], accompanied by a good life according to the law of nature, it is consistent with God’s providence that he will illuminate them regarding the name of Christ.

St. Augustine (428): “… God foreknew that if they had lived and the gospel had been preached to them, they would have heard it without belief.”

St. Augustine (426): “Consequently both those who have not heard the gospel and those who, having heard it, and having been changed for the better, did not receive perseverance… none of these are separated from that lump which is known to be damned, as all are going… into condemnation.”

In the Summa Theologica, St. Thomas further taught the truth that all men above reason are bound to know the principal mysteries of Christ for salvation with no exceptions for ignorance. With regard to people who have never heard of Christ, he explains that they could not be saved; and that if one of them were of good will he would be brought into the faith:

St. Thomas Aquinas, De Veritate, 14, A. 11, ad 1: Objection- “It is possible that someone may be brought up in the forest, or among wolves; such a man cannot explicitly know anything about the faith. St. Thomas replies- It is the characteristic of Divine Providence to provide every man with what is necessary for salvation… provided on his part there is no hindrance. In the case of a man who seeks good and shuns evil, by the leading of natural reason, God would either reveal to him through internal inspiration what had to be believed, or would send some preacher of the faith to him…”

St. Thomas, Summa Theologica: “After grace had been revealed, both the learned and simple folk are bound to explicit faith in the mysteries of Christ, chiefly as regards those which are observed throughout the Church, and publicly proclaimed, such as the articles which refer to the Incarnation, of which we have spoken above.”

Also, the distant lands were evangelized and reached with the Gospel far earlier and faster than most people believe. That’s covered in the book.

Lutheran/Vatican

Subject: Lutheran/Vatican signing

I was watching this video with interest, but as I began watching I felt the need to rebut some of your comments, however, you disabled comments and so I did not bother watching the rest. If you can't clarify a question I have, what's the use? Too much work to be emailing my thoughts, so this will be the only time I write you…. Good luck figuring out your 'own' truths.

Jilbert

MHFM: You offer a lame excuse for being unable to specify your problem with the video. You think that what was stated was false, yet you are unable to give an example. You could just write in and mention what it is, but you don’t. That’s because it would be refuted. Your e-mail demonstrates bad will.

St. Jude

Dear Brothers Dimond,

I decided to look up St. Jude in the Liturgical Year books. There are some interesting thoughts there we thought you might be interested in looking at. In volume 14 page 447 The first paragraph on that page tells us why the Church exists. "Such is the condition of her existence on earth, that she can remain here only as long as she continues to give children to our Lord; and therefore, in the Mass of Oct. 27 she makes us read the passage of the Gospel where it said: 'I am the true vine, and My Father is the husbandman. Every branch in Me, that bearth not fruit, He will purge it, that it may bring forth more fruit.'

On page 449 "Ecclesiastical history informs us that, towards the end of his reign, and when the persecution he had raised was at its height, Domitian caused to be brought to him from the east two grandsons of the apostle St. Jude. He had some misgivings with the regard to these descendants of David's royal line; for they represented the family of Christ Himself, whom His disciples declared to be king of the whole world. Domitain was able to reassure himself that these two humble Jews could in no way endanger the empire; and that if they attributed to Christ sovereign power, it was a power not to be visibly exercised till the end of the world. The simple and courageous language of these two men made such an impression on the emperor, that according to the historian Hegesippus from whom Eusebius borrowed the narrative, he gave orders for the persecussion to be suspended."

It ends with a prayer on page 451. " All thanks be to you, O holy apostles, who in labor and suffering procured us this blessing; maintain in us the title and the rights of this precious adoption. Great Evils surround us; is there any hope left to the world? The confidence of thy devout clients proclaim thee O Jude, the patron of desperate cases; and for thee O Simon, this is surely the time to prove thyself Zelotes, full of zeal. Deign, both of you, to hear the Church's prayers; and aid her, with all your apostolic might, to reanimate faith, to rekindle charity, and to save the world."

When one realizes that there is no missionary activity in the novus ordo since all are saved and all religions are good, she already has no reason to be on earth. And the fearful thing to think on is that the Traditional priests and people have only a little missionary zeal ...because they too believe souls do not have to be a member of the Church in order to be saved. How many of these Traditional orders risk having no reason to exist? Is that the reason, perhaps, that the SSPX is falling from the Traditional Faith so quickly and the poor people in her pews are struggling to choose to keep their faith or follow along to embrace the novus ordo heresies and invalid sacraments? I myself am looking at St. Jude's patron of desperate cases in a whole new light. His statue is now front and center in my living room along with the Holy Family because after all he is a member of that family by not only adoption but by blood.

May God protect the Most Holy Family Monastery in its missionary zeal to bring adoptive sons to God.

Mary Ann Davis

Comment

Brother Dimond,

I am ordering 75 of your new DVDs and lots of the others, too, because I want to show people how wrong they are to think John Paul II is a saint. Your bluntness really helped me to re-think everything. Jesus was also very blunt when He told the people “You will die in your sin.”... I know what you are saying is correct and I pray you will continue.

Virgilia Newman

Hard

I am a Catholic, but it’s so hard to find the truth. Your monastery has helped me so much, thank you! I hope you continue with your work because your books really explain the truth. God bless you!

Sherwin Contaoi

Communion of Saints and BOD

Subject: The Communion of Saints and BOD

Dear Rev. Brothers,

In the Creed we express our belief in the Communion of Saints. There is now a situation in several countries of the world where Christians are in a minority, that the majority routinely hate the Christian community and tend to blame it for all the ills of the nation.

I live in one such country where the majority non-Christian population blames us for everything from the garbage, to corruption to bad driving. Some of the people who hold such prejudices are (supposedly) God-fearing and seem to be living in a state of justification. The Vatican II Church and the false Traditionalists will say that these people have the BOD. But how can this be? Their so-called well- meaning hatred towards Christians flatly contradicts belief in the Communion of Saints (as well as the teaching of the Mystical Body of Christ ).

I'd appreciate your comments. Thanks.

Joe

MHFM: Since they are non-Christians, certainly the people you mention don’t have the state of justification. That’s something a Catholic must believe. With regard to the Vatican II sect and false traditionalists holding that such individuals could have “baptism of desire,” they do hold that false (and heretical) idea. Once they admit that they believe a certain member of a false religion could have “baptism of desire,” they must leave the door open for anyone and everyone, including people who hate Christians (Catholics).

Your point about how this contradicts the communion of saints is true, but we think it most precisely contradicts the unity of faith. Their heretical idea destroys any notion of a true unity of faith; for the “baptism of desire” heretics must argue, when correctly cornered, that a man who rejects and even hates Jesus Christ and His followers can have the ONE FAITH AND THE ONE LORD that those who accept Jesus Christ have. They must argue that someone who hates the Lord (the person you describe) has THE SAME FAITH as the person who believes in the Lord (the Catholic). That is of course absurd and false, and it mocks the Church’s dogma: that all in the Church have one faith.

Read

Subject: domestic problems

Dear Brothers Michael and Peter,

The recent e-exchanges regarding the troublesome wife, problems with making their children truly catholic… the separation, divorce not due to infidelity but due to conflict in keeping the Catholic Faith against joining the heretical beliefs, not only limited to V2 Church. I am most inspired how TM takes his situation with his 8-yr old son ... Joe, Bill, David, tm and the rest who share the same domestic troubles keeping the Faith. Some of you are the type of parents, we traditional catholic children would dream of having ... In view of this struggle it comes to my mind St. Rita of Cascia's plight getting married with her pagan husband.

We read in the Life of St. Rita of Cascia that the saint’s great desire was to become a nun, but, in obedience to the will of her parents, she, at the age of twelve, married a man extremely cruel, ill-tempered and an immoral man. St. Rita endured his insults, abuse, and infidelities for 18 years, and bore two sons. Although she tried to raise them with Catholic values, her sons were unholy for most of their lives. Toward the end of her husband's life, St. Rita helped convert him to live in a more pious manner. Although Mancini became more congenial, his allies betrayed him, and he was violently stabbed to death. Before his death, he repented to St. Rita and the Church, and she forgave him for his transgression against her. After Mancini's murder, her sons wished to exact revenge on their father's murderers. Knowing murder was wrong, she tried to persuade them from retaliating, but to no avail. She, instead, prayed to God for Him to take away the lives of her sons instead of seeing them commit such a terrible sin. God heard St. Rita's words and her sons died of natural causes (disease) a year later. On account of the many miracles reported to have been wrought at her intercession she received in Spain the title of La Santa de los impossibiles (Patron Saint of the Impossible).

The most unfortunate scenario is St. Rita lived in the age of faith while all of us are now living in the most dreaded last days, the age of apostasy of faith leading to the Second Coming of Christ on earth. We have to do our utmost best in keeping and propagating the Faith even if we resort to the means employed by St. Rita (that is asking God to take away the life of our love ones than see them commit crimes most abominable in the eyes of God - heresy) ... yes, St. Rita showed us the way should all our efforts failed us

May the Passion of Christ live in our hearts day in day out.

In Crucified Christ and Immaculate Mary,
Joey, EENS-Sedevacantist (Philippines)

Novus Ordo

Dear Brothers

… about the novus ordo abomination clip from your website. Why are they so, so , so, so, PROTESTANT!, PENTECOSTAL HAPPY CLAPPYS? Give me a some asperin, or pepto LOL. Fake novus ordo presbyters, fake bishops. This is a totally freemasonic sect from hell. Great job in posting this video. Have a happy and blessed easter and triduum. The lord willing.

mark v

MHFM: Yes, it’s a prime example of how the Novus Ordo represents the abomination of desolation in the temple of God.

Dinner

Subject: Dinner

It's too bad I ate dinner just prior to viewing the "novus order abomination" on your site---well I almost lost my dinner! really. And the "kiss" to the fake altar---reminds one of the "kiss of Judas"---total betrayal. The whole episode was entirely wicked, satanic evil-----kind of reminds one of well-orchestrated Jehovahs Witnesses events, "with a cast of thousands". How mournful to see our Lord and Savior mocked this way. Thank you for exposing this: hopefully some souls will be saved during this Holy Week by MHFM exposing this evil abomination---the V2 sect---for what it really is....

Like to

MHFM,

To Joe and all those with a troublesome spouse, I'd like to say, stay on the narrow path. I too, after being led back into the VII sect by my so-called spouse of eight-plus agonizing years, separated and divorced. I gave up custody of my 8 year old son, knowing God's Will would triumph in the end. My son and I share more quality time without having to worry about walking on egg shells and I have the opportunity to present the true traditional faith and explain the dangers of the Vatican II New Mass. I have him wearing the brown scapula and I'm showing him that it's O.K. not to be "one of the boys," and to avoid the dangers of this world.

My son was placed in the local swim team by his mom and eventually went to state competition this past year. After being called the worst dad in the world for avoiding the events and continuing to profess the dangers of the sins of the flesh, my son is now asking me to suggest another sport for next year in hopes I'll attend. My son will also be going through the false-VII First communion ceremony this Easter season with his mom and my folks from out of town. I will not be attending the ceremony, nor do I have much to do with my folks anymore as well. My son understands why I won't be attending and wishes he too were afforded the opportunity not to go. God willing, in a couple years, God will make it strong in my son's heart, which parent he wants to live with.

With True Devotion to Mary and the Holy Rosary, the Blessed Mother Mary will clean up your life of all that is not pleasing to her.

God Bless,
tm

In the works

MHFM: Note: we have a multi-part item that we hope to post very soon. We think people might find it interesting, so please keep an eye out for it.

Encouragement

Subject: Encouragement

I’m writing to encourage Joe. I’ve been sedevacantist for about five years now, and it has been, especially in the beginning, a struggle at home. I stopped going to the Novus Ordo with my family and of course I have tried to convince them, to no avail… Originally my wife was nearly hysterical and accused me of betraying our marriage by “changing religions”. She tried to get mutual friends to “talk sense to me”, etc. But she has gotten used to it and while I literally can’t even discuss it rationally with her, she absolutely breaks into tears and leaves the room, she gave me a traditional Missal for Christmas last year. So in a way she is starting to cooperate.

So I pray for her and my four children (all in their early twenties and beyond my practical direct influence) to convert. I don’t know how it will ultimately turn out. But I would leave and try to enter a monastery if I had to before I’d ever give in. I feel it is my duty to try to be leader I’m supposed to be. I don’t think I compromise on anything essential, but you have to always be on guard about it. I wish I had the understanding at 25 that it took until 45 to discover. (Understand that we were very involved in the Novus Ordo, “Catholic” Schools, CYO, etc).

I saw the truth of the traditional and sedevacantist positions when I first was exposed to it almost instantly. It was like someone turned on a light switch and everything made sense all at once. But it makes my wife cry and rant. It is really extraordinary to see and hard to understand.

But anyway, if you pray and persevere, trust in Mary, say the rosary everyday, things work out. I think they will for me and I think they will for you. BTW, there are others too I know of who have this problem. You are not unique.

Bill Mulligan

Benedict XVI’s Recent Heresies

MHFM: We’ve updated our Benedict XVI's recent heresies file with new heresies from Benedict XVI’s recent trip to the Lutheran church.

Debating with Day

Subject: Debating with Dad

Any suggestions for surviving a debate with my father? He is a Eucharistic minister... This position is new to him. This is the first Easter I am not hosting my parents and sister's family because I am traveling to an independent Latin Mass. My family is upset with me. My father believes I am being led away from the church. I have all your literature. He wants to spend 2 hours with me. I want very much more than to survive 2 hours with him. I appreciate any help…

Kathleen

MHFM: A good way to start is by pulling out the quotes from the popes and councils which defined the dogma, Outside the Church There is No Salvation. Show him the solemn definitions from Pope Eugene IV, Innocent III, etc. which are found in our books (see the first section of our salvation book), and have him read them. At that point, he is faced with the clear choice of whether to accept what the Catholic Church has officially taught or to reject it. Then explain to him how the Vatican II sect and its antipopes completely reject that dogma. At that point you usually you begin to see the rejection of the truth, but hopefully you won’t. After that, you could get into the evidence against the validity of the New Mass.

Reminded

After reading "Troublesome" and Joe's problems with his rebellious wife, I am reminded of what Pope Pius XI had to say about the duty of wives towards their husbands... and I think it is symptomatic of the times we are living in as prophesized by St. Matthew regarding the last days; we have seen the "empowering" of women, ever increasing since the 1960's, when the feminist movement reared its ugly head at the expense of males in society, ih general. The result of which is the rejection of the natural order designed by God for the harmonious ordering of human society...which are witnessing today in ever increasing numbers it seems!

...Pope Pius XI, Casti Connubi, Dec 31, 1930: "This order includes both the primacy of the husband with regard to the wife and children, the ready subjection of the wife and her willing obedience, which the Apostle commends in these words: 'Let women be subject to their husbands as to the Lord, because the husband is the head of the wife, and Christ is the head of the Church.' "

The advice given so far to Joe, is well founded...you have demonstrated your duty to love your wife, by your concern for her spiritual welfare, as the Gospel dictates...you must leave the invalid "mass" of the Vatican II sect, immediately, and start saying the full fifteen decades of the Rosary daily… as the MHFM advise...

Leave the rest in God's hands and the hands of His Blessed Mother...it will be tough, but God will not test you beyond your strenghth, and in the end, you will have saved your soul!

God bless,

David

MHFM: The only thing we would add is that today almost all the husbands are either heretics, pagans or very lax about the true faith. Therefore, an interested wife must take the initiative not only in the case of her own salvation, but for the rest of the house, if possible, rather than being led by the faithless or heretical direction (or lack thereof) of the husband.

Troublesome

Subject: Troublesome wife

I read the e-mail from a gentleman named Joe, I can perfectly understand what he is going through, I am currently separated from my wife and family because of my strong faith which mhfm helped me with and wanting no part with the Vatican ll counter church. I was also criticized by my wife and kids for being on mhfm's website a lot. And yes I also was called crazy! This past halloween I took a stand and said no to this pagan celebration, although I knew it was wrong in the past I didn't have the courage to take a stand, knowing the backlash it would bring. That was probably one of the last straws that caused my wife to want a divorce. I also have a strong sense of being responsible for my wife and children's salvation being the head of the family but everyone also has free will to choose or reject God! God is trying to do many things in my life and I feel one of them is the detachment of family, don't misunderstand me I love my wife and children very much but I'm not going to give up God and my faith to have my family back. They don't want to live life the way that I see it and that is the rejection of this world and all of its lures, they run head long right after them.

As the brothers always say pray the whole rosary: joyful, sorrowful, glorious mysteries everyday our lady won't let you down. I read a sobering small black book called: The Four Last Things; DEATH JUDGEMENT HELL HEAVEN, once you understand the endgame and the times we are living in you will want to be on the right side and not on the left on that Judgement Day. Hang in there Joe!

DVD

Dear Brothers,

I finally got a chance to watch the 3rd Secret of Fatima DVD… It is brilliant, sums up everything and is easy to understand. My sister and I watched it, and she usually being indifferent, seemed interested and convinced of the truth of the fake Sister Lucia and everything.

Thanks for the DVD and all the work behind it.

- Nancy

The Faith

Subject: Traitors to the faith

Dear MHFM,

It's good to see how… Catholics have found your site, and it seems by having this inner hunger for the faith. That's what lead me you your site-this hunger for Christ and His Most Beloved Mother-The Blessed Virgin Mary… many of these so-called Catholics would doubt at first the sede' position, after the massive betrayal from the bowels of Vatican II, and their multi-billion dollar empire, with a propaganda machine rolling 24/7, having the exterior of Catholicity vested in fine linen and gold. However, Jesus is on your side, and money, of course, and fine linen is sand, and mold for Jesus Christ and his court in Heaven. We, as Catholics have Him from above, and we have our treasure here on earth-Sacred Tradition. Just delving into these sacred histories we clearly see from early on that the church suffered periods of The Chair of Peter being vacant. For example, in the early fourth Century, from 304-308, during the horrible persecutions by Diocletian, from Pope St. Marcellinus to Pope St. Marcellus I, the Chair of Peter remained vacante, but the Catholic Church still held together in the faithful. Then, in the early 20th century Pope Leo XIII, St.Pius X, Pius XI, Pius XII constantly reminding us of the dangers from within the Church with the modernists infiltrated-Rahner, De Chardin, Lubac, Wojtyla, Ratzinger, etc., etc...-bent on bringing in destructive theology to our traditions-why shouldn't we believe that present day Rome is infested with these pestilent traitors-modernists? God Bless MHFM.

Dea

Marriage

Subject: marriage

Recently i have been very serious about leaving the V2 mass. I have spoken with my wife about it and she said she will absolutely not come with me to a real Catholic Mass...which is extremely hard to find. She has not been supportive and she is even getting to the point to where i can't even listen to music pertaining to God. I thought i was being too over the top so i backed off.... but recently she noticed i was on the internet with the mhfm website and she called me crazy!!... she is saying i am changing too much. In Genesis, Eve ate from the tree because Adam was not there to protect her from evil. I feel it is my job to protect her no matter how mad she gets at me. But i have a feeling she might leave me if i keep this up. If you have any suggestions or readings i could go to for help i would appreciate it.

Joe

MHFM: We are glad to hear about the interest. However, we would say that you must not decrease your practice of, or interest in, the faith just because your wife is getting upset. You must focus first on saving your soul, and if she leaves you that’s her problem. The way it’s going, you might have to consider leaving her. We would recommend the books Preparation for Death and True Devotion to Mary. You need to leave the V-2 invalid Mass. A Catholic may not attend such an invalid service under pain of grave sin. Perhaps you haven’t left the New Mass for the reason that it would offend her. You must leave, and if she doesn’t also stop going it’s her mortal sin. To allow her to have such influence over your decisions – for example, to stay at the New Mass simply because she goes there or because she would be upset – is something that will cause the loss of one’s soul. Based on your description, she sounds like a complete pagan who is seriously bogged down by dark spiritual forces.

Reject

I reject the Novus Ordo – and the invalid mass. I am looking for the true pure catholic church. Every since they changed it I felt empty and the mass didn’t feel the same as when I attended back in the early 60’s. I have always felt that. Now I know why. I was reading your home page and I was amazed. When I saw the pope on tv back a few years I saw the cross up side down on his chair. That was a sign to me from God not to trust him. I would like to receive communion and go to mass but I don’t know where a true priest and a true mass is near me. Please help me find one…

Thank you,

Chantal Poggi

Lutheran Agreement

Broken

Dear Brothers,

I haven't seen this mentioned but I have never seen a crucifix until John Paul's that had Our Lord's legs spread open. I purposely looked up crucifixes before emailing this and John Paul's was the only one with the knees far apart. Any decent artist portrays Our Lord with His knees together out of modesty's sake. Anyone doubting should search it and compare.

Theresa

MHFM: It makes sense that the broken or bent cross is the symbol of Antichrist. That’s because by having the edges of the cross point down, it essentially becomes an inverted cross. One could argue that it is an inverted cross, and therefore that the cross they consistently carried was an inverted cross. With the edges distorted and broken and bending down, it almost becomes a peace symbol, which is an inverted cross (a satanic symbol). It represents that they were trying to crush and destroy the cross.

Question

Dear MHFM,

Thank you for your help. I have a few questions that have been bothering me.

1.Why are people born with disabilities. Does God have a purpose behind this or is it because of some other reason?..

Thank You,
Yours Sincerely Sampath.

MHFM: Of course God has His reasons, but one reason could be that if they were without that disability, and fully healthy of body, they would get involved in things which would make it more difficult to save their souls. This is not to suggest that by simply having the disability they will be saved.

Necessary

Brothers in Christ,

Is it necessary for a priest to wear a stole when hearing confession?

John

MHFM: Not for the validity of the confession, no.

I think that you analysis of AJ was a little exagerrated. no one in their right mind would think that he is a religious authority, which is why he doesn't really talk religion. secondly, your analysis of linsday was off as well. he never said mccain was a shoe in, he said that mccain was the favored one. he did predict the cost of oil from 150 to 50 per barrel. that is enough proof for anyone.

frankly, there is no talk show host that comes close. there are no catholics that stepping up to the plate either, which is mind boggling, considering the amount of anti masonic literature written by catholics in the past.

the false prophet label is misleading. he never claims to be a prophet. however, he is extremely accurate on political issues.

Danny

MHFM: It was not exaggerated. He does sometimes talk religion, and he attacks the true religion. He also mixes false religion and a false salvation message with his views. He has claimed to be a prophet repeatedly, and he even attributed this verse to himself: “And Jesus said to them: A prophet is not without honor, but in his own country, and in his own house, and among his own kindred” (Mark 6:4). He did so when speaking about how he sometimes is more well-known or received in other states or other countries than near his home. Again, we are not discounting the good information he has on news issues, but what we did was necessary and accurate. The analysis of Lindsey was not off. The fact that he got a few things correct doesn’t prove he’s talking to an insider, especially when the insider told him that Obama would never get elected. You are partial to Alex and defending his evils, probably because you don’t have the true faith and have been deceived about what’s most important: having the true faith and saving your soul.

Prayer

Dear brothers,

I have been saying a novena for a ittle under a month now to saint joseph for many important intentions. this is because i am 8 months pregnant and my husband and i live in his mother’s house here… as many people know this town is the 3rd worst crime town in america. i miss living in my small town, and so does my husband. we are very devout to him and have been trying to pray for him to move us out of here before our son is born in may. not only do we want our own home so we can dedicate a special section of it to the holy family, but we have no room here. in order to move we need for him to have a new job closer to our desired small town, but also we need a car for when the baby arrives. a 2door truck doesn’t work with carseats. i have my hopes and trust placed in saint joseph and saint gerard to release us from this mini-prison. i dont know if u recall but we also recently wrote about my mother in law who thought we worshiped the devil because we had a douay rheims bible. anyways. to make this short i was hoping you too could pray for us to saint joseph for our intentions so we might be able to live a holy life alone with our son, away from all the people in this house and town who blaspheme god and think we’re outsiders because our beliefs. if it’s all God’s will i ask that you will pray for us too. Thank you sooo much! -emily

MHFM: We would recommend praying the full Rosary each day, if you don’t do so.

Information

Hello:

I am writing for more information about where to find a validly ordained priest… I have come to know much about the evils of Vatican II and have learned a great deal more about it on your web site. Suffice it to say, I am disheartened and feel very alone. I wish to practice the True Faith as it has been for centuries but I, of course, am not sure where to turn… Thank you in advance.

God Bless You.
Kathy Green

Problem

I watched many of your videos where you are making the claim that the Popes chair has been empty since Vatican II. This is quit a serious charge!

Most faithful Catholic agree with you that there are wolves in the church and they need to be removed. The bible even says that wolves will enter the church and its seems that the past 40 years have proven it to be very true; especially with passage of the health care bill…

I do have a problem with the arguments that you are making about Vatican II. If the Popes seat is now empty and everything being taught is now an apostasy, then you are also claiming that Jesus lied to us when he said that he would be with us always and the holy spirit will guide the church and the church has the authority and the keys to heaven. The Mormons make the same claim and that is why the Later Today Saints exist.

I am not saying I disagree with what your research, I am disagreeing that Jesus lied to us. I do not know the details of what you speak but I would be careful what you are saying because what I hear you saying is that Jesus lied and that the Catholic church has gone underground. Who knows where the Catholic church now resides?

Eboiling…

MHFM: You are starting with a false premise, that what we are saying contradicts Jesus’ promises to the Church. It does not. The Church has had antipopes, crises and periods where the faith was reduced to a remnant (e.g., the Arian crisis). There have been vacancies of the papal chair, even extended ones, as well as times when antipopes reigned in Rome. It is also predicted that there will be a great apostasy which will reduce the Church to a remnant. Your concerns are addressed in this file:

Responses to the Most Common Objections Against Sedevacantism [PDF file]

The fact is that by adhering to a heretical antipope and a sect which officially denies Catholic teaching, you are contradicting Christ, papal teaching and Christ’s promises to His Church.

Bent Cross

Subject: bent cross

How do you know if the crucification cross that they used on Jesus was not bent? You are playing with fire with your acquisations. You will be held accountable as you are trying to split the church with conflict. I don't think you have the facts to back up your statements.

Pray for the Bishops, Cardianls, Priests...that would be more appropiate than lashing out at them.

Good Day.

MHFM: Besides its history in the occult, it’s obviously a sinister symbol. Nevertheless, you don’t seem to recognize that Benedict XVI, his “cardinals” and his “priests” are utterly heretical and apostate. They accept false religions, deny Catholic dogma, believe in salvation outside the Church, etc. You really need to look at the information.

Lamp

Subject: lamp in the dark (Lamp in the Dark Exposed - 1)

I wrote to the people who made this, expressing my disappointment with this documentary. they purport to show an unbroken chain of belief, go over a little 1st and 2nd century politics, then ship to the 12th century or thereabout. they call the group the "albigensians" as opposed to cathars because they realize anyone who knows any amount of history will recognize the cathars as clearly heretical, yet they try to make it seems as if there was universal consensus that St Dominic lost all the debates....but the worst was the spurious quotes...they sounded so over the top they were unbelievable...they might as well have said "Pope X said to decapitate babies and drink their blood" they are on that level of ridiculous.

Chief…

But

Subject: Great videos about Alex Jones, but listening to Alex Jones for religious direction

is like going to your accountant and asking about having your car fixed. AJ fights the NWO and he(AJ) is just another miserable sinner full of pride. Granted where my/your soul is going is more important than your car. Lindsey Jones is a strange sort of fraud , I agree. Again another sinner full of pride, (like me). I'm still confused about how only Catholics will get into Heaven. Please send videos/info. about this. So Jesus is not in Heaven? He was/is a Jew. Mary was not catholic. The thief on the cross was not Catholic.

Where in the Bible is Catholicism the only way. Faith thru Jesus is the only way. I go to your website all the time.

MHFM: You should go to our “Refuting Protestantism” section and obtain our book, The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church. They deal with the issue you bring up.

Solomon

Subject: the Video [Sexual Sins made the wise King Solomon most wicked, and 666 in the OT]

Hi,

I saw a video you have about King Solomon and 666. Exposing Solomon as the beast that was is what God is calling his saints to do "now"...

Im…

MHFM: We are not saying he was the beast, but rather that the number 666, as it appears in his life, gives us an indication of what it signifies.

Never

Heya I have never been one to throw dirt, but isn't it more of a concern that here in the EU we are now seeing all day everyday, new sex abuse claims coming out about the whole of the Catholic World. I don't know if you know this or you merely choose to discuss issues that have no real bearing. What is happening to the CC on a worldwide scale tells me that it is information that has been out there for yrs and just now it is coming to light and I mean, everyday new claims are made. Not just that but priests in many churches are openly asking for forgiveness, see the vids about this.

I feel someone is attacking the CC, WHY, why was the Pope Attcked in public just 2 mos ago, it seems there is worry about his posistion on the NWO banking takeover, it is on the news here every week, there is a new plan or meeting for the new currancy, there is talk about a week long bank closer. I feel you are talking jazz, so as to not dig deeper into the issues of these open attacks on the CC, The Pope and the fact that it seems to be inline with the major moves the banks are making. Just so you know.

Claris

MHFM: As we’ve discussed before, as part of her punishment, God is allowing the evil public and the media to expose the Vatican II sect (the Counter Church) and to make a mockery of her.

Fr. J.C.

Subject: John Corapi

Subject: Hey [Expletive deleted]

Get your facts straight......You know nothing of Jesus christ. Fr.JC is doing the work of the lord...not idealistic american christianity....we are not muslims to hate other false religions.

[expletive deleted] with grace!

Was…

MHFM: Considering that you speak like a devil, it’s not surprising that you feel inclined to defend the apostasy of John Corapi. He’s clearly not a Catholic. He accepts false ecumenism, salvation outside the Church and false religions. In fact, speaking about the conflict between Protestants and professing Catholics in Ireland, he declared: “I don’t care if you’re Baptist or Catholic; you are Christian. Just practice it.” That is a total denial of the Catholic faith. You know nothing about Jesus Christ or Catholicism.

Dear Brothers,

That's a great video explaining the horrendously heretical Joint Declaration on Justification with the Lutherans (the gates of Hell) that the Vatican II sect signed, and both John Paul II and Benedict XVI approved. The document is a shocking insight into the heretical mindset, because heretics usually state the positive and true form of the Catholic teaching, but then retract their statement in some way in the same context. The JD, as you mentioned, states Catholic teaching, but also states Lutheran teaching, and then it denies Catholic teaching by saying that nothing in the JD is condemned by the Council of Trent. The Council of Trent is Catholic teaching and is all about fighting off and condemning the Protestant heresies, especially the heresies of Martin Luther and the Lutherans! But, as usual, nothing is heresy to the Antipopes, except for true Catholic teachings. Benedict XVI doesn't even think Protestantism is heresy!:

Pope Pius XI, Rerum omnium perturbationem (#4), Jan. 26, 1923: “The saint was no less a person that Francis de Sales, Bishop of Geneva and Doctor of the Universal Church. Like those brilliant examples of Christian perfection and wisdom to whom We have just referred, he seemed to have been sent especially by God to contend against the heresies begotten by the [Protestant] Reformation. It is in these heresies that we discover the beginnings of that apostasy of mankind from the Church, the sad and disastrous effects of which are deplored, even to the present hour, by every fair mind.”

Heresy means to choose, and Protestantism means to protest against the authority of the Catholic Church, so even the name Protestant proves that they are heretics because they choose to reject the authority of the Catholic Church - an authority invested in the Catholic Church by Jesus Christ Himself!!! Protestantism is a means of remaining in sin but retaining a false Christian veneer, which fact is even admitted by the Lutheran heretical contradictory term of the "justified sinner." (It's like saying "Physical spirit," or a "Catholic heretic") Also, the idea that Christ's justice is imputed to the sinner, and not the justified person having their own justice, is borderline Antichrist, since it confuses the justified soul of Christ with the unjustified soul of the sinner! This is why many Protestants commit sins of drunkenness, gluttony and fornication, because they read in the Bible that Jesus ate and drank with sinners, and they imagine that Jesus permits, allows or encourages sin! It's horrifying - they are basically saying that one can only be justified by sinning, as though sin is a sacrament!!! Finally the idea that we cannot cooperate with our salvation is so ridiculous as to be laughable. Obviously Martin Luther was not very familiar with the Canons of the Second Council of Orange (529 A.D.):

CANON 6. If anyone says that God has mercy upon us when, apart from his grace, we believe, will, desire, strive, labor, pray, watch, study, seek, ask, or knock, but does not confess that it is by the infusion and inspiration of the Holy Spirit within us that we have the faith, the will, or the strength to do all these things as we ought; or if anyone makes the assistance of grace depend on the humility or obedience of man and does not agree that it is a gift of grace itself that we are obedient and humble, he contradicts the Apostle who says, "What have you that you did not receive?" (1 Cor. 4:7), and, "But by the grace of God I am what I am" (1 Cor. 15:10).

CANON 9. Concerning the succor of God. It is a mark of divine favor when we are of a right purpose and keep our feet from hypocrisy and unrighteousness; for as often as we do good, God is at work in us and with us, in order that we may do so…

CANON 18. That grace is not preceded by merit. Recompense is due to good works if they are performed; but grace, to which we have no claim, precedes them, to enable them to be done…

CANON 23. Concerning the will of God and of man. Men do their own will and not the will of God when they do what displeases him; but when they follow their own will and comply with the will of God, however willingly they do so, yet it is his will by which what their will is both prepared and instructed.

According to the catholic faith we also believe that after grace has been received through baptism, all baptized persons have the ability and responsibility, if they desire to labor faithfully, to perform with the aid and cooperation of Christ what is of essential importance in regard to the salvation of their soul. [end of quote]

The Council of Orange constantly emphasizes the permanent interior change brought about by water baptism (sanctifying grace), i.e. from being a sinner to being justified, and then that person's cooperation with God's grace to maintain and increase his own justice, grace, and merit. I don't think it's a coincidence that the Second Council of Orange was held in 529 A.D., which totally contradicts Martin Luther's heresies on justification, and which was held exactly 1000 years before Martin Luther's Large and Small heretical Catechisms were published in 1529 A.D. (Catholic Encyclopedia)! Protestants hate the Catholic Church because the Catholic faith has all the checks and balances in place that, if followed correctly, do not permit a person to sin, but Protestantism attempts to justify the unjustifiable, namely, sin!!! The JD really is the AntiTrent!

Thank you and God Bless,

Chris White

Blood Type

Subject: Our Lord’s Blood Type

It seems we have ample evidence that our Lord’s blood type was AB. It is evidenced from the Shroud, from the cloth which covered His head, from various Eucharistic miracles. I have pondered this fact for Theological significance. It would seem, from a superficial, let’s call it a “Protestant” perspective, that Christ’s blood-type should be type O; for O is considered the “universal donor”. Anyone, regardless of his own blood type, can use type O blood. Therefore it seemed to me that if Christ shed His blood for “all” men, then His being the universal donor would seem to be more elegant symbolically harmonious.

So being of the firm belief that Heaven doesn’t do anything of significance randomly, I thought there has to be a reason, a message in the type of Christ’s blood. Then I learned that type AB blood is the “universal recipient”. A type AB person can use any other type of blood. Suddenly the type of Christ’s blood seemed perfectly consistent with the Catholic understanding of the Redemption. It seems to validate the Catholic notion that while Christ is open to all, we too must “pick up our cross”. We must be willing to participate, to join our sufferings to His. I think it argues against the Faith Alone concept. I think it also symbolizes the way Christ takes on all of our sins, since Christ’s blood could be mixed with any of ours. And in this way, through our willing participation, is Christ’s sacrifice effective for us. If “all” were saved merely by Christ’s shedding of blood, as the Protestant’s believe and the new mass implies, then I think He would have been an “O”.

Maybe you think I’m reaching too far here, and maybe I am, but I think that it has to “mean” something.

Bill Mulligan

Received

Dear MHFM:

I received your book on Padre Pio from a man I met at the March for Life. He told me he converted because of reading your book. I, too, was impressed, so much so that I want to hand them out. I’ll take 3 boxes. Thank you and God bless you.

Mark Hall

Comment

Subject: Fastened

Dear Brothers,

Really Appreciate your bringing THIS to the public's attention. V2 people Need to Know that God forsaw all This and gave directions on what to do. I think the Overwhelming feeling of Abandoment is where a lot of V2 people are. This V2 'church' has made a Great Effort to see to it that most Catholics don't Know What the Church taught previously, as you well know. As always, you're filling a Great Need. The Vatican is their Christmas Tree....hanging one rotten thing on it after another, the same way Hillary Clinton and Co. decorated the White House Tree with filthy items… etc…

Carol D.

Resign

I heard second hand that b16 might resign? your thoughts?

Rack…

MHFM: We don’t think so. In fact, we would expect him to come back strong in the eyes of the world or in the eyes of New Church. For example, we wouldn’t be surprised if there were a false miracle to move forward the “beatification” and “canonization” of John Paul II, or some kind of conservative action on his part to regain some of his lost credibility. That seems to be how God allows things to happen. God gives people the chance to see the heretics in all of their heresy, filth, ugliness and depravity, before he allows a semi-deception to occur. People then have the choice to cling to the truth about these heretics or be deceived by the lies and the deception. No, we don’t think he will resign.

Interest

Dear Dimond Brothers and MHFM,

I hope more people access your wonderful website. You have guts… You explain to us how we’ve been bamboozled. You are giving away all your hard work and knowledge for free on your website! You have done all the work for us.

Susan Clary

MHFM: Thanks for the comment and the interest.

Fastened

MHFM: Speaking of The Whore of Babylon, Apocalypse 18:4-5 says: “And I heard another voice from heaven, saying: Go out from her, my people; that you be not partakers of her sins, and that you receive not of her plagues. For her sins have reached unto heaven, and the Lord hath remembered her iniquities.”

In his book, The Book of Destiny, Fr. Herman Kramer makes a very interesting point about this verse (“her sins have reached unto Heaven”):

“According to the Greek text, the sins of Babylon have been ‘fastened’ on to Heaven. Heaven is the Church, and the clause may mean that the wicked inhabitants of the city have imputed their own sins to the Church and have accused her of every perversity of which they are guilty themselves or have blamed her for the punishment received…” (Fr. Herman Kramer, The Book of Destiny, Tan Books, p. 409)

With his point about how the precise meaning of the verse is that her sins have been “fastened” on to Heaven, we believe that Fr. Kramer is tending to the correct point. He obviously did not have the Vatican II sect and apostate Rome in mind, but consider how precisely this clause applies to her. The sins, the sex scandals, the abuse, etc. of apostate Rome and the Vatican II sect have been FASTENED on to the Church. Even though she is strictly speaking not part of the true Church, in the eyes of the world she represents the Catholic Church. Therefore, when the media covers how “Catholic” priests and the “Catholic Church” are mired in a sex abuse scandal that almost defies comprehension, it all gets attributed to (fastened on to) the true traditional Catholics who abhor all of it and have no part with it. It is fastened on to the true priesthood, the true faith, etc. even though the Vatican II harlot and its heretics are not representative of the true faith or the true priesthood.

Destroyed

Greetings to you and your community!!!

May the peace and love of our Lord Jesus Christ cover you always. I am Sherwin. I am a Roman Catholic… I agree with Bro Michael Dimond's findings about what has happened in vatican council II. I can see the result from the news how the false pope and other priests are destroying our Catholic faith. It's alarming 'coz even if i know the invalidity of the new order mass, i don't know where else can i attend the valid old mass.

I want to find the true Catholic faith. Thank you for the enlightening documents and videos you have posted in your website. May the Holy Spirit of the Lord Jesus Christ be with you always.

Project

MHFM: We have a project we are working on which some of our readers might find interesting. We are trying to get it done soon.

Joint Declaration

Hello Brothers:

Thank you once again for the brief touching upon the Joint Declaration with the Lutherans (video). This must not be disregarded, as the J.D. is one of the worst offenses against God that there has ever been - probably second only to the Assisi prayer meetings (and like acts of idolatry). My experience during my time as a former protestant was such that when speaking on matters of justification, almost nobody in that false religion had even a modicum of care for what the bible plainly says regarding justification. It is akin to being a Catholic Sedevacantist attempting to discuss the issues with the Novus Ordos. Besides not caring about the clear teaching of scripture, the poor protestants truly believe that they actually must enjoy their sin out to the full in order to glorify God. And what sin one would see them commit! Beside the shameful sins, which they would hide, they would usually boast gleefully about sinning in various ways - as if it glorified God. Of course, if someone was caught red handed in mortal sins of the flesh - such as adultery, etc., - they would say that he was "out of fellowship" with God, but thank God for his "justification". There are very few Catholics who realize how horribly wicked Protestantism is. The Tridentine Popes loathed it immensely - and we must thank God for these good Popes. Protestantism is every bit as bad as paganism and this can be known with certainty. It is an occult form of idolatry, and the epitome of the worship of false, man made doctrines.

- That short video in itself is a good fruit,

Thanks, Mike

Luther

I had a question regarding this quote.

Martin Luther, Letter to Melanchthon, August 1, 1521: “If you are a preacher of grace, then preach a true and not a fictitious grace; if grace is true, you must bear a true and not a fictitious sin. God does not save people who are only fictitious sinners. Be a sinner and sin boldly, but believe and rejoice in Christ even more boldly, for he is victorious over sin, death, and the world. As long as we are here [in this world] we have to sin. This life is not the dwelling place of righteousness, but, as Peter says, we look for new heavens and a new earth in which righteousness dwells. It is enough that by the riches of God’s glory we have come to know the Lamb that takes away the sin of the world. No sin will separate us from the Lamb, even though we commit fornication and murder a thousand times a day. Do you think that the purchase price that was paid for the redemption of our sins by so great a Lamb is too small? Pray boldly—you too are a mighty sinner.”

I hate Luther and his terrible heresies he gave to the world but is this quote technically wrong. When he says No sin will separate us from the Lamb, even though we commit fornication and murder a thousand times a day. Isn't that correct because can't only heresy separate us from the Lamb, not mortal sins. Please respond I debate people a lot and this has been bothering me.

William

MHFM: It is certainly heretical because by it he meant that they are not separated from a life-giving relationship with the Lamb (from justification). According to him, they would still go to Heaven and be united to the Lamb, which is of course outrageously heretical and false. The truth is that they are removed from the state of justification and they are therefore spiritually dead to the Lamb, even though they remain (dead) members of the Church who could regain the lost justification.

Pope Paul III, Council of Trent, Session 6, Chap. 15: "... the doctrine of divine law which excludes from the kingdom of God not only the unbelievers, but also the faithful who are fornicators, adulterers, effeminate, liers with mankind, thieves, covetous, drunkards, railers, extortioners (1 Cor. 6:9), and all others who commit deadly sins, from which with the assistance of divine grace they can refrain and for which they are separated from the grace of God."

Video

Subject: Health Care

MHFM,

I can't believe that congress passed the health care bill despite the clear fact most Americans don't want it. I think it is a horrible bill regardless and I liked your video, but I did see a news article that made me wonder, does the bill in fact pay for abortions? According to a news report the bill was supposed to restrict abortion funding, and President Obama (amazingly) kept his promise to sign an executive order that says abortion has to be paid out of pocket. Is abortion indeed divorced from the healthcare bill or did I miss something? (Please note I don't think the bill is good, even if abortion is out of the bill, I think it is the road to socialism).

Also people are threatening, causing property damage in some states over the legislation. I'm worried that if it were to grow severe in my state I would get called up to battle riots as I'm a military policeman for the state's national guard unit.

(If you decide to publish this please do not show my name on the e-exchanges).

Question

Brothers

All my family members help me out whenever I need it, including my older brother who has 5 kids who works for [a Novus Ordo Diocese], he also does my taxes every year..,---They respect the information I give them but they won’t apply it, they even asked for the new Fatima Dvd, but doubt they even watched it yet...Anyways, over here at my job, I can email people a code that allows them to buy electronic, computers, appliances etc at a good discounted rate though my company..The company allows us to give the code to our friends, family etc....My older bros washer/dryer broke and needs a new one & asked me to give him the code...Would this be ok? Could I give him the code but let them know they need to get on board, watch Fatiima, and that I’m not happy that they are not making any progress toward conversion...Or should I just tell them all that I wont be able to help them in matters such as these anymore since I don’t want to give them the impression that im accepting them in their false faith? If I go this route, will this dampen the chances of them accepting future information from the Monastery, or should I just assume they are not going to change and close book on em....Where is the line drawn for helping out heretics

Steve

MHFM: No, you should not give them the code. They are obstinate. You have been trying to convert them for years, and to give them special assistance at this point would be the wrong thing to do.

Video

God of Nature

Dear Brothers,

We are hearing a lot about the God of our Constitution now. Knowing there were a Lot of Masons involved in the creating or our Constitution we hear a lot of conversation about whether this Country was based on the Real God, or the God of the Masons.

When they say "Nature's God", are they talking about worshipping Nature in any way.....or is that the acceptable description of the Catholic Church?

If our Constitution IS all based in Masonic language, then we are NOT founded on Christian principles at all ?

This is extremely confusing and is the constant subject of discussion. Will you please clear it up for us.

Thank you,

Carol D.

MHFM: It would really depend upon what one meant by that description. Certainly the true God is the God of nature, but a true believer (i.e., a Catholic) would almost never find himself referring to “Nature’s God.” Those who would choose that description would usually be heretics or liberals who are doing so euphemistically, i.e.., to avoid a more specific reference to Jesus Christ or the Trinity or the God of the Bible or the God of the Catholic Church; for these references are more likely to offend others.

Rapture?

Hi, Brothers. Just a quick question. Is the rapture a protestant idea? What is the Catholic explanation?

Carol Walker

MHFM: Yes, it’s a Protestant and false idea. To find support for it they take verses which refer only to the Second Coming of Christ and falsely apply them to some kind of removal of the just before the end of the world. For instance, the verse below refers to the Second Coming of Christ. It speaks of those who are alive when Christ returns. It simply says that those good people, who are alive when Christ comes, will be caught up with Him in the air.

1 Thess. 4: 14-16- “For this we say unto you in the word of the Lord, that we who are alive, who remain unto the coming of the Lord, shall not prevent them who have slept. For the Lord himself shall come down from heaven with commandment, and with the voice of an archangel, and with the trumpet of God: and the dead who are in Christ, shall rise first. Then we who are alive, who are left, shall be taken up together with them in the clouds to meet Christ, into the air, and so shall we be always with the Lord.”

It of course says nothing about a removal of the just during the tribulation of the final days well before Christ finally comes to judge the living and the dead. Yet, this is one of their “best” verses. Needless to say, it’s not a biblical idea.

Comment

Dear MHFM,

Your videos are excellent, especially the new one. Thank you for your tireless research ... and for valiantly casting human respect to the wind! Keep up the good work….

Bon…

Theology

Brothers Dimond:

Assuming that the correct matter and form are used during a protestant or other heretical Baptism, does the erroneous and heretical theology of the minister concerning Baptism affect its validity? Most do not believe that baptism absolves original sin.

EJP, M.D., D.D.

MHFM: The intention required in conferring the Sacrament of Baptism is extremely minimal. It’s simply to pour the water and say the correct words and not to interiorly fail to intend to perform the outward action. Therefore, even false ideas about original sin, baptism and other matters of theology do not vitiate the intention to do what the Church does. This was confirmed by Pope St. Pius V, as shown in the very interesting quote below. Pope Pius V decided in favor of the validity of baptisms performed by Calvinists, even though they denied baptismal regeneration.

“According to Calvin baptism had not the power of taking away original sin, and the French preachers, in consequence, made it clear that in baptizing they had no intention of doing what the Roman Church understood by baptism. The Council [of Trent] had declared that the baptism of heretics was only valid if they intended to do what was intended by the Church of Christ, and the French Catholics therefore felt serious doubts as to the validity of Calvinist baptisms. The Congregation of the Council decided in favor of their validity, on the ground that, in spite of their errors as to the effects of baptism and the true Church of Christ, the preachers steadily maintained their intention of administering true Christian baptism, and of doing what the Christian Church had always done in conferring it. This decision was confirmed by [Pope St.] Pius V.” (Dr. Ludwig Pastor, History of the Popes, Vol. 17, p. 205)

Note: WE DO BELIEVE THAT CONDITIONAL BAPTISM SHOULD BE DONE IN MANY CASES WHERE THE BAPTISM WAS PERFORMED EITHER IN A PROTESTANT SETTING OR A NOVUS ORDO ONE. THIS IS BECAUSE UNLESS ONE IS SURE THAT IT WAS DONE WITH THE CORRECT MATTER AND FORM, ETC., IT SHOULD BE DONE CONDITIONALLY JUST IN CASE. ANYONE CAN DO IT. THE FORM OF CONDITIONAL BAPTISM IS HERE: File The point is, in answer to your question, that heretical theology does not invalidate the baptism provided the basic matter, form, etc. are present.

Awoke

Dear Brothers

I wanted to let you know what good work you do for all of us. I have finally awoke to the truth thanks to you guys, and your valuable information. I wanted to share my story with you in hopes of helping others that have been in my shoes. To start out I didn't have much of a religious upbringing, so I have spent my life searching for answers but not taking my journey that seriously until now. Before I knew about your information, I took religious classes though the V2 sect but sensed something wasn't right so I went back to the protestant religion still sensing something was missing there to, and feeling like a fish out of water when I attended their services. I never felt I belonged there. I learned of your web site about a year and a half ago and ordered your material and read it but was not completely convinced, and I still was going to the protestant church thinking God was love surely he wouldn't send me hell or would he I started to ask myself. So I decided to be honest to myself and told the pastor of the church I believed the teachings of the catholic church to be the most true. He told me that I needed to make a decision and he was very matter a fact about it. So I took his advice and made a decision to become catholic, and raise my children catholic. I wrote him a letter to inform him of my decision and to refer him to your web site so that he may know the truth.
He wrote me back and I wanted to share the letter with you, so here it is.

Dear Veronica

Thank you for writing. But I was distressed over what you wrote. We love you and your family and have tried to help you spiritually. I hope if you change your thinking you will feel free to contact us and come back to the chapel. You have apparently decided to become Roman Catholic. Their teaching is that they believe in Christ and the cross but that faith in him is not enough. One must also be baptized and keep the church sacraments, live a good life, and then go to purgatory to atone for ones sins. One can never know he is going to heaven as long as he is alive because his works may not be good enough.

The scripture emphasizes that Christ is enough to save us, his death atones for our sins. Time and time again it is emphasized that salvation is by grace through faith (EPH.2:8-9) This truth is emphasized in Romans 1-5, the book of Galatians and many other scriptures. Put aside R.C. teachings and simply read the scriptures and ask God to show you the truth. I am quite familiar with R.C. teaching and am convinced that it is wrong. It will not bring salvation to you or to your family. And the end of false teaching is eternal destruction. Do not be deceived.

That was the letter the pastor wrote me and that is how they lure people into their false teachings hope this can help others see how they do it. Because that is how they did it to me. But not no more.

Thanks God Bless

Veronica.

Reading

Hi, I was reading your new book, "The Bible proves the teachings of the Catholic Church" and while I was on the chapter of Mary as the second Eve, An idea popped into my head on the similarities between Adam and Eve eating the forbidden fruit and the Eucharist. Eve tells the serpent in Gen 3:1-6 that God has said to her, "Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die" So when Adam and Eve did eat the fruit we know that they sinned mortally and their souls died. This is the same as the Eucharist except in reverse. You must eat the Eucharist and when you do (if you are in the state of grace) you will have life in you.

Also, Eve believes from the mouth of the serpent that if she eats the fruit, her eyes shall be opened and she will know good and evil.

So if one in the state of grace eats the Flesh and drinks the Blood of Christ, their eyes will be opened to truth and it will be easy to distinguish between good and evil.

This is a great book not only for those who do not yet believe in Catholic truth but also for those who are seeking to have a greater knowledge of Catholic apologetics.

I thank you for this book, it will save many souls. God Bless

BOD

Subject: Baptism of Desire – Gnostic

Hello Brothers -

I was very glad to see the e-mail from Chris White quoting Irenaeus. Baptism of Desire is absolutely Gnostic, in its implications, expression, and in every way in its definition. Let us call it what it is! The Gnostic Heresy, ( the Gnostic Heresy has dressed itself up in various garbs since its demonic inception.) The Baptism of Desire advocates are each and every one "invincible ignorance" heretics as well. This is Gnosticism pure and simple.

Thanks for the tireless work,

-Mike

Agree

Excellent video on the US Bishops being responsible for health care passing. I agree completely. The other reason they are responsible is because they have connected government health care with social justice. On the Catholic Bishop website it states they have been supportive of universal healthcare for decades. They state that health care is a basic human right. They have abandoned the concept of Catholics volunteering freely to the poor and sick to an imposed government right that will come with a loss of privacy and steep price tag.

Kathleen

Enjoy

Hello Brother Dimond-

First of all I'd like to tell you how much I enjoyed your books, videos, audios & website. It is in my favorites & I check it regularly. I am looking for a real vatican 1 church a driveable distance from my home… I was born & raised Catholic but fell away from it in my teens after questioning some things in grade school. I went to St. Francis of Assisi for grade school & Notre Dame high school. I was suspicious of the sexual abuse cases that kept coming up in the news & smelt a rat. It was then that I somewhat suspected infiltration of the church but I didn't, at the time, know there was such a thing as vatican 1. I am so glad that I found it & your site. Anyway, I need to go to Confession- by a real priest. I won't walk into a vatican 2 church anymore at all. My kids have been baptised by the vatican 2 church (before I knew there was a difference) so they need to be re-baptised… Thank you so much for your wonderful site.

Sincerely,

Lisa Moore

Penitent

How would a penitent confess the sin of receiving the true Eucharist unworthily if the only validly ordained priest available to him was a novus ordo priest (who does not try to justify mortal sins)? How would that penitent put this sin into words so that he does not cause the priest to bring up his own heretical beliefs about the Eucharist? Should the penitent even consider this priest to be an acceptable option for Penance in this case?

TD

MHFM: If he is validly ordained and uses the essential form, the Novus Ordo priest would be an option for such a confession. The penitent would say: I ask forgiveness for having sacrilegiously received Holy Communion, by receiving it in mortal sin. Specify the number of times.

Sickening

Thank you to MHFM and Brother Peter Dimond for the comments on the video re: US "Healthcare" -- "vote"---if you could call it that. How SICKENING, NAUSEATING the whole thing is, what an abomination and what a ultimate HUMILIATION for any American! I think Brother Peter's comments accurately depict this scenario as merely a reflection of and part of the due punishment for the most HEINOUS CRIMES we in "America" accept and even throw roses at those who promote----"Vatican 2 Catholics" who are TOTALLY PRO-ABORTION such as Pelosi, the abomination Chaput, Biden-----oozing, bleeding sores and wounds on the body of this nation....yes, hell awaits them all: let us pray ever more ardently and fervently not to be caught up in the evil web of the demon which is dragging SO MANY souls into fiery gehenna! Jesus, Mary, help us!

Comment

Hi Bros, Michael and Peter Dimond,

That's a great breakdown of the Obama "health care" bill....excellent...

God bless

David

Protestants

Dear Brothers in Christ,

Your book "The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church" is the best book dealing with the errors of protestantism I've ever read. It's a clear-cut proof that protestants don't care about the Bible at all, and that the protestantism, besides the V2 evil teachings, is probably the largest collection of self-contradictory statements on the planet Earth. For example, the protestant teaching about the 'one and only mediator between man and God' is mind-bogglingly illogical teaching, simply because the preaching about it is a form of mediation between man and (as the protestants erroneously think) God. Every protestant, who thinks that a man is an idolater if he seeks for an intercession from a saintly person, should ponder about basic questions: why have a church at all? why listen to the preaching of the pastor at all? why read the Bible at all?

All of these activities are a form of mediation, for God certainly can reveal Himself to a man without the church, without the pastor, without the Bible, without anything and anyone at all in between man and Himself, as He has done so with Abraham, Noah, Moses and many other prophets.

It brings me much joy every time when I read a letter, on your website, from a reader who converts from protestantism to the True Faith.

St. Joseph, the protector of The Church, pray for us.

Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia

Baptism

Dear Brothers,

I found this interesting quote on the necessity of Baptism from St. Irenaeus', Against Heretics.

Against Heretics, St. Irenaeus, Book I, Chapter XXI.-The Views of Redemption Entertained by These Heretics [the Gnostics]: "1. It happens that their [the Gnostics'] tradition respecting redemption is invisible and incomprehensible, as being the mother of things which are incomprehensible and invisible; and on this account, since it is fluctuating, it is impossible simply and all at once to make known its nature, for every one of them hands it down just as his own inclination prompts. Thus there are as many schemes of "redemption" as there are teachers of these mystical opinions. And when we come to refute them, we shall show in its fitting-place, that this class of men have been instigated by Satan to a denial of that baptism which is regeneration to God, and thus to a renunciation of the whole [Christian] faith."

St. Irenaeus equates the denial of water baptism ("that baptism which is regeneration to God") to a total rejection of the Christian faith, i.e. Apostasy ("a renunciation of the whole [Christian] faith.")!!! Apart from proving the fact that St. Irenaeus believed in the absolute necessity of water baptism, it shows how the Gnostics had a type of "tradition respecting redemption" that sounds similar to Baptism of Desire because it "is impossible simply and all at once to make known its nature, for every one of them hands it down just as his own inclination prompts. Thus there are as many schemes of "redemption" as there are teachers of these mystical opinions." Vatican II only references Books 3 and 4, not 1,2, or 5 of St. Irenaeus' Against Heretics, but it still draws attention to the title under which all 5 books are named. So the very seed of the Vatican II Apostasy, i.e. the denial of the Absolute necessity of water baptism for salvation and entrance into the Catholic Church, is buried in the Vatican II documents! Also, according to the Catholic Encyclopedia, St. Irenaeus was born between 115 A.D. and 125 A.D., which shows again how dishonest it is to assert that Baptism of Desire was Church Tradition from the beginning - the very opposite is in fact the case, as is shown by St. Irenaeus' book, Against Heretics!

God Bless,

Chris White

Refutation

Subject: Your refutation of “A Lamp in the Dark”

Brothers,

I am hoping that you decide to produce a video refuting the horrible new movie, "A 'Lamp' in the 'Dark'."

I especially would like to see a thorough refutation of the lie about the Society of Jesus assassinating President Lincoln. Mary Surratt, a Catholic, was tried, convicted and executed by a kangaroo military tribunal for the "aiding and abetting" of the assassins. Her story is typical of the totalitarian state that was constructed during the War of Northern Aggression. Freemason President Johnson refused to intervene for this poor woman, and nowhere in the book detailing the travesty of justice was the Society of Jesus even remotely mentioned as accomplices or planners. The name of the book is, "The American Bastille Vol. 2." This 2-volume set serves as a ready guide to the coming communist state apparatus to which we will be exposed.

Please permit me to pre-order 1000 copies of this work, should you choose to produce it.

Sincerely,

Howard

Participation

Good job exposing the "bishops" participation in the health care bill. Knowing politics and the mentality of "you scratch my back I'll scratch yours," I bet that as a thank you to the Bishops, the powers that be printed this.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100323/ap_on_re/us_rel_catholic_abuse_report

It seems more than a coincidence that this comes out only a day later.

Please withhold name

Poem

Just something I wrote last night that I wanted to share with you. Hope you like it:

A snuffed lamp

A lamp in the dark

has missed the mark

by trying to wreck

Saint Peter's Barque.

A web of lies

dark minds devise,

but it's their hour,

there's no surprise.

There was no outrage

but for voices two,

who from Monastry Holy

us the Truth shew.

The bullets of Truth

simple beads of wood,

pierced through the lies of

darkened minds.

Through night and wind

on sailed the Barque,

and the only thing snuffed

was a lamp in the dark.

Job 18:5 Shall not the light of the wicked be extinguished, and the flame of his fire not shine?

God bless,

V. from Croatia

MHFM: Thanks, that was amusing.

Helped

Bro. Michael Dimond,

Your website has really opened my eyes to what is happening in the world. The more I learn from what you have to say, the more it’s changing my life and putting me on the right path and keeping me praying, especially the rosary… I’m sending your materials to all my family back home in Ireland so they can know they’ve been deceived. There are so many people who just don’t know. Thank you for your work. I can’t say enough for how much you’ve helped me.

Kieran Stainsby

Comment

Hail Mary brothers Michael and Peter Dimond

I am really thankful for your exposure of the false prophet Alex Jones and the diabolical movie which he endorses.

Like you said, many good things are revealed by him, but always in a very materialistic point of view, that leaves the impression that all that matters is to guarantee our liberties and nothing else matters.

Another point that gets proven is how "...those who are not with Christ (His Church) are against Him", so no matter what 'good' this Alex Jones does in exposing the evil New World Order, he neverthless sponsors a truly diabolical film against the True Church of Christ, and in the end, is another 'agent' even if not aware of the NWO that is satanic.

By the way, today was shown here in Brazil the History Channel documentary on the 3rd Secret of Fatima with the participation of Brother Michael. I have to say that for a secular and somehow 'biased' tv channel, the program itself was neverthlees quite good, although Brother Michael´s lines were definitely cut off, and there were some other very important points missing or taken out of context.

Greetings,

Marco

Padre Pio

Marco

Dear Br. Dimond,

What about this letter referred in several biographies of Fr. Pio ? Also, several of his biographies have him predicting on two different occasions that Archbishop Montini would be the next pope after John 23 ? Thanks, Fred Nesbitt

Letter to Paul VI on Humanae Vitae

MHFM: We addressed that in an audio we did sometime back: Answering Objections Against Padre Pio [42 min. audio discussion]. We discuss and respond to the claims that Padre Pio endorsed the heresies of Vatican II, Humanae Vitae and salvation outside the Church.

Ratzinger

To contrast the teachings of the Modernist Vatican II council on false ecumenism, completely fostered by head heresiarch Dr. Ratzingzer, aka, antipope Benedict XVI and his fervent heretical belief of following and worshiping false religions to attain eternal life in Christ's Kingdom-Heaven. Let's read of St. Benedict-sixth century Catholicism-. "...Upon the crest of Monte Cassino "there was an ancient chapel in which the foolish and simple country people, according to the custom of the old gentiles, worshiped the god Apollo. Round about it likewise upon all sides there were woods for the service of devils, in which, even to that very time, the mad multitude of infidels did offer most wicked sacrifice. The man of God, coming hither, feat in pieces the idol, overthrew the altar, set fire on the woods and in the temple of Apollo built the oratory of St. Martin, and where the altar of the same Apollo was, he made an oratory of St. John: and by his continual preaching he brought the people dwelling in those parts to embrace the faith of Christ." According to heretic, antipope Benedict XVI, St. Benedict of Nursia was wrong in preaching Christ to infidels, and destroying devil worship. Who's right? He who has eyes to see...

Dea…

MHFM: Yes, it’s a quote we cite in our file on Benedict XVI.

Pope Pius XII, Fulgens Radiatur (# 11), March 21, 1947: “… he [St. Benedict] went south and arrived at a fort ‘called Cassino situated on the side of a high mountain; on this stood an old temple where Apollo was worshipped by the foolish country people, according to the custom of the ancient heathens. Around it likewise grew groves, in which even till that time the mad multitude of infidels used to offer their idolatrous sacrifices. The man of God coming to that place broke the idol, overthrew the altar, burned the groves, and of the temple of Apollo made a chapel of St. Martin. Where the profane altar had stood he built a chapel of St. John; and by continual preaching he converted many of the people thereabout.’”

For many

Subject: for many versus for all

Hello Bro. Dimond

While reading through Denzinger I found this passage that seems to indicate that the New Mass words of consecration do confect and produce a valid sacrament.: Denzinger 715:

…there can be no doubt but that after aforesaid words of the consecration of the body have been uttered with the intention of effecting, it will be changed immediately into the substance of the true body of Christ.

What do you think of this?

Jim

MHFM: No, it doesn’t indicate that at all. In order to confect a sacrament, one must have matter, form, minister and INTENTION. The Church teaches that intention is determined by intending to do what the Church does, that is, intending to use the FORM that the Church uses. So, using the proper form determines whether one has the proper INTENTION. In the traditional Mass, since one intends to use the WHOLE FORM, one has the proper INTENTION to do what the Church does.

Therefore, when a priest who is using the traditional form, and therefore has the proper INTENTION, says: “This is my body,” the substance is immediately changed. That’s because he intends to do what the Church does. He intends to go on to use the rest of the Church’s form. That's what the Council of Florence is discussing, someone with proper "intention." However, when a “priest” uses the new mutilated Novus Ordo form, he does not intend to use the form prescribed by the Catholic Church but a mutilated and heretical form. Therefore, he has a defect of intention from the start. This defect of intention is present at the very moment the Novus Ordo "priest" says “This is my body,” and thus nothing happens. So, the defect of form in the wine portion of the New Mass gives rise to a defect of intention which takes effect at the very moment he says the words for the consecration of the bread: “This is my body.”

Bugging

Dear Brothers

My query is this, as it has been bugging me for a while now. One of the arguments you use against John Paul II was his use of the upside cross. Surely it makes sense to use the cross of St. Peter as we all recognise him as the first Pope. This is something your detractors would bring up to try and discredit you. I haven't yet came across you address this as regards to it being the cross of St. Peter. If you could shine a bit of light on your view of this that would be most appreciated.

P.S. There is a lot of interesting reading on your website and your videos are always food for thought. Your discussion on the film, 'A lamp in the dark', was informative and also entertaining, particularly the bit about the Cardinals hat. Anyway, as a lapsed Catholic trying to revitalise my faith I find that your material and information is very helpful so I thank you for that.

Yours sincerely

Lil…

MHFM: Thanks for the interest. First of all, we have addressed this before. John Paul II had the huge upside-down cross over his head when he was in Israel on March 24, 2000. When he did that, it was not in commemoration of St. Peter. There was no commemoration of St. Peter at all, and it wasn’t done on any of St. Peter’s feast days. The upside-down cross is one of the biggest symbols in Satanism. That’s why the satanic antipope used it. The people who argue that it was for St. Peter are simply outrageous, desperate and without anything to back them up. In fact, John Paul II even used it on his vestment before he was antipope, when he was a “cardinal,” which further destroys their argument. That is shown in this video.

Additionally, it’s not a main argument (or even a necessary one) that we bring forward to prove he was not the pope. The heresies prove that by themselves. It’s an additional point, for those with eyes to see, which serves to reveal the kind of evil he represented.

Predict

Dear Brothers,

Is Nancy Pelosi a possessed witch? What an ABOMINATION! Everybody needs to oppose this OBAMACARE conspiracy. I predict we are going to become a communist police state. Also I wondered if you would like to make some youtube videos about what you think is the MARK OF THE BEAST 666, THE ANTICHRIST, THE SECOND COMING OF CHRIST AND THE END OF THE WORLD, THE GREAT TRIBULATION, etc. I think these subjects might be interesting from a true catholic perspective. I wish you a blessed ST BENEDICT feast day! ST BENEDICT pray for us! In the holy family… MARK V

MHFM: The passing of this bill will mean the end of America as we have known it. It might not be recognized immediately, but it’s the first major step to socialism or communism. We have some videos on the topics you mention, but there are other important points that will hopefully be discussed very soon.

Convert

Hello Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,

… I discovered your site a few months ago. Let me tell you with complete honesty that I credit the material in there with my conversion from Protestant/ Evangelical conviction to Catholicism. I am for a first time completely sure of what I believe in and why. The true Catholic faith is a true representation of the contents of the Bible and the will of God. I had never encountered such complete teaching of the scriptures. It is unfortunate that many of my friends who were searching for the truth got taken in by the JWs, Mormons, and other heretical sects and religion. If they had this material available at the time, or knew of it, who knows how many of them would have taken the right path… Most catholic clergy, it seems, do everything in their power to make the Faith sound as ridiculous as possible. I have had debates with a few that were not even up on some basic Biblical doctrine.

I do, however, deem myself lucky enough to stumble upon your website and find the material there. Once I familiarized myself with its contents, heard the audios, and the debates, I felt an overwhelming rush of happiness. It was like coming home after a long and arduous journey from strange and unpleasant places. Your work, dear brothers, is not done in vain. You have succeeded in putting me, or at least pointing me, to the right path. I wish you could multiply and be supernaturally transported to every household, school, church, city and given the authority to preach and teach. I am sure the harvest would be plentiful, as many thirst, but few are quenched. May God be with you always, and may the powerful intercession of Our Blessed Lady Holy Mother of God never waver in supporting the sacred work you are performing.

Edmund Dallakian

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. It’s great to hear about the interest. For those who intend to convert to the Catholic faith, it important for them to follow the steps in our “steps to convert” file.

Amorth

Subject: Amorth

Dear MHFM,

I have a hard time trying to understand how someone like the "chief" exorcist of the Vatican, Fr. Amorth, can NOT see or refuses to see the vatican 2 church for the imposter Catholic religion that it is. How this man who was validly ordained and has cast out countless demons from the possessed, who knows firsthand the trickery, deception, and cunning of the devil cannot or does not see the truth about vatican 2 is beyond my comprehension. How can this man be so spiritually blind?? If this priest does not convert and adhere to traditional Catholicism, will he be one to say to Jesus, "In thy name have I not cast of demons" only to hear our Lord rebuke and condemn him that He never knew him?

Alph…

MHFM: Yes, he will be one of those people. He believes in the activity of the Devil on some level, but obviously not in traditional Catholic doctrine. He thinks that John Paul II, with all of his apostasy and false ecumenism, was “holy” and even “saintly.” That’s outrageous. It’s somewhat similar to how people who claim to be traditional Catholics, who might even put out a lot of effort traveling to Latin Masses, also believe that Muslims, Buddhists and Jews can be saved without the Catholic faith. It’s doesn’t even bother them that their view is heretical and was condemned infallibly by the Catholic Church. They just explain it away. It’s the mystery of bad will.

Alex Jones and “Lamp” Discussion

MHFM: This is our discussion of Alex Jones:

Alex Jones: the Good and the Evil - Part 1

Alex Jones: the Good and the Evil - Part 2

Alex Jones: the Good and the Evil - Part 3

Alex Jones: the Good and the Evil - Part 4

Alex Jones: the Good and the Evil - Part 5

This is a related discussion of a new anti-Catholic film, A Lamp in the Dark, one of the most anti-Catholic films ever produced:

A Lamp in the Dark Exposed - Part 1

A Lamp in the Dark Exposed - Part 2

A Lamp in the Dark Exposed - Part 3

Discovered

Dear Brother Michael and Brother Peter,

We have discovered your website! Your research and study is prodigious, and we encourage you to continue the efforts to find and reveal the truth about Vatican II and the deplorable apostasy in the world today. I, myself, am at present reading the article concerning the further, more current, heresies of Benedict XVI. After only a quarter of the way through the page, I noticed a feeling of sickness in my stomach and head. At the halfway point, I feel overwhelmed by the stench! This anti-pope is definitely a cosmic one-worlder, totally devoid of faith in the Truth – Jesus Christ, and is NOT in the least bit a protective and nurturing shepherd of the flock, being totally humanistic, materialistic and not interested in the true salvation of souls. On one hand he suggests religious freedom and on the other he says that expressing one’s differing beliefs is not to be allowed – that is if you are truly Catholic. The “Progress of Humanity” is not attained by the efforts of man. The antipopes have perpetrated the sacrilegious use of major Catholic shrines as well as invalidating the Mass, sacraments, and the priesthood, depriving the true faithful access to pure devotion, the saving grace of Jesus.

My husband, Dennis, and I, Chris, were brought up in the pre-Vatican II Church and have been in great pain ever since the Novus Ordo came along. Although we realized that it seemed more Protestant than Catholic and that things were not right, and some “celebrations” were an abomination, we didn’t put it all together till now – we were dealing with heresy on a huge scale! All these years we have been continuing to go to the new mass thinking that we were going to “stay Roman Catholic no matter what”. Now we know that continuing to attend them put us in the same category as a heretic! All these years we have not been to a real Catholic Mass or received the real Body and Blood of Jesus, or the real Sacrament of Confession, except on rare occasions. Up until yesterday I used to make the sign of the Cross when going by a “Catholic Church”. Today, I didn’t…

We pray for the peace of our Lord Jesus, the wisdom of the Holy Spirit and the aide of our Blessed Mother Mary for the Remnant and for the conversion of souls to the glory of the Most Holy Trinity One God.

Dennis White & Christine Andre

Comment

Dear MHFM,

When you first broke the story about Alex Jones (mainline fake Christian) a few days ago, I wrote a letter with my views on the whole matter (I used to frequently listen to the AJ show). I decided to wait until you made a full expose before sending that letter. After I have seen and heard what you had to say in those videos I decided not to send the letter because you have addressed almost every point that I mentioned in it. Long story short, your expose of AJ and that idiotic ''documentary'' is simply brilliant.

Besides AJ's constant promotion of extremely anti-Catholic and pagan individuals (such as Jordan Maxwell, Michael Tsarion, David Icke...), the notorious incident with J. Bermas from 2009 was too much at that time… and I stopped listening to his show. Only recently I again started to tune in occasionally (listened to some guests) until this new fiasco. This time I can say with certainty that I will never be going back. The whole show in my opinion is mostly a waste of time. Instead of listening to him, people should visit http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/ and get their life and soul saving information there. It is BY FAR THE BEST PLACE for those who seek first the Kingdom of God (Matthew 6:33).

God bless,

V. from Croatia

Listened

I listened to the interview you linked between James Traficant and Alex Jones. I really had never paid attention to him (Jones) before, never heard his show, only an occasional you-tube clip. I assumed the Brother Nathaniel guy to be reliable in this sphere of politics. But I have to agree with you, it is a stunning interview, and it is hard to imagine a shill for the Jews making it.

It is also refreshing to hear Traficant tell the truth about some basic economics. It is just a simple fact that the only reason to impose and collect taxes is social engineering. This is because the burden on any economy comes from what the government spends, not the amount of fiat currency in private hands. For example, if the government took half of everyone’s “money” and burned it, didn’t spend it, the economy is not taxed at all. Price levels would adjust (downward) and everyone would have the same spending power with fewer dollars. One the other hand if the government didn’t take any money from anybody, but spent like crazy, printing money or borrowing it, then the society is “taxed”, as production is diverted to whatever the government wants to buy and the price of everything left over goes up. More dollars chasing the same or fewer goods. Inflation therefore is a form of tax. High interest rates (the “crowding out” effect) is also a form of tax.

Another scam is the notion of the “corporate income tax”. A corporation is an abstract entity, not some fat rich guy with a cigar as oft portrayed in the popular imagination. Any cost it incurs to produce its product (be it food, or heating oil, or other stuff people need) must be borne by either its customers or its employees, or its shareholders (like old ladies who own pensions). But because there is a corporate income tax, incredible talent and resources are diverted from productive work into tax avoidance schemes. It is so wicked evil, a stupid notion borne of misguided envy. But does the New Church have a clue and oppose notions such as the corporate income tax? No, in fact usually the opposite in the name of equally misguided “social justice”. When you don’t understand the Faith, you don’t understand anything. It really seems to work that way often.

Yes the Traficant interview was quite good. I have never heard a politician discuss this stuff honestly before. It is not a coincidence that the federal income tax and the federal reserve were both born at the same time (1913?). Soon then the US was off fighting the last great Catholic Monarchy in WWI.

Bill Mulligan

Rome

MHFM: In The Book of Destiny (a book on the Apocalypse) by Fr. Herman Kramer, there are some interesting quotes about how the apocalyptic Babylon refers to Rome. This coincides with what we’ve believed and pointed out: Why Rome is now The Whore of Babylon. We don’t agree with everything in the book, but these quotes are very interesting:

“A harlot is given to fornication. Ezechiel (XXIII.) calls Israel and Juda harlots, because they practiced the idolatry of the pagan nations bordering on Israel. Fornication and adultery in prophetical language mean apostasy from the true faith and from God. Hence this GREAT harlot is a city whose apostasy from the true faith is a monstrous thing. This may point to Rome. Rome is the Holy City of Christ, the center of His eternal Kingdom, as Jerusalem was the center of the theocracy. And the apostasy of this city, and her becoming the head of an empire that would lead all possible nations and peoples into antichrist-worship would merit for her the title of THE GREAT HARLOT. The apostles called ancient Rome ‘Babylon’ (1 Peter 5:13). So the conclusion is near that the great harlot of the future shall be Rome.” (The Book of Destiny, Tan Books, p. 383.)

“The title of the harlot city, BABYLON THE GREAT, leads us to the conclusion that it shall be Rome.” (The Book of Destiny, p. 389)

“In St. John’s description of Babylon, the conspicuous traits of ancient pagan Rome appear as the most prominent features. Babylon is not ancient Rome, but a new Rome that has a resemblance to the ancient center of idolatry and Godlessness. This Rome is entirely cut off from God, is in a spiritual desert.” (The Book of Destiny, p. 388)

Collection

Dear Brothers,

That is a great expose of the evil "documentary" - "A Lamp shining in the Darkness." Thank you. "The Lamp" appears to be a collection of every single Anti-Catholic myth, lie and distortion that has ever been dreamed up by the Devil's minions. Do they ever consider that Satan appears as an angel of light? 2 Corinthians 11:13, 14 - "For such false apostles are deceitful workmen, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. And no wonder: for Satan himself transformeth himself into an angel of light." In fact, it sounds very similar to what the Watchtower Society ("Jehovah's Witnesses") teaches. As usual, the Jesuits are portrayed as the most evil people ever, and if anything bad happens it's always the Catholic Church's fault, so they think. It's another weapon in the heretics’ arsenal for arguing that there is salvation outside the Catholic Church. What gets me is how Alex Jones can endorse things that pretend to expose the Antichrist, such as "The Lamp", but then he is a big fan of the heavy metal rock group "Megadeath"! Also he allows his websites to be a vehicle for promoting marijuana use, homosexuality, abortion, etc.! It is similar to modernism, where there is no objective truth when it comes to religion, "it's all in your mind" they say:

Pascendi, On the Doctrine of the Modernists, Pope St. Pius X, 10 - "It is thus that the religious sense, which through the agency of vital immanence emerges from the lurking places of the sub-consciousness, is the germ of all religion, and the explanation of everything that has been or ever will be in any religion."

Also interesting was that you exposed the Gnostic dualism lurking beneath their promotion of the Waldensian and Albigensian heretics. The Albigensian heretics were thwarted not only by St. Dominic's books being miraculously preserved from the flames, but also by the Most Holy Rosary of the Blessed Virgin Mary:

Fausto Appetente Die, On St. Dominic, Encyclical of Pope Benedict XV promulgated on June 29, 1921 - "God Himself was ever at hand to aid him in his battle for the Faith. Thus, having accepted the challenge of the heretics that each should consign his book to the flames, his book alone remained untouched by the fire. Thus by the valor of Dominic Europe was freed from the danger of the Albigensian heresy."

On the Rosary, Octobri Mense, Encyclical of Pope Leo XIII promulgated on September 22, 1891 - "8. The heresy of the Albigenses had in effect, one while covertly, another while openly, overrun many countries, and this most vile offspring of the Manicheans, whose deadly errors it reproduced, were the cause in stirring up against the Church the most bitter animosity and a virulent persecution. There seemed to be no human hope of opposing this fanatical and most pernicious sect when timely succor came from on high through the instrument of Mary's Rosary. Thus under the favor of the powerful Virgin, the glorious vanquisher of all heresies, the forces of the wicked were destroyed and dispersed, and faith issued forth unharmed and more shining than before."...

Chris White

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. It’s also interesting to note that in the video, they of course (falsely) claim that St. Dominic lost his debate with the Albigensians, and for that reason had to resort to killing them.

Comment

I was willing to check out your website in case i've been led astray in following the post vatican ii church. i was not convinced of any of the "heresies." far too many of your quotes are taken out of context. some of your arguments have faulty logic, and the conclusions you jump to are far-reaching and unfounded. you need to spend some serious time in front of the eucharist asking Jesus to enlighten you…

also, i watched your father corapi video on youtube (again-faulty conclusions) and was unconvinced. the mocking tone of voice you used detracts from your credibility as a christian witness to the Truth. i believe you are well-intentioned (except for the mean, mocking tone of voice), but i am afraid you are not leading people to the Truth. i will pray for you. i always wondered why people broke away from the church after vatican ii. if it is only due to supposed heresies i will need some solid evidence (that considers the totality of the pope's actions and writings-taking into account whether some statements or actions may be misunderstood, misinterpreted, or taken out of context).

if i scrutinized your writings, took them out of context, and used the catholic dictionary as a rock solid point of truth (which it isn't-it does not constitute "church teaching" in and of itself.) i could accuse you of heresy as well…

i apologize if this seems aggressive, but i am greatly worried when i see the truth misconstrued or misapplied. i worry about the souls that may be led astray. i'm sure you can understand this, considering it is the only reason you reach out to others in the holy name of Jesus as well. let us pray for one another to be led to the Truth, which is Jesus Christ himself. fortunately God brings good from all evil and sees the heart of man.

your sister in Christ,

kateri

may God bless you!

MHFM: You are nothing more than a liar. “Out of context,” “false,” etc. is what they all claim. You don’t give even one example because, if you did, it would be completely refuted. General statements and charges, without specific examples to back up those charges, are WORTHLESS. Your e-mail is worthless. You are simply dishonest and of bad will. Barring a stunning conversion, you will be saying in Hell, for all eternity, that the proof provided (which will convict you on Judgment Day) was “out of context.” Corapi accepts false ecumenism. That’s a fact. He holds that Protestants, Jews and others can be saved without the Catholic faith. That’s a fact. His position is heretical. He holds that rabbis have a “mission,” and thus that Jews can be saved without belief in Christ. That’s a fact. He is not a Catholic, and neither are you.

The Vatican II antipopes hold that heretics and schismatics are in the Church. That’s a fact. They hold that they don’t need to be converted. That’s a fact. They accept, promote and engage in condemned false ecumenism. That’s a fact. They are not Catholic and they cannot be popes.

Bible Proves Booklet Usage

Subject: Bible proves booklet usage

Dear MHFM,

Based on the research and the accuracy of this book based on the Bible, it would be great if it was used in Catholic schools. Has there been any effort on your behalf to get this book into schools? Do you recommend this being done at a local level? I would imagine based on the V2 infiltration of our schools that there would be resistance to this.

I would be interested if this has been done by you or any of the readers of your web page.

Your ardent supporter,

Bob

MHFM: We are not aware of anyone who has tried to have it used in schools themselves. If they allowed it, it would be a minor miracle.

Problem

Dear Brothers,

Your recent series of videos on Alex Jones and A lamp in the dark exposed are excellent. The problem with Alex, like some politicians, he has identified the problem, though doesn't have the solution to the problem. The solution being God and his Commandments. If you’re not part of the solution, then you’re part of the problem. He does a nice job of bringing to light the masonic plan to destroy the world, though the path he's on has no means of salvation for those following him…

For the true believers, it's no "news flash" that the world is evil and will end one day. As you've stated on your site, the Masons are behind the evil of this world and the Vatican II Great Apostasy. The masons evilness is responsible for the removal of women through Feminism and also responsible for immodest dress in our society. Both cause the destruction of the family and moral decay of society. The following is from a masonic Letter of Vindice to Nubius; [pen-names of 2 leaders of the Italian ‘Alta Vendita’] dated the 9th August 1838. This letter was drafted eight years prior to the message from Our Lady of La Salette.

“Catholicism does not fear a very sharp sword any more than the monarchies feared it. But, these two foundations of Social Order can collapse under corruption; let us never tire to corrupt them. Tertullian was right in saying that from the blood of martyrs Christians are born; let us not make martyrs; but, let us popularize vice among the multitudes; may they breathe it through their five senses; may they drink it and be saturated. Make vicious hearts and there will be no more Catholics. It is corruption on a big scale that we have undertaken…a corruption that should one day enable us to lead the Church to its grave. Lately, I heard one of our friends laughing philosophically at our projects saying: ‘To destroy Catholicism, we should do away with women’. The idea is good in a certain way, but since we cannot get rid of women, let us corrupt them with the Church. ‘Corruptio optimi, pessima’. The best dagger to strike the Church is corruption.”

A follow-up letter below is from the (International Review of Freemasonry, 1928)

“Religion does not fear the dagger’s point; but it can vanish under corruption… It is necessary to corrupt, that our boys and girls practice nudism in dress. To avoid too much reaction, one would have to progress in a methodical manner: first, undress up to the elbow; then up to the knees; then arms and legs completely uncovered; later, the upper part of the chest, the shoulders, etc. etc.”

God Bless the Faithful,
Tom Miles

Exposing

This guy (“Brother Nathaniel”) has done a couple of features exposing Jones’s ties to Zionism. He too thinks he is controlled opposition and criticizes his protestant views.

Though he is “Orthodox”, as a Jewish convert he sometimes has interesting information and cites everything pretty well. I sometimes can’t believe this guy is walking around alive with the enemies he must have. You guys too for that matter.

Bill

MHFM: We’re familiar with the schismatic “Orthodox” individual you mention, and we believe that his claims (at least on this point) are totally unpersuasive and unsubstantiated. There is no evidence at all. In fact, one of the “best” pieces of evidence people try to bring forward to show that Jones is a Jew, or that he works for the Jews, is that he allegedly said his wife is Jewish. But actually, when people listen to the clip, they can see that he didn’t say that. He said that his wife is a “Christian” who has Jewish blood somewhere back in her family tree. He probably mentioned that she has Jewish blood somewhere in her family tree in order to shoot down any lies that he might be “anti-Semitic” or against people solely because of blood lines. That’s quite different from saying that she is Jewish, as if she’s a practicing Jew or was born to a Jew, which is not the case. We’re not saying that you are making that claim, but the others who spread that idea (such as the individual you mention) don’t even have their facts correct or they aren’t capable of any careful analysis whatsoever. Starting with this distortion and error, they then falsely conclude that Jones must be a Jew. This is taken and spread around (falsely) as a fact, and then anyone who doesn’t agree with this utterly false conclusion (because they are more careful, accurate and charitable) must be Jewish as well. It’s beyond outrageous.

Here’s an interview that Jones did with James Traficant. This utterly refutes the lie that he’s a Jewish shill. Jones is exactly what we said in our discussion of him. This interview is very interesting, by the way, and it is worth listening to. No one in the tank for the Jews would do such an interview. In the interview, Jones even mentions that he has sometimes been “mild” on Jewish control issues because he’s trying to bring everyone together to fight the New World Order. Translation: whether you agree with him or not, he believes that he can be most effective fighting the New World Order by not being cast to the fringe as an “anti-Semite” and by trying to remain as big and mainstream as possible, rather than risking the elimination of his operation if he too aggressively exposes Israeli influence. The relevant portions begin at about the 6-minute mark of this part:

James Traficant Interview - Part 2

Of course, as we covered in our discussion, we condemn Jones for the evil false prophet that he is, despite the good he does. However, since we love truth, we feel that we must speak up to refute lies that are being spread, such as the false notion that he is some kind of agent.

Clearly

Subject: Verified

Hi MHFM,

To my best efforts I could not hear Jones say the word "not". He clearly said "mainline fake Christian" whatever that means. How divinely providential. And thank you again for your tireless efforts in exposing not only the lies, but also the half-truths (Alex Jones) and the baseless wicked imaginations (A Lamp in the Dark) of the disinformation experts. Half-truths are like rat poison (90% water, 10% chemicals). The rats drink for the benefit of the water (new knowledge), but die from the poison (evil insinuations and conclusions). That is what half-truths do to people, and for the imaginative fake stories, it's so clearly false, it borders on the ridiculous. It's not good if people fall for it because they do not investigate further.

Let us pray that more people will follow the Lord's command: To seek ye first the Kingdom of God. He did not command us to seek ye first the worldly kingdom. When we seek God's Kingdom, we learn eventually the necessary knowledge of the worldly kingdom.

With prayers,

Sanjiv

Lamp

Hi Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,

Thanks for alerting us re A Lamp in the Dark DVD as advertised on Alex's webpage....truly shocking and you have done a great job in exposing it!

I have not viewed it, but the description, brief as it is given on the webpage, is enough! It is a vicious attack based on lies and distorted history which will not go well with Alex, to be sure!

The rest of your coverage is well researched and very interesting, and long overdue, I feel. There are a lot of questions to be satisfactorily answered by someone over all this, for I feel it will simply just not fade away, as easy as that!

God bless

David

No doubt

Dear Brothers,

In regard to Alex Jones speech, first of all there is no doubt that the words pronounced by him were definitely “I am a mainline fake Christian”, and if one looks carefully at his face in that fraction of a second it gives a clear impression of hesitation and shock he got from his own words. In a normal situation no one would ever say such a thing about himself.

Sincerely,

M. Fernanda da Silva

Book

Brothers..

Have you ever read the book 'The Sermons of the Cure of Ars' by St. John Vianney? I credit that book as one of the things that helped in my conversion..If I were a priest, Id have a stack of those in the back of my church and would impose it as a penance on my penitents- That book turned me white as a ghost and cried when I read it, one of the most powerful impacting books I ever read--This book is like a spiritual mirror being placed infront of ones self..The devil told St. John Vianney that if there were 2 other people like him on this world, Satan’s kingdom would fall to its knees....

Steve

MHFM: Yes, it’s a good book.

Reminds

Hello Brothers -

This whole Alex Jones thing reminds me of a well known protestant evangelist who some years ago is said to have been at the pulpit at his huge "church" and, attempting to confirm his heretical message, held up his notes and said "what I am telling you ... this is.. untrue" and again "this is.. untrue" and again and again, finally attempting to laugh off the idea that he just could not untwist his tongue.

- God guide you,

Mike

Mary is the Ark

Audible

Dear Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,

Just to confirm that Alex did not include the word "Not" in that statement; his speech is quite audible, the words measured and precise, as those who listen to Alex on a regular basis know his speaking style...

He is composed, calm, not excited as he sometimes can be, and after making that statement, showed no alarm or surprise at that somewhat startling, 'slip of the tongue' some might call it...he was thinking about the topic in hand and what was to follow...did he actually realize he had made that 'slip'? Maybe, although he gave no indication at the time…

The truth is, Alex is sadly not a Christian… in spite of all the good work he does in uncovering various conspiracies, of which he is so good at.

God bless

David

Alex Jones

Issues

He clearly says I am a mainline fake christian. You people who deny this have some real honesty issues.

William

Comment

Brothers: I don't know where these listeners are finding the word "not" in Alex's discourse - it is simply not there.

Had another faux pas that this reminds me of. I was explaining to a protestant minister about all the books that are missing from his "bible." I explained that Our Lord quoted from books that he, the protestant, doesn't recognize and gave the example from Tobit. Jesus Christ quotes "do unto others as you would have them do unto you, for this is the law and the prophets", an almost verbatum quote from Tobit, except that Tobias omits the law and the prophet portion. So I explained to the minister, "So Jesus has just quoted from Tobit and said that Tobit is a prophet." The minister interrupted and blurted out "I don't care what Jesus said!" The small crowd around us all stood with our mouths open. Things like that don't just happen.....

Keep up the good fight,
Patricia

Clear

Hi, Brothers.

I saw the video clip and you're right. He does say I'm a mainline fake Christian. All you need to do is listen carefully and look at his lips. You don't need to be able to read lips to see the evidence of what he said. It's clear from the video and audio of the clip.

Carol Walker

Normal

Hi Brothers Michael and Peter,

I heard the audios you posted on Alex Jones... all who have normal hearing would hear Alex saying "I'm a mainline fake christian" period.

I totally agree with you that Alex Jones has done an excellent job in exposing the tenets of the Devil on the secular matters specially dealing with the developments of the New World Order, the Bilderberger Group, the Secret Elite, the Illuminati etc ... in fact I've been quoting him on these matters exclusively but not until now that I have heard it loud and clear from you on his abominable belief mocking our holy Mother Church ..

Thanks God I regularly update myself reading the E-Exchanges now that I can also expose Alex should it be needed .. it’s so unfortunate to discover how many brilliant minds have fallen to the snares of the Devil, in Illuminati and Secret Societies issues alone, hundreds of brilliant minds have dedicated their entire lives, sacrificing many things to cling to their passion to expose the lies of the NWO ... just to realize that they have fallen in the same deception laid down by their masters himself - the Devil ... since these people forgot that the real battle is spiritual in nature and not activism in the political arena! Oh Mother of God, please protect us from the snares of the Devil!!!

As God allows the Truth to come out little by little … the road to heaven is becoming narrower and narrower while the world is becoming crazier each day!

May the Queen of Heaven protect MHFM!!!

Joey, Philippines

Definitely

Dear Brothers,

The article on the decline in marriages in Scotland due to co-habitation is interesting. Co-habitation is like a bomb just waiting to explode being such a constant occasion of sins. It encourages abortion too, since the couple are not committed or bound by the sacrament of marriage. It's really shocking.

Alex Jones definitely said, "I'm a mainline fake Christian," not "...Not a mainline fake Christian." I noticed on the video that when he says this, that his left hand's fingers are in a sort of el diablo of the first and third fingers. I don't know if that qualifies as an actual el diablo though..

God Bless,

Chris White

Blind & Deaf

Brother(s) Dimond:

At the risk of having my hearing, my sanity, or my integrity questioned, I must note that, on your Alex Jones clip, both the audio and the video make it appear to me that he is saying, "not a mainline fake Christian", rather than "I'm a mainline fake Christian", and his tone of voice on the clearer words that immediately follow is certainly more in keeping with the former rather than the latter. At the very least, one would think that we could all agree that the only thing in dispute is a single one-syllable word, said in a low tone in a tiny fraction of a second. (No one is suggesting that Jones said, "I'm not a mainline..."; it's either "I'm a mainline" or "not a mainline...") Given that fact, it seems a bit unfair to question someone's ability to hear, much less that person's grasp on reality or his honesty, simply because he says he perceives this fleeting sound differently than you do.

You correctly criticized the e-mail writer, though, for suggesting, with no supporting evidence, that Jones is Jewish, calling that accusation "uncharitable". But, since the writer himself doubts Jones' claim to being a Christian, it's unlikely that he perceived the one word in question differently than you because of a pre-existing pro-Jones bias on his part. In fact, you said many positive things about Jones in your video, while the e-mail writer said nothing positive about him. As such, it might have been more charitable to chalk up the difference in perception on this to the fact that the one-syllable utterance in question was unclear enough to allow for an honest and ethical difference of opinion, even among people with no hearing problems.

Also, on the video you conceded that "(i)t's true that everyone makes speaking errors. But we believe that this was God's way" of exposing Jones as a fake Christian. So even if all people of good will and adequate hearing were to agree that Alex Jones said "I'm" rather than "not"--in itself obviously not a matter of infallible Catholic dogma--it still is a matter of one's personal belief rather than Church teaching as to whether or not this was a Freudian slip by Jones, which alone would seem to preclude the need for any personal jabs in the course of defending one's own position.

What is far more significant is your statement that Jones recently endorsed a strongly anti-Catholic documentary, and that you have a response in the works which will cover this subject. I wasn't familiar with the documentary in question nor with Jones' endorsement of anything of that nature, so I look forward to your critique of this presentation; it will be helpful to get the Catholic side on this and similar material from people such as yourselves, who clearly do your research and pay diligent attention to detail. But you admit that Jones is revealing many important truths about secular matters, and it's not a stretch to assume that, given the nature of those truths, Jones is offending some powerful and evil people in the process, which might be putting himself in some danger. As such, it might be more charitable to refrain from explicitly calling him a "fake" anything until we have more solid evidence specifically concerning his motives, and what he really knows, as opposed to what we simply think he should know. Even if he is wrong about something dogmatic, there doesn't seem to be a clear dogmatically-established line beyond which his error is proof of his dishonesty--at least not one that we know for a fact that he has crossed…

Lyndon Olson

MHFM: We are sorry, but we must say that you are totally wrong and, in fact, dishonest. You are exercising bad will or you labor in a profound spiritual fog as a result of bad will. As an example, you say that we should refrain (!) from calling Jones a fake Christian, even though he’s clearly a heretic and accepts gross immorality. This is a clear demonstration of your liberalism and also why God would blind you. It’s undeniable that he said “I’m a mainline fake Christian.” The word “not” is most certainly not there. One can clearly hear “I’m a mainline fake Christian.”

We must say that in one sense it surprises us that a few people actually wrote in to say that Alex said “not,” but in another sense it doesn’t surprise us. We are living in such an age of spiritual darkness and bad will that people cannot tune in to actual spoken words, especially when they uncover and expose an evil. In your case, you obviously like Jones somewhat. You might be blinded by your desire to see his state of soul as less evil than it is; or perhaps you rebel at the thought that God sometimes supernaturally compels evil people to declare truths about themselves and that such self-denunciations serve to expose them. For this reason, perhaps you mentally add in what’s not there because the notion of a God who does such things might be too strict for your tastes.

Whatever it is, you are totally wrong and there is a reason Jesus said:

Mark 4:9 – “He that hath ears to hear, let him hear.”

The wicked (or even people who are laboring in a spiritual fog) not only cannot hear the words of God, in the spiritual sense of perceiving and accepting the truth. But sometimes this can spill over into not being able to hear in a literal way, including the words of man, when those words of man might reveal a truth about God or expose an evil. They will not hear it because their evil hearts and minds are darkened. As a result, they dishonestly hear only what they imagine or want to hear or what’s more conformable to their outlook or liberalism.

Matthew 13:15- “For the heart of this people is grown gross, and with their ears they have been dull of hearing, and their eyes they have shut: lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them.”

Romans 11:7-8- “…and the rest have been blinded. As it is written: God hath given them the spirit of insensibility; eyes that they should not see; and ears that they should not hear, until this present day.”

Matthew 13:9- “And others fell upon good ground: and they brought forth fruit, some an hundredfold, some sixtyfold, and some thirtyfold. He that hath ears to hear, let him hear.”

Liar

Brother Dimond,

I've listened to the clip several times now… He either says (quickly and somewhat inaudibly) "not a fake mainline Christian" or "but a fake mainline Christian." Why would Alex Jones (or anyone, for that matter) disparage and belittle his own religious faith by referring to it as "fake" and "mainline," and in an earnest tone of voice no less? Please put what you think you hear into context...

Scott

MHFM: You are TOTALLY wrong and you also don’t understand the point. You ask why he would ever say such a thing and undermine his own religious “faith.” It’s because he wasn’t intending to say it, as we explained! It’s something that God had him say to express his false reality. Not understanding that, and hearing only what you want to hear, you dishonestly add in what is not there to fit your false view of what makes sense and what he “must have been trying to say.” Your e-mail is thus a good example of how those who deny what he clearly said (and there is no doubt that he said: “I’m a mainline fake Christian”) are liars. They convince themselves of something that doesn’t exist to fit their preconceived notions, while denying the clear truth. See Blind & Deaf above.

Have

Dear Brothers,

I have been listening to Alex Jones for some time. In the video you posted, he said, "not a mainline fake Christian". He has been exposing how their are tens of thousands pastors getting paid from government to preach the bible in a favorable light for Martial Law.

Please correct your misquote,

Thanks
Wishing to be anonymous.

MHFM: We rebuked this person and said (essentially) that you either cannot hear or are a liar. We also explained that we were talking about what he actually said, not what he intended to say. He (or she) responded and said:

Dear MHFM,

I listened to the clip again; and I agree with you he said that…

Thanks

Anonymous.

MHFM: What happened with this person is that he probably thought our point was that Alex intended to tell everyone that he’s a fake Christian, which was not the point at all (as explained below). They just dismiss what he actually said. Because he knew that Alex didn’t INTEND to say that, he dishonestly said that he didn’t say that. But after he understood that we were not saying that he intended to declare himself a fake Christian, he wrote back and finally acknowledged the truth, that Alex said: “I’m a mainline fake Christian.” This is a prime example of the point made above, in Blind & Deaf.

Incredible

MHFM,

It is incredible that Bob could say Alex said "not". Bob said he listened to it over and over again. Besides the fact that Bob has hearing issues, did he forget to watch Alex's gestures or mannerisms? When he says he is a mainline fake, he actually nods in the affirmative very clearly…

Sincerely,

Robby

MHFM: It is incredible. It’s simply a fact that Jones said “I’m a mainline fake Christian.” It’s quite obvious to anyone with good hearing and who is not a liar.

False

Subject: That is exactly what he said. Distorted thinking on your part.

There IS a NOT in it.

MHFM: You are a liar. See Blind & Deaf above. We post this as an example of how we are living in a theological and spiritual “Twilight Zone” (not that we endorse that such a thing exists). But the concept of a “Twilight Zone” captures the idea of a make-believe world, in which truth is what you imagine it to be. We are seeing people lie right before us. It’s analogous to the many people we have conversed with and covered, who claim that they don’t believe Muslims and Jews can be saved, while simultaneously telling us that Fr. Denis Fahey’s statement, that Jews who reject Christ can be saved, expressed true teaching.

Catholic

Dear Bros. Michael and Peter,

I just wanted to write you a quick email to express my gratitude for your work.

And at the risk of coming across as offensive, for the last year I've been trying to find something...ANYTHING... to prove to myself that the Sedevacantist position is wrong and that your arguments on the said position hold no water. However, thus far, I've come up completely empty. What it seems to keeping coming down to is not whether one is a Sedevacantist (a title which the entire so-called Catholic world has painted with a very derogatory brush)...but whether one is a true Catholic.

With that being said, I still have some lingering questions that I feel only you two could best address...questions I believe could be better answered by voice...I thank you for your time and your tireless apostolate.

Yours,

Robert Cantu

Bayside

Hello,

I'm come from 3 generations of people who believe Bayside's message. You are wrong with what is written. I agree with much of what you wrote on the web page. But Bayside promotes Latin Mass as the only true mass, and Vatican II being brought on by the freemasons who have infiltrated the Catholic church. My mom studied this. Bayside speaks against freemasons, Rockefeller. Veronica drew an image of the empire state building, with a line going into it. Yes, it wasn't the WTC, but after seeing the image, it made me think she's real. Also, I actually have received a picture when I visited Bayside. Are the beads of the rosary pointing up to heaven of the devil? It also had two blue lights on each side, Virgin Mary's color. Is that evil?

I hate when dates are set from prophecy than a proved to be wrong. But she's still human. And who said that maybe a freemason didn't put those dates out to make it seem like a joke. Maybe she was assuming a date?... I don't believe the whole Marian app. to be of the devil. My mom and I have prayed about it. You focused on only like 1% of what Bayside says. If I judged people that way, I wouldn't be friends with anyone.

Melissa

MHFM: No, it’s clearly a false message which contains heresy against Catholic dogma. It also tells people to stay at the invalid New Mass, and it promotes the Vatican II antipopes. It also says true things to deceive people like you.

The False Apparitions at Bayside, NY [PDF File]

No “not”

Dear brothers in Christ,

Regarding Alex Jones' 'slip of the tongue', I just want to confirm what you say--AJ indeed says "I'm a mainline fake Christian". I don't hear "not". In your answer to the reader who says he hears "not a mainline...", you've made use of a phrase "came out", and this very phrase triggered in my memory remembrance of the case of Mother Angelica, when she, after being initialized in a devilish charismatic movement, tried to say a simple 'thanks', but something else CAME OUT. I quote from your material:

"Mother tried to say thank you, but ‘something else CAME OUT.'" I think this is very interesting connection between AJ and MA.

Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia

Comment

Brothers,

I am so glad that you are going to take up the Alex Jones issue. I have listened to him every day for years, and suspected he was anti Catholic. I listened to him for secular news dealing with the new world order. But when I heard him and his guest blast the catholic faith, the Popes etc, I decided to not listen any more. You are correct he does say "I am a mainline fake Christian", and that's exactly what he is.

Bill from Michigan

Alex Jones

Dear MHFM,

I have to disagree with what you heard regarding the AJ sound clip. I listened to it over and over, and what I hear the man saying is "I'm a Christian...Not a mainline fake Christian". That's what I hear. Although my own opinion of the man is that he is actually Jewish and has been parading as though he is "Christian."

Regards,

Bob

MHFM: We must say that you obviously don’t have a good ability to hear or you are hallucinating or you are a pure liar blind to the truth. He did not say, “not a mainline fake Christian”! You can listen to it 100 times… He said: “I’m a Christian… I’m a mainline fake Christian.” Yes, he WANTED AND INTENDED TO SAY “not a mainline fake Christian,” but that’s not what came out or what he said. You have to listen to WHAT HE SAID, not what you think he wanted to say!

Your confusion might stem from the following: you probably think our point is that Alex admitted or wanted or intended to say (and is declaring to the world) that he’s a mainline fake Christian. That’s not the point. Listen to the version with our commentary. The point is that God had him say what he really is, even though he didn’t realize what he was actually saying. That’s the point. He said that he’s a mainline fake Christian. But truthfully, to maintain that he said that he’s “not” a mainline fake Christian is to lie or demonstrate that you lack decent hearing ability. Perhaps the fog you are in is also why you think he’s Jewish, which is totally absurd, uncharitable and ridiculous, as we will cover in a more detailed discussion.

Questions

Subject: Questions about New DVD

Dear Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,

I have recently purchased your DVD "The Third Secret of Fatima, etc..." and watched it with great attention. I have found the information extremely interesting, especially with respect to the consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart by Pope Pius XII, the impostor "Sister Lucia", and some other facts…

I have some questions though. First, you mention that Our Lady of Fatima is the woman clothed with the sun from Revelations 12, and that the red dragon corresponds to the red army. But you also know that it is mentioned in that same passage that the woman is pregnant and with pains of labor. How can this be explained? We know Our Lady did not suffer from pains of labor since Our Lord was born miraculously and with no perturbation of Our Lady's virginity. It is also said in the Revelations that the woman gave birth to the son and the dragon tries to devour him. This Son has always been interpreted by the Church as Our Lord. If what you mention is true and the Woman is indeed Our Lady of Fatima... how can the pains of labor and the birth of Our Lord can be interpreted in the context of the history of the XX Century (i.e., Second World War, Second Vatican Council, etc.) I hope I have explained myself correctly…

Anyway, thanks in advance for having read such long email. I would like to hear some feedback from you guys about these very important issues. I truly admire your work, dedication and desire to spread the truth.

God bless,
Carlos Montes

MHFM: Thanks for the interest. The fathers understood the woman of Apocalypse 12 to represent both Our Lady and the Church. We believe it definitely signifies Our Lady, the “sign of Heaven” (Our Lady of Fatima in 1917), and the Church. The woman (as she signifies the Church) is in pains to bring forth the Son; in other words, she is laboring to spread the faith, to nourish the Church and give birth to more children of the Lord and of the Church. It’s a struggle because of the persecution from the red dragon, the destruction of Catholic society, and the extirpation of Catholic principles which occur as a result of the persecutions and proliferation of liberalism.

Apocalypse 12:13- “And when the dragon saw that he was cast unto the earth, he persecuted the woman, who brought forth the man child:”

We plan on doing something, hopefully very soon, which will cover some in-depth thoughts and opinions about specific things in the Apocalypse. We think people might find it interesting. It will address some of your other questions.

Not “out of context”

Rotten

Dear brothers in Christ,

I've received the package you sent to me. As always, it contained more than I paid for. Obviously the generosity you show is a virtue stemming from the true faith you hold and promote…

Recently I have read somewhere on the Internet (on one of innumerable "catholic" web pages floating around) that the "pope" B16 finds himself between two extreme (as they call it) sides--the first is "very angry sedevacantists" and the second is "ultra liberal catholics who care not in the least for Tradition". So, they say, the "pope" B16 is following the realistic path between two equally bad oppositions.

Well, I admit, this evil comment made me very angry. First, they are judging the truthfulness of what some people say according to whether they are angry or cheerful. These evil people, who try to present the V2 antipopes as "realistic" (meaning, I guess, good) people are rotten to the core. I doubt they have even the slightest potentiality to convert to the true Faith. In their rotten hearts do they ever wonder why Jesus, as far as we know from The Gospels, never laughed? Do they ever wonder why Jesus was in many occasions angry with people? Of course they don't, simply because they are children of the father of all lies.

Second, the truth is that a true Catholic living in these extremely evil times can escape the sadness and/or fury only by retreating to the prayer in solitude, by not gazing at the lying apostate muzzles at all…

Our Most Holy Mother of God and St. Joseph, pray for us…

Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia

MHFM: We also read in the Gospels that the disciples were afraid to ask Jesus certain questions – a far cry from how Jesus is portrayed by many liberals:

Mark 9:31- “But they [the disciples] understood not the word, and they were afraid to ask him.”

Short Video

Unam Sanctam

Dear Brothers,

On coming across a Portuguese V11 apostate site where they were commenting on the incompatibility of Sedevacantism……among the quotes given by them from Denzinger, which I am able to refute because their true meaning is clearly changed and even address the articles of faith totally according to their own interests and not as it is read in the book.

There is a particular one Denz 468/469 on the Unity and Power of the Church, from the Bull “Unam Sanctam” where it refers to the “Supreme Power deviates”, states it can be judged by “God alone”, not by man, in this particular Bull I find it difficult to comprehend its true significance on “Supreme Power deviates” which these people hold on to.

Could you please clarify me on this part of the Bull at your earliest convenience.

Thanking you,

In J.M.J

M. Fernanda da Silva

MHFM: In that Bull, Pope Boniface VIII is explaining how there are two powers: the spiritual authority and the secular authority. They are separate, but they should work together; and the secular authority should work under and for the interests of the spiritual authority. That’s because the laws of God should be reflected in, and upheld by, society. If the secular authority deviates, it can be judged and condemned and even deposed by the spiritual. When excommunicating evil kings, popes have sometimes declared them to be deposed from their authority. However, the secular authority cannot do the same to the spiritual authority. Only God can do that. The secular authority, for example, cannot depose a pope if it deems the pope to be evil. But God’s laws, such as the automatic divine law penalty laid down for heresy, can and do automatically depose a pope (who would become a manifest heretic) from office. The penalty for heresy, which separates a heretical cleric from the Church and from his office, is God’s law (a divine law penalty). It is thus perfectly in line with the teaching of Unam Sanctam. For that reason, the argument of the non-sedevacantist has no merit, and it is very much misapplied. The Bull is teaching in the context of the secular vs. spiritual authorities and it as nothing to do with a heretical claimant to the Papacy; but even when teaching on that point, we find the principle that the divine law (God’s law) can judge and depose the spiritual authority.

Comment

Dear Brothers,

Thank you for posting the short video on the fact that a heretic cannot be a pope and also on the video of the false and ridiculous accusation that your word-for-word quotes of Benedict XVI and the other V2 Antipopes are "out of context." No, the only thing that is out of context is the minds of the heretics who lie about MHFM. They're like Satan's pets, just barking away in their dark blindness. But when the light shines, the truth, they run away whimpering and howling because it burns and stings their eyes! In fact, in typical bold heretical blindness, Par. 17 of Dominus Iesus footnotes The Dogmatic Constitution from Vatican I, Pastor Aeternus, Session 4 : 18 July 1870, which states at Par. 6:

6. And since the gates of hell trying, if they can, to overthrow the Church, make their assault with a hatred that increases day by day against its divinely laid foundation, we judge it necessary, with the approbation of the Sacred Council, and for the protection, defense and growth of the Catholic flock, to propound the doctrine concerning the 1. institution, 2. permanence and 3. nature of the sacred and apostolic primacy, upon which the strength and coherence of the whole Church depends. [end quote]

This once again disproves the outrageous notion that Benedict XVI is a mistaken Catholic, i.e. a "material heretic", because he footnotes the very things which prove him to be a heretic! Thank you also for the points about ambiguity. A Catholic may word something carelessly, making an ambiguous statement for instance, but a heretic deliberately dresses his heresy in ambiguity. When it's ambiguity, condemn the heretical side!...

God bless,

Chris White

Novus Ordo Guide

Subject: Novus Ordo Guide

Hi MHFM,

A fictional Novus Ordo (NO) guide to debunking sedevacantism (SV). For laughs.

1. First, define terms by getting the Latin or Greek origin of important words, and then explain the Greek, explain the Latin, and then explain the English or vernacular. Ensure to create an image of diligence and knowledge of old languages and important documents before going into the explanation proper…

2. Deny the SV claim early on, without explaining the details. Deny it early and repeat while the listener has your full attention. The lazy person will forget the substance of the NO explanation anyway, let alone the SV facts and arguments.

3. Misrepresent the sedevacantists by claiming they use "private judgement". Make the listener think SV catholics are arrogant. This works when the person encounters a SV catholic later on. The more the SV catholic tries to explain the errors of NO, the more the prejudice is reinforced. Prepare the person to totally ignore SV arguments. The listener should not even bother to understand the SV position apart from what we say.

4. Misrepresent the sedevacantists by claiming they are "protestants" which is a loaded word. This rallies NO people together against a new common foe, which christians love to do throughout history. Reinforce NO people's self belief in their catholicity and make them feel more catholic. The listeners' minds are computers. Input the equation "sedevacantist = protestant", then their brains will run on auto-pilot. Then we do not need to respond to SV ever again.

5. Misrepresent the sedevacantists by claiming they do not know how to interpret church writings. Quote only from the NO church writings. Only we can exploit the ambiguities of NO church writings, so they can never win… If they cannot interpret our texts correctly how can they look credible?

Note: Never bring up ancient catholic councils. Those are too accurate. NO audiences might get the idea of comparing ancient councils with our texts. We might look bad. Do not show the people that NO church writings are deliberately ambiguous for our own advantage. We can make the texts sound conservative, liberal, or even socialist whenever we want, depending on the plan for each audience. This advantage is lost when the catholic teachings become crystal clear.

6. Accuse that the sedevacantists read only the letter of the writings and not the spirit of the letter. This makes us sound like lawyers.

Note: Name call and insult the sedevacantists only with quotes from the Bible and through a sweet and gentle voice. NO listeners won’t even notice…

7. Accuse that sedevacantists are not objective.

8. Accuse that sedevacantist facts and arguments are not relevant.

… Note: Do not remind audience that we edited all their sacraments while they were sleeping.

10. Lastly and most importantly. Input equation in their brains "judge = admonish". Then teach that no one but God can "judge." No one has the right to "judge" anyone, most especially the ecumenical services. Anyone who "judges" is a megalomaniac. Ecumenical dialogue and services must go on at all costs. They won’t notice the new age when it hits them.

Note: When answering questions from curious NO people, introduce a long argument, then distract them with a second argument. When finished, nobody will notice that there is no valid proof for both arguments.

Just for laughs,

S

Comment

Thank you for sharing a bit about your family in your recent video… I married a man who also was raised without religion and made to feel making money was the priority in life. He did convert to the Catholic faith when we got married but is not convinced now of sedevacantism. Your site is the only support I have. I have tried very hard with my Catholic family and friends. Everyone I know thinks this is crazy. I am strengthened by the rosary, solitude and lives of the saints. I love to be alone to say my prayers. Please pray for my upcoming decision to home school my three children. I tried last year but was unable to convince my husband I could do this. The Catholic schools are abominable. My children were recently given their astrologic signs and this spring my daughter's fifth grade class will be given sex education. Of course I will remove her from the class but what good will that do when they discuss this at lunch time. This year I will go to a catholic homeschooling seminar and try again. The changes are very hard to make.

Kathleen

Found

Dear Brothers,

I found that last letter rather interesting, about how family life sometimes makes it difficult to communicate with God. That is true, however, being a mother with 8 children I still find time to be alone for brief parts of the day, and in the evening after everyone else goes to bed, it is a very good time for mental prayer. There really is no excuse for not praying, even with distractions, we must find time every day to pray…

A pathetic story about the CMRI: My son John got into a conversation with a lady at the local CMRI chapel where we used to go to Mass. He was trying to convince her of the necessity of baptism, that the desire was not sufficient. She reminded him of the church's "teaching" on baptism of desire and of blood. (She clearly learned her faith from the Baltimore Catechism). He reminded her that in the Nicene Creed we confess "one baptism for the remission of sins", not three. She made the ludicrous statement "Haven't you ever heard of fractions"? When my son told me about this conversation, I burst out laughing. I have never heard of anyone trying to divide up a sacrament like one would divide up a pie!!...

God bless you and keep up the good work!

Yours in Christ,

Brenda Roy

Debates

i've been listening to some of your debates, i'm sorry but all of your opponents come off really stupid, can you please get someone a bit more intelligent? these guys arguments are some of the dumbest things i've ever heard

mp…

MHFM: They are not stupid. It’s that the arguments and positions, when confronted with strong truth, look stupid; and, in the process, their bad will and inconsistency become apparent. We’ve debated a variety of individuals and we are trying to set up more debates.

Comment

Brothers,

I'd like to thank you for "disabling" the comment section in u-tube. "Give not that which is holy to dogs; neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest perhaps they trample them under their feet, and turning upon you, they tear you" (Matthew 7:6). For those seeking the truth, those negative comments are Satan's last defense against the the true faith. In most cases, the lounge lizards and leaches that try to discredit someone else good work, recognize the truth and are unable to bring themselves to that level of understanding (unable to walk the straight and narrow path). The spirit of the anti-Christ compels the leaches to "trespass" against their neighbor in hopes of bringing their neighbor down, while building their empty lives up to a higher level...

God Bless,
Tom Miles

Solitude

Dear MHFM,

I wanted to get your clarification on your "Where God is found" posting of about a week ago. In that piece you talk about that God is found in "peace and quiet" and that He is hard to or more difficult to find if you are surrounded by family or friends. It makes perfect sense when you think about it. How is one going to be able to meditate and pray with constant interruptions and the responsibilities and the running around of being parents in these tough economic times? Granted some people are overextending themselves on luxuries and would have more time if they stuck to the basic needs of a family. I remember reading somewhere in the Bible also where it establishes the point that it is better to remain single than enter into the married state. If one is to read Genesis 2-18 however it states that " it is not good for man to be alone: let us make him a help unto himself." Now I know from a shady past that the lust of the flesh is a passion that is hard to resist and if one remains single he or she will eventually give in to these temptations. I have to admit what was missing in my life before was a strong prayer life and falling away from the sacraments.

If all or most people remained single the population would eventually be reduced dramatically. It is sad to see all my married friends tied down to family related matters and this is probably the number one reason why I or others cannot get through to them regarding the evil in the Vatican II church. There is a side of me that says they are using this (busy nature) as an excuse not to investigate the failings of the church and are also hoping to use it when judged and are presuming God will make "allowances" for parents. I read that one of the greatest sins against the Holy Spirit is the "presumption upon God's mercy and this is so very obvious today. I know God is not going to allow for this.

I may in a round about way answered my own questions here but would still like you take on the married /single states of life.

Your supporter,

MHFM: Thanks for the interest. St. Paul teaches that the single state is better (1 Cor. 7), but some are called to marriage. Even if people are surrounded by distractions, they need to have that relationship with God which is based on solitude and gives them a holy independence from others. In other words, they need to have a true interior and prayer life which is firmly rooted in God alone and which enables them to assess things as God sees them and not be distracted or overly dismayed by what others say or think. Perhaps we can expand more on this as time permits. We are probably going to be recording a program this evening which will discuss in detail an issue which we think our readers might find interesting.

Banned from CMRI over EENS car sticker

Bros. Peter and Michael,

Rob Blascyk gave us permission to tell others about this and to use his name.

Keith

---

Greetings Keith

Something very interesting happened to me yesterday that I thought you might find interesting.

Fr. Radecki after Mass asked to see me,so I went to his office where he proceeded to tell me that my station wagon was banned from church property because the words EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS posted on my back window may be{ I suspect are } offensive to people. When I asked how could telling people they need to be Catholic to be saved could be offensive, he replied, it was not right to tell people that and we should only pray that people find out.

He told me he was only following his vow of obedience to Pivarunas because the Bishop does not want offensive or extreme material to be displayed at CMRI churches and it was nothing personal..... I laughed!

I stated that this printing had been on my car for a year and a half and why now for this concern he gave no real answer. I believe though it is because someone that I know in the parish recieved a copy of MHFM"s new dvd and they ran to Fr. Radecki {probably terrified and crying } ,I know this because Fr. Radecki mentioned someone receiving a dvd in the conversation and other than this person telling him he {Fr. Radecki} would have no way of knowing. I really feel now that the people there are in a cult like way, they don't read, watch or say anything unless it is CMRI approved no one thinks for themselves…

God Bless

Robert

Video

Lent

Are those from age 7 to death required to have no meat on wednesdays during lent?

is your answer based on the 1958 or 1962 missal?

please

dan reindl

MHFM: No, the laws are explained in this file: Traditional Catholic Calendar and Fast Days .

The Impostor Sr. Lucia

Who is?

Dear Brothers

I thought of something to ask you. Who in your opinion is the pope in white who is killed according to the real third secret of fatima? Is it a future true pope after anti-pope benedict 16 dies? Maybe you might like to do a youtube video to elaborate on this point. I was thinking of this lately…

Mark

MHFM: The one you are referring to is the Vatican’s false Third Secret, not the real one.

More Insanity

Subject: more insanity

Hello Brothers:

Have you seen this:

“VATICAN CITY, 10 MAR 2010 (VIS) -… Following Vatican Council II some people were convinced that all was new, that a new Church existed, that the pre-conciliar Church had come to an end and that there would be another, completely different Church, an anarchic utopia. Yet thanks to God the wise helmsmen of the ship of Christ, Paul VI and John Paul II, defended on the one hand the novelty of the Church and, at the same time, the uniqueness and continuity of the Church, which is always a Church of sinners, and always a place of grace".

It just gets crazier and crazier.

-Thanks very much for the years of consecrated work,

Mike

Martin

Hello,

I recently listened to a recording of Fr. Martin on the Art Bell radio show. During the conversation with Mr. Bell, he said that John Paul II believed in the one world government, and made it his mission to bring the Church into step with it. Also, he stated flatly that John Paul II wanted to make the Church and the world one.
We know what happens when the Church and the world become one. Does one need more evidence?

In addition, Fr. Martin said that he had been privileged to read the third secret of Fatima, but he had taken an oath before not to reveal it. When asked to reveal it by Mr. Bell, he claimed that he didn't have the authority to do so.

Now, wasn't this full messaged ordered to be reveal by Our Lady herself, and doesn't that order supercede any other, especially for those having taken a vow to server Her and the True Church? Or was he justified in not revealing it like Heaven wanted, and in leaving us hanging out to dry, unprepared and not properly warned? It's hard to respect the authority of any organization that is willing to defy Heaven for its own purposes, and then demand that we obey them without question

Karl…

MHFM: As a Vatican insider who frankly ran in some shady circles, Malachi Martin was privy to some very interesting inside information. However, he was sadly not an orthodox Catholic. He denied the Catholic salvation dogma, and said that John Paul II committed no heresy! If he had read the real third secret (which is a mystery), he should have revealed it and not doing so is another example of bad will.

Follow-up

It also occured to me since that if they follow this verse literally, it places them in quite a predicament. If, as they maintain, the VCII wolves are valid, then per this verse they have to "do as they say." SSPX is notorius for not doing as Ratzinger or JPII say - they pick and chose as a matter of habit. If they follow what they say, then the SSPX must be handing out Communion to non-catholics, recognizing some quite unusual "saints," saying the Novus Ordo Missae, etc. I am sure you have already pointed this out in your materials, but it seems hypocritical to throw this passage out as a reason for (false) obedience. Pax Christi,

Patricia

Fatima and the Miracle

Scribes

You have covered his response thoroughly, as usual, but I hope you will allow me to add a defense of Matthew 23:1-3. Unfortunately, this passage is often used as an excuse to adhere to those leaders who do evil, but it does not defend them in this case at all.

It says "Jesus spoke to the multitudes and to his disciples, Saying: "the scribes and the Pharisee have sitten on the Chair of Moses. All things therefore whatsoever they shall say to you, observe and do: but according to their works do ye not; for they say, and do not."

Note that Christ identifies that they say and do not, in other words they are hypocrites. Christ shows here that they are teaching correctly but not following their own rules. This is not the situation we face now. These men are not teaching correctly. The Douay commentary says regarding this passage "such as therefore that did not depart from the letter of the law were called scribes..."

If these VCII anti-Popes taught the truth and did not follow it, it would be scandalous - trouble is, they are not even teaching correctly- they have departed from the letter of the law, therefore they are wolves in sheeps clothing, which is what Our Lord warns people of. In the very next Chapter of Matthew Christ warns: take heed that no man seduce you; For many will come in my name saying, I am Christ; and they will seduce many." and only a few verses from that "When therefore, you shall see the abomination of desolation, which was spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place; he that readeth let him understand..." These are the last days.

Sorry to be so long - I just wish more Catholics read their bibles. They get led by false prophets because of ignorance of the scriptures as interpreted by the Church.

Have a blessed day,
Patricia

MHFM: Yes, it’s an important point, and one which we considered adding to the response. The argument concerning the Scribes and Pharisees is also irrelevant because the laws and principles which govern the Church of Christ after the promulgation of the Gospel (heresy, automatic excommunication, loss of office, etc.) are not necessarily identical to the laws and principles which governed the people of God before the full institution of the Church.

Benedict XVI’s Recent Heresies

MHFM: We’ve updated our Benedict XVI's recent heresies file with a new heresy.

Esteem

Dear MHFM,

I posed the first few of Bro. Peter's questions to my brother Pat. He is a SSPX follower, and just moved to St. Mary's Kansas. I thought you might be interested in the response. It would be great to hear any thoughts on it...although I think it is typical of an SSPXer.

Here is my email to him in part:

So here is my first question (which has three parts) about your faith (Bro. Peter recently posted a video detailing these questions):

1) Can a Catholic esteem false religions?

1 a) Do the Vatican II Anti-popes, esteem false religions (Islam etc.)?

1 b) Can one be a Catholic and esteem religions which the Church has declared to be diabolical and abominable?

Hope to hear back soon,

Robby

HIS RESPONSE:

… 1.) The definition of "esteem" is to give honor to or regard highly. Of course as Catholics we cannot esteem their specific beliefs because they are false and go against the teaching of the Church. 2.) It would seem yes, the Popes have honored these false religions in public. And usually exterior actions are a window into the soul of that person. However, 3.) I have absolutely no authority to look into that window and declare anyone a heretic publicly, much less the Vicar of Christ. This can only be done by a future Pope. This does not mean that I condone any of these actions (Popes visiting synagogues and the like). But Christ bid his Apostles to respect the position of authority of the Pharisees and Scribes and not follow their exterior actions. Whereas we have respect for the Authority and position of the Pope as Head of the Church, but we do not follow his exterior actions if they go against the traditional teachings of the Church.

Patrick

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. We discussed more on this point in the recent video, “Material Heretic Nonsense…” (below). We will also be addressing more angles to this issue. In short, his response is heretical. It denies numerous Catholic teachings, such as those brought up in the video. The Church teaches that such a belief about other religions is incompatible with the possession of the Catholic faith. It’s not possible to believe in Christ and believe that other religions are good or worthy of esteem. Since all in the Church have one faith, his admission also places him in a communion of faith with Benedict XVI, a man who believes that it’s good to worship devils, to worship idols and to reject Christ. He shares faith with one who denies the faith; and therefore, by that admission, he denies the faith.

Moreover, he claims that a Catholic can’t esteem false religions. However, Benedict XVI does that and remains a Catholic, according to him. If Benedict XVI can do that and remain a Catholic, then so could you or your family members or anyone else. Therefore, the end result contradicts his claim. The end result of his position is that a Catholic can esteem false religions and remain not only part of the Church but its leader.

Finally, his position that he doesn’t have authority to recognize Benedict XVI as a heretic means that he must accept baptized anti-Catholic Protestants as Catholics too because they haven’t been declared heretics. If he says otherwise, it destroys his whole argument. His position also requires him to hold that a man who was raised a Catholic, but then denied Christ for decades and became an atheist, would have to be considered Catholic instead of outside the Church. If he says otherwise, it destroys his argument.

Additionally, he’s an independent “traditionalist.” If he can’t judge Benedict XVI, then he needs to follow that through logically and go back to the Novus Ordo churches.

What

Dear Brothers,

Here is what I have done with some of the Fatima DVD's I bought from you. On Mondays, I go to a nursing home… The receptionist… one day she asked me my opinion on a Catholic matter, so today I gave her a DVD and the book- The Bible proves the Catholic Church. She was very interested as she mentioned she does not like all the modernism.
Also, one of the nurse's aides was interested in the Rosary when I say it, so a few weeks ago I gave her a copy of the Secret of the Rosary. Today I gave her a DVD and your book The Bible proves. I thought she was Catholic, but she said she was raised a Baptist, but she is interested because of the residents there-when she goes into their rooms she likes to comfort them and If they are Catholic she feels she knows what she should to calm them.

… On Sundays when I go to the Latin Mass In Akron, when I come home I get back at 11 AM. In the old NO Church where I went before Vatican II invaded it, their 10:30 AM 'mass' is going on. I go in the back, leave some of your flyers and yesterday I left a few DVD's and Bible books. Then I put some of the flyers in the Church Bulletins that are lying on the counter, just randomly.

God bless you.

Kathryn Rubio

Catholic?

Dear Brother,

I pray the rosary and read the Bible every day. I was a hindu but i now believe in the teachings of the Catholic church. Am i a catholic? I have not gone through the rituals that normal Catholics go through.Plz reply

Samp.

MHFM: One is not a Catholic until one believes in the core truths of the faith and has been baptized. We would advise you to obtain the small catechism we offer, pray the Rosary each day, and then we can help you with your baptism.

The Steps to convert to the traditional Catholic faith and for those leaving the New Mass - Baptism and Conditional Baptism - the Council of Trent's Profession of Faith for Converts

Video

Challenges

MHFM: We recently challenged various individuals who try to refute the sedevacantist position to debates, and each one has refused. We will be discussing this. We will be exposing the hypocrisy, the dishonesty and the alarming lack of charity manifested in these refusals.

Question/Comment

Dear Brother(s),

I happen upon your web site the past weekend and I have studied it for the past few days. It is an amazing amount of research and work certainty not the type of reading for the timid or even the casual Catholic. Plus with a lot of your topics you are assuming the reader has above average intelligence and the are well schooled in the One,Holy,Roman and Apostolic Church AND have an inclination to finding out more their faith. Sort of a narrow well defined market or person.

Well I am that person -having attended a private chapel in Cleveland, OH for the Holy Mass for the past 15-10 years and trying working out my salvation in fear and trembling I was amazed that a site like this even existed.I have a deep love and respect for the Benedictine Order having attended St. Vincent College and getting an understanding of the Pre. Vat II and Post Vat.II Church firsthand. Having read the Promises of the Benedictine Order years ago- I guess I am trying to discern what is really going on with the OSB and the remnant church of which I consider myself a lowly, sinful, insignificant member. I saw right through the Vat. II Council once it was explained to me and I experience The Mass Of All Time…

The only thing on the web site I have a hard time with is the knock on Rock -and roll music, That is my weak point.

So keep up the good work.

Richard

MHFM: It’s truly nice to hear about your interest. We’re not sure if your comments mean that you have stopped going to the New Mass and are in full agreement, but we sincerely hope that you continue to look at the material and come to those conclusions.

Difficult Choice

We have had to abandon homeschooling as in this economic time it was essential for my wife to return to work, else we would lose our house. My wife has sent our son to the V2 school and she and my son now start attending and supporting v2 services and she says this is the right thing to do. Should I continue to stay with her or should we split up the family and separate.

MHFM: You should tell her that she can’t take the son to the services. If she refuses, you should probably split up. Those would be legitimate grounds. As head of the house, you should not allow her to take your son to the invalid New Mass.

The problem

Subject: the problem

about you saying john pall was the Antichrist is that he ruled more than a time, time and a half a time which is the last part of the tribulation which is yet to come so he may be Antichrist but he is not the Antichrist..

. mother Merry said the next two popes and the end would come so the soon we will see our next pope which may be the one who says its ok to get the microchip and will not him self get it .. and that is the false profit in the church and the Antichrist will fix-things and according to a ST pall he was there present with him at one time the church knows that he has been alive for over 200years and can not be killed, till Christ kills him

the upside down cross the pope wore was about saint peter being crucified up side down and the left was made the right it has to do with gospels that were not included in the bible…

god bless in Jesus name

Ekult…

MHFM: The 1260 days, or a time, and times and half a time, is a period understood by many to be symbolic of the duration, not necessarily the literal extent of the final tribulation or the Antichrist’s reign. Our Lady did not say that there would be two more popes. There is also strong evidence that the mark of the Beast is spiritual, not physical. We will probably have an in-depth discussion which will cover some more thoughts on the Apocalypse, but there is no doubt that Antichrist is presently in control of the Vatican and has been for some time. It’s not just a phase, but a signal of the end times. Moreover, John Paul II’s astounding preaching wasn’t just that of any old Antichrist, but the specific fulfillment of Antichrist in the Vatican. Nevertheless, people can have different opinions about who the Antichrist is. What’s indisputable is that the forces of Antichrist, in a special way, have taken over Rome; and, when that’s considered, it’s not very plausible to believe that it’s not in fulfillment of the prophecies about the Great Apostasy and the final tribulation.

The upside-down cross was not in honor of St. Peter. When John Paul II sat in the chair with the gigantic upside-down cross above his head, it was not on any one of St. Peter’s feast days; and nothing was mentioned about St. Peter. In fact, John Paul II also wore the upside-down cross on his vestment when he was a “cardinal,” before his so-called election! His use of the upside-down cross was a signal, to those with eyes to see and who don’t let evil pass without denunciation, of what is going on.

Questions

Byzantine Catholics

Hello Brother Michael and Brother Peter, I've got a couple questions I'd like to ask you. My first question is:

If Jesus Christ, our Most True God decided to destroy all the "bishops" in Vatican II, could the Byzantine Catholic Bishops, because their Holy Orders are valid, elect a true Pope from one of their own ranks?

If I wanted to join a monastery, would a Byzantine Catholic monastery be a good option?...

Please get back to me as soon as you can.
-Brandon

MHFM: No, they couldn’t because they accept Vatican II. A man would have to reject all the heretics and heresies of the Vatican II sect and accept all Catholic teachings to be a true pope. Obviously one may not join a monastery that accepts Antipope Benedict XVI.

Bashings

Subject: Catholic Bashings

I wouldn't want to be within 100 feet of you when you come face to face with Christ. I can feel the heat already!!

P…

MHFM: You must feel the heat of the Hell fire emanating from Satan’s presence which blinds you to the truth. We’re sure you have no problem with Benedict XVI, who denies that Jesus is the Christ; and yet you consider the enunciation of Catholic dogma and the denunciation of heretical unbelief to be evil. You label the defense of Christ as Antichrist, and defend the doctrines of Antichrist as being of that of Christ. You are so deceived.

Contrast

Dear MHFM,

To contrast heretical antipope Ratzinger with a great true pope of the past-Pope Innocent III-Fourth Lateran Council-On the Jews #69- It would be too absurd for a blasphemer of Christ to exercise power over Christians...#70-Certain people who have come voluntarily to the waters of sacred baptism, as we learnt, do not wholly cast off the old person in order to put on the new more perfectly... And today, the Jews, with the heretical blessing of Ratzinger can be saved by professing their Jewish beliefs grossly apart from worshiping Our savior Jesus Christ? And Vatican II is a true council of the Roman Catholic Church deeming this so?-Please! Lord Jesus, by the intercessory power of Most Holy Mother, bless and empower the sacred truths passed on by MHFM, protecting us from satan's minions in apostate Rome!

Dea

Frightening

Dear Brothers Dimond,

I received a frightening e-mail, telling third Lady of Fátima's secret is going to be fullfilled after a 8 hours earthquake (like last ones during weekend) near from where I am , and after a very cold night, that three days of darkness is about to come and we must be locked inside our houses , light blessed wax (only these will light) and pray. That only a third part of current population will survive. And many other things. Please, tell me if this message has any sense, since you have read a lot about this issue. If you need I could translate more parts of the message,

May Good God bless you,

Vivian

MHFM: No, that’s not true. Those are false messages which are meant to distract people from what they need to be protected from Satan’s assault: the state of grace. Having a lighted blessed wax candle is not the issue.

Father

Hi, I was reading the e-mails you post on your page and I came across the one on Fr De Smet. Can you e-mail me the title and Author, this seems like a great book that would shut up those people who do not understand that the Protestants were cruel and horrible people and the Catholics were the opposite. Thanks

MHFM: The name of the book is, The Life of Fr. De Smet by Fr. E. Laveille, S.J. It’s cited in our salvation book.

Hand

At 8:48 of Apostasy and Antichrist the Pope raises his Rt. hand with index finger and small finger extended even with the thumb out. I have been shown this is the New World order sign after Baphomet???

R…U…F

MHFM: He’s not the pope. That’s the first thing. But yes, they do give devil hand signs and those are captured in our videos. That’s what he is doing in the clip to which you refer. The Vatican II antipopes are very evil.

Messiah

I'm shocked that Pope Benedict has said that the OT passages that predict the Messiah, do not refer to Jesus! If this were true, Jesus would have no validity. Plus as you say, the NT passages tell us that Jesus is the fulfillment. This is a huge issue.

Who does Ratzinger think Jesus is I wonder? What does he think Jesus bases His credentials on - if not the OT prophecies? Who is the Jesus that Ratzinger worships? If J.R. doesn't believe Jesus is the Messiah/God, then he had better not be worshiping Him, because we can only worship God. If Jesus is not the Messiah, then that means the Messiah has not yet come. WE might as well be Jews. This may seem like a little thing to some, but when examined, it is HUGE

Thanks for the videos.

Christine

MHFM: It is a huge issue. It alone proves that he’s not a Christian and not a true pope. The problem is that few seem to grasp the significance of key points.

Heretical devil worship

Subject: heretical devil worship

Hi Brothers: I'm trying to find where St. Paul says the "gods of the Gentiles are devils" & where the curse from God is (giving them a false religion to believe as true). I work security where thousands of prots. come to "christian rock & heretical services". The behavior, attire & attacks against true Christianity are satanic. If their speakers told them to burn the small formerly Catholic church beside the convention center & kill any occupants; they'd do it. Total mob psychology!

History depicts their ancestor's slaughter of thousands of Priests, Sisters & the faithful. My daughter tragically believes the lies against the true Church told by those who committed those atrocities (we're accused of) against Catholics/Christians...

Contemplating the true worship of God in the Blessed Eucharist with the contrast of any heretical assembly is enough to terrify any believer to pray constantly that we don't fall too. It's clear that Satan appears as almost anything drawing them (falling like snow flakes) into Hell. Two conversations I had with young "youth ministers" shows their brainwashed hatred of historical Christianity & the original Bible. One prot college student said he wanted to follow God & yet had no problem with their heretical "bible". Both denied the true Bible was authored by the true Church. They're oblivious to the fact that our Lord tells us exactly how we are to worship/please Him!! Because they hate Him while claiming to love Him!!

Dave

MHFM: In regard to your question: 1 Corinthians 10:20 & 2 Thess. 2:10.

“Material Heretic” Nonsense

Concerning

Subject: Debate with Jabinger

Greetings, Brother(s) Dimond...

Ordinarily I'm not motivated to respond to pointless visceral criticism, but I had to marvel at the irony in the latest e-mail from Jabinger. His spelling and grammar, though slightly improved, still left much to be desired, and he didn't always use complete sentences even when he apparently thought he was doing so, but he did use the rather intellectual sounding word "obtuse" (and even spell it correctly) in criticizing your reply--though apparently he didn't have a clue that this word (meaning "not quick in perception, feeling or intellect") characterizes his own writing...

He accuses you of nitpicking his spelling because you are unable to defend your position, but he fails to say what you were supposed to defend your position against. I have read his original e-mail repeatedly, in search of anything resembling a coherent point to challenge any of your positions on anything, and I have found nothing of the kind. I'm seeing only cheap insults, with any discernible intellectuality reserved for his sophomoric stab at injecting an element of wit into his pointless put-downs. If he had presented anything in the broad category of a logical or factual challenge, I'm sure you would have addressed such a point directly. As it is, sad to say, he seems oblivious to the fact that he hasn't even made a point, let alone a logically persuasive one. Some people can't tell heat from light, then simply condemn the other person when their vacuous vitriol doesn't win a convert. This is unfortunate, but maybe Bill Milligan is right--we should view it as comic relief.

It does seem to reinforce the evidence that you don't duck a challenge, though, which is something positive that we can draw from the experience of reading this exchange. Thanks for being so open to feedback. I hope future e-mail writers, even if critical, will be more polite and give you something of greater substance to address.

Lyndon Olson

The Consecration of Russia

NFP

Just to be sure that I understand the argument against NFP, it is only acceptable for a married couple to have sex during the 3-5 day period of fertility each month, correct? Every act of sex must have the intention of conception so sex is not allowed when the woman is not fertile on the other 25 or so days. ‘Intercourse even with one’s legitimate wife is unlawful and wicked where the conception of offspring is prevented.’

Rae…

MHFM: You are not correct. This is addressed in our article. It is not unlawful to use marriage rights at times when the woman is thought to be infertile, for in that case they are not doing anything to positively prevent conception. In addition, the woman could still get pregnant. NFP is wrong because when using it people restrict the use of marriage rights to the times when they believe pregnancy cannot or is less likely to occur. That’s the sin: to take positive steps to avoid conception. Moreover, there are even cases in which women have become pregnant while already pregnant with another child. This happened again recently and was reported in the news. People should let God plan their families, and not be concerned about tracking times, etc.

“Catholic” Colleges

George

Dear MHFM-

Possibly you already know that Francis Cardinal George of Chicago, President of the United States Conference of (so-called) Catholic Bishops has announced that "Catholics and Mormons stand as one in defense of religious liberty" (aka "insanity")… [a] V2 apologist radio station will host an "exclusive interview" with George… so that he can present his "insights."

-RDS

Opinion

Hello Brothers!

In my opinion, the gold looks better then the green, but I think changing it up every once in a while is better…

Daniel

Brothers,

My vote is for Blue...as in water Baptism.

Tom

“Material Heretics”

Dear Brothers,

Great short video on the incredible nonsense of the position that the Apostate Benedict XVI (and all the other 4 Antipopes of the Vatican II sect) are "material heretics." Benedict XVI and the other four Antipopes of the Vatican II sect are closet sedevacantists - they know that none of them are popes! This can be demonstrated by the fact that the Vatican II sect's antipopes are almost totally incestuous- they almost exclusively praise and quote only the other V-2 Antipopes! For instance, in a word search of all Antipope Encyclicals, including the title of the encyclicals and all references, the name Paul VI appears 192 times, Pius XII 175, Leo XIII 95, John Paul II 90, John XXIII 88, Pius XI 84, (St.) Pius X 19, Benedict XV 16, and John Paul I 6 times (Some other true popes are mentioned but not often enough to be significant). Of the over 200 true popes in Church history, only a handful are regularly mentioned by the Antipopes, but the Antipopes get a total of 376 mentions (versus 389 in the example above). This shows a huge flaw in their position because they neglect many true popes' great writings. It reveals that they are perfectly capable of quoting past claimants to the Papacy, whether true or false claimants - a total of 765 mentions/quotes of a past claimant to the Papacy, in the example above. Importantly, it proves that it is impossible that the 5 Antipopes of the Vatican II sect could be ignorant of Catholic dogmas and teachings (writings of true popes), and that therefore it is totally impossible for them to be "material heretics."

Another staggering flaw in their position is the total elimination of the words “heresy”, “schism”, and “apostasy” from the Vatican II documents. The words “apostate” and “schismatic” cannot be found in the Vatican documents either, and the word “heretic” only appears 6 times in the footnotes due to it being a reference to St. Irenaeus’, “Against Heretics.”…

To accept the position that Benedict XVI is a mistaken Catholic i.e. a “material heretic”, and not an Antichrist Apostate Antipope, one would have to believe the absurd notion that he doesn’t even know about the very things which he explicitly rejects (Heresies of Benedict XVI File), such as that Benedict XVI has never heard of:

- Jesus Christ - because he teaches that it is unnecessary to accept Him for salvation. (Benedict XVI, God and the World, 2000, p. 209)

- Vatican I - because he believes that it is problematic for schismatics and other Non-Catholics to accept the Papacy. (Benedict XVI, Principles of Catholic Theology, 1982, pp. 197-198)

- The Council of Trent - because he promotes the Joint Declaration on Justification with the Lutherans, and says its decree on the Eucharist is offensive. (Benedict XVI, Address at Ecumenical Meeting in Lutheran church in Warsaw, May 25, 2006), (Benedict XVI, Feast of Faith, 1981, p. 130)

- Protestantism - because he says it is not heresy. (Benedict XVI, The Meaning of Christian Brotherhood, pp. 87-88)…

Chris White

Amorth

In the posted article Fr Amorth says, of course the “Pope” knows about the Satanism in the clergy but he does what he can. Where do you start w/that? Fr Amorth learned of this from people and also from demons that speak under obedience during exorcism. Fr Amorth should be privy to a lot of things he had questions about yet he is still V2 and protects the "Pope". At least he dared to speak.

Matthew

MHFM: Yes, he is unfortunately a total heretic and apostate. In a book about him, it mentions that he is a devotee of John Paul II (the deceased manifest heretic). He even uses a statue of John Paul II at his exorcisms! That’s really bad. He must know about John Paul II’s horrible false ecumenism and acts of apostasy. That shows us that even the most conservative among the Vatican II clergy are quite heretical. He acknowledges that “cardinals” are in satanic cults, but he doesn’t realize or want to acknowledge that the problem is actually worse than that.

Georgetown

Hello Dimond Brothers,

A few days ago a friend told me about how the Georgetown University which is supposedly "Catholic", covered up religious symbols in order to accomodate Obama's visit. This was at the request of the White House staff, and of course the apostates at the university went right along with the request and covered up all religious symbols. If they were true Catholics they would never do such a thing nor would they have accepted Obama as a guest…

Sylvestre

MHFM: Yes, that was really bad.

More from Jab

SPELLING MAKES THE DIFFERENCE TO… LIKE YOURSELVES. I THOUGHT THAT RELIGION AND ITS PHILISOPHICAL POSITIONS AS THEY APPLIES TO THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH. JUST MORE PROOFA OF YOUR INANE ANTICHRISTIAN POSITION. WHEN ONE CAN'T DEFEND ONE'S POSITION, ATTACK THOSE WHO OPPOSE IT BY ANY OBTUSE METHOD AVAILABLE. YOU ARE TRULY ANTIRELIGIOUS PERVERTS

Jabinger

MHFM: Actually, that’s not something we care much about. We only mentioned it because it was relevant in your case. When a devilish, blind, utterly arrogant unbeliever such as yourself (whom we’ve never heard from before) comes right out of the box throwing out ridiculously false and insulting things, and at the same time he is unable to spell simple words – including words that are pertinent to the issues he’s attempting to discuss – it speaks to the falsity of his claims and the level of his spiritual blindness. You are an abomination headed right for the pit.

Sad

Subject: Sad

Dear Brothers,

Just wanted to share something. My wife and kids and I were out today on my day off. We thought we would pass out some of your materials while we were out. I stopped by this building that said "Divine Mercy Center" on the outside. I figured it was VII and thought maybe they could benefit from your new "Fatima" video. I walked up to the door to see if it was open, it was and I poked my head inside. I was met there by a rude, overweight man who had the most effeminate way about him. I asked if it was a church and he said it was. I asked if there was a table or something in the church where people could pick up free info on the Catholic Church because I would like to put some stuff there. He said there was but it had to be reviewed by the priest first. I said "Ok, I'll call the priest and ask him about it."

He said in his extremely girly voice "What is the material" I told him I would just talk to the priest because it looked like this man was very angry at me. He said "You're speaking to him". My mouth dropped right in front of him. This sad looking, probably homo man, in front of me, was the VII "priest" at this "parish". I was totally disgusted… It was not funny to see this with my own eyes. It was sad.

Nate

MHFM: That’s extremely interesting, a further example of the Vatican II apostasy, its moral and spiritual bankruptcy and emptiness. Besides giving perhaps one to the “priest,” we would also say that people should try to give the extra copies of materials to the people (or leave them for them in some way) rather than to the Novus Ordo “priests” who might throw them away.

De Smet

I recently finished the book on Fr De Smet. His accomplishments were supernatural. It shows among many other things the contrast between the Catholic missionaries and the Protestant missionaries and how different they were in how they treated the Indians. The Indians could trust the Black Robes but not the married bible peddlers. If finished it in 4 sittings at 400+ pages. It's a wonderful read. Should be mandatory in "Catholic" schools.

Matthew

MHFM: Yes, it’s a very interesting book. There are also some very good quotes against invincible ignorance and the heresy that people can be saved without baptism and the Catholic faith. They are quoted in our book, Outside the Catholic Church There is Absolutely No Salvation.

Book

Subject: The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church

I don’t know how I got your book, but I’ve read only the first few pages and knew this is something I’ve got to hand out. I’m also going to use it… because of the way it is presented and it leads you to the right interpretation. I’m so grateful to have this… Eileen

Jabinger

You were actually very kind to Jabinger. You gave him a pass on several more misspelled words including reading, Roman, needed, and the always difficult “that”. He also needs quite a bit of help on grammar and syntax. I know that academic standards aren’t what they once were, but it is still hard to believe he is a graduate of a Jesuit, even a modern faux Jesuit institution. I find that most heretics can yet spell. I’m not the greatest speller myself, but it is so easy today with spell checker to clean up your work. How can such buffoonery be explained? Is it OK to view it as a form of comic relief?

Bill Mulligan

Letter

Subject: Jabinger’s letter

Brothers,

Isn't wonderful how the devil consistently shows himself in order to prove what you say. In Jabinger’s letter he has completely proved your point regarding the Vatican II schools and colleges. Not only does it fill the student's mind with impurity but they pass someone to a higher grade without the ability to use simple English grammar.

All that is needed to prove the points you make is to have the opposition respond. Not much else needs to be added.

Know that you and all at the monastery are in our prayers nightly.
Paul

1960

Dear Brothers:

At the bottom of the Epoch Times article you linked on your site is this sentence. Note the year, please:

"In 1960, Chile suffered the biggest earthquake ever recorded in human history, one with a magnitude of 9.5 Richter. This terrible event caused thousands of deaths, and the country's terrain was changed forever."

Relative of Satan

RIGHT OUT OPF THE BOX, WHAT RELIGIOUS ORDER ARE YOU A PART ? IN READING YOUR DRIBBLE WITH ONLY A MODICU M OF KNOWLEDGE OF THEOLOGY, I ONLY HAVE A MINOR IN THEOLOGY FROM LOYOLA U. CHICAGO AND THE BENEFIT OF BEING EDUCATED BY THE DOMINICANS IN FENWICK H.S. IN OAK PARK, IL., I HAVE NEVER EXPERIENCED SUCH VITRIOLIC, SATANIC IDIOTACY WRITTEN BY MEMBERS OF A SUPPOSSED ROMAN CATHOLIC RELIGIOUS ORDER. CULT FITS THE GROUP BETTER. YOUR PHILOSOPHY, ETHICS, LOGIC, MORALS AND MODIVATION CANNOT BE SANELY DEFENDED. IN DECADES PAST YOUR GROUP WOULD BE PROPERLY TAKEN CARE OF IN AN ASYLUM, WHERE YOU WOULD BE FEDD AND WATERED, AS NEESDED, AND CARED FOR SO THAR YOU WOULD NOT INJURE YOURSELVES OR OTHJERS. WERE I TO RATE YOUR GROUP TO THE BORGIA POPE ALEXANDE VI REGARDING ALL ASPECT OF THE RONAN CATHOLIC CHURCH, I WOULD HAVE TO NOM INATE HIM FOR SAINTHOOD AND CAST YOUR GROUP INTO THE LOWEST LEVELS FOUND IN DANTE'S "INFERNO". YOU KNOW, THE BOOK ON HELL. FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE A LITTLE BEHIND IN CATHO;IC CHURCH HISTORY, TYOU CAN BONE UP ON THE SUBJECT OF ALEX VI BY READIBNF MARIO PUZO'S BOOK " THE FAMILY ". SOME OF YOU MIGHT GET YOUR SEXUAL JOLLYS READING IT.

IN CLOSING, I MUST SAY THAT YOUR GROUP ARE THE CLOEST GROUP THAT I KNOW OF WHO CAN LEGITIMATILY CLAIM TO BE THE TRUE RELATIVES OF SATEN.

Jabinger…

MHFM: Since you are of your father the Devil (John 8:44), you classify Catholic truth along with Satan’s lies and spread satanic lies as if you are defending Catholic truth. As you mock the spread of Catholic dogma and demonstrate your utter ignorance and demonic malice, you remind one of the devilish Pharisees who said that Jesus Christ cast out devils by the prince of devils (Matthew 9:34). It’s therefore no surprise that you have impure insinuations in your e-mail, for you speak with an evil mouth and are under the control of Satan, who revels in impure apostates like you. You might want to try to learn how to spell the words: idiocy, supposed, motivation, fed, legitimately and Satan.

Feedback

MHFM: Here’s some of the feedback we received on the color question. Thanks to all who responded. Of those who responded, it’s about 50-50 at this time.

GOLD

Subject: Home page color

Hi Brothers,

I'd like to see the page stay gold.

Christina

---

GOLD

For what it is worth I think the yellow is a better background color, it reminds me of the Papal flag

Robert B

----

GOLD

Dear Mhfm,

I prefer the gold colour.

Sean

---

GOLD

Dear Brothers,

I seem to prefer the gold background colors over the green. One more idea may be to change the dark blue lettering to another color and use a blue background as this is the color associated with Mary.

Bob Bohr

---

GOLD

Subject: Yellow is easier to read on my old eyes

Brothers:

Thank you for changing the color. I always like to read the Quotes of the Day and the green was hard to read the black typeface. The yellow makes it easier to read.

Thank you again,

---

GOLD

I like the idea of changing colors for it reminds me of changing seasons. Winter, I imagine, is like the time of our Lord's crucifixion; spring, His Resurrection. Since spring is nigh, and Easter close, I think gold is befitting.

-Zak

---

GOLD

In answer to your question as to the color of the background (green or gold) I choose gold. It is easy on these older eyes of mine. Also the various colors used to highlight the main topics of the page seem to go well with the gold. The entire page appears softer, in my humble opinion. The content of the website is worth its weight in "GOLD"

God Bless you Brothers
Jennifer

---

LIGHT GREEN

Dear MHFM I prefer a light green background color for the mainpage color. Also I sort of like a black outer space type color background for some other secondary links for your site… MARK CA

---

GOLD

The gold is better

---

LIGHT GREEN

MHFM,

Green because it was more comfortable to read your website…

Bernardo

---

BLUE

The blue color was better than the light green or the gold; the gold being the worst of the three (no offense).

Krim…

MHFM: Blue might be the best. However, the problem we noticed is that it’s bright and it can make it difficult to look at things for longer periods of time. We might bring it back for a time or a trial.

---

LIGHT GREEN

… I like the green color.

---

LIGHT GREEN

Dear Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,

Hardly noticed the change, but for what it's worth , I think I would go for the Green.....it must be the "Irish" in me! Besides, St. Patrick's Day is just around the corner!

God bless

David

---

LIGHT GREEN OR BLUE

… I've always prefered the light blue color on your website, and I always considered it more soothing. If I had to choose between the green and golden color, I would choose the green one…

Jakub

---

LIGHT GREEN

Brothers,

Keep the Green colour on the website, it’s easy on the eye as well as being a nice colour.

Thanks for all the amazing info on the site.

Jim

---

LIGHT GREEN

I look forward to the soothing sage-type green color you've had, however, I think that anything in the blue-green color family as long as it is on the softer side (much more soothing in these tempestuous days we are living in) are ideal. Isn't it interesting the days are technically getting shorter now due to the axis shifting? Jesus did promise God would shorten the days for the sake of the elect: was he referring to this? Is this another sign? The days are getting shorter!

---

LIGHT GREEN

I prefer the light green more. But both do look good

Shuck…

MHFM: Thanks for the others who wrote. Gold is up for now just to change things up, but light green has not been retired. It may return any day.

Color

MHFM: We are interested in hearing opinions from readers about whether they prefer the light green color or the gold color for our website. If you have an opinion, please e-mail us and indicate which one you like better.

Can’t

Subject: Leading a horse to water

Dear Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,

It is quite obvious, Eizabeth has not bothered to read your material thoroughly, or even at all...

As the saying goes: ' You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink."

The MHFM provides the information ( water ), but they can't force people to read it, if they don't want to!

God bless,

David

Fr. C

Subject: Fr. Corapi Exposed Video

I would like to understand what Church Authority of the Roman Catholic Church (under Pope Benedict XVI) authorized you to defame Fr. Corapi by calling him a heretic?

How come the Pope himself has not announced that fact? I guess how are the faithful to know ..? Father Corapi teaches everything in accordance with the Church's Teaching and in line with the Gospels of the New Testament.

Please respond. Thank you,

Elizabeth

MHFM: First, Antipope Benedict XVI is not an authority in the Catholic Church. According to the teaching of the Catholic Church and the popes, he is without doubt a manifest heretic and therefore an antipope. See: The Catholic Teaching that a heretic cannot be a valid pope [PDF file]. Benedict XVI doesn’t even believe that Jesus is the Messiah, and he denies Vatican I, among other things. There have been over forty antipopes in Catholic history, and we are presently in the Great Apostasy. One doesn’t need any special authority to recognize and denounce as heretics those who dissent from Catholic teaching. The Church teaches that those who depart from the rule of Catholic faith must be considered heretics and outside the Church.

Corapi is unfortunately a heretic because he embraces salvation outside the Church; he also accepts false religions and false ecumenism. False ecumenism is the Vatican II sect’s movement which respects, wants to unite and pray with non-Catholic sects and false religions. Those who embrace false ecumenism, as Corapi does, have abandoned the Catholic religion (see Pope Pius XI, Mortalium Animos). He also thinks that Jews have a “mission” and that they can be saved in their religion. This is heresy. He is without question a heretic. He also serves a role as a false prophet for those who are looking for a voice which speaks some moral truth but mixes it with Vatican II apostasy. Wake up, and look at the material on our website which provides the real Catholic faith.

Colleges, drugs

Dear Brothers,

Thank you for posting the video on the Crazy "Catholic" Colleges, which are not even remotely Catholic. The only thing that is really taught at the Vatican II Colleges is how NOT to be Catholic and the only qualification to be received from such place is a Masters degree in Sin with majors in heresy and apostasy! Sin is a sacrifice to Satan. The Religious Indifferentism in such places is so extreme: pro-abortion, pro-gay, pro-divorce, pro-jew, pro-hindu, pro-buddhist, pro-anything that is not true Traditional Catholic. It's crazy.

Thank you for the comments about how drugs open a persons eyes to the demonic realm. I remember, years ago, being offered drugs (which I refused) because they were supposedly "spiritual". Even back then I knew there are only evil spirits associated with drugs. I knew a girl who over-dosed on heroin. At her funeral (which my mother attended, not me) they quoted her as having said that her drug problem "was like a demon following her." Many "artists" have used drugs to supposedly tap into their creativity, but in reality are opening the gateway to the dark spiritual realm. Another man I knew was recovering from an addiction, and after 2 years was still having huge problems, like horrible nightmares. Many other people I've known who took drugs at some point made a total wreck of their lives. Also, the Illuminati and other occult groups use drugs all the time to control their members. Sorceries is exactly what such substance abuse is!

"D" is blinded by sin. It's amazing how many people write into you Brothers criticizing you for being like Protestants, Schismatics and other non-Catholics, but they fail to see their hypocrisy, i.e. that Benedict XVI and the Vatican II sect are all for Non-Catholics! It's outrageous!!

God Bless,

Chris White

Axis

Thought some of the e-exchangers may find this interesting.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aLAUn4Gy92ss

God Bless
Jennifer

The Great Apostasy and The Antichrist

It's also interesting to consider that Benedict XVI's name in Greek ("Benediktos") equals 666. People really should watch this video all the way through. This is a small sample section from our new DVD, The Third Secret of Fatima, the Impostor Sr. Lucia, and the End of the World. The actual DVD is of higher quality than this sample video.

Four times

How sick the "V-2 Catholic" girls are 4x more likely to fornicate than secular college girls---the explanation? For one thing, they go to their local "V-2 FAKE masses" DRESSED LIKE THE CHEAPEST POSSIBLE HOOKERS! Personally, when I attended V-2 up until about one year ago, these girls at "mass"----- wow----truthfully I do not exaggerate, I really could not tell them apart from the HOOKERS ON THE WORST STREETS OF ATLANTIC CITY!!! So their lack of modesty and brazen lack thereof, does not help. I am sure there are other factors which I am probably just as happy not to know about. What I can see in broad daylight in their own "churches" is believe me---bad enough! I even noticed this while working at two elementary "Catholic" schools before converting to sedev. last winter----the mothers --- they all look and dress just like hookers, too! the heavy (very ugly) makeup, the tight this and non-existent that for apparel----so I suppose their own daughters just copy them! Our Lady talked about this at Fatima, that many fashions would be introduced that would offend God very much....from "fashion" to fornication: not a big step. The next step: into Hell, but they can't get out of there. Our Lady Help of Christians: Pray for us!

Anne

Comment

Dear MHFM,

Your ministry hits it on the head every, single time. How clueless the world remains that has bought the lies of satan and his minions imbedded in Rome at this time in salvation history. If you suggest to anyone anymore just to pray one Ave Maria, just one, most give you a look like they've been struck by a rock. I've seen people actually flinch when I've suggested they pray just one Ave Maria. The world is clueless. God Bless MHFM.

Dea

Sorcery

Someone I know was on the drug meth, they claim they are not doing it anymore, but they say they see souls, other beings & UFO etc all the time.....I heard that meth causes hallucinations, or does this sound like possession...?? Is it possible to see 'souls' and other entities without being possessed?

Steve

MHFM: By his use of drugs, we’ve believe he’s putting himself into a state in which he can see and have access to demonic entities. In the Apocalypse (e.g., chapter 9, verse 21) the word sorceries is used. It’s from the Greek “pharmakeia,” which includes the use of drugs to achieve hallucinations, as part of witchcraft, evil arts, etc. The point is that there is a biblical connection between drug use, such as you describe, and sorcery (access to evil spirits). It’s therefore no surprise that he’s seeing evil spirits. He’s obviously in mortal sin, but he might also be possessed. He doesn’t have to be possessed to see the demonic entities, but he’s definitely opening himself up to becoming possessed.

Apocalypse 9:21- “Neither did they penance from their murders, nor from their sorceries, nor from their fornication, nor from their thefts.”

Waves

Subject: Waves

Thank you for so specifically citing the verse on the "waves": this verse (and I do believe there are at least one or two others like it which very specifically do mention "waves") has been on my mind in the last several days given the many "wave" events--you saw the one in CA with the surfers etc among many many others--(sometimes while cleaning/working in home I LISTEN to Bible on CDs so I hear notable things but do not always have a chance to grab paper and pen to jot down verse with up to elbows in kitchen sink etc!!!) But yes CERTAINLY the "waves" prophecy is being fulfilled very obviously right now----I think in 2004 with the very major tsunami around Phuket, Thailand, it's become very obvious to those who do study scripture…

That guy "Dan": he needs to read a little history to get a grasp on the reality of the free-masonic infiltration----anyone who reads history can surely grasp this reality in Church history-----… maybe he needs to "take the red pill" I guess this is a "Matrix" reference to facing the hard cold facts of where we really are. If it were not for the work of MHFM, I'd still be an unhappy V-2er or possibly just lost with no hope anymore...

Comment

The new Fatima DVD is wonderful. Beyond excellent. How could anyone not be absolutely convinced of what is going on? Unless of course they just don't want to accept the truth. Beatification of JPII on Good Friday? God help us!

Roxanne

Distress of Nations

Subject: Earthquakes

Dear Brothers:

The terrible, recent earthquakes in Haiti and Chile are certainly awful.

In both countries, do you think that these earthquakes could in any way be a punishment from God for the heresies of the conciliar church and for the apostasy of Catholics to "evangelical" and other protestant and heretical sects?

EJP, M.D., D.D.

MHFM: Yes, we believe those earthquakes are a punishment for sin, heresy and general apostasy. The level of the world’s paganism and rejection of God at this time is simply indescribable. However, more precisely, it is our opinion that we are seeing the fulfillment, or the beginning of the fulfillment, of Luke 21:25:

Luke 21:25- “And there shall be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars; and upon the earth distress of nations, by reason of the confusion of the roaring of the sea and of the waves.”

There is no way that one can say that what we saw this weekend didn’t correspond to what is stated in this verse, specifically the bolded portion. Following one of the biggest earthquakes in recorded history, the countries of Chile, America (Hawaii), New Zealand, Australia, Japan, Russia, etc. were all in distress because they thought a tsunami was coming their way (i.e., because of the confusion of the roaring of the sea and of the waves). We wouldn’t be surprised at all if there were more earthquakes like this which sparked tsunamis or rise in sea levels or distress of countries for fear of them, in fulfillment of this verse.

Information

Good Morning!

Just wanted to give thanks for the information on the consecration/conversion of Russia, I had referenced it to my loved one in conversation and needed some answers… he helped me out and then some, your link about the truth in 1952 of Pope Pius has shed amazing new light on this for me and am forever grateful for this knowledge, wow! how things get confusing if you don't keep seeking the truth, God bless and thank you…

Theodore Mooney

Los Angeles,CA

Poor

Ow you poor souls, what sin you do against the body of christ the church. Sin has blinded you so deeply. You contradict the protestant churches when you yourself did exactly what they did. Do you know that if what you say is true Jesus has lied to us. If you say that a council of the church made an error then the gates of hell have triumphed over the church. If you are right Satan has one. But we both know that Satan cannot win because the Gates of Hell will never overcome the church. The church cannot be destroyed but your claim against the popes, the Vatican II and the teachings of the Magisterium only point to one truth that the gates of hell have reached over the church. The holy spirit has not abandoned all the catholics of the world as you claim. Who do you think is saved? Only your monastery in New York and the… people who agree with you. All the rest of the catholics are condemned to hell? You are committing a sin against the church, you are the one who is a false catholic but my words i am sure are nothing to you. I guess we will just have to wait until we stand before Jesus. I will pray for you and all non catholics that they be united with one true body the church.

Dan

MHFM: You are obviously clueless and apostate. Benedict XVI teaches that non-Catholics are united to the Church. That’s why he’s a heretic. By defending him, you defend the promotion of Judaism, Islam, Eastern Schism, Protestantism and pro-abortion politicians – all of which he promotes, accepts or participates in. He is without question an antipope, and he must be denounced as such by all who care about or believe in Catholic teaching. But you don’t fall into that category.

Watching

I have been watching your videos and keeping up to date with your site. I'm a catholic of the traditional Church before the novus ordo. I never understood fully why the new mass was bad, except that there were bad changes. I’m thanking you guys for all your hard work showing the truth.

Dale…

What about?

Dear Brothers,

You mention in the message below that Mike should not go into that church to pray, even when they are not having NO services. Does that hold universally? Should one also avoid, for example, going to see the Holy Tilma of Juan Diego with the image of Our Lady of Guadalupe? It is in that monstrosity that replaced the old basilica in Mexico City. I will be in Mexico next May and was thinking about venerating the Image of Our Lady there. Should I not do so?

What about visiting the basilicas in Rome, St. Peter’s, St. Mary Major, to venerate the saints and artifacts that are there, like the manger of Our Lord, etc?

Karl

MHFM: It’s an interesting question. Our opinion would be that one should not go in for those reasons. However, we wouldn’t condemn those who might have a different opinion on that point, namely, that one could go in to see the image when no service is going on. That’s because with such well-known images and relics the building then becomes almost a museum rather than a Novus Ordo church. That’s why we think it’s different from simply going in to a Novus Ordo church to pray. However, we still think that people should forgo it and simply obtain an image of Our Lady of Guadalupe for themselves.

Benedict XVI’s heresies with other “Christians”

MHFM: This is a small sample section from our new DVD, The Third Secret of Fatima, the Impostor Sr. Lucia, and the End of the World. The actual DVD is of higher quality than this sample video.

Rotten

Subject: rotten country USA?

Dear MHFM

Would you agree with me that this country USA has become very very rotten, rotten to the core? This masonic country, probably from its birth. I find it Interesting that the USA was founded in the same year 1776 as the ILLUMINATI was on may 1 1776. just coincidence? PAX CHRISTI MARK V CA

MHFM: Yes, it has become rotten. That’s why God is allowing the freedoms to be taken away slowly. It’s a physical manifestation of the spiritual slavery they find themselves in as a result of sin and heresy. It’s also why those who try to fight for physical freedoms, without regard for the real cause of the loss of those freedoms (sin), and the recognition that God is allowing this loss of freedom as a result of sin, are deceived and deceivers.

Ashes

Dear Brothers,

Regarding Joe Biden, isn't it ok for a non-Catholic to receive ashes, since it is not a sacrament?

Sylvestre

MHFM: Perhaps it would be okay for an unbaptized catechumen who is in preparation for baptism, but not for a heretic. Someone like Biden wouldn’t even be allowed into the church by a Catholic priest. The very persistence in heretical positions is clearly incompatible with the penance which the ashes signify. Conferring ashes upon one who favors murder in the womb is definitely wrong.

No more

Have you an explanation where God says, "I will remember your sins no more" ?

Trying to have a balanced/proper attitude about my guilt of past confessed sins. My family tells me I'm too depressed, morose etc. & that I couldn't have the TRUE faith & be so terrified for my faults & their state of Mortal Sin.

This is preventing their conversion.

I'm concerned there's a sin of pride in my attitude interfering with their conversion & my spiritual development. It seems my melancholic type personality may be a problem…

MHFM: It’s in Hebrews 11:12. It signifies that in the New Covenant with Christ’s sacrifice, there is now a true and full remission of sins – a true justification that puts away sins. This was not available in the Old. A true devotion to Mary is the best way to have a balanced attitude. However, without knowing more specifics, one couldn’t really say whether you are being scrupulous or whether you should be legitimately concerned about sins you are committing. Nevertheless, it’s true that a person who is in the state of grace, while aware of the potential to lose his or her soul at any time, should not be walking around terrified. That’s not compatible with fostering the love of God.

Questions for non-sedevacantists

V-2 “Mass”

Subject: V-2 Mass invalid

I knew as a child that the Vatican 2 mass was invalid. If the place is spiritual, it has a feel to it, because of the things that are there. While growing up in Portage, Michigan, our parish St Catherine of Sienna was extremely Vatican 2. They reveled in it. From pop culture "masses" to all kinds of offensive, modern art. As a result, the place had an unpleasant spiritual feel. My family didn't care, they numbed themselves with compromise, my father believing that compromise was a virtue…

Once, when I mentioned how beautiful the old ways were (I had never seen them, but once I had been in an old cathedral, and the feel around the confessional and the old, beautiful statues was one of peace and the opposite of fear) Some of the adults around me, including priests and a visiting bishop, turned and were very nasty to me. Nastier than I assume they realized. Well, that was it, I was convinced. The new stuff was as it felt, deformed and an affront to God.

I had to go, my parents were "good Catholics" after all, so we went every Sunday. When I grew up I spent years searching for the real thing- maybe here, maybe there, but to no avail. I live apart from it and always will. I like the way I live and wouldn't change it for the world. We are all in exile. So if someone argues that the new thing is valid, just remind him that if the enemy were going to have his way with the world, he would have to move the real Mass out of the way, lest he be blocked by it. That was first on his list. Some things he can't move, he gets hurt if he tries. But he doesn't have to get rid of the whole thing to do what he's going to do...

Baptism, Salvation

Subject: Baptism and Salvation heresies

Dear MHFM,

I have read a lot of discussions, heard a series of audio materials on the heresies on Baptism Dogma ... Some things are really simple but it amazes me how people thwart and complicate things .. Baptism Dogma is quite simple as excellently explained, proved and detailed here in MHFM website and many attempted to refute them and succeeded not! Though this issue is so simple we have to look at it with the eyes of faith, things become so complicated as a result of sin secretly hiding from the hearts of people who not only deny them but even those who cast doubts and becomes so worried about it ... I fully agree with your opinion that deep inside these people really don't know God and have no internal relationship with Him ... in the event of great trials against Faith, it's the submission of our human will to the Divine Will that surpasses all forms of sacrifices to God ... no amount of penance, flagellations and the like would even equal it in the Eyes of God! that's how St. Alphonsus describes the superiority of Submission to Divine Will ... some will try to refute this statement that we have to follow the Pope on these issues, but our generation has been punished by God for almost 50 years not having one ... God has blessed our Church with history and we simply have to learn from them ... if during Arian Heresy only 3-5% of the Cardinals agree with the Catholic Church how much more in our generation when doomed has been prophesied to the inhabitants of the earth on the Last Days?

People who cast doubts on Baptism and Salvation Dogmas not only are wanting of humility, but (God forbid)... these very sentiments once not resolved before death would definitely be their condemnation in the end!

Your apostolate is heaven sent… I thank God for bringing me to this website... this website clearly show how to become a saint and die with odor of sanctity should God be pleased.

In Crucified Christ and Immaculate Mary,
Joey, EENS-Sedevacantist (Philippines)

Solitude: Behold where God is found

Opportunity

Subject: Debate

Dear MHFM,

I had the opportunity, during a long drive yesterday, to once again listen to your second debate with “Lucifer's Mouthpiece” (AKA William Albrecht). One of his most heretical arguments is the changing of "for many” to “for all”. Aside from the clear Catholic teaching against the changing of the words of consecration, for many to for all, basic logic simply refutes his idiotic position. It goes without saying that they (VII, or anyone else for that matter) cannot make this change since they are changing the words of Christ himself.

He states many times during the debate that the fathers of the church and the Catholic church in general have understood that “for all” and “for many” are synonymous. That by changing from one to the other in no way changes the meaning and confecting the sacrament.

If one assumes that for something to be changed also implies a “reason” for change, then we must ask what specifically was the reason for their change? Would this not simply be a waste of time since universally (according to LM) the church does not distinguish between the two? If one assumes they wanted to “correct” something that was worded improperly, this would imply that “for all” and “for many” DO NOT MEAN THE SAME THING! So his entire argument is devastated by the change!

This individual is the most proud, arrogant, blind, soulless, obstinate and evil individual I have heard in quite some time. He consistently speaks heresies against the Catholic faith. Keep up the good work defending the church in these dark times.

God Bless you for your works!

Bruce

MHFM: Yes, we agree. He’s human, but he’s equivalent to a walking devil. He is so dishonest, such a total heretic and such a liar (with special emphasis on this last point) that it’s almost beyond belief. The only way to explain it is by making reference to demonic forces. Since he kept bothering us, not that long ago one of us again brought to his attention his ridiculous claim in the debate, that not one doctor of the Church rejected the short form. This ridiculous claim, which showed his gross ignorance of the issue and even his ignorance of the position of his friends, was refuted in the debate by pointing out that St. Thomas rejected the short form. Instead of admitting that he was wrong about that point or simply remaining silent, he decided to respond and add a new lie. He said: “I was referring to every single doctor other than Thomas!” This is a total lie. Anyone who hears the debate can see that this is not what he said. The guy doesn’t have a conscience. He lies as a way of life. That’s precisely why people like him can be attracted to the Antichrist Vatican II sect and want to defend it. They are liars at heart. They are not of the truth; and therefore they defend lies in service of their father, the Devil, who is the father of lies and of all liars.

Comment

MHFM,

I am starting to get annoyed with this yapping broken record liar, William Albrecht. This guy’s hatred for Truth is amazing. I am appalled. By the way, I saw William’s video giving that “Spanish quote” and being well aware of my own native tongue (Spanish), the ”quote” had a lot of grammar errors, which made me wonder if it was “quoted” at all? What’s worse is that he thought quoting the exact same quote you quoted in your article in a different language, ACTUALLY PROVES HIS POINT! This guy just doesn’t get that he’s been exposed! And so, being a coward and won’t admit he is a fraud, he will only get Mike Duddy to debate you WITH ONE CONDITION: “…provided it's a debate between your brother and yourself against myself and him. If you aren't interested in coming out of hiding and debating me again--then don't even bother or waste my time.” RIGHT!!! This guy is really pathetic. And in addition to this, although not necessary to prove the point since you have already proven he is a “PROVEN LIAR AND FRAUD” as stated in your article, but look at the list of music he listens to shown on his YouTube channel: “Classical, Rock N' Roll, Country, Opera...and pretty much anything that has a great beat to it and awesome lyrics.” Well that proves who is his father and where he gets his influence from… THE DEVIL. I hope Mike Duddy debates you anyway without that fraud.

Also, I recently saw the videos from the two people who changed their positions to Sedevacantism, mainly from looking at MHFM’s material, as you have stated in your recent video update. But, one thing that struck me from these two persons, and from my own experience talking with others as well, was that they remind me a lot of the Parable of the Sower. I was happy to hear that they changed positions but when I saw the 22 year old young man’s video, who you sent a letter a while back, still showed much care of the world and of human respect and of “losing friends, subscribers.” Well, here is what Our Lord says about this in this parable: “He also that received seed among the thorns is he that heareth the word; and the care of this world, and the deceitfulness of riches, choke the word, and he becometh unfruitful.” This also goes with that other guy, Jeremiah, who started disagreeing with you guys on small important issues like telling them in charity that they shouldn’t receive the sacraments now because he is a raging heretic and has a happy birthday video to his father, which obviously they can’t see that that’s not allowed, and his wife states prideful: “Who gave them permission to judge us?”; or him making a joke about your low price materials comparing it to the apostate evangelist Benny Hinn, and goes further on as he disrespectfully jokes about it saying “He is the Creflo Dollar of Sedevacantism… That’s exactly what they are! But you know what? They come against us because we have a sense of humor.” This guy makes me sick! He won’t have a sense of humor if he remains on his path to Hell! It’s very sad by how they are deceive by externals and emotions. After having giving your whole lives exposing the Vatican II and teaching the true Catholic position and selling materials at a low price so that it can reach all kinds of people, and then seeing this guy wanting to be stuck “among the thorns,” I reach to my concluding question: How far are people willing to go for jesus christ and his teachings?

I am a testimony of the True Catholic Faith among many others that have testified over the years about this website that has affected their lives. I believe God has allowed, through Mary, that His teachings be widely spread and convert others to the Truth by your daily prayers and the sincere, honest, tiresome dedication to this apostolate work for the GREAT GLORY OF GOD AND THE SALVATION OF SOULS. I am truly indebted to Jesus and Mary, for they have led me here. Thanks be to Jesus for His Spouse, Holy Catholic Church, that we are able to understand what is dogma and what is not, because God saw the Great Apostasy of the Antichristian Vatican II, so He willed that the dogma on Papal Infallibility be revealed a few years before this Great Apostasy. This revelation was not given to the saints and theologians before Vatican I’s ex cathedra pronunciation on Papal Infallibility. Truly, God’s love and mercy is infinite. Thank you, MHFM.

Most Holy Trinity give us holy perseverance to persevere faithfully to the Holy Teachings of the Catholic Church.

Matthew 10:22- “And you shall be hated by all men for my name's sake: but he that shall persevere unto the end, he shall be saved.”

Sincerely,

Bernardo

Ipso facto

Dear brothers in Christ,

Your questions for non-sedevacantists are really shaking device for the people who are "speaking lies in hypocrisy, and having their conscience
seared" (Timothy 4:2). I hope there will be even more questions in the future. I would personally like to pose a question about their (non-sedevacantists') attempts to get away with 'ipso facto' excommunications. Namely, the pope Pius VI condemned many errors of the synod of Pistoia; one of the condemned errors
is about 'ipso facto'.

"Likewise, the proposition which teaches that it is necessary, according to the natural and divine laws, for either excommunication or for suspension, that a personal examination should precede, and that, therefore, sentences called "ipso facto" have no other force than that of a serious threat without any actual effect,--false, rash, pernicious, injurious to the power of the Church, erroneous." --CONDEMNED

So, the non-sedevacantists' mumbo-jumbo talk about 'ipso facto' being invalid before personal examination is FALSE.

Most Holy Mother of God help us with your powerful intercession to keep our faith. Our Lord bless the MHFM.

Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia

MHFM: Yes, it’s a good quote, one that’s cited in our material. Someone wrote in and tried to respond to most of the questions. We will probably be posting an analysis of the responses soon. It will show how their responses only serve to confirm the falsity of their position.

New Service

dear mhfm brothers, feel so happy when go to your website. i even made it my home page so i can read the quote of the day. i came upon your site about two years ago when i first got my computer because i was going to go online for the first time. i walked to the local burger king so i could pick up the internet and wanted the first thing i looked up to be something about the Blessed Mother to thank her for my laptop…. i looked up our lady of Fatima online and saw many links but i thought yours looked the best… i read for a few mins but i kept getting a poor connection to their wi-fi so i saved the link and went home. when i read it many days later I was delighted to see that there was someone out there who felt the same as my family did. it made me so much more sure of what my mom kept telling me all my life, ...that the new service was not a mass. but hearing it from an outside source helped for me cause sometimes i still wondered, but you gave us proof. Thanks…

nancy kelly

Faith Alone

Do you think this applies to the refutation of "faith alone" and possibly proof of the Church Christ established - personal interpretation?

Galatians 4:19

My little children, of whom I am in labour again, until Christ be formed in you.

Haydock Footnotes:

Ver. 17-20. He tells them this change comes from the false teachers among them, who with a false zeal would exclude them from a friendship and a submission to St. Paul, and deprive them again of that Christian liberty by which Christ, and the faith of Christ, had freed them from the yoke of the Mosaical law. On this account I must labor and travail, as it were to bring you forth a second time. How do I now wish to be with you, to change my voice, to exhort you, to reprehend you, to use all ways and means to regain you to Christ? --- I am in confusion about you,[2] I am perplexed, as the Greek signifies, as not knowing what to say or do. (Witham)

MHFM: We do think it’s another verse which shows that salvation is more than just accepting Jesus. It shows that believers can fall away from the faith and into sin by things they do or embrace and thus lose their salvation.

Fr. O

Additionally, to Bros. Mike and Pete, may I ask for a comment on the works of Father John O'Connor?...

Sanjiv

MHFM: Father O'Conner had some interesting and true things to say about the secular conspiracy and the evil working in that arena. However, many people don't know this, but he offered the invalid New Mass. He said both the traditional and the New Mass.

The only reason we found this out is because one of us got into a discussion with him after he heard a talk which one of us gave against the Novus Ordo many years ago. He was upset at the thought that it's invalid. He said the idea is “an insult,” to which one of us said, "Why?" He responded by saying, "Because I say the Novus Ordo." We were surprised to learn that he said the New Mass, for O'Connor gave out the impression that he was traditional. Just before the end of his life, he also promoted Antipope John Paul II in some of his material. He complained that the "bishops" did not obey him! Sadly, he was an apostate.

He was also extremely secular in his commentary and overall outlook, and this was a symptom of his apostasy. For that reason, his commentary is sometimes misleading, despite true points.

Apostates

Subject: Apostates

Hello Brothers:

There is an image of the Glorious Virgin of Fatima at the Novus Ordo church that I came out of. This image is very dear to me - it is the one we used to pray before as little lads. I go down in the early morning when nobody is around to make veneration before this precious image - not leaving her without sympathy. I really love Her. This morning a woman came in - one of these in her mid-50's with the men's haircut, sweatshirt, men's jeans, men's jacket - really despicable how women actually broach transvestitism in this manner almost everywhere. Well she went over to the altar and started banging things around, took out a key to the tabernacle and started rearranging things inside of it. Amazing to me. She had her own key to the tabernacle and her hands deep inside. I have to be honest, my blood boiled. The "priest" actually gave this usurper a key to the most Holy. In their minds they truly believe in nothing at all. It left me fearful - such strident apostasy - her hands inside the tabernacle. It is frightful - if I was angry, being unworthy, how much must God be wrathful now. Very, very fearsome!

-Thanks,

Mike

MHFM: That’s very interesting, but one should not be going in there. One should not go in to pray, even if it’s at a time when they are not having the invalid Novus Ordo “Mass.”

Man, papacy

"It' s all about man, and the man they think (quite wrongly) is the pope, whom they treat as if he is Christ Himself"

Dear Brothers,

I appreciate your site, even if I am an Orthodox Christian and see your critique of the Orthodox Church.

Your words above concerning the worshipping of the pope today, brought to mind the words of the great teacher of the faith, Fr. Justin Popovich, when he said:

"with the docrtine of the infallibility of the Pope western man exalted man as the highest good, and removed the GOD-MAN."

"There have three great falls in history: the fall of Adam, the fall of Judas, and the fall of the Pope."

… I believe if you read his writings - because you truly believe and are zealots for Christ - you would reconsider the place and beliefs of the Orthodox.

Please tell me why you don't think Vatican II, the ascent of masonry in the papacy and the present state of things is not ALSO a fruit of the false dogma of the infallibility of the Pope. You can see why it would seem that way to the Orthodox, right?

JH

MHFM: No, a true Catholic would never ever consider “Orthodoxy,” and would never become an Eastern “Orthodox” schismatic. Eastern “Orthodoxy” is fundamentally illogical. Its position on the ecumenical councils, and which ones must be accepted as binding and precisely why, is completely arbitrary. Whenever they attempt to precisely explain or define it, it becomes totally contradictory. Eastern “Orthodoxy” is utterly unbiblical: it rejects the obvious and undeniable teaching of the Bible on the primacy of St. Peter and his unfailing faith. It is opposed to the early Church. It is anti-Christian and anti-Christ; it rejects the clear words and teaching of Christ. Please see our debates, audios and book.

Vatican II is a confirmation of the truth of papal office, for it is an obvious fulfillment of the prophesied end times apostasy from the one true Christian faith. That’s why its features and doctrines are precisely the things which the true popes and the papal office condemned. We are glad that you like some aspects of the site, but you need to pray to God and the Virgin for the true faith and convert. One thing we’ve noticed with those who have fallen to “Orthodoxy” is a severe form of intellectual pride; perhaps an "uppity" outlook is a good way to describe it. It is one which really attracts them to in-depth and high-level discussions of relatively unimportant issues. They often look down upon simple communications of important truth. For instance, people who are fascinated and spend a lot of time on how God’s grace acts upon man and mystical aspects of the same or things like that, while missing or scoffing at the big and simple points, are often the type whom God punishes for their pride by allowing them to embrace the “Orthodox” schism.

Fatima

Dear MHFM,

The Fatima dvd is surely monumental in veritable truth and scope. What couldn't be emphasized however was that Father Fuentes was faith filled, reputable, and devoted wholeheartedly to the Blessed Mother and her message to the world and would have never in any way maligned what sister Lucia recalled of the message from the holy words of the Blessed Mother, and what was transcripted by him to the world. The veracity of Father Fuentes was undeniable, and that came from the mouth of bishop Leiria who himself was above reproach and highly respected in his region and by the heirarchy in Rome at that time. The conspiracy unraveled by your holy works at the monastery without a doubt will open doors to the truth of Vatican II and its diabolical acts by these modernist pests of satan. Once again, thank you. May St. Michael protect your ministry, I pray fervently.—D

“Seminarians”

Subject: “seminarians”

I talk to the "seminarians" around campus every once in a while and try to convince them of the truth. They drive me crazy!!! So I show them where it says in trent where it says WATER is necessary for baptism.

Me: Do you believe this when it says water is necessary.

Him: Yes.

Me: So you believe you need real water, like in this cup, to be baptized.

Him: Yes.

Me: So in order to be baptized we need real physical water that is on this earth correct.

Him: Yes(now slightly annoyed)

Me: Do you need to get rid of original sin to go to heaven.

Him: Yes.

Me: Do you need to be baptized to get rid of original sin.

Him: Yes (now quite annoyed)

Me: Okay so i am dying in the woods no one is around I am a pagan and I realize I should of been baptized then I die, I go to hell right.

Him: Well God could give you the merits of baptism and you could be baptized in that way.

Me: So I was baptized without physical water

Him: Yes, in a metaphysical way.

Me: So you just said water is not necessary for baptism.

Him: Oh it’s necessary, just in certain cases...

Me: You totally contradicted yourself!!

Him: Well I don't think so.

William

More Yoga

Subject: more Yoga

In response to your article on yoga, my local novus ordo church St. Mary's in Colts Neck NJ has yoga once a week also. After seeing the reader approach the altar that was empty, no tabernacle, no priest, just a plain table, she bowed to the empty altar and then turned around to the congregation and bowed to us. Shocked, I approached the priest later who said she bowed to you because "you are the body of Christ" . I pointed out that St. Paul says we should not bow to anyone but our Lord. He was speechless but got angry with me. I can't help but believe the yoga had some influence on the bowing. There is a lot of bowing to each other in Eastern religions. The other thing that is being reported to me in my diocese is that in some parishes in response to "This is the Body of Christ" instead of saying "Amen" the parishioners are saying "I am"

This was just what I needed to never return to St. Mary's again. Without a church....

Kathleen

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. We’re glad that you won’t go there again, and hopefully not to any Novus Ordo because they are all invalid and non-Catholic, as our material covers.

Polka “Masses”

Hello MHFM,

It’s never my intent to look and browse without any purpose; today I wanted to find a Traditional Tantum Ergo hymn, but Our Lord wanted me to see this total abomination instead. I run into this site of ‘father’ Jeff of 64 working for the Society of St. Paul media ministry, probably sponsor of this very site. He is posting the Polka ‘mass’

To date I only have heard from you about the Polka ‘mass’, however, only 21 hours ago this person posted it online. I couldn’t believe it, how evil these people are, but the proof is out there.

The actual thing is by Fr. George Balasko, St. Ann Parish, East Liverpool. Check it out:

"Catholic Polka Mass Catholic priest, Fr. George Balasko, celebrates a Catholic mass with the hymns played and sang in a Polka Style"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sSLijTYuV0E

and at: http://www.youtube.com/user/FatherJeffrey#p/a/u/1/sSLijTYuV0E

Not that that these people care, but Saint Paul is crying out for vengeance!

Renata

Reconsidering

Subject: I am reconsidering the sedevacantist position. Can you help?

I am reconsidering the sedevacantist position. But there's a lot to see on your videos and a lot to read. So I was wandering where should I start looking? What document, papal bull, encyclical or Apostolic constitution I should began to read, so that I gain a better understanding of the sedevacantist position.

Ed…

MHFM: We would recommend that you start with this, The Catholic Teaching that a heretic cannot be a valid pope [PDF file], and obtain our new Fatima DVD and the package with our big book and other critical information. We would also recommend that you look at the files under our antipopes section, the silver button in the lower left corner of our main menu. This section contains files on Benedict XVI’s heresies, answers to objections, John Paul II’s heresies, etc. Our larger package is important to obtain as well because numerous critical books are included, such as Outside the Catholic Church There is Absolutely No Salvation. Most people are unfortunately denying this dogma today and it covers the entire issue, the common objections, etc.

Wonder

You both are frequently attacked as being severe in your instruction and correction. I wonder if the people who accuse you have ever really spent time reading the bible...

Galatians 3:1 O Senseless Galatians, who hath bewitched you that you would not obey the truth?

Titus 1:13 This testimony is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith.

So much for Mr. (or Mrs.) Nice Guy

Patricia

Apparently

Apparently Vinzy hasnt read:

2 Corinthians 4:3: "And if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost, in whom the god of this world [Satan] hath blinded the minds of unbelievers, that the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should not shine unto them."

I highly doubt Benedict Groeschel & friends would ever quote this verse on EWTN...

Steve

Helped

Many thanks for answering the question from one of your readers, who asked why the devil would attack Vat II. It helped me a good deal. It was a very good question and I'm sure many of us have asked it to one extent or another. Your explanation was very insightful and makes perfectly good sense. Do you ever get asked why there was never a counter revolution? Traditional priest/bishops/cardinals must not have been passionate or organized enough to try and reverse or stop it. Thank you for helping me so much.

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. To your question, the traditional Catholic remnant which holds the fullness of the faith exists. It rejects and combats the Counter Church. But the reason that there wasn’t a massive resistance of bishops, etc. was because of bad will, and too much denial of the salvation dogma (Outside the Church There is No Salvation) and the necessity of water baptism.

A must-see

MHFM: This is a small sample section from our new DVD, The Third Secret of Fatima, the Impostor Sr. Lucia, and the End of the World. The actual DVD is of higher quality than this sample video.

Comment

Subject: Solitude

Dear MHFM:

So often your brief videos and talks are so timely. While I was a Protestant I felt this or was impressed by this notion many times. I was lost and yet people were all around me. Solitude truly is the answer as we will stand alone before Jesus Christ. Thanks for your comforting messages!

Sincerely,

Joseph

Finished

Subject: Fatima DVD

Dear Mhfm,

Just finished watching the Fatima DVD. Amazing piece of work from start to finish. Answered a lot of questions especially the part on the two beasts. It’s amazing how Benedict XVI plans on doing the "Beatification" of John Paul II on good Friday. The antichrist John Paul II being "beatified" on the day of Jesus's death is a direct Blasphemy by Benedict XVI towards Christ.

I am going to share the DVD with the "Traditional" "priest" in my area. He most likely will not change but it's a worth a try. I would also like to thank you for the extra material which came with the package.

Sincerely,

Sean Keogan

Vinzy

In response to Vinzy. He appears to have a belief in universal salvation. Christ indeed died for "all" but only "many" will be saved. This is part of the same heresy that lead to the false, invalidating and heretical changes in the words of consecration in the Novus Ordo Missae. He then goes on to ask, " who really knows the will of God?" He obviously has no knowledge of or belief in Catholic doctrine which was revealed to us so that we may know the truth.

Is this what he is learning from EWTN?

EJP, M.D., D.D.

Just

Dear Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,

Just finished watching your Solitude video, which surely must be one of your best efforts to date! ...it is a very absorbing and thought provoking topic,one which we can all benefit from. It fits in beautifully with the backdrop scene, as one can almost feel the 'air of solitude' , as if one was actually sitting in the long grass gazing upon God's handiwork!

God bless,

David

Paul VI and John Paul II

MHFM: This is a small sample section from our new DVD, The Third Secret of Fatima, the Impostor Sr. Lucia, and the End of the World. The actual DVD is of higher quality than this sample video.

Ratzinger

How can the Jews be free not to believe in the messiah Jesus Christ, and with the blessing of Ratzinger?... Ratzinger is an infiltrator, out in the open, outlined perfectly by the late Pope Leo XIII in one of the greatest prayers of the last century, the St. Michael prayer…

Dea

Comment

Dear Brothers,

Thank you for the video on Solitude. It's an astounding truth that so many people think they need to be with other people in order to be happy. The grace that God gives to those who seek Him in solitude is so rich. This is especially true in regard to family, where the strongest emotional bonds exist. But if we do make the break with relatives in order to seek God, He rewards us so sweetly, that we will be left wondering why on earth we delayed in the first place. Also, the Internet is a huge temptation for so much sin today. Many websites promote something true, but lace it with heresy and lies. Chat room and forums in particular are just incubators of error and sin. May Jesus and Mary give us the courage to seek God in solitude so as to forge the relationship with Him that is so necessary for salvation.

God Bless,

Chris White

Empty

Dear brothers in Christ,

By watching a small sample of your DVD on Fatima (I've ordered this DVD; my order is in due process) concerning B16 and Illuminati, I've looked for the word 'empty' in the Bible. The passage from Isaias 32:6 perfectly describes the wickedness of the whole satanic hierarchy now occupying Vatican. It goes:

"For the fool will speak foolish things, and his heart will work iniquity, to practise hypocrisy, and speak to the Lord deceitfully, and to make empty the soul of the hungry, and take away drink from the thirsty. 7 The vessels of the deceitful are most wicked: for he hath framed devices to destroy the meek, with lying words, when the poor man speaketh judgment."

Indeed, the V2 counter-church took away drink from the thirsty (i.e. True Mass), and emptied the souls of the hungry (invalid consecrations).

Our Most Holy Mother and St. Joseph, pray for us, and protect MHFM, the remnant of the True Church

Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia

Watching

I have been watching EWTN’s Journey Home and learned about the early church fathers – something I had never before heard about as a Protestant. I was considering joining the Catholic Church. Then I found your commentary on EWTN and the new Popes and am now afraid to join the local Catholic Church as they are followers of Vatican II. Where can I find a church in Florida… Thank you for your kind consideration.

MHFM: It's great to hear about your interest. There are places to receive traditional sacraments, but no priests in your area that are 100% for instruction, etc. The reason that there are so few priests who are 100% Catholic is that we are in the Great Apostasy, the time about which Our Lord said that there would hardly be any faith on Earth (Lk. 18:8). This is explained in our material. What you need to do is get the catechism we offer, read it, and pray the Rosary each day. And then, when you have read it and you are convinced of everything, follow the steps to convert which are given in this file and we can help you further.

The Steps to convert to the traditional Catholic faith and for those leaving the New Mass - Baptism and Conditional Baptism - the Council of Trent's Profession of Faith for Converts

Fit

How sad to read such venom against the established church of God. Why do you feel that you alone are favored? Did Jesus not say all are saved? People who have not been exposed to Jesus or the bible cannot be determined not saved, since Christ died for all. Those of us who have been fortunate to be born or exposed to christianity are indeed fortunate. We cannot, however, place ourselves above those less fortunate. Who really knows the will of God as you presume to? There is nothing in the bible that gives you that authority. Do you not feel any guilt for the poison you spill? As far as the book in question, FYI it is not a new ;publication. I thank you for strengthening my resolve to keep EWTN on the air by my monthly donation. It has done much good for those of us exposed to the likes of you. God Bless!!

Vinzy…

MHFM: Considering that you believe that “all are saved,” you fit right in with the Vatican II sect and outside the Catholic Church. You obviously don’t care one bit about Catholic teaching or the fact that Jesus actually said few are saved (Mt. 7:13). Your view is a bold rejection of the teaching of the Bible and Catholic dogma. We’ve come across quite a few heretics, but your e-mail is so outrageous that it’s almost hard to believe.

Comment

Subject: Thank you for new video

Dear MHFM,

Thank you for new video on solitude/detachment. This comes as an answer to prayer. It is truly a great blessing when God calls a soul into a life of more solitude. Yes, the more solitude, the better.

I have a certain individual in my life who has been applying a lot of "pressure" on me to join "Facebook", which I am naturally adverse to for many reasons (the very name itself seems so egotistical). No, I will not submit to this or other pressures like it… this is a very special video, with a lovely photo too…

Claims

Question: So why does the devil in your opinion attack the V2 church ? It's very obvious to any openminded person of good will that most of these (if not all) so called "sexual abuses" are made up lies, just like they were mostly made up lies in the USA. Shouldn't the devil be protecting this 'false bride' as you claim ?

Ahrs…

MHFM: Just so our readers know, the person posing this question is a defender of the Vatican II sect. He is currently resisting with all his might the undeniable proof that it’s not the Catholic Church.

The first thing you need to realize is that, even though the claims are against the Vatican II sect, which is not the Catholic Church, they do damage the image of the Catholic Church in the minds of most. That’s because for most people the mainstream V-2 Church is the true Catholic Church. They draw no distinction. So, by further disgracing it and making it appear to be a scandal-filled cesspool of iniquity – which for the most part the V-2 sect is – it destroys the credibility of the true Church in the eyes of most in the public. It also destroys its credibility in the eyes of most non-Catholics who have no idea what’s going on. That’s one reason why the Devil would push for it.

We would also add a few things which we’ve mentioned before. We have to disagree with you that most (“if not all”!) of the claims are false. You are obviously bending over backwards to see things in favor of the Vatican II sect. The Vatican II sect’s “priesthood” is without question filled with homosexuals and perverts. About ten years ago we telephoned various “priests” for a particular reason, and we encountered effeminate “priest” after effeminate “priest.” The number was staggering. Moreover, even though some of these claims are false, many of them are true; and the Vatican II sect opened itself up to all of this by its failure to exclude homosexuals, and by its failure to remove, condemn and excommunicate all deviants. By its participation in evil, the floodgates of Hell have opened against it. What we are seeing is also the punishment inflicted upon the Great Harlot.

In the Old Testament, God frequently punishes the wicked by making them the reproach of all. This would include true and false accusations against them. Not that He positively wills such false accusations; for they are mortally sinful, and the wicked also make false accusations against the good. However, when you are dealing with innumerable claims of total moral degeneration combined with voluminous amounts of bad publicity, it’s obviously something He has allowed against the Vatican II sect as a punishment for its evils. At the same time, as the ultimate punishment for the sins of the world, He punishes the world by allowing the general image of the Catholic Church to be damaged – since, as stated above, the public draws no distinction between the V-2 harlot and the Catholic Church. This makes the truth harder to find and it’s a punishment for sins. God permits all of it and the V-2 harlot is becoming the reproach of all.

That’s what we are seeing with the mockery of the Great Harlot (the Vatican II sect).

Apocalypse 17:16-18- “And the ten horns which thou sawest in the beast: these shall hate the harlot, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and shall burn her with fire. For God hath given into their hearts to do that which pleaseth him: that they give their kingdom to the beast, till the words of God be fulfilled. And the woman which thou sawest, is the great city, which hath kingdom over the kings of the earth.”

Additionally, more of the claims might be true than you think. The Vatican II sect and its “priests” rarely seem to plead not guilty – which any normal person would do from the housetops if such heinous and false accusations were made against him. No, they pay up and apologize.

Comment

Greeting brothers. The new film was very interesting and I look forward to getting it out there. Prior to leaving the Novus Ordo, I attended the "Catholic" Congress in Anaheim, Ca. I'm considering going this year for the sole purpose of distributing your information as there will be many priests and religious there who although Novus Ordo, may be open to the truth. I would not consider going for any other reason than this.

This is probably considered old news, but there was a story a few months ago about the death of a young heiress of the Johnson & Johnson company. Her death shocked many because she was only in her late twenties. Well, it so happened that this woman was "engaged" to another young woman and were set to get "married" in an event which would without a doubt have been covered without condemnation by the pagan media. I believe God prevented this evil event from occurring since it would have undoubtedly led many impressionable and weak souls into grave mortal sin. I believe that this is why this unfortunate young woman died at a time when, under natural circumstances, she should have not. I've personally known people who died young, and they all committed sins of the flesh, fornication, or sins against the body. This also shows that God will never allow the abomination of gay "marriage" to become the norm.

If it were not for you, brothers, the Devil would have it a lot more easier…. Thank you, brothers, for your time, effort and dedication to being model Christians in this hour of darkness. God bless.

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. While it’s also true that many great saints died young, we agree with your point.

Coma

I don't know if you have seen this but I found this to be interesting.

http://tvnz.co.nz/health-news/coma-patient-talks-via-brain-waves-3348399

"A man in a deeply unconscious state for five years has been able to communicate with doctors using just his thoughts in a study scientists say is a "game changer" for care of vegetative state patients. British and Belgian researchers used a brain scanner called functional magnetic resonance imaging to show the man, who suffered a severe traumatic brain injury in a road accident in 2003, was able to think "yes" or "no" answers to questions by wilfully changing his brain activity."

-Angelica

Soft Words

Hi MHFM,

If I may comment also on using soft words. Patience and humility are fine in so far as one is living with the faithful, who are patient and the humble. The heretics are not so kind and in fact they are vicious. In the conflict with the liberal heresies, Pope Pius X warned before his death that he had not yet defeated the beast. They were only driven underground, and if the Church falls asleep, they would come back stronger than ever. It seems they have already done so, during the rebellious 1960's, using the tools of the Church to spread their errors all over the world. If fact, there are people right now spreading errors in the name of Pope Pius X himself. One can see the heretical forces are cunning.

We are talking about the souls of the multitude here, who are living in mass delusion. Even past communists admit that the next war is a war over people's hearts and minds using media and education as the weapons. There are forces at work attempting to subtly deprive the people of the the gospel, to subtly destroy the holy mass and the priesthood, and to subtly disperse the flock. Very few suspect anything. Bad news is bad news, and no one ought to say soft words about it. Everyone has to deal with the facts, or else many will be lost…

Sanjiv

Interest

Hi!

My name is Iselin… and I am a Catholic/sedevacantist and have been for the past 2,5 years. I am a Norwegian woman of 27, mother of 2 little girls and married to a Polish man who also converted with me. Besides my husband’s best friend, Mikael… a Swede who might have emailed you already, we don't have any contact with Catholics in the Nordic region. We don't have a Mass to go to and we don't have the opportunity of homeschooling our children, as the government then automatically would remove the children from their home and place them in fostercare.

We therefore feel very isolated and in great need of getting in contact with other catholics. As far as I know I am the only Norwegian sedevacantist on the planet. As a Norwegian my understanding of Swedish and Danish is pretty high too. There are also swedishspeaking groups in Finland. Do you know of anyone in the region that you could put us in contact with?... Great website. Is it possible to get your DVD's with region2 anywhere?

Iselin

Response

Hi Brothers,

I just wanted to give you a big bravo on "the tone of your answers" to those who email you and make it onto the e-exchanges page(see Mrs. CasalinoJellerson's letter). BRAVO! It's sad and aggravating to see so many think you are too harsh/ negative/ judgmental. I thoroughly enjoy your responses as I feel that you speak in a way that would be in line w/ how Padre Pio would speak to us, were he alive today.

I'd like to remind Mrs. CasalinoJellerson (and others like her) the good Padre would toss her out of the confessional if she went to him for confession.

Thanks for defending our beloved Savior, His Holy Mother and the True Faith and extra special thanks for letting "your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven."

Christina Kalix

BOD

Dear Brothers

This is in response to a lady who wrote to you in the exchanges section about the sacraments. You can get to heaven without the latin mass, but you can’t get to heaven without the catholic faith whole and pure. So yes the faith does matter. She is putting the mass before the faith. It’s only the faith that matters. People need to realize this is why we are in the horrible times that we are. The faith was being corroded and undermined quite some time before V2. Remember it was the faith, dogmas that went before the mass did, VATICAN 2. Also I really like the audios and materials, book about refuting the heresy of baptism of blood and baptism of desire. This is a stupid and ridiculous heresy that needs to be exposed and refuted. Great job brother peter dimond! I really don’t like when the other side calls us feeneyites. This is a mockery of the late great father leonard feeney, as if he invented this teaching, or this is his doctine. I hate all of this evil lying and dishonesty from these BOD/BOB heretics. keep up the great work! DEO GRATIAS

MARK V

Question

Subject: Question

Really interested in information I saw on the web. My question (and trust me, it is a sincere one.) how are we to know the truth? You provide many good arguments, but I have always been taught that the Magisterium and the Pope are infallible. If this is true, then how could I possibly oppose them. On the other hand, if they are indeed in error, how can I as a believing Catholic possibly know for sure?

DD…

MHFM: You can oppose them because you are not opposing popes but manifest heretics and antipopes. It is the very teaching of the past popes which requires you to believe that these men are not legitimate popes. You know for sure that this position is not in error because the authoritative teaching of the past popes cannot be wrong, nor can those who adhere to that teaching.

Received

Subject: Fatima DVD

Brothers,

Received the dvd's on Fatima Friday, I must say that this is one powerful dvd that must be obtained to help ourselves and others understand the extremly important message from our Blessed Mother.

I intend to send the extra copies out to family, and those who think they are traditional catholics, whether they are priest, bishops, or the lay people.

I would also like to say thank you brothers for standing firm in the One True Church and only true church .

"Most Sacred Heart of Jesus have Mercy on us"

"Immaculate Heart of Mary pray for us"

Tim

Exception

Dear Brother Michael,

I have been going through your website and in most cases I agree with you. I do however take exception to the tone of a lot of the letters you send in response to questions. I am a Catholic, before Vatican II I was just a Catholic, nothing special, not any different from many others. With Vatican II I was displaced, someone stole my Church from me. For 30 years I have been looking for a real Priest, as I believed them to be. I had many issues with many of the things I saw in the New Order, and I couldn't force myself to go to the New Mass with any regularity, however, I had kids, so it was my duty, so I tried. There are many of us out here. Many of us who have no home anymore. Many of us who are trying to make sense of what we find that differs from what we were taught.

The tone of your answers is very negative. It isn't enough for someone to know that things have changed and that the New Church isn't right, If they don't believe exactly what you believe, they are heretics. I was personally taught that there was valid baptism of blood and desire, and in extraordinary circumstances, they would suffice. This is important to me personally because I had a granddaughter who was born dead, and though I baptized her immediately, I relied on the acute desire of her mother and me to cover her, if her soul no longer resided in her body. I believe that that child is in heaven, based on what I was taught by the Nuns as a child. I believe that this position is more in keeping with the teachings of Christ, who was inclusive and loving in His ministry.

I believe that you do a very great service to Catholics like me with your website. It gives us hope that the Church we love is still there. I also believe that instead of listing heretics and explaining all their various heresies, it would be more Christlike to refer people to ANY validly ordained Priest for the sacraments. I don't think that there has ever been a time in the Church when all priests agreed on everything. I believe that getting the valid Mass and sacraments is more important than how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.

I believe that all of you theologians should get together and start with the basics. We, the faithful need the Mass and the Sacraments. That is more important than anything else. Disqualifying everybody who has been validly ordained because they have a relatively minor disagreement with you is counterproductive. It does not set a good example for those of us who are trying to be good Catholics. Jesus Christ was all about Love. He included everyone among the lovable. The Catholic Church, founded by Him ought to be about the same. Yes the rules are important, but not more important than the love. Jesus healed people on the Sabbath. When He did so, he was violating the law. I don't think that being more inclusive is a greater violation. There is time enough to discuss your differences with each other, after we, the faithful have the basics we need for salvation, Mass and the Sacraments.

Respectfully,

Mary CasalinoJellerson

MHFM: We’re glad you like the site, but you have some views that are not consistent with Catholic teaching. First, we denounce as heretical those who dissent from Catholic dogma, not people who might have a different opinion on a matter not taught by the Church. So your statement is inaccurate.

Second, receiving sacraments is NOT the most important thing. Your view is unfortunately heretical. If that were true, then the Eastern “Orthodox” are just fine because they have valid Masses. But that’s not the case. If one doesn’t have the faith, one can’t profit from the reception of the sacraments (Heb. 11:6). That’s why having the true Catholic faith, whole and undefiled, is the most important thing and the first requirement for salvation (Athanasian Creed).

Third, the Church has infallibly taught, in various ways, that no man is saved without water baptism. It is simply to contradict dogma to persist in the belief that there is salvation without water baptism, after having seen the various dogmatic arguments and angles to the issue. Additionally, almost everyone who believes in the false idea of “baptism of desire” believes that souls can be saved in any religion. Your position that an infant can be saved without water baptism directly contradicts numerous dogmatic statements and is heretical.

Fourth, soft words are not always appropriate when fighting evil or battling with heretics who attack the truth and lead souls to Hell. Your comments about tone are misplaced and result from your general liberal attitude toward issues of faith and the denial of the faith. You lack the foundational belief in the absolute necessity of Christ and His Church for salvation, and the attendant recognition that deviations from Christ and His truth are evil.

Condemned

Subject: Jewish man condemned to death is a “man of faith” according to Vatican

Dear Brothers Michael and Peter:

See related articles below.

“The Vatican had asked for Grossman's life to be spared in a letter written by Archbishop Fernando Filoni on behalf of Pope Benedict XVI. The letter said Grossman had "repented and is now a changed person, having become a man of faith."

http://www.gainesville.com/article/20100217/ARTICLES/2171010/1002

According to the vatican-two sect, you can be a Jew and a murderer scheduled for execution by the State and at the same time be a "man of faith".

He [Archbishop Fernando Filoni] asked for “whatever steps may be possible to save the life of Mr. Grossman.”

http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/General+News/48573/Pope+Calls+For+Mercy+For+Martin+Grossman+As+Execution+Nears.html

The vatican-two sect ignores pro-abortion politicians, but when a Jew is scheduled to be executed for murder in Florida, it rallies support to save his life.

-John Mains

MHFM: Very interesting… thanks for the e-mail. Based on what Benedict XVI has said and done, we are of the opinion that he’s Jewish just like Paul VI was and John Paul II probably was. Of course, that’s not necessary to prove he’s not the pope.

Don Bosco

I have been reading about don bosco and some of his dreams allude to the great apostasy of our time. He tells of God visiting Rome 4 times, the third time God removes the protector and the protections of the Church, allowing the smoke of satan to enter the Church. I believe the fourth time will be the destruction of Rome in one day!!! Don Bosco intimates that this happened because of the hatred for the Pope and the Church which was very prevalent at his time. He also brought to light the apparition of Our Lady of La Salette. Very interesting!

Thanks

Dear MHFM,

Thank you so very much for sending us the Fatima DVDs. We watched it very intently.

In the Litany to Our Lady one of the invocations is “The Ark of the Covenant, pray for us”. I never really understood that, but now your DVD explained it without any doubt. It is obvious that generations before us, before N.O., who were stanch Catholics, honored her so much so, that it got written in the Litany (permanently!). I very much like the chronological approach, from the Old to the New Testament. Having all the facts presented into a logical way and flowing one from the other, gives a strong sense that no Catholic can live only within their own times, during their own lives; but we must look beyond the contemporary times.

I really appreciate having the Church explain to me how it really is without sugarcoating.

Thank you,

Renata

Irish

People are ready to explode here over the Irish V2 "bishops" as they met with the antipope and to no surprise Benedict XVI did nothing about the "bishops" who covered up all the pedophile "priests". Abuse victims asked Benedict XVI to remove these "Bishops" and he doesn't even remove one. I honestly cannot understand why people complain about all these terrible "bishops" but never complain about benedict XVI as he is the one who encourages these horrible "bishops" by not condemning them.

God Bless

Sean

Worst

Dear Brothers,

Thank you for the video on how John Paul II the Apostate Antipope promoted Judaism. Of all the outrageous things he did, that's got to be one of the worst… for John Paul II to promote Judaism is totally satanic. John Paul II probably has the worst place in hell, apart from Judas.

God Bless,

Chris White

John Paul II - sample

MHFM: This is a small sample section from our new DVD, The Third Secret of Fatima, the Impostor Sr. Lucia, and the End of the World. The actual DVD is of higher quality than this sample video.

Finished

I just completed watching the Fatima movie. Brilliant and marvelous... Overflowing with wonderful information. Irrefutable. Thank you for solving the timeframe of poor Sr. Lucy's death and possible murder, which would therefore have been a martyrdom, hidden to us... From start to finish, a brilliant historical review of the 20th century's central tragedy: the infiltration of the Vatican and the installation of the direct descendants of Caiaphas as the head priests in the Vatican.

God bless you in your continued work,

Deidre

Smoking

… about the smoking debate: I can't understand why people want to smoke AT ALL---it's a FILTHY habit! Not to mention that it has been exposed, that in more recent years, the tobacco-growers INTENTIONALLY GROW THEIR CIGARETTE TOBACCO IN VERY HIGHLY CARCINOGENIC SUBSTANCES WHICH ALMOST INEVITABLY WILL CAUSE CANCER! I had a double-heartbreak recently, (about one year ago) since a friend of mine (unfortunately no longer a friend, and maybe no longer living) --- she was a HEAVY SMOKER. We parted ways primarily over the materials I gave her from your monastery, MHFM. She had advanced 4th stage breast cancer that had spread EVERYWHERE in her body, when I gave her your info. I think, she did not want to hear the truth.

It saddens me to see people smoking, DEFILING THE TEMPLE, what is supposed to be the temple of the Holy Ghost here on earth, the human body. Somehow, I think these souls just can not wait to get to hell where it is smoke-filled from the never-ending fires there, so they just can not wait to "light up": how disgusting! I think the best way to get rid of these addictions is by prayer, possibly it requires a signal grace to be set free? Depending on the severity of the addiction...but I believe God will give this grace, through Mary, for those who are truly sincere.

I totally agree with what you said that if one "puts the Kingdom first", then "all else" (food, shelter, clothing, the basic things we actually NEED in order to accomplish our work for God and family) will also be provided---by our Heavenly Father! It has always been so for us, praise and thank God!

Working

Subject: Catholics working in Islamic countries

Dear Brothers Michael and Peter,

For more than 4 decades, hundreds of thousands Filipinos left their families and work in Islamic countries like Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Dubai to name a few. I would like to know do these people sin mortally in doing so? Do parents send a wrong signal to their children in abandoning their faith simply to earn a better life compared back home?

The arab countires allow Christian to practice their religion except in Saudi Arabia. A Filipino OCW would in fact sign, as part of his employment contract a Declaration agreeing never to practice Christian religion of any kind, not to bring any Christian materials be it a prayer book, Bible or image/picture of any Christian religion representations. Should a Christian caught violating this, he woud be jailed and eventually deported. With this scenario in mind, Catholics are thus suppressed in their faith and yet many went to Saudi while some had spent almost their old age there eventually abandoning the practice of their Catholic religion. Nonetheless, Saudi Arabia does not impose their religion to Christians but Christians are not allowed to express their faith in anyway.

Please shed some lights on the spiritual plight of thousands of filipino souls trapped in the heretic lands just to put food on the table. Please help...

In Jesus and Mary,
Joey, Philippines

MHFM: No, a Catholic should not move to an Islamic country just for an employment opportunity. God will assist those who are truly of good will and desire to support their families. He promises that:

Matthew 6:31-33- “Be not solicitous therefore, saying, What shall we eat: or what shall we drink, or wherewith shall we be clothed? For after all these things do the heathens seek. For your Father knoweth that you have need of all these things. Seek ye therefore first the kingdom of God, and his justice, and all these things shall be added unto you…”

Putting oneself into a country of infidels where the practice of the faith will be much more difficult is definitely a bad decision; and to sign an agreement that one will not practice the faith is a mortal sin.

Comment

Hail Mary brothers

I would just like to share my opinion on the subject of smoking.

I do not believe that smoking once in a while constitutes a sin, and the reason for that is that the cigarrete (or cigar, pipe, etc) does not cause an alteration on the 'spirit' (counciousness), like marijuana, strong beverage, drunkness, and other heavy drugs.

Another point I have is because I once read a biography of St. Pius X, and in there said that he had the habit of smoking and sniffing 'rapé' (i don´t know if it´s spelled correctly) and he quit them mainly because they were habits somehow inconvenient for his position and they could also left dirt in the clothing.

Neverthless, about 'addiction' I know many people who quit smoking without any problem, and other people who can´t quit beverage, and gambling. Addiction in my humble and fallible opinion is a matter in a person´s mind (soul actually) and is not a 'rehab program' or a 'anti tabacco gum' that will make someone addicted to any kind of thing to leave that, since what the person wants is sensible feeling of pleasant satisfaction.

That aside would like to greet you for the recent debate which was very enlightening and uncovers the false doctrine that is shared by all newchurch goers.

Thanks, Marco

MHFM: Thanks for the interest. Very few people smoke in extremely small amounts and infrequently. Our comments concerned those who do it regularly.

Why don’t

Subject: why don’t people see it

Greetings in Jesus Christ:

You have done great job to show people that Vatican II invaded. Look at all of them, the head of Vatican II wears the symbol of the Jews, what else do people need to convince them? We have been robbed. The true church had been pushed to be the outsiders and they took everything that belonged to Christ and his Church. Everything for 2000 years of hard work to build his church was gone.

… the materials you provide should educate them and wake them up quickly, but if they still don't see it, then I don't know what else to say.

Thank you for being such a great faithful disciples of Jesus Christ in this very difficult time…. As I always pray for the true church to be recognized and united, so that, we can work together for the glory of His Kingdom. Very scared, not many people whom are left at all.

Glory to God,

Kim-Lan Vu

Update Vid.

MHFM: For those who are interested, this is a follow-up to something we’ve discussed recently.

Question

Subject: Question regarding No Salvation Outside the Catholic Church

Good evening Brothers Dimond,

In regards to No Salvation Outside the Catholic Church, could you please comment on the sovereignty of God? I've heard it argued that, yes it's true that God instituted the Church and the Sacraments for our salvation, but He is not bound by them. He can do whatever He wants and can save whoever He wants. To state otherwise denies His sovereignty and limits God to our feeble and very limited human understanding. Your thoughts?

Thank you,

Marie

MHFM: We have commented on questions like this before. The answer is that it’s “impossible for God to lie” (Hebrews 6:18). Therefore, it’s incompatible with His very nature, His justice and His truth to save people in a way which contradicts what He has revealed. He has revealed that He only saves people inside the Church and by receiving baptism. If people were saved in a different way, He never would have revealed what He did. Therefore, it contradicts His very justice, His truth and Sacred Scripture to assert or believe that God will contradict His own revelation and save people outside the Church. This also ties into the fact that Jesus is the “faithful and true witness” (Apoc. 3:14); in other words, He does what He said He will do.

Third Secret Sample Video

MHFM: This is a small sample section from our new DVD, The Third Secret of Fatima, the Impostor Sr. Lucia, and the End of the World. The actual DVD is of higher quality than this sample video.

Lost

Dear, Bros. Dimond, I am at a lost of how to reply to a grown son who says he is refusing organized religion and is going to a synagogue just to learn Hebrew, so that he can read the old testament himself. He says he doesn't believe that God meant to put all the rules on man that religion does. I told him in the New testament are rules that man are to abide by and that he is breaking most of them by his life style. He brought up all the killing that took place (not sure if he meant inquisition) and doesn't believe God would have wanted that. He wants to read the dead sea scrolls and reads the Key's of Enoch. He believes we have been lied to thru out the ages. I told him that even protestant preacher's have to read the early Father's and saint's writings handed down in theology studies, and they still reject the Catholic Faith. He rejects the Catholic Faith . I guess I get too emotional when talking to my son's about the Catholic Faith and don't debate them very well. I will none the less pray for their conversion always. I have tried to get him read your web site and books, or saint books. Anything I could refer him to would be appreciated.

Sincerely, D.A

MHFM: With people like that, the only thing you can do is recommend humility and try to get them to pray the Rosary. People need to realize that many people (and that’s an understatement) are so of bad will that nothing will convince them. That’s because their hearts are not interested in truth and their intellects are too proud. If he won’t pray the Rosary, you should avoid him and remove his unbelieving influence from your life.

Wondering

Subject: what u r saying on video and website

Hello, I'm wondering if this is a legitimate email address, and if there is someone here that I can converse with about the things on your website and videos. Please if there is someone there that would like to converse, write back to me… My name is Kristina and your site blows my mind. Thanks

MHFM: Yes, we are really here. We’re glad that you are looking at the information, and we hope that you continue to do so.

Great Apostasy

MHFM,

First of all, AMAZING WORK ON THE FATIMA DVD! I have to be honest, I was really scared when I saw it, even though I had read mostly all of your books, this was the first time I’ve ever felt so frightened and disgusted about the GREAT APOSTASY, especially when seeing those worst heresies from those ANTICRISTS. The blindness of the Novus Ordites is AMAZING!! I actually felt sick to my stomach watching it…

Sincerely,

Bernardo

Relate

Not to sound like a broken record, but I certainly can relate to Mike Glennon’s feelings of astonishment and disbelief about his informal debate with the Brother from the Saint Benedict Center. I have not experienced the weak on substantive argument (none) but strong on sheer obstinate defiance retorts in my own encounters with anyone who postures as “traditional”, but I have had the same sort of experience many times with “learned” Novus Ordites (priests, nuns, lawyers). It truly does leave one dumbfounded. It is surreal. I also know what he means when he says it “strengthened” his faith. This is because when one encounters such a totally contrary attitude, devoid of any argument (in his case simply “I won’t”), especially in someone who has devoted a great deal of his life to studying such issues and pretends to believe; then I think the only logical conclusion one can draw in explanation is that the denials are supernaturally inspired. It seems these people have to be possessed. Natural reason can only lead to one place, and yet these people go to another...

Bill Mulligan

Billboards

Subject: Regarding removal of “Hell is real” billboards

Those KY billboards sound fantastic, it would be a shame to take them down: and yet EVERY imaginable kind of filthiness and moral degeneration is widely accepted and heavily promoted throughout most every billboard/advertising---it just shows how some powerful/noisy people love evil and they hate the good God…

Appalled

Hello Brother,

I have to say that I am appalled by the the article written about Pope John Paul I by one of your members. How self-righteous, judgmental, unloving, uncompassionate is your view of this beloved Pope. For me, he exemplies Jesus as he was when he lived earth. Jesus, live in humility and love for all (including sinners, which we all are) and all the marginalized members of society. You sound like the Pharisees whom Jesus abhorred because of their attachment to the laws but completely devoid of human love, understanding and compassion.

John Paul I and Pope John XXIII were the most Christ-like popes in modern history. Just like Jesus, they were ready to break some traditions that don't make sense. Just like Jesus, they were full of human love and compassion for all - without discrimination as evident in the styles of the Pharisees and Christians like them in the modern times.

Yes, the Church's obsession with sexual sins makes it oblivious to greaters sins against justice and compassion. Look at so many Christians who don't care about the suffering and the poor in the world. Yes, they may obey some Church laws, but their hearts are hardened to needs of the poor, the outcasts. Brotherhood and love should be what Christianity should be all about.

I'm just on my lunch break and no time to edit my message (should there be errors, please forgive). There is blessing in kindness in thoughts and in heart, Brother. And I believe that there are kind and good people and saintly people even if they're not Catholics. In the same way that there are cruel and sinful Catholics in this world. Be open minded, Brother. Think more like Christ just John Paul I and John XXIII were. Don't be so hung up on things that are un-Christ like.

Thanks and God bless,

MHFM: Obviously God’s truth, Catholic dogma and heresy mean nothing to you. A false view of brotherhood, charity and open-mindedness is one of Satan’s most effective ways of spreading apostasy, getting sin accepted, and leading people like you to Hell. Your comments not only make your apostasy clear, but they also show that you accept sexual sins that are condemned in the Bible and by Catholic teaching. Your words also reveal that you deny the dogma that the Catholic faith is necessary for salvation. And yet you have the audacity to present yourself as one who understands and/or cares about popes and what makes a good pope. The pride is astounding.

http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/heresy_of_antipopes_john_paul_ii_and_benedict_xvi.php

Comment

Brothers,

I found myself in a captivated awe while watching this dvd. It is a masterpiece, a true work undoubtedly guided by our Lord! I would like to take a minute to detail why I feel this way.... your dvd, for which I'm certain required much valiant effort, has made it so that even the laziest of man can now have NO excuse. NO way to propose "The great sign in heaven: A woman clothed with the sun" is a myth, a figment of the imagination, an apocalyptic "best selling thriller". This dvd brings to reality, not only Our Lady of Fatima's message and authenticity into every television screen in the world but an insight of the corruption that took place within the walls of the Church during the false Vatican II Council. To see these men as they really were, as they really looked, as they really presented themselves in the flesh, profoundly highlights the truth of their existence and the wicked agenda they intend to carry out. A powerful presentation does not satisfy the exaltation this dvd deserves. As Christ appropriately admonished the Apostle (doubting) St. Thomas - (John 20:29)...":blessed are they that have not seen, and have believed" after the Apostle expressed he would not believe unless he put his fingers in Christ's side, He still allowed for this Saint the opportunity to see Him in the Flesh and acquire Sainthood. I personally believe with this dvd, in a very similar fashion, Christ is allowing us doubters (naysayers) to see His Church and simultaneously see, "in the flesh" anti-christ.

Peter Inglima
Brooklyn, NY

Vid. discussion

MHFM: For those it might interest, this is a brief video discussion. It should be the last we say on this topic. The recent article, which is discussed in the video, is here: article.

Sad

Dear Brothers,

I LOVE your new DVD on Fatima, etc as I have told you before. I have watched it several times, and when I don't watch it, I listen to it while I work around the house. There is so much to absorb! However, I am very discouraged because I cannot find anyone who likes it. First of all, I gave out 2 of them, and since then these 2 people have not responded, one of them is an 'EWTN groupie'-everything on EWTN is wonderful! Although she professes to be 'traditional'. The other one I think has blocked me from his email list, as other emails I have sent to him have all bounced. These people just do not understand, and they are so mesmerized by the Vatican II church, they think they are in Utopia!

K R

MHFM: It’s making an impact with a lot of people, but you will of course run into many people of bad will who won’t be convinced by anything. We also really wonder if they spent the time to look at the entire thing. With some of them, they won’t even watch it. But the fact that you ran into two people, who are not only mesmerized by their Vatican II apostasy but have deliberately close their hearts to the truth, is not at all surprising.

John Paul II

Hi,

I just read… that John Paul 2 was born on May 18th 1920- THE DATE OF A TOTAL ECLIPSE If this is true then I believe it is a sign that not only has the true church been in eclipse since the Vatican 2 council but that JP2 would be a major player in the eclipse of the true Catholic Church which Our Lady of La Salette predicted.

Our Lady of La Salette, Sept. 19, 1846: “Rome will lose the Faith and become the seat of the Anti-Christ… the Church will be in eclipse.”

MHFM: Yes, we made this point over ten years ago in our magazines. John Paul II definitely represented the eclipse of the Church, which remained visible but only in a remnant; and this remnant was blocked out of sight for most by the Counter Church.

Benedict XVI, secret Illuminati?- sample

MHFM: This is a small sample section from our new DVD, The Third Secret of Fatima, the Impostor Sr. Lucia, and the End of the World. The actual DVD is of higher quality than this sample video.

SBC

Hello Brothers;

I had written you an email regarding my recent debate with the Superior of Saint Benedict Center in Still River Ma. It would be fruitful to speak with you sometime, but I see how large your ministry is and do understand how each hour of the day must be prioritized and flies away so quickly. I just wish to at least warn others of how unbelievably heretical this entire situation is. A lot of people in my area do not have anywhere to go and so go to this Still River Saint Benedict Center. The Center itself is very nice externally, and they have a very old priest saying the true Mass. I'd said a couple of words to the Superior briefly after Mass one Sunday questioning how one could hold the Salvation Dogma in truth while being in communion with the Local completely apostate "bishop". Trent even came up and I was told that the anathemas were removed because a new pope can remove anathemas. I protested but we only had a couple of minutes to talk. I pursued the man in Christian Charity and finally got an audience.

During our debate he rejected Apostolatus Officio as an admitted error of Paul IV. He rejected the Lateran Council outright saying we do not need to "go back to the Lateran Council". He rejected that Trent is still totally binding. He also made the unbelievable statement "I believe as Saint Catherine of Sienna - I don't care If the pope was the devil incarnate I would follow him into hell" !!!

The externals are seductive with people like this. Everything seems so good. Yet people are being led directly to these wicked antipopes. I even said "You have a school here - you say you are teaching the faith, and in so many ways you are, but then you refuse to teach that a heretic is a heretic, and further, you explicitly teach that these heretics are NOT heretics. The little ones will be seduced." "No, No" was the only answer. I also made the explicit point that the Lateran Council defined the ancient faith maxim "If anyone according to the holy Fathers, harmoniously with us and likewise with the Faith, does not with mind and lips reject and anathematize all the most abominable heretics together with their impious writings even to one least portion that man is condemned" ! He said "I won't do it!" I said "then you will be condemned no question!" he reiterated "I won't do it" I reiterated "then you do not care that you will be condemned to hell ?" He angrily demanded: "I wont' do it !"

This is the man who, when I talk with anyone up there, they say "go see Brother Thomas about these things". He is their guide. The conversation was really so unbelievable that it has taken me almost a week now to really believe that it happened. It shook me - not my faith of course, my faith is simply strengthened by it thanks to the Lord, but it was really just an amazing thing to me. I thought that I would surely hear a lot of the false arguments, but that in the end I could at least reduce it to the Salvation Dogma and its rejection by the VII apostates, and there could be no resistance from the descendent of Father Feeney. But this was rejected with a nebulous position about never judging. Further - I could not even get him to agree that going into these pagan temples and worshipping the devil is wickedness. He just would not speak that it is so! There are some young sisters in the community up there - with good hearts and naive. These do not have all of the information I am sure. They will be corrupted definitely by this false religion - even though the externals are correct. So will anyone who gets involved with this. This is a different community than the New Hampshire community. There is a third community as well, on the same property in Massachusetts, where I heard the sisters, in order to evangelize, go to the new mass on occasion, although they profess it is wrong. I am not certain if this last point is true. I have only heard it word of mouth and have not verified. But it seems consistent with what I am seeing and hearing. During my conversation with Brother Augustine, I heard him deny the faith entirely - this is something one would never ever expect if one did not pin him down. And the people that meet him would not believe it if I told them - that is certain. The basic consensus up there is "just save your own soul - go into your prayer closet - and wait it out - it will get better - Benedict XVI - or "somebody" will fix it!" You should know that not only the New Hampshire Saint Benedict Center is heretical, but also the Superior of the Still River Saint Benedict Center. I could let you know more details if you wish.

By the way thanks for the new Fatima video. My seven year old understands how clearly these men are heretical antipopes and verbally admits that a heretic is no catholic. It is really encouraging to hear the truth spoken by a seven year old girl amidst a crisis such as this, where grown men will oppose the Lord with such vigour - while abusing His Holy name to do so! You are a great blessing and are truly helping me to straighten out my children on a lot of points which they, being children, are confused about - having been raised thus far in the Vatican II false church. I candidly admit that I was wrong to not leave that apostacy sooner. Now you are assisting me to correct my children. What thanks can a man give to monks who are a great help to him in raising his family in the true faith! Your ministry is blessed.... Such an excellent ministry you have! Such virulent hatred of Brother Michael and Brother Peter by almost everyone I speak to! This is quite a different attitude than the world has for the antipopes - who are truly beloved to even the most violent enemies of Christ!

… thanks… in Christ,

- Mike Glennon

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. We understand the sentiments you have at seeing first-hand the total apostasy of individuals who claim (and externally appear) to care about the traditional Catholic faith. To remain in the positions that they’ve held for so long is simply a sign that they believe in nothing, and your conversation with them showed it clearly. The point about externals being deceiving is quite relevant, and it’s one we’ve focused on many times. It’s often only in conversations, debates and encounters that the dark reality underneath the pleasant externals is uncovered. Without faith it is impossible to please God (Heb. 11:6), no matter how nice the habits, the Latin, the buildings or the vestments. And they clearly don’t have it, but they are sadly apostates. We do marvel at how those who have dedicated at least a lot of time to what they consider to be the Catholic faith can actually care so little and reject so clearly the teachings they claim to accept. What you experienced is the case not only with that particular group, but with the others like it. Many of their supporters will be quite surprised, to their dismay, after death when they find out how they were deceived to the path of Hell by not caring about the faith, and by caring primarily about “community,” “friends” and externals.

Many waters

Dear Brothers,

Thanks for the last video on the liar and heretic, William Albrecht. He's obviously obsessed with externals and as a result ends up looking foolish. How dare he put his lying words in St. Jerome's mouth by saying that he (Jerome) wrote that St. Ephrem's homily was a valid consecration, when he was just making a sweeping generalization about the good character of St. Ephrem. How dare he (Albrecht) say that St. Ephrem's homily was used as the consecration formula when it was not at all - conveniently omitting the fact that the homily is not even theologically correct ("But if any doubter eat of it, for him it will be only bread" - wrong)! How dare he say that the Council of Trent (Denz. 874) defines the consecration formula when it is actually proving that those who distort the words of consecration to mean that Jesus did not give us His Body and Blood, are satanical!! It is William Albrecht and his Vatican II posse that are satanical since they obstinately hold to the heretical view that the grace signified by the Eucharist is the union of "all" men with Christ. In fact, this quote (below) from the Council of Florence (I don't recall if this quote was used in the debate), absolutely and unequivocally destroys and obliterates William Albrecht's argument, that the word "all", used in the consecration of the wine, renders it valid - it does not, because "all" does not point to, or signify, the grace proper of the sacrament of the Eucharist: the union of the Catholic faithful with Christ. This quote is from a section in the Council of Florence which details the precise elements of both matter and form for every single sacrament! It is infallible and it explicitly defines the matter and form of the sacraments! I've quoted the entire passage because it connects the necessity of the sacrament to signify what it effects, to the actual matter and form of the sacrament. The key is to notice its constant emphasis on the mixing of the water with wine, which represents the union of the faithful with Christ, i.e. the grace proper to the Sacrament of the Holy Eucharist:

Council of Florence, SESSION 8, 22 November 1439, Bull of union with the Armenians - The third is the sacrament of the Eucharist. Its matter is wheat bread and wine from the vine, to which a very little water is added before the consecration. Water is added thus because it is believed, in accordance with the testimony of holy fathers and doctors of the church manifested long ago in disputation, that the Lord himself instituted this sacrament in wine mixed with water, and because it befits the representation of the Lord's passion. For the blessed pope Alexander, fifth after blessed Peter, says: "In the oblations of the sacraments which are offered to the Lord within the solemnities of masses, only bread and wine mixed with water are to be offered in sacrifice. There should not be offered in the chalice of the Lord either wine only or water only but both mixed together, because both blood and water are said to have flowed from Christ's side”; also because it is fitting to signify the effect of this sacrament, WHICH IS THE UNION OF THE CHRISTIAN PEOPLE WITH CHRIST. FOR, WATER SIGNIFIES THE PEOPLE ACCORDING TO THOSE WORDS OF THE APOCALYPSE: MANY WATERS, MANY PEOPLES. And Pope Julius, second after blessed Silvester, said: The chalice of the Lord, by a precept of the canons, should be offered mixed of wine and water, because we see that the people is understood in the water and the blood of Christ is manifested in the wine; hence when wine and water are mingled in the chalice, the people are made one with Christ and the mass of the faithful are linked and joined together with him in whom they believe. Since, therefore, both the holy Roman church taught by the most blessed apostles Peter and Paul and the other churches of Latins and Greeks, in which the lights of all sanctity and doctrine have shone brightly, have behaved in this way from the very beginning of the growing church and still do so, it seems very unfitting that any other region should differ from this universal and reasonable observance. We decree, therefore, that the Armenians should conform themselves with the whole Christian world and that their priests shall mix a little water with the wine in the oblation of the chalice, as has been said. The form of this sacrament are the words of the Saviour with which he effected this sacrament. A priest speaking in the person of Christ effects this sacrament. For, in virtue of those words, the substance of bread is changed into the body of Christ and the substance of wine into his blood. In such wise, however, that the whole Christ is contained both under the form of bread and under the form of wine, under any part of the consecrated host as well as after division of the consecrated wine, there is the whole Christ. THE EFFECT OF THIS SACRAMENT, WHICH IS PRODUCED IN THE SOUL OF ONE WHO RECEIVES IT WORTHILY, IS THE UNION OF HIM OR HER WITH CHRIST. Since by grace a person is incorporated in Christ and is united with his members, the consequence is that grace is increased by this sacrament in those who receive it worthily, and that every effect that material food and drink produce for corporal life -- sustaining, increasing, repairing and delighting -- this sacrament works for spiritual life. For in it, as Pope Urban said, we recall the gracious memory of our Saviour, we are withdrawn from evil, we are strengthened in good and we receive an increase of virtues and graces. [all emphasis mine]

There are four key points which prove William Albrecht's arguments totally ridiculous:

1. The water and wine mixed represents the union of the faithful with Christ.

2. The waters represent many waters and many peoples, not all waters and all peoples - if all had ever been used by the Church, now would have been a good time to mention this fact, but the Council of Florence, not only doesn't mention it, it proves that the word MANY is used, by directly quoting from the Book of Apocalypse (see beow) from the Holy Scriptures - the Bible!

3. The Church has behaved this way from the very beginning. It is unanimous Catholic Church Tradition.

4. The effect of the sacrament, in one who receives it worthily, is the union of the faithful with Christ, as is signified by the mixing of the water with wine AND the use of the word MANY in the consecration.

....Council of Florence, SESSION 8, 22 November 1439, Bull of union with the Armenians - All these sacraments are made up of three elements: namely, things as the matter, words as the form, and the person of the minister who confers the sacrament with the intention of doing what the church does. If any of these is lacking, the sacrament is not effected.

So as to nail shut William Albrecht's vampires coffin, and to give him some rest from dancing to death to the devil's tune, here are the actual scriptures from the book of Apocalypse which the Council of Florence is referring to:

Apocalypse 17:1 - And there came one of the seven angels, who had the seven vials, and spoke with me, saying: Come, I will shew thee the condemnation of the great harlot, who sitteth upon many waters,

Apocalypse 17:15 - And he said to me: The waters which thou sawest, where the harlot sitteth, are peoples, and nations, and tongues.

It's interesting that the very verses which speak of "many waters, many peoples," is referring to the Whore of Babylon - the Vatican II sect, which has rendered the entire New Mass invalid by changing the words of consecration to "all" from "many" (among other things, such as leaving out "mysterium fidei" and having invalid "priests"). I don't think it's a coincidence. This is especially significant when one considers the fact that the words, "the condemnation of the great harlot", directly precede the phrase, "who sitteth upon many waters." In other words, the Vatican II sect is condemned by it's use of the word "all" in the New Mass!

God Bless,

Chris White

MHFM: Yes, the mixing of water with wine, and how the Church has declared that this signifies many (the union of the faithful with Christ) is another point to further refute the heretics. We quote that passage from Florence in this article: Is the Vatican II sect the Whore of Babylon prophesied in the Apocalypse?

It’s extremely interesting that the Apocalypse, in prophesying about the great harlot, also seems to make reference to this very mixing:

Apocalypse 18:6- "Render to her as she also hath rendered to you; and double unto her double according to her works: in the cup wherein she hath mingled, mingle ye double unto her."

With striking specificity, the Apocalypse is drawing our attention to the Mass and to the great harlot’s violations in this area.

Comment on Smoking

I think I can be of some help considering the recently posted question about smoking being or not sinful. The first tobacco ban in History that I know came from the Church. In 1575 Mexican ecclesiastical council ban that forbid the use of tobacco in any church in Mexico and Spanish colonies in the Caribbean. It should be noted, however, that it was an disciplinary measure, and in a local scale.

Later, Popes Urban VII (in 1590) and Urban VII (in 1624) both passed on decrees banning smoking. Urban VII considered it so grave that he threatened to excommunicate anyone who "took tobacco in the porchway of or inside a church, whether it be by chewing it, smoking it with a pipe or sniffing it in powdered form through the nose"

In 1650, a bull from Innocent X also reproved smoking.

So Benedict XIII came. And like some people like to say, he put the previous documents inside his pipe and smoked them. He reversed the bans in 1725. It should be noted that this Pope himself was indeed a smoker. There are anecdotes circulation that he used tobacco instead of incense, but that´s probably legend.

In 1863 Pope Bl. Pius IX built a cigar factory in Rome facing Mastai's Square…

But the question remains: Is smoking a sin? Science was only able to demonstrate the harmful effects of smoking a few years ago. So the smokers from eras previous to that could be defended as being erring in good faith, since they probably considered it a harmless action. Nevertheless, the substances contained are known to be very addictive. Rarely I have seem someone who smokes only now and then. It´s like trying to find someone who thinks that Baptism of Desire is only applicable to people who are waiting to be baptized. People either have an aversion to smoking, or they do it in large quantities. And the reason why is no mystery, since it´s know to be highly addictive…

MHFM: Yes, the addictive nature of smoking is another thing that favors the position that habitual and regular smoking is a sin. It seems that those who smoke habitually can’t live without it. They are tied down and it dominates them.

Smoking

Dear brothers,

This is probably a dumb question but its one that I would really appreciate answered. I've been smoking for awhile and when I started I didn't think anything of it but then I heard it was a sin. I was just wondering if you could clarify that issue for me. I feel like it is and it isn't. Mostly because I'm a big skeptic of all the so called cancer and heart disease research, I don't really believe all the statistics they put out there. God Bless and Thank You.

Aaron

MHFM: We don’t know if smoking in very small amounts once in a while is a sin. But we believe that smoking habitually or regularly is a sin, and it definitely cuts out graces from people’s lives. We don’t see how those who smoke habitually, for example throughout the day, would be any different from people who eat candy all day and thus try to constantly gratify themselves in that way. This is not even to get into the issue that we know it’s horrible for health and leads to death.

Sacraments

Subject: Sacraments

Dear Brothers,

Greetings!

Could you please help me in addressing a concern? A question was put to me recently from a relative who attends the F.S.S.P… This family member has just come back to the 'Church' and during our conversations about V-II and the F.S.S.P., most all of the usual questions arise about the Consecration and valid ordinations. However, the question that he asks regarding the Blessed Sacrament and confession, has left me without an answer.

For the sake of brevity, I will say that the question was one in which I found myself somewhat uncertain about. The question is, and I paraphrase;

"As regards the F.S.S.P., if the Blessed Sacrament is not to be considered as being consecrated and absolution cannot be granted in the confessional, due to the invalid ordination of our priest, then how come my 'old habits' have seemingly melted away overnight and the desires for such things no longer exist? This demonstrates to me that the Sacraments are indeed providing the graces necessary and, for me, prove that God has worked, and continues to work through them to change my life"!

He goes on to say that his love for the Mass is strengthening daily and Our Lord is now at the fore-front of his thoughts and actions. He is praying the Rosary everyday and said his family life has dramatically changed. He says that his pastor has evidently been a Society priest for over 20 years.

I am not sure how to answer this, exactly. I have given him your materials and have debated with him from this foundation. However, even though I do not agree with his conclusions, I do have to admit that there IS a very notable and genuine change within his life. How would one answer his question in light of the F.S.S.P.?

Sincerely,
Chris

MHFM: We would answer by pointing out a few things.

First, there are many examples of individuals who break from alcohol addiction or a carousing lifestyle or something else after going to a Protestant bible study or a Protestant church. The reason is that when God sees that they are putting out some effort to observe a basic Christian morality, He will give them some graces to bring about some changes in their lifestyle and in their habits. This is not uncommon at all. Likewise, the fact that a person is making the effort to confess his/her sins, even if that person is not being absolved validly, can obtain for him/her some graces to approach Catholic morality and break from some sins. That does not mean that the priest is valid or even Catholic, just like the change in the former alcoholic doesn’t show that the Protestant bible study is Christian or true. There are Christian elements in it, such as true Scriptures discussed, just as the FSSP has some Catholic elements to it.

Second, many people – and this is a very big problem – pat themselves on the back for breaking from basic mortal sins. They are (frankly) so naturally proud and liberal that when they do anything spiritual, even if it’s praying some or simply refraining from doing what they shouldn’t have been doing in the first place, they define everything in terms of it. They need to realize that they are not that special. People who begin to live the spiritual life should pray regularly and immediately break from mortal sins and mortally sinful habits. In fact, it’s the first degree of humility to stop doing such things out of a fear of God. Thus, it’s obviously inappropriate to define everything in terms of a change to the first degree of humility, as is the case with your relative.

St. Benedict (c. 520): “The first degree of humility, then, is that a man always have the fear of God before his eyes, shunning all forgetfulness and that he be ever mindful of all that God hath commanded, that he always considereth in his mind how those who despise God will burn in hell for their sins, and that life everlasting is prepared for those who fear God.”

Third, he claims that Jesus is now at the forefront of his life. If one asks him a few specific questions, one can demonstrate that his claim isn’t true. If he is truly devoted to Jesus, as he says, does he accept what Jesus’ dogma declares (quote Pope Eugene IV for him), that all who die as Jews, pagans, Muslims, etc. are not saved? He probably does not, and this will quickly show that he doesn’t even believe in Jesus. Additionally, he supports a group (the FSSP) which teaches that Jews are not rejected by God even though they reject Jesus. The FSSP teaches that Jews are not rejected by God precisely because they accept Vatican II which teaches it. So, by supporting the FSSP, he accepts Vatican II and rejects Jesus.

Received

Dear Brothers Peter and Michael,

I received the Fatima dvd (25 of them) hurried to the player and proceeded to watch the presentation 8 times. It is a very well done account. Thank you so very
much..

Most Sincerely,

Jennifer

Kasper

Subject: Concerning the recent “Cardinal” Kasper news item

First they invite Protestants to overlook the development of their phony Liturgy.

Then, they sign a joint declaration.

Next, they allow heretics to receive the Eucharist (well, it´s probably a fake).

Now, they want to create an all new Ecumenical Catechism.

That´s what someone gets from living with heretics. You offer them a finger, then a hand, and next thing you´ve noticed, they have already devoured your entire arm.

I´m actually hoping this will come to pass and Ratzinger promulgates this thing. It will make much easier for people inside the Novus Ordo structure and the False Traditionalists to see what a fraud this counter-church is.

Fatima DVD

Dear Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,

Having just received and viewed the 2hr 30min DVD on Fatima, I would have to consider this to be a synthesis of much of what the MHFM have been releasing over the past decade or so, which succinctly summarizes the crisis facing the Catholic Church of the last days, especially in the aftermath of the Vatican II. This presentation has the advantage over much that has gone before in that the novice may gain much from just this one sitting, for the narration, at the very beginning, logically explains to the viewer the role of Mary, the mother of Jesus, the Second Person of the Blessed Trinity, True God and true man, in this apocalyptic scenario to be played out in the Last Days… all in all, this is a blockbuster, well researched, which I feel will, along with the book " The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church", will convert many and prove a thorn in the side of the Vatican II sect, and hopefully induce a few " to come out of her"!

God Bless

David

Stumbled

Brother Michael, have stumbled upon your existence by way of utube; as I was researching many factors in connection with my existence, which I still don`t comprehend many occurrences. As for the first time reading through your website, many memories of past acquaintances which are also prevatican II Catholics as your self have tried many times to take me away from the present Vatican.

Am not writing this with the intent to argue or fight over who is right or wrong, yet I Am compelled in asking you some questions in order to come about some type of understanding. So if I may, here is a point within a question, which hopefully you may be able to explain. According to history before Vatican II, their have been many actions by man in the name of the Vatican, which were not Christ like. The way that I see it throughout time, the Church has been contaminated since the very beginning, and changes are constantly made in order to correct wrong doings.

As I type Am also listening to your interview (UFOs & Demonic Activity), and do like the way you speak. Except the part on Vatican II, because of the following: The Vatican has had individuals in the Church for many centuries prior to Vatican II, that have committed crimes of rape , murder, etc.. This is the part most important to me in asking you for an answer on this matter of being against the Vatican II, why don't you participate in the current Vatican in order to save it? thinking about the reformation of Luther and many others I would ask them the same. When people ask me why do I go to Church, when so many fonies are in there, and my answer is that I don't go for those that don't truly care. I do not judge them because I don't know what type of influences they find them selves in. ( Just started video #6, so you know that I Am listening to you as I type, and do like how you answer the questions to non Catholics). I must go now, will continue tomorrow.

Thank you

Miggel~+

MHFM: We are glad that you came across the material and are listening to it. It seems that you have an incorrect view of Catholic history, which is perpetuated by anti-Catholic sources. It’s also apparent that you have a too liberal and modernistic outlook on Catholic matters. We would point out that not every action by a church representative was an action by the Church itself, which should be obvious; but you might be criticizing things (such as the Inquisition) which were not even, in themselves, wrong. You can’t hope to begin to see the truth until you come to a basic belief in Christ, His necessity for salvation, and that there is no salvation outside of His one true Church. You don’t believe that yet, and perhaps not in papal infallibility. Adherence to Catholic dogmas, which is required by adherence to Christ, leads one inescapably to the conclusion that Vatican II was false. Please look at the material and pray the Rosary each day.

Denzinger/Our Lady

Subject: Denzinger/Our Lady

Dear MHFM,

Thank you for the great new DVD. I agree with you Bro. Michael...if this doesn't work to convince someone nothing will!

We also listened to the new debate. Excuse the phrase, but William is the best example of theological puke! Those debates are so fascinating to me because of how you can just shoot down his arguments one by one. It really demonstrates how great the Truth is, in which you clearly explain and apply accordingly, and how pathetic his arguments are. Well done Bro Peter.

I was able to borrow Denzinger recently and was wondering you had any particular guidelines for it. I think I may remember you mentioning some mistranslations and may be a letter or two that shouldn't be in there. I can't quite remember, but I was hoping you could help.

Also, I recently had a thought about theological weight. In your recent debate with William you had mentioned the theological weight given to St. Thomas's writing versus others. How do approved apparitions weigh in on the theological scale if you will? For example if Our Lady made a decree,"you must pray the rosary every day to get to heaven", does that hold the same weight as a dogma of the church? Would it become a dogma which we must all believe? Seemed like an interesting topic, and I was hoping you could shed some light on it. Thank you,

Robby

MHFM: Thanks for the comments. Regarding Denzinger, if people use it we think they need to realize that it’s a collection of documents. Some of them are infallible, some are not. It’s a collection of creeds, papal and conciliar statements. It has excerpts from regional councils. They are not necessarily infallible, although they can be. It also has letters from popes which are not necessarily infallible, and some in fact have errors. For instance, Honorius’s letter, which was condemned by the Church, is in Denzinger. That’s why having and being familiar with our books, which cover the critical dogmatic issues, is strongly recommended.

Approval for a church apparition simply means that it doesn’t contain anything contrary to faith or morals. One such as Fatima, however, which was confirmed by such clear, public and undeniable miracles and prophecies, should carry with it even more importance to any person with goodness and humility in his or her heart. When, in the context of such a message, Our Lady says you must pray the Rosary each day, it is not to be understood or believed as a divinely revealed truth like a dogma. It is, rather, an important and necessary recommendation for those people and in general, delivered at a certain point in time.

Established

Dear Brothers: According to the New Testament, St Paul established churches in Greece and Asia Minor which were the original Orthodox churches and St Peter established the Roman Catholic church in Rome. So how is the Orthodox church a false church? Also, it seems to me that the Orthodox church did not abandon its ancient traditions like the Roman church did after Vatican Council II.

Alon…

MHFM: St. Paul established churches for the one Church of Christ, the Catholic Church, which recognized the papal primacy, as our Debate on the Papacy: does the Bible teach the Office of the Pope shows. He didn’t establish “Orthodox” schismatic churches. The “Orthodox” arbitrarily declare any ancient Christian church to be one that adhered to their schismatic views; but that’s simply not true. St. Paul and the early Church recognized the Papal primacy, as our material shows. The “Orthodox” reject the biblical and ancient teaching on the office of St. Peter, the Papacy. See our Refuting Protestantism section.

Video

Greetings Brothers...

Just finished watching the Fatima DVD, what a fireball this thing is!!! I enjoyed on how it started out with the Old testament, moved through the New, and goes all the way to the end which were now living and Mary’s role with it all..I liked also the way it brought up things I didn’t know about such as certain dates & events that corresponded / overshadowed each other, such as Pope Pius XII (the one who consecrated Russia) becoming a bishop on May 13th, which was also the same date that Mary appeared at Fatima. Also the sea shells that Benedict XVI was pictured wearing at times in lieu of what the Illuminati chief Adam Weishaupt’s statement was about the plan to make Rome an 'empty shell' itself..--Lots of rich information about the underhandedness in Rome during the birth of Vatican II. Captivating info on the Vatican bank / John Paul I etc...for a moment there it was as if I were watching a Vatican thriller movie the way it kept me on the edge of my seat... I will pray that those I give it to will watch it without distraction. Anyone who honestly watches this will not be able to deny that we are truly in the last days and that the Catholic Church is the Devil & friends #1 enemy...Only question I have is, what kind of speech is Brother going to give when they hand him the microphone after he wins an Oscar for 'Best Picture'...

Steve-

MHFM: Thanks for the positive review. Yes, the point about the shell is very interesting. We think it’s more interesting when it’s seen in the context of the DVD with all the other information. For those who would find that particular point just too hard to believe, we would ask them to consider the following: Joseph Ratzinger (Benedict XVI) is an extremely learned man, as his books show. He is also a heretic and an apostate of historical proportions. He claims to be a Catholic pope while teaching that the Papacy doesn’t have to be believed. He claims to be the very leader of the true Church of Jesus Christ while teaching that Jesus doesn’t even have to be seen as the Messiah prophesied in the Old Testament. It is on record (i.e., an indisputable fact) that he lied about the Third Secret of Fatima. In the 1980s, he said clearly that it deals with the end times. He now says that it does not. He was also involved with the cover-up of the Message of Fatima. He has also worn a mitre with the Star of David, and he says that violence against Jews is an attempt to kill God Himself. He also originates from the same neck of the woods as the founder of the Illuminati, Adam Weishaupt (i.e., Germany). And he is covered with shells. Considering all of this, it should not be that hard to believe.

$Description: Description: C:\Users\mhfm\Desktop\Website Docs\E-discussions\Benedict_XVI_Pictures_Miscellany\star_of_david_mitre.jpg$ $Description: Description: C:\Users\mhfm\Desktop\Website Docs\E-discussions\Benedict_XVI_Pictures_Miscellany\flag_of_israel.png$

Check

Dear Brother Michael,

I check out your website at least 2-3 times a week and I am astonished at the wealth of information that you make available to the world and for that I truly am grateful to you… Keep up your life changing mission and please realize how much of an impact you are having on mankind. May God Bless you, always…

John Mills

Another Sample of new Fatima DVD

MHFM: This is a small sample section from our new DVD, The Third Secret of Fatima, the Impostor Sr. Lucia, and the End of the World. The actual DVD is of higher quality than this sample video.

Got it

Dear bros.,

Thanks to God and Our Lady I have finally got it into my thick skull the full truth about what has been happening to the Church. I obtained a copy of your Fatima DVD and it literally stabs straight into the heart of the devil and his illuminati plan to establish spiritual deception amongst the faithful and the world. Our Lady was right in saying the rosary will destroy heresy. It took my a while to actually come into the realisation that not only something was wrong with our local novus ordo "church", but it had to come from a higher authority. Ive been a novus ordo member my whole life. I started to come out of the darkness when i first found out about what trully went on on 9/11, and the erection of a new world order and how we have had history rewritten. I started questioning why the so called "churches" goal was only to talk of the cute and cuddly, while engaging in preaching the illuminaties solutions to the problems wich are presented. They didn't want to defend the truth or expose evil. Almost like George Orwells 1984, they engage in doublespeak by saying war is bad, but the prayers the "priests" offer in "mass" include "making sure our troops establish peace in a troubled world". Every time "mass" was over i grew increasingly mad about how brainwashed the novus ordo really is because they are preaching a lie that the troops are fighting for good. (through peace, destruction cometh). That was just part of it.

My local "priest" made an interesting statement and even quoted john xxiii saying that Our Father was indeed our mother as well! He even stated boldly that he would not deny a mormon "communion"! My quest to find the truth made me fall into the deception of bayside false apparitions and I actually started kneeling and reciveing desolate "communion" at the novus ordo because the demonic entity of bayside mixed truth with heresy. I have seen your material the past couple of years and would engage in double think for a while because i was always taught in the novus ordo that good willed people are saved even if they dont accept Jesus and while at the same time I would see benedict xvi praise a new world order with religious liberty. I recently decided that one side is false and if indeed we can be any religion we want according to vatican ii, why not be on the side who truelly understands the whole picture? I am now convinced that we are in an era of an empty chair and the abomination that maketh desolate and tramples the host under foot, who sitteth in the holy temple is now reigning in rome now. People who are novus ordo BETTER WAKE UP NOW FOR THE SAKE OF THEIR ETERNAL SOUL! I know hold to the traditional teachings of the Catholic Church. Thanks for the help Bros!...

Isaac

New Article

MHFM: This is a new article: William Albrecht, a proven liar and fraud - and some thoughts on the New Mass Debate [article]

This article is worth printing out and reading. It exposes the absolutely shocking and appalling dishonesty of our last debate opponent, and pins down his fabrication of a quote from St. Jerome and more. It also covers certain key points and quotes on the New Mass issue.

It will be found permanently in our file on the New Mass Debate, which is accessible under Traditional Catholic Audios. It will also be found in our sub-section dealing with various issues under Traditional Catholic Issues and Groups.

Condolences

Subject: Condolences

Dear Dimond Brothers,

In your opinion is it ok to give a condolence or sympathy card to a friend whose relative died outside the Church? In this case, it's my friend's father, who lived and died as an atheist. Of course I won't pray for him nor attend services.

Sylvestre

MHFM: No, that’s not something a Catholic should do.

On article, DVD

While proving William Albrecht is a liar and fraud, you nailed his character with the description "He was more concerned about keeping up a false appearance than he was about the fact that he had sinned mortally,...". This is not only true for William, though for all the Vatican II sect members. "What a web we weave, at first we deceive." You know they are liars by their very words and actions, though call them out as a liar, it's not as if Eve ate the apple and then ran to hide herself from shame. They (VII) don't care about their constant lying, it's sugar coated with Pride. They cling to their circle of sect friends and continue to put up a false front thinking they are so smart and are getting away with their lies. Pathetic spiritual trash!!

I really like that you switched to your new DVD envelope format. Much easier to carry more DVD's in your coat pockets and easier placement especially under a vehicle windshield wiper. Sharper images on the covers as well. The new Fatima DVD can be seen from quite a distance. What a site when VII sect members come out of their empty churches, feeling empty and see a life changing gift awaiting them, should they choose.

God is showing his way of shutting down the tyrants in D.C. with the snow storm.

God bless your work,
Tom Miles

New Mass Debate

Subject: New Mass Debate

Dear Brothers,

It is simply unbelievable that M. Albrecht cannot or doesn't want to accept the invalidity after all your strong reasoning. But of course, if he goes only to the invalid N.O.M, he will never receive the necessary divine graces to understand. Although I am personally absolutely convinced since a very long time, that the N.O.M is not valid, I would be very glad if you could answer to the following question:

- Why having added "QUOD PRO VOBIS TRADETUR" invalidates the NOM? (I know it does but I don't understand why) (in "HOC EST ENIM CORPUS MEUM QUOD PRO VOBIS TRADETUR ) If I don't mistaken, Luther and Cranmer started by adding this.

I would like to be able to respond to some people I sometimes meet who still believe that the NOM is valid.

I was very pleased to listen to your nearly 2h30 debate, but I thought it was a pity to use so much time in discussing "for ALL and for MANY" because among all the existing reasons (for invalidity) , this is in fact the easiest point (in my opinion) to prove the invalidity and moreover it can only be used as an argument in english, because some (few) Novus Ordo priests here in France (and other countries like Poland) don't say for "ALL" but they say for "MANY" for the latin "PRO MULTIS" , so it cannot always be used to demonstrate the invalidity.

I think it is important that simple laypeople like me can explain to others why the new mass is not valid.(but even some SSPX priests think in some cases they are valid)

C. Christiaanse (France)

MHFM: Just so our readers know, you are asking about the Novus Ordo addition to the form of the bread, “which will be given up for you.” We are not convinced that this is a strong or necessary argument against the validity of the New Mass. The change from “many” to “all” is the key one because it is absolute proof of the invalidity of the New Mass. Further, there are almost no “priests” who don’t use “all” in place of “many.”

Nevertheless, in the debate we also covered the removal of mysterium fidei. We believe this also invalidates the New Mass, and therefore demonstrates that the original Latin version is invalid. The reason is, as Pope Leo XIII explains, that the intention to do what the Church does is connected with using the form of the Church. Intention is corrupted if the form is deliberately changed or things which have a specific meaning in it are deliberately suppressed. To deliberately remove from a rite something which has a specific meaning in the rite, and to suppress the meaning or alter it by changes radically introduced, is to fail to intend to do what the Church does.

Mysterium fidei had a very definite meaning in the traditional form of consecration: it signified the Body and Blood of Christ under the appearances of bread and wine (Pope Innocent III). To remove that deliberately from the consecration, and then add it after the consecration, and thus give it a TOTALLY DIFFERENT signification (the Death, Resurrection and Second Coming of Christ) is to depart from the intention to do what the Church does (Leo XIII). So, the change to “all” should be focused on because it proves that 99% of the New Masses are without question invalid. The very few others which retain the equivalent of “many,” such as the original Latin version of the New Mass, are shown to be invalid (or have to be considered invalid) as a result of the removal of mysterium fidei. This deliberate removal manifests an intention contrary to that of the Church. That’s not even to get into the fact that almost all the “priests” are invalid because they weren’t ordained in the traditional rite.

What happened

What happen to your pope? still busy criticizing others huh? criticize the evangelicals or the Moslems or the Hindus. I noticed you've been criticizing the catholics year in year out? Are you sure you are barking at the right tree? What make you sure you won't end up in hell?

MHFM: We guess facts, dogmas, consistency and truth mean nothing to you. It’s truly a mystery of iniquity.

On New Video

Subject: New Video

Great work!...

Matthew

Kasper’s fruit

Subject: Kasper’s fruit

This links to an article on Kasper’s proposal to draft an ecumenical catechism, you know, in cooperation with the heretics.

http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/1000540.htm

He actually speaks of the exercise in the context of what he calls “harvesting the fruit” of 40 years of “dialogue”. Of course the notion is evil and his comments heretical, but even putting the Theological issues aside, how delusional are these people? Just what “fruit” of the last 40 years is he so proud of? Abortion on demand in virtually every nation once claimed by Christendom? Homosexual marriage while not yet everywhere a reality, is everywhere seriously discussed in “polite” company. Such talk would have gotten one arrested and committed to an asylum 40 years ago. Religious vocations (I mean the phony Vatican II ones) essentially none existent, “Mass” attendance nearly gone, rampant scandal throughout the clergy, and Kasper’s “separated brothers” seem to be competing with each other in terms of who can become the most heretical and most perverted. It is stunningly bad, yet this despicable creature can speak with a straight face about the “fruits of the dialogue”. Was this the goal? Of course it was. Who cannot see these men for what they are?

Bill Mulligan

Chicago Earthquake

Subject: Earthquake in Chicago

"Millions of people felt the temblor, with reports coming in to the USGS from Georgia, Tennessee, Kentucky, Ohio, Indiana, Michigan, Iowa and Wisconsin, as well as Illinois. Members of the public sent more than 10,000 reports of the earthquake to the USGS within the first few hours after it struck."

http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/02/10/illinois.earthquake/index.html?hpt=T2

By the way, this was a 4.3 4=3 =7, ....also this is the main fault for the Midwest of the United States. There have been 2 earthquakes on this fault, 8.0 and 8.1

Steve

Article

Subject: William A. Exposed William Albrecht, a proven liar and fraud - and some thoughts on the New Mass Debate

Great article exposing William Albrecht the monumental liar and fraud. It's clear how desperate the heretics are to discredit MHFM - they resort to the most blatant and horrendous tactics, such as lying. If the heretics, such as William Albrecht, actually loved God and the Truth, then they wouldn't commit so many sins. The "Apologetic-heretics" really need to apologize!!! If they actually wanted to save souls from hell, then their focus would be on the conversion of sinners, starting with their own conversion… there is no effect when the Novus Ordo "priests" say that Jesus' blood is effective for "all" men - No!!! Jesus' blood is sufficient for all men, but not effective for all men…

Chris White

MHFM: Thanks. We thought it was important to put into writing some of these thoughts and highlight some of the lies. We hope people will read the article, although we realize that many people unfortunately have a limited attention span. One interesting point concerning the so-called St. Ephrem consecration prayer – which, as the article shows, is not even a consecration prayer but just a homily in which St. Ephrem mentions Luke 22! – is this: St. Ephrem says: “But if any doubter eat of it, for him it will be only bread.” This is not theologically correct, and serves to further prove the point made in the debate and in the article.

Concerning Debate

Only now I was able to catch up with your recent debate. How Brother Peter Dimond was able to stand [Albrecht’s] arrogance for a total of 5 hours without breaks for throwing up every 5 minutes is a mystery that challenges reason itself.

I think you guys should stick with Vin Lewis. That is, if he´s willing. Of all the debaters from the Novus Ordo Camp, thus far he´s the only one I still hold in a certain level of respect, even though he lost big time. Nevertheless, he was (although far) the closest thing to a worthy opponent. Or should William be formally considered as Protestant (since we all saw that he is)? Well, that being the case, Mr. Moore is a better candidate. My 9 year old brother is also more of a challenge. Not to mention more reasonable and mature.

Your current opponent is totally immature (there are even some hints of insanity), dishonest to his rotten core, his statements are tiresome and always the same, and he does not even do his homework. When I first came across him, he was doing a series trying to refute some of your videos (without any success, I should add) and in the very first video, he did say that Sedevacantists only accept the Tridentine Mass rite. That´s not true at all. A valid ordained priest could perfectly use any of the old primitive rites that persisted inside the Latin Church other than the Roman Rite. And there are always the Eastern rites. Should you ever debate him again, please switch to no more than 2 opening statements, and them jump to questions to shake the debate. Otherwise it quickly grows tiresome.

The only reason why I´ve endured two and a half hours listening to this audio was out of respect for Brother Peter Dimond, because frankly, this can´t even be called a debate. His opponent didn´t have a prayer of a chance. He was helpless and hopeless from beginning to end. The end result is no surprise. To be honest, I did not like the debate. During the whole course I could not help but feeling sad for William. Seeing that the same false arguments, the same faulty premises that he holds, are the same ones I used to, not so long ago. I´m so glad and grateful that I was able to change and see the facts, in large part thanks to your webpage, audios and videos. I guess the only difference between he and me is that I wasn´t arrogant nor insincere in my heart. But I still feel sorry for the idiot.

Instead of licking his wounds and limping home after his first shameful performance, the big fool wasn´t satisfied, and issued another challenge for a debate, as if asking for an even bigger public humiliation. Oh my... Never in my life I´ve seen a man being verbally cremated. The first time, Peter was just a little angry and William was torn to pieces. But this second time, he was reduced to ashes.

And the saddest thing about it is that he does not even realize it. That´s what happens when a person has more ego than competence. Right now he´s bragging (as usual) that he won easily. Prior to his first debate, he accused the Monastery of cheating, because (according to him) they hand-picked the weakest opponents available. He now gave credence to this calumny, since HE ended up being finally picked up, cornered and beaten to a bloody pulp. Not that he did not deserved it, or even begged for it. Nicely done.

I think it´s proven that: The New Mass was indeed made to please Protestants. And in order to do that, they watered down the Catholic doctrine contained in the texts and actions. I mean, come on, even the Protestant advisors, when the Mass was promulgated, were happy and smiling, telling that the work started by Luther centuries before was finally completed. if they themselves were able to write some parts of the texts I do not know, nor do I care. After all, they still acted in a capacity of making complaints. By the way, from what I´ve

read, Bugnini´s team used them as test audience, until there was no displeasing flavor for them. The end result is a fabricated Liturgy that it´s so ambiguous that could (in theory, like the leader of Taize at the time remarked) be used both with Catholic and Protestant intention. What a tragic event.

… But who needs valid form and proper intention in the New Church, when anaphoras with no words of consecration are said to be valid, throwing out of the window everything the Church has ever taught about Sacramental Theology? When wrongly translated, the Novus Ordo Protestant Liturgy falsifies Our Lord Jesus Christ statement, and while it´s true that in SOME cases all and many can be used in Scripture, that does not happen in every stance.

William has severe emotional issues. Is he on crack or something? His petty declaration regarding his grammar error was the silliest, and served only to further expose his dishonesty. No contest. Brother Peter wins, as one would expect from a wild and hungry Lion locked in a cage with a rabbit. "No, it´s not proven to a bold faced LIAR!"

How true. These were words from Brother Peter´s first debate with Albrecht that I never forgot. And they ought to remain true, until William´s arrogance stop blinding his senses and he finally admits that he (is) lost.

MHFM: Thanks for the interest. We thought the debate was very valuable, and we liked it. Despite some of the lies he uttered which were addressed, refuted and exposed, and which will only persuade brain-dead, half-awake morons who couldn’t care less about consistent argumentation or the truth, many issues were covered. Furthermore, when these debates occur, the points are brought out in a unique way. Vin Lewis was easy to deal with in terms of the tenor of the conversation, but he obviously has nothing to offer in response. His apostasy is simply outrageous, and the debate showed that he (sadly) believes in nothing. We don’t see how he is more worthy than some of the others we’ve debated. That debate with him was very valuable as well. It doesn’t matter who you get. It’s going to be the same. That’s why almost no one will debate.

On Debate

A bit late getting to this but I wanted to comment on Lucifer's Mouthpiece, Aka "William Albrecht". As usual Brother Peter shows the true teaching of the Catholic Church and references this throughout the debate, Papal Bulls, Councils (Trent and Florence as well as others), true Popes, Magisterium, etc.

One of the most diabolical statements Albrecht makes is that "for all" and "for many" can be interchanged throughout scriptural passages, and that this was declared by the fathers of the church on many occasions. Starting at 3:23 of the second .MP3 he makes the following statement, "As many scholars have pointed out, all and many are interchangeable in scripture". Lucifer's Mouthpiece enjoys rendering his own private interpretation of scripture (Sola Scriptura) and DOES NOT consider Catholic teaching. Let's look at some uses of "for many" in the New Testament and see if they even make sense with the term, "for all". Below you will find a number of passages, simply replace the highlighted "for many" with "for all". It renders the meaning of EACH of these statements completely different from what was originally written. Completely different from Church teaching as well!

The thoroughness of Brother Peter is shown in EVERY debate and the true teaching of the Catholic church. I implore you in the future to exchange with someone who understands what they are debating. This individual need not be given the podium again!

Matt. 20: 16, 28- So the last shall be first, and the first last: for many be called, but few chosen.

Matt. 24:5 For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.

Matt. 26: 28- For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.

Mark 13: 6- For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.

Luke 21: 8- And he said, Take heed that ye be not deceived: for many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and the time draweth near: go ye not therefore after them.

Philip. 3:18- (For many walk, of whom I have told you often, and now tell you even weeping, that they are the enemies of the cross of Christ:

2 Jn. 1: 7- For many are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an b.

God Bless you for Your Works,

Bruce

Sample Section of New Fatima DVD

MHFM: This is a small sample section from our new DVD, The Third Secret of Fatima, the Impostor Sr. Lucia, and the End of the World. The actual DVD is of higher quality than this sample video.

On Debates

Debate with Vatican II apologist [47 min. audio – May 21, 2008]

[A guy who wrote in defending Vatican II, and called us “loons,” agreed to debate/discuss these issues on a recorded phone call. He turns out to be an apologist for the Archdiocese of Chicago (that’s what he claims). This audio is revealing. It covers Vatican II, salvation issues, dogma and more…]

THIS DEBATE IS THE SAME GUY YOU HAD A DEBATE WITH.... I FORGET WHICH ONE BUT THE GUY ASKS YOU ABOUT ACTS 10 CORNELIUS AND THE HOLY SPIRIT AND YOU
GIVE THE EXAMPLE OFF ELIZEBITH BEING FILLED WITH THE HOLY SPIRIT AS WELL.... AND THEN HE SAYS HE HAS TO GO, HE [STALLS] YOU TO LEAVE THE
CONVO. SAME GUY

HOW CAN YOU NOT NOTICE HIS VOICE UNLESS YOU SET IT UP... YES OR NO? YOU DESTORY ALL THESE DEBATES THESE GUYS DONT KNOW ANYTHING FIND PEOPLE THAT KNOW WHAT THERE ON ABOUT then it’s interesting. !!!!!

THANKS GUYS
CIAO CIAO

MHFM: The debate with the V-2 “apologist” from Chicago, which is found here: Telephone Conversations and Telephone Debates, is certainly not with the same person as the debate with Roger Owen on “baptism of desire,” which is found here: File of Recent Audio Debates on "Baptism of Desire” and Outside the Church There is No Salvation. The former is an enthusiastic modernist and full-fledged supporter of Vatican II. The latter is a supporter of a SSPX-type position. They are certainly not the same guy. The first guy called us up, and the second guy challenged us to a debate-discussion on the issue. There are very few people willing to debate because they are afraid to face the arguments and be exposed. Find us a prominent individual and we’ll set it up, but basically no one is willing. That’s why we would debate the delusional apostate William Albrecht on Vatican II again, but he has failed to produce the “quote” from St. Jerome (as expected). He had no responses or good arguments so he decided to fabricate some, when not engaging in personal attacks without substance. The quote from St. Jerome doesn’t exist and he fabricated it, and we will have an article about this. Our readers are also getting tired of us debating and refuting him.

Earthquakes

Brothers,

This site offers an animation of the earthquakes across the country and even the world. As you know, the vast majority of the quakes in the states are in California and Alaska. You'll even notice activity on the west side of TN on the New Madrid seismic zone, the most earthquake prone region east of the Rocky Mountains. I've heard it said that a destructive earthquake will occur at an area not thought very likely. Also, that Katrina was allowed by God due to our meddling elsewhere in the world and the U.S. would be divided, just as the U.S. divided Israel. I'm thinking the New Madrid Fault will split up the Mississippi River before or during the Yellowstone eruption. http://www.ktuu.com/Global/story.asp?S=11937688

Never grow tired in doing what is right in Christ's name,
Tom Miles

The Great City?

"the great city" of Revelation 11:8 is the place "where [the] Lord was crucified."

Our Lord was not crucified in Rome….

Ahrs…

MHFM: You are quite wrong. We have addressed this before, in our book and article on the Whore of Babylon. We realize that the apostates of the Vatican II sect are desperate to avoid the conclusion despite all of the evidence; but it is to no avail. We quote from our book and article on this point:

Some may ask: "If Rome is the 'great city,' why does Apocalypse 11:8 say that the great city is the place where Our Lord was crucified, which is Jerusalem?" The answer is that it doesn’t actually say that:

Apoc. 11:8 - “[the two witnesses] shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, even where their Lord was crucified.”

Notice that, contrary to what some have claimed, the Apocalypse doesn’t clearly state that the two witnesses (which some believe describe Peter and Paul) are killed in the city where Our Lord was crucified. Notice that the passage could very well mean that the great city is called Sodom and Egypt even where their Lord was crucified. In other words, the great city, Rome, is referred to as “Sodom” and “Egypt” as far away as Jerusalem (where their Lord was crucified) because of its immoralities! This makes sense when we consider that Rome was notorious for its corruption. Hence, this passage doesn’t clearly prove, as some have suggested, that Jerusalem must be the great city.

On the contrary, the evidence is overwhelming that “the great city” is Rome. As our video shows, Scripture, Pope Benedict XIV and even Antipope Benedict XVI all agree: Babylon refers to Rome, not Jerusalem. Many of the early Church fathers say the same. Writing from Rome, St. Peter specifically calls it “Babylon” (1 Peter 5:13). That’s in addition to all of the other points, dealt with in the video below, which lead one to the undeniable conclusion that the Whore of Babylon (clearly a false bride contrasted with the true bride, the Church) is the Vatican II sect.

Fatima DVD

Subject: Fatima DVD

Dear Brother Michael,

    I wish to express how much my wife and I enjoyed your new DVD! It is a tremendous work of charity! I have read the comments of others on the website and I can say that I echo their praises for the tireless work you have labored within to help save many souls! Thank you!

    It is sad...very sad, that in the times in which we live, wherein modern technology has proven quite capable and profitable for the acquiring and distributing of the teachings and dogmas of the Catholic Church, people who call themselves 'Catholic' still CHOOSE to remain blind and ignorant? In viewing the DVD, I wondered at how learned men such as John Paul and Benedict, to whom Providence has bestowed such magnificent and extraordinary graces; who have acquired admirable and rock solid understanding of Theology and Catholic dogma, history, teaching, etc., as handed down by the Church through the ages, still CHOOSE to cooperate with Satan to promote the very evil we find the world immersed into today? How evil is this?

    What is amazing to me is that these men have been given ALL the necessary graces to not only save their own souls, but to become the very Vicar of Christ (If they were true Popes) and be responsible for the salvation of countless souls for Christ! Yet, armed with such graces, mercies and knowledge, they have CHOSEN to bind their souls to hell for all eternity. What kind of evil is this ~ that a man would CHOOSE eternal damnation, even after KNOWING that he is fully armed with the TRUTH and the entire arsenal of Heaven so as to save not only his own soul, but countless millions of other souls...in spite of this, CHOOSES otherwise? Simply remarkable!

    In my estimation, any person who will, after viewing this DVD, write into MHFM and argue with the truths that are depicted, cooperates in the same evil. Those who do so are liars and have themselves CHOSEN to remain ignorant and blind. In the end, they will contend with the fury of Our Lady who, through this Ministry, has graciously given specific inspirations for these truths to be made available to all who sincerely wish to save their soul!

    What is to be said about these people who, once the truth is made known to them, and they understand it and can comprehended it, should thereafter consciously CHOOSE to turn away to embrace the Lie? How can one remotely defend this insanity and define this level of evil? Yet, this is exactly what these two Anti-popes have done, and the others who have followed obstinately after them. A thought occurs to me...in St. Matthews Gospel, Christ says, "For many are called but few are chosen". Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, says that, “Whoever wishes to be saved, needs above all to hold the Catholic faith; Pope Eugene IV says in essence, that those WISHING to save their souls, must CHOOSE to be chosen! That is exactly what John Paul and Benedict have done! They CHOSE...poorly!

C.

Conversion

Subject: Conversion thru Fatima DVD

Dear Brothers Michael and Peter,

Your new Fatima DVD must be doing great miracles to numerous souls. KEITH… must have been a notorious heretic as shown in his previous emails attacking the Dogmas of Infallibility and Indefectibility of the Church, however, I can safely say that though he had this demonic thinking all along with him, deep inside him he doubts his stand. Otherwise, he would not have wasted his time watching the Fatima DVD and reading the 600-pages books he recounted to us that brought his change of stand. It must have been the Blessed Mother in the works, a proof that as long as one is alive on earth, salvation is possible. We all know that the crown of eternal life is promised to those who follow the teachings of Christ but it [crown of eternal life] is given to those who persevere till the end. Lets' all pray for the conversion of heretics and continue to beg God for their conversion without of course risking our Faith by mingling with them ... this miracle of conversion is achieved thru the power of prayer, no wonder St. Teresa of Avila and the rest of contemplative saints saved thousands of souls and brought conversion to many without leaving the walls of their cloisters/monasteries. This hold true to both of you brothers, you dont have to travel far and wide, preaching and defending the Truth but with a life of prayer you attain holliness and intercede for others to get converted and to stand firm to the Faith and race to the end to received from God the promised crown of eternal life.

Your apostolate is amazing, in the age of apostasy ... to stand for the Truth against almost the whole world is a sign that you are entering the narrow road to salvation. I can't thank God enough for you ... you shaped my fortitude in embracing a life of prayer and a complete conformity to the Divine Will, thanks to your holy website.

In Jesus and Mary,
Joey, Philippines

EWTN

Dear Brothers,

I've just read your article on EWTN and the Charismatic Movement and it scared me half to death. Can you please give me more information on this subject and what to do if you've been involved, i.e., been prayed over/prayed for others? I've just left the charismatic movement after being involved for three months. I realized little by little that it was simply not the Holy Spirit. I started searching for information from traditional sources and found your article. Can you tell me what to do next because involvement did some damage. I never did (thank God!) get "baptized in the spirit" but they laid hands on me and prayed for this to happen more than once. I felt SOMETHING happen each time they prayed over me, too. It's left something behind, too, I can feel it. It's very hard to describe but I keep getting strange sensations. Please give me as much information as you can on what to do, I feel the devil has got his tentacles around me, or worse. I'm trying to find a traditional priest in my area, one who won't think I'm crazy.

Thank you so much for the work you are doing.

Best regards,

F…

EWTN and the Charismatic Movement [link to section]

Recording Bait & Switch

Subject: Recording Industry Bait & Switch

Dear Brothers,

I am forwarding this video, as additional proof of the evil nature of the Music Recording Industry! This video was sent to me by an old friend living in Mexico. It is from a rock concert, including many famous celebrities. It starts off as a Negro gospel and apparently innocent, but notice that Jesus is never mentioned! When the crowd is near ecstasy, the chorus switches from chanting Hallelujah, to chanting Hare Krishna, Hare Rama!

I am certain, most of the people attending the concert, had no idea, they were worshipping Satan! But Paul McCartney, Ringo Starr, Eric Clapton and the others involved sure did! They wrote it!! Upon finishing, the members of the band congratulate each other, laughing internally at the blindness of the audience!! The hidden demonic messages, disseminated by the recording industry is unimaginable! Please continue your good work!!!

Richard Cardet

Bordeaux, France

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. That sounds very interesting, and consistent with other things we’ve seen on that topic. If you have a Youtube link, we might link to it. Similar things are covered in the video we sell, Rock and Roll Sorcerers of the New Age Revolution.

Afterthoughts 2/2

Incredible Change

Well I have to admit, I was wrong all along! The info you have shown in your books I got and the new Fatima DVD, have convinced me that Vatican II and the current pope are heretics!

I can't kid myself anymore. The six hundred page book about Vatican II is the best I have read on that subject, (still reading it)...

My apologies and pray for me…

Thanks, Keith

MHFM: That’s quite a change, and we’re glad to hear about it. Just so our readers see how dramatic a change this is, this is the same person who wrote in a few months ago attacking us and the information. Those e-mails are below. After seeing the new Fatima DVD, our big book and some of the other material, he has changed his position. That’s great news. Those original e-mails can also be found in our Next Archive for the E-Exchanges (Winter 2010 Archive), but we have pasted them below. Also, for one in such a situation, following the steps in our steps to convert would be required. This would include making the profession of faith from the Council of Trent, becoming convinced on all issues (including the salvation dogma, no NFP, no support for heretical priests, etc.) and making a full and good confession. Again, this is tremendous news.

[A FEW MONTHS AGO]

I must reply to Bill Mulligan's goofy reply to my email to mhfm.

1. Those who perservere till the end will be saved. We all know that there is corruption in Rome. Vatican II is nothing new. There is a pope right now as we speak. He may be good or bad but is the pope and this one has done more for tradition and it's restoration than his predecessors. We'll wade through the muck until Rome comes back to it's senses or Christ returns. Either way there is no need for sedevacantism, (fools out there cursing Rome and trying to be the modern pharisees of the day).

2. The FSSP has served under the pope and Rome since it's foundation and spread the mass and the faith without becoming just another group of conspiracy theorists (gone mad) just to evade all attempts to remain catholic and with the church, like it's creator would want them too. Unless a man eat and drink of my body and blood, he have no life in him. Then all but the apostles left him. When things get a little crazy, are you sticking with Rome (Christ), or are you leaving and losing faith?

3. I don't condemn people to hell, nor does God. Only the corrupt of this world do this to themselves. Beware of the wolves who come to you dressed in sheeps clothing. The traditional zealots are the leaders in this sick category. If the pope isn't condemming some political leader or bishop to hell everyday then that must mean that he's a manifest heretic? You sedevacantists are not concerned with people and their salvation, you're only concerned with whom you can cast into hell and you're not satisfied with just a few, you want the whole world cast into the fiery oven, because you are sick! You goofballs would do good to read revelation and you will find out just how many are standing with the Lamb on the last judgement! Might be an eye-opener for you??

4. The SSPX has seen the good that has come out of The FSSP over the past 20 years and has decided that they have been out of the church long enough. Now, (because of the faithful's prayers), The SSPX is negotiating with The Holy Father as we speak. I know that this infuriates you sedevacantists because you want not "to serve in the chruch", "you want to be served" and thus is the reason why you'll always be lost and under the spell of the devil unless you come back home to the church, like The SSPX.

5. There is nothing valid in the practice of sedevacantism! Billy Graham is closer to consecrating a host than The Dimond Bros...

6. Repent of your nonsense!

Keith Downey

-----

I see you guys are still leading the blind on your website, to total desolation! You blasphemers of the pope and Rome will deserve the eternity in hell you are headed toward when you face the ultimate judge on judgement day very soon!

Repent of your evils while there is still time! Accept the truth and join the FSSP!

Keith Downey

The Future

Subject: The Future

Dear Rev. Brothers

I was interested to see the post by Artur concerning God's foreknowledge of all events and your reply. Please could you explain what exactly is meant by the word 'predestination'. Furthermore, for nearly 50 years I have been vexed as to how accurate fortune telling arts like palmistry and even card-reading can be . Although I have not been to these fortune tellers for over 30 years, a great misfortune that befell me decades ago was correctly foretold. How can these things be explained?.How can I rid myself of this accursed fear of such arts?

Thanks very much.

Francis

MHFM: The Devil doesn’t know the future. However, he does have a plan for people in mind. Therefore, if people reject God’s will and do the Devil’s, he can make the things happen in their lives which he wanted and planned to happen. In that way, an occult fortune teller might be able to accurately predict what will happen in the future. It’s because that person is following the Devil’s plan for his/her life. God also punishes those who involve themselves with the occult or put stock in such things. It’s a grave sin against faith. For that reason, He might allow people to fall into precisely what the Devil laid out for them years ago. This will increase a person’s unbelief. It will happen as a punishment for having trusted the occult arts in the first place.

You can rid yourself of such feelings of unbelief by praying the full Rosary each day, practicing true devotion to Mary, praying the Hail Mary as much as you can, and removing from your sight anything that smacks of the occult. By looking at or delving into such things, God pulls His grace and allows people to lose faith. The same is true with those who entertain the arguments of atheists, evolutionists, etc. Unless one is looking at them specifically for the purpose of exposing them, it’s a bad idea. It’s like listening to the Devil talk. Many lose or struggle with faith for this reason.

Debates

I would like to thank mhfm for opening my eyes to the heresy going on in the catholic church and showing me how to save my soul from eternal damnation. I have learned so much from your website and your debates have shown me how the heretics lie and try to get us to buy into their deceitful ramblings that they seem to think people like me aren't smart enough to discern their lies from. Thank you for exposing these demonic works to me. I pray to Jesus that they too will someday see their errors.

Adele Hunter

Extraordinary From

Subject: Extraordinary form

Good morning,

Why is it bishops will not allow more than one Extraordinary Form parish in a diocese? Or at least here in Colorado Springs. We have to drive miles, to Security, CO, to attend on the one parish present here.

Any why do U.S. bishops continue to allow liturgical abuses in the liturgy and sacred music? I refuse to walk into a Catholic Church anymore. It is just heartbreaking what has occurred since Vatican 2. Just heartbreaking.

Our diocese here is so offensive.

Thank you.

Sam Lopez
Colorado Springs

MHFM: It’s because it’s only a token offering to keep people in the Vatican II sect and to keep them from becoming independent traditional Catholics who realize that the dioceses are in the hands of a Counter Church. It’s not about spreading the Latin Mass. Most of the “priests” offering the Latin Mass in the dioceses are invalid anyway, for they were not ordained in the traditional rite of ordination. The “bishops” allow the abuses because they are apostates, not Catholic bishops. They are part of a counterfeit sect. Please continue to look at the information, and we urge you to get our new DVD on the Third Secret of Fatima.

New DVD

Subject: New DVD

Dear Brothers,

I just finished watching your new DVD, The Third Secret of Fatima, the Impostor Sr. Lucia, and the End of the World. It is truly brilliant. I've never seen such a beautiful and profound explanation of the facts surrounding the Great Apostasy. Like a single golden thread of grace you manage to trace the reasons for the Antichrist Apostasy, from the Ark of the Covenant to now. The Second Vatican Council was not a vague and waffling Council as many assume. It is actually a surgically precise abortion of the heart of the Catholic faith - a 180 degree revolution of the Cross of Christ - and a replacement with a cold, unfeeling, and mechanical heart of heretical iron that kills souls. That's the Vatican II sect. It's headed by gangsters dressed up as popes flying around the planet (like demons) shaking hands like homosexuals (masonic knuckle shake) and committing spiritual fornication… This is by far your most important DVD, a death-blow to the Vatican II sect and its snakes… May the Hearts of Jesus and Mary convert many thousands by this DVD.

God Bless,

Chris White

On “Faith-Healing” Article

Subject: On “Faith Healing”

Greetings Brothers!

I have a quick question. I'm just wondering what you make of these faith-healing articles? Is this something to show us how God doesn't help the wicked and heretical, or how our society is totally godless and unjust when punishing the faith-healing families with jail sentences?

Thank you and God Bless!

Daniel

MHFM: Thanks for the question. We posted it because we thought it was somewhat interesting, in addition to the two reasons you mentioned. Primarily, we posted it for the latter reason you mentioned. It shows how government and society are intruding into the personal lives of people, and how stern they are with those reject the mainstream for reasons of “faith” or conservative values.

“Primordial Soup” Rejected

Subject: ‘Primordial Soup’ rejected

Evolution hoax---textbook update

New lie to replace the old/outdated one

New Research Rejects 80-Year Theory of 'Primordial Soup' as the Origin of Life

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/02/100202101245.htm

ScienceDaily (Feb. 3, 2010) — For 80 years it has been accepted that early life began in a 'primordial soup' of organic molecules before evolving out of the oceans millions of years later. Today the 'soup' theory has been over turned in a pioneering paper in BioEssays which claims it was the Earth's chemical energy, from hydrothermal vents on the ocean floor, which kick-started early life.

“Textbooks have it that life arose from organic soup and that the first cells grew by fermenting these organics to generate energy in the form of ATP. We provide a new perspective on why that old and familiar view won't work at all…”

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. They just keep inserting new lies and switching out the old ones.

Run-through

Subject: Fatima

Dear MHFM,

Did my first run-through of the Fatima dvd. Mindboggling, to say the least. This is truly for the remnant few at heart. Most won't be able to comprehend the unquestionable truths provided from above. But, as it says in Holy Scripture-the truth shall set you free. With most of the world despising Jesus Christ, and His Holy Mother, without worship and devotion, and the saints crying out from the altars for justice, may those fervent few remaining, kneel and pray eternally at the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary for the light of salvation to appear in this wicked, evil world. Thank you MHFM.

Dea

Eclipse

Dear Brother(s) Dimond,

The Fatima dvd was very fascinating and flowed wonderfully… truly amazing. The fake Sister Lucia proof was more than persuasive. How will the V2 sect - and false traditionalists - be able to hide from all of this proof?

Although the eclipse lasted a really long time, would it be wrong for me to believe that the eclipse is over? I personally think the eclipse is over at this point. Your video, as well as your website, clearly proves that the atrocities and heresies are now at every level for everyone to see....not masked in the obscurity of Vatican II documents.

Anyway, I can't even begin to imagine the time and work that went into the video. What a wonderful tool this will be to pass on to those that God has put on our path!

May God reward you for your tireless efforts.

Teri Thurman

MP3 of New Mass Debate

The mp3 of The New Mass debate is here:

New Mass Debate - Part 1

New Mass Debate - Part 2

New Mass Debate - Part 3

It will also be added to our file on it: Debate: Is the New Mass Valid?

Fatima

Subject: new Fatima/DVD

Dear MHFM

I was watching your new DVD about fatima yesterday. Great DVD! Very shocking and convincing! I don’t see how anyone can watch it and remain unconvinced…

MARK V CA

Listen

The debate was hard to listen to because of Mr. Albrecht, he will find himself standing on the left side at the last judgment day if he doesn't convert. As always Peter Dimond did a great job defending the true faith! Run the race to the end!!!

Comment

God bless you for telling the truth.

John

Invisible

Dear brothers in Christ,

The term 'invisible boundaries', referred to by modernists, is a clear-cut stupidity. First, for logical reasons only, the term 'boundary' is so specific that it implies visibility, whether it is in a physical world, such as boundaries between countries or between private properties, or it is in the abstract world such as mathematics or ethics. It is always visible either by the physical eyes or the intellect. Second, the 'invisibility' of boundary of the Church is a clear-cut denial of all dogmas of the Catholic Church--the dogmas themselves are the boundary, for the obstinate denial of any dogma of the Catholic Church excludes the denier from the Church. One cannot neither be invisibly included in the Church nor invisiblyexcluded from Her. The 'invisible inclusion' refers to "baptism of blood/desire" heresy, invented by the Devil to deny the real inclusion in the Church by the SACRAMENT of baptism. Third, if there could exist such a thing as 'invisible boundary' of the Church, then there would be no way to tell the difference between good and evil, between sin and holiness, between God and world. It is obvious that the 'invisibility' of the Church boundaries is a meta-heresy, whence any other specific heresy could be logically derived. I cannot stress enough the viciousness of this heresy.

May our VISIBLE Most Holy Mother Mary and St. Joseph lead us to their VISIBLE Son of God, our VISIBLE Lord Jesus Christ and His VISIBLE Church, the One and Only True Church.

Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia

Some Interesting post-debate thoughts

Benedict XVI’s Recent Heresies

MHFM: We’ve updated our Benedict XVI's recent heresies file with some new heresies. There are some bad ones.

Grace effected

Subject: grace effected

Again a masterful job in you recent debate on the validity of the New Mass. I think that you expressed your points quite well; not only in using authoritative (and relevant) citations, but also in explaining their significance to the topic with logic and clear language. I think that an honest person, even were he completely uninitiated in the controversy, would have had no difficulty in following your arguments. However your opponent was just brutally tedious. I had difficulty for a while in following him at all. However eventually, since he was so repetitive, I think his argument came down to these two premises:

1) Some Greek word was used in Exodus to mean “all”, and gee whiz, what do you know, the same Greek word was used later (in John?) to mean “many”.

2) The “long form” (that is the form defined by the Church) is not present in Scripture, and in fact, there is some evidence that some ancient rites didn’t use the “long form” (assuming they actually existed, they said neither, “many” nor “all”, the significance of which seemed lost to your opponent).

So in short, Albrecht’s argument is reduced to “many” and “all” being the same word (ridiculous on its face) and the Church didn’t know what it was doing in defining Sacramental forms (heretical, as well as ridiculous).

I think the greatest argument on the side of the Truth, which you made several times, is the requirement imposed by the Church, that a Sacrament must “signify the Grace it effects”, and this signification must be expressed in the form. He just didn’t seem to grasp this basic notion of what a Sacrament is, or probably more accurate to say he didn’t want to grasp it. I mean it isn’t that difficult. Rather it is much more difficult to grasp the reality of these people. I see it over and over again (and you see it even more so), but I never get used to it. It makes my head hurt to contemplate the impenetrable ignorance, plated with arrogance. They’re kind of like little anti-miracles.

Bill Mulligan

P.S. Another great point you made was the reference to John’s revelation in which the souls of the saints are said to cry out for vengeance from “beneath the altar”. This is such a powerful indictment in light of the present situation that although I had heard it before, I was quite taken aback by its being shown in this context. And Albrecht’s response to this I think was his most pathetic of the entire affair. He ran again to his Greek dictionary to tell us that the use of such a Greek word implied the Altar was valid! Well duh, of course it is a valid Altar if the relics of Saints are present. The problem is that there is no more valid sacrifice upon it! What does Albrecht presume the Saints are so worked up about? It was just a stunning moment.

MHFM: Thanks for the comments. Yes, it was quite interesting that he just couldn’t get the simple concept of a false altar on top of a true altar with the martyrs crying out from under the true altar. He really thought the issue was a “strong” part of his “argument,” but he was clearly illogical and wrong on it as well as the rest.

On New Mass Debate

Subject: New Mass Debate

MHFM,

Just wanted to let you know I listened to the new debate between Bro. Peter Dimond and “apologist” William Albrecht while doing homework and other things over the course of three days.

William appears as such a conspicuous liar. It's clear he wrote out his opening statement, which I think is understandable. However, what also seems clear is that he premeditated, without honest consideration, almost everything else, too. It's as though he was a robot during the debate for a majority of the time.

I think in all of his responses/rebuttals he would state something like, "Obviously/It is clear/I just don’t understand [sarcastically], Bro. Peter cannot/didn't/doesn't ____." If enough time was allotted, Bro. Peter answered all his questions. It’s like William just ignored what was stated and went on-and-on like a drunk in a stupor.

It was as though his arguments were mere computational formulaic responses, something I'm learning in PreCalculus, that doesn’t work in a live debate with premeditations. It’s like he tried solving the problem prior to seeing it or knowing what it was. How absurd.

When x = 5, then f(x) = this/When Bro. Peter says x, then p(x) = this. I guess that may work in circumstances if the calculations are correct, but his responses were wrong since he had answers before the problems were given. I don’t recall but a few honest responses, which he then denied later or ignored as true.

I say he appears as such a conspicuous liar because he implements blatant logical fallacies throughout the debate, such as red herrings by changing subjects and not answering on important issues as the words of consecration – “what do they signify?” What makes it worse is that he uses sentimentality in such an evil way by almost voicing prayers for Bro. Peter in what Albrecht perceived as errors…which, of course, were not, as was heard.

I noticed several other fallacies in his argumentation: converse fallacy of accident: one significant patristic source – that is not credible (as was pointed out by Bro. Peter) - to conclude a general rule; he ignored those rebuttals frequently. He formed irrelevant conclusions: for example, he didn’t acknowledge the possibility that there could be a counterfeit “church” by forgetting the prediction of Our Lady at La Salette. Some of his arguments just were begging the question, “The Church will never be abandoned by Christ… Therefore, the New Mass is valid.”

It’s almost impossible to believe someone could be of such bad will. Especially, in his conclusion he claims that Bro. Peter failed to refute his positions, which he did thoroughly. (It was confusing listening to him but God granted graces to sort out some of his garbage.) That’s another reason why I think he just wrote out everything and read most of what he had. It was very obvious that William implemented many logical fallacies – his statements were devious, especially his final statement about hoping Bro. Peter will see the truth – or something like that – which implies he’s wrong – but Bro. Peter’s points were irrefutable.

Good job MHFM – please, keep up the good work,

Zachary Gragg

On Debate

Hello Brothers:

Thank You for another excellent debate. I have debated many times, and sat on a health ethics debate at Harvard University where I was an undergraduate. This Albrecht would be ostracized even in pagan circles for his absolute lack of reason, and self annihilating propositions. He also uses some really shelfworn tactics - like demanding his own standards at the start of the debate "three pillars" and then opening his rebuttals by simply stating that what you say is not true, even though it is entirely factual. A good moderator would likely address this very weak style of his. Tactics, no substance at all…

Thanks again,

Mike

Comment on Debate

Subject: Comment on the Debate

Hi MHFM,

I just had to comment on this debate, but it also applies to your earlier debates. Let us recall the words of Jesus Christ himself: "O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because thou hast hidden these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them to little ones. Yea, Father, for so it hath seemed good in thy sight." You consistently debate very well, because the Lord is pleased in the sight of those "little ones" who are faithful to the words of our Lord, and his servants the popes and saints of the Church.

The Lord warned us beforehand that even wise and prudent men will be blinded by the apostasy. Who then will guide those who are not informed of sound doctrine? Who will guide those of bad faith and ill will? Who will guide those who are too busy with what is worldly?

Let us pray more folks open their eyes, such as ones you have debated. We live in a time delusion. Being patient and humble in dealing with the good natured people will help. If the other guy feels personally threatened (most especially the bad willed), he/she will just defend the ego instead. More will come back to the faith after your debate. May you have more debates to come, with upgraded competition hopefully, like with actual Novus Ordo clergy for instance. The debates are too one sided in your favor, for obvious reasons.

God Bless

Sanjiv

Concerning Debate

Subject: debate

Brother Peter, you’re definitely on a higher plain than your guest William Albrecht. Bill's livelihood is obviously dependent upon his skills of maintaining a following by continuing to lead those that will follow him around and around in circles. Bill's skills are attempted, and fail drastically throughout the debate as his "good friend Mike Dud-ly" and his own "research" adds up to a bunch of unprofessional rambling mumble jumbo. An "Epitome of a blind spiritual fool". What debate, point or argument was Mr. Bill really trying to make? The pre-drafted "dribble" he recited, was pointless and had nothing to do with the debate at hand. The pre-drafted debate of Bill's was full of criticism concerning previous debates, where Brother Peter had obviously buried Bill in the debates and hurt Bill's feelings. Bill wants so much to debunk MHFM and to live up to the prideful hero image of himself on his own site. Bill's critique of whether or not Brother Peter has ever heard of the Council of Trent, showed the true intelligence level of who Brother Peter was debating against.

Thank-you Brother Peter for being professional and sticking with the debate at hand and proving that the New Mass is not valid and proving through many means to include the bible that the mass would disappear in the end times. This is considered to be a false prophecy by the protestant, heretic, Bill Albrecht. A shame that we had to subject ourselves to over two hours of Bill's nonsense lies, assumptions and contradictions in-order to listen to Brother Peter's interpretation of what the "New Mass" is "not". Bill's final remarks showed how truly blind he and others are as they say the Dimond Brothers "concocted from their own wit", these final prophesies and what is the true faith. Clearly showing how little they know and little faith they have as demonstrated also in your final remarks where your hand is revealed in order to bury Bill in his heresy once again.

God Bless,
Tom Miles

Debate comment

Subject: Debate Comment

Dear MHFM,

I have just finished listening to the recent debate and I want to thank Brother Peter for yet another superb defense of the Catholic Truth and an overall great performance throughout the debate. It is truly a blessing for Catholics around the world to have (in these last days) a safe haven where they can hear the true Catholic teaching--the teaching confirmed by the infallible authority of the Popes, the teaching that is always the same and has remained the same since the death of the last apostle until this very day (and to the end of time), the teaching that always confounds the heretics and is the cause of their fall because they are simply (and unfortunately) not of the Truth and they do not recognize in it the Voice of the Lord.

By listening to this last debate and also the other debates that you provide on your website certain common traits can be observed regarding the people who oppose Catholic Truth. Of these the one that certainly stands out the most is the blatant disregard of the infallible (dogmatic) Papal proclamations, wheter they be a part of the Conciliar decrees, the Extraordinary Magisterium, or the Ordinary and Universal Magisterium. In these sources heretics fail to recognize The Truth fallen from Heaven which by itself (i.e. declared as it is) is immutable and must be accepted and believed as such without further interpretation. Pope Benedict XIV, St.Pope Pius V, the Councils of Florence and Trent, numerous Popes, Saints and Doctors of the Church etc. give us the definitive Truth , they(the Popes) pass down and define the dogmas of the Faith that the Fathers unanimously held, for there can be no (and there certainly is no) contradiction between the two. From this debate it is obvious whose argument and faith is rooted in the infallible Teaching of the Church and the See of Peter.

Thank you and may Our Lord Jesus Christ and His Holy Mother continue to bless and strengthen you in the fight against heresies.

V. from Croatia

Debate

Subject: Debate on the New Mass

Dear Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,

It's quite obvious the Holy Ghost continues to guide Brother Peter Dimond as his debating skills reach ever increasing heights; he must he surely be reckoned as the modern day "hammer of heretics"...

How anyone would dare to expose themselves to these devasting blows, by challenging Catholic teaching, is beyond comprehension!

How terrible is false pride!

God bless,

David

Comment

Subject: Debate

Dear Brothers,

I usually don't write in unless I have a question, but I felt like I wanted to comment on this debate. I have listened to almost all the other debates but this one really got me upset. There are many things that riled me but these are just the ones that I can remember.

1. Every time it was his turn to respond, he started out with either insults, straw-man arguments, false claims about Brother Peter or some other type of irrelevant statement. (e.g. in the beginning of many of his statements he would falsely claim that Brother Peter called him a protestant for citing Scripture, completely ignoring the fact that Brother Peter was calling him protestant because of his false interpretation of Scripture and belief in Sola Scriptura )

2. He would claim that Brother Peter wouldn't respond to his arguments when half the time he didn't make any. Or the ones he would make were not relevant.

3. It was obvious that he didn't even know what Brother Peter's argument was and it was made clear by the last question asked him in which he had no idea how to respond. Then in his closing statement he made a bunch of excuses for not answering it. (You know what? I did rewind it and he still didn't answer it.)

4. He said that Brother Peter had to knock down one of his three pillars; a)The usage of the word "all" was never used in the early Church (Brother Peter proved that when "all" was used, the Church never approved it), b) that the words "for many" were necessary to bring about a valid sacrament (which Brother Peter did by citing Council of Florence, Catechism of Trent, St. Thomas) c) That the novus ordo contradicts Scripture and Tradition (this was proven by Brother Peter using both Scripture and Tradition; note: this was a funny pillar for William because he didn't even understand the whole issue, i.e. the differences between the efficacy of Christ's Blood and the sufficiency of His Blood.)

5.The fact that he says that Sedevacantists believe that Satan has prevailed against the Church proves that he doesn't even have a basic understanding of his opponent in this debate.

6. When Brother Peter has refuted all of his statements and shown William to be what he is (a son of the father of lies) and exposed his pride, William resorts to petty and irrelevant issues like the fact that Brother Peter is not a priest and I guess, therefore should not be listened to. Should we then listen to William, a.k.a. GNRhead which I assume means "guns and roses head" which is an evil rock band. He admits in his profile that he enjoys Rock n Roll and various evil movies. He is not a Priest either. My point is this; should we listen to a man who has given up most of the world to dedicate his entire 24/7/365 life to the Catholic Faith (Brother Peter) or to an obviously worldly individual who readily admits to liking blatantly evil things (GNRhead).

Anyone with an ounce of Good Will has to listen to GNRhead and know that he has no idea what he is talking about. His answer to the final question was a summation of his side of the whole debate. He didn't understand the issues and could do nothing but make false claims and arguments and insult Brother Peter.

Never Cease In Defending The Faith Against These Evil People

Nate

Comment

Subject: Albrecht debate

Dear Brothers,

Another crushing debate against the Protestant heretic William Albrecht. What a baby. He really needs to grow up and start thinking because just repeating his own heretical ideas under the guise of defending the Catholic faith is indefensible. He couldn't deal with any of your arguments so he just dodged them - what a Dud! Obviously the V-2 sect's New Mass is invalid for all the reasons you cited, but most especially for the simple fact that "all" does not mean "many" - all men are not saved - but the V-2 sect does teach universal salvation. Interesting was when William's microphone dropped out especially after saying, "anyone who can listen to this audio..." (vid. 15, 3:30 mins). Exactly, anyone who can hear will understand that Williams whole argument is flawed because he just couldn't deal with the facts - what an incompetent nincompoop!!! It's sad when an amateur thinks himself to be an apologist or a theologian when in reality he is a lying heretic. Clearly Albrecht is haunted by his Protestant past - he's still on the back foot - you can't defend the Catholic faith as a Protestant, i.e. Sola Scriptura. The Church, not the Bible, is the Pillar and Ground of the truth (1 Tim. 3:15). Besides, Hannibal Bugnini is dead as a result of making the New Mass - whether it was suicide or not makes no difference in his case - he is in hell for creating the New Invalid Mass - the Abomination of Desolation from the Great Apostasy!!! Thank you for defending the Catholic faith from such compromised cowards as William Albrecht. What is one to expect from someone who's favorite movies include Schindler's List and El Espanza Del Diablo, who loves Rock'n'roll, and who's a staff member of a "Catholic Apologist" website which has in its creed: "We are loyal and obedient to the bishop of Rome in all things. Should there be a difficulty in trying to reconcile a current Magisterial teaching with a previous one, we propose to look positively on the current teaching, and do our best as amateur Catholic laymen to reconcile both views." What outrageous apostates!!!

God Bless Brothers,

Chris White

On Debate

Subject: debate

Just listened to new debate..thought your final statement and overall point that the evil fruits of the V2 sect largely emanate from their attempted destruction of the true mass, foisted upon gullible, naive and under-educated catholics-- in the form of P6's "New Mass". Possibly this is one of the things Heaven was pointing toward at Fatima, when the Angel appeared to the children bearing and administering the true Eucharistic, the true body, blood, soul and divinity of Jesus Christ, was it in 1916? In fact, Fatima is the only marian apparition I am personally aware of where BOTH Jesus AND Mary appeared and were present, (even as the lightning flashing from East to West before our Lady appeared)---for Jesus was TRULY present in the Eucharist the Angel gave the children. Also, looking at the AWESOME REVERENCE with which the Angel at Fatima treated the Eucharist, and taught the children to do..(that INCREDIBLY BEAUTIFUL prayer).....again, was Heaven POINTING TO THE EUCHARIST especially here at the beginning of the Fatima apparitions, to really reinforce this message of the trueness of and the reverence toward the Eucharist, or to raise our awareness that the issue of the Eucharist would be of central importance to, and very much at stake, in the upcoming message Our Lady was ABOUT to deliver to the world from God in Heaven, in 1917? (I am sure millions of people have said this however, since I am slower than most, it just now occurred to me.)

Your opponent never grasped the essential "signifies grace/grace it signifies" concept about the validly confected Eucharist, upon which this argument is hinged---so either he is obtuse, or insincere.

He is obsessed with "Patristic, cosmos, and "Mike Duddy", and his shaky, wavering voice reminded one of a man who was worried about getting his paycheck........It sounded like he was reading a script, in certain sections, as if someone had prepared pages ahead of time, to try to refute what they thought would be your arguments. Maybe the boys in the Vatican have heard about your work and are starting to get a bit nervous?......I noticed he even attempted to use some of your own points you'd developed (on for example a video on St. Thomas Aquinas re: the Immaculate Conception), against you.....that was TRULY pathetic.

Since this guy is so gung-ho about the V2 sect making up any old changes in the mass they please----why don't they just change their word "all" (in their FAKE, V2 mass) to "absolutely no one at all"? this would more accurately reflect the total emptiness of in their "New Mass"--most certainly the abomination of desolation, indeed.

I would not trust a word Arinze says. His bosses at the vatican (or wherever his bosses reside) may be setting him up to make it look like they are sincerely concerned about the wording in the mass, but I do not believe it. Who knows, they may even be setting Arinze up to become the next anti-pope, should the current one make his very un-merry way to hell, anytime soon.

Brother Dimond, you slaughtered your opponent, even if he didn't notice it, or just pretended not to. Thank you MHFM for defending the true propitiatory, sacrificial nature of the ancient Catholic mass --- God's liturgy. One shudders at how brazen these evil men are in offending God in this way.

MHFM: Thanks for the interest. Of course we don’t trust Arinze. We simply quoted him and what the Vatican II sect said about “all” to demonstrate that even his very own sect leaders agree (paradoxically) that it’s a false translation.

On debate

Subject: debate

Brother Peter brought out a lot of interesting points in the debate on the novus ordo "mass" with the protestant GNRhead [is this a reference to the rock band Guns 'N Roses? It wouldn't surprise me]. The opposing 'arguments' were quite laughable - it was like shooting fish in a barrel! Thanks for exposing this pseudo-intellectual for the the farce that he is...AGAIN!

John

Brand new New Mass debate posted

Debate: Is the New Mass Valid? [click here for the videos]

MHFM: One of us recently engaged in a very interesting debate on the New Mass.

This file will be found permanently under Traditional Catholic Audios.

Like clockwork

Subject: here we go again

Just like clock work, Antipope Benedict spits out of his mouth something for the "consevative catholics" to get the attention off of another act of apostacy he has just done {going to the jewish temple in Rome} he truly has two heads.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35143792/ns/world_news-europe

MHFM: Yes, that’s what he does. Nothing will happen, either. He was the head of the Vatican II sect’s CDF for years and did nothing.

The Annulment Fiasco - The Vatican II sect's De Facto acceptance of Divorce and Remarriage [PDF File]

Invisible

A long time ago… I debated a modernist and he kept saying that the Catholic Church has 'invisible' boundaries. How do I refute that?

Angelica T

MHFM: That’s specifically covered in Section 18 of the book. If you go to this file, and scroll down to section 18, “The Soul of the Church Heresy,” and click on it, you will find the information there.

Outside the Catholic Church There is No Salvation book and file

DVD

Subject: new DVD

Dear MHFM:

The new DVD is interwoven so wonderfully. It ties together everything you have been saying and trying to say in a powerful, compact way. It truly is superior to all the others. Thanks for the new DVD.

Sincerely,

Joseph

Near-death

Dear Brothers,

I've been studying near death experiences (NDE's) for quite sometime now and they all seem to have one thing in common, everyone goes to heaven. It doesn't matter if you are Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, or even atheist. As long as you are basically a good person, you're in! Can you please comment on this?

By the way, thank you so much for teaching the true Catholic faith. I've learned so much since I first heard Brother Michael on Coast to Coast.

God Bless

Steve

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. The experiences are deceptions. Therefore, it’s not surprising that they consistently contain a false message which the Devil wants people to accept. In fact, almost all of them include people hearing a noise, then seeing light, and being happy. It’s the lie on salvation that the Devil wants them to accept and, most importantly, spread to others.

Bothersome question

Subject: Bothering Question

Dear Brother Michael and Brother Peter,

I am a Roman Catholic and am already 70 years of age, but keep on wondering why we are put to test in this world when God already knows our future.

I have read a great deal of books on this subject, but its explanation was not really satisfactory. Can you please help to clarify this doubt in my mind?

Eternally grateful.

Artur

MHFM: First, we would say that one shouldn’t even be troubled by such questions. There are many mysteries in how and why God does things. It’s our job to accept them, not be troubled if the reasoning or justice behind them is not readily apparent.

Second, we would say that our opinion on that question is that God is the “faithful and true witness” (Apoc. 3:14). He is 100% authentic and real. He is so perfectly authentic that it’s impossible for Him to lie (Heb. 6:18). For that reason, it would be inconsistent with His perfect justice to reward with Heaven or condemn to Hell those who did not actually and really carry out what He knew they would. Even though He knows what’s going to happen, He must let it play out in reality because what ends up being His verdict must be based on actual and real occurrences, not just His foreknowledge.

Comment

Subject: Blind

Dear MHFM, How emboldened they are these Vatican 2 apostates in Rome, that they loudly and openly proclaim to the duped Catholic masses this false dialogue with false religions as equals in embracing Our God, Jesus Christ when Catholics know that Jews hate Jesus Christ and crucify him with pleasure every day, and insult His Holy Mother equally with pleasure. If Catholics knew their Sacred history they would know that from 33AD till 1965 the Catholic world prayed for the conversion of these demonic sects and false religions to convert to Roman Catholicism-period! Is the world so blind presently, and the devil so powerful as we witness so many human beings created by God follow belial into Hell as they embrace antipope Benedict and his crew in these totally false teachings from robber council V2?

Dea

Video

MHFM,

I've come to truly appreciate the sobering truth in the 5 min video on sadness. That is beautiful and extremely encouraging to me. However, my family members that have watched or heard about it do not agree. They believe some people just have a chemical imbalance – me, once being deemed one of those. They may still consider it true of me.

I was in a very dark depression, which without a present doubt was due to my spiritual laziness. I even knew I was spiritual lazy but I was in such ignorance and dumbed by such claims of psychology that there was little that my feeble mind and lazy soul could apprehend to its betterment.

God granted graces and mercy to me for years struggling in that state.

I believe, by God's grace, especially through the prayer of the Rosary, that I have been given great graces. I have reason for this joy, truly a non-superficial hope for my soul that has once been clouded by false gospels of psychology and erroneously dangerous Protestant teachings.

Even though it has been dreary weather here, in my soul the Son is rising and lighting the firmament of that which was created through Him. There are still some peripheral gray clouds, but the blueness is healing.

I just listened to the new audio on the case of demonic possession. It was difficult to hear but very insightful…

[name removed]

Interesting

MHFM: Since it has been in the news recently, we thought this was relevant. If for no other reason, it’s interesting to see how man is helpless against God’s natural wonders, should He choose to unleash them.

Tried

mhfm

Some weeks back I had tried to write you about the insanity and paranoia over the swine flu hoax, then I changed my mind, I figured it was hopeless. But today looking at the e-Exchanges section I saw the link with the story that the swine flu thing was a hoax. The insanity over the hoax in this household was almost overwhelming. I"m at a loss, somewhere there has to be Catholic teaching on the dangers of constant fretting over what happens in the world. In the story of Sodom and Gemorahh Lot's wife turned into a pillar of salt because she couldn't bear leaving her 'world' and had to turn around and look.

Is being gullible a sin ?

Samuel

MHFM: It’s probably a sin to have the blind attitude that you have. Contrary to what you think in your blindness, the article about how the “swine flu” is now admitted to be a hoax, does not prove the “conspiracy-theory-mockers” (like you) correct. It proves just the opposite. It proves that those who correctly identified that the whole thing was a fraud, a hoax and a conspiracy, were correct all along. For the world was told that there would be a world-wide outbreak, and a pandemic had been officially declared. Laws were on the books in Massachusetts and other states to declare martial law, enter people’s homes, and impose vaccinations. There was an international congress in Washington for the same reason. But then it just dropped off the map. It dropped off the map simply because so many people were alerted to this hoax by those who had the courage to expose it (e.g., MHFM). They were simply unable to go through with their plan. Information demonstrating that it was a hoax, with the accompanying information about the dangers of vaccines, became so widespread on the internet that they just couldn’t pull it off. There was too much resistance and exposure.

So, now that even the mainstream media is saying that the “swine flu” was essentially all hype, it proves true what we said from the beginning: “swine flu” probably doesn’t even exist. In fact, the recent admissions precisely coincide with what we pointed out: that “swine flu” doesn’t exist and is simply the product of media hype and manipulation. They coincide more precisely with what we said than with what was said by those who believed it was a deliberately engineered virus. But they also correctly saw that the whole thing was fraudulent.

They still might attempt some other form of “outbreak” to impose vaccinations if they can.

Comparison

Subject: Comparison, Yellowstone

Dear Brothers,

Another blow to historical revisionism by not allowing a perfectly reasonable comparison to be mentioned, i.e. between Nazism and Communism - "Holocaust" v. Gulags. So, Jews cannot be compared with non-Jews? That's what I keep hearing. What's so special about the Jews? It's discrimination in reverse, i.e. special treatment for those who don't deserve it. Of course, saying such things would risk one being branded a genocidist or exterminationist. Everyone needs to be a Catholic for salvation, not just Jews. Enough of the Judeocentrism already! I thought most western countries were democracies, but look at how the Jews are pulling the strings and they constitute around 2-3% of the population, more or less! No one can keep the Jews happy, whether they be friend or foe. People need to wake up to the secret war that Israel/Zionism/Jewry is waging against them by way of deception. I suppose people are only deceived if they want to be!

If the Yellowstone volcano goes then I wonder how that would affect the underground hide-outs for the 2012 cataclysm. I think God is giving us a hint. How sad that most geologists don't know or believe the facts about the Earth being less than 10,000 years old. They would far more concerned about the magnitude of these latest quake-swarms.

God Bless,

Chris White

New DVD

Subject: Wow!! Your new Fatima DVD-Fatima!

Dear Brothers,

I just received your DVD today in the mail and all I can say is WOW!!! I just finished watching the 2 and 1/2 hour presentation on The Third Secret of Fatima, the Impostor Sr Lucia and the End of the World. It is absolutely FANTASTIC!! You have outdone yourselves in presenting the truth! Some of the information I knew from your previous videos, but there is a lot of new material in it and it is explained so well. It almost made me cry to think that we have come to this! When I was a little girl in the 'real' Catholic school in the late 50's, I remember the nuns telling us that we learned the Latin Mass because when we grew up and went to other countries, the Holy Mass was the same all over the world! Never, in my wildest dreams, would I have thought that this present situation we are in could have happened! We so have to pray to Our Blessed Mother to help us through this tribulation! And She will!!
Also, I noticed on the DVD that there is an extra on the Vatican II Apostasy , parts 1 and 2, which I assume is an update? I will definitely watch that next!
You are so right, Everyone MUST see this video! I can't understand how anyone could see this information, so well presented , and not believe!!
God bless you for this and all that you do!!

Kathryn Rubio

MHFM: Thanks for all the comments. Note: for those who ordered but haven’t received it yet, there’s no need to worry. The people who received the DVD extremely fast and therefore were able to view it already were people who pre-ordered, some many months ago.

DVD

Brothers,

… I found your new DVD on Fatima in my mailbox today. I am truly blessed and speechless; the DVD is a wake-up call to say the least. The DVD is definitely your best work yet as it incorporates all your work into one DVD. Your mission of exposing the Vatican II as the counter-church in these last days is clearly expressed throughout the video. To my amazement you were able to show without a doubt, the history of the true faith; the truth behind Fatima; and that Vatican II is the Whore of Babylon with its leaders and members being anti-Christ as predicted in the bible and by the saints. I highly recommend watching this video in one sitting as the movie flows beautifully from beginning to end. God's hand has blessed your ministry with the accomplishment of this new DVD.

Thank-you, In Christ's Name, God Speed,
Tom Miles

MHFM: Thanks for all the comments. The DVD affords people the opportunity to watch the film in chapters, which is valuable especially for repeated reference. However, we fully agree with you that people should watch it from start to finish, in one viewing, if they can. That’s because one of the most important aspects of the DVD, in our view, is that it demonstrates how everything is interconnected and fits with the other things covered.

Fatima

Dear Brothers,

I just finished watching the excellent DVD on Fatima. What a difference between your version and that of the History channel and other movie versions. As always you get to the real meat and potatoes and heart of the matter in this production. Everything you present is based on documented fact and tied perfectly into several Bible verses. This in contrast to the History channel and movie versions which chose to base their versions on speculation and personal opinions. Anyone of good will who watches the complete work has to come away asking them self how they were able to miss the blatant acts of deception on the part of the false Catholic church as well as the heretical churches that preach the gospel of feel good Christianity. I especially liked the way that you "bookmarked" the importance of veneration to the Blessed Virgin in the beginning and end of the DVD. Great job! I will be sure to order many copies and distribute them.

Bob Bohr

JP2, “self-mortification”

Subject: John Paul II, self-mortification

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35079187/ns/world_news-europe/?GT1=43001

Dear Brothers,

This page is about a new book that has been published about John Paul II's practices of self-mortification, extreme penance, and the like that were done in private. How can we explain such a situation, where an obstinate heretic like JP II performs such rigorous penance but over time does not amend his heretical views or isn't opened to the light of truth?

Thanks,

Adam Twardowski

MHFM: How can we explain such a situation? We can do so by pointing out that people are often deceived by externals. Just because a person practices (or appears to practice) mortification does not mean that he pleases God. It doesn’t prove anything. John Paul II was totally evil, completely possessed, and knowingly taught that every man is Jesus Christ. We have proven that clearly.

John Paul II preached the Doctrine of the Antichrist

That’s not even to consider his other outrageous heresies and apostasy. Some Buddhist monks also lead very rigorous lives. It reminds us of the story of the Novus Ordo “nuns” who live without heat, yet pray for Jews to remain Jews.

The problem with being persuaded on the basis of externals is a serious one in the traditional movement. It’s arguably the second worst problem, after the denial of the salvation dogma. Many false traditionalists see groups such as the SSPX, etc. in their habits. They see them looking devoted and traditional, and possibly chanting in solemn fashion. That’s all they need to see. They are bowled over because they don’t really know God. They don’t really have an interior relationship with Him and value His faith. Thus, they measure everything by appearances. In addition to the community feel they provide, that’s the main reason the SSPX has so many followers. The need so many have for being part of a group or a “community” is the second reason that so many gravitate to such groups.

It doesn’t matter to them that they reject the faith. They appear Catholic, and so holy and traditional. Their chanting is so nice and reverent, they think; and they can’t resist being persuaded. We cannot emphasize enough how people are being deceived in this way. This includes many sedevacantists. Some of the worst heretics in the early Church were known for their ascetism. Arius is a prime example. By his apparent holiness he successfully persuaded many, including virgins dedicated to Christ (i.e., nuns), to his heretical cause. If a person doesn’t have the faith, he (or she) cannot be of God (Heb. 11:6). The rigorous penance you ask about with reference to John Paul II was all part of the diabolical deception. However, this deception is occurring in much more subtle ways with many traditionalist groups.

This is because many “traditionalists” pray, practice devotion or do penance without a pure intention. Their actions are either corrupted by pride, and thus serve to puff them up, or they are tainted with the desire to feel holy. (Note: this is really seen in those who are consumed with certain religious attire, or certain external religious activities.) They are consumed with feeling holy, rather than with actually being holy: in other words, truly pleasing God and helping others. For this reason, when they do pray, practice devotion, etc., they become focused or consumed by what they are doing. Since they lack a pure intention and a true humility and charity, God resists them. In this way, many who might externally appear very devoted are actually displeasing to God, while those with a proper intention, who might appear less rigorous or devoted, might be and/or are very pleasing to God. That’s because the former individuals don’t worship God in spirit and in truth, while the latter do. Thus, when the latter pray, etc., their actions are not tainted and become fruitful.

John 4:23- “But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true adorers shall adore the Father in spirit and in truth. For the Father also seeketh such to adore him.”

St. Alphonsus ( c. 1760): “In the estimation of men, the value of an act increases in proportion to the time spent in its performance; but before God the value of an act increases in proportion to the purity of intention with which it is performed. For, as the scripture says, men look only to the external acts, while God regards the heart…”

Frankly, those who have seen John Paul II’s activity, and are bothered by this story, have a problem with faith. They value (and measure things by) externals far too much. They don’t really understand or know God.

JP2

Subject: JP2

Hello brothers.

Here's an article about JPII wherein it states that he flaggelated himself and practiced self-mortification. I know he was anti-pope; I would just like your insight on how one would reply to this if the subject was brought up by a Novus Ordo defender in conversation.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20100126/wl_nm/us_vatican_johnpaul

Carol Walker

MHFM: We would reply with some of the thoughts above.

DVD

I just received the first box of your new Fatima DVDs from MHFM and the DVD is fantastic---incredibly superb work! I think it is wonderful that you released this DVD on January 25th, isn't this the date the "Great Light" prophesied by Our Lady of Fatima regarding the beginning of WWII, and also the same date Jan. 25th the anti-pope John 23 announced Vatican II? I think it is also the Feast Day of the conversion of St. Paul and also St. Peter the Apostle's Feast Day?... Great job! I Our Lady of Fatima, pray for us!

New Fatima DVD is now Available

Our new DVD is available for order.

DVD: The Third Secret of Fatima, the Impostor Sr. Lucia, and the End of the World (Click here for info and ordering options)

$Description: Description: C:\Users\mhfm\Desktop\Website Docs\E-discussions\Cover_pictures\Fatima_DVD.jpg$

This DVD contains the very best information from all the DVDs we have ever put out dealing with the post Vatican II apostasy. It also contains critical new information, and connects everything with what is predicted in the Third Secret of Fatima. This is the best DVD we have ever released, and the most important DVD that has been produced on the Catholic Church. This is a must-see.

Comment

Comment: Sedevacantism debate with William A.

As someone who is not a sedevacantist & was hoping William would prove this position to be false, I would have to agree with the previous comment "William got Slaughtered" & even seems to be more focused on winning the debate rather than finding the truth. William if this was in a court of law I believe the jury would say it's a land slide victory in favour of Bro Dimond - all you have to do is listen to it & be honest to yourself which is what I've done!!

Bro Dimond, it's clear to anyone who listens to this using the God given gift of logic has to admit you have clearly won this debate, I was hoping it was going to be the contrary... however it's not!! - I would like to ask though, if we have no valid Bishops after VII, how is the church ever to be restored? How would there ever be another true Pope? is this the end? Didn't our Lady say "In the end My Immaculate Heart will triumph"? your comments would be greatly appreciated.

Alpherno

MHFM: Thanks for the comment. We’re glad that you listened to it. The Church doesn’t need to be restored. It exists in a faithful remnant. We have addressed these issues in our material, including the issue of how we could get another pope. Regarding Fatima, we have a new DVD which deals with this issue and related issues. We strongly encourage you to obtain it.

Shun

I shun your religious dogma. If one believes that Jesus is the One True God and that He sacrificed Himself for us, one is a child of God. Baptists believe this, Pentecostals believe this (I am both), Orthodox believe this, and Anglicans believe this. Tell me, where in the Bible does it say that the Catholic Church as we know it today is the only true religion.

Hyenashowl

MHFM: No, your position is not consistent. Those denominations contradict each other on crucial matters of faith, matters on which Jesus Himself taught. They were also all founded by men. Two contradictory beliefs, concerning matters of faith, cannot both be true and acceptable. The Bible teaches that Jesus founded one Church upon St. Peter, to which all of His flock must adhere. That one Church is proven to be the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church alone is historical, original and consistent with the Bible in all of its teachings. We ask you to consult this file and obtain our book: Refuting Protestantism from the Bible and Eastern "Orthodoxy" (audios and articles).

Anti-Catholic

Subject: I think it's Great that you give Anti-Catholic's ammunition.

I think it's Great that you give Anti-Catholic's ammunition. I'm out here Defending the Faith..... and you're out here making a joke out of the Church. I've just seen your video on John Paul ll, and you sounded like the Protestants I see on YouTube, interpreting what John Paul ll meant about the Blood of Christ, like a Protestant interpreting what the Bible means about Salvation. GREAT JOB!!

Hockey…r

MHFM: You are not defending the Catholic Church. You are actually attacking it. The Vatican II "Church" is not the Catholic Church. We have proven this over and over. It's the Counter Church predicted in Scripture. Benedict XVI teaches that Protestants don't even need to convert and has agreed with the Lutherans on Justification. He just went to the synagogue and committed apostasy again. Get your head out of the sand. Watch our video on the clearest heresy in Vatican II, and listen to our debate on sedevacantism.

Questions

Dear Most Holy Family Monastery,

I am a non-Roman Catholic Orthodox Christian, who for the most part, believes as you do in regards to our Lord Jesus Christ our God, and also I share in the same rejection of ecumenism and Vatican II, not to mention rejection of Pope John Paul XXIII as you do. In fact, even a number of our Patriarchs deserve the same label as antichrists and heretics as Pope John Paul XXIII does.

I have been trying to understand your organisation a bit more. Please help me with my inquiries.

1) How many anti-popes have there been, and could you list them or at least direct to a list of them?

2) Although this is a dated question, is it true that Pope Pius XII approved of Nazism? Was there no actual encyclical condemning Nazism and its racist theories along with its outright anti-Christian sentiment?

3) From a traditionalist Catholic viewpoint, would you term Medjugorje as heretical, even demonic?

4) What do most traditional Catholics have to say regarding Mother Theresa? (I personally find her heretical and anti-Christian in essence, but I want to hear your thoughts).

God bless.

Yours in Christ,

Timothy Kwoh

MHFM: To your questions… 1. You will find a list of the antipopes in this file. 2. Pope Pius XI condemned Nazism and the racist theories you describe in his 1937 encyclical, Mit Brenneder Sorge. Pius XII did not approve of Nazism. 3. Medjugorje is both heretical and demonic. We refer you to this file: False Apparitions (Divine Mercy, Bayside, Medjugorje) 4. Mother Teresa was unfortunately a heretic, and not remotely a Catholic. She is discussed and covered in this file: The Religious Orders in the Vatican II sect: Totally Apostate [PDF File].

“Orthodoxy” is not true Christianity. We encourage you to listen to our Debate on the Papacy: does the Bible teach the Office of the Pope [link to description, mp3 and videos]. You should also listen to these programs, which cover the evidence for the Papacy in the ancient Church and in the East: The Bible teaches that Jesus made St. Peter the first pope [link to section]

Yellowstone

"Over 250 earthquakes have occurred in the park over the last few days, most between 0.5-3.1 on the Richter Scale - and getting larger each day."

http://scienceblogs.com/eruptions/2010/01/more_on_the_january_2010_yello.php

This underground volcano is one of the worlds deadliest..If it goes, everyone within 700 miles dies instantly and will have dire effects on the planet...

Steve

Watching

Dear Brother Michael and Brother Peter,

I have been watching many of your videos from your site and it is an eye opener and it might well be helping me to make sense of the nonsensical things that I have experienced as a Catholic for a great many years now! Through your movies I’ve had a thought and I’d like you to give me your opinion. It seems to me that the Catholic Church has not had a valid pope since prior to John 23rd; correct?...

God bless,
Terry (TJ)

MHFM: That’s correct. We’re glad to hear about your interest.

Concerning

Subject: Concerning Response to Robby E-Exchange

Dear Brothers,

Reading Robby's comments and others like it, sadden me and they remind me of the problems I have with my parents. They are all but divorced: he has had a string of mistresses; she rests content that Catholics don't divorce and has remained single. They both frequent V2 services and are home there. But that's the only dogma that she seems to understand. The 'No salvation outside the Church' dogma, she chooses to ignore. And as you know the whole Faith hinges on this dogma, without which the Faith becomes meaningless..

I have tried to engage her in conversation regarding the Faith, but she can never sit still and long enough to hear what I have to say. Her attention span is remarkably short on matters pertaining to the Lord and the Faith. Yet, I have observed countless times, her ability to sustain conversations with her friends on the most trivial topics for hours on end. She's superhuman on the phone! I once joked with my sister that if mum were to speak on the phone with 6 of her best friends for 2 Hrs each, she could manage 12 hrs of non-stop speech!

Which brings me neatly to the point I'm trying to make. My mum knows that we have diverging views on matters of faith. She must know (for she believes I'm holding heretical opinions) that in the next life, we will be apart in Hell or Heaven, but certainly not together. You would think that a parent who claims to be Catholic and loving would be mightily concerned if, for sake of argument, her son or daughter were slipping inexorably into Hell. So logically, one would expect a level of interest in what one's progeny believed in order to dissuade - for the sake of love. Naturally!

In an ideal world where the Lord is Lord indeed, it is logical and natural. In this world however, it is not. Things are never quite - what they seem to be and heresy is the root cause of it all. If 'modernism is the synthesis of all heresies' (Pius X): then we all have it bad! And that's just for us, who thanks to the hard work and diligence of MHFM, are able to see in the dark and hence avoid the pitfalls of the Vatican II sect.

The majority on the other hand, are just not fortunate (an act of God... call it what you will). There's something that keeps them in there, in what I've come to believe and understand to be the most dangerous place on earth: the V2 service. In this service, 2 millennia worth of heresies are synthesised, distilled and imbibed weekly.. They can't get enough of it! This is what we're up against: a comfort zone of pure humanism.

Catholicism is alien to them. We don't share a common language with these people. Therefore hopes of a civilised discussion on the issues are virtually nil! That's why a mother can be criminally disinterested and a father threaten violence when MHFM material is presented. I've tried my best to present the Faith to my family. My conscience is clear.

Thanks Brothers for all your work.

Godbless,

MM UK

On Interview, UFOs

Subject: On Coast interview ufos & demons

Hi Brother Michael

Listening again to previous Coast interview I'm going to have to agree with you on this. These are surely not et's, although I think we might have built our own ships and drivers of these since Roswell and all that. I believe that the cattle mutilations and such are us needing spareparts to build someone who can fly at these speeds, them still not being the speeds we see in the "real" ufos. I think the grays are bio-robots we have made.

Here's why, I see them all the time here in Norway and have for some 15 years now, quick story; I live on a small farm here with two horses and two dogs. A while back we only had one horse. I had fallen asleep around 11 p.m when a shock-dream woke me up around 12 a.m when I saw our horse in the dream. I immediately woke up and ran to the stables, thinking we had forgotten to feed him or something and this was why I had got that eary feeling. Got up there, he was well fed, standing with his head out the door, when one of these came shooting over the stables in an orange (this time) glow, no sound of course.

I have since made my mind up because I can feel them when they come, and since I would think it really cool if this was actual et's or something, I'm sure I would get a better feeling. I am what has become known as an empath, an evil-o-meter if you will, and these things are NOT good, y'know.

So my question is this; As a rocker I have done almost everything wrong in my life, although not anymore so what do I do? What faith and how am I ever going to be able to forgive myself? I pray, nothing. Also how can there be so many faiths claiming to be the right one. I pick the wrong one and I'll still go to Hell right? What about the Chinese, are they all going to Hell? I find this almost as puzzling as the ufos. Also good, Godfearing people have been taken by these things and tortured. I'm like, where is God when we need him, he's sure taking his time (no offence intended).

It's all very confusing.

Be well & continued luck to you & yours
Kaf

MHFM: We’re glad that you seem to have concluded that UFOs are demons. However, you need to become convinced and convert to the Catholic faith. We would encourage you to look at the material and pray the Rosary each day of the grace of faith.

Quote

… Your St. L. M. d. Montfort quote… I've been doing some heavy lifting "home office" work this week --- and despite praying my "normal" Rosary-----this quote has been coming into my mind---so when I've been at a red light or in line, running errands etc. I just say ONE MORE HAIL MARY whenever possible, as I thought about that quote. And if I recall, that nun who appeared had had a VERY long, severe, illness (several years of agonies) and yet she would do it all again just to gain the grace and merits of saying ONE MORE HAIL MARY!! And God allowed her to come back from the dead to share this advice with the other nun (I think it was a nun?). I think that ought to tell us earthling mortals about the power and efficacy of this blessed prayer....AVE MARIA, GRATIA PLENA!!!!...

New Videos

Hoax falls apart

Subject: Shakedown

Brothers,

Here is an article on the "swine flu" shakedown. A hoax, a sham and a successful shakedown.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=17096

Sincerely,

Howard

Another reader comment: the truth reaches even the MSM: H1N1 Swine Flu Hoax Falls Apart at the Seams

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,582749,00.html

Abortions

Subject: Abortions

Dear Brothers,

Could you please inform me the teachings of the Catholic Church on baptism to a premature fetus by natural abortion in the very early or even later stage of pregnancy? Is it advisable, for one to baptize in water these little souls whenever possible immediately after their birth? What about in the cases of forced abortions can we also emerge the babies in water to baptize them? I came across some reading on this, and since I had never heard about it before I would like to know the truth.

Many thanks,

In Jesus and Mary

M.Fernanda da Silva

MHFM: Yes, you should try to baptize them in any way you can, if you are afforded the opportunity.

Modesty

Hi I'm studying Modesty and was wondering what St Pio and found the statement ...

He forbade his spiritual daughters to wear transparent stockings. I was wondering what transparent stockings meant?

Thanks
Veronica Wolf

MHFM: It means those which are see-through or easily seen through. Also, he’s not a canonized saint because John Paul II was an antipope.

Sign

$Description: Description: C:\Users\mhfm\Desktop\Website Docs\E-discussions\E_Pictures\6_church_sign.jpg$

Subject: 666 on Novus Ordo

Hello Brothers:

There is a very interesting occurrence in my town. It will be over three weeks tomorrow that the sign at Novus Ordo Saint Mary's has a Large 666 painted on its sign on the main road. The whole town is talking and the apostate "priest" REFUSES to paint over the sign. It is a regular fixture of this church now. This follows my family praying that the Lord give a definitive sign to our prior Novus Ordo friends who go there. Unfortunately they are just shaking it off. Very, very sad. There is not much more I can say to them to help them save their souls-they simply do not care! They are far too caught up in what they will have to give up to follow Christ (their schedules, their apostate friends, their heretical confraternities, their women's luncheons, etc) they would explicitly rather defy Christ and go to hell rather than take up the slightest cross. Very, very sad. Here's the link - http://www.milforddailynews.com/features/x1530318927/Church-sign-spray-painted-with-mark-of-devil

Thanks,

Mike

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. That’s very interesting. The most remarkable aspect of it is that the Novus Ordo “priest” hasn’t done anything to remove it. The sign serves as a sign. We understand your desire to get the deceived souls to recognize what’s happening. The truth is that even if someone were to leave the Vatican II Church based only on some perceived “sign,” his (or her) commitment probably would not last and his faith probably wouldn’t become firm or sincere. That’s because God’s revelation didn’t persuade him, but only a perceived sign. He would probably fall into another heresy, or eventually lose his conviction once the going got tough. It’s true that God sometimes does make use of such things to cause a good-willed person to investigate (and then find) the full truth. However, it’s much more likely that those who are only interested or moved by perceived “signs” will not become true believers.

Response

Subject: Response to Emily E-Exchange

Dear MHFM,

After reading your email to Emily concerning her Mother-in-law I had to write in hopes of encouraging her that you are right! I had a recent occurrence with my Mother of which I won't go into great detail because I am sure you have heard all of it a thousand times. Simply put, I had been arguing with her and fighting her for a few years. In September I told her I wasn't going to call her on the phone any more because she continually brought up the same arguments and it was really getting silly. Recently we emailed a few times back and forth, and she started going back to the old arguments again. After reading the E-exchange about Emily and her Mother-in-Law I was encouraged to simply tell my Mother in bullet point fashion pretty much what you had suggested to Emily about her Mother-in-law's opposition being a rebellion against God and so forth. The amount of time I had spent explaining to my Mother the Truth, and not to mention she introduced me to your material 9 years ago, bullet point fashion was a justifiable way of putting things.

It was shocking! Over the years she always acted like the loving mother who just wanted to keep the peace. Then after I directly told her the heresy she holds to and the lies, and that it is leading her to hell, the devil reared his head. She referred to you (Bro. Peter and Bro. Michael) as "Predators" appearing as "angels of light", and "Your hasty judgment of souls, especially of Catholics, comes from the pit of hell!!" (Referring to how you and I may call someone "of bad will"). It was astonishing, yet quite revealing. Thank you so much for pointing out how weak and defensive people are, me included, and for encouraging us in our faith. I now know what my Mother really thinks of us, and how blind she is to the Truth.

I hope this is a good encouragement for Emily to stay the course and trust in God, and that you know what you are talking about!

Sincerely,

Robby

Material, EW

Subject: Australia

IM READING YOUR BOOK ITS EXCELLENT SO FAR. ALL YOUR MATERIAL IS GOOD AND TRUE… AFTER HEARING UR MATERIAL YOU SLIGHTLY CHANGED THE ROAD IN MY HEAD I HOPE ITS FOR THE BETTER BUT. WHAT DO YOU THINK OF PACWA COME ON HE IS WAS SENSATIONAL DEFENDER AND TRUTHFUL… WHAT DO YOU THINK OF HIM ? AND DONT BAG… HIM EITHER. YOUSE ARE SMART YOUR MATERIAL IS UNREFUTABLE BUT ONLY DOWNFALL TO ALL YOUR VEIWS AND AUDIENCE IS YOU FULLY DESTORY PEOPLE FOR SAYING ONE WRONG WORD HAVE YOU EVER SAID OR BEILIVED SOMETHING WRONG I BET YOU DIDNT THINK TO YOUR SELF YOU ARE A DEVIL COME ON. BE TRADITIONAL BUT BE KIND AS WELL INSTEAD OF BURNING SOMEONE TO THE GROUND ALL YOU GO TO SAY IS "OK YOU DON’T ACCEPT CATHOLIC TEACHING" SAY THAT 1000 TIMES THATS PERFECT AND CLEAR AND THATS WHAT WILL BURN THEM EVEN MORE INSTEAD OF CALLING THEM NAMES.

REPLY BACK MAN THIS ONCE NEXT TIME YOU CAN IGNORE ME AHAHAH THANKS

Jason…

MHFM: First, with regard to Pacwa, he’s part of EWTN. He’s therefore a defender of Vatican II, the Counter Church, and its attendant heresies. The fact that his calm demeanor (and seemingly friendly personality) can evoke pity does not change the fact that he’s a public heretic.

EWTN and the Charismatic Movement [link to section]

He’s also a huge fan of John Paul II. He even did a series on John Paul II’s heretical encyclicals. He obviously knows what John Paul II did and what he generally taught; although he clearly doesn’t have the eyes to see that John Paul II taught that every man is Christ, in many of his encyclicals (not to mention his speeches).

John Paul II preached the Doctrine of the Antichrist

Being a huge fan of John Paul II, Pacwa is therefore a huge fan of false ecumenism (i.e., heresy and religious indifferentism). You can’t read John Paul II’s Ut Unum Sint and not know that John Paul II was an utter religious indifferentist and world champion of false ecumenism. Pacwa says some true things, but he’s certainly not a Catholic and he’s leading souls to Hell. He does this by confirming them in the false resistance of EWTN, making it appear viable, lively and Catholic. The truth is that it’s deceptive, spiritual deadly and desolate. Sadly, either he lost the faith a long time ago or he never had it.

Second, we completely reject your characterization that we “destroy people for saying one wrong word.” That’s completely untrue. Obstinate rejections of Catholic teaching hardly equate to “saying one wrong word.” Additionally, we use appropriate appellations and words to describe heretics as situations arise and when we deem them just. Most of the time it’s in reference to individuals who aggressively attack the Catholic faith, if not ourselves and the truth we are promoting. Since, in many cases, they show the truth and those who promote it no respect, they deserve none in return.

People also need to realize that we are not living in the ages of faith. We are in the age of apostasy. The bad will (yes, bad will, for that’s what most aptly characterizes our present situation and the super-majority of those in it) is much more thick; the rejections of the truth are much more profound; the attacks on those who promote it are much more widespread; and, for the aforementioned reasons, the avenues for spreading the full truth are much more limited. Therefore, if you don’t have a militant fighting faith, you don’t stand a chance. You will be swept away to the side of the enemy. It’s a spiritual battle for souls, for the true faith, and for God. It’s fierce, and it’s primarily being waged with men used by devils rather than devils themselves.

BOD-BOB

Subject: Bod-Bob

Dear MHFM,

Once again, excellent videos on bod-bob. The evidence and truth is overwhelming. The liberals love to quote St. Thomas Aquinas to make their liberal point, of salvation outside the Church possible, misinterpreting the meaning of St. Thomas Aquinas. Further, St. Thomas Aquinas told the world that his Summa lacked completion, as his end was near, intuitively, he realized. St. Thomas was young when he left the world, but was honest enough to clearly state that there was much left to interpret with his method for understanding God and his teachings. Understanding that, Mark 16:16 is explicit about the necessity of baptism-"He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved: but he that believeth not shall be condemned." This clearly means that if you have the desire to be Roman Catholic, or suffer martyrdom you would have been baptised before dying. God does not deceive, never! But remember the warning of Our Lord-"Beware of the leaven of the scribes and Pharisees!" The Scholastic Method of St. Thomas Aquinas over and over again disproves desire and blood, but who is there in Vatican City to promote his sacred method of learning so that desire and blood is explicitly eradicated from the Catholic sense, and we can continue being Roman Catholics once again in truth? Sifting the wheat from the chaff can only come from the few diligent workers left in this evil world. Thanks again to MHFM. May God Bless your Holy works!

D…

Refuting

Subject: Refuting BOD videos

Dear Brothers,

They are great videos on refuting Baptism of Desire. Baptism of desire advocates love to get excited about the danger of death issue. It's as though they think anyone is justified simply because they are experiencing the fear and grief surrounding death, which is not the case at all, and most certainly is not Catholic teaching, let alone Sacred Catholic Tradition! Strangely, the reasoning of these BOD heretics reminds me of false flag terrorism: They set up a scenario, a crisis like death (problem). Then they use the "any means necessary" argument to imply that baptism is not necessary in such terrible situations (reaction). Then hey presto they give you Baptism of desire (solution)!!! It's outrageous. Then they'll give you a little book or flyer on BOD and send you on their heretical way to hell! Watch out if you are a new convert in such a situation, because they'll make you know how "little you know" in comparison with St. Thomas Aquinas and "the whole tradition of the Church." That's an abominable lie to say that BOD has been a constant tradition of all the saints and theologians! I wouldn't doubt that Protestants, Schismatics and other heretics have always had some version of Baptism of desire up their sleeve, ready to pounce on the unwary! Clearly, the first and foremost priority of all Catholic missionaries and saints was to baptize the unbaptized, especially in danger of death. So the Catechumens, in a normal situation, i.e. not a life and death emergency, can wait a little, but not too long because they are still in a state of damnation. Baptism of desire is such a bad excuse for bad will. Water baptize now!!!

God Bless,

Chris White

Another

Subject: Another priest against BOD

…"St. Anthony Daniel had just finished celebrating Mass for his Huron converts (those who had become Christians) when the Iroquois attacked the village. The Christian Indians begged him to try and escape. But Father Daniel stayed. He wanted to help all those who were crying to him for Baptism before they would be killed. The Iroquois burned him to death in his little chapel."

… It’s a very sad story. What´s even sadder is witnessing the abomination of the desolation taking place, making a big mockery on the pains those brave men had to endure.

Well, there you have another saint against baptism of desire and blood.

BOD

… awesome and outstanding… DEMOLITION WORK, MHFM, on the 2 new videos refuting the total lies of BOD. This must be the dogma (the "salvation dogma") Our Lady of Fatima mentioned at the very start of the 3rd Secret (that I think we've all heard, just the first few words before it was stopped, I think she mentioned something about the "dogma of the Faith in Portugal"? I am probably the very last person on Earth to figure all this out)....anyway, to think that ANYONE would be blind/foolish enough to fall for all those stupid BOD LIES, which as you pointed out so aptly, IS a MORTAL SIN! I guess all those people really are not concerned with exactly where and how they will be spending their eternity: in the everlasting fires of Hell. One would think more people might be a bit more concerned about this.

I also really appreciated how in one of your very recent videos (the one with all the photos of those HIDEOUS, GNARLY DEMONIC ANTIPOPES!!!) you mentioned that heinous imposter antipope B16 the ultra- evil is probably a satanist: it is good to call a spade a spade. He certainly looks and acts like one.

Thank you MHFM for ALL your fine work: for it is SO refreshing to hear the TRUTH!! St. John de Brebeuf, St. Francis Solanus Apostle to South America… pray for us!

Sincerely,

No B.O.D.

MHFM: In the life of St. John de Brebeuf (17^th century missionary to North America), there is the following very interesting occurrence. As captive of the Iroquois savages, he was being tortured by them. One of them (a Huron turned Iroquois) was mocking him and the many times he had told them that they must be baptized to be saved. This savage was pouring burning water on St. John in mockery of baptism. He said he was “helping” him get to Heaven. What the savage says about what St. John said concerning baptism is quite interesting. Note: St. John de Brebeuf was known to them as “Echon.”

“De Brebeuf, standing shackled to the torture post, answered the spokesman as mildly as he had often answered his enemies in the Huron councils and pleaded with him to remember the One-who-governed-all. ‘Echon,’ the former Huron spoke sweetly, ‘you see plainly that we treat you as a friend. You have often told us that we must be baptized in order that we may have eternal happiness after we die. In turn, we wish to be the cause of your happiness in heaven. Thank us, then, for the good turn we do to you. We believe what you have told us, that the more you suffer here, the more God will reward you hereafter.

“They carried forward the steaming pots of boiling water and, while emptying them over his head, they shouted: ‘Echon, we baptize you so that you may be happy in heaven. You know that you cannot be saved by your God without a proper baptism.’” (Francis X. Talbot, Saint Among the Hurons, p. 300.)

This has been added to a new article, which will be expanded as time goes along: Powerful quotes in the life of St. John de Brebeuf

How?

Dear Brothers of the Most Holy Family Monastery,

Could you please tell me how Vatican II's teaching on salvation does in fact contradict other ex cathedra statements? I fail to see the contradiction. I do not see how Vatican II actually contradicts the other statements. Namely, I do not see how the following contradicts the teachings of Vatican II:

Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, “Cantate Domino,” 1441, ex cathedra: “The Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that all those who are outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans but also Jews or heretics and schismatics, cannot share in eternal life and will go into the everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels, unless they are joined to the Church before the end of their lives; that the unity of this ecclesiastical body is of such importance that only for those who abide in it do the Church’s sacraments contribute to salvation and do fasts, almsgiving and other works of piety and practices of the Christian militia produce eternal rewards; and that nobody can be saved, no matter how much he has given away in alms and even if he has shed blood in the name of Christ, unless he has persevered in the bosom and unity of the Catholic Church.”(from your website, http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/the_catholic_church_salvation_faith_and_baptism.php#Chair)

God Bless you,
Pax Domini tecum.

c… 3live…

MHFM: There are many things we could discuss. But we would just direct you to our video below: The Most Specific Heresy in Vatican II.

Bothered

Dear Brothers, God bless you for the great videos you have posted lately: especially the ones about BOD and St. Thomas Aquinas, and Blagojich, and the Jesse Ventura ones. They are so informative.!

Also, with Benedict XVI running around in Jewish Temples and praising the Lutherans, and the VooDoo worshipers in Haiti, etc, isn't it amazing that EVERYONE is going to Heaven according to the VII church, except the Traditional Catholics! I know the whole Soc of St Pius X thing is a mess, but Benedict wants them to accept the VII teachings but he does not demand it of the pagans, jews etc.! I think the reason they are so afraid of the Traditional Catholics is because they are literally falling apart and they know the WE are right because we follow the true teachings of Our Lord.

And one thing that really bothers me is that they accept all these pagans, and I wonder what do they really think of the Early Church Martyrs and the English Martyrs of the 16th century. They died for the true Faith instead of worshiping pagan idols and attending protestant services! Don't they realize that the word "protestant' means PROTEST? They protested against the Catholic faith!

God bless you and I look forward to more little videos!

Sincerely,
Kathryn Rubio

How dare

This is Blasphamy!

How dare you accuse Holy Father (may the lord have mercy on his soul) John Paul II. He has every right to be tolerant to other religions, and the Koran doesn't speak out against Christians. How can you try to shove such stupidity into the minds of others?!?! It was a Catholic priest who said that Muhammad would be a prophet, Muslims consider Jesus a prophet, Messiah, and the son of the Lord God almighty you anti-Muslim/anti-Catholic freak. If you don't know what your talking about then don't say anything at all! You will, by the power of God make a video apologizing to all Muslims and Catholics.

Jakub

MHFM: Islam rejects the Trinity and in fact blasphemes the idea. It denies the divinity of Jesus Christ. It is a false religion. It’s truly ironic that you in fact justify the actual blasphemies of Islam and then accuse of blasphemy those who rightly denounce the apostasy of John Paul II.

Pope Eugene IV, Council of Basel, 1434: “… there is hope that very many from the abominable sect of Mahomet will be converted to the Catholic faith.”

Pope Callixtus III: “I vow to… exalt the true Faith, and to extirpate the diabolical sect of the reprobate and faithless Mahomet [Islam] in the East.”

Shroud

Subject: Shroud

Thank you for your work on the Shroud... about the rest i am not so sure... have to give it more consideration...

Being a Catholic i consider a split within the Church as a terrible thing to happen...

I agree though the catholic church need's to navigate its way back to Pre Vatican II ways of faith... many within the Catholic church think so...

but we must work this out in Truth and LOVE

Alaya

MHFM: It’s quite simple, Alaya. The Church’s teachings are clear. The Vatican II sect is not Catholic. You should look more carefully into our material on this and become convinced.

New Video

Enough

Subject: Joseph Ratzinger, the rat man

Dear Brothers Michael and Peter Dimond

Joseph Ratzinger (the Rat Man) has done it again! How anyone can still consider him the head of the catholic church after this public act of apostasy, is just unbelievable. Even if he was a true pope before this incident (which he was not, this would be enough for him to lose his office, to throw him out of the church. this is sort of like he is proclaiming himself a Jew. He might as well be. He is not the head of the catholic church!. The freemasons have completely taken over the vatican, and infiltrated the vatican. They are trying I believe to get catholics behind the NWO and to accept the jewish messiah, (ANTICHRIST). You should make a youtube video about this. I think it would be interesting! keep up the great work of your apostolate of truth.

SOLI DEO GLORIA MARK V CA

PS every traditionalist should come to the defense of the most blessed trinity. to defend the honor and glory of the blessed trinity! and denouce this evil man.

Exploring

Hello Brother Peter and Michael Dimond,

… I mentioned earlier how I am exploring Traditional Catholicism and I am really moved by your materials. I've noticed you mentioned not to attend the N.O. mass, even before reading the exchanges, there were things that just didn't seem right. There's guitars, drums... etc. Everytime after "mass" people would clap like it's a concert. Somehow I don't equate the sacrifice of the Mass of Our Lord to clapping at the end.

Just curious how did both of you find the true faith growing up, realize your calling and remaining devoted? I'm in my 20s still young, had many unCatholic experiences… It probably wasn't until last year when I started noticing the problems with VII, NO mass, realizing the lack of emphasis on the sacraments. I started being frustrated with the secular world aka "do what you want, whatever feels good you do it..." mentality. I coincidently starting seeing these things the same time when I started praying the Rosary for guidance.

I see you both as role models, would like to here you advice for young people like me exploring the True Traditional Catholic Faith.

Rich

Sent

… I sent a link to your video on “the most specific heresy” to some of my “modern- Catholic” friends and family thinking to myself that they would spare 10 minutes and see something truly irrefutable. The Catholic lawyer responded that only the Immaculate Conception and Assumption are infallible. I guess he thinks then that the Incarnation and Trinity are up for grabs? Also he charged you guys with not being “respected theologians”. The nun responded that she couldn’t “argue” with it on the facts, but she simply couldn’t “feel” that God would reject anyone, regardless of their faith. She then went on to say how important her “Catholic faith” was to her and how she resented being implied to be a heretic.

The level of blindness is truly amazing. I mean it has to be supernaturally imposed because nobody, certainly not two people with advanced degrees, could be that stupid on their own accord.

Bill Mulligan

Comment

… Onto Benedict's visit to the Synagogue:

Benedict stated "the rulers of the Third Reich wanted to crush the entire Jewish people... by wiping out this people, they intended to kill the God who called Abraham...".

We are undergoing a new replacement theology. From the Passion, Death and Resurrection of Jesus Christ to the the Passion, Death and Resurrection of the Jewish People, who are our new lords. In this new religion, Christ is no longer Lord. The New Replacement Theology teaches the Jews are our lords. The Passion and Death = The Shoah/"THE Holocaust" and the Resurrection = Zionism achieved.

In some countries, if you say less than 6 million Jews died in the holocaust, you will be tried for heresy against the new world religion. You cannot dare question what Jews tell you to believe. If you point this out and say there is some plot against the Church in particular and gentiles in general, you are blaspheming against the Jews, our new lords, and are branded an "anti-Semite".

JPII said Man = Jesus & God. Benedict says Nazis thought "by wiping out this people, they intended to kill the God".

This is the religion of the Anti-Christ…

Robert

Haiti

Brothers,

Those News articles about the Haitian statistics on voodoo are astounding. I think God was showing his mercy by the latest earthquake there - either more people would have gotten into Voodoo or else the ones already practicing (50-80%) would have kept going with it and deserved a worse place in hell. I don't think it was a tragedy but a wakeup call for anyone who survived. The media is obsessed with the economic poverty of Haiti - they don't understand that the economic poverty is a symptom of the long-term and chronic spiritual poverty created by Voodoo. Notice that Antipope Benedict XVI just mentioned the "charities" that will help out, but doesn't make a single comment on anything about the spiritual poverty of Haiti. It's outrageous!!!

The video on 2012 by Jesse Ventura is incredible. I think the government is simply digging their own graves by building the underground bunkers. All their confidence and faith is in science, i.e. natural phenomena. Just like they totally miss the point about the earthquake in Haiti, they're literally burying their heads in the sand about 2012. If the solar flares hit, then all their circuitry will be melted and they'll be stuck behind those big doors they're so proud of. Also, there are so many anomalies regarding 2012 that it is inevitable that they've missed something. The picture of the end of the world in Denver airport is so callous. It's like they put it there in mockery, along with the devil in the suitcase statue…

God Bless,

Chris White

Interesting

Subject: Haiti

Hello Dimond Brothers,

I'm an American of Haitian descent born and raised in NY. I can testify that it is indeed true that most Haitians believe in and/or practice voodoo to some degree. Not all of them do. My family has never believed in it nor practiced it. In fact my father (now deceased) often used to keep his ethnicity a secret from people who asked him about it simply because he was embarassed to admit it since most people associate Haiti with voodoo. Some of the "going-on's" in Haiti are unspeakable. I know this from many stories my parents, aunts, and uncles recounted to me.

In the years prior to the Vatican II apostasy there were many good Catholics, but there were also many bad ones who combined elements of voodoo with Catholicism. The good Catholics were a minority. My grandfather attended daily Mass and said the Rosary daily with his children back then. But now it's very different over there. As far as I know there is no traditional movement over there which means that the "Church" over there is 100% Novus Ordo.

I'd like to tell you just one example of how evil some of the locals are. My father recounted a story in which a French priest, back in the days when France had a colony there, scolded a group of locals because of their superstitious beliefs. The next day they offered him a plate of food. He took it from them but did not eat it for he was suspicious. So he gave it to a stray dog and the dog died.

I believe God has punished that country through oppression and a cruel dictator for so long because of their sins of idolatry, in the same way He punished the Israelites when they turned from Him by allowing them to be enslaved by the Pharoah and again by allowing them to be captured by the Babylonians.

God Bless You,

Sylvestre

Agree

Dear brothers in Christ,

I completely agree with you regarding the earthquake in Haiti as God's punishment. I would add that this severe physical punishment is the admonition to all other nations, who are, regrettably, not any better than Haitians. We can only try to guess what will be God's punishments for innumerable abortions throughout the world, for apostasy, for endless stream of blasphemies, for atheism, for mocking the Truth by "scientific" hoaxes such as "theory" of evolution, etc. And the coming physical punishments for all these evils will be as nothing compared to the spiritual sufferings here on Earth, and in eternal fire in Hell. The magnitude of the Haiti's earthquake is a clear sign of accumulated God's wrath to be expected soon on all Earth. It surpasses my imagination and use of words.

Let us all pray for conversion of all people on Earth. God bless MHFM, and all the remnant of The One and Only True Church.

Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia

Haiti, Punishment

Subject: Haiti, Punishment

Mr. Miles is going a bit too far in saying that the earthquake (not hurricane) in Haiti was a direct act of God's vengeance on the Voodoo practicing Haitians. While it is true that some people in Haiti practice Voodoo, it is certainly not the norm. Much of that perception comes from movies, television shows, and other pop culture outlets. Further, at a time like this, when an entire country is in crisis, it is certainly much more important to send our prayers and aid (if possible) rather than affixing God's wrath to the situation.

MHFM: We linked to two news articles which also state that roughly half, if not more, of the country practices Voodoo. One of the articles even mentioned that Voodoo is so commonly practiced that funeral rites are frequently followed by a “Catholic” (Novus Ordo) funeral service. That’s really something, isn’t it? The fact that the Vatican II “priests” have no problem performing “Catholic” rites for those who were also involved in Voodoo speaks volumes. It’s a commentary on the laypeople, in addition to the Vatican II sect’s false clergy. They are so far from the authentic faith and respect for the one true God. The world – and Haiti is a prime example – has devolved into sundry forms of paganism, often mixed with one’s personal ideas about religion.

We are not saying that food, water, medicines, etc. shouldn’t be provided for such people, but one should not give unconditional aid or donations to people who will, almost certainly, continue their pagan and/or heretical lifestyles in rejection of the true God. One of course should hope and pray for their conversion; and it’s likely that some young children who died after baptism were saved. But it’s almost certainly a divine punishment – not necessarily for every single individual in Haiti but for most. In fact, this is another article which confirms that Voodoo is “practised alongside Roman Catholicism by the vast majority of Haitians…” It also says that some Haitians see this event as God’s punishment.

The current catastrophe in Haiti is certainly the most devastating one they’ve experienced. Based on the number of people killed in addition to the horrific suffering in the aftermath, it’s arguably the worst physical catastrophe in modern times. It’s extremely interesting to consider that this catastrophe resulted from a crack, movement and rumbling in the Earth and under the Earth. When people practice Voodoo, they are invoking evil spirits who reside in Hell under the Earth. The Earth rumbling in punishment, therefore, might be the physical manifestation of their spiritual invocation of evil spirits who reside under the Earth. In other words, that’s how God probably decided to punish them.

The earthquake was also exactly 7.0 on the Richter scale. The number seven in the Bible is linked with perfection. The 7.0 quake might signify a perfect punishment from God. We are not saying that this is necessarily the case, but it could be. Those who come out and reject the idea that it’s a divine punishment are giving in to the spirit of liberalism and the political correctness of the world. What else do people expect this pagan, heretical, sin-saturated, godless world to receive? The event was stunning and apocalyptic. One witness who survived and made it to America said that the Earth suddenly opened up underneath her. She walked forward and fell, and then looked down the street and all the small homes were suddenly collapsed, in an instant. One second she was standing there, and the next all the homes were instantly destroyed.

You two brothers should spend some of your waking time seeing what the real world has to offer. It is not all wrapped up in causes. There really is some fun in living.

Your partner in the Roman Catholic Church.

John

MHFM: There is fun in living the Catholic faith. There’s no fun in being a pagan or a heretic, where one finds only temporary and unfulfilling distractions. There’s only one cause that matters in life:

Matthew 16:26- “For what doth it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and suffer the loss of his own soul? Or what exchange shall a man give for his soul?”

Ghost

Subject: Ghost

Hi, I was wondering what the church teaches about ghost whenever I am asked this question, I reply that a ghost is either a demon or possibly a person in purgatory.

Is this a correct response? Thanks

MHFM: Basically, yes, though one might word it a bit differently. If someone sees the manifestation of a spirit, it could be a saint (i.e., a person in Heaven), it could be a demon, or it could be a soul in Purgatory. We read in the lives of certain saints that God allowed some souls in Purgatory to manifest themselves to people on Earth.

Who’s right?

Subject: new rite

Every traditional group that I know of says that the "new rite of mass and ordinations" are valid?

Yet you claim that they are not?

Who's right here anyway?

Ken Deane

MHFM: We are.

Conspiracy

Subject: Conspiracy Theory 2012

Dear Brothers

That was excellent. I heard about that two decades ago. But they always say that it’s for in case of war, so the government can hide out. Now it turns out that it’s for the rich and the elite…

Kim.

Conversion Progress

Subject: Update & Conversion desire

To Whom it May Concern,

… I think I may have done enough to convert minus what it takes another to do…

I have read the Penny Catechism I ordered. I believe the teaching it contains therein and am confident that I believe them…

I believe in the dogmas which I know of the Catholic Church: the Trinity, the Incarnation, the Papacy, Papal infallibility, outside the Church there is no salvation, the necessity of water baptism. I have assented to praying the precious Rosary when possible. Since I believe in the Catholic Church and her sacred and true teachings, I will pray to believe those necessary things to which I know not now.

I reject the post-Vatican II "Church", its claimants, beginning with John XXIII, and the New Mass. I believe the third secret of Fatima has been fulfilled. I believe the “Church” is in worse state than the Arian crisis, in which 1-3% of those purporting to be bishops were practicing the Faith. (That is an easy logical understanding since we are in the time of the great apostasy.) However, I believe there is a remnant of the true Church – and believe there always will be the Church. I desire to keep the faith whole and inviolate...

Zachary Lewis Gragg

p.s. – I have found the book about Padre Pio to be very interesting, helpful and encouraging.

Comment

Great job on the "Most specific heresy in Vatican II" video. I am very grateful you interspersed the faces of the malicious evil anti-popes and their minions with beautiful images of the mountains and the streams. Had you not given us this bit of visual relief, I think I would have gotten physically sick from viewing those most hideous despicable faces, for each and every anti-pope is so wicked to behold----the very faces of evil---- that it's as if one can SEE the demons crawling out of their face especially their eyes----REALLY REALLY SUPER-CREEPY demonic presence there. I think they must all have been possessed...

“No conflict”

[Subject: This is in reference to a post about a week back on heresy in the Bayside messages]

Christ gave Peter authority over His Church not the world. Popes have no justification to govern or dictate to the people of the world, only to members of the Church. Popes declaring that outside the Church there is no salvation can only pertain and be a concern for Catholics. A Catholic that falls out of grace is outside the Church and there in no salvation for those outside the Church as popes have declared.

Consider Limbo, a place where the souls of those not baptized and free of grievous sin go. Limbo is considered part of Heaven by the Church even though the souls in it were never a member. Just like the true believers are assigned to different rooms in the Father’s mansion. Is it inconceivable to think that the souls in Limbo might not have a room or two of their own in the mansion, although they may be on a different level.

I see no conflict for Catholics between Our Lady alleged words at Bayside, that there are those outside the Church of different faith in Heaven, and CATHOLICS believing the ex cathedra pronouncements of the popes that outside the Church there is no salvation.

Pete B

MHFM: Bayside says that members of other faiths gain salvation. The Catholic Church defines the opposite. You see no conflict because you are a liar. The truth is not in you; it does not resonate with you. On the contrary, lies find comfort in your heart.

John 18:37- “For this was I born, and for this came I into the world; that I should give testimony to the truth. Every one that is of the truth, heareth my voice.”

Regarding limbo, the limbo for unbaptized children is not part of Heaven, but a separate part of Hell. This is confirmed by the Councils of Lyons II, Florence and Pius VI’s Auctorem fidei.

You also have no understanding of dogmatic truth. A dogma is a truth of divine revelation. It was revealed by Christ and delivered to the Church. When pronouncing on such matters of faith, a pope is not making up laws as he goes along. So your comment about how popes don’t “dictate” to the world is completely off the mark. When they make a solemn pronouncement on a point of faith or morals, they are accurately repeating the truth that Christ revealed. By rejecting it, you reject Christ, the Papacy and papal infallibility.

BOD & St. Thomas

Subject: BOD & St. Thomas

I’d like to make another point in refutation of the BOD guy who cited Saint Thomas’s error as justification for holding the BOD position. Saint Thomas clearly erred as you have adequately proven. But just for sake of argument, pretend for a second that St. Thomas’s formulation was correct. I don’t know how it would significantly change anything in a PRACTICAL sense in terms of the need for everyone to convert and to hold the Catholic faith in order to be saved. Saint Thomas’s formulation clearly contemplates one who is convinced of Catholic truth and desires the Sacrament (explicitly) of Baptism. St. Thomas’s conception of the desire for the sacrament has nothing to do with and is nothing like what modern day heretics pretend it to be. To the moderns, BOD means essentially that one can believe anything at all, as long as he is somehow “good” (impossible without God to be good) and follows his conscience. In this warped formulation “ignorance” somehow suffices for the lack of explicit “desire”, and thus presto, just about everyone is saved. In Saint Thomas’s construction, all the work of real conversion must actually take place and the person must actually believe in the minimum things (Trinity, Incarnation) to be Catholic. The only thing missing is the water. So I would ask this person; though he be proven wrong on the narrow premise; just what would be the point if he were right? Almost nothing would change.

Bill Mulligan

MHFM: We agree with your points. We made the same kind of argument in this rather short article.

The folly of those who tenaciously fight for "Baptism of Desire"

We offer one caveat, in case our readers misunderstand the point. We are of course not saying that it’s a matter of indifference whether one believes in explicit “baptism of desire” or the true position: that there is only salvation for those who have been water baptized. It is not a matter of indifference. What one believes on this matter is very important; it involves submission to defined dogmatic truth. The point we are making is that for those who wrongly believe in explicit BOD (what St. Thomas teaches), it’s foolish for them to fight for the idea. The reason they fight for it, however, is because there is something much bigger at stake for them than just the (false) notion that some unbaptized catechumens can be saved. They see “baptism of desire” (even explicitly speaking) as the gateway for a world of salvation outside the Church, which is why they scratch and claw for the false idea with demonic determination.

2012

MHFM: This is very interesting.

Conspiracy Theory - 2012 - Jesse Ventura - Part 1

Conspiracy Theory - 2012 - Jesse Ventura - Part 2

Conspiracy Theory - 2012 - Jesse Ventura - Part 3

Conspiracy Theory - 2012 - Jesse Ventura - Part 4

Conspiracy Theory - 2012 - Jesse Ventura - Part 5

Conspiracy Theory - 2012- Jesse Ventura - Part 6

Family

Dear Brothers

Question # 1: Would it be ok for me pray for temporal matters for my heretical N.O. family members?- Such as getting over an illness, finding a job & so forth ?

Question # 2: I believe there will be lots of earth changes disasters, calamities & more chastisements in that area coming down the pike..Would it be sinful for me to give them a sacramental that serves as a protection for all that?

I pray daily for the conversion of my family and told them they need to convert inorder to be saved. Also I know about the dangers of being too attached to family as I read in True Spouse book, I do distance myself from them most of the time .... But I would feel responsible for their deaths if they perished in the disasters when I could have given them the protection sacramental... Yes, I know their hellbound but care about them as well..

Steve

MHFM: You should avoid doing #1. They are heretical and, until they are converted, that should not be something you dedicate prayers to. Regarding #2, considering that they are heretical, a sacramental is not going to protect them from a chastisement. One should not cast those pearls before swine – in other words, before those who have obstinately rejected the truth. One could give them advice and make them aware of impending temporal dangers, in addition to praying for their conversion; but one should not give them sacramentals if they have obstinately rejected the truth.

Austrian “Catholics”

Subject: Austrian Catholics

Greetings.

The article you posted about Austrian Catholics leaving what they think is the Catholic Church is quite revealing. The secular and modernist media is trying to paint this as a reaction to Ratzinger's position in the Bishop Williamson affair. They do not seem to realize that their leaving is one of the bad fruits of Vatican II and the religious indifferentism of the post Vatican II "popes." I feel certain they are disgusted with the words and actions of Ratzinger especially regarding the Talmudic Judaics and the Mohammedans.

EJP

MHFM: Yes, we noticed that part of the article as well. They blame the exodus primarily on, what a surprise, Jewish issues. It’s another interesting glimpse into the focus, intentions and bias of the mainstream media. [This was in our News and Commentary, for those who don’t know what we’re referring to.]

Deaths after Baptism

MHFM: There are many quotes in the life of St. John de Brebeuf which explain how almost all of the people they baptized would die shortly after baptism. In other words, it’s as if the natives were being kept alive for baptism and then, once it was received, they departed life. Here’s just one quote of many:

“… Lalemant [Superior of the mission] testifies: ‘The Hurons observed with some sort of reason that those who had been nearest to us, happened to be the most ruined by the disease. Whole villages who had first received us, now were utterly exterminated. It has happened very often and has been remarked a hundred times, that where we were most welcome, where we baptized more people, there it was, in fact, where they died most. On the contrary, in the cabins to which we were denied entry, although they were sick to extremity, at the end of a few days, one would see every person happily cured.’” (Francis X. Talbot, Saint Among the Hurons, p. 221)

Adult Baptism

Subject: Adult Baptism

In this time of crisis can a layperson baptize an adult, even though there may be validly ordained Novus Ordo clergy, or even Traditionalist ones, around?. And will all the past sins of this newly baptized adult be forgiven by this lay-baptism?

Thanks

MHFM: Yes. That’s discussed in this file:

The Steps to convert to the traditional Catholic faith and for those leaving the New Mass - Baptism and Conditional Baptism - the Council of Trent's Profession of Faith for Converts

Comment

What wonderful videos on St. John de Brebeuf and St. Thomas Aquinas. I think that anyone who believes that there is salvation outside of the Catholic Church completely mocks the lives of the Saints. I hope you continue your videos. They are brief, but packed with so much information (especially the St. Thomas Aquinas video)…

Teri Thurman

JP2 & Pius XII

Subject: “saint” John Paul II and Pius XII

There was a lot of speculation about why Ratzinger would advance the canonization of both men at the same time. Now it appears that Ratzinger knew that Pius XII being advanced would be controversial, and would divert attention away from the reprehensible actions of Wojtyla. If he had advanced Wojtyla alone, I'm certain there would have been dissenting voices. Now all that is quashed by the din of the "controversy" surrounding Pius XII.

Pax Christi,
Patricia

Haiti

The hurricane in Haiti should come as no surprise as the country is ruled by the devil. Where witchcraft, witchdoctors, voodoo and blood sacrifices are their daily lifestyle. What goes unannounced is the modern day Sodom and Gomorrah similarity of God's Wrath that has struck that country. A warning for other nations and rulers that is seen as just a natural weather incident, although is a sign of things to come in these last days. During my military career, I took the Haiti-Creole language test, a derivative of the French language. To my surprise, the exam questions were all about their voodoo culture. My thoughts at that time, were had I known more about their culture I most likely would have never taken the test to begin with.

God Bless,
Tom Miles

Girlfriend

Subject: Quick girlfriend question

I wanted to ask you what you thought about this:

Do you think it is bad/wrong/sinful, to want to have a girlfriend, even if you have resolved not to marry? Do you think it is wrong to have a girlfriend if you have decided you are not going to marry (at least at the moment or anytime soon)?

MHFM: One should not have a girlfriend if one has no intention of pursuing marriage.

Bl, B, Pius XI

Subject: Blagojevich, Bankers, Pius XI

Brother(s) Dimond:

Thanks for posting the intriguing YouTube video about Gov. Blagojevich and the bankers. As your comments suggest, one doesn't have to be an across-the-board admirer of Blagojevich to suspect that he was targeted for his good deeds, not his faults, as we might also surmise about JFK, RFK, MLK, and some others. The media accounts of the Blagojevich case always seemed to have a missing piece, but this is the first time that I've heard this specific information. Once again, MHFM is diligently getting the word out on issues we should be investigating, and I appreciate it.

Thanks also for your accompanying comments, including your quote from Pope Pius XI about the bankers. When I first read that quote on your video page, I was impressed by his insights on the subject, made all the more noteworthy by the fact that he made these remarks 75 years ago, without the benefit of recent investigations and YouTube videos. This inspired me to do a little further research on Pius XI, which revealed, among other things, some evidence that he boldly stood up to Mussolini and his unjust acts, which some suspect may have resulted in Mussolini having had a hand in Pius Xi's death. It seems that this may have been a man of underrated wisdom and integrity, whose full story perhaps hasn't gotten the attention it deserves. I'm sure you have a lot on your plates already, but it might be inspiring for many people to learn more about the Pope who, if I read you correctly, was the last true Pope who wasn't a "weak Pope"; I hope you'll consider presenting more on this subject.

Though we have some areas of disagreement, I'm grateful for your ongoing efforts to expose the facts about a wide variety of matters. Thanks for your dedication to truth, honesty, and justice. I'm looking forward to more enlightening and challenging material on your website in the future.

Lyndon Olson

Bankers run the Show

This is an extremely interesting video which shows the power of the bankers. It’s about former Governor of Illinois, Rod Blagojevich. Blagojevich is a pro-abortion and foul-mouthed apostate. But what’s so interesting is that on Dec. 8, 2008, when he was still Governor of Illinois, he decided to cut off business with one of the banks which would not release credit to local workers. As critics of the Federal Reserve have pointed out, the private banks control the country by creating money out of nothing and by arbitrarily deciding not to give out loans when they desire. In this way, they hold sway over the nation's economy and in fact run the power structure of the entire country.

Pope Pius XI, Quadragesimo anno (#106), May 15, 1935: “This dictatorship is being most forcibly exercised by those who, since they hold the money and completely control it, control credit also and rule the lending of money. Hence they regulate the flow, so to speak, of the life-blood whereby the entire economic system lives, and have so firmly in their grasp the soul, as it were, of economic life that no one can breathe against their will.”

So, Blagojevich decided to fight back and cut off business with the banks and the bankers who wouldn’t lend money. The very next day he was arrested, and the entire media was branding him as the most despicable character in politics. Just a coincidence? We don’t think so. This shows the power of the bankers, and how they run the show, the media, and much more. If he hadn’t tried to fight against the bankers, it’s quite likely that he never would have been removed from office.

What’s also quite interesting is that, in the interview in this video, he points out that they didn’t want other governors to follow his example. If other governors had decided to cut off business with banks that simply played by their own rules, it might have caused a chain reaction against the banking faction. They had to nip this in the bud right away and come down hard.

Spiritual desert

Hello Brothers

… I'm promoting your stuff [to various people on the internet]… you would not believe the answers the so called Catholics are giving. It's JP II quotes and BoD 24 / 7 it’s really a spiritual desert it’s very sad…

Patrick

MHFM: Yes, it’s really bad.

New Video

Protestantism

… I spent nine years in protestantism and was a youth pastor and then a pastor. I know that you realize this - but others… do not - exactly how extremely wicked protestantism is. Most Catholics - including priest and bishops, and of course the entire VII sect, (but even valid priests and bishops of the traditional churches) believe truly that protestants are our brothers! This is a HUGE issue brothers. People think that protestants have the bible, the practices of Christian prayer, etc., and so they feel it is undeniable that they are saved Christians. I studied most all of their theologies relentlessly, debated their doctors (God giving me this grace and opportunity to see) and I can tell you fisthand that they have not only a different approach to Christianity, but an entirely different religion - so thoroughly different from even the most basic concepts of Christian thought that it can not even rightly claim the name Christian. I refer to those who claim to be 'orthodox' (no such thing) protestants such as the baptists, pentecostals, faithful (sic) lutherans, independent bible churches, wesleyans, nazarenes, etc. It is just really incredible how clear it is that their Jesus is not Jesus Christ who is the One Just Judge…

-Thanks for everything…

Michael Glennon

Water

It's great to see Bernardo standing up against another proud and heretical priest. It's the typical "you don't have the right to judge heretics" argument. That's the type of argument that started the Great Apostasy in the first place. If no Layman can, or is allowed to, discern who is or isn't Catholic or what is or isn't Catholic, then what's the point of the Catholic Church? It is the Catholic Church who has already judged what and who is Catholic or not. The Catholic faithful, whether they be laymen, monks, priests, bishops, prophets, saints or popes, are simply repeating what the Catholic Church has already stated when they judge heretics. In effect, these types of anti-salvation heretical priests are saying, "you don't have the right to repeat what the Catholic Church has stated." It's outrageous and ridiculous!!!...

The article C hyperlinks to on the Vatican II sects new work trying to debunk the Bible is really outrageous. If people can't see that the VII sect is the Whore of Babylon and that this is now the time of the Great Apostasy after reading that article, I don't know what would convince them! One of the main duties of the Papacy is to teach what the correct meaning of Holy Scripture is. Obviously, if Benedict XVI (and the other four Antipopes - JPII, PVI, etc.) were a true pope he would be condemning such a work, not promoting it!!! But there you have it - The gates of hell pretending to be the Catholic Church. It's disgusting!!!

Great to see James Heapes' turnabout. I hope he fully converts to the Catholic faith, where God judges not the purity of our skin color, but the purity of our hearts. Indeed, the entire human race will not exist for much longer anyway because we are living in the days just before Jesus returns.

Great video on St. Thomas Aquinas and the great refutation of the Baptism of Desire heretics. The bad-willed heretics who deny the dogma of the absolute necessity of water baptism for salvation, by accepting and promoting Baptism of desire are liars. How can anyone put a saint on par with a pope when it comes to the authority of their pronouncements. Jesus only prayed for St. Peter's faith to fail not, no other Apostle or disciple. Jesus only gave the Keys of the Kingdom to St. Peter, no other Apostle or disciple. The Holy Ghost does not protect saints from making errors - only the pope is protected from making errors when speaking in an infallible capacity. The Baptism of Desire heretics truly do not desire the salvation of all people, as God truly does. If they did, then they would make sure that they are following the absolute authority of the Papacy, and not a Doctor or saint's teachings. Clearly, St. Thomas Aquinas was fallible, as is proven by his complete mistake regarding the Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary. BOD heretics attempt to be their own Magisterium and pope by declaring fallible teachings as infallible - they try to usurp Peter's chair like Lucifer tried to usurp the throne of the Almighty. Down to hell you heretics and burn where there is no water - then you will understand the absolute necessity of water baptism!!!

… If we lived in a desert, we wouldn't last more than 3 days without water. If we need water for physical salvation, then how much more do we need water for spiritual salvation!!! God made water plentiful on Earth because we absolutely need it for water baptism.

God Bless,

Chris White

St. Thomas, B.O.D.

Subject: Baptism of desire

1917 Pio Benedictine Code of Canon Law Canon 1366 (2)

Professors shall treat studies in rational theology and philosophy and the instruction of students in these disciplines according to the system, teaching, and principles of the Angelic Doctor (St. Thomas Aquinas) and hold to them religiously.

St. Thomas Aquinas..... "THE SACRAMENT OF BAPTISM IS SAID TO BE NESSESARY FOR SALVATION IN SO FAR AS THERE CAN BE NO SALVATION FOR MAN UNLESS HE AT LEAST HAVE IT IN DESIRE WHICH, WHICH WITH GOD, COUNTS FOR THE DEED." (Summa Theologica 3, 68 2 )

According to you St. Thomas is burning in hell. Clearly one would be in Grave error in two ways by obedience and condeming a Saint to hell, to deny these facts one would be lying to yourself and to God.

In Charity....

MHFM: You are quite wrong. Our response is found in this file and in the video below. It contains an important new quote from St. Thomas to completely refute your corruption of Catholic principles.

New sub-section on finer points, quotes, arguments, objections and issues relevant to certain "traditionalists"

Clarify

Dear Brothers, Could you clarify for me the 2 pages listed below concerning "unless and except", the 2 pages listed below do not seem to agree with each other? My bible and missal agrees with the first page below thank you ---- Donald

http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/the_catholic_church_salvation_faith_and_baptism.php

John 3:5 vs. John 6:54

Some writers, including Fr. Laisney in Is Feeneyism Catholic?, have tried to refute a literal interpretation of John 3:5 by appealing to the words of Our Lord in John 6:54: "Amen, amen I say to you: Except you eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, you shall not have life in you." They argue that the language in this verse is the same as in John 3:5, and yet the Church doesn’t take Jn. 6:54 literally – for infants don’t need to receive the Eucharist to be saved. But the argument falters because the proponents of this argument have missed a crucial difference in the wording of these two verses.

John 6:54- "Amen, amen I say to you: EXCEPT YOU EAT the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, you shall not have life in you."

John 3:5- "Amen, amen I say to thee, UNLESS A MAN be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God."

Our Lord Jesus Christ, when speaking on the necessity of receiving the Eucharist in John 6:54, does not say: "unless a man eat the flesh of the Son of man…" He says: "Except you…" His words, therefore, are clearly intended for the people to whom He was speaking, not every man. Since the people to whom He was speaking could receive the Eucharist, they had to in order to be saved. This applies to all who can receive the Eucharist, which is what the Church teaches. But in John 3:5 Our Lord unequivocally speaks of every man. This is why the Catholic Church’s magisterial teaching, in every single instance it has dealt with John 3:5, has taken it as it is written (see Council of Carthage, Denz 102; Florence, Denz. 696; Trent, Sess. 5, no. 4, Denz. 791; Trent, Sess. 6, Chap. 4; Trent, Can. 2 and 5 on Baptism, Denz. 858 and 861.). Also, one should note that Trent’s Canons on Baptism are Canons on the Sacrament (Canones de sacramento baptismi). This means that Can. 5 (see below) condemns anyone who says that the Sacrament of Baptism (i.e., water baptism) is not necessary for salvation. It also takes John 3:5 literally once again, as the Church always does.

Pope Paul III, Council of Trent, Canons on the Sacrament of Baptism, Can. 5: "IF ANYONE SHALL SAY THAT BAPTISM IS OPTIONAL, THAT IS, NOT NECESSARY FOR SALVATION (cf. John 3:5): let him be anathema."

John 3:5-7: "Jesus answered: Amen, amen I say to thee, unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God… WONDER NOT, that I said to thee, YOU MUST BE BORN AGAIN."

http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/baptism.php

Since households generally include children – and the Bible repeatedly mentions that whole households were baptized – these passages by themselves make the case against infant baptism extremely unlikely. In fact, if a Protestant who rejects infant baptism believes in Scripture alone, he would have to find an explicit teaching in the Bible that infants should not be baptized. But there is nothing like that.

Third, Jesus clearly taught that every man must be baptized to be saved. We saw this in John 3:5. He does not make any distinctions or exceptions. This is very significant because in John 6:53 – a passage on the necessity to eat Jesus’ flesh, which uses language that is similar to John 3:5 – we do see a distinction. In John 6:53, Jesus says:

“Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.”

But in John 3:5, he says:

“Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.”

In John 6:53 (John 6:54 in Catholic versions), Jesus says unless YOU eat the flesh of the Son of man. But in John 3:5, the statement is universally applicable: unless A MAN is born again of water and the Spirit.

The wording is slightly different because receiving the Eucharist is necessary for all who hear the command and can fulfill it, such as those above the age of reason. Jesus said unless you, to those to whom He was speaking and to others who hear the command. But the necessity to receive water baptism is universal. Hence, Jesus says unless a man is born again of water and the Spirit he cannot enter into the Kingdom of God. Every man necessarily includes infants. It logically follows from the teaching of Jesus in John 3:5 that infants should be baptized.

MHFM: You are focusing on the words except and unless. They are not the crucial words; in fact, they mean the same thing. The crucial difference is between “a man” (John 3:5) and “YOU” (John 6:54). The use of “a man” in John 3:5 shows that every single man, without exception, must be water baptized to be saved. The word “YOU” in John 6:54 shows that it’s not absolutely necessary for every man, but for all who hear the command and can fulfill it.

E and R

Subject: Evolution hoax and racism

Dear Brothers:

It´s old news, but nevertheless worth mentioning in light of your most recent videos: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article574768.ece

Now, returning to the racism controversy, all one needs to do is having a shred of honesty (that´s the hardest part nowadays) and read a little of Brazilian and/or Mexican colonial History, to see that the Church not only NEVER objected to interracial marriages but actually consented to perform it MANY times. On so many occasions in fact that the entire Mexico population now reflects this, while Brazil has the highest level of mixing in our entire planet, without ghettos and segregation like in countries of Protestant colonization.

One interesting challenge to racist who deny that non-whites and non-jews are true human beings or with a soul is: If they breed with a black, Japanese or Chinese woman, what would happen to the their son? Would he be only half-human? Possessor of only half a Soul? And if this person decided to have human descendants, for how many generations would his children and grand-children and so forth require to mix again with white persons so that all "impure" traces be eliminated? 5 generations? 7? 10? Never?

There´s a fact you may not be aware, but it´s very interesting. When the first Portuguese expedition arrived in what would one day be Brazil, they did send a message back to Europe. In it, they say they are unsure about the riches in the newly discovered territory, but that the place has an immeasurable treasure that can not be overlooked: The lost souls of all those natives, souls desperate for Salvation that need to be won for Christ and the Catholic Church… So much for invincible ignorance and the Baptism of Desire hoax.

Comment

Subject: “Holy Communion” for sale?

Dear Brothers,

A friend heard on Fox News Saturday(01/08/10) that a priest in the Los Angeles area was charging people for holy communion(not cap'd on purpose since most Novus Ordo sacraments are not valid) AND OTHER SACRAMENTS. All this with the urging and approval of the priest's bishop in Mexico. Have you seen the story? What was the name of the priest and the name of the bishop?

Marie H., Chicago

Interracial

MHFM: In response to our recent videos which refuted and condemned racism, some leftover racists and opponents of interracial marriage complained about the lack of more positive proclamations from the Church that specifically authorize interracial marriage. We refuted this by pointing out the illogic of the objection (i.e., where would the line be drawn?), and the fact that never once was it forbidden, even though it occurred and other prohibitions (such as interreligious marriage) were enacted. It was directly endorsed by accepting all marriages between baptized Christians, and members of all races fall into that category. We also pointed out that it was done especially in mission territories. To further refute them, here’s a quote from the life of St. John de Brebeuf, 17^th century missionary to North America. To solve a certain problem, he specifically recommended interracial marriage with the natives. This proves that he (and everyone else) recognized that there was nothing wrong with it. It was not enacted in this particular case because of the still untrustworthy morals of the natives; but this quote demonstrates, once again, that it was accepted by the Church.

“Marriage with native women was thought of as a solution. Champlain had promised this and de Brebeuf, knowing the circumstances, rather approved of it. In one of the councils near Ihonatiria he asked the chiefs their thought on the marriage of the French with the Huron women; they thought it would bind the nations together more closely. He proposed that the matter be brought before a general council; they saw no reason for this. He explained that these marriages must be permanent and that the women could not divorce themselves or mix with other men; they did not think this reasonable. The matter ended by their demanding valuable gifts which the women would own. It was clear to de Brebeuf that such marriages, at this time, would be ruinous for the Frenchmen.” (Francis X. Talbot, Saint Among the Hurons, p. 178.)

Apology

Do you remember me?

I say the rosary often and got the Douay Rheims version of the Bible. I renounce the hate I felt for other people who were not by my definition "the seed of Abraham" and came to a more enlightened perspective, some of what I sent to you was just plain garbage...but I still feel that the diversity of God's creation is something that glorifies God, and that each individual type of creature has an un-shakeable responsibility to keep their kind in existence, and how that is done descides the fate of the soul. I see population statistics for white people and it scares me, we wont be around much longer. Catholics who are white should have as many children as possible.

This "racism" word was invented by the ultra-millionaire banker Jew Bronstein ( "Trotsky" ) to be an emotional trigger word, just like "reactionary" and "fascist" and all other slogans, so the marxists can intimidate people with them and stop them talking about these things, but then there is also the neo-nazi vermin who are no better than marxists who paralise debate by sinking to their level.

By the way, this website is the best website on the internet, its like our island of truth in a stormy ocean. I read it everytime I use the internet and find it very informative. You may continue to hate me if you wish but I want nothing but success for your monestary and for it to grow, and part of that growth will involve embracing natural truth like never before since this is the collapse of Christian Europe.

By the way, Ive never apologized not once in my life and this is not an apology, its telling you you were right about certain things, so people can learn I changed the position I hold, because I caused a debate on your site…

-James H
Eire

MHFM: [This is the guy, James from Ireland, who wrote in with racist views and who condemned interracial marriage.] We’re glad to hear about the move in the right direction. However, you still need to undergo a conversion, and make the profession of faith for converts once you are fully convinced and have completely abandoned your previous views.

EWTN

As a former employee of EWTN please let your readers be assured that EWTN and its Theology Department, including the two men mentioned in the recent letter about EWTN, are no friends of the true Catholic faith. They are apologists for Ratzinger and his minions under cover of traditional vestments.

New Video

Heretical priest

MHFM,

I just wanted to add a comment on your great videos exposing those heretical “traditionalists”. Today, when I went to receive the sacraments, a priest from the CMRI, who just came from Denver who goes by the name of Fr. Raul Macias, told me that we shouldn’t tell heretics or non-Catholics that they’re on the road to Hell, even after I had mentioned the words “in charity” because out of love for Christ and their souls, we certainly don’t want them in Hell. But what’s even more shocking is that he used the term “obstinate”. He stated something like: “..even if they are obstinate persons, you shouldn’t tell them that.” He went on to say that “that’s the duty of priest or of a bishop” and that it’s not my duty or that’s not our job to do because we “shouldn’t judge like that.” I mean, then what about when Nestorius denied that Mary was the Mother of God from his pulpit and A SIMPLE LAYMAN named Eusebius stood up and protested the public heresy!? Well I guess, according to what Macias had scolded me for, Eusebius must have acted very uncatholic and it was a reaction which was erroneously praised by councils and popes. The level of stupidity this heretical position and its blindness is amazing.

But I believe he really is worse than our last encounter because the first I saw him he stated that my father shouldn’t tell his novus ordo mother about the traditional movement, because she might be “scandalized” and that’s it’s BETTER if she doesn’t know the traditional movement and stays in ignorance, because she can be saved by… THAT’S RIGHT, “invincible ignorance”. It’s quite disgusting, unbelievable, and outright offensive. This is a so called “traditionalist” of the CMRI. So what does it leave us with? If a novus ordite can be saved in “invincible ignorance”, why not a Buddhist, a Hindu, or even a Jew? I truly appreciate your new YT videos, I will now used them as means to explain to traditionalist why the CMRI and other groups like them, are actually REALLY EVIL!

Brothers, thanks for your great work…

Sincerely,

Bernardo

Interest

My dear friend, Peace!

I am a 50 years old single man from central Brazil, a schoolteacher, gardener, translator and writer. I live in a small farm near Goiânia, a city with a population of 1.6 million people, not far from Brasília. I am a curious human being… I would like to learn more about your religion, of what I have read a bit in a magazine and fount to be very interesting and deeply inspiring!...

Onaldo Alves Pereira

Jansenism

Subject: Jansenism

Dear Brother Dimond

In my humble opinion it would behoove MHFM to post a warning on the dangers of becoming Jansenistic at least once weekly. In my household it has become almost unbearable, if I don't dot every i and cross every t "it might be a mortal sin".. Also it necessary to know our Catholic Faith, but that is not sufficient, The Faith needs to be practiced in its entirety. It appears that there are "cafeteria" traditional Catholics also.

Michael

MHFM: Yes, there is a problem with Jansenism among some “traditional Catholics.” That’s why it’s important to have a source of recreation that keeps a person balanced and humble. However, while some people consider lawful actions to be sinful, there is a much larger problem with laxity. Most people consider legitimate concerns about actual mortal sins to be Jansenistic, when they are not. Without knowing the specifics, one couldn’t analyze whether, in your family’s case, the concerns are justified or unjustified.

Subject: Bayside

The recent Bayside letter concerning (John14:2- In my Father's house there are many mansions. If not, I would have told you: because I go to prepare a place for you) the false idea that there are other faiths in heaven ties in nicely with your recent video (He would not remove the cross). Exposing the VII's mockery attempt with JPII at the Inter-religious prayer meeting II at Assisi when JPII turned the many rooms of St. Francis Monastery into different rooms of worship for the many different false religions while removing the Crucifixes.

Looking at the aged old photos of the obvious anti-popes just "hanging out" with the leaders of the false religions, makes me think the world is a stage and these VII sect members are just bad actors. The show, "The little fib that turned into a huge lie that became the Vatican II sect reality."

God Bless,
Tom Miles

Bayside

Bro. Michael: You wrote Page 461

BAYSIDE TEACHES THAT THERE ARE OTHER FAITHS IN HEAVEN

“Our Lady” of Bayside, August 14, 1979: “Do not judge your brothers and sisters who have not been converted. For My Father’s House, My Son has repeated over and over - remember always – that in My Father’s House, there are many rooms in the Mansion, signifying faiths and creeds.”

John14:2- In my Father's house there are many mansions. If not, I would have told you: because I go to prepare a place for you.

If John 14:2 - doesn’t indicate faiths and creeds then, what does it indicate?

Pete

MHFM: It indicates different rewards for believers. It also signifies that Heaven is filled with accommodations for all of the true faithful who die in grace; in other words, it’s not as if there is limited room which would require any true believer (who dies in grace) to be shut out. Additionally, it’s in that very context that Jesus refutes the heretical misconception spread by Bayside and others. He emphasizes that there is no salvation outside of Him and His true faith.

John 14:6- “Jesus saith to him: I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No man cometh to the Father, but by me.”

The interpretation of Bayside, that John 14:2 is referring to other faiths, is a grossly heretical misconception. It’s gratuitous (i.e., it’s supported by nothing); it’s out of context (i.e., it’s refuted by the very words which follow in the chapter); and finally, it’s blatantly heretical (i.e., it’s condemned and denounced by numerous dogmatic definitions.) Notice how these dogmatic pronouncements declare that there is only one faith in Heaven. To deny that is to cease to be Catholic.

Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, Sess. 8, Nov. 22, 1439, ex cathedra: “Whoever wishes to be saved, needs above all to hold the Catholic faith; unless each one preserves this whole and inviolate, he will without a doubt perish in eternity.”

Pope Pius IV, Council of Trent, “Iniunctum nobis,” Nov. 13, 1565, ex cathedra: “This true Catholic faith, outside of which no one can be saved… I now profess and truly hold…”

Pope Benedict XIV, Nuper ad nos, March 16, 1743, Profession of Faith: “This faith of the Catholic Church, without which no one can be saved, and which of my own accord I now profess and truly hold…”

Pope Pius IX, Vatican Council I, Session 2, Profession of Faith, 1870, ex cathedra: “This true Catholic faith, outside of which none can be saved, which I now freely profess and truly hold…”

EWTN

Hello,

Greetings in Jesus Our Lord. I typed into Google ....EWTN HERESIES Your site came up. I would like to bring to your attention one comment made buy an Arch-Heresiac Fr. Groeschel, on 12/27/09. Someone called into his program at 7 pm, Christmas Mailbag, asking a question, (I'm sorry but I do not recall it precisely) but within his response was this comment: "God is not Catholic".

I saw this program repeated (not withdrawn by EWTN) the next morning 12/28/09 at 9am. I called into EWTN to complain, to speak with a Theologian, but to no avail. I did leave a message with a certain Mr Colin Donovan, President of Liturgy and Theology. He did return my call at 4pm Sunday, denied the comment, said he would review the program, and asked me to call him the next day to discuss it. I did but to no avail. And again, the next day I could only leave a message. He never did return my call.

A couple more days went by and I called again. This time I spoke with a Lay Theologian named Csaba. He did see the program. He didn’t agree with it. Admitted its error. I asked him to take the matter to the Top. His response was that it would not do any good.

Now, just how many people already weak in the Faith, lost the Faith entirely because of this Heresy? "Well if God is not even Catholic then why should I be?" Of course all of Catholicism falls apart if God is not Catholic.... like a house of cards. Amazingly, it appears that even though millions of viewers saw this program no one is objecting!!! What is wrong with the minds Catholics at large? I cannot be the only one to come forth and object.

… Absolute proof positive of Arch Heresy and EWTN did nothing to come to the defense of God Our Father. Nothing!

Pax

Richard Liberatore

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. Groeschel is an astounding apostate: The heresies of EWTN [link to section].

Global Warming

Subject: “Global Warming”

Dear Dimond Brothers :

Here in Orlando, FL we have a high temperature of 38 degrees.. That's not unusual but it normally drops down to that temperature range during overnight hours and even so it doesn't usually last for more than two or three nights before it warms up again. But it has been consistently cold here for about a week now. I've lived here for over 14 years now and I don't recall the cold snaps ever lasting this long. There was even snow flurries in some parts of Florida this morning. The point I want to make in this e-mail is that to me this contradicts the whole "Global Warming" theory, which is just a complete hoax.

Anthony

“Orthodox”

I am a Russian Orthodox Christian of the Old Believers. You did not even exist when we did. You broke off from the Eastern Orthodox Church, not the other way around. I take exception to your blatant lies and attempts to destroy the santity of the Eastern Orthodox Church… Finally, your homesite is adorned with icons across the top of the page. You do not use icons but pray to statues. Please remove the icons from your website. They are of the Eastern Orthodox persuasion and since you so make plain your hate for those of us who are Eastern Orthodox you have no right to use our icons. My father was a Greek Orthodox and my mother is a Russian Orthodox. You are an aberration. Most Sincerely-Joanna Markessinis (and don't bother to return my email. I have no intention of carrying on further communication with you.)

MHFM: You are quite mistaken, in more ways than one: Refuting Protestantism from the Bible and Eastern "Orthodoxy" (audios and articles)

Comment

Subject: E-Exchanges: D’Souza

If I am correct this Dinesh D'Souza made his mark during the Reagan era. He was an Asiatic whose (ultra right wing) noises pleased the Reaganites and (Margaret) Thatcherites. I am given to understand that he hails from Mumbai, India.

Chris White informed your E-exchangers of the term "Indian-giver " ( ... someone who gives a gift and then takes it back.). There is another term, coined by missionaries who labored in India in the 19th and early 20th centuries. It wouldn't have surfaced had it not been applicable to many. "Rice Catholics" - those who joined Catholicism mainly for food and material benefits.

Joe

Helped by site

Subject: About your new article refuting NJP

Once again I am just amazed by your level of erudition in your arguments. Your website has truly done wonders in my life. I just can't believe how much you actually know about the history of the church and scripture. I and everybody who comes to this website are truly indebted to your work and what the Lord has done through you… You truly are a beacon for the one true faith. You brothers must be brilliant. I would encourage everyone to read this recent article because it is a seemingly subtle error that you skillfully refute. You do it so well though and really point the spotlight on what I think is the most important part of Christ's message in today's world where there are far more wolves in sheeps clothing than ever, which is his scourge of the scribes and Pharisees. This really needs to be more on everyone's minds because so many of us can easily fall into hypocrisy and not realize it. Once again I thank you for your hard work. I wish I could only do a modicum of your work and save souls.

In Christ,
Nathan D. Barton

God or evolution

Subject: God or evolution, not both

Dear MHFM-

Thanks for exposing D'Souza. Like many of the other "Christian" evolutionists, he hides behind the Evolution AND God theory to pretend we can have it both ways. But it's either-or, not both. Consider when Death first came into the world; it was with the fall of Adam. So if man didn't get here until billions of years after life started like the evolutionists claim, nothing at all would have died until then: not animals, not plants, not even microorganisms. But during all that time, reproduction would have to keep happening for the original species to 'evolve' into new species.

Can you imagine what a forest or ocean would look like if everything kept reproducing and nothing ever died, even for a century? And we're supposed to believe this went on for Billions of years!? This is just one example of how people who pretend to believe in both don't really believe in God at all. The theory of Macroevolution came from bad scientists and the theory of Evolution AND God came from bad theologians, especially Teilhard de Chardin.

-RDS

Position

Subject: sedevacantist position

Dear Brothers,

My family and I have been very blessed by the dvds and posting on your website, we have made a journey in new understanding. Your postings have literally changed the course of the way we live our lives and has given us understanding that we otherwise would never have had.

These are my deepest questions and concerns... please answer these for me so that I can understand and deal with the terrible pain that I am feeling: I need more that pat answers I need HOPE!

1 - Would Christ abandon His Bride, the church, even when He tells us that "the gates of hell will not prevail against the church"?

2 - If Judas is present do we abandon the upper room?

3 - Who defines heresy and who decideds if something qualifys as heresy?

4 - Is heresy, error, apostacy, and sin, an adequate pretext for drawing the conclusion of an invalid church or Holy Mass?

5 - Didn't sin, heresy, apostacy, and error, exist in the past 1965 years of our church and do we throw it all out now?

6 - If the validity of the pope, bishops, priests, and ultimately the Mass are deemed void due to heresy, apostacy, sin, and error, and we refuse to take part, where does that leave us?

7 - Can we find any good in the church?

8 - Would God leave us so breft and without HOPE?

9 - If Christ could not possibly be present with His Bride, the Holy Roman Catholic Church, because of heresy, sin, apostacy, and error then have we entered hell itself?

10 - Scripture tells us that where evil abounds God's grace abounds even more... where is God's grace in our current church (and all her various rites)?

11 - Don't we have a valid church in a state of apostacy and sin?

12 - Can't an argument be made in either direction concerning the validity of the current church or, at least, it's various tributaries (i.e., SSPX, FSSP, etc.)?

Sincerely,

Your Sister in Christ

MHFM: Allow us to address each of your questions.

1. Christ hasn’t abandoned His bride. There’s nothing incompatible with Christ’s promises in recognizing the current situation: a set of antipopes presiding over a counterfeit Church, as our material has addressed many times. Please read it. In fact, to accept these apostates as popes is to deny Christ’s promises. 2. A heretic is not a member of the Church. That’s Catholic teaching, whether you like it or not. That’s why he can’t be pope. 3. The Church has defined what heresy is, and proclaimed that all who obstinately embrace heretical positions are to be considered outside the Church without declaration. 4. Yes, in terms of recognizing an invalid Counter Church. The New Mass has its own reasons for invalidity, as our material covers. You are obviously not very familiar with the facts covered in our material. 5. No, the popes of the Catholic Church were not manifest heretics and apostates, as the antipopes of the Vatican II sect are. 6. Addressed in our material; this question also manifests your desire to eschew reasonable and dogmatic considerations and cling to emotions, appearances and externals. 7. Your question is not precise enough to give an adequate answer. 8. It’s a punishment for sin, and it’s predicted in the Bible and Catholic prophecy. There is hope for true Catholics with the true faith – those who have eyes to see and who reject the apostasy. There is no hope for heretics who cling to the apostate sect. 9. Addressed already, see our comments in 6. 10. It abounds with the few who follow after truth and reject the heretical, prophesied Counter Church. 11. There is a valid Church in the remnant of uncompromising true Catholics. 12. No, because those groups obstinately accept the Christ-denying and papacy-denying antipopes. They also accept Vatican II and salvation outside the Church.

Comment

I'd like to make a comment about the news article on your site "largest abortion in U.S. set to open", but I am too busy vomiting..Satanism is triumphing in this instance: it's even worse than what Our Lady came to stop at Guadalupe, since this time Satan has convinced women to offer up their VERY OWN CHILDREN in this bloody satanic sacrifice.

New Video

Extremism

Subject: Extremism

I have to weigh in on Edman again. It is hard to believe that a person can be either that stupid, or that dishonest, and yet there it is right in front of us. But the thing that most caught my attention was his characterization of you as “traditional extremists”. The modern culture of which he is a product uses the term “extremist” as though it were a pejorative, an insult. It betrays either a shallow understanding or incredible dishonesty… “Extremism in defense of truth is no vice; moderation in defense of justice is no virtue”. It is such a mindless, meaningless charge in any context…

But what really bothers me about this is how the term “extremism” is being deliberately used by the political culture to demonize traditional virtues. It’s been done for years in the sense that liberal positions (abortion, homosexual rights) are never characterized as “extreme”. However the term “conservative” (what passes for it nowadays) is often preceded by “extreme” or followed by “extremist”. But in the last several years “extremism” is actually directly associated with the pop culture’s idea of evil. The terrorists (contrived bogeymen though they may be) are “bad” not because they are apostate Muslims, but because they are “extremists”. In other words, they actually take this silly religion thing SERIOUSLY! How gauche! I think they use Islam as the “backdrop” for this attack because few of the people they wish to influence are motivated to defend it. Yet the message of anti-extremism, which really means that “one should not actually take faith seriously, and try to live it, for it only leads to intolerance and divisiveness”; gets through. Edman has obviously fallen for it.

This clever tactic hardly seems necessary from the Devil’s perspective with the overwhelming number of people already lost. But I think the Devil isn’t satisfied. He wants to not only send everyone to Hell, but to leave God with a creation completely devoid of even all natural virtue, a mankind completely debased, worse than the beasts. He is like a football coach trying to run-up the score.

Bill Mulligan

Wrong!

I really think you should listen to some of Dinesh's debates because you are GREATLY misinterpreting his arguments. When he is "supporting evolution" it is not the same "evolution" that an evolutionist is talking about. Think of it as adaptation. God created man, man has "evolved" slightly over the years...that is what he believes - not that we came from single-celed organisms.

Skinner

MHFM: You are wrong! Comments like yours, which attempt to put down totally accurate statements, are truly outrageous.

The bio on his own website describes him as a Catholic numerous times. "A believing Catholic... D'Souza said religious faith is vital to achievement.” It quotes Business Week which did the same. It also points out that he edited a "Catholic" magazine and he went to a "Catholic" school. He is certainly not a true Catholic, as is proven in the video; but his own website confirms that he claims to be, with a certainly ecumenical flavor.

To your other point, he is without question a Trojan Horse. The fact that you think he's a great "apologist" is further proof of the danger. Also, we have heard some of his debates, contrary to what you suggest. The man is an evolutionist believer in nothing, and his arguments play right into the hands of the atheists. He also plays both sides of the fence - criticizing evolution when it's convenient and accepting it when he wants to be palatable to the mainstream audience.

Finally, your most significant error is the claim that he doesn't believe in evolution the way the evolutionists do! You are completely wrong. He doesn't just believe in microevolution (i.e., minor changes within a species) but macroevolution (i.e., evolving from one species to another). He believes in macroevolution just as the evolutionists do. So you don't have a clue what you are talking about. He specifically addresses this in his book, and was asked about it in one of his debates. He’s a full-fledged evolutionist, just like Dawkins or Hitchens.

Additionally, your comments show that you haven't even listened to our video carefully, yet you have the arrogance to try to “correct” it. For we quote D'Souza's book, What’s So Great About Christianity, p. 150, in which he specifically endorses the evolutionists' view of the geological record. He argues that it proves the evolution from single-celled organisms to more complex creatures, then to fish, then to amphibians, etc. – and finally to man. There are many other quotes one could give as well. So you are specifically refuted by what we quoted in the video. You need to wake up, and you have the audacity to say that someone else should familiarize himself with the issue. It’s a prime example of spiritually blind arrogance.

Dinesh

Subject: Dinesh D’Souza

MHFM,

I listened to your videos on D'Souza earlier today, and it was quite interesting. I had never heard of him before, and about 30 minutes or so after listening I was walking through one of the academic buildings at my college and saw a flier advertising his coming to the campus on January 28 to have a debate, the topic was "Is it possible to be moral without God?" I think was the subject. Also I was thinking about what D'Souza said about "if a lackadaisical Catholic becomes a fervent protestant, its a net gain." That doesn't make any sense. A protestant is bad by the very fact he lacks the Faith and is thus faithless, that can never be a gain. I think the following quote is very good against D'Souza's nonsense:

"People often say, 'It is better to be a good protestant than a bad Catholic.' That is not true! That would mean that one could be saved without the true faith. No. A bad Catholic remains a child of the family, although a prodigal; and however great a sinner he may be, he still has a right to mercy. Through his faith a bad Catholic is nearer to God than a protestant, for he is a member of the household, whereas the heretic is not. And how hard it is to make him become one!" St. Peter Julian Eymard…

One should note that the above quote has some inexact terminology, there is no such thing as a "good protestant." Heresy in my opinion (as well as schism/apostasy) is the worst sin of them all. Not only does one lose his justification, he also loses his faith. And most forms of protestantism sink people not only in doctrinal perversity, but their "doctrines" (like faith alone) tends to lead to moral perversity as well and these heretics are given up to all sorts of vices (I think the worst vice that plagues ALL protestants is pride, they think they can believe whatever they want and God is bound by it, thus many protestants make themselves their own "gods" over and against the One True God and his One True Faith).

Kenneth Connelly

Typical

Dear brothers in Christ,

The reader Edman is indeed a perfect example of a typical V2-sect adherent. He (or she?) asks "If someone reads the entire Bible and the CCC or any Church document, does that means that that person will become a believer of God and adhere to the teachings of the Church, and understand everything he/she read?" Well, the answer to the question is: You cannot become a believer of God if you don't accept what is written in the Bible, no matter if you've read it or not. The exceptions to this rule are little babies who have received the sacrament of baptism. It means that if you hold some opinion which turns out to be contrary to the Scripture and the Teaching of the Catholic Church you must reject this opinion and accept the Truth. If you don't do that, once you are admonished of your false position, then you reject Christ. As simple as that.

Whether you understand or not what the Scripture and the Teaching say is irrelevant--the non-understanding is not an excuse for rejection of The Truth.

Edman: No wonder why God says not to judge anybody(James 4:11), because He is the only One who knows our hearts….

No, it doesn't say not to judge ANYBODY. It says: Detract not one another, my brethren. He that detracteth his brother, or he that judgeth his brother, detracteth the law, and judgeth the law. But if thou judge the law, thou art not a doer of the law, but a judge.

Detract not ONE ANOTHER. It means "detract not the ones of the same FAITH"

Just before that, James 4:4 says this: Adulterers, know you not that the friendship of this world is the enemy of God? Whosoever therefore will be a friend of this world, becometh an enemy of God.

The V2-sect adherents obviously think that the enemies of God are their brothers. Well, I couldn't agree more on that point.

Let Our Most Holy Mother Mary and St. Joseph bless MHFM.

Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia

MHFM: Yes, and his argument that we are somehow implying that a person has to know or understand every dogma was completely dishonest and irrelevant. That’s because he is aware of the dogma at issue here. He saw it quoted and discussed in our videos, to which he objected. He was then personally instructed and admonished in numerous e-mails. In those e-mails, the dogmatic definitions were further cited or referred to. So it’s not a question of a person not being aware of a dogma, as he dishonestly implies. Rather, it’s that he clearly rejects that which he knows the Church has taught ex cathedra. And he does so in a brazen fashion: “There is indeed salvation outside the Church” – exactly the opposite of the dogma.

In fact, consider that he used the word “indeed”!

Pope Innocent III, Fourth Lateran Council, Constitution 1, 1215, ex cathedra: “There is indeed one universal Church of the faithful, outside of which nobody at all is saved, in which Jesus Christ is both priest and sacrifice.”

Exploring

Dear Dimond Brothers,

I've ordered your package. I've been an attendee to the novus ordo church. I've always had a sense that something was wrong with VII, it seems like its become a "faith" of convenience versus a faith of truth. I am currently exploring the traditional faith, the way it was always intended. Amazing work you do... God bless you.

Rich

Comment

Great job debunking D'Souza---he was probably hired by the Vatican's masters----obviously, he does not know how to let his "yes mean yes" and his "no mean no" as Jesus proscribed. Yet the liberal "intellectuals" once again will try to hold a pseudo-intellectual such as d'Souza up as a "luminary"...yes, a "luminary", guiding yet many more hapless souls into hell.....great job exposing him. By the way, the title and image on the cover of his book should tell us pretty much everything we need to know about him----it is totally INSULTING to true and faithful followers of Christ---this D'Souza is JUST ANOTHER CREEP

B-16

MHFM,

How cunningly bold that antipope Benedict XVI would attempt to beatify pope Pius XII along with the heretic JP2. As if both these men of the cloth were truly Roman Catholic, and united in faith in the Sacred Traditions of Holy Church. Such deceptive cunning can only be borne from the fiery depths of Lucifer''s eternal dwelling, no? Completely diabolical considering that pope Pius XII called St. Pope Pius X-The Greatest pope of the twentieth century- and antipope Benedict being a foul, blooded Modernist opposed to the sacred teachings of the the Great St. Pope Pius X, placing JP2 his Modernist predecessor, who cowered to the world and praised it wholeheartedly, openly eschewing the Lord's caution-He was not of this world- alongside Pius XII, a pre-Vatican II pontiff who acquiesced moderately to the liberal line of this stench of Modernism, allowing the rampaging of the likes of Roncalli and the subsequent Modernist V2 council fomenting its ills on Holy Church now impregnated with its cancer morphed into an evil of godless worship and the drinking of the 'cup of demons.' What a denoucement unfolding! World oppression by the globalist oligarchics on the horizon and Benedict leading the black-plagued sheep into it's oppressive fields of death and horror as history repeats itself in eternal death. Antipope Benedict XVI praises satanic gods of the world daily as he sits on Peter's Chair. Truly diabolical how blinded the human race has become. War is punishment for sin-Our Blessed mother stated to the three little seers at Fatima. How quickly the world forgets as Belial and the golden calf are praised in Vatican City. The world celebrates its love for the gods of the earth, and embraces Jesus Christ as amongst them-which He is not! Holy Scripture-Psalms 95-5-...All the gods of the pagans are DEVILS...Oremus-Ave Maria, gratia plena...

D’Souza

Dear Brothers,

Great video exposing the lying heretic, Dinesh D'Souza. What a phony! He reminds me of the term "Indian-giver" - someone who gives a gift and then takes it back. He pretends to be giving the truth about creationism and Christianity, etc. but in reality is taking everything back! Like all liberals, he seems quite adept in the use of ambiguity e.g. The title of his book, "What's so great about Christianity", if a question mark were added would sound like an arrogant refusal to listen to the facts about Christianity, i.e. "What's so great about xyz?" The fact is that he's more interested in what's so great about his bank account - how many zeros are on the end of his bank statement! So, what's so great about Dinesh D'Souza ? Zip, zero, nothing!!! His comments about Luther, Mohammed, and "Catholic" Protestants are alarming. The Novus Ordo is always talking about one's spiritual "journey" - I suppose the term appeals to people who enjoy getting off the straight and narrow track, or getting lost! One will always get lost with Luther the loser, Mohammed the murderer, and Protestant pride! It seems that Dinesh has tried to create a synthesis of lies and facts, which is impossible, but it doesn't stop some people! And like you said, he doesn't want to lose his big audience, who will pay big time to hear his lies. I suppose he imagines it to be a type of "intellectual diplomacy", where one doesn't really hold any position uncompromisingly, since that would offend someone, so he tries to please the majority, by writing garbage! Otherwise, he would be labeled an "extremist," or a "fanatic," and someone might say he is filled with "hate" if he were to actually write things that are true. What an outrageous apostate!!!...

Thank you and God Bless,

Chris White

All I can say about your organisation is that you are "Traditionalists extremists".

If someone reads the entire Bible and the CCC or any Church document, does that means that that person will become a believer of God and adhere to the teachings of the Church, and understand everything he/she read? Why do we have the sacrament of reconciliation for, if we are going to be perfect catholics by learning perfectly everything that the Church teaches. Do you really think that anyone knows every single teaching of the Church? Do you know how much history and information on many subjects the Church has gathered during its 2000 years since it was establish by Jesus Christ? Do you really think that anybody today knows at least half of all that has been written in the Church? No wonder why God says not to judge anybody(James 4:11), because He is the only One who knows our hearts….

There's indeed salvation outside the Church. William, Glenn and I are Catholics. You should not be judging. God bless you.

Edman….

MHFM: This is Edman’s response to our response. It’s really something, isn’t it? In our response to Edman, we further explained what Catholic dogma is and we emphasized one’s obligation to accept it. We pointed out that just because you claim to be Catholic doesn’t mean that you are a Catholic. If you deny a dogma, you cease to be a Catholic. We reiterated the fact that Outside the Church There is No Salvation is a dogma that one must accept to be Catholic. We post his latest to demonstrate how stunningly heretical some people are, as well as how blind and bad-willed they can be. He boldly, openly and stubbornly asserts the opposite of a defined dogma; and, as you can tell, he isn’t concerned one bit about denying defined Catholic truth. He is without question ipso facto excommunicated. The bad will, the pride (e.g., having no fear at all of rejecting God’s revelation) and the presumption are truly remarkable.

Benedict XVI’s recent heresies with the “Orthodox” and other amazing heresies

MHFM: We’ve updated our Benedict XVI's recent heresies file with some new heresies. There are some outrageous ones.

New Video

Aware

Hi. Have you any thoughts regarding the 2012 hysteria as it relates to end times? As I'm sure you know, it's supposed to have something to do with the end of the Mayan calendar. But when I was listening to Coast to Coast the other night they had on a 2012 "expert" who said something to the effect that the (Jewish) Kabballah from 700 years ago also says that 2012 would has significance. If both the Mayans and apostate Jews are being deceived by demonic spirits telling them that 2012 is so significant, it makes me wonder if in 2012 the antichrist will be revealed.

On a side note, isn't it something how so many other "Christian" denominations are well aware of the anti-Christian NWO agenda but yet it seems the majority of Vatican 2 Catholics don't have a clue!

MHFM: Concerning your last point, it’s quite true that while many Protestants understand the NWO agenda, very few members of the Vatican II Church do. There’s a reason for this, we believe. It’s that the Vatican II Church is completely enveloped by religious liberalism, religious indifferentism, and the belief in salvation outside of Christ. While some of its more “conservative” members do claim to hold (at least intellectually) certain principles to be true and those opposed to them to be false, they can’t and won’t condemn anyone. They hold a completely non-judgmental theology, which springs from their belief in salvation for basically everyone. Faithful to their non-judgmental apostasy, they will not and cannot declare that anyone is evil. As a result, the notion of the Devil operating in the spiritual or material planes to damn souls or do evil vanishes. They cannot perceive or clearly identify real evil or real evildoers who are used by the Devil. Therefore, they become numb to the movements of evil in the secular arena.

Protestants, on the other hand, though unfortunately mired in heresy and deceived on what’s truly important, sometimes do believe that those outside of Christ are in darkness. Their theology is not completely non-judgmental. They will acknowledge some sort of spiritual battle. That’s why more Protestants come to realize the evil plan for the NWO and are able to identify some of the evil people working for it. However, being outside the Church, they are ultimately deceived by the Devil as well. They also miss the point about the real focus of Satan’s spiritual warfare. Moreover, the prominent ones among them, who oppose the NOW, become even bigger false prophets; for they persuade people that the NWO constitutes the real battle, when it is in fact only a secondary issue and a secondary operation of Satan.

Battle

Dear brothers.

I’m in a huge battle with my mother in law over… your site and the true catholic religion. My husband and i can’t figure out where her accusations come from besides the devil especially since she thinks were in a cult or something of sorts because our strict faith. We were expecting our first baby in may and she thinks were going to brainwash our baby in what she thinks is satanism for some strange reason. I know she will never understand what we believe because she’s soo stubborn, but what kind of things can we do to shake off her constant thoughts all because our true religion? Any advice on how to defeat this demon at work? Thank you! -emily

MHFM: Yes, her accusations do come from the Devil.

What to do… you should first try to explain to her that she’s not a dogmatic Catholic and that her problem is that she dissents from the traditional, unchangeable and binding teachings of the Church. Assuming you’ve done that and it hasn’t gotten you anywhere, you need to condemn her and tell her that she’s totally deceived and on the road to Hell. You should clearly explain to her that her opposition is a rebellion against God’s truth which she refuses to accept and thus attacks. If that doesn’t get you anywhere, you should avoid her completely and cut her demonic influence out from your life. Don’t visit her, don’t talk to her, don’t go out with her, etc.

We don’t understand why people become overly troubled by the fact that certain family members condemn what they do. We understand the desire to bring them to the truth and the concern for their salvation, but you shouldn’t be overly disconcerted if someone in your family vigorously opposes you. Far too many people are too weak and defensive with family members who attack and hate the truth. Don’t worry about what she thinks about you. Tell her what you think about her. You have the truth; she does not. She’s the one who is of the Devil. That needs to be made clear. And once you’ve battled with her a few times and presented the truth in charity, don’t waste more time with her; for she will never be convinced.

We’ve said it before: many people waste much of their lives (and often lose their souls) trying to help or please bad-willed family members who hate the truth and never will be convinced.

Hindu

Dear MHFM,

I wasn't sure if you have heard the audio on Bishop Fellay's infamous...or should we say disgusting speech in Denver (2006) on the Hindu. I came across the whole file on his speech. I attached the audio of the part where he covers this topic (starts around the 6:20 mark). Kind of old news I know, but it is even more disturbing to hear him actually say it.

Robby

Listened

Dear MHFM

I listened to your recent audio on sedevacatist priests who deny salvation dogma. It Is quite revealing, no wonder we are In the times we are living in, the great apostasy! And by the way isn’t it their job to convert the whole world to the catholic faith.? Instead of them spending all that time denying dogma, they should be trying to convert as many people as they can to the catholic faith. I believe God blinds these people from true graces because of their bad will and refusal to accept and embrace the truth. keep up the great work you are doing! PAX DOMINI MARK V CA

666 on Parish Sign

Hello Brothers - I am a grateful brother who has been greatly blessed by yourselves. I know how precious your time is - I just wanted to inform you of a very interesting occurrence in my town. I was struggling with my local "novus ordo priest" and "bishop" for the past few months. A terrible struggle for the faith basically - the priest is new and worse than the last, etc. - the point is that they dismissed the faith entirely. You cannot even slightly trust your bishop-that is how bad these apostates are. Needless to say we are in full opposition to the vatican II apostacy now and total adherents to Christ's teaching that one must be baptized and holding to His body (the Catholic Church) to be saved! So, last night my daughter was going by the local Church which we had this war for the faith with. She noticed that the sign in front of the rectory - a large sign which says "Saint Mary of the Assumption Parish" on the main road - was vandalized. Someone (some demon obviously) spray painted a large white cross on this sign, and wrote a large 666 around the cross! This is a plain sign from God confirming for all that this Christ rejecting local "Church" - one of the largest in the "diocese" with 8000 members, is antichrist! What more sign do people need!!! It is sitting there now, as I write this - on the main road with a sign in front that says "666"!!! Our Great and Mighty God said "when you see the "signs". Ironic that this is the very "church" which totally rejects Christ and has a literal "sign" in front proclaiming antichrist. Any pure and holy priest would rise from his bed and take a sledge hammer to this sign - effacing the blasphemy. Again Ironic that this is the "church" where the last time I was there-before we saw your material and left the apostacy - I went for confession and the altar in the lower church had mettalica playing music proclaiming Satan!

I will download the picture and send it to you (wife has the pictures on her phone) - maybe you and others will find this "Sign" quite interesting and revealing!...

MHFM: Wow, that last part about Metallica playing in the church is simply incredible.

9/11 Predictive Programming

MHFM: This is a fascinating, jaw-dropping clip from a Fox show called, The Lone Gunmen. This show first aired many months before September 11, 2001. It first aired on March 4, 2001. In this dramatic television episode, they envision a plot by certain people in the U.S. government to hijack a plane and crash it into the World Trade Center as part of a conspiracy to justify military action against certain countries. Does that sound familiar? The even feature Boston’s airport – the place from which two of the planes departed on 9/11! It’s also worth noting that one individual who claimed to speak in-depth with one insider said that the conspirators have a sick kind of “creed.” This “creed” requires them to tell the world in advance what they are planning, usually through television, movies, etc. If there’s any truth to that claim, this fascinating clip lends credence to it.

It should also be noted that the plot in this Fox show has the hijacked plane being flown by remote control into the World Trade Center. Many of those who conclude to a conspiracy on this issue believe that the planes had to be flown by remote. Some of the eyewitness evidence (“no widows on the side”) supports the same. Finally, the show mentions that the conspiracy to hijack this plane and crash it into the World Trade Center is involved with “war games” scenarios. Documentaries about the conspiratorial aspects of 9/11 cover how “war games” were taking place on 9/11, and that they were essential in confusing and distracting our normal military response and facilitating the conspiracy. So, in short, this short clip, which aired months before 9/11, contains most of the features of what really happened.

(The clip does have two inappropriate uses of the word which refers to the lost souls or condemnation.)

Recent

Thank you, sir, for the recent "heresy of the week". At this rate, you could easily produce a second video on him. Although it´s doubtful he will have a long "pontificate", it´s possible that he will have the capacity to top John Paul II in terms of heresies.

Difficult

As its always difficult to include all the available information concerning 9/11 in one video, the video "In Plane Site" is a good documentary. Other considerations include:

President Bush and Jeb Bush's younger brother Marvin Bush was employed as head of security approximately six months prior to 9/11, when he had ordered all drug sniffing dogs removed from the building. Reported during that time by workers within the buildings, was the work being completed for a new networking system consisting of having networking cables (possibly detonation wires) run through the buildings.

Larry Silverstein six months prior to 9/11 had just insured the buildings for millions if not billions of dollars. The buildings were so contaminated with asbestos that it would cost him millions to cleanup the buildings. He wanted to be rewarded double on the insurance payoff for some accidental (terrorist) clause in the policy, that he was not rewarded.

White military doomsday command aircraft were spotted flying above both the twin towers and the Pentagon on 9/11 (as seen in other videos). The doomsday planes may explain how the aircraft were possible un-manned drone planes controlled from a remote location (doomsday plane); the bunker buster missile that flew into the pentagon was possibly launched, then guided in by a lazer projection on the building from the doomsday plane, and the controlled demolitions in the twin towers were remotely triggered from high in the sky.

The multi-million dollar doomsday command center in tower #7 was unoccupied and rigged with explosives and Mayor Giuliani ran the show as he sat in a nearby doughnut shop. While after hearing the news, our commander and thief sat patiently in an elementary classroom considering his next move as the nation was supposedly under attacked. Letting the fear mount within the people (as during Katrina/Oklahoma) before jumping into the spotlight and coming to our rescue as our hero…

God Bless,
tm

Booklet

Subject: Heretical Booklet

MHFM,

"The Golden Key To Paradise" booklet referenced earlier in an email is promoted by the heretic Bishop Robert McKenna. In the Foreword he writes, " See, on reading this pamphlet, how perfect contrition is even---for those not baptized---nothing less than baptism of desire (in voto). He uses a false premise, that the unbaptized can achieve "perfect contrition" and then falsely conclude to a fictional "baptism of desire". McKenna is a hard core deceiver, beneign in appearance, deadly in doctrine.

Only those who are baptized and who remain joined to the Church in membership, could with the proper dispositions avail themselves of perfect contrition. All others who are outside the bounds of the Catholic Church could never make a "perfect contrition" per se. Of course, they could offer to God their contrition for sin, but never in a perfect form as God requires, since they are not joined to His Church in Faith. In fact, the contrition offered would be an imperfect form and far less imperfect than say that offered by a fallen member of the Catholic Church who employs imperfect contrition with the right dispositions.

It should be observed that most all of the Trad clergy and writers, SV or not, never distinguish God's grace as either actual or habitual. Actual grace, that being an impulse or movement to perform a moral act, and habitual grace which is sanctifying grace in its common term, produces Divine life in our soul through the Sacraments only. Traditional heretic leaders and drum beaters cloud the differences or ignore the distinction entirely…

Donald Livingston

Comment

Subject: concerning recent video on Sede priests

… this so called "Christian" organization …. [their new upload] in which they call out and identify priests they disagree with on a specific issue...even going so far as to post identifying photos of the alleged "perpetrators". If you are that concerned with the salvation of souls, then why don't you pray for them instead of resorting to a juvenile hit list at worst...blacklist at best. Whose anger are you trying to stoke anyway?

Bill Thaxton

MHFM: You are condemned out of your own mouth. Allow us to explain. You write in and denounce the fact that we've publicly called out priests for teaching heresy. You say that we should, instead, just pray for them. Yet, you posted your comment and thus "called out" those whom you think (quite wrongly) are doing what they shouldn’t do. You have thus done exactly what you condemn; and, in the process, you have proven the utter falsity of your premise: that it's not necessary to publicly refute and/or denounce heretics.

Edman

Subject: Edman’s Conscious

You let Edman off pretty easy. Maybe you’re tired of the same old tripe, I understand. But someone ought to at least tell him that the little voice within he refers to (the one he says saves non-Catholics) is not the “conscious” (which is an adjective) but the “conscience”. I think Freud tried to make a noun out of it in order to distinguish it from his invention of the sub-conscious, the true root of all evil in Freud’s make-believe, purely naturalistic world.

Once he learns the word, Edman should also take a minute to ponder how in a world in which each mans’ conscience is his ultimate unfailing guide, no matter what he believes, how any standards of behavior could rightfully be established and enforced. How could say a law against bigamy be deemed moral? If God (according to Edman) must respect the conscience of a polygamist Mormon, what right have mere men to legislate against such things? Indeed how can we be sure murder is always wrong?

Edman cited several passages from scripture (vaguely). What does he suppose John 3:5 means? The really sad thing is that all of this said, Edman thinks exactly like your typical Novus Ordo Bishop. It is crazy stupid.

Bill Mulligan

Abortion

Subject: Jesse Ventura – Secret Societies

Hi, after watching the Jesse Ventura secret societies videos; I starting thinking about how no one in the videos talked about abortion being a huge part of the plan to stop the population growth. It seems obvious to me that besides the poisons placed in our food and vaccines, abortion would be the number one way of killing off the population and doing it legally. Other than that it seems that Jesse and his crew did a good job, I wonder if Jesse believes the info or is he just paid by the producers because of his appeal to audiences?

MHFM: Well, Ventura is actually pro-abortion and pro-evolution. So he’s obviously a deceived pagan. However, he has caught on to some aspects of the secular conspiracy and his programs on those issues are very valuable.

Cutter

Subject: Cutter Charges at WTC

Dear Brothers,

I watched the “cutter-charges” video of the WTC. And I remain profoundly unimpressed.

Some observations:

1) The “charges” are “detonated” after the tower starts collapsing.

2) The “charges” are “detonated” on the exact same floor as the plane hit. Is this plausible? Are we to believe that many floors were rigged so that the exact floor that was hit could then be detonated?

3) Note that a jet-fuel fire had been raging for hours on a floor allegedly packed with explosives and did not set off these “explosives;” and presumably the “detonators” themselves had remained unscathed by the fire. Is this plausible?

4) If this is the kind of video that passes for evidence in the 9/11-conspiracy community, then I don't think that the “conspirators” should worry about being prosecuted anytime soon…

Best regards,

George R.

MHFM: [Just so our readers know, this man, George R., is extremely dishonest. He denies essentially every major conspiracy and scoffs at every single piece of evidence brought forward. He is extremely brainwashed by the mainstream media and the liberal thought controllers. His desire to defend the deceivers is appalling.]

Everything you have said is false. It’s simply a fact that the buildings were brought down in a controlled demolition. In addition to the undeniable evidence for explosives in the video footage, in the way the buildings fell, in the testimony of firefighters and other witnesses, in the evidence for explosive material in the debris, etc., it’s a fact that the fires simply didn’t burn hot enough to bring such a steel-structured building down without the aid of explosives. That’s why no modern, steel-structured skyscraper had ever collapsed before 9/11 as a result of fire, even in buildings where fires were much hotter and much more widespread. It had never happened before 9/11, when it (amazingly) happened three times.

Rather than expanding on this issue, it would be much more expedient to ask: have you watched 9/11 Mysteries – or, for that matter, any serious documentary on this topic? We doubt it. It’s quite interesting that almost everyone who scoffs at the undeniable evidence hasn’t even watched any full-length presentation of the arguments, e.g., 9/11 Mysteries. Watch it, and then tell us if you still believe the buildings were not brought down by explosives in a controlled demolition. If you have any honesty whatsoever, you will change your opinion.

Please go to WATCH OUR CATHOLIC DVDS ONLINE FOR FREE, scroll down to 9/11 Mysteries, and spend the time to sit through the whole thing. It’s well worth your time. We know that people have short attention spans, especially for things that are true; but you need to watch the whole thing. You shouldn’t say anything else on this topic until you have seen the video and familiarized yourself with the facts; for you are completely wrong.

Also, for those who are totally new to this subject, we think the video below is the best introduction. While it is not as detailed as some other videos – and some people have disagreements with parts of it – this video does the best job of explaining and presenting the basic facts to those who are completely unfamiliar with this topic. In our opinion, it’s the best introduction for those who find the concept of a conspiracy on this matter simply too hard to believe or overwhelming. We would recommend seeing it first.

9/11 in Plane Site (an excellent introductory video on the 9/11 conspiracy)

False trads

Subject: false trads

MHFM,

Again-excellent video on false trads. What's that saying, "You can lead the horse to water, but you can't make him drink." These people devote themselves with the externals of Catholicism, but when they see the truth they fall into the trap of Lucifer, and scoff at the saving power of Jesus Christ and his teachings.. What sells it for me, always, is that St. John the Baptist was baptising by real, natural, water in great numbers, even before he baptised Jesus Christ Our God. And then Jesus showed us by being baptised by a devoted follower of Him-that God Himself had to be baptised in whole, natural water. "Eyes to see and ears to hear," says Holy Scripture! Great work MHFM!

Thanks

Thank you for exposing all the BOLD FACED LIES OF THE LIARS claiming to be "sedevacantist priests"---I mean with "friends" like this, does Our Lord Jesus need enemies? Thank you for being true friends and followers of Jesus Christ and His Catholic Church and exposing all these EVIL MALICIOUS LIARS---if it were not for the work of MHFM, I would not have any clue about what is REALLY going on in the church.

Ventura

Subject: Ventura

Ventura does a very good job to expose those so called "secret societies". If the people know the truth, we don't have to live in fear and be manipulated by these wicked, evil people and they are only 120.

With that small amount, that is so easy to be eliminated, of course, they want to remain secret, as long as people don't know them, they can do whatsoever they want.

Kim

Regarding

Brothers,

… Does the Church teach or do you believe that when the "man of sin" appears on earth, will the only people who recognize him for who he is will be Catholics, and not false traditionalists, heretics, or other non-believers?

Regarding the History Channel Special, besides the fact that the first two secrets of Fatima were mentioned and Brother Michael's appearance, the show was very dis-jointed.

Though, I did find the comment by one "pundit" when he actually stated that "World War II was fought to spread communism." Everyone else on TV usually states the canned excuses for fighting fascism, for liberty, etc.

Take care Brothers and God Bless you.

Howard

MHFM: The Church has not issued any authoritative interpretation on the Antichrist or the “man of sin.” Thus, people can advance different opinions.

No salvation

Subject: No salvation outside the Catholic Church?

In 1 Cor. 6:9-10; Gal. 5:19-21 seems pretty clear that those who live doing such things will not inherit the Kingdom of God. I am a Roman Catholic and I believe that there could be salvation outside the Church. You say that some people in the Church teach the heresy that there's salvation outside the Catholic Church. How could it be heresy? Not everyone is born in a Catholic family. Not everyone studies the faith. And there're many protestants as you can see on youtube. The Church teaches that we must have faith in Jesus and do good works. And that those who are not catholics are saved or not saved by their consciousness. We all have a conscious, which is like a voice within, that tells us if an action that we are about to take is moral or immoral. I believe that that voice is the voice of God. The conscious which was created by Him and given to all of us. If a non catholic follows his/hers consciousness in a morally standpoint, how could God send that person to hell? If a non catholic never commits a mortal sin and lives a moral life, how could God send that person to hell? And for some one who dies in a state of grace will most likely be purged(1 Cor. 3:10-15). Jesus came to save all men, not just the catholic men. And the law is now written in our hearts(Jeremiah 31:33b-34; 2 Cor. 3:2-3), the conscious. God bless you and me, and give us strength and wisdom to save and be saved in the end. Amen

Edman…

MHFM: How could it be heresy, you ask? It’s heresy because it’s a defined dogma that there is no salvation outside the Church, and to deny or contradict a defined dogma is heresy.

What’s most amazing about your e-mail is that you seem to think you are Catholic. You are not.

Infra

There are 6 separate objects in the left hemisphere of the infra guard symbol (with the 6 stars and 6 stripes both being in the right). They appear to be the capital dome, three columns, and two gear-like disc shapes. However also interesting is that the writing around the periphery: “:infragard partnership for protection” contains 33 letters. This is especially interesting since had they spelled “guard” correctly, there would be more than 33. Coincidence?

Bill Mulligan

Twin

Subject: Twin Towers

MHFM,

Gullible Americans propagandized by a democratic government gone corrupt. Like the saying goes, "Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely." One could line up ten charged/imploded buildings from different locations in the world and place the the twin towers in between them and the results would be identical. Wanna bet! People see, but are blind. Americans must have the DNA of lemmings heavily tinged with bad will. In the end this will cost us all dearly. Pray the Rosary. As Padre Pio would say, "Pray, pray, and pray some more..."

Package

DEAR BROTHERS:

I HAVE BEEN FOLLOWING YOUR WEB SITE FOR A FEW YEARS NOW. WITH YOUR GREAT PACKAGE OF TRUE CATHOLIC DOGMATIC INFORMATION AND INFORMATION ON THE ONE TRUE HOLY CATHOLIC AND APOSTOLIC CHURCH I HAVE BEEN ABLE TO RETURN TO THE TRUE CATHOLIC CHURCH…

THANK YOU AND GOD BLESS YOU FOR THIS MOST MIRACULOUS CATHOLIC INFORMATIONAL WEB SITE. WITH YOUR WEB SITE AND HARD WORK THE TRUE CATHOLIC REMNANT LIVES AND GROWS DAILY FOR THE GREATER HONOR AND GLORY OF GOD OUR HEAVENLY FATHER!!!

MR. MICHAEL MELLO

Jesse Ventura – Secret Societies

MHFM: This is definitely worth watching. It might be the most important and interesting one of the series.

Conspiracy Theory - Secret Societies - Part 1

Conspiracy Theory - Secret Societies - Part 2

Conspiracy Theory - Secret Societies - Part 3

Conspiracy Theory - Secret Societies - Part 4

Conspiracy Theory - Secret Societies - Part 5

Conspiracy Theory - Secret Societies - Part 6

Stars

Subject: Big Brother Jesse Ventura video

While watching the video I noticed the logo for infragard had 6 inverted stars. It has 6 strips as well. I didn't notice another symbolized six, but 66 with all inverted stars is weird enough. I attached the logo. May be someone else can spot another 6.

Sincerely,
Robby

$Description: Description: C:\Users\mhfm\Desktop\Website Docs\E-discussions\E_Pictures\infragard.jpg$

Comment

Dear Brothers,

Great Video on the Civilian spy machine, aka. Big Brother. Civilian spies are already here in Australia. If I happen to say a word like “Catholic” at work, then I’ll likely trip the alarm in someone’s mind, which they will either report or catalogue in their memory under “dangerous persons”! Seriously, many people are hyper sensitive when it comes to religious words, especially words pertaining to the Catholic faith…

The topic of Infragard is shocking. These people are given a license to kill because they’ve spied on their neighbors It’s criminal. Infragard is an exercise in the classic war dogma, “know thy enemy.” The more information one has on his enemy, the better equipped one will be to outsmart, outmaneuver and destroy the enemy. That’s why secrecy aids the conspirators so powerfully – they can retrieve information without being seen, and cannot be spied upon themselves! Infragard is the perfect structure whereby someone who has been specifically trained to infiltrate, influence and carry out more serious operations can waltz right in.

What really blew me away is the dramatic paradigm shift that has occurred over the past decade and more. It used to be taken for granted that the role of the government is to serve the citizens, to protect against abuses of power and authority. Now it’s taken for granted that the government could become the enemy at anytime!!!

Jesse: “How would you respond to someone that would say this is Big Brother watchin’ us?”

Infragard: “You know as a member, ah, You know I’d, You could, people can always speculate, you know, and, and, um, um, submit those, those kind of claims, and again, the, ah, the potential for government to um, to go beyond what it should be doin’, ah, is, is always there.” The constitution carrying Infragard boss hides under the argument that it is a lesser evil to expose citizens to abuses of power from their own government than from the abuses of power from “terrorists.” What a shock when people realize that Big Brother is the terrorist!!! It seems that “the constitution” can be used to protect all the people – even the evil ones – really, someone who carries a copy of the constitution in their pocket doesn’t believe in it – they carry it to see how they can dodge it!!! The Custody battle between the Lesbian and Evangelical “Christian” mother is shocking. It reminds me of the story in 3 Kings 3:16-28. The true mother of the child was physically moved by compassion for the child, whereas the false “mother” wanted the child to be divided.

God Bless,

Chris White

Malaysia

Dear MHFM

I've talked to an old nun from Malacca and she told me that there's a stone on which St Francis Xavier stood on to preach and his footprints are still on it. When arguing with some "Catholics", I told them it was because of St Francis' belief that none can be saved outside the true Church which moved him with zeal to spread the good news to this country. If he believed otherwise, he wouldn't be the great saint we know of.

However, today, the loss of faith is so great that there're no priests who holds the true faith anymore. I've talked to some of the oldest priests here and one of them taught in the local seminary. He told me he has gone to an atheist conference and a freemason temple, and being a superior among the brothers (before he became a priest) he threw the Rule's book into the dustbin in front of the brothers, telling them that it's useless. Another old missionary priest prayed in the monastery in Taize, another nun prayed in the Buddhist temple. They are all well respected by the "Catholics" here.

To break the Christian spirit further, the Government's Tourism Board is exhibiting the Medieval torture tools used during the Inquisition inside an Islamic museum, which is probably full of lies. It depicts the torturer as a monk that look very devilish. This takes place in Malacca, where St Francis first stepped in when he arrived to spread the good news.

Thank you for keeping up the Christian Spirit. Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Blessed New Year.

+JMJ+

Jerome, Malaysia

L, M

Subject: Lenin/Mao Giant Statues in Canada

Dear Brothers Michael and Peter,

Thanks for posting in the News and Catholic Commentary section of your website the gall of Canadian government to allow the giant statues of Russian Communist Leader Vladimir Lenin and Mao Zedung. These people are mass murderers as recounted by our history, but most of the residents of Richmond (if I may say) are passive over this issue. If only men would contemplate how Vladimir has mass murdered the Russians during the Bolsheveik Revolution, they would tremble remembering those cursed years. The Blessed Mother had in fact interceded with God to put a stop to the genocide and famine, persecutions of the Church and annihilations of neighboring nations of Russia. I could still remember the detailed accounts of the events prior to the Conversion of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary posted here in your website - the very article that refutes the LIES behind the world clamor for Our Lady of Fatima's Consecration of Russia to be done (as it was already done by Pope Pius XII, though late and not in a manner as requested by Our Lady). I could still remember how millions of catholics simply died of famine inthe hands of Communist murderers; sent to forced labor and death camps and the like; thousand of catholic religious and priests gained their martyrdom at the hands of faithless communists. The once before huge country with much catholic population was reduced to death ... the once Catholic Country has become a Communist Land ... a land where evey catholic would never wish to live .. a total Godless Land, abominable in the sight of God Almighty!

Canada, the country that has the largest land on earth has outraged God by allowing these statues to be displayed for whatever reason, the cursed memory of these mass murderes should in no way be given a chance to be honored by anybody! The silence and lack of zeal among the people in that country would contribute if one day they would be surprise Canada to have become a Communist Republic, too. All signs are already in placed for the success of communism in the world, in fact it did succeed in Vatican since 1958, need I say more?

May God be pleased with you Brothers for informing us about this and in helping us open our eyes as our World is truly changing ... leading to a Christ-rejecter planet earth ... may God help us all!

Ave Maria!

In Crucified Christ and Immaculate Mary,
Joey, EENS-Sedevacantist (Philippines)

Jesse Ventura - Big Brother

MHFM: This is worth watching:

Conspiracy Theory - Big Brother - Part 1

Conspiracy Theory - Big Brother - Part 2

Conspiracy Theory - Big Brother - Part 3

Conspiracy Theory - Big Brother - Part 4

Conspiracy Theory - Big Brother - Part 5

Conspiracy Theory - Big Brother - Part 6

Statue

Subject: Lenin Statue in Canada

I don't know how to spell "yamaka", (sorry!) however it does appear that on the "statue" (actually a piece of GARBAGE not even worthy of the trash, and that is putting it nicely!) of luciferianist lenin that he is sporting a yamaka. Just one more absurdity about this total abomination--all people responsible for this monstrosity should be completely horrified at themselves--it's just in-your-face satanic offensiveness and absolute ugliness and hideousness to the max, and way beyond! It is repulsive beyond words and measure.

Perfect Contrition

Subject: Perfect Contrition

I am reading a booklet titled "Perfect Contrition Golden Key to Paradise" (1930J De Driesch from the French of Fr. Simon). Regarding Perfect Contrition the article makes the claim that "... in our times, there exists no other form of forgiveness for thousands of pagans and heretics." This sounds like a BOD adjunct.

I would appreciate your opinion: Can there be the forgiveness of actual sin without first removing original sin from the soul by baptism?

Thank you,

MHFM: First, the answer to your question is no. The Church teaches that there is no remission of sins outside the Church, and all who are in original sin are necessarily outside the Church.

Pope Boniface VIII, Unam Sanctam, Nov. 18, 1302:

“With Faith urging us we are forced to believe and to hold the one, holy, Catholic Church and that, apostolic, and we firmly believe and simply confess this Church outside of which there is no salvation nor remission of sin.”

Some might attempt to counter this argument by bringing up examples from the Old Testament. This response fails, however. That’s because the justification which came to the true believers (not the pagans) in the Old Testament was not even full justification. It was a preliminary and inferior form of justification; it didn’t truly remit sins. As Hebrews 10 and the teaching of the Magisterium make clear, it provided a covering for sins, but not true and full forgiveness. True forgiveness only comes with justification in the New Testament. Therefore, there can be no forgiveness for those who are in original sin, and of course not for pagans.

Second, the quote you bring forward from that 1930 book is quite interesting. It’s another clear example of pure pre-Vatican II heresy against the dogma Outside the Church There is No Salvation. We should notice how the author implies that thousands of pagans can be saved. As radically heretical as such a conclusion is, it follows from his heretical premise. For once you believe that one or even a few members of a false religion can be saved, you have departed from the dividing line. You have dissented from the only certainty: the divinely revealed dogma. You are thus left adrift in a foggy haze of unbelief, in which salvation must be considered possible anywhere and for any number.

Interested

[To MHFM]

My name is Ralph Wilms and I am from the Netherlands. I am 34 years old, happily married and we have two wonderful children… I grew up as a roman catholic, but at the age of 21 I left the roman catholic church, and became a Baptist.

As a family we are also active members of our Baptist church, and myself I am also preaching once in the while.

We are living in a Roman Catholic area in the Netherlands, and right now I want to study again sincerely my roman catholic background, because I read so much against roman catholic church and the papacy, so I want sincerely read about roman catholic apologetics, like your books and great website for the Rediscovery of Catholic Tradition.
Because of my roman catholic background, I also started to read these last days some roman catholic theologians like Augustine, Bernard Clairvaux and especially Thomas Aquinas.

So as a Baptist and ex-catholic i have become sincerely interested in the study of roman catholics, because I see more and more that we as evangelicals don’t really understand Roman Catholism and it’s doctrine. At the same aim pretty much confused, because of my roman catholic background and it’s liberal influences in the RCC, which hath draw me to a Baptist church, were the Bible has been taken seriously, and which I was missing at my RCC church..

Since I have been seeing some of your video’s and articles I have seriously reading again the roman catholic tradition and my own background it, and by your website I have found information which I have taken very seriously, because when I converted to evangelism and the Baptist church, the priest of the RCC in our town could not defense his own RCC position and was warning me at all.

After listen some of your MP3 with lectures, I also saw that you wrote some great books like “The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church, The Truth about What Really Happened to the Catholic Church after Vatican II & Outside the Catholic Church there is Absolutely No Salvation.

… I am sure that they contain a lot of great information and insight to understand theology of the RCC view of the church, mary, rosary the papacy the mass & the Eucharistic Sacrifice…etc., for the Rediscovery of Catholic Tradition…

May the Lord God bless you and your ministry,

Soli Deo Gloria!

Ralph Wilms

The Netherlands

Your response to VC’s assertion that using contraception without “full knowledge” analogous to making an innocent misstatement of fact, was spot on. However, what VC would undoubtedly say in response, is that the possession of “full knowledge” (more accurately “sufficient reflection” as you point out) does not refer to knowing the purpose of the act itself, but to knowing that the act is wrong. A lot of people think this way, and I think it is an error in thinking which was deliberately introduced to Catholic education, probably even before Vatican II. I think this is the same confusion that underpins Baptism of Desire. Carried to its most extreme conclusion (and the one that leads to all of today’s indifferentism) it goes like this: “obviously if a person ONLY KNEW about Baptism and its effects, he would want it; therefore he receives the graces of Baptism anyway, because God can’t hold his ignorance against him”.

Obviously, as you have pointed out in the past, if this were true, then the safest thing to do would be to Baptize no one, and in fact to keep everyone as ignorant as possible. It is absurd, but these people just don’t seem to be able to reason to this next level.

If VC thinks that ignorance excuses one from using contraception, he would in fairness have to also conclude that ignorance excuses one from murder. “Sure he knows he is killing someone, but perhaps he doesn’t know that it is wrong”. However even VC might think twice before carrying his own line of reasoning this far.

The problem I think comes down to the fact that most people today have been taught from the perspective of “relativism” and hence don’t understand, or acknowledge, that some things are intrinsically evil. This means that their very nature makes them always wrong, in every place and in every time. If something is NOT intrinsically evil, then the lack of knowledge to which VC refers might be an excuse. For example eating meat is not intrinsically wrong. Therefore if someone didn’t know about the disciplinary prohibition, or didn’t know that it was Friday, he doesn’t sin mortally by eating meat. But one (everyone) is supposed to know that killing your brother is wrong. You’re not supposed to have to check the Catechism or consult a Canon Lawyer first. If you drop the piano without knowing your brother was standing under it, then you lack sufficient reflection. If you purposefully drop the piano on your brother, you sin mortally, even if you think that killing your brother is an OK thing. These same rules apply to everyone, even the non-Baptized.

Bill Mulligan

MHFM: Yes, VC is simply repeating the very falsehood that was refuted in our video on Corapi. He ignores the points and asserts that “full knowledge” means you have to “know it’s a mortal sin,” even when the act itself is intrinsically evil, as it is in artificial contraception.

Annotation

Subject: Comment

Dear brothers in Christ,

The annotation from Douay-Rheims Bible, just like other similar fallible statements the heretics like to quote, contains at least one glaring contradiction. The annotation says:".. God which hath not bound his grace, in respect of his own freedom, to any Sacrament..". So, ANY sacrament can somehow be circumvented. How about the sacrament of holy order? Could it be that "by some "remedyless necessity" anybody could serve the Mass, without being properly ordinated? How about the sacrament of holy matrimony? Did Henry VIII experience "remedyless necessity" by "marrying" six women?

In operation of God's grace there is no such thing as "remedyless necessity". The sacrament of baptism is the only absolutely necessary sacrament to enter the Kingdom of Heaven, and through "ex opere operator" could be ministered even by pagans and heretics, man and women. Why would God in His infinite mercy remove such obvious obstacles in ministering the sacrament of baptism, and retain the "remedyless necessity"? Is there something He could not foresee, is there something He could not overcome?

The only remedyless situation is being cast in Hell. There is no God's grace in the Hell. On Earth there is no remedyless situation, because there is God's grace. The baptism of blood and/or desire adherents simply deny God's omnipotence and suggest that the Earth is Hell. The Earth is not Hell, it never was and never will be. The Earth shall pass away, the Hell shall not pass away--it is eternal. And it is looking forward to meet countless obstinate heretics who are trying to invent something to cheat God's will.

Let these holy days, when we remember Little Jesus and The Holy Family, gives you much joy.

Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia

Against the V-2 Sect

Subject: Against the Vatican II Sect

GALATIANS, Chapter 1 VS 6-12 and vs. 20

                (6) I wonder that you are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ, unto another Gospel. (7) Which is not another: only there are some that trouble you and would pervert the Gospel of Christ. (8) But though we, or an Angel from Heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be Anathema. (9) As we said before, so now I say again: If any one preach to you a Gospel, besides that which you have received, let him be Anathema. (10) For I do not persuade men, or God? Or do I seek to please men? If I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ. (11) For I give you to understand brethren, that the Gospel which was preached by me is not according to man. (12) For neither did I receive it of man: nor did I learn it but by the revelation of Christ!..... (20) Now the things which I write to you, behold, before God, I lie not!
                   Here we see that this Epistle of St. Paul points directly to the vatican II sect and also the protestants. Plainly we can see the no mass (novus ordo) does not serve Christ, The council did every thing to please man and also crushed the teachings of the past holy Popes! As for the protestants are rebuked easily in St. John Chapter 6 verse (55) He that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood hath everlasting life: and I will raise him up in the last day... (57) He that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood abideth in me: and I in him.         If one is not in communion with Jesus Christ by eating his flesh and drinking his blood he is dead. In order to be one with Christ one must hold the Catholic Faith. St. Peter shows its clearly a sacrifice for the bread & wine to become flesh and blood in his First Epistle in chapter 2 verse 5,   Be you also as living stones built up, a spiritual house, a HOLY PRIESTHOOD, to offer up spiritual SACRIFICES, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ, These are not animal sacrifices but spiritual and the Canon of the Latin Mass causes the sacrifice to be acceptable through it many prayer pleading for acceptance.
                                                                                                                                          JMJ

Thank you and God love you MHFM
John Makovich

Locate

To whom it may concern:

I am trying locate the article you wrote on the comparison of the 4 fake, pretender "High Priests" of the Macabees period with the first 4 anti-popes of our time. And information on St. Joan of Arc, as I can seem to find it on your web site. Thanks!

MHFM: It’s located here:

The New Mass is The Abomination of Desolation – and the (first) Four Vatican II Antipopes parallel the Four False High Priests at the time of the Abomination of Desolation in the Machabees

It can also be found on our mainpage and under the section, Vatican II “Catholic” Church Exposed. Concerning St. Joan of Arc, she is discussed some in this article:

Examining the Theological Status of Geocentrism and Heliocentrism and the Devastating Problems this creates for Baptism of Desire Arguments [PDF]

When

Subject: dishonesty

… when I was a V2er I hated it [dishonesty] because they were against saying anything bad about anything. And I had such hatred for abortion and all the Homo stuff and especially the child molestation scandals. But I thought I had too just forgive people and not condemn them for their evils, so I stayed quiet. But when I learned the truth I was so much happier I can say what I think. I can hate abortion and sin I don't have to tolerate this trash.

School

My heart and prayers go out to little NJ 3rd-grader Mariah Jordat whose "school-teacher" (more like a communist jail-warden!) forced her to put away her Bible during reading time----no wonder she cried!...---that really is the problem with "public education" today and one of the many reasons I DESPISED it myself, years ago (besides the lousy food, lousy architecture and everything else there): it's totally atheistic, communistic and EVIL! Would that ALL the children were as BLESSED… to be home-schooled by a TRULY loving, caring mother! Moms and Dads out there---WAKE UP! Rearrange your priorities, PRAY THE ROSARY EVERY DAY AS A FAMILY and give your kids a CHANCE! Our Lady will show you how it can be done, we need to get children OUT of those evil vile dens of immorality they call "schools"!

Pius XII

Subject: Question about “Venerable” Pius XII

Benedict-Ratzinger aka "Pope" Benedict XVI made Pius XII venerable the same time he did Apostate Anti-Christ Clown Pope jP2. The horribleness of the latter is obvious. What do you think about Pius 12 and saint process, (assuming for sake of discussion that Benedict-Ratzinger is a real pope, which he isn't of course). Of course, a real pope should not care what Jews or anyone else thinks. But do you think he deserves any discussion since he allowed Bugini to begin the destruction of the Mass from 1951-1958? Thanks for your answer.

Thank you also for your comments on Merry Christmas and (sic) Happy holidays.

William S

MHFM: No, he definitely doesn’t deserve any consideration for such a distinction from any real pope.

Annotation

Dear Brother,

… I would greatly appreciate your comments regarding this quotation from the Original and true Reims New Testament 1582 Annotations on John, chapter 3 beginning on page 162.

Thank you,

Cecelia

"Here is an incredible annotation from the Douay-Rheims Bible that proves -- if you trust the annotations of the Douay-Rheims -- that my position on EENS is the correct one. Baptism of desire and blood are real; but you cannot be saved by an act of "good will" in another religion."

Douay-Rheims 1582:

“Though in this case, God which hath not bound his grace, in respect of his own freedom, to any Sacrament, may and doth accept them as baptized, which either are martyred before they could be baptized, or else depart this life with vow and desire to have that Sacrament, but by some remediless necessity could not obtain it. Lastly, it is proved that this Sacrament giveth grace ex opere operator, that is, of the work itself (which all Protestants deny) because it so breedeth our spiritual life in God, as our carnal birth giveth the life of the world.

He that believeth in Christ with faith which worketh by charity (as the Apostle speaketh) shall not be condemned at the later day nor at the hour of his death. But the Infidel, be he Jew, Pagan, or Heretic, is already (if he die in his incredulity) by his own profession and sentence condemned, and shall not come to judgment either particular or general, to be discussed according to his works of mercy done or omitted."

MHFM: It’s simply a fallible annotation – one which clearly contradicts the infallible teaching of the Magisterium. The Magisterium certainly connects the grace of justification with receiving the Sacrament itself. What’s amazing is how much “faith” heretics have in fallible annotations which assert things they like, and how they have no faith in the infallible dogmatic definitions of the Magisterium. It’s also worth noting that while this annotation teaches the clear false doctrine of explicit “baptism of desire,” it rejects the bold heresy that a Jew or a pagan or a heretic can be saved by “baptism of desire.” The latter is how basically everyone defines “baptism of desire” today. Here are some infallible and dogmatic annotations on John 3:5, and how first justification is inextricably bound up with receiving water baptism.

Pope Paul III, The Council of Trent, Sess. 7, Can. 5 on the Sacrament of Baptism, ex cathedra: “If anyone says that baptism [the Sacrament] is optional, that is, not necessary for salvation (cf. Jn. 3:5): let him be anathema.”

Pope Eugene IV, The Council of Florence, “Exultate Deo,” Nov. 22, 1439: “Holy baptism, which is the gateway to the spiritual life, holds the first place among all the sacraments; through it we are made members of Christ and of the body of the Church. And since death entered the universe through the first man, ‘unless we are born again of water and the Spirit, we cannot,’ as the Truth says, ‘enter into the kingdom of heaven’ [John 3:5]. The matter of this sacrament is real and natural water.”

Pope Paul III, The Council of Trent, On Original Sin, Session V, ex cathedra: “By one man sin entered into the world, and by sin death... so that in them there may be washed away by regeneration, what they have contracted by generation, ‘For unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God [John 3:5].”

Pope St. Leo the Great, dogmatic letter to Flavian, Council of Chalcedon, 451:

“IN OTHER WORDS, THE SPIRIT OF SANCTIFICATION AND THE BLOOD OF REDEMPTION AND THE WATER OF BAPTISM. THESE THREE ARE ONE AND REMAIN INDIVISIBLE. NONE OF THEM IS SEPARABLE FROM ITS LINK WITH THE OTHERS.”

Corapi

Dear Brother Dimond,

I would like to tell you that I am disappointed with your attacks against Fr. John Corapi. Your accusations against Father Corapi have been rationalized, much like what atheists do to rationalize their atheism and disdain for religion.

For example, Corapi's explanation of the guilt incurred by the use artificial contraception is absolutely right. If a person does not know that it is a serious matter, they are not fully guilty of a mortal sin. What you have done is to unfairly "spin" an argument against Corapi, but it crumbles under the weight of scrutiny.

In order for a mortal sin to be mortal, three conditions are necessary:

1) Serious matter
2) Full knowledge
3) Full consent of the will

If a man and woman are not blessed with your upbringing and do not have the full and complete knowledge of the evils of contraception, then they cannot be held fully accountable. Much like if you say something that is untrue, not realizing that it is a lie, you are not guilty of lying…

V.C.

MHFM: No, you are quite wrong. The conditions are: serious matter, sufficient reflection and full consent of the will. “Full knowledge” can mean the same thing as “sufficient reflection,” if understood correctly. The use of artificial contraception satisfies all three conditions every time, regardless of what one understands about the significance of the act. It of course involves grave matter. It’s also an act that is automatically committed with sufficient reflection or full knowledge of what one is trying to do. In other words, one doesn’t use artificial contraception without knowing that he is trying to avoid the natural conception of a child. It’s therefore false to compare it, as you do, to a person who says something that is untrue while thinking it to be true.

Such an attempted analogy fails miserably because it is quite possible to say something that is false and reasonably think that it is true. But it is obviously not possible to buy a contraceptive, and then use it during a sexual act, without knowing or intending to avoid the conception of the child. Thus, your analogy doesn’t work in the slightest way. It fails completely. Your desire to defend the apostate Corapi, who is neither a priest nor a Catholic but rather a phony heretic, is disgusting. Equally disgusting is your gravitation toward liberalism. You need to look carefully at the material we have presented against the Vatican II “popes,” and listen to our debates on this issue.

In addition to what is said above, your position is proven to be heretical by the infallible teaching of Pope Pius XI. He specifically contradicts you and the heretic Corapi by solemnly declaring that all who use contraception are branded, by the fact, with the guilt of a grave sin. You deny this by saying that people who use it might not be so branded.

Pope Pius XI, Casti Connubii (#’s 53-56), Dec. 31, 1930: “But no reason, however grave, may be put forward by which anything intrinsically against nature may become conformable to nature and morally good. Since, therefore, the conjugal act is destined primarily by nature for the begetting of children, those who in exercising it deliberately frustrate its natural powers and purpose sin against nature and commit a deed which is shameful and intrinsically vicious.

“Small wonder, therefore, if Holy Writ bears witness that the Divine Majesty regards with greatest detestation this horrible crime and at times has punished it with death. As St. Augustine notes, ‘Intercourse even with one’s legitimate wife is unlawful and wicked where the conception of offspring is prevented.’ Onan, the son of Judah, did this and the Lord killed him for it (Gen. 38:8-10).

“Since, therefore, openly departing from the uninterrupted Christian tradition some recently have judged it possible solemnly to declare another doctrine regarding this question, the Catholic Church, to whom God has entrusted the defense of the integrity and purity of morals, standing erect in the midst of the moral ruin which surrounds her, in order that she may preserve the chastity of the nuptial union from being defiled by this foul stain, raises her voice in token of her divine ambassadorship and through Our mouth proclaims anew: any use whatsoever of matrimony exercised in such a way that the act is deliberately frustrated in its natural power to generate life is an offence against the law of God and of nature, and those who indulge in such are branded with the guilt of a grave sin.”

Enthronement

Dear MHFM,

… I was wondering what you think of the "enthronement" that took place in the Vatican in 1963, that supposedly also took place simultaneously in South Carolina if I am not mistaken? I think Malachi Martin had written about it in the book "Windswept House". Isn't there satanic worship now in the Vatican? Do you think John Paul I was murdered and if so, why?

God Bless,

MHFM: In some of our audios and past videos, we addressed the enthronement of Satan in the Vatican. We do believe there was a connection between the enthronement, Paul VI's reign, and the post-Vatican II sect. We also believe that Antipope John Paul I was murdered. It wasn’t because he was good, but rather because he wanted to give away the Church's money.

New SSPX video

New Mass

The New Mass

The earliest records of the liturgy show that it was said in the vernacular of the people. There was also more emphasis on readings from the Old Testament… All these liturgies pre-date the TLM. Do me a favour and study the liturgy of the Eastern Church whilst it was in union with Rome before saying the the NO Mass is invalid.

Jerome

MHFM: Do us a favor and get a clue about the facts presented: the New Mass is invalid not because it’s said in the vernacular, but because the words used are not sufficient for a valid consecration. So, you haven’t even correctly understood the argument; yet you presume, in your blindness, that the argument is absurd.

Luther

I have been studying the life of Martin Luther and have come to the conclusion that he is the greatest thing that ever happened to the Catholic Church since the time of Christ.

He stood against all that was unholy and corrupt in the church and I admire him for that.

What really gets me is how people of supposed intelligence can still teach such medieval myths as the existence of purgatory, the value of holy water, the ability of a priest who are given a stipend can pray loved ones out of purgatory, the worship of icons (the Blessed Virgin, St. Joseph, the baptism of 6-day-old infants, etc.).

The church really was evil, I believe, as evidenced by the torturing and deaths of tens of thousands of people who didn't agree wit it.

I am really sorry that I was exposed to the teachings of the church at an early age and all the way through high school.

I have since renounced those teachings and profess to be a true believer of Jesus Christ, minus all the untruths attached to his teachings by the totally misguided church.

MHFM: No, you are not a biblical Christian. You embrace unbiblical doctrines invented by a possessed heretic who made his teachings up as he went along. You are outside the true Church.

Refuting Protestantism from the Bible and Eastern "Orthodoxy" (audios and articles)

What you don't know about Martin Luther

Martin Luther, the Devil and Denominations

Discovered

Hello - and a Happy New Year.

I have just discovered your website and am quite interested in some of the articles and comments. It is clear that the Holy Church has been under attack for some years by those who would wish to destroy it - in particular by marxists currently embedded in the authorities. Karl Marx (real name Mordechai) always planned to destroy our Holy Church - because he and his criminal gang needed to abolish that which is correctly identified by the Roman Catholic Church as either good or evil in the hearts and the affairs of men. This was so that they can replace it with their own, new versions of what is 'good' and what is 'evil'.

I often bring items to the attention of the Catholic Herald Newspaper and the Universe in Britain - but my letters or messages seem to be ignored as though I were some sort of crank. I believe that sometimes evil and malign intervention really can be global and subvert on a breath-taking level through deceit woven into the authorities.

The very fabric of our families are also under attack in every way and with every warped television programme and new 'government' directive. We live in England where it has become so difficult to keep families together. My wife and I have been married for 33 years and have six children - but this is now regarded as unusual and even strange. Life is becoming a constant struggle against the very people who should be guiding us and taking care of us and our welfare. The system has become satanic.

I wish you and all your families well - and with the hope that 2010 can bring about a world-wide renewal of faith - with those impostors disguised as purveyors of 'good deeds' correctly identified for what they are - and treated accordingly.

With very warm regards,

Stephen,

Somerset,

England.

Great Deception

MHFM,

The True Catholic Doctrine that is revealed through you on your site enables one to see the truth through all the deception. The Bible becomes interesting and rewarding reading once again. World events are seen moving toward the coming of the Anti-Christ. Our lives are organized as we prepare for eternal life, and share with others the true love of God that is within us.

The recent series on global warming, is yet another message to those that follow the "princes" of this world in these final days, "Don't put your faith in the Princes of this world." In God's mercy, he is trying to wake us up to these events. Our current leader "O" was empowered to show true believers that he and these other "princes" are in fact, tyrants. Had his opponent won the last election, neither the progress of the new world order nor the knowledge of such activities would have been made as clear. The "great deception" is unfolding before our eyes and becoming so obvious to anyone that dismisses the externals (Lies) projected by these "Princes."

Thank-you and God Bless You,
Tom Miles

Question

Greetings,

Your information on sedevacantism is brilliant. I wonder how anyone can not be a sedevacantist after reading your materials. All your information on the Catholic Church has helped me enormously. And I especially love the relevant quotes on Islam.

Question-

1. A family member (not a Christian) made a donation to an Afghan Muslim charity IN MY NAME as a Christmas present to me. I'm horrified. What should a Catholic do in this situation?

Leisa

MHFM: Thank you for the interest. One should clearly admonish the person who did it, and remove that person from any position of control which would enable him or her to do such a thing again.

Worse

Dear MHFM,

With nearly 50 million abortions performed each year worldwide, complete brutal slaughter of God's little ones, wars and rumors of wars abounding, and over a billion so-called Catholics partaking of God in the Eucharist, that is clearly not Christ present, and an antipope who praises false gods, surely it must be worse than all the Sodom's and Gomorraha's that have ever existed. Is it possible to have a Blessed New Year? Blessed Mother Mary, Mother of God, ora pro nobis!

Series

Dear Brothers,

That's a great video series by Jesse Ventura on the Global Warming Conspiracy. I thought it was interesting that in the 4th video, at about 3 minutes, Maurice Strong, the ex-U.N. Climate vigilante, aka. the Godfather of the Environmental movement, said: "We are united as one family, on one home, in this universe, it's called the Earth, it is the home of all of us, and it can only be saved by the cooperation of all of us." He's implying that humanity can only save itself, as though we don't need God - Jesus Christ and the Holy Trinity - to save us in the Catholic Church only before we save ourselves by good works and avoiding sins! Also, I thought Jesse's comment, twice, that "Well, the one thing I learned in government - if you want to find the answer to a question, FOLLOW THE MONEY." In Video 5, when Ben Santer, Maurice Strong's right hand man, was confronted about the changes and deletions to the scientists report, i.e. that there is no discernable human influence on global climate, he said, "Our Chapter came to the conclusion, ah, a line that's burned on my memory forever, 'The balance of evidence suggests a discernable human influence on global climate.'" Yeah, right! The only discernable human influence on global climate is the propaganda on global climate, designed to create panic so as to form a New World Tyranny. The line is burned on his memory forever because it's a lie:

1 Timothy 4:2 - "Speaking lies in hypocrisy and having their conscience seared,"

Also, when Ben Santer, was asked the question, "Why do you think there are so many Conspiracy Theorists around this issue?" He answered, "People love believing a good conspiracy theory." (Vid. 5, 2 minutes) It is amazing how when large quantities of money are involved, like in the Carbon Tax Pyramid Scheme, the people at the top even believe their own lies!!! Any good theory is built on facts first. Since the facts on global warming show that the temperatures are dropping while the global warmist's salaries are rising, then the facts for a conspiracy theory are over-whelming!...

God Bless,

Chris White

MHFM: Yes, the link between the Rothschild banking family, and the climate conspiracy’s main man (Maurice Strong), is quite interesting. We think it shows again how the financial conspiracy is, in terms of secular power, at the top of the rest.

Video

Subject: 11 minute summary

Great video on the SSPX. I think you beautifully summarized what is the core issue, the central error of the day, in just 11 minutes. I linked it in this e-mail (below) to several friends and family members. Most of these people are highly educated, lawyers, teachers, one a VII nun. However they likely won’t even respond, let alone attempt to muster a counter argument. I’ll never understand the attitude, it is hard even to describe. Perhaps smug indifference? I would understand it if they made no claims to belief, if they just admitted to being atheists. But they don’t. Some are daily attendants of the Novus Ordo. Some attend Bible Study. It is mind boggling. Anyway, a very nice job. I think this format should be effective, if anything can be. It is short enough that many people will actually sit through it. Yet it still makes what I think is an exhaustive case.

Bill Mulligan

Read

Subject: Thanks for your work

I read some of your explanations (Catholic apologetics) and I just want to thank you for your work.

Godspeed,

Robert Hill

Found

Subject: I need help

Fathers:

I found you because my cat stepped on the laptop keyboard… I have been reading your site. I finally found Catholics who think like me.

While I don't want to sound nuts. I feel like I am cursed. I don't know why. I've never hurt anyone except myself. But this much [stuff] shouldn't happen to one person.

I would elaborate but I don't feel like writing a book just yet I don't know where to turn… I have a Catholic education. Grade school… High School, Franciscan (defunct).

George........

MHFM: It was providential that you came across the material. Please look carefully at the information. There is a file on our site which explains how to convert and what to do when leaving the Vatican II Church. We can also help a person with that once he is fully convinced. You should also begin to pray the Rosary each day, all 15 decades a day if possible. We would also encourage you to obtain our basic package of materials.

On denial

Subject: My comment on baptism/desire/blood / denial of EENS

Dear MHFM

My comments about the sspx rejecting defined salvation dogmas. I believe this heresy of baptism of desire/blood / soul of the church began in the mid to late 19 century. Pope Pius ix in his syllabus of errors condemned these heresies and errors. Also satan was released in 1864 according to la sallete . Also all the saints before believed in no salvation outside the church, like st francis xavier, st issac jogues, st francis de sales, st john vianney, st anthony claret, st alphonsus ligouri, st ignatius loyola, etc,. For the sspx to deny dogma like this, they are making everything meaningless. This is the worst heresy in the church which is the root cause of why we are in the great apostasy. I believe God allowed this great apostasy because of this denial of the salvation dogmas, which I believe is the foundational blocks for our faith. And i got depressed after i listened to your audio about the sspx. Also all of us catholics in this country have to do all in our effort to convert and evangelize this country to true Catholicism, or else I believe this country is doomed. We need to pray and convert this harlot USA to true catholicism. SOLI DEO GLORIA to jesus through mary. In Christ MARK V CA

Jesse Ventura – Global Warming Conspiracy

MHFM: This is worth watching:

Global Warming Conspiracy - part 1

Global Warming Conspiracy - part 2

Global Warming Conspiracy - part 3

Global Warming Conspiracy - Part 4

Global Warming Conspiracy - part 5

Global Warming Conspiracy - part 6

Comment

Subject: “Merry X-Mas”

Hello Dimond Brothers,

Have you ever noticed how some people when they want to say Merry Christmas in writing, they remove the name of Christ from Christmas and substitute it with an "x", and you have "Merry X-mas".

Anthony

Question

I have given out nearly 200 "The Bible Proves the Teaching of the Catholic Church". Your booklet is so complete that I have had only 3 questions to date, two of which I have answered. However, the third individual claims that Acts 5: 13-21 shows that James had the same authority as Peter. Any information on this subject would be greatly appreciated.

Joan

MHFM: St. Peter speaks first because he has the primacy over the apostles and the Church. When St. Peter speaks, the debate ends and the entire assembly goes silent, in recognition of his authority. His decision sets the course of action for what is finally promulgated. St. James then speaks because he is an apostle and, as Eusebius (early Church historian) tells us, he was left to be the local Bishop of Jerusalem. St. Peter, not St. James, clearly has the primacy.

No longer amused

Subject: The Wrigglers

I'm humbled listening to your debates. When I first came across your website, I burst out laughing by your constant use of the phrase 'bad will', to describe those that were grudgingly and sneakily dishonest in their statements, opinions and positions on the Catholic Faith. I'm no longer amused!

Listening to William Albrecht was a most painful experience. I can hardly describe it. I felt compelled to revisit your other debates with Vin Lewis, Ken, Ken G and William Golle; sure enough, it was pretty much the same thing. Their shameless ability to construct arguments on the flimsiest premise, against countless dogmatic statements, smacked of rank hypocrisy. I tell you, and I'm quite irritated by this, if the situation was reversed, they wouldn't give you the time of day and frankly, neither would I.

The demonic streak that runs through their posturing proves the absolute necessity of the catholic dogmas. Dogma today is used as an insult that ne'er-do-wells sling at traditional catholics. What they in their stuborness fail to understand, is that without dogma, we cease to be catholic. The men you debated claimed to be catholics but alas, they spoke with forked tongues, for they protest the religion!

Again, they have the impious ability, like their master the devil, to hold contrary views in the same noggin. Truth is so simple for the good willed heart that seeks it; it need not be complicated. Yet these guys, as 'apologists' unfortunately, have made a career from bending the truth to suit their own warped views on salvation. They're out there on Youtube spreading heresies to the gullible. They refuse to enter the Kingdom of Heaven and end up plugging the narrow gate.

St Polycarp was right regarding the heretic Marcion. They're a despicable menace to man and beast! And I'm absolutely glad that you hold them to their heresies and show them, that they are nothing more than apostates of the V2 religion.

Pax Christi+

Michael Mortune UK

SSPX video

Subject: SSPX video

Dear MHFM,

Excellent video on sspx-heretics. St. Alphonsus De Liguori calls these heretics, 'double-tongued,' and will never see the kingdom of God until they repent completely and make reparation for their hideous beliefs in the name of Christ. God Bless, and Merry Christmas and a Happy New year in Jesus Christ Our Lord!

Comment

Dear MHFM,

I have two siblings in my family in the SSPX. The video was great! I should send it to them! Merry Christmas… to everyone at the monastery! Have a blessed Christmas season and be assured of our prayers.

Robby

Strange

Dear Brothers of the Most Holy Family Monastery,

Before I found your site and when I was still struggling to understand the reasons for all the changes in the Catholic Church, including modifications to the “Catholic Bibles” so I thought they were Catholic because I had purchased them from the so called “Catholic Book Shops” in Lisbon. I was going through an intensive Biblical study on my own comparing as much Catholic Doctrine I was able to get, and even went to the extent of comparing Bibles and found many but many differences, what was most appalling was the vulgar and offensive language applied to the Devine Revelation and whenever the Scriptures referred to our Lady, its true meaning was found distorted, and so on.

Feeling very upset, I took the Bible which I had bought for my daughter at the time with a list of contradictions and their page reference and put a complaint requesting from them a true Catholic Bible. When putting the problem to the young salesman, he looked at me as if I was not normal and with a very unfriendly voice kept on repeating that he was a theologian, as if there was nothing wrong with these modifications.

In the meantime a strange thing happened, a certain man, with fair skin and a French accent holding a pram with a young child in it, whom I had not seen when I entered the store, suddenly began to shout in a loud voice from quite a distance and then all of a sudden came straight up to me, so mad and with such contempt, if not hate, began yelling at me, can you imagine, he did not know me from anywhere and how could he have heard my conversation from such a distance I just don´t know, I just stood there looking at him mouth opened. He then turned to the salesman shouting, and saying, that he should not listen to me, no he must not listen to me because I was an ignorant person and did not know anything, I did not know what I was talking about, this went on for a while until he began to devalue the Bible and defend the Koran saying that it was the true revelation and not the Bible, and so forth, he just would not keep quiet, so I told him to mind his own business and to get on with his doings, well, you won’t believe this but while he walked out of the “Catholic Store” still shouting at me and always looking back, still not satisfied, he actually left the child in the pram alone outside on the pavement and came running back like a mad man into the store again screaming at me. What would man who hates so much Christianity be doing in a “Catholic Store”. So he thought it was, or rather, knew better than I that these stores were no longer Catholic.

I am a very firm and a very convicted person as far a my faith is concerned, I turned towards him and looked him straight in the eyes told him again to mind his own business and to look after the child he had left alone outside. Boy what an experience, I could only say, there you are, a clear manifestation of the evil one. I wish to put an order for a Catholic Bible from you in due course.

All the blessings to you,

M.Fernanda da Silva

Climate “Ecumenism”

Subject: Climate “Ecumenism”

Novus Ordo...what an empty, shallow, meaningless joke of a religion!

United Methodists, ''Catholics'' Discuss Climate

http://www.zenit.org/article-27936?l=english

WASHINGTON, D.C., DEC. 23, 2009 (Zenit.org).- Representatives from the U.S. bishops' conference and the United Methodist Church gathered last week to discuss issues related to the environment...In the communiqué, Bishop William Skylstad of Spokane, Washington, co-chair of the dialogue, affirmed that this topic is an opportunity for Catholics, Protestants and Orthodox Christians to "witness together in solidarity and common responsibility....Participants in the dialogue plan to write a final statement regarding the "covenantal relationship that exists between Christian worshipers and the natural environment." The meeting was held Dec. 15-17 at St. Paul's College in Washington D.C."

Comment

… furthermore, in baptism of desire and blood, a person is essentially baptising themselves. That's impossible! Where is the third person to complete the matter and FORM? Reason can be an elixir for good or evil, no? God Bless MHFM, and Merry CHRISTmas, and have a Happy New Year in Our Lord Jesus Christ!!!

Various

Dear Brothers,

Thank you so much for posting the quote of the day from St. Alphonsus:

St. Alphonsus ( c. 1760): “…rightly was devotion to Our Lady called by St. Ephrem the passport of escape from hell.” (The Glories of Mary, p. 258)

It is very encouraging… Also, the quote from Acerbo Nimis on how many people suffer the loss of heaven because of ignorance of the Mysteries of the Catholic faith which must be believed for salvation is great. It shows how poisonous heresies like invincible ignorance are, when so many people are lost for being ignorant of the Catholic faith.

That article on the "beatification" of Pope Pius XII, and the criticism such a move has received from the Jews, really strengthens Benedict XVI's image as a conservative in the eyes of false traditionalists. This is especially true when one considers the fact that Pope Pius XII was a weak pope, in comparison with St. Pope Pius X, since it was under his reign (pope Pius XII) that Fr. Feeney was excommunicated, which paved the way for the Great Apostasy of the Vatican II sect…

The article on how Christmas carol lyrics have been changed is shocking. The world has become obsessed with the political correctness of singular words, like "man", "king" and even "white"!!! How outrageous! CF, who wrote you accusing you of being a schismatic, is himself a schismatic… The article about the Swedish authorities kidnapping the homeschooling parents' child is astonishing. If parents aren't allowed to educate their own children, what gives the state the right to do so?!! Education begins at home, so no one has the right to take away the right to complete a child's education at home by means of home-schooling!!!

So China is becoming a leading force in the formation of the New World Order?! It's not really surprising given that it is a communist country!!! I went to China, twice. It is incredibly polluted and poor - communism has devastated it. The article about Obama's Christmas decorations is really outrageous. He really wants to offend anyone at all who even claims to be Christian…

God Bless,

Chris White

O, A, T

Subject: Obamacare, Abortion and Paying Taxes

Dear Brothers,

I am deeply troubled by the fact that Obamacare will pay for abortions with our tax dollars. Now the United States has long perpetrated various forms of evil with our money, but this appears to cross a line for my conscience. Can a Catholic continue paying taxes? What if the alternative means going to jail and no longer being able to support
one's family? If I had no family to support, I would gladly quit my job and become a homeless person or beggar rather than help fund this evil government. I would rejoice to be able to suffer that for Our Lord. But I fear that, given my duty to support my children, it would be sinful for me to do so. Too bad we have a degenerate and in many cases entirely apostate Catholic hierarchy. If all Catholics refused to pay these taxes, they couldn't very well throw us all in jail. But as it is, I'm sure that I'd be almost completely alone, would go to jail, and then would no longer be able to provide for my family.

May God bless you,
Laszlo

MHFM: We agree that it’s horrible. But they’ve been using tax payers’ money to fund evil things for a long time. Examples would include contraception, etc. One is forced to pay taxes or go to jail; and when one pays taxes he or she is not directly paying for abortions. It’s the government that is going to decide whose money and how much is going to be diverted to what things.

Baptism

… it does state explicitly that Jesus Christ Our King who we must worship was baptized in the Jordan river by St. John the Baptist. Gnosticism is perhaps the power and force of baptism of desire and blood, and gnostics are of Lucifer-the power of false light of the world and condemned to Hell for eternity. We must follow Sacred Tradition, and Holy Scripture, and to the ends of this earth all traditionalists suffered to the death to baptize with water, in matter and form. So simple. Jesus, Our Lord stated simply-My burden is light-. How more simple could it be to baptize in plain, whole water, abounding on God's created earth?

Dea…

Lost

… please stop passing yourself off as a "catholic" (small "c") while still denying the current popes, Vatican II, the Novus Ordo Mass, etc. Face it dude, you're just another one of those spiritually lost schismatics. No different than Martin Luther, Wesley, and others. Come back to the One True Faith mhfm ...

MHFM: “Spiritually lost schismatics,” as in those whom Benedict XVI praises every week… We continue to marvel at your cluelessness and bad will, i.e., of people like you. You are obviously oblivious to the fact that Benedict XVI agrees with and praises Luther. You obviously don’t care to figure out that he praises Protestantism, says it’s not heresy and says that they don’t need conversion. Look at the information on our website. You are not a Catholic.

Debate

MHFM: In the upcoming weeks a debate should occur which some of our readers might find interesting.

Subtle

Subject: Vatican and Manger

The Vatican decision to place the scene of Christ's birth at Nazareth instead of Bethlehem is a very subtle way of their denying that Christ is the Messiah. Old Testament Scripture foretold that the Messiah would be born in Bethlehem. By placing His birth at Nazareth, they are saying He is not the Messiah. It's dispicable. And consistent. What else can we expect from those wolves? Have a blessed and joyful Christmas, to you and your readers, celebrating the Incarnation of Our Saviour in Bethlehem!

Regards, Patricia

One Baptism

Subject: “One Baptism”

That there is only "one baptism" means that baptism cannot be repeated. One cannot receive baptism more than one in their life. It does not mean that BOD and BOB don't exist. If a person receives BOB that is their baptism.

Thanks,

Cathy

MHFM: It’s obvious that you are troubled by the one baptism argument. You should be, for you are completely wrong. One baptism means that there is only one baptism in terms of number and kind (i.e., all have the same type of baptism). We learn this from numerous things. Section 12 of our book: EENS has many quotes on this point. First, the Council of Vienne dogmatically taught that the “one baptism” refers to that one baptism in water. In other words, all have the same kind or type of baptism (water).

Pope Clement V, Council of Vienne, 1311-1312, ex cathedra: “Besides, one baptism which regenerates all who are baptized in Christ must be faithfully confessed by all just as ‘one God and one faith’ [Eph. 4:5], which celebrated in water in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit we believe to be commonly the perfect remedy for salvation for adults as for children.”

Second, it’s clear from the context of Ephesians 4. Ephesians 4 is talking about the unity in the Church of Christ. It’s teaching that all in the Church have the same Lord, the same Faith, and the same baptism. It is thus referring to unity not just in number, but in kind: all have the same kind of baptism. That’s also clear in many papal references to Ephesians 4:5, which cite it in the context of Church unity.

Pope Pius VI, Inscrutabile (# 8), Dec. 25, 1775: “… We exhort and advise you to be all of one mind and in harmony as you strive for the same object, just as the Church has one faith, one baptism, and one spirit.”

Notice that they have the same kind of spirit, and the same kind of baptism (and faith). Perhaps this quote of St. Jerome, however, best articulates the point that it’s referring to the same kind of baptism:

St. Jerome (386): “The Lord is one and God is one… Moreover the faith is said to be one… And there is one baptism, for it is in one and the same way that we are baptized in the Father and in the Son and in the Holy Spirit.” (Jurgens, The Faith of the Early Fathers, Vol. 2: 1368.)

Divorce

Subject: Divorce

Good afternoon Brothers,

I need some clarification. Take the situation of a properly married Catholic couple. The husband divorces the wife even though the priest says divorce is not an option. There are no grounds for an annulment or even for a divorce in the church. The husband's "reason" is financial "stressors." He has no intention and does nothing to try to put the marriage back together or to even contribute financially to the family he left behind. He continues to go to Mass and receive communion. Should communion be allowed to him?

SF

MHFM: The answer to your question is no. There are legitimate reasons for separation (e.g., adultery, heresy, etc.). These legitimate reasons could lead to a civil divorce (for a financial division) with the recognition that the marriage bond remains intact and that neither party is free to marry again. However, financial considerations alone are not legitimate grounds for separation and a civil divorce. If that’s truly the reason, he should not be given Communion.

Concerned

Subject: Concerned Jew

Concerning the concerned Jew that wrote in; reminds me of an old bumper sticker I had, " Wrong is wrong even if everyone is doing it and right is right even if no one is doing it". Just a little prideful to say he and the other Jews gave us Jesus. What timing God has to send his only Son during a time of a prideful lot (Jews) and when capital punishment and the death sentence was that of Crucifixion on the cross. Little did the Jews, non-believers and the devil know, the Cross would be a symbol that would remind them of their sins against God for all eternity.

God Bless,
Tom Miles

Role

Subject: Philippine’s Role in One World Government

Dear Brothers Michael and Peter,

Thanks for posting in your News and Catholic Commentary section regarding the news on our Philippine President addressing the high-level plenary session of the United Nations Climate Change Conference 2009 in Copenhagen. Why am I not surprise? this is just one of the many proofs that my country's leaders are always in the 'yes-mam yes-sir mentality' to the US and United Nations leaderships. Sad to admit, my country's leaders, almost all of them, are in full support of everything the United Nations, the US, World Health advocacies. Needless to say, the Philippine Republic was liberated by the masonic revolutionaries [freemasons] who are real players behind the scene and who truly run the Philippine Government. The Philippines, though dominated by Catholic population are so much attached with the Novus Ordo Church; the Philippine Government has trashed the Kingship of Christ in our land for a number of decades thus sending millions of souls into Hell. The leaders are so much obsessed with the glory of politics, money and wordly honors, not knowing that the very ideologies they support will send their souls and their followers and adherents to condemnation. The majority of Filippinos are so busy with either the comforts of life or complaining about poverty. Hence, only a handful are in the know of massive, global and deep deception created by the Freemasons Secret Elite who plan to establish One World Government devoid of any shadow of Catholic religion or Christian beliefs whatsoever. Majority of the Filipinos are ignorant of all these deceits, Climate Change is just one of the many global hoax the Freemasons had launched on planet Earth. Deception in the State is so easy to unmask and yet most of my compatriots are blinded by the obvious deceits ... you could just imagine them being deceived in the Church affairs! The world is getting crazier each day ... it does not acknowledge that the highest law on planet earth is ... SALVATION OF SOUL! ... no wonder the world hates Our Lord Jesus Christ so much because He is not of the World ...

I always read and ponder the E-Exchanges and the News and Catholic Commentary sections in your website. The learnings I got from your website is priceless! Words are mute in describing the brilliancy of light, your apostolate, has shown the world that is deeply-sunk in darkness.

May Christ be pleased in providing you all the graces you need in the conversion of sinners. Please include me in your prayers.

In Crucified Christ and Immaculate Mary,
Joey, EENS-Sedevacantist (Philippines)

Bible & History

1. Has the Church ever solumnly declared that use of any bible, other then the
original ACCURATE Douay-Rheims Bible, is prohibited? All other bibles contain
up to 2600 errors plus intentional hereseys.

2. My protestant daughter is denying the true Church partially due to her belief that our Lord
wasn't born on Dec. 25th. She's accepting, apparently w/o question the anti-
Catholics claim that the traditional date was invented. Her doubts include Easter too.

MHFM: The Church has issued disciplinary decrees which prohibit the use of heretical translations of the Bible, yes. If your daughter denies the true Church because of a question about the date of Christmas or Easter, then her problems run much deeper than some confusion on that issue. She lacks essential faith in Christ and the promises He made to the Church. In celebrating Christ’s birth on Dec. 25, the Church is not dogmatically stating that Christ was born on that day. It is simply commemorating His birth on that day.

Cards

An evangelizing idea for this time of year: walking around the neighborhood, one (very pleasantly surprisingly!) sees some spiritually beautiful as well as tasteful Christmas "decorations" around peoples' homes. A few of these actually indicate that whoever lives within that home actually have some sensitivity to the true meaning of Christmas---and this may be a good spot to leave an MHFM "Bible Proves" book, flyer or video: (so I really do need to order some more literature supplies from you asap!) Normally, when I see a very lovely statue of Our Lady (there are quite a few around here) in garden or lawn, that may be a good place to leave some MHFM info, /or try to talk to owner… I've been doing that--it is also easy to strike up conversation about their trees, flowers, dog, etc..and then leave some lit.)

And a question: is it better, do you think, in light of what you said about not saying "Merry Christmas" to those not professing the true Traditional Catholic faith, to simply not send out "Christmas cards" of any kind/ones that say things like "Merry Christmas" on them? Sometimes I wait until after Christmas (well it does last 12 days anyway, I think!) to send out a card or letter to just stay in touch with friends/family, so it does not necessarily have to be for "Christmas". Do you think it is better to simply SKIP Christmas gift-giving and card-giving to anyone except those who we know already hold and profess the true Traditional Catholic faith? As you know, I am sending boxes of your lit. and videos to my siblings and their families, this is actually their "Christmas present" ( I couldn't think of anything better for Christmas than info on the true Christian faith) --- although I was planning on sending them a little something like macaroons or something like that, too. I know this may sound like a goofy question, but I really do not want to do anything or say or send anything that would ending up dishonoring or insulting God on Christmas...thanks for any advice! Sincerely,

MHFM: Yes, we would say that one should avoid sending out Christmas cards. One should send the information about the faith to those people. But since it sounds like you have, then one should not send them Christmas cards.

Quick question

Subject: Quick Question

I really have been wanting to know this: would it be considered wrong/gluttony, to eat more than normal, and to eat more, but because you exercise a lot? I'm not saying I'm a bodybuilder or getting into that or anything like that, because I'm not and I don't even lift weights; I only do bodyweight exercises and gymnastic-type like handstand pushups and planches and stuff like that, but when you exercise a lot or heavy, you feel the need to eat more, or actually, I think you really need to eat more because of all the work you are doing.

So would it be wrong to eat more but because you are doing a lot of exercise and spending a lot of energy?

I know that another thing would be if you ate more but did nothing at all of exercises and things like that, eating just for the sake of eating or for the pleasure and when you don't need to.

So I just really want to know what you think about this...

MHFM: No, not necessarily. It’s difficult to offer an opinion about the proper amount of food to eat since each person really has to weigh how hungry he or she is and whether it constitutes over-eating. We do believe that the exercise or occupation in which you are engaged or employed can play a part in how much you should or could eat.

Concerning exercise and particularly weightlifting, however, we can offer a few words. We’ve seen time and again how those who engage in aggressive weightlifting suffer spiritually. We would make a distinction between exercise/playing a sport and weightlifting. We are not saying that one couldn’t or shouldn’t lift weights in moderation, but those who do it a lot or aggressively basically always fall spiritually as a result. That’s because it’s usually accompanied by pride, vanity, impurity of intention and worldliness. We are not saying that people cannot remain fit or strong by measures taken in moderation, but to put a big emphasis or a lot of time into bodybuilding is a big mistake. It can hamper if not completely cancel out spiritual growth. In fact, it’s usually an inverse relationship: the more concerned one is with building the body the more one’s soul withers away.

1 Tim. 4:8- “For bodily exercise is profitable to little: but godliness is profitable to all things, having promise of the life that now is, and of that which is to come.”

Honorius

Subject: Heretical pope

Why does your list of antipopes not include Honorius, who was condemned as a heretic by the sixth ecumenical council in 680?

Elv…

MHFM: Because he was a true pope to begin with and fell into heresy during his reign.

Confessional

Subject: Use of Confessional

Good Afternoon

I attend Mass in the Asia District of a well known Traditionalist society. I would like to know the following concerning Confession:

Can the penitent mention a third party (known to the priest) by name as:
* The occasion of sin
* The cause of the sin
* The occasion and cause of sins not committed by the penitent himself/herself

All the above told by the penitent to the priest may well be based purely on his/her subjective opinion.

Secondly: Can the priest-confessor himself in subsequent Confessions, ask the penitent about the moral behaviour of the third party?. Or ask other penitents about this third party named in a Confession?.

Thank you.
F.S.

MHFM: Since a penitent is concerned with confessing his or her own sins, we don’t see why it would be necessary to mention a third party by name. If a third party is indeed guilty of public sins and/or offenses against Catholic teaching, and a priest might give the sacraments to that person, then the priest could be informed outside the confessional. Moreover, we don’t buy this idea that an occasion or cause of someone’s sin is based on “subjective opinion.” Either it is clear that someone is involved in a sin or it is not. If it is not clear then it should not be attributed to that person at any time.

Your site

Subject: Your website

To whom it may concern,

I recently google imaged "Holocaust" and got a link to your site. Curious to find out who had taken one of the pictures I was interested in, I searched your site, and quite franky was appalled by what it had to say. Shame on you. As a Jew, I think it is disgusting that you are under the impression that I am going to hell for being "without Christ," but most importantly, I was horrified that your website tried so hard to deny the Holocaust. In my opinion, the facts are evident. Six million people did not just decide to starve themselves in concentration camps for years while working themselves to death. People did not carry heavy weights to the tops of buildings and forced themselves to jump off. No one would willingly walk into a gas chamber. Contrary to what you may believe, millions of people lost their lives to the Holocaust and the wrath of the Nazis. I respect your opinion, and I have no intention of changing it, however, I would appreciate it if you would try to be more tasteful with your denial of this event in history. You have the right to your own opinion, however, I find it unnecessary to say derogatory things such as, "As Catholics, we also hold firmly that no Jew (or any other non-Catholic) can be saved without baptism and the Catholic faith; and we work to expose Jewish domination and evil Jewish enterprises in the world, which (one must say) constitute the main power of the secular conspiracy." With all due respect, millions of people have been practicing the Jewish beliefs for longer than Christans have been. Christ was actually Jewish, and without the Jewish religions and beliefs, your religion would not have a leader and you would not have what you call the old testament. Millions of people are happy with being Jewish and are proud of their Jewish identity. How dare you try to take that away from someone. For claiming to not be racist, you come off as a hypocrite. No one likes to be discriminated against; I am sure you agree with me. So if you would please make some simple changes to your site, I'm sure the number of people you have offended would decrease rapidly. Thank you.

A concerned reader.

MHFM: You say that you are surprised by our belief that a Jew (or a Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, etc.) cannot be saved without Christ. You shouldn’t be surprised. All you have to do is read the Gospels and you will find that truth taught repeatedly. It’s not as if we made it up.

As far as our opinion about the number of Jews killed in what is called “the Holocaust,” we give an assessment of the facts. Among the important points covered in the file we have are: -how it was officially claimed and supposedly proved at Nuremberg (and “verified" by governments) that there were gassings of Jews at camps in Germany proper, such as Dachau. That is now completely rejected by everyone. Now it is only claimed that there were gassings at six camps in what is now Poland. (The only reason that people still claim gassings at those camps in Poland is because those camps came under Soviet control after the war and couldn't be investigated by the West.) As this individual points out in the video in the file, the "evidence" for the so-called gassings at the camps in Poland is neither qualitatively different nor more abundant than the already discredited and rejected "evidence" for gassings at camps in Germany proper (which no one believes).

Holocaust Controversy

Masses

Hi MHFM,

First off thanks for the new Radio show. It gave me some great well needed information. A long time ago after I understood not… Supporting heretics.
A long time ago I asked MHFM with many other questions on the phone about having Mass/Divine Liturgy offered up for personal intentions and the Holy Suffering Souls in purgatory. I never heard your answer… I thank GOD as alone as I am these days for giving me the gift of faith and perseverance. And His MOTHER for giving me the ears to hear MHFM... On a sad and truthful note that this is the first Christmases without any mention of CHRIST on any TV/stores. We know better. He's alive.

On a good note yesterday on a evening local news show they showed the devils billboards, which continue to spread. We are gay thats why we
pray. The newscaster said they have been hearing a few complaints overthe billboards. And showed the billboards…

GOD bless you
Anthony

MHFM: One should not offer stipends to heretical priests for them to say Masses. Also, one should not be offering Masses for anyone who did not die as a traditional Catholic.

Convinced

Subject: Catholicism

To Brother/s Dimond,

I have found vaticancatholic.com to be irrefutable thus far. As of recent, I have challenged my former "pastor", friends, and prior girlfriend to explain the legitimacy of their (Protestant) Christian faith to no definitive avail.

I think Protestantism is easily refuted by the following proofs:

Jesus is the truth.

Any deviation from the truth is heresy.

There are ~15,000 - 20,000 Protestant churches teaching at least one different thing about God.

Therefore, there are at least ~14,999 - 19,999 heretical Protestant churches.

* note: It is more sensible for there to be one separate from the 15,000 - 20,000, i.e. the Catholic Church.

Protestants believe Holy Spirit guides them in their interpretation of Scripture.

Protestants speak speculatively about some passages, such as John 3:5, 1 Peter 3:18-22.

Therefore, Holy Spirit doesn't guide them in their interpretation of certain Scripture.

*note: Why would Holy Spirit leave them to speculation?

Brief history of my life: baptized as an infant in the Presbyterian church… we moved around from certain Protestant churches; eventually I "got saved" by praying the sinner's prayer after a charismatic "Rapture Play" around the age of 10; I became involved in a Southern Baptist Church youth group going to activities and on trips, camps, etc.; I saw hypocrisy and left around 12… I wanted to join the Catholic Church; I didn't do that; My mother wanted me to wait until after college to join; I stopped seeing the priest and began going to Protestant churches… recently, I came across vaticancatholic.com; I began researching; I am convinced of the true Catholic faith; I no longer attend First Baptist Church at Jacksonville, where am I a member; am communicating with the college "pastor" via e-mail about doctrines; talking to other church members and friends about questionable Protestant doctrines; broke up with my girlfriend whom I was planning to marry for her lack of capitulation to the Catholic faith and incapability to prove her faith as legitimate and her beliefs as biblical - we plan to still talk as friends but not to pursue marriage for reasons of faith…

Now, what should I do?

-Zachary Gragg

MHFM: It’s great to hear that you came across the information. First, we would encourage you to obtain and read our book, The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church. Second, once you’re convinced not only of all Catholic dogmas but also of all the issues concerning the post-Vatican II “Church,” we would encourage you to follow the steps on how to convert here:

Where to go to Mass or confession today?

Third, and most importantly, obtain and begin to pray the Rosary each day, all 15 decades each day if possible. Instructions for how to do that are on our website. Finally, we would recommend the Penny Catechism we sell and a few spiritual books, such as True Devotion to Mary and The Secret of the Rosary.

Weddings

Subject: sin

Hi, on your website I read that a traditional Catholic should not go to weddings, funerals or anything else like that if it is not a traditional catholic one; and that a traditional Catholic should not even say Marry Christmas to non traditional Catholics. I agree with you, but in the past I have gone to many non Traditional Catholic weddings, funerals, etc... Does this mean that I should confess this? Or as long as i no longer go to such events in the future it is ok to not confess it unless I was to do it again knowing that I should not?

I ask this question because the only traditional catholic confessors or properly ordained confessors I have in my area are Bishop McKenna , Father smith who is novus ordo but was ordained properly, and pius X in manhatten. I dont believe any of these Priest would even think it was a sin to do what I discussed above. I quess I could confess it anyway regardless of what they say and Christ would forgive me.

I would appreciate your advice on this.

Thanks Vinny

MHFM: One should confess it, yes. One can do so by saying that he attended non-Catholic funerals and weddings, and giving the number of times; or one could say that he attended the funerals and weddings of non-Catholics (while giving the number of times), if that more precisely applies to what one did. For confession one may go to a priest who was ordained in the Eastern Rite or even an old Novus Ordo priest, if he was ordained in the traditional rite. See our file for a discussion of guidelines:

Where to go to Mass or confession today?

One should not go to McKenna. He’s a notorious and imposing apostate, and not remotely Christian. He should not be approached for anything. He believes that souls can be saved worshipping false gods and in every religion, and he imposes his apostasy on others.

India

Subject: Re: V-2 “Catholic” Church in India rejects converting others

Hello Brothers,

We are truly, in the days when the scriptures tell us that black will be called white and evil will be called good. How anyone can not see the absurdity in the last statement "The prelate urged participants to refrain from trying to attract members of other Churches to their own. This creates divisions among Churches, he noted”. So to unify (albeit into a false christian church) is to divide.

They definitely are completely spiritually blind and faithless.

Strengthened

I am now trying to finish reading all the Archive E-Exchanges in your website; however, due to voluminous pages and other matters occupying my mind I really could not finish it right away.… Your great apostolate pleases God so much and I can say that countless souls have been converted and are continuously converting through your website. Your website has strengthened my Catholic Faith and Orthodoxy; has vindicated my stand from the start to assert the Kingship of Christ on Earth and promote the Catholic Church as the One True Church founded by Christ ... to assert this Truth with authority and boldness like what you two brothers have been doing all along! I have always admired the great saints who fought boldly with their words to defend the Church like St. Joan of Arc, St. Athanasius, St. Vincent Ferrer among others. May God be pleased to send more graces to your monastery and apostolate for the conversion of souls….

Ave Maria and Merry Christmas to all of you in the Monastery!

In Crucified Christ and Immaculate Mary,
Joey, EENS-Sedevacantist (Philippines)

Thoughts

Subject: Institute of Christ the King

What are your thoughts about Institute of Christ the King Sovereign Priest

Lump…

MHFM: They accept Vatican II and salvation outside the Church (both of which are heretical). They are also in communion with Benedict XVI, who is a manifest heretic and an antipope. They accept his apostate hierarchy. They are not Catholics, but unfortunately modernists and heretics. They are also ordained by “bishops” who come from Paul VI’s false New Rite of Episcopal Consecration. That means that they cannot be considered to have valid priests.

Mobile

Subject: Catholicism in Mobile, Alabama

Dear Sirs:

I am a baptized Catholic but have lost confidence in our churches primarily because there is a masonic temple right next to the Cathedral. I've been listening to Bro. Dimond and the other videos on your website and was wondering if you all have a prayer group in our area.

Thanks,

John

MHFM: We don’t have a prayer group in that area. But we encourage you to look at the information and obtain the material. Also, we recommend that you pray the full Rosary each day on your own.

Points

I have a couple of questions and points to make… regarding a canonization ceremony that took place on October 11, 2009. It had a picture of Benedict XVI wearing a mitre with several hexagrams ("Stars of David") on it. Not surprising considering his past behavior, nevertheless quite astounding. What is even more astounding is that people can see this and still consider him to be Catholic….

$Description: Description: C:\Users\mhfm\Desktop\Website Docs\E-discussions\Benedict_XVI_Pictures_Miscellany\hexagram_mitre.jpg$

[It’s even on every part of the mitre]

[Concerning the Talmud] People need to realize that Judaism has nothing to do with the Old Testament true religion; it was a heretical sect even in the time of Jesus and in fact was criticized by Him. Judaism is a very dangerous sect and needs to be exposed.

Santa Claus: This ancient nordic god has nothing to do with St. Nicholas. This particular demon went around in a carriage pulled by two goats, gnasher and gnorr and according to pagan sources, he used to give treats to children. Christians should not be teaching their children about santa claus. I remember reading about this a number of years ago.

One topic I have never seen discussed by any Catholic priest or even by you is the legitimacy of organ donation. I have seen and read so many stories about desperatly sick people waiting for a heart or a liver or some other organ. Donations of vital organs such as the heart are immoral and a mortal sin, since they involve the murder of the donor. Brain death is a lie; many so called brain dead people, if given the chance will recover to some degree and some will have a full recovery from their injury or illness. We have gone back to the days of the Aztecs, where the victims hearts were torn from their chests while still beating. One has to wonder how much more God will put up with before He returns.

Thank you for all the information you have provided… combatting the diabolical errors of the antichrist… God bless you; please pray for me and my family.

Brenda R

Show

I listened to your radio show. One way to get your website to spread more is to get your stuff translated into different languages. I have seen your Padre Pio book translated into Spanish, but no other of your works. I am sure you would, if you asked, get many translators to volunteer freely to translate all of your articles and important books for the salvation of souls for free.

Best wishes.

Hietanen

Message

Antipope B16 promotes ''peace'' without mentioning the Prince of Peace

Dear MHFM,

This is just additional information regarding the latest writing of the antipope (given on the Feast of the Immaculate Conception). In the latest message for the so called World Day of Peace antipope B16 doesn't even once mention the name of Jesus and the word Catholic is also nowhere to be found. People should really stop and think about this fact for a moment. We are in the Christmas Season and the Catholic Church celebrates the birth of Jesus Christ who is the Prince of Peace(Isaias 9:6). The absence(from the antipope's text) of the Holy Name of Jesus actually speaks volumes to those who have ears...

Isaias 9:6 For a CHILD IS BORN to us, and a son is given to us, and the government is upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called, Wonderful, Counsellor, God the Mighty, the Father of the world to come, the Prince of Peace.

Just wanted to share this with you,

V. from Croatia

Comment

Dear Brothers,

That article on the judge ordering the father not to take his daughter to Church is outrageous, and to top it off he is only allowed to take her to places of worship that are Jewish!!! I spoke to a Jew on the street yesterday, and, in the course of the conversation, when I told him that he needs to give up the Talmud, he burst out saying, "Oh! So you can keep your Traditions, but I can't keep mine!!!" I said that he has already given up his traditions by rejecting Jesus Christ, the Jewish Messiah. He was full of intellectual pride - he said he knew about it all. For instance, he thought Christ is three, i.e. the Trinity! or more - I told him that is Antichrist - dissolving Christ. Also, he thought Jesus became Christ in 60 A.D. or something weird like that - I said, "No, Christ was Christ from all eternity." Also, he was intrigued by the facts about the Antipopes, the New Mass, the Great Apostasy, etc. He asked me what the difference is between knowing something and believing it (but with more words!). I said that believing something involves an act of the will, and ultimately that a person doesn't really know something unless he believes it. I doubt he will convert though - too proud - bad will. He was actually grateful for many of the answers I gave him because he said so and thanked me at the end. He wanted to shake my hand at the end (he took the DVDs and some flyers) but, as I had already shaken his hand during the conversation, I just said, "you need to convert." The infinite pride of Judaism - the synagogue of Satan!!!

That article on the German father being jailed for shunning sex-education is also outrageous. The German state has really lost the plot by uniting with the heretical Lutheran "Church." How sad!

Also, the totalitarian laws being imposed in Britain about background checks for home-schooling parents is stunning. The Devil is attacking the family unit with unprecedented vehemence. How urgently people need the soul-saving Catholic faith to protect it (the family) - how urgently people need to see your website to convert and get saved!!!

Houston electing a lesbian as mayor is just begging to be cursed.

Thank you MHFM, Merry Christmas, and God Bless,

Chris White

Portugal

Dear Brothers,

Portugal's PM José Sócrates promised to legalize Gay “Marriage” If Re-Elected. Well, He Was, and today initiated his push to legalise gay marriages. Last night about 01.30 in the morning a strong earthquake was felt 6.l from North to South of Portugal. The same thing happened about two years ago when abortion was legalized, the earth shook.

It looks very much like a warning, may God have mercy on us.

M. Fernanda da Silva

Homeschool help

Hi Dear Friends in Christ!

Concerning an e-mail about homeschooling a kindergartner for the first time, I thought this might be helpful.

The Riggs Institute: http://www.riggsinst.org/ - and then go to the online catalog. (The 3 essential things are the: Writing and Spelling Road to Reading and Thinking - Teachers Edition, The boxed set of 71 Phonogram Cards, and the audio tape of 71 phonograms). You only have to purchase these once, and then use it again and again with your other kids.

This is the BEST way to teach a child how to read and write. I used this with each of my children - and each one could write and put words together before kindergarten because of these cards and lessons. I also highly recommend Saxon Math. The instruction manuals teach you how to teach your children math. (If your child is pretty good with numbers, skip the kindergarten and go straight to first grade). My older children still have excellent penmanship, and spelling because of this method. All of my older children also have a solid math foundation.

If anyone starts with these 2 programs, they will have such a positive start! Especially a few months before kindergarten. Before I started homeschooling, almost EVERYONE (especially so called "traditionalists" said, "don't do it!!!!"). So, I was scared. I decided to start 6 months before my daughter was in kindergarten (that way if I failed she wouldn't be behind) - so I started with Riggs, and within a few months, she was writing and was putting words together!

When I had the confidence to homeschool, I used the Our Lady of Victory School curriculum, but they have a lot of bad Novus ordo stuff mixed in with their stuff. So now, I buy the history, science, and English textbooks, but I don't buy any religious or coloring books (for the younger ones) - and I create my own day to day curriculum. We start each day with the Rosary, and I couldn't think of a better way to spend each day with my kids!

Anyway, God through the Most Holy Rosary, gave me such a great grace to start with homeschooling (I hadn't discovered the truth back in 2002) - but I knew something was wrong with the Novus Ordo Sect. I had no support from anyone, except the Immaculate Heart of Mary, and Homeschooling has turned out to be the most wonderful thing that God could have given our family.

The Riggs institute and Saxon Math have been an incredible asset to being successful with homeschooling. Every family that I have recommended both of these to (for a start in homeschooling), have had the same success.

May God continue to bless and reward all of you!

Teri Thurman

Answer

My name is Charles I am 51 years old and have been Novus Ordo all my life although I always knew something was fishy in Denmark. I could never get definitive answer on outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation, I knew that was Dogma but all the priest would ignore me when I would bring it up. It was also countless other things that made me too Catholic for the people in my parish they would not let me be on the church board I did not know where to go. I went to church every sunday raised 6 children alone my wife left me, you know the annulment thing. The one thing me and my children did was say the rosary every day.

I have been an avid coast to coast listener for the past 15 years I guess it is my thirst for knowledge about strange things most of which I write off as bs but a little over a year ago I heard brother Michael Diamond on coast to coast and it was like a blindfold was dropped off my eyes, I could see things for what they truly were and I was not crazy or too Catholic. I want you to Know that I grew up rough… My mother taught me the rosary when I was a child and I always said it even though I didn't think I was all that good a Catholic And I alway went to the novas ordo church. Now I know the truth or I should say I always knew the truth but now I know the way.

Thank you for going on Coast to Coast.

p.s I ordered the Fatima dvd you made when do you think it will be out?

Charles Edwards Eagle River Alaska
Eagle River Alaska

MHFM: Thanks for the interest. It should be out very soon. The information will be posted on our site.

Coincidence

Re: Ben Bernanke named Time "person of the year" - this was on Wednesday, the day before the Senate Banking Housing and Urban Affairs Committee was to vote on his nomination for a second term, which of course they voted in favor of today (Thursday). http://www.courthousenews.com/2009/12/17/Senate_Panel_Clears_Bernanke_Nomination.htm

Coincidence? I think not!...

John

Jesse Ventura 9/11 Conspiracy

Subject: Jesse Ventura – 9/11 Conspiracy

Part 1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tkio6TF0Ufg

Part 2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8490zVpDBs&feature=related

Part 3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s48kHu-zDhE&feature=related

Part 4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZNQYuV4nqjI&feature=related

School

Next year our son will start school and we are unsure of where he should go. We live in a small town with only two real choices of schools. One is a V2 Catholic, the other a Public school. The difficulty is the principal of the Public school has been divorced three times and the senior infant teacher is in a same sex relationship.
What advice would you offer

regards
Brian

MHFM: One should homeschool. Many say they can’t do it, when the reality is that they don’t want to.

Mayor

Dear Brothers:

… the gay was elected to be a mayor of Houston, and listen to her speech, I don't see any talent or extraordinary in that person. Why did they vote for her? Houston used to be arrogant republican and now turned out to be a sissy city.

About time God will act promptly, because of their sins, God let it go the way of destruction.

Glory to God,

Kim

Comment

Brothers,

Concerning the article on Ben Bernanke as Time Magazine's "Person of the year". A very well read of the situation on your part. Another example of the depth of the wickedness of this world and those that choose to take part. The thought of spending eternity with some of these obvious evil spirits disguised as humans, not to mention all the devils, is reason enough to avoid Hell and those that dwell there.

Also, I enjoyed your recent audio on performing missionary work from home and our neighborhoods. The true gift of "giving"… throughout the year. I often think how close a person comes to eternal salvation every time I cross their path and hand out your material. The gift of true knowledge should they accept the offer and follow-up. As in life insurance sales, I've heard it said, "in order to get one sale you have to approach ten people". Your message and material is what I consider "Eternal Life Insurance!"

In Christ's name,
Tom Miles

Re: “Happy Holidays”

MHFM: Just a note: true Catholics shouldn’t say “Happy Holidays” – something that’s frequently said this time of year. Even though there’s more than one Catholic feast day in this period, and thus it could have a legitimate Catholic meaning for a true Catholic, by “Happy Holidays” 99% of people understand the “holy days” of various religions. The days of non-Catholic religions are not holy days of course. Thus, saying or responding to “Happy Holidays” can give a false impression. It shouldn’t be done.

Also, one should not say “Merry Christmas” to anyone who is not a true Catholic; for non-Catholics are outside of Christ and therefore do not truly celebrate the feast. Sadly, that would mean that one would be saying “Merry Christmas” to almost no one.

Bernanke, Fed

Lost for words!

Bernanke Named Time’s ‘Person of the Year’

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aha7dayF3enc&pos=9

Dec. 16 (Bloomberg) --Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke was named “Person of the Year” by Time magazine today for leading the “most-powerful, least-understood government force shaping our lives,” Managing Editor Richard Stengel said... “He was the great scholar of the Depression, and he saw what looked like another depression coming and he decided he would do whatever it takes to forestall that,” Stengel said. “And I think he did...''

MHFM: If one didn’t know that the bankers control the press, it would be a surprise that he won the award. Bernanke is in charge of the institution (the privately-controlled Federal Reserve System) which is most responsible for the financial crisis, and they give him the Man of the Year award. It’s just amazing. If this isn’t proof that they control the press, we don’t know what is. We also believe that there is a calculated reason for giving it to him now. Many Americans are catching on to the privately-controlled Federal Reserve. They are realizing in large numbers that the Federal Reserve is America’s #1 enemy by far. A bill to audit the Fed is currently moving forward in Congress. If it’s audited, it will almost certainly be destroyed; for when Americans see what the Fed is doing it should be all over for it. There will be a great outcry to have it abolished. So, the Fed is using its controlled press to create the impression that Bernanke and its representatives are actually good guys; they desire to help America, when the truth is that they are robbing America blind.

The Private Federal Reserve Bank Exposed

Debate

Brother Michael and Brother Peter;

You had a letter regarding a debate with a so-called Catholic "priest" and a protestant. I wrote to the protestant debater telling them that they are not debating a Catholic and they should contact you and debate you if they truly wanted the Catholic side. I told them I didn't think they would take me up on that since it is easier to debate someone who doesn't know the catholic teachings and therefore they can get brownie points by winning a debate. The letter below is a response to my 2nd letter to them. I watched both of the debates listed below and like you have said, the N.O/Vatican II "catholic" can't justify the self contradictory theology. I pointed out to the protestant in my email that the Vatican II church is a counterfeit church and those he is debating with are apostates and don't represent true Catholic Teaching. I have urged them to contact you for a real debate if they and their supporters really want the Catholic side. The videos are interesting in that it shows the complete and insidious teachings of the Novus Ordo church. If I wasn't Catholic, I would not become one after listening to the supposed Catholic side.

It would be very enlightening and interesting if you could or would debate this protestant. He is not blind to the contradictions between the teachings of the Council of Florence and Vatican II, which he brought up in the 2nd debate listed below, in some respects, he understands the Catholic teaching much better than the so called Catholic proponent.

Paul Smith

MHFM: Yes, the Vatican II sect’s representatives totally disgrace the Catholic position, especially when they answer any questions about the necessity of the Catholic faith and Jesus Christ for salvation.

Pearls

Subject: Promoting the Rosary

I have a friend who is of bad will and I have given her your material but does not act upon the information. Is it okay to continue telling her to pray the rosary? or is it like giving pearls to the swine? She is a novus ordo and she has nothing against the rosary but I know she does not pray it often. Is it bad to continue reminding her, or any other person of bad will (i.e. protestants, etc.), to pray the rosary every once in a while? I remember my grandmother would tell her grandchildren every time they visited her to pray the rosary, she passed away 8 years ago but I still remember her gathering us around the little altar she had to pray the rosary.

Angela

MHFM: If you’re around her, we think you could continue to encourage her to say it, even though she’s an obstinate heretic. It’s basically her only hope of receiving the grace to change and convert. One should also make sure – if it hasn’t been done sufficiently already – that she has been thoroughly rebuked and told that she’s not a Catholic and on the road to damnation.

Last Straw

Dear MHFM,

I believe that this gay and lesbian marriage thing, if it becomes almost universal will be the last straw before God says enough is enough. And I have a response to a person named rob who e-mailed you in the exchange section. Don’t ever give up praying for the conversion and salvation of souls. You could also offer up some kind of penance, or sacrifice for her conversion to the true faith, as our lady of fatima said…

MARK V CA

Discovered

Dear MHFM,

I was planning to write this email for a long time, but only now I have finally decided to do so. Let me briefly introduce myself. I come from the Czech Republic, still studying, coming from a very strange family, which claims to be both spiritual, christian and atheistic at the same time… So, let me just tell you that I can't express to you my gratitude for the information you have published; in fact, I don't even desire to imagine what would have happened, since you are seemingly the only active catholic apologetics that care for the true meaning of EENS - and this played a crucial role in my spiritual and intellectual development, for had I not become acquianted with your material, I may never have even accepted catholicism, let alone sedevacantism.

Now, I'll just briefly explain my spiritual background… After some time, I really became interested in New Age, New Thought, telepathy, unity of the cosmos, numerology and all sorts of things of great relevance to New Age and the occult. After becoming an avid chaneller, understanding spiritual concepts on the first hearing, and experiencing many "synchronities" in my life, a small - although breathtaking - miracle happened, and this single miracle inspired me to investigate Christianity. That was pretty interesting in itself, for I had previously, while still being immersed in New Age, despised purely Biblical Christianity, the concept of hell-fire, etc. However, I kept practicing New Age, but each time less and less, while at the same time, I came to know the Bible much better and started to like many of it's passages. Around that time, I discovered your website, and well, it's hard to describe my initial emotions, but I originally had several waxes while reading your website, going as far as to denounce you as "Christian fundamentalists". However, once, I just decided to sit down, and read the section number 45 of your book "The Truth about what really happened to the Catholic Church after Vatican II". Well, after the introduction, I just started to like something about the way it was written, for I found the logic of the text to be very compelling, and since then, I started to have a more positive outlook on your material. Now, a key dilemma arose in my life. Since I was becoming more and more convinced of the truth of the Bible from a purely spiritual standpoint, I had to say to myself, "Ok, I'am making a large effort to discover the true teaching of the Bible, and so the question is, is there a real Christian denomination, truly Christian and truly founded by Jesus Christ, or is it just enough to accept the basic teachings of the Bible, to believe in Jesus, and to be of good will?"

Well, based on the events that led me to study Christianity, the many miracles and synchronities that kept occurring in my life even after the aforementioned miracle, I came to the conclusion, that there indeed must be one true church, for then all those events in my life wouldn't make any sense - in fact, this would simply mean, that I support the notion of "baptism of desire" - and the Bible also seemed to contradict that, and finally, the idea that it's just enough to be of good will would mean, that it does not matter if there is a visible true church, or a even a true church on this earth, and good will alone will grant us eternal life and heaven, which is actually what they once told me in the "Catholic" school I went to in Mexico. So, after having spent countless hours of good-willed reading and searching for the truth, I became firmly convinced of the truth of what you say, sometime in may or june of this year, meaning 2008. However, while I was already familiar with the heresies of the post-conciliar church, I still had many doubts about Catholicism, which came to the surface when I visited Protestant websites, bringing up constantly Ephesians 2:8-9 and John 3:16, and so these sites really made me feel uncomfortable, for I didn't know really well how to answer such objections, while at the same time, these websites contain sub-pages bearing titles such as "Rosary from Hell" and "The Roman Catholic Whore from Hell". So, I felt the urgent need to listen to your audio program refuting Justification by Faith alone. My computer is broken to a certain extent, so I listened to it on my sister's computer, and well, it really pleased me to hear a refutation of the Protestant view of Justification, but I couldn't hear it in it's entirety. What is interesting, is that despite not having heard it all, I wanted to have a written copy of it, and - miracles indeed still happen - the next day you published your document refuting Justification by Faith alone. Anyway, at this moment I'am already familiar with the rest of your audio programs, and I think this is a sufficient description of my spiritual background - although I'am making a very long and extensive story short…

Abundant blessings,

Jakub Eisenbruk.

Video

Hello, Brothers.

I have seen the video with the woman who was questioned about her beliefs. . . you are right! It's astounding to see that her voice was totally muted! They definitely don't want anyone to hear her side of the story!

Carol Walker

Swedenborg

Subject: Swedenborg Cult

Friendly advice for your reader PT Jr.,

One should avoid the false prophet and heretic E. Swedenborg (both his writings and his ''New Church'' cult) like the plague...

this should suffice:

''Swedenborg was sharply opposed to the Christian doctrine of the Trinity as three Persons, the concept of One God being three separate Persons: the Person of the Father, the Person of the Son, and the Person of the Holy Spirit. Instead he claimed that the three were different aspects of the one God, one Person, in whom is the Divine Trinity, and that divinity is impossible if divided into three Persons........... He considered the separation of the Trinity into three separate Persons to have originated with the First Council of Nicaea in 325 CE Athanasian Creed, circa 500........''

V. from Croatia

Comment

Emmanuel Swedenbourg fancied himself a "mystic" and was a self-made Luciferian (early) New Age "guru" leading many souls to hell through his New Age "philosophy"---- "Swedenbourgianism"!! It's simply unbelievable to me that anyone would "follow" the "teachings" of a super-ultra-mega CREEP like that and think they are worshipping God! I advise that reader to immediately DESTROY their books on "Swedenbourgian philosophy", dissociate from people in the "new Church" (take a sanity break!) and seriously devote the next several weeks to studying all the info on the MHFM website and learn about Traditional Catholicism ---the very fact they already found you site and wrote in is hopeful----time is WAY too short to be listening, much less adhering, to overtly Luciferian New Age nonsense!

Dishonesty

Subject: Dishonesty

I’m still not a great missionary but i am learning how to be one. I really don't know how I will ever convert anyone, everyone seems so blind. Some dishonest arguments I have heard.

1. While arguing about absolutely no salvation outside the church(with a priest): I ask, "do you know the dogma", answer, "yes it is irrefutable", I ask, "Do you think you need to be inside the Church to be saved", answer, "depends how you understand inside"

2. Arguing with the same priest about hell: He says, "the church doesn't condemn anyone", I take out the council of trent and start reading,"if anyone shall say ... let him be anathema", he says "stop stop we don't need to read that", I say, "the church condemned people there"

3. Arguing with the same priest about heresy: I ask, "i say the pope is a heretic will i go to hell for saying this?", answer, "I don't know depends on if you understand what your saying", I say, "I fully understand", I say, "how about now, will i go to hell?", no answer, I ask, " who has a better chance at salvation under your rules me or a hindu who worships shiva", answer, "I can't answer that"

4. Arguing with same priest about assisi prayer meetings:I say, "the assisi prayer meetings were abominable do you agree", he says, "Maybe they weren't a great idea but that doesn't mean he is a heretic", I say, "yes it does", I say, "would you let a buddhist worship Buddha in your Church" answer, "yes"

This was the validly ordained priest that I went to for confession, he is V2 and very old. by far the most conservative priest I had ever met. But start digging and all you find is heresy religious indifference. Hopefully one day I will get one convert.

MHFM: Yes, it’s when you get into the missionary work that you really see the bad will and the blindness. #4 was quite interesting....

New Church

Subject: New Church…

Dear MHFM,

I am writing to you as a former Vatican II member and now a member of the New Church which is a church that believes that the second coming has already happened in the Spiritual World revealed through Emanuel Swedenborg who wrote many books that the religion believes was inspired by The Lord Jesus Christ. I know your position is that if you are not in the bosom of the True Catholic Church when you die that you will end up in Hell…So I guess my question is: Have you ever read or heard of Emanuel Swedenborg and if you have do you think there is any truth to what he is saying?

God bless you,

Paul Therrien Jr.

MHFM: It’s good to hear about your interest. To your question, we haven’t heard of him.

New Radio Program

Dec. 12, 2009 Radio Program [mp3 file – 1 hr. 17 min. audio]

MHFM: On this program we discuss and update various issues, including: our advertising outreach; Bro. Michael’s recent appearance on the History Channel; some other facts which further prove that Cardinal Siri did not remain pope until his death; some thoughts about our recent You Tube videos; the significance of Benedict XVI’s upcoming trip to a synagogue; some more facts and quotes from the interesting book about the Inquisition; afterthoughts about a recent debate; and numerous other things. This will be found permanently under “Traditional Catholic Audios.”

$Description: Description: C:\Users\mhfm\Desktop\Website Docs\E-discussions\E_Pictures\stats.jpg$

Above are the stats (from 5/16/07 to 12/10/09) for just the one ad campaign that is discussed in the radio program, concerning how many people came to our site from that one ad campaign.

$Description: Description: C:\Users\mhfm\Desktop\Website Docs\E-discussions\E_Pictures\chart_rankingcom.png$

This other chart displays our website ranking of 29,807 out of 156 million websites

Article about how there are 156 million total websites

Regarding

Brothers,

Regarding Mr. Downey's statement on "Billy Graham is closer to consecrating a host than the Dimond Bros:"

Yes, this is a true statement, as you Brothers have never tried to consecrate a True Host, whereas Mr. 33rd Degree Freemason Billy Graham has assisted in at least one Black mass, and I feel pretty certain that Mr. Graham has been involved in many, many more. So Mr. Graham is closer to consecrating of the"body of satan" than you Brothers are in consecrating the Body of Christ.

Mr. Downey also contradicted himself by first stating that "we all send people to hell," but at the end of his email he says that "we are all lost." This poor man really needs to have someone edit his emails.

Mr. Downey, a broken clock is right twice a day; you were right only once, but you're improving.

Sincerely,

Howard

Convinced

Hello My Friends -

I have to tell you that I am at a point where you have been wholly instrumental, used by God to deliver the truth to me. I have been struggling for some time with the Vatican II apostacy. It is very difficult to see when you are inside of it. You just continue to pray and hope that it will sometime change - not realizing acutely that it is indeed the great apostacy. This is obviously because this is what the great apostacy is! A mystery! A deception! Still, I am on page 25 of your book and I am thoroughly convinced. I do not see how anybody that reads this information can get past the first few pages and still remain obstinate. I must say also that I am not one to proceed without caution. Only one week ago I thought that sedevacantism was nuts - just another fringe group trying to explain things away! Like I said - I am on page 25 and I am convinced, without question - how could one even attempt to question it!...

I do want to thank you again, and encourage you to continue your fight. I have not seen truth presented so clearly and without prejudice almost anywhere, as I have seen from yourselves. This is the gospel of Jesus Christ that you defend, and Godspeed to you.

-Always in Jesus and Mary,

M. S. G.

Siri and JP2

Subject: Siri and JP2

apropos Cardinal Siri

In this video (from 1978) he is shown behind antipope JP2 on what is probably the saddest day in the history of the Church (the guy grinning behind antipope's right shoulder is Siri)

...no Catholic Pope could ever do that

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dVbgz9YnkA

Program

Dear MHFM

I listened to your new audio program of DEC,12 2009, which I thought was very good and interesting. I have a suggestion you might want to Increase your outreach to the state of california. There are millions of people here , and they could benefit from your apostolate and services. And in closing …If It wasnt for you, I would probably never have become a serious true catholic. DEO GRACIAS! I wish you a holy christmas season. IN DOMINO NOSTRO MARK V CA

New Video

Add

Please allow me to add my comment on Bill Mulligan's very sound letter. The SSPX priests who defect either to the Indult groups, or even to the Novus Ordo itself, are invariably misfits, intriguers and trouble-makers. I have known four of these characters in the past twenty years, one of whom bordered on the diabolical. Unprincipled and worthless .

Joe M.

Crazy

This is crazy! Half of Britain's population must die in order to have a ''sustainable society'', says JONATHON PORRITT, one of Gordon Brown’s leading green advisers

UK population must fall to 30m, says Porritt

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article5950442.ece

Bible

Question: I've not found a solumn teaching condemning heritical Bibles. Seems there must be something. Maybe I've missed it but I can't imagine that selling, distributing, printing & using heretical bibles would not be mortal sin. Particularly considering the last paragraph in Apopcalypse. Please direct me.

Thanks,

MHFM: Of course a person should use a good and Catholic translation, such as the one we offer, if that’s available. However, if one doesn't have a better option, it’s not as if using an inferior translation for reference or study is sinful. That's especially true if one is aware of its shortcomings.

Apostate

Keith Downey

MHFM: You just don’t get it, Keith. It’s utterly illogical for you to claim fidelity to “the pope,” or any pope, when the man you are claiming fidelity to esteems false religions (including Islam and Judaism) and rejects the very papal dogmas you are talking about. You just can’t see the truth. That’s why the Catholic authorities who have addressed the issue teach that a manifest heretic is not a pope.

Protestantism

I re-read the article you wrote on the comparison of the 4 fake, pretender "High Priests" of the Macabees (sp?) period with the first 4 anti-popes of our time------stellar article, really well written, very interesting.....for some reason, since I believe we ARE really living in the last days at the end of time-----I can only imagine that in this particular period of history, God is allowing some "extra" anti-popes at the tail end for time, for His own reasons (merciful ones, now doubt, extending the time of opportunity to convert?) and so the "show" or "spectacle" of Vatican II is being allowed to be extended, a bit. It's kind of like, reminds me of the "fire-works" at the 4th of July....and at the moment it seems we are beholding the "Grande Finale" ---and the last few sparks of the "fire-works" from Hell---B16 and his lot.

I also read (for first time) the article on Helio-centrism/Baptism of Desire--superb. I particularly appreciated the info on Saint Joan of Arc----now I understand WHY God chose to raise up SUCH a powerful, mighty warrior Saint for France during that time, before England was lost----in defense of the one true Faith, for France. I also really appreciated the way the article underlined that all this demonstrates just how much God LOATHES "protestantism", and how He ALWAYS finds a way to protect his chosen children of the Catholic Church. Just imagine how much God LOATHES Vatican II and those accepting it, now!

Saint Joan of Arc has always seemed to me one of the most "other-worldly" of God's chosen elect. Surely, we are in the final battle: St. Joan of Arc, pray for us! Sincerely,

Stunner

Mr. Downey’s (Keith) e-mail condemning you to Hell for rejecting the current “pope”, but then in the next sentence, enjoining you to “accept the truth and join the FSSP”, is yet another stunner. What do these people think about?

If Benedict XVI is his “pope”, then what need is there for an FSSP to further truth? This is the same illogic that the SSPX subscribes to. The only difference between the FSSP and the rest of the Vatican II establishment is that they have prettier churches, more modestly dressed women, and some Latin. Does Mr. Downey think that this all come down to “style” or fashion (externals)? I’d have more respect for him if he merely defended Benedict XVI and left it at that. But to suggest that something as superficial as the FSSP solves the problem is maddening.

People should know (many may not) that the FSSP is even worse than the SSPX. They were formed by SSPX defectors who made a deal with Rome to have a few “normalized” traditional parishes, where they can sort of “play Catholic”. The big catch is that NONE of their priests (apart from the few founding members) are validly ordained, because Rome insists that their ordinations are performed by a Novus Ordo bishop, who was consecrated in the New Rite. Even though the traditional rite of priestly ordination is used, Rome forbids any bishops ordained in the old Episcopal rite to perform them. It is that transparently a deliberate fraud to anyone who cares to see it… The FSSP Mass is nothing more than a stage play. But to Downey it is the same as the “Truth”. Amazing.

Bill Mulligan

MHFM: We would add one thing: a person should have no respect for him, even if he merely defended Antipope Benedict XVI.

To do

Dear Brothers

I'm E-mailing about my mother. She's church of England and I have told her that she has to come into the catholic church because it’s the church Christ founded and he did not found the church of England it was invented by Martin Luther and Henry the VIII, but I can't get through to her she believes she is a christian and she told me that Jesus won't condemn her for being a protestant. I also told her that there is no salvation outside the church and she said that's a load of rubbish. so I don't know what to do.

thanks
Rob.

MHFM: You should make it clear to her, one final time in charity, that she will without any question lose her soul unless she converts. After that, you can only pray for her and try to get her to pray the Rosary. The hope of course would be that if she prayed the Rosary she would get certain graces to see the need to convert.

Other than that, there’s nothing you can do. She’s of bad will at this time and you can’t force a person to believe.

Enjoy

My name is marc Anderson and i wanted to stop by to say i am a convert to the faith and really enjoy the videos you have posted on line! Very informative indeed…

Dilemma

Subject: Dilemma

To Whom It May Concern,

I have been watching the videos on Antipope John Paul II…

Now, I wonder, why should anyone join the Roman Catholic Church since the papal teachings' evident decline into heresy?

Also, I have heard that the Catholic doctrine that all must be Catholic to be saved references the global Body of Christ, whether or not physically affiliated with the Catholic Church. Is this true?

Please, answer my questions, Lord willing.

Thank you,

Zak

MHFM: You should join the Catholic Church because it’s the only Church Christ founded, against which He promised the gates of Hell cannot prevail. The decline into heresy by the post-Vatican II antipopes was predicted in Catholic prophecy and in Scripture. They are not true popes, according to previous Catholic teaching. Their heresies therefore pose no problem for the consistency of Catholic truth.

The Body of Christ is the Catholic Church. Therefore, there is no one who is part of the global Body of Christ who is not part of the Catholic Church. All who are not Catholics cannot be saved unless they join the Church.

See

Keith Downey

MHFM: No, unfortunately you can’t see anything. If you could, you would see that your comments are just the opposite of the truth. As we’ve shown, your heretical and apostate leaders don’t believe that anyone goes to Hell. They also hold that those who reject the true popes and the Papacy are in the Church. In addressing these topics and expressing yourself on these issues, you condemn yourself with every word you speak, you blind apostate. You reject the Catholic faith and you are headed straight for Hell.

Benedict XVI (The Heresies of Benedict XVI File) [link to section]

The Catholic Teaching that a heretic cannot be a valid pope and loses the papal office automatically [PDF file]

Judging

I went on this mormon website to debate mormons because I was bored. And the conversation got around to judging. So I asked him, "if i said I worshiped the devil would you say that is bad". And he is like No because that would be judging. What, how stupid is everyone, God will not reward you for being tolerant of satan. The Vatican 2 people are just the same though, it is pathetic. No wonder God allowed this Great Apostasy to happen.

Inquisition

Subject: Inquisition Audio and Obama Speech

The timing of your audio on the Inquistion was fortuitous with Obama's peace prize speech. He stated that no holy war is justified. Many liberals define peace as the absence of conflict, not how Pius XI identified it in that only when every country submits to Christ will there be peace. So under Obama's logic, the Crusades, originally started to allow pilgrims to go to the Holy Land, would not be right. Allow the Mohamedites to do what ever they want? Maybe you could do a similar audio on the Crusades? Thank you.

William Sloan

Comment

Dear MHFM -

Thank you for your first video regarding the Spanish Inquisition. This is a topic I have been very interested in for a while, and I have difficulty finding an impartial perspective (much less a Catholic perspective on this.) Far too often you see the inquisition used as a scape goat by enemies of the church. I look forward to your follow up videos !

- Ed

Confession Prayer

MHFM: It’s good to pray three Hail Marys before confession. Ask the Blessed Mother specifically for the assistance to make a good confession. The Act of Contrition is of course recommended. It’s also important to pray to the Holy Ghost. This short prayer – or a variation of it – is recommended:

“O, Holy Ghost, source of all light, come to my assistance and enable me to make a good confession. Bring to my mind the evil which I have done and the good which I have neglected. Grant me, moreover, heartfelt sorrow for my sins and the grace of a sincere confession. Mary, my Mother, help me to make a good confession.”

Myths

Subject: Myths

Dear Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,

Pleased to see you have at last covered this important topic; it is long overdue and this refutation, hopefully, will put an end to the use of distorted history, by many Protestants and others, to discredit the Catholic Church! Looking forward to your video on the Crusades!

God bless

David

Mystery

Subject: concerning mystery, mysterious light

Ephesians 2, could this be the great deception that will happen, the appearance of UFO's{demons} after a nuclear exchange, these two things are probably the two most scariest things on earth, that the average unbeliever would experience to make them worship the devil. Freemasons motto is order thru chaos, the use of fear has been very handy for them. Your book on UFO's has been very eye opening!

Todd

Link

I thought your Monastery might be interested in the attached link.

http://www.breitbart.tv/sen-feinstein-says-its-morally-correct-to-force-taxpayers-fund-abortion/

Patricia

Hates

Dear MHFM,

Thank you so much for updating us continually on the heresies of antipope Benedict XVI. Holy Scripture-John 15v23-"He that hateth me hateth my Father also." Here we have blatant heresy. Antipope Benedict praises Islam and the Talmudic Jews in their false religions. Islam HATES Jesus Christ. The Talmudic Jews HATE Jesus Christ, and say horrible things about our Blessed Mother. Both these false religions would never, never, never worship Jesus Christ, our Lord, never! Antipope Benedict HATES Jesus Christ. He can't possibly be the Vicar of Christ, impossible! The logic is so, so simple. The Hammer of Heretics, St. Anthony, ora pro nobis. God Bless MHFM.

Found

Dear Brothers,

… About two years ago I told you how I accidently found your site. I was baptized in a Catholic Church in 1963 and went to Catholic schools. Learned little about the faith. Religion class was actually the study of false religions. With my past lifestyle I should have died many times over (what patience and mercy). I was practicing Protestantism and moving around from place to place. I bought all of your books and began to faithfully pray the Rosary. I believe because of my pride there is no way possible w/o devotion to the Blessed Virgin I could have begun to understand the truth. She provides the grace to "see"… I can't thank you enough. Lasalette, Lourdes and Fatima have taught me that Mary is the perfect conduit and the easiest path to the truth. She is here right now in a battle for us I cannot imagine. God’s greatest creation! May we see Her sweet face at our death!

Looking

Subject: Looking for answers

Hello and good day,

I am writing as a 53 year old woman, mother, wife who has never been comfortable with this "new mass" and the direction of the Roman Catholic Church since Vatican II, but has never quite understood why. Until now. Over the last couple of weeks I have been reading through the information on your website. Today, I received the publications and literature which I had ordered. To say I am overwhelmed is an understatement. I cannot explain the emotional upheaval I am experiencing, from anger to misery to frustration to amazement. Yet in another sense, I feel that my years of discontent are being validated.

For the first time in many years, I am at a loss. Please help me find some answers…

In Jesus,

Elissa

Changed

Well I read some more into it the teachings of the Popes down through the centuries and I will change my position on the interracial marriage. Would it matter if everyone in the world became one race though? And I shall not let my brother sway me to joining the Orthodox. He can't join them or he'll be damned. These schismatics allow divorce when Christ clearly forbade it and reject the Immaculate Conception, by doing so they reject Mary, and thus reject Christ in doing so. They don't follow the binding dogmas and councils of the true popes from the 11th century-1958! We are required to submit to the papacy under penalty of eternal death… I know God wants the whole world converted to the true Catholic Faith, but why is there such a huge demand from Heaven for Russia to convert in particular? Are not the Orthodox nations less evil than, say, China?

-M. Rudnicki

MHFM: The request for the consecration of Russia was given for a specific period and in a specific context and thus had a specific meaning, as our article on that issue shows.

Fatima (the sign, the miracle, the Consecration of Russia, the False Sr. Lucy) [Link to Section]

Unconditional

I am a 61 year old cradle Catholic & was married in a Lutheran church in 1974 with a Catholic priest presiding in the ceremony. What does this mean & what am I suppose to do about it, if anything. My wife has been converted to the Catholic faith in 2006.

I attend mass at St. Peter's church in Antioch, Illinois & the question I have is the sacrament of Holy Eucharist a valid one. Please comment.

One other question & perhaps you have heard this one said by the deacons & priests. "God's love is unconditional." When I read the bible I see conditions on every page. If this is true, how will God judge us with no conditions? Why would He establish a place called hell?

JPM

MHFM: It sounds like you are attending the New Mass, which isn’t valid. One must avoid it under pain of grave sin.

God’s love is not unconditional. That’s why He sends people to Hell forever. His love and favor are conditioned upon obeying His commandments and accepting His faith.

John 15:10- “If you keep my commandments, you shall abide in my love; as I also have kept my Father's commandments, and do abide in his love.”

The idea that God’s love is unconditional is a modernist misconception that many people have adopted. You mentioned that a Vatican II “priest” presided at a marriage in a Lutheran church. Wow, that’s a new one – although it is in line with the heretical ecumenical directory. Once a person is convinced on all issues, we can help him with rectifying that situation.

The Invalid New Mass

Chemtrails

Dear Brothers,

Here are a couple of snapshots of what look like chemtrails on a massive scale. They are spread all over the sky of Canberra (Capital City of Australia). I was outside for the afternoon, and I noticed the planes constantly flying backwards and forwards. I've never seen such a high concentration of them. These pictures were taken around 8:30pm (daylight saving time) - you can see the sun has gone but the light is still there. On the left-hand side of the first one you can even see some fresh ones forming - 3 planes together! The other one, looking north-east, you can also see some fresh ones forming. Interestingly, they are crisscrossed over the sky, like a net…

God Bless,

Chris White

$Description: Description: C:\Users\mhfm\Desktop\Website Docs\E-discussions\E_Pictures\chemtrails1.jpg$ $Description: Description: C:\Users\mhfm\Desktop\Website Docs\E-discussions\E_Pictures\chemtrails2.jpg$

Read

Brothers,

I read with interest the article on the plan for coed accommodation in Columbia. I had guessed the reason for this before reading, after clicking the nypost.com page - I was sorry to see that I was right. I quote one of the posts after the article -

nypostequalsmorons 12/07/2009 5:11 PM You ignorant, ignorant newspaper! Gender Neutral Housing is intended to help LGBTQ students feel more comfortable. It has nothing to do with helping couples shack up. Welcome to the modern era where we try to accommodate all people from all walks of life.

No surprise about this. Another added benefit for the liberals will be the increase in STDs, pregnancy and ultimately more abortions. If I were a parent with a child at that place - they would be removed asap. Although I don't know that any of the other colleges or universities are morally any better.

Jim

Dear MHFM,

This email is in reply to Ahr's post, and his/her general doubt about the sexual abuse committed by Novus Ordo V2 "Jesuits." As you at MHFM are well aware, the book… clearly demonstrates the perversion and complete immorality in post V2 seminaries and so-called "Catholic" schools and institutions - which are anything BUT Catholic. You also do an excellent job on your website for laying the case, and every reader here on your website should view your link to those articles. We may never know the true numbers, how many young men were abused by pedophile priests over the past 30 years...how many people had (and still have) an axe to grind against the church and are lying...? However one this is absolutely clear, when you lower the moral standards for seminarians. When you promote and harbor immorality by embracing homosexuality and other lifestyles which are incompatable with true and authentic Catholic dogmas - you lay the groundwork for the moral breakdown of the priesthood. We have had the last 8 years to look back with disgust at 30 years of post V2 lies, deceit, and coverups that were committed to hide pedophile priests. 30 years of things swept under the rug to save face and live in denial, while now we see diocese after diocese shelling out money to settle lawsuits - while other diocese have filed for bankruptcy. Are some of these claims of sexual abuse lying? (yes I'm sure some of them are) But not to face the facts and identify where the real problems lie, is to continue to live in denial. The problem my friends begins and ends in the seminary.

- Ed

The Seminaries of the Vatican II sect are unspeakable cesspools of homosexuality and heresy [PDF File]

Testimonial

Dear Brothers,

We wish to express our heartfelt gratitude for the stand you are courageously making, and for the zeal you demonstrate in defense of the Faith...for the tremendous good you do through the methodical, laborious and painful work of exposing this hideous, "V- II monster" erroneously and shamefully called the "Catholic Church".

What a magnificent work you are employed within! What a powerful role-model you demonstrate of "how" to rightly defend the Faith in this present day and age!

We thank Our Lord and Our Lady for the many graces that have been granted to us through your ministry! We are most thankful that, through the deafening silence of today's "milk-toast" clergy who posture themselves as the front line force of the "Catholic Church", a voice which continues to cry out in the wilderness, proclaiming THE ACTUAL TRUTH, can still be heard form Fillmore, New York!

Sufficient to say for now, that the removal of ourselves from the grasp of this horrible sect, is not only due to the primary and direct work of sanctifying grace, but also through the actual graces given to us specifically by your ministry and holy labor for the salvation of souls! We have much to be thankful for! We thank you for being righteous ambassadors of the Faith! Since our words lack in expressing the tremendous help you have been to us, please accept this minuscule gift as a token of our deep gratitude and appreciation for all that you have done and continue to do for the Kingdom!

Be assured of our poor prayers for you. We pray also for those graces necessary to continue this huge work of grace and goodness that you are doing!

Please, DO NOT grow weary in well doing!

We wish you a very blessed Christmas and joyful and peaceful New year!

May Our Lady help you always!

Sincerely,

Chris and Debra Pierce

Comment

I’d like to ask Alan to clarify or expand upon his snide comments intended as insult. He says after accusing you of anti-Semitism: “I know you’ll pretend it is all about religion (as though that were an excuse)”. Putting the insult of his challenging the sincerity of your beliefs aside; what is Alan saying? Is he saying that to oppose one based on what he believes, advocates and does is no different than opposing someone for an inconsequential accident of nature such as race? Why then, by what standard of morality, can one praise the philanthropy of say a volunteer at a soup kitchen, while castigating a child molester? Or an example more to the point: Assume just for sake of argument that the “holocaust” were true in the way it is conventionally preached. If religion were not a proper basis for discrimination; by what standard can one accuse the Nazis? Were not they just following their “religion”?

The point (and I hope it is clear) is simply that every body has an idea of what is good, what is bad, and what is fair and acceptable “civilized” behavior. Nearly everyone has a belief system. But Alan is using the same stupid/dishonest argument that the homosexuals try to use when they say that discrimination against them is no different than discrimination based on race. The implication is that judgments based on actions, beliefs, or “lifestyle”, are somehow off limits, somehow unfair or wrong. But even the “non-religious” person as Alan seems to be, must recognize that there are good and bad beliefs and good and bad behaviors which follow from these beliefs. So again Alan, what did you really mean? Are you that cognitively challenged, or just dishonest?

Bill Mulligan

Claims against the harlot

Subject: 500 claims filed against V-2 NW “Jesuits”

I wonder how many of these "sexually abused" are lying. I suspect most if not all. Just like most of all the other "sexually abused" we have been hearing about in the last decade or so.

Ahr…

MHFM: We would have to agree with you. Many of these recent claims might be false. However, many claims of abuse against priests of the Vatican II sect are true. The Vatican II sect opened itself up to all of this by its failure to exclude homosexuals, and by its failure to remove, condemn and excommunicate all deviants. By its participation in evil, the floodgates of Hell have opened against it. What we are seeing is the punishment inflicted upon the Great Harlot.

That’s what we are seeing with the mockery of the Great Harlot (the Vatican II sect).

Racism

Subject: Racism

Dearest Brothers

Obviously your anti-racism stance doesn't extend to anti-Semitism. Yes, I know you'll pretend it's all about religion, not race (as if that's any kind of a defence anyway), but you make it very clear what your real agenda is when you start denying the Holocaust and defending lunatics like Richard Williamson.

God bless

Alan

MHFM: No, your statement is false and irresponsible. Our analysis of all issues is based upon truth and facts, not upon skin color or bloodlines. Our opinion about the “Holocaust” is based upon our opinion about the facts. You would have to say that the young Jewish man, whose video appears in the file below, was “anti-Semitic” because he rejected the “Holocaust” after finding no evidence for the official story or the gas chambers.

Holocaust Controversy

You have also confused the issue because what people of other religions are doing in the world does of course involve considerations of religious issues and spiritual forces. It’s simply a fact that many of the prominent figures working to construct a new global antichristian order are Jewish.

Talmudic

Dear MHFM,

Concerning the recent racism dispute that you had with the marrano J.H. (sorry for the lack of a nicer word) .

At first I was very surprised that someone who claimed to be a traditional Catholic could hold such distorted views on race, marriage between races and humankind in general. From the very first moment his position sounded as if deeply rooted in Judaism and when you later revealed in your post that he actually was a ''convert'' from that abominable religion everything immediately made sense. For all those who may not know this yet, what this guy holds is actually word for word taken out of the notorious Talmud which is basically the work of the synagogue of Satan (mentioned by Jesus Christ Our Lord). These and other outrageous teachings and traditions were present even in Jesus' time and they were continued to be spread after the Resurrection throughout the whole world, sort of like an anti-Gospel . I believe (this is my personal opinion) that Our Lord is pointing to and exposing these false teachings(found in the Talmud) when He is warning His disciples of the ''traditions of men'', ''synagogue of Satan'', ''the mystery of iniquity already being at work'', ''doctrines of devils'', ''Scribes and Pharisees'' etc. To make a long story short, in order to further expose racism which is simply put Talmudic idiocy (rooted in satanic contempt for humans), I refer your readers to an informative video named ''The Other Israel'' that you have posted in your 'Online videos' section.

Keep fighting the good fight of faith!

Sursum corda,

V. from Croatia

MHFM: Yes, you are correct. The sick man is quite blind; he actually thinks he’s correct. There was another point we wanted to add in response to him. We condemned the perverted “logic” which opposes interracial marriage. We explained that, according to their argument, they would have to forbid marriages between people of different hair colors, people of different shades of skin, etc. He didn’t like that idea, obviously because he knows that it creates big problems for his sick racist theories. He wants his “people” to have the freedom to marry a wide-range of people (of all kinds of skin shades and hair colors), among the “white” people.

He responded by saying that, despite the aforementioned differences, these are all “white people.” They are thus (according to him) to be classified within a single category. But that doesn’t work. For if you are going to be strict about it – which is what the essence of their theory requires – not all “white” people are actually white. There is in fact a wide-range of skin colors and shades (not to mention hair colors) among people classified by him as “white.” Some of them are quite dark when compared to those with rather pale skin. Thus, it’s completely arbitrary and self-serving for him to say: “well they’re all white,” even though they are a different color.

This shows us again that their heretical theory is man-made and illogical. Like other heretical religions created by men, it allows the racist to be the judge and jury of who falls into what category. It’s truly an evil tradition of men, just like Christ condemned.

Agree, but

Dear brothers,

I totally agree with the position of the Church on racism, but when I look at those who promote mixed marriages I only see liberals and jewish organizations, Hollywood and the mass media. This propaganda is coming from the worse ennemies of the Church.

Some people are accusing those who think it's better to marry someone from your own ehtnic group of race idolatry. I could accuse them of placing human love between a man and a woman above the common good of the collectivity and the nation and even the Church. Many studies show that children from mixed unions are having a lot more psychological problems and are confused about their own identity. All multicultural states are facing horrible social problems. Should the physical attraction between a man and a woman takes precedence over the well-being of children and the community?

If two Catholics from different ethnic backgrounds want to marry, there's no reason to deny their wishes. But we are dealing here with a vast campaign of propaganda orchestrated by the ennemies of Christ. That being said, if the Church teaches in fact that all humans should become one race throught mixed marriages, I will accept it.

Best regards,

MHFM: We just don’t understand why it’s such a big deal. To us, a person’s color doesn’t make any difference. It’s irrelevant and we don’t see why people have to harp on it so much. For that reason, we don’t see why it would be “so hard on the children.” If the concern is that some racists might chide them, well perhaps the children would learn from an early age not to care what losers and heretics think. Don’t get us wrong: we are not saying that there should be an effort to push marriages between this or that; but simply analyzing the question of whether there’s anything wrong with it and why some have such an aversion to it. Again, people are thinking too much on the natural level and caring too much about their skin shade.

The fact that liberals push interracial marriage as part of their effort to remove discrimination of every kind – including any kind of religious discrimination – does not prove that interracial marriage is evil. To say otherwise is not logical. It’s their entire package, of full acceptance and tolerance of people of all religions and “sexual orientations,” that’s evil.

B-16’s latest heresies with schismatics, heretics and Muslims

MHFM: We’ve updated our Benedict XVI's recent heresies file with some new heresies.

Thought

I have thought much about becoming Catholic. I have fully watched your 50 minute presentation on the false "catholic Church" after 1968 and Vatican II. so I have a few questions:

1. What if any Pope do you follow? Certainly not the current one.

2. How do you say you are Roman Catholic without allegiance to the current Pope? Are you in fact Roman Catholic?

3. What Mass should then be OK to attend? Is it any Latin Mass in the fashion before Vatican II with a Priest not Ordained after 1968 and who does not follow the current Pope or support the current Vatican II Church financially? Are these the "Right" conditions of your point of views to be a valid Catholic?

HMC…

MHFM: 1. There is no pope at this time. 2. To be a Catholic, one must be baptized and believe in all the teachings of the Catholic Church. That includes the Papacy and all the magisterial pronouncements of the popes throughout history. This does not change when there isn’t a pope (e.g., every time a pope died). 3. The New Mass is unacceptable, as it is invalid and not Catholic. One may only receive traditional sacraments. We have a file which explains guidelines on that issue. However, one must be convinced on all issues before receiving any sacraments.

The Steps to convert to the traditional Catholic faith and for those leaving the New Mass - Baptism and Conditional Baptism - the Council of Trent's Profession of Faith for Converts

Video update

MHFM: This video update further refutes those “Catholics” who are racists and who condemn interracial marriage. It became necessary after we received some e-mails in response to our recent answers.

More on Colonization

Dear Brothers Michael and Peter,

I would like to commend Bill and the person who wrote regarding conflicting forces of Protestant against Catholic Colonization, the messages lift my spirit ... I, myself is a product of a Catholic Colonization a million thanks to Catholic Spain! My archipelago, the Philippine Islands, was colonized by Catholic Spain for more than 300 years (1521-1898), It was March 1521 when the First Holy Mass was officiated to our natives by the Spanish Missionaries who made our country Christian ... my country was in fact FIRST named as Archipelago of Saint Lazarus. It was during this century when Great Saints of Spain like St. Teresa of Avila, St. John of the Cross and St. Peter of Alcantara made Spain a truly Catholic and blest one .. the century (16th) when the Holy Mother Church assumed Her Greatest Iron Fist against the Devil's machinations during the Inquisition! ... I really loved the Spaniards not only because of my great admiration to these three spanish saints but because Spain gave us Christ and the Blessed Virgin Mary ... had we've been colonized by the British we could have been liberals and prone to the beliefs of witchrafts and magic ... I have nothing against the UK, it's uncatholic and uncharitable for me to do that .. I'm only stating a fact that the British colonizers are often tainted with Masonic mission, had not God granted France St. Joan of Arc, France would have lost her prestige to be the Oldest Daughter of the Catholic Church under King Clovis ... However, the Catholic Banner in the Philippines was soon conquered by the American when she declared war against Spain under the disguise of independence ... The Spanish-American War that ended the Spain's claim to our country ended in 1898 (the century when the historiuc French Revolution took its toll) ... and our country declared independence from Spanish Rule ... I just learned a decade year ago that the very patriots we are taught to admire at schools by out government like Jose Rizal (our national hero), Apolinaro Mabini and the rest of the revolutionaries were actually inspired by Freemasonry. In fact, should one wants to find out the truth ... the net will provide all the information to the public that these revolutionaries are ALL FREEMASONS ... that's how we got our independence so-called assisted by the US, it is Masonic-led since the people running America are under the influence of Illuminai-Freemasonry .... it's really scary to discover one massive and deep deception one after another ...

The Filipinos remember American colonization more than the Spanish regime; since the lifestyle America brings to us are often sweet to the flesh compared to the Christian axiom of mortifying oneself to free the spirit by the Catholic Spain ... By the way, i would like to commend and thank you Brothers Michael and Peter for all you articles and videos on Freemasonry (I have studied and researched a lot on the influence of Freemasonry in the Philippines and we are not any different now from the US and UK, though, we all know that these 2 countries would expedite the birth of the diabolic One World Government by the Devil!) your vidoes on Freemasonry has tackled the very root cause of its existence ... the Rebellion of Lucifer against Christ as the proclaimed Messiah of Humanity since the Fall of the Angels in Heaven ... Hence, Freemasonry's spirit is the height of hatred the Devil bears against God ... and our Holy Mother Church is just right in excommunicating not only the Freemasons but also ALL who in any way associates themselves with these damned souls

In Crucified Christ and Immaculate Mary,
Joey, EENS-Sedevacantist (Philippines)

A tool of Satan

Subject: Racism - a tool of Satan

Dear MHFM,

Let's look at this. Lucifer uses all available tools to deceive the innocent. One tool used for centuries in this country (USA), has been racism mixed with Protestantism and then fortified with Masonic indoctrination. Now, the weed in their garden of evil they would most like to tear by the roots and burn is, of course, Roman Catholicism. The Roman Catholic Church founded by Jesus Christ has always had the only simple solution, as Most Holy Family Monastery has stated truthfully-Accept all men, in Christ and in His Church. Accept all the Holy teachings within the Church passed down through the centuries since they possess infallibility stamped with the power of the Holy Ghost, third person of the Blessed Trinity, and therefore, can never fail…. There is only one thing our Lord hates, sin. And as you so eloquently point out racism is a horrid sin against man and God, and that the Catholic Church has never deviated from protecting mankind from this disease called racism by accepting all men in His Church as brothers and sisters in Him. That's the teaching-so simple. Only Satan could devise racism to divide and conquer so effectively, and steal souls away from Christ, no? If you are a racist you are of Satan and his minions, and not of our Lord Jesus and in his one true Church, the Roman Catholic Church. So, so simple.

Let's not detract from the main issue at hand, although racism in the Church can't ever be tolerated, and as clearly shown, hasn't, but the most discriminatory institution in the world-The Vatican II Sect does, if implicitly, promote a form of racism. An institution that is wedded to the false notion of separation of Church and State. Something held by all pre-Vatican II holy pontiffs as being completely opposed to God's way in this wicked world. Satan's penultimate tool, Vatican II, and presently with antipope Benedict with scepter in hand, clothed in the Devil's robe, pressing forward, gaining souls for Satan with this false belief of separation of church and state… this pernicious thinking of separation of church and state that antipope Benedict supports forthrightly. Nowadays, wicked things appear more frequently, and our hearts grow cold, burdened with this imposing aura. And yet, we accept the lie of the Devil, and bow down to the likes of antipope Benedict and his vile predecessor, Wojtyla-complete dupes of Satan! Benedict lies to us, and we know it. We know he lies! His army of men in Rome lie daily to the innocent masses.

Oh, Satan is a powerful angel. Living and breathing his foul odor upon this earth! And yes, Satan slithered onto the halls in Vatican City, back in '62, vested in Christ's robe. He pronounced new dogmatic teachings for the so-called modern world. These Vatican II documents sound Catholic, in a sense, inclusive of all mankind, but contain the substance of chaff that with time and rebuke will be seen for what those documents are, elitist, and racist since they side from only one source-Lucifer-the greatest racist of them all, stealing souls to Hell! St. Michael The Archangel, ora pro nobis! God Bess MHFM

Various – Against Racism

Subject: Benedict XVI apostasy, racism, Pornography, Tupac

Dear Brothers,

More outrageous heresies from the schismatic apostate Antipope Benedict XVI. Thank you for showing him for what he is - Antichrist! It's quite amazing how bold the Antipopes are - they "unite" with schismatics who reject the papacy, all the while pretending to be popes!!! I suppose it fools those who love externals more than Truth. Also, just in case we forgot how heretical he is, Benedict XVI has to re-emphasize how he rejects anything remotely Catholic to do with Justification, by accepting the Lutherans and waiving goodbye to the Council of Trent's Canons on Justification. And to top it off, he has to load the abominable sect of Islam with gushy praise - Benedict XVI is so apostate, he could probably trick the devil!!! It's clear the Devil is behind Benedict XVI's work, because being outside the Church and nowhere near the state of grace, he would have most likely fallen flat on his face by now - but no, the "Church" of Hell, the Vatican II sect, just keeps on smoking!!!

Interesting to see the research on how pornography destroys families. Apparently it is as addictive as crack cocaine. Perhaps Tupac would know something about that - what an abomination having his songs on the Vatican II website!!!

As for James Heapes I think he should simply learn to love his neighbor as himself. What a psycho apostate - what a demon!!!

Romans 1:14 - To the Greeks and to the barbarians, to the wise and to the unwise, I am a debtor.

Perhaps James would say that men and women cannot marry due to this verse: Ecclesiasticus 10:22 - Pride was not made for men: nor wrath for the race of women.

What an infidel! How would he reply to this scripture?:

Romans 2:28,29 - For it is not he is a Jew, who is so outwardly; nor is that circumcision which is outwardly in the flesh: But he is a Jew, that is one inwardly; and the circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.

The Catholic Church often only refers to one race - the human race. And the enemy of the human race is Satan the Devil. Wake up James!!!

SATIS COGNITUM, ON THE UNITY OF THE CHURCH, ENCYCLICAL OF POPE LEO XIII, JUNE 29, 1896: But the mission of Christ is to save that which had perished: that is to say, not some nations or peoples, but the whole human race, without distinction of time or place. "The Son of Man came that the world might be saved by Him" (John iii., 17). "For there is no other name under Heaven given to men whereby we must be saved" (Acts iv., 12). The Church, therefore, is bound to communicate without stint to all men, and to transmit through all ages, the salvation effected by Jesus Christ, and the blessings flowing there from. Wherefore, by the will of its Founder, it is necessary that this Church should be one in all lands and at all times. To justify the existence of more than one Church it would be necessary to go outside this world, and to create a new and unheard-of race of men.

PASCENDI DOMINICI GREGIS, ON THE DOCTRINE OF THE MODERNISTS, ENCYCLICAL OF POPE PIUS X, SEPTEMBER 8, 1907: There has never been a time when this watchfulness of the supreme pastor was not necessary to the Catholic body, for owing to the efforts of the enemy of the human race, there have never been lacking "men speaking perverse things," "vain talkers and seducers," "erring and driving into error."

Luke 2:13,14 And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly army, praising God, and saying: Glory to God in the highest; and on earth peace to men of good will.

Thank you Brothers and God Bless,

Chris White

No Reason

Dear Brothers in Christ,

Regarding your recent and current e-mail exchanges and videos about racism, I would like to add a few comments about this issue. First, and most important, are Gods's words:

" And if thy right eye _scandalize thee_, pluck it out and cast it from thee. For it is expedient for thee that one of thy members should perish, rather than that thy
whole body be cast into hell. And if thy right hand scandalize thee, cut it off, and cast it from thee: for it is expedient for thee that one of thy members should perish, rather than that thy whole body be cast into hell."

"Going therefore, teach ye _all_ _nations_; baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost."

These words are absolute proof that the Body of Christ, The Catholic Church, is not in the least measure founded on physical body's characteristics whatsoever. Thus there is no reason to differentiate people on the grounds of their skin's color, or any other racial characteristic… So anyone who has problem with human races has a problem with God's words.

Second, it is true that the secular ideologies and philosophies, which are all under dominion of the Devil, have perverted this supernatural principle of The Unity of The Church to
the highest possible degree. The secular philosophies, which are pretending to defend the equality of all people on Earth, are all in favour of the so-called religious tolerance and indifference. That is, their so-called 'brotherhood and unity' is only a stinking cover for their contempt for The Truth, The Faith and The Catholic Church. They, the secular philosophers, politicians, and "spiritual people" are destroying the souls by appearing to build something valuable and noble. Their "peace" is a "peace" of death in Hell, not The Peace of Christ.

Third, it is utterly sad thing that some "Catholics" are not capable to discern Devil's tricks from The Truth. The Devil's perversion of supernatural equality of all people
in The Christ Body, the Christ Peace amongst people in The Body, the marriage between men and women IN THE BODY, are NOT proof that these principles are faulty, but is a proof that the people of bad will are cheap 'game in the field' for The Devil.

May our Most Holy Mother Mary and St. Joseph bring you Christ's Peace.

Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia

Horrid

Hello Brothers - My family and I are just now coming out of this horrid abomination which calls itself the Church, and much thanks to you. I have read a good deal of the info on you from your detractors as well, within the past two days. I can only say that they do not even submit to implicit logic in deriding you. I thank you for your work - you are doing a very good thing. Of course most all men will hate you for it. That is telling in itself is it not?!!...

I have been at your website for a few days now. I have learned more in these past two days from your untainted, clean, temperate, and factual explanation on Church teachings than I have in a year from other sources.

This is most definitely touched of God.

Thank you again,

In Jesus and Mary,

Michael Sean Glennon

MHFM: That’s great to hear! You have the good will to follow after truth and not care what the herd thinks. It’s simply a fact, as Our Lord told us, that all who aggressively attack evil and spread the truth will be contradicted, persecuted and hated. The quote of the day is to the point:

“If the world hates you, know that it hated me before you. If you had been of the world, the world would love its own, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.” (John 15:18-19)

We have indeed marveled in surprise at the level of bad will present among so many of those who claim to be conservative or traditional Catholics. They dismiss the facts, scoff at good arguments, believe lies and distortions, and attack those who spread the truth. Sadly, almost all of them are liars. From your e-mail, one gets the sense that the power and truth of the information has clicked with you. It should. A person shouldn’t need repeated convincing, once the information is presented.

Real

Subject: Racist Wacko

Incredible! I can’t even believe he is real. How does this happen? I’m laughing (is this wrong?) and crying at the same time. Quite disappointed he comes from Ireland though. A little prideful on my part; I realize.

Bill Mulligan

MHFM: Yes, he’s real. He had written to us numerous times in the past. We had no idea what he really believed. It gets even more interesting. “Kevfal” wrote in to agree with James – probably only because James attacked us. However, “Kevfal” doesn’t seem to realize that James holds that non-Jews and non-whites are not human. As far as we know, “Kevfal” is not a Jew. By agreeing with him, Kevfal is denouncing himself as a non-human. Here’s a recent exchange. Admittedly, deeply pondering his e-mail causes one to burst out laughing:

Subject: MHFM are the true racist waco [sic]

James put you in your place and you don't like it. Poor Baby heretic, how about this advise: GROW UP! Just because you decided to say the sky is red and you will go to hell if you don't obey me is just plain SICKNESS and you need some therepy. Have a nice day.

Kevfal….

MHFM RESPONSE: Maybe you should learn the difference between advise and advice. They are two different words, heretic. By agreeing with James (probably for the sole reason that he attacked us), you have thus confirmed that you also believe that non-Jews and non-whites are not human. You are thus without any doubt an apostate Christ-rejecter. You also call us racists. So, we are racists for condemning racism… that makes a lot of sense… it reminds us of those who call us anti-Catholic for quoting dogmatic definitions… consider spiritual therapy…

Sick

That extremely sick racist character, "James", from Dublin, Ireland makes one entertain the notion that there is, out there in humanity, a "satanic blood-line", "people" who are actually DNA-genetically connected with satan---the "wicked seed"-----and if such a monstrous thing were ever true, certainly Mr. James… would come to mind as part of that very uh-holy "family"........... at the very least, he needs to be exorcised of at least some of his very many demons----and since this poor depraved creature seems to be SO, so very sick, considering such an extremely disturbed soul, one feels obliged to pray for him....I really didn't know people of that kind of disturbed mentality even existed except for in the lower-most regions of hell.......

Point

Brothers Diamond:

Excellent, as usual, commentary on racism-bigotry-interracial marriage.

As I converted about a year ago from Novus Ordo to Traditional Catholic, I realized that one of my stubborn sins was racism-bigotry. (in spite of the fact that my nephew has a black "father" and white mother.) Excellent point that blind bigotry is anti-Christ since He came to save all people. I fight the bigoted thoughts I have against some of my neighbors and have started to pray for them that they find Christ and that I stop having bigoted thoughts myself just becuase of their skin color (and age). They are God's children too.

You also have a good point (a non-politically correct one) that black people can be color bigots as well. Especially "Reverend" Jesse Jackson and "Reverend" Al Sharpton.

Comment

Greetings Brothers Michael and Peter Dimond.

In regards to the recent talks on racism, I think it should be pointed out that this racist view exists amongst some traditional Catholics, mostly in Europe, due to certain politics. To explain, many Catholics, in Europe particularly, adhere to the right or the far-right. In Italy you have a group like Forza Nuova that is a "traditional" Catholic political group but many of its members are certainly racist. It is also a flashback to the Mussolini era. This "racism" comes mostly due to the flood of third-world immigrants into Europe. You have groups like this in other European countries, like Spain, Hungary, France and so forth. While I for one am not a racist and would never advocate such activity, I also don't support this trend of uncontrollable immigration into Europe.

Danijel Filipovic

MHFM: In our view, it is not attributable to immigration or a particular party, but to the selfishness and pride of people.

Colonization

Subject: Protestant vs. Catholic colonization

I liked the e-mail from the person who pointed out the differences in what happened with colonization of what became the US, vs. what happened in Latin America. I think it is a very good point, on which Catholic Americans should be aware of and understand. The predominantly protestant settlers in the regions which became the US, held the Calvinist view of predestination, and thus saw nothing wrong in murdering the “savages”. The Catholic Spanish on the other hand worked to convert the Indians and soon inter-married as well.

This same phenomenon was seen in the areas colonized by the Catholic French versus those colonized by the protestant British. The French quickly established excellent relations and alliances with the Indians and indeed lived among them. The protestant settlers for the most part preferred extermination. British power and policy was consolidated as a result of their victory in the so-called French and Indian War, in which the British fought against an alliance made up of Frenchman and Indian tribes loyal to the French who treated them well and converted many.

On the other hand the person who wrote to oppose inter-racial marriage (in a most illiterate fashion) because of “problems with the children” is a disgrace. What “problems” is he referring to? Any problem he perceives can be of no concern to God. Every real Catholic he ought to realize will face “problems” of the worldly kind; else he is doing something wrong.

Bill Mulligan

Problem

Re: the creep "kevfal" on racism: I guess this non-catholic schismatic's problem like, some others', may really boil down to a sin against the first commandment: idolatry. Idolatry because I believe racism is kind of like a certain "worship of man", of a man's RACE, of HIS body, color, HIS culture, or whatever----I mean how can anyone even ATTEMPT to "justify" this ? They can't: so they have to resort to yet another sin---profanity (or so it looks, from the sections of his email you had to delete).

The road to hell is paved with views like this fool's. As you aptly mentioned in your video refuting racism, such people totally FAIL to move from the natural to the supernatural. Well guess what? God dwells ABOVE, in the supernatural, and thank goodness we can aspire and hope for a better world to come in Heaven WITHOUT idiot idolaters like "kevfal"…

Freemasonry

Subject: Thanks for the videos and info

Hi...

Thanks for the info on the Church relating to matters on Vatican II. Also, the information on Masonic Lodges were accurate and covered some aspects that I was unaware.

My brother is a Masonic Shriner 32nd degree Scottish Rite and I have many family members that are masons. I was asked to join Free Masonry by many different individuals all the way up to 33 degree Masonic individuals. I declined the invitations, "Thanks be to God"..

My brother and I would discuss the Church and Free Masonry constantly, he was quite argumentative. I couldn't understand why my brother insists he was Jewish, until I saw the video you posted on Free Masonry.. We have Jewish relatives but only through marriage not blood relations... In the past I thought about joining the free masons, because I had found a very old Knights Templar Sword with the crown over the Cross. I found this in the year 2000... I believe it was a Masonic Sword.. As a Christian, I thought it would be neat to join an Organization that promotes Christianity and its beliefs.. As I said, I didn't join the free masons…

Anyways, again, thanks for the info... Glad I had time to read the material…

God Bless,

Mary-Michael (lou)

More points

Subject: More points concerning racism

First of all, I wanted to congratulate Brother Peter on his stance (The TRUE Catholic stance) regarding the insanity of racism.

Forgive me if I may sound blunt, but I think the reason so many people in the Traditional Movement in America are racists is because your country was colonized by Protestant Heretics, who believed they were a chosen people, predestinated to rule, while the natives were simply doomed to Hell. That´s why they did not bother in converting the natives. The exact opposite happened in countries like Mexico and my native Brazilian land, colonized by Spain and Portugal, both Catholic nations.

While in what would become the United States the Protestants devastated the original populations, in Brazil and Mexico, the missionaries and the colonized formed a single mixed people. The souls the Church had lost in Europe to the Protestant Revolt, she received back in Latin America.

Best regards.

Comment

Nice job refuting the selfish, ignorant, completely UNCHARITABLE BIGOTS who are racists out there, who mistakenly fancy themselves "Catholics"! To said bigots I say: get off my favorite web-site and DON'T COME BACK until you repent of your sinful sick disturbed racism, and earn the name "Catholic"!

No idea

[NOTE: this is in response to our recent videos and comments]

I will keep this short. There is nothing wrong with a white man marries a white woman and so forth. This is NOT raciest! Marrying a black man (Political Correct is Communism) with a white woman even it is a Catholic marriage is NOT advised because it causes problems.

What don't you understand?

Instead of using "threats of excommunication" BTW are you the Pope? No! So shut up [EXPLETIVE DELETED] get the facts straight not just your opinions calling it catholic teachings.

I have no problems with different races (there are races your [INAPPROPRIATE REFERENCE REMOVED]).

You could be the one with the WRONG view. Stop distorted thinking today.

Kevfal…

MHFM: The first part of your e-mail doesn’t make any sense. It seems that you have trouble writing in coherent sentences. That’s not surprising considering the schismatic and stupid position you hold. Your e-mail is further confirmation of the fact that people such as yourselves are spiritually deranged schismatics mired in massive confusion.

On Video

Subject: Racism schism video

Dear Brothers,

Great video on the evil of those who reject interracial marriage – thank you. Racism has always struck me as a blind ignorance – a hatred without cause. After all, the same God created all men! These racist schismatics remind me of a famous quote, “race is the answer to everything.” Obviously this is wrong and evil, but that seems to be how they view everything – they’re colour blind! Also, as you mentioned from Exodus 12: 48-49, about how the stranger must be circumcised to eat the Passover lamb; that was a type of the New Law, where baptism replaces circumcision, the Eucharist replaces the Passover lamb, and the stranger is simply the convert to the Catholic faith (as indeed we are all):

Exodus 23:9 - Thou shalt not molest a stranger, for you know the hearts of strangers: for you also were strangers in the land of Egypt.

Obviously, Egypt refers to being outside the Church. It blows me away how stupid racism is – how do these racists eat fruit salad or wear clothes of mixed fabrics? Also, I think the curse of deformity from inbreeding is probably a result of the sin of racism.

Lastly, it’s interesting to note that the Jews, who are notoriously racist, were chosen by God specifically because they were a small and insignificant people – He chose a weak people to prove His power and glory among the other nations who thought themselves powerful and glorious, such as “the Hethite, and the Gergezite, and the Amorrhite, and the Chanaanite, and the Pherezite, and the Hevite, and the Jebusite” (Deuteronomy 7:1) :

Numbers 13:33, 34 - And they spoke ill of the land, which they had viewed, before the children of Israel, saying: The land which we have viewed, devoureth its inhabitants: the people, that we beheld, are of a tall stature. There we saw certain monsters of the sons of Enac, of the giant kind: in comparison of whom, we seemed like locusts.

Deuteronomy 7:7, 8 - Not because you surpass all nations in number, is the Lord joined unto you, and hath chosen you, for you are the fewest of any people: 8 But because the Lord hath loved you, and hath kept his oath, which he swore to your fathers: and hath brought you out with a strong hand, and redeemed you from the house of bondage, out of the hand of Pharao the king of Egypt.

God Bless,

Chris White

Comment

Hi Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,

So Roger is feeling a little "peeved" right now. That's really sad, especially with Christmas around the corner.

He reminds me of the Climate Warming Scam crowd, who, in spite of mounting and overwhelming evidence, that humanity is not faced with a worldwide catastrophe, are determined to go down with the sinking climate change ship, rather than humbly admitting their error, and accepting the consequences that that entails.

His mindset is typical of the Vatican II sect , who have rebelled against the true faith, by accepting these bogus claimants to the papacy, when all the accumulated years of evidence clearly demonstrates they cannot possibly be. It seems they are determined also to go down with this sinking ship!

They have rejected the true Mass, which will shortly be offered up three times on Christmas Day to celebrate the birth of our Lord and Savior, Jsus Christ 2000 years ago, by accepting a false jewish -masonic, protestant meal service in its place.

...and so he is planning to celebrate a "Merry Christmas" ...Well, I am sure Satan will be chuckling and rubbing his hands with glee as he listens to Roger and "his Brothers in Christ" , 'clinking the glasses of their modernism' on the 25 th December, 2009!

David

Help

Dear MHFM,

I first want to thank you for your book about UFO's and all your info about protestantism. They are truly a blessing. I have a problem with a friend. She is in college now and has decided to convert to buddism. She has had a rough upbringing and never really practiced the Catholic faith. She has become a fallen away catholic. Can you please send me any info that can refute buddism in a simple manner. I don't want her to lose her soul. Thanks and please pray for me and her.

God Bless
Tom

Video

Dear Brothers:

The Sadness Video you posted not too long ago reminds me of a quote from St. Alphonsus:

St. Alphonsus: "Worldlings shun solitude, and with good reason; for in solitude they feel more acutely the remorse of conscience, and therefore they go in search of the conversations and tumults of the world, that the noise of these occupations may stifle the stings of remorse."

-Steve

Debate

Dear Brothers

I've been listening to the debate you had with william albrecht, and i think he was the most arrogant person you have had a debate with. you told him what the church teaches a heretic is he just completely ignored that and kept going on about titus 3.10. you quoted what the popes teach he dismissed them as nothing then he had the cheek to say you were incompetent.

God bless
Rob.

MHFM: Yes, and to be very frank, that’s why we took great satisfaction in the fact that he was demolished. Before the debate, he said that our arguments are “laughable.” We saw what was laughable in the debate. His arrogance speaks to his level of spiritual blindness. He didn’t have even a semblance of a response to the arguments or the heresies which were brought up to prove our point. He simply ignored them all. Among many other things, he didn’t even know the difference between the civil and moral rights to religious liberty. He didn’t even bother to look into the issue even though he knew it might come up in the debate.

What’s most despicable, however, is the fact that some people are so shallow and disgustingly blind that they consider people like that to be correct and/or learned or knowledgeable – simply because they might cite Greek or attempt to insult us. It’s really pathetic. One thing we’ve noticed is that the Devil possesses certain people in the false traditionalist movement to insult those who are promoting Catholic truth. He really wants to put down those who are promoting the truth. So, he has his foolish cronies attempt to insult them. This is true not only among apostates in the Novus Ordo, but also among many heretical sedevacantists who deny the salvation dogma.

Peeved

I'm rather peeved right now. I believe we worship the same God. You have damned Luther, all Protestant faiths as well as any pope since Vatican II if I am understanding correctly. I shall pray for my salvation because what you have told me I haven't a snowballs change of ever receiving it. Where did you come up with this Catholic doctrine? You need not answer that question.

My belief as stated before is that we are ALL BROTHERS IN A SINGLE CHRIST! I feel sorry you cannot accept that.

I would wish you a Merry Christmas but you most likely don't celebrate that eitherl.

In the love of Christ, the one that I know.

Roger Swaner

MHFM: You are just a total liberal. That’s obvious. In your dream world, you want to believe that rejecting core truths of the Christian faith has no consequences. It’s the traditional teaching of the Church that heretics such as Luther are damned. You also bring up Christmas. Christmas refers to Christ’s Mass – the Mass in honor of Christ’s birth. Since you don’t accept the Mass, why do you celebrate Christmas?

What you don't know about Martin Luther

Martin Luther, the Devil and Denominations

Insane

Subject: This is insane

Concerning those emailing in about in about interracial marriage. You people are ridiculous, interracial marriage is evil or abominable! What, your to good for an Asian or a Black person because you are white? No, no you say its not because we are better than everyone, every race should marry within there race. This is a pathetic lie. There union is abominable you say! What of their children then? should they be killed because they are abominable also? You people are pathetic, and God will send you to hell for your evil beliefs. You think because you are a sedevacantist you will just go to heaven, you are wrong. No one on this earth is immune to hell, don't think so highly of yourselves.

William

MHFM: Yes, it’s utterly stupid. We will post some more points which show that their racist position is neither biblical nor Christian.

Inquisition

MHFM: The following quote is interesting. It’s relevant, first of all, to the Vatican II sect’s recent defense of Muslims, mosques and minarets. Second, it’s relevant to the heresy that Muslims, Jews and pagans can be saved without the Catholic faith. This false idea is widely held by “traditionalists.” Third, it’s relevant to the fact that Benedict XVI prayed like Muslims toward Mecca in a mosque, with arms crossed in the Muslim prayer gesture called “the gesture of tranquility,” on Nov. 30, 2006.

The Spanish Inquisition tried the following for heresy: “The inquisitors in 1490 in Cuenca were informed of a Christian who claimed that ‘the good Jew and the good Muslim can, if they act correctly, go to Heaven just like the good Christian.’… In 1486 the Inquisition of Saragossa tried a Christian ‘for saying that he was a Muslim, and for praying in a mosque like a Muslim.’” (Henry Kamen, The Spanish Inquisition – A Historical Revision, Yale University Press, 1998, p. 6.)

Interest

You are in our prayers for many graces and blessings upon you today and throughout these difficult days.

You have provided Catholics with the true Faith, which was stolen from us after Vat. II. I was raised and attended 16 years of Catholic schooling pre-Vat. II, so I know and have experienced the Church that existed before Vat. II. Now there are those who like to use the terms, "ultra-conservative," or "extreme Catholics," or "fringe" Catholic group, referring to those who would have been considered normal Catholics, members of the Roman Catholic Church, in the pre-Vat. II years. We have ordered your material and continuously read your website. Thank you so much for all you've done to defend the true Roman Catholic Faith!

frank and mary jane in Michigan

Read

Read the story of Jacob's Ladder in Genesis 28. Jacob wakes up in the morning and sets up a memorial stone, annoints it with oil and says this is the gate of Heaven, the House of God(Church)Genesis 28:11-20. Of course this foreshadows Christ's setting up His memorial stone after waking up from a three day sleep(John 21:14-19) as He promised in Mat.16:15-19. So wherever this memorial stone(Pope Benedict)is there is the Church, the Gate of Heaven. No Pope no Church. Christ promises that the first person He comes to see at the second coming is the Pope(Mat.20:8, Mark 13:34). Not some heretical schismatic, so called traditionalist sect(Jude 4-5). According to your sedevacantist heresy, Christ won't come because you've absurdly declared the seat of Peter vacant. You slander John Paul the Great and Pope Benedict(Ex.20:16) but you're the ones who have left the Church(3John 9-10). Please repent and return home to the One true Church(1Tim 3:15), The Bride of Christ(Apoc.21:2) which you call whore(Apoc.17:1) before it's too late. Now have a nice day(John 9:4).

MHFM: All you have is a man who dresses up in robes. But that’s all you need because you don’t care about the Catholic faith. It’s all about externals to you. Even though Benedict XVI denies many Catholic dogmas including the Papacy, you don’t care. You don’t care as long as he has the externals. If you read some Catholic teaching – specifically the facts we present – you would perhaps realize that the popes themselves teach that heretics cannot be regarded as popes. You would also realize that there have been many antipopes and periods without a pope. And of course you won’t read or accept the overwhelming evidence that Antipope Benedict XVI is not remotely a Catholic.

The Catholic Teaching that a heretic cannot be a valid pope and loses the papal office automatically [PDF file]

Benedict XVI (The Heresies of Benedict XVI File) [link to section]

Ridiculous

I agree with that guy about interracial marriage. Doesn't the Bible say that you should seek out your own kind? Interracial marriage is an abomination!...

Michael

MHFM: The Bible forbade marrying those of certain nations because they worshipped false gods. By holding your racist views on interracial marriage, you demonstrate that you are not Catholic. It’s ridiculous. For if you were to take it to its logical conclusion, you would have to say that not only shouldn’t black or Asian marry white, but also that Canadians shouldn’t marry the French, and the Irish shouldn’t marry the Spanish, and the Italians shouldn’t marry the Dutch, etc. Nay, you would logically have to hold that dark-haired people shouldn’t marry blond-haired people, and that red-haired people shouldn’t marry brown-haired people. For if not, where and by what measure do you draw the line? It’s non-Catholic nonsense. It’s rooted in selfish pride and tends toward a rejection of the universality of Christ’s Church and the dogmatic truth that all men are from Adam and Eve.

1 Cor. 7:39- “A woman is bound by the law as long as her husband liveth; but if her husband die, she is at liberty: let her marry to whom she will; only in the Lord.”

Glad

Good afternoon Bro Michael Dimond,

I am very glad that i came across this e-mail address on the internet because i have been looking for a way to contact you. I listened to some of your teachings as well as reading some of your articles and found them true and inspiring for one that really wants to know the truth. After listening to one of your tapes, i have stopped attending the new mass but instead praying my rosary at home as i couldn't find where i will attend the old mass…

Thank you and looking forward to hearing from you.

Tesy

History

Brother Michael,

I finally had a chance to view the History channel version of Fatima and the third secret. True to the previous comments on your site; the same modern whitewash story was presented while leaving those in the know shaking their heads. I felt it was ironic that history was made on the history channel by your presence in the spotlight. A shame that all the material that you presented for the show was not included in the final episode.

I thought it odd that Sister Lucy would have given the true version of the third secret during her illness in the 1940's, even though the secret was supposedly sealed in an envelope. This allowed almost 20 years for the evil powers to be an opportunity to ready themselves for the Vatican II great apostasy. Knowing well in advance, the evils they were doing. The secrets of Fatima are definitely a thorn in the side of the Vatican II evil doers.

I look forward to your future endeavors and the release of your Fatima video as you present the truth to the world.

God Bless,
Tom

Luther

I was trying to do some research last evening and came upon your web site. Being a Lutheran (ELCA) for the last 40 years, I found your part on Martin Luther interesting to say the least. I have been taught different "facts" concerning his life and times. He was, in my belief, a very intelligent man and knew God from a very personal relationship with Him.

I try never to tell someone how wrong their domination is. I mean the following statement as gentle as it can be. I have a dear friend who is a retired Lutheran Bishop. He had two audiences with John Paul II while he served 6 years as chair of the Catholic/Lutheran dialogue. The Bishop was holding a series of adult classes relating how Catholics and Lutherans are alike and are also different. A Catholic was in attendance to give the "other side", if you will. It was soon apparent that the Catholic was trying to answer most of the questions fielded from the floor. The Bishop looked at the fellow and said, "You know the difference between Catholics and Lutherans? We accept some things on faith. Catholics have all the answers."

I have read many parts of the Catholic Catechism and found it interesting. I came to the same conclusion. You do have all the answers. Again, I'm not judging anyone. Just stating my viewpoint. Hope we can remain friends and trusted brothers in Christ.

Soli Deo Gloria,

Roger Swaner

MHFM: Roger, there is only one Church of Christ. Luther rejected it and invented unbiblical doctrines. He was not a Christian. We would recommend that you consult our Refuting Protestantism section and the section on Luther:

Refuting Protestantism

Please get our book, The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church.

Follow-up on Williamson

It seems such a shame. I can’t understand it. How can a guy so good at understanding problems that are very nuanced, a guy not afraid to tell the truth about 9/11, the holocaust, evolution, you name it, one not afraid to be nearly universally vilified, remain so obtuse? It seems impossible that he can’t see it. So therefore he won’t see it, that is chooses not to. Is he playing a “role” and if so to what end? Or is it simply that people can be that “blind”?

Thanks,

Bill Mulligan

MHFM: It’s that people are blind. That’s why the Bible repeatedly gives us the imagery of darkness and blindness to describe spiritual error. The people who are deceived don’t see it; that’s the punishment for sins and bad will. That’s what grace does: it removes blindness. It’s like the people who obstinately defend the Vatican II sect and think that they are defending the Papacy. They can’t see the truth, which is that they are not defending the Papacy but the antithesis to the Papacy. Sadly, for almost everyone it will only be before the Judgment Seat of Christ that the blindness will be lifted; but then it will be too late.

Reading

Dear Brothers~

I found your website most fascinating. I am a non-practicing Catholic, but in my heart, I know the Catholic Church is the true Church of Christ. I was born in 1962, so I have never attended a valid mass…

I have done much reading about the Church and my faith, and I have known and believed for many years Vatican II was wrong. I miss going to mass and receiving our Lord. I have many questions and concerns. Would someone be able to correspond with me and guide me?

I ordered your book about the Church after Vatican II and I can not wait until it arrives.

Thank you and God bless,

Kalan W.

MHFM: We’re glad that you found the information. We recommend that you begin to pray the full Rosary each day, and that you continue to look over the information. We would recommend our main materials which cover what’s going on and what a Catholic must know. Additionally, we encourage you and everyone to obtain a few of the primary books we offer on spiritual topics. A good example of this would be True Devotion to Mary. We can also help you with your questions.

W.C.

Dear Brothers and Sisters,

… I get so much from your website and your services. There's one question I have: That is when do you think your new documentary about the third secret of Fatima, The impostor Sister Lucia and the End of the World will be able to be viewed? I've read your whole book about what really happened to the Catholic Church after Vatican II. The scholarship of your work was stupendous! It's getting clearer and clearer all the time that we’re in end times. I have a man I'd like you to look up on You Tube. He was a Christian. His Name was William Cooper. He was killed by Federal Marshalls in his own home right at the end of 2001. He fought courageously for about twenty years trying to wake as many people as he could reach to the coming end of our world and he paid with his life. He wrote a book called "Behold A Pale Horse". During his twenty years fighting for all the good in the world. He had been followed by unmarked government cars and one time was run off the road and lost one of his feet in the accident. He had many attempts on his life. I really think you should add some of his erudition to your website, because he was truly a good man… There are many of hours of his short wave radio program which he carried on for years trying to alert anybody who believed in God about the satanic Shadow Government's plans to bring about the New World Order. He paid with his life.

Your friend in Christ,
Nathan

MHFM: Soon we should have an update about the new DVD. Regarding William Cooper, we are familiar with him. Unfortunately, he was neither a good man nor a Christian. He was a Protestant heretic. Therefore, all the truth he may have promoted on secular matters did not, in the end, help him. If you die outside the true Church, it doesn’t matter if you stand against evil in the secular arena.

To believe that a Protestant heretic was a good man and/or a Christian is not compatible with faith in Catholic dogma.

Comment

I agree with the word you used---racism is stupid, ignorant. Also in debate, I noticed the protestant objected at one point that St. Peter could "hold the key to knowledge"---- he really objected to this, he used the phrase.... I noticed his term, "key to knowledge", wondering exactly what it meant to him, why He brought this specific expression, term, up, and then why he objected to this very idea----it seemed kind of like maybe he holds gnostic beliefs of some kind, and that is partly why he is anti-Catholic.

Seems upon closer examination I'm one of the last people to find out that the "vaccination shot" could hold a "chip"---I guess they use some kind of "nanotechnology" or other that's been around for years. Well, if this has already happened to me (in 08), I just offer it up along with everything else and leave myself as usual, in Our Lady's hands. But how incredibly evil. Could a "chip" like that kill one? "track" one? who knows?? I still feel victorious in Christ even if they did that to me.....especially when I say the Rosary!!! what a lovely photo of path way in debate-----looks like a sneak preview of Heaven!!! In Our Lord Jesus, A

Drums

Hello Brother Dimond . . .

I live in Williamsburg, Virginia and, the two or three Catholic churches we have here are verrrry Protestantized; and, I am so sick of the so-called services with the drums and guitars and the lack of kneeling and with no reverence paid to the Blessed Sacrament, which has been kicked to the back of the bus. Our churches do not look like Catholic churches anymore; they look like Protestant halls…

I would appreciate any help you could provide for me.

Thank you and God Bless you and your good work,

Linda A.

MHFM: Thanks for the interest. One must come to the conclusion that one will never attend the New Mass for any reason. One must also be convinced on all other matters of traditional Catholic faith. When a person is convinced, we can help him or her with the question of where to receive sacraments. We also have a file on that issue which covers certain key points and principles.

It’s very interesting that reader after reader sends us letters about the liturgical aberrations that are customary at the New Mass. The New Mass is invalid in any form, of course. But all of these personal testimonies further contradict the lie that wacky aberrations are just unusual exceptions in the Novus Ordo.

G. Washington

Dear Brothers,

…George Washington's Thanksgiving Proclamation of 1789. Even though Washington was a Freemason, did not live as a Catholic and presided over a secular government, his faith and good-will seem very evident in the text of his proclamation. It's interesting to note that Washington’s body servant, Juba, testified that the General made the Sign of the Cross at meals. Washington banned from public practice the celebration of the anti-Catholic, anti-papal "Guy Fawkes Day"… Several times, as President, he is reported to have slipped into a Catholic church to hear Sunday Mass. There are even accounts that the President died a Roman Catholic in his final hours. The story is that Father Leonard Neale, a Jesuit priest, was called to Mount Vernon from St. Mary’s Mission across the Piscatawney River four hours before Washington’s death. The black slaves working on the Washington plantation and Fr. Neale's Jesuit brethren testify to Washington's deathbed conversion. If nothing more, it's an interesting and little-known footnote in American history…

Michael Dougherty

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. We would just say that, unless he did in fact become a Catholic, he was not of good will.

10 year-old

One of those ''you have to see it to believe it'' abominations

CNN- 10-year-old boy won't pledge allegiance until gays have equal rights

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uOPrYwKaGb8&feature=player_embedded#

MHFM: The young (very wicked) pagan is definitely inclined to evil. That’s why he has chosen to make this “stand.” He has also clearly been brainwashed by the pro-homosexual all-the-time liberal media. As the recent rejections of gay “marriage” in basically every state show, the people (as bad, apathetic and evil as they are on the whole) still have an aversion to the unnatural abomination. The movement is fueled primarily by the liberal media who desire to normalize the perversity and criminalize any opposition to it. CNN is extremely pro-homosexual by the way. It’s no surprise that they would feature him.

The young pagan says that “liberty and justice” for all requires that everyone be allowed to “marry.” Perhaps if he thought his false argument through more carefully he would realize that it requires him to accept “marriages” between members of the same family, between parents and children, between groups of more than two, etc.

B.W.

… Williamson has been fired, disowned, vilified, and for what seems to be the right reason (defense of Truth), yet he still seems to miss the basics. Why? What is going on? Have you ever tried to engage him?

Bill

MHFM: Years ago one of us spoke with him numerous times. For years we also tried to send him some truth. He specifically requested to be removed from our list; yet he didn’t have the courage to sign his name. He’s of bad will. You have to be to reject all the evidence and obstinately accept as Catholic the manifestly heretical Vatican II sect. His heresies are covered in this file:

The Society of St. Pius X [Link to Section]

Sunday

Dear brothers,

First let me start by saying that I fully believe in all of the materials that you present on your web site about what you must believe to be a Catholic.

There is clearly no church in my area that does not follow Benedict XVI. The church that I did belong to only had the traditional latin mass and did not conduct the Novus Ordo service, but they still held B XVI as a valid pope so I left. On Sunday I have moved to saying the full rosary (15 decades) in place of the mass and also praying for the souls in purgatory (I try to pray the full rosary everyday). For some reason I am still a bit nervous about not going even to a fully traditional mass, as not going to mass seems very strange. Do you feel that under the circumstances what I am doing is a valid substitute?

God Bless
GB

MHFM: Those issues are covered and addressed in this file:

Where to go to Mass or confession today?

Newman

Subject: Benedict XVI plans to “beatify” Newman during visit to Britain

Wasn't Newman a clear modernist heretic?

Benedict XVI plans to beatify Cardinal Newman

I.S.

MHFM: Yes, unfortunately he was a modernist heretic. Perhaps down the line, when we have the time, we can do a more full and detailed treatment of that particular issue. Newman is a “sacred cow” to many false traditionalists, especially those who savor the things of intellectual pride and not the things of God.

Amazing

… It's amazing that "traditional catholics" still can't understand the pope issue; fancy sitting down with the "anglican primate" and trying to do a deal. A true Catholic would not do this. These so called trads do not know their Catholic Faith; what did our Holy Martyrs die for? I rest my case.

Sincerely in Christ,

Richard, (England).

“Bishop of Canterbury”

Brothers, your e-exchange photo of B-16 and the schismatic Bishop of Canterbury is quite the photo opportunity. The (pathetic) heartwarming embracing handshake between the two is being covered to possibly hide the reality that it is a masonic handshake and that they are both masons.

Regards,
Tom

Follow-up

Subject: regarding interracial marriages response

have been a follower of your web-site for years and will continue to be, but I did not much like being called stupid or illogical, mistaken or gravely mistaken maybe and probably and now it seems more than likely. But stupid Iam not, just mis informed. You guys need to be a little more understanding and patient with us "stupid people" out here, we're only looking for the truth so we can be true Catholics. I'll pray that you become more patient and understanding with us "stupid people"

MHFM: We are not saying that you are stupid, but rather that the mindset, which has a serious problem with interracial marriages, is stupid. Since all men come from Adam and Eve and the differences in races are simply a result of isolation of populations, it’s simply not logical to have a serious aversion to two Christians of different races getting married. It’s clearly opposed to charity and reveals an underlying racism.

Pope St. Pius X, Lacrimabili Statu (#5), June 7, 1912: “Christian charity, which holds all men, without distinction of nation or color, as true brethren, shall be continually preached and commended.”

This statement of course presupposes that the brethren agree on the true faith. His point is that color and nation don’t matter. Our words in response to your position were not unjustified, but accurate. There is no reason that someone should insist upon a separation of colors or races in marriage except for reasons of pride and an inordinate fascination with oneself.

Debate

What a great debate!... It’s very sad though, how they argue on and on, going from point to point, defeat after defeat, but still not accepting the truth about the Catholic faith – it’s simply bad will!

It seems to me that, like David’s view that the Church is invisible, that his "Church" is full of straw men (arguments) who practice Bibolatry!!! These Protestants just constantly slither around the rocks of truth – ad hoc explanations here, deconstructive criticisms there – like the world; they try to find the truth by destroying it!!! St. John’s Gospel doesn’t read: “and the Word of God was made paper.” No, it says, “and the Word of God was made flesh.” (John 1:14) So, naturally, the Word of God, Jesus Christ, would institute a Chief amongst His Apostles, who were also flesh and blood, so as to rule the flock. After all, the very Author of nature, Jesus Christ, made the head to rule over the body – naturally He would therefore institute a physical head to govern His Mystical Body on Earth – the Roman Catholic Church.

Also, added to his dishonesty about the irrefutable weight of Scriptural evidence, which proves that Jesus instituted the Papacy, is his acknowledgement that he simply refuses to believe it. For instance, in the second video, he mentions that a teaching is “unthinkable,” as though it is impossible to think such things as the plain simple truth. He mentioned a few times that the Catholic teaching is “force of suggestion,” as though the truth were a mirage. He asks, “How Apostolic succession could even, could anyone even believe it, I don’t know.” It’s very simple; the Apostles laid their hands upon other men, which continued each generation up to our day…

However, his closing remarks showed how irregular his position is: “I don’t think there is any way God would condemn anyone who would refuse to believe that which is outside His word, when we see the example of the Boreans, and the warning against those who come after the apostles.” As was dealt with in the debate, topics such as the Trinity and Incarnation (neither of which words are found in the Bible), must be believed for salvation. Once again, the Protestants are really just protesting against God!!! Thank you for the peaceful picture too - nice trees!

God Bless,

Chris White

Matthews vs. Tobin

Subject: Chris Matthews vs. “Bishop” Tobin

Chris Matthews is a perfect example of trash-journalism. Instead of giving even the slightest notion of impartiality and honestly reporting both sides of an issue, he asks a series of loaded-questions and then talks over his guest. The majority of this "so called" debate looked more like some kind of heretical interrogation. Possibly the most pathetic aspect is that Tobin had a golden opportunity to take a stand and preach some truth infront of a national audience. Instead of showing some backbone, he crumbles and shows his vague indifference time and time again. Then at the end, he gets talked down to and belittled by Matthews (who has the nerve to call himself Catholic) - it made me sick to my stomach to watch that.

- Ed

The Races

Dear Brothers Peter and Michael;

I have a question. What does the true Catholic Church teach on interracial marriages? My wife and I got into it about it… I am not a racist. I just believe( and here I told her it's my opinion, not infallible) I just don't think it's right especially when it involves children. I do not just mean white and who ever, it could be asian and black, mexican and asian, what ever you get my drift…

Thank You

MHFM: The Church teaches that there is nothing wrong with it at all. Many popes have spoken against racism in various ways, including exclusion based on race. There is no distinction, for we are all one in Christ Jesus (Gal. 3:28). To have a problem with interracial marriages is to be un-catholic; it is to not be universal. All men come from Adam and Eve. Racism (and that would include a definite opposition to a member of one race marrying a member of another) is therefore illogical and stupid. It’s all rooted in pride.

The races are simply the result of the isolation of different populations. The following link is an excellent – and quick – explanation of how the races came to be. It’s from the book, In the Beginning, by an M.I.T. scientist named Dr. Walt Brown. We sell this excellent book. It devastates the evolution hoax. It also shows how the world-wide flood is Earth’s defining geological event.

This is a good explanation of how the races came to develop

Through

Just got through watching the interview with " bishop" Tobin. I was almost embarrassed for him. That guy chewed him up and spit him out. Stay home "bishop" until you really become Catholic and say many Te Deums.

Stu

MHFM: Chris Matthews is a true abomination, filled to the max with the evil spirit of liberalism and the desire to please the world. You could see the hatred that even a mild rebuke of a pro-abortion “Catholic” engendered in his dark soul. There’s no doubt that Chris Matthews was unfair to Tobin on a number of fronts. Matthews’ apostasy is even worse than Tobin’s, though Matthews is less dangerous.

Nevertheless, “Bishop” Tobin’s general weakness, as well as his promotion of evil Vatican II apostasy and religious indifferentism, came through for all with eyes to see to see. Simply put, he is an apostate.

Tobin and Matthews

Subject: Tobin and Matthews

I thought the John F. Kennedy (JFK) video clip, which Matthews used as a lead-in to his questioning of Tobin, was quite interesting and revealing. In it JFK is shown saying that no politician, be he Catholic, Protestant or Jew, “should neither ask for nor accept” advise on policy from the Pope or any other religious figure. Tobin right out of the box seems to accept JFK’s premise. Once he does, Matthews has the debate. If the JFK position is accepted as the guiding principle, then Matthew’s is absolutely right, and Catholics are obligated to turn off the light of their baptism when they enter the political door. Just what “lights” (guiding principles) are supposed to replace the Catholic ones isn’t made clear.

Indeed if one accepts the JFK position, then one has no right to protest against any particular law on religious grounds. The position is philosophically undermined by JFK’s false, but not refuted, premise. Tobin then further undermined the anti-abortion argument by saying that all politicians, regardless of their faith, are obligated to follow their conscience, and in this way they will save their souls. Does he not realize that he is essentially saying that the Muslim who murders Christians in the name of Allah, believing he is doing God’s work, is acting nobly and will go to Heaven? By this standard (the primacy of the individual conscience), how can ANY law, indeed any behavior, be opposed or supported with moral confidence?

Perhaps this is the reason why Tobin generally appeared timid, confused and defensive. He was unable to even suggest what laws should be enacted. Not being a legislator (his self proclaimed excuse) he declines Matthew’s invitation to opine on proper justice regarding the matter. But he is supposed to be a bishop! Just what does he think his job is!? I wondered why he even opened his mouth regarding Kennedy in the first place, having actually so little to say. He seemed in fact to not have even given the matter serious thought before sitting down with Matthews. But this of course is the natural and obvious consequence of the false doctrine of Religious Liberty. This is why the real Church (pre-Vatican II) called it “insanity”. It leads to total chaos and confusion; not only in society at large, but in the minds of those who accept it, like Tobin.

Bill Mulligan

MHFM: Yes, his statement that members of all religions are bound to follow their “faith” is not only heretical but utterly illogical. For if his position is that some things are so obviously opposed to the natural law (e.g., abortion) that they are non-negotiable, it is therefore contradictory to assert that everyone is bound to follow the dictates of his “conscience” and “faith.” That’s simply because another’s “faith” could theoretically teach him to accept and promote abortion and murder.

Not pro-life

I still have 2 more parts of the latest debate, thank you for putting it into parts. It makes it a lot easier for me to listen. It truly is food for my soul. It was very accurate to say that he had to completely try hard not to accept the truth of the papacy. I love learning about the Faith! For me it is a little easier to listen to a debate and learn, than it is to just read. I seem to take it in a lot better.

One last thing (I know it was weeks ago), I was so disappointed in the History Channel! I can't believe I actually thought they would give you more than just a few moments! The other "experts" spoke complete nonsense. At the end of the History Channel's "program", they mentioned that your theory was false, "Since the Catholic Church is thriving".....I was appalled....I mean, seriously? The novus ordo Church is thriving? It's really prospering and flourishing? With all of their closed churches and scandals? With their complete apostasy - that is evident to even the simplest person? With the Muslims having surpassed Novus Ordo numbers? That was their conclusion? Totally ridiculous. Needless to say, I can't wait to order your DVD on Fatima!

… I thought the Tobin debate on MSNBC further proves your point that the Novus Ordo sect is not Pro Life.

I have to admit that Chris Matthews was completely obnoxious, and I am sure that it was hard to keep composure trying to debate someone like that. But that was not Tobin's only problem. He truly isn't pro life. He couldn't say that a woman who commits an abortion should be subject to the death penalty (as any person would be subject to, given the state laws, if that person committed pre-meditated murder). Any true pro lifer would say, yes, a woman who has an abortion should be punished for premeditated murder. Tobin (as a "Bishop") should have also said that anyone who had a part in the murder by abortion should also be punished. Any true prolifer would be able to make that statement confidently.

May God Bless all of you!

Teri Thurman

MP3

Hi!

Are you aware that not everybody has DSL or some other connection that actually allows looking at videos?

http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/Articles/debate_on_the_papacy_in_the_bible.php and some other of your recent recordings are completely out of range
for people who don't have a rapid internet connection…

Y.W.

MHFM: Yes, we are aware that some of our readers can’t watch online videos. The mp3s for the recent debates on Justification and the Papacy are available. To access them, go into the file below and then click on the appropriate debate. You will find the mp3 there.

Formal Catholic vs. Protestant Debates [link to section]

New Debate

New Debate: Does the Bible teach the Papacy, that Jesus made St. Peter the first Pope

This is an important debate. It gets much more interesting as it goes along. Many interesting facets of this issue and related issues are covered and discussed. Click on the link above for a description of the debate and links to it. This debate will be found permanently in our Traditional Catholic Audios, Telephone Debates, and Refuting Protestantism sections.

Found

Dear brothers/fathers,

i am randel obineta, a catholic from the philippines. after reading the topics on your website, i found myself lacked of so many things i should have known that would help me save my soul. please pray for me to attain total conversion to the true church and help me renew myself. please pray for me.

i am very thankful i had found your website. i thank GOD for helping me find your website.

GOD BLESS!

Madness

Hello,

Just found your site. I am in Orlando, FL and Catholic Church is in a very sad state here. I have jumped from Church to Church and all you get is the same madness. It is like they are performers in a Disney show - making jokes, telling crazy stories. Everyone claps like it is a show. Everyone already has a seat in Heaven - no need for prayer, confession etc. - we are all good people etc.

It is absolute madness here…

Kevin

MHFM: Thanks for the interest. That’s why, as one will see on our site, a Catholic must have nothing to do with the New Mass and the Vatican II sect. The madness that you’ve described is exhibited by the Counter Church, not the Catholic Church.

Truth

My name is Nicole Selier. I am 22 Years old and I live in the Netherlands. Currently I do not have a religion, but since +/- three years I have a desire to converse to the Roman Catholic Church. During I was looking for some info about Lucia of Fatima, I found out your website and i read some articles. It made me a little confused, but I am open to know the full Truth and so I would like to find out more about the things you write on the internet….

Best regards,
Nicole Selier

MHFM: We hope that you continue to look at the website and pray the full rosary each day. Our video, Creation and Miracles, covers Fatima. We also have a new one on Fatima coming out. We also have information about Fatima on our site now.

WATCH OUR CATHOLIC DVDS ONLINE FOR FREE

Fatima (the sign, the miracle, the Consecration of Russia, the False Sr. Lucy) [Link to Section]

The Steps to convert to the traditional Catholic faith and for those leaving the New Mass - Baptism and Conditional Baptism - the Council of Trent's Profession of Faith for Converts [link to section]

Ironic

Dear MHFM,

What's ironic about Mr. Moore and his beliefs is that the Vatican II sect would side with him, before they would side with St. Pope Pius X, Pope Leo Xlll, Pope Pius IX, and St. Peter himself, and argue for Mr. Moore's heretical beliefs of why he detests the authority of Peter and in his successors. Dr. Ratzinger after all, an obstinate heretic, who is devoted in the theology of truth by contradiction (condemned by the Fifth Lateran Council, I believe), and his cronies in Rome have fought the battle to destroy Catholicism right… since convoking the bait and hook, Modernist Second Vatican Council.

Point

Subject: Those who reject the Honor of Mary

Dear Brothers,

I'm glad you posted those debates, I have burned the two debates in a CD to give to a protestant so she may listen to them and hopefully see the truth when hearing a protestant who also believes as her in "faith alone" and "eternal security"…

One last point I wanted to make, which I found very interesting, is that when I was re-reading the 3rd section "The Message of Fatima", you quoted Sr. Lucia when speaking to Fr. Fuentes in 1957 and I had remembered how many will be deceived even the elect, if it were possible. I remember your audio about the whole "co-redeemer role of Mary" heresy. And what I found interesting is that even though these false traditionalists who hold this position and show their external "devotion" to Mary, in reality they are rejecting her honor. And Sr. Lucia mentioned that "through many centuries of Church history the obvious testimony which demonstrates, by the terrible chastisements which have befallen those who have attacked the honor of His Most Holy Mother, how Our Lord Jesus Christ has always defended the honor of His Mother."

I mean, it's enough already that they reject the dogmas of the Church, especially the great necessity of water baptism, BUT TO DISHONOR OUR LADY BY HOLDING THAT SHE IS "CO-REDEMPTRIX" is just way too much! Just like you mentioned in your audio, it offends both Our Lord and Our Lady. I think this is precisely what Sr. Lucia was talking about and that's why she points out that THIS IS IT, this is the final battle, God or Devil. Just a thought to think about and motivation to honor Our Lady more with more said rosaries, especially in these last days.

Thank you Brothers, and I am sure that Our Lady is very well pleased with spreading the Truth about Fatima, especially with Bro. Michael's new DVD coming soon.

-Bernardo

MHFM: Thanks for the comments. Yes, to hold it obstinately in the face of the specific dogmatic statements which contradict it – and to hold it as a strict formal doctrinal title, as opposed to an imprecise and poetic or flowery way of describing her profound role in the events leading up to the Redemption – is very bad. It is to reject her honor, as you say. It is to have false devotion. It is to reject the truth.

Comment

Brother Michael and Peter,

After reading the comment from Todd regarding the debate and how Mr Moore couldn't grasp the obvious parallel between the Old and New Testaments, the following came to mind. How can Mr Moore accept that Jesus is God? Nowhere in the scriptures does Jesus say I AM GOD, using those specific words. We do know that Jesus says He is God because, using one example, when Jesus said, ..."before Abraham was I AM". We know that this refers to the Old Testament passage when Moses asked God, ..."who should I say sent me and God says tell them I AM sent you". I am sure Mr Moore would accept this. Why because he would probably understand that the Jews of the time would make that connection, which in fact, they did because they attempted to kill Jesus when He made that statement. This is a parallel I'm sure Mr Moore would agree with. So his arguments against using parallels falls short. The point here is, the Jews of that time understood what was being said because they understood the Old Testament scriptures. In the same way, when Jesus told St Peter He was giving him the Keys of the Kingdom, they understood what was being done, they understood the connection. As a side note; we know that a joke usually has some truth to it. Listen to the Protestants tell jokes about people going to heaven. For example, Person A and person B get to heaven and meet St Peter at the gate and he says... Even in their jokes they admit that St Peter has the Keys to the Kingdom.

Paul

Read

Subject: read your website

HELLO MY NAME IS MARK. I BELIEVE ALL THAT YOU STATED ON WHAT THE CHURCH TEACHES, HOWEVER, YOU ALSO HAVE UP ON THE HEADING THAT THE POST VATICAN 2 ERA IS NOT OF GOD? THAT ITS HERITICAL? IS THAT WHAT I’M READING? HOW SO? I BELONG TO A RENEWAL GROUP, AND IT IS ALL PRAISE AND WORSHIP, AND BIBLE STUDY. IT TAKES PLACE AT THE DIOCESE CENTER. PLEASE EXPLAIN. YOU MUST EXPLAIN, OK? DO YOU MIND IF I RESPOND?

GOD BLESS, MARK

MHFM: No, to defend Vatican II is heretical, anti-papal, anti-Christ, and anti-Catholic. Please look at the evidence:

The Heresies in Vatican II [PDF File]

The Catholic Teaching that a heretic cannot be a valid pope and loses the papal office automatically [PDF file]

Heresies of John XXIII, Paul VI, John Paul I, John Paul II and Benedict XVI [link to section]

Interesting

Yet another interesting debate; St. Peter as the first Pope. Nice job of staying with the subject, rather than being drawn off target. Interesting as always, especially during these times of the great apostasy, to witness your testimony against these great enemies (devils) of the christian religion. These locusts that infect the souls of men with the poison of their heresies. Mr. Moore was a bit luke warm and sitting on the fence during this debate. He seemed to be part of the audience as well, while at times blurting out blindly, passages of the bible. Hopefully, the faith of a mustard seed will fall from heaven and knock Mr. Moore off the fence onto the christian side in order to pick up his cross and follow the true faith.

God Bless,
Tom Miles

Climate Change

Subject: Climate Change Bombshell

Hi Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,

I think some of your readers may be interested in the following… especially, as we are fast approaching the Cap and Trade Conference scheduled for December, 2009, in Copenhagen and what it means for mankind if the NWO get their way…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ydo2Mwnwpac

…. where Dr.Tim Ball discusses the hacked e-mails

God bless

David

Forgiveness

Subject: Forgiveness

Brothers,

I frequent your site daily and probably have most of your material. Clearly you are blessed with the gift of knowledge, your research is unparalleled. If you could please direct me to the scripture (I believe it was Paul) where it mentions that old covenant sacrifices simply assuage God's anger and did not actually forgive sins. If I am mistaken pardon my email, but I am near certain that I read it somewhere in your material.

Thanks,
Mark

MHFM: Thanks for the interest. To your question, we find the answer in St. Paul’s letter to the Hebrews, chapter 10. He first speaks of how the sacrifices of the Old Law didn’t truly put away sin, but only provided a covering.

Hebrews 10:1-3- “For the law having a shadow of the good things to come, not the very image of the things; by the selfsame sacrifices which they offer continually every year, can never make the comers thereunto perfect: For then they would have ceased to be offered: because the worshippers once cleansed should have no conscience of sin any longer:”

He then speaks of Christ. He explains how it is through Him and His sacrifice that the true taking away of sins (i.e., full justification and remission of sins) comes.

Hebrews 10:12-14- “But this man offering one sacrifice for sins, for ever sitteth on the right hand of God, From henceforth expecting, until his enemies be made his footstool. For by one oblation he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified.”

He then goes on to explain, in Hebrews 10:22, how the new, full, true justification in Christ involves an interior change of the heart. He tells us that it’s effected by water (i.e., baptism).

Hebrews 10:22 –“Let us draw near with a true heart in fulness of faith, having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience, and our bodies washed with clean water.”

This reference to clean water refers to Ezechiel 36, in which the interior justification, which would come with water baptism, was foretold.

Ezechiel 36:24-26- “For I will take you from among the heathen, and gather you out of all countries, and will bring you into your own land. Then will I sprinkle clean water upon you, and ye shall be clean: from all your filthiness, and from all your idols, will I cleanse you. A new heart also will I give you, and a new spirit will I put within you.”

Matthew 16

I have been pretty busy but I got through the second part of I think it is 12 parts to this debate, you have to be kidding me, when you quoted the old testament with David to the new testament with St. Peter, asserting the parallel between the two of them should have been enough, it’s so clear. Then he tries to use Matthew and saying that Matthew is so detailed about many things but not the Chair of St. Peter, thats because St. Matthew didn't need to because it was so blatantly obvious that St. Peter was the first pope. Does something so big and so obvious need to be scrutinized as Mr. Moore tries to assert, I don't think so!!! Its funny Mr. Moore you don't even acknowledge all the rock solid quotes in the bible that the Brothers bring up, you just dance right around everyone of them. I think that’s because you are so focused on trying to win and not listening to the evidence at hand, it’s sad!

Todd

Helped

… I have been following your videos on youtube and your website for about 4 months now, and it has really helped and been an eye-opener for me. Thanks again for all your work, it really has brought forth much fruit.

- Ed Peschi

D comment

Subject: Debate comment

Dear MHFM,

I must admit that your defence of the doctrine of the Papacy is by far the best that I have ever heard, not only in this debate (against the protestant heretic D.M.) but also in numerous other debates and especially the audios that you freely give on your website for everyone to listen (e.g. the 'early papacy' audios) . People should really listen to these spiritually uplifting recordings frequently (I do that myself) if they want to hear from biblical, historical and many other sources the most obvious and unfortunately the most attacked truth of the Catholic Faith, namely the doctrine of the Papacy. I don't want to make this post unnecessarily long so I am just going to close by saying that you have once again proven beyond any doubt that the revealed Truth of God (the Holy Catholic Faith) is only to be found in the Catholic Church against which the gates of hell, i.e. the disputations of heretics, will never prevail.

Keep defending Holy Mother Church and her Sacred Doctrine

V. from Croatia

Comment

Dear Brothers in Christ,

Thank you for an excellent debate you had with Mr. Moore about papacy…. Your words in the debate, your whole line of argumentation, were inspired by The Holy Ghost. I have no doubts about that. I would like to add a comment on Mr. Moore's objections about papacy he made at the end of the debate. Mr. Moore had mentioned some things, some words and titles the Catholics use, which are not found in The Bible. For example, the title Holy Father and The Chair of St. Peter, are not found in The Scripture.

In fact, the phrase "Holy Father" is found in John 17:11, where Jesus prays for the unity of the faithful. In Mr. Moore's point of view this occurrence proves that the Catholics are idolaters because they use the same title for the human creature as Jesus used for God. Of course, that logic is faulty and opposed to The Bible. For in The Bible we find many occurrences of "holy grounds", "holy vestments", "holy places", "holy lands", etc. etc. The point is that God makes holy what He wishes to make holy. His Church is holy, and The Church's hierarchy is holy. What Mr. Moore and his fellow protestants expect; that the Catholics call their Church unholy, their hierarchy unholy etc.? If Mr. Moore expects not the hierarchy to be found in The Church, then he is diametrically opposed to Jesus, for Jesus undoubtedly talked about hierarchy in The Kingdom of Heaven. Yes, The Catholic Church is The Kingdom of Heaven on the Earth, and it is Holy because it is founded by The Holy, the father(s) of The Church are Holy because The Heavenly Father is Holy. If we, the human beings, are obliged to respect "the holy ground", and The Scripture does not lie, how much more we are obliged to respect the human beings whom God has put amongst us to lead us? Yes, every human creature, with the sole exception of The Most Holy Mother Mary, is sinful and inclined to do evil. But, it is not the creature which makes itself holy, it is God who makes it Holy…

As for "the chair of st. Peter" not found in The Bible, I would like to ask Mr. Moore and his fellow protestants would they accept "the chair of Moses", which IS found in The Bible? If they would, then why would they reject "the chair of Peter", because St. Peter is to The New Testament what Moses is to The Old Testament?

I pray and hope Mr. Moore and his fellow protestants to cease to be rebellious against The Catholic Church, to convert and return to the bosom of Holiness. There is no life without The Life, there is no holiness without The Holiness. If they keep to embrace the man-made "holiness", they will surely perish.

Dear Brothers, thank you once again…

Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia

Comment

Dear Brothers at MHFM,

Thank you for posting your second debate with David Moore… You both handled yourselves in a professional manner and stayed on topic for the majority of time (just as you did in your first debate). There was a lot of information covered over those 12 videos and I actually had to listen twice to digest it. Some key points I think Brother Peter demonstrated perfectly were: the primacy of Peter as chief of the Apostles, the authority of the early church (with Peter and his successors as the head), the connection between the keys of heaven and Isaiah 22, and the binding and loosing connected with papal infallibility… A re-occurring theme with Mr Moore's attack on the papacy starts with the phrases, "in my opinion...I can't believe, etc" A clear contrast to this is the historical and biblical support that Brother Peter gives. It's this contrast where we see the clear failures of the various Protestant sects, where the individual decides what he/she likes and doesn’t like, based on personal opinions and "what they feel."

It’s unfortunate that most Catholics are confused, and conditioned to be politically correct these days. It’s more important not to offend someone, rather than evangelizing with boldness and authority. How refreshing it is to see true Catholic positions being defended and preached by MHFM. It also speaks volume that Mr Moore himself admits to referring people to your website to find truth and answers. Please continue your great work in defending the faith...in these times MHFM is one of the few real defenders of Catholicism left.

- Ed

Comment

Subject: Response to Debate

Good Morning Brothers,

Your debate… on the papacy was very good and with hope this shall bring more people to True Church of Christ. I happened to be reading some of St. Augustine's work this morning, and I found something very interesting in regards to your debate which in the end boils down to interpretation.

St. Augustine, On Christian Doctrine- Book 2 Chapter 6:

But hasty and careless readers are led astray by many and manifold obscurities and ambiguities, substituting one meaning for another; and in some places they cannot hit upon even a fair interpretation. Some of the expressions are so obscure as to shroud the meaning in the thickest darkness. And I do not doubt that all this was divinely arranged for the purpose of subduing pride by toil, and of preventing a feeling of satiety in the intellect, which generally holds in small esteem what is discovered without difficulty.

May all who protest the True Faith for whatever reason be brought home to our Lord who waits on the prayers of the faithful. To Love God first (for his sake), and to love our neighbor (for his sake, and desire their salvation) is the whole moral of Holy Scripture.

Take care

Gary Craft

About the Debate

Subject: … About the Debate

Well, what can I say? The last 2 hours were really as enjoyable as instructive. And worth every minute spent listening to the last debate.

I have to say you two acted again like true gentlemen engaged in a high-level intellectual exchange. Despite the sad state of his soul, Mr. Moore deserves to be congratulated by his behavior during the exchange, since he never lost his temper. I´m loving the new flexible format you´ve been adopting recently.

I was actually surprised by the amount of points and information brought up during the discussion. For those who dare to say that Sedevacantists don´t know their stuff when it comes to the Papacy, Brother Peter sured proved them wrong. This was the best defense of the Papacy I´ve ever seen. And done using only the Written Word of God, no less.

As a Catholic, I felt immensely proud today, seeing how easily Brother Peter managed to quickly respond to all the objections he met during the course of the debate. May God keep him and Brother Michael on the fight and the straight and narrow path for many years till the consummation. It´s hard to find the exact words to describe the satisfaction given to the soul, seeing the Truth being presented and defended in such an effective way. My favorite part was when Mr. Moore argued that a matter so important as the Papacy ought to be taught in clearer terms in the Scriptures, and Brother Peter correctly pointed out that the most elementary truth of the Christian Faith, the Trinity, does not receive this treatment.

I don´t expect Mr. Moore to change his views overnight, but I hope and pray for his future conversion. Who knows? Someday he might be convinced by the facts.

You never know where this flexible format is going to take the discussion, and that´s probably the best thing about it. You have covered a wide range of topics in 2 hours. And to every question and objection, you had in advance an answer prepared. You really came in prepared. Seeing all the objections being systematically destroyed was very satisfying indeed. When Brother Peter enters the battlefield, he´s sure that victory is certain.

All in all, this debate was spectacular. In many ways, even greater than the previous one dealing with FaithAlone/EternalSecurity. The only problem is having to open 12 different videos. If this is related to bandwidth issue, you could use a system that freely storages mp3 files online.

May God continue to Bless You.

MHFM: Thanks for the comments. We feel that it’s a very important and interesting debate. We hope that people listen to it and stick with it, even though the first part and a half might not be as interesting for most. We’re definitely not saying that people shouldn’t listen to the first two parts; for some very important points, which lay the groundwork, are covered. But it really starts to get going and into the different issues in the second half of Part 2 and then in Part 3 and the following parts. Some of the discussions of St. Paul and whether he recognized Papal authority are very important because Protestants think those issues represent devastating blows to Catholic teaching.

Debates

Hi Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,

In all these debates with Protestants it is becoming increasingly clear that their ability to grasp the simple truths stems from the fact of their need to understand first and believe second.

Catholics do not have that problem, for as St. Augustine points out in his Sermones, 43:7:9 "Credo ut intelligam"- I believe in order that I may understand. That is, faith is the absolute standard for all rational thought. Not the other way round as Protestants would have it.

St. Anslem also alludes to this maxim,"Fides quaerens intellectum"- Faith seeking understanding.

The debate was really getting interesting, up until 8/12 and 11/12, where an error occurred and was unable to watch... a temporary glitch!... now working o.k....

God bless,

David

Debate

Dear Brothers:

Thanks for the newest debate. Thanks for being there every time my soul needs a little nourishment!

JP2 the “great”

Subject: John Paul the Great

Dear MHFM

It will be a real abomination when they “canonize” anti-pope john paul 2, I have heard that they will even institute a special feast for him and prayers for him in an new missal , the future reform of the reform. this man was an evil antichrist. we should pray that everyone will become a sedevacantist after this happens. and I believe it will happen next year 2010. this whole thing makes me sick!!! and angry!. God bless!

MARK CA

“Material Heretics”

Subject: material heretics are mistaken Catholics

Dear Brothers,

Thank you for the precise explanation of the fact that a "material heretic" is actually just a mistaken Catholic, and not a heretic in any way whatsoever. I don't know where the term originated, but I do know that the schismatical SSPX love to use the term in an attempt to "justify" their disobedience to Vatican II and the Vatican II hierarchy, but most especially to create the illusion that Benedict XVI and the last four Antipopes needn't be obeyed, even if they are true popes (which they are not, of course!!!) because they are still "Catholics" (not!). Also, it seems to me that their use of the term is probably used in an attempt to "justify" their Baptism of desire (and blood) apostasy, i.e. That anyone can be saved, as long as they have enough "human respect"!!!

God Bless,

Chris White

Survivor

Jesus and Maria!

I am happy you have the fighting spirit, defensor fidei. It refreshes me, even though this conflict is difficult to enjoin, the whole world refusing to discuss the main issues honestly, even to discuss at all…

I am a bit of a survivor of the present disorder. I converted in 1996, was fooled by phony traditionalists. Was disgusted by the new crowd. Was scandalized by the 'pope.' Am a great devotee of Fatima, visiting, seeing with my own eyes the fake lucy, although I did not even imagine a thing like that at the time. It is all so sad, all those lost vocations, all that lost devotion, lost masses for the suffering souls, lost family life, lost saints....were it not for the mercy of God finding a stubborn [person] like myself, who does not want to defect, despite no end of scandal and aggravation not to, I would be shaking hands, aborting, going to my Sunday obligation two hours before dawn on the 'sabbath' of the jews...

Jim T

San Francisco

Glad

I have found, by chance, your web site in which you set out the problems w/ the new Mass since Vatican II. I have suffered greatly and grievously since I became aware, which was not until 1999, what had happened to my church. Here, lately, since last year, I thought that a young priest had helped me get back to the church, but attending this church, which is somewhat better than some others, is causing great pain for me, because there is blasphemy and irreverence, no piety and no respect for the Eucharist.

Now that I read your articles, I can see that most likely there is no Jesus at the altar as well, since the priests there, especially the pastor, (who is singularly "modern") may not be validly ordained…. My formative years were spent in a convent in Germany, and this teaching is ingrained in me and I have constantly complained about the wrong doings and the irreverence, the indifference to the Eucharist, the noise during the mass and all in all the atmosphere of a social gathering, rather than the sacrifice of calvary.

I am so glad that there are others who also feel terrified and saddened by these events. I thought that I was the only one. One thing I knew, however, this was not a true catholic church…

Thanks for your help.

Ursula H. King

MHFM: Yes, thank you for the interest. We think that you do realize (or are coming to realize) that one must not attend the New Mass at all.

Problem

Hi,

I'm new to your web site, so please pardon me if you have answered this before. My question is… what do you think of the next revision of the missal by Benedict XVI. This missal would apparently include some parts of the Tridentine like a hybrid mass. Will this solve the missal problem you raised?

Regards

Sanjiv

MHFM: Thanks for the interest. The answer is no. That's because it's still a Protestant service. It's still missing words from the consecration. And most of the "priests" are invalid.

Formal Heretic

May I suggest, in response to the recent inquiry about types of heretics, more precise descriptors: A “material heretic” is one who manifests (or holds even privately) a heresy. He may or may not hold it in good faith. We don’t yet know.

An “obstinate heretic” is one who has been shown the correct position of the Church, yet refuses to accept it. He is then definitely outside of the Church. This is the status of the Vatican II hierarchy, as it is impossible to believe, based on their levels of education; that they hold to a heresy in innocent ignorance. Ipso facto excommunication applies. However they are not “formal” heretics, because they are not adjudicated. Of course the only “heresy” the Vatican II sect will adjudicate anyone for is holocaust denial.

Bill

MHFM: You assert that one is not a “formal” heretic until he is adjudicated. That’s wrong. You also imply that a “material heretic” could be obstinate and in bad faith. That is also wrong. If the person you describe were in fact obstinate, he would be a true (and thus a formal) heretic.

As we explained before – and the descriptions were precise and accurate – it’s very simple. In the dogmatic teaching of the Church, there are two categories: 1) Catholics and 2) heretics. There isn’t a third or a fourth category. There’s no such thing as a “material” or a “formal” heretic. Again, there is no such thing. There are the Catholics and there are the heretics. The heretical side is therefore the “formally” heretical side. The Catholic side is therefore the “formally” Catholic side. One can be on the side of the Catholics or on the side of the heretics. The Church doesn’t make the distinction between the Catholic side and the (formally) heretical side based upon a declaration. It does so based upon whether one is guilty of the sin of heresy.

Pope Pius XII, Mystici Corporis Christi (# 23), June 29, 1943: “For not every sin, however grave it may be, is such as of its own nature to sever a man from the Body of the Church, as does schism or heresy or apostasy.”

All actual heretics (i.e., all who are guilty of the sin of heresy) are therefore on the side of the (formal) heretics. That’s true whether or not they have been declared. They have been truly separated from the Church by the actual sin of heresy. They have been placed on the side of the heretics and removed from the side of the Catholics.

The so-called “material heretic” is not guilty of the sin of heresy. He remains therefore on the “formally” Catholic side. That’s because he’s holding a position which conflicts with Catholic teaching but not in an obstinate way. Therefore, he has not separated himself from the Church or been put on the side of the (formal) heretics by automatic excommunication for the sin of heresy.

The apostate bishops of the Vatican II sect are true (and thus “formal”) heretics, even though undeclared. Protestants who reject and attack the Catholic Church are true (and thus “formal”) heretics, even though they have not been declared. According to your position, Protestants who reject and attack the Catholic faith are not formal heretics. That’s not true of course. You are thinking of declared and undeclared heretics and confusing it with material and formal.

On Abuse “study”

Nothing these guys come out with should surprise us anymore, but to paraphrase the obscure yet grammatically challenged James Heberley, it just keeps getting worser and worser. A quote from the article you linked regarding the $1.8 million study:

"Even though there was sexual abuse of many boys, that doesn't necessarily mean that the person had a homosexual identity".

Apparently $1.8 million doesn’t buy what it used to. How can any sane person reach such a conclusion? I guess one has to be some kind of an “expert”. Any normal man will tell you (especially if he doesn’t carry the scars of a college education), as will any woman who knows a normal man; that to a normal man the thought of any sort of intimate contact with another man is disgusting… The very thought of such a thing is repugnant. It is incomprehensible.

That aside, doesn’t the mere fact of having relations with one of the same sex make you “homosexual”? If not, what does the term mean? How can these guys put such nonsense forward without dying from shame?...

Bill Mulligan

Comment

Hi Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,

So the steps towards Antipope John Paul II's Beatification are complete...Consider this then.

The man who enforced the edicts of the apostate, non- Catholic Vatican II Council ( 1962-195), forbidding any nation to declare that Catholicism was its state religion, thus going counter to the statements of Pope Pius IX's Syllabus, that the notion of separation of church and state was a condemned idea.

And, as a result of this action, Catholicism was abrogated in 1984 ( interesting date), by the very person the Vatican II sect, the church of Satan, wishes to make a saint!

We are now witnessing the fruits of this very action, by the very people who laid the groundwork for the recent declaration that all crucifixes be removed from Italian classrooms , the very men who formulated this diabolic council, Antipopes JPII and Benedict XVI. The European Union Court of Human Rights has declared that crucifixes thus displayed are unconstitutional.

To top it off, the present encumbant to the usurped throne of St. Peter, has just recently praised this socialistic, atheistic supranational organization in his encyclical of September, 2009, Caritas Veritatis!

Now that is ironic!

How much more proof do people need to prove that the Vatican II sect is not Catholic!

God Bless

David

A true racist wacko

"1 Cor. 7:39- “A woman is bound by the law as long as her husband liveth; but if her husband die, she is at liberty: let her marry to whom she will; only in the Lord.”"

Your response was just plain redicelous. By your logic I suppose she is free to marry her father or brother too??? If you ignore the ideology in the rest of the Bible then this statement is an endorsement of marriage to anyone or anything according to you.

Owned. He does say “only in the Lord” and the Lord is Jesus Christ who said he was not sent to anyone other than Israel. He forbade the conversion of Gentiles and refused to perform miracles for them when they asked him. And let me tell you another thing MHFM. You are ignoring the most basic thing in Christianity which is the preservation of Israel. The Bible does teach that all humans are descended from adam and eve

BUT IT ALSO TEACHES THAT ONLY ISRAEL IS HUMAN AND FROM ADAM AND EVE AND ALL OTHER PEOPLES ARE DESCENDED FROM THE PRE-ADAMITE PEOPLE

( CHEY ERETZ ) ( Genisis)

“For if you were to take it to its logical conclusion, you would have to say that not only shouldn’t black or Asian marry white, but also that Canadians shouldn’t marry the French, and the Irish shouldn’t marry the Spanish, and the Italians shouldn’t marry the Dutch, etc.”

Your comparisons are not comparing like with like AND YOU KNOW IT. Those nations are white and I was talking about non whites marrying whites, which is abomination by definition.

“Nay, you would logically have to hold that dark-haired people shouldn’t marry blond-haired people, and that red-haired people shouldn’t marry brown-haired people. For if not, where and by what measure do you draw the line?”

People are naturally attracted to those with similar genes and this will result in the same kinds of people sticking together ( Sirach explains this ) You are pretending that diversity amongst white people justifies the same extreme miscegenation of white with black. Its absolutely shocking behavior from your monestary! This reaks of marxism.

“It’s non-Catholic nonsense.” EXCUSE ME????

“It’s rooted in selfish pride” Ever looked in the moral mirror lately MHFM?? “and tends toward a rejection of the universality of Christ’s Church and the dogmatic truth that all men are from Adam and Eve.”

The bible states that only Israelites can be “men”. My quote was much better than yours. “I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of ISRAEL” – GOD

MHFM: Yes, it’s utterly stupid. We will post some more points which show that their racist position is neither biblical nor Christian.

Is that so? God is “utterly stupid and un-Christian”!?!?

& Im “utterly stupid” but yet I can debate without childish insults UNLIKE MHFM. The preservation of Israel is absolutely fundamental to Christianity and the Bible. If you don’t know this, you don’t know what Christianity is at all. I suppose you have to close your eyes when you read something in the bible that doesn’t fit your modernist ideology.

I feel sorry for you – yet I shall attempt to save your soul wether you like it or not. Wether you admit it or not – I have the right to stick with my own kind and I am following my heart when I do so. I don’t find non whites attractive – theyre ugly and repulsive and that’s being honest, and I will never ever entertain associations with them because they threaten Holy Israel. They are nothing but parasites upon our Godly civilization, they dress like whites and speak our language but we all know that once you take a break from the television and live in real life for a change that theyre not equal – not even close and they all behave as is in our nature.

The Bible advocates our separation so that our race and culture may exist in the future.

“Holy” translates as “SEPORATE”. You will get consistently owned by me when I notice you until you repent.

James Heapes, Dublin, Ireland

MHFM: We will quickly respond to your sick, racist e-mail. Perhaps you should learn how to spell the word “ridiculous.” What we find most amazing about your e-mail is not your darkened, warped and hellish belief-system. It’s the fact that you actually think you are a Catholic and/or Christian. If we are not mistaken, you do claim to be a traditional Catholic, right? You hold that non-Jews aren’t human. That’s apostasy. No matter how you might attempt to play word games, you embrace the condemned heresy of Polygenism. (As weak as Pius XII was on some of these related points, he correctly reiterated that such an idea is condemned by the Church.)

Pope Pius XII, Humani Generis #37, Aug. 12, 1950: “When, however, there is question of another conjectural opinion, namely polygenism, the children of the Church by no means enjoy such liberty. For the faithful cannot embrace that opinion which maintains that either after Adam there existed on this earth true men who did not take their origin through natural generation from him as from the first parent of all, or that Adam represents a certain number of first parents.”

You are condemned by all the papal documents which were cited in our recent video, which denounce distinctions based on race or stock. Here are just a few:

Pope Leo XIII, on the abolition of slavery (#4), May 5, 1888: “From the first sin came all evils, and specially this perversity that there were men who, forgetful of the original brotherhood of the race, instead of seeking, as they should naturally have done, to promote mutual kindness and mutual respect, following their evil desires began to think of other men as their inferiors, and to hold them as cattle born for the yoke. In this way, through an absolute forgetfulness of our common nature, and of human dignity, and the likeness of God stamped upon us all, it came to pass…”

Pope Leo XIII, on the abolition of slavery, May 5, 1888: “Nor did they hesitate to assert that the slave class was very inferior to the freemen both in intelligence and perfection of bodily development, and therefore that slaves, as things wanting in reason and sense, ought in all things to be the instruments of the will, however rash and unworthy, of their masters. Such inhuman and wicked doctrines are to be specially detested…”

Pope Pius XI, Ecclesiam Dei (#22), Nov. 12, 1923: “… God who ‘is not a respecter of persons’ (Acts x, 34) and who ‘puts no difference between us and them.’ (Acts xv, 9) In such a union, all nations, no matter what their race, their language, or their liturgy, will enjoy the selfsame rights…”

Pope Pius XI, Rerum Ecclesiae (#26), Feb. 28, 1926: “Anyone who looks upon these natives as members of an inferior race or as men of low mentality makes a grievous mistake.”

Your beliefs are so obviously false and opposed to the Scriptures that they are not worthy of being addressed in much detail. Contrary to your claim, Christ didn’t just say to spread the Gospel to Jews. He said to preach it to every creature (Mark 16:15; Mt. 28:19). This of course included the Gentiles. Prior to His Resurrection, it was more confined to the Jews. That’s because before His Resurrection the prophecies concerning Him were not fully completed, and the fullness of His doctrine was not yet delivered to His Apostles. Your hellish belief-system would have to consider St. Peter, St. Paul and the other apostles as non-Christians for converting Gentiles. You are the epitome of a blind demonic racist, and you are headed straight to Hell.

If we recall correctly, are you not a so-called convert from Judaism? If so, then your problem is – exactly as we have pointed out with others – that you worship yourself and your Jewishness. You can’t get over it. You are disgusting. That also explains why, if we recall correctly, you have sent us numerous e-mails which express your confused and often disheartened state of soul. Considering your demonic beliefs, it’s not a surprise that you have serious spiritual problems. Jesus Christ will cast you right into the fire of Hell. You claim to be His while totally perverting, for your own self-worshipping interests, the whole content of His message. Every scripture you cite is misunderstood.

Concerning 1 Cor. 7:39, you say that our argument would allow a woman to marry her father or brother. No, you are wrong because the Church and the Bible (see Leviticus 18) explicitly condemned marriage within certain degrees of kindred. This was perennially repeated in authoritative papal pronouncements. See, for example, the Council of Trent’s canons on marriage (and many other papal statements) which had their root in the clear biblical prohibition. On the other hand, your man-made racist doctrine is not found in the Bible or in any papal pronouncement. Therefore, your argument falls completely to the ground. You are an apostate and not remotely a believer in Jesus Christ or the Bible.

Again, it is truly remarkable that you could dismiss, ignore and reject the whole message of the Bible and countless Scriptures (see just one below), which contradict your sick beliefs: that non-Jews and non-whites are not humans. You have convinced yourself of this nonsense solely to gratify your idolatrous desire to worship yourself. Your selfishness is immense. It merits a place alongside the demons. To serve it, you have created a false version of the Gospel.

Galatians 3:26-29- “For you are all the children of God by faith, in Christ Jesus. For as many of you as have been baptized in Christ, have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek: there is neither bond nor free: there is neither male nor female. For you are all one in Christ Jesus. And if you be Christ's, then you are the seed of Abraham, heirs according to the promise.”

Formal heretic

Thanks for the reply! but what about Formal Heretic?

Alberto

MHFM: A formal heretic is simply a heretic: someone who knows about a Catholic dogma and obstinately persists in a position contrary to it.

Discernment

Hi Brothers,

Could you give me what the church teaches on St. Luke chapter 12 verses 51 to 53. I understand this to be those who hold the truth faith to those that don't even like those in my family. Thank you in advance. Todd

Luke 12:51-53- “Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation. For there shall be from henceforth five in one house divided: three against two, and two against three. The father shall be divided against the son, and the son against his father, the mother against the daughter, and the daughter against the mother, the mother in law against her daughter in law, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.”

MHFM: It means that there will almost always be people in your house or in your family who will be of bad will. They will represent an obstacle to your salvation and the attempt to do God’s will. It also means that in order to be saved people must oppose, separate, ignore or offend such individuals when necessary. Those who do not do so when it’s required, but rather let their family members take them from the path to God, will be lost. Sadly, that’s the case with many people.

Many people waste too much time worrying about and getting involved in what bad-willed family members are doing and their problems. Instead of separating from them and not getting entangled in their lives – a course of action which will certainly offend those family members – so many do entangle themselves and attempt to “help out.” They do so either because of human respect or under the cover of concern for that person. Since these are people who reject the truth anyway, one should let them handle their own situations. By getting involved instead of putting their hands to plough and not looking back, they often fail to accomplish what God desired for them.

Question

… I have been ministered to by your site, which has the earmark of much devotion and service to all: thank you for your devoted lives, the time and effort you have sown for the salvation, illumination and ministry of others.

I have some sincere questions concerning the Virgin Mother and, until I found you site, was not inclined to ask a "modern" Catholic about it because there is so much mixture, as your site displays. Being a devoted Biblical student, I am asking for direction and illumination from the scripture on the following attributes of the Virgin Mother that I have been unable to discover: Her virgin birth/immaculate conception; her sinlessness; and, where in the Bible we are directed to pray to her instead of Jesus. If there is a booklet or book you can recommend or, if you can answer my questions personally, I would be grateful for any guidance you can offer.

Thank you for your time, assistance and consideration,

gigi veguilla

MHFM: Thanks for the interest. Your questions are covered in our book: The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church. That's what we'd recommend, along with our other books.

Comment

Dear Brothers,

That article on the V-2 propaganda "study" is shocking. Everyone knows the abusers are gay, but the more they try to hide it, then the more they make themselves look stupid! Also, it adds more influence to the misconception that celibacy is unnatural, as though the fact that human beings are born and live predominantly single is "unnatural"!!!...

The article on JPII's fast-track to "sainthood" does not surprise me. After all, if they waited even just a little bit longer, someone would probably start asking some awkward questions, like, "didn't he have a girlfriend," or "wasn't he the biggest heretic of all time and thus an Antipope? …

God Bless,

Chris White

Debate

MHFM: We recently engaged in a debate which some of our readers might find interesting. It will be posted soon.

“Wrong”

I looked thru your website and it is very nice except it has a few problems. You guys are very wrong on your sedevacantist position and no salvation for all those outside the Catholic church thru no fault of their own. May God help you get out of your errors. Pride may be what is blinding you.

MHFM: Sorry, the Catholic Church does NOT teach that there are exceptions to Outside the Church There is No Salvation. Your statement is heretical. The dogmatic definitions not only don’t make any exceptions, but they positively exclude all exceptions. They use all exclusive language in every case, positively eliminating all exceptions: “nobody,” “every human creature,” “none,” etc. Your position is simply a rejection of Catholic dogma.

Pope Boniface VIII, Unam Sanctam, Nov. 18, 1302, ex cathedra:

“With Faith urging us we are forced to believe and to hold the one, holy, Catholic Church and that, apostolic, and we firmly believe and simply confess this Church outside of which there is no salvation nor remission of sin… Furthermore, we declare, say, define, and proclaim to every human creature that they by absolute necessity for salvation are entirely subject to the Roman Pontiff.”

Pope Clement V, Council of Vienne, Decree # 30, 1311-1312, ex cathedra:” Since however there is for both regulars and seculars, for superiors and subjects, for exempt and non-exempt, one universal Church, outside of which there is no salvation, for all of whom there is one Lord, one faith, and one baptism…”

Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, Sess. 8, Nov. 22, 1439:

“Whoever wishes to be saved, needs above all to hold the Catholic faith; unless each one preserves this whole and inviolate, he will without a doubt perish in eternity.”

Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, “Cantate Domino,” 1441, ex cathedra:

“The Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that all those who are outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans but also Jews or heretics and schismatics, cannot share in eternal life and will go into the everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels, unless they are joined to the Church before the end of their lives; that the unity of this ecclesiastical body is of such importance that only for those who abide in it do the Church’s sacraments contribute to salvation and do fasts, almsgiving and other works of piety and practices of the Christian militia produce eternal rewards; and that nobody can be saved, no matter how much he has given away in alms and even if he has shed blood in the name of Christ, unless he has persevered in the bosom and unity of the Catholic Church.”

Pope Leo X, Fifth Lateran Council, Session 11, Dec. 19, 1516, ex cathedra: “For, regulars and seculars, prelates and subjects, exempt and non-exempt, belong to the one universal Church, outside of which no one at all is saved, and they all have one Lord and one faith.”

Pope Pius IV, Council of Trent, Iniunctum nobis, Nov. 13, 1565, ex cathedra: “This true Catholic faith, outside of which no one can be saved… I now profess and truly hold…”

Pope Benedict XIV, Nuper ad nos, March 16, 1743, Profession of Faith: “This faith of the Catholic Church, without which no one can be saved, and which of my own accord I now profess and truly hold…”

Pope Pius IX, Vatican Council I, Session 2, Profession of Faith, 1870, ex cathedra: “This true Catholic faith, outside of which none can be saved, which I now freely profess and truly hold…”

As far as the sedevacantist position goes, you are quite mistaken about that as well. The Vatican II “popes” are without any doubt heretics, and the Church teaches that heretics are not popes.

Mass query

Subject: true Mass

Good day Brothers,

I am writing because my husband and I have read your books, watched your DVD's and see the darkness of V-2. Our eyes have been open and we are praying a 54 day novena for God's guidance in our new awareness in regards to our Catholic faith. We have called your Monastery four times looking for answers to churches where we can go to attend the true Mass and receive the true sacraments. We have been turned away each and every time telling us to do even more research. I understand the need for protection of such Holy information, but at the same time it should be your number one interest to save souls. You state at the end of your What Really Happened to the Catholic Church after Vatican 2 for us to call and we will be told where we can go to attend the true Mass. We feel it shouldn't be so secretive once we have done the research and come into awareness. You do as you feel is right and we will respect that, but please let us know what more to do so we can receive the answers to our questions. Thank you for all your work in spreading God's true word. God Bless!!

ew

MHFM: First of all, we object to your statement. Our whole work is for the salvation of souls. To imply the contrary is false and insulting. You have obviously benefitted from the work which was put together for the salvation of souls. We couldn’t give you a location because you were unfamiliar with, and/or unconvinced about, the invalidity of the New Rite of Ordination and the “priests” ordained in it. We cannot give a location to someone unless that person agrees on all core issues of the faith, as well as key issues in our day. One can’t just find traditional sacraments. In order to receive sacraments with benefit, one must agree to: not attending the New Mass ever again for any reason; a complete rejection of the Vatican II sect; a belief in the salvation dogma without exceptions, including the absolute necessity of water baptism and no “baptism of desire” or “invincible ignorance”; a rejection of NFP; an acknowledgment and agreement that he or she will not support any of the heretical priests who offend on any of these key points.

The person with whom you spoke also said that you protested, in confident/arrogant fashion, that you were basically familiar with the whole website. Yet you weren’t familiar with the New Rite of Ordination issue. So obviously you aren’t very familiar with the material yet. The New Rite of Ordination is a key issue – one that’s covered somewhat prominently in our material. It’s a key issue because if one isn’t aware of that information, he might be receiving invalid sacraments. He might also fail to re-confess mortal sins that were confessed to “priests” ordained in said invalid rite. So obviously it’s a big deal.

It’s not that the whole thing is extremely complicated or difficult. The point is that generally people don’t have the interest level in the faith which they need to have. They just want a traditional Mass location. They want to have their Mass and move on. Many of them are not even committed to a rejection of the New Mass. In other words, they would go back to it if they didn’t have another option. So obviously we cannot and will not give any locations to such individuals until they are fully convinced. One of the biggest problems today is “Mass alone” Catholics. That’s why, for most people, it’s all about finding a Mass – not about what a true Catholic must believe. They have a great interest in the Mass issue and where to go to Mass…. oh yeah, that’s pretty much all they are concerned about. Their interest in the critical issues of faith is minimal. That’s precisely the problem we have today.

Since you weren’t in full agreement yet, we could not provide you with a specific location for where to receive valid sacraments. That would be the case with anyone else who was not in full agreement. We’re glad that you have some interest, and we hope that you will be fully convinced sometime soon.

B.O.D.

Dear MHFM,

What's amazing about the fantasy of 'baptism of desire and blood,' is that Satan who masquerades as the light of God tricks mankind so eloquently with priests posing as holy men of God, and how Satan effectively uses these human tools for destruction of men, year in and year out as he has along, but since his council, Vatican II, the speed of apostasy-mega fasttrack bad fruit. When Jesus Christ commanded His apostles to go throughout the world and teach and baptize, it's really a given that the apostles possessed supernatural skills to communicate the faith and instruct mankind which is what they did, and then given free will each man chose whether to be baptized into the faith or not. The early Church strictly demanded and forbade entrance into the Church by the physical act of baptism unless each was instructed properly through knowledge about the faith. That had to happen first, and then as God directed, the act of baptism took place.

Because of this gift of free will given to man by God, and God knows all things, the act of baptism becomes necessary to enter into the kingdom. As we all know there is only one entrance into the kingdom. There is no other way in. Those who refuse baptism, or those who didn't receive baptism while being instructed in the faith, and died before actually being baptized, God searched their hearts and found them not worthy of his kingdom. In man's finite way of thinking, God's actions aren't good enough for man, and much to harsh, and so, out of disobedience to God, through Satan's prodding, man devises an appealing, feel good, method of allowing easy entrance into the Holy Church through this fallacious belief in desire and blood, which in God's eyes are evil acts willingly accepted by man. "Most men are damned and going to Hell," Jacinta stated to Lucia. And so, today, millions of souls take the wide path to Hell, as opposed to the narrow, seemingly difficult, road to Heaven, accepting by the millions and millions this false belief in baptism of desire and blood as a form of mercy on mankind by a Loving God. Diabolical! As St. Augustine stated (paraphasing), "...take the literal interpretation, always." ...as it is written..."…. God Bless always!

Material Heretic

To whom it may concern:

Is there such a thing as material heretic and formal heretic? Or is this a modenist view? Is there an Ecumenical Council and or Ex Cathedra pronouncements about this?

Thanks!

Alberto

MHFM: There’s no such thing as a material heretic in the dogmatic teaching of the Church. There are heretics; there are schismatics; and there are Catholics. Material heretic is simply a name for a Catholic who is erring in good faith about a dogma. In other words, it’s another name for a mistaken Catholic. It’s a person who is holding a false position – one that is strictly incompatible with Catholic dogma. However, that person is not obstinate against that dogma. He would change his position immediately upon being informed of the true position. The “material heretic” is a Catholic.

That’s important to understand. For it really drives home the absurdity of the position that Benedict XVI is only a “material heretic.” It would mean that he’s just a mistaken Catholic, which is absurd, ridiculous and in fact impossible.

Wonder

Dear Brothers,

I just wonder how you can say that current pope, mass, .... is not valid. The Pope was elected by the Bishops per the teachings of the Holy Roman Catholic Church. You get to live by the word of past Popes and teaching of the Church, you get to live with the results of Dogma that is taught. Happy living with the results of not a strict biblical interpretation? People like yourselves make me sad. You have an answers for everything but you don't have love of Christ. I am so glad that I have read the scriptures and made up my own mind on what scripture says. Christ has died for our sins, communion is for all, women should be priest, Lay people can run the church, Christ did not even want ordained priest as we know it today. You teach "men's traditions as God Truth" . Jesus would find you a bunch of "scribes" and will toss you out of the church. Why don't you seek the truth of God and Get OVER ALL YOUR Legalisms. You teach like the very scribes that Jesus despised. Jesus wanted mercy and justice. Not formalism and legal counting of sin. You are blind to you holier than thou righteous attitudes.

Saved by Faith, proven by acts of faith, and Loved by God even if I sin. God has done it all, not by our actions are we saved so how can we lose our salvation by actions. It is a free gift. Faith proven by actions shows that we are saved. Action with out faith proves nothing. Move into the true spirit of Jesus. Read Cor. 13 and start to love Jesus and get rid of all the "Catholic" junk. Move to the Spirit of truth. You hard hearts are full of your self-righteousness.

Jeff Hvass

MHFM: You wonder? We wonder how you could wonder? It’s covered in detail in the material. You mention Catholic dogma. Did you look at the material we have? We show that Catholic dogma teaches that a heretic can’t be the pope. That’s the teaching of the popes themselves. It is rooted in the Catholic dogma that heretics are not inside the Church. It’s rooted in the dogma that heretics cannot rule in the Church, and that Catholics are not in communion with heretics.

Benedict XVI (The Heresies of Benedict XVI File) [link to section] –

The Catholic Teaching that a heretic cannot be a valid pope and loses the papal office automatically [PDF file]

However, based on the second half of your e-mail, it’s obvious that you don’t believe in any aspect of Catholic teaching whatsoever. So the evidence from Catholic teaching won’t persuade you in the slightest way. You accept the heretical idea of women “priests,” faith alone, and utter modernism. As you indicated in your e-mail, you want to be able to sin without consequences. You reject all of what Christ taught. Christ said most men are condemned (Mt. 7:13). The Bible condemns preaching a new Gospel (Gal. 1:8), which you do. It says that those who fail in one point are guilty of all. Your “accept-everything-in-love” modernism is apostasy and blasphemy. It’s condemned by Christ and the Bible, of course.

James 1:10-11- “And whosoever shall keep the whole law, but offend in one point, is become guilty of all. For he that said, Thou shalt not commit adultery, said also, Thou shalt not kill. Now if thou do not commit adultery, but shalt kill, thou art become a transgressor of the law.”

Pet

Dear Brothers in Christ,

I thought I read some time ago that it was sinful to care for a pet through extraordinary means. For example, if my dog gets cancer I shouldn't pay thousands of dollars to try to treat him. Is this true? Should he get a disease in the coming years should I just put him to sleep?

John Settimo

MHFM: In our opinion, if the animal is going to die within a few months anyway, then you shouldn't do it. You could get another pet that's residing in a cage in an SPCA or somewhere else. They would love to have an owner.

However, if the operation will allow the pet to live for a year or years longer, then we believe you may pay to have it.

“Fr. C”

Subject: Comment on your video: Fr. John Corapi Exposed - 1

You are heretic for being critical of this good man. Examine your own conscience.

MHFM: So, we’ve denied your “dogma” of human respect, phony Catholicism, and not exposing the false teachers who give you a warm spiritual feeling. We’re running out of ways to describe your bad will. Real Catholic truth – you don’t care one bit about it. You will almost certainly remain in your fog until your death, and it will probably only be lifted before the Judgment Seat of Christ. But then it will be too late. You will be condemned to Hell.

Does it even penetrate you that he believes that Muslims, Jews and Protestants can be saved? Are you alive? He accepts false ecumenism, which has been condemned as apostasy by the Catholic Church. No, you don’t care about that at all because you are not a Catholic. The facts that were covered don’t matter to you. All that matters to you is that someone you like has been insulted.

Found

Dear Brothers,

I can't tell you how much you and your ministry have spoken to me. Your recent video on sadness was like a confirmation from God that you are doing his work. I was raised Episcopalian, and after I was left adrift in the wake of the "episcopalypse", I was happy to remain a Protestant. After all, they had the Bible on their side! Then I found your website. I found you videos on Vatican II to be fascinating, but when I saw the section "Refuting Protestantism", I scoffed. Canon law might work for disputing Catholicism, but you couldn't use sola scriptura! Your articles were such a shock to me! They made so much SENSE! They took all of the "problem verses" I had struggled with, and they explained them! And using my trust KJV, no less! My faith was completely re-directed.

I am still praying and studying about what I should do, and trying to find a church in my area I can go to. (I mean, this is my immortal soul here! I don't want to go damning it to hell on accident!) But if it wasn't for your site, I would never have even considered the issues you pointed out! I'd be incredibly ignorant! "Was blind but now I see", I guess. ;) I'm sorry this letter was so long, but I just wanted to tell you what a blessing your site has been. By the Grace of our Lord Jesus Christ,

Scotty

New Video

Billboard

Hi MHFM,

In Rochester, NY a billboard comment. On the corner of Main Street and Alexander St there is a full size billboard that shows 2… men dressed in a full Priests attire. White collar and all.It READS "_ WE ARE GAY THATS WHY WE PRAY "_Come join us for service and I can't look at it much more.The address is a LBGT/Pride something or other.

Then the next week I noticed a similar one in Saint Paul St and Driving Park Rd. Heaven Help Us

GOD Bless MHFM

Anthony

Interesting

Very interesting indeed

I never knew such a Catholic church existed. From your website i see you honour Padre Pio but he would have participated in the Vatican 2 church.

I was an Irish Catholic for 28yrs until 4yrs ago while photographing the West Bank. I meet two Christians in Jerusalem who tell me about Jesus in a way i never heard from a priest. Long story short i was born again and received the Holy Spirit. I noticed the change within me in an instant.

The true church of Christ is believers coming together to worship in Spirit and Truth.

Regards,

David

MHFM: Thanks for the interest, but you need to look at the information on our site which deals with the biblical proof for Catholicism. Christ founded a Church upon St. Peter. The views you have about being born again and what constitutes the Church of Christ are neither historical nor biblical.

Priest

Dear Brother Dimond,

I was looking for a validly ordained priest for the sacrament of Penance when I called Most Holy Family Monastery in 2008. I talked to Brother Michael about possibly going to Fr. Zapp of Blessed Sacrament Church in Martinez, CA. We talked about the importance of asking the priest what he believes before receiving sacraments from him.

I typed a letter about the Church's teaching on Salvation and handed it to one of the altar servers at… church. I asked him to give it to Fr. Zapp.

Later on I did talk to Fr. Zapp. I asked him if he had read my letter. He said, "Yes." I said, "Do you believe the Church teaches no salvation without water baptism?" He said, "No," and claimed that the Council of Trent teaches baptism of desire. He also cited the example of St. Emerentiana. He said the circumstances surrounding the death of this martyr saint prove that the Church does not teach absolutely no salvation without water baptism.

I told him that I believe in absolutely no salvation without water baptism. I indicated to him that I would not be going to him for the sacraments. He said I would be falling into mortal sin by refusing to attend his mass because of the issue with the Salvation dogma.

I remembered that Brother Peter's Salvation book has specific sections on both the Council of Trent and St. Emerentiana. Unfortunately, I did not have this book with me at the time. I did remember enough of the material, however, to realize that I needed to leave. Both of these detailed sections were extremely helpful in preparing me to handle arguments that baptism of desire advocates bring forth.

Thank you, Brother Peter.

Sincerely,
TD

MHFM: Yes, he’s an example of a heretic who should be avoided. Thanks for the interest. If you had asked him about souls being saved in false religions, he would he shown his total apostasy. As such, all they can do is repeat the same, tired, already-refuted arguments and distortions.

Sede priest

Dear Brothers Dimond,

Thank you for the work that you do.

We just want to let your readers know that there is now a sedevacantist priest in the Philippines…

I hope you help us publish this so the sedevacantists from the Philippines (though very, very few in number) may have the chance to attend the truly Traditional Mass offered by a truly Catholic priest not in union with BXVI and the Conciliar church.

Thank you very much, and let us keep one another in mutual prayers and support.

Sincerely,

Manila faithful, Philippines

MHFM: Thanks for the interest, but the fact that he’s a sedevacantist isn’t good enough. He must also reject baptism of desire and Natural Family Planning. You will almost certainly discover that he accepts baptism of desire and is a heretic. Depending upon what he believes and/or how imposing or notorious he is, you might be able to receive sacraments from him; but one couldn't support him. And it could be the case that you shouldn’t go to him for the sacraments at all. It depends. Sadly, most of the sedevacantist priests today are almost as bad as Benedict XVI: they believe that souls can be saved in any religion.

Croatian pres

To MHFM,

The president of formerly Catholic Croatia S.M. (that is the self-professed communist iconoclast-knucklehead who wants to remove the crucifixes from all public places in my country) had a fairly cordial meeting with antipope B16 in the ''apostate occupied territory'' of Vatican yesterday. They discussed several ''very important'' issues but had no time to discuss the topic of crucifix removal. My guess is that it was a nuisance to them and that they probably share the same opinion. Upon his return to Croatia comrade Mesic even said that he never had any disputes or troubles with the Vatican. I couldn't agree more. What dispute could there be between an atheist and an apostate, they practically have the same faith and share the same beliefs, i.e. they believe in nothing.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3O-to8SMkc&feature=player_embedded

P.S. I've tried to watch Brother Michael's appearance on the History channel but without success. It seems as though this episode (of nine in the series so far) is also the only one that is not available for online viewing. I could easily find all the others (even the one that aired just yesterday) but the episode on Fatima is nowhere to be found. I am not implying anything but it is interesting....

Keep up the good work,

V. from Croatia

Comment

Brothers,

Your recent video on the Desolate Church; Matthew 23:38, "Behold, your house shall be left to you, desolate" is very inspiring and thought provoking. This is very true for VII/nonbelievers homes and even their bodies, the temple of God. Adults/children of this generation that have not God create an emptiness that they try to fill with the material things of this world. Their homes and cars get bigger and bigger as they try and fill their empty lives with more and more stuff. I've heard it say that the bathrooms and showers are becoming bigger in attempt to not only accommodate their larger bodies, though as an attempt to possibly build a shrine in order to wash away their shamefulness (sins), if that were possible. It's very humbling to visit a landfill site and see all the junk that once temporarily filled someone's material hunger for want, rather than need.

Because this country is ridding itself of anything to do with God, there is the vast increase in desolate homes and the next crises of desolate commercial property. Years ago, as well today, I'd comment on what a waste it is that all the new commercial buildings are being built next to abandoned vacant buildings. I think as a whole, the world is being conditioned by the anti-Christ (Satan) to believe bigger is better. When choosing the correct path to eternal salvation, the majority end up choosing the bigger path, leading to choosing the bigger gate rather than trying to enter the narrow gate. (Matthew 7:13, "Enter ye in at the narrow gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way that leadeth to destruction, and many there are who go in thereat")…

God Bless you all,
Tom

Comment

Subject: new video

Wow, awesome video, I think if we stayed in the realm of common sense more people would realize what is true and what is not!!! … I just got off the phone with my mother who was poisoned by the 70's charismatic movement where you put aside all the facts and dogmas and go by this stupid feeling inside: I feel to do this, I feel to do that, are you kidding me. I asked her where do the babies go that have been aborted, she said limbo, but I told her that they go to hell, apart of hell where there is no fire. She refused to believe that because of the lovey, feely garbage. She drives me out of my mind, she side steps the simple and commonsense truth for a more
complicated lie!!!! Todd

Muslim domination

Hi salutations from Brazil!

I am really anxious about the new Fatima DVD that you are preparing. I´d like to say that your DVDs are a great help in showing my wife and family about the faith and the truth of what is really going on.

I wish you brothers many blessings and keep up the good works!!

By the way I would like to show a really scary video I found on youtube, which I already imagined something like this was going on, but this is really terrifying!!

(muslim future world domination)

Mark

MHFM: Thanks for the interest. Yes, that video is definitely worth watching. It’s an excellent presentation of the facts on that issue. The disparity between Western and Islamic fertility rates is clearly attributable to a number of things. Chief among them are of course the evil contraceptive/NFP mentality which has taken over the West, including almost all modern “Catholics” and Protestants. This mentality of course does not exist with the Muslims.

We believe that the facts covered in the video serve as another indication that we are in the final days. God is not going to allow the world to become a Muslim republic.

New Video

Subject: regarding your new “Sadness” video

Dear Brothers at MHFM,

Your new video touches on a point that many people should reflect on and think about as we approach Advent, and the holiday season. To quote your video "man was created for God...and we can only be satisfied in Him." This reminded me of a quote from Saint Augustine's "Confessions" that you will probably be familiar with. A theme he often repeats through out the book "Yet man, this part of your creation, wishes to praise you. For you have made us for yourself, and our hearts are restless until they rest in you." We are encouraged and conditioned to be consumers, but ultimately we find that chasing after earthly treasures is self-defeating. It's only through God and for God that we find true peace and happiness.

- Ed

The Cross

Dear MHFM,

And why is antipope Benedict not demanding a retraction of the state sponsored school system in Italy imposing this hideous removal of God on the Cross, Crucifixes, from schools of learning? Separation of church and state can only be learned from a true pontiff, St. Pope Pius X, who denounced separation of church and state as 'pernicious.' Who are these people of Vatican II? Devils, I say, wholeheartedly, as I bow before the Holy Ghost, third person of the Blessed Trinity, that I Love, and will fight to the death to repeal this hideous pastoral council of Lucifer with my last dying breath! God Bless MHFM.

Video

Dear Brothers,

That is a great short video on sadness. It's so true how people seek consolations from creatures rather than waiting peacefully in God. I imagine the main grief and horror of hell (apart from the physical pains), as is said by many saints and the Catholic Church, is the eternal and extreme sadness and grief at having lost God.

That "Brother Metal" is really sad!!! He, "fell in love with heavy metal when he attended a Metallica concert some 15 years ago" - what a fool for going in the first place! And if he wants to "kill" the devil, why on earth would he "honor" the devil by using the "el diablo" hand signal. It's disgusting.

God Bless,

Chris White

Video

Subject: Sadness - video

Hi Bro. Michael and Peter Dimond,

Another great thought provoking video...well done; nice pictures as well...

God bless

David

“Out of context”

Hello,

I consider myself a faithful catholic. In your video about the heresies of B16 Why is it that when you quote the writings of cardinal Ratsinger currently OUR POPE (us that are true Catholics) You take only a small portion of the text, and take it out of context, to according to you prove your point. You twist and play with the words, you are proving your self wrong by trying to make your point. This is not only a heresy you are committing if you are catholic, but also dishonest if you are not.

Between your quotes I was also reading the pages and they says the opposite of your comments. If you truly believe in Hell, you should reflect on your actions. The very doctrines that you claim to defend, are the same doctrines you are attacking. The more I read your website, the more you proved your error. Although I should say some stated facts in other videos are true.

I will truly pray for you "Diamond brothers" so that OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST forgive your grave Apostasy. But according to the work that you do, I doubt that you are committing apostasy, since in order to do it you must first be Catholic. And obviously you are not. Since you are doing the work of Satan by going against the church. But remember THE GATES OF HELL WILL NOT PREVAIL AGAINST IT. He seduces man with pride.

My god enlighten you
Sergio Sanchez

MHFM: “… out of context….” Right… sure…. that’s what they all say. That’s why you don’t give any examples. We see how that kind of claim holds up in a debate. Such a lie doesn’t work with people who have read their speeches and their books. What you claim couldn’t be more false. People like you are so of bad will, so dishonest, SUCH LIARS and so attracted to the lie, that it’s almost beyond words. You deserve every bit of the apostate Counter Church that you’ve received. To give just one example which obliterates your lie and proves our point, let’s quote Benedict XVI’s book, Principles of Catholic Theology. This book contains numerous major denials of Vatican I. We will only focus on one of those denials. In fact, this book, in itself, provides all the proof we need to show that Benedict XVI is not a Catholic. In the quote below, we cited EXTRA CONTEXT simply because we know that COMPLETE LIARS like you will, when confronted with any heresy, lie and say that it’s “out of context.” Here it is:

Benedict XVI, Principles of Catholic Theology, 1982, pp. 197-198: “Against this background we can now weigh the possibilities that are open to Christian ecumenism. The maximum demands on which the search for unity must certainly founder are immediately clear. On the part of the West, the maximum demand would be that the East recognize the primacy of the bishop of Rome in the full scope of the definition of 1870 and in so doing submit in practice, to a primacy such as has been accepted by the Uniate churches. On the part of the East, the maximum demand would be that the West declare the 1870 doctrine of primacy erroneous and in so doing submit, in practice, to a primacy such as has been accepted with the removal of the Filioque from the Creed and including the Marian dogmas of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. As regards Protestantism, the maximum demand of the Catholic Church would be that the Protestant ecclesiological ministers be regarded as totally invalid and that Protestants be converted to Catholicism; the maximum demand of Protestants, on the other hand, would be that the Catholic Church accept, along with the unconditional acknowledgement of all Protestant ministries, the Protestant concept of ministry and their understanding of the Church and thus, in practice, renounce the apostolic and sacramental structure of the Church, which would mean, in practice, the conversion of Catholics to Protestantism and their acceptance of a multiplicity of distinct community structures as the historical form of the Church. While the first three maximum demands are today rather unanimously rejected by Christian consciousness, the fourth exercises a kind of fascination for it – as it were, a certain conclusiveness that makes it appear to be the real solution to the problem. This is all the more true since there is joined to it the expectation that a Parliament of Churches, a ‘truly ecumenical council’, could then harmonize this pluralism and promote a Christian unity of action. That no real union would result from this, but that its very impossibility would become a single common dogma, should convince anyone who examines the suggestion closely that such a way would not bring Church unity but only a final renunciation of it. As a result, none of the maximum solutions offers any real hope of unity.”

Notice that Benedict XVI specifically mentions, and then bluntly rejects, the traditional teaching of the Catholic Church that the Protestants and Eastern Schismatics must be converted to the Catholic Faith. He says that their conversion and acceptance of Vatican I (a dogmatic council) and the Papacy (a dogma) is NOT the way for unity. This is a total rejection of the Catholic Faith.

The only possible way that more context could contradict his blatant heresy is if Benedict XVI had said just the opposite somewhere else in the book – or if he clarified that he was only kidding. Of course, he says no such thing. And even if we suppose, for the sake of argument, that Benedict XVI had said just the opposite (namely, that all Protestants and schismatics must accept Vatican I and its definition of the Papacy for Christian unity), which he most assuredly does not do, it still would not exonerate him of heresy. That’s because you can’t affirm a dogma sometimes and deny it at other times. If you say you’re against abortion, and then go on in the same speech to favor it, you’re pro-abortion.

Any person with any honesty and good will can see that your claim and your e-mail are a pack of lies. You are not a Catholic. You are a total liar, and you don’t have the first clue what it means to accept the Catholic Church and the Papacy.

Benedict XVI (The Heresies of Benedict XVI File) [link to section]

Williamson

If the new nazis of Germany keep up their ungodly persecution of Bishop Williamson, I will join the SSPX. I already am a traditional Latin mass-goer and they are no longer excommunicated, and I usually like to be against what the worldly people are for. What's your opinion?

… forgive me if you already addressed this. God bless you all.

Susan

MHFM: That’s ridiculous. Bishop Williamson is unfortunately an obstinate heretic and a schismatic. He’s not a real Catholic. He regards Antipope Benedict XVI and his apostate bishops as Catholics. He holds that the Catholic Church can be equated with an apostate non-Catholic sect. He also believes in salvation outside the Church, as Lefebvre did. He adheres to the false positions of the SSPX. They are covered in detail here:

The Society of St. Pius X [Link to Section]

So many people have such a secular orientation that if someone receives unjust persecution in that arena, they assume that he is therefore on the good side, even if he rejects Catholic teaching. That is a denial of Christ and His truth. It is to totally miss the point. Few people care about the Gospel and about the true faith of Christ.

Spies and Aliens

Subject: Spies and Aliens

Dear Brothers,

That London spy program is like Communist East Germany where there were apparently, 1 civilian spy for every 6 people!

How insane that the V-2 sect is searching for "aliens"! The V-2 sect is like one big "alien" space craft - alien to God!!!

Apocalypse 18:2 - And he cried out with a strong voice, saying: Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen: and is become the habitation of devils and the hold of every unclean spirit and the hold of every unclean and hateful bird.

God Bless,

Chris White

Comment

…. checking in with your site every day and studying all you have to offer really, really helps! Thanks to you and all your readers! I must be pretty slow, because it just occurred to me today that we've been in the very final stages of lucifer's ultimately FUTILE attempts to truly "exterminate" the true, traditional ancient Catholic FAITH. He has failed: the Immaculate Heart has triumphed: truly her Immaculate Heart is our refuge and the way that leads us to God....looking forward to your Fatima DVD…

Anne

Comment

Subject: Vatican joins search for Alien Life

Hi Bros, Michael and Peter Dimond,

So the Vatican II sect is going to join the search for "alien life"!

May I suggest, that since the term "alien" may be defined as something "repugnant, foreign, not one's own etc., the present occupants of the Vatican might start their search right in the hallways of the very place they have usurped!

...they will not be disappointed in their results....

God Bless

David

Opinion

Dear MHFM,

I can relate to Nestorianian thinking since it's so prevalent in American society. Multitudes of Americans act as their own gods. To paraphrase, "...each man to his castle...," is very much Nestorian. That's why socialism and the socialists making inroads to Americanism will fail because of this American way of thinking. In the end, however, the American system will fail because we failed Jesus Christ and accepted the Vatican II sect way of life, which is none other than Nestorian tinged with pantheism, heresy of all heresies with the head heresiarch, Ratzinger leading the way...

Document

Subject: Heresies on ratzinger´s new document concerning Anglican "converts"

1-He makes no distinction between the Catholic Churches and the schismatics.

2-He says the Church is a Sacrament, which was condemned.

3-Once again, he says that the elements of sanctification present in the sects guide the people there to the Catholic Church.

4-If they really need to follow the Catechism, then there´s no need to convert at all, since the Vatican II version considers the Protestants as being part of the Church.

Cremation

Would it be wrong to take a job in sales selling cremation services if the reason for the person purchasing the program was due to the lower cost?

S.S.

MHFM: One should not take such a job.

By the way, here’s a quote from Antipope Benedict XVI on this point. He acknowledges that cremation was traditionally forbidden, and that the prohibition was abandoned by Vatican II.

Benedict XVI, God and the World, 2000, p. 436: “Q. Is it permissible to have dead bodies cremated, or is that just a heathen ritual? A. … Right up to the Second Vatican Council, cremation was subject to penalties. In view of all the circumstances of the modern world, the Church has abandoned this.”

Interest

Hi Brothers !!!

I am a daily visitor of your website which I find to be the BEST Catholic source of soul - saving information for today's times…

A Bracha

Watched

Dear MHFM,

I had the opportunity to watch the History Channel's overview of Fatima (if you can call it that, The Nostradamus Effect). They tried to weave this into the false visionary (Nostradamus) and imply that he may have predicted the miracle. True to History Channel format they presented so many deceptive comments and angles on the secret that it was more about the end of times by a nuclear war and how the supposed Catholic Church had indeed released the "real" 3rd secret. I would like to commend Brother Michael for "presenting" his overview… I eagerly await Brother Michael's DVD release on Fatima and know from his past publications his thoroughness and adherence to facts will make this the real overview of Fatima.

God Bless you for Your Works.......

Bruce

Prayer

Dear MHFM

Here is a good prayer people should say many times per day. JESUS, MARY, I LOVE THEE! SAVE SOULS! Amen…. God bless in the sorrowful and Immaculate heart.

MARK

MHFM: Yes, it’s a very good prayer. We believe that we’ve mentioned it before on our website.

DVD

Subject: Fatima DVD

Dear Mhfm

Can't wait to order the fatima dvd. Very excited when I saw the cover. The picture on the cover looks great… Keep up the great work.

God Bless

Sean

John Paul II’s first homily

MHFM: This is from our video, John Paul II preached the Gospel of the Antichrist. In light of the question below, we thought it was appropriate.

Dissolves

http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/john_paul_ii_preached_the_gospel_of_the_antichrist.php

Dear Brothers.

I commend all work and effort that you've put in to your researches.

I am not quite sure, however, if I follow your logic and would like some clarification.

You said that Nestorius dissolves Christ by stating that "THE SON OF GOD UNITED HIMSELF IN A CERTAIN WAY WITH A MAN NAMED JESUS".

The way I understand this is that The Son of God (person 1 being God) united himself with another man Jesus (person 2 being a man named Jesus) (Two people in one body?)

Then you go on to say that JPII says "the Son of God, incarnate in the womb of the Virgin Mary, ‘has in a certain way united himself with each man."

I don't see how this is the same as what Nestorius was saying and would like some clarification.

The way I understand the "anti" pope is that he is saying Jesus, the Son of God (person 1 - God and Man) unites himself with mankind.

This, to me, doesn't dissolve Christ because he didn't say that person 1 (Christ) is different from person 2 (Jesus). He said that person 1 (Christ Jesus) is united to all of humanity.

Is this correct?

Jeff

MHFM: As we point out in the video and in the article, it’s Nestorianism applied to every man. Nestorius dissolved Christ by teaching that the Son of God didn’t become man, but rather united Himself with a single man named Jesus. Hence, Nestorius held that Jesus was a man who carried or was united with God. According to his heresy, there were two persons in Christ: the Son of God and a mere man named Jesus.

Pope St. Leo the Great, Dogmatic Letter to Flavian, 449: “Let Nestorius, therefore, be anathematized… he made one person of the flesh, and another of the Godhead, AND DID NOT PERCEIVE THAT THERE WAS BUT ONE CHRIST…”

By dissolving or dividing Our Lord Jesus Christ into two persons, Nestorius’ Antichrist doctrine logically resulted in the worship of two Christs, and introduced, as a consequence, THE WORSHIP OF MAN!

Pope Vigilius, Second Council of Constantinople, 553: “The holy synod of Ephesus… has pronounced sentence against the heresy of Nestorius… and all those who might later… adopt the same opinions as he held… They express these falsehoods against the true dogmas of the Church, OFFERING WORSHIP TO TWO SONS, trying to divide that which cannot be divided, AND INTRODUCING TO BOTH HEAVEN AND EARTH THE OFFENCE OF THE WORSHIP OF MAN. But the sacred band of heavenly spirits worship along with us only one Lord Jesus Christ.”

John Paul II taught that the Son of God didn’t just unite Himself with a single man named Jesus (as Nestorius taught), but rather with EVERY SINGLE MAN. Thus, it is Nestorianism applied to all people on earth. That means that, in John Paul II’s doctrine, every single person is what Nestorius considered Jesus to be. According to John Paul II, every single man is actually two: a mere man and the Son of God. That’s precisely why he defined Christianity as the deep amazement at man. That’s why he said all of the other incredible things we cover in our video. His statements are in perfect line with how Nestorianism leads inescapably to the worship of man.

Antipope John Paul II, Redemptor Hominis (# 10), March 4, 1979: “IN REALITY, THE NAME FOR THAT DEEP AMAZEMENT AT MAN’S WORTH AND DIGNITY IS THE GOSPEL, THAT IS TO SAY: THE GOOD NEWS. IT IS ALSO CALLED CHRISTIANITY.”

All of the evidence is covered in the video and the article. But these two quotes show how he believes that the Word became flesh in every man.

Antipope John Paul II, Encyclical on the Holy Ghost (# 50): “’The Word became flesh.’ The Incarnation of God the Son signifies the taking up into unity with God not only of human nature, but in this human nature, in a sense, everything that is ‘flesh’: the whole of humanity ...”

Here Antipope John Paul II quotes the words of John 1:14, and says that the Word becoming flesh means the taking up of all flesh, the whole of humanity. This literally means that the Son of God became all flesh, the whole of humanity. And this is why Antipope John Paul II says the following:

Antipope John Paul II, Evangelium Vitae (# 104): “It is precisely in the ‘flesh’ of every person that Christ continues to reveal himself … so that rejection of human life, in whatever form that rejection takes, is really a rejection of Christ.”

John Paul II without any doubt taught Nestorianism; but he taught Nestorianism applied to every single man, not just one. His teaching was the dissolving of Jesus: the precise doctrine which the inspired Word of God (the Bible) says is the mark of Antichrist (1 John 4:2-3).

Apollo

I'm reading the first epistle of St. Paul to the Corinthians and the word apollo is used, could you tell me who is apollo or what the significance is with the name apollo. Thanks Todd

MHFM: As we read in Acts 18, Apollo was a convert who was successful in converting many Jews. In 1 Corinthians 1, St. Paul is correcting the mistaken notion of some Corinthians. They began to consider as their master whoever baptized them. Thus, some said: “I indeed am of Paul: and I am of Apollo: and I of Cephas…” (1 Cor. 1:12). St. Paul rebuked them and explained that it is Christ whom they must worship, not the person who brought them into the faith.

Video Update

MHFM: This video also discusses an extremely important quote from St. Isaac Jogues.

Heretical priest

A few days ago I talked like 3 times over the phone with a sedevacantist priest who is affiliated/in communion with… all of those heretics, he's from Phoenix, well he said he's currently living in Phoenix, but he's really from Argentina.

So this guy is in favor of salvation by BOD/BOB, salvation for "invincibly ignorant" people who have never heard of the Church or of the Gospel ("as long as they live up to the dictates of their conscience a morally good life", or something like that), he believes in salvation for non-Catholics by "implicit" desires; he believes a non-baptized person can be in union/communion with the Church "in voto" or "by desire" and consequently be saved, and all of those similar things.

So I asked him: "Well what about the Athanasian Creed? It says we must have explicit Faith in the Trinity and the Incarnation if we wish to be saved, and the Council of Florence also used this Creed dogmatically." and other things like that.

So then he tells me: "We can't take what the Athanasian Creed says literally, or what the other dogmatic definitions say about no salvation outside the Church, we can't understand them just like that, we have to see what the theologians say about it."

So then I asked him: "Well didn't Vatican I say that dogmas are to be believed and understood as they are once declared by the Church?"

And then he said: "Yes, but we also have to go by what the theologians teach about that subject."

MHFM: What a surprise. You heard the unbelief, the heresy and the rejection of Catholic teaching right from the heretic’s mouth. The heretic couldn’t be more wrong. We must submit to what the Chair of St. Peter has defined. Furthermore, no sainted theologian taught the heresies that he holds. The definition of Vatican I and the following papal teaching confound his false outlook on how to understand Catholic teaching. To sum him up simply, he rejects papal infallibility. He doesn’t believe in what Christ promised to St. Peter alone. That’s why he sees no distinction between the Office of St. Peter and the teaching of fallible theologians.

Pope Benedict XIV, Apostolica (# 6), June 26, 1749: “The Church’s judgment is preferable to that of a Doctor renowned for his holiness and teaching.”

Errors of the Jansenists, #30: “When anyone finds a doctrine clearly established in Augustine, he can absolutely hold it and teach it, disregarding any bull of the pope.”- Condemned by Pope Alexander VIII

Pope Pius XII, Humani generis (# 21), Aug. 12, 1950: “This deposit of faith our Divine Redeemer has given for authentic interpretation not to each of the faithful, not even to theologians, but only to the Teaching Authority of the Church.’”

Additionally, it’s interesting to consider the following quote. Pope Leo XIII is talking about the protection that the Holy Ghost gives to the Bible and to the teaching of the Magisterium.

We all know that the inspiration and protection that the Holy Ghost gives to the Bible is unique. But Pope Leo XIII teaches that the Holy Ghost gives the same unique protection to the teaching of the Magisterium. Many forget or reject this truth. The only minor difference between the two is that the Magisterium is infallibly protected from error in whatever it teaches, even though the words aren’t necessarily inspired. Moreover, the Magisterium is our proximate rule of faith, while the Bible is a remote rule of faith. That means that the Magisterium’s definitions give us the true understanding of the Bible. They are the interpretation.

For a person with true faith, the Holy Ghost’s protection of the infallible papal decrees goes without saying. However, for a modern BOD apostate, it’s a revelation. That’s because they see no distinction between the infallible teaching of the Magisterium and the fallible teaching of theologians. Since Pope Leo XIII speaks of both in the same breath, it’s a very interesting quote. It (further) refutes the heretic you spoke with and his faithless outlook on how to understand Catholic teaching.

Pope Leo XIII, Providentissimus Deus (#14), Nov. 18, 1893: “… passages of Holy Scripture… in passages already defined, the private student may do work equally valuable, either by setting them forth more clearly to the flock and more skilfully to scholars, or by defending them more powerfully from hostile attack. Wherefore the first and dearest object of the Catholic commentator should be to interpret those passages which have received an authentic interpretation either from the sacred writers themselves, under the inspiration of the Holy Ghost (as in many places of the New Testament), or from the Church, under the assistance of the same Holy Spirit, whether by her solemn judgment or her ordinary and universal magisterium - to interpret these passages in that identical sense, and to prove, by all the resources of science, that sound hermeneutical laws admit of no other interpretation.”

Story

hi, i just found your web site. The articles i have read make sense. I stopped going to v2 mass after a great number of things happened. One story, the liberal nun had the kids cyo group go to six flags . when they got there it was gay day. my son got home at 1 in the morning , woke me up and said he had the worst day in his life. he was 16yrs old.. he said it was gay day at six flags and he and his friends had to follow the sexual pervert homosexuals around all day. being exposed to their blatant perverted sexual behavior… i wouldn't even let my kids watch any tv shows with homo. agendas etc. and little did i know there was a homo. nun in charge of my kids religious formation. One of her nun friends wears men’s clothes, men’s hair cut. they call her (mister sister) . my child was put in danger by the church . it is a well known fact that the most horrid mutilating murders are done by homosexuals . and their preferred meeting place is the public bathrooms… i took the kids out of religion class and i tried to teach them at home. i took bible studies on and off . the nun would say all kinds of heretical teachings , i would challenge her . i would bring documents exposing the lies she would tell, but i ended up being attacked by the others in the class. two of them belong to the local masonic lodge. when i brought a document about what the masons were about, one of the men got so mad he started to come over the table at me . very eye opening.! i could go on and on with storys …. basically destroyed my faith when i was in 3rd grade when they changed the mass to v2. closed the cath . school… i never was comfortable with the v2 mass and all the changes. they chopped up the beautiful hand carved ornate altar with an axe , and removed everything that lookeded catholic out of the church. in its place they put up ugly stark furniture. they stopped playing the organ and banged on guitars up and down the aisle. the church building is over a hundred years old. my dad had watched the altar being carved and put together when he was a small boy and then he saw them tear it down with an ax later in his life. the altar was so well made they had to use an axe . we were helpless to stop any of it. the priest that was in charge of the destruction in the church was later defrocked years later for unsavory reasons… i wish i had known years ago that there is a remnant of the faith that i learned about… when i was in 1st grade. i never would have exposed my family to the v2 church. it sickens me to think about all the years my kids were exposed to the corruption…. i feel like an orphan, nowhere to go no one to talk to. to top it off the only catholic friend i could talk to about the faith… stopped going to v2 mass and she is thinking about going to a protestant church for the social aspect . all i can say any more is LORD HAVE MERCY , LORD HAVE MERCY, LORD HAVE MERCY .

SINCERALLY,

Question

I wanted to ask you… in the Bull Auctorem Fidei, in Denzinger #1515 (proposition #15)…

15. "The doctrine which proposes that the Church "must be considered as one mystical body composed of Christ, the head, and the faithful, who are its members through an ineffable union, by which in a marvelous way we become with Him one sole priest, one sole victim, one sole perfect adorer of God the Father, in spirit and in truth," understood in this sense, that no one belongs to the body of the Church except the faithful, who are perfect adorers in spirit and in truth,--heretical."

What was it condemning here?

MHFM: It was condemning the idea that the Church (and thus the faithful) is only comprised of those who are perfect adorers in spirit in truth. In other words, it is false to believe that the Church consists only and at all times of good or of perfect people. During the Middle Ages there were various heresies which proposed that only the elect are part of the Church; that is, that a person who is or will be damned was never part of the Church to begin with.

Confession

Dear Brothers,

I hope you can answer this question. I'm having trouble resolving this. I suddenly remembered something that happened long ago when I was a child. I believe I committed a mortal sin. Obviously, I've been to confession since and I know it has been forgiven, despite that I forgot about it. My question is: Do I have to keep remembering it now and confess it the next time I go to confession? or, if I remember it during confession do I still have to confess it? The reason is, is that it's embarrassing and I don't want to have to deal with it if I don't have to. I not trying to get away with anything, it's just that I need to know how to give myself peace. Please help me. Thank you for all you do in you work! I pray for you.

MHFM: You do need to remember it and mention it the next time you go to confession.

Comment

Brothers,

Congratulations on landing such a high profile media outlet as the History Channel in this day and age of liberal false Catholics and their media. This is one of the few times I wished I'd subscribed to television. Although I missed the program last night, I had my folks record the show, hoping they would watch and learn, being part of the world that is all about "externals". I hope the show/DVD is a success even though the network decided to air the show during the sixth/last game of the World Series…

God Bless your many works,
Tom

Update

Subject: Update, etc.

Dear Brothers,

That was a great quote of St. Theresa's from yesterday on how she saw hell and that she was grieved at the fact that the Lutherans, all of whom go there, were once of the Church because they were baptized (though not once they accepted heresy).

That story about Moshe and the Ukraine is astounding. Thank you very much for posting it.

Thank you for the update video (great pictures). The points you made about how many false traditionalists will talk and talk without believing is interesting. It made me think of Jesus' words when speaking of the neccessity to eat His flesh and drink His blood, and how many were scandalized and left Him:

John 6:61,62 - Many therefore of his disciples, hearing it, said: This saying is hard, and who can hear it? But Jesus, knowing in himself, that his disciples murmured at this, said to them: Doth this scandalize you?

It seems to me that these types of false traditionalists, etc. are so concerned about externals that they are shocked by words like "antichrist" and also that they only believe in things that they can see, and so are tricked by the V-2 sect's illusions. I think it's interesting that the very "Mystery of Faith", the Holy Eucharist, is Our God, whole and entire, in Flesh, Body and Blood, but UNSEEN, and so the necessity of eating necessitates believing first in Him who is unseen, as is faith:

Hebrews 11:1 - Now faith is the substance of things to be hoped for, the evidence of things that appear not.

The quote of St. Isaac Jogues is really brilliant. It shows how pure his intention was in saving souls. Thank you for quoting that. Also, the points about predestination are encouraging because so many people are just so bad-willed.

God Bless,

Chris White

Galatians, added

MHFM: This is an interesting point which has been added to our article: Where does the Bible teach that Jesus is God?

Galatians 1:1- “Paul, an apostle, not of men, neither by man, but by Jesus Christ, and God the Father, who raised him from the dead…”

Since Paul did not become an apostle by men or of man, but by Jesus Christ, the obvious implication is that Jesus Christ is not just a man. He is also God.

Crucifixes barred

Subject: Regarding - Italy school crucifixes 'barred'

Dear brothers at MHFM -

This email is regarding "Italy school crucifixes barred." This is sad, really sad, that a (European court) interferes in an Italian matter to not only ban crucifixes in Italian schools, but then rewards the "victim" with a monetary settlement? It never ceases to amaze me how progressives in this generation can't wait to tear down and destroy every aspect of Christianity, and turn their backs on their own Christian identity! Western civilization seems to be on a deathwish to kill itself. Most countries in Europe have a declining population (and under an invasion of muslim immigrants, motivated on converting a declining Christian Europe into a muslim Europe.) I fear that without a real Christian revival to regain its identity, and a lot of prayer (including the rosary), we are going to see the fall European society within a generation or two.

History channel program

A good program and worth the time. I was disappointed that they did not show you (as I am sure you mentioned) talking about the 3rd secret and it had to be released by 1960. It would make more sense then said Sister Lucia. It would not make sense to have the 3rd secret talk about the assassination attempt of an (anti)pope 20 years later. Father-Mister Andrew Apostate swallowed the Vatican story of course. The Sister Lucia that we saw in 2000 kissing the Pope after receiving communion was possibly brainwashed to swallow the V2 crap. Kissing JP2 hand?? Muslims adore the Blessed Mother. Why would they if they don't believe that she is the mother of God? Of course trying to understand a false religion is not easy. Anyway, I look forward to your DVD about Fatima…

William

MHFM: Thanks for the interest. The “Sr. Lucia” who kissed John Paul II’s hand was not just brainwashed. She was not the real Sr. Lucy.

History Show

Dear Brothers,

I thought EWTN's "Father" Andrew Apostoli (more like Andrew Apostate) gave a typically-pathetic performance as a token Vatican II stooge in the History Channel's program on the Fatima secrets. Apostoli did nothing but give lip service to the Vatican II sect and its antipopes to whom he is so foolishly devoted. Apostoli praised John Paul II, stated his acceptance of the false third secret and the imposter Sr. Lucy, and Apostoli even went so far as to utter a heresy when he stated that Our Lady appeared at Fatima as a gesture of thanks and esteem for the Islamic religion. What a heretic! Anyone who still watches and supports EWTN and their heretic "priests" really needs to be honest, open their eyes and see through the lies and deceptions of men like Andrew Apostoli. By the way, Brother Michael Dimond was in great form on the program as a true, stalwart Roman Catholic -- unlike Apostoli and the other interviewees. Thank you and may God bless you for sharing on national television Our Lady's true message of Fatima.

Mike Dougherty

History

Dear Brother Michael,

I was very disappointed that they did not let you have more speaking time on the show. They cut you off it seemed when details were going to make too much sense to them! It seems that they want the world to still believe that the 3rd secret has been revealed. Of course that would be expected since they on the show were part of Vatican II or just plain skeptics. I cannot wait until you have your new book out on Fatima and Sr. Lucia. I was very intrigued at the fact that you said the Vatican document had, that they claimed was the third secret, had about 60 lines instead of about 20 as in Sr. Lucia's real letter… God Bless you and I thank the Holy Spirit for giving you wisdom.

Jodi

MHFM: In an audio discussion we will probably have some more comments with thoughts about the show. They did splice together a few quotes and used the portions they wanted to.

History Special

Brothers...

Concerning the Fatima History Channel show last night, they showed Bro. Michael more than I thought they would, and some people here that I been working with seemed interested in the fact that he was going to be on the show.. If anything, I think it adds credibility for the our movement... (Just the mere fact of being on TV)- I liked that fact that the show stated about a few times on why the secret was supposed to be released by 1960. I also liked on how they stated the Fatima message predicted the reign of Pius XI, way before he even got elected !!.. They showed the vision of Hell and quoted what the Seers description of Hell was…I did get upset though on how they stated that "Sr. Lucia" got upset at those who thought the 3rd secret wasn’t fully revealed- Also the spin on the theory that the 3rd secret had maybe something to do with a possible missile attack in the 60's / Cuba etc...I also didn’t like that they showed "Lucia" and John Paul II being all buddy buddy...If only they would have given Brother Dimond about 15 seconds to throw some light on the imposter "Lucia"....Anyway at the final end of the show, some guy came on and said, that in the end, it’s all about the salavation of souls. By the way, I about fell out of my chair here at work when a co worker turned around and told me he also watched the show and thought there’s no way that the "Lucia" with John Paul II was the same person compared to Sister Lucia that Mary appeared to.. I asked him he had any prior knowledge of the imposter scenario and he answered no…

-Steve

MHFM: It’s interesting that the person you know concluded that the “Lucia” with John Paul II was not the same person as the traditional, pre-Vatican II Sr. Lucia. However, it’s not surprising that he came to that conclusion. If one believes in Fatima and is honest, one should come to that conclusion. It’s simply a fact that the post-Vatican II “Sr. Lucia” endorsed the modernist, post-Vatican II version of Fatima. Therefore, one cannot accept her if one holds a traditional view of Fatima or traditional conclusions about the Third Secret of Fatima. The fact that so many people do – and they do so obstinately – is another clear example of their dishonesty.

Fatima Special

Dear MHFM,

After about fifteen minutes into the History Channel Third Secret of Fatima special, I was seeing that it was mostly distortion and trying to lead the viewers down the wrong path. The sections with Brother Dimond were all truthful statements about this miraculous event in our Churches history. There were also many others that were on the show that made truthful statements about Fatima. The HC took it upon themselves to twist things around and make speculations. The most damaging of the distortion or lies were;

1. The tie in between the Islamic religion and our Lady of Fatima. This gave the impression that there may be some mutual respect between Islam and Catholicism.

2. The "false" Sister Lucy made out to be respectful of anti-Pope JPII. It showed her taking Communion from him and kissing his hand.

3. The vision of hell made out to be symbolic of WW I instead of showing that this literally was hell and that was made perfectly clear by our Blessed Lady.

4.. Little emphasis was made on the secret needing to be released by 1960 and the ramifications had if it been released at that time to all the Vatican II changes starting with anti-Pope John XXIII.

5. Not one word about the Rosary or our Lady's message about immorality in dress, sins of the flesh and other key warnings.

6. The overall impression that anti-Pope JP II was the greatest Pope of all time even though he was an anti-Christ.

There are several other major flaws that the uninformed Catholic is going to take away from this program. This means the release of the MHFM accurate DVD version of Fatima will show the lies and distortions in this "Masonic" version and possibly bring more people back to the true Catholic faith had this HC special not been aired at all.

Your ardent supporter,

Bob Bohr

Show

Brothers:

I can't say that I'm surprised at the way the History Channel chose to spin things, but at least you were able to point out that the released "third secret" isn't the real deal. Hopefully a few people who watched will find their way to your material.

Respectfully…

Against Racism

MHFM: The following quote is somewhat interesting. In fifteenth century Spain, a few were endeavoring to forbid converted Jews (i.e., Christians who had Jewish blood) from holding office. The pope at the time, Pope Nicholas V, rightly came out against this attempt at racial exclusion. Note: he did not condemn excluding people for religious reasons, i.e., if a person doesn’t believe or if a convert’s faith is in question. Rather, he condemned racism and excluding people solely because of their bloodlines.

“The immediate result was a bull issued by Pope Nicholas [V] on 24 September 1449 under the significant title Humani Generis Enemicus (Enemy of the Human Race), in which he denounced the idea of excluding Christians from office simply because of their blood origins. ‘We decree and declare’, the pope went on, ‘that all Catholics are one body in Christ according to the teaching of our faith.’” (Henry Kamen, The Spanish Inquisition – A Historical Revision, Yale University Press, 1998, p. 34.)

Tonight’s program

Brothers,

I searched the TV listings for today and tomorrow and I don't see the special that Brother Michael is appearing on. Did the times or dates get moved? I am really looking forward to seeing it. I'm in Texas so maybe they are not showing it here. I don't think that makes sense. Hopefully if I miss it I will get to see it on the internet somewhere.

God Bless
Nate

MHFM: It’s listed for 9:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the History Channel under the title “Nostradamus Effect: Fatima’s Lost Prophecy.” The description for the show says:

“The Vatican closely guards the secrets of one of three prophecies that children in Fatima, Portugal, claimed to have received from the Virgin Mary in 1917.”

Apparently it will air multiple times.

Product

MHFM: This is something someone sent to us. It’s a beauty product from “stem-cell” technology.

$Description: Description: C:\Users\mhfm\Desktop\Website Docs\E-discussions\E_Pictures\product.jpg$

Question

Dear Brothers,

I have a New American Bible from years ago. Should I dispose of it? Is there a proper way to get rid of it? I think on the sleeve of the book jacket is an inverted triangle. Also, do you believe in our Lady's appearance at Knock, Ireland in the late 1800's?

John Settimo

MHFM: We have no reason to conclude that the apparition at Knock in the 1800s was false. Our recent post concerned the false apparition occurring there now. Even if it isn’t the best, you don’t need to necessarily get rid of the New American Bible you have. It can be used as a reference to compare translations, etc.

Comment

Thank you for putting the comment about halloween on your blog, this is what I was looking for, I knew for myself it was a pagan ritual but it’s good to have the information regarding the background and history of it. By the way I didn't let my kids participate or hand out any candy and thats what the war was about between my wife and I. It’s [difficult] trying to do the right thing in this house hold when someone is so of this world. Keep up the good work I pray for your perseverance and safety and I am looking forward to seeing you on the history channel...

Todd

Ouija boards

Concerning ouija boards, I heard a story of some people that were trying to get the board to communicate and they asked it various questions, but then someone asked, Who is this?..All of a sudden all the dogs in the neighborhood started barking, the candle in the room then melted fast, and it spelled out the word B-e-e-l-z-e-b-u-b! Also someone I knew personally told me that someone asked the spirit if it ever seen God before and it spelled out the word H-a-t-e..... One girl said that she was at a party & she asked the board if she should even be using it, and the board answered 'NO', then she felt as if her fingers were melting into the planchette, she then said her sense of hearing went out thus not being able to hear other people in the room talking around her....These boards are gateways to demonic possession along with having the devil occupy your residence...Why anyone would want to fool or have anything like that in their home is beyond me... People need to avoid these "games" at all costs.

-Steve

Comment

Dear Brothers in Christ,

I've listened to your debate with Mr. Moore. Of course your position in the debate was the correct one. As far as I can see, the "faith alone" thing, from the standpoint of pure logic, is a product of a faulty logic (of course, the Devil makes use of a faulty logic all the time; faulty logic is one of its favorite tools). Namely, the condition of a necessity is not the same as the condition of sufficiency. Thus, faith is necessary for salvation, but is not sufficient; likewise the sacrament of baptism is necessary for salvation, but is not sufficient.

Our Lord Jesus Christ insisted on faith simply because it was lacking those days (nowadays the faith is apparently non-existent save but in small remnant of true Catholics). But the insistence on what is necessary does not imply that this is the only thing needed nor that it is sufficient. You have substantiated your position with many quotes from the Scriptures, but Mr. Moore could not find not even a single one to substantiate "faith alone".

It is obvious truth that you also insist on the True Faith these days simply because The One and Only Catholic Faith is viciously attacked from many sides, the most wicked attack coming from V-2 sect… In essence, "faith alone" is a blasphemy because it is evident that the OBEDIENCE to the Word is of utmost importance--our Lord insisted on obedience as much as on faith. One is obviously not obedient if he/she thinks that it is allowable to sin gravely as long as one has The Faith. The final result of "faith alone" is "faith none", because sin destroys faith, and vice versa. Faith and sin are mutually excluded. The "faith alone" is much the same thing as "love alone" thing characteristic for V-2 satanic "theology". The phony "love" of the V-2 adherents is as empty as the "faith alone". In the end "love alone" turns out to be "love none".

It is not a mere coincidence that V-2 and other "christians" are kin with Buddhism and other emptiness-loving man-made eastern philosophies. Yet somehow I think that Mr. Moore has a potential to convert to The True Faith, although at this moment he is of bad will. I don't know why I have this feeling. Anyway, the feelings and all other human qualities have to be subdued to the Truth. And to the prayer.

Thank you for an excellent debate. May our Most Holy Mother Mary and St. Joseph keep you on the right path and show your holy efforts to our Lord.

Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia

Marriage

Pope Leo XIII, Dum Multa (# 2), Dec. 24, 1902: “It follows then that the marriage of Christians when fully accomplished… cannot be dissolved for any reason other than
the death of either spouse, according to the holy words: ‘What God has joined, let no man put asunder.’

Does the term "marriage of Christians" here imply that if two non-Christians got married, and then were divorced, and then one of them converted to Catholicism, the Catholic would be free to marry? Also, someone once told me that if two people are married outdoors, ie. not in a church building, then it is not valid, this seems ridiculous, but I'd like to hear it from you.

I am looking forward to the History channel special.
-A huge supporter.

MHFM: It only refers to “the marriage of Christians” because there is the Pauline Privilege. The Pauline Privilege applies when two unbaptized persons (thus two non-Christians) are married, but one of them converts to the faith. If the other one (i.e., the remaining unbaptized person) will neither convert nor live at peace with the new Christian, then the marriage may be completely dissolved. That’s called the Pauline Privilege because it has its roots in the epistle of St. Paul to the Corinthians (1 Cor. 7:12-17). That’s why Pope Leo qualifies the statement with “the marriage of Christians.”

A marriage can be valid if it is outdoors.

Debate

Brothers: A very good debate with Mr. Moore. I think Mr. Moore (I could be wrong) is of good will and is just confused. I think he is confusing "faith" with being in a state of grace. He agrees with you; he just does not know it. I would hope that you praying for him that he convert to the true faith.

You responded to an e-mail from Ms. Kalix a week ago or so about her miscarriage. Your words to her were compassionate and on the money. It helped me deal with a miscarriage my wife and I suffered a few years ago. The child may have been a monster sinner and the miscarriage may have been the best things. I am learning now to trust God in these things since He is a lot smarter than me.

I agree with you about the Halloween situation. The feast of All Hallows Eve had some redeeming qualities a long time ago. It is simply evil now...

William

MHFM: Thanks for the interest. One could not say, however, that a person who rejects (and in fact attacks) the Catholic faith is of good will. He is not confused. He understands Catholic teaching and rejects it. He might have enough good will to eventually convert. That’s something for which we should hope and pray; but a person who attacks the Catholic faith is demonstrating bad will at the time he is rejecting Catholic teaching. One must be convinced of that.

History Channel

MHFM: Bro. Michael Dimond will be appearing on the History Channel, in a special on the Third Secret of Fatima, on Wednesday Nov. 4, at 9:00 p.m. Eastern Time.

Antipope “Beatification”

Dear MHFM,

It is truly a sign of end times when the anti-Christ is going to be canonized a saint and Melanie Calvat of La Salette has not been canonized. Could this be the last straw? If you read her life story in the book Sister Mary of the Cross you can see that should have been canonized years ago She lived everyday as a Saint and anti-Pope lived everyday as a "feel good" pope. Catholics of the world, wake up!

Your ardent supporter,

Bob Bohr

Halloween

I do not let my children participate in halloween. I also do not turn on my porch light or hand out candy to other children. I have seen many videos on Halloween and I wonder if people actually know what "trick or treat" really means. The origin of trick or treat came from the Druids about 2,200 years ago. The Druids were priests in the ancient Celtic countries. What they believed is that on Halloween, evil spirits would come back to visit the living. The Druids would go house to house saying that the owner of the house had to leave some sort of food out on the doorstep for the spirits as a treat or the Druids would trick the household by placing a curse upon them or killing their children. Even today, many humans including children are sacrificed on an evil altar on halloween night.

Virtually every Catholic I know lets their children dress up for halloween. If we dress our children up like saints and send them out to participate in a pagan ritual, does this really honor the saints???

May God bless you. Keep up the great work.

Mary

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. We fully agree. People should not have anything to do with Halloween. It’s very interesting that almost every parent who claims to be Catholic will allow his or her children to dress up for Halloween. It’s another example of how liberal and out of touch with the faith and the truth almost everyone is today.

New Rite of Exorcism

Subject: New Rite of Exorcism of Paul VI

Even though Father Amorth serves the NewChurch, he makes an astonishing admission: The revised rite of exorcism is worthless in the everlasting fight against evil. As if it wasn´t enough JP2 promulgated a new form of rosary that increases the number of Hail Marys by each 1/3 to 66.6 instead of the usual 50.

… Lefebvre DID state on certain occasions that the Vatican II Sacraments were deprived of validity, how about a similar admission from the biggest expert on exorcisms in the world? Maybe it´s a first step for many inside the Novus Ordo structure to see the light. First they realize that the Vatican II sect replaced a time proven Exorcism rite with a phony that won´t even tickle the Devil.

After accepting that, newchurchmen can move one step forward and see the errors in the New Catechism. And finally see that the New Sacraments were invalidated.

I also wanted to mention about a supposed accusation that Paul VI was fooled by Bugnini during the reform of the Liturgy. A lot of people in the Traditional circles (FSSPX) are moving to the position that Paul VI was a good Pope who happened to be misled by evil men (the same scenario they apply to JP2 and B16). If that is really the case, like they claim, then why did Paul VI go anyway and promulgate the Novus Ordo, with very few alterations? Why did he personally make Bugnini a Bishop? Seems like a promotion to me. And why did he let the New Mass go ahead for almost ten years, without ever wanting to do a recall

MHFM: Those who think that Paul VI was good really need to look at our video or file on him: Paul VI (manifest heretic who claimed to be Pope 1963-1978) [link to section]

Two questions

Hi, my name is Jorge and live in Utah. I have a great respect for brother Michael Diamond and so I turn to Most Holy Family Monastery for two concerns/questions that I have. The first question is by far the most important… The two concerns are listed below. Thank you so much for your time.

Question #1: What do you think about the Diocese of Utah decreed that the Blood of Christ is suspended from mass during Swine Flu epidemic.

Question #2: There is a picture called "Jacinta 1972". In it contains the hour, date, time and year of the great chastisement. I figured June 10, 1011 when WWIII will occur. What's your comment on that?

Again, thanks for your time.

Jorge Rodriguez

MHFM: Thanks for the interest. To your first question, we think it’s irrelevant that the Diocese of Utah made that move. That’s because the Body and Blood of Christ are not present in the New Mass. It’s invalid. Please consult our file: on the New Mass.

Regarding #2, it comes from the false Bayside Messages. These false messages contain numerous heresies and false prophecies. They are not from God or the Blessed Virgin, but from the Devil: False Apparitions (Divine Mercy, Bayside, Medjugorje) [Link to Section]

SSPX

Dear MHFM -

Just wondering if the brothers at MHFM are aware of yesterday’s meeting between Vatican and SSPX representatives? Apparently the SSPX reps are calling out the Vatican over its false-ecumanism and vague/contradicting topics of V-2 documents. What are your opinions?

MHFM: We think it further expresses the ridiculous, heretical and schismatic position of the SSPX. It has only been decades now, and they still aren’t under the “authorities” and the “hierarchy” they regard as Catholic. It’s absurd. At the same time they even have the audacity to denounce people who correctly point out that the Vatican II sect doesn’t have any authority. Their position is a joke at this point.

The Society of St. Pius X [Link to Section]

It also highlights Benedict XVI’s role as a deceiver in the last days. His gross apostasy is there for all to see, but he fools the bad-willed by making it look like he’s friendly in some way to tradition.

Interest

Dear Brothers and Sisters:

Years ago, I left the church after Vatican II. I do not like the "New Mass ", and the majority of changes that were made since that time. Since I have not found any Traditional Catholic Churches in the area where I live, what can I do? I do not wish to return to the "New Church" at present. Should I change to another denomination? Any suggestions or advice would greatly be appreciated.

Thank you and God bless.

Gerard

MHFM: Thanks for the interest. You need to become a traditional Catholic. The steps for how to do that are on our website. We recommend that you obtain our basic package. One must be convinced of all Catholic teachings before making the profession of faith and receiving sacraments. Obviously one is not convinced of Catholic teachings if one is considering becoming part of another denomination. We’re glad to hear about the interest, but you should pray the Rosary and become convinced.

New Debate Posted

David Moore is a Protestant who studies the Bible and attempts to refute Catholic teaching from it. He produces videos, articles and materials which are dedicated to trying to disprove Catholic teaching from the Bible. He challenged us to a debate. So, we had a recorded debate discussion on the topic of faith alone and eternal security. The total time for the debate discussion is 1 hour and 56 minutes.

Debate is here

It will be found permanently in our Traditional Catholic Audios, Telephone Debates, and Refuting Protestantism sections.

Halloween

Brothers,

Here is an article describing the goings-on at the white house. Though the article states that Obama was in plain clothes, the picture of him on my Yahoo start-up page appears, to me, that he is dressed up like a priest. No doubt a novus horror "priest."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091101/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_obamas_halloween

Sincerely,

Howard

Dear Brothers,

This latest publicity stunt by the V-2 sect to celebrate the heretical Joint Declaration on Justification with the Lutherans is yet another example of how bad willed Australian "Catholics" are. I think it's really just a celebration of Halloween - October 31 (and the "principles" of Halloween - "do what thou wilt") - by the V-2 sect!!! The fact that the Joint Declaration was signed on Halloween in 1999 shows how Antichrist the whole affair is. How in-your-face-Antichrist does it have to get before people wake up and see how the Catholic Church's buildings are being raped by apostates?!!

God Bless,

Chris White

Praying

Alright, I'm confused, and I would really appreciate it if you could enlighten me on this point:

When we pray the Rosary, do we dedicate it to Our Lady, or to God? Do we offer the Rosary to Our Lady only, or do we have to offer it to God? I'm confused!

Do we have to pray it with the belief that whatever grace of favor we might receive from praying it, we receive it from Our Lady, or from God?

I'm confused! This has always confused me, because, it goes without saying that we only adore God in the Holy Trinity alone, and not any Saint or even Our Lady, but, then they also say that when we pray to any Saint or even to Our Lady, that we Catholics do not expect to receive any graces or favors from the power of the Saints of from Our Lady, but that they intercede for us and obtain from God whatever we ask from them, not that they of their own power grant us said grace or favor; but then how do we reconcile that with the Rosary? I don't get it!

This is why I have hesitated to pray the Rosary, because I just realized these things and now I don't know what to think or the beliefs we should or should not have when we pray the Rosary.

Could you please help me with this?

AB

MHFM: When we pray to the Blessed Virgin, she prays to God for us. Yet the connection between the Mother of God and God Himself is so powerful and strong and intimate, that it’s automatic. It’s not as if one needs to draw a mental separation: well, I pray to Our Lady, who will in turn pray to God for me. No, it’s instantaneous and automatic. We pray to Our Lady; she grants us graces. The same is true when we pray to other saints, who are in possession of the Beatific Vision. Yet it’s true to an even greater and more powerful degree with Our Lady.

Rosary

To whom it may concern,

My name is Amanda… I live in a very small town in North Carolina. I desire to become catholic. I read a catholic bible, I pray the rosary.. In fact the doctors told me I could never have any more children. After saying the rosary to the Holy mother, I became pregnant. I live in a southern baptist community, and there isnt much help for me. I feel its imperative that I become catholic. I dream about it, I feel led to it. Please help me … Thank you

Amanda

MHFM: It’s great to hear about your interest. You should continue to pray the Rosary each day, more than five decades a day if possible. You should obtain basic package with the main books and DVDs we sell. We recommend the basic catechism and the books we offer from St. Louis De Montfort on the Rosary and True Devotion to Mary. A few other lives of the saints might really help.

This file explains the steps one needs to take to convert. If you contact us here, we can also help you further.

The Steps to convert to the traditional Catholic faith and for those leaving the New Mass - Baptism and Conditional Baptism - the Council of Trent's Profession of Faith for Converts

Comment

Thank you so much for posting your debate with David Moore. In my opinion, this is your finest debate! It was very educational, and you both should be congratulated for conducting yourselves in a professional manner and staying on topic. I think it was quite clear that when Mr Moore was challenged with irrefutable and overwhelming evidence - he had concede that he either had no answer, or at the very least he had to admit the text was "difficult." I REALLY hope you debate him again in the future on other topics: such as scipture alone and the true presence of the Eucharist (both of which were briefly touched on.) In most cases, Mr Moore seemed sincere and was willing to admit when you caught him in contradictions. Ultimately it was obvious that the Catholic position was shown to be correct, and anyone with a shred of honesty will admit that Brother Peter clearly won this debate.

God bless the MHFM, and continue your great work!

- Ed

Noises

Dear Brothers,

Those are astounding videos on the heretics JP2 and Reginald Foster. They are really just like very bad comedians, only they are pretending to be real "pope" and "priest"!!! Those weird noises of JP2 remind me of your exorcism tape, how the possesed person was making pig noises, etc. "Fr." Reginald Foster treats hell like it's a joke, but you can see him physically squirm as he wrestles with his conscience…

That was a fascinating debate with the heretic David Moore on the heresies of Faith Alone and Eternal Security. It touched on many important points. It did sadden me though that Mr. Moore was obstinate in the face of his own confusion about what many scriptures mean. If God is the God of understanding, then surely he would enable us to understand his words in the Bible. Catholics understand that Jesus made St. Peter the Pope in order to explain the true meaning of scriptures (amongst many other duties). Perhaps it was providential that St. Peter, the first Pope, was the one who wrote of St. Paul’s Epistles:

2 Peter 3:16 - As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are certain things hard to be understood, which the unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, to their own destruction.

Eternal Security is like saying that Adam, made in the state of grace/justice, could never have committed the Original Sin, or to say, “oh, now that I’m an American citizen, it is ipso facto impossible for me to break the law!!!”

At 0:45 of video 5, David said, “I really do believe it’s a question of have you ever seen God or not.” If that were so, then how come Satan, who really, truly, substantially saw God, and stood in His presence – how is it that Lucifer became Satan the Devil, if it’s simply a question of whether one has “seen” God or not?! Obviously even angels can be damned!

Faith Alone is like people who believe that by simply imagining something, it will happen. If I were to imagine a house to live in, would that then appear? No. I would need to physically work at building it…. It seems to me that Protestants, like David Moore, almost secretly worship the Bible! I think this because that is where God seems to begin and end for them – in the Bible! Our God, the True God, the Catholic God, the Lord Jesus Christ, actually made everything and uses it according to His will, and not according to man’s desires. Protestants seem to begin with the initial assumption that all you need for salvation is the Bible, but we know that the entire Catholic Church is needed for salvation. If God were actually their authority, they (Protestants) would believe what the Bible says about St. Peter, etc. Also, I’m guessing that about half the NT is admonitions and encouragements for the faithful to continue in justice and grace. If we cannot lose salvation, then half of the NT is superfluous.

…In his closing statement David said, “The Catholic Church would have to be 100% right about everything.” And if the Catholic Church was established by God Himself, with a rock as the keeper of the Keys to the Kingdom, we would expect it to be right about everything, as it truly is and always has been. Why is it that Protestants all acknowledge the elaborate Jewish system and its destruction (of the temple, etc.), but they deny the Christian system, the Catholic Church, the new Israel?! Oh I forgot, they are PROTESTants, head-butting the rocks like Jews!!!

Thank you Brothers and God Bless,

Chris White

MHFM: Thanks for the comments. We think that there is more hope for his conversion than for many Protestants out there.

About

Subject: About the sola fide debate

Part 7 was simply the best. Since Mr. Moore sees no difference between venial and mortal sins, he should see no difference between fornicating just one time or a thousand times.

Comment

Your recent debate once again proves as you stated, that many points are "ignored" when people are trying to justify their thinking. Out of ignorance and their Vail of spiritual blindness, they choose from an al-a-cart menu to manifest their own reality. Ignoring what they can not understand merely because they are excluded from its interpretation (blindness). Unfortunately, their false interpretation out of pride, leads only to eternal damnation. I believe deep down, these folks know they are wrong. Many people continue down the wrong path none the less, while few, fight the fight to have the Vail lifted to see the truth.

God Bless MHFM,
Tom

Comment

Great job on the 11-part debate with David Moore on the issue of whether the Bible teaches "justification by faith alone" or "eternal security". The debate showed clearly both of those Protestant beliefs are totally unscriptural, and I think Mr. Moore (if indirectly) did concede that the Catholic views Bro. Peter showed in this debate are correct.

It is sad to realize that this man, who expressed many times how very careful he is to NOT sin, especially in a grave manner… IS sinning in a mortal, death-dealing manner by disobeying Jesus… by joining a false religion started by A MAN who was riddled with evil (Luther), and by NOT adhering to the ONLY true religion on Earth which Jesus Christ founded.

For example, Mr. Moore agreed with Bro. Peter about the scriptures where even St. Paul expresses fears that HE---the GREAT Apostle to the Gentiles---could become REPROBATE-------well, maybe Mr. Moore could understand it this way: HAD "PROTESTANTISM" EXISTED AT THE TIME OF ST. PAUL, AND HAD ST. PAUL ABANDONED THE TRUE FAITH CHRIST TAUGHT---THE CATHOLIC FAITH----in order to become a "protestant", then in that case St. Paul's worst fears would have been realized, for he WOULD have become a REPROBATE, and fallen into heresy and died in this most wretched and vile state of mortal sin, and Hell would have been his eternity.

Maybe it is because protestants------just like Vatican 2 "catholics" and other apostates, heretics and schismatics----ARE in these tragic delusions that they lack the grace to see the only one true church of the traditional Catholic Faith........for mortal sin blocks grace. But miracles can happen, they do happen every day---and I believe that if a reprobate and sinner like me can come to see the truth, than others can.....but clinging to such clearly non-Biblical "pacifiers" of "justification by faith alone"/"eternal security" has to end, since such pacifiers are filled with death-dealing poison. Same goes for the V2 "Catholics"---- let go of your baby blankets, and embrace the only truth that can help you get into Heaven----TRADITIONAL Catholicism.

That's why the grace of final perseverance is the most important thing to pray/ask for… Once again Thank You! and great job on this debate.

Innocent III

Subject: Innocent III

Hey Brothers,

I am sorry if you already have this quote in your material somewhere, I could not find it on your site or in your books. Maybe I did not look hard enough.
This is from Denzinger 410 and it has to do with there being a difference between a person dying with only original sin as opposed to actual sin. I think I understand it right.

(Denz. 410) Innocent III "The effect of Baptism (and the Character)": "Original, therefore, which is committed without consent, is remitted without consent through the power of the sacrament; but actual, which is contracted with consent, is not mitigated in the slightest without consent... The punishment of original sin is deprivation of the vision of God, but the punishment of actual sin is the torments of everlasting hell..."

I thought this was relevant to the belief that some schismatics have that unbaptized infants suffer the same punishment as those who die in actual mortal sin.
Also it proves that those with original sin cannot be in Heaven because they lose the vision of God. This may not be ex cathedra but it reiterates Dogma. Please correct me if I am missing something or I am not enterpreting something correctly.

Nate

MHFM: We don’t generally use that citation to prove the point about unbaptized infants not suffering the fires of Hell. That’s because it comes from a letter of Pope Innocent III called Ex Parte Tua. That letter is not infallible. That letter also teaches the error that original sin was remitted by circumcision. That error, that original sin was remitted by circumcision, was contradicted by the infallible teaching of the Council of Trent. We cover this in our book: EENS, in section 17, in the process of refuting an objection raised for “baptism of desire.”

That being said, we think that the quote does add something. Even though it doesn’t come from an infallible document, it shows that another pope held the same position: that unbaptized infants go to a part of Hell where there is no fire. It’s something additional to consider, along with the more authoritative statements which demonstrate the point.

JP2

Crazy JP2 Video…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TIoelyZ5qvQ

John XXIII

DEAR BROTHER DIMOND

I HAVE BEEN GOING THROUGH YOUR WEBSITE AND FIND YOUR INFORMATION RELEVANT TO OUR TIMES AND I DO WANT TO HAVE MY FAMILY AND I'S SOULS SAVED HOWEVER IF THE LATE POPE JOHN XXIII WAS ACTUALLY AN ANTIPOPE WHY IS HIS BODY LAYING IN A STATE OF INCORRUPT NATURE AND IF EVERY CHURCH IS USING THE NEW MASS IS TAKING COMMUNION VALID AND ARE MY CONFESSION VALID?

A VERY MUCH UPSET CATHOLIC

TERRY MORIER

FROM CANADA

MHFM: As we point out in our book (The Truth about What Really Happened to the Catholic Church after Vatican II), and in our section on John XXIII: The Scandals and Heresies of John XXIII [PDF File]:

After his death, the Vatican sent for Gennar Goglia, who with his colleagues embalmed John XXIII. Goglia injected ten liters of embalming fluid into John XXIII’s wrist and stomach to neutralize any putrefaction. This explains why John XXIII’s body didn’t decompose like normal bodies. In January 2001, John XXIII’s body was exhumed and placed in a new bullet-proof crystal coffin now on display in St. Peter’s basilica. John XXIII’s face and hands were also covered in wax. (citations in section)

This is the only reason that John XXIII (who was a very wicked heretic) did not decay like normal people. As far as your other question goes, the New Mass is definitely invalid and it’s a grave sin to continue to go there. The confessions to priests ordained in the New Rite of Ordination are not valid, but if the priest was ordained in the old rite and says the proper words it could have been valid. That’s covered in our material.

Liturgy

Dear Brothers

"HIGH CHURCH" NON-CATHOLICS

Some so-called Traditionalist Catholic websites and blogspots salivate in, and glorify the "Tridientine" liturgy, supposedly celebrated in a most pristine way, by various Anglican/Episcopalian clergy and groups. Truly, brothers, are not these liturgies celebrated by heretics fit only for the garbage bins, whether velvet lined or not?

More seriously, such Traditionalists claim that they are any different to Novus Ordo Catholics who vigorously pursue ecumenical practices?

Sincerely,

Joe. M

MHFM: It’s certainly true that many traditionalists don’t have the faith, but instead glory only or primarily in the external, aesthetical and emotional aspects of Catholicism. They enjoy the chanting and the singing and the liturgy but don’t really care about the faith and the truth. In that way, many of them are very similar to high-Church Anglicans. They just have a slightly more traditional or conservative inclination. We definitely believe that the comparison is appropriate.

Debate

MHFM: A new debate that some of our readers might find interesting will hopefully be posted soon.

Astounding

Thought you might be interested in this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7JBQvIC7YQ

Astonishing indeed. Well, at least he's honest in his heresies.

MHFM: That’s just astounding heresy. The guy is totally evil. That’s the Vatican II apostasy for you. He’s a senior Vatican priest. Also, we wonder how many false traditionalists – who say they cannot judge that Benedict XVI is a heretic – would say the same about this apostate.

College

MHFM,

I would like to ask your opinion on college parties. My parents as well as the people who invited me to a party say that its fine, they understand I don't approve of getting drunk so just come and don't drink, you can just socialize. I see two problems with it. One, it is an approximate occasion of many sins (alcohol, immodest dress, these parties easily induce many to sins of the flesh). Secondly, even though they say they know I don't want to be a part of drinking I still think that my going is giving them scandal. I feel my attendance shows I don't drink personally but it’s fine if someone else chooses to do so, which would be wrong. What do you think about it? Several of them know my views on many things.

Kenneth Connelly

MHFM: One should definitely not go to such parties. It is an occasion of sin, as you said. But additionally, to be in such a mortally sinful atmosphere where the entire occasion is basically defined by mortal sin is to be implicated in it. It would have to be one of the worst things a person could do – not in the sense that there aren’t worse mortal sins, but in terms of putting oneself in a situation where one’s soul is apt to be ruined.

Former

I am a former employee of EWTN who was terminated because of my support of true Catholic faith and sacraments. I assure you that you are correct. They are modernists who are afficted with conciliar papolatry.

Comment

That article you posted about "Cardinal George" and "Archbishop Dolan" can only be described as a "puke page" because seeing this idiotic face in the photo, the sliminess, the malevolence so obvious in this apostate's visage and countenance, could only make one want to puke.

At this point, I can't help but feeling that anyone who can fall for these most noxious and pestilent enemies of Christ ANTICS deserve everything they get: total spiritual blindness, etc. Still, since I was a blind fool myself, until very recently when I was miraculously led to your website and information (the truth) I will pray for all those poor deceived hapless souls still "accepting" these V2 apostates and their incredibly EVIL counter-church, since the Holy Ghost will blow wherever He wills, and there may be a certain number of Mary's true children still out there, somewhere, whom God intends to save....

As for the bad news on "president" obama's (what a side-show freak!) "National Emergency'" re: "swine flu"----- can any one out there say "FASCISM"??? My own health is so incredibly damaged from a "flu shot" I got last winter (yes I was a big-time fool for allowing it) that I have to admit my life will probably (except for a miracle, which I am still praying for) never be the same. It's even hard for me to pray, much less clean the house and fulfill all my duties as a house-wife, much less WORK, as I always used to do.....be warned---beware----do not get any of these "flu shots" because from my own personal experience, I would advise that they are designed to incapacitate, and even to kill.............Sincerely,

Topic

Subject: Great job on audio praying to Saints

Brothers Thanks for all the information

James

Topic

Thank you for the pro life video. I had a miscarriage earlier in the year. I could accept that this soul was in a part of hell where there was no hellfire, but had still been haunted as to why our Almighty God let it happen. Now I can see that if this child had been born, its future sins would probably put him/her at a worse place in hell. Thanks again. This is a hard topic to frame as so many do want to believe these unborn souls go straight to heaven. I'm very glad God gave you the grace to make this video. May The Holy Trinity continue to bless MHFM!

Christina Kalix

Comment

Great video again guys, I just wanted to make a few comments, abortion is of the devil and he has a reason for it just like the same reason he tries to get all of us into hell. That is his one and only objective to ruin souls, that being said if he gets man to promulgate abortion but the unbaptized babies go to heaven anyway, his purpose is defeated! Oh yes, I know the devil is defeated anyway but many souls are lost in this great battle that Our Lady predicted at Fatima.

Remember what Mary said to the children about WWll, that most will go to hell. The devil wouldn't persist in something that has no effect for him {devil}, the ruining of souls. Remember that these devils were once Angels but were cast out of Heaven, Angels and devils are very highly intelligent beings, more intelligent than we are. Plain and simple Jesus says that you need water and the HOLY SPIRIT to remove original sin. Remember the devil will always do the opposite of what JESUS teaches or does!!! The problem here is that the dogmas taught by the True Catholic Church are so linked together that to deny one you deny them all, you can't mix good and evil theology! With the
BLESSED HOLY TRINITY everything has its order and reason even if we don't understand it, we are finite and He is infinity!!! May the Queen of Heaven, with the Great Rosary and the scapular save us all.

Todd

EWTN

Subject: What would Jesus do?

Did you pray and seek God's guidance before you wrote this website? Just wondering. Do you actually watch EWTN before you trash it. I wonder what Jesus would do. He spoke kindly even to Mary Magdaline.

Della

MHFM: The heresies that we cover from EWTN are documented. You need to wake up. The people on EWTN accept Vatican II and false ecumenism. They are modernists. Jesus spoke kindly to Mary Magdalene because He knew that she had the good will to change. But He condemned other obstinate sinners and false teachers in strong words when it was appropriate.

EWTN and the Charismatic Movement [link to section]

New Video

Comments

… Thank you for posting the video on JP2 teaching that "Man is the Way". It becomes more and more apparent how the world has put man in the place of God.

The near misses are incredible. Thank you for posting them.

The Lord Monckton speech is startling. The end truly is near!

Vatican 2 thumbs up for Karl Marx?! How do they answer for the Gulags when they silence Bp. Williamson on the "Holocaust" - oh, I forgot - the Gulags were not aimed at Jews, so it's ok to slaughter 100,000,000 people (in their mind)!!!

The video on abortion and the Pelagian heretics is excellent. It is very easy to see how wrong the modern day abortionist heretics are, and also how they are worse than the Pelagians, since they reject the necessity of any kind of baptism (even though there is only one). Your reference to the denial of Original Sin is also very helpful in understanding this issue. Thank you.

God Bless,

Chris White

Letter

[NOTE: For those it might interest, this is a letter we recently sent to a person who is still a supporter of the Vatican II sect. This person is considering the full truth of the traditional Catholic faith (i.e., sedevacantism, etc.), but is not convinced.]

As an addendum to the last e-mail, you really should get our big book, The Truth about What Really Happened to the Catholic Church after Vatican II, if you haven't seen it - in addition to our other books. The evidence is covered there. It contains their worst heresies, a history of their false ecumenism, hundreds of photos, the heresies in Vatican II, etc. (By the way, Benedict XVI's endorsement of Vatican II alone would prove that he's not the pope.)

You also probably believe in heresy on the dogma Outside the Church There is No Salvation. If so, that's another big reason that you still are unable to see the truth. You really should get that book as well.

The fact that you would say that most of the heresies come from PCT [Benedict XVI’s book, Principles of Catholic Theology] seems to reveal that you aren't very familiar with the material we've put out. Some significant heresies do come from that book, but they constitute only a tiny fraction of the heresies. We have a whole section on Benedict XVI's post-election heresies. For instance, one of his worst heresies (among dozens) is his recent declaration that a schismatic leader is a "pastor in the Church of Christ."

Also, from what we gathered, you seem to like popular music. That is all sinful garbage which blocks out grace. You really should stop listening to it. In addition, if you don't pray the full Rosary each day (all 15 decades), you should. It's critical.

Finally, and I'm saying this to help, you say that you hang around with your girlfriend. Well, unless a person is seriously considering marriage and perhaps soon, having a long-standing girlfriend is very dangerous and usually an unwise thing to do. Almost always people fall into sins of the flesh that way. If you are committing sins that way (and even deep kissing between unmarried persons is a mortal sin), and not praying the full Rosary, then God will pull grace from you and you will be unable to see the truth. Wisdom is chaste (James 3:17).

Frankly, some of the things you have said reveal that you are still in a spiritual fog. The fact that you need more proof, after hearing the debate and seeing some of the things we've covered, is a very bad sign. You need to realize that the people you think are Catholic [like the guy we debated, other prominent figures in the Vatican II sect, etc.] are very evil people. That's no exaggeration. I know that might shock you, but it's the truth. They are totally apostate unbelievers headed straight for Hell. They hold that anti-Catholic Protestants are not even heretics. You heard him say it when he was asked about it in the debate. That’s almost satanic. That means that the Catholic faith is meaningless.

That is a total mockery of everything Catholic, all the dogmas, Our Lady, Our Lord, etc. It reveals that they don't possess one whiff of faith. So, by surrounding yourself with those types, even if you are just reading them all the time or listening to them or thinking that they cannot be on the wrong path, it can brainwash a person. It can sort of give you a community feeling that this group is okay, when it is not. It can negatively impact you in a huge way. The way to find the truth and analyze things correctly is to prescind completely from what all of your friends and clique-members think. It is to analyze, in solitude, what God thinks. Consider the truth without any regard for the opinions of the people around you; for they are totally deceived.

-MHFM

Comment

Dear Brothers:

I never had the chance to thank you for the 3 part-series of videos dealing with the sins of the flesh against purity. Nicely done! I did not know that [these things were] so bad. I knew the church regarded it (or at least used to) as a sin, but I thought it was only venial.

Nowadays, if you go to a Psychologist, he will say it´s only normal. Even many of the Protestant sects (with their changeable morality) bought the idea that´s part of own´s "exploration" and a way of acquiring "practice". The same mentality that encourages people to accept and even try to embrace homosexuality. In my youth, my parish priest (novus ordo) treated the whole masturbation subject as venial and a chapter or live. He was also against infant baptism (a total heretic, a protestant under a priest´s clothes). When I told him I wanted to be a Priest he told me that first I needed to "experience" live, go out, date, kiss... I don´t think some guy like that will ever threaten someone with the pains of hell.

To be frank with you, I live in a city that is as close to hell as can be (Rio de Janeiro)… I now walk around with my rosary inside my pocket. Every time I see something that disturbs me… I just place my hand on it and ask for strength…

It seemed impossible at first, but it´s not so hard after someone watches Brother Michael´s masterpiece video "Death and the Journey to Hell". That´s a very inspiring material. The best I´ve ever seen on this topic. If you guys want to attract people to your page, this video (along with Creation and Miracles) is by far the best option, since even Traditionalists (FSSPX alike) and conservative newchurchmen can feel attracted to it, without touching at first glance on sedevacantism and the whole baptism of desire issue. This may be one of your earliest works, but I don´t think it will ever get old. Deo gratias that you did not follow the trend and took easy on the issue with fear of insulting or scaring people away. After the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus lost nearly all of his followers, and even inquired the twelve if they were planning to run away too. But He did not care. He knew all too well that Truth is far more important than damaged egos.

Fatima

Dear MHFM,

The Vatican II sect remains the Vatican II sect until it is deposed, and sadly these events are forever violent and catastrophic as Catholic history clearly illustrates. Since the atmosphere at the Vatican, at present, by most reports coming out of Rome, tense, on both sides, those that side with the present administration, and those who are plotting to overthrow them, from several fronts-religious and political- it can logically be computed that the third secret of Fatima, unrevealed in totality to the world, has a date yet in the future. Moreso, the complete message must be revealed to the world. There is no way out of this since the Blessed Mother has commanded that it be done, and it will be done, completely and correctly. What the Queen demands, the Queen gets! It's not complicated. It's regal obedience. The 'etc...' after the dogma of the faith in Portugal remains silent, and squashed, moreso, after sister Lucia disappeared from the scene, I suppose, suffering violent, torturous death-deliberate poisoning- as some conspiricists have propounded- hence, replaced by phony Lucy, by and for the Vatican II agenda. Our Lady of Fatima is the penultimate thorn of the Vatican II sect and their worldwide plot of destructing the Catholic Church by creating a new theology, and new Church, by the aegis of Vatican II quasi-authority as your ministry clears elucidates by providing the true teachings of the Roman Catholic Church; undefiled, pure, and holy as handed down from the time of Peter. If most Catholics only realized that throughout the life of sister Lucia those in heaven never left her side and communicated with her when necessary. Sister Lucia was that conduit to this evil world the Blessed Mother used, and sister Lucia administered humbly without retardation, and assurance. Her supposed silence since the early 50's, til her supposed death a few years past, sans revelations from heaven is inordinate in sister Lucia's unique position as seer, and revealer in this era. For sister Lucia to remain silent all that period of time is absolutely without precedence as long as she walked, and devoutly prayed in this evil world. The last revealing secret of Fatima, undisclosed at this time, begins with a loud defiance with heretic Roncalli , who we know rubbed shoulders with those openly opposed to the Roman Catholic Church; communists, Rosicrusians, Masons, Protestants-the minions of evil. By openly proclaiming the Fatima seers, "...prophets of doom..." Roncalli revealed not only his pride, but that 'something' in the future spelled worse catastrophy than what the world had previously went through. Roncalli was in blatant denial of Catholic truth, and revelation-divine and private. Roncalli reviled the Fatima message and their seers as much as the masons of Ourem. The infiltration of the Church was complete in his eyes, and man would rule the day from the Chair of Peter bringing good news, not of Christ, but of man, and The Blessed Mother's message at Fatima would never see the light of day til' the end of time-so Roncalli and his successors thought. The bad fruit, and the root of this plague, Vatican II, is dying, and the fetid odor emanating from Ratzinger and his disilusioned sect begs an end. Through your revealing efforts, and those opposed to Vatican II continue, hope remains, and Love in Christ, and His true Church prevails. God Bless MHFM.

MHFM: Thanks for the interest. One point: we don't believe that the Vatican II sect has revealed any part of the real Third Secret of Fatima.

Death

Subject: God did not make death but God is the one who kills and makes alive

I have a question.

In the Wisdom of Solomon 1:13 it states that: "God did not make death" however in Deuteronomy 32:39 that: "God is the one who kills and makes alive." How do we reconcile these two apparently contradictory views of God and death?

Thanks,
Ken

MHFM: God did not make death because God made man immortal. Death only came into existence as a result of the sin of Adam. Since death now exists as a result of man’s sin, God kills and makes alive.

Comment

This morning I was listening to The Laura Ingram show. She says she's a Catholic. Today her guest Ray Arroyo said the "Popes" move to absorb Anglicans is a triumph of Orthodoxy. Some of the Anglicans are feeling out of sorts because their religion is being overrun by liberals. So, the schismatics have found a new home where they can practice their false religion. Annexing false religions to create a conglomerate of false faith seems like push towards someone's idea of a new world order. I wonder who's next?

Hmmm...When I googled Mr. Arroyo to get the spelling of his name his blog popped up and he is a big EWTN supporter. The page that was brought up discussed how the V2" Bishops" were very pro government healthcare. To me that means pro socialism. From a Catholic standpoint I don't know how to react to the healthcare issue. Certainly Capitalism has its issues but to broaden the scope of Socialism always is cause for alarm especially if there is separation of church and state. Unless I am corrected, at first glance I would have to reject US Government Healthcare.

Matthew

MHFM: Arroyo is EWTN’s main host. He is a TOTAL apostate. He fully embraces the worst of the false ecumenism, commenting with glee on synagogue trips, Assisi-abominations and many others.

Huh?

Hi, i can see why you are upset with Benedict. But i can assure you that his outward appearance of toleration is just for show. Political correctness is in fashion now a days. Believe me, Benedict, in his heart, is just as intolerant as you are. Look at where he came from? He was head of the Holy Office, the very seat of the Inquisition. Rest assured, Benedict would just as soon see every non catholic burned at the stake. But to buy time, he is putting on sheeps clothing. thanks for your time. your friend wayne

MHFM: You are obviously confused. When he was the head of the Vatican II sect’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Benedict XVI was every bit the apostate that he is now. In our material we cover loads of his outrageous pre-“election” heresies.

Benedict XVI (The Heresies of Benedict XVI File) [link to section]

Baptism

Hello,

First, thanks for all the information your monastery has made available - I've only recently converted and your site is very helpful in these first days as a Catholic. This brings me to my question: I asked my Catholic fiance to baptize me, which she did, and all went well except that she preferred to use "Holy Spirit" in place of "Holy Ghost". Besides that, everything else was identical to the form as stated on your website. Is this a valid baptism?

Thanks for your time,
Steve Stanley

MHFM: Yes, both Holy Spirit and Holy Ghost are acceptable. We’re glad to hear about the interest.

The Way

From our video, John Paul II preached the Gospel of the Antichrist: that every man is God.

Comment

... I grew up in the "Novus Ordo" church. Until I discovered your web site I never knew the Traditional Catholic Church existed. Though I knew something was wrong with the "Novus Ordo" church, I couldn't leave "The Catholic Church" and I didn't know why. When I first started examining your materials, I didn't want to be taken a fool. I didn't want to be deceived. I began the process of ensuring the quotes you provided in your books were accurate and in context by verifying your citations. I have purchased many of the books you have referenced in your materials and I have verified many of the citations. I don't necessarily agree with everything you say, but most of it, yes. There is more of the Truth of Jesus Christ in your materials than I have ever seen before in my entire life. I have found only one quote that was questionable, and that may have been a matter of interpretation as the original language of the document in unknown. I thank you for your work and your efforts. May God bless you with unfailing faith and may you see His face in Heaven.

Receiving your material has absolutely changed my life, though I must say I still have a long way to go... Thank you for the valuable service you have provided.

Sincerely

James B. Patterson III

V-2 “converts”

In many of the debates regarding the Vatican II sect, you raised the valid question "Can a Protestant convert into a Neo-Cath without abjuring heresies like Sola Fide?"

I guess that question should be made once again in light of the recent news. In any direction this newchurch is a simply a joke. They either refuse converts, or, when they decide to accept mass conversions, they do it in the wrong way and by the wrong reasons.

It seems to me all an Anglican has to do to "become" Catholic is to be against gay marriage, gay priests and woman priests. Those are relevant points, no doubt about that, but they are primary disciplinary and/or moral issues, not about faith.

So the question remains: Can a displeased Anglican "convert" to the new religion while still believing in Anglican Theology?

PS: People nowadays have very soft skin and easily become offended by the truth. And in a paradox, they don´t realize that they themselves are being offensive. How could someone accuse you guys of not being polite, when the person in question who first wrote said people (including you) were silent on the issue. By the way: Isn´t true that you guys once send your material to every priest and bishop in the United States of America? If that is silence, I wonder what a scandal would be.

That being said, I believe both the content and the tone used in your answer seemed totally adequate to me.

MHFM: Yes, does anyone really believe that these “converts” accept the defined dogma Outside the Church There is No Salvation? Of course not. Does anyone really believe that they have become convinced that their former Anglican friends and colleagues, who don’t accept all of Catholic dogma, are in heresy and schism? No.

They have decided to visibly join the Vatican II sect only because they no longer felt comfortable where they were. It’s only because they no longer got the warm fuzzy spiritual feeling – which defines their false religion – in a “Church” that allowed women “priests” and active homosexuality. So they’ve just moved over slightly to a group that’s a bit more in line with their personal thinking. And that’s probably only because the Vatican II sect is also allowing them to be under an “ordinary” from among their ranks – so that they feel as Anglican as possible – in addition to keeping their previous “liturgical traditions” and married “priestly” lifestyle.

Near misses

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQ24Mw_r0eo&feature=player_embedded

MHFM: This first one is amazing. One can only conclude that God miraculously intervened to keep the child unharmed. It’s also very interesting that the child fell only an instant before train came. If it had fallen thirty seconds before that, it probably could have been removed from danger. It seems like a concatenation of events which lined up to show God’s miraculous power.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BO2rW1alVv8&feature=player_embedded

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNqWPswYYaA&feature=player_embedded

Book

Yesterday I had lunch with a friend for her birthday and she gave me a copy of Brother Michael Dimond's book about Padre Pio. I've already read it and it is the best book I've ever read!

Dolores Molter

MHFM: Thanks for the interest. It’s not the best book, but it has value and we’re glad that you have benefited from it.

Not too harsh

I thought your response to Emmanuel T’s question was right on point. It did not strike me as some kind of a harsh attack in anyway, rather you answered the question directly, and in a way which suggests you accepted it on face, as written, and did not attack the questioner at all. You approached it as though Emmanuel’s question was borne of a sincere concern along the lines of “someone ought to tell Rome, for if only they knew” (as opposed to say sarcasm), in that I took your answer to be patient and reassuring. For example how could he characterize you guys (and you easily could have interpreted his question as a direct attack) as “silent and helpless”? That assertion is patently ridiculous. Yet you explained to him in a matter of fact way, how a Catholic should view the situation in such a way that a real Catholic could take comfort.

What is it with people like “S”, so numerous nowadays, who think it is rude, or some kind of a personal attack, to say that one’s opinion is wrong, or that a particular statement is ridiculous?

I think this modern attitude is reflective of both the “self esteem” movement and the somewhat older relativist movement (the “truth isn’t knowable, if it is even real), and this of course comes directly from the false and condemned notion that Religious Liberty is somehow a “good thing”. What “S” seems to really be saying is “don’t tell me the truth, it might hurt my feelings”.

I’m reminded of the social etiquette rule that one should never discuss “religion and politics”. These subjects tend to force people into head on confrontations with truth in a way that small talk seldom does. The fact that these topics make most uncomfortable, is evidence that most are not of goodwill. They don’t want to know. If you tell them you are “mean spirited”, not charitable. Charity has come to mean something else. Usually it means giving other people’s money away to fund the result someone’s vice.

Bill Mulligan

Book

Dear MHFM,

Thank you for compiling the book about the Bible proving the Catholic Church. It is an excellent resource for anyone seeking the true Biblical Church.

Sincerely,
Matthew Falcon

Plan

Subject: New Vatican Plan

You see the news? 'New Vatican Plan Lets Anglicans Convert Easier'...there's your "Heresy of the Week"... Benedict never disappoints you guys, does he?

PLP

Comment

… the last e-mail exchange of someone accusing you of being too "harsh", was very troubling to me. One of my own vices that I have been praying and working to overcome is my "human respect" vice. I think I am being "charitable" to people by sugar coating words - instead of being honest and revealing their wicked ideas or speech as such - and it has nothing to do with being charitable, but being a coward....you were accurate in calling the motivation behind her false accusation as "human respect" and not out of charity.

Anyway..... her comment just really bothered me.

Comment

Subject: “S” regarding Emmanuel T

I'm pretty certain that the "S" stands for "satan" in the "re:emmanuel t " writer today---you were right on the mark… in reading in between the lines of emmanuel t's insulting "question" (accusation)---- all I have to say to people like "S" is: you'd better hurry up and get onto the RIGHT side of this battle BEFORE it's all over and too late, once Mary has totally crushed the enemy's head, and he is dead, forever…

Anne K

Sent

I don't know what to think about the state of the soul of Captain Lou Albano! He just died recently, October 14 at the age of 76. I knew he lost a lot of weight during the '90s after a heart attack. As a big fan of the Super Mario Brothers Super Show, which he played Mario in both live action and animated segments, I contacted him via the internet and sent him some of your material. He said "Yeah, that interesting. I don't like that they're [Rome] is cow tailing to certain groups like the you-know-whos. I'll certainly look into it." I certainly hope he did. I hope he did not have to answer for appearing in that "Girls Just Wanna Have Fun" video with Cyndi Lauper, which encouraged girls to exhibit wild behavior and turn a blind eye to their parents request! And some people say this song became a theme song for girls everywhere! That's truly evil. Cyndi Lauper who has a homosexual sister is a big supporter of the evil LGBT agenda. She even wrote the foreword to his autobiography. Too bad such a great talent doing the devil's bidding like that! But Captain Lou had to be a conservative! I just know he did! It doesn't seem to fit who he was as a man to be anything but that! I pray he found the true faith before his recent death…

-Michael Rudnicki

MHFM: We’re glad you sent him the material. A Catholic cannot consider someone among the faithful departed unless there is evidence that he or she died as a real Catholic.

Expose

Dear brothers michael and peter,

pls expose in your website the evils and lies of the wacky vatican 2 regarding this news though every traditional catholics know that this union is another abominable act but we have to condemn it publicly and unmask the deception and lies .. claiming for "universal salvation" and going against Salvation Dogma .. keep up the excellent apostolate for the glory of God! - sedevacantist from the Philippines

MHFM: It will be interesting to see what the actual “constitution” says when it comes out.

Harsh?

Subject: Rude Response

"What if someone were to go to Rome in the Vatican and denounce them all as heretics and tell them they are going against the Church?"

Your rude response to Emmanuel T's interesting question was full of mistaken assumptions, and was laced with unwarranted hostility:

Your assertion... is totally wrong.

It’s ridiculous for you to suggest...

But it’s absurd for you to imply...

[Y]our assertion reveals that you have an incorrect outlook...

Down South, we would say, "Where's your hometraining, boy?"

It is unfortunate for you and your readers that your lack of graciousness is so obvious. It is more than just immature, it looks like paranoia.

You are not helping the cause. You need to pray more.

And cut out the caffeine! ;)

MHFM: No, you are completely wrong. The response was totally warranted. You’re getting lost in the shuffle of some of his more mild language, and ignoring what he is actually asserting. He didn’t simply ask a question; he made serious accusations. You people let major insults to the Catholic faith or to true Catholics pass as long as they are couched in some mild language. True Catholics can focus and zero in on the truth when people like you cannot. Words matter. Not surprisingly, you only quoted his question, not what he actually asserted.

If you look carefully at what he is actually asserting, it’s very strong. It’s a major insult to true Catholics. In fact, it’s a direct slap in the face to all the true Catholics who have spent much time and effort (and even much of their lives) opposing the Vatican II sect and its apostate antipopes. He’s basically saying: you do nothing. You are helpless. He asserts that those who don’t go to Rome are “remaining silent” (i.e., doing nothing and possibly denying the faith and committing mortal sin by omission). That’s no small accusation. But his assertion that Catholics opposing the apostasy do nothing doesn’t matter to you because truth doesn’t matter to you. It’s all about appearing to be nice to people. (We wouldn’t be surprised in the least if you are a BOD salvation-in-any-religion apostate.)

His statement was false, uncalled for, and it deserved such a response. Hence, your criticism of our response reveals that you lack a Catholic understanding. You are too bogged down by human respect. Thus, you cannot focus in on the key points. In addition, this individual, if we recall correctly, has demonstrated bad will numerous times in the past.

Why?

I wanted to ask you, what you thought would happen, if any sedevacantist were to go to Rome and try to tell everyone there or maybe even Ratzinger, all that they have done, or ask them what are they doing? What if someone were to go to Rome in the Vatican and denounce them all as heretics and tell them they are going against the Church?

Why hasn't anyone attempted to do this? Or have there actually been some people that have attempted to do something like this, to go there and try to get them to see what they have done?

Don't you think something like this should be done, instead of just remaining silent and living helplessly without doing something like this?

I would really like to know your thoughts about this.

Emmanuel T.

MHFM: To sum up your e-mail: it’s much ado about nothing. Your assertion that people are remaining silent is totally wrong. People are spreading the truth in every medium: through the internet, mail, video, audio, etc. in public. It’s ridiculous for you to suggest there is some kind of need for Catholics to travel to Rome to talk to (and condemn) the apostates in person. If people want to do that, we don’t have any problem with it. But it’s absurd for you to imply that it’s some sort of obligation. That’s like saying: you should go visit the notorious abortionist and try to reason with him and tell him that it’s wrong to take a life. Or: you really need to have dinner with the head of the “Church” of Satan and tell him that it’s dark and evil to worship the Devil. They are fully aware of what they are doing. It’s enough to condemn the activity publicly.

You ask how they would react. They would respond by repeating their heresies. They would respond by saying that you don't have a “proper understanding” of Catholic teaching. They would tell you that you are not submissive to “the Magisterium,” “the pope” and “the council” (i.e., Vatican II). They would probably tell you about "the development of doctrine," and say that you "misunderstand" those dogmas you are quoting. (By the way, that sounds a lot like what the sedevacantists who deny the salvation dogma say, doesn’t it?)

Many people have written letters to Antipope Benedict XVI about his modernism, his heresies, and his false ecumenism. People in Rome have seen our material. Heretics are in control of the buildings in Rome. That’s just the situation. They know what they are doing and they are modernist apostates precisely because they want to be. That’s the situation that God has allowed, the one He predicted.

Lastly, your assertion that people are “living helplessly” reveals that you have an incorrect outlook on things. You are giving way too much emphasis to externals, almost equating it with the possession and practice of the faith. Catholics can find the truth they need to be Catholic and save their souls. That’s what matters. That’s certainly not helpless. It’s just the opposite: helpful unto salvation, for those of good will. It’s only helpless if you equate Catholicism with being in possession of certain buildings, etc.

Comment

Each day is a continued thank you for opening my eyes to the truth.

Sovereignty

Subject: MUST MUST WATCH - Actual VIDEO of Lord Monckton Saying, "Obama Poised to Cede Sovereignty in Copenhagen"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMe5dOgbu40

New Church

I just realized MHFM has a lot on u-tube and last night i re-listened to the debate you had with wm. golle back in 06....you know when I first heard this last Feb/March 09, when I first came upon your info online, it was one of the very first things I listened to but I remember it not making much sense to me as I did not have enough context or background info on the issues you cover in general. Well listening to it again last night, I was amazed at how very clearly and succinctly you Brothers expressed and defended all the facts in your material. But what amazed me most was that this character golle basically spent almost all of his portion of the 3 hour debate screeching like a woman something unintelligible about the "Roman Clergy"---I mean it was REALLY bizarre--- then I read where it says golle is FROM THE CAMDEN DIOCESE AND WORKS FOR THE CAMDEN DIOCESE CATHOLIC STAR HERALD--- well--- suddenly------the whole scenario all snapped right into focus. I mean, the hocus pocus that goes on around here with newchurchers has got to be some of the worst planet-wide. Trying to bring even a little light into this area can be quite a challenge.

For many years since we moved here in 97, my husband kept saying to me (about the "Catholic" church around S. jersey) "they're trying to bring in a new religion" but I didn't understand it, and nor really did he!, until we stumbled across your website….

Interest

Hello Sir / Madam,

I'm a Catholic here in the Archdiocese of Cebu, Philippines; 21 years of age. I was deeply troubled about the new mass. I really put emphasis on the Eucharist as a climax of my Catholic life. It's so sad to hear that there's no priest or bishop here offering traditional Catholic mass.

Is there any way that traditional mass be reinstated here in the archdiocese or parish?

MHFM: Thanks for the interest. All the bishops of the Vatican II sect are heretics and not Catholic. Therefore, one should not be looking for them to reinstate Catholic things in their “dioceses.” Before receiving traditional sacraments, one must be convinced on all issues (no baptism of desire, no salvation outside the Church, a rejection of the Vatican II antipopes, no NFP, etc.). Also, one must be convinced to never attend the invalid New Mass again.

You should look at our Where to go to Mass or confession today? for guidelines on receiving sacraments in our time. Also, one should pray the Rosary each day, all 15 decades if possible.

RU-486

Dear Brothers` Michael and Peter,

The `morning after` abortion pill RU486 translated into:

RU stands for `are you`.

4 stands for "for".

86 is a mafia term for killing someone, as in, "the boss said to 86 him". In the Numeric Greek Concordance, the number `86` represents the word meaning, "HADES-THE ABODE FOR THE DEAD".

Consequently, RU486 states, " ARE YOU SENDING YOUR BABY TO THE ABODE OF THE DEAD"?...

With best wishes,

To Tell The Truth

MHFM: Some people also think that RU-486 means “are you antichrist?” They believe this because they believe that the peace symbol is a broken upside-down cross representing Antichrist. And on a clock the numbers 4, 8 and 6 would visually represent the peace symbol.

$Description: Description: C:\Users\mhfm\Desktop\Website Docs\E-discussions\E_Pictures\clock.bmp$ $Description: Description: C:\Users\mhfm\Desktop\Website Docs\E-discussions\E_Pictures\peace_s.jpg$

Comment

Comment: False traditionalist backs down from sedevacantism debate

Dear Brothers Michael and Peter,

Ave Maria!

… I received my copy of the latest video you have posted on that false traditionalist who backs down from the sedevacantism debate. I would like to comment that I really am amazed at how the Devil works these days. Truly I can safely say what the Lord says in the vision of Pope Leo XIII regarding the Last Days when Lucifer boasts to God and he could destroy the Church... that he only need time and additional power should be granted to him on behalf of all those who render their services to the Devil. We recall that God agreed to this that time and power would be granted to Lucifer as Pope Leo XIII recalls…

This video only proves how powerful Lucifer has become and he can use 'pseudo-traditionalist' catholics .. quoting Scriptures, but his lips vomit the poisonous venom of lies directly coming from hell to blaspheme the Holy Ghost!!! ... and to our surprise, unlike the catholics of previous generations who would cry HERESY and cause commotion and public disturbance, this very apostate would in fact gain a number of followers complimenting his very heresies and wage war against the defenders of the True Faith. This generation is the worst and we all deserve this supreme punishment as all the crimes of previous generations since the creation of Adam would not equal with the crimes humanity has had ever done in our generation… We are reminded by Revelation that in the last days, the Beast of the Apocalypse is in the mood to wage his final war against the seed of Her who was flown into the wilderness. The Beast is in the mood since he considers himself powerful enough to crush the remainder (remnants) of the One, True Church of Christ ... the Catholic Church, but of course we know the Blessed Mother will vanquish Lucifer but since these are the last days the trials of our Faith will also exceed all imaginable trials the Church members has ever had. That leads us to believe literally "in the last days, deception were so profound that even the elect would be deceived, if it were possible" (Matt 24)

Well done brothers michael and peter... words are not enough to show my appreciation to your excellent apostolate, though all praises and glories must be directed to God alone…

In Jesus and Mary,

Joey, a sedevacantist from the Philippines

Comment

… re: the unqualified COWARD who RAN AWAY from debating you: wonderful job shining a strobe light of Catholic truth onto this most cowardly cockroach who has been vainly attempting to gnaw away at the truths of the Church with his lying falsehoods---I have to admit, that it's kind of fun to watch the cockroaches run, thanks again! It's nice to watch THEM (but THIS guy is the ULTIMATE loser!) get a little sand kicked in their eyes, now that evil modernists like him have "had their fun" mocking the True Bride of Christ over so many decades.

As for that absolutely ridiculous phony appearance he so vainly dons---the pipe, sideburns---how very TRAGIC for him!!!----maybe he is trying to hide his lack of brain cells! and how tragic for all people who claim to "think" like him, (if you want to be generous and call what goes in his mind "thinking"!) It is abundantly obvious that this pseudo-intellectual--and I do mean pseudo, meaning FAKE---- is not even remotely any kind of intellectual at all but is instead just another vapid AIRHEAD!! I find all these modernists are airheads, ultimately, totally lacking in the power to REASON.

Again, great job, and THANK YOU and all of you at MHFM for exposing this particular creep, and ALL the other noxious pestilent creeps like him... I will pray for this heretic’s and all heretics like him, conversion… Beautiful dusting of snow on the fall foliage in the photo---isn't snow a blessing-- this must be the first snow of the season. All Praise to the Sacred Heart of Jesus and thank you for defending the true Catholic religion!

Video Update

Tamiflu

Good morning,

I wanted to make a comment on the flu situation. I am a medical transcriptionist and I type progress notes and consultations all day on children in a children’s hospital. I receive multiple reports a day on children who became ill, went to see their primary care doctor, and because the illness was deemed not too late for it they are put on Tamiflu. These children do not get better with this poison. They end up in the hospital within a week, most in the ICU. Even if the only other underlying medical problem they have is as common as seasonal allergies, Tamiflu causes extreme difficulties in these children. Because the doctors keep them on the Tamiflu throughout their hospital stay, the children acquire more complications, eventually being sent home with new underlying medical problems like seizures and chronic respiratory difficulties to add to their allergies. I have also noticed that the only time the doctors even consider the problem to be the Tamiflu is because the parents make note that the worsening began when the Tamiflu regimen was started. If parents do not speak up, the doctors get away with it. Also beware, I had a specific case where a child had been placed on Tamiflu by the PCP for swine flu, without being tested. The child became worse within a few days and was admitted to the hospital. It was there that the child was found to be flu negative and pneumonia positive, but they continued the Tamiflu regardless.

Video

Dear MHFM

Thank you for your latest video regarding Daniels miraculous transport, sins, and further exposing the errors of V2. I found your commentary (on the enslavement of sins) to be very accurate. "Lust wounds people, keeps them unhappy and enslaved..the happiness they desire will not come by sins of the flesh." I think many people find themself today "enslaved" to their sexual addictions to pornography and lustful thoughts and actions through the internet. It's also very sickening to see how QUICKLY the vatican was to congratulate Obama on receiving the Nobel prize. I wouldnt expect them to oppose it, but it would be better to say nothing at all - rather then show support for the most pro-abortion/pro-gay president in history. On a side note, please consider the fact that the USCCB has a long history of financially supporting liberal organizations such as ACORN. So all V2 "catholics" should know that part of their hard earned money given in the collection plate is going to support liberal/progressive, ANTI-catholic "politically correct" organizations.

Thank you,

Interesting

MHFM: Some arrogant, pseudo-intellectual false traditionalist, who had criticized us, recently backed down from our challenge to debate him on the sedevacantist issue. This was after he told someone that he could refute us and that he’d be willing to debate. We will probably have an update about that.

Comment

Dear Brothers, I love your little update short videos. As always they are so informative.

I also have enjoyed all the other videos you have recently presented. I wanted to tell you that I have read the book "The Martyrs of the Coliseum" By Fr. AJ O'Reilly… It was written back in 1874. It was such a fascinating book, so descriptive and detailed… I am now re-reading it and am about halfway through again, but now I highlight certain areas so I can easily reference them. Fr.O 'Reilly used such beautiful descriptive phrases. And the way he brought out all the miracles God worked through the martyrs-how the lions licked their feet, protected them from the Romans, the many conversions that took place… And I am re-reading Secret of the Rosary.

God bless you for your work.

Sincerely,

Kathryn Rubio

P.S. Don't you think it 'odd' that California suffered the rains and floods on Oct 13 (feast of Our Lady of Fatima's miracle of the sun) and right after Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed a crazy bill for the "GAY Harvey Milk" day on his birthday May 22. How sick! God is punishing California, All that was missing was the fire and brimstone! And Cleveland won the GAY Games for 2014! We should live so long!! We so have to pray the Rosary!!

Dancing

Dear Brothers,

Thank you for the reply to the email on dancing - it's such a big enticement to lust and vanity, not piety!

Here is a scripture that could also be applied to dancing: 1 Corinthians 7:1 - Now concerning the thing whereof you wrote to me: It is good for a man not to touch a woman.

I remember a history class I took which argued that dancing is to be likened to voodoo demonic possession!!! King Louis XIV, aka. "the Sun King" (Sun-Worship) was a dancer. That's what made dancing "high-class." The most renowned dancers had the most debauched lives imaginable. Rudolph Nureyev constantly had little boys in his Limousine. Valsav Nijinsky, some argue the greatest male dancer ever, said he "danced like God" and believed that he was God (Antichrist). He was also a homosexual and he had a wife simultaneously - he was admitted to a mental institution. Immorality is second nature to these types of people. Many other example could be given. If they are not doing drugs, then they are promoting the New World Order (homosexuality, paganism, spiritism, etc.). Don't dance with the devil!!!

… Wherever there is dancing, there will be corruption. The quote of St. John Vianney is brilliant:

“There is not a commandment of God which dancing does not cause men to break… Mothers may indeed say: ‘Oh, I keep an eye on their dress; you cannot keep guard over their heart. Go, you wicked parents, go down to Hell where the wrath of God awaits you, because of your conduct when you gave free scope to your children; go! It will not be long before they join you, seeing that you have shown them the way so well… Then you will see whether your pastor was right in forbidding those Hellish amusements.’” (Abbé Francis Trocu, The Curé D’Ars, St. Jean-Marie-Baptiste Vianney, p. 146)

Also, freemasonry’s main means of attack is by destroying morals.

God Bless,

Chris White

Comment

… last week one of my really good friends took her son to the doctor because he had been sick. The doctor rushed her son to the hospital because the doctor claimed her son had swine flu. The hospital released him a few hours later saying that he really had scarlet fever and a normal case of the flu and simple antibiotics would be able to take care of the problem.

Pro-abortion

… As you have been pointing out for some years, the Vatican II sect IS IN FACT pro-abortion by means of omission. In the same way they endorse divorce by giving annulments based on the most ridiculous and idiotic grounds. People in the new church really need to wake up and see the facts. It´s nearly impossible for Ratzinger not to know the Ted Kennedy´s background; How could he be unaware? It´s just not realistic. It´s not matter of being judgmental, but simply grasping the facts, realize what´s really happening.

That young man from youtube… I wonder what would be his mental shield against an utter undeniable fact like this text. Did he ever reply to your letter? I was interested in seeing the follow-up, because he does not strike me as a person of bad will, just some victim of the great deception that surrounds us.

In a sense, I´m actually grateful that Ratzinger is acting like this. I hope he organizes another inter-religious meeting like the 2 Assisi events of John Paul II. The more open he is about his heresies and betrayal of the faith, the bigger are the chances of poor newchurchmen and false trads realizing the truth. What really concerns me is when he acts like he´s very conservative or even traditional. Some people are sooooo deluded they even think he´s going to change everything back, promoting the so-called great restoration. Since people are so blinded and desperate, I guess all it takes is to celebrate one or two tridentine mass every once in a while, make a few brief conservative comments from time to time and quote a pre-vatican II pope every six months and you become a Traditional in the eyes of the blinded.

About 2 years ago I would say we should refrain from judging, since we don´t know if he´s under pressure, being manipulated, not well informed or whatever. But after so many expositions of heresy and apostasy, it becomes difficult to conceal the facts. It´s a sad truth, but there comes a point in which there´s no use in denying it. People like Mr. William Golle would certainly say you´re making a big stretch in saying he´s pro-choice, but I believe the facts speak for themselves. If a mature and well informed person does not connect the dots, he or she can only be of bad-will, or a total coward in terms of faith.

Thank you, Bother, for making me once again open my eyes. Your material is indeed the best available…God bless you.

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. No, there was no response. Sadly, he is of bad will.

Where?

I found your website by accident some time ago, and ever since I have been reading all about the Church from your site and in other websites and things like that.

I wanted to give you thanks, because it was through your website that I realized what is really going on, and converted from the Novus Ordo sect, but of course God is the one Who is ultimately responsible for the conversion of peoples, but I give you thanks anyways.

But I still had some questions, that I haven't been able to find the answer to, and which, when I try to tell Novus Ordinarians about sedevacantism so that they get out of that sect and convert to the true Faith, they ask them to me all the time and I don't really know how to answer them, so I wanted to see if you could help me with them:

… How do I answer to their objection of "where is the Church"

… Rafael DeMontis from EL SALVADOR.

MHFM: The Church exists with the remnant of traditional Catholics which maintains the fullness of the faith and holds all Catholic dogmas (including the salvation and baptism dogmas) without compromise. The Church is visible in those individuals, wherever they are.

Things were so bad in the Arian crisis that St. Gregory Nazianz felt compelled to say what the Catholic remnant today could very well say.

St. Gregory Nazianz (380): “Where are they who revile us for our poverty and pride themselves in their riches? They who define the Church by numbers and scorn the little flock?” (“Against the Arians,” The Faith of the Early Fathers, Vol. 2, p. 33)

Distribute

Dear MHFM,

Another way which I have not tried yet, but will when my next order comes through, is to distribute materials at car pool parking lots. One who has access to the Internet can type in "car pool parking lots" and get information for these lots across his or her state. I went on line and within twenty minutes had multiple listings within 30 miles in each direction for locations that held around 500 cars. I am looking forward to trying this method with my next supply!

I have found that if you distribute information in crowded parking lots and try to distribute more than ten booklets or other info that parking lot security will come and confiscate the books. I have had much better success with the smaller amounts.

Pass this on to your supporters!

Bob Bohr

Insert

Dear Brothers Michael and Peter,

God bless you and all the wonderful work you are doing, I do not know if you have seen this but on the very package of the H1N1 Vaccine manufactured by Novartis 2009 we can read this…

H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccine Insert Admits It Causes Guillain-Barre Syndrome, Vasculitis, Paralysis, Anaphylactic Shock And Death

John Ogaz

Stumbled

Another great job referring to the new video guys keep up the good work. I have been reading since 1991 about the endtimes and as I said in previous e-mails always had a problem with the v-2 mass for a long time even though the priest was a very conservative priest and had the tabernacle in the center of the church, when I stumbled upon your
website, which was a miracle for me you finished my journey to the truth. I thank God for you all so much.

Todd

Update

Pagans

Subject: Pagans are innocent

Hello, I was just talking to my Dad about the Aztecs and their paganism. He mentioned that they practiced this paganism of sun worship and this worship and that and that they only practiced it out of innocence. In other words it is not their fault that they practiced human sacrifice to satan (!!!), because they were ignorant of Christ. Do you know of any bible verses that could prove that pagans become pagans because of their sins and not out of ignorance?

Jim

MHFM: The best thing to quote for him are the dogmas of the Church. They give us the authoritative understanding of Scripture and Tradition. However, the answer to your question is that Scripture makes it quite clear that pagans are in darkness and that they worship devils. They are outside the pale of salvation.

2 Corinthians 4:3: “And if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost, in whom the god of this world [Satan] hath blinded the minds of unbelievers, that the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should not shine unto them.”

2 Thessalonians 1:7-8- “And to you who are troubled, rest with us when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven, with the angels of his power: In a flame of fire, giving vengeance to them who know not God, and who obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ.”

Colossians 1:12-13: “Giving thanks to God the Father, who hath made us worthy to be partakers of the lot of the saints in light: Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of the Son of His love.”

Ephesians 2:1-2- “And you, when you were dead in your offences, and sins, Wherein in time past you walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of this air, of the spirit that now worketh on the children of unbelief.”

1 Corinthians 10:20- “But the things which the heathens sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils, and not to God. And I would not that you should be made partakers with devils.

Psalm 95:5- “For all the gods of the Gentiles are devils: but the Lord made the heavens.”

UFO

Hello,

I listened to an internet broadcast last night and the guest mentioned Our Lady of Fatima. He made reference to the fact that the historical descriptions of Her apparitions point to the fact that these were actually demonic appearances reminiscent of UFO-type sightings. I'm sure you've heard about this. Can you please explain.

Thank you.

Loretta Ursini

MHFM: They are nothing like UFO accounts. It's a ridiculous statement on the guest's part. Fatima predicted and delivered an undeniable miracle.

Waltz

"SF" mentioned the Waltz in her e-mail about dancing. Pope Leo XII condemned the Waltz….

B.O.D.

I gotta hand it to you, Brother Michael Dimond, for putting up and documenting all of the heresies of Benedict XVI in your section Heresies of the Week of Benedict XVI; I've seen the file you have on his previous heresies of the week, which is quite a long file, and whenever I start reading it, moments later I can't keep reading anymore, because his heresies, apostasies and schisms are just so outrageous, so completely diametrically opposed to Catholic teaching, and just so plain sick that I just can't take it anymore because I get fired up with holy indignation and disgust at all this heresiearch says, and so I stop reading them. But I'll make the effort to eventually read them all.

It takes a lot of effort and, I don't know, probably "spiritual endurance", to put up with so much heresy and apostasy and then still comment on it and present the correct teaching of the Church. Well done, not many can do that.

But I also had one question for you: I've pretty much read all that you have written on the so-called "baptisms" issue (I reject them), but I think I haven't seen this quote been used by you to disprove "baptism of desire":

Pope Paul III, Council of Trent, Sess. 6, "Decree on Justification", Ch. 5-7, 1565, ex cathedra: "People are disposed for that justice when, by that repentance ... they are proposing to receive baptism ... This disposition and preparation precede [do not result in] the actual justification ... The causes of this justification are: ... the instrumental cause, the sacrament of baptism, which is the sacrament of faith, without which justification comes to no one. ... Consequently, in the process of justification, ... all these are infused at the same time: faith, hope, and charity. For faith, unless hope is added to it, and charity too, neither unites him perfectly with Christ nor makes him a living member of his body. ... From apostolic tradition, catechumens seek this faith from the church before the sacrament of baptism when they ask for the faith that gives eternal life; and this, without hope and charity, faith cannot give."

So my question is: does this passage really disprove "baptism of desire"? I've seen this passage been used by some people and websites to disprove "baptism of desire", but I think I haven't seen it been used by you.

Peck C.

MHFM: The key passages in chapter 7 of the Council of Trent’s decree on Justification are cited and discussed throughout our book: EENS. In fact, the book contains a section on the instrumental and efficient causes of Justification (in Section 23). It quotes and discusses the significance of what the Council had to say on that point. The declaration that water baptism is “the Sacrament of Faith” is also very important. It’s discussed throughout the book, especially in reference to the “One Church of the Faithful” (Innocent III, Section 6).

The part of the chapter concerning catechumens, and how they “beg for the faith,” is also quoted and expanded upon numerous times in the book. It’s quoted in Sections 6, 16, and 21. It’s an extremely significant passage because it shows that the only time that Trent uses the word “catechumens,” it teaches that they do not have the faith which gives eternal life. They “beg” for the faith which they don’t have and which is only granted in water baptism. That shows again that no one, including unbaptized catechumens, has the faith or can be saved without water baptism.

Comment

Thank you,

I have received your dvds and books. After carefully readying and studying your material I have taken my name off my partish lists for anything to do the Novos Nordos mass and am no longer attending any Nordos Ordos mass. I am done with them. Please direct me to the true Catholic sacraments in my area. I believe everything you have said in your material.

Dancing

Subject: Dancing

Dear Brothers,

Thank you for your continued support of true Catholicism. I am aware of you through my parents who have been your supporters for quite some time. My children even copy your daily quotes on your home page for their daily penmanship exercises. I have seen a great deal of improvement in their behavior since school started this year because of it.

Now, please help me. I am at a loss of words and feelings. All my “friends” at church have their children involved in a dancing group called Scottish Country Dancing. They believe it is wholesome and convinced me to join my children into it. I decided to allow my children a chance at this socialization a couple of years ago. It had me worried from the start that they are taught to keep their eyes on each other and they must touch hands while dancing boys with girls of all ages. It also bothered me that some of the older young ladies were quite developed and bouncing in the faces of the young men they were partnered with, due to the bouncing on your toes form of the dance. I intermittently took my young children to class until December 2008. The last class before their Christmas break the children were introduced to a form of dancing they had not seen yet (at least mine hadn’t; the other children have been taking this class for multiple years). This dance required the boys to put their hands on the girls’ waists. I was appalled. I never took them back and even stated my position to a few of these “friends.” They seemed to think me prude. My then 9 yr old son shot a scared look in my direction when he had to touch a girl’s waist after his father had been teaching him not to touch girls. My then 11 yr old daughter was also uncomfortable; I saw her squirm when the boy touched her. Have I taught my children incorrectly all these years in thinking this just doesn’t feel right?

Just today another mother brought this topic up in email and was concerned for her teenage son putting his hand on the girls’ waists during the waltz. I am not one to speak up as I have not been blessed with the gift of eloquent and clear speaking and the fund of knowledge to post quotes and articles on the topics. I do, however, have a fund of knowledge of the real world, as I was raised in public schools and went to the dances from an early age and know what happens when boys and girls learn it is okay to touch, regardless of having been a Catholic. That said, please correct me if I am being overprotective. I responded in this email chain today my opinions and what can happen with “chemistry,” etc. I am now being lashed out at with responses from the eloquent speakers who can find and understand articles and official statements made by the Church regarding this issue. In one particular email, the person pasted quote after quote about how all the Doctors of the Church forbid dance and they can find that there was no exception to be made about the SCD. But in the last paragraph of the email, this person clearly states that after their own prayer and contemplation that they can see no wrong in this waltz with the boys touching the girls and that they think Jesus would approve of this waltz. I should note that some of the 10 to 12 yr old boys in our families are beginning to express having crushes on certain 12 and 13 yr old girls. Is it right, then, to throw them together like dancing? Won’t it only encourage these “crushes?” or is my way of thinking only in the public school/protestant world?... One of our water-believer families has already fallen victim to the niceness of one of the BOD families. I should also mention that my children haven’t even really been accepted by the children of the other families. I would see the girls roll their eyes when their mothers would tell them to go play with my daughter. I would also be the last to find out, usually at last minute, while everyone else had ample time to prepare, about picnics and get-togethers. My family is the “baby” of this group of families; the rest having known each other and having been in each others’ confidence for many years before I showed up. They are very apt to listen to each other and not to my sad little opinions and they will do what they will. So, for my own conscience, I have some questions. Didn’t someone tell Sister Lucy of Fatima that she should not attend the dances during festivities? As I am the only one who holds these opinions, am I just being prude and ridiculous and should I change my mind and allow the dancing? Or should I keep my position and just deal with being isolated from these families?

MHFM: That’s an important question. The answer to your question is that they absolutely should not be involved in any such dancing. You are not being overprotective. Those who defend it are deceived. They are leading their children down the wrong path. We think that St. John Vianney summed it up:

“There is not a commandment of God which dancing does not cause men to break… Mothers may indeed say: ‘Oh, I keep an eye on their dress; you cannot keep guard over their heart. Go, you wicked parents, go down to Hell where the wrath of God awaits you, because of your conduct when you gave free scope to your children; go! It will not be long before they join you, seeing that you have shown them the way so well… Then you will see whether your pastor was right in forbidding those Hellish amusements.’” (Abbé Francis Trocu, The Curé D’Ars, St. Jean-Marie-Baptiste Vianney, p. 146)

The Fatima children stopped going to dances after they saw Our Lady of Fatima.

By the way

MHFM: Yesterday we posted some thoughts on some more “swine flu” propaganda which surrounded the death of a 14-year-old Naperville teen. (We are referring to our post below under “Almost nobody.”) Only a few hours after that post, an article came out. In total confirmation of our point, the article said that they just discovered that the girl had a serious pre-existing heart condition:

“A 14-year-old Naperville girl with Swine Flu had a serious heart condition that contributed to her death, authorities said today. The girl, Michelle Fahle, died Thursday. The DuPage County coroner said a pathology examination revealed the girl had an undiagnosed progressive defect in her heart that made her vulnerable to illness.” http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/1818273,chicago-swine-flu-fahle-101009.article

Facts

Dear Brothers` Michael and Peter,

Regarding the regular seasonal flu and `swine` flu with emphasis on their potential lethality, all one must do is look to the southern hemisphere where the flu outbreaks had peaked in august and you will note that there were no mass casualties. Remember their seasons are the opposite of ours. Consequently, our flu season will peak in february, and normally occuring flu cases will be increasing over the next 5 months. It`s as simple as that.

Dr. James J. Lapinsky,D.C.

MHFM: Yes, that coincides with the position that it’s all hype and propaganda to get people (or force them) to take the vaccine.

Comment

Dear MHFM,

Wonderful follow-up video on the Shroud of Turin. I have your Creation and Miracles DVD and the, "Jesus and The Shroud of Turin" DVD from your website (which I highly recommend). The amount of bad will and deceptive practices today are stunning. Readily apparent we are in the last days when you see attack after attack on Catholic faith hundreds of times a day.

God Bless you for your works.....

Bruce

Concerns

Subject: Some concerns

Hello,

First I would like to say that the book UFOs Demonic Activity and Elaborate Hoaxes Meant to Deceive Mankind by Bro. Michael Dimond is very resourceful. I'm very thankful for this resource, for the whole UFO phenomenon has been sparking questions for me. I would also like to say that I notice that Most Holy Family Monastery is pre-Vatican II. I would like to say a few things. And I want to be as humble as possible when I say these things because I'm only 15 and I of course would only be strinking the surface of the issues...

Jesus established his Church on the Rock, Peter. And on him the Church would be sturdy, for the "gates of hell shall not prevail against it [the Church]" (Matthew 16:18). Jesus promised that the Holy Spirit would lead the Church into all truth (John 16:13); therefore the Church really is the "pillar and foundation of the truth" (1 Tim. 3:15). With this in mind, Christ also prayed that Peter’s faith would not fail (Luke 22:32), and ordered him to tend and Christ’s sheep (John 21:15-17).

This leadership and union would never pass away, or else Christ's promise that the gates of hell could never prevail against his Church (Matt. 16:18) would collapse. Jesus would be a liar. If the Church ever taught error, it would cease to be Christ’s Church. So if Jesus Christ really did establish the office of pope, as evident by His words to Peter, would that office -- the unifying factor of all Christians -- cease? Would the Rock of the Church, the chief steward of Christ's Kingdom, ever fail?

I would like to end by these words from Cyprian of Carthage: On him he builds the Church, and to him he gives the command to feed the sheep [John 21:17], and although he assigns a like power to all the apostles, yet he founded a single chair, and he established by his own authority a source and an intrinsic reason for that unity.

...If someone does not hold fast to this unity of Peter, can he imagine that he still holds the faith? If he should desert the chair of Peter upon whom the Church was built, can he still be confident that he is in the Church?"

(The Unity of the Catholic Church 4; 1st edition [A.D. 251]).

Please return to your Home, the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church established by Jesus on Peter

With concern,

Patric

MHFM: "Now when he [the Pope] is explicitly a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church..." St. Francis De Sales (17^th century), Catholic Doctor of the Church, The Catholic Controversy, pp. 305-306:

The Catholic Teaching that a heretic cannot be a valid pope and loses the papal office automatically [PDF file]

The popes infallibly teach that heretics cannot be popes. By denying that teaching, you deny the teaching of the Catholic Church and the past popes. You need to listen to our debates and look at the material. The post-Vatican II sect and its antipopes teach that the Papacy is meaningless. Every scripture you cite about the office of St. Peter is denied by Benedict XVI. He holds that the office of St. Peter is not binding and can be rejected. That’s why he’s not the pope.

Vatican II was a heretical false council which rejects papal teaching. It says that those who reject the Papacy, i.e., those who reject the Pope, are in the Church. That’s not Catholic. Your position is not a defense of the Papacy, but a denial of it. You are defending the very anti-papal heretics who say that Protestants are going to Heaven.

You are confused and misled. There have been many times without a pope. There have been over 40 antipopes in Church history. It’s predicted that there will be a great apostasy and that the Church will be reduced to a remnant. That doesn’t contradict the promises of Christ to His Church. Recognizing a heretic as the pope, and a heretical sect as the Church, does contradict the promises of Christ to His Church. You need to educate yourself about Catholic teaching by looking at the material on our site. You need to look at the heresies of Benedict XVI, especially those which concern the Papacy and groups (e.g., the “Orthodox”) which deny the Papacy. He praises them all the time. He teaches that they don’t need conversion to the Catholic faith. He teaches that they can reject the dogma of Papacy and go to Heaven.

Important File

Almost nobody

Subject: “almost nobody dies of the flu” and “deaths [are] associated with flu, but not necessarily caused by flu.”

Brothers,

Here is another good article on the propaganda behind the "swine flu" scare.

http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15585

Sincerely,

Howard

MHFM: We’ve been pointing out from the beginning that “swine flu” doesn’t exist – until the vaccine is administered. It’s just a hoax in which regular flu and other problems are falsely attributed to “swine flu.”

This is interesting. We just came across this article: Naperville teen who died had swine flu. Seeing the headline, we said to ourselves: “This clearly gives the impression that ‘swine flu’ took a life. Let’s see if they can really prove or confirm that she died from ‘swine flu,’ as the headline suggests?”

Well, when you read the article, you discover this (as we expected):

“A 14-year-old Naperville North High School student who died suddenly Thursday had swine flu, health officials confirmed Friday. But the DuPage County Health Department said it has not determined whether the H1N1 virus was the primary cause of freshman Michelle Fahle's death. Further testing is in progress to "confirm a possible underlying condition" that might have been a contributing factor, the health department said in a statement.”

So, there are possible “underlying conditions.” That’s basically always the case when you hear about a death which is supposedly from “swine flu.” But it gets more interesting. The article also mentioned that an autopsy would be conducted to determine the actual cause of death. We were interested in that result. So, we looked up the autopsy results. Guess what? They are inconclusive. They cannot confirm what caused her death. In fact, when you read this article, you not only see that the autopsy was unable to determine the cause of death, but that Michelle had complained of “flu-like symptoms” sometime before her death.

“Authorities said they are unsure what caused Michelle's death but she had complained of flu-like symptoms in recent days, according to DuPage County Coroner Pete Siekmann.” http://www.dailyherald.com/story/?id=327522

Why is this reference to “flu-like symptoms” significant? That’s because back in July the U.S. and other nations stopped testing for and confirming cases of “swine flu.” Instead, they dishonestly and outrageously chalk up every flu-like symptom as “swine flu.”

U.S. and other nations stopped counting for "swine flu" in July

Even before July it was a hoax; for only certain select individuals could “confirm” a case. But now they don’t even go through any semblance of a “process.” They just attribute basically anything that touches upon a symptom close to flu to “swine flu”! So, just because this young woman complained of some flu-like symptoms, the national media is now giving the country the impression that “swine flu” has taken a life. This is dishonest, of course; but it works. It effectively convinces the masses. They cannot even say for sure that she had “swine flu” at all, since they don’t “confirm” cases anymore. As we mentioned at the beginning, it’s all propaganda. Every year large numbers of people die from all kinds of things. People die from combinations of things, from the regular seasonal flu, etc. But the lying propaganda will now attribute anything it can to “swine flu.”

Red Cross

Subject: Mass Vaccinations coming soon

Hello Brothers,

I took some Red Cross classes awhile back and was put on their email list. This is what they recently sent me. Roger is the director of disaster services at the Red Cross here in Sonoma County, CA.

---

“The Red Cross has long worked to prevent disasters as well as to respond to them. We are looking to partner with the Sonoma County Department of Public Health in their program to provide swine flu (H1N1) inoculations. The Mendocino DPH has not asked for assistance yet, but they have been told we are ready to help.

I have told them that with our cadre of well-trained paid and volunteer staff we would be able to assist them with their inoculation plans. The first day they plan to operate 3 Dispensing centers is Oct. 24, to be followed on Nov. 14 and Dec. 5. These dates may change, so let me know if you are interested in helping at some point, and I’ll keep you informed. Sometimes there has been too much news about the swine flu and sometimes there has been too little. What we do know is that it is expected to re-surge this fall. While its first appearance in the spring produced no more deaths than you expect during an ordinary flu season, it happened on top of flu season which means a number of deaths were doubled. We do know that the Center for disease control is very concerned about how strongly this may come back and to see whether not it has migrated into a worse form.

The Sonoma County Department of public health is sponsoring a series of free clinics for the public to receive these immunization shots. They will be processing hundreds if not thousands of people during these opportunities. Consequently they need our assistance in many ways.

We are asking our Disaster Health Service staff to sign up in any way they want, but preferably to help give shots. This is a change in normal Red Cross protocol and the approve change is entirely appropriate for the situation.

We are looking for staff who can:

server as runners or run errands

work traffic control

guide people to the appropriate stations

assist with feeding and snacks

and other chores as needed.

We were also probably need staffing assistance here in the office to coordinate our response. On-the-job training will be provided for all of you who choose to assist in this. We are not working with sick clients, rather we are working to reduce the chances of getting sick bur working with those who are well. On the other hand Person Protection Equipment will be provided for anyone who wants it.

This is not the Mass Care, Sheltering, Casework, Logistics, etc. training which we have given you. It is Red Cross work which you joined us for. It is a little different from the norm, but we remain FLEXIBLE.

Please let me know if you are interested in being part of this.

Rodger”

New Video

Holy Shroud

Subject: Holy Shroud

Dear Brothers Michael and Peter:

Another attack on the Holy Shroud: http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/europe/10/07/italy.turin.shroud/index.html

It seems Luigi Garlaschelli has "proven" the Shroud is a fake by making a "copy." It's remarkable that he was funded by the Union of Rationalist Atheists and Agnostics (as an analogy, how reliable is research into the benefits of milk consumption when said research is funded by a dairy corporation). As far as I can tell, I can't see that he has proven anything except that he has a method for capturing a 3D image on cloth. It seems to me that this is like saying "I have proven this dollar bill is fake by making another fake dollar bill." I saw your video on the Holy Shroud and I'm convinced that the evidence of the Shroud's authenticity overwhelms the questionable C14 tests in the 80's. In fact, I'm going to watch it again…

Rational Atheist - sounds like a contradiction in terms.

PC
Ohio

MHFM: Yes, thanks for the interest. We posted a video on this very issue around the same time you sent your e-mail.

U.S. “bishops”

Subject: U.S. “bishops” --- what a joke!

Wow, those fakes and phonies and jokesters calling themselves the "u.s. catholic bishops" (hah! ha!) are at it again (today's news post)---but I can't figure out why they have to be so COMPULSIVE and REPETITIVE in RENOUNCING THEIR BAPTISMAL VOWS to the entire planet again, and again---I mean, you'd think once or twice of renouncing one's baptismal vows, thoroughly and completely and publicly, and in no uncertain terms to the whole world, would be quite enough to make their total apostasy from the Catholic Faith very clear..

....however, in light of their overly compulsive behavior to keep on renouncing ALL the vows and promises they ever made to Jesus Christ, it really does throw into even sharper relief the reasons why God had St. Louis Marie de Montfort develop the "Total Consecration" and "Holy Slavery to Jesus through Mary" for these the very last days----and the increasingly obvious stark contrast between the FAKE, versus the "True Devotion" to the Blessed Virgin Mary de Montfort so clearly prescribed.

What a relief it must be to those relatively few SINCERE souls who ACTUALLY DO want to find the true Kingdom of God on Earth today, and the VERY Narrow Gate leading to Heaven, that there are still a few REAL Catholics around (basically, you at MHFM and some of your readers including the few and only True Catholics still left on Earth) who can help point them the Way!

great job on the new video today, and it looks like your having a lovely foliage season in upstate---looking forward to Brother Michael's new video! Please keep us in your prayers,

AMTK

MHFM: It’s quite a heresy. What do those people who consider themselves “conservative” or “traditional” think when they see these heresies and still maintain that these men are Catholic bishops? It’s amazing. We also changed the link from a news report to the actual press release of the Vatican II apostate “bishops”:

V-2 "bishops" assure Jews: no conversion intended

The key heretical paragraph: “The Jewish leaders wrote to express their concern that paragraph 7 of the Note had formally characterized Catholic-Jewish dialogue as an invitation, either explicit or implicit, to Jews to abandon their faith in order to embrace Christianity. The bishops responded by saying that Catholic-Jewish dialogue "has never been and never will be used by the Catholic Church as a means of proselytism,” nor is it "a disguised invitation to baptism.”

Comment

Great job on the new video, how anyone with common sense could go against the information in the video is most definitely spiritually blind!!!...

Todd

Ignorance

How on earth can anyone ever believe in invincible ignorance. Do they think that their ignorance will save them from Gods judgement? They use the word invincible, as if God is powerless against their Ignorance. Your Ignorance did not create the universe, your ignorance is not going to judge you when you die, your ignorance did not die on the cross for the sins of the world. Only Jesus Christ can save you and he does this through the Catholic Church.

William

Books

Dear MHFM

I just wanted to make some short comments. I really liked the book the dimond brothers sent me a long while ago, titled THE TRUTH ABOUT WHAT REALLY HAPPENED TO THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AFTER VATICAN 2. I use this book as a reference to look things up. It is the one of the best books written by you. And I also liked the live audios on your website titled WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AFTER VATICAN 2, where brothers michael and peter discuss for 2 hrs the topics on the church. Also in closing the original purpose of the consecration of Russia to the immaculate heart of Mary was to prevent WORLD WAR 2. It is too late for that now. POPE PIUS XI was the one who should have consecrated Russia back in 1929 or the early 1930s. POPE PIUS XII did it late in 1952. We have already had a period of peace since then and a possible WORLD WAR 3 delayed and averted. People who have a opposite opinion on this are just simply wrong. Keep up the great work you do!

MARK CA

MHFM: Thank you very much for the comments. We feel that The Truth about What Really Happened to the Catholic Church after Vatican II is a very important book. It’s very large; but we broke it down into sections so that it’s easy to use, read and follow. A lot of time, study and work were put into it. It contains thousands of the most pertinent and powerful quotes, arguments, facts, photos, etc. It’s a study-guide and manual (the only book of its kind) for all aspects of the Vatican II sect (the heresies of each antipope, the counter arguments, the changes to the Mass and sacraments, the history of antipopes, the historical precedents, the scandals of the “hierarchy” of the V-2 sect, the false traditionalist arguments, etc.). We strongly encourage people to obtain it and read it.

Audio

Dear Brothers Dimond. I have tried listening to your program from Jan. 2009 "Debate on Baptism of Desire with ' traditionalist' Roger. There is an error msg. that comes up that says it cannot be opened. Do you have this debate on a disc or is there another way I could listen to it? Thanks very much for any help you can give….. God bless you.

SML

MHFM: It’s probably because it’s a windows media audio. We would recommend downloading a windows media player. Hopefully that works.

Comment

Dear Brothers,

I found this article quite interesting about the Shroud of Turin and how someone "duplicated" the image. They will stop at nothing to attempt to obliterate the faith. Pay particular attention to the second from the bottom paragraph, which states, "Garlaschelli received funding for his work by an Italian association of atheists and agnostics but said it had no effect on his results". Of course not!!!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20091005/sc_nm/us_italy_shroud

God Bless you for your works,

Bruce

MHFM: Thanks, we posted a video on that issue.

Update

Papacy follow-up

[Follow-up to a recent e-exchange]

Vatican I says that ".....after the resurection Jesus conferred the JURISDICTION of the highest...." , yes the jurisdiction was conferred , not the office, which had been bestowed before. There is a difference between the office of the papacy and the jurisdiction of that office.

Jay

MHFM: This is a prime example of bad will. You are totally wrong. Instead of simply admitting that you weren’t aware of that teaching, you have chosen to obstinately fight for your false position. You do that because you are a liar. That’s also precisely why you are a defender of the Vatican II sect and its apostate antipopes. God doesn’t grace you with the ability to see the truth; for He sees that you are a dishonest person at heart. For that reason, He resists, rejects and blinds you. You obviously didn’t know about Vatican I’s teaching on when St. Peter became the pope. It’s okay for someone to be unaware of that teaching. But instead of correcting yourself when confronted with it, you obstinately fight for your false position.

You say that the office was conferred before the Crucifixion, but not the jurisdiction. You thus create a false dichotomy between the office of the papacy and the jurisdiction of the office. That’s totally wrong and in fact heretical. It’s disproven simply because the OFFICE is nothing other than the supreme and full JURISDICTION (authority) over the flock. That’s what it is. So when Vatican I said that “upon Simon Peter alone Jesus after His resurrection conferred the jurisdiction of the highest pastor and rector over his entire fold,” it is to say that the office was conferred upon him. That’s undeniable from Vatican I. There is no office (of the papacy) without supreme and full jurisdiction over the flock. Your position is schismatic, and akin to “Orthodoxy.”

In fact, notice that in the bolded portions below, the office of the papacy or Chief Shepherd is inseparable from – and in fact defined by – the power of JURISDICTION OVER THE ENTIRE FLOCK.

Pope Pius IX, First Vatican Council, Session 4, Chap. 1: “So we teach and declare that according to the testimonies of the Gospel the primacy of jurisdiction over the entire Church of God [NOTICE THAT THE OFFICE IS DESCRIBED AS THE PRIMACY OF JURISDICTION] was promised and was conferred immediately and directly upon the blessed Apostle Peter by Christ the Lord. For the one Simon, to whom He had before said: "Thou shalt be called Cephas" [John 1:42], after he had given forth his confession with those words: "Thou art Christ, Son of the living God" [Matt. 16:16], the Lord spoke with these solemn words: "Blessed art thou, Simon Bar Jona; because flesh and blood hath not revealed it to thee, but my Father who is in heaven. And I say to thee: That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it: and I shall give to thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven. And whatsoever thou shalt bind upon earth, it shall be bound also in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose upon earth, it shall be loosed also in heaven" [Matt. 16:17 ff.]. [against Richerius etc. (see n. 1503)]. And upon Simon Peter alone Jesus after His resurrection conferred the jurisdiction of the highest pastor and rector over his entire fold, saying: "Feed my lambs," "Feed my sheep" [ John 21:15 ff.]. To this teaching of Sacred Scriptures, so manifest as it has been always understood by the Catholic Church, are opposed openly the vicious opinions of those who perversely deny that the form of government in His Church was established by Christ the Lord; that to Peter alone, before the other apostles, whether individually or all together, was confided the true and proper primacy of jurisdiction by Christ; or, of those who affirm that the same primacy was not immediately and directly bestowed upon the blessed Peter himself, but upon the Church, and through this Church upon him as the minister of the Church herself.

[Canon]. If anyone then says that the blessed Apostle Peter was not established by the Lord Christ as the chief of all the apostles, and the visible head of the whole militant Church, or, that the same received great honor but did not receive from the same our Lord Jesus Christ directly and immediately the primacy in true and proper jurisdiction: let him be anathema.” [HERE WE SEE THAT THE OFFICE OF “CHIEF OF ALL THE APOSTLES” IS INSEPARABLE FROM THE PRIMACY OF TRUE AND PROPER JURISDICTION.]

And, as we said before, you are further refuted by the fact that Matthew 16 clearly employs the future tense in order to describe how Jesus WILL give the keys of the Kingdom to St. Peter (i.e., after the Resurrection). We’re sick of the lying and dishonesty. We’re sick of people’s obstinate refusal to accept the truth.

For those who don’t know, this person (Jay) obstinately fights for his lie for two reasons: 1) he wants to argue that popes can deny Christ and remain popes. He thinks this is valuable for defending the anti-papal apostate Antipope Benedict XVI. 2) He refuses to admit that he actually doesn’t understand papal teaching and that he was refuted.

The notion that he was refuted is particularly galling for Jay. That’s because he wrote in as if he’s a defender of the papacy. The truth, however, is that he is a defender of anti-papal apostates. It thus irks him that a sedevacantist – someone he wrongly thinks denies the papacy – knows more about the papacy and Vatican I than he does. But it of course makes sense that his arguments would be refuted by those who are truly dedicated to papal teaching.

Questions

Dear Sir,

I am a Turkish christian (age 41). I was baptized in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit at a Protestant Church back in 2004 (my wife was baptized in 2008) After a while after my baptizm, I grew a very deep interest in Catholicism and bagan attending the Saint Anthony Catholic Church in Istanbul, Turkey. Again, after a while, because of some factors beyond my control, I had to leave the Catholic church and ended up in the Protestant Church again.

Now we are back in the Catholic church again because we detest almost everything related with the Protestantism. We now know very well that salvation is only in the church which Christ himself established, which is the Catholic church. I am a very good reader, I spend almost all my spare times and also some of my working hours on learning more about Christianity and apologetics. Apologetics is very important to me because I live in a country where there are very few Turkish christians and where the available christianity is dominated by the Protestant crowd. I am in a position of defending my faith against the muslims and against the Prostestant who are always ready to mock at my Catholic faith (you know how Protestant reasoning works).

Anyway, I am writing to you now because some things are worrying me at the church and although I am a simple man, I can easily realize that the New Mass looks and sounds like a Protestant celebration, with all those awkward songs, guitar and drum sounds. I used to think that because I was an old-minded man, I made a problem out of some trivial details. But after reading almost everything in your website and in similar websites, I have come to understand that the source of the problem is not me… I am trying to persuade myself that all what the Church teaches is correct but I know deep inside my heart that many issues after the Vatican II, such as salvation outside the church, are at odds with the former teachings. I can not blindfold my eyes to the truth.

People both in the Protestant and Catholic churches here love to preach about lovingkindness of Jesus Christ, how He is full of love and mercy for us etc. But no one, including priests and pastors, is willing to talk about hell and damnation. All we know is to raise our hands, clap them and sing halleluja. No one seems interested in the possibility of going to hell. We tend to pick up the nice words of the Lord and omit the warnings.

As I told you before, maybe I am an old fashioned man, maybe I read too much and keep myself preoccupied. I really do not know. Meanwhile, one of the most important things to me in this life is to be able to kneel down before the tabernacle and pray to the Lord. If I can not do that, I feel very bad all day long. I need to kneel down in front of the Blessed Sacrament and talkto my dear Lord. But now, I really am confused because as I understand from what I have read in your website, new order is not so valid as I though it to be and I now keep questioning myself if the Blessed Sacrament is fully blessed. I also wonder if my and my wife's baptisms are valid or not.

We are now cathechumens in the Catholic church and I wonder if you recommend us that we should keep up with this education till our Confirmation. And one of the things that bothers me most is that this is not even a christian country and I am unable to find a traditional catholic church. Even it is almost impossible to find a catholic church in smaller cities of my country, let alone a traditional one. What am I supposed to do ?

Thank you

May the Lord bless you all.

Hakan Ergun Ozcan

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail and the interest. You must get out of the New Mass and become convinced that the Vatican II sect is not the Catholic Church. Before converting or receiving sacraments, one must be convinced to never go to the New Mass again. One must also hold the traditional Catholic position on all the other issues. Leaving the Catholic Church, as you did, is never a decision “beyond one’s control.” It’s something that needs to be confessed once one converts. You should not follow through with the New Mass/Vatican II church until Confirmation. Confirmation is not valid in the Vatican II sect anyway. One needs to get out of there immediately. These files answer your questions about baptism and converting to the traditional Catholic faith.

The Steps to convert to the traditional Catholic faith and for those leaving the New Mass - Baptism and Conditional Baptism - the Council of Trent's Profession of Faith for Converts

Where to go to Mass or confession today?

New Video

Learned

Dear MHFM,

Thanks to you I have learned the "TRUE" Catholic faith over the last 1.5 years of listening, reading and studying not only your site, but the bible, the teaching of the Papal office, your videos and audio/radio programs, your books, as well as Catholic Dogma. I had been in the Novus Ordo since birth and thank God every day for his guiding me to you site to explain the true Catholic faith.

Bruce

Reading

We have been reading and following your information for some time. It has changed our spiritual life.

Tom

Comment

"Kblur" of "try it" e-exchange strikes me as an extremely malevolent child of wrath... I hope all those people who were not able to see Mr. Benny Hinn in England, who had some unlooked-for time on their hands, surfed the web, found YOUR website, learned the truth about Fatima, what happened to the Catholic Church during this Great Apostasy, made the Profession of the Catholic Faith for converts on your site, and started praying at least all 3 decades of Our Lady's Most Holy Rosary every single day, and went to confession… It would be a great opportunity to reverse the evils begun in that country there under "King" Henry VIII, and ever since with the evils of "protestantism" around the world… thanks again for all your work at MHFM,

Sincerely,

Deceived

Subject: Kblur

The problem with this guy is he has been deceived by the likes of the waco incident and types like this etc. He doesn't understand that this time given to the devil is about 100 years from 1917 to about 2017 but what he isn't seeing is the signs of the times as Jesus tells us: how is it when you see the clouds coming you know a storm is approaching but you don't see the signs of the times. You guys are right he is chasing the fussy warm feeling of the vatican ll debacle!!! Keep up the good work!

Todd

Banner

… this article… explains the happiness of the anti-Christ ADL Jews after a highschool forbade the football team from displaying Christian banners.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5g2ayvPp1qelo6trD8RZ6pfw7xSjwD9B3B5DO1

No doubt Abe Foxman and the Talmudists at ADL were behind this…

Book

Dear Brothers,

I have in the past heard about Santa Margarita Maria Alacoque of the Sacred heart of Jesus but was not familiar with this devotion at all, I had never seen books on it on sale in the said “Catholic Book Shops” out here.

One day I went to a second hand book bazaar and while looking through hips of books to find an old Bible, instead, after an exhausting effort and just about to give up I suddenly put my hand on an 1928 edition book on Margarita Maria Alacoque whose author is R.P. Matéo Grawley-Boevey apparently known world wide as Father Matéo. The providential missionary at the time became very ill and was about to end his apostolic mission, his superiors were forced to send him to Europe to recuperate.

On his way, by accident he stopped at Paray-le-Monial . He kneeled in the chapel of the apparitions and prayed, shortly thereafter, he felt a strange disturbance, he was cured. He did not know what had happened, it is believed that he was pierced by an acute arrow of Love. In the afternoon during the Holy Hour, the Sacred Heart of Jesus inspired him to conquer the world with this vigil, family after family by introducing it in every home. He was authorized by Pope Pius X to work in this new mission.

Apart from the Holy Scriptures this is one of the most beautiful and spiritually touching book that I ever read. It consists of l2 vigil exercises for the first Friday of the month, between 11.00 pm and 12.00 pm Thursday/Friday where our Divine Lord, King of Love talks and opens his Sacred Heart to the true faithful who await on Him, requesting reparation for the sinful world, His enemies, the enemies of His Church and especially for His once privileged friends who have abandoned Him in the tabernacles. In turn, the faithful during that holy hour ask forgiveness, and in this colloquium with Jesus the souls who are present console the Divine Master. There are a further seven exercises for various other important circumstances of the year in which includes our Blessed Mother.

It is written in the book = “Certainly, holy Margarita Maria´s assiduous and fervour of her zeal won many souls for this pious vigil to the Sacred Heart. Jesus said= "Advise and let the whole world know that I will not put limits to my graces when these are requested on behalf of my Sacred Heart”. But let us not lose sight of the final objective which our Lord aims in the worship of His divine Heart, that is the triumph of this Holy Heart, His Kingdom of Love in the world.

Within many religious institutions who were dedicated to the cult of the Divine Heart these exercises were esteemed with great veneration and approved in 1829 by Pius VIII, In 1834 S.S. Gregory XVI, in 1886 by Pope Leo XIII and in 1911 S. S. Pius X.” This book touched me even to tears and I keep on wondering, to whom did this little book belong, possibly to some very holy priest or layman. Imagine, that such a treasure was thrown out and abandoned. Dear Brothers, do you know anything about this book and if it can still be found for sale, perhaps in USA. I would like to obtain more copies. Keep up the good work

M. Fernanda da Silva

Demonic

For the past 2.5 years, I have been subject to demonic oppression. While I have been prayed over, I have been denied the formal rite of exorcism. I am willing to discuss this in detail should you avail yourself of the possibility of this rite for a Catholic struggling from the need for relief from this problem.

MHFM: The first thing you need to do is get out of mortal sin and start to pray the full rosary each day. You need to accept and embrace all the tenets of the traditional Catholic faith and then make a good confession. Our steps to convert and for those leaving the Novus Ordo has more on that point. That should solve your problem. If it doesn't, get back to us. But that’s usually the problem with people: they are in heresy or mortal sin.

Try it!

Subject: Try it!

Man you guys really need to get with the FSSP! I can't tell you how the graces have flowed to me by just attending the latin mass in accordance with Rome at the FSSP centers! So beautiful!

Benedict XVI is going to turn out to be one of the best popes the church has ever had, wouldn't agree? Man has definetly got the faith!

You know if you two started listening to the church and the pope, and you stopped looking at the skies for an apparition to fly by and drop you an apocalyptic message so you could plan out an end-of-the-world scenario, then you might be at peace, like Your Saviour would have wanted!!

When will you all wake up and realize that Fatima was the biggest hoax of the 20th century? I'm sorry but it's true! You can't drag that silliness on for another hundred years!

All this time of your lives WASTED by preaching about an end that never comes? How long are you two going to keep fooling yourselves? Doesn't it get old when nothing ever happens? YOU'VE BEEN CONNED! Everyday you take worldly events and try and apply them to Revelation? You guys are no different than them silly protestants! But, hold on here a minute, maybe you guys are protestants? You ain't with Rome? You preach against Rome! That makes you protestants!

Kblur

MHFM: You are so deceived. All you care about are externals, some Latin, some incense, and Gregorian chant. You don’t care one bit about Our Lord Jesus Christ or His truth. Catholic dogma… you don’t believe any of it. You only care about the sentimentality that makes you feel good – an ephemeral feeling of spirituality without any real belief in Christ. That’s precisely why God allows you to be totally deceived. That’s why he blinds you and allows you to think that you are a Catholic, when in fact you are nothing more than an apostate.

You say that Benedict XVI has the faith… what planet are you on? Look at the evidence, you heretic. Oh, we forgot, you are of bad will, so you have ignored the evidence.

Benedict XVI (The Heresies of Benedict XVI File) [link to section]

He denies all aspects of the Catholic faith. He denies the Papacy; he denies the necessity of Christ; he teaches that false religions are good; he teaches that Protestants and schismatics don’t need conversion; and on and on. If we recall correctly, aren’t you the same person who said: sedevacantism = satanism?

Among your lies, you say that we apply worldly events to Revelation every day. No, we don’t do that. Since you have no regard for the truth, it does not surprise us that you utter such a falsehood. We do believe that we are in the last days, as anyone with eyes to see can recognize. Waiting for something to happen? No, but if you weren’t a completely blind apostate you might recognize that the Counter Church has already been constructed and it has been around now for a generation. But a person such as yourself, who thinks that a man who praises Islam “has definitely got the faith,” of course wouldn’t recognize it.

It also doesn’t surprise us that you reject Fatima. You think darkness is light and light is darkness. You think heresy is (definitely) faith and faith is heresy. For that reason, it makes sense that you would consider such a clear message from Heaven to be from Hell. Fatima was confirmed by an undeniable miracle. It carries with it such an overwhelmingly supernatural, spiritual and prayerful message. The Catholic conversions, the good fruits and the devotion to the Rosary which emanate from the study and application of its message are undeniable. The true goodness and power of its message – a message that doesn’t conflict with Church teaching at all – are palpable to those with a true Catholic sense. They are immediately apparent to those love the light, but not to the children of bad will and the children of pride.

Speaking of Protestantism, the apostate Benedict XVI says that Protestantism isn’t even heresy. That’s why he’s a Protestant and so are you.

Benedict XVI, The Meaning of Christian Brotherhood, pp. 87-88: “The difficulty in the way of giving an answer is a profound one. Ultimately it is due to the fact that there is no appropriate category in Catholic thought for the phenomenon of Protestantism today (one could say the same of the relationship to the separated churches of the East). It is obvious that the old category of ‘heresy’ is no longer of any value. Heresy, for Scripture and the early Church, includes the idea of a personal decision against the unity of the Church, and heresy’s characteristic is pertinacia, the obstinacy of him who persists in his own private way. This, however, cannot be regarded as an appropriate description of the spiritual situation of the Protestant Christian. In the course of a now centuries-old history, Protestantism has made an important contribution to the realization of Christian faith, fulfilling a positive function in the development of the Christian message and, above all, often giving rise to a sincere and profound faith in the individual non-Catholic Christian, whose separation from the Catholic affirmation has nothing to do with the pertinacia characteristic of heresy. Perhaps we may here invert a saying of St. Augustine’s: that an old schism becomes a heresy. The very passage of time alters the character of a division, so that an old division is something essentially different from a new one. Something that was once rightly condemned as heresy cannot later simply become true, but it can gradually develop its own positive ecclesial nature, with which the individual is presented as his church and in which he lives as a believer, not as a heretic. This organization of one group, however, ultimately has an effect on the whole. The conclusion is inescapable, then: Protestantism today is something different from heresy in the traditional sense, a phenomenon whose true theological place has not yet been determined.”

Protestantism is the rejection of many dogmas of the Catholic Faith. Protestantism is not only heresy, but the most notorious collection of heresies with which the Church ever had to contend.

Pope Pius XI, Rerum omnium perturbationem (# 4), Jan. 26, 1923: “… the heresies begotten by the [Protestant] Reformation. It is in these heresies that we discover the beginnings of that apostasy of mankind from the Church, the sad and disastrous effects of which are deplored, even to the present hour, by every fair mind.”

Finally, in addition to being heretics who accept Vatican II and salvation outside the Church, the FSSP “priests” are ordained by “bishops” who are made “bishops” in Paul VI’s new rite of ordination. That new rite cannot be considered valid. See our file for the information on that issue.

The New Rite of Consecration of Bishops [PDF file]

This article explains the changes that Paul VI made to the rite of consecrating bishops after Vatican II.

Why the New Rite of Ordination is Invalid [PDF File]

This article explains why the New Rite of Ordination – which was instituted by Paul VI on June 18, 1968 after Vatican II – is not valid.

Obelisk

Hi Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,

I am currently refuting protestant commentators…. non- catholic commentators have raised the issue of the obelisk in St. Peters Square, is proof that the Catholic Church has pagan roots.....

My question is "What were the reasons for the popes at that time placing it in St. Peters Square? My theory ?... is that it is a constant reminder to the world that it is a battle between Christ and Satan, and hence the Cross and inscription attached, by the popes of the time ...

Your comments appreciated..thanks

God bless,

David

MHFM: Just so our readers know, we have pointed out in the past that there is a cross on top of the obelisk in St. Peter’s Square. It signifies the Church’s victory over paganism, etc.

To your question, we believe that there are two probable reasons. First, it is a fact that the popes kept items, artifacts, monuments, statues, etc. from the ancient and pagan world which were deemed to be of major historical significance. We have some other quotes on this point. It seems that they didn’t want to destroy all of them because they considered them to be historically important. In the same way, they probably deemed that monument to one of unique historical significance. That could be one reason for moving it into the Square and placing a cross on top of it.

But additionally and probably more importantly, in the Book of Daniel we read about the prophecy of the past kingdoms of the world being destroyed and superseded by the kingdom of Christ.

Daniel 2:44- “But in the days of those kingdoms the God of heaven will set up a kingdom that shall never be destroyed, and his kingdom shall not be delivered up to another people, and it shall break in pieces, and shall consume all these kingdoms, and itself shall stand for ever.”

In Daniel, we are clearly given a picture (and a prophecy) of the various strong and powerful kingdoms of the earth being broken and destroyed one by one; and then finally they are all replaced eternally by the Kingdom of Christ, with His coming and the establishment of His Church. This kingdom shall not be destroyed. The obelisk is essentially an emblem of the pagan world and the faded glory of its past kingdoms. Therefore, placing the Cross on top of it signifies the Kingdom of Christ’s eternal victory over the transitory kingdoms of man, in fulfillment of the prophecy of Daniel.

Disgusted

Dear Brothers in Christ,

One of the readers, Kit White, excellently pointed out the supernatural stupidity and malevolence of both, the protestant host and Monsignor, we could hear and watch in the video found by the reader RDS. The statement of the protestant host:"It's [baptism] not essential, but Christ has commanded it to His believers..." in most direct way says that our Lord commanded nonessential things. For a true believer in Jesus Christ there are absolutely no nonessential commands issued by Him. So, these two brothers in stupidity, protestant and "catholic", are saying they know better than God what is essential for salvation and what is not. Is there a better illustration of the words:"Advise not with fools, for they cannot love but such things as please them" (Ecclesiasticus 8:20)

The way our Lord said:"Amen, amen I say to thee, unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God" leaves us not even a
smallest doubt about uttermost essentiality of water baptism. If the stupidity of the mentioned "christian brothers" would be only natural one, they could comprehend the clarity and importance of Jesus' words. Even a naturally stupid atheist could see that, although (s)he does not believe in Jesus.

I am disgusted with innumerable "catholics", in particular with false traditionalists and sedevacantists, who are very busy with inventing the most absurd and stupid apologies for their apostasy.

St. Joseph pray for us.

Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia

Encouraged

Subject: Faith in Nigeria

Dear Brothers,

I really get encouraged and strengthened when ever i read the E-Exchanges. I was also happy over the way people told us how they spread the materials .To be honest, here in my country, Nigeria, the bad willed is just so much. People are not just interested the way they ought to be. Here, they are highly interested in pursuing money that they don’t want anything that would disturb their peace of mind. i.e., they don’t want anything that would reduce the zeal at which they would go after this money. I read how young people of 19, those in their 20s and most of all young ladies of such ages getting interested in things of the faith but over here, it’s always about going out with friends and enjoying themselves and for the young ladies, marriage often seem to be their topmost priority while most elderly women always think of what their husbands would say or do.

People in this part of the world just argue and argue baselessly. We will continue to try our best in our own little way in spreading the true faith even though very few people are listening to us while we beg our brothers and sisters in the faith to continue to pray for us for the grace of final perseverance and conversion for others in this country of ours.

Thanks.

T.K

Salvation

Subject: No salvation vs. some salvation

Dear MHFM

Not all of the Catholic popes taught that there is no salvation outside of the Catholic Church. Some of them taught that there is ABSOLUTELY no salvation outside of the Catholic Church. What part of NO and ABSOLUTELY don't they understand? If there was any salvation at all outside of the Catholic Church, the correct wording would be, "Outside of the Catholic Church there is SOME salvation. Yet they insist that the No and Absolutely are "too rigorous" or "too literal." Nobody could be that dumb, but there they are, or they pretend to be in order not to be blamed for their cherished sins. No human being with a lick of sense is that dumb without a good sinful reason.

Then there's the Vatican II issue of passing judgment when the heretics stand there, lies flowing out of their mouths in streams; lies published in their newspapers, books, articles and encyclicals; Christ being rejected every waking moment, and to call them heretics who will not be saved is "passing judgment." It has nothing to do with passing judgment; it has to do with stating the obvious facts and quoting Christ and His apostolic successors of nearly 2,000 years.

Monsignor

Subject: Monsignor Debate

Dear Brothers,

That “Debate with Monsignor” video is astounding. I watched it a second time to see how he tried to conceal the lies. He’s like a serial killer just coldly going through the details of his latest kill! Even the Protestants could see that he was so far gone as to be laughable. Like you wrote, the Sedevacantist apostates and their heretical priests believe the same thing, only they wouldn't admit it quite so directly. I think the quote of the day summed up his apostate attitude well, that the “Roman Catholic Church today” teaches that baptism is not necessary for salvation:

Pope St. Pius X (1907), Against Modernist Worship: “The chief stimulus in the domain of worship consists in the need of adapting it [worship] to the uses and customs of peoples.” (Pascendi # 26)

An interesting point was when the host was going through the list of reasons why they believe the Monsignor is correct. The tenth point states, “Baptismal Regeneration makes salvation depend on WATER.” The host, while pointing to the sentence says, “You know, if you’re gonna be saved by baptism, you gotta have water, if you don’t have water then you’re out of luck.” In typical protestant style he has listed huge chunks of scriptural quotes for some of the other irrelevant points, but on this one, which is the most blatant rejection of the truth, he has very conveniently forgotten to have any scriptural basis for their heresy. Also, he says they would be "out of luck," as though God's Providence is determined by chance…

If the BOD apostates believe that water baptism is impossible for all who are of good will, then they might as well say that, “All things happen from absolute necessity. – Condemned,” (Council of Constance, Errors of John Wycliffe, No. 27, Denz. 607) since neither God nor men would act out of charity.

If they believe that it is impossible for God (Matt. 19:26) to provide a baptizer and some water in all cases for a person who is predestined, then they would probably also believe “That God neither ought nor is able to prevent evil. - Condemned.” (Council of Sens, Errors of Peter Abelard, No. 8, Denz. 375)

Later the host states, “I sure didn’t get baptized to get saved. I got baptized out of obedience to Christ’s command.” In other words, he’s saying that one need not be obedient to Christ’s commands for salvation!

Another quote of the host speaking about Monsignor, “he did say baptism is important, but it wasn’t essential, so why even have it and that’s a good question if it’s not ah, if it’s not such a big thing...” I’ve noticed that Protestants seem to enjoy asking questions that they don’t or can’t answer. I suppose they’re too busy protesting against Christ, like bleating goats, to care about the truth!

Further, “It’s [baptism] not essential, but Christ has commanded it to His believers, as something that they should do, so we need to perf...do it, because Christ has commanded it but it certainly isn’t gonna get you saved as we’ve already stated.” So Noah going through the flood and the Israelites walking through the Red Sea, which are types of baptism, didn’t save them?!...

Finally, the horrible comment of the Monsignor was when he was questioned on Islam and Pagan religions. “Q. Pagan worshippers also who worship idols and stuff like that that haven’t heard about Christ, they would go to Heaven? M. (nodding affirmatively) That are living in good faith. Q. To their idols? M. (pause) to whatever.”

How sad and outrageous. Thanks RDS for finding that.

God Bless Brothers,

Kit White

Baptism of Water

Subject: Baptism of Water

Dear Brother.

I send you this youtube about the apparition of Our Lady of Coromoto Patroness of Venezuela. In 1652 the indian "Cacique" named Coromoto saw a moost beatiful Lady who gave him a message: "Go to white men"s house and ask for water upon your head. SO YOU CAN go to heaven" In spanish: "Vayan a la casa del hombre blanco y pidan que les eche agua por la cabeza PARA QUE PUEDAN ir al cielo". When I saw the youtube below I remembered your teaching about Baptism of water. With greetings

ANTONIO

www.youtube.com/watch?v=mL3uKZdu0wM

Video

Subject: Video

Brothers, your new video on Martin Luther and the denominations is a very powerful message to those that remain in the true faith, and those who have either defected from, nor never knew the true faith. A shame that countless followers of these sects do not have the love of truth and continue to follow merely on outward appearances and enjoy the eternal poison offered by Satan.

God Bless you and your work,
Tom Miles

Papacy

Subject: Papacy

I'm looking at your email section about St. Peter. How can you say that He(Peter) wasn't pope at the time he denied Our Lord? He was pope since Jesus built the church on him in, as related in the gospels. Immediately after being made pope he was called "satan", yet, he didn't become an antipope! He was simply wrong and was corrected by Jesus. Also the Catholic church does not start a new religion, it is the New covenant of the old religion. God only has one religion: from the Garden of Eden till the end of the world.

Jay

MHFM: No, you are quite wrong. The First Vatican Council defined that Jesus made St. Peter the pope AFTER His Resurrection, by the words in John 21:15-17: “Feed my lambs, etc.” He was not the pope before the Resurrection. Jesus’ words in Matthew 16:18-20 promise St. Peter that He WILL (future) build His Church upon him. They promise that He WILL (future) give St. Peter the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven. That’s why St. Jerome’s Latin Vulgate uses the future: aedificabo (I will build) and dabo (I will give). Jesus did that after His Resurrection.

Pope Pius IX, Vatican Council I, Session 4, Chap. 1: “And I say to thee: That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it: and I shall give to thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven. And whatsoever thou shalt bind upon earth, it shall be bound also in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose upon earth, it shall be loosed also in heaven" [Matt. 16:17 ff.]. And upon Simon Peter alone Jesus after His resurrection conferred the jurisdiction of the highest pastor and rector over his entire fold, saying: "Feed my lambs," "Feed my sheep" [ John 21:15 ff.].” (Denz. 1822)

Monsignor shocks

Dear MHFM:

I came across this youtube video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2Pd6BqCSWE

of Monsignor Jordan giving "catholic" answers on water baptism and salvation outside the church to protestant questioners. The questioners can hardly believe their ears, but have been told that the monsignor's views represent Rome and his diocese. Most shocking of all, is there anything that this wolf in sheep's clothing is saying openly that most "traditional catholics" aren't also saying just under the surface?

I've decided to leave copies of your pamphlet Outside the Catholic Church there is Absolutely No Salvation at places where protestants meet (without actually going into their churches) so that any who may be honest and of good faith can read what the Church really teaches and be converted.

-RDS

MHFM: That’s very interesting. It’s exactly how the crowd of “baptism of desire” apostates in our day – many of whom consider themselves to be “traditional Catholics” – would answer. All of you sedevacantists who love “baptism of desire” should watch that clip. Basically the same answers would come from any of your heretical priests who deny the salvation and baptism dogmas.

Comment

Hi,

I loved the items I received in the shipment. You do fantastic work.

Mary Ann Benedetto

Thoughts

Dear Brothers,

It is interesting considering Benedict XVI and his experience with the spider to read two brief reflections in the O.T. and see analogies.

Job 8:13-14 - "So is the end of everyone who forgets God, and so shall the hope of the godless man perish. His confidence is but a gossamer thread and his trust is a spider's web."

Isaias 59:5-6 - "They hatch adders' eggs, and weave spider's webs: whoever eats their eggs will die, if one of them is pressed, it will hatch as a viper; their webs cannot serve as clothing, nor can they cover themselves with their works."

"Their works are evil works, and deeds of violence come from their hands."

Perhaps the spider was attempting to whisper some truth into Benny's ear, but deterred, it moved away, but remained in the palace after Benny's departure.

Donald Livingston

Luther

Dear Brothers,

Excellent videos on the shocking heretic Martin Luther. Thank you. The pictures of the various sects and their heretical patriarchs makes it very interesting too.

God Bless,

Kit White

Martin Luther, the Devil and Denominations

Gave

My neighbor had fallen away from the faith, but I gave her a Padre Pio book and now she's praying the Rosary and wearing the Brown Scapular again. And so is her mother! Please send me 50 more books.

Jim Davis

Found

By surfing the internet watching vids about Eucharistic miracles on youtube I found your website. Thanks for all the information. I`m a seminarian from The Netherlands.
Over here we can celebrate the real Mass 3 times a week now (thank God)

God bless.

Keep the faith

In Cristo
Sven Volkers

MHFM: Thanks for the interest. However, the seminary probably accepts baptism of desire and salvation outside the Church. Therefore, one should not be part of it.

Sacred Tradition

Subject: Sacred Tradition

Dear MHFM,

What is simply mindboggling is that tradition, inspired by the Holy Ghost, gave us pope after holy pope, succession after succession who warned us of the false christians entering the church hierarchy with the intent to destroy Holy Mother Church from within, and how obvious these wretched beings are now camped hungrily in the form of US bishops spewing their wretched ecumenism of destruction in this country, and the Modernist wolves in Rome scribing false documents engaging them, and the sheep bow to this nonsense. One only has to read the exploits of, let's say, Holy Pope Gregory VII, radical pontiff 11th century, to ingest the truth of how to protect Holy Mother Church from infiltrators, then Jews, today, again the Jews, pagans, masons, and since the onset of Vatican II, Roncalli, Montini, Wojtyla, and German crony nationalist/globalist Ratzinger to clearly see the apostasy trailing behind their hideous tails the halls of Vatican City. Like in the past these contemporary tyrants will fall. St. Michael, ora pro nobis! May Jesus guide you in wisdom and action, and the Blessed Mother protect you with her supernatural graces!

Reminded

Brothers,

The post about the "catholic" newspaper reminded me of a recent advert posted by my local V2 parish. It was for a catholic singles group that catered for "single, widowed, separated and divorced catholics" I was brought up to believe that the latter two groups were not single, just like my own mother who was divorced (not her choice) who considered herself married and not free to marry or date anyone - and never did.

While growing up my family laughed at how the protestants changed the rules to enable them to get what they wanted divorce , remarriage in church etc- it seems that V2 church are now free to do the same.

Jim

Comment

Dear Brothers in Christ,

I would like to make a comment on some opinions held by radical schismatic false traditionalists. The typical example of such opinions is to take some erroneous statements made by a true pope and say:"You see, this individual is a heretic and therefore he was not a true pope and therefore every claimant to the See of Peter after this false pope was also a false pope." Well, if this kind of "logic" would be valid, then there is no way to avoid the conclusion that there wasn't any true pope in the history at all, since the apostle Peter DID made a "heresy" by deed. What this radical schismatic "traditionalists" are doing is nothing else but calling our Lord Jesus Christ a liar, for they are saying that The Catholic Church never existed. In that way they are fittingly joined to modern day antipopes, and their adherents, false Catholics, for those antipopes also denied the existence of The Catholic Church---for the last 40+ years they were searching for the "unity of the church" as if The Church is/was not One True Church from the very beginning.

The evilness of modern day antipopes--the ones followed after the last true pope Pius XII--is unprecedented in the history of mankind and The Catholic
Church. Who does not see a clear-cut difference between weak, or even bad but true popes, like Pius XII, and those satanic antipopes in the last 50+ years, is utterly blind and of
utterly bad will. I'm not sure if it is possible to find the dogma of The Church they, those antipopes, didn't deny. Even to try to compare those antipopes to the worst but
true pope constitute dishonesty at the least and a mortal sin to the worst.

Thank you for your holy efforts, brothers Dimond. I always pray to our Most Holy Mother and St. Joseph to support you and lead your thoughts and deeds "ad maiorem Dei gloriam".

V

MHFM: Thank you for the e-mail. We agree with your comments, except for one thing. St. Peter's denial of Christ occurred before He became pope. The scandalous action in Galatians 2:11, which is also frequently attributed to him, was almost certainly not him, as we've mentioned. The problem with these radical schismatics is that they don’t have any Catholic sense or a real dedication to the Catholic Church. They have come across certain true principles (mostly from our material) but, lacking an interior dedication to the Church which begets this Catholic sense, they frequently misapply these principles and consequently fall into disastrous errors. God allows them to stumble into schism because they don’t study and pursue the Catholic faith in humility and with a purity of intention. They think that it’s no big deal to denounce a true pope as an antipope; whereas a Catholic realizes that to do that requires clear and overwhelming proof. That’s why those same individuals usually reject the canonizations of the Church. They aren’t Catholic.

Another on Pius XII

MHFM: Another person wrote in complaining about the Pius XII issue. The e-mail and our response are in this file:

New sub-section on finer points, quotes, arguments, objections and issues relevant to certain "traditionalists".

Relics

Dear Brothers,

Thanks so much for the excellent piece on "father" Corapi. He fools many. Also great thanks for keeping up the traditional Catholic calendar. I print it and hang it at work and home and give copies away. I do, however, have a specific question I'd like an opinion on. Can one go to a NO "church" to venerate a Saint's relics as long as they don't attend mass or leave money in the donation box?... Thanks again for all the hard work. May Our Lady guide and guard you always.

Christina

MHFM: One should avoid doing that.

Opened

Brother Michael and Peter, greetings...

I opened my local "Catholic" paper today to see what kind of junk I could find. Well I see this small section headlined, Courage, Encourage and Same-Sex Attraction.

It's a "Catholic" support group… I didn't have a ton of time to spend on it but reading a letter from Father Paul Check it’s a mental issue and never any mention of grave sin. Also, he figures St. Paul may have been struggling with this when talking about the thorn in his side. Unbelievable! The site is huge. It must have a lot of customers. Sad.

Matthew Macheca

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. That’s really bad.

Contradiction

Subject: Holy Catholic Church

Most Holy Family Monastery

First off thank you for all the great work, I can't say it enough. I wanted to comment on all the attacks you get from people in the Novus Ordo church. While they profess to believe in universal salvation they clearly point out that you are dangerous and you’re going to burn in hell for rejecting Vatican II but in the same breath they treat other false churches that contradict every action of catholic teaching and not only that reject the Blessed Mother as capable of still having hope of salvation. It’s wonderful to be so blessed to see the devil scrambling in panic, having his false church unveil itself with clear contradiction and having souls he would almost consume question their faith again when they say, only you who reject Vatican II will not be saved.

Keep up the good work it’s making a difference!!!

James

Agreement on Justification Marks 10 Years

http://www.zenit.org/article-26948?l=english

''...The declaration was the fruit of some 35 years of Lutheran-Catholic dialogue since the issue of justification was one of the first points of controversy raised by Martin Luther.... The president of the Vatican's council for promoting Christian unity, Cardinal Walter Kasper, has expressed the hope that the declaration will lead to more prayer in common. "May it encourage us," he said, "to continue our theological dialogue, and building on our common foundations, may it lead to an increase in joint witness to the Gospel of Jesus Christ."

MHFM: Yes… more proof that their sect accepts it.

Comment

Another way to share Most Holy Family Monastery materials is to leave them in the newspaper baskets at Starbucks and Peet's Coffee.

TD

Comment

Dear MHFM:

I thought this might be of interest to you. It pertains to a a radio program from the 1940's called "The Juggler of Our Lady". I reference it below in my email conversation with Renata (requires Real Player). If you follow the progress of the main character (the poor juggler), he ends up committing an act of sacrilege in the sanctuary of a Catholic Church. This is portrayed in the radio program as being acceptable to our Lady and a good thing. However, as my comments (below) indicate, this was probably meant to prepare people for the modernism to come in the vatican-two "church".

Here is the program --> http://www.otr.net/r/famt/97.ram

… By the way, I enjoyed your exposure of the fraud "Fr." Corapi. It really showed the crapulent nature of this man and what he really stands for (nothing!).

-John.

Renata:

I checked out some of the selections on this website. Below is an interesting program called, "The Juggler of Our Lady" (requires Real Player). It is about a poor Juggler who encounters a monk and is invited to live in a supposed Catholic monastery. Since he didn't have anything to give our Lady for Christmas, he commits a sacrilege in the monastery chapel by performing his juggling act. The program portrays this sacriledge as an acceptable "gift" to our Lady. He could have prayed reverently to our Lady in the Chapel or recited the Rosary. But, no. He performs his juggling act in the sanctuary.

This program, produced in 1947, was obviously designed to make people accept the modernism that was to come in the vatican-two "church". By portraying man's "gifts" as being an acceptable offering to God (instead of the One, True Offering made by the priest), it clearly teaches the doctrine of the antichrist. So, although this program sounds nice, it has absolutely no value to Catholics and is just jewish-communist propaganda

-John.

Added

MHFM: The recent question about Pius XII and heresy has been added to our sub-section. Note: shortly after we answered this question, we added some important points. That means that those who saw this exchange shortly after it was posted might not have seen the full response. For the full response to that question, see the first entry in this file:

New sub-section on finer points, quotes, arguments, objections and issues relevant to certain "traditionalists".

Akita

Dear Brothers,

I was wanting to get your input about the apparitions of Akita, Japan. As you already know these apparitions took place in the post-conciliar era and indicate a crisis in the Church. From everything I can find on the subject the visionary appears to belong to a congregation that celebrates the new Mass. What is your take on this particular apparition?

Thanks,

Brian

MHFM: It’s clearly a false apparition. It occurs within a Novus Ordo context. That’s sufficient to prove that it’s false. It contains some “conservative” Novus Ordo elements to keep people off balance and within the Vatican II sect.

Bishops

After viewing the news article you posted on the U.S. "Catholic" (gag) "Bishops" (make me ill) in which they condemn any "proselytizing”…. what is WRONG with these people? I mean, first of all, they have the satanic symbol of the "4 Directions" used in sorcery on their letterhead… how much more OBVIOUS does it have to be?

Anyone who cannot see from THIS document that these most evil men are hypocrites and apostates and Christ-deniers and Christ-haters, must simply have had a lobotomy (or two, or three). These evil men condemn what they call "sheep-stealing": meanwhile, THEY are busy stealing precious, irreplaceable, immortal human souls out from the flock of Christ every single day (and God only knows what these kind of people do by night!), while sending them all straight to hell----------and THEY KNOW IT. Jesus, Mary, give us strength to stand before the Son of Man----for He comes to judge us all.

Pius XII

Subject: Was Pius XII a heretic? Please help!

[I have been arguing with someone] Before I held your position, that he was a Pope, but now I am unsure and do not know what to say, this is what he wrote to me,

"No, a pope cannot teach heresy in his fallible documents! Why would you believe that unless you follow the Dimonds? So according to your position, as long as the pope does not intend to bind the faithful to his teachings, he can be a heretic! Why was John XXIII an antipope then? Answer me that one right now."

"I have another question for you, in addition to the John XXIII question. If a pope does not lose office for teaching heresy in his fallible capacity, then do you not give lip service only to the dogma that heretics are outside the Church? Or do you assert that a heretic who is outside the Church can still be pope, so long as he doesn't try to bind all the faithful and invoke infallibility for his heresy? Finally, if what you say is true, then how many heresies can a pope teach in his fallible capacity? Can he teach one and still be pope? Seven? Seventy times seven?

"You and they both believe that a pope can teach heresy in his fallible capacity, essentially equating the dogma of infallibility with protecting a pope from uttering heresy while binding the whole Church. It is so much more than that. It means that whatever they utter ex cathedra is completely true, yet you and the Dimonds only give lip service to this reality, as most people do. And as a result of this you believe that a pope can utter heresy in his fallible capacity, and that he would still be pope."

What are we to say to such questions. It just seems to be that Pius XII was a heretic, does it not? Please, if you could shed light on this for me would be much appreciated!
Thanks and God bless.

Regards,
V. Veikko

MHFM: His entire line of argumentation is a straw man – that is, attributing to another a position he doesn’t actually hold. We don’t believe that someone who is a heretic in his fallible capacity remains the pope. We don’t say that. Since they cannot refute the position, they must use straw-man argumentation. No heretic can remain the pope, even if he only teaches the heresy in his fallible capacity. (A true pope could never teach heresy in an infallible capacity, of course.)

The point is that there isn’t sufficient evidence to definitely conclude that Pius XII was a heretic, rather than someone who was a terribly weak pope who made doctrinal errors. That’s because the errors which Pius XII taught were not specific propositions which have been explicitly condemned by the Magisterium by name. Rather, they are proven to be false and incompatible with Catholic teaching by the positive dogmatic statements on related subjects. As a result, these errors become heresies once one puts together (or can be shown to be directly obstinate against) all of the positive dogmatic evidence which contradicts them. That doesn’t mean that someone doesn’t sin for promoting them and neglecting to more carefully consult Catholic teaching. It is simply to point out that there is a difference, from the standpoint of manifest heresy, between the promotion of such an error and the promotion of something that has been explicitly and notoriously condemned by name in a dogmatic decree (e.g., Justification by faith alone).

In fact, notice that in the following decree of the Council of Constance, there is a distinction between propositions that are offensive to Catholic teaching, etc. and those which are notoriously heretical. They are “notoriously heretical” because they have previously been condemned by the Magisterium by name, in a manner which should be obvious to all. This proves that notoriety is not simply reserved for how one promotes a falsehood, but also THE SPECIFIC FALSEHOOD ITSELF (i.e., how clearly and obviously has it been condemned by the Church). This coincides precisely with what we’ve said about certain undeclared heretical priests. We’ve pointed out (correctly) that how notorious they are is not only dependent upon how they promote something, but also dependent upon the content of the falsehood they embrace.

Council of Constance, Sess. 15, July 6, 1415, Sentence against John Huss: “This most holy Synod of Constance therefore declares and defines that the articles listed below, which have been found on examination, by many masters in sacred scripture, to be contained in his books and pamphlets written in his own hand, and which the same John Huss at a public hearing, before the fathers and prelates of this sacred council, has confessed to be contained in his books and pamphlets, are not Catholic and should not be taught to be such but rather many of them are erroneous, others scandalous, others offensive to the ears of the devout, many of them are rash and seditious, and some of them are notoriously heretical and have long ago been rejected and condemned by holy fathers and by general councils, and it strictly forbids them to be preached, taught or in any way approved.”

That should be sufficient to demonstrate the point. Many of these issues are covered in this file: New sub-section on finer points, quotes, arguments, objections and issues relevant to certain "traditionalists". Scroll down to the second set of audios which completely refute the radical schismatics.

New Video on Luther

We feel that this is an important video. It’s a revealing look at the life of the first Protestant. This video covers how Martin Luther, the first recognizable Protestant and the progenitor of all non-Catholic denominations, "discovered" and invented his doctrines by the day. It explains how all Protestants are following Martin Luther's man-created religion. It explains how he came upon his beliefs later than you might think, and more.

Christian Unity

Subject: Christian Unity

Brothers,

I have just read the article you posted about Christian unity & V2 rejecting proselytism. I can't see how they can seriously call for Christian unity; when everyone who is ready to see the truth knows that the only Christian church is the true Catholic Church - and not the V2 version or any other so called religions.

There is no need to call for Christian unity. Real Christians are already united. They are united in being part of the true Catholic Church, you cannot unite that which is not separated.

If anyone really wants to be part of the true church they will have to convert and give up their false religion or sect - V2 or protestant etc, for they are not members of the true Christian church to begin with.

Thanks for all the info on this website. I have learned more here in 18 months than in my previous 45 years of the V2 church.

Jim

Witch

Your recent news article about the Bible being banned and the parents being told to suggest their child rather, read info. about witchcraft in a classroom reminds me of me and my husband's recent experience with the Novus Ordo 6th Grade CCD classroom: in our 7th year of teaching 6th Grade CCD as a couple at our local Novus Ordo parish (NJ), we found your info., digested it and LEFT the Novus Ordo FOREVER. However, though I refused to step foot onto the Novus Ordo property to complete the final class of the school-year (last Mary, 2009) my husband went to teach because he said he felt obliged to the KIDS to do so. Well...guess what? That night, the FIRST GRADE CCD teacher was dressed up AS A WITCH! My husband asked her what she was doing, and she informed him she was TEACHING THE FIRST GRADERS ABOUT WITCHCRAFT!!! the DRE was informed however we do not know if anything was said or done and we will not ever be going back there. We must pray for the children.....

Debates

Hi Brothers Peter and Michael,

I first want to start out by saying thank you for your work… Great debates by the way. I was so happy to see that William tried to take you guys on. He really made himself look like a fool…

Want

Dear MHFM,

My name is Nathan… I really want to be a true Catholic. I want a true baptism into the faith by strong Catholics who believe in only the original teachings of the original Catholic church. I have done so many terrible things in my life. Sometimes I feel like I might have been one of the most evil people on Earth. I've been given so much by the lord and I've beared very little fruit if any. I would like to talk more in depth to Brother Dimond. I'm afraid I've committed Blasphemy of the Holy Spirit. I'd like to know exactly what this unforgiveable sin really is. I'm not sure. I just want to be saved. I've gone to confession at V2 churches before realizing they were v2 churches. I've tried to get answers everywhere and your website is the only one that has given me any real inklings of answers. I thank you very much for that. Please write me back as soon as possible.

Sinner seeking salvation,
Nathan

MHFM: Nathan, it’s great to hear about your interest. You are definitely getting powerful graces to move toward the true Church. Any kind of sin can be forgiven. You need to follow the steps on our website for how to convert.

The Steps to convert to the traditional Catholic faith and for those leaving the New Mass - Baptism and Conditional Baptism - the Council of Trent's Profession of Faith for Converts

You should get the catechism we offer and our basic package. Ask for a rosary and begin to pray it each day. We can also help you with more questions when you contact us. You need to act upon this and convert to the Catholic faith. We plan on posting some thoughts about the unforgiveable sin. This will hopefully shed some light on the questions that arise on this issue. However, it's not something you need to worry about simply because any kind of sin can be forgiven. You should just focus on converting and being forgiven through the sacraments. Please obtain our material and look carefully at the items which refute Protestantism. You need to be convinced that the Catholic Church is the one true Church, and that all of its dogmas are true.

We look forward to hearing from you.

Roadblock

Subject: Roadblock in Rochester, NY

Thanks Brother Michael for telling me to view MHFM daily. I just viewed your new movie posted… I went to visit my Mother… 3-5 miles away… Charlotte, NY…

I drove up to the Lake… There was a Roadblock. There were at least *_15-20 police cars_ *there and cones in the road. With a 4x4 also. They were done with what they were doing and I had to wait for about 10 minutes. Then they let us drive past. I have been stopped in police… or whatever checkpoints before. Nothing like this. This must have a Training assignment…

Anthony

Article

Dear Brothers,

Thank you for that article on the swine flu. It really makes all the hype appear as it actually is - hype! Also, the video on the bold heretic John Corapi (Corrupty) is excellent…

I recently re-watched all of your superb DVD’s on Freemasonry and Communism. Freemasonic Communism has so obviously snaked its way into this part of the world. For instance, there’s a bike shop near where I live called, “The Hammer and Cycle.” Across the street from the library is a freemasonic lodge. In the city centre of Canberra there’s a new “hip” nightclub called, “the Kremlin Bar”! Then down the street is a triple x shop – this is in the heart of the Capital city of Australia! A block or two over is a bar which boasts itself to be “the biggest gay bar in Canberra”! Finally, one need only look at the sky line to see a big transparent pyramid on top of parliament house, through which the sun shines, just like the Illuminati pyramid!! The closest "Church" to the Illuminati house is the schismatical Anglican "Church," and not far away, almost hidden, is the National Jewish Memorial Centre! If you go to the other end of this street you’ll find St. Christopher’s Cathedral, which celebrates the apostate New World Order “Mass.” Also, about 10 minutes from the city centre is a suburb notorious for being full of pornography warehouses! Also, near the Australian National University, you’ll find the scientific CSIRO, no doubt feverishly trying to find new ways to bring eugenicide to the world, either through abortion/contraceptive methods, “assisted” suicide drugs, or another poisoned vaccine! There is also a new prison that was built just outside the city, presumably to put the people in who don't comply with the New World Orders program to help kill themselves! This is what the capital city of Australia offers! It’s not Australia anymore, it's Fascistralia!!!

Thank you for your hard work and God Bless,

Kit White

Comment

...as for "Say Your Rosary"'s comments and your response to them… to you at MHFM I say "nice job slaying the dragon!" To think of the NERVE of this person trying to USE our Most Holy Queen and Mother and her Most Holy Rosary to pathetically attempt to forward their own Luciferian, anti-God, anti-Catholic agenda----simply unreal---I think it just goes to show how crazy it makes the evil one to find any true Catholics still around even in this day and age---so nice job proving the enemy wrong and THANK YOU for defending the true Catholic dogmas! Sincerely,

V2 “bishop”

Brothers,

This link is to an article on bbc.co.uk news website;

Irish V2 bishop tells catholics to vote yes to Lisbon treaty -

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/8260836.stm

Jim

Vatican II

If Vatican II was a true council, it would have erased all previous councils. No one, stupid, abominable modern council in the evil 1960's could whitewash 2,000 years of Church teaching. That is why I believe all those who accept Vatican II in the slightest way, or who even doubt whether or not to reject the apostate hierarchy, will be damned. It is so ridiculous. The Catholic Church does not teach religious freedom. Why then would the Catholic Church even be required to exist? Ever since I was five, I was told and knew and thought and believed that all those who die outside the one true Church are damned to Hell. A great question I thought of: What if the original twelve apostles had been ecumenical? Then what? We'd all be pagans today.

-Michael Rudnicki

Ingredients

Brothers,

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15092

Here is yet another interesting and disturbing article on one of the ingredients added to the "swine flu vaccine." This is truly the devil's "cocktail."

Sincerely,

Howard

To Start

Hi Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,

This has just caught my attention...Aussies are going to start "swine flu" vaccinations in one weeks time; not mandatory at this stage...

viz., http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2009/s2690354.htm

God bless

David

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. They begin by saying that it’s voluntary. We’ll see if it remains that way. It’s certainly mandatory for some people already. There’s reason to think that once they have the media hype-machine working, they can say: “Oh, everyone’s getting sick. We must make them mandatory now.”

Previously

I had previously disagreed with your position that Catholics could attend the Masses of (undeclared) heretics. I realize now (after praying a novena) how horribly deceived I've been. Your position is 800 years old. It has been upheld unanimously by Popes, Councils, canonists, and renowned theologians - de Lugo, Suarez, Navarro, - and of course, the great St. Thomas Aquinas. Anyone who disagrees with this position is in serious danger- and, at best, missing the very graces he needs to steer clear of mortal sin... I can only stress the danger of "mingling" with the crowd, and failing to uphold the faith whenever the opportunity arises...These failures nearly cost me my soul.... Thank you for your time,

An idiot

MHFM: We give you credit for the acknowledgement. We should emphasize (for anyone who might not be clear on it) that our position is not that one may go to all undeclared heretics for the sacraments, but rather that one may go to certain ones.

Distribution

Distribution Ideas

Dear Brothers, maybe you could share these tactics with those you know who also have an interest in distributing the material...What I do is rubberband the '4 in 1' dvd to the 'Bible proves' book, or add also UFO / Padre Pio books too...then whenever I go somewhere and notice a Rosary or religious article hanging from rear view mirror in the car I park next too, I’ll put a set on their windshield. Or I’ll put the material in their car though the window or sunroof if they leave them open… Another idea is at the drive thru restaurant, if the person in the window is wearing a religious necklace, ask them what religion they are, if they claim to be catholic, give them the whole set, if not, then give them bible proves book and Creations DVD-- Also if there’s a candidate at the intersection, tell them you are going to toss the material though their window if they seem interested in it before the light turns green, or hand it to the passenger from your car once traffic gets going..Also If I notice a candidate getting in or out of their car that I park next to, I'll ask him if he wants some free info about the Church, be sure to tell them it’s free along with having a big smile on your face so they don’t think you are trying to sell something...Maybe these Ideas can instill some confidence/ideas in others who may want to pass out the material as well...

-Steve -

Comment

I really appreciated the O'Keefe's and others' ideas as to how to distribute your MHFM-soul-saving true Catholic info---great ideas--many thanks for all they do---also really appreciated "MARK"'s thoughts about our country, the "USA"... how sad but so true....Gosh, its been SO many year since college---however, if I'm not mistaken, back then I read a certain book called Democracy in America I believe by one Alexis de Tocqueville in which de Tocqueville (sp?) asserts that America would (eventually) EITHER become what he called (I think he was a late 18th century writer) PANTHEISTIC---what today we would call MODERNISM OR "NEW AGE"---IE, LUCIFERIAN, FREEMASON etc (same difference) OR America would become CATHOLIC. Even way back then in my oh-so-sophmoric "wisdom) or distinct lack thereof!! this statement made a memorable impression on me-------Well, its kind of difficult for most to distinguish the difference between "Pantheism" and "Catholic" in our own day and age, in America and elswehere--especially when your various modern-era antipopes (like "JPII", etc) keep calling for more "pan-Christian" events!!!!). I agree totally with Mark and yes we need a true Catholic Monarchy, a TRUE Catholic King and Queen in America---let it be Jesus and Mary! Thanks for all your work and please keep us in your prayers,

Unity of Faith

Dear Dimond Brothers:

You have been a great comfort over the years in the material you have published and the debates you have conducted. There is however, a subject I have not seen covered or debated which seems most important to me. In your debates you speak frequently about unity of faith and hierarchy. Why then don't the traditionalists seek for unity of faith and hierarchy. Why are there so many societies and independent priests when the Catholic Church is supposed to be one in faith and hierarchy.

Why wouldn't it be a primary urgency to unite together under one hierarchy. It seems to me that if they are trying to preserve tradition, why are they so separate. It appears as though the traditionalists are practicing protestantism. They hang a shield on their doors, claiming to be Catholic and hope Catholics come and support them. If they were truly Catholic, why wouldn't their primary goal be to unite in faith and hierarchy, since this is a dogma of the Catholic Church? Please Respond...

Yours truly in Jesus and Mary

Concerned Christian

MHFM: A few thoughts: just because some people believe they are “trying to preserve Catholic tradition” in some way doesn’t mean that they accept the Catholic faith. There are countless false traditionalists who think they are traditional, but in fact reject the defined dogma Outside the Church There is No Salvation. You cannot have a unity of faith with such individuals because they don’t accept the fullness of the faith! They reject Catholic teaching.

There cannot be a unity of faith unless people TRULY accept all of Catholic teaching. A Catholic can sense when this unity of faith is lacking. If a person doesn’t really believe in the necessity of Catholic faith and in the necessity of water baptism – but instead believes as the BOD apostates do, that it’s just a big mystery who can be saved – the Catholic can sense that there just isn’t the same outlook. There isn’t the same internal conviction, and this will be manifested outwardly. As a result, a real supernatural unity between the two simply doesn’t exist. That’s because only one person really believes in Christ and in His dogmas. The other person does not.

The fact is that Catholics must consider as outside the unity many others who claim to be Catholic. This isn’t comparable to Protestantism at all. Protestants have no way of preserving a unity of faith. There is no criterion for Protestants to point to which can reasonably give them a unity of faith. Catholics can point to the magisterial teachings as the rule of Catholic faith. This rule can and must be utilized to determine who is to be considered within the unity.

Another thing we’ve noticed is how many people are being deceived by externals today. This is true in the traditional movement to a great extent, but also in some “conservative” sectors of the Vatican II sect. People are really concerned about communities, about having a priest or a bishop, about a new Latin Mass that might be popping up, about priests or nuns or religious being seen in habits, about Latin prayers, about singing or chanting, and many similar things. Meanwhile, those very same groups either accept total apostates like Benedict XVI as Catholic – thus rendering every single external thing they value to be completely meaningless – or they believe that souls can be saved in any religion. They are totally deceived and their intentions are not pure.

THEY ARE MORE CONCERNED WITH FEELING HOLY, THAN WITH BEING HOLY. THEY ARE MORE CONCERNED WITH FEELING AND LOOKING CATHOLIC, THAN WITH ACTUALLY BEING CATHOLIC AND HAVING THE FAITH. They are abominable! They miss and in fact reject the substance of the faith, while focusing on these things.

Dogma

Dear Brothers,

Your correspondent Mr. “Say Your Rosary” writes:

“I don't believe that adult Jews (who KNOW their "faith") will have a very good chance [to be saved] but I'll let God decide.”

God has already decided, Mr. SYR: “[N]one of those existing outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans, also Jews, heretics, and schismatics can ever be partakers of eternal life. . .” (Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence Cantate Domino)

But do Mr. SYR and his associates abide by the decision of God? No. They don’t like the decision, so they reject it.

Of course, they do not reject it outright (their whole game being to pretend to adhere to Church Teaching, while at the same time believing only what they want to believe). Instead, they will interpret dogmatic statements to mean the exact opposite of what the words say. For example, the above ex cathedra statement by Eugene IV, which says that Jews can not be saved, they will simply interpret to mean that Jews can be saved. Then with consummate temerity they will accuse those who say that the words mean what they say of heresy and of wanting to see everyone damned to hell.

The reality, of course, is that Pope Eugene’s words interpreted literally have saved more onetime pagans, Jews, heretics, and schismatics from hell than Fr. Martin has ever even imagined in all his fantasies about invincible ignorance.

Well, maybe not quite that many.

Regards,

George R.

Suggestion

Dear Brothers,

I’m writing in response to the person who wrote, thanking you for making your materials economical enough for people to purchase and distribute. I would like to add some of the ways our family tries to share them: We talk to our family and the people that God “puts in our path”, by asking them to look at the evidence for the truthfulness of the position of the Catholic Church by either referring them to your website, or giving them material that may be applicable to our conversation. We also try to remember to take a tote bag with several items, including the booklet “The Bible proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church” and the one on UFOs and leave them in the waiting rooms of anywhere our family happens to be – whether it is for medical, dental, or automotive checkups. We write “FREE” on the top of the front cover, so that a person will feel comfortable picking it up and taking it with them upon leaving the waiting area. We also have purchased and send out your fliers on “No Salvation Outside the Church”, “The heresies of Benedict XVI”, “The New Mass is Invalid”, etc… to any “junk mail” that happens to find its way to our home with a “postage paid” return envelope inside. On some of them, we will use our own postage (if their return envelope is not marked “postage paid”) just to make sure it gets distributed as far and wide as possible. We get numerous pleas for financial assistance from Novus Ordo organizations in the mail and we use the fliers on the invalidity of the New Mass or the Heresies of Benedict XVI to send to them whereas if it is a secular organization soliciting our aid, we include the “No Salvation outside the Church” flier. When paying local bills by mail, in addition to remitting our payment, we insert that same flier, hoping that it finds its way to a person of good will. There are places near shopping centers where local real estate companies place their circulars/home sales information booklets for people to open and pick up and we have left information in those, too. We also try to remember to leave one or two booklets or cassettes in the bathrooms of restaurants we happen to be dining in. We would also love to know how others have used your materials to spread the truth.

We add our sincere and humble thanks to you for the hours of tireless research and work that goes into these materials and your willingness to make them available to all of us at such a low cost.

With much appreciation,

Melanie & Bill O’Keefe

Great Apostasy

Dear MHFM

You deserve tremendous credit for the work you do. My advice to all Catholics seeking the truth, GET… OUT OF THE V2 SECT, NOVUS ORDO!!! Become a true catholic, in these final days. The V2 sect is the abominable WHORE OF BABYLON marked for destruction by God. I also believe that the united states of freemasonry USA is the physical whore of babylon, sad to say. This country needs to fully convert to the true catholic faith, and become a monarchy ruled by a catholic king, like the nations of Europe once had. This is the only way america has any chance of surviving. This country will fall if it continues on its present path. In closing, if this isn’t the great apostasy i don’t want to be here when the real one comes. Thanks! and God bless! keep up the great work !

MARK

Sharing Materials

Subject: Sharing Materials

Dear Brothers: Thank you for the great job you continue to do there not only with the web site and the debates etc. but in particular in regard to the materials you do such an outstanding job with in researching and publishing as well as making them available at such modest costs. I wanted to share with you also some of the things I've been doing to distribute and share your materials which includes not only handing them out to family members, friends and neighbors but also have mailing pertinent publications/dvds to area new order "catholic" churches as well as protestant churches throughout my area. I also leave the booklet "The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church" in waiting rooms when I go to medical appointments. Perhaps others could also share what they may be doing in turn to share/distribute your materials.

Thank You!

GOD BLESS YOU

Phil White

Salvation

Dear Brothers,

I listened to the audio on the phony John Corapi. Good job exposing him. I'd like to add another of his heresies which you did not specifically mention.

I recall watching one of his talks on EWTN called The Catechism of the Catholic Church. On this particular talk he addressed the dogma, Outside the Church There Is No Salvation.

Here is what he said. Pardon me because I may not remember it all word for word, but it was something like this :

"We have often heard the saying, Outside the Church There Is No Salvation.....Yes there is no salvation outside the Church, but you must understand what the Church is.....So can a Buddhist be saved? Yes a Buddhist can be saved because there is what we call baptism of desire.... So if a Buddhist does what he believes is right and lives a good life he can be saved and is thus united to the Church....."

By the way, he was "ordained" by Antipope John Paul II.

Alain

Comment

Thanks for exposing john corapi, who may have deceived millions --- what a phony, creepy, child of Lucifer that evil man is....... he reminds one of B16 very much, he is big into deception ... in Jesus and Mary.

Let’s hope

HA! I've known who "Father" John Corapi is since I was a V2 Catholic in 1994, I think it was. Maybe earlier. He was a good friend of out pastor Father Slade Crawford and would preach parish missions in the church. Everyone thought he was another Fulton Sheen and we bought his tapes. He told us his story about being a rich drug addict in California, but some relatives who prayed their rosary for him were the probable cause of his "conversion."

I was part of his fan club until, during one of his visits, it was announced that he was going to be on EWTN as a regular. This time I did inot line up outside with the crowd after "Mass" to shake his hand and compliment him. Later, I wrote a letter asking him how he could be on EWTN and be silent about Mother Angelica's promotion of false apparitions, esp. Medjugorje and The Marian Movement of Priests. No reply of course. He had replied to an earlier letter when I questioned him about his adding to the Mass with "This is Jesus" at the consecration. He said it was a legal addition. To this letter, about EWTN, however, nothing. I always had the feeling that these great speakers felt that it was okay to ignore the EWTN heresies in order to get their message across, but they also ignored the fact, as Fr. C mentions in the video, that silence in the face of sin is also a sin. He's a hypocrite. They all are. I heard so much hypocrisy in the V2 church where the only sin is abortion, unless you're ignorant or a politician.

I think he still has this cult type community somewhere in Texas. A family of Charistmatic/conservative V2 Catholics from this parish sold all their belongings and their home to live in and give their life to this Charismatice type community. Several years ago I heard they were… still enjoying it.

Fr. C is just your typical V2 "priest". He is teaching very well and very loud the V2 theology and is loyal to the V2 antipopes. All priests and V2 catholics who appear on EWTN are heretics and believers in the V2 theology. Some disapprove of the Medj. apparitions but still appear; some have been banned because they mentioned Medj. in a negative way, but it's not just the apparitions but the entire V2 theology that they've swallowed, hook line and sinker. My pile of books written by V2 "Catholics” is very large. Those I keep for reference; The rest are in the land fill, including Father Corapi's tapes.

I just read somewhere that the devil will tell you a thousand truths to get you to believe just one lie. That one lie was the pre-Vatican II heresy of salvation outside of the Catholic church, baptized or not; Jew or pagan. This "one" lie…was accepted as dogma by Vatican II and the V2 “popes” and a brand new theology and a brand new anti-Christian church emerged that calls itself Catholic. Its basic truth is that God can change his mind and that Christ taught a one size fits all theology. Those too weak to avoid sin are excused. Christ's promise that everyone can find strength in Him to avoid sin is null and void.

Let's hope by your exposure that at least some of Father Corapi's fans will see the light…

Stop lying

Subject: heretic! heretic!

you are the one who is heretic

what you do is cut some clips of Father corapi and misrepresent it. be afraid of commandment number 8.

if you are truly are what you say you are. then be ashamed of yourself

Dino

MHFM: No, you need to stop lying. He definitely has not been misrepresented. That’s what he believes. He accepts false ecumenism and believes that rabbis have a mission to spread Judaism, in addition to the other things covered. He’s not a Catholic. You need to put aside your bad will and your emotional attachments. We know it’s difficult for people like you, but you need to try to be honest and look at the truth. It’s amazing how many people who call themselves Catholic – Novus Ordo and “traditional” – are complete liars.

Fr. Corapi

Last guy

Dear MHFM,

That last guy that wrote in asking you about Fr. Feeney is clearly a provocateur. He says that he has read most of the material on your website but if that were true why does he ask a hundred questions. Most of them could be answered just by skimming through your main page. If anyone wants a debate with you they know where they can find you. All the information is there in plain sight(it has been there for years now), free of charge and for everyone of good will.

the heretic said:...''I have looked at most things on your site and agree with everything but your bullheaded Feenyite position...'' - this statement could be equivalent to something like this: ''I have read the whole New Testament and I agree with everything in it except that Resurrection part, I don't really believe in that...''

For 4-5 years now I've been reading, listening and watching the material on your website, especially the material pertaining to the dogma EENS, and one question has always perplexed me. Why would someone who claims to be a Catholic find it so difficult to accept a dogma that says that in order to be saved you have to be a Catholic i.e. receive the sacrament of baptism and possess the Catholic faith? I mean, you would expect a Protestant, a Jew, a Muslim etc. to reject that dogma but why would someone who professes to be Catholic do it? Now let's just for the sake of argument say that those who believe in baptism of blood, baptism of desire( these days we could also add ''baptism of ignorance'' since for the heretics ignorance has become a salvific quality) are right (which they are clearly not) and that our so called ''feeneyite'' position is a VILE HERESY as they tend to say, what would the ramifications or the fruits of that ''heresy'' be? Well, the fruits of that ''vile heresy'' would be that people would be converting to the Catholic faith, they would be baptised and they would believe and preach to others that the Catholic Church and the Catholic faith is the only salvific one, to the exclusion of all other religions. Isn't that exactly what the Catholic Church has been doing for the last 2000 years. Well of course it is! Any resonable person(of good will) can compare the two positions, namely the literal understanding of EENS and the liberal, modernist understanding(bod,bob, invincible ignorance...) of that dogma and see which of these two leads you to the Church and which one leads you away from the Church or persuades you to remain in a false religion.

Catholics know and they have always known which position is the true one. God has revealed it, the Church has dogmatically confirmed it, our whole faith depends on it and our reason consents to it. As for those who call our belief in the dogma ''a vile heresy'' they can be compared to the Pharisees in the Gospel of Matthew:

Mathew 12:24 But the Pharisees hearing it, said: This man casteth not out the devils but by Beelzebub the prince of the devils....31 Therefore I say to you: Every sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven men, but the blasphemy of the Spirit shall not be forgiven. 32 And whosoever shall speak a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him: but he that shall speak against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, nor in the world to come. 33 Either make the tree good and its fruit good: or make the tree evil, and its fruit evil. For by the fruit the tree is known.

For me this pronouncement pretty much ends the whole debate:

Pope Eugene IV, The Council of Florence, “Exultate Deo,” Nov. 22, 1439, ex cathedra:
“Holy baptism, which is the gateway to the spiritual life, holds the first place among all the sacraments; through it we are made members of Christ and of the body of the Church. And since death entered the universe through the first man, ‘unless we are born again of water and the Spirit, we cannot,’ as the Truth says, ‘enter into the kingdom of heaven’ [John 3:5]. The matter of this sacrament is real and natural water.”

V. from Croatia

MHFM: Yes, the only explanation is that they are of Satan. It’s the mystery of iniquity. By the way, that heretic (and we don’t believe he is a conspirator, just simply of profound bad will) wrote back again. He said that we shouldn’t accuse those people and priests of believing Jews can be saved! That’s after he just admitted (in the previous e-mail) that he believes Jews can be saved! And they of course believe the same thing that he does, as he admits and is documented! The lying is simply beyond words.

Comment

I see "say your rosary" is sending his "bod" garbage to you. Ha I found it funny when he said Bishop Sanborn could debate you, yeah Bishop Sanborn could try explain why an apostate Jew who doesnt believe in Christ can be saved. It's amazing how many follow certain "trad" priests like Mckenna, Dolan and Sanborn. The only difference between them and the sspx is sedevacantism. I e-mailed Fr Cekada on Bob/Bod and he couldn't give me a quote from one pope that says bod is true… Cekada is afraid to deal with heresies in vatican II that deal with people being saved in false religions. Catholics profess to believe in ONE Baptism not three therefore it should be simple for people to see that Baptism of desire/Blood is not true...

It really is sad with the level of bad will that so many have....

Sean

God Bless

Makes sense

Hello.

I grew up in the Roman Catholic church. I was born in the late 1950's and attended parochial school in my early years and saw things that did not seem very Christian to me and watched the church change under Vatican II. I never lost my spirituality and recently returned to praying the Rosary again daily about a month ago and attended confession, mass and received the Holy Eucharist for the first time in about 20 years last Saturday. Although I never lost my faith in God or Jesus I didn't feel right and at home with the church and did not feel akin to any other faith. And I was probably more lazy than I want to admit in finding my way back to the Lord.

I have been praying the Luminous Mysteries on Thursdays and will stop. I understand from your website that I should be praying the other three "real" Mysteries each day (all 15 decades), but I am concerned about what church I should be attending…

What you say makes much sense to me. I had noticed that Sister Lucia did not look the same, but did not dare think the Vatican would have ever done such a thing, but sometimes you just have to see what is right in front of your eyes...

… through studying some of his works what you claim makes a lot of sense, and in my mind the pics of Sister Lucia in her later years leave no doubt in your claims. It was something that seemed very familiar to me at the first read of such. I had noticed in my research that her features did not look the same but I think in trying to work back to my faith I turned a blind eye to it.

Please guide me in the way of Jesus and tell me the path I need to follow to serve my beloved Lord. I have been praying a lot and I feel it is through His spirit that I have been led to the truth. Please help guide me to stay on course. I tell Satan to go away and that I will give him no power.

In the name of Jesus Christ our Lord and Savior,
Nancy Godinho

SYR guy

Subject: SYR guy

It is just too ridiculous to be real. Makes me want to scream. What problem do these people have with Vatican II if they believe in BOD? Don’t they understand that BOD is the logical underpinning for all of the theological errors of Vatican II? I think some of Vatican II, like changing the Mass, were just in your face malicious. But religious liberty, ecumenism (defined as accommodation), praise for false religions, the notion that the Church somehow subsists in other religions, the misplaced emphasis on human dignity, all are made possible by the notion of BOD. Take away this false notion, which is really born out of a failure to trust God in the perfection of His justice, and the problems of Vatican II are logically irrefutable. However with BOD, I don’t understand what their gripe is. And then he says he is going to pray for you, but he (in response to your offer of a phone conversation) doesn’t want to talk about it? What a coward.

I’m quite sure that Sanborn won’t be ringing your phone anytime soon either. It is a shame though. It would make for great listening. But he won’t call because he knows he can’t win. Yet he’ll go on lying to people I guess. It is so hard to grasp. What makes these people tick?

Bill Mulligan

Comment

Subject: Papal Infallibility

Dear MHFM,

What is so, so, simply amazing is that in all this color of clerical interpretation by so-called professional theologians of the Catholic Church, how they obviously deny papal infallibility. Pope Leo X condemned Luther and his 95 thesis', anathema. Which means-out-for all time. The matter was closed in the early 16th century, and here in the 21st Luther and his ilk have drawn the Catholic world into a false debate and the possibliity of what he proposed as truth. The devil truly masquerades as the light of Jesus Christ. What was condemned by Pope Leo X in the 16th applies to the 21st. Accept the truth-so simple! It's refreshing news to read solid Catholic wisdom coming from your ministry. St. Michael, ora pro nobis!

Books

Dear Brothers,

I always like St. Athanasius' quotes. The one on how, "we don't worship a creature. Inconceivable!" is great. I was thinking how fruitful the Catholic Church must have been when the Athanasian Creed was being used in the liturgy (I'm not saying there is anything wrong with St. Pius V's Liturgy). We can be grateful we can still read it and use it to refute the heretics. Not all that long ago I thought it would be a useful exercise to write it out, so I did.

I'm almost finished the Consecration to Mary from True Devotion to Mary and also the tremendous book, Our Lady of Fatima. I was thinking how devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary is like her giving us the secret key (actual grace) to the hidden door (our heart, mind, and soul) which opens onto the secret shortcut (humility) through the hidden forest (merits) and into the Heavenly Kingdom of God - Mary is the secret shortcut to God, Jesus Christ, her Son! I thought it was interesting that St. Louis de Montfort said how our Lord would return by means of our Lady - I wonder if there will be a big cross of light in the sky, instead of the sun, as the conclusion to the miracle of the dancing sun of Fatima and to the Church being in eclipse?! Thank you for recommending those books. I do not hesitate to assert that without a series of stunning miracles of grace I would not now be a Catholic. If I had not prayed to the Blessed Virgin Mary, and persevered in devotion to her by means of the Most Holy Rosary, I doubt that I would now even be walking this planet!

Thank you Brothers and God Bless,

Kit White

Comment

Dear Brothers,

It is no mystery as to why the S.S.J. has opened up "shop" in Paraguay. At the Seventh International Conference of American States, with regard to A-35: Convention on Extradition, 12/26/1933, Paraguay has never ratified this treaty. Legally speaking, it appears that in the future S.S.J. would be immune from extradition to the U.S.and/or the International Criminal Court.

Coincidentally, the Bush family also owns a 98,000 acre ranch in Paraguay.

Intel also has Kenneth Lay of ENRON infamy feasting on pineapples in this "Hoods` Paradise".

Best wishes,

To Tell The Truth

Faith

MHFM: This is an interesting passage about faith, God’s power, and trust in God.

2 Paralipomenon 25:6-9- ““He hired also of Israel a hundred thousand valiant men, for a hundred talents of silver. But a man of God came to him, and said: O king, let not the army of Israel go out with thee, for the Lord is not with Israel, and all the children of Ephraim: And if thou think that battles consist in the strength of the army, God will make thee to be overcome by the enemies: for it belongeth to God both to help, and to put to flight. And Amasias said to the man of God: What will then become of the hundred talents which I have given to the soldiers of Israeli and the man of God answered him: The Lord is rich enough to be able to give thee much more than this.”

Claimants

Hello Brother Michael and Peter Dimond,

I thank you for all your insights. Again, I have more questions to ask for guidance. We know that there are false popes in Rome since Pope Pius XII. There are also claimants or contenders to the papacy during these times within the Traditionalist movement. Do you recommend any of these claimants as plausible solution? We should reject Conclavism because papal election is not strictly necessary and possible with ordinary people, correct?...

Thanks,

AJ

[Note: this reader is not asking about the Vatican II antipopes John XXIII, Paul VI, John Paul I, John Paul II and Benedict XVI. He’s asking about others in our day who claim to be the pope.]

MHFM: We definitely reject all those individuals. The simple reason is that they have no legitimate claim to be the Bishop of Rome. They do not possess any connection with valid cardinals appointed by a true pope; nor do they have acclamation by the Roman clergy and people, which would give them a legitimate connection to the See of Rome. That’s how popes were elected in the first millennium. As a result, these individuals have no real claim to be valid popes. That’s without even getting into the various heresies held by such individuals, which would also be an invalidating factor.

Who counted

Subject: Comment on Sedevacantism Debate

Who counted and figured out that 97% of the Eastern bishops fell into Arianism?

Rom

MHFM: As quoted in our book, The Truth about What Really Happened to the Catholic Church after Vatican II, that was the assessment of patristic scholar Fr. William Jurgens. He was the one who compiled the well-known work, The Faith of the Early Fathers.

Fr. William Jurgens: “At one point in the Church’s history, only a few years before Gregory’s [Nazianz] present preaching (A.D. 380), perhaps the number of Catholic bishops in possession of sees, as opposed to Arian bishops in possession of sees, was no greater than something between 1% and 3% of the total. Had doctrine been determined by popularity, today we should all be deniers of Christ and opponents of the Spirit.” (William Jurgens, The Faith of the Early Fathers, Collegeville, MN: The Liturgical Press, Vol. 2, p. 39.)

B.O.D., “Feeneyism,” discussion

Well guys I DO believe that "outside the Church there is no Salvation" Just not in the radical Feenyite way you that you do . I cannot understand for the life of me why you give NO CREDIT to your leader and founder Fr. Feeney ? Is it just a "coincidence" that Fr. Feeeney operated in the same area as you now hail from ? Were you influenced by Fr Feeney/ Y or N ?

I have looked at most things on your site and agree with everything but your bullheaded Feenyite position . I think you guys do a lot of good and by this one issue (one drop of vile heresie) poison everything . Why? I have no idea and can only ass ume that selling books may be the issue ?

I have the utmost respect for bros Dimond and the great videos they create but have grown tired of correcting good Catholics that DO NOT even know they are FENNEYITES because you give Fr Feeney NO CREDIT whatsoever and I can only guess your parents were somehow connected with him ?

CERTAINLY you did not come up with this heresy on your own as it is just to Feeneyite to be possible. You ignore your hero . (please forgive me if I missed the portion of your site that does honor him) but since this seems to be the ONLY THING you get wrong why would you be embarrased to be called what

you are ? Feeneyite "Catholics" Just for you to know I think you're site would increase traffic and blessings 10 fold if you would just amit that you are STILL following a knee jerk reaction to Vatican Jew heresies and that you have made a grave mistake on this ONE issue…

But We may never be able to correct the damage done by you guys over this heresie. Seems you are victims of the New Order also ? I'm pretty certain I could get Dr Droleskey/Bishop Sanborn to debate you two live on camera ? Maybe we could put a end to all this foolishness real quick.

… I think every ferevent Catholic who knows you when asked about MHFM says "yep poor guys seem correct on everything " But you see where they have BOD all wrong 100% (first thing out of their mouths ) This almost invalidates everything you do . I certainly keep you in my prayers . Let me know about the on camera debate with those Catholics mentioned and I would appreciate a Catholic response to the question . What about your leader ? May Our Lady love you ..

SAY YOUR ROSARY

MHFM: This shows how brainwashed you are, and sadly how little you understand. We came to our position on that issue – that there is no BOD and BOB – before we’d ever heard of Fr. Feeney. Further, we don't even agree with his position on Justification. He made a mistake on that point, as we discuss in our book. You are so obsessed with Feeney, and so blind to the dogmatic evidence. (In addition, Feeney did not operate in the area in which we live. So you are wrong on that as well.)

We already challenged the cowardly apostate Droleskey to a debate. He refused. We would debate Sanborn in a recorded telephone debate. We don't travel. Ask him or Cekada if they'd be willing to have a recorded phone conversation. You believe that Jews who reject Christ can be saved. Both of those men believe that. That's a fact. Thus, you are not a Christian. The claim that you believe in no salvation outside the Church – when you believe Jews who reject Christ can be saved – is outrageous. Your position that Jews, etc. could be saved proves that you don't believe in anything. It makes everything else you do worthless. Your heresy was the cause of all the apostasy. Also, they probably won't be willing; so maybe you could give us your phone number and we could have a recorded conversation. It doesn't have to be a formal debate, just a conversation in which we can show you why your position is not Catholic.

[SYR’S RESPONSE]

… I don't believe that adult Jews (who KNOW their "faith") will have a very good chance but I'll let God decide . I need not converse on the issue .

I KNOW what the Church has taught and still teaches .......... you did not answer, where you picked up the Feenyite heresy

…. SAY YOUR ROSARY

MHFM: Exactly as we said, you believe that Jews, etc. can be saved. You are not sure of what the Church has already dogmatically defined at the Council of Florence, that all who die as Jews, pagans, etc. are lost! By these words you prove yourself to be a non-Catholic heretic. You prove exactly what we point out about you people.

We explained that we came to our position simply by looking at the Church’s infallible and dogmatic teaching. We saw that it excludes any salvation without water baptism. We realize that you sedevacantists who believe in BOD have no faith in God or in Catholic teaching, but only in man. For that reason, we understand that it’s incomprehensible and mind-boggling to you that someone would come to his position based on infallible Catholic teaching rather than based on confidence in a man.

False Traditionalist

I’ve been reading your materials for nearly four years now, but I never really appreciated the problem of “false traditionalists” until today. What I mean is that while there is so much attention given to the problem, and I while I understood it intellectually, I never really had a visceral reaction to it. I go to the SSPX for Mass, and while I “know” their official position regarding the current Vatican is ridiculous, I never heard anyone defend it nor have I heard anything bad coming from the pulpit…

But today at the office I was alone and working on something that wasn’t too mentally engaging, shuffling a spreadsheet around, so I thought to look for something Catholic to stream for background noise. I found a [sermon] by a Father Stepanich. He is said to be well over 90 years old. I thought gee, this guy must have seen the whole development of the problem. I soon found out this guy IS the problem! He started out innocently enough on the topic of “No Salvation Outside of the Church”. He explained how the Church has always taught that absolutely no one can be saved who is not a member of the Church. He explained that heretics fall outside the Church. He condemned the usual suspects: modernists, protestants, etc. But then he explained “what Holy Mother Church really means…”, they might be “invincibly ignorant”. It was incredible. I paraphrase: “the Church has NEVER taught that all Muslims, pagans, Jews, are lost”. He said that interpreting the dogma too literally was also a Heresy, and he condemned those (like you) who lead so many “good souls” outside of the Church (presumably to damnation) by interpreting the dogma in the literal sense! So in summary, I guess the “good” Muslim is “in the Church”, but the strict believer in the dogma is damned. It was mind bogglingly irrational, contradictory and wicked. It so angered me, I came away thinking that this guy is more wicked than most Novus Ordites; because they don’t pretend to defend dogma, and most of them were never taught anything anyway. But this guy KNOWS he is lying.

Anyway, to make a long story short, I now understand all of the fuss.

Bill Mulligan

MHFM: You heard first-hand what we’ve been talking about. He and the people like him are very evil. They reject and rebel against Catholic dogma and the revelation of Christ on the necessity of Him and His faith. God despises these faithless monsters, who parade themselves as traditionalist defenders of Catholic truth when they in fact believe in nothing. They are not Catholic. As you heard for yourself, they believe that Jews, pagans, Muslims, etc. can be saved, which is blatantly heretical. They were the very cause of the Vatican II apostasy. They deceive people who care only about externals. As long as they wear Franciscan robes or some other habit or cassock and say a Latin Mass, some are deceived. The fact that he denies Christ and rejects His dogma means nothing to them because they deny it themselves.

View

Dear Brothers,

The latest debate with William Albrecht was another insightful view into the total denial of not only the Catholic faith but Christ himself. His "questions" if one can call them thus (and pointed out by others) are VERY similar to William Golle. They both deny the Magisterium and the teachings of the Catholic Church and instead render their own interpretations of Bible passages. They deny the fact Brother… EVER answers their questions but rather that he "derails" or "moves onto another point". As always, Brother… holds fast to Catholic teaching and provides this as his "proof".

I believe the following statement best sums up the widespread "loss of faith". If I am correct the following can be attributed to St. Louis de Montfort in dealing with meditations on the Act of Consecration;

"The devil is the Prince of the World and never was the world so corrupt as it is now. Because it was never so astute, so wise in its own conceit, so cunning. It is so skillful in deceiving the soul seeking perfection that it makes use of truth to foster untruth, of virtue to authorize vice and it even distorts the meaning of Christ's own truths to give authority to its own maxims. The number of those who are fools according to God, is infinite."

God Bless you for your works,

Bruce

Next Archive for the E-Exchanges is Here (A)

Next Archive for E-Exchanges is Here (B)

www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com

www.vaticancatholic.com