The Whole Truth about
the Consecration and Conversion of
and the impostor Sr.
Lucy
By Bro. Peter Dimond, O.S.B.
-The question is: Can you handle the truth on this issue?
-The truth that you won’t hear from “Fr.” Gruner; the stunning facts on
an issue that we’ve all been brainwashed only to consider from one angle
-An article that every traditional Catholic needs to read
|
Proverbs
16:7- “When the ways of man shall please the Lord, He will convert
even his enemies to peace.” |
Our Lady: “If they listen to my
requests, |
Proverbs 16:7- “When the ways of man
shall please the Lord, He will convert
even his enemies to peace.”
“…cum placuerint Domino viae hominis
inimicos quoque eius convertet ad pacem.”
* If you
have the capability, you will want to print this article in color, since there
are color pictures.
* Emphasis
in this article (bolding, underlining and italicization) is not necessarily
that of the quoted author and is usually my own.
IN THIS ARTICLE:
-FACT #1:
POPE PIUS XII CONSECRATED
-FACT #2: WHAT OUR LADY MEANS BY THE CONVERSION OF
-THIS
POSITION IS FURTHER SUBSTANTIATED BY CONSIDERING
-THIS
POSITION IS FURTHER SUBSTANTIATED BY SR. LUCY’S SUMMARY OF THE TUY VISION
-“THE GOOD
WILL BE MARTYRED” AND “VARIOUS NATIONS WILL BE ANNIHILATED” ARE PROPHECIES THAT
HAVE ALREADY BEEN FULFILLED
-WHAT
-HE WILL DO
THE CONSECRATION, BUT IT WILL BE “LATE”
-OUR LADY’S
WORDS REVEAL TO US THAT HER TRIUMPH IS NOT A UNIVERSAL TRIUMPH OR REIGN OF
PEACE, BUT ONLY A “CERTAIN” PERIOD OF PEACE
-THE
CONVERSION OF
-THE
EVIDENCE
-SOME
LEFTOVER OBJECTIONS – AND SR. LUCY DIDN’T EVEN KNOW IF PIUS XII’S 1942
CONSECRATION OF THE WORLD WAS ACCEPTED IN HEAVEN
-PART II:
THE EVIDENCE EXPOSING THE IMPOSTOR SR. LUCY
-THE FALSE MESSAGE OF “FR.” NICHOLAS GRUNER
One of the
most frequent questions that we receive concerns Our Lady’s statement at
“You see hell, where
the souls of poor sinners go. To save
them God wishes to establish in the world the devotion to my Immaculate
Heart. If they do what I will tell you,
many souls will be saved, and there will be peace. The war is going to end. But if they do not stop offending God,
another and worse war will begin in the reign of Pius XI. When you shall see a
night illuminated by an unknown light, know that it is a great sign that God
gives you that He is going to punish the world for its crimes by means of war,
of hunger, and of persecution of the Church and of the Holy Father. To prevent this I come to ask the
consecration of
The Vatican
II “Popes” must be true Popes, so the objection goes, because one of them will
finally consecrate
First, in
examining this issue it is important for people to clear their minds of any
pre-conceived notions or prejudices in this area. They
must be prepared to take a fresh new look at the facts. Let’s jump right into this very important
issue:
FACT #1: POPE PIUS XII
CONSECRATED
Many know
that Pope Pius XII consecrated the world to the Immaculate Heart of Mary in
1942. Many do not know that Pope Pius
XII specifically consecrated
I didn’t
know this until I began studying this issue in some depth. But this important fact is revealed even in
the books promoted by “Fr.” Nicholas Gruner’s apostolate.
Frere Michel de la Sainte Trinite, The Whole Truth About
This fact
can also be found in the book Fatima in
Twilight:
Mark Fellows, Fatima
in Twilight, p. 119: “The letter
went on to request that Pius consecrate
Here are
the words of Pope Pius XII:
Pope Pius XII, Sacro
Vergente Anno (Apostolic Letter), July 7, 1952: “…just as a few years ago We consecrated the entire human race to the
Immaculate Heart of the Virgin Mary, Mother of God, so today We consecrate
and in a most special manner We entrust all the peoples of Russia to this
Immaculate Heart…”
Thus, it is an undeniable fact that
Pope Pius XII specifically consecrated
But didn’t
Our Lady promise that
FACT #2: OUR LADY
NEVER SAID THAT THE CONVERSION OF
The
question that we must re-examine is: did
Our Lady ever say that
“But of course it means that the entire
country will be converted to the Catholic Faith,” as one person told us, “for it couldn’t mean anything else!” This person even said that it is absurd to
think that Our Lady would ever use the word “conversion” to mean anything but a
conversion to the true Faith. Oh really? Well, this person may be surprised to learn
that in Proverbs 16:7, Almighty
God Himself uses the word “conversion” not to mean a conversion to the true
Faith, but the conversion of a persecuting enemy to peace (i.e. to a cessation of his
persecuting ways).
Proverbs 16:7- “When the ways of man
shall please the Lord, He will convert
even his enemies to peace.”
In fact,
what is striking is that Our Lady’s words of July 13 appear to be structured on
Proverbs 16:7: in the context of both, conversion is immediately linked with peace,
after a man fulfills the request of the Lord.
|
Proverbs
16:7- “When the ways of man shall please the Lord, He will convert
even his enemies to peace.” |
Our Lady: “If they listen to my
requests, |
After
studying this issue in depth, and taking a fresh new look at the facts, I am of
the firm opinion that Our Lady’s words are structured on the promise of
Proverbs 16:7: the “conversion” of Russia does not mean the conversion of the
nation to the Catholic Faith, but rather the conversion of a persecuting enemy
(Russia) to a certain period of peace.
We will see exactly what this means as we go along, and that the
evidence from the message of
THIS POSITION IS FURTHER SUBSTANTIATED
BY CONSIDERING
To attempt
to substantiate their position that
John Vennari, “It Doesn’t Add Up,” The Fatima Crusader, Issue #70: “Thus it is not hard to understand
why
However, in
bringing up the example of
Frere Michel de la Sainte Trinite, The Whole Truth About Fatima, Vol. 2, p. 420: “Curiously, in this accord [of the
Portuguese nation], the Catholic
religion is not recognized as the official religion of the
If
THIS POSITION IS FURTHER
SUBSTANTIATED BY SR. LUCY’S SUMMARY OF THE TUY VISION
In order to
attempt to substantiate their position that
Our Lady to Sr. Lucy, June 13, 1929, at Tuy: “The moment has
come when God asks the Holy Father to make, in union with all the bishops of
the world, the consecration of
What is
HUGELY SIGNIFICANT is that Frere Michel admits that Sr. Lucy summarized this
communication at Tuy in a slightly different manner in two letters to Fr.
Goncalves:
Frere Michel de la Sainte Trinite, The Whole Truth About Fatima, Vol. 2, p. 465: “[page after quoting what you just read]
Let us point out right away that in
1930, in two letters to Father Goncalves, Sister Lucy was to express in a
slightly different manner the requests of heaven… [Sister Lucy]: ‘The good Lord promises to end the
persecution in Russia, if the Holy Father will himself make a solemn
act of reparation and consecration of Russia to the Sacred Hearts of Jesus and
Mary, as well as ordering all the bishops of the Catholic Church to do the
same. The Holy Father must then promise
that upon the ending of this persecution he will approve and recommend the
practice of the reparatory devotion already described.’”
So,
according to Sr. Lucy, the message at Tuy that Our Lord will “save”
Our Lord to Sr. Lucy, Oct. 22, 1940: “I will punish the
nations for their crimes by means of war, famine and persecution of My Church
and this will weigh especially upon My Vicar on earth. His
Holiness will obtain an abbreviation of these days of tribulation if he
takes heed of My wishes by promulgating the Act of Consecration of the
whole world to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, with a special mention of
The
consecration of
“The war is going to end. But if they do not stop offending God, another and worse war will begin in the reign of Pius XI. When you shall see a night
illuminated by an unknown light, know that it is a great sign that God gives
you that He is going to punish the world
for its crimes by means of war, of hunger, and of persecution
of the Church and of the Holy Father.
To prevent this I come to
ask the consecration of Russia to my Immaculate Heart and the Communion of
reparation on the first Saturdays. If
they listen to my requests,
Notice, the
consecration of
This point
is corroborated when one considers the
“great sign” mentioned by Our Lady in the context of her request for the
consecration of
Well,
everyone knows that this “great sign” was the unknown light that lit up the sky
on Jan. 25, 1938, just prior to the events that precipitated World War II.
“An aurora borealis
of exceptional size furrowed the sky of
I think
that most people can agree that this sign doesn’t seem that significant to us
from our vantage point today. Yet, within the context of the consecration of
“THE GOOD WILL BE MARTYRED” AND
“VARIOUS NATIONS WILL BE ANNIHILATED” ARE PROPHECIES THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN
FULFILLED
In order to
further understand what Our Lady meant by the “conversion” of
Our Lady of Fatima, July 13, 1917: “If they listen to my requests,
Many
believe that Our Lady’s words “various nations will be annihilated” and “the
good will be martyred” (as a result of the spread of
VARIOUS NATIONS WERE ANNIHILATED
As we will
see, even Frere Michel, an author whose work is promoted by Nicholas Gruner’s
apostolate, admits that the Soviet
Union’s takeover of the Baltic nations and other small States during the period
of World War II, which it simply annexed to itself making them exist no longer, constituted the annihilation of
nations of which Our Lady spoke.
Frere Michel de la Sainte Trinite, The Whole Truth About Fatima, Vol. 3, p. 190: “In 1939 the
Besides the
nations of
“The small Baltic
nations –
An article
carried on the website of the Joint Baltic American National Committee notes
that:
“On July 23, 1940, Sumner Welles, acting US Secretary of
State, stated that the ‘devious
processes whereby the political independence and territorial integrity of
the three small Baltic republics – Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania – were to be deliberately annihilated by one of their more powerful
neighbors, have been rapidly drawn to their conclusion.’” (Joint Baltic American
Committee, http://www.jbanc.org/65joint.html)
Notice, the absorption of the Baltic
nations by the
Our Lady’s
words about the annihilation of nations clearly refer to the
Sister Lucy to Fr. Fuentes, 1957: "Tell them, Father,
that many times the Most Holy Virgin told my cousins Francisco and Jacinta, as
well as myself, that many nations will
disappear from the face of the earth.
She said that
Sr. Lucy is
obviously reiterating Our Lady’s words about the annihilation of nations. However, if a nation were devastated by
nuclear catastrophe, it wouldn’t disappear.
It would still be visible, but as an empty and devastated
wasteland. The only way to make a nation
literally “disappear” is by erasing it from the map by incorporation into
another country, as happened with the
Soviet Foreign Minister, Molotov, to Lithuanian Foreign
Minister: “You must take a good look at reality and understand that in the
future small nations will have to
disappear. Your
This map (above) of Eastern Europe
before World War II defines the Baltic nations (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania)
before they were annihilated and made to disappear by full absorption into the
satanic Soviet Empire
This map of
The
annihilation of nations, the making of nations “disappear,” clearly refers to
the Soviet Union and its takeover of the
Frere Michel de la Sainte Trinite, The Whole Truth About Fatima, Vol. 3, pp. 193-194: “Is it necessary to enumerate these
nations, which perhaps Our Lady of
In every
Communist nation controlled by the
“In
And this
led to the “good being martyred,” which has also been fulfilled:
THE GOOD WERE MARTYRED
It is
simply a fact that countless Catholics were martyred at the hands of the
Frere Michel de la Sainte Trinite, The Whole Truth About Fatima, Vol. 2, p. 764: “When, in a letter
of January 21, 1940, Sister Lucy
mentioned in connection with the war ‘the
blood spilled by the martyrs’, which in the end would appease the
divine wrath, and when Our Lady
announced in her Secret that ‘the good
will be martyred,’ how can we forget about these millions of Ukrainian or
Polish Catholics martyred by the Bolsheviks?”
A prime
example comes from
“On Holy Thursday of
1923, Msgr. Budkiewicz was martyred with frightful cruelty. Brutally pushed across a dark corridor, he
fell and broke his leg… Stripped of
his clothes and no longer able to walk, the martyr was dragged by the ears all
the way to the detachment of guards. One
of his ears had been severed. In the
gaping hole, he was given a revolver shot.
Father Walsh… heard the shot ring out among shouts, drunken singing
and bursts of laughter. So that no
relics would remain, the martyr’s body was burned and his ashes dispersed. And this
was the signal for a series of attacks against the hierarchy, clergy and laity,
many of whom were sent to the icy
prisons of Solowki on the
“…during the year 1922 alone more than 800 Catholic and
Orthodox priests, brothers and nuns were shot in
Pope Pius XI, Letter
to Cardinal Pompili, Feb. 2, 1930: “This
past year during the Christmas holy days, not only were hundreds of churches
[in Russia] closed, great numbers of icons burned, all workers and
schoolchildren compelled to work and Sundays suppressed, but they even
compelled factory workers, both men and women, to sign a declaration of formal
apostasy and hatred against God, or else be deprived of their bread rationing
cards, without which every inhabitant of this poor country is reduced to dying
of hunger, misery and cold.
Among other things, in all the cities and in many villages… during the
Christmas holy days last year: they witnessed a procession of tanks manned by
numerous ruffians clad with sacred vestments, taking the cross in derision and
spitting upon it while other armored cars transported huge Christmas trees,
from which marionettes representing Catholic and Orthodox bishops were hung by
the neck. In the center of the city,
other young hoodlums committed all sorts of sacrileges against the cross.”
(quoted in WTAF, Vol. 2, p. 539)
“In 1946 the Soviet
authorities removed every Lithuanian bishop but one from his diocese… From
1946 to 1948, 357 priests – one-third of
all the priests in
(As an
aside, this priest could have been spared the horrors of the labor camps if he
had simply consented to becoming an Eastern Schismatic. He refused, and suffered horribly. This shows us again the evil of false
ecumenism. Post-Vatican II ecumenism,
which accepts and praises Eastern Orthodoxy, holds that his martyrdom was
pointless.)
dead bodies of Lithuanians after the
In 1936,
the errors of Russian communism stirred up a revolution and the Spanish Civil
War. What resulted was arguably the
worst persecution of the Catholic Church in history:
“Almost all at once
the holocaust of
Hugh
Thomas, considered the premier historian of the Spanish Civil War, gives us
some details on these martyrdoms:
“In Cervera, rosary
beads were forced into monks’ ears till their eardrums were perforated… Certain persons were burned, and others
buried, alive – the latter after being forced to dig their own graves. At Alcazar de
That the
Spanish persecution was fueled and stirred up by the errors of
One could
multiply examples of the good being martyred for pages. For instance, after the
Cardinal Slipyi: “On April 11, 1945, I was arrested with all the other bishops. Less than a year later, over 800 priests had
followed us into captivity. From March
8-10, 1946, the illegal Synod of Lvov took place. Under atheist pressure it proclaimed the
‘reunification,’ and by the very fact, the
official liquidation of our Church was effected by brutal force. The
bishops were deported to every corner of the Soviet Union. Almost all of them have died since then, or
were killed in captivity… over 1,400 priests and 800 religious, to tens of thousands of the Faithful who in
captivity sealed, by the sacrifice of their life, their fidelity to the Pope,
the Roman Apostolic See and the Universal Church.” (WTAF, Vol. 3, p. 192)
It is a
fact that doesn’t need to be proven any further: the good were martyred in the
Soviet Union, in its Communist satellites, and in other countries, such as
Our Lady: “If they listen to my
requests,
Sr. Lucy to Fr. Jongen, Feb. 1946: “I think that now Our Lady’s words are being fulfilled: ‘If this is
not done (she had just recalled ‘the exact request’ of the Blessed Virgin)
Some also
ask: what about the persecution of the Holy Father, who will “have much to
suffer”? What is the meaning of
this? We find the answer in the
aforementioned message of Our Lord to Sr. Lucy from 1940:
Our Lord to Sr. Lucy, Oct. 22, 1940: “I will punish the nations for their crimes by means of war, famine and
persecution of My Church and this will weigh especially upon My Vicar on
earth. His Holiness will obtain an abbreviation of these days of tribulation if
he takes heed of My wishes by promulgating the Act of Consecration of the whole
world to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, with a special mention of
The
persecution of the Church during this period – the torture and martyrdom of
priests and faithful, the suppression of ecclesiastical activity – weighed as
an incredible burden and torment on the Pope who felt responsible, yet
helpless, in the face of this tragedy.
With these facts in mind, we can see that all four aspects of Our Lady’s
message, the spread of
What people
fail to realize is that Our Lady’s request for the consecration of
That is why
Our Lady came to Tuy in 1929 to ask for the consecration of
At this
point, it is very important for us to look at what those errors of
WHAT
Vladimir Lenin, maker of the
Communist revolution, mass-murderer, and leader of Communist Russia from
1917-1924
In 1917,
Lenin closed all Catholic churches in
In 1918,
Lenin shut down all newspapers in
“In 1918,
one could read the following words in the official organ of the Soviet of
Petrograd: ‘We will render our hearts
cruel, harsh, without pity. We will open
the dams of this bloody sea. Without
pity, without mercy, we will kill our enemies by the thousands. We will drown them in their own blood.” (WTAF, Vol. 2, p. 454)
A decree of
February 26, 1922 confiscated all the treasures of the Church, including
consecrated objects. At the same time,
and this was still the very early stage of the Bolshevik horrors, Cardinal
Mercier published the first figures of the persecution: “Statistics for the
victims of the persecution are frightening.
Since November 1917, 260,000 simple soldier prisoners and 54,000
officers; 18,000 landed proprietors; 35,000 ‘intellectuals’; 192,000 workers;
815,000 peasants; 28 bishops and 1,215 priests were put to death.” (WTAF, Vol.
2, p. 451)
Things were
so bad in
Shortly
after taking over
“In April 1919,
following Dzerzhinsky’s recommendation and with Lenin’s approval, the Soviet government ordered the
establishment of a network of concentration camps, at least one per
province, the first of its kind in history, which served as a model and
inspiration to Hitler and his Nazis and
was later to become infamous as the GULAG.
By 1923 the number of these camps had reached 315.” (Warren H.
Carroll, The Rise and Fall of the
Communist Revolution, p. 142)
It’s
important for us to get a glimpse of the horrors of the Gulag. For this purpose, I will quote from Warren H.
Carroll who, in turn, draws from Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s famed work, The Gulag Archipelago.
Alexander Solzhenitsyn as Gulag
labor camp prisoner scs 262
“The famine dealt out death at home, or as far
away from home as dying men could walk. The labor camps dealt out death afar…It seems almost presumptuous for any man to
write of the gulag, after Alexander Solzhenitsyn. He was in it; he made its theme his own;
he changed the world and history by what he wrote about it… Here we can only select, here and there, from Solzhenitsyn, and
annotate him – to give a bit of the sense, the flavor, the sound of the wind
from hell that blew across those killing grounds in the wilderness.”
(Warren H. Carroll, The Rise and Fall of
the Communist Revolution, p. 243)
Carroll
then proceeds to describe the labor camp at Orotukan:
“We may begin with
Orotukan. In the middle of the
second volume of The Gulag Archipelago,
Solzhenitsyn concludes a brief description of Orotukan (which he then locates only by a reference to the Kolyma River in far
northern Siberia), whose horrors sound as bad but no worse than those of
many other labor camps he has described, with this one stark sentence: ‘All
who survived Orotukan say they would have preferred the gas chamber.’ All who were there and survived, and
spoke about it, say they would have preferred death to survival?... On the
far side of the
Until November
they had only shelters made of branches to live in, and were given no clothing
but what they had arrived in. Then they
were given wooden barracks with walls made of single boards without
insulation. There were stoves for
heating, but the laborers had to cut their own wood – at thirty and forty and
fifty degrees below zero – after completing their day’s work. These, still at Magadan, were the lucky
ones. The less fortunate were sent to begin building the road to
man who froze to death at a Gulag
labor camp
"As soon as
the ice melted in the
Orotukan was
built as a punishment camp for those laborers on the
Carroll also
describes the
“The
‘At the end of the workday there were
corpses left on the work site.
The snow powdered their faces. One of them was hunched over beneath an
overturned wheelbarrow; he had hidden his hands in his sleeves and frozen to
death in that position. Someone had frozen with his head bent down
between his knees. Two were frozen
back to back leaning against each other. They were peasant lads and the best workers
one could possibly imagine. They were
sent to the canal in tens of thousands at a time, and the authorities tried to
work things out so no one got to the same subcamp as his father; they tried to
break up families. And right off they gave them norms of shingle and boulders that you’d
be unable to fulfill even in summer.
No one was able to teach them anything, to warn them; and in their
village simplicity they gave all
their strength to their work and weakened very swiftly and froze to death,
embracing in pairs. At night the sledges
went out and collected them. The
drivers threw the corpses onto the sledges with a dull clonk.
And in the summer
bones remained from corpses which had not been removed in time, and together
with the shingle they got into the concrete mixer.” (Warren H. Carroll, The Rise and Fall of the Communist
Revolution, pp. 248-249)
Besides the
countless people who were sent off to the labor camps and other regions from
within
“Massive deportations had already begun in Soviet-occupied
Joseph Stalin, arguably the greatest
mass-murderer in history, leader of Communist Russia from 1924-1953
From
1930-1934, Stalin instituted the policy of “dekulakization.” Farmers that were opposed, or perceived as
threats, to the Communist policy of collectivization of farms were dubbed “kulaks”
and liquidated. This unspeakable tragedy
resulted in the deaths of 14.5 million:
“Who were these ‘kulaks’?... In May 1929 the Council of People’s Commissars formally defined a kulak
as any farmer who made any money whatsoever from any source or activity other
than the sale of agricultural produce grown in his own fields. Any outside income, any processing of goods
done on the farm (as by a small hand-operated mill), was sufficient to make a
kulak. When the campaign of liquidation was launched in 1930, from ten to
fifteen per cent of the small farmers in every region were arbitrarily dubbed
kulaks and liquidated. If there were not enough of them fitting
the May 1929 definition, others had to be added to fill up the quota. They could be selected by income level,
actual or apparent; by leadership in local villages… by opposition to forced
collectivization (a particularly frequent reason for designation as a kulak);
or simply by being devout Christians… It
was the first act of a farm holocaust from 1930 to 1934 that took ten million
lives by Stalin’s own estimate given to U.S. President Franklin
Roosevelt at
Here is the
harrowing account of Miron Dolot. Dolot
witnessed the deportations of these “kulaks” from his hometown to the labor
camps and other regions:
“A cold wind blew
snow on the unfortunates, who were not properly dressed, for they had not
been allowed to take warm clothing with them.
We wanted to help somehow, and
since we could assume that they would be banished to Siberia, we had to
get them some heavy clothing… Under
careful supervision of soldiers, a score of sleighs moved into the square. They were to take the arrested farmers out of
the village. Loading of six to eight
persons to a sleigh started immediately, controlled through the use of a list… husbands were separated from their wives,
and children from their parents… As one sleigh moved to join a column, a
young man sprang from it and raced toward another sleigh in which his helpless
and weeping wife and children were riding. The father obviously wanted to be with his
family, but he did not reach them. Comrade Pashchenko, the chairman of the
village soviet who was supervising the whole action, raised his revolver and calmly fired.
The young father dropped dead into the snow, and the sleigh carrying his
widow and orphans moved on.” (Warren H. Carroll, The Rise and Fall of the Communist Revolution, pp. 227-228)
“There are reports of ‘kulaks’ on trains to Kazakhstan or
Siberia, locked in cars each carrying fifty of them, with a loaf of bread and a
pail of tea or thin soup per day per ten people (on days when it was
delivered), crawling with vermin, unheated in winter, suffocatingly hot in
summer, throwing their dying babies out the windows to put an end to their
suffering.” (Warren H. Carroll, The Rise
and Fall of the Communist Revolution, p. 228)
In 1933, in
order to starve millions in the
Children in the largely Catholic
“The cold hard
essence of the situation was this:
the Ukrainian farmers were going to die; and the Communist operatives
feared death, or purging, or the labor camps if they did not let them die.
They knew there was no grain.
Everybody knew it. But no one
dared say it… Meanwhile the people were eating rats, mice, sparrows, snails,
ants, and earthworms, leather and shoe soles, old skins and furs, ground-up
bones, acacia bark and nettles. By
March, in many areas, even most of these things were gone, and there was
nothing at all left to eat. A ghastly
silence fell over the countryside; there were no animals to make any sound, and
the people still alive rarely spoke.
Victor Kravchenko, then a Party activist sent to
‘Here I saw people dying in solitude by slow
degrees, dying hideously, without the excuse of sacrifice for a cause. They had been trapped and left to starve,
each in his own home, by a political decision made in a far-off capital around
conference and banquet tables. There
was not even the consolation of inevitability to relieve the horror. The most terrifying sights were the little
children with skeleton limbs dangling from balloon-like abdomens. Starvation had wiped every trace of youth
from their faces, turning them into tortured gargoyles; only in their eyes
still lingered the reminder of childhood.
Everywhere we found men and women lying prone, their faces and bellies
bloated, their eyes utterly expressionless… Some five million Ukrainians died in this genocidal, deliberate
famine.” (Warren H. Carroll, The
Rise and Fall of the Communist Revolution, pp. 240-241)
At this
point we can clearly see why, on July 13, 1917, Our Lady mentioned persecutions
of “war,
of hunger, and of persecution of the Church and of the Holy Father. To
prevent this I come to ask the consecration of
These facts
should show us clearly the context in which Our Lady requested the consecration
of
HE WILL DO THE CONSECRATION, BUT IT
WILL BE “LATE” – FITS POPE PIUS XII
It is
certain that Pope Pius XI failed to consecrate
Our Lord to Sister Lucy, Summer, 1931: “Like the King of
Pope Pius XII, Sacro
Vergente Anno (Apostolic Letter), July 7, 1952: “…just as a few years ago We consecrated the entire human race to the
Immaculate Heart of the Virgin Mary, Mother of God, so today We consecrate
and in a most special manner We entrust all the peoples of Russia to this
Immaculate Heart…”
It’s clear
that, as most commentators agree, Our Lord’s words “They” will repent and do it apply to the line of Popes – just as
Popes in encyclicals refer to themselves as “We.” (“They” cannot refer to the Pope and all the Bishops, because all the Bishops
did not delay the request and therefore do not need to repent of delaying it.)
That Pope
Pius XII was the one who did it, but “late,” makes perfect sense.
First, Pope
Pius XII consecrated the world to the Immaculate Heart of Mary in 1942. Ten years later, however, he “repented and
did it” by specifically consecrating
Second, in
1939
Third,
there may be another signal that Pope Pius XII (though he certainly did it
late) would be the one who would actually consecrate
William Thomas Walsh, Our
Lady of Fatima, 1954, p. 52 (note 1): “It
is an interesting coincidence that Monsignor Eugenio Pacelli [Pius XII] was
being consecrated Bishop at the Sistine Chapel in Rome on May 13, 1917, the
very day when the children [first] saw the Lady of Fatima.”
Fourth, a
careful consideration of Our Lady’s words reveals that the actual fulfillment
of the consecration of
OUR LADY’S WORDS REVEAL TO US THAT
HER TRIUMPH IS NOT A UNIVERSAL TRIUMPH OR REIGN OF PEACE, BUT ONLY A “CERTAIN”
PERIOD OF PEACE
|
“If they listen to my requests, |
“In the end my
Immaculate Heart will triumph. The Holy
Father will consecrate |
Please notice this extremely
important point! In the Secret of July 13, Our Lady first
expresses a conditional promise. “If they
listen to my requests,
Why does
Our Lady add the word “certain” when telling us what will actually happen in the end, and not (on the left) when
telling us what would happen if her requests were fulfilled precisely? It’s
obviously because what would happen with the consecration of
THE CONVERSION OF
In this
article we’ve seen that Our Lady’s words about the conversion of
|
Proverbs
16:7- “When the ways of man shall please the Lord, He will convert
even his enemies to peace.” |
Our Lady: “If they listen to my
requests, |
We’ve also
seen that Sr. Lucy’s summary of the Tuy vision confirms that this is what Our
Lady meant by her words: “In the end my
Immaculate Heart will triumph. The Holy
Father will consecrate
Sr. Lucy to Fr. Goncalves, summarizing the Tuy Vision: “The good Lord promises to end the
persecution in
We’ve also
seen that Our Lady specifically requested the consecration of
“The war is going to end. But if they do not stop offending God, another and worse war will begin in the reign of Pius XI. When you shall see a night illuminated by an
unknown light, know that it is a great sign that God gives you that He is going to punish the world for its
crimes by means of war, of hunger, and of persecution of the
Church and of the Holy Father. To prevent this I come to ask the
consecration of Russia to my Immaculate Heart and the Communion of
reparation on the first Saturdays...”
We’ve also
seen that heaven revealed that the actual fulfillment of the consecration of
Our Lord to Sister Lucy, Summer, 1931: “Like the King of
We’ve also
seen that Our Lady’s words about her triumph over Russia do not promise a universal
or ideal reign of peace, as so many have suggested, but only a certain period
of peace – one that is inferior to the peace that she would have given if her
requests were fulfilled precisely.
|
“If
they listen to my requests, |
“In the end my
Immaculate Heart will triumph. The
Holy Father will consecrate |
We’ve also seen
that Pope Pius XII clearly consecrated
Pope Pius XII, Sacro
Vergente Anno (Apostolic Letter), July 7, 1952: “…just as a few years ago We consecrated the entire human race to the
Immaculate Heart of the Virgin Mary, Mother of God, so today We consecrate
and in a most special manner We entrust all the peoples of Russia to this
Immaculate Heart…”
We’ve also
seen that another vision of Sr. Lucy shows that the conversion of
Our Lord to Sr. Lucy, Oct. 22, 1940: “I will punish the
nations for their crimes by means of war, famine and persecution of My Church
and this will weigh especially upon My Vicar on earth. His
Holiness will obtain an abbreviation of these days of tribulation if he
takes heed of My wishes by promulgating the Act of Consecration of the
whole world to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, with a special mention of
In conclusion,
we can answer the question about the consecration of
“After the dissolution
of the Soviet Union on 25 December, 1991, the
“…Gorbachev
formally resigned his now vanished office of President of the Soviet Union on
December 25, the day of the official transfer of all power from the
“On Dec. 25 [1991], Gorbachev
resigned as president of the
Now, there
are some who assert that the collapse of the
Even an
article carried on “Fr.” Gruner’s own website is forced to admit that the
Cornelia Ferreira, “Commentary on The Perestroika Deception
by Anatoliy Golitsyn,” Catholic Family
News, March, 1996: “In order to increase Communist representation and
influence in the UN, the European Union and international financial organizations,
the Soviet Union was deliberately
converted into independent republics.” (also carried on fatima.org,
Gruner’s website)
I don’t
know what more one needs to prove that Russia (the Soviet Union) was
“converted” into something else, which resulted in a certain period of peace
from its persecutions, etc., than seeing this fact admitted in publications
such as these! These are the
publications that would be the most opposed to the thesis of this article, yet even they are compelled to admit that with
the dissolution of the
That is why
it is irrelevant for people such as Nicholas Gruner and his followers to
continually bring up the fact that
Shortly we
will take a look at how things changed in each of the satellites of the
THE FALL OF THE SATELLITES
The Fall of
“In 1956 the régime
became more liberal, freeing many people from prison and expanding some
personal freedoms. In 1970 the government
was changed. It was a time when the economy was more modern, and the government
had large credits. Labor turmoil in 1980 led to the formation of the independent trade
union, "Solidarity", which over time became a political force. It eroded the dominance of the Communist
Party; by 1989 it had triumphed in parliamentary elections, and Lech
Wałęsa, a Solidarity candidate, eventually won the presidency in
1990. The Solidarity movement greatly
contributed to the soon-following collapse of Communism all over
What
further corroborates that Russia was converting from its satanic regime of
persecutions to a certain period of peace is the fact that, as Poland began to
free itself from Communist domination, Russia
did not roll in the tanks to restore order and re-assert the dominance of the
Communist Party, as it had done in the past; whereas in China, during the
same period, when demonstrators for Democracy got “out of hand,” the Chinese
regime sent in the force to restore order by means of the Tiananmen Square
Massacre.
The Fall of
“Then in May
[1989] the reform-minded Hungarian Communist government took a step
unprecedented for a Communist country.
It opened the national border with Austria. The cement and barbed-wire barricades which
held the people of
The Fall of
“Rapidly as the
momentum of change in the Communist world was building in the last four months
of 1989, it seemed unlikely to most observers that there would be any fundamental
alteration in the status of Communist
(top) guards on the Berlin Wall,
ready to shoot anyone who crossed
(bottom) the lighted "death
strip," painted white so that anyone crossing would be easy to see and
shoot
“In Honecker’s capital,
the
By August the
West German embassy in
Let us stop
right here and summarize the point that is being made. Without special permission, travel from
behind the Iron Curtain was strictly forbidden during the reign of the
(not pictured here is the
“News of this spread
fast. Second to
Not all the
East Germans who wanted to flee to the West could reach
“On October 3 [1989]
Honecker banned all travel by East Germans to
One can
only imagine the enthusiasm at this point in the satellite States. Seeing that others in
“The anniversary ceremonies took place on October 8… The
next day was Monday – prayer and rally time at St. Nicholas Church in
Huge crowds in
“The East German army, which had never fired a gun in anger
and was not and never had been defending a real country, could not be counted
on in a crisis. If the crowds in
“In the dissolving chaos, some anonymous government official
issued a statement that ‘private trips abroad can be requested without fulfilling
requirements.’ No one knew what it
meant, probably including the official who wrote it; but crowds surging up to the
The Fall of
“The fall of the
Berlin Wall tolled the knell for Communist rule in Czechoslovakia. On November 17 a student-led rally of 17,000
in
The Fall of
“The day the Berlin Wall fell there was a change in the
Communist leadership in
The Fall of
“There remained,
standing against the freedom tide, the long unchallenged Communist dictator of
Once again, as in
The people of the city responded with a
general strike as the army began to withdraw from it, eager to put the scene of
their killings behind them. Sympathy
demonstrations began in other cities; Ceausescu warned that he would use
similar force against any and all of them if they continued. On December 21 he went outside the
presidential palace to harangue a crowd on live national television. For the first time in his 24 years of power
he was met with shaken fists, hoots and jeers and shouts of ‘Ceausescu
dictator!’ lasting a full three minutes.
Startled, he began to wave his hands ineffectually; Elena hissed at him,
‘Be calm! Be calm!’ Then the nation’s
television screens went blank. The crowd
grew to 15,000 in the course of the day and was finally broken up by the security
police, who killed thirteen people.
The next day large crowds surrounded the
building used by the Party Central Committee in Palace Square in Bucharest.
Still full of manic confidence, Ceausescu came out to speak to
them. But someone had turned off the
microphone. There was fighting in the
streets; the people were entering the building.
Nicolae and Elena Ceausescu boarded a waiting helicopter just ahead of
the attacking crowd. The helicopter
landed short of its destination, by an open road… Nicolae and Elena leaped out
and tried to flag a passing truck. A few minutes later they were
arrested. Many of the rest of the
government… shed its Communist structure and very soon its Communist name,
blamed Ceausescu of everything, and got away with it. The reconstituted government disposed of the
Ceausescus with lightning speed. On
Christmas day 1989 they were brought
before a drumhead court-martial, convicted, and executed.” (Warren H. Carroll, The Rise and Fall of the Communist Revolution, pp. 742-743)
And while
the era of persecution officially culminated with the fall of the satellites
(1989-1991) and the dissolution of the
“Speaking at a
“…[in 1962]
Khrushchev authorized the publication of Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s short novel, One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, the
first explicit account of the horrors of Stalin’s labor camps to be printed in
the Soviet Union… This act of Khrushchev may well have been, from the vantage
point of history, second in importance only to his own denunciation of Stalin. For Solzhenityn’s was a voice no man and no
system could silence, once it had been heard.” (Warren H. Carroll, The Rise and Fall of the Communist
Revolution, p. 494)
“To many in the Party,
Khrushchev’s permission for the publication of Solzhenitsyn’s book was a major
error which rendered the follow-up writings inevitable and had potential for
seriously endangering the regime.” (Warren H. Carroll, The
Rise and Fall of the Communist Revolution, pp. 529-530)
Of course,
Khrushchev was an evil Communist who threatened nuclear war with the
Q. But
A. Our Lady never promised that
Sr. Lucy to Fr. Goncalves, summarizing Tuy Vision, 1930: “The good Lord promises to end the
persecution in
SOME LEFTOVER OBJECTIONS
Q. What about Sr.
Lucy. If Pope Pius XII’s consecration of
A. Sr. Lucy knew what Heaven revealed to her; she
did not know what heaven did not reveal to her.
It is extremely important to note that in 1947, when asked by William
Thomas Walsh about Pope Pius XII’s 1942 consecration of the world, Sr. Lucy
didn’t even know if it was sufficient!
William Thomas Walsh, Our
Lady of Fatima, p. 222: “After my return from
This was in
reference to Pope Pius XII’s consecration of the world on Oct. 31,
1942! Sr. Lucy didn’t even know that
this didn’t fulfill the request of heaven!
Five years later, Pius XII went further and specifically consecrated
Q. Didn’t Fr. Alonso,
the Fatima expert, also hold that
A. Yes, in addition to “Fr.” Gruner, Fr. Alonso
has probably been the biggest proponent of the idea that the consecration of
Russia will convert the nation to the Catholic Faith, and that a universal
reign of peace will result – an idea which finds no proof in the words of Our
Lady. What people need to know is that
Fr. Alonso was a liberal heretic who 1) justified Paul VI’s decision not to
reveal the third secret; 2) condemned traditionalists; 3) was extremely soft on
the number one enemy of Fatima, Fr. Dhanis; and 4) agreed with the bogus note
from the Coimbra diocese which rejected Sr. Lucy’s 1957 interview with Fr.
Fuentes.
Fr. Alonso: “An
inopportune revelation of the text [by Paul VI] would only have further
exasperated the two tendencies which continue to tear the Church apart: a
traditionalism which would believe itself to be assisted by the
Here we see
Fr. Alonso condemning traditionalists and justifying Paul VI for not revealing
the third secret! Remember, this is the
man who, in addition to Gruner, is largely responsible for promoting the idea
(now almost universally believed) that
Fr. Alonso: “It must
be clearly noted that certain ‘revelations’ made by the press concerning Sister
Lucy cannot be attributed to her, for example, those spread by Father Fuentes and Father Lombardi.” (WTAF, Vol. 3, p. 552)
Here we see
Fr. Alonso agreeing with the bogus note from the Diocese of Coimbra (more on
this in a bit) which denounced Fr. Fuentes as a fabricator. Thus, the fact that Fr. Alonso held such and
such a position or idea proves nothing.
What is very interesting and unfortunate is that writer after writer has
adopted the idea of Alonso and Gruner on the conversion of
Mark Fellows, Fatima
in Twilight, p. 334: “Mary has
given us this promise: ‘In the end, My
Immaculate Heart will triumph. The Holy
Father will consecrate
On that day history will at last be pulled
into conformity with the Divine Will.
The chastisement of apostasy will cease.
In the new dawn all will realize that the darksome nightmare we are
living through did not vitiate Christ’s promise that the gates of hell would
never conquer His Church. Perfect mercy will follow perfect justice.
Sounds
great, doesn’t it? The problem is that
it has no foundation in the words of Our Lady, as we have shown. The triumph of Our Lady is a triumph “in the
end” (i.e., after
Frere Michel de la Sainte Trinite, The Whole Truth About
Notice that
Frere Michel seems to hold the same position, banking everything on his version
of the triumph of Our Lady. On page 845
of his third volume, Frere Michel goes so far as to move the words of Our Lady
about “In the end, My Immaculate Heart
will triumph. The Holy Father will
consecrate
Q. What do you think
is the meaning of the words: “In
A. Since we don’t have the complete sentence, we
cannot say for sure, but it could be: “In
PART II: THE IMPOSTOR
SISTER LUCY
Q. What about Sr.
Lucy’s statements after 1960? She seems
to be quoted every which way? Some quote
her saying that John Paul II successfully consecrated
A. After 1960 we are undoubtedly dealing with a
massive conspiracy and an impostor Sr. Lucy.
We will now cover the striking evidence that the enemies of the message
of
First of all, we know that there was
a conspiracy involving Sr. Lucy starting in 1959.
In 1957, Sr. Lucy gave her famous interview to Fr. Augustin Fuentes,
postulator of the cause of Beatification for Jacinta and Francisco. In this interview, Sr. Lucy said that she had
determined that we are in the last times, and that there are punishments in
store for the world. Sr. Lucy also said
not to wait for the hierarchy for the call to penance. Following the interview, in 1959 the Diocese
of Coimbra issued a note. This note
declared that Fr. Fuentes fabricated basically all the statements attributed to
Lucy in the interview not dealing specifically with Jacinta and Francisco. Included in this note was a statement
allegedly from Sr. Lucy, in which she supposedly declared that Fr. Fuentes’
claims were not truthful. Here is
a portion of the note:
Note from the Diocese of Coimbra, July 2, 1959, on the Fuentes
interview: “Father Augustin Fuentes,
postulator of the cause of beatification for the seers of Fatima… visited
Sister Lucy at the
[Sr. Lucy]: ‘Father Fuentes spoke to me in
his capacity as Postulator for the causes of beatification of the servants of
God, Jacinta and Francisco Marto. We
spoke solely on things connected with this subject; therefore, whatever else
he refers to is neither exact nor true. I am sorry about it, for I do
not understand what good can be done for souls when it is not based on God, Who
is the Truth. I know nothing, and could therefore say nothing, about such
punishments, which are falsely attributed to me.’
The chancery of
Even “Fr.”
Gruner’s apostolate holds the Fuentes interview to be authentic, and this
statement from the Diocese of Coimbra, in which Sr. Lucy supposedly disavows
much of the Fuentes interview, to be a lie.
Thus, we are dealing with a
conspiracy surrounding Sr. Lucy as early as 1959 – the diocese attributing and publishing false statements in Sr. Lucy’s
name to disavow important warnings for the world. At the same time, it was conveniently
declared that Sr. Lucy “has said everything she believed it her duty to say about
Fatima”; in other words, Sr. Lucy has nothing more to say about
Frere Michel de la Sainte Trinite, The Whole Truth About Fatima, Vol. 3, pp. 748-749: “From then on [after the Fuentes interview
and diocesan note disavowing it], she was bound to a much more rigorous
silence on everything concerning
Well, we
believe that the following photographs (in addition to other evidence) reveal
why, following the Fuentes interview, Sr. Lucy was subjected to a rigorous
silence, why she became “invisible.”
It’s because after that point it wasn’t Sr. Lucy at all, but an impostor
posing as Sr. Lucy. Here are pictures of
the real Sr. Lucy from 1945, when she was 38 years old:
The real Sr. Lucy in 1945, at age 38
Now here is
the picture of "Sr. Lucy" in 1967 at age 60!
"Sr. Lucy" in 1967 at age
60
You can
judge for yourself, but the woman pictured here is not the same as the woman
pictured above. First, this photograph
is from 1967. Thus, this is supposedly
“Sr. Lucy” 22 years later, at age 60!
But this woman looks as young, or even younger, than Sr. Lucy when she
was 38 years old!
Second, the
real Sr. Lucy (the first picture) has a different nose structure than this
"Sr. Lucy." This "Sr.
Lucy's" nose is much broader; it's a different woman. Of course, while a person can (and often
does) noticeably age when going from middle-aged to late middle-aged, he or she
is still noticeably the same person – unlike in this case.
Third, a
reader of ours named Barbara Costello has pointed out that Sr. Lucy has a
characteristic dimple in her chin and in her cheeks. We see this in the
following photograph of Sr. Lucy in 1945, again at age 38 (as well as first
picture above, the right-hand picture from 1945):
Notice the characteristic dimple in
her cheeks and the center of her chin
But this
"Sr. Lucy" below does not have the characteristic dimples in her
cheeks and the center of her chin. This
“Sr. Lucy” has a predominant characteristic of a protruding, forward chin,
which the real Sr. Lucy doesn't have (besides the different nose structure).
This woman is not Sr. Lucy, but a
phony Sr. Lucy that was implanted and specially picked to serve the purpose of
the false Fatima line and the
Francis Alban, The
Fatima Priest, Intro page: "On October 11th, 1990,
For more
than 40 years, "Sr. Lucy" was unable to be seen even by her sister
except through a grille and with other nuns present! This would explain why her sister would not
have uncovered the fraud – she was never able to see “Sr. Lucy” except behind
a grille and fully clothed in a habit, and never able to speak intimately
with her because of the constant presence of “many” other nuns! This strange quarantining of “Sr. Lucy” was
not, as "Fr." Gruner has suggested, because she would tell the world
the truth about
So Sr. Lucy
was never allowed to speak with her family except from behind a grille, but when they needed “Sr. Lucy” to publicly
endorse the Vatican II sect, its Antipopes, and their failure to release the
third secret, she was neatly presented to the world at Fatima in 1967, so that
she could be seen hobnobbing with her fellow conspirator, Antipope Paul VI.
The phony Sr. Lucy brought out from
behind the grille to be seen by the world at
Same thing here: the phony Sr. Lucy
brought before the world to be seen hobnobbing with Antipope John Paul II
Another
question that springs to mind after viewing these photographs is: when did Sr.
Lucy get her teeth fixed? Here is a picture of the real Sr. Lucy; her front
teeth were characteristically mangled.
“When Lucia’s second teeth began to
come in… they were large, projecting and
irregular, causing the upper lip to protrude and the heavy lower one to
hang…” (William Thomas Walsh, Our Lady of
Fatima, p. 11)
But in the
photographs of the phony Sr. Lucy above, we see that her teeth are neat and
straight, not large, projecting and irregular.
Sure, it's possible that Sr. Lucy had massive dental surgery or had her
teeth replaced to get them looking so neat and straight as the impostor Sr.
Lucy's do, but it is more likely just another
proof of the fact that the woman pictured above is not the real Sr. Lucy
pictured here.
For those who find this hard to accept, I ask them to
focus on two things: 1) Our Lord said that in the last days the deception will
be so profound that even the elect would be deceived if that were possible
(Matthew 24), and an impostor Lucy was crucial to the Devil’s plan of deceiving
the world on Fatima. 2) Every traditionalist who doesn’t accept the
At this event, “Cardinal” Sodano (in view of “Sr.
Lucy”) announced that the
In the following quote, notice that even a Grunerite
acknowledges the problem. He admits how
“almost disquieting” it was to see “Sr. Lucy” endorse “Cardinal” Sodano’s
interpretation of the third secret – yes, I would say so! – but he fails to
draw the appropriate conclusion.
Mark Fellows, Fatima in Twilight, p. 327: “In
fact, her [Sister Lucy’s] exuberance at
There you
have it: the phony “Sr. Lucy” fully endorsed the
In 1992,
there was the infamous Two Hours with Sr.
Lucy interview, conducted by “Cardinal” Padiyara of Ernaculam,
"Cardinal Padiyara: 'And, was this [consecration] accomplished
by Pope John Paul II on March 25th of 1984?'
Sister Lucy: 'Yes, Yes, Yes (In a low affirmative voice which
also seemed to show that she was expecting this question)…
Carlos Evaristo: 'So this consecration was then accepted by
Our Lady?'
Sister Lucy: 'Yes.'
Carlos: 'Our Lady is content and has accepted it?'
Sister Lucy: 'Yes.'…
Cardinal Padiyara: 'Does God and Our Lady still want the Church to reveal the
Third Secret?'
Sister Lucy: 'The Third Secret is not intended to be revealed. It
was only intended for the Pope and the immediate Church hierarchy.'
Carlos: 'But didn't Our Lady say that it was to be revealed to the public by
1960, at the latest?'
Sister Lucy: 'Our Lady never said that. Our Lady said that it was
for the Pope.'
Father Pacheco: 'Does the Third Secret have to do with the Second Vatican
Council?'
Sister Lucy: 'I cannot say.'
Carlos: 'Can the Pope reveal the Third Secret?'
Sister Lucy: 'The Pope can reveal it if he chooses to, but I advise
him not to. If he chooses to, I advise great prudence. He must be prudent.'"
The
Grunerites have desperately tried to discredit this interview, since it is so devastating
to their position; but Bro. Michael Dimond (superior of Most Holy Family
Monastery) had a chance to speak with “Fr.” Pacheco when he came to visit the
Monastery once for a conference in the 1990’s.
“Fr.” Pacheco told Bro. Michael that something is very wrong with this
Sr. Lucy, and that she couldn’t answer simple questions about her life. It’s quite obvious that the interviewers were
simply probing too deeply in areas with which the impostor was unfamiliar.
The
Grunerites attempt to discredit this 1992 interview by pointing out that Sr.
Lucy was always behind the grille, but in this interview she was supposedly out
in the open, even holding hands with people.
But this makes sense: the
Besides the
1992 interview, Two Hours with Sr. Lucy,
there are numerous other statements from the phony Lucy in which she fully
endorses the Vatican II sect’s line on
VATICAN CITY, DEC 20, 2001 (Vatican Information Service):
“With reference to the third part of the secret of Fatima, she [“Sr. Lucy”] affirmed that she had attentively read and meditated upon the
booklet published by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and
confirmed everything that was written there. To whoever
imagines that some part of the secret has been hidden, she replied: ‘Everything
has been published; no secret remains.’ To those who speak and write of new revelations she said:
"There is no truth in this. If I had received new revelations I would have
told no-one, but I would have communicated them directly to the Holy
Father." Sister Lucy was asked: ‘What
do you say to the persistent affirmations of Fr. Gruner who is gathering
signatures in order that the Pope may finally consecrate
Of course,
the Grunerites will claim that this interview was fabricated or distorted, but
then they are admitting that there is a conspiracy! If the Vatican will go that far, it is
certainly conceivable that it would implant an impostor; and, as we saw, the
claim that all of these statements from “Sr. Lucy” endorsing the phony third
secret are just fabrications is blown away by the video evidence in
which anyone could see her endorse the Vatican’s version of the third secret at
Fatima in 2000.
A bizarre picture of “Sr. Lucy”
kissing John Paul II's hand immediately after receiving "Communion"
Another
point worth mentioning is “Sr. Lucy’s” bizarre activity when receiving
“Communion” from John Paul II at the aforementioned 2000 “Beatification”
ceremony at Fatima (the same one where she clearly endorsed the
Q. So what do you think happened to the real Sr.
Lucy? A.
They clearly eliminated her at some point. Whenever that may have occurred, there is no
doubt that the woman playing the part of “Sr. Lucy” since Vatican II was not
the real one. Readers can take this for
what it is worth (and it is not essential in any way to the facts above
which prove that there was indeed an impostor Sr. Lucy), but a few years
back we received a very disturbing letter.
We received a letter from a woman (a traditional Catholic convert) whose
family was involved in the higher-echelons of the Illuminati and
Freemasonry. We also spoke to this woman
both before and after she sent it. There
was much more in the letter and in the telephone conversations that added
context and creditability to her claim, but we can only give a portion of the
letter below. As hard as this may be to
believe, we really did receive the
following letter and speak at length with this woman (she asked that we
withhold her name for obvious reasons):
“Dear Brothers of Holy Family Monastery… As I told you on
the phone I have some very dark relatives…[a world
famous Freemason] is the brother of [x- name removed to preserve anonymity of
author] who was married to my Grand Aunt.
All of my relatives on my mother’s side were 33rd degree
Illuminati Freemasons. My Grandparents
were in Eastern Star… I know I must sound like a screaming weirdo by now. I am not… When I was five my Mother hosted a
gathering. There are many things that
went on that are too gruesome to put in print about these gatherings. They are basically sacrificing to satan to
put it briefly. I had a new baby brother
named [x]… My mother didn’t know ahead of time [that x] was to be part of the
‘ceremonies’. They were going to put him
in what looked like a large brass wok [and torture him] in order to tell the
future. …[thankfully, this didn’t happen because of
intervening events]… [But] One of the
things that was said that awful day was they had just killed sister
Lucy (I thought they were talking about a sister I didn’t know I had that they
had killed). When I asked they said ‘No
stupid…she’s a nun’ It only made
sense years later what this meant. It
was 1958, late Oct when this happened.
[I remember because my brother had just been born]. I know that I sound like a mad woman but it
is the truth…”
We have
spoken with this woman at length; she is a traditional Catholic convert, and we
believe that she is telling the truth.
But regardless of whether one accepts this testimony or not, the fact is
that there was an impostor Sr. Lucy.
There is no doubt about this; the evidence is undeniable. The Vatican conveniently kept her alive until
97 years old, until it had revealed the phony third secret and she had finished
playing her part, then a few years later she “died” and her cell was ordered
sealed by “Cardinal” Ratzinger.
There are
so many souls who have dismissed the evidence against the Vatican II apostasy
and the New Mass simply because they saw that “Sr. Lucy” accepted them. We always informed them that they cannot
dismiss facts of the Faith based on what they think another person
believes.
Galatians 1:8-9- “But though
we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that
which we have preached to you, let him be anathema. As we said before, so now I say again: If
anyone preach to you a gospel, besides that which you have received, let him be
anathema.”
Alas, but
lacking true Faith, they chose to follow man instead of God, and were actually
following a complete impostor.
THE FALSE MESSAGE OF “FR.” NICHOLAS
GRUNER
Prior to
examining this issue in detail, like almost everyone else we also held the
popular position on the consecration of
There are
many people who have held, and do hold, the erroneous position on the
consecration and conversion of
That being
said, I believe that the Fatima Enterprise of “Fr.” Nicholas Gruner has become
a colossus with the assistance of the devil.
His enterprise has been hugely important to the devil in distracting
souls from the real issues of the Faith to get a phony Antipope to consecrate
We hear
from these people very frequently, and we’ve always assured them that they
cannot dismiss facts from the teaching of the Magisterium based on their
question of who will fulfill a prophecy.
We always told them that against a fact there is no argument (heretics
cannot be Popes), and truth cannot contradict truth, and therefore there
is a good answer to their question about the consecration, even if one didn’t
have it at the time. But alas, they dismissed
all the facts from the teaching of the Magisterium, and accepted the Vatican II
apostates because of their false idea that one of them must consecrate
That “Fr.”
Gruner’s apostolate has been assisted by the devil finds corroboration in his
devilish mixture of truth with error – of Catholicism with apostasy. We see this so clearly in the next quote
about the apostasy in the Church.
“Fr.” Gruner, “God Have Mercy on us all,” Crusader 71: “‘In the Third Secret it is foretold, among
other things, that the great Apostasy in the Church will begin at the top.’
These are the very words of Cardinal Ciappi (personal Papal Theologian to Pope
John Paul II). The result of "the great Apostasy" starting "at
the top" is corruption of the clergy and the laity in doctrine, in morals
and in liturgy… God is very angry with
His people because He is not only sending us bad priests, He has also
apparently sent us bad bishops and bad Cardinals too… Pope John Paul II at Fatima, on May 13,
2000 told us that: ‘The message of
This really
encapsulates “Fr.” Gruner’s evil methods and evil apostolate. Here we see Gruner discussing the truth of
how it is predicted that the apostasy in the Church will begin “at the
top.” Who could that be? Obviously it would apply first and foremost
to John Paul II, the man who claimed to be the Pope (claimed to be the top of
the Church) and led the entire apostasy by his idolatrous prayer gatherings at
In addition
to his deadly mixture of truth with error, one of the ways by which “Fr.”
Gruner’s apostolate has become so influential is by propaganda. Here are some of the things that you can find
on the website of his apostolate: His website (Fatima.org) calls his magazine
“Our Lady’s magazine.” It states: “Click
here to read more about Our Lady’s
magazine…”! Boy, who would want to
disagree with or not support “Our Lady’s magazine” – the magazine of Our Lady
herself!
He calls
his Book Service “Our Lady’s Book Service”!
Wow, we wish we could have the privilege of being “Our Lady’s Book
Service.” He calls his radio program “Our Lady’s Radio Program”! And – yes, you guessed it – he calls his
Apostolate, not just a Fatima Apostolate, but “Our Lady’s Apostolate”! His website states: “Shortly following the
formation of Our Lady's Apostolate,
Father Gruner began publishing the Fatima Crusader magazine. In 1980, Pope John
Paul II directly encouraged Father Gruner in his
Wow, he
must be some “priest” to run “Our Lady’s Apostolate” – the Apostolate of Our
Lady herself! – as well as her Radio
Program, her magazine and her Book Service. Does anyone fail to see how presumptuous –
and arguably blasphemous – this is? Oh,
never mind… it’s okay… I almost forgot… Gruner is, according to his Apostolate
(i.e. “Our Lady’s” Apostolate), “the Fatima Priest”!
In truth,
this is simply propaganda from a false prophet, and that is why “Fr.”
Gruner has had such an influence on what people think about
Besides
being wickedly presumptuous, this propaganda brainwashes people just like the
propaganda from the mainstream media.
When they hear this stuff over and over – this is “Our Lady’s
apostolate” and “Our Lady’s magazine” and “Our Lady’s Book Service” – they are
often brainwashed to follow everything he says on Fatima, support him
vigorously (for who wouldn’t want to support Our Lady?) or consider Gruner to
be Our Lady’s personal representative.
Since people are so gullible, it has been a major factor in how big his
apostolate has become. That is why his
apostolate continues to use this type of propaganda so often. It is why so many have been brainwashed not
to consider anything on this issue that doesn’t conform to “Fr.” Gruner’s
views.
By the way,
Gruner stated in one of his letters that he wants to send the book “Fatima
Priest” (which is the story of his life) to every “Bishop” in the country! What a complete waste. The book Fatima
Priest, which is replete with pictures of Gruner from throughout his life
including as a baby, which is basically all about him and what a hero he
supposedly is, has been translated into various languages to spread the “Good
News” of Nicholas Gruner around the world.
All of this
explains why Gruner consistently promoted pictures of Antipope John Paul II in
his magazine for years (in a positive light) after he was aware of John Paul
II’s apostasy. For Gruner, it wasn’t
about telling people the truth; it was about keeping himself popular and seen
as a hero with a somewhat mainstream “Catholic” audience – by promoting John
Paul II and Fatima at the same time.
Only a very wicked man would not have denounced John Paul II once
he became aware of his apostasy, and that’s exactly what Nicholas Gruner is.
www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com
Copyright
© 2006: Most Holy Family Monastery.