Heresy of the Week, Week of 10/29/04
And Here’s the “Cardinal” happy to be there
Please notice the striking contrast in the second picture with the “Cardinal” and the Dalai Lama. Above, we see the large Crucifix of Our Lord Jesus, while below – like the serpent slithering on the ground – we see his enemy the Dalai Lama invading His space and corrupting the children, with the Novus Ordo “Cardinal” looking on, encouraging and enabling him. This picture captures in one shot the striking reality of what has occurred: a phony, Antichrist, non-Catholic sect has arisen with Vatican II, and attempts to eclipse the true Church of Christ (the true Catholic Church), which has been reduced to a remnant of faithful Catholics.
Comment: On Oct. 4, 2004 the Dalai Lama came to the Novus Ordo Cathedral in Mexico City, Mexico to conduct a prayer session. For those who don’t know, the Dalai Lama is the leader of Buddhism, a pagan and idolatrous religion created by Satan – as are all false religions. The Dalai Lama, in the Buddhist pagan tradition, is the Incarnation of a Tibetan god. Thus, the “Dalai Lama” is, in a very true sense, a false Christ. He is also called “the god-king.” Thus, the Dalai Lama is not only an idol worshipper, one of Satan’s top emissaries, and the promoter of a Satanic religion, but he actually serves as a living, walking idol – as he is considered to be the incarnation of Avalokitesvara. Please consider this carefully: think about what it means that the “Cardinal” of Mexico is welcoming this man and his Satanic religion into the Cathedral and commemorating his visit with a plate. “Cardinal” of Mexico unveils plate commemorating Dalai Lama’s visit
Matthew 24:15- “When therefore you shall see the abomination of desolation, which was spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place: he that readeth let him understand.”
And this type of thing is happening all over the Novus Ordo sect: in Fatima in the spot where Our Lady appeared, in Assisi, in Michigan, etc., all because it is the manifestation of the religious indifferentism officially taught by Antipope John Paul II and his Bishops.
What is one to say about those who are aware of all these facts and continue to regard John Paul II and his Bishops as Catholics?