“ROME – Confronting a rebel archbishop’s accusations and acts of defiance was the heaviest cross Blessed Paul VI had to bear in his pontificate, said a new book based on never-before published notes and documents.
After years of correspondence and efforts at convincing Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, founder of the traditionalist Society of St. Pius X, to accept the teachings of the Second Vatican Council and the authority of the pope, Paul lost his patience at times in a private meeting with the suspended cleric at the papal villa in Castel Gandolfo, Sept. 11, 1976…
The typed report and handwritten notes and letters of Paul are part of a new Italian book, The Barque of Paul, by Msgr. Leonardo Sapienza, regent of the Prefecture of the Pontifical Household.
The book makes public more than two dozen handwritten or typed notes and letters by the pope…
But the most ‘dramatic are the documents on the matter of Lefebvre,’ said an article published May 15 in the Vatican newspaper, L’Osservatore Romano.
The book focuses on the pope’s comments and reactions in 1976-1977 when the situation with Lefebvre had reached a breaking point.
At length, the pope condemned the false and ‘inconsistent’ doctrine, and the grave and divisive actions of the archbishop during a secret consistory with cardinals May 24, 1976, the book said. The times, the pope told the cardinals, called not for concessions, but vigilance against all dangerous and incorrect interpretations of the Second Vatican Council.
Just a few months later, in July 1976, Lefebvre was suspended from his priestly functions after he illegally ordained 13 priests at his seminary in Econe, Switzerland. In an open violation of his suspension, he led a Mass at a sports arena in Lille, France, Aug. 29 before thousands of faithful and hundreds of journalists, who reported or broadcast his lengthy homily in which he defended the ‘traditional’ faith and lambasted the ‘conciliar’ Church.
In the end, after direct correspondence, intermediaries and a number of public statements seemed to have failed to sway the archbishop, the pope met face-to-face with him Sept. 11. The pope’s personal secretary also attended along with the assistant secretary of state, whom the pope charged with taking notes on the entire proceedings.
Written like a transcript, the report said Paul began the conversation saying, ‘I hope to have before me a brother, a son, a friend. Unfortunately, the position you have taken is that of an antipope. What can I say? You have not allowed for any measure in your words, your actions, your behavior.’
Paul said the question at stake was not obedience to him as a person, but obedience to the office of pope.
‘You judged the pope as disloyal to the faith of which he is the supreme guarantor. Perhaps this is the first time in history that this has happened. You told the whole world that the pope lacks the faith, does not believe, that he is a modernist and so on,’ Paul said, underlining the ‘extreme gravity’ of such accusations, and the need to ‘reflect’ and accept the ‘just consequences.’
Lefebvre insisted it was never his intention to attack the pope, and he admitted ‘perhaps there was something inappropriate in my words, my writings.’ His true intention, he said, was to follow his conscience and respond to the concerns of numerous others who were worried that the recent changes in the Church forced them to either ‘risk losing the faith’ or ‘give the impression of disobedience.’…
What bothered the pope, he said, wasn’t the archbishop’s ‘perplexity’ with what the council taught, but his attitude or approach to the council, which he had also taken part in.
‘I am not against the council, but against some of its acts,’ Lefebvre said.
‘If you are not against the council, you must adhere to it, to all of its documents,’ the pope replied, remarking later that the archbishop had signed many of the council’s acts.
Lefebvre proposed requiring bishops to make available in churches a chapel where people could ‘pray like before the council.’
‘We are a community. We cannot permit autonomy in behavior in different places,’ the pope said, but the archbishop continued to make the case that the council accepts ‘pluralism’ and ‘we ask that that principle be applied to us, too.’
The archbishop added that he would let the Vatican oversee the Econe seminary to ensure it was forming candidates in ‘true piety,’ and he said he would be ready not to speak at any more conferences, staying put in the seminary – ‘I promise I won’t come out anymore.’
Paul questioned how this would be being in communion with the Church ‘when you take positions against us, before the world, to accuse us of infidelity, of wanting to destroy the Church?’
‘I had no intention…,’ the archbishop said. However, the pope added, that was what the archbishop had said and written and if he were such a modernist pope betraying the Church, ‘I would have to resign and invite you to take my place and lead the Church.’
When the archbishop explained the Church was in crisis, the pope said, ‘… You contributed to making it worse with your solemn disobedience, with your open challenge against the pope.’
‘I am not being judged as I should,’ Lefebvre replied.
‘Canon law judges you,’ the pope said, urging him to make an examination of conscience…
He asked Lefebvre to sign a public declaration, retracting his recent remarks and actions which ‘everyone took notice of as actions not to build the Church but to divide it and bring it harm.'”