$5.00 Package: Includes 2 Books & 24 Videos On 1 DVD (Price Includes Shipping)

BUY FOR $5.00
MHFM’s E-mail Newsletter

FREE SIGN-UP
“Coronavirus” (”Covid-19”) Hoax - Video Evidence And Ground Reports - Must-See

READ HERE

Help Save Souls
DONATE

Apocalypse Now In The Vatican
WATCH VIDEO

“Magicians” Prove A Spiritual World Exists - Demonic Activity Caught On Video (Final Edition)
WATCH VIDEO

The Antichrist Identified!
WATCH VIDEO

Why So Many Can’t Believe
WATCH VIDEO

Amazing Evidence For God - Scientific Evidence That Refutes Evolution
WATCH VIDEO

Why Hell Must Be Eternal
WATCH VIDEO

Babylon Has Fallen, Fallen!!
WATCH VIDEO

What Millions Of Fake Christians Get Wrong About Ephesians
WATCH VIDEO
Archives
Categories
- Addiction (2)
- Antipope Francis’ Recent Heresies (82)
- Baptism of Desire (13)
- Benedict XVI (2)
- Bible (10)
- Catholic Audios (2)
- Christianity and Catholicism (244)
- Counter “Church” Hierarchy (25)
- Early Church Fathers (6)
- Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus (5)
- Faith Alone (3)
- Heretics (72)
- Jesus (5)
- John Paul II (4)
- New Rite of Ordination (4)
- Non-Catholic Religions (9)
- Paul VI (2)
- Protestantism (6)
- Saints (4)
- Scientific Evidence for God (1)
- Sedevacantism (8)
- Society of St. Pius X (4)
- Spiritual Issues (15)
- Traditional Catholic Articles (5)
- Vatican II Antipopes (43)
^
Objection 7): No one can judge the Holy See… thus the Vatican II popes are true popes.
For more posts
Answer: First, people need to understand what the teaching “No one can judge the Holy See” means. It comes from the early Church. In the early Church, when a bishop was accused of a crime, there would sometimes be a trial presided over by other bishops or by a patriarch of greater authority. These bishops would sit in judgment on the accused bishop. The Bishop of Rome, however, since he is the supreme bishop in the Church, cannot be subjected to any trial by other bishops or by other people.
This is what “No one can judge the Holy See” means. It does not refer to recognizing a manifest heretic who claims to be the pope as one who is not a true pope. This brings us to the second point, which is the most important in this regard.
Second, the Holy See has told us that no heretic can be accepted as the valid occupant of the Holy See (the Pope)! With the fullness of his authority, Pope Paul IV declared that anyone who has been promoted to the Papacy as a heretic is not a true and valid pope, and that he can be rejected as a warlock, heathen, publican and heresiarch.
Thus, one is obeying and adhering to the teaching of the Holy See in rejecting as invalid the heretical post-Vatican II claimants. They are not true popes, according to the teaching of the Holy See.
Third, it was near the beginning of this Bull, prior to the declaration that the faithful can reject as totally invalid the “election” of a heretic, that Pope Paul IV repeated the teaching that no one can judge the pope.
Pope Paul IV, Bull Cum ex Apostolatus Officio, Feb. 15, 1559: “1. In assessing Our duty and the situation now prevailing, We have been weighed upon by the thought that a matter of this kind [i.e. error in respect of the Faith] is so grave and so dangerous that the Roman Pontiff, who is the representative upon earth of God and our God and Lord Jesus Christ, who holds the fullness of power over peoples and kingdoms, who may judge all and be judged by none in this world, may nonetheless be contradicted if he be found to have deviated from the Faith.”
Unlike non-sedevacantists who use the “no one can judge the Holy See” argument, Pope Paul IV correctly distinguishes between a true Catholic pope, whom none can judge, and a manifest heretic (e.g. Benedict XVI). A manifest heretic has revealed himself to be a non-Catholic who is not the pope, since he is outside the true Church. This is striking proof that sedevacantists, who hold as invalid the “elections” of the manifest heretics Joseph Ratzinger, Jorge Bergoglio, etc., are not judging a pope.
Fourth, many of the people who defend the Vatican II “popes” by arguing “no one can judge the Holy See” are themselves guilty of judging the most authoritative actions of the men they claim occupy the Holy See. Many of those “traditionalists” reject Vatican II, the “canonizations” of the Vatican II “popes,” etc. That is a schismatic position. They reject the authoritative actions of that which they deem to be the Holy See. Hence, the errors and false doctrines in the universal and authoritative actions of the Vatican II antipopes prove that they do not, in fact, occupy the Holy See. They are not true popes but heretical antipopes.
Notes:
[1] Denzinger 330.
Sign Up For Our Free E-mail List To See Future Vaticancatholic.com Videos And Articles