$5.00 Package: Includes 2 Books & 24 Videos On 1 DVD (Price Includes Shipping)

BUY FOR $5.00
MHFM’s E-mail Newsletter

FREE SIGN-UP
“Coronavirus” (”Covid-19”) Hoax - Video Evidence And Ground Reports - Must-See

READ HERE

Help Save Souls
DONATE

America’s Fall To Communism (2021) – Documentary
WATCH VIDEO

Apocalypse Now In The Vatican
WATCH VIDEO

“Magicians” Prove A Spiritual World Exists - Demonic Activity Caught On Video (Final Edition)
WATCH VIDEO

The Antichrist Identified!
WATCH VIDEO

Why So Many Can’t Believe
WATCH VIDEO

Amazing Evidence For God - Scientific Evidence That Refutes Evolution
WATCH VIDEO

Why Hell Must Be Eternal
WATCH VIDEO

Babylon Has Fallen, Fallen!!
WATCH VIDEO
Archives
Categories
- Addiction (2)
- Antipope Francis’ Recent Heresies (82)
- Baptism of Desire (13)
- Benedict XVI (2)
- Bible (10)
- Catholic Audios (2)
- Christianity and Catholicism (245)
- Counter “Church” Hierarchy (25)
- Early Church Fathers (6)
- Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus (5)
- Faith Alone (3)
- Heretics (72)
- Jesus (5)
- John Paul II (4)
- New Rite of Ordination (4)
- Non-Catholic Religions (9)
- Paul VI (2)
- Protestantism (6)
- Saints (4)
- Scientific Evidence for God (1)
- Sedevacantism (8)
- Society of St. Pius X (4)
- Spiritual Issues (15)
- Traditional Catholic Articles (5)
- Vatican II Antipopes (43)
^
The Incarnation Took Place In The Person, Not In The Natures
Bro. Peter Dimond
This article deals with properly understanding and communicating an aspect of the Incarnation. This is especially relevant because a few radical schismatics named Ryan and R.I., lacking the faith and a correct understanding of this matter, have falsely accused Pope Martin V and the Council of Constance of heresy (as will be explained below).
When we speak of the union of the two natures (divine and human) that belong to Our Lord Jesus Christ, it’s important to understand that this union did not occur between the natures themselves but rather in the person of the Word. The union of the two natures is called hypostatic (hypostasis = person) because it occurred in the person.
The idea that the union of the Incarnation was made between the natures themselves is the heresy of Eutychianism (from Eutyches). Eutyches held that there was a mixing or fusion of the divine and human natures in Christ. But the Church has proclaimed that the divine and human natures were united without mingling or confusion in the one divine person of the Word.
The union could not have occurred in the natures themselves, for if the two natures mingled the human nature would have been absorbed into the divine and Christ would not have been truly man.
Further, all three divine persons have the exact same divine nature. Hence, if the union of the Incarnation took place in the natures themselves, all three persons would have been incarnate. But that idea is heretical. The union of the Incarnation was not contracted in the natures but in the person, as St. Thomas correctly teaches.
St. Alphonsus also wrote against the heresy that the two natures in Christ mingled.
THE HUGE BLUNDER AND HERESY OF THE RADICAL SCHISMATICS
At the Council of Constance under Pope Martin V, the following error of John Hus was condemned.
This was correctly condemned by the Church because even though Our Lord Jesus Christ has two natures, the one Christ is not simply a fusion of those natures (for the reasons explained above). The union occurred in the one divine person of the Word, not in the natures.
Failing to understand the point we explained above (namely, that Jesus is one divine person with two natures and that the union of the Incarnation occurred in the person and not in the natures), certain radical schismatics rashly declared that the condemned error of John Hus cited above is “true”. They also said that “both of these natures are the one Person” and that Martin V was a heretic and an “antipope” for condemning what they consider to be the true doctrine! Wow. In doing so they committed the mortal sin of schism, endorsed the heresy of Eutychianism, and exposed their failure to understand Christian theology about the Incarnation. It’s another example of why people should not follow such radical schismatics and how the Devil uses them as a deception.