I have your video, Vat II Council of Apostasy, in which you show the document whereby Paul VI infallibly (for his followers) ratified VAT II in 1965, including the decrees for the Novus Ordo. Many of my older friends do not have TV video access, and I would like a print reference--in Denziger?-- so I can give them a written copy, as you don't show this in any of your print material.
The best place to go to see Paul VI’s ratification of every Vatican II document is The Documents of Vatican II by Walter M. Abbott. It shows that:
EACH OF THE VATICAN II DOCUMENTS ENDS WITH THESE WORDS (OR WORDS ALMOST IDENTICAL TO THESE):
“EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THE THINGS SET FORTH IN THIS DECREE HAS WON THE CONSENT OF THE FATHERS. WE, TOO, BY THE APOSTOLIC AUTHORITY CONFERRED ON US BY CHRIST, JOIN WITH THE VENERABLE FATHERS IN APPROVING, DECREEING, AND ESTABLISHING THESE THINGS IN THE HOLY SPIRIT, AND WE DIRECT THAT WHAT HAS THUS BEEN ENACTED IN SYNOD BE PUBLISHED TO GOD’S GLORY... I, PAUL, BISHOP OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH.”It also contains Paul VI’s Brief solemnly declaring the heretical Council closed, in which it is declared again that everything established at Vatican II is to be “religiously observed by all the faithful.” Perhaps those who doubt this should order the book so they can see it for themselves, and realize that there is no way for them to accept the Vatican II “Popes” as true Popes if they (quite rightly) reject the heretical Vatican II Council.
Paul VI, “Papal” Brief declaring Council Closed, Dec. 8, 1965: “At last all which regards the holy Ecumenical Council has, with the help of God, been accomplished and ALL THE CONSTITUTIONS, DECREES, DECLARATIONS, AND VOTES HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE DELIBERATION OF THE SYNOD AND PROMULGATED BY US. Therefore, we decided to close for all intents and purposes, WITH OUR APOSTOLIC AUTHORITY, this same Ecumenical Council called by our predecessor, Pope John XXIII, which opened October 11, 1962, and which was continued by us after his death. WE DECIDE MOREOVER THAT ALL THAT HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED SYNODALLY IS TO BE RELIGIOUSLY OBSERVED BY ALL THE FAITHFUL, for the glory of God and the dignity of the Church… WE HAVE APPROVED AND ESTABLISHED THESE THINGS, DECREEING THAT THE PRESENT LETTERS ARE AND REMAIN STABLE AND VALID, AND ARE TO HAVE LEGAL EFFECTIVENESS, so that they be disseminated and obtain full and complete effect, and so that they may be fully convalidated by those whom they concern or may concern now and in the future; and so that, as it be judged and described, ALL EFFORTS CONTRARY TO THESE THINGS BY WHOEVER OR WHATEVER AUTHORITY, KNOWINGLY OR IN IGNORANCE, BE INVALID AND WORTHLESS FROM NOW ON. Given at Rome, at St. Peter’s, under the [seal of the] ring of the fisherman, December 8… the year 1965, the third year of our Pontificate.”By the way, in his recent Conference in Denver (carried in the recent article in The Angelus), Bishop Fellay of the SSPX mentioned a very important point in this regard. He admitted that, in his personal meeting with Antipope Benedict XVI, the Antipope made it very clear to him that the SSPX must accept Vatican II.
Bishop Bernard Fellay, Conference in Denver, Feb. 18, 2006: “Then he [Benedict XVI] went to the second level. And he said that the second level is the acceptance of the Council...’… The Pope clearly indicated in the words he used during audience, that for him, it is impossible to accept someone in the Church, at least in his, let’s say, modern way of looking at the Church, who would not accept the Council. He was very clear. When I heard these words there, and especially one word afterwards, for me, the big fight we will have under this pontificate will be the fight about the Council.” (The Angelus, “A Talk Heard Round the World,” April, 2006, p. 15.)How many times does this have to be proven? The false traditionalists need to give up their impossible position.