Audios
refuting in detail the schismatic “No Jurisdiction Position”
Jurisdiction - Quick Intro [9
min. audio]
This
is a quick introduction to the controversy and the importance of Jurisdiction.
Jurisdiction Part 2 - facing up to the facts of the GWS [18
min. audio]
This
part begins to get into the facts of the Great Western Schism. It shows how these facts completely refute the advocates of the “No Jurisdiction
Position.” They have no response to
these points. This section addresses and
refutes Gerry Matatics on “extraordinary mission” and
more.
Jurisdiction Part 3 - More
devastating facts [40 min. audio]
This section further pins down and refutes the
advocates of the “No Jurisdiction Position” on the point of the Great Western
Schism. This part shows how Gerry Matatics cannot address the facts, so instead he
dishonestly shuffles them to the side.
This section also addresses many other points, including epikeia, the external and internal forum, and a book called
Supplied Jurisdiction According to Canon
209.
This
book, which Gerry Matatics wrongly says “devastates” the other side, actually devastates his
position and that of other advocates of the “No Jurisdiction Position.” This audio covers, with supporting citations
from the book, the extent of supplied
jurisdiction, doubt of fact, doubt of
law, colored title, putative title and more. It explains what these mean and why they are
significant to this issue. The facts in
this section serve to further completely refute the schismatic “No Jurisdiction
Position.”
Jurisdiction Part 4 - More points
and La Salette [20 min. audio]
Note: This part 4 contains some important information. It will not be as interesting for our general
readers as part 5 or some other sections.
The information in this part is for those who have a deeper interest in
these topics. This part also covers a
controversy that some of our readers have asked about: did the Holy Office, before Vatican II, condemn commenting on the
Message of La Salette? Hear our response to this issue. This section also contains some more
important points from Supplied
Jurisdiction According to Canon 209.
It covers intrinsic cessation of the law. It also covers the dilemma of canonists in
determining the precise extent of common error, etc. and how their comments
serve to further obliterate the schismatic “No Jurisdiction Position.”
Jurisdiction Part 5 - Bishops and
focusing in on their outrageous hypocrisy [30 min. audio]
This section refutes the advocates of the “No Jurisdiction
Position” on consecrating bishops without a papal mandate. It covers what Pius XII said about that
matter. It refutes Gerry Matatics’ outrageous attempt to justify his clear violation
of the normal canons against preaching, etc. without permission. It focuses in on their hypocrisy, the laws
they violate, and how they condemn themselves out of their own mouths. It also covers lessons from Our Lord and the Machabees which further refute the “No Jurisdiction” schismatics.
Gerry Matatics' heresies against the salvation dogma [40 min. audio]
This
audio proves that Gerry Matatics rejects the dogma
Outside the Church There is No Salvation.
He rejects it by accepting as Catholics those who reject it. It proves that he is actually a
Christ-denier, by recognizing as Catholics those who believe that Jesus Christ
is not necessary for salvation. It also
proves that he denies the dogma by considering Suprema haec sacra to not be heretical, and by
failing to accept the absolute necessity of water baptism. It also proves how he dishonestly tries to
deny that he denies the dogma, but is refuted by his own words. Hear the very clips which prove the
point. It also examines his position on Geocentrism. This
audio shows how his position on Geocentrism
undermines and refutes his criticism of our position on the status of the
absolute necessity of water baptism. It
also refutes his claim that St. Thomas Aquinas did not deny the Immaculate
Conception (before it was defined).
This
article refutes the false position that no independent priest today has
jurisdiction. The “no independent priest today has jurisdiction” position
is more widespread than one might think.
We have received many questions about this issue. Therefore, we strongly recommend that those
who are interested in or concerned about this topic print this article out and
read it.