Dr. Tom Droleskey believes that members of false religions can be saved

By Bro. Peter Dimond, O.S.B.

INTRO

A few of our readers are probably familiar with Dr. Tom Droleskey. We believe that some of the arguments and research on our website were helpful in his recent change to the sedevacantist position. Some time back we also sent him a package with the hope that he would accept the correct positions a Catholic must take in this time of apostasy. Seeing that Mr. Droleskey persisted in publicly endorsing bishops and priests who deny the dogma Outside the Church There is No Salvation, on July 9, 2007 I wrote him an e-mail attempting to charitably inform him of the serious problem with the priests and bishops he was promoting. Since he had read some of our material and had received a package from us, he was probably already aware of their stance. The personal letter was sent, however, to make sure that he was cognizant of the problem. If Droleskey had responded in a way that manifested his agreement with Catholic truth, we would have been more than happy to keep my letter to him private. However, since he responded with a letter demonstrating his commitment to heresy and to the promotion of heretics, it is necessary to warn any readers who are familiar with him that he is, unfortunately, an obstinate and bad willed heretic. He is a complete phony and I was dismayed to discover how heretical he actually is. I thought that he would at least reject the heresy of Fr. Denis Fahey, that Jews who reject Jesus Christ can be in the state of grace; but he didn’t. What follows is my first letter to him, then his formal e-mail response (exactly as he sent it), and then my response to his letter.

MY FIRST LETTER TO TOM DROLESKEY ABOUT HIS SUPPORT OF BISHOPS AND PRIESTS WHO DENY THE SALVATION DOGMA

July 9, 2007

Dear Dr. Tom Droleskey:

Hello, my name is Bro. Peter Dimond. You’re probably familiar with our website and some of the materials we have produced. We were glad to hear that some time back you changed your view on the Conciliar Church and now publicly support the sedevacantist position.

I’m writing to you because I’ve noticed that you publicly support and end