The
Amazing Heresies of Paul VI
By Bro. Michael Dimond, O.S.B.
Paul
VI was the man who claimed to be the head of the Catholic Church from June 21,
1963 to August 6, 1978. He was the man
who promulgated the heretical Second Vatican Council and the New Mass. In our video Vatican II: Council of Apostasy we showed what happened in the
papal conclaves of 1958 and 1963, from which John XXIII and Paul VI emerged
claiming to be the elected Popes. We
showed that other Cardinals were lawfully elected Pope before John XXIII and
Paul VI were elected. Evidence of this
fact has been admitted by a Cardinal who participated in the conclaves, a
prominent Vatican insider, newspapers reports and former intelligence agents.
In the
video Vatican II: Council of Apostasy,
we also showed that the documents of Vatican II contained many heresies. Paul VI solemnly ratified all 16 documents of
Vatican II. It is not possible for a
true Pope of the Roman Catholic Church to solemnly ratify teachings that are
heretical. The fact that Paul VI did
solemnly ratify the heretical teachings of Vatican II proves that Paul VI was
not a true Pope, but an Antipope.
The
Catholic Church has had about 40 Antipopes in Church history. An Antipope is an uncanonically elected
“Pope,” that is, a person claiming to be Pope who has not been legally
elected.
The
Catholic Church has also infallibly taught that a heretic cannot be a true
Pope. The reason for this is that a Pope
is a member of the Church and the visible head of the Church. But a heretic places himself outside the
Church and ceases to be a member of the Church.
Thus, a heretic cannot be the Pope, because one who is outside cannot be
the head of the Church. This why the Code
of Canon Law, Pope Innocent III, Pope Paul IV, St. Francis De Sales, St.
Alphonsus and St. Robert Bellarmine all teach that a heretic cannot be a Pope;
and that if a true Pope were to become a manifest heretic he would cease to be
the Pope. This teaching is rooted in the
infallible dogma that a heretic is not a member of the Church.
St.
Robert Bellarmine, Cardinal and Doctor of the Church:
“A
pope who is a manifest heretic automatically ceases to be pope and head, just
as he ceases automatically to be a Christian and a member of the Church. Wherefore, he can be judged and punished by
the Church. This is the teaching of all
the ancient Fathers who teach that manifest heretics immediately lose all
jurisdiction.”
So,
even if one claims to be a priest, a Bishop or a Pope, if he has become a
manifest heretic, he has lost authority to rule as a leader of the true Church
because he has ceased to be a Catholic.
St.
Robert Bellarmine: “This principal is most certain. The non-Christian cannot in any way be Pope,
as Cajetan himself admits. The reason
for this is that he cannot be head of what he is not a member, now he who is
not a Christian is not a member of the Church, and a manifest heretic is not a
Christian, as is clearly taught by St. Cyprian, St. Athanasius, St. Augustine,
St. Jerome and others; therefore the manifest heretic cannot be Pope.”
And
how do we judge that someone is a heretic?
St.
Robert Bellarmine: “For men are not bound, or able to read hearts, but when
they see that someone is a heretic by his external works, they judge him to be
a heretic pure and simple, and condemn him as a heretic.”
Remember
this fact: Paul VI was the person who gave the world the New Mass, the other
new “sacraments” and the heretical teachings of Vatican II. If you go to the New Mass or embrace the
teachings of Vatican II, the confidence that you have that these things are
legitimate is directly connected to the confidence that you have that Paul VI
was a true Catholic Pope.
This
article will expose the amazing heresies of Paul VI. This article will show, from his official
speeches and writings, that he was a complete apostate who was not even
remotely Catholic. All of the official
speeches and writings of the men who claim to be Pope are contained in the
Vatican’s weekly newspaper, L’
Osservatore Romano. The Vatican has
reprinted issues of their newspaper from April 4, 1968 to the present. I have personally gone through every weekly
issue of the Vatican’s official weekly newspaper from April 4, 1968 to present. From that research mainly, I will now prove
that Paul VI was not a true Pope because of the irrefutable and undeniable
evidence that he was a complete heretic and an apostate.
Paul
VI, General Audience, Dec. 6, 1972: “Does God exist? Who is God?
And what knowledge can man have of him?
What relationship must each of us have with him? To answer each of these questions would lead
us to endless and complex discussions…”[1]
These
questions don’t lead us to endless and complex discussions. Does God exist? Yes.
Who is God? The Holy Trinity. What knowledge can man have of him? The Catholic Faith. What relationship must each of us have with
him? To belong to the Church He
established. Paul VI is blasphemously
stating that these are endless and complex questions. No Catholic would ever assert such nonsense
which mocks and renders meaningless the Catholic Faith and the true God.
Paul
VI, General Audience, June 27, 1973: “…everything
must change, everything must progress.
Evolution seems to be the law that brings liberation. There must be a great deal that is true and
good in this mentality…”[2]
Here
Paul VI explicitly states and approves the Modernist blasphemy that everything
is in a state of evolution. His heresy
was explicitly condemned Pope Pius X.
Pope Pius X, Pascendi (# 26), Sept. 8, 1907, Explaining the doctrine of the
Modernists: “To the laws of evolution
everything is subject – dogma, Church, worship, the Books we revere as sacred,
even faith itself…”[3]
Paul VI on Non-Christian Religions
The
Catholic Church teaches that all non-Catholic religions are false. There is only one true Church, outside of
which no one can be saved. This is
Catholic dogma.
Pope St. Gregory the Great, 590-604:
“The
holy universal Church teaches that it is not possible to worship God truly
except in her and asserts that all who are outside of her will not be
saved.”
All of
the other religions belong to the devil.
This is the teaching of Jesus Christ, the Catholic Church and Sacred
Scripture. See 1 Cor. 10:20 and Psalm
95:5. Anyone who shows esteem for
non-Christians religions, or regards them as good or deserving of respect,
denies Jesus Christ and is an apostate.
Paul
VI, General Audience, Nov. 8, 1972: “Ecumenism
began in this way; as respect for non-Christian religions…” [4]
Pope Pius XI, Mortalium
Animos (# 2), Jan. 6, 1928:
“…that false opinion which considers all religions
to be more or less good and praiseworthy...
Not only are those who hold this opinion in error and deceived, but also
in distorting the idea of true religion they reject it...”[5]
Here
is what Paul VI thought about non-Christian religions of the devil:
Paul
VI, Address, Sept. 22, 1973: “…noble
non-Christian religions…”[6]
This
is apostasy – a total rejection of Jesus Christ.
Paul
VI, General Audience, Jan. 12, 1972: “…a disconcerting picture opens up before
our eyes: that of religions, the
religions invented by man; attempts that are sometimes extremely daring and
noble…”[7]
Here
Paul VI says that religions invented by
man are sometimes extremely noble.
This is apostasy – a total rejection of Jesus Christ and the Catholic
Faith.
Paul
VI, Message, Dec. 6, 1977: “…non-Christian religions, which the Church respects
and esteems….”[8]
He is
saying that he esteems false religions.
Paul
VI, Message, Nov. 24, 1969: “…overcome divisions, by developing a mutual respect between the different religious confessions.”[9]
Paul
VI, Address, Dec. 3, 1970: “We greet with respect
the representatives of all the other
religions who have honored us by their presence.”[10]
Paul
VI, General Audience, July 6, 1977: “We
welcome with sincere respect the Japanese delegation of the Konko-kyo religion.”[11]
In
his Address, Aug. 22, 1969, Paul VI praised the Hindu Ghandi, and stated that he was quote: “Ever conscious
of God’s presence…”[12]
Hindus
are pagans and idolaters who worship many different false gods. For Paul VI to praise the notorious Hindu
Ghandi as ever-conscious of God’s presence shows again that Paul VI was a
complete apostate. Paul VI also
officially praised the false religion of Hinduism in the official Vatican II
document Nostra Aetate #2 on
non-Christian religions.
Paul
VI, Apostolic Exhortation, Dec. 8, 1975: “The Church respects and esteems these
non-Christian religions…”[13]
Notice
again that Paul VI esteems false religions; this is purely Satanic.
Paul
VI, Address, Aug. 24, 1974: “Religious and cultural differences in India, as you
have said, are honored and respected… We
are pleased to see that this mutual honor and esteem is practiced…”[14]
Paul
VI says that religious differences are honored in India and that he is pleased
to see this. This means that he honors
the worship of false gods.
Paul
VI, Address to Synod of Bishops, Sept. 2, 1974: “Likewise we cannot omit a
reference to the non-Christian
religions. These, in fact, must no
longer be regarded as rivals, or obstacles to Evangelization…”[15]
Here
Paul VI boldly reveals that he is preaching a new Gospel. Non-Christian religions, he tells us, are no
longer our obstacle to Evangelization.
This is an Antichrist religion of apostasy.
Pope
Gregory XVI, Mirari Vos (# 13), Aug. 15, 1832: “They should consider the
testimony of Christ Himself that ‘those who are not with Christ are against
Him,’ (Lk. 11:23) and that they disperse unhappily who do not gather
with Him. Therefore, ‘without a
doubt, they will perish forever, unless they hold the Catholic faith whole and
inviolate” (Athanasian Creed).
Paul
VI, Address to Dalai Lama, Sept. 30, 1973: “We are happy to welcome Your
Holiness today… You come to us from Asia, the cradle of ancient religions and human traditions which are rightly held in deep
veneration.”[16]
Paul
VI tells us that it is right to hold false religions which worship false gods
in deep veneration. Thus, Paul VI
worshipped the false gods of these religions, and he was encouraging others to
worship them as well by respecting such idolatry.
Paul
VI, Address, August, 1969: “…Uganda includes differing faiths which respect and
esteem one another.”[17]
This
again is total apostasy.
Paul
VI, Message to Pagan Shinto Priests, March 3, 1976: “We know the fame of your
temple, and the wisdom that is represented so vividly by the images contained
therein.”[18]
This
may be the most evil, revealing and heretical statement that the apostate Paul
VI ever uttered. He is praising the
wisdom contained in the images in the pagan Shinto Temple; in other words, he
is praising the idols of the Shintoists themselves!
Paul VI on Buddhism
Buddhism
is a false pagan religion of the East which believes in re-incarnation and
karma. Buddhists hold that life is not worth
living, and that every form of conscious existence is an evil. Buddhists worship various false gods. Buddhism is a disgusting, idolatrous and
false religion of the devil. Here is
what Paul VI thought about Buddhism:
Paul
VI, General Audience to Japanese Buddhists, Sept. 5, 1973: “It is a great pleasure for us to welcome
the members of the Japanese Buddhists Europe Tour, honored followers of the
Soto-shu sect of Buddhism… At the Second Vatican Council the Catholic
Church exhorted her sons and daughters to study and evaluate the religious
traditions of mankind and to ‘learn by sincere and patient dialogue what
treasures a bountiful God has distributed among the nations of the earth’ (Ad Gentes, 11)… Buddhism is one of the riches of Asia…”[19]
According
to Paul VI, the false, pagan and idolatrous religion of Buddhism is one of the
riches of Asia.
Paul
VI, General Audience to Japanese Buddhist Mission Tour, Oct. 24, 1973: “Once
again it is our pleasure to welcome a distinguished group of Japan Buddhist Mission
Tour. We are happy to reiterate the
esteem we have for your country, your
noble traditions…”[20]
Paul
VI, Speech to Tibetan Buddhist Spiritual Leader, Jan. 17, 1975: “The Second
Vatican Council has expressed sincere
admiration for Buddhism in its various forms… We wish Your Holiness and all
your faithful an abundance of Prosperity and Peace.”[21]
Notice
his idolatry and total apostasy in admiring the false religion of Buddhism.
Paul
VI, Address, June 5, 1972, Speech to Buddhists: “It is with great cordiality and esteem that we greet so
distinguished a group of Buddhist
leaders from Thailand... We have a
profound regard for… your precious
traditions.”[22]
Paul
VI to a group of Buddhist Leaders, June 15, 1977: “To the distinguished group of
Buddhist leaders from Japan we bid a warm welcome. The
Second Vatican Council declared that the Catholic Church looks with sincere
respect on your way of life…On this occasion we are happy to recall the
words of St. John: ‘The world, with all it craves for, is coming to an end; but
anyone who does the will of God will remains forever’.”[23]
He
first says that the Catholic Church looks with sincere respect upon the
Buddhists’ way of life. This is
apostasy. He then says that on this
occasion we must recall the words of St. John: anyone who does the will of God
remains forever. This clearly means that
Buddhists will live forever, that is, they will be saved. This is total
apostasy.
Paul
VI, Address to Buddhist Patriarch of Laos, June 8, 1973: “… Buddhism… the Catholic Church considers its spiritual riches with esteem and
respects and wishes to collaborate with
you, as religious men, to bring about real peace and the salvation of man.”[24]
Paul
VI says that the Catholic Church considers with esteem the spiritual riches of
the false religion of Buddhism. He then
says that he wishes to collaborate with the Buddhist Patriarch to bring about
the salvation of man. This is apostasy.
Paul VI on Islam
Islam
is a false religion which denies the Divinity of Christ and rejects the Most
Holy Trinity. Besides rejecting the true
God, Islam allows polygamy up to four wives, and its followers (Muslims) spread
this false religion with a zeal unequalled by the others. Islam is the most viciously anti-Christian
major false religion in the world. To
convert to Christianity in many Islamic countries means death; and the
propagation of the true Faith is strictly prohibited by the Muslims. Islamic society is one of the most evil
things in human history. Here is what
Paul VI thought about this false religion which rejects Christ and the Trinity:
Paul
VI, Speech, Sept. 9, 1972: “We would also like you to know that the Church
recognizes the riches of the Islamic
faith – a faith that binds us to the one God.”[25]
Here
he is speaking about the “riches” of the Islamic Faith, a “Faith” that rejects
Jesus Christ and the Trinity. He says
this “Faith” binds us to the One God.
This is apostasy.
Paul
VI, Address, Sept. 18, 1969: “…Moslems… along with us adore the one and
merciful God, who on the last day will judge mankind.”[26]
Moslems
don’t worship the one true God, the Holy Trinity, together with Catholics. This is apostasy. And Moslems certainly don’t worship God who
will judge mankind on the last day, Jesus Christ.
Paul
VI, Address to Muslim Ambassador, June 4, 1976: “... Moroccan Moslems … our
brothers in faith in the one God. You
will always be made very welcome and you will find esteem and understanding
here.”[27]
He
says that Muslims are brothers in the Faith.
This is apostasy. He then says
that Muslims will always find esteem
at the Vatican.
Paul
VI, Address, Dec. 2, 1977: “…the Moslems (who) profess to hold the faith of
Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, mankind’s judge
on the last day, as the Second Vatican Council solemnly declared.” [28]
Paul
VI, Address, August, 1969: “…Our lively desire to greet, in your persons, the
great Moslem communities spread throughout Africa? You thus enable Us to manifest here Our high
respect for the faith you profess… In recalling the Catholic and Anglican
Martyrs, We gladly recall also those confessors of the Moslem faith who were
the first to suffer death…”[29]
He
mentions his high respect for the false faith of Islam, and he commemorates
Muslims who witnessed to this false religion through death. This is total
apostasy.
Paul
VI, Angelus Address, Aug. 3, 1969: “Twenty-two
martyrs were recognized, but there were many more, and not only
Catholics. There were also Anglicans and some Mohammedans.”[30]
This
is the most heretical statement we’ve ever seen regarding the heresy that there
are non-Catholic martyrs; for he says that Muslims, who don’t even believe in
Christ or the Trinity, are martyrs, in addition to Anglicans. This is amazing.
Pope
Eugene IV, Council of Florence, 1441, ex cathedra:
“….nobody can be saved, no matter how much he has given
away in alms and even if he has shed blood in the name of Christ, unless he has
persevered in the bosom and unity of the Catholic Church.”
Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, dogmatic Athanasian
Creed, 1439: “Whoever wishes
to be saved, needs above all to hold the Catholic faith; unless each one
preserves this whole and inviolate, he will without a doubt perish in
eternity…”[31]
“Great Religions”
Only
the Catholic religion is great; the rest are false and of the devil. But Paul VI asserted that false religions of
the devil are great countless times.
This is a total rejection of the Catholic Faith.
Paul
VI, Speech, Nov. 29, 1973: “We likewise
rejoice when we recognize venerable and wise voices from the great religious
traditions of Asia… The Catholic Church has sincere respect and admiration
for those traditions.”[32]
Paul
VI, Encylical Ecclesiam Suam, Aug. 6,
1964: “And finally we have the followers of the great Afro-Asiatic religions.”[33]
Paul
VI, Address, Aug. 31, 1969: “…the holy places of the three great monotheistic
religions.”[34]
Paul
VI, Address, Dec. 3, 1970: “All the
great religions of the world meet here; Moslem, Buddhist, Hindu, Confucianist
and Christian.”[35]
Paul
VI, Address to Students from India, June 11, 1971: “... we fulfilled a
long-cherished desire to visit your land
of ancient culture, the cradle of great religions…”[36]
Paul
VI, Speech, Aug. 12, 1971: “…revered Patriarch of three great religions.”[37]
Paul
VI, July 6, 1974: “…the document that saw the light on 28 October 1965, that
is, the declaration Nostra Aetate [on non-Christian religions] on relations of the Church with those great
religious creeds.”[38]
He
says that the creeds of false religions are great.
Paul
VI, Address, Oct. 5, 1972: “…a new atmosphere in relations between the Catholic
Church and followers of the other great
world religions… the great non-Christian religions…”[39]
Paul
VI, Speech, Sept. 5, 1974: “The religions represented here today, like all the great religions of the world,
are rich in teaching…”[40]
Paul
VI, Angelus Message, Sept. 16, 1973: “…the land from which flow the three great
monotheistic religions…”[41]
Paul
VI, Address, April 8, 1976: “… with due regard for the millions of followers of
the three great monotheistic religions…”[42]
Paul
VI, Audience, Sept. 25, 1968: “…the collaboration of Christians with the adepts of the great non-Christian
religions…”[43]
Paul
VI, Address, Dec. 13, 1976: “…the faithful of the three great monotheistic
religions.”[44]
Paul
VI, Address, Feb. 13, 1978: “…the three great monotheistic religions…”[45]
Paul
VI, Speech, April 29, 1978: “… the three great monotheistic religions of
Judaism, Christianity and Islam… are joined in brotherhood by the worship they
offer to the one and only God.”[46]
Paul
VI, Discourse, Dec. 21, 1973: “… the three great monotheistic religions…”[47]
Paul
VI, Homily, Jan. 1, 1976: “…to the followers of the great Religions…”[48]
Paul
VI, Address, June 21, 1976: “…the three great monotheistic religions.”[49]
Paul
VI, Address, Jan. 14, 1978: “… with other great religions…”[50]
Religious Liberty
Paul
VI, Address, July 9, 1969: “She [the Church] has also affirmed, during Her long
history, at the cost of oppression and persecution, freedom for everyone to
profess his own religion. No one, She
says, is to be restrained from acting, no one is to be forced to act in a
manner contrary to his own beliefs… As we said, the Council demanded a true and
public religious freedom…”[51]
Paul
VI, Message, Dec. 10, 1973: “… the repeated violations of the sacred right to
religious liberty in its various aspects and the absence of an international
agreement supporting this right…”[52]
Paul
VI, Letter, July 25, 1975: “…the Holy See rejoices to see specifically
emphasized the right of religious liberty.”[53]
Paul VI doesn’t
discriminate against false religions
Paul
VI, General Audience, June 2, 1971: “Dear friends, it is a pleasure for us to
welcome in St. Peter’s your distinguished group of leaders of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith... We have recently spoken out against all
discrimination based on race, origin, color, culture, sex or religion.”[54]
Paul
VI, Audience, Jan. 3, 1970: “…every type
of discrimination… whether based on sex, race, color,
social condition, language or religion,
is to be overcome and eradicated as contrary to God’s intent.”[55]
Paul
VI, Discourse, May 22, 1974: “…we
reiterate the Church’s often-repeated appeal to banish all discrimination, in
law or in fact, which is based on ‘race, origin, color, culture, sex or religion.’”[56]
Paul
VI, Discourse, May 22, 1974: “…we
reiterate the Church’s often-repeated appeal to banish all discrimination, in
law or in fact, which is based on ‘race, origin, color, culture, sex or religion.’”[57]
Paul
VI, Address, Aug. 1, 1969: “…Christians,
can never forget that the Church condemns ‘any discrimination against men, or
harassment of them, because of their race, color, condition of life, or religion’… a new and truer conception of civilization that founded upon effective
brotherhood… between religions…”[58]
This
means that one religion is as good as another.
The “Orthodox”
The
Eastern Orthodox are Schismatics who reject Papal Infallibility and the last 13
General Councils of the Catholic Church.
They reject that the Holy Ghost proceeds from the Second Person of the
Trinity. They permit divorce and
remarriage, and many of them reject the Immaculate Conception. Here’s what Paul VI thought of these
schismatics:
Paul
VI, Speech, April 19, 1970, Speaking of the deceased schismatic Patriarch of
Moscow: “To the very end he was
conscious and solicitous for his great ministry.”[59]
He
says that leadership in a schismatic church is a great ministry.
Paul
VI, Address, Jan. 24, 1972: “…greet
among us an eminent representative of the venerable Orthodox Church… a man of
great piety...” [60]
Paul
VI, Speech, Jan. 23, 1972: “…the great, venerable and excellent Orthodox
Patriarch…”[61]
Paul
VI, Address to Schismatic Delegation, June 27, 1977: “Then, ten years later, we
paid a visit to your holy Church…”[62]
Paul
VI, General Audience, Jan. 20, 1971: “… the venerable Eastern Orthodox
Churches…”[63]
He
says that schismatic churches are venerable.
Paul
VI, Speaking of the death of the Schismatic Patriarch Athenagoras, July 9,
1972: “…we recommend this great man to you, a man of a venerated Church… ”[64]
Paul
VI, Address, May 25, 1968: “…the venerable Orthodox Church of Bulgaria.”[65]
Paul
VI, Common Declaration with Patriarch of Syrian Schismatic Sect, Oct. 27, 1971:
“This should be done with love, with openness to the promptings of the Holy
Spirit, and with mutual respect for each
other and each other’s Church.”[66]
So
Paul VI respects the rejection of the Papacy and Papal Infallibility.
Paul
VI, Telegram upon election of new Schismatic Patriarch of Constantinople, July,
1972: “At the moment when you assume a heavy charge in the service of the
Church of Christ…”[67]
This
means that the Schismatic Church is the Church of Christ.
Paul
VI, Address, Dec. 14, 1976: “…very dear Brothers, sent by the venerable Church
of Constantinople…we carried out the solemn and sacred ecclesial act of lifting
the ancient anathemas, an act with which we wished to remove the memory of
these events forever from the memory and the heart of the Church…”[68]
The Schismatic Orthodox are anathematized by the
Church for denying the Papacy and not accepting dogmas of the Catholic
Faith. But Paul VI solemnly lifted these
anathemas against them. This means that
Paul VI attempted to overturn the Papacy as a dogma which must be believed
under pain of anathema.
Paul
VI, Letter, March 7, 1971, regarding the death of two schismatic Patriarchs:
“…moved by the death of His Holiness Patriarch Kyrillos VI we express our
sincere sympathy with assurance of our prayers for the eternal repose of your
beloved pastor and for God’s consoling
blessing on the entire Coptic Orthodox Church.”[69]
Notice
two things: First, Paul VI says that he will pray for soul of the dead
schismatic, indicating that the deceased non-Catholic patriarch can be saved,
which is heretical. Second, he calls for
God’s consoling blessing on the entire Coptic Orthodox Church. How about that there is only one true Church
and that the Coptic Schismatic Church is not part of it? How about God’s conversion for the Coptic
Orthodox to the true Church, the Catholic Church. Paul VI’s statement shows again that he holds
that heretical sects are true Churches; and that he holds that the Catholic
Faith is meaningless.
Paul
VI, Speech to Patriarch of Syrian Schismatic sect, Oct. 27, 1971: “…we would
like to express once more our joy and
our gratitude to God that we have
had the opportunity to meet with the spiritual head of the Syrian Orthodox
Church… your Church has given
witness to Our Lord Jesus Christ…”[70]
Pope Gregory XVI, May
27, 1832: “Be not deceived, my brother;
if anyone follows a schismatic, he will not attain the inheritance of the
kingdom of God.”[71]
Paul
VI, Letter to Schismatic, November, 1976: “… the first Pan-Orthodox Conference
in preparation for the Great Holy
Council of the Orthodox Churches is beginning its work… for the best service
of the venerable Orthodox Church.”[72]
He
calls the schismatic Council Holy and the Schismatic Church venerable. Paul VI was a schismatic.
Paul
VI, General Audience, Jan. 24, 1973: “…our brother of venerated memory, the ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople…”[73]
Paul
VI, Address, Oct. 22, 1973: “…our brothers in Rumania with whom we are united
by the same Christian Faith but who are not yet in full communion with the
Catholic Church…”[74]
He
says that he shares the same Christian Faith with those who are not in
communion with the Catholic Church, namely, Rumanian schismatics who reject the
Papacy. This means that the Papacy is
not an essential part of the Christian Faith.
Paul
VI, Address to Schismatic “Pope” Shenouda III, May 11, 1973: “As you return to
your See and to your country, may we ask Your Holiness to convey our greetings
to the faithful of your own Church.”[75]
Paul
VI says that the Schismatic Patriarch occupies a See and that the members of
his Church are the faithful. This is
totally heretical and totally schismatical.
Pope Gregory XVI, Summo Iugiter Studio, May
27, 1832: “… in the decree on faith
which Innocent III published with the synod of Lateran IV, these things are
written: ‘There is one universal Church of all the faithful outside of which
no one is saved.’ …”
Paul
VI, Message concerning deceased Russian
Schismatic, April 7, 1972: “…we express to Your Eminence and the Holy
Synod of the Georgian Orthodox Church our sincere condolences with the assurance of our prayers for the
eternal repose of your pastor…”[76]
Paul
VI, Message, May 23, 1968, to the
Schismatic Patriarch of Moscow: “…Holiness,
on the occasion of the celebrations for the fiftieth anniversary for the day
when the Synod of the whole Orthodox Church of Russia re-established the
Patriarchal See of Moscow… we have delegated to participate in the solemn
celebrations which will take place in your Patriarchal City our very dear brothers in the Episcopate…”[77]
Paul VI, Speech to Schismatic, July
1, 1978: “We receive you with affection and esteem.”[78]
Paul
VI, General Audience, Nov. 30, 1977: “We greet you joyfully, beloved brothers, who represent here His
Holiness Patriarch Pimen and the
Russian Orthodox Church… all our
esteem and brotherly love to His
Holiness Patriarch Pimen, to his clergy and to the whole people of the faithful.”[79]
Paul
VI went on to say in a letter about the schismatic Athenagoras (July, 1972):
“…we pray the Lord to receive into His heavenly kingdom him…”[80]
Paul
VI, Joint Declaration with the Schismatic “Pope” Shenouda III, May 10, 1973:
“Paul VI, Bishop of Rome and Pope of the Catholic Church, and Shenounda III, Pope of Alexandria and
Patriarch of the See of St. Mark… In the name of this charity, we reject all forms of proselytism… Let it
cease, where it may exist…”[81]
This
is all one really needs to see to know that Paul VI was a schismatic and not a
Catholic. He makes a Joint Declaration
with a schismatic “Pope.” He
acknowledges this schismatic as the holder of the See of St. Mark; and this is
a blasphemy against the Papacy and the Church, since this schismatic holds no
authority whatsoever. And he rejects all
forms of proselytism – that is, trying to convert the schismatics – and he says
“let is cease where it may exist.” He
could not be more of a formal heretic and schismatic.
Pope Leo XIII, Satis
Cognitum (# 13), June 29, 1896:
“You are
not to be looked upon as holding the true Catholic faith if you do not teach
that the faith of Rome is to be held.”[82]
Pope Benedict XIV, Allatae Sunt (#19), July 26, 1755:
“First, the
missionary who is attempting with God’s help to bring back Greek and eastern
schismatics to unity should devote all his effort to the single-objective of
delivering them from doctrines at variance with the Catholic faith.”[83]
Pope Benedict XIV, Allatae Sunt (#19):
“For the
only work entrusted to the missionary is that of recalling the Oriental
to the Catholic faith…”[84]
Paul VI on other Protestant Sects
Protestantism
began with the German priest Martin Luther, who left the Catholic Church and
started the Protestant revolution in 1517.
Luther denied free will, the Papacy, praying to the Saints, Purgatory,
Tradition, Transubstantiation and the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. Luther replaced the Mass with a memorial
service commemorating the Last Supper.
All the sacraments except Baptism and the Holy Eucharist were
rejected. Luther held that after the
fall of Adam man cannot produce any good works.
Most Protestants hold the same beliefs as Luther, but all of them reject
numerous Catholic dogmas. Here’s what
Paul VI thought of these heretics and schismatics:
Paul
VI, Angelus Address, Jan. 17, 1971: “From polemical opposition among the
various Christian denominations we have passed to mutual respect…”[85]
Here
Paul VI reveals that the Vatican II agenda with regard to Protestant sects has
gone from polemical opposition – in other words, an opposition to their false
doctrines – to an attitude of acceptance of and mutual respect for their false
religion.
Paul
VI, Speech to Representatives of non-Catholic churches in Geneva, June, 1969
“The spirit that animates us…This spirit lays down, as the first basis of every
fruitful contact between different confessions, that each profess his faith
loyally.”[86]
Paul
VI is saying that the Protestants should not become Catholic, but remain loyal
to their own sects.
Paul
VI, Homily, Jan. 25, 1973: “…express a respectful and affectionate thought in
Christ to Christians of other denominations residing in this city and assure
them of our esteem…”[87]
This
is an incredible homily. He is assuring
the heretics of other denominations of his esteem. And notice that Paul doesn’t even personally
know all the people that he is esteeming; but he is assuring them of his esteem
simply because he knows that they belong to one of these sects!
Paul
VI, Letter, Aug. 6, 1973, to the World Council of Churches: “The World Council of Churches has been
created in order, by the grace of God, to serve the Churches and Ecclesial
Communities in their endeavors to
restore and to manifest to all that perfect communion in faith and love which
is the gift of Christ to His Church.”[88]
The
World Council of Churches is an organization made up of many different sects
and denominations. A Traditional
Commentator would correctly label it a Communist front group. But it is undoubtedly a heretical and
ecumenical organization made of various man-made religions. Paul VI says that the World Council of
Churches has been created to restore and to manifest to all that perfect
communion in faith and love which is the gift of Christ to His Church. Notice the astounding implication of this
statement. The perfect communion in
faith and charity which is the gift of Christ to His Church is the organization
of the Catholic Church, the Universal Church of Christ. But Paul VI says that this is manifested by
the World Council of Churches! He has
replaced the Catholic Church with the World Council of Churches.
Paul
VI, Discourse, Dec. 12, 1968: “…our sons are on friendly terms with their
Christian brothers, Lutheran Evangelicals…”[89]
Pope Pius
IV, profession of faith, Council of Trent, ex cathedra: “This true Catholic faith,
outside of which no one can be saved… I now profess and truly hold…”[90]
Paul
VI, Address, April 28, 1977:
“…relations between the Catholic Church and the Anglican Communion… these words of hope ‘The Anglican Communion
united not absorped’ are no longer a mere dream.”[91]
This
means that Paul VI wants to unite with the Anglican sect without absorbing
them, that is, without converting them.
Paul
VI, Speech, Aug. 2, 1969: “We wished to meet the Anglican Church which
flourishes in this country. We wished to
pay homage to those sons of whom it is most proud, those who – together with
our own Catholic martyrs – gave the generous witness of their lives to the
Gospel...”[92]
Paul
VI, Speaking of the death of the Protestant Martin Luther King, Jr., April 7,
1968: “…we shall all share the hopes which his martyrdom inspires in us.”[93]
Pope Gregory XVI, May
27, 1832:
“Finally some of
these misguided people attempt to persuade themselves and others that men are
not saved only in the Catholic religion, but that even heretics may attain
eternal life.”[94]
Marriage
Paul
VI, Speech to Roman Rota, Feb. 9, 1976: “There is certainly no doubt about the
significance the Council attached to conjugal
love, since it declared this to be the perfect marital condition and the
highest goal, toward which spouses are counseled to direct their life together.”[95]
Pope Pius XI, Casti
Connubii (# 17), Dec. 31, 1930: “The
primary end of marriage is the procreation and the education of children.”[96]
Paul VI on Birth Control
Paul
VI favored birth Control.
Paul
VI, Speech, Nov. 16, 1970: “…this, among other effects, will undoubtedly favor a rational control of birth by couples…”[97]
Paul VI, Address, Aug. 24, 1969: “…the liberty of
husband and wife and does not forbid them a moral and reasonable limitation of
birth…”[98]
Paul VI, Humanae
Vitae, (No. 16) July 25, 1968: “It cannot be denied that in each case the
married couple, for acceptable reasons, are both perfectly clear in their
intention to avoid children and wish to make sure that none will result.”[99]
Paul
VI says that couples are perfectly free to have zero children if they want to.
Paul VI on the United Nations
The
United Nations is an evil organization that promotes contraception, abortion
and looks to take control of the decision-making for every country on the
planet. Former UN Secretary General U
Thant praised the Communist Lenin as a man whose “ideals were reflected in the
United Nations Charter.”[100] Here’s what Paul VI thought of the UN:
Paul
VI, Address, Feb. 5, 1972: “…we have faith in the UN.”[101]
Paul
VI, Message, April 26, 1968: “…may all men of heart join together peacefully in
order that the principles of the United Nations may be not only proclaimed, but
put into effect, and that not only the constitution of States may promulgate
them, but public authorities apply them…”[102]
Paul
VI, Message to President of a U.N. Conference, May, 1976: “…this new
international economic order that has to be ceaselessly built up.”[103]
Paul
VI, Message, Sept. 8, 1977: “Stress is legitimately laid nowadays on the
necessity of constructing a new world order...”[104]
Paul
VI, Message to United Nations, May 24, 1978: “… we are aware that the path
which must lead to the coming of a new international order… cannot in any case
be as short as we would like it to be… Disarmament, a new world order and
development are three obligations that are inseparably bound together…”[105]
Paul
VI, Address to Secretary General of the U.N., July 9, 1977: “We wish to listen
to the voice of the authorized representative of the United Nations
Organization… all this merely emphasizes more the beneficial and irreplaceable
role of the United Nations Organization…”[106]
Paul
VI, Address to Secretary General of the U.N., July 9, 1977: “We wish to listen
to the voice of the authorized representative of the United Nations
Organization… all this merely emphasizes more the beneficial and irreplaceable
role of the United Nations Organization…”[107]
Paul
VI, Message to U.N., Oct. 4, 1970: “Today we wish once more to repeat the words
which we had the honor to pronounce on 4th October 1965 from the
tribune of your assembly: ‘This
Organization represents the path that has to be taken for modern civilization and
for world peace… Where else,
moreover, could these governments and peoples better find a bridge to link
them, a table round which they can gather, and a tribunal where they may plead
the cause of justice and peace?... who
better than the United Nations Organization and its specialized agencies will
be able to take up the challenge presented to all mankind?... There exists in
effect a common good of man, and it is up to your Organization, because of its
dedication to universality, which is its reason for being, to promote it
untiringly.”[108]
First,
he says that the U.N. is the path that has to be taken; and he says that the
U.N., not the Church, is the best means for the cause of justice and peace for
the world. Second, he says that the U.N.
is better than the Church. Third, he
says that the U.N. is the universal (that is, Catholic) body for mankind. He is replacing the Church with the UN.
Paul VI and the worship of man
Paul
VI, Address, Feb. 7, 1971: “All honor then to man!”[109]
Paul
VI, Address, Aug. 1, 1969: “…do not let yourselves become discouraged by the
obstacles and difficulties that constantly arise; do not lose faith in man.”[110]
Paul
VI, Message, March 25, 1971: “…man, to whom all things on earth should be
related as their center and crown.”[111]
This is blasphemy.
If all things on earth should be related to man as their center and
crown, then everything should be measured by man’s law, not God’s. This means that man is actually God–
everything is to be related to him.
Paul
VI, Speech, Nov. 18, 1971: “On our visit to Bombay we emphasized: ‘Man must
meet man.’”[112]
Paul
VI, Audience, Jan. 10, 1972: “For the demands of justice, Gentlemen, can only
be gathered in the light of truth, that truth which is man…”[113]
This
means that man is the truth.
Paul
VI, Address, April 11, 1973: “…always anxious to safeguard, above everything
else, the primacy of man…”[114]
In
his Angelus Address, Jan. 27, 1974, Paul VI spoke positively of: “…the cult of
man for man’s sake.”[115]
Paul
VI, Address, Feb. 15, 1974: “…as Your Excellency has rightly recalled – that
the final aim is man…”[116]
Paul
VI, Address, Dec. 29, 1968: “The Christian mystery which rests on Man…”[117]
Paul
VI, Audience, April 28, 1969: “In the final analysis, there are no true riches
but man…”[118]
Paul
VI, Angelus Address, July 20, 1969: “We would do well to meditate on man…”[119]
Paul
VI, General Audience, July 28, 1971: “The dignity of man! We will never be able to appreciate and honor
it enough.”[120]
Paul
VI, Discourse, Sept. 4, 1968: “…the themes which today pre-occupy religion, be
it Catholic or non-Catholic, all these converge from different directions upon
one central, dominant focus, namely: man.
‘According to the almost unanimous opinion of believers and unbelievers
alike, all things on earth should be related to man as their center and
crown.’”[121]
Paul
VI, Angelus Message, July 13, 1975: “…the most precious science of all, the
science of knowing oneself, of reflecting, almost dreaming, about one’s own
conscience… Long live the holiday free of other commitments, but occupied in
exploring the secrets of one’s own life.”[122]
Think
about this astounding message. He
doesn’t say that theology, the study of God, is the most precious science; but
he says it is the science of knowing oneself and dreaming about one’s own
conscience. He also says long live the
holiday (that is, long live the holy day) free of other commitments (perhaps
attending Mass), and long live the holy day occupied in exploring the secrets
of one’s own life. In other words, he
wants a holy day about yourself with no other commitments. This is clearly the worship of man.
Paul
VI, Angelus Message, Sept. 26, 1976: “We are in ecstasy of admiration for the
human countenance…”[123]
Paul
VI, Speech, June 28, 1978: “… Every child has the right to live childhood to
the full and to make an original contribution to the humanizing of society…”[124]
Paul
VI, Address, Oct. 16, 1976: “…if the Gospel is for man, we Christians are
completely for the Gospel.”[125]
Notice
that he only says that we are for the Gospel if the Gospel is for man.
Paul
VI, Address, Dec. 4, 1976: “…above all ideological conditionings, the greatness
and dignity of the human person must emerge as the only value to promote and
defend.”[126]
Paul
VI, Christmas Message, Dec. 25, 1976: “Let us honor fallen and sinful
humanity.”[127]
Paul
VI, Speech, June 10, 1969: “For in the final analysis there is no true riches
but the riches of man.”[128]
Paul VI on Christmas
Paul
VI, General Audience, Dec. 17, 1969: “… Christmas is the birthday of Life. Of our life.”[129]
Christmas
is the Birthday of Jesus Christ. It is
not the Birthday of Our Life, because we are not Jesus Christ. But this is what Paul VI is preaching.
Paul
VI, Angelus Address, Dec. 21, 1974: “A merry Christmas to you… It is the feast
of human life…”[130]
Paul
VI, Christmas Message, Dec. 25, 1976: “Brethren, let us honor in the Birth of
Christ the incipient life of man.”[131]
The
word incipient means “Beginning; in
an initial stage.”[132] So, Paul VI is saying that in the Birth of Christ
we find in the beginning stages of the life of man. This clearly means that man is Christ.
Paul
VI, Angelus Message, Dec. 18, 1976: “Christmas is a feast of mankind…
dedicated, as a happy effect, to honor human existence.”[133]
Paul VI preaching that man is god
Paul
VI, Speech to Bishops’ Assembly, Nov. 28, 1970: “We are the heirs of the
apostles; we are Christ working in
history and the world.”[134]
Paul
VI, Address, Dec. 15, 1969: “…all mankind, capable of becoming of the Mystical
‘Christ today, Christ for us, Christ entire.’”[135]
Paul
VI, Message, Dec. 20, 1968: “We live in the era of hope. It is, however, a hope in the kingdom of this
earth, a hope in human self-sufficiency.”[136]
According
to Paul VI, the hope is not in God or His Kingdom, but in human
self-sufficiency.
Paul
VI, General Audience, Aug. 16, 1972: “Man is master of himself... He is free
who is the cause of himself.”[137]
Man is
not the cause of himself. God creates
man.
Paul
VI, Speech, Sept. 12, 1970: “…the only word which explains Man is God himself
made Man, the Word made Flesh.”[138]
This
clearly means that man is God Himself made man, Our Lord Jesus Christ.
Pope Pius X, E Supremi Apostolatus, Oct. 4, 1903: “… the distinguishing mark of Antichrist, man
has with infinite temerity put himself in the place of God…”[139]
Other changes made by Paul VI
On
November 13, 1964, Paul VI gave away the triple-crowned papal tiara. Paul VI had the tiara auctioned at the New
York World’s fair.[140] The
Papal Tiara is a sign of a true Pope’s authority, the three crowns
representing the dogmatic, liturgical and disciplinary authority of a
Pope. By giving it away, Paul VI was
symbolically giving away the authority of the Papacy (although he had none to
give away since he was actually an Antipope).
But it was a symbolic act of how he was a satanic infiltrator whose
whole mission was to attempt to destroy the Catholic Church.
Paul VI was also seen many
times wearing the breast-plate of the Ephod, a.k.a. the rational of Judgment,
of a Jewish High-Priest. Notice the
twelve
stones which represent the twelve tribes of Israel. Not
only is this the breast-plate of a Jewish High-Priest, but according to the Encyclopedia of Freemasonry by Mackey, the ephod is also
"worn in the (Masonic) American Chapters of the Royal Arch, by the
High-Priest as an official part of his official ornaments." The
ephod was the vestment that was worn by Caiphas, the High Priest of the Jewish
religion, who ordered Our Lord Jesus Christ to be put to death by Crucifixion.
Antipope Paul VI wore the
breast-plate of the Ephod, a.k.a. the Rational of Judgment of the High-Priest,
numerous times. God allows things such as this
to come out to show the people that these men are infiltrators and enemies of
the Catholic Church.
Paul VI, John Paul I, and John Paul II have carried
a cross that very few have understood.
This bent or broken cross was used by black magicians and sorcerers in
the sixth century to represent the Biblical term “mark of the beast.” The fact it was used for occult purposes can
be seen in the Museum of Witchcraft in Bayonne, France.[141]
Antipope
Paul VI was the man who authoritatively implemented the false Second Vatican
Council, changed the Catholic Mass into a Protestant service, and changed the
rite of every single Sacrament. He
changed the matter or form of the Eucharist, Extreme Unction, Holy Orders, and
Confirmation. Antipope Paul VI wanted to
put Christ to death in the Mass (by removing it and replacing it with a
counterfeit) and wanted to kill His Catholic Church by attempting to change the
Church completely.
Within
two years of the close of Vatican II, Paul VI removed the index of forbidden
books, a decision one commentator rightly called “incomprehensible.”
Paul
VI then abolished the oath against modernism, at a time when Modernism was
flourishing as never before.
On
Nov. 21, 1970,[142]
Paul VI also excluded all Cardinals over 80 years of age from participating in
Papal elections.
Paul
VI disestablished the papal court, disbanded the Noble Guard and the Palatine
Guards.[143]
Paul
VI abolished the rite of Tonsure, all four Minor Orders, and the rank of
Subdiaconate.[144]
“Paul VI gave back to the Muslims the Standard of
Lepanto. The history of the flag was
venerable. It was taken from a Turkish
admiral during a great naval battle in 1571.
While Pope St. Pius V fasted and prayed the Rosary, an out-numbered
Christian fleet defeated a much larger Moslem navy, thus saving Christendom
from the infidel. In honor of the
miraculous victory, Pius V instituted the Feast of Our Lady of the Most Holy
Rosary to commemorate her intercession.
In one dramatic act Paul VI renounced not only a remarkable Christian
victory, but the prayers and sacrifices of a great Pope and saint.”[145]
Under Paul VI the Holy Office was reformed: its
primary function now was research, not defending the Catholic faith.[146]
According to those who watched film of Paul VI’s
visit to Fatima, they claim he did not pray one Hail Mary.[147]
In 1969, Paul VI removed forty saints from the
official liturgical calendar.[148]
Paul VI removed solemn exorcisms from the baptismal
rite. In the place of the solemn exorcisms he substituted an optional prayer
that makes only a passing reference to fighting the devil.[149]
Paul VI granted more than 32,000 requests from
priests who had asked to be released from their vows and returned to lay status
– the greatest exodus from the priesthood since the Reformation.[150]
Paul VI's disastrous influence was visible immediately. For example, in Holland not a single
candidate applied for admission to the priesthood in 1970, and within 12 months
every seminary there was closed.[151] Spiritual destruction was everywhere;
countless millions left the Church; countless others ceased practicing their
Faith and confessing their sins.
And while
Paul VI was the cause of this unrelenting disaster and spiritual destruction,
like the sly serpent he was, he calculatingly misdirected the attention away
from himself. In perhaps his most famous
quotation, he noted that Satan’s smoke had made its way into the Temple of God.
Paul
VI, Homily, June 29, 1972: “Satan’s smoke has made its way into the Temple of
God through some crack’…”[152]
When Paul
VI made this statement, everyone looked at the Cardinals, the Bishops and the
Priests to discover where this smoke of Satan might be. They looked at everyone except the man who
made the statement. But Paul VI was actually the smoke of Satan, and he made
the statement to misdirect people away from himself, which he was successful in
doing. And what is perhaps most
frightening is that Paul VI’s famous statement is basically a direct reference
to Apocalypse 9:1-3.
Apoc.
9:1-3: “And there was given to him the key of the bottomless pit. And he opened the bottomless pit: and the
smoke of the pit arose, as the smoke of a great furnace…”
In
Apocalypse 9 we see a direct reference to the smoke of Satan, and to someone
who is given the key to unleash it.
Antipope Paul VI did not have the keys of Peter, but he was given the
key to the bottomless pit. He was the
one who brought in the smoke of Satan from the great furnace; as he says, from
some crack.
Jean
Guitton, an intimate friend of Paul VI, related what Paul VI said at the final
session of Vatican II: “It was the final session of the Council,” Guitton
wrote, “the most essential, in which Paul VI was to bestow on all humanity the
teachings of the Council. He announced
this to me on that day with these words, ‘I am about to blow the seven trumpets
of the Apocalypse.’”[153]
Paul
VI, Speech to Lombard Seminary, Dec. 7, 1968: “The Church finds herself in an
hour of disquiet, of self-criticism, one
might say even of self-destruction …The
Church is wounding herself.”[154]
Here
Antipope Paul VI again mocks the people.
He says the Church is in “self-destruction” and is “wounding
herself.” He is referring to himself
again; for he was the one trying to destroy her and wound her at every turn.
Paul VI’s belief in “Magic”
The Oxford Illustrated
Dictionary
defines magic as: “Pretended art of influencing events by occult control of
nature or of spirits, witchcraft…”[155]
Catholics
are forbidden to practice magic. But
Paul VI promoted magic.
Paul
VI, Homily, Nov. 12, 1972: “Where does it come from, this interior magic that banishes
fear…”[156]
Paul
VI, General Audience, Dec. 30, 1970: “…invisible
but overpowering magic of the
flood of public opinion…”[157]
Paul
VI, Message, Jan. 1, 1975: “Reconciliation!... Could not this magic word find a place in the dictionary of your hopes…”[158]
Paul
VI, Homily, May 11, 1975: “You, artists of the theatre and the cinema… who
possess the magic art of offering
with voice and with music… the real-life scene of the event…”[159]
Paul
VI, Speech, May 18, 1969: “Everything is transformed under the magical influence of science…”[160]
Paul
VI, Message to Brazilian People, February, 1972: “Service: a magic word that galvanizes into action…”[161]
Paul
VI, Address, June 23, 1973: “…the religious root seems to have lost so much of
its magical power of inspiration?”[162]
Why does
Paul VI speak so much about magic? It is
precisely because he knows that it was Black Magic that allowed him, a Satanic
infiltrator, to fool the world into thinking that he was a Pope so he could
then destroy the Mass and almost the entire Catholic Church. He knows that it was his Black Magic that
allowed him to get away with changing the rite to every sacrament and foist his
new Vatican II religion upon the world.
Paul VI admits his Church is the Whore of Babylon
In the
Apocalypse, Chapters 17 and 18, there is predicted that a whore will arise in
the last days from the city of seven hills, which is Rome. This whore will tred upon the blood of the
martyrs and Saints; and this whore is clearly contrasted with the immaculate
bride of Christ, the Catholic Church. In
other words, the whore of Babylon will be a false church from Rome that will
appear in the last days. In our
material, we have demonstrated the evidence that this whore of Babylon is the
Vatican II sect, a false bride which arises in Rome in the last days in order
to deceive the Catholic Faithful.
In
her appearance at La Salette, France, Sept. 19, 1846, the Blessed Mother
predicted: “Rome will lose the Faith and
become the seat of the Anti-Christ… the Church will be in eclipse.”
In the
following quote Antipope Paul VI admits that his new Church is this false
church by admitting that his church has thrown off its opposition to the world,
which characterizes the true Church.
Paul
VI, General Audience, Oct. 1, 1969: “On the other hand, She [the Church] is also trying to adapt herself and assimilate herself
to the world’s ways; She is taking
off her distinctive sacral garment, for She wants to feel more human and
earthly.
“She is tending to let herself be absorbed
by the social and temporal milieu. She
has almost been seized by human respect at the thought that She is different in
some way and obliged to have a style of thought and life which is not that of
the world. She is undergoing the world’s changes and degradations with conformist,
almost avante-garde zeal.”[163]
Here
Paul VI admits that the post-Vatican II Church is a false church which has
adapted itself to the world and assimilated the world’s ways with zeal. This is
a stunning admission by Paul VI. He is
admitting in so many words that the post-Vatican II Church is the whore of
Babylon.
When one combines the fact that
Paul VI frequently wore the Jewish Ephod with all of his other systematic
attempts to destroy all of Catholic Tradition, the evidence is strong that he
was a Satanic Jewish infiltrator.
In
fact, Paul VI ancestors were of Jewish origin.
The Montini family are Jews and listed as such in the Golden Book of
Noble Italian Heritage (1962-1964, p.994): “A branch of the…noble family from
Brescia…wherefrom their noble blazon comes and which avows as its sure trunk
and founder, a Bartholomew (Bartolino) de Benedictis, said Montini was of
Hebrew origin.[164]
We have proven in this video
that Paul VI was a complete apostate who believed that false religions are
true; that heresy and schism are fine; and that schismatics should not be
converted, just to name a few.
If you accept Vatican II or the
New Mass or the New Sacramental rites – in short, if you accept the Vatican II religion
– this is the man whose religion you are following: a complete apostate who was
not remotely Catholic, as we have proven, and clearly a man whose whole mission
was to attempt to overturn and destroy as much of the Catholic Faith as
possible.
Catholics must have no part
with Paul VI’s New Mass (the Novus Ordo) and must completely reject Vatican II
and the new sacramental rites. Catholics
must completely reject Antipope Paul VI for the apostate infiltrator that he
was. Catholics must reject and not
support any group which accepts this apostate as a valid Pope, or accepts the
New Mass, Vatican II or the new sacramental rites of Paul VI.
The truth remains that the Catholic Church is the
one Church founded by Christ to which all must belong in order to be saved, and
that this Church still exists in a remnant of Catholics who maintain the
infallible teachings of the true Popes throughout history.
St. Athanasius: “Even if Catholics faithful
to Tradition were reduced to a handful, they would be the true Church.”
“At one
point in the Church’s history, only a few years before Gregory’s [Nazianz]
present preaching (+380 A.D.), perhaps the number of Catholic bishops in
possession of sees, as opposed to Arian bishops in possession of sees, was no
greater than something between 1% and 3% of the total. Had doctrine been determined by popularity,
today we should all be deniers of Christ and opponents of the Spirit.”
(W.A. Jurgens, The Faith of the Early
Fathers, Vol. 2, p. 39.)
If the Arian heresy was so bad that approximately
1% of the jurisdictional bishops remained Catholic and 99% became Arian, and
the Great Apostasy preceding the Second Coming of Christ is predicted to be
even worse – the worst apostasy of all time – then one should not be surprised
by the fact that there are very few Catholics in the world today who preserve
the true Faith and that an Antipope is reigning from Rome (as predicted by Our
Lady of La Salette) and heading a counterfeit Church of apostasy.
Anyone who quotes any
portion of this article must give credit to the author with our website. Permission is granted to make copies of this
article, as long as our name and website are given.
www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com
[1] L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 14, 1972, p. 1.
[2] L’Osservatore Romano, July 5, 1973, p. 1.
[3] The Papal Encyclicals, by Claudia Carlen, Raleigh: The Pierian Press, 1990,Vol. 3 (1903-1939), p. 82.
[4] L’Osservatore Romano, Nov. 16, 1972, p. 1.
[5] The Papal Encyclicals, Vol. 3 (1903-1939), pp. 313-314.
[6] L’Osservatore Romano, Oct. 11, 1973, p. 10.
[7] L’Osservatore Romano, Jan. 20, 1972, p. 1.
[8] L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 22, 1977, p. 2.
[9] L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 18, 1969, p. 2.
[10] L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 17, 1970, p. 7.
[11] L’Osservatore Romano, July 14, 1977, p. 12.
[12] L’Osservatore Romano, Oct. 9, 1969, p. 5.
[13] L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 25, 1975, p. 5.
[14] L’Osservatore Romano, Sept. 12, 1974, p. 2.
[15] L’Osservatore Romano, Oct. 10, 1974, p. 7.
[16] L’Osservatore Romano, Oct. 11, 1973, p. 4.
[17] L’Osservatore Romano, Aug. 14, 1969, p. 12.
[18] L’Osservatore Romano, March 11, 1976, p. 12.
[19] L’Osservatore Romano, Sept. 13, 1973, p. 8.
[20] L’Osservatore Romano, Nov. 1, 1973, p. 1.
[21] L’Osservatore Romano, Jan. 30, 1975, p. 5.
[22] L’Osservatore Romano, June 15, 1972, p. 5.
[23] L’Osservatore Romano, June 23, 1977, p. 5.
[24] L’Osservatore Romano, June 21, 1973, p. 5.
[25] L’Osservatore Romano, Sept. 21, 1972, p. 2.
[26] L’Osservatore Romano, Oct. 2, 1969, p. 2.
[27] L’Osservatore Romano, June 24, 1976, p. 4.
[28] L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 22, 1977, p. 2.
[29] L’Osservatore Romano, Aug. 14, 1969, p. 10.
[30] L’Osservatore Romano, Aug. 7, 1969, p. 1.
[31]Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils, Vol. 1, pp. 550-553; Denzinger 39-40.
[32] L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 13, 1973, p. 11.
[33] The Papal Encyclicals, Vol. 5 (1858-1981), p. 157.
[34] L’Osservatore Romano, Sept. 4, 1969, p. 2.
[35] L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 17, 1970, p. 6.
[36] L’Osservatore Romano, June 24, 1971, p. 5.
[37] L’Osservatore Romano, Aug. 26, 1971, p. 2.
[38] L’Osservatore Romano, July 18, 1974, p. 3.
[39] L’Osservatore Romano, Oct. 19, 1972, p. 3.
[40] L’Osservatore Romano, Sept. 19, 1974, p. 3.
[41] L’Osservatore Romano, Sept. 27, 1973, p. 3.
[42] L’Osservatore Romano, April 15, 1976, p. 1.
[43] L’Osservatore Romano, Oct. 17, 1968, p. 4.
[44] L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 30, 1976, p. 6.
[45] L’Osservatore Romano, Feb. 23, 1978, p. 2.
[46] L’Osservatore Romano, May 11, 1978, p. 2.
[47] L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 27, 1973, p. 4.
[48] L’Osservatore Romano, Jan. 8, 1976, p. 12.
[49] L’Osservatore Romano, July 1, 1976, p. 8.
[50] L’Osservatore Romano, Jan. 26, 1978, p. 7.
[51] L’Osservatore Romano, July 17, 1969, p. 1.
[52] L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 20, 1973, p. 3.
[53] L’Osservatore Romano, Aug. 14, 1975, p. 3.
[54] L’Osservatore Romano, June 10, 1971, p. 12.
[55] L’Osservatore Romano, Jan. 15, 1970, p. 3.
[56] L’Osservatore Romano, June 6, 1974, p. 2.
[57] L’Osservatore Romano, June 6, 1974, p. 2.
[58] L’Osservatore Romano, Aug. 7, 1969, p. 12.
[59] L’Osservatore Romano, April 23, 1970, p. 12.
[60] L’Osservatore Romano, Feb. 10, 1972, p. 3.
[61] L’Osservatore Romano, Jan. 27, 1972, p. 12.
[62] L’Osservatore Romano, July 14, 1977, p. 10.
[63] L’Osservatore Romano, Jan. 28, 1971, p. 1.
[64] L’Osservatore Romano, July 13, 1972, p. 12.
[65] L’Osservatore Romano, June 6, 1968, p. 5.
[66] L’Osservatore Romano, Nov. 4, 1971, p. 14.
[67] L’Osservatore Romano, July 27, 1972, p. 12.
[68] L’Osservatore Romano, Jan. 1, 1976, p. 6.
[69] L’Osservatore Romano, March 18, 1971, p. 12.
[70] L’Osservatore Romano, Nov. 4, 1971, p. 14.
[71] The Papal Encyclicals, Vol. 1 (1740-1878), p. 230.
[72] L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 30, 1976, p. 8.
[73] L’Osservatore Romano, Feb. 1, 1973, p. 12.
[74] L’Osservatore Romano, Nov. 1, 1973, p. 12.
[75] L’Osservatore Romano, May 24, 1973, p. 7.
[76] L’Osservatore Romano, May 11, 1972, p. 4.
[77] L’Osservatore Romano, June 6, 1968, p. 4.
[78] L’Osservatore Romano, July 13, 1978, p. 3.
[79] L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 15, 1977, p. 4.
[80] L’Osservatore Romano, July 13, 1972, p. 12.
[81] L’Osservatore Romano, May 24, 1973, p. 6.
[82] The Papal Encyclicals, Vol. 2 (1878-1903), p. 399.
[83] The Papal Encyclicals, Vol. 1 (1740-1878), p. 57.
[84] The Papal Encyclicals, Vol. 1 (1740-1878), p. 58.
[85] L’Osservatore Romano, Jan. 21, 1971, p. 12.
[86] L’Osservatore Romano, June 19, 1969, p. 9.
[87] L’Osservatore Romano, Feb. 8, 1973, p. 7.
[88] L’Osservatore Romano, Sept. 6, 1973, p. 8.
[89] L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 26, 1968, p. 4.
[90] Denzinger 1000
[91] L’Osservatore Romano, May 5, 1977, p. 1.
[92] L’Osservatore Romano, Aug. 14, 1969, p. 1.
[93] L’Osservatore Romano, April 18, 1968, p. 2.
[94] The Papal Encyclicals, Vol. 1 (1740-1878), p. 229.
[95] L’Osservatore Romano, Feb. 26, 1976, p. 3.
[96] The Papal Encyclicals, Vol. 3 (1903-1939), p. 394.
[97] L’Osservatore Romano, Nov. 26, 1970, p. 7.
[98] L’Osservatore Romano, Sept. 5, 1968, p. 10.
[99] The Papal Encyclicals, Vol. 5 (1858-1981), p. 227.
[100] Carey Winters, “The Catholic Church and Globalism,” March, 1998, p.9.
[101] L’Osservatore Romano, Feb. 17, 1972, p. 5.
[102] L’Osservatore Romano, May 2, 1968, p. 4.
[103] L’Osservatore Romano, June 17, 1976, p. 3.
[104] L’Osservatore Romano, Sept. 22, 1977, p. 11.
[105] L’Osservatore Romano, June 15, 1978, p. 3.
[106] L’Osservatore Romano, July 21, 1977, p. 6.
[107] L’Osservatore Romano, July 21, 1977, p. 6.
[108] L’Osservatore Romano, Oct. 15, 1970, p. 3.
[109] L’Osservatore Romano, Feb. 11, 1971, p. 12.
[110] L’Osservatore Romano, Aug. 14, 1969, p. 8.
[111] L’Osservatore Romano, May 27, 1971, p. 5.
[112] L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 2, 1971, p. 3.
[113] L’Osservatore Romano, Jan. 20, 1972, p. 7.
[114] L’Osservatore Romano, April 19, 1973, p. 9.
[115] L’Osservatore Romano, Feb. 7, 1974, p. 6.
[116] L’Osservatore Romano, Feb. 28, 1974, p. 3.
[117] L’Osservatore Romano, Jan. 2, 1969, p. 12.
[118] L’Osservatore Romano, May 8, 1969, p. 3.
[119] L’Osservatore Romano, July 24, 1969, p. 12.
[120] L’Osservatore Romano, Aug. 5, 1971, p. 12.
[121] L’Osservatore Romano, Sept. 12, 1968, p. 1.
[122] L’Osservatore Romano, July 24, 1975, p. 2.
[123] L’Osservatore Romano, Oct. 7, 1976, p. 2.
[124] L’Osservatore Romano, July 6, 1978, p. 12.
[125] L’Osservatore Romano, Oct. 28, 1976, p. 4.
[126] L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 16, 1976, p. 4.
[127] L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 30, 1976, p. 1.
[128] L’Osservatore Romano, June 19, 1969, p. 6.
[129] L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 25, 1969, p. 3.
[130] L’Osservatore Romano, Jan. 1, 1976, p. 11.
[131] L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 30, 1976, p. 1.
[132] The Oxford Illustrated Dictionary, p. 425.
[133] L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 30, 1976, p. 5.
[134] L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 3, 1970, p. 6.
[135] L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 25, 1969, p. 12.
[136] L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 26, 1968, p. 1.
[137] L’Osservatore Romano, Aug. 24, 1972, p. 1.
[138] L’Osservatore Romano, Sept. 24, 1970, p. 2.
[139] The Papal Encyclicals, Vol. 3 (1903-1939), p. 6.
[140] Fr. Joaquin Arriaga, The New Montinian Church (410 W. Central Ave. Suite 101, Brea, CA.) pp.394-395.
[141] Piers Compton, The Broken Cross, Cranbrook, Western Australia: Veritas Pub. Co. Ptd Ltd, 1984, p. 72.
[142] L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 3, 1970, p. 10.
[143] George Weigel, Witness to Hope, New York, NY: Harper Collins Publishers, Inc., 1999, p.238.
[144] The Reign of Mary, Vol. XXVI, No. 81, p.17.
[145] Mark Fellows, Fatima in Twilight, p. 193.
[146]Mark Fellows, Fatima in Twilight, p. 193.
[147] Mark Fellows, Fatima in Twilight, p. 206.
[148] Nino Lo Bello, The Incredible Book of Vatican Facts and Papal Curiosities, Ligouri, MO., Liguori Pub. 1998. p. 195.
[149] The Reign of Mary, Vol. XXVIII, No. 90, p. 8.
[151] Piers Compton, The Broken Cross, p. 138.
[152] L’Osservatore Romano, July. 13, 1972, p. 6.
[153] Jean Guitton, “Nel segno dei Dodici,” interview by Maurizio Blondet, Avvenire, Oct. 11, 1992.
[154] L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 19, 1968, p. 3.
[155] The Oxford Illustrated Dictionary, Second Edition, p. 512.
[156] L’Osservatore Romano, Nov. 23, 1972, p. 1.
[157] L’Osservatore Romano, Jan. 7, 1971, p. 1.
[158] L’Osservatore Romano, Sept. 26, 1974, p. 6.
[159] L’Osservatore Romano, May 22, 1975, p. 3.
[160] L’Osservatore Romano, May 18, 1969, p. 12.
[161] L’Osservatore Romano, March 9, 1972, p. 2.
[162] L’Osservatore Romano, July 12, 1973, p. 6.
[163] L’Osservatore Romano, Oct. 9, 1969, p. 1.
[164] Fr. Joaquin Arriaga, p. 391.