E-Exchanges on the Catholic Church and other issues

 

*This section of our website will contain some less formal – and short – e-mail exchanges that we’ve had which we feel may be of value to our readers.  We will include those portions of the exchanges we deem relevant and valuable.  We often add bolding and underlining which are not necessarily that of the other party.  This section also frequently includes, not only e-exchanges we have, but notes, updates and comments by us.*

 

Rome

 

MHFM: In The Book of Destiny (a book on the Apocalypse) by Fr. Herman Kramer, there are some interesting quotes about how the apocalyptic Babylon refers to Rome.  This coincides with what we’ve believed and pointed out: Why Rome is now The Whore of Babylon.  We don’t agree with everything in the book, but these quotes are very interesting:

 

“A harlot is given to fornication.  Ezechiel (XXIII.) calls Israel and Juda harlots, because they practiced the idolatry of the pagan nations bordering on Israel.  Fornication and adultery in prophetical language mean apostasy from the true faith and from God.  Hence this GREAT harlot is a city whose apostasy from the true faith is a monstrous thing.  This may point to Rome.  Rome is the Holy City of Christ, the center of His eternal Kingdom, as Jerusalem was the center of the theocracy.  And the apostasy of this city, and her becoming the head of an empire that would lead all possible nations and peoples into antichrist-worship would merit for her the title of THE GREAT HARLOT.  The apostles called ancient Rome ‘Babylon’ (1 Peter 5:13).  So the conclusion is near that the great harlot of the future shall be Rome.” (The Book of Destiny, Tan Books, p. 383.)

 

“The title of the harlot city, BABYLON THE GREAT, leads us to the conclusion that it shall be Rome.” (The Book of Destiny, p. 389)

 

“In St. John’s description of Babylon, the conspicuous traits of ancient pagan Rome appear as the most prominent features.  Babylon is not ancient Rome, but a new Rome that has a resemblance to the ancient center of idolatry and Godlessness.  This Rome is entirely cut off from God, is in a spiritual desert.” (The Book of Destiny, p. 388)

 

Alex Jones and “Lamp” Discussion

 

MHFM: This is our discussion of Alex Jones:

 

Alex Jones: the Good and the Evil - Part 1

 

Alex Jones: the Good and the Evil - Part 2

 

Alex Jones: the Good and the Evil - Part 3

 

Alex Jones: the Good and the Evil - Part 4

 

Alex Jones: the Good and the Evil - Part 5

 

This is a related discussion of a new anti-Catholic film, A Lamp in the Dark, one of the most anti-Catholic films ever produced:

 

A Lamp in the Dark Exposed - Part 1

 

A Lamp in the Dark Exposed - Part 2

 

A Lamp in the Dark Exposed - Part 3

 

Collection

 

Dear Brothers,

 

That is a great expose of the evil "documentary" - "A Lamp shining in the Darkness." Thank you. "The Lamp" appears to be a collection of every single Anti-Catholic myth, lie and distortion that has ever been dreamed up by the Devil's minions. Do they ever consider that Satan appears as an angel of light? 2 Corinthians 11:13, 14 - "For such false apostles are deceitful workmen, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. And no wonder: for Satan himself transformeth himself into an angel of light." In fact, it sounds very similar to what the Watchtower Society ("Jehovah's Witnesses") teaches. As usual, the Jesuits are portrayed as the most evil people ever, and if anything bad happens it's always the Catholic Church's fault, so they think. It's another weapon in the heretics’ arsenal for arguing that there is salvation outside the Catholic Church. What gets me is how Alex Jones can endorse things that pretend to expose the Antichrist, such as "The Lamp", but then he is a big fan of the heavy metal rock group "Megadeath"!  Also he allows his websites to be a vehicle for promoting marijuana use, homosexuality, abortion, etc.! It is similar to modernism, where there is no objective truth when it comes to religion, "it's all in your mind" they say:

 

Pascendi, On the Doctrine of the Modernists, Pope St. Pius X, 10 - "It is thus that the religious sense, which through the agency of vital immanence emerges from the lurking places of the sub-consciousness, is the germ of all religion, and the explanation of everything that has been or ever will be in any religion."

 

Also interesting was that you exposed the Gnostic dualism lurking beneath their promotion of the Waldensian and Albigensian heretics. The Albigensian heretics were thwarted not only by St. Dominic's books being miraculously preserved from the flames, but also by the Most Holy Rosary of the Blessed Virgin Mary:

 

Fausto Appetente Die, On St. Dominic, Encyclical of Pope Benedict XV promulgated on June 29, 1921 - "God Himself was ever at hand to aid him in his battle for the Faith. Thus, having accepted the challenge of the heretics that each should consign his book to the flames, his book alone remained untouched by the fire. Thus by the valor of Dominic Europe was freed from the danger of the Albigensian heresy." 

 

On the Rosary, Octobri Mense, Encyclical of Pope Leo XIII promulgated on September 22, 1891 - "8. The heresy of the Albigenses had in effect, one while covertly, another while openly, overrun many countries, and this most vile offspring of the Manicheans, whose deadly errors it reproduced, were the cause in stirring up against the Church the most bitter animosity and a virulent persecution. There seemed to be no human hope of opposing this fanatical and most pernicious sect when timely succor came from on high through the instrument of Mary's Rosary. Thus under the favor of the powerful Virgin, the glorious vanquisher of all heresies, the forces of the wicked were destroyed and dispersed, and faith issued forth unharmed and more shining than before."...

 

Chris White

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  It’s also interesting to note that in the video, they of course (falsely) claim that St. Dominic lost his debate with the Albigensians, and for that reason had to resort to killing them.

 

Comment

 

I was willing to check out your website in case i've been led astray in following the post vatican ii church.  i was not convinced of any of the "heresies."  far too many of your quotes are taken out of context.  some of your arguments have faulty logic, and the conclusions you jump to are far-reaching and unfounded.  you need to spend some serious time in front of the eucharist asking Jesus to enlighten you…

 

also, i watched your father corapi video on youtube (again-faulty conclusions) and was unconvinced.  the mocking tone of voice you used detracts from your credibility as a christian witness to the Truth.  i believe you are well-intentioned (except for the mean, mocking tone of voice), but i am afraid you are not leading people to the Truth.  i will pray for you. i always wondered why people broke away from the church after vatican ii.  if it is only due to supposed heresies i will need some solid evidence (that considers the totality of the pope's actions and writings-taking into account whether some statements or actions may be misunderstood, misinterpreted, or taken out of context). 

 

if i scrutinized your writings, took them out of context, and used the catholic dictionary as a rock solid point of truth (which it isn't-it does not constitute "church teaching" in and of itself.) i could accuse you of heresy as well…

 

i apologize if this seems aggressive, but i am greatly worried when i see the truth misconstrued or misapplied.  i worry about the souls that may be led astray.  i'm sure you can understand this, considering it is the only reason you reach out to others in the holy name of Jesus as well.  let us pray for one another to be led to the Truth, which is Jesus Christ himself.  fortunately God brings good from all evil and sees the heart of man.

 

your sister in Christ,

 

kateri

 

may God bless you!

 

MHFM: You are nothing more than a liar.  “Out of context,” “false,” etc. is what they all claim.  You don’t give even one example because, if you did, it would be completely refuted.  General statements and charges, without specific examples to back up those charges, are WORTHLESS.  Your e-mail is worthless.  You are simply dishonest and of bad will.  Barring a stunning conversion, you will be saying in Hell, for all eternity, that the proof provided (which will convict you on Judgment Day) was “out of context.”  Corapi accepts false ecumenism.  That’s a fact.  He holds that Protestants, Jews and others can be saved without the Catholic faith.  That’s a fact.  His position is heretical.  He holds that rabbis have a “mission,” and thus that Jews can be saved without belief in Christ.  That’s a fact.  He is not a Catholic, and neither are you.

 

The Vatican II antipopes hold that heretics and schismatics are in the Church.  That’s a fact.  They hold that they don’t need to be converted.  That’s a fact.  They accept, promote and engage in condemned false ecumenism.  That’s a fact.  They are not Catholic and they cannot be popes.

 

Bible Proves Booklet Usage

 

Subject: Bible proves booklet usage

 

Dear MHFM,

 

Based on the research and the accuracy of this book based on the Bible, it would be great if it was used in Catholic schools. Has there been any effort on your behalf to get this book into schools? Do you recommend this being done at a local level? I would imagine based on the V2 infiltration of our schools that there would be resistance to this.

I would be interested if this has been done by you or any of the readers of your web page.

 

Your ardent supporter,

 

Bob

 

MHFM: We are not aware of anyone who has tried to have it used in schools themselves.  If they allowed it, it would be a minor miracle.

 

Problem

 

Dear Brothers,

Your recent series of videos on Alex Jones and A lamp in the dark exposed are excellent. The problem with Alex, like some politicians, he has identified the problem, though doesn't have the solution to the problem. The solution being God and his Commandments.  If you’re not part of the solution, then you’re part of the problem. He does a nice job of bringing to light the masonic plan to destroy the world, though the path he's on has no means of salvation for those following him…

 

For the true believers, it's no "news flash" that the world is evil and will end one day. As you've stated on your site, the Masons are behind the evil of this world and the Vatican II Great Apostasy. The masons evilness is responsible for the removal of women through Feminism and also responsible for immodest dress in our society. Both cause the destruction of the family and moral decay of society. The following is from a masonic Letter of Vindice to Nubius; [pen-names of 2 leaders of the Italian ‘Alta Vendita’] dated the 9th August 1838. This letter was drafted eight years prior to the message from Our Lady of La Salette.

“Catholicism does not fear a very sharp sword any more than the monarchies feared it. But, these two foundations of Social Order can collapse under corruption; let us never tire to corrupt them. Tertullian was right in saying that from the blood of martyrs Christians are born; let us not make martyrs; but, let us popularize vice among the multitudes; may they breathe it through their five senses; may they drink it and be saturated. Make vicious hearts and there will be no more Catholics.  It is corruption on a big scale that we have undertaken…a corruption that should one day enable us to lead the Church to its grave. Lately, I heard one of our friends laughing philosophically at our projects saying: ‘To destroy Catholicism, we should do away with women’. The idea is good in a certain way, but since we cannot get rid of women, let us corrupt them with the Church. ‘Corruptio optimi, pessima’. The best dagger to strike the Church is corruption.”

A follow-up letter below is from the (International Review of Freemasonry, 1928)

“Religion does not fear the dagger’s point; but it can vanish under corruption… It is necessary to corrupt, that our boys and girls practice nudism in dress. To avoid too much reaction, one would have to progress in a methodical manner: first, undress up to the elbow; then up to the knees; then arms and legs completely uncovered; later, the upper part of the chest, the shoulders, etc. etc.”

God Bless the Faithful,
Tom Miles

 

Exposing

 

This guy (“Brother Nathaniel”) has done a couple of features exposing Jones’s ties to Zionism.  He too thinks he is controlled opposition and criticizes his protestant views.

 

Though he is “Orthodox”, as a Jewish convert he sometimes has interesting information and cites everything pretty well.  I sometimes can’t believe this guy is walking around alive with the enemies he must have.  You guys too for that matter.

 

Bill

 

MHFM: We’re familiar with the schismatic “Orthodox” individual you mention, and we believe that his claims (at least on this point) are totally unpersuasive and unsubstantiated.  There is no evidence at all.  In fact, one of the “best” pieces of evidence people try to bring forward to show that Jones is a Jew, or that he works for the Jews, is that he allegedly said his wife is Jewish.  But actually, when people listen to the clip, they can see that he didn’t say that.  He said that his wife is a “Christian” who has Jewish blood somewhere back in her family tree.  He probably mentioned that she has Jewish blood somewhere in her family tree in order to shoot down any lies that he might be “anti-Semitic” or against people solely because of blood lines.  That’s quite different from saying that she is Jewish, as if she’s a practicing Jew or was born to a Jew, which is not the case.  We’re not saying that you are making that claim, but the others who spread that idea (such as the individual you mention) don’t even have their facts correct or they aren’t capable of any careful analysis whatsoever.  Starting with this distortion and error, they then falsely conclude that Jones must be a Jew.  This is taken and spread around (falsely) as a fact, and then anyone who doesn’t agree with this utterly false conclusion (because they are more careful, accurate and charitable) must be Jewish as well.  It’s beyond outrageous. 

 

Here’s an interview that Jones did with James Traficant.  This utterly refutes the lie that he’s a Jewish shill.  Jones is exactly what we said in our discussion of him.  This interview is very interesting, by the way, and it is worth listening to.  No one in the tank for the Jews would do such an interview.  In the interview, Jones even mentions that he has sometimes been “mild” on Jewish control issues because he’s trying to bring everyone together to fight the New World Order.  Translation: whether you agree with him or not, he believes that he can be most effective fighting the New World Order by not being cast to the fringe as an “anti-Semite” and by trying to remain as big and mainstream as possible, rather than risking the elimination of his operation if he too aggressively exposes Israeli influence.  The relevant portions begin at about the 6-minute mark of this part:

 

James Traficant Interview - Part 2

 

Of course, as we covered in our discussion, we condemn Jones for the evil false prophet that he is, despite the good he does.  However, since we love truth, we feel that we must speak up to refute lies that are being spread, such as the false notion that he is some kind of agent.

 

Clearly

 

Subject: Verified

 

Hi MHFM,

To my best efforts I could not hear Jones say the word "not". He clearly said "mainline fake Christian" whatever that means. How divinely providential. And thank you again for your tireless efforts in exposing not only the lies, but also the half-truths (Alex Jones) and the baseless wicked imaginations (A Lamp in the Dark) of the disinformation experts. Half-truths are like rat poison (90% water, 10% chemicals). The rats drink for the benefit of the water (new knowledge), but die from the poison (evil insinuations and conclusions). That is what half-truths do to people, and for the imaginative fake stories, it's so clearly false, it borders on the ridiculous. It's not good if people fall for it because they do not investigate further.

Let us pray that more people will follow the Lord's command: To seek ye first the Kingdom of God. He did not command us to seek ye first the worldly kingdom. When we seek God's Kingdom, we learn eventually the necessary knowledge of the worldly kingdom.

With prayers,

Sanjiv

 

Lamp

 

Hi Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,

 

Thanks for alerting us re A Lamp in the Dark DVD as advertised on Alex's webpage....truly shocking and you have done a great job in exposing it! 

 

I have not viewed it, but the description, brief as it is given on the webpage, is enough!  It is a vicious attack based on lies and distorted history which will not go well with Alex, to be sure!

 

The rest of your coverage is well researched and very interesting, and long overdue, I feel.  There are a lot of questions to be satisfactorily answered by someone over all this, for I feel it will simply just not fade away, as easy as that!

 

God bless

 

David

 

No doubt

 

Dear Brothers,

 

In regard to Alex Jones speech, first of all there is no doubt that the words pronounced by him were definitely  “I am a mainline fake Christian”, and if one looks carefully at his face in that fraction of a second it gives a clear impression of hesitation and shock he got from his own words.  In a normal situation no one would ever say such a thing about himself.

 

Sincerely,

M. Fernanda da Silva

 

Book

 

Brothers..

 

Have you ever read the book 'The Sermons of the Cure of Ars' by St. John Vianney?   I credit that book as one of the things that helped in my conversion..If I were a priest, Id have a stack of those in the back of my church and would impose it as a penance on my penitents-   That book turned me white as a ghost and cried when I read it, one of the most powerful impacting books I ever read--This book is like a spiritual mirror being placed infront of ones self..The devil told St. John Vianney that if there were 2 other people like him on this world, Satan’s kingdom would fall to its knees....

.

Steve

 

MHFM: Yes, it’s a good book.

 

Reminds

 

Hello Brothers -

 

This whole Alex Jones thing reminds me of a well known  protestant evangelist who some years ago is said to have been at the pulpit at his huge "church" and, attempting to confirm his heretical message, held up his notes and said "what I am telling you ... this is..  untrue" and again "this is.. untrue" and again and again, finally attempting to laugh off the idea that he just could not untwist his tongue.

 

- God guide you,

 

Mike

 

Mary is the Ark

 

 

  

Audible

 

Dear Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,

 

Just to confirm that Alex did not include the word "Not" in that statement; his speech is quite audible, the words measured and precise, as those who listen to Alex on a regular basis know his speaking style...

 

He is composed, calm, not excited as he sometimes can be, and after making that statement, showed no alarm or surprise at that somewhat startling, 'slip of the tongue' some might call it...he was thinking about the topic in hand and what was to follow...did he actually realize he had made that 'slip'?  Maybe, although he gave no indication at the time…  

 

The truth is, Alex is sadly not a Christian… in spite of all the good work he does in uncovering various conspiracies, of which he is so good at.

 

God bless

 

David

 

Alex Jones

 

 

 

 

 

Issues

 

He clearly says I am a mainline fake christian. You people who deny this have some real honesty issues.

 

William

 

Comment

 

Brothers:  I don't know where these listeners are finding the word "not" in Alex's discourse - it is simply not there.
 
Had another faux pas that this reminds me of.  I was explaining to a protestant minister about all the books that are missing from his "bible."  I explained that Our Lord quoted from books that he, the protestant, doesn't recognize and gave the example from Tobit.  Jesus Christ quotes "do unto others as you would have them do unto you, for this is the law and the prophets", an almost verbatum quote from Tobit, except that Tobias omits the law and the prophet portion.  So I explained to the minister, "So Jesus has just quoted from Tobit and said that Tobit is a prophet."  The minister interrupted and blurted out "I don't care what Jesus said!"  The small crowd around us all stood with our mouths open.  Things like that don't just happen.....
 
Keep up the good fight,
Patricia

 

Clear

 

Hi, Brothers.

 

I saw the video clip and you're right.  He does say I'm a mainline fake Christian.  All you need to do is listen carefully and look at his lips.  You don't need to be able to read lips to see the evidence of what he said.  It's clear from the video and audio of the clip.

 

Carol Walker

 

Normal

 

Hi Brothers Michael and Peter,

 

I heard the audios you posted on Alex Jones... all who have normal hearing would hear Alex saying "I'm a mainline fake christian" period.

 

I totally agree with you that Alex Jones has done an excellent job in exposing the tenets of the Devil on the secular matters specially dealing with the developments of the New World Order, the Bilderberger Group, the Secret Elite, the Illuminati etc ... in fact I've been quoting him on these matters exclusively but not until now that I have heard it loud and clear from you on his abominable belief mocking our holy Mother Church ..

 

Thanks God I regularly update myself reading the E-Exchanges now that I can also expose Alex should it be needed .. it’s so unfortunate to discover how many brilliant minds have fallen to the snares of the Devil, in Illuminati and Secret Societies issues alone, hundreds of brilliant minds have dedicated their entire lives, sacrificing many things to cling to their passion to expose the lies of the NWO ... just to realize that they have fallen in the same deception laid down by their masters himself - the Devil ... since these people forgot that the real battle is spiritual in nature and not activism in the political arena! Oh Mother of God, please protect us from the snares of the Devil!!!

 

As God allows the Truth to come out little by little … the road to heaven is becoming narrower and narrower while the world is becoming crazier each day!

 

May the Queen of Heaven protect MHFM!!!

 

Joey, Philippines

 

Definitely

 

Dear Brothers,

 

The article on the decline in marriages in Scotland due to co-habitation is interesting. Co-habitation is like a bomb just waiting to explode being such a constant occasion of sins. It encourages abortion too, since the couple are not committed or bound by the sacrament of marriage. It's really shocking.

 

Alex Jones definitely said, "I'm a mainline fake Christian," not "...Not a mainline fake Christian." I noticed on the video that when he says this, that his left hand's fingers are in a sort of el diablo of the first and third fingers. I don't know if that qualifies as an actual el diablo though..

  

God Bless,

 

Chris White

 

Blind & Deaf

 

Brother(s) Dimond:

At the risk of having my hearing, my sanity, or my integrity questioned, I must note that, on your Alex Jones clip, both the audio and the video make it appear to me that he is saying, "not a mainline fake Christian", rather than "I'm a mainline fake Christian", and his tone of voice on the clearer words that immediately follow is certainly more in keeping with the former rather than the latter.  At the very least, one would think that we could all agree that the only thing in dispute is a single one-syllable word, said in a low tone in a tiny fraction of a second.  (No one is suggesting that Jones said, "I'm not a mainline..."; it's either "I'm a mainline" or "not a mainline...")  Given that fact, it seems a bit unfair to question someone's ability to hear, much less that person's grasp on reality or his honesty, simply because he says he perceives this fleeting sound differently than you do.

You correctly criticized the e-mail writer, though, for suggesting, with no supporting evidence, that Jones is Jewish, calling that accusation "uncharitable".  But, since the writer himself doubts Jones' claim to being a Christian, it's unlikely that he perceived the one word in question differently than you because of a pre-existing pro-Jones bias on his part.  In fact, you said many positive things about Jones in your video, while the e-mail writer said nothing positive about him.  As such, it might have been more charitable to chalk up the difference in perception on this to the fact that the one-syllable utterance in question was unclear enough to allow for an honest and ethical difference of opinion, even among people with no hearing problems.

Also, on the video you conceded that "(i)t's true that everyone makes speaking errors.  But we believe that this was God's way" of exposing Jones as a fake Christian.  So even if all people of good will and adequate hearing were to agree that Alex Jones said "I'm" rather than "not"--in itself obviously not a matter of infallible Catholic dogma--it still is a matter of one's personal belief rather than Church teaching as to whether or not this was a Freudian slip by Jones, which alone would seem to preclude the need for any personal jabs in the course of defending one's own position.

What is far more significant is your statement that Jones recently endorsed a strongly anti-Catholic documentary, and that you have a response in the works which will cover this subject.  I wasn't familiar with the documentary in question nor with Jones' endorsement of anything of that nature, so I look forward to your critique of this presentation; it will be helpful to get the Catholic side on this and similar material from people such as yourselves, who clearly do your research and pay diligent attention to detail.  But you admit that Jones is revealing many important truths about secular matters, and it's not a stretch to assume that, given the nature of those truths, Jones is offending some powerful and evil people in the process, which might be putting himself in some danger.  As such, it might be more charitable to refrain from explicitly calling him a "fake" anything until we have more solid evidence specifically concerning his motives, and what he really knows, as opposed to what we simply think he should know.  Even if he is wrong about something dogmatic, there doesn't seem to be a clear dogmatically-established line beyond which his error is proof of his dishonesty--at least not one that we know for a fact that he has crossed…

                                                                   Lyndon Olson        

MHFM: We are sorry, but we must say that you are totally wrong and, in fact, dishonest.  You are exercising bad will or you labor in a profound spiritual fog as a result of bad will.  As an example, you say that we should refrain (!) from calling Jones a fake Christian, even though he’s clearly a heretic and accepts gross immorality.  This is a clear demonstration of your liberalism and also why God would blind you.  It’s undeniable that he said “I’m a mainline fake Christian.”  The word “not” is most certainly not there.  One can clearly hear “I’m a mainline fake Christian.” 

 

We must say that in one sense it surprises us that a few people actually wrote in to say that Alex said “not,” but in another sense it doesn’t surprise us.  We are living in such an age of spiritual darkness and bad will that people cannot tune in to actual spoken words, especially when they uncover and expose an evil.  In your case, you obviously like Jones somewhat.  You might be blinded by your desire to see his state of soul as less evil than it is; or perhaps you rebel at the thought that God sometimes supernaturally compels evil people to declare truths about themselves and that such self-denunciations serve to expose them.  For this reason, perhaps you mentally add in what’s not there because the notion of a God who does such things might be too strict for your tastes. 

 

Whatever it is, you are totally wrong and there is a reason Jesus said:

 

Mark 4:9 – “He that hath ears to hear, let him hear.”

 

The wicked (or even people who are laboring in a spiritual fog) not only cannot hear the words of God, in the spiritual sense of perceiving and accepting the truth.  But sometimes this can spill over into not being able to hear in a literal way, including the words of man, when those words of man might reveal a truth about God or expose an evil.  They will not hear it because their evil hearts and minds are darkened.  As a result, they dishonestly hear only what they imagine or want to hear or what’s more conformable to their outlook or liberalism. 

 

Matthew 13:15- “For the heart of this people is grown gross, and with their ears they have been dull of hearing, and their eyes they have shut: lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them.”

 

Romans 11:7-8- “…and the rest have been blinded.  As it is written: God hath given them the spirit of insensibility; eyes that they should not see; and ears that they should not hear, until this present day.”

 

Matthew 13:9- “And others fell upon good ground: and they brought forth fruit, some an hundredfold, some sixtyfold, and some thirtyfold.  He that hath ears to hear, let him hear.”

 

Liar

 

Brother Dimond,

I've listened to the clip several times now… He either says (quickly and somewhat inaudibly) "not a fake mainline Christian" or "but a fake mainline Christian." Why would Alex Jones (or anyone, for that matter) disparage and belittle his own religious faith by referring to it as "fake" and "mainline," and in an earnest tone of voice no less? Please put what you think you hear into context...

Scott

 

MHFM: You are TOTALLY wrong and you also don’t understand the point.  You ask why he would ever say such a thing and undermine his own religious “faith.”  It’s because he wasn’t intending to say it, as we explained!  It’s something that God had him say to express his false reality.  Not understanding that, and hearing only what you want to hear, you dishonestly add in what is not there to fit your false view of what makes sense and what he “must have been trying to say.”  Your e-mail is thus a good example of how those who deny what he clearly said (and there is no doubt that he said: “I’m a mainline fake Christian”) are liars.  They convince themselves of something that doesn’t exist to fit their preconceived notions, while denying the clear truth.  See Blind & Deaf above.

 

Have

 

Dear Brothers,
 
I have been listening to Alex Jones for some time.  In the video you posted, he said, "not a mainline fake Christian".   He has been exposing how their are tens of thousands pastors getting paid from government to preach the bible in a favorable light for Martial Law.  
 
Please correct your misquote,
 
Thanks
Wishing to be anonymous.

 

MHFM: We rebuked this person and said (essentially) that you either cannot hear or are a liar.  We also explained that we were talking about what he actually said, not what he intended to say.  He (or she) responded and said:

 

Dear MHFM,

 

I listened to the clip again; and I agree with you he said that…

 

Thanks

Anonymous.

 

MHFM: What happened with this person is that he probably thought our point was that Alex intended to tell everyone that he’s a fake Christian, which was not the point at all (as explained below).  They just dismiss what he actually said.  Because he knew that Alex didn’t INTEND to say that, he dishonestly said that he didn’t say that.  But after he understood that we were not saying that he intended to declare himself a fake Christian, he wrote back and finally acknowledged the truth, that Alex said: “I’m a mainline fake Christian.”  This is a prime example of the point made above, in Blind & Deaf.

 

Incredible

 

MHFM,

It is incredible that Bob could say Alex said "not". Bob said he listened to it over and over again. Besides the fact that Bob has hearing issues, did he forget to watch Alex's gestures or mannerisms? When he says he is a mainline fake, he actually nods in the affirmative very clearly…

Sincerely,

Robby

 

MHFM: It is incredible.  It’s simply a fact that Jones said “I’m a mainline fake Christian.”  It’s quite obvious to anyone with good hearing and who is not a liar. 

 

False

 

Subject: That is exactly what he said.  Distorted thinking on your part.

 

There IS a NOT in it.

 

Kf

 

MHFM: You are a liar.  See Blind & Deaf above.  We post this as an example of how we are living in a theological and spiritual “Twilight Zone” (not that we endorse that such a thing exists).  But the concept of a “Twilight Zone” captures the idea of a make-believe world, in which truth is what you imagine it to be.  We are seeing people lie right before us.  It’s analogous to the many people we have conversed with and covered, who claim that they don’t believe Muslims and Jews can be saved, while simultaneously telling us that Fr. Denis Fahey’s statement, that Jews who reject Christ can be saved, expressed true teaching.

 

Catholic

 

Dear Bros. Michael and Peter,

 

I just wanted to write you a quick email to express my gratitude for your work. 

 

And at the risk of coming across as offensive, for the last year I've been trying to find something...ANYTHING... to prove to myself that the Sedevacantist position is wrong and that your arguments on the said position hold no water.  However, thus far, I've come up completely empty. What it seems to keeping coming down to is not whether one is a Sedevacantist (a title which the entire so-called Catholic world has painted with a very derogatory brush)...but whether one is a true Catholic.

 

With that being said, I still have some lingering questions that I feel only you two could best address...questions I believe could be better answered by voice...I thank you for your time and your tireless apostolate.

 

Yours,

 

Robert Cantu

 

Bayside

 

Hello,

I'm come from 3 generations of people who believe Bayside's message. You are wrong with what is written. I agree with much of what you wrote on the web page. But Bayside promotes Latin Mass as the only true mass, and Vatican II being brought on by the freemasons who have infiltrated the Catholic church. My mom studied this. Bayside speaks against freemasons, Rockefeller. Veronica drew an image of the empire state building, with a line going into it. Yes, it wasn't the WTC, but after seeing the image, it made me think she's real. Also, I actually have received a picture when I visited Bayside. Are the beads of the rosary pointing up to heaven of the devil? It also had two blue lights on each side, Virgin Mary's color. Is that evil?

I hate when dates are set from prophecy than a proved to be wrong. But she's still human. And who said that maybe a freemason didn't put those dates out to make it seem like a joke. Maybe she was assuming a date?... I don't believe the whole Marian app. to be of the devil. My mom and I have prayed about it. You focused on only like 1% of what Bayside says. If I judged people that way, I wouldn't be friends with anyone.

 

Melissa

 

MHFM: No, it’s clearly a false message which contains heresy against Catholic dogma.  It also tells people to stay at the invalid New Mass, and it promotes the Vatican II antipopes.  It also says true things to deceive people like you.

 

The False Apparitions at Bayside, NY [PDF File]

 

No “not”

 

Dear brothers in Christ,


Regarding Alex Jones' 'slip of the tongue', I just want to confirm what you say--AJ indeed says "I'm a mainline fake Christian". I don't hear "not".  In your answer to the reader who says he hears "not a mainline...", you've made use of a phrase "came out", and this very phrase triggered in my memory remembrance of the case of Mother Angelica, when she, after being initialized in a devilish charismatic movement, tried to say a simple 'thanks', but something else CAME OUT. I quote from your material:

"Mother tried to say thank you, but ‘something else CAME OUT.'"  I think this is very interesting connection between AJ and MA.

Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia

 

Comment

 

Brothers,

I am so glad that you are going to take up the Alex Jones issue.  I have listened to him every day for years, and suspected he was anti Catholic.  I listened to him for secular news dealing with the new world order.  But when I heard him and his guest blast the catholic faith, the Popes etc, I decided to not listen any more.  You are correct he does say "I am a mainline fake Christian", and that's exactly what he is.

 

Bill from Michigan

 

Alex Jones

 

Dear MHFM,

 

I have to disagree with what you heard regarding the AJ sound clip. I listened to it over and over, and what I hear the man saying is "I'm a Christian...Not a mainline fake Christian". That's what I hear. Although my own opinion of the man is that he is actually Jewish and has been parading as though he is "Christian."

 

Regards,

Bob

 

MHFM: We must say that you obviously don’t have a good ability to hear or you are hallucinating or you are a pure liar blind to the truth.  He did not say, “not a mainline fake Christian”!  You can listen to it 100 times… He said: “I’m a Christian… I’m a mainline fake Christian.”  Yes, he WANTED AND INTENDED TO SAY “not a mainline fake Christian,” but that’s not what came out or what he said.  You have to listen to WHAT HE SAID, not what you think he wanted to say!

 

Your confusion might stem from the following: you probably think our point is that Alex admitted or wanted or intended to say (and is declaring to the world) that he’s a mainline fake Christian.  That’s not the point.  Listen to the version with our commentary.  The point is that God had him say what he really is, even though he didn’t realize what he was actually saying.  That’s the point.  He said that he’s a mainline fake Christian.  But truthfully, to maintain that he said that he’s “not” a mainline fake Christian is to lie or demonstrate that you lack decent hearing ability.  Perhaps the fog you are in is also why you think he’s Jewish, which is totally absurd, uncharitable and ridiculous, as we will cover in a more detailed discussion.

 

Questions

 

Subject: Questions about New DVD

 

Dear Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,

I have recently purchased your DVD "The Third Secret of Fatima, etc..." and watched it with great attention. I have found the information extremely interesting, especially with respect to the consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart by Pope Pius XII, the impostor "Sister Lucia", and some other facts…

I have some questions though. First, you mention that Our Lady of Fatima is the woman clothed with the sun from Revelations 12, and that the red dragon corresponds to the red army. But you also know that it is mentioned in that same passage that the woman is pregnant and with pains of labor. How can this be explained? We know Our Lady did not suffer from pains of labor since Our Lord was born miraculously and with no perturbation of Our Lady's virginity. It is also said in the Revelations that the woman gave birth to the son and the dragon tries to devour him. This Son has always been interpreted by the Church as Our Lord. If what you mention is true and the Woman is indeed Our Lady of Fatima... how can the pains of labor and the birth of Our Lord can be interpreted in the context of the history of the XX Century (i.e., Second World War, Second Vatican Council, etc.) I hope I have explained myself correctly…


Anyway, thanks in advance for having read such long email. I would like to hear some feedback from you guys about these very important issues. I truly admire your work, dedication and desire to spread the truth.

God bless,
Carlos Montes

 

MHFM: Thanks for the interest.  The fathers understood the woman of Apocalypse 12 to represent both Our Lady and the Church.  We believe it definitely signifies Our Lady, the “sign of Heaven” (Our Lady of Fatima in 1917), and the Church.  The woman (as she signifies the Church) is in pains to bring forth the Son; in other words, she is laboring to spread the faith, to nourish the Church and give birth to more children of the Lord and of the Church.  It’s a struggle because of the persecution from the red dragon, the destruction of Catholic society, and the extirpation of Catholic principles which occur as a result of the persecutions and proliferation of liberalism.

 

Apocalypse 12:13- “And when the dragon saw that he was cast unto the earth, he persecuted the woman, who brought forth the man child:”

 

We plan on doing something, hopefully very soon, which will cover some in-depth thoughts and opinions about specific things in the Apocalypse.  We think people might find it interesting.  It will address some of your other questions.

 

Not “out of context”

 

 

 

Rotten

 

Dear brothers in Christ,

I've received the package you sent to me. As always, it contained more than I paid for. Obviously the generosity you show is a virtue stemming from the true faith you hold and promote…

 

Recently I have read somewhere on the Internet (on one of innumerable "catholic" web pages floating around) that the "pope" B16 finds himself between two extreme (as they call it) sides--the first is "very angry sedevacantists" and the second is "ultra liberal catholics who care not in the least for Tradition". So, they say, the "pope" B16 is following the realistic path between two equally bad oppositions.

Well, I admit, this evil comment made me very angry. First, they are judging the truthfulness of what some people say according to whether they are angry or cheerful. These evil people, who try to present the V2 antipopes as "realistic" (meaning, I guess, good) people are rotten to the core. I doubt they have even the slightest potentiality to convert to the true Faith. In their rotten hearts do they ever wonder why Jesus, as far as we know from The Gospels, never laughed? Do they ever wonder why Jesus was in many occasions angry with people? Of course they don't, simply because they are children of the father of all lies.

Second, the truth is that a true Catholic living in these extremely evil times can escape the sadness and/or fury only by retreating to the prayer in solitude, by not gazing at the lying apostate muzzles at all…

Our Most Holy Mother of God and St. Joseph, pray for us…

Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia

 

MHFM: We also read in the Gospels that the disciples were afraid to ask Jesus certain questions – a far cry from how Jesus is portrayed by many liberals:

 

Mark 9:31- “But they [the disciples] understood not the word, and they were afraid to ask him.”

 

Short Video

 

 

 

Unam Sanctam

 

Dear Brothers,

 

On coming across a Portuguese V11 apostate site where they were commenting on the incompatibility of  Sedevacantism……among the quotes given by them from Denzinger, which I am able to refute because their true meaning is clearly changed and even address the articles of faith totally according to their own interests and not as it is read in the book. 

 

There is a particular one Denz  468/469 on the Unity and Power of the Church, from the Bull “Unam Sanctam” where it refers to the “Supreme Power deviates”, states it can be judged by “God alone”, not by man, in this particular Bull I find it difficult to comprehend its true significance on “Supreme Power deviates” which these people hold on to.

 

Could you please clarify me on this part of the Bull at your earliest convenience.

 

Thanking you,

In J.M.J

M. Fernanda da Silva

 

MHFM: In that Bull, Pope Boniface VIII is explaining how there are two powers: the spiritual authority and the secular authority.  They are separate, but they should work together; and the secular authority should work under and for the interests of the spiritual authority.  That’s because the laws of God should be reflected in, and upheld by, society.  If the secular authority deviates, it can be judged and condemned and even deposed by the spiritual.  When excommunicating evil kings, popes have sometimes declared them to be deposed from their authority.  However, the secular authority cannot do the same to the spiritual authority.  Only God can do that.  The secular authority, for example, cannot depose a pope if it deems the pope to be evil.  But God’s laws, such as the automatic divine law penalty laid down for heresy, can and do automatically depose a pope (who would become a manifest heretic) from office.  The penalty for heresy, which separates a heretical cleric from the Church and from his office, is God’s law (a divine law penalty).  It is thus perfectly in line with the teaching of Unam Sanctam.  For that reason, the argument of the non-sedevacantist has no merit, and it is very much misapplied.  The Bull is teaching in the context of the secular vs. spiritual authorities and it as nothing to do with a heretical claimant to the Papacy; but even when teaching on that point, we find the principle that the divine law (God’s law) can judge and depose the spiritual authority. 

 

Comment

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Thank you for posting the short video on the fact that a heretic cannot be a pope and also on the video of the false and ridiculous accusation that your word-for-word quotes of Benedict XVI and the other V2 Antipopes are "out of context." No, the only thing that is out of context is the minds of the heretics who lie about MHFM. They're like Satan's pets, just barking away in their dark blindness. But when the light shines, the truth, they run away whimpering and howling because it burns and stings their eyes! In fact, in typical bold heretical blindness, Par. 17 of Dominus Iesus footnotes The Dogmatic Constitution from Vatican I, Pastor Aeternus, Session 4 : 18 July 1870, which states at Par. 6:

 

6. And since the gates of hell trying, if they can, to overthrow the Church, make their assault with a hatred that increases day by day against its divinely laid foundation, we judge it necessary, with the approbation of the Sacred Council, and for the protection, defense and growth of the Catholic flock, to propound the doctrine concerning the 1. institution, 2. permanence and 3. nature of the sacred and apostolic primacy, upon which the strength and coherence of the whole Church depends. [end quote]

 

This once again disproves the outrageous notion that Benedict XVI is a mistaken Catholic, i.e. a "material heretic", because he footnotes the very things which prove him to be a heretic! Thank you also for the points about ambiguity. A Catholic may word something carelessly, making an ambiguous statement for instance, but a heretic deliberately dresses his heresy in ambiguity. When it's ambiguity, condemn the heretical side!...

 

God bless,

 

Chris White

 

Novus Ordo Guide

 

Subject: Novus Ordo Guide

 

Hi MHFM,

A fictional Novus Ordo (NO) guide to debunking sedevacantism (SV). For laughs.

1. First, define terms by getting the Latin or Greek origin of important words, and then explain the Greek, explain the Latin, and then explain the English or vernacular. Ensure to create an image of diligence and knowledge of old languages and important documents before going into the explanation proper…

2. Deny the SV claim early on, without explaining the details. Deny it early and repeat while the listener has your full attention. The lazy person will forget the substance of the NO explanation anyway, let alone the SV facts and arguments.

3. Misrepresent the sedevacantists by claiming they use "private judgement". Make the listener think SV catholics are arrogant. This works when the person encounters a SV catholic later on. The more the SV catholic tries to explain the errors of NO, the more the prejudice is reinforced. Prepare the person to totally ignore SV arguments. The listener should not even bother to understand the SV position apart from what we say.

4. Misrepresent the sedevacantists by claiming they are "protestants" which is a loaded word. This rallies NO people together against a new common foe, which christians love to do throughout history. Reinforce NO people's self belief in their catholicity and make them feel more catholic. The listeners' minds are computers. Input the equation "sedevacantist = protestant", then their brains will run on auto-pilot. Then we do not need to respond to SV ever again.

5. Misrepresent the sedevacantists by claiming they do not know how to interpret church writings. Quote only from the NO church writings. Only we can exploit the ambiguities of NO church writings, so they can never win… If they cannot interpret our texts correctly how can they look credible?

Note: Never bring up ancient catholic councils. Those are too accurate. NO audiences might get the idea of comparing ancient councils with our texts. We might look bad. Do not show the people that NO church writings are deliberately ambiguous for our own advantage. We can make the texts sound conservative, liberal, or even socialist whenever we want, depending on the plan for each audience. This advantage is lost when the catholic teachings become crystal clear.

6. Accuse that the sedevacantists read only the letter of the writings and not the spirit of the letter. This makes us sound like lawyers.

Note: Name call and insult the sedevacantists only with quotes from the Bible and through a sweet and gentle voice. NO listeners won’t even notice…


7. Accuse that sedevacantists are not objective.

8. Accuse that sedevacantist facts and arguments are not relevant.

… Note: Do not remind audience that we edited all their sacraments while they were sleeping.

10. Lastly and most importantly. Input equation in their brains "judge = admonish". Then teach that no one but God can "judge." No one has the right to "judge" anyone, most especially the ecumenical services. Anyone who "judges" is a megalomaniac. Ecumenical dialogue and services must go on at all costs. They won’t notice the new age when it hits them.

Note: When answering questions from curious NO people, introduce a long argument, then distract them with a second argument. When finished, nobody will notice that there is no valid proof for both arguments.

Just for laughs,

S

 

Comment

 

Thank you for sharing a bit about your family in your recent video… I married a man who also was raised without religion and made to feel making money was the priority in life.  He did convert to the Catholic faith when we got married but is not convinced now of sedevacantism.  Your site is the only support I have.  I have tried very hard with my Catholic family and friends.  Everyone I know thinks this is crazy.  I am strengthened by the rosary, solitude and lives of the saints.  I love to be alone to say my prayers.   Please pray for my upcoming decision to home school my three children.  I tried last year but was unable to convince my husband I could do this.  The Catholic schools are abominable.  My children were recently given their astrologic signs and this spring my daughter's fifth grade class will be given sex education.  Of course I will remove her from the class but what good will that do when they discuss this at lunch time.  This year I will go to a catholic homeschooling seminar and try again.  The changes are very hard to make.      

 

Kathleen

 

Found

 

Dear Brothers, 

 

I found that last letter rather interesting, about how family life sometimes makes it difficult to communicate with God.  That is true, however, being a mother with 8 children I still find time to be alone for brief parts of the day, and in the evening after everyone else goes to bed, it is a very good time for mental prayer.  There really is no excuse for not praying, even with distractions, we must find time every day to pray… 

 

A pathetic story about the CMRI:  My son John got into a conversation with a lady at the local CMRI chapel where we used to go to Mass.  He was trying to convince her of the necessity of baptism, that the desire was not sufficient.  She reminded him of the church's "teaching" on baptism of desire and of blood.  (She clearly learned her faith from the Baltimore Catechism).  He reminded her that in the Nicene Creed we confess "one baptism for the remission of sins", not three.  She made the ludicrous statement "Haven't you ever heard of fractions"?  When my son told me about this conversation, I burst out laughing.  I have never heard of anyone trying to divide up a sacrament like one would divide up a pie!!...

 

God bless you and keep up the good work!

Yours in Christ, 

Brenda Roy

 

Debates

 

i've been listening to some of your debates, i'm sorry but all of your opponents come off really stupid, can you please get someone a bit more intelligent? these guys arguments are some of the dumbest things i've ever heard

 

mp…

 

MHFM: They are not stupid.  It’s that the arguments and positions, when confronted with strong truth, look stupid; and, in the process, their bad will and inconsistency become apparent.   We’ve debated a variety of individuals and we are trying to set up more debates.

 

Comment

 

Brothers,

 

I'd like to thank you for "disabling" the comment section in u-tube.  "Give not that which is holy to dogs; neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest perhaps they trample them under their feet, and turning upon you, they tear you" (Matthew 7:6).  For those seeking the truth, those negative comments are Satan's last defense against the the true faith.  In most cases, the lounge lizards and leaches that try to discredit someone else good work, recognize the truth and are unable to bring themselves to that level of understanding (unable to walk the straight and narrow path).  The spirit of the anti-Christ compels the leaches to "trespass" against their neighbor in hopes of bringing their neighbor down, while building their empty lives up to a higher level...

God Bless,
Tom Miles

 

Solitude

 

Dear MHFM,

 

I wanted to get your clarification on your "Where God is found" posting of about a week ago. In that piece you talk about that God is found in "peace and quiet" and that He is hard to or more difficult to find if you are surrounded by family or friends. It makes perfect sense when you think about it. How is one going to be able to meditate and pray with constant interruptions and the responsibilities and the running around of being parents in these tough economic times? Granted some people are overextending themselves on luxuries and would have more time if they stuck to the basic needs of a family.  I remember reading somewhere in the Bible also where it establishes the point that it is better to remain single than enter into the married state. If one is to read Genesis 2-18 however it states that " it is not good for man to be alone: let us make him a help unto himself." Now I know from a shady past that the lust of the flesh is a passion that is hard to resist and if one remains single he or she will eventually give in to these temptations. I have to admit what was missing in my life before was a strong prayer life and falling away from the sacraments. 

 

If all or most people remained single the population would eventually be reduced dramatically. It is sad to see all my married friends tied down to family related matters and this is probably the number one reason why I or others cannot get through to them regarding the evil in the Vatican II church. There is a side of me that says they are using this (busy nature) as an excuse not to investigate the failings of the church and are also hoping to use it when judged and are presuming God will make "allowances" for parents. I read that one of the greatest sins against the Holy Spirit is the "presumption upon God's mercy and this is so very obvious today. I know God is not going to allow for this. 

 

I may in a round about way answered my own questions here but would still like you take on the married /single states of life.

 

Your supporter,

 

B

 

MHFM: Thanks for the interest.  St. Paul teaches that the single state is better (1 Cor. 7), but some are called to marriage.  Even if people are surrounded by distractions, they need to have that relationship with God which is based on solitude and gives them a holy independence from others.  In other words, they need to have a true interior and prayer life which is firmly rooted in God alone and which enables them to assess things as God sees them and not be distracted or overly dismayed by what others say or think.  Perhaps we can expand more on this as time permits.  We are probably going to be recording a program this evening which will discuss in detail an issue which we think our readers might find interesting.

 

Banned from CMRI over EENS car sticker

 

Bros. Peter and Michael,

 

Rob Blascyk gave us permission to tell others about this and to use his name.

 

Keith

---

 

Greetings Keith

 

Something very interesting happened to me yesterday that I thought you might find interesting.

 

Fr. Radecki after Mass asked to see me,so I went to his office where he proceeded to tell me that my station wagon was banned from church property because the words EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS posted on my back window may be{ I suspect are } offensive to people.   When I asked how could telling people they need to be Catholic to be saved could be offensive, he replied, it was not right to tell people that and we should only pray that people find out. 

 

  He told me he was only following his vow of obedience to Pivarunas because the Bishop does not want offensive or extreme material to be displayed at CMRI churches and it was nothing personal..... I laughed!

 

I stated that this printing had been on my car for a year and a half and why now for this concern he gave no real answer.  I believe though it is because someone that I know in the parish recieved a copy of MHFM"s new dvd and they ran to Fr. Radecki {probably terrified and crying } ,I know this because Fr. Radecki mentioned someone receiving a dvd in the conversation and other than this person telling him he {Fr. Radecki}  would have no way of knowing.   I really feel now that the people there are in a cult like way, they don't read, watch or say anything unless it is CMRI approved no one thinks for themselves…

  

God Bless

 

 Robert

 

Video

 

 

 

Lent

 

Are those from age 7 to death required to have no meat on wednesdays during lent?

is your answer based on the 1958 or 1962 missal?

please

dan reindl

 

MHFM: No, the laws are explained in this file: Traditional Catholic Calendar and Fast Days.

 

The Impostor Sr. Lucia

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Who is?

 

Dear Brothers    

 

I thought of something to ask you. Who in your opinion is the pope in white who is killed according to the real third secret of fatima?  Is it a future true pope after anti-pope benedict 16 dies?  Maybe you might like to do a youtube video to elaborate on this point.  I was thinking of this lately…

 

Mark

 

MHFM: The one you are referring to is the Vatican’s false Third Secret, not the real one.

 

More Insanity

 

Subject: more insanity

 

Hello Brothers:

 

 Have you seen this:

 

“VATICAN CITY, 10 MAR 2010 (VIS) -… Following Vatican Council II some people were convinced that all was new, that a new Church existed, that the pre-conciliar Church had come to an end and that there would be another, completely different Church, an anarchic utopia. Yet thanks to God the wise helmsmen of the ship of Christ, Paul VI and John Paul II, defended on the one hand the novelty of the Church and, at the same time, the uniqueness and continuity of the Church, which is always a Church of sinners, and always a place of grace".

 

It just gets crazier and crazier.

 

-Thanks very much for the years of consecrated work,

 

Mike

 

Martin

 

Hello,

I recently listened to a recording of Fr. Martin on the Art Bell radio show.  During the conversation with Mr. Bell, he said that John Paul II believed in the one world government, and made it his mission to bring the Church into step with it.  Also, he stated flatly that John Paul II wanted to make the Church and the world one.
We know what happens when the Church and the world become one.  Does one need more evidence?

In addition, Fr. Martin said that he had been privileged to read the third secret of Fatima, but he had taken an oath before not to reveal it.  When asked to reveal it by Mr. Bell, he claimed that he didn't have the authority to do so.

Now, wasn't this full messaged ordered to be reveal by Our Lady herself, and doesn't that order supercede any other, especially for those having taken a vow to server Her and the True Church? Or was he justified in not revealing it like Heaven wanted, and in leaving us hanging out to dry, unprepared and not properly warned?  It's hard to respect the authority of any organization that is willing to defy Heaven for its own purposes, and then demand that we obey them without question

 

Karl…

 

MHFM: As a Vatican insider who frankly ran in some shady circles, Malachi Martin was privy to some very interesting inside information.  However, he was sadly not an orthodox Catholic.  He denied the Catholic salvation dogma, and said that John Paul II committed no heresy!  If he had read the real third secret (which is a mystery), he should have revealed it and not doing so is another example of bad will.

 

Follow-up

 

It also occured to me since that if they follow this verse literally, it places them in quite a predicament.  If, as they maintain, the VCII wolves are valid, then per this verse they have to "do as they say."  SSPX is notorius for not doing as Ratzinger or JPII say - they pick and chose as a matter of habit.  If they follow what they say, then the SSPX must be handing out Communion to non-catholics, recognizing some quite unusual "saints," saying the Novus Ordo Missae, etc.  I am sure you have already pointed this out in your materials, but it seems hypocritical to throw this passage out as a reason for (false) obedience. Pax Christi, 

 

Patricia

 

Fatima and the Miracle

 

 

 

Scribes

 

You have covered his response thoroughly, as usual, but I hope you will allow me to add a defense of Matthew 23:1-3.  Unfortunately, this passage is often used as an excuse to adhere to those leaders who do evil, but it does not defend them in this case at all.
 
It says "Jesus spoke to the multitudes and to his disciples, Saying: "the scribes and the Pharisee have sitten on the Chair of Moses.  All things therefore whatsoever they shall say to you, observe and do: but according to their works do ye not; for they say, and do not."
 
Note that Christ identifies that they say and do not, in other words they are hypocrites.  Christ shows here that they are teaching correctly but not following their own rules.  This is not the situation we face now.  These men are not teaching correctly.  The Douay commentary says regarding this passage "such as therefore that did not depart from the letter of the law were called scribes..." 
 
If these VCII anti-Popes taught the truth and did not follow it, it would be scandalous - trouble is, they are not even teaching correctly- they have departed from the letter of the law, therefore they are wolves in sheeps clothing, which is what Our Lord warns people of.  In the very next Chapter of Matthew Christ warns: take heed that no man seduce you;  For many will come in my name saying, I am Christ; and they will seduce many." and only a few verses from that "When therefore, you shall see the abomination of desolation, which was spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place; he that readeth let him understand..." These are the last days.
 
Sorry to be so long - I just wish more Catholics read their bibles.  They get led by false prophets because of ignorance of the scriptures as interpreted by the Church.
 
Have a blessed day,
Patricia

 

MHFM: Yes, it’s an important point, and one which we considered adding to the response.  The argument concerning the Scribes and Pharisees is also irrelevant because the laws and principles which govern the Church of Christ after the promulgation of the Gospel (heresy, automatic excommunication, loss of office, etc.) are not necessarily identical to the laws and principles which governed the people of God before the full institution of the Church.

 

Benedict XVI’s Recent Heresies

 

MHFM: We’ve updated our Benedict XVI's recent heresies file with a new heresy. 

 

Esteem

 

Dear MHFM,

I posed the first few of Bro. Peter's questions to my brother Pat. He is a SSPX follower, and just moved to St. Mary's Kansas. I thought you might be interested in the response. It would be great to hear any thoughts on it...although I think it is typical of an SSPXer.

Here is my email to him in part:

So here is my first question (which has three parts) about your faith (Bro. Peter recently posted a video detailing these questions):

1) Can a Catholic esteem false religions?

1 a) Do the Vatican II Anti-popes, esteem false religions (Islam etc.)?

1 b) Can one be a Catholic and esteem religions which the Church has declared to be diabolical and abominable?

Hope to hear back soon,

Robby

 

HIS RESPONSE:

 

… 1.)  The definition of "esteem" is to give honor to or regard highly.  Of course as Catholics we cannot esteem their specific beliefs because they are false and go against the teaching of the Church.  2.)  It would seem yes, the Popes have honored these false religions in public.  And usually exterior actions are a window into the soul of that person.  However, 3.)  I have absolutely no authority to look into that window and declare anyone a heretic publicly, much less the Vicar of Christ.  This can only be done by a future Pope.  This does not mean that I condone any of these actions (Popes visiting synagogues and the like).  But Christ bid his Apostles to respect the position of authority of the Pharisees and Scribes and not follow their exterior actions.  Whereas we have respect for the Authority and position of the Pope as Head of the Church, but we do not follow his exterior actions if they go against the traditional teachings of the Church.

 

Patrick

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  We discussed more on this point in the recent video, “Material Heretic Nonsense…” (below).  We will also be addressing more angles to this issue.  In short, his response is heretical.  It denies numerous Catholic teachings, such as those brought up in the video.  The Church teaches that such a belief about other religions is incompatible with the possession of the Catholic faith.  It’s not possible to believe in Christ and believe that other religions are good or worthy of esteem.  Since all in the Church have one faith, his admission also places him in a communion of faith with Benedict XVI, a man who believes that it’s good to worship devils, to worship idols and to reject Christ.  He shares faith with one who denies the faith; and therefore, by that admission, he denies the faith.

 

Moreover, he claims that a Catholic can’t esteem false religions.  However, Benedict XVI does that and remains a Catholic, according to him.  If Benedict XVI can do that and remain a Catholic, then so could you or your family members or anyone else.  Therefore, the end result contradicts his claim.  The end result of his position is that a Catholic can esteem false religions and remain not only part of the Church but its leader.

 

Finally, his position that he doesn’t have authority to recognize Benedict XVI as a heretic means that he must accept baptized anti-Catholic Protestants as Catholics too because they haven’t been declared heretics.  If he says otherwise, it destroys his whole argument.  His position also requires him to hold that a man who was raised a Catholic, but then denied Christ for decades and became an atheist, would have to be considered Catholic instead of outside the Church.  If he says otherwise, it destroys his argument. 

 

Additionally, he’s an independent “traditionalist.”  If he can’t judge Benedict XVI, then he needs to follow that through logically and go back to the Novus Ordo churches. 

 

What

 

Dear Brothers,


Here is what I have done with some of the Fatima DVD's I bought from you.  On Mondays, I go to a nursing home… The receptionist… one day she asked me my opinion on a Catholic matter, so today I gave her a DVD and the book- The Bible proves the Catholic Church.  She was very interested as she mentioned she does not like all the modernism.
  Also, one of the nurse's aides was interested in the Rosary when I say it, so a few weeks ago I gave her a copy of the Secret of the Rosary.  Today I gave her a DVD and your book The Bible proves.  I thought she was Catholic, but she said she was raised a Baptist, but she is interested because of the residents there-when she goes into their rooms she likes to comfort them and If they are Catholic she feels she knows what she should to calm them.

… On Sundays when I go to the Latin Mass In Akron, when I come home I get back at 11 AM.  In the old NO Church where I went before Vatican II invaded it, their 10:30 AM 'mass' is going on.  I go in the back, leave some of your flyers and yesterday I left a few DVD's and Bible books. Then I put some of the flyers in the Church Bulletins that are lying on the counter, just randomly. 

God bless you.

Kathryn Rubio

 

Catholic?

 

Dear Brother,


I pray the rosary and read the Bible every day.  I was a hindu but i now believe in the teachings of the Catholic church.   Am i a catholic?  I have not gone through the rituals that normal Catholics go through.Plz reply

 

Samp.

 

MHFM: One is not a Catholic until one believes in the core truths of the faith and has been baptized.  We would advise you to obtain the small catechism we offer, pray the Rosary each day, and then we can help you with your baptism. 

 

The Steps to convert to the traditional Catholic faith and for those leaving the New Mass - Baptism and Conditional Baptism - the Council of Trent's Profession of Faith for Converts

 

Video

 

 

 

Challenges

 

MHFM: We recently challenged various individuals who try to refute the sedevacantist position to debates, and each one has refused.  We will be discussing this.  We will be exposing the hypocrisy, the dishonesty and the alarming lack of charity manifested in these refusals.

 

Question/Comment

 

Dear Brother(s),

I happen upon your web site the past weekend and I have studied it for the past few days. It is an amazing amount of research and work certainty not the type of reading for the timid or even the casual Catholic. Plus with a lot of your topics you are assuming the reader has above average intelligence and the are well schooled in the One,Holy,Roman and Apostolic Church AND have an inclination to finding out more their faith. Sort of a narrow well defined market or person.

Well I am that person -having attended a private chapel in Cleveland, OH for the Holy Mass for the past 15-10 years and trying working out my salvation in fear and trembling I was amazed that a site like this even existed.I have a deep love and respect for the Benedictine Order having attended St. Vincent College and getting an understanding of the Pre. Vat II and Post Vat.II Church firsthand. Having read the Promises of the Benedictine Order years ago- I guess I am trying to discern what is really going on with the OSB and the remnant church of which I consider myself a lowly, sinful, insignificant member. I saw right through  the Vat. II Council once it was explained to me and I experience The Mass Of All Time…

The only thing on the web site I have a hard time with is the knock on Rock -and roll music, That is my weak point.

So keep up the good work.

Richard

 

MHFM: It’s truly nice to hear about your interest.  We’re not sure if your comments mean that you have stopped going to the New Mass and are in full agreement, but we sincerely hope that you continue to look at the material and come to those conclusions.

 

Difficult Choice

 

We have had to abandon homeschooling as in this economic time it was essential for my wife to return to work, else we would lose our house.  My wife has sent our son to the V2 school  and she and my son now start attending and supporting v2 services and she says this is the right thing to do. Should I continue to stay with her or should we split up the family and separate.

 

MHFM: You should tell her that she can’t take the son to the services.  If she refuses, you should probably split up.  Those would be legitimate grounds.  As head of the house, you should not allow her to take your son to the invalid New Mass.

 

The problem

 

Subject: the problem

 

about you saying john pall was the Antichrist is that he ruled more than a time, time and a half a time which is the last part of the tribulation which is yet to come so he may be Antichrist but he is not the Antichrist..

. mother Merry said the next two popes and the end would come so the soon we will see our next pope which may be the one who says its ok to get the microchip and will not him self get it .. and that is the false profit in the church and the Antichrist will fix-things and according to a ST pall he was there present with him at one time the church knows that he has been alive for over 200years and can not be killed, till Christ kills him

the upside down cross the pope wore was about saint peter being crucified up side down and the left was made the right it has to do with gospels that were not included in the bible…

god bless in Jesus name

 

Ekult…

 

MHFM: The 1260 days, or a time, and times and half a time, is a period understood by many to be symbolic of the duration, not necessarily the literal extent of the final tribulation or the Antichrist’s reign.  Our Lady did not say that there would be two more popes.  There is also strong evidence that the mark of the Beast is spiritual, not physical.  We will probably have an in-depth discussion which will cover some more thoughts on the Apocalypse, but there is no doubt that Antichrist is presently in control of the Vatican and has been for some time.  It’s not just a phase, but a signal of the end times.  Moreover, John Paul II’s astounding preaching wasn’t just that of any old Antichrist, but the specific fulfillment of Antichrist in the Vatican.  Nevertheless, people can have different opinions about who the Antichrist is.  What’s indisputable is that the forces of Antichrist, in a special way, have taken over Rome; and, when that’s considered, it’s not very plausible to believe that it’s not in fulfillment of the prophecies about the Great Apostasy and the final tribulation.

 

The upside-down cross was not in honor of St. Peter.  When John Paul II sat in the chair with the gigantic upside-down cross above his head, it was not on any one of St. Peter’s feast days; and nothing was mentioned about St. Peter.  In fact, John Paul II also wore the upside-down cross on his vestment when he was a “cardinal,” before his so-called election!  His use of the upside-down cross was a signal, to those with eyes to see and who don’t let evil pass without denunciation, of what is going on.

 

Questions

 

Byzantine Catholics

 

Hello Brother Michael and Brother Peter, I've got a couple questions I'd like to ask you. My first question is:

If Jesus Christ, our Most True God decided to destroy all the "bishops" in Vatican II, could the Byzantine Catholic Bishops, because their Holy Orders are valid, elect a true Pope from one of their own ranks?

If I wanted to join a monastery, would a Byzantine Catholic monastery be a good option?...

Please get back to me as soon as you can.
-Brandon

 

MHFM: No, they couldn’t because they accept Vatican II.  A man would have to reject all the heretics and heresies of the Vatican II sect and accept all Catholic teachings to be a true pope.  Obviously one may not join a monastery that accepts Antipope Benedict XVI. 

 

Bashings

 

Subject: Catholic Bashings

 

I wouldn't want to be within 100 feet of you when you come face to face with Christ. I can feel the heat already!!

 

P…

 

MHFM: You must feel the heat of the Hell fire emanating from Satan’s presence which blinds you to the truth.  We’re sure you have no problem with Benedict XVI, who denies that Jesus is the Christ; and yet you consider the enunciation of Catholic dogma and the denunciation of heretical unbelief to be evil.  You label the defense of Christ as Antichrist, and defend the doctrines of Antichrist as being of that of Christ.  You are so deceived.

 

Contrast

 

Dear MHFM, 

 

To contrast heretical antipope Ratzinger with a great true pope of the past-Pope Innocent III-Fourth Lateran Council-On the Jews #69- It would be too absurd for a blasphemer of Christ to exercise power over Christians...#70-Certain people who have come voluntarily to the waters of sacred baptism, as we learnt, do not wholly cast off the old person in order to put on the new more perfectly...  And today, the Jews, with the heretical blessing of Ratzinger can be saved by professing their Jewish beliefs grossly apart from worshiping Our savior Jesus Christ?  And Vatican II is a true council of the Roman Catholic Church deeming this so?-Please!  Lord Jesus, by the intercessory power of Most Holy Mother, bless and empower the sacred truths passed on by MHFM, protecting us from satan's minions in apostate Rome!

 

Dea

 

Frightening

 

Dear Brothers Dimond,

I received a frightening e-mail, telling third Lady of Fátima's secret is going to be fullfilled after a 8 hours earthquake (like  last ones during weekend) near from where I am , and after a very cold night, that three days of darkness is about to come and we must be locked inside our houses , light blessed wax (only these will light) and pray. That only a third part of current population will survive. And many other things.  Please, tell me if this message has any sense, since you have read a lot about this issue. If you need I could translate more parts of the message,

May Good God bless you,

Vivian

 

MHFM: No, that’s not true.  Those are false messages which are meant to distract people from what they need to be protected from Satan’s assault: the state of grace.  Having a lighted blessed wax candle is not the issue.

 

Father

 

Hi, I was reading the e-mails you post on your page and I came across the one on  Fr De Smet. Can you e-mail me the title and Author, this seems like a great book that would shut up those people who do not understand that the Protestants were cruel and horrible people and the Catholics were the opposite.  Thanks 

 

VC

 

MHFM: The name of the book is, The Life of Fr. De Smet by Fr. E. Laveille, S.J.  It’s cited in our salvation book.

 

Hand

 

At 8:48 of Apostasy and Antichrist the Pope raises his Rt. hand with index finger and small finger extended even with the thumb out. I have been shown this is the New World order sign after Baphomet???

 

R…U…F

 

MHFM: He’s not the pope.  That’s the first thing.  But yes, they do give devil hand signs and those are captured in our videos.  That’s what he is doing in the clip to which you refer.  The Vatican II antipopes are very evil. 

 

Messiah

 

Messiah

 

I'm shocked that Pope Benedict has said that the OT passages that predict the Messiah, do not refer to Jesus!  If this were true, Jesus would have no validity. Plus as you say, the NT passages tell us that Jesus is the fulfillment. This is a huge issue.

 

Who does Ratzinger think Jesus is I wonder? What does he think Jesus bases His credentials on - if not the OT prophecies? Who is the Jesus that Ratzinger worships?  If J.R. doesn't believe Jesus is the Messiah/God, then he had better not be worshiping Him, because we can only worship God.  If Jesus is not the Messiah, then that means the Messiah has not yet come. WE might as well be Jews.  This may seem like a little thing to some, but when examined, it is HUGE

Thanks for the videos.

Christine

 

MHFM: It is a huge issue.  It alone proves that he’s not a Christian and not a true pope.  The problem is that few seem to grasp the significance of key points.

 

Heretical devil worship

 

Subject: heretical devil worship

 

Hi Brothers:  I'm trying to find where St. Paul says the "gods of the Gentiles are devils" & where the curse from God is (giving them a false religion to believe as true). I work security where thousands of prots. come to "christian rock & heretical services".  The behavior, attire & attacks against true Christianity are satanic.  If their speakers told them to burn the small formerly Catholic church beside the convention center & kill any occupants; they'd do it.  Total mob psychology! 

 

History depicts their ancestor's slaughter of thousands of Priests, Sisters & the faithful.  My daughter tragically believes the lies against the true Church told by those who committed those atrocities (we're accused of) against Catholics/Christians...

 

Contemplating the true worship of God in the Blessed Eucharist with the contrast of any heretical assembly is enough to terrify any believer to pray constantly that we don't fall too.  It's clear that Satan appears as almost anything drawing them (falling like snow flakes) into Hell.  Two conversations I had with young "youth ministers" shows their brainwashed hatred of historical Christianity & the original Bible.  One prot college student said he wanted to follow God & yet had no problem with their heretical "bible".  Both denied the true Bible was authored by the true Church.  They're oblivious to the fact that our Lord tells us exactly how we are to worship/please Him!!  Because they hate Him while claiming to love Him!!

 

Dave

 

MHFM: In regard to your question: 1 Corinthians 10:20 & 2 Thess. 2:10.

 

“Material Heretic” Nonsense

 

 

 

Concerning

 

Subject: Debate with Jabinger

 

Greetings, Brother(s) Dimond...


Ordinarily I'm not motivated to respond to pointless visceral criticism, but I had to marvel at the irony in the latest e-mail from Jabinger.  His spelling and grammar, though slightly improved, still left much to be desired, and he didn't always use complete sentences even when he apparently thought he was doing so, but he did use the rather intellectual sounding word "obtuse" (and even spell it correctly) in criticizing your reply--though apparently he didn't have a clue that this word (meaning "not quick in perception, feeling or intellect") characterizes his own writing...

He accuses you of nitpicking his spelling because you are unable to defend your position, but he fails to say what you were supposed to defend your position against.  I have read his original e-mail repeatedly, in search of anything resembling a coherent point to challenge any of your positions on anything, and I have found nothing of the kind.  I'm seeing only cheap insults, with any discernible intellectuality reserved for his sophomoric stab at injecting an element of wit into his pointless put-downs.  If he had presented anything in the broad category of a logical or factual challenge, I'm sure you would have addressed such a point directly.  As it is, sad to say, he seems oblivious to the fact that he hasn't even made a point, let alone a logically persuasive one.  Some people can't tell heat from light, then simply condemn the other person when their vacuous vitriol doesn't win a convert.  This is unfortunate, but maybe Bill Milligan is right--we should view it as comic relief.

It does seem to reinforce the evidence that you don't duck a challenge, though, which is something positive that we can draw from the experience of reading this exchange.  Thanks for being so open to feedback.  I hope future e-mail writers, even if critical, will be more polite and give you something of greater substance to address.

Lyndon Olson

 

The Consecration of Russia

 

 

 

 

     

NFP

 

Just to be sure that I understand the argument against NFP, it is only acceptable for a married couple to have sex during the 3-5 day period of fertility each month, correct? Every act of sex must have the intention of conception so sex is not allowed when the woman is not fertile on the other 25 or so days.  ‘Intercourse even with one’s legitimate wife is unlawful and wicked where the conception of offspring is prevented.’

 

Rae…

 

MHFM: You are not correct.  This is addressed in our article.  It is not unlawful to use marriage rights at times when the woman is thought to be infertile, for in that case they are not doing anything to positively prevent conception.  In addition, the woman could still get pregnant.  NFP is wrong because when using it people restrict the use of marriage rights to the times when they believe pregnancy cannot or is less likely to occur.  That’s the sin: to take positive steps to avoid conception.  Moreover, there are even cases in which women have become pregnant while already pregnant with another child.  This happened again recently and was reported in the news.  People should let God plan their families, and not be concerned about tracking times, etc.

 

“Catholic” Colleges

 

 

 

George

 

Dear MHFM-

Possibly you already know that Francis Cardinal George of Chicago, President of the United States Conference of (so-called) Catholic Bishops has announced that "Catholics and Mormons stand as one in defense of religious liberty" (aka "insanity")… [a] V2 apologist radio station will host an "exclusive interview" with George… so that he can present his "insights."

-RDS

 

Opinion

 

Hello Brothers!
 
In my opinion, the gold looks better then the green, but I think changing it up every once in a while is better…

 

Daniel

 

--

 

Brothers,

 

My vote is for Blue...as in water Baptism. 

 

Tom

   

“Material Heretics”

 

Dear Brothers,
 
Great short video on the incredible nonsense of the position that the Apostate Benedict XVI (and all the other 4 Antipopes of the Vatican II sect) are "material heretics." Benedict XVI and the other four Antipopes of the Vatican II sect are closet sedevacantists - they know that none of them are popes! This can be demonstrated by the fact that the Vatican II sect's antipopes are almost totally incestuous- they almost exclusively praise and quote only the other V-2 Antipopes! For instance, in a word search of all Antipope Encyclicals, including the title of the encyclicals and all references, the name Paul VI appears 192 times, Pius XII 175, Leo XIII 95, John Paul II 90, John XXIII 88, Pius XI 84, (St.) Pius X 19, Benedict XV 16, and John Paul I 6 times (Some other true popes are mentioned but not often enough to be significant). Of the over 200 true popes in Church history, only a handful are regularly mentioned by the Antipopes, but the Antipopes get a total of 376 mentions (versus 389 in the example above). This shows a huge flaw in their position because they neglect many true popes' great writings. It reveals that they are perfectly capable of quoting past claimants to the Papacy, whether true or false claimants - a total of 765 mentions/quotes of a past claimant to the Papacy, in the example above. Importantly, it proves that it is impossible that the 5 Antipopes of the Vatican II sect could be ignorant of Catholic dogmas and teachings (writings of true popes), and that therefore it is totally impossible for them to be "material heretics."

 

Another staggering flaw in their position is the total elimination of the words “heresy”, “schism”, and “apostasy” from the Vatican II documents. The words “apostate” and “schismatic” cannot be found in the Vatican documents either, and the word “heretic” only appears 6 times in the footnotes due to it being a reference to St. Irenaeus’, “Against Heretics.”…

 

To accept the position that Benedict XVI is a mistaken Catholic i.e. a “material heretic”, and not an Antichrist Apostate Antipope, one would have to believe the absurd notion that he doesn’t even know about the very things which he explicitly rejects (Heresies of Benedict XVI File), such as that Benedict XVI has never heard of:

 

-       Jesus Christ - because he teaches that it is unnecessary to accept Him for salvation. (Benedict XVI, God and the World, 2000, p. 209)

 

-       Vatican I - because he believes that it is problematic for schismatics and other Non-Catholics to accept the Papacy. (Benedict XVI, Principles of Catholic Theology, 1982, pp. 197-198)

 

-       The Council of Trent - because he promotes the Joint Declaration on Justification with the Lutherans, and says its decree on the Eucharist is offensive. (Benedict XVI, Address at Ecumenical Meeting in Lutheran church in Warsaw, May 25, 2006), (Benedict XVI, Feast of Faith, 1981, p. 130)

 

-       Protestantism - because he says it is not heresy. (Benedict XVI, The Meaning of Christian Brotherhood, pp. 87-88)…

 

Chris White

 

Amorth

 

In the posted article Fr Amorth says, of course the “Pope” knows about the Satanism in the clergy but he does what he can. Where do you start w/that?  Fr Amorth learned of this from people and also from demons that speak under obedience during exorcism.  Fr Amorth should be privy to a lot of things he had questions about yet he is still V2 and protects the "Pope". At least he dared to speak.

Matthew

 

MHFM: Yes, he is unfortunately a total heretic and apostate.  In a book about him, it mentions that he is a devotee of John Paul II (the deceased manifest heretic).  He even uses a statue of John Paul II at his exorcisms!  That’s really bad.  He must know about John Paul II’s horrible false ecumenism and acts of apostasy.  That shows us that even the most conservative among the Vatican II clergy are quite heretical.  He acknowledges that “cardinals” are in satanic cults, but he doesn’t realize or want to acknowledge that the problem is actually worse than that.

 

Georgetown

 

Hello Dimond Brothers,

 

A few days ago a friend told me about how the Georgetown University which is supposedly "Catholic", covered up religious symbols in order to accomodate Obama's visit.  This was at the request of the White House staff, and of course the apostates at the university went right along with the request and covered up all religious symbols.  If they were true Catholics they would never do such a thing nor would they have accepted Obama as a guest…

 

Sylvestre

 

MHFM: Yes, that was really bad.

 

More from Jab

 

SPELLING MAKES THE DIFFERENCE TO… LIKE YOURSELVES. I THOUGHT THAT RELIGION AND ITS PHILISOPHICAL POSITIONS AS THEY APPLIES TO THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH.  JUST MORE PROOFA OF YOUR INANE ANTICHRISTIAN POSITION.  WHEN ONE CAN'T DEFEND ONE'S POSITION,  ATTACK THOSE WHO OPPOSE IT BY ANY OBTUSE METHOD AVAILABLE.  YOU ARE TRULY ANTIRELIGIOUS PERVERTS

 

Jabinger

 

MHFM: Actually, that’s not something we care much about.  We only mentioned it because it was relevant in your case.  When a devilish, blind, utterly arrogant unbeliever such as yourself (whom we’ve never heard from before) comes right out of the box throwing out ridiculously false and insulting things, and at the same time he is unable to spell simple words – including words that are pertinent to the issues he’s attempting to discuss – it speaks to the falsity of his claims and the level of his spiritual blindness.  You are an abomination headed right for the pit. 

 

Sad

 

Subject: Sad

 

Dear Brothers,


Just wanted to share something.  My wife and kids and I were out today on my day off. We thought we would pass out some of your materials while we were out. I stopped by this building that said "Divine Mercy Center" on the outside. I figured it was VII and thought maybe they could benefit from your new "Fatima" video.  I walked up to the door to see if it was open, it was and I poked my head inside. I was met there by a rude, overweight man who had the most effeminate way about him. I asked if it was a church and he said it was. I asked if there was a table or something in the church where people could pick up free info on the Catholic Church because I would like to put some stuff there. He said there was but it had to be reviewed by the priest first. I said "Ok, I'll call the priest and ask him about it."

He said in his extremely girly voice "What is the material"  I told him I would just talk to the priest because it looked like this man was very angry at me.  He said "You're speaking to him".  My mouth dropped right in front of him. This sad looking, probably homo man, in front of me, was the VII "priest" at this "parish". I was totally disgusted… It was not funny to see this with my own eyes. It was sad.


Nate

 

MHFM: That’s extremely interesting, a further example of the Vatican II apostasy, its moral and spiritual bankruptcy and emptiness.  Besides giving perhaps one to the “priest,” we would also say that people should try to give the extra copies of materials to the people (or leave them for them in some way) rather than to the Novus Ordo “priests” who might throw them away.

 

De Smet

 

I recently finished the book on Fr De Smet. His accomplishments were supernatural.  It shows among many other things the contrast between the Catholic missionaries and the Protestant missionaries and how different they were in how they treated the Indians. The Indians could trust the Black Robes but not the married bible peddlers. If finished it in 4 sittings at 400+ pages. It's a wonderful read. Should be mandatory in "Catholic" schools.

 

Matthew

 

MHFM: Yes, it’s a very interesting book.  There are also some very good quotes against invincible ignorance and the heresy that people can be saved without baptism and the Catholic faith.  They are quoted in our book, Outside the Catholic Church There is Absolutely No Salvation.

 

Book

 

Subject: The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church

 

I don’t know how I got your book, but I’ve read only the first few pages and knew this is something I’ve got to hand out.  I’m also going to use it… because of the way it is presented and it leads you to the right interpretation.  I’m so grateful to have this…  Eileen

 

Jabinger

 

You were actually very kind to Jabinger.  You gave him a pass on several more misspelled words including reading, Roman, needed, and the always difficult “that”.   He also needs quite a bit of help on grammar and syntax.  I know that academic standards aren’t what they once were, but it is still hard to believe he is a graduate of a Jesuit, even a modern faux Jesuit institution.  I find that most heretics can yet spell.  I’m not the greatest speller myself, but it is so easy today with spell checker to clean up your work.   How can such buffoonery be explained?  Is it OK to view it as a form of comic relief?

 

Bill Mulligan  

 

Letter

 

Subject: Jabinger’s letter

 

Brothers,


Isn't wonderful how the devil consistently shows himself in order to prove what you say.  In Jabinger’s letter he has completely proved your point regarding the Vatican II schools and colleges.  Not only does it fill the student's mind with impurity but they pass someone to a higher grade without the ability to use simple English grammar.

All that is needed to prove the points you make is to have the opposition respond.  Not much else needs to be added.

Know that you and all at the monastery are in our prayers nightly.
Paul

 

1960

 

Dear Brothers:

 

At the bottom of the Epoch Times article you linked on your site is this sentence.  Note the year, please:

 

"In 1960, Chile suffered the biggest earthquake ever recorded in human history, one with a magnitude of 9.5 Richter. This terrible event caused thousands of deaths, and the country's terrain was changed forever."

 

DH

 

Relative of Satan

 

RIGHT OUT OPF THE BOX, WHAT RELIGIOUS ORDER ARE YOU A PART ?  IN READING YOUR DRIBBLE WITH ONLY A MODICU M OF KNOWLEDGE OF THEOLOGY, I ONLY HAVE A MINOR IN THEOLOGY FROM LOYOLA U. CHICAGO AND THE BENEFIT OF BEING EDUCATED BY THE DOMINICANS IN FENWICK H.S. IN OAK PARK, IL., I HAVE NEVER EXPERIENCED SUCH VITRIOLIC, SATANIC IDIOTACY WRITTEN BY MEMBERS OF A SUPPOSSED ROMAN CATHOLIC RELIGIOUS ORDER. CULT FITS THE GROUP BETTER.  YOUR PHILOSOPHY, ETHICS, LOGIC, MORALS AND MODIVATION CANNOT BE SANELY DEFENDED. IN DECADES PAST YOUR GROUP WOULD BE PROPERLY TAKEN CARE OF IN AN ASYLUM, WHERE YOU WOULD BE FEDD AND WATERED, AS NEESDED, AND CARED FOR SO THAR YOU WOULD NOT INJURE YOURSELVES OR OTHJERS.  WERE I TO RATE YOUR GROUP TO THE BORGIA POPE ALEXANDE VI REGARDING ALL ASPECT OF THE RONAN CATHOLIC CHURCH, I WOULD HAVE TO NOM INATE HIM FOR SAINTHOOD AND CAST YOUR GROUP INTO THE LOWEST LEVELS FOUND IN DANTE'S "INFERNO". YOU KNOW, THE BOOK ON HELL.  FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE A LITTLE BEHIND IN CATHO;IC CHURCH HISTORY, TYOU CAN BONE UP ON THE SUBJECT OF ALEX VI  BY READIBNF MARIO PUZO'S  BOOK  " THE FAMILY ".  SOME OF YOU MIGHT GET YOUR SEXUAL JOLLYS READING IT. 
 
IN CLOSING, I MUST SAY THAT YOUR GROUP ARE THE CLOEST GROUP THAT I KNOW OF WHO CAN LEGITIMATILY CLAIM TO BE THE TRUE RELATIVES OF SATEN.

 

Jabinger…

 

MHFM: Since you are of your father the Devil (John 8:44), you classify Catholic truth along with Satan’s lies and spread satanic lies as if you are defending Catholic truth.  As you mock the spread of Catholic dogma and demonstrate your utter ignorance and demonic malice, you remind one of the devilish Pharisees who said that Jesus Christ cast out devils by the prince of devils (Matthew 9:34).  It’s therefore no surprise that you have impure insinuations in your e-mail, for you speak with an evil mouth and are under the control of Satan, who revels in impure apostates like you.  You might want to try to learn how to spell the words: idiocy, supposed, motivation, fed, legitimately and Satan.

 

Feedback

 

MHFM: Here’s some of the feedback we received on the color question.  Thanks to all who responded.  Of those who responded, it’s about 50-50 at this time.

 

GOLD

 

Subject: Home page color

 

Hi Brothers,

 

I'd like to see the page stay gold.

 

Christina

---

 

GOLD

 

For what it is worth I think the yellow is a better background color, it reminds me of the Papal flag

 

Robert B

----

GOLD

 

Dear Mhfm,

I prefer the gold colour.

Sean

---

GOLD

 

Dear Brothers,

 

I seem to prefer the gold background colors over the green. One more idea may be to change the dark blue lettering to another color and use a blue background as this is the color associated with Mary.

 

Bob Bohr

---

 

GOLD

 

Subject: Yellow is easier to read on my old eyes

 

Brothers:

 

Thank you for changing the color.  I always like to read the Quotes of the Day and the green was hard to read the black typeface.  The yellow makes it easier to read.

 

Thank you again,

DH

 

---

GOLD

 

I like the idea of changing colors for it reminds me of changing seasons.  Winter, I imagine, is like the time of our Lord's crucifixion; spring, His Resurrection.  Since spring is nigh, and Easter close, I think gold is befitting. 

 

-Zak

---

 

GOLD

 

In answer to your question as to the color of the background (green or gold) I choose gold.  It is easy on these older eyes of mine. Also the various colors used to highlight the main topics of the page seem to go well with the gold. The entire page appears softer, in my humble opinion. The content of the website is worth its weight in "GOLD"

God Bless you Brothers
Jennifer

---

LIGHT GREEN

 

Dear MHFM     I prefer a light green background color for the mainpage color. Also I sort of like a black outer space type color background for some other secondary links  for your site… MARK CA

---

GOLD

 

The gold is better

 

MM

---

LIGHT GREEN

 

MHFM,

 

Green because it was more comfortable to read your website…

 

Bernardo

---

 

BLUE

 

The blue color was better than the light green or the gold; the gold being the worst of the three (no offense).

 

Krim…

 

MHFM: Blue might be the best.  However, the problem we noticed is that it’s bright and it can make it difficult to look at things for longer periods of time.  We might bring it back for a time or a trial.

 

---

LIGHT GREEN

 

… I like the green color.

 

AP

---

LIGHT GREEN

 

Dear Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,

 

Hardly noticed the change, but for what it's worth , I think I would go for the Green.....it must be the "Irish" in me!  Besides, St. Patrick's Day is just around the corner!

 

God bless

 

David

---

LIGHT GREEN OR BLUE

 

… I've always prefered the light blue color on your website, and I always considered it more soothing. If I had to choose between the green and golden color, I would choose the green one…

 

Jakub

---

LIGHT GREEN

 

Brothers,

 

Keep the Green colour on the website, it’s easy on the eye as well as being a nice colour.

 

Thanks for all the amazing info on the site.

 

Jim  

---

LIGHT GREEN

 

I look forward to the soothing sage-type green color you've had, however, I think that anything in the blue-green color family as long as it is on the softer side (much more soothing in these tempestuous days we are living in) are ideal.  Isn't it interesting the days are technically getting shorter now due to the axis shifting?  Jesus did promise God would shorten the days for the sake of the elect:   was he referring to this?  Is this another sign?  The days are getting shorter!

 

A

---

LIGHT GREEN

 

I prefer the light green more. But both do look good

 

Shuck…

 

MHFM: Thanks for the others who wrote.  Gold is up for now just to change things up, but light green has not been retired.  It may return any day. 

 

Color

 

MHFM: We are interested in hearing opinions from readers about whether they prefer the light green color or the gold color for our website.  If you have an opinion, please e-mail us and indicate which one you like better.

 

Can’t

 

Subject: Leading a horse to water

 

Dear Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,

 

It is quite obvious, Eizabeth has not bothered to read your material thoroughly, or even at all... 

 

 As the saying goes: ' You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink."

 

The MHFM provides the information ( water ), but they can't force people to read it, if they don't want to!

 

God bless,

 

David 

 

Fr. C

 

Subject: Fr. Corapi Exposed Video

 

I would like to understand what Church Authority of the Roman Catholic Church (under Pope Benedict XVI) authorized you to defame Fr. Corapi by calling him a heretic?

 

How come the Pope himself has not announced that fact?  I guess how are the faithful to know ..?  Father Corapi teaches everything in accordance with the Church's Teaching and in line with the Gospels of the New Testament.

 

Please respond.  Thank you,

Elizabeth

 

MHFM: First, Antipope Benedict XVI is not an authority in the Catholic Church.  According to the teaching of the Catholic Church and the popes, he is without doubt a manifest heretic and therefore an antipope.  See: The Catholic Teaching that a heretic cannot be a valid pope [PDF file].  Benedict XVI doesn’t even believe that Jesus is the Messiah, and he denies Vatican I, among other things.  There have been over forty antipopes in Catholic history, and we are presently in the Great Apostasy.  One doesn’t need any special authority to recognize and denounce as heretics those who dissent from Catholic teaching.  The Church teaches that those who depart from the rule of Catholic faith must be considered heretics and outside the Church. 

 

Corapi is unfortunately a heretic because he embraces salvation outside the Church; he also accepts false religions and false ecumenism.  False ecumenism is the Vatican II sect’s movement which respects, wants to unite and pray with non-Catholic sects and false religions.  Those who embrace false ecumenism, as Corapi does, have abandoned the Catholic religion (see Pope Pius XI, Mortalium Animos).  He also thinks that Jews have a “mission” and that they can be saved in their religion.  This is heresy.  He is without question a heretic.  He also serves a role as a false prophet for those who are looking for a voice which speaks some moral truth but mixes it with Vatican II apostasy.  Wake up, and look at the material on our website which provides the real Catholic faith. 

 

Colleges, drugs

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Thank you for posting the video on the Crazy "Catholic" Colleges, which are not even remotely Catholic. The only thing that is really taught at the Vatican II Colleges is how NOT to be Catholic and the only qualification to be received from such place is a Masters degree in Sin with majors in heresy and apostasy! Sin is a sacrifice to Satan. The Religious Indifferentism in such places is so extreme: pro-abortion, pro-gay, pro-divorce, pro-jew, pro-hindu, pro-buddhist, pro-anything that is not true Traditional Catholic. It's crazy.

 

Thank you for the comments about how drugs open a persons eyes to the demonic realm. I remember, years ago, being offered drugs (which I refused) because they were supposedly "spiritual". Even back then I knew there are only evil spirits associated with drugs. I knew a girl who over-dosed on heroin. At her funeral (which my mother attended, not me) they quoted her as having said that her drug problem "was like a demon following her." Many "artists" have used drugs to supposedly tap into their creativity, but in reality are opening the gateway to the dark spiritual realm. Another man I knew was recovering from an addiction, and after 2 years was still having huge problems, like horrible nightmares. Many other people I've known who took drugs at some point made a total wreck of their lives. Also, the Illuminati and other occult groups use drugs all the time to control their members. Sorceries is exactly what such substance abuse is!

 

"D" is blinded by sin. It's amazing how many people write into you Brothers criticizing you for being like Protestants, Schismatics and other non-Catholics, but they fail to see their hypocrisy, i.e. that Benedict XVI and the Vatican II sect are all for Non-Catholics! It's outrageous!!

 

God Bless,

 

Chris White

 

Axis

 

Thought some of the e-exchangers may find this interesting.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aLAUn4Gy92ss


God Bless
Jennifer

 

The Great Apostasy and The Antichrist

 

 

 

It's also interesting to consider that Benedict XVI's name in Greek ("Benediktos") equals 666.  People really should watch this video all the way through.  This is a small sample section from our new DVD, The Third Secret of Fatima, the Impostor Sr. Lucia, and the End of the World.  The actual DVD is of higher quality than this sample video.

 

Four times

 

How sick the "V-2 Catholic" girls are 4x more likely to fornicate than secular college girls---the explanation?  For one thing, they go to their local "V-2  FAKE masses"  DRESSED LIKE THE CHEAPEST POSSIBLE HOOKERS!  Personally, when I attended V-2 up until about one year ago, these girls at "mass"----- wow----truthfully I do not exaggerate,  I really could not tell them apart from the HOOKERS ON THE WORST STREETS OF ATLANTIC CITY!!!  So their lack of modesty and brazen lack thereof, does not help.  I am sure there are other factors which I am probably just as happy not to know about.  What I can see in broad daylight in their own "churches" is believe me---bad enough!  I even noticed this while working at two elementary "Catholic" schools before converting to sedev. last winter----the mothers --- they all look and dress just like hookers, too!  the heavy (very ugly) makeup,  the tight this and non-existent that for apparel----so I suppose their own daughters just copy them!  Our Lady talked about this at Fatima, that many fashions would be introduced that would offend God very much....from "fashion" to fornication:  not a big step.  The next step: into Hell, but they can't get out of there.  Our Lady Help of Christians:  Pray for us!

 

Anne

 

Comment

 

Dear MHFM, 

 

Your ministry hits it on the head every, single time.  How clueless the world remains that has bought the lies of satan and his minions imbedded in Rome at this time in salvation history.  If you suggest to anyone anymore just to pray one Ave Maria, just one, most give you a look like they've been struck by a rock.  I've seen people actually flinch when I've suggested they pray just one Ave Maria.  The world is clueless.  God Bless MHFM.

 

Dea

 

Sorcery

 

Someone I know was on the drug meth, they claim they are not doing it anymore, but they say they see souls, other beings & UFO etc all the time.....I heard that meth causes hallucinations, or does this sound like possession...??   Is it possible to see 'souls' and other entities without being possessed?

 

Steve

 

MHFM: By his use of drugs, we’ve believe he’s putting himself into a state in which he can see and have access to demonic entities.  In the Apocalypse (e.g., chapter 9, verse 21) the word sorceries is used.  It’s from the Greek “pharmakeia,” which includes the use of drugs to achieve hallucinations, as part of witchcraft, evil arts, etc.  The point is that there is a biblical connection between drug use, such as you describe, and sorcery (access to evil spirits).  It’s therefore no surprise that he’s seeing evil spirits.  He’s obviously in mortal sin, but he might also be possessed.  He doesn’t have to be possessed to see the demonic entities, but he’s definitely opening himself up to becoming possessed. 

 

Apocalypse 9:21- “Neither did they penance from their murders, nor from their sorceries, nor from their fornication, nor from their thefts.”

 

Waves

 

Subject: Waves

 

Thank you for so specifically citing the verse on the "waves":  this verse (and I do believe there are at least one or two others like it which very specifically do mention "waves") has been on my mind in the last several days given the many "wave" events--you saw the one in CA with the surfers etc among many many others--(sometimes while cleaning/working in home I LISTEN to Bible on CDs so I hear notable things but do not always have a chance to grab paper and pen to jot down verse with up to elbows in kitchen sink etc!!!)  But yes CERTAINLY the "waves" prophecy is being fulfilled very obviously right now----I think in 2004 with the very major tsunami around Phuket,  Thailand,  it's become very obvious to those who do study scripture…

 

That guy "Dan":  he needs to read a little history to get a grasp on the reality of the free-masonic infiltration----anyone who reads history can surely grasp this reality in Church history-----… maybe he needs to "take the red pill" I guess this is a "Matrix" reference to facing the hard cold facts of where we really are.  If it were not for the work of MHFM, I'd still be an unhappy V-2er or possibly just lost with no hope anymore... 

 

Comment

 

The new Fatima DVD is wonderful.  Beyond excellent.  How could anyone not be absolutely convinced of what is going on?  Unless of course they just don't want to accept the truth.  Beatification of JPII on Good Friday?  God help us!

 

Roxanne

 

Distress of Nations

 

Subject: Earthquakes

 

Dear Brothers:

 

The terrible, recent earthquakes in Haiti and Chile are certainly awful.

 

In both countries, do you think that these earthquakes could in any way be a punishment from God for the heresies of the conciliar church and for the apostasy of Catholics to "evangelical" and other protestant and heretical sects?

 

EJP, M.D., D.D.

 

MHFM: Yes, we believe those earthquakes are a punishment for sin, heresy and general apostasy.  The level of the world’s paganism and rejection of God at this time is simply indescribable.  However, more precisely, it is our opinion that we are seeing the fulfillment, or the beginning of the fulfillment, of Luke 21:25:

 

Luke 21:25- “And there shall be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars; and upon the earth distress of nations, by reason of the confusion of the roaring of the sea and of the waves.”

 

There is no way that one can say that what we saw this weekend didn’t correspond to what is stated in this verse, specifically the bolded portion.  Following one of the biggest earthquakes in recorded history, the countries of Chile, America (Hawaii), New Zealand, Australia, Japan, Russia, etc. were all in distress because they thought a tsunami was coming their way (i.e., because of the confusion of the roaring of the sea and of the waves).  We wouldn’t be surprised at all if there were more earthquakes like this which sparked tsunamis or rise in sea levels or distress of countries for fear of them, in fulfillment of this verse. 

 

Information

 

Good Morning!

 

Just wanted to give thanks for the information on the consecration/conversion of Russia, I had referenced it to my loved one in conversation and needed some answers… he helped me out and then some, your link about the truth in 1952 of Pope Pius has shed amazing new light on this for me and am forever grateful for this knowledge, wow! how things get confusing if you don't keep seeking the truth, God bless and thank you…

 

Theodore Mooney

Los Angeles,CA

 

Poor

 

Ow you poor souls, what sin you do against the body of christ the church.  Sin has blinded you so deeply.  You contradict the protestant churches when you yourself did exactly what they did.  Do you know that if what you say is true Jesus has lied to us.  If you say that a council of the church made an error then the gates of hell have triumphed over the church. If you are right Satan has one.  But we both know that Satan cannot win because the Gates of Hell will never overcome the church.  The church cannot be destroyed but your claim against the popes, the Vatican II and the teachings of the Magisterium only point to one truth that the gates of hell have reached over the church.  The holy spirit has not abandoned all the catholics of the world as you claim.  Who do you think is saved? Only your monastery in New York and the… people who agree with you.  All the rest of the catholics are condemned to hell?  You are committing a sin against the church, you are the one who is a false catholic but my words i am sure are nothing to you.  I guess we will just have to wait until we stand before Jesus.  I will pray for you and all non catholics that they be united with one true body the church.

 

Dan

 

MHFM: You are obviously clueless and apostate.  Benedict XVI teaches that non-Catholics are united to the Church.  That’s why he’s a heretic.  By defending him, you defend the promotion of Judaism, Islam, Eastern Schism, Protestantism and pro-abortion politicians – all of which he promotes, accepts or participates in.  He is without question an antipope, and he must be denounced as such by all who care about or believe in Catholic teaching.  But you don’t fall into that category. 


Watching

 

I have been watching your videos and keeping up to date with your site. I'm a catholic of the traditional Church before the novus ordo. I never understood fully why the new mass was bad, except that there were bad changes. I’m thanking you guys for all your hard work showing the truth.

 

Dale…

 

What about?

 

Dear Brothers,

 

You mention in the message below that Mike should not go into that church to pray, even when they are not having NO services.  Does that hold universally?  Should one also avoid, for example, going to see the Holy Tilma of Juan Diego with the image of Our Lady of Guadalupe?  It is in that monstrosity that replaced the old basilica in Mexico City.  I will be in Mexico next May and was thinking about venerating the Image of Our Lady there.  Should I not do so?

 

What about visiting the basilicas in Rome, St. Peter’s, St. Mary Major, to venerate the saints and artifacts that are there, like the manger of Our Lord, etc?

 

Karl

 

MHFM: It’s an interesting question.  Our opinion would be that one should not go in for those reasons.  However, we wouldn’t condemn those who might have a different opinion on that point, namely, that one could go in to see the image when no service is going on.  That’s because with such well-known images and relics the building then becomes almost a museum rather than a Novus Ordo church.  That’s why we think it’s different from simply going in to a Novus Ordo church to pray.  However, we still think that people should forgo it and simply obtain an image of Our Lady of Guadalupe for themselves.

 

Benedict XVI’s heresies with other “Christians”

 

 

 

MHFM: This is a small sample section from our new DVD, The Third Secret of Fatima, the Impostor Sr. Lucia, and the End of the World.  The actual DVD is of higher quality than this sample video.

 

Rotten

 

Subject: rotten country USA?

 

Dear MHFM  

 

Would you agree with me that this country USA  has become very very rotten, rotten to the core?  This masonic country, probably from its birth.  I find it Interesting that the USA was founded in the same year 1776 as the ILLUMINATI was on may 1 1776. just coincidence?   PAX CHRISTI     MARK V CA     

 

MHFM: Yes, it has become rotten.  That’s why God is allowing the freedoms to be taken away slowly.  It’s a physical manifestation of the spiritual slavery they find themselves in as a result of sin and heresy.  It’s also why those who try to fight for physical freedoms, without regard for the real cause of the loss of those freedoms (sin), and the recognition that God is allowing this loss of freedom as a result of sin, are deceived and deceivers.  

 

Ashes

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Regarding Joe Biden, isn't it ok for a non-Catholic to receive ashes, since it is not a sacrament?

 

Sylvestre

 

MHFM: Perhaps it would be okay for an unbaptized catechumen who is in preparation for baptism, but not for a heretic.  Someone like Biden wouldn’t even be allowed into the church by a Catholic priest.  The very persistence in heretical positions is clearly incompatible with the penance which the ashes signify.  Conferring ashes upon one who favors murder in the womb is definitely wrong. 

 

No more

 

Have you an explanation where God says, "I will remember your sins no more" ?

 

Trying to have a balanced/proper attitude about my guilt of past confessed sins.  My family tells me I'm too depressed, morose etc. & that I couldn't have the TRUE faith & be so terrified for my faults & their state of Mortal Sin.

 

This is preventing their conversion.

 

I'm concerned there's a sin of pride in my attitude interfering with their conversion & my spiritual development.  It seems my melancholic type personality may be a problem…

 

jd

 

MHFM: It’s in Hebrews 11:12.  It signifies that in the New Covenant with Christ’s sacrifice, there is now a true and full remission of sins – a true justification that puts away sins.  This was not available in the Old.  A true devotion to Mary is the best way to have a balanced attitude.  However, without knowing more specifics, one couldn’t really say whether you are being scrupulous or whether you should be legitimately concerned about sins you are committing.  Nevertheless, it’s true that a person who is in the state of grace, while aware of the potential to lose his or her soul at any time, should not be walking around terrified.  That’s not compatible with fostering the love of God. 

 

Questions for non-sedevacantists

 

 

 

V-2 “Mass”

 

Subject: V-2 Mass invalid

 

I knew as a child that the Vatican 2 mass was invalid.  If the place is spiritual, it has a feel to it, because of the things that are there.  While growing up in Portage, Michigan, our parish St Catherine of Sienna was extremely Vatican 2.  They reveled in it.  From pop culture "masses" to all kinds of offensive, modern art.  As a result, the place had an unpleasant spiritual feel.  My family didn't care, they numbed themselves with compromise, my father believing that compromise was a virtue…


Once, when I mentioned how beautiful the old ways were (I had never seen them, but once I had been in an old cathedral, and the feel around the confessional and the old, beautiful statues was one of peace and the opposite of fear)  Some of the adults around me, including priests and a visiting bishop, turned and were very nasty to me.  Nastier than I assume they realized.  Well, that was it, I was convinced.  The new stuff was as it felt, deformed and an affront to God.

I had to go, my parents were "good Catholics" after all, so we went every Sunday.  When I grew up I spent years searching for the real thing- maybe here, maybe there, but to no avail.  I live apart from it and always will.  I like the way I live and wouldn't change it for the world.   We are all in exile.  So if someone argues that the new thing is valid, just remind him that if the enemy were going to have his way with the world, he would have to move the real Mass out of the way, lest he be blocked by it.  That was first on his list.  Some things he can't move, he gets hurt if he tries.  But he doesn't have to get rid of the whole thing to do what he's going to do... 

 

KS

 

Baptism, Salvation

 

Subject: Baptism and Salvation heresies

 

Dear MHFM,

 

I have read a lot of discussions, heard a series of audio materials on the heresies on Baptism Dogma ... Some things are really simple but it amazes me how people thwart and complicate things .. Baptism Dogma is quite simple as excellently explained, proved and detailed here in MHFM website and many attempted to refute them and succeeded not!  Though this issue is so simple we have to look at it with the eyes of faith, things become so complicated as a result of sin secretly hiding from the hearts of people who not only deny them but even those who cast doubts and becomes so worried about it ... I fully agree with your opinion that deep inside these people really don't know God and have no internal relationship with Him ... in the event of great trials against Faith, it's the submission of our human will to the Divine Will that surpasses all forms of sacrifices to God ... no amount of penance, flagellations and the like would even equal it in the Eyes of God! that's how St. Alphonsus describes the superiority of Submission to Divine Will ... some will try to refute this statement that we have to follow the Pope on these issues, but our generation has been punished by God for almost 50 years not having one ... God has blessed our Church with history and we simply have to learn from them ... if during Arian Heresy only 3-5% of the Cardinals agree with the Catholic Church how much more in our generation when doomed has been prophesied to the inhabitants of the earth on the Last Days?

 

People who cast doubts on Baptism and Salvation Dogmas not only are wanting of humility, but (God forbid)... these very sentiments once not resolved before death would definitely be their condemnation in the end!

 

Your apostolate is heaven sent… I thank God for bringing me to this website... this website clearly show how to become a saint and die with odor of sanctity should God be pleased.
 

In Crucified Christ and Immaculate Mary,
Joey, EENS-Sedevacantist (Philippines)

 

Solitude: Behold where God is found

 

 

 

Opportunity


Subject: Debate

 

Dear MHFM,

I had the opportunity, during a long drive yesterday, to once again listen to your second debate with “Lucifer's Mouthpiece” (AKA William Albrecht).  One of his most heretical arguments is the changing of "for many” to “for all”.  Aside from the clear Catholic teaching against the changing of the words of consecration, for many to for all, basic logic simply refutes his idiotic position.  It goes without saying that they (VII, or anyone else for that matter) cannot make this change since they are changing the words of Christ himself.

He states many times during the debate that the fathers of the church and the Catholic church in general have understood that “for all” and “for many” are synonymous.  That by changing from one to the other in no way changes the meaning and confecting the sacrament. 

If one assumes that for something to be changed also implies a “reason” for change, then we must ask what specifically was the reason for their change?  Would this not simply be a waste of time since universally (according to LM) the church does not distinguish between the two?  If one assumes they wanted to “correct” something that was worded improperly, this would imply that “for all” and “for many” DO NOT MEAN THE SAME THING! So his entire argument is devastated by the change! 

This individual is the most proud, arrogant, blind, soulless, obstinate and evil individual I have heard in quite some time.  He consistently speaks heresies against the Catholic faith.  Keep up the good work defending the church in these dark times.

God Bless you for your works!

Bruce

 

MHFM: Yes, we agree.  He’s human, but he’s equivalent to a walking devil.  He is so dishonest, such a total heretic and such a liar (with special emphasis on this last point) that it’s almost beyond belief.  The only way to explain it is by making reference to demonic forces.  Since he kept bothering us, not that long ago one of us again brought to his attention his ridiculous claim in the debate, that not one doctor of the Church rejected the short form.  This ridiculous claim, which showed his gross ignorance of the issue and even his ignorance of the position of his friends, was refuted in the debate by pointing out that St. Thomas rejected the short form.  Instead of admitting that he was wrong about that point or simply remaining silent, he decided to respond and add a new lie.  He said: “I was referring to every single doctor other than Thomas!”  This is a total lie.  Anyone who hears the debate can see that this is not what he said.  The guy doesn’t have a conscience.  He lies as a way of life.  That’s precisely why people like him can be attracted to the Antichrist Vatican II sect and want to defend it.  They are liars at heart.  They are not of the truth; and therefore they defend lies in service of their father, the Devil, who is the father of lies and of all liars. 

 

Comment

 

MHFM,

 

I am starting to get annoyed with this yapping broken record liar, William Albrecht.  This guy’s hatred for Truth is amazing.  I am appalled.  By the way, I saw William’s video giving that “Spanish quote” and being well aware of my own native tongue (Spanish), the ”quote” had a lot of grammar errors, which made me wonder if it was “quoted” at all?  What’s worse is that he thought  quoting the exact same quote you quoted in your article in a different language, ACTUALLY PROVES HIS POINT! This guy just doesn’t get that he’s been exposed!  And so, being a coward and won’t admit he is a fraud, he will only get Mike Duddy to debate you WITH ONE CONDITION: “…provided it's a debate between your brother and yourself against myself and him. If you aren't interested in coming out of hiding and debating me again--then don't even bother or waste my time.”  RIGHT!!!  This guy is really pathetic.   And in addition to this, although not necessary to prove the point since you have already proven he is a “PROVEN LIAR AND FRAUD” as stated in your article, but look at the list of music he listens to shown on his YouTube channel: “Classical, Rock N' Roll, Country, Opera...and pretty much anything that has a great beat to it and awesome lyrics.”   Well that proves who is his father and where he gets his influence from… THE DEVIL.  I hope Mike Duddy debates you anyway without that fraud.

 

Also, I recently saw the videos from the two people who changed their positions to Sedevacantism, mainly from looking at MHFM’s material, as you have stated in your recent video update.  But, one thing that struck me from these two persons, and from my own experience talking with others as well, was that they remind me a lot of the Parable of the Sower.  I was happy to hear that they changed positions but when I saw the 22 year old young man’s video, who you sent a letter a while back, still showed much care of the world and of human respect and of “losing friends, subscribers.”  Well, here is what Our Lord says about this in this parable: “He also that received seed among the thorns is he that heareth the word; and the care of this world, and the deceitfulness of riches, choke the word, and he becometh unfruitful.”  This also goes with that other guy, Jeremiah, who started disagreeing with you guys on small important issues like telling them in charity that they shouldn’t receive the sacraments now because he is a raging heretic and has a happy birthday video to his father, which obviously they can’t see that that’s not allowed, and his wife states prideful: “Who gave them permission to judge us?”; or him making a joke about your low price materials comparing it to the apostate evangelist Benny Hinn, and goes further on as he disrespectfully jokes about it saying “He is the Creflo Dollar of Sedevacantism… That’s exactly what they are!  But you know what? They come against us because we have a sense of humor.”  This guy makes me sick!  He won’t have a sense of humor if he remains on his path to Hell!  It’s very sad by how they are deceive by externals and emotions.  After having giving your whole lives exposing the Vatican II and teaching the true Catholic position and selling materials at a low price so that it can reach all kinds of people, and then seeing this guy wanting to be stuck “among the thorns,” I reach to my concluding question: How far are people willing to go for jesus christ and his teachings?

 

I am a testimony of the True Catholic Faith among many others that have testified over the years about this website that has affected their lives.  I believe God has allowed, through Mary, that His teachings be widely spread and convert others to the Truth by your daily prayers and the sincere, honest, tiresome dedication to this apostolate work for the GREAT GLORY OF GOD AND THE SALVATION OF SOULS.  I am truly indebted to Jesus and Mary, for they have led me here.  Thanks be to Jesus for His Spouse, Holy Catholic Church, that we are able to understand what is dogma and what is not, because God saw the Great Apostasy of the Antichristian Vatican II, so He willed that the dogma on Papal Infallibility be revealed a few years before this Great Apostasy.  This revelation was not given to the saints and theologians before Vatican I’s ex cathedra pronunciation on Papal Infallibility.  Truly, God’s love and mercy is infinite.  Thank you, MHFM.

 

Most Holy Trinity give us holy perseverance to persevere faithfully to the Holy Teachings of the Catholic Church.

 

Matthew 10:22- “And you shall be hated by all men for my name's sake: but he that shall persevere unto the end, he shall be saved.”

 

Sincerely,

Bernardo

 

Ipso facto

 

Dear brothers in Christ,


Your questions for non-sedevacantists are really shaking device for the people who are "speaking lies in hypocrisy, and having their conscience
seared" (Timothy 4:2). I hope there will be even more questions in the future.  I would personally like to pose a question about their (non-sedevacantists') attempts to get away with 'ipso facto' excommunications. Namely, the pope Pius VI condemned many errors of the synod of Pistoia; one of the condemned errors
is about 'ipso facto'.

"Likewise, the proposition which teaches that it is necessary, according to the natural and divine laws, for either excommunication or for suspension, that a personal examination should precede, and that, therefore, sentences called "ipso facto" have no other force than that of a serious threat without any actual effect,--false, rash, pernicious, injurious to the power of the Church, erroneous." --CONDEMNED

So, the non-sedevacantists' mumbo-jumbo talk about 'ipso facto' being invalid before personal examination is FALSE.

Most Holy Mother of God help us with your powerful intercession to keep our faith. Our Lord bless the MHFM.

Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia

 

MHFM: Yes, it’s a good quote, one that’s cited in our material.  Someone wrote in and tried to respond to most of the questions.  We will probably be posting an analysis of the responses soon.  It will show how their responses only serve to confirm the falsity of their position.

 

New Service

 

dear mhfm brothers, feel so happy when go to your website. i even made it my home page so i can read the quote of the day. i came upon your site about two years ago when i first got my computer because i was going to go online for the first time. i walked to the local burger king so i could pick up the internet and wanted the first thing i looked up to be something about the Blessed Mother to thank her for my laptop…. i looked up our lady of Fatima online and saw many links but i thought yours looked the best… i read for a few mins but i kept getting a poor connection to their wi-fi so i saved the link and went home. when i read it many days later I was delighted to see that there was someone out there who felt the same as my family did. it made me so much more sure of what my mom kept telling me all my life, ...that the new service was not a mass. but hearing it from an outside source helped for me cause sometimes i still wondered, but you gave us proof. Thanks…

 

 nancy kelly

 

Faith Alone

 

Do you think this applies to the refutation of "faith alone" and possibly proof of the Church Christ established - personal interpretation?

 

Galatians 4:19

My little children, of whom I am in labour again, until Christ be formed in you.

 

Haydock Footnotes:

 

Ver. 17-20. He tells them this change comes from the false teachers among them, who with a false zeal would exclude them from a friendship and a submission to St. Paul, and deprive them again of that Christian liberty by which Christ, and the faith of Christ, had freed them from the yoke of the Mosaical law. On this account I must labor and travail, as it were to bring you forth a second time. How do I now wish to be with you, to change my voice, to exhort you, to reprehend you, to use all ways and means to regain you to Christ? --- I am in confusion about you,[2] I am perplexed, as the Greek signifies, as not knowing what to say or do. (Witham)

 

TC

 

MHFM: We do think it’s another verse which shows that salvation is more than just accepting Jesus.  It shows that believers can fall away from the faith and into sin by things they do or embrace and thus lose their salvation. 

 

Fr. O

 

Additionally, to Bros. Mike and Pete, may I ask for a comment on the works of Father John O'Connor?...


Sanjiv

 

MHFM: Father O'Conner had some interesting and true things to say about the secular conspiracy and the evil working in that arena.  However, many people don't know this, but he offered the invalid New Mass.  He said both the traditional and the New Mass.

 

The only reason we found this out is because one of us got into a discussion with him after he heard a talk which one of us gave against the Novus Ordo many years ago.  He was upset at the thought that it's invalid.  He said the idea is “an insult,” to which one of us said, "Why?"  He responded by saying, "Because I say the Novus Ordo."  We were surprised to learn that he said the New Mass, for O'Connor gave out the impression that he was traditional.  Just before the end of his life, he also promoted Antipope John Paul II in some of his material.  He complained that the "bishops" did not obey him!  Sadly, he was an apostate.

 

He was also extremely secular in his commentary and overall outlook, and this was a symptom of his apostasy.  For that reason, his commentary is sometimes misleading, despite true points. 

 

Apostates

 

Subject: Apostates

 

Hello Brothers:

 

There is an image of the Glorious Virgin of Fatima at the Novus Ordo church that I came out of. This image is very dear to me - it is the one we used to pray before as little lads. I go down in the early morning when nobody is around to make veneration before this precious image - not leaving her without sympathy. I really love Her. This morning a woman came in - one of these in her mid-50's with the men's haircut, sweatshirt, men's jeans, men's jacket - really despicable how women actually broach transvestitism in this manner almost everywhere. Well she went over to the altar and started banging things around, took out a key to the tabernacle and started rearranging things inside of it. Amazing to me. She had her own key to the tabernacle and her hands deep inside. I have to be honest, my blood boiled. The "priest" actually gave this usurper a key to the most Holy. In their minds they truly believe in nothing at all. It left me fearful - such strident apostasy - her hands inside the tabernacle. It is frightful - if I was angry, being unworthy, how much must God be wrathful now. Very, very fearsome!

 

-Thanks,

Mike 

 

MHFM: That’s very interesting, but one should not be going in there.  One should not go in to pray, even if it’s at a time when they are not having the invalid Novus Ordo “Mass.”

 

Man, papacy

 

"It' s all about man, and the man they think (quite wrongly) is the pope, whom they treat as if he is Christ Himself"

 

Dear Brothers,

I appreciate your site, even if I am an Orthodox Christian and see your critique of the Orthodox Church.

Your words above concerning the worshipping of the pope today, brought to mind the words of the great teacher of the faith, Fr. Justin Popovich, when he said:

"with the docrtine of the infallibility of the Pope western man exalted man as the highest good, and removed the GOD-MAN."

"There have three great falls in history: the fall of Adam, the fall of Judas, and the fall of the Pope."

… I believe if you read his writings - because you truly believe and are zealots for Christ - you would reconsider the place and beliefs of the Orthodox.

Please tell me why you don't think Vatican II, the ascent of masonry in the papacy and the present state of things is not ALSO a fruit of the false dogma of the infallibility of the Pope. You can see why it would seem that way to the Orthodox, right?

JH

 

MHFM: No, a true Catholic would never ever consider “Orthodoxy,” and would never become an Eastern “Orthodox” schismatic.  Eastern “Orthodoxy” is fundamentally illogical.  Its position on the ecumenical councils, and which ones must be accepted as binding and precisely why, is completely arbitrary.  Whenever they attempt to precisely explain or define it, it becomes totally contradictory.  Eastern “Orthodoxy” is utterly unbiblical: it rejects the obvious and undeniable teaching of the Bible on the primacy of St. Peter and his unfailing faith.  It is opposed to the early Church.  It is anti-Christian and anti-Christ; it rejects the clear words and teaching of Christ.  Please see our debates, audios and book. 

 

Vatican II is a confirmation of the truth of papal office, for it is an obvious fulfillment of the prophesied end times apostasy from the one true Christian faith.  That’s why its features and doctrines are precisely the things which the true popes and the papal office condemned.  We are glad that you like some aspects of the site, but you need to pray to God and the Virgin for the true faith and convert.  One thing we’ve noticed with those who have fallen to “Orthodoxy” is a severe form of intellectual pride; perhaps an "uppity" outlook is a good way to describe it.  It is one which really attracts them to in-depth and high-level discussions of relatively unimportant issues.  They often look down upon simple communications of important truth.  For instance, people who are fascinated and spend a lot of time on how God’s grace acts upon man and mystical aspects of the same or things like that, while missing or scoffing at the big and simple points, are often the type whom God punishes for their pride by allowing them to embrace the “Orthodox” schism.

 

Fatima

 

Dear MHFM,

 

The Fatima dvd is surely monumental in veritable truth and scope.  What couldn't be emphasized however was that Father Fuentes was faith filled, reputable, and devoted  wholeheartedly to the Blessed Mother and her message to the world and would have never in any way maligned what sister Lucia recalled of the message from the holy words of the Blessed Mother, and what was transcripted by him to the world. The veracity of Father Fuentes was undeniable, and that came from the mouth of bishop Leiria who himself was above reproach and highly respected in his region and by the heirarchy in Rome at that time.  The conspiracy unraveled by your holy works at the monastery without a doubt will open doors to the truth of Vatican II and its diabolical acts by these modernist pests of satan. Once again, thank you.  May St. Michael protect your ministry, I pray fervently.—D

 

 “Seminarians”

 

Subject: “seminarians”

 

I talk to the "seminarians" around campus every once in a while and try to convince them of the truth. They drive me crazy!!! So I show them where it says in trent where it says WATER is necessary for baptism. 

 

Me: Do you believe this when it says water is necessary.

Him: Yes.

Me: So you believe you need real water, like in this cup, to be baptized.

Him: Yes.

Me: So in order to be baptized we need real physical water that is on this earth correct.

Him: Yes(now slightly annoyed) 

Me: Do you need to get rid of original sin to go to heaven.

Him: Yes.

Me: Do you need to be baptized to get rid of original sin.

Him: Yes (now quite annoyed)

Me: Okay so i am dying in the woods no one is around I am a pagan and I realize I should of been baptized then I die, I go to hell right.

Him: Well God could give you the merits of baptism and you could be baptized in that way.

Me: So I was baptized without physical water

Him: Yes, in a metaphysical way.   

Me: So you just said water is not necessary for baptism.

Him: Oh it’s necessary, just in certain cases... 

Me: You totally contradicted yourself!!

Him: Well I don't think so.

 

William

 

 More Yoga

 

Subject: more Yoga

 

In response to your article on yoga, my local novus ordo church St. Mary's in Colts Neck NJ has yoga once a week also.  After seeing the reader approach the altar that was empty, no tabernacle, no priest, just a plain table, she bowed to the empty altar and then turned around to the congregation and bowed to us.  Shocked, I approached the priest later who said she bowed to you because "you are the body of Christ" .  I pointed out that St. Paul says we should not bow to anyone but our Lord.  He was speechless but got angry with me.  I can't help but believe the yoga had some influence on the bowing.  There is a lot of bowing to each other in Eastern religions.  The other thing that is being reported to me in my diocese is that in some parishes in response to "This is the Body of Christ" instead of saying "Amen" the parishioners are saying "I am"

 

This was just what I needed to never return to St. Mary's again.      Without a church.... 

 

Kathleen

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  We’re glad that you won’t go there again, and hopefully not to any Novus Ordo because they are all invalid and non-Catholic, as our material covers.

 

Polka “Masses”

 

Hello MHFM,

 

It’s never my intent to look and browse without any purpose; today I wanted to find a Traditional Tantum Ergo hymn, but Our Lord wanted me to see this total abomination instead.  I run into this site of ‘father’ Jeff of 64 working for the Society of St. Paul media ministry, probably sponsor of this very site.  He is posting the Polka ‘mass’ 

To date I only have heard from you about the Polka ‘mass’, however, only 21 hours ago this person posted it online.  I couldn’t believe it, how evil these people are, but the proof is out there.

 

The actual thing is by Fr. George Balasko, St. Ann Parish, East Liverpool.  Check it out:

 

"Catholic Polka Mass Catholic priest, Fr. George Balasko, celebrates a Catholic mass with the hymns played and sang in a Polka Style"

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sSLijTYuV0E

and at:  http://www.youtube.com/user/FatherJeffrey#p/a/u/1/sSLijTYuV0E

 

Not that that these people care, but Saint Paul is crying out for vengeance!

 

Renata

 

Reconsidering

 

Subject: I am reconsidering the sedevacantist position.  Can you help?

 

I am reconsidering the sedevacantist position. But there's a lot to see on your videos and a lot to read. So I was wandering where should I start looking? What document, papal bull, encyclical or Apostolic constitution I should began to read, so that I gain a better understanding of the sedevacantist position. 

 

Ed…

 

MHFM: We would recommend that you start with this, The Catholic Teaching that a heretic cannot be a valid pope [PDF file], and obtain our new Fatima DVD and the package with our big book and other critical information.  We would also recommend that you look at the files under our antipopes section, the silver button in the lower left corner of our main menu.  This section contains files on Benedict XVI’s heresies, answers to objections, John Paul II’s heresies, etc.  Our larger package is important to obtain as well because numerous critical books are included, such as Outside the Catholic Church There is Absolutely No Salvation.  Most people are unfortunately denying this dogma today and it covers the entire issue, the common objections, etc.

 

Wonder

 

You both are frequently attacked as being severe in your instruction and correction.  I wonder if the people who accuse you have ever really spent time reading the bible...
 
Galatians 3:1 O Senseless Galatians, who hath bewitched you that you would not obey the truth?
 
Titus 1:13 This testimony is true.  Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith. 
 
So much for Mr. (or Mrs.) Nice Guy
 
Patricia

 

Apparently

 

Apparently Vinzy hasnt read:

 

2 Corinthians 4:3: "And if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost, in whom the god of this world [Satan] hath blinded the minds of unbelievers, that the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should not shine unto them."

 

I highly doubt Benedict Groeschel & friends would ever quote this verse on EWTN...

 

Steve

 

Helped

 

Many thanks for answering the question from one of your readers, who asked why the devil would attack Vat II. It helped me a good deal. It was a very good question and I'm sure many of us have asked it to one extent or another. Your explanation was very insightful and makes perfectly good sense.  Do you ever get asked why there was never a counter revolution? Traditional priest/bishops/cardinals must not have been passionate or organized enough to try and reverse or stop it.  Thank you for helping me so much.

 

E  

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  To your question, the traditional Catholic remnant which holds the fullness of the faith exists.  It rejects and combats the Counter Church.  But the reason that there wasn’t a massive resistance of bishops, etc. was because of bad will, and too much denial of the salvation dogma (Outside the Church There is No Salvation) and the necessity of water baptism. 

 

A must-see

 

 

 

MHFM: This is a small sample section from our new DVD, The Third Secret of Fatima, the Impostor Sr. Lucia, and the End of the World.  The actual DVD is of higher quality than this sample video.

 

Comment

 

Subject: Solitude

 

Dear MHFM:

So often your brief videos and talks are so timely.  While I was a Protestant I felt this or was impressed by this notion many times.  I was lost and yet people were all around me.  Solitude truly is the answer as we will stand alone before Jesus Christ.  Thanks for your comforting messages!

Sincerely,

 

Joseph

 

Finished

 

Subject: Fatima DVD

 

Dear Mhfm,

Just finished watching the Fatima DVD.  Amazing piece of work from start to finish.  Answered a lot of questions especially the part on the two beasts.  It’s amazing how Benedict XVI plans on doing the "Beatification" of John Paul II on good Friday.  The antichrist John Paul II being "beatified" on the day of Jesus's death is a direct Blasphemy by Benedict XVI towards Christ.

I am going to share the DVD with the "Traditional" "priest" in my area.  He most likely will not change but it's a worth a try.  I would also like to thank you for the extra material which came with the package.

Sincerely,

Sean Keogan

 

Vinzy

 

In response to Vinzy. He appears to have a belief in universal salvation. Christ indeed died for "all" but only "many" will be saved. This is part of the same heresy that lead to the false, invalidating and heretical changes in the words of consecration in the Novus Ordo Missae. He then goes on to ask, " who really knows the will of God?" He obviously has no knowledge of or belief in Catholic doctrine which was revealed to us so that we may know the truth.

 

Is this what he is learning from EWTN?

 

EJP, M.D., D.D.

 

Just

 

Dear Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,

 

Just finished watching your Solitude video, which surely must be one of your best efforts to date! ...it is a very absorbing and thought provoking topic,one which we can all benefit from.  It fits in beautifully with the backdrop scene, as one can almost feel the 'air of solitude' , as if one was actually sitting in the long grass gazing upon God's handiwork!

 

God bless,

 

David

 

Paul VI and John Paul II

 

 

 

MHFM: This is a small sample section from our new DVD, The Third Secret of Fatima, the Impostor Sr. Lucia, and the End of the World.  The actual DVD is of higher quality than this sample video.

 

Ratzinger

 

How can the Jews be free not to believe in the messiah Jesus Christ, and with the blessing of Ratzinger?...  Ratzinger is an infiltrator, out in the open, outlined perfectly by the late Pope Leo XIII in one of the greatest prayers of the last century, the St. Michael prayer…

 

Dea

 

Comment

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Thank you for the video on Solitude. It's an astounding truth that so many people think they need to be with other people in order to be happy. The grace that God gives to those who seek Him in solitude is so rich. This is especially true in regard to family, where the strongest emotional bonds exist. But if we do make the break with relatives in order to seek God, He rewards us so sweetly, that we will be left wondering why on earth we delayed in the first place. Also, the Internet is a huge temptation for so much sin today. Many websites promote something true, but lace it with heresy and lies. Chat room and forums in particular are just incubators of error and sin. May Jesus and Mary give us the courage to seek God in solitude so as to forge the relationship with Him that is so necessary for salvation.

 

God Bless,

 

Chris White

 

Empty

 

Dear brothers in Christ,


By watching a small sample of your DVD on Fatima (I've ordered this DVD; my order is in due process) concerning B16 and Illuminati, I've looked for the word 'empty' in the Bible. The passage from Isaias 32:6 perfectly describes the wickedness of the whole satanic hierarchy now occupying Vatican. It goes:

"For the fool will speak foolish things, and his heart will work iniquity, to practise hypocrisy, and speak to the Lord deceitfully, and to make empty the soul of the hungry, and take away drink from the thirsty. 7 The vessels of the deceitful are most wicked: for he hath framed devices to destroy the meek, with lying words, when the poor man speaketh judgment."

Indeed, the V2 counter-church took away drink from the thirsty (i.e. True Mass), and emptied the souls of the hungry (invalid consecrations).

Our Most Holy Mother and St. Joseph, pray for us, and protect MHFM, the remnant of the True Church

Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia

 

Watching

 

I have been watching EWTN’s Journey Home and learned about the early church fathers – something I had never before heard about as a Protestant.  I was considering joining the Catholic Church. Then I found your commentary on EWTN and the new Popes and am now afraid to join the local Catholic Church as they are followers of Vatican II.  Where can I find a church in Florida… Thank you for your kind consideration.

 

BJ

 

MHFM: It's great to hear about your interest.  There are places to receive traditional sacraments, but no priests in your area that are 100% for instruction, etc.  The reason that there are so few priests who are 100% Catholic is that we are in the Great Apostasy, the time about which Our Lord said that there would hardly be any faith on Earth (Lk. 18:8).  This is explained in our material.  What you need to do is get the catechism we offer, read it, and pray the Rosary each day.  And then, when you have read it and you are convinced of everything, follow the steps to convert which are given in this file and we can help you further.

 

The Steps to convert to the traditional Catholic faith and for those leaving the New Mass - Baptism and Conditional Baptism - the Council of Trent's Profession of Faith for Converts

 

Fit

 

How sad to read such venom against the established church of God.  Why do you feel that you alone are favored?  Did Jesus not say all are saved?  People who have not been exposed to Jesus or the bible cannot be determined not saved, since Christ died for all.  Those of us who have been fortunate to be born or exposed to christianity are indeed fortunate.  We cannot, however, place ourselves above those less fortunate.  Who really knows the will of God as you presume to?  There is nothing in the bible that gives you that authority.  Do you not feel any guilt for the poison you spill?  As far as the book in question, FYI it is not a new ;publication.  I thank you for strengthening my resolve to keep EWTN on the air by my monthly donation.  It has done much good for those of us exposed to the likes of you.  God Bless!!

 

Vinzy…

 

MHFM: Considering that you believe that “all are saved,” you fit right in with the Vatican II sect and outside the Catholic Church.  You obviously don’t care one bit about Catholic teaching or the fact that Jesus actually said few are saved (Mt. 7:13).  Your view is a bold rejection of the teaching of the Bible and Catholic dogma.  We’ve come across quite a few heretics, but your e-mail is so outrageous that it’s almost hard to believe.

 

Comment

 

Subject: Thank you for new video

 

Dear MHFM, 

 

Thank you for new video on solitude/detachment.  This comes as an answer to prayer.  It is truly a great blessing when God calls a soul into a life of more solitude.   Yes, the more solitude, the better.

 

I have a certain individual in my life who has been applying a lot of "pressure" on me to join "Facebook",  which I am naturally adverse to for many reasons (the very name itself seems so egotistical).  No, I will not submit to this or other pressures like it… this is a very special video, with a lovely photo too…

 

A

 

Claims

 

Question:  So why does the devil in your opinion attack the V2 church ? It's very obvious to any openminded person of good will that most of these (if not all) so called "sexual abuses" are made up lies, just like they were mostly made up lies in the USA. Shouldn't the devil be protecting this 'false bride' as you claim ?

 

Ahrs…

 

MHFM: Just so our readers know, the person posing this question is a defender of the Vatican II sect.  He is currently resisting with all his might the undeniable proof that it’s not the Catholic Church.

 

The first thing you need to realize is that, even though the claims are against the Vatican II sect, which is not the Catholic Church, they do damage the image of the Catholic Church in the minds of most.  That’s because for most people the mainstream V-2 Church is the true Catholic Church.  They draw no distinction.  So, by further disgracing it and making it appear to be a scandal-filled cesspool of iniquity – which for the most part the V-2 sect is – it destroys the credibility of the true Church in the eyes of most in the public.  It also destroys its credibility in the eyes of most non-Catholics who have no idea what’s going on.  That’s one reason why the Devil would push for it.

 

We would also add a few things which we’ve mentioned before.  We have to disagree with you that most (“if not all”!) of the claims are false.  You are obviously bending over backwards to see things in favor of the Vatican II sect.  The Vatican II sect’s “priesthood” is without question filled with homosexuals and perverts.  About ten years ago we telephoned various “priests” for a particular reason, and we encountered effeminate “priest” after effeminate “priest.”  The number was staggering.  Moreover, even though some of these claims are false, many of them are true; and the Vatican II sect opened itself up to all of this by its failure to exclude homosexuals, and by its failure to remove, condemn and excommunicate all deviants.  By its participation in evil, the floodgates of Hell have opened against it.  What we are seeing is also the punishment inflicted upon the Great Harlot. 

 

In the Old Testament, God frequently punishes the wicked by making them the reproach of all.  This would include true and false accusations against them.  Not that He positively wills such false accusations; for they are mortally sinful, and the wicked also make false accusations against the good.  However, when you are dealing with innumerable claims of total moral degeneration combined with voluminous amounts of bad publicity, it’s obviously something He has allowed against the Vatican II sect as a punishment for its evils.  At the same time, as the ultimate punishment for the sins of the world, He punishes the world by allowing the general image of the Catholic Church to be damaged – since, as stated above, the public draws no distinction between the V-2 harlot and the Catholic Church.  This makes the truth harder to find and it’s a punishment for sins.  God permits all of it and the V-2 harlot is becoming the reproach of all.  

 

That’s what we are seeing with the mockery of the Great Harlot (the Vatican II sect).

 

Apocalypse 17:16-18- “And the ten horns which thou sawest in the beast: these shall hate the harlot, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and shall burn her with fire. For God hath given into their hearts to do that which pleaseth him: that they give their kingdom to the beast, till the words of God be fulfilled. And the woman which thou sawest, is the great city, which hath kingdom over the kings of the earth.”

 

Additionally, more of the claims might be true than you think.  The Vatican II sect and its “priests” rarely seem to plead not guilty – which any normal person would do from the housetops if such heinous and false accusations were made against him.  No, they pay up and apologize.

 

Comment

 

 

Greeting brothers.  The new film was very interesting and I look forward to getting it out there.  Prior to leaving the Novus Ordo, I attended the "Catholic" Congress in Anaheim, Ca.  I'm considering going this year for the sole purpose of distributing your information as there will be many priests and religious there who although Novus Ordo, may be open to the truth.  I would not consider going for any other reason than this.

 

This is probably considered old news, but there was a story a few months ago about the death of a young heiress of the Johnson & Johnson company.  Her death shocked many because she was only in her late twenties.  Well, it so happened that this woman was "engaged" to another young woman and were set to get "married" in an event which would without a doubt have been covered without condemnation by the pagan media.  I believe God prevented this evil event from occurring since it would have undoubtedly led many impressionable and weak souls into grave mortal sin.  I believe that this is why this unfortunate young woman died at a time when, under natural circumstances, she should have not.  I've personally known people who died young, and they all committed sins of the flesh, fornication, or sins against the body.  This also shows that God will never allow the abomination of gay "marriage" to become the norm.

 

If it were not for you, brothers, the Devil would have it a lot more easier…. Thank you, brothers, for your time, effort and dedication to being model Christians in this hour of darkness.  God bless.

 

MW

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  While it’s also true that many great saints died young, we agree with your point.

 

Coma

 

I don't know if you have seen this but I found this to be interesting.

 

http://tvnz.co.nz/health-news/coma-patient-talks-via-brain-waves-3348399

 

"A man in a deeply unconscious state for five years has been able to communicate with doctors using just his thoughts in a study scientists say is a "game changer" for care of vegetative state patients.  British and Belgian researchers used a brain scanner called functional magnetic resonance imaging to show the man, who suffered a severe traumatic brain injury in a road accident in 2003, was able to think "yes" or "no" answers to questions by wilfully changing his brain activity."

 

-Angelica

 

Soft Words

 

Hi MHFM,

If I may comment also on using soft words. Patience and humility are fine in so far as one is living with the faithful, who are patient and the humble. The heretics are not so kind and in fact they are vicious. In the conflict with the liberal heresies, Pope Pius X warned before his death that he had not yet defeated the beast. They were only driven underground, and if the Church falls asleep, they would come back stronger than ever. It seems they have already done so, during the rebellious 1960's, using the tools of the Church to spread their errors all over the world. If fact, there are people right now spreading errors in the name of Pope Pius X himself. One can see the heretical forces are cunning.

We are talking about the souls of the multitude here, who are living in mass delusion. Even past communists admit that the next war is a war over people's hearts and minds using media and education as the weapons. There are forces at work attempting to subtly deprive the people of the the gospel, to subtly destroy the holy mass and the priesthood, and to subtly disperse the flock. Very few suspect anything. Bad news is bad news, and no one ought to say soft words about it. Everyone has to deal with the facts, or else many will be lost…

Sanjiv

 

Interest

 

Hi!

 

My name is Iselin… and I am a Catholic/sedevacantist and have been for the past 2,5 years. I am a Norwegian woman of 27, mother of 2 little girls and married to a Polish man who also converted with me. Besides my husband’s best friend, Mikael… a Swede who might have emailed you already, we don't have any contact with Catholics in the Nordic region. We don't have a Mass to go to and we don't have the opportunity of homeschooling our children, as the government then automatically would remove the children from their home and place them in fostercare.

 

We therefore feel very isolated and in great need of getting in contact with other catholics. As far as I know I am the only Norwegian sedevacantist on the planet. As a Norwegian my understanding of Swedish and Danish is pretty high too. There are also swedishspeaking groups in Finland. Do you know of anyone in the region that you could put us in contact with?... Great website. Is it possible to get your DVD's with region2 anywhere?

 

Iselin

 

Response

 

Hi Brothers, 

 

I just wanted to give you a big bravo on "the tone of your answers" to those who email you and make it onto the e-exchanges page(see Mrs. CasalinoJellerson's letter). BRAVO!  It's sad and aggravating to see so many think you are too harsh/ negative/ judgmental. I thoroughly enjoy your responses as I feel that you speak in a way that would be in line w/ how Padre Pio would speak to us, were he alive today. 

 

I'd like to remind Mrs. CasalinoJellerson (and others like her) the good Padre would toss her out of the confessional if she went to him for confession. 

Thanks for defending our beloved Savior, His Holy Mother and the True Faith and extra special thanks for letting "your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven."

 

Christina Kalix

 

BOD

 

Dear Brothers  

 

This is in response to a lady who wrote to you in the exchanges section about the sacraments.  You can get to heaven without the latin mass, but you can’t get to heaven without the catholic faith whole and pure. So yes  the faith does matter. She is putting the mass before the faith. It’s only the faith that matters.  People need to realize this is why we are in the horrible times that we are. The faith was being corroded and undermined quite some time before V2.   Remember it was the faith, dogmas that went before the mass did, VATICAN 2.  Also I really like the audios and materials, book about refuting the heresy of baptism of blood and baptism of desire. This is a stupid and ridiculous heresy that needs to be exposed and refuted.  Great job brother peter dimond!  I really don’t like when the other side calls us feeneyites.  This is a mockery of the late great father leonard feeney, as if he invented this teaching, or this is his doctine. I hate all of this evil lying and dishonesty from these BOD/BOB heretics.  keep up the great work!  DEO GRATIAS                      

 

MARK V

 

Question

 

Subject: Question

 

Really interested in information I saw on the web.  My question (and trust me, it is a sincere one.) how are we to know the truth?  You provide many good arguments, but I have always been taught that the Magisterium and the Pope are infallible.  If this is true, then how could I possibly oppose them.  On the other hand, if they are indeed in error, how can I as a believing Catholic possibly know for sure?

 

DD…

 

MHFM: You can oppose them because you are not opposing popes but manifest heretics and antipopes.  It is the very teaching of the past popes which requires you to believe that these men are not legitimate popes.  You know for sure that this position is not in error because the authoritative teaching of the past popes cannot be wrong, nor can those who adhere to that teaching.  

 

Received

 

Subject: Fatima DVD

 

Brothers,

 

Received the dvd's on Fatima Friday, I must say that this is one powerful dvd that must be obtained to help ourselves and others understand the extremly important message from our Blessed Mother.

 

I intend to send the extra copies out to family, and those who think they are traditional catholics, whether they are priest, bishops, or the lay people.

 

I would also like to say thank you brothers for standing firm in the One True Church and only true church .

 

"Most Sacred Heart of Jesus have Mercy on us"

"Immaculate Heart of Mary pray for us"

 

Tim

 

Exception

 

Dear Brother Michael,

 

I have been going through your website and in most cases I agree with you.  I do however take exception to the tone of a lot of the letters you send in response to questions.  I am a Catholic, before Vatican II I was just a Catholic, nothing special, not any different from many others.  With Vatican II I was displaced, someone stole my Church from me.  For 30 years I have been looking for a real Priest, as I believed them to be.  I had many issues with many of the things I saw in the New Order, and I couldn't force myself to go to the New Mass with any regularity, however, I had kids, so it was my duty, so I tried.  There are many of us out here.  Many of us who have no home anymore.  Many of us who are trying to make sense of what we find that differs from what we were taught.

 

The tone of your answers is very negative.  It isn't enough for someone to know that things have changed and that the New Church isn't right, If they don't believe exactly what you believe, they are heretics.  I was personally taught that there was valid baptism of blood and desire, and in extraordinary circumstances, they would suffice.  This is important to me personally because I had a granddaughter who was born dead, and though I baptized her immediately, I relied on the acute desire of her mother and me to cover her, if her soul no longer resided in her body.  I believe that that child is in heaven, based on what I was taught by the Nuns as a child. I believe that this position is more in keeping with the teachings of Christ, who was inclusive and loving in His ministry. 

 

I believe that you do a very great service to Catholics like me with your website.  It gives us hope that the Church we love is still there.  I also believe that instead of listing heretics and explaining all their various heresies, it would be more Christlike to refer people to ANY validly ordained Priest for the sacraments.  I don't think that there has ever been a time in the Church when all priests agreed on everything.  I believe that getting the valid Mass and sacraments is more important than how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.

 

I believe that all of you theologians should get together and start with the basics.  We, the faithful need the Mass and the Sacraments.  That is more important than anything else.  Disqualifying everybody who has been validly ordained because they have a relatively minor disagreement with you is counterproductive.  It does not set a good example for those of us who are trying to be good Catholics.  Jesus Christ was all about Love.  He included everyone among the lovable.  The Catholic Church, founded by Him ought to be about the same.  Yes the rules are important, but not more important than the love.  Jesus healed people on the Sabbath.  When He did so, he was violating the law.  I don't think that being more inclusive is a greater violation.  There is time enough to discuss your differences with each other, after we, the faithful have the basics we need for salvation, Mass and the Sacraments.

 

Respectfully,

Mary CasalinoJellerson

 

MHFM: We’re glad you like the site, but you have some views that are not consistent with Catholic teaching.  First, we denounce as heretical those who dissent from Catholic dogma, not people who might have a different opinion on a matter not taught by the Church.  So your statement is inaccurate. 

 

Second, receiving sacraments is NOT the most important thing.  Your view is unfortunately heretical.  If that were true, then the Eastern “Orthodox” are just fine because they have valid Masses.  But that’s not the case.  If one doesn’t have the faith, one can’t profit from the reception of the sacraments (Heb. 11:6).  That’s why having the true Catholic faith, whole and undefiled, is the most important thing and the first requirement for salvation (Athanasian Creed).

 

Third, the Church has infallibly taught, in various ways, that no man is saved without water baptism.  It is simply to contradict dogma to persist in the belief that there is salvation without water baptism, after having seen the various dogmatic arguments and angles to the issue.  Additionally, almost everyone who believes in the false idea of “baptism of desire” believes that souls can be saved in any religion.  Your position that an infant can be saved without water baptism directly contradicts numerous dogmatic statements and is heretical.

 

Fourth, soft words are not always appropriate when fighting evil or battling with heretics who attack the truth and lead souls to Hell.  Your comments about tone are misplaced and result from your general liberal attitude toward issues of faith and the denial of the faith.  You lack the foundational belief in the absolute necessity of Christ and His Church for salvation, and the attendant recognition that deviations from Christ and His truth are evil.

 

Condemned

 

Subject: Jewish man condemned to death is a “man of faith” according to Vatican

 

Dear Brothers Michael and Peter:

 

See related articles below.

 

“The Vatican had asked for Grossman's life to be spared in a letter written by Archbishop Fernando Filoni on behalf of Pope Benedict XVI. The letter said Grossman had "repented and is now a changed person, having become a man of faith."

 

http://www.gainesville.com/article/20100217/ARTICLES/2171010/1002

 

According to the vatican-two sect, you can be a Jew and a murderer scheduled for execution by the State and at the same time be a "man of faith".

 

He [Archbishop Fernando Filoni] asked for “whatever steps may be possible to save the life of Mr. Grossman.”

 

http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/General+News/48573/Pope+Calls+For+Mercy+For+Martin+Grossman+As+Execution+Nears.html

 

The vatican-two sect ignores pro-abortion politicians, but when a Jew is scheduled to be executed for murder in Florida, it rallies support to save his life.

 

-John Mains

 

MHFM: Very interesting… thanks for the e-mail.  Based on what Benedict XVI has said and done, we are of the opinion that he’s Jewish just like Paul VI was and John Paul II probably was.  Of course, that’s not necessary to prove he’s not the pope.

 

Don Bosco

 

I have been reading about don bosco and some of his dreams allude to the great apostasy of our time.  He tells of God visiting Rome 4 times, the third time God removes  the protector and the protections of the Church, allowing the smoke of satan to enter the Church.  I believe the fourth time will be the destruction of Rome in one day!!!   Don Bosco intimates that this happened because of the hatred for the Pope and the Church which was very prevalent at his time.  He also brought to light the apparition of Our Lady of La Salette.  Very interesting!

 

Nk

 

Thanks

 

Dear MHFM,

 

Thank you so very much for sending us the Fatima DVDs.  We watched it very intently.

 

In the Litany to Our Lady one of the invocations is “The Ark of the Covenant, pray for us”.  I never really understood that, but now your DVD explained it without any doubt.  It is obvious that generations before us, before N.O., who were stanch Catholics, honored her so much so, that it got written in the Litany (permanently!).  I very much like the chronological approach, from the Old to the New Testament.  Having all the facts presented into a logical way and flowing one from the other, gives a strong sense that no Catholic can live only within their own times, during their own lives; but we must look beyond the contemporary times.

 

I really appreciate having the Church explain to me how it really is without sugarcoating.

 

Thank you,

 

Renata

 

Irish

 

People are ready to explode here over the Irish V2 "bishops" as they met with the antipope and to no surprise Benedict XVI did nothing about the "bishops" who covered up all the pedophile "priests".  Abuse victims asked Benedict XVI to remove these "Bishops" and he doesn't even remove one.  I honestly cannot understand why people complain about all these terrible "bishops" but never complain about benedict XVI as he is the one who encourages these horrible "bishops" by not condemning them.

God Bless

Sean

 

Worst

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Thank you for the video on how John Paul II the Apostate Antipope promoted Judaism. Of all the outrageous things he did, that's got to be one of the worst… for John Paul II to promote Judaism is totally satanic. John Paul II probably has the worst place in hell, apart from Judas.

 

God Bless,

 

Chris White

 

John Paul II - sample

 

 

 

MHFM: This is a small sample section from our new DVD, The Third Secret of Fatima, the Impostor Sr. Lucia, and the End of the World.  The actual DVD is of higher quality than this sample video.

 

Finished

 

I just completed watching the Fatima movie.  Brilliant and marvelous... Overflowing with wonderful information.  Irrefutable.  Thank you for solving the timeframe of poor Sr. Lucy's death and possible murder, which would therefore have been a martyrdom, hidden to us... From start to finish, a brilliant historical review of the 20th century's central tragedy: the infiltration of the Vatican and the installation of the direct descendants of Caiaphas as the head priests in the Vatican. 

 

God bless you in your continued work,

 

Deidre

 

Smoking

 

… about the smoking debate:  I can't understand why people want to smoke AT ALL---it's a FILTHY habit!  Not to mention that it has been exposed,  that in more recent years,  the tobacco-growers INTENTIONALLY GROW THEIR CIGARETTE TOBACCO IN VERY HIGHLY CARCINOGENIC SUBSTANCES WHICH ALMOST INEVITABLY WILL CAUSE CANCER!  I had a double-heartbreak recently,  (about one year ago) since a friend of mine (unfortunately no longer a friend,  and maybe no longer living)  --- she was a HEAVY SMOKER.  We parted ways primarily over the materials I gave her from your monastery,  MHFM.  She had advanced 4th stage breast cancer that had spread EVERYWHERE in her body,  when I gave her your info.  I think, she did not want to hear the truth. 

    It saddens me to see people smoking,  DEFILING THE TEMPLE,  what is supposed to be the temple of the Holy Ghost here on earth,  the human body.  Somehow,  I think these souls just can not wait to get to hell where it is smoke-filled from the never-ending fires there,  so they just can not wait to "light up":  how disgusting!  I think the best way to get rid of these addictions is by prayer,  possibly it requires a signal grace  to be set free?  Depending on the severity of the addiction...but I believe God will give this grace, through Mary,  for those who are truly sincere. 

    

I totally agree with what you said that if one "puts the Kingdom first",  then "all else" (food,  shelter,  clothing,  the basic things we actually NEED in order to accomplish our work for God and family) will also be provided---by our Heavenly Father!  It has always been so for us,  praise and thank God!

 

Working

 

Subject: Catholics working in Islamic countries

 

Dear Brothers Michael and Peter,

 

For more than 4 decades, hundreds of thousands Filipinos left their families and work in Islamic countries like Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Dubai to name a few.  I would like to know do these people sin mortally in doing so? Do parents send a wrong signal to their children in abandoning their faith simply to earn a better life compared back home?

 

The arab countires allow Christian to practice their religion except in Saudi Arabia.  A Filipino OCW would in fact sign, as part of his employment contract a Declaration agreeing never to practice Christian religion of any kind, not to bring any Christian materials be it a prayer book, Bible or image/picture of any Christian religion representations.  Should a Christian caught violating this, he woud be jailed and eventually deported.  With this scenario in mind, Catholics are thus suppressed in their faith and yet many went to Saudi while some had spent almost their old age there eventually abandoning the practice of their Catholic religion.  Nonetheless, Saudi Arabia does not impose their religion to Christians but Christians are not allowed to express their faith in anyway.

 

Please shed some lights on the spiritual plight of thousands of filipino souls trapped in the heretic lands just to put food on the table.  Please help...
 

In Jesus and Mary,
Joey, Philippines

 

MHFM: No, a Catholic should not move to an Islamic country just for an employment opportunity.  God will assist those who are truly of good will and desire to support their families.  He promises that:

 

Matthew 6:31-33- “Be not solicitous therefore, saying, What shall we eat: or what shall we drink, or wherewith shall we be clothed? For after all these things do the heathens seek. For your Father knoweth that you have need of all these things. Seek ye therefore first the kingdom of God, and his justice, and all these things shall be added unto you…”

 

Putting oneself into a country of infidels where the practice of the faith will be much more difficult is definitely a bad decision; and to sign an agreement that one will not practice the faith is a mortal sin.

 

Comment

 

Hail Mary brothers
 
I would just like to share my opinion on the subject of smoking.
 
I do not believe that smoking once in a while constitutes a sin, and the reason for that is that the cigarrete (or cigar, pipe, etc) does not cause an alteration on the 'spirit' (counciousness), like marijuana, strong beverage, drunkness, and other heavy drugs.
 
Another point I have is because I once read a biography of St. Pius X, and in there said that he had the habit of smoking and sniffing 'rapé' (i don´t know if it´s spelled correctly) and he quit them mainly because they were habits somehow inconvenient for his position and they could also left dirt in the clothing.
 
Neverthless, about 'addiction' I know many people who quit smoking without any problem, and other people who can´t quit beverage, and gambling. Addiction in my humble and fallible opinion is a matter in a person´s mind (soul actually) and is not a 'rehab program' or a 'anti tabacco gum' that will make someone addicted to any kind of thing to leave that, since what the person wants is sensible feeling of pleasant satisfaction.
 
That aside would like to greet you for the recent debate which was very enlightening and uncovers the false doctrine that is shared by all newchurch goers.
 
Thanks, Marco

 

MHFM: Thanks for the interest.  Very few people smoke in extremely small amounts and infrequently.  Our comments concerned those who do it regularly.

 

Why don’t

 

Subject: why don’t people see it

 

Greetings in Jesus Christ:

 

You have done great job to show people that Vatican II invaded. Look at all of them, the head of Vatican II wears the symbol of the Jews, what else do people need to convince them? We have been robbed. The true church had been pushed to be the outsiders and they took everything that belonged to Christ and his Church. Everything for 2000 years of hard work to build his church was gone.

 

 … the materials you provide should educate them and wake them up quickly, but if they still don't see it, then I don't