E-Exchanges
*This section of our website will contain some
less formal – and short – e-mail exchanges that we’ve had which we feel may be
of value to our readers. We will include
those portions of the exchanges we deem relevant and valuable. We often add bolding and underlining which
are not necessarily that of the other party.
This section also frequently includes, not only e-exchanges we have, but
notes, updates and comments by us.*
On Abuse
“study”
Nothing these guys come out with should
surprise us anymore, but to paraphrase the obscure yet grammatically challenged
James Heberley, it just keeps getting worser and worser. A quote from the article you linked regarding
the $1.8 million study:
"Even though there was sexual abuse of
many boys, that doesn't necessarily mean that the person had a homosexual
identity".
Apparently $1.8 million doesn’t buy what it
used to. How can any sane person reach such a conclusion? I guess
one has to be some kind of an “expert”. Any normal man will tell you
(especially if he doesn’t carry the scars of a college education), as will any
woman who knows a normal man; that to a normal man the thought of any sort of
intimate contact with another man is disgusting… The very thought of such a
thing is repugnant. It is incomprehensible.
That aside, doesn’t the mere fact of having
relations with one of the same sex make you “homosexual”? If not, what
does the term mean? How can these guys put such nonsense forward
without dying from shame?...
Bill Mulligan
Comment
Hi Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,
So the steps towards Antipope John Paul
II's Beatification are complete...Consider this then.
The man who enforced the edicts of the
apostate, non- Catholic Vatican II Council ( 1962-195), forbidding any
nation to declare that Catholicism was its state religion, thus going counter
to the statements of Pope Pius IX's Syllabus, that the notion of separation of
church and state was a condemned idea.
And, as a result of this
action, Catholicism was abrogated in 1984 ( interesting date), by the very
person the Vatican II sect, the church of Satan, wishes to make a saint!
We are now witnessing the fruits of this
very action, by the very people who laid the groundwork for the recent
declaration that all crucifixes be removed from Italian classrooms , the
very men who formulated this diabolic council, Antipopes JPII and Benedict
XVI. The European Union Court of Human Rights has declared that
crucifixes thus displayed are unconstitutional.
To top it off, the present encumbant to the
usurped throne of St. Peter, has just recently praised this socialistic,
atheistic supranational organization in his encyclical of September, 2009,
Caritas Veritatis!
Now that is ironic!
How much more proof do people need to prove
that the Vatican II sect is not Catholic!
God Bless
David
Formal
heretic
Thanks for the reply! but what about
Formal Heretic?
Alberto
MHFM: A formal heretic is simply a heretic: someone who knows
about a Catholic dogma and obstinately persists in a position contrary to it.
Discernment
Hi Brothers,
Could you give me what the church teaches on St. Luke chapter 12 verses 51
to 53. I understand this to be those who hold the truth faith to
those that don't even like those in my family. Thank you
in advance. Todd
Luke 12:51-53- “Think ye, that I am come to
give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation. For there shall be from henceforth five in
one house divided: three against two, and two against three. The father shall be divided against the son,
and the son against his father, the mother against the daughter, and the
daughter against the mother, the mother in law against her daughter in law, and
the daughter in law against her mother in law.”
MHFM: It means that there will almost always be people in your
house or in your family who will be of bad will. They will represent an obstacle to your
salvation and the attempt to do God’s will.
It also means that in order to be saved people must oppose, separate,
ignore or offend such individuals when necessary. Those who do not do so when it’s required,
but rather let their family members take them from the path to God, will be
lost. Sadly, that’s the case with many
people.
Many people waste too much time worrying about and getting
involved in what bad-willed family members are doing and their problems. Instead of separating from them and not
getting entangled in their lives – a course of action which will certainly
offend those family members – so many do entangle themselves and attempt to
“help out.” They do so either because of
human respect or under the cover of concern for that person. Since these are people who reject the truth
anyway, one should let them handle their own situations. By getting involved instead of putting their
hands to plough and not looking back, they often fail to accomplish what God
desired for them.
Question
… I have been ministered to by your site, which
has the earmark of much devotion and service to all: thank you for your devoted
lives, the time and effort you have sown for the salvation,
illumination and ministry of others.
I have some sincere questions concerning
the Virgin Mother and, until I found you site, was not inclined to ask a
"modern" Catholic about it because there is so much mixture, as your
site displays. Being a devoted Biblical student, I am asking for
direction and illumination from the scripture on the following attributes of the
Virgin Mother that I have been unable to discover: Her virgin birth/immaculate
conception; her sinlessness; and, where in the Bible we are directed to pray to
her instead of Jesus. If there is a booklet or book you can recommend or,
if you can answer my questions personally, I would be grateful for any guidance
you can offer.
Thank you for your time,
assistance and consideration,
gigi veguilla
MHFM: Thanks for the interest. Your questions are covered in our book: The Bible Proves the Teachings
of the Catholic Church. That's what we'd recommend, along with our other books.
Comment
Dear Brothers,
That article on the V-2 propaganda
"study" is shocking. Everyone knows the abusers are gay, but the more
they try to hide it, then the more they make themselves look stupid! Also, it
adds more influence to the misconception that celibacy is unnatural, as though
the fact that human beings are born and live predominantly single is
"unnatural"!!!...
The article on JPII's fast-track to
"sainthood" does not surprise me. After all, if they waited even just
a little bit longer, someone would probably start asking some awkward
questions, like, "didn't he have a girlfriend," or "wasn't he
the biggest heretic of all time and thus an Antipope? …
God Bless,
Chris White
Debate
MHFM:
We recently engaged in a debate which some of our readers might find
interesting. It will be posted soon.
“Wrong”
I looked thru your website and it is very
nice except it has a few problems. You guys are very wrong on your
sedevacantist position and no salvation for all those outside the Catholic
church thru no fault of their own. May God help you get out of your
errors. Pride may be what is blinding you.
S
MHFM: Sorry, the Catholic Church does NOT teach that there are
exceptions to Outside the Church There is No Salvation. Your statement is heretical. The dogmatic definitions not only don’t make
any exceptions, but they positively exclude all exceptions. They use all exclusive language in every
case, positively eliminating all exceptions: “nobody,” “every human creature,”
“none,” etc. Your position is simply a
rejection of Catholic dogma.
Pope Innocent
III, Fourth Lateran Council, Constitution 1, 1215, ex cathedra: “There is indeed one universal Church of the
faithful, outside of which nobody at all is saved, in which Jesus
Christ is both priest and sacrifice.”
Pope Boniface
VIII, Unam Sanctam, Nov. 18, 1302, ex cathedra:
“With Faith
urging us we are forced to believe and to hold the one, holy, Catholic Church
and that, apostolic, and we firmly believe and simply confess this Church outside of which there is no salvation nor remission of sin…
Furthermore, we declare, say, define, and proclaim to every human creature
that they by absolute necessity for salvation are entirely subject to the Roman
Pontiff.”
Pope Clement V, Council
of Vienne, Decree # 30, 1311-1312, ex cathedra:” Since however there is for both regulars and
seculars, for superiors and subjects, for exempt and non-exempt, one universal Church, outside of which there
is no salvation, for all of whom there is one Lord, one
faith, and one baptism…”
Pope Eugene IV, Council
of Florence, Sess. 8, Nov. 22, 1439:
“Whoever wishes to be saved, needs above all
to hold the Catholic faith; unless each one preserves this whole and
inviolate, he will without a doubt perish in eternity.”
Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, “Cantate Domino,” 1441, ex cathedra:
“The Holy Roman
Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that all those who are
outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans but also Jews or heretics
and schismatics, cannot share in eternal life and will go into the
everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels, unless they
are joined to the Church before the end of their lives; that the unity of this ecclesiastical body is of such importance that only
for those who abide in it do the Church’s sacraments contribute to
salvation and do fasts, almsgiving and other works of piety and practices of
the Christian militia produce eternal rewards; and that nobody can be saved, no matter how much he has given away in alms and even if
he has shed blood in the name of Christ, unless he has persevered in the bosom
and unity of the Catholic Church.”
Pope Leo X, Fifth
Lateran Council, Session 11, Dec. 19, 1516, ex cathedra: “For, regulars and seculars, prelates and
subjects, exempt and non-exempt, belong to the one universal Church, outside of which no one at all is saved,
and they all have one Lord and one faith.”
Pope Pius IV,
Council of Trent, Iniunctum nobis, Nov. 13, 1565, ex cathedra: “This true Catholic faith, outside of which no
one can be saved… I now profess and truly hold…”
Pope Benedict XIV, Nuper ad nos, March 16, 1743, Profession of
Faith: “This faith of the
Catholic Church, without which no one can be saved, and which of
my own accord I now profess and truly hold…”
Pope Pius IX, Vatican
Council I, Session 2, Profession of Faith, 1870, ex cathedra: “This
true Catholic faith, outside of which none can be saved, which I
now freely profess and truly hold…”
As far as the sedevacantist position goes, you are quite
mistaken about that as well. The Vatican
II “popes” are without any doubt heretics, and the Church teaches that heretics
are not popes.
Mass
query
Subject: true Mass
Good day Brothers,
I am writing because my husband and I have read your books, watched your DVD's and
see the darkness of V-2. Our eyes have been open and we are praying a 54 day
novena for God's guidance in our new awareness in regards to our Catholic
faith. We have called your Monastery four times looking for answers to churches
where we can go to attend the true Mass and receive the true sacraments. We
have been turned away each and every time telling us to do even more
research. I understand the need for protection of such Holy information, but at
the same time it should be your number one interest to save souls. You
state at the end of your What Really Happened to the Catholic Church after
Vatican 2 for us to call and we will be told where we can go to attend the true
Mass. We feel it shouldn't be so secretive once we have done the research and
come into awareness. You do as you feel is right and we will respect that, but
please let us know what more to do so we can receive the answers to our
questions. Thank you for all your work in spreading God's true word. God
Bless!!
ew
MHFM: First of all, we object to your statement. Our whole work is for the salvation of
souls. To imply the contrary is false
and insulting. You have obviously
benefitted from the work which was put together for the salvation of
souls. We couldn’t give you a location
because you were unfamiliar with, and/or unconvinced about, the invalidity of
the New Rite of Ordination and the “priests” ordained in it. We cannot give a location to someone unless
that person agrees on all core issues of the faith, as well as key issues in our
day. One can’t just find traditional
sacraments. In order to receive
sacraments with benefit, one must agree to: not attending the New Mass ever again for any reason; a complete rejection of the Vatican II
sect; a belief in the salvation dogma without
exceptions, including the absolute necessity of water baptism and no
“baptism of desire” or “invincible ignorance”; a rejection of NFP; an
acknowledgment and agreement that he or she will
not support any of the heretical priests who offend on any of these key
points.
The person with whom you spoke also said that you protested, in
confident/arrogant fashion, that you were basically familiar with the whole
website. Yet you weren’t familiar with
the New Rite of Ordination issue. So
obviously you aren’t very familiar with the material yet. The New Rite of Ordination is a key issue –
one that’s covered somewhat prominently in our material. It’s a key issue because if one isn’t aware
of that information, he might be receiving invalid sacraments. He might also fail to re-confess mortal sins
that were confessed to “priests” ordained in said invalid rite. So obviously it’s a big deal.
It’s not that the whole thing is extremely complicated or
difficult. The point is that generally
people don’t have the interest level in
the faith which they need to have.
They just want a traditional Mass location. They want to have their Mass and move
on. Many of them are not even committed
to a rejection of the New Mass. In other
words, they would go back to it if they didn’t have another option. So obviously we cannot and will not give any
locations to such individuals until they are fully convinced. One of the biggest problems today is “Mass
alone” Catholics. That’s why, for most
people, it’s all about finding a Mass – not about what a true Catholic must
believe. They have a great interest in
the Mass issue and where to go to Mass…. oh yeah, that’s pretty much all they
are concerned about. Their interest in the critical issues of faith is
minimal. That’s precisely the problem we
have today.
Since you weren’t in full agreement yet, we could not provide
you with a specific location for where to receive valid sacraments. That would
be the case with anyone else who was not in full agreement. We’re glad that you have some interest, and
we hope that you will be fully convinced sometime soon.
B.O.D.
Dear MHFM,
What's amazing about the fantasy of
'baptism of desire and blood,' is that Satan who masquerades as the light of
God tricks mankind so eloquently with priests posing as holy men of God, and
how Satan effectively uses these human tools for destruction of men, year
in and year out as he has along, but since his council, Vatican II, the speed
of apostasy-mega fasttrack bad fruit. When Jesus Christ commanded His apostles
to go throughout the world and teach and baptize, it's really a given that the
apostles possessed supernatural skills to communicate the faith and instruct
mankind which is what they did, and then given free will each man chose whether
to be baptized into the faith or not. The early Church strictly demanded
and forbade entrance into the Church by the physical act of baptism unless
each was instructed properly through knowledge about
the faith. That had to happen first, and then as God directed, the
act of baptism took place.
Because of this gift of free will given to
man by God, and God knows all things, the act of baptism becomes
necessary to enter into the kingdom. As we all know there is only one
entrance into the kingdom. There is no other way in. Those who
refuse baptism, or those who didn't receive baptism while being instructed in
the faith, and died before actually being baptized, God searched their
hearts and found them not worthy of his kingdom. In man's finite way of
thinking, God's actions aren't good enough for man, and much to harsh, and so,
out of disobedience to God, through Satan's prodding, man devises an
appealing, feel good, method of allowing easy entrance into the Holy
Church through this fallacious belief in desire and blood, which in God's eyes
are evil acts willingly accepted by man. "Most men are damned and
going to Hell," Jacinta stated to Lucia. And so, today, millions of
souls take the wide path to Hell, as opposed to the narrow, seemingly
difficult, road to Heaven, accepting by the millions and millions this
false belief in baptism of desire and blood as a form of mercy on mankind by a
Loving God. Diabolical! As St. Augustine stated (paraphasing),
"...take the literal interpretation, always." ...as it is written..."….
God Bless always!
Material
Heretic
To whom it may concern:
Is there such a thing as material
heretic and formal heretic? Or is this a modenist view? Is there
an Ecumenical Council and or Ex Cathedra pronouncements about
this?
Thanks!
Alberto
MHFM: There’s no such thing as a material heretic in the
dogmatic teaching of the Church. There
are heretics; there are schismatics; and there are Catholics. Material
heretic is simply a name for a Catholic who is erring in good faith about a
dogma. In other words, it’s another name
for a mistaken Catholic. It’s a person
who is holding a false position – one that is strictly incompatible with
Catholic dogma. However, that person is
not obstinate against that dogma. He
would change his position immediately upon being informed of the true
position. The “material heretic” is a
Catholic.
That’s important to understand.
For it really drives home the absurdity of the position that Benedict
XVI is only a “material heretic.” It
would mean that he’s just a mistaken Catholic, which is absurd, ridiculous and
in fact impossible.
Wonder
Dear Brothers,
I just wonder
how you can say that current pope, mass, .... is not valid. The Pope was
elected by the Bishops per the teachings of the Holy Roman Catholic
Church. You get to live by the word of past Popes and teaching of the
Church, you get to live with the results of Dogma that is taught.
Happy living with the results of not a strict biblical interpretation?
People like yourselves make me sad. You have an answers for
everything but you don't have love of Christ. I am so glad that I have
read the scriptures and made up my own mind on what scripture says.
Christ has died for our sins, communion is for all, women should be
priest, Lay people can run the church, Christ did not even want ordained priest
as we know it today. You teach "men's traditions as God Truth"
. Jesus would find you a bunch of "scribes" and will toss you
out of the church. Why don't you seek the truth of God and Get
OVER ALL YOUR Legalisms. You teach like the very scribes that Jesus
despised. Jesus wanted mercy and justice. Not formalism and
legal counting of sin. You are blind to you holier than thou righteous
attitudes.
Saved by Faith,
proven by acts of faith, and Loved by God even if I sin. God has done it
all, not by our actions are we saved so how can we lose our salvation by
actions. It is a free gift. Faith proven by actions shows that we
are saved. Action with out faith proves nothing. Move into the
true spirit of Jesus. Read Cor. 13 and start to love Jesus and get rid of
all the "Catholic" junk. Move to the Spirit of truth.
You hard hearts are full of your self-righteousness.
Jeff Hvass
MHFM: You wonder? We
wonder how you could wonder? It’s
covered in detail in the material. You
mention Catholic dogma. Did you look at
the material we have? We show that
Catholic dogma teaches that a heretic can’t be the pope. That’s the teaching of the popes
themselves. It is rooted in the Catholic
dogma that heretics are not inside the Church.
It’s rooted in the dogma that heretics cannot rule in the Church, and
that Catholics are not in communion with heretics.
Benedict XVI (The Heresies of
Benedict XVI File) [link to section] –
The Catholic Teaching that a heretic cannot be a valid pope and
loses the papal office automatically [PDF
file]
However, based on the second half of your e-mail, it’s obvious
that you don’t believe in any aspect of Catholic teaching whatsoever. So the evidence from Catholic teaching won’t
persuade you in the slightest way. You
accept the heretical idea of women “priests,” faith alone, and utter
modernism. As you indicated in your
e-mail, you want to be able to sin without consequences. You reject all of what Christ taught. Christ said most men are condemned (Mt. 7:13). The Bible condemns preaching a new Gospel
(Gal. 1:8), which you do. It says that
those who fail in one point are guilty of all.
Your “accept-everything-in-love” modernism is apostasy and
blasphemy. It’s condemned by Christ and
the Bible, of course.
James 1:10-11- “And whosoever shall keep
the whole law, but offend in one point, is become guilty of all. For he that
said, Thou shalt not commit adultery, said also, Thou shalt not kill. Now if
thou do not commit adultery, but shalt kill, thou art become a transgressor of
the law.”
Pet
Dear Brothers in Christ,
I thought I read some time ago that it was
sinful to care for a pet through extraordinary means. For example, if my dog gets
cancer I shouldn't pay thousands of dollars to try to treat him. Is this true?
Should he get a disease in the coming years should I just put him to sleep?
John
Settimo
MHFM: In our opinion, if the animal is going to die within a few
months anyway, then you shouldn't do it. You could get another pet that's
residing in a cage in an SPCA or somewhere else. They would love to have an owner.
However, if the operation will allow the pet to live for a year
or years longer, then we believe you may pay to have it.
“Fr.
C”
Subject: Comment on your video: Fr. John Corapi Exposed - 1
You are heretic
for being critical of this good man. Examine your own conscience.
DB
MHFM: So, we’ve denied your “dogma”
of human respect, phony Catholicism, and not exposing the false teachers who
give you a warm spiritual feeling. We’re
running out of ways to describe your bad will.
Real Catholic truth – you don’t care one bit about it. You will almost certainly remain in your fog
until your death, and it will probably only be lifted before the Judgment Seat
of Christ. But then it will be too
late. You will be condemned to Hell.
Does it even penetrate you that he
believes that Muslims, Jews and Protestants can be saved? Are you alive? He accepts false ecumenism, which has been
condemned as apostasy by the Catholic Church.
No, you don’t care about that at all because you are not a
Catholic. The facts that were covered
don’t matter to you. All that matters to
you is that someone you like has been insulted.
Found
Dear Brothers,
I can't tell you how much you and your ministry have spoken to me. Your recent
video on sadness was like a confirmation from God that you are doing his
work. I was raised Episcopalian, and after I was left adrift in the wake
of the "episcopalypse", I was happy to remain a Protestant.
After all, they had the Bible on their side! Then I found your
website. I found you videos on Vatican II to be fascinating, but when I
saw the section "Refuting Protestantism", I scoffed. Canon law
might work for disputing Catholicism, but you couldn't use sola scriptura!
Your articles were such a shock to me! They made so much SENSE!
They took all of the "problem verses" I had struggled with, and they
explained them! And using my trust KJV, no less! My faith was
completely re-directed.
I am still praying and studying about what
I should do, and trying to find a church in my area I can go to. (I mean,
this is my immortal soul here! I don't want to go damning it to hell on
accident!) But if it wasn't for your site, I would never have even
considered the issues you pointed out! I'd be incredibly ignorant!
"Was blind but now I see", I guess. ;) I'm sorry this letter was so long, but I just
wanted to tell you what a blessing your site has been. By the Grace of our Lord Jesus Christ,
Scotty
New
Video
Billboard
Hi MHFM,
In Rochester, NY a billboard comment. On
the corner of Main Street and Alexander St there is a full size billboard that
shows 2… men dressed in a full Priests attire. White collar and all.It READS
"_ WE ARE GAY THATS WHY WE PRAY "_Come join us for service and
I can't look at it much more.The address is a LBGT/Pride something or other.
Then the next week I noticed a similar one
in Saint Paul St and Driving Park Rd.
Heaven Help Us
GOD Bless MHFM
Anthony
Interesting
Very interesting indeed
I never knew such a Catholic church
existed. From your website i see you honour Padre Pio but he would have
participated in the Vatican 2 church.
I was an Irish Catholic for 28yrs until 4yrs ago while photographing the West
Bank. I meet two Christians in Jerusalem who tell me about Jesus in a way i
never heard from a priest. Long story short i was born again and received the
Holy Spirit. I noticed the change within me in an instant.
The true church of Christ is believers coming together to worship in Spirit and
Truth.
Regards,
David
MHFM: Thanks for the interest, but
you need to look at the information on our site which deals with the biblical
proof for Catholicism. Christ founded a
Church upon St. Peter. The views you
have about being born again and what constitutes the Church of Christ are
neither historical nor biblical.
Priest
Dear Brother Dimond,
I was looking for a validly ordained priest for the sacrament of Penance
when I called Most Holy Family Monastery in 2008. I talked to Brother Michael
about possibly going to Fr. Zapp of Blessed Sacrament Church in Martinez, CA.
We talked about the importance of asking the priest what he believes before
receiving sacraments from him.
I typed a letter about the Church's teaching on Salvation and handed it to
one of the altar servers at… church. I asked him to give it to Fr. Zapp.
Later on I did talk to Fr. Zapp. I asked him if he had read my letter. He
said, "Yes." I said, "Do you believe the Church teaches no
salvation without water baptism?" He said, "No," and
claimed that the Council of Trent teaches baptism of desire. He also cited the
example of St. Emerentiana. He said the circumstances surrounding the death of
this martyr saint prove that the Church does not teach absolutely no salvation
without water baptism.
I told him that I believe in absolutely no salvation without water
baptism. I indicated to him that I would not be going to him for the
sacraments. He said I would be falling into mortal sin by refusing to attend
his mass because of the issue with the Salvation dogma.
I remembered that Brother Peter's Salvation book has specific
sections on both the Council of Trent and St. Emerentiana. Unfortunately, I did
not have this book with me at the time. I did remember enough of the material,
however, to realize that I needed to leave. Both of these detailed sections
were extremely helpful in preparing me to handle arguments that baptism of
desire advocates bring forth.
Thank you, Brother Peter.
Sincerely,
TD
MHFM: Yes, he’s an example of a heretic
who should be avoided. Thanks for the
interest. If you had asked him about
souls being saved in false religions, he would he shown his total apostasy. As such, all they can do is repeat the same,
tired, already-refuted arguments and distortions.
Sede
priest
Dear Brothers Dimond,
Thank you for the work that you do.
We just want to let your readers know that
there is now a sedevacantist priest in the Philippines…
I hope you help us publish this so the sedevacantists
from the Philippines (though very, very few in number) may have the chance to
attend the truly Traditional Mass offered by a truly Catholic priest not in
union with BXVI and the Conciliar church.
Thank you very much, and let us keep one another
in mutual prayers and support.
Sincerely,
Manila faithful, Philippines
MHFM: Thanks for the interest, but
the fact that he’s a sedevacantist isn’t good enough. He must also reject
baptism of desire and Natural Family Planning. You will almost certainly
discover that he accepts baptism of desire and is a heretic. Depending
upon what he believes and/or how imposing or notorious he is, you might be able
to receive sacraments from him; but one couldn't support him. And it could be the case that you shouldn’t
go to him for the sacraments at all. It
depends. Sadly, most of the
sedevacantist priests today are almost as bad as Benedict XVI: they believe
that souls can be saved in any religion.
Croatian
pres
To MHFM,
The president of formerly Catholic Croatia S.M. (that is the self-professed
communist iconoclast-knucklehead who wants to remove the crucifixes from all
public places in my country) had a fairly cordial meeting with antipope B16 in
the ''apostate occupied territory'' of Vatican yesterday. They discussed
several ''very important'' issues but had no time to discuss the topic of
crucifix removal. My guess is that it was a nuisance to them and that they
probably share the same opinion. Upon his return to Croatia comrade Mesic even
said that he never had any disputes or troubles with the Vatican. I couldn't
agree more. What dispute could there be between an atheist and an apostate,
they practically have the same faith and share the same beliefs, i.e. they
believe in nothing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3O-to8SMkc&feature=player_embedded
P.S. I've tried to watch Brother Michael's appearance on the History
channel but without success. It seems as though this episode (of nine in the
series so far) is also the only one that is not available for online viewing. I
could easily find all the others (even the one that aired just yesterday) but
the episode on Fatima is nowhere to be found. I am not implying anything but it
is interesting....
Keep up the good work,
V. from Croatia
Comment
Brothers,
Your recent video on the Desolate Church; Matthew 23:38, "Behold, your
house shall be left to you, desolate" is very inspiring and thought
provoking. This is very true for VII/nonbelievers homes and even their bodies,
the temple of God. Adults/children of this generation that have not God
create an emptiness that they try to fill with the material things of this
world. Their homes and cars get bigger and bigger as they try and fill
their empty lives with more and more stuff. I've heard it say that the
bathrooms and showers are becoming bigger in attempt to not only accommodate
their larger bodies, though as an attempt to possibly build a shrine in order
to wash away their shamefulness (sins), if that were possible. It's very
humbling to visit a landfill site and see all the junk that once temporarily
filled someone's material hunger for want, rather than need.
Because this country is ridding itself of anything to do with God, there is the
vast increase in desolate homes and the next crises of desolate commercial
property. Years ago, as well today, I'd comment on what a waste it is
that all the new commercial buildings are being built next to abandoned vacant
buildings. I think as a whole, the world is being conditioned by the anti-Christ
(Satan) to believe bigger is better. When choosing the correct path to eternal
salvation, the majority end up choosing the bigger path, leading to choosing
the bigger gate rather than trying to enter the narrow gate. (Matthew 7:13,
"Enter ye in at the narrow gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the
way that leadeth to destruction, and many there are who go in thereat")…
God Bless you all,
Tom
Comment
Subject: new video
Wow, awesome video, I think if we stayed in
the realm of common sense more people would realize what is true and what
is not!!! … I just got off the phone with my mother who was
poisoned by the 70's charismatic movement where you put aside all the
facts and dogmas and go by this stupid feeling inside: I feel to do this,
I feel to do that, are you kidding me. I asked her where do the
babies go that have been aborted, she said limbo, but I told her that they
go to hell, apart of hell where there is no fire. She refused to
believe that because of the lovey, feely garbage. She drives me out of
my mind, she side steps the simple and commonsense truth for a more
complicated lie!!!! Todd
Muslim
domination
Hi salutations from Brazil!
I am really anxious about the new Fatima DVD that you are preparing. I´d like
to say that your DVDs are a great help in showing my wife and family about the
faith and the truth of what is really going on.
I wish you brothers many blessings and keep up the good works!!
By the way I would like to show a really scary video I found on youtube, which
I already imagined something like this was going on, but this is really
terrifying!!
(muslim future world domination)
Mark
MHFM: Thanks for the interest.
Yes, that video is definitely worth watching. It’s an excellent presentation of the facts
on that issue. The disparity between
Western and Islamic fertility rates is clearly attributable to a number of
things. Chief among them are of course
the evil contraceptive/NFP mentality which has taken over the West, including
almost all modern “Catholics” and Protestants.
This mentality of course does not exist with the Muslims.
We believe that the facts covered in the video serve as another
indication that we are in the final days.
God is not going to allow the world to become a Muslim republic.
New
Video
Subject: regarding your new “Sadness” video
Dear Brothers at MHFM,
Your new video touches on a point that many
people should reflect on and think about as we approach Advent, and the holiday
season. To quote your video "man was created for God...and we can
only be satisfied in Him." This reminded me of a quote from Saint
Augustine's "Confessions" that you will probably be familiar
with. A theme he often repeats through out the book "Yet man,
this part of your creation, wishes to praise you. For you have made us
for yourself, and our hearts are restless until they rest in you."
We are encouraged and conditioned to be consumers, but ultimately we find that
chasing after earthly treasures is self-defeating. It's only through God
and for God that we find true peace and happiness.
- Ed
The
Cross
Dear MHFM,
And why is antipope Benedict not demanding
a retraction of the state sponsored school system in Italy imposing this
hideous removal of God on the Cross, Crucifixes, from schools of learning?
Separation of church and state can only be learned from a true pontiff, St.
Pope Pius X, who denounced separation of church and state as
'pernicious.' Who are these people of Vatican II? Devils, I say,
wholeheartedly, as I bow before the Holy Ghost, third person of the Blessed
Trinity, that I Love, and will fight to the death to repeal this hideous
pastoral council of Lucifer with my last dying breath! God Bless
MHFM.
Video
Dear Brothers,
That is a great short video on sadness.
It's so true how people seek consolations from creatures rather than
waiting peacefully in God. I imagine the main grief and horror of hell (apart
from the physical pains), as is said by many saints and the Catholic
Church, is the eternal and extreme sadness and grief at having lost
God.
That "Brother Metal" is really
sad!!! He, "fell in love with heavy metal when he attended a Metallica
concert some 15 years ago" - what a fool for going in the first place! And
if he wants to "kill" the devil, why on earth would he
"honor" the devil by using the "el diablo" hand signal.
It's disgusting.
God Bless,
Chris White
Video
Subject: Sadness - video
Hi Bro. Michael and Peter Dimond,
Another great thought provoking
video...well done; nice pictures as well...
God bless
David
“Out
of context”
Hello,
I consider myself a faithful catholic.
In your video about the heresies of B16 Why is it that when you quote
the writings of cardinal Ratsinger currently OUR POPE (us that are true Catholics)
You take only a small portion of the text, and take it out of context, to
according to you prove your point. You
twist and play with the words, you are proving your self wrong by trying to
make your point. This is not only a
heresy you are committing if you are catholic, but also dishonest if you are
not.
Between your quotes I was also reading the
pages and they says the opposite of your comments. If you truly believe in Hell, you should
reflect on your actions. The very doctrines
that you claim to defend, are the same doctrines you are attacking. The more I read your website, the more you
proved your error. Although I should say
some stated facts in other videos are true.
I will truly pray for you "Diamond brothers" so that OUR LORD JESUS
CHRIST forgive your grave Apostasy. But
according to the work that you do, I doubt that you are committing
apostasy, since in order to do it you must first be Catholic. And obviously you are not. Since you are doing the work of Satan by
going against the church. But remember THE GATES OF HELL WILL NOT PREVAIL
AGAINST IT. He seduces man with pride.
My god enlighten you
Sergio Sanchez
MHFM: “… out of context….”
Right… sure…. that’s what they
all say. That’s why you don’t give any
examples. We see how that kind of claim
holds up in a debate. Such a lie doesn’t
work with people who have read their speeches and their books. What you claim couldn’t be more false. People like you are so of bad will, so
dishonest, SUCH LIARS and so attracted to the lie, that it’s almost beyond
words. You deserve every bit of the
apostate Counter Church that you’ve received.
To give just one example which obliterates your lie and proves
our point, let’s quote Benedict XVI’s book, Principles
of Catholic Theology. This book
contains numerous major denials of Vatican I.
We will only focus on one of those denials. In fact, this book, in itself, provides all
the proof we need to show that Benedict XVI is not a Catholic. In the quote below, we cited EXTRA CONTEXT
simply because we know that COMPLETE LIARS like you will, when confronted with
any heresy, lie and say that it’s “out of context.” Here it is:
Benedict XVI, Principles of Catholic Theology, 1982,
pp. 197-198: “Against this background we can now weigh the possibilities that
are open to Christian ecumenism. The
maximum demands on which the search for unity must certainly founder are
immediately clear. On the part of the West, the maximum demand would be that the East
recognize the primacy of the bishop of Rome in the full scope of the definition
of 1870 and in so doing submit in practice, to a primacy such as has
been accepted by the Uniate churches. On the part of the East, the maximum
demand would be that the West declare the 1870 doctrine of primacy erroneous
and in so doing submit, in practice, to a primacy such as has been accepted
with the removal of the Filioque from the Creed and including the Marian dogmas
of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.
As regards Protestantism, the
maximum demand of the Catholic Church would be that the Protestant
ecclesiological ministers be regarded as totally invalid and that Protestants
be converted to Catholicism; the maximum demand of Protestants, on the
other hand, would be that the Catholic Church accept, along with the
unconditional acknowledgement of all Protestant ministries, the Protestant
concept of ministry and their understanding of the Church and thus, in
practice, renounce the apostolic and sacramental structure of the Church, which
would mean, in practice, the conversion of Catholics to Protestantism and their
acceptance of a multiplicity of distinct community structures as the historical
form of the Church. While the first three maximum demands are today rather unanimously
rejected by Christian consciousness, the fourth exercises a kind of
fascination for it – as it were, a certain conclusiveness that makes it appear
to be the real solution to the problem.
This is all the more true since there is joined to it the expectation
that a Parliament of Churches, a ‘truly ecumenical council’, could then
harmonize this pluralism and promote a Christian unity of action. That no real union would result from this,
but that its very impossibility would become a single common dogma, should
convince anyone who examines the suggestion closely that such a way would not
bring Church unity but only a final renunciation of it. As a result, none of the maximum solutions offers any real hope of unity.”
Notice
that Benedict XVI specifically mentions, and
then bluntly rejects, the traditional teaching of the Catholic Church that
the Protestants and Eastern Schismatics must be converted to the Catholic
Faith. He says that their conversion and
acceptance of Vatican I (a dogmatic council) and the Papacy (a dogma) is NOT
the way for unity. This is a total
rejection of the Catholic Faith.
The
only possible way that more context could contradict his blatant heresy is if
Benedict XVI had said just the opposite somewhere else in the book – or
if he clarified that he was only kidding.
Of course, he says no such thing.
And even if we suppose, for the sake of argument, that Benedict XVI had
said just the opposite (namely, that all Protestants and schismatics must
accept Vatican I and its definition of the Papacy for Christian unity), which
he most assuredly does not do, it still would not exonerate him
of heresy. That’s because you can’t
affirm a dogma sometimes and deny it at other times. If you say you’re against abortion, and then go
on in the same speech to favor it, you’re pro-abortion.
Any
person with any honesty and good will can see that your claim and your e-mail
are a pack of lies. You are not a
Catholic. You are a total liar, and you
don’t have the first clue what it means to accept the Catholic Church and the
Papacy.
Benedict XVI (The Heresies of
Benedict XVI File) [link to section]
Williamson
If the new nazis of Germany keep up their
ungodly persecution of Bishop Williamson, I will join the SSPX. I already am a traditional Latin mass-goer
and they are no longer excommunicated, and I usually like to be against what
the worldly people are for. What's your opinion?
… forgive me if you already addressed
this. God bless you all.
Susan
MHFM: That’s ridiculous.
Bishop Williamson is unfortunately an obstinate heretic and a
schismatic. He’s not a real
Catholic. He regards Antipope Benedict
XVI and his apostate bishops as Catholics.
He holds that the Catholic Church can be equated with an apostate
non-Catholic sect. He also believes in
salvation outside the Church, as Lefebvre did.
He adheres to the false positions of the SSPX. They are covered in detail here:
The Society of
St. Pius X [Link to Section]
So many people have such a secular orientation that if someone receives
unjust persecution in that arena, they assume that he is therefore on the good
side, even if he rejects Catholic teaching.
That is a denial of Christ and His truth. It is to totally miss the point. Few people care about the Gospel and about
the true faith of Christ.
Spies
and Aliens
Subject: Spies and Aliens
Dear Brothers,
That London spy program is like Communist
East Germany where there were apparently, 1 civilian spy for every 6 people!
How insane that the V-2 sect is searching
for "aliens"! The V-2 sect is like one big "alien" space
craft - alien to God!!!
Apocalypse 18:2 - And he cried out with a
strong voice, saying: Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen: and is become the
habitation of devils and the hold of every unclean spirit and the hold of every
unclean and hateful bird.
God Bless,
Chris White
Comment
…. checking in with your site every day and
studying all you have to offer really, really helps! Thanks to you
and all your readers! I must be pretty slow, because it just
occurred to me today that we've been in the very final stages of lucifer's
ultimately FUTILE attempts to truly "exterminate" the true,
traditional ancient Catholic FAITH. He has failed: the Immaculate
Heart has triumphed: truly her Immaculate Heart is our refuge and the way
that leads us to God....looking forward to your Fatima DVD…
Anne
Comment
Subject: Vatican joins search for Alien
Life
Hi Bros, Michael and Peter Dimond,
So the Vatican II sect is going to join the
search for "alien life"!
May I suggest, that since the term
"alien" may be defined as something
"repugnant, foreign, not one's own etc., the present occupants
of the Vatican might start their search right in the hallways of the very place
they have usurped!
...they will not be disappointed in their
results....
God Bless
David
Opinion
Dear MHFM,
I can relate to Nestorianian thinking since
it's so prevalent in American society. Multitudes of Americans act as
their own gods. To paraphrase, "...each man to his castle...,"
is very much Nestorian. That's why socialism and the socialists making
inroads to Americanism will fail because of this American way of
thinking. In the end, however, the American system will fail because we
failed Jesus Christ and accepted the Vatican II sect way of life, which is none
other than Nestorian tinged with pantheism, heresy of all heresies with the
head heresiarch, Ratzinger leading the way...
D
Document
Subject: Heresies on ratzinger´s new
document concerning Anglican "converts"
1-He makes no distinction between the
Catholic Churches and the schismatics.
2-He says the Church is a Sacrament, which
was condemned.
3-Once again, he says that the elements of
sanctification present in the sects guide the people there to the Catholic
Church.
4-If they really need to follow the
Catechism, then there´s no need to convert at all, since the Vatican II version
considers the Protestants as being part of the Church.
CK
Cremation
Would it be wrong to take a job in sales
selling cremation services if the reason for the person purchasing the program
was due to the lower cost?
S.S.
MHFM: One should not take such a job.
By the way, here’s a quote from Antipope Benedict XVI on this
point. He acknowledges that cremation
was traditionally forbidden, and that the prohibition was abandoned by Vatican
II.
Benedict XVI, God and the World,
2000, p. 436: “Q. Is it permissible to
have dead bodies cremated, or is that just a heathen ritual? A. … Right
up to the Second Vatican Council, cremation was subject to penalties. In view of all the circumstances of the
modern world, the Church has abandoned this.”
Interest
Hi Brothers !!!
I am a daily visitor of your website which I find to be the BEST Catholic
source of soul - saving information for today's times…
A Bracha
Watched
Dear MHFM,
I had the opportunity to watch the History Channel's overview of Fatima (if you
can call it that, The Nostradamus Effect). They tried to weave this into
the false visionary (Nostradamus) and imply that he may have predicted the
miracle. True to History Channel format they presented so many deceptive
comments and angles on the secret that it was more about the end of times by a
nuclear war and how the supposed Catholic Church had indeed released the
"real" 3rd secret. I would like to commend Brother Michael for
"presenting" his overview… I eagerly await Brother Michael's
DVD release on Fatima and know from his past publications his thoroughness
and adherence to facts will make this the real overview of Fatima.
God Bless you for Your Works.......
Bruce
Prayer
Dear MHFM
Here is a good prayer people should
say many times per day. JESUS, MARY, I LOVE
THEE! SAVE SOULS! Amen…. God bless in the sorrowful and
Immaculate
heart.
MARK
MHFM:
Yes, it’s a very good prayer. We believe
that we’ve mentioned it before on our website.
DVD
Subject: Fatima DVD
Dear Mhfm
Can't wait to order the fatima dvd. Very excited when I saw the cover. The
picture on the cover looks great… Keep up the great work.
God Bless
Sean
John
Paul II’s first homily
MHFM:
This is from our video, John Paul II
preached the Gospel of the Antichrist.
In light of the question below, we thought it was appropriate.
Dissolves
http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/john_paul_ii_preached_the_gospel_of_the_antichrist.php
Dear Brothers.
I commend all work and effort that you've put in to your researches.
I am not quite sure, however, if I follow your logic and would like some
clarification.
You said that Nestorius dissolves Christ by stating that "THE SON OF GOD
UNITED HIMSELF IN A CERTAIN WAY WITH A MAN NAMED JESUS".
The way I understand this is that The Son of God (person 1 being God) united
himself with another man Jesus (person 2 being a man named Jesus) (Two
people in one body?)
Then you go on to say that JPII says "the Son of God, incarnate in
the womb of the Virgin Mary, ‘has in a certain way united himself with each
man."
I don't see how this is the same as what Nestorius was saying and would like
some clarification.
The way I understand the "anti" pope is that he is saying Jesus, the
Son of God (person 1 - God and Man) unites himself with mankind.
This, to me, doesn't dissolve Christ because he didn't say that person 1
(Christ) is different from person 2 (Jesus). He said that person 1
(Christ Jesus) is united to all of humanity.
Is this correct?
Jeff
MHFM: As we point out in the video and in the article, it’s
Nestorianism applied to every man.
Nestorius dissolved Christ by teaching that the Son of God didn’t become
man, but rather united Himself with a single man named Jesus. Hence, Nestorius held that Jesus was a man
who carried or was united with God.
According to his heresy, there were two persons in Christ: the Son of
God and a mere man named Jesus.
Pope St. Leo the Great, Dogmatic Letter to
Flavian, 449: “Let Nestorius, therefore, be anathematized… he made one person of the flesh, and another of the Godhead, AND
DID NOT PERCEIVE THAT THERE WAS BUT ONE CHRIST…”
By dissolving or dividing Our
Lord Jesus Christ into two persons, Nestorius’ Antichrist doctrine logically
resulted in the worship of two Christs, and introduced, as a consequence, THE WORSHIP OF MAN!
Pope Vigilius, Second Council of Constantinople, 553: “The holy synod of Ephesus… has pronounced sentence against the heresy
of Nestorius… and all those who might later… adopt the same opinions as he
held… They express these falsehoods against the true dogmas of the Church, OFFERING WORSHIP TO TWO SONS,
trying to divide that which cannot be divided, AND INTRODUCING TO BOTH HEAVEN AND EARTH THE OFFENCE OF THE WORSHIP
OF MAN. But the sacred band of
heavenly spirits worship along with us only one Lord Jesus Christ.”
John Paul II taught that the Son of God didn’t just unite
Himself with a single man named Jesus (as Nestorius taught), but rather with
EVERY SINGLE MAN. Thus, it is Nestorianism applied to all people on
earth. That means that, in John Paul
II’s doctrine, every single person is what Nestorius considered Jesus to
be. According to John Paul II, every
single man is actually two: a mere man and the Son of God. That’s precisely why he defined Christianity
as the deep amazement at man. That’s why
he said all of the other incredible things we cover in our video. His statements are in perfect line with how
Nestorianism leads inescapably to the worship of man.
Antipope John Paul II, Redemptor Hominis (# 10), March 4, 1979: “IN REALITY, THE NAME FOR THAT DEEP AMAZEMENT AT MAN’S WORTH AND
DIGNITY IS THE GOSPEL, THAT IS TO SAY: THE GOOD NEWS. IT IS ALSO CALLED CHRISTIANITY.”
All of the evidence is covered in the video and the
article. But these two quotes show how
he believes that the Word became flesh in every man.
Antipope John Paul II, Encyclical on the Holy Ghost (# 50): “’The Word became flesh.’ The
Incarnation of God the Son signifies the taking up into unity with God not only
of human nature, but in this human nature, in a sense, everything that is
‘flesh’: the whole of humanity ...”
Here Antipope John Paul II quotes the words of John 1:14, and says
that the Word becoming flesh means the taking up of all flesh, the whole
of humanity. This literally means that
the Son of God became all flesh, the whole of humanity. And this is why Antipope John Paul II says
the following:
Antipope John Paul II, Evangelium Vitae (# 104): “It
is precisely in the ‘flesh’ of every person that Christ continues to reveal
himself … so that rejection of
human life, in whatever form that rejection takes, is really a rejection of Christ.”
John Paul II without any doubt taught Nestorianism; but he
taught Nestorianism applied to every single man, not just one. His teaching was the dissolving of Jesus: the
precise doctrine which the inspired Word of God (the Bible) says is the mark of
Antichrist (1 John 4:2-3).
Apollo
I'm reading the
first epistle of St. Paul to the Corinthians and the word apollo is used,
could you tell me who is apollo or what the significance is with the name
apollo. Thanks Todd
MHFM: As we read in Acts 18, Apollo was a convert who was
successful in converting many Jews. In 1
Corinthians 1, St. Paul is correcting the mistaken notion of some
Corinthians. They began to consider as
their master whoever baptized them.
Thus, some said: “I indeed am of Paul: and I am of Apollo: and I of
Cephas…” (1 Cor. 1:12). St. Paul rebuked
them and explained that it is Christ whom they must worship, not the person who
brought them into the faith.
Video
Update
MHFM:
This video also discusses an extremely important quote from St. Isaac Jogues.
Heretical
priest
A few days ago I talked like 3 times over
the phone with a sedevacantist priest who is affiliated/in communion with… all
of those heretics, he's from Phoenix, well he said he's currently living in
Phoenix, but he's really from Argentina.
So this guy is in favor of salvation by BOD/BOB, salvation for "invincibly
ignorant" people who have never heard of the Church or of the Gospel
("as long as they live up to the dictates of their conscience a morally
good life", or something like that), he believes in salvation for
non-Catholics by "implicit" desires; he believes a non-baptized
person can be in union/communion with the Church "in voto" or
"by desire" and consequently be saved, and all of those similar
things.
So I asked him: "Well what about the Athanasian Creed? It says we must
have explicit Faith in the Trinity and the Incarnation if we wish to be saved,
and the Council of Florence also used this Creed dogmatically." and other
things like that.
So then he tells me: "We can't take what the Athanasian Creed says
literally, or what the other dogmatic definitions say about no salvation
outside the Church, we can't understand them just like that, we have to see
what the theologians say about it."
So then I asked him: "Well didn't Vatican I say that dogmas are to be
believed and understood as they are once declared by the Church?"
And then he said: "Yes, but we also have to go by what the theologians
teach about that subject."
br
MHFM: What a surprise.
You heard the unbelief, the heresy and the rejection of Catholic
teaching right from the heretic’s mouth.
The heretic couldn’t be more wrong.
We must submit to what the Chair of St. Peter has defined. Furthermore, no sainted theologian taught the
heresies that he holds. The definition
of Vatican I and the following papal teaching confound his false outlook on how
to understand Catholic teaching. To sum
him up simply, he rejects papal infallibility.
He doesn’t believe in what Christ promised to St. Peter alone. That’s why he sees no distinction
between the Office of St. Peter and the teaching of fallible theologians.
Pope Benedict XIV, Apostolica (# 6), June 26, 1749: “The Church’s judgment is preferable to that of a Doctor renowned
for his holiness and teaching.”
Errors of the Jansenists, #30: “When anyone finds a doctrine clearly
established in Augustine, he can absolutely hold it and teach it, disregarding
any bull of the pope.”- Condemned
by Pope Alexander VIII
Pope Pius XII, Humani generis (# 21), Aug. 12, 1950: “This deposit of faith our Divine Redeemer
has given for authentic interpretation not to each of the faithful, not even
to theologians, but only to the Teaching Authority of the Church.’”
Additionally, it’s interesting to consider the following
quote. Pope Leo XIII is talking about
the protection that the Holy Ghost gives to the Bible and to the teaching of
the Magisterium.
We all know that the inspiration and protection that the Holy
Ghost gives to the Bible is unique. But
Pope Leo XIII teaches that the Holy Ghost gives the same unique protection to
the teaching of the Magisterium. Many
forget or reject this truth. The only
minor difference between the two is that the Magisterium is infallibly
protected from error in whatever it teaches, even though the words aren’t
necessarily inspired. Moreover, the
Magisterium is our proximate rule of faith, while the Bible is a remote rule of
faith. That means that the Magisterium’s
definitions give us the true understanding of the Bible. They are the interpretation.
For a person with true faith, the Holy Ghost’s protection of the
infallible papal decrees goes without saying.
However, for a modern BOD apostate, it’s a revelation. That’s because they see no distinction
between the infallible teaching of the Magisterium and the fallible teaching of
theologians. Since Pope Leo XIII speaks
of both in the same breath, it’s a very interesting quote. It (further) refutes the heretic you spoke
with and his faithless outlook on how to understand Catholic teaching.
Pope Leo XIII, Providentissimus Deus (#14), Nov. 18,
1893: “… passages of Holy Scripture… in passages already defined, the private
student may do work equally valuable, either by setting them forth more clearly
to the flock and more skilfully to scholars, or by defending them more powerfully
from hostile attack. Wherefore the first and dearest object of the Catholic
commentator should be to interpret those
passages which have received an authentic interpretation either from the sacred writers themselves, under the inspiration of the Holy Ghost
(as in many places of the New Testament), or
from the Church, under the assistance of the same Holy Spirit, whether by her
solemn judgment or her ordinary and universal magisterium - to interpret
these passages in that identical sense, and to prove, by all the resources of
science, that sound hermeneutical laws admit of no other interpretation.”
Story
hi, i just found
your web site. The articles i have read
make sense. I stopped going to v2 mass after a great number of
things happened. One story, the liberal nun had
the kids cyo group go to six flags . when they got there it was gay
day. my son got home at 1 in the morning , woke me up and said he had the worst
day in his life. he was 16yrs old.. he said it was gay day at six flags
and he and his friends had to follow the sexual pervert homosexuals around all
day. being exposed to their blatant perverted sexual behavior… i wouldn't
even let my kids watch any tv shows with homo. agendas
etc. and little did i know there was a homo. nun in charge of
my kids religious formation. One of her nun friends wears men’s clothes,
men’s hair cut. they call her (mister sister) . my child was
put in danger by the church . it is a well known fact that the most horrid
mutilating murders are done by homosexuals . and their preferred meeting place
is the public bathrooms… i took the kids out of religion class and i tried
to teach them at home. i took bible studies on and off . the
nun would say all kinds of heretical teachings , i would challenge her . i
would bring documents exposing the lies she would tell, but i ended up being
attacked by the others in the class. two of them belong to the local
masonic lodge. when i brought a document about what the masons were
about, one of the men got so mad he started to come over the table at me . very
eye opening.! i could go on and on with storys …. basically
destroyed my faith when i was in 3rd grade when they changed the mass to v2.
closed the cath . school… i never was comfortable with the v2 mass and all the
changes. they chopped up the beautiful hand carved ornate
altar with an axe , and removed everything that lookeded catholic out of
the church. in its place they put up ugly stark furniture.
they stopped playing the organ and banged on guitars up and down the
aisle. the church building is over a hundred years old.
my dad had watched the altar being carved and put together when he was a small
boy and then he saw them tear it down with an ax later in his life. the
altar was so well made they had to use an axe . we were helpless to stop
any of it. the priest that was in charge of the destruction in the
church was later defrocked years later for unsavory reasons… i wish i had
known years ago that there is a remnant of the faith that i learned
about… when i was in 1st grade. i never would have exposed my family
to the v2 church. it sickens me to think about all the years my kids were
exposed to the corruption…. i feel like an orphan, nowhere to go no one
to talk to. to top it off the only catholic friend i could talk to about
the faith… stopped going to v2 mass and she is thinking about going to a
protestant church for the social aspect . all i can say any more is LORD
HAVE MERCY , LORD HAVE MERCY, LORD HAVE MERCY .
SINCERALLY,
Question
I
wanted to ask you… in the Bull Auctorem Fidei, in Denzinger #1515 (proposition
#15)…
15. "The doctrine which proposes that the Church "must be considered
as one mystical body composed of Christ, the head, and the faithful, who are
its members through an ineffable union, by which in a marvelous way we become
with Him one sole priest, one sole victim, one sole perfect adorer of God the
Father, in spirit and in truth," understood in this sense, that no one
belongs to the body of the Church except the faithful, who are perfect adorers
in spirit and in truth,--heretical."
What was it condemning here?
MHFM: It was condemning the idea that the Church (and thus the
faithful) is only comprised of those who are perfect adorers in spirit in
truth. In other words, it is false to
believe that the Church consists only and at all times of good or of perfect
people. During the Middle Ages there
were various heresies which proposed that only the elect are part of the
Church; that is, that a person who is or will be damned was never part of the
Church to begin with.
Confession
Dear Brothers,
I hope you can answer this question.
I'm having trouble resolving this. I
suddenly remembered something that happened long ago when I was a child. I believe I committed a mortal sin.
Obviously, I've been to confession since and I know it has been forgiven,
despite that I forgot about it. My
question is: Do I have to keep remembering it now and confess it the next
time I go to confession? or, if I remember it during confession do I
still have to confess it? The reason is,
is that it's embarrassing and I don't want to have to deal with it if I don't
have to. I not trying to get away with anything, it's just that I need to
know how to give myself peace. Please
help me. Thank you for all you do in you work! I pray for you.
C
MHFM: You do need to remember it and mention it the next time
you go to confession.
Comment
Brothers,
Congratulations on landing such a high profile media outlet as the History
Channel in this day and age of liberal false Catholics and their media. This is
one of the few times I wished I'd subscribed to television. Although I missed
the program last night, I had my folks record the show, hoping they would watch
and learn, being part of the world that is all about
"externals". I hope the show/DVD is a success even though the
network decided to air the show during the sixth/last game of the World Series…
God Bless your many works,
Tom
Update
Subject:
Update, etc.
Dear
Brothers,
That was a great quote of St. Theresa's from yesterday on how she saw hell and
that she was grieved at the fact that the Lutherans, all of whom go there, were
once of the Church because they were baptized (though not once they accepted
heresy).
That story about Moshe and the Ukraine is astounding. Thank you very much for
posting it.
Thank you for the update video (great pictures). The points you made about how
many false traditionalists will talk and talk without believing is interesting.
It made me think of Jesus' words when speaking of the neccessity to eat His
flesh and drink His blood, and how many were scandalized and left Him:
John 6:61,62 - Many therefore of his disciples, hearing it, said: This saying is hard, and who can hear it? But Jesus, knowing in himself, that his disciples murmured
at this, said to them: Doth
this scandalize you?
It seems to me that these types of false traditionalists, etc. are so concerned
about externals that they are shocked by words like "antichrist" and
also that they only believe in things that they can see, and so are tricked by
the V-2 sect's illusions. I think it's interesting that the very "Mystery
of Faith", the Holy Eucharist, is Our God, whole and entire, in Flesh,
Body and Blood, but UNSEEN, and so the necessity of eating necessitates
believing first in Him who is unseen, as is faith:
Hebrews 11:1 - Now faith is the substance of things to be hoped for, the
evidence of things that appear not.
The quote of St. Isaac Jogues is really brilliant. It shows how pure his
intention was in saving souls. Thank you for quoting that. Also, the points
about predestination are encouraging because so many people are just so
bad-willed.
God Bless,
Chris White
Galatians,
added
MHFM: This is an interesting point which has been added to our
article: Where does the Bible teach that Jesus is God?
Galatians 1:1- “Paul, an apostle, not of men, neither by man, but by Jesus
Christ, and God the Father, who raised him from the dead…”
Since Paul did not become an apostle by men or of man, but by
Jesus Christ, the obvious implication is that Jesus Christ is not just a
man. He is also God.
Crucifixes
barred
Subject: Regarding - Italy school
crucifixes 'barred'
Dear brothers at MHFM -
This email is regarding "Italy school
crucifixes barred." This is sad, really sad, that a (European court)
interferes in an Italian matter to not only ban crucifixes in Italian
schools, but then rewards the "victim" with a monetary
settlement? It never ceases to amaze me how progressives in this
generation can't wait to tear down and destroy every aspect of
Christianity, and turn their backs on their own Christian identity!
Western civilization seems to be on a deathwish to kill itself. Most
countries in Europe have a declining population (and under an invasion of
muslim immigrants, motivated on converting a declining Christian Europe into a
muslim Europe.) I fear that without a real Christian revival to regain
its identity, and a lot of prayer (including the rosary), we are going to see
the fall European society within a generation or two.
E
History
channel program
A good program and worth the time. I was
disappointed that they did not show you (as I am sure you mentioned) talking
about the 3rd secret and it had to be released by 1960. It would make
more sense then said Sister Lucia. It would not make sense to have the
3rd secret talk about the assassination attempt of an (anti)pope 20 years
later. Father-Mister Andrew Apostate swallowed the Vatican story of
course. The Sister Lucia that we saw in 2000 kissing the Pope after
receiving communion was possibly brainwashed to swallow the V2 crap.
Kissing JP2 hand?? Muslims adore
the Blessed Mother. Why would they if they don't believe that she is the
mother of God? Of course trying to understand a false religion is not
easy. Anyway, I look forward to your DVD about Fatima…
William Sloan
MHFM: Thanks for the interest.
The “Sr. Lucia” who kissed John Paul II’s hand was not just
brainwashed. She was not the real Sr.
Lucy.
History
Show
Dear Brothers,
I thought EWTN's "Father" Andrew Apostoli (more like Andrew Apostate)
gave a typically-pathetic performance as a token Vatican II stooge in the
History Channel's program on the Fatima secrets. Apostoli did nothing but give
lip service to the Vatican II sect and its antipopes to whom he is so foolishly
devoted. Apostoli praised John Paul II, stated his acceptance of the false
third secret and the imposter Sr. Lucy, and Apostoli even went so far as to
utter a heresy when he stated that Our Lady appeared at Fatima as a gesture of
thanks and esteem for the Islamic religion. What a heretic! Anyone who still watches
and supports EWTN and their heretic "priests" really needs to be
honest, open their eyes and see through the lies and deceptions of men like
Andrew Apostoli. By the way, Brother Michael Dimond was in great form on the
program as a true, stalwart Roman Catholic -- unlike Apostoli and the other
interviewees. Thank you and may God bless you for sharing on national
television Our Lady's true message of Fatima.
Mike Dougherty
History
Dear Brother Michael,
I was very disappointed that they did not let you have more speaking time on
the show. They cut you off it seemed when details were going to make too much
sense to them! It seems that they want the world to still believe that the 3rd
secret has been revealed. Of course that would be expected since they on the
show were part of Vatican II or just plain skeptics. I cannot wait until you
have your new book out on Fatima and Sr. Lucia. I was very intrigued at the
fact that you said the Vatican document had, that they claimed was the third
secret, had about 60 lines instead of about 20 as in Sr. Lucia's real letter…
God Bless you and I thank the Holy Spirit for giving you wisdom.
Jodi
MHFM: In an audio discussion we will probably have some more
comments with thoughts about the show.
They did splice together a few quotes and used the portions they wanted
to.
History
Special
Brothers...
Concerning the
Fatima History Channel show last night, they showed Bro. Michael more than I
thought they would, and some people here that I been working with seemed
interested in the fact that he was going to be on the show.. If
anything, I think it adds credibility for the our movement...
(Just the mere fact of being on TV)- I liked that fact that the show
stated about a few times on why the secret was supposed to be released by
1960. I also liked on how they stated the Fatima message predicted the
reign of Pius XI, way before he even got elected !!.. They showed the vision of
Hell and quoted what the Seers description of Hell was…I did get upset
though on how they stated that "Sr. Lucia" got upset at those who
thought the 3rd secret wasn’t fully revealed- Also the spin on the theory
that the 3rd secret had maybe something to do with a possible missile
attack in the 60's / Cuba etc...I also didn’t like that they showed "Lucia"
and John Paul II being all buddy buddy...If only they would have given Brother
Dimond about 15 seconds to throw some light on the imposter
"Lucia"....Anyway at the final end of the show, some guy came on and
said, that in the end, it’s all about the salavation of souls. By the
way, I about fell out of my chair here at work when a co worker turned
around and told me he also watched the show and thought there’s no way
that the "Lucia" with John Paul II was the same person compared to
Sister Lucia that Mary appeared to.. I asked him he had any prior knowledge of
the imposter scenario and he answered no…
-Steve
MHFM: It’s interesting that the person you know concluded that
the “Lucia” with John Paul II was not the same person as the traditional,
pre-Vatican II Sr. Lucia. However, it’s
not surprising that he came to that conclusion.
If one believes in Fatima and is honest, one should come to that
conclusion. It’s simply a fact that the
post-Vatican II “Sr. Lucia” endorsed the modernist, post-Vatican II version of
Fatima. Therefore, one cannot accept her
if one holds a traditional view of Fatima or traditional conclusions about the
Third Secret of Fatima. The fact that so
many people do – and they do so obstinately – is another clear example of their
dishonesty.
Fatima
Special
Dear MHFM,
After about fifteen minutes into the
History Channel Third Secret of Fatima special, I was seeing that it was mostly
distortion and trying to lead the viewers down the wrong path. The sections with
Brother Dimond were all truthful statements about this miraculous event in
our Churches history. There were also many others that were on the show that
made truthful statements about Fatima. The HC took it upon themselves to twist
things around and make speculations. The most damaging of the distortion or
lies were;
1. The tie in between the Islamic religion
and our Lady of Fatima. This gave the impression that there may be some mutual
respect between Islam and Catholicism.
2. The "false" Sister Lucy made
out to be respectful of anti-Pope JPII. It showed her taking Communion
from him and kissing his hand.
3. The vision of hell made
out to be symbolic of WW I instead of showing that this literally was hell
and that was made perfectly clear by our Blessed Lady.
4.. Little emphasis was made on the secret
needing to be released by 1960 and the ramifications had if it been
released at that time to all the Vatican II changes starting with anti-Pope
John XXIII.
5. Not one word about the Rosary or our Lady's
message about immorality in dress, sins of the flesh and other key warnings.
6. The overall impression that anti-Pope JP
II was the greatest Pope of all time even though he was an
anti-Christ.
There are several other major flaws that
the uninformed Catholic is going to take away from this program. This means the
release of the MHFM accurate DVD version of Fatima will show the lies
and distortions in this "Masonic" version and possibly bring
more people back to the true Catholic faith had this HC special not been aired
at all.
Your ardent supporter,
Bob Bohr
Show
Brothers:
I can't say that I'm surprised at the way
the History Channel chose to spin things, but at least you were able to point
out that the released "third secret" isn't the real
deal. Hopefully a few people who watched will find their way to your
material.
Respectfully…
M
Against
Racism
MHFM: The following quote is somewhat interesting. In fifteenth century Spain, a few were endeavoring
to forbid converted Jews (i.e., Christians who had Jewish blood) from holding
office. The pope at the time, Pope
Nicholas V, rightly came out against this attempt at racial exclusion. Note: he did not condemn excluding people for
religious reasons, i.e., if a person
doesn’t believe or if a convert’s faith is in question. Rather, he condemned racism and excluding
people solely because of their bloodlines.
“The immediate result was a bull issued by
Pope Nicholas [V] on 24 September 1449 under the significant title Humani Generis Enemicus (Enemy of the
Human Race), in which he denounced the idea of excluding Christians from office
simply because of their blood origins.
‘We decree and declare’, the pope went on, ‘that all Catholics are one body
in Christ according to the teaching of our faith.’” (Henry Kamen, The Spanish Inquisition – A Historical
Revision, Yale University Press, 1998, p. 34.)
Tonight’s
program
Brothers,
I searched the TV listings for today and tomorrow and I don't see the special
that Brother Michael is appearing on.
Did the times or dates get moved? I am really looking forward to seeing
it. I'm in Texas so maybe they are not showing it here. I don't think that
makes sense. Hopefully if I miss it I
will get to see it on the internet somewhere.
God Bless
Nate
MHFM: It’s listed for 9:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the History
Channel under the title “Nostradamus Effect: Fatima’s Lost Prophecy.” The description for the show says:
“The Vatican closely guards the secrets of
one of three prophecies that children in Fatima, Portugal, claimed to have
received from the Virgin Mary in 1917.”
Apparently it will air multiple times.
Product
MHFM:
This is something someone sent to us.
It’s a beauty product from “stem-cell” technology.

Question
Dear Brothers,
I have a New American Bible from years ago.
Should I dispose of it? Is there a proper way to get rid of it? I think on the
sleeve of the book jacket is an inverted triangle. Also, do you believe
in our Lady's appearance at Knock, Ireland in the late
1800's?
John Settimo
MHFM: We have no reason to conclude that the apparition at Knock
in the 1800s was false. Our recent post
concerned the false apparition occurring there now. Even if it isn’t the best, you don’t need to
necessarily get rid of the New American Bible you have. It can be used as a reference to compare
translations, etc.
Comment
Thank you for putting the comment about
halloween on your blog, this is what I was looking for, I knew for myself
it was a pagan ritual but it’s good to have the information regarding the
background and history of it. By the way I didn't let my kids
participate or hand out any candy and thats what the war was about between
my wife and I. It’s [difficult] trying to do the right thing in this
house hold when someone is so of this world. Keep up the good work I
pray for your perseverance and safety and I am looking forward to seeing
you on the history channel...
Todd
Ouija
boards
Concerning ouija boards, I heard a
story of some people that were trying to get the board to
communicate and they asked it various questions, but then someone
asked, Who is this?..All of a sudden all the dogs in the neighborhood started
barking, the candle in the room then melted fast, and it spelled out the
word B-e-e-l-z-e-b-u-b! Also someone I knew personally told me that
someone asked the spirit if it ever seen God before and it spelled out the word
H-a-t-e..... One girl said that she was at a party & she asked
the board if she should even be using it, and the board
answered 'NO', then she felt as if her fingers were melting into
the planchette, she then said her sense of hearing went out thus not being
able to hear other people in the room talking around her....These boards are
gateways to demonic possession along with having the devil occupy your
residence...Why anyone would want to fool or have anything like that in their
home is beyond me... People need to avoid these "games" at
all costs.
-Steve
Comment
Dear Brothers in Christ,
I've listened to your debate with Mr.
Moore. Of course your position in the debate was the correct one. As far as I
can see, the "faith alone" thing, from the standpoint of pure logic,
is a product of a faulty logic (of course, the Devil makes use of a faulty
logic all the time; faulty logic is one of its favorite tools). Namely, the condition of a necessity is not
the same as the condition of sufficiency. Thus, faith is necessary for
salvation, but is not sufficient; likewise the sacrament of baptism is
necessary for salvation, but is not sufficient.
Our Lord Jesus Christ insisted on faith
simply because it was lacking those days (nowadays the faith is apparently
non-existent save but in small remnant of true Catholics). But the insistence
on what is necessary does not imply that this is the only thing needed nor that
it is sufficient. You have substantiated your position with many quotes from
the Scriptures, but Mr. Moore could not find not even a single one to
substantiate "faith alone".
It is obvious truth that you also insist on
the True Faith these days simply because The One and Only Catholic Faith is
viciously attacked from many sides, the most wicked attack coming from V-2
sect… In essence, "faith
alone" is a blasphemy because it is evident that the OBEDIENCE
to the Word is of utmost importance--our Lord insisted on obedience as much as
on faith. One is obviously not obedient if he/she thinks that it is allowable
to sin gravely as long as one has The Faith. The final result of "faith
alone" is "faith none", because sin destroys faith, and vice
versa. Faith and sin are mutually excluded.
The "faith alone" is much the same thing as "love
alone" thing characteristic for V-2 satanic "theology". The
phony "love" of the V-2 adherents is as empty as the "faith
alone". In the end "love alone" turns out to be "love
none".
It is not a mere coincidence that V-2 and
other "christians" are kin with Buddhism and other emptiness-loving
man-made eastern philosophies. Yet
somehow I think that Mr. Moore has a potential to convert to The True Faith,
although at this moment he is of bad will. I don't know why I have this feeling.
Anyway, the feelings and all other human qualities have to be subdued to
the Truth. And to the prayer.
Thank you for an excellent debate. May our Most Holy Mother Mary and St. Joseph
keep you on the right path and show your holy efforts to our Lord.
Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia
Marriage
Pope Leo XIII, Dum Multa (# 2), Dec. 24, 1902:
“It follows then that the marriage of Christians when fully accomplished…
cannot be dissolved for any reason other than
the death of either spouse, according to the holy words: ‘What God has joined,
let no man put asunder.’
Does the term "marriage of Christians" here imply that if two
non-Christians got married, and then were divorced, and then one of them
converted to Catholicism, the Catholic would be free to marry? Also, someone once told me that if two people
are married outdoors, ie. not in a church building, then it is not valid, this
seems ridiculous, but I'd like to hear it from you.
I am looking forward to the History channel special.
-A huge supporter.
MHFM: It only refers to “the marriage of Christians” because
there is the Pauline Privilege. The
Pauline Privilege applies when two unbaptized persons (thus two non-Christians)
are married, but one of them converts to the faith. If the other one (i.e., the remaining
unbaptized person) will neither convert nor live at peace with the new Christian,
then the marriage may be completely dissolved.
That’s called the Pauline Privilege because it has its roots in the
epistle of St. Paul to the Corinthians (1 Cor. 7:12-17). That’s why Pope Leo qualifies the statement
with “the marriage of Christians.”
A marriage can be valid if it is outdoors.
Debate
Brothers: A very good debate with Mr.
Moore. I think Mr. Moore (I could be wrong) is of good will and is just
confused. I think he is confusing "faith" with being in a state
of grace. He agrees with you; he just does not know it. I would
hope that you praying for him that he convert to the true faith.
You responded to an e-mail from Ms. Kalix a
week ago or so about her miscarriage. Your words to her were
compassionate and on the money. It helped me deal with a miscarriage my
wife and I suffered a few years ago. The child may have been a monster
sinner and the miscarriage may have been the best things. I am learning
now to trust God in these things since He is a lot smarter than me.
I agree with you about the Halloween
situation. The feast of All Hallows Eve had some redeeming qualities a
long time ago. It is simply evil now...
William
MHFM: Thanks for the interest.
One could not say, however, that a person who rejects (and in fact
attacks) the Catholic faith is of good will.
He is not confused. He
understands Catholic teaching and rejects it.
He might have enough good will to eventually convert. That’s something for which we should hope and
pray; but a person who attacks the Catholic faith is demonstrating bad will at
the time he is rejecting Catholic teaching.
One must be convinced of that.
History
Channel
MHFM: Bro. Michael Dimond will be
appearing on the History Channel, in a special on the Third Secret of Fatima,
on Wednesday Nov. 4, at 9:00 p.m. Eastern Time.
Antipope “Beatification”
Dear MHFM,
It is truly a sign of end times when the
anti-Christ is going to be canonized a saint and Melanie Calvat of La Salette has
not been canonized. Could this be the last straw? If you read her life story in
the book Sister Mary of the Cross you can see that should have been canonized
years ago She lived everyday as a Saint and anti-Pope lived everyday as a
"feel good" pope. Catholics of the world, wake up!
Your ardent supporter,
Bob Bohr
Halloween
I do not let my children participate in
halloween. I also do not turn on my porch light or hand out candy to other
children. I have seen many videos on Halloween and I wonder if people actually
know what "trick or treat" really means. The origin of
trick or treat came from the Druids about 2,200 years ago. The Druids were
priests in the ancient Celtic countries. What they believed is that on
Halloween, evil spirits would come back to visit the living. The Druids would
go house to house saying that the owner of the house had to leave some sort of
food out on the doorstep for the spirits as a treat or the Druids would trick
the household by placing a curse upon them or killing their children. Even
today, many humans including children are sacrificed on an evil altar on
halloween night.
Virtually every Catholic I know lets
their children dress up for halloween. If we dress our children up like saints
and send them out to participate in a pagan ritual, does this really honor the
saints???
May God bless you. Keep up the great
work.
Mary
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. We fully agree. People should not have anything to do with
Halloween. It’s very interesting that
almost every parent who claims to be Catholic will allow his or her children to
dress up for Halloween. It’s another
example of how liberal and out of touch with the faith and the truth almost
everyone is today.
New Rite of Exorcism
Subject: New Rite of Exorcism of Paul VI
Even though Father Amorth serves the
NewChurch, he makes an astonishing admission: The revised rite of exorcism is
worthless in the everlasting fight against evil. As if it wasn´t enough JP2
promulgated a new form of rosary that increases the number of Hail Marys by
each 1/3 to 66.6 instead of the usual 50.
… Lefebvre DID state on certain occasions
that the Vatican II Sacraments were deprived of validity, how about a similar
admission from the biggest expert on exorcisms in the world? Maybe it´s a first
step for many inside the Novus Ordo structure to see the light. First they
realize that the Vatican II sect replaced a time proven Exorcism rite with a
phony that won´t even tickle the Devil.
After accepting that, newchurchmen can move
one step forward and see the errors in the New Catechism. And finally see that the New Sacraments were
invalidated.
I also wanted to mention about a supposed accusation
that Paul VI was fooled by Bugnini during the reform of the Liturgy. A lot of
people in the Traditional circles (FSSPX) are moving to the position that Paul
VI was a good Pope who happened to be misled by evil men (the same scenario
they apply to JP2 and B16). If that is really the case, like they claim, then
why did Paul VI go anyway and promulgate the Novus Ordo, with very few
alterations? Why did he personally make Bugnini a Bishop? Seems like a
promotion to me. And why did he let the New Mass go ahead for almost ten years,
without ever wanting to do a recall
MHFM: Those who think that Paul VI
was good really need to look at our video or file on him: Paul VI (manifest heretic who claimed to be Pope
1963-1978) [link to
section]
Two questions
Hi, my name is Jorge and live in
Utah. I have a great respect for brother Michael Diamond and so I turn to
Most Holy Family Monastery for two concerns/questions that I have. The
first question is by far the most important… The two concerns are listed
below. Thank you so much for your time.
Question #1: What do you think about
the Diocese of Utah decreed that the Blood of Christ is suspended from mass
during Swine Flu epidemic.
Question #2: There is a picture
called "Jacinta 1972". In it contains the hour, date, time and
year of the great chastisement. I figured June 10, 1011 when WWIII will
occur. What's your comment on that?
Again, thanks for your time.
Jorge Rodriguez
MHFM: Thanks for the interest. To your first question, we think it’s
irrelevant that the Diocese of Utah made that move. That’s because the Body and Blood of Christ
are not present in the New Mass. It’s
invalid. Please consult our file: on the New Mass.
Regarding #2, it comes from the false
Bayside Messages. These false messages
contain numerous heresies and false prophecies.
They are not from God or the Blessed Virgin, but from the Devil: False Apparitions (Divine Mercy, Bayside, Medjugorje) [Link to Section]
SSPX
Dear
MHFM -
Just
wondering if the brothers at MHFM are aware of yesterday’s meeting between
Vatican and SSPX representatives? Apparently the SSPX reps are calling
out the Vatican over its false-ecumanism and vague/contradicting topics of V-2
documents. What are your opinions?
MHFM: We think it further expresses
the ridiculous, heretical and schismatic position of the SSPX. It has only been decades now, and they still
aren’t under the “authorities” and the “hierarchy” they regard as Catholic. It’s absurd.
At the same time they even have the audacity to denounce people who
correctly point out that the Vatican II sect doesn’t have any authority. Their position is a joke at this point.
The Society of St. Pius X [Link to Section]
It also highlights Benedict XVI’s
role as a deceiver in the last days. His
gross apostasy is there for all to see, but he fools the bad-willed by making
it look like he’s friendly in some way to tradition.
Interest
Dear Brothers and Sisters:
Years ago, I left the church after Vatican
II. I do not like the "New Mass ", and the majority of changes that
were made since that time. Since I have not found any Traditional Catholic
Churches in the area where I live, what can I do? I do not wish to return
to the "New Church" at present. Should I change to another
denomination? Any suggestions or advice would greatly be appreciated.
Thank you and God bless.
Gerard
MHFM: Thanks for the interest. You need to become a traditional
Catholic. The steps for how to do that are on our website. We
recommend that you obtain our basic package. One must be convinced of all
Catholic teachings before making the profession of faith and receiving sacraments.
Obviously one is not convinced of Catholic teachings if one is considering
becoming part of another denomination. We’re glad to hear about the
interest, but you should pray the Rosary and become convinced.
New Debate Posted
David Moore is a Protestant who studies the Bible
and attempts to refute Catholic teaching from it. He produces videos, articles and materials
which are dedicated to trying to disprove Catholic teaching from the Bible. He challenged us to a debate. So, we had a recorded debate discussion on
the topic of faith alone and eternal security.
The total time for the debate discussion is 1 hour and 56 minutes.
It will be found permanently in our Traditional
Catholic Audios, Telephone Debates, and Refuting Protestantism sections.
Halloween
Brothers,
Here is an article describing the goings-on
at the white house. Though the article states that Obama was in plain clothes,
the picture of him on my Yahoo start-up page appears, to me, that he is dressed
up like a priest. No doubt a novus horror "priest."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091101/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_obamas_halloween
Sincerely,
Howard
JD
Dear Brothers,
This latest publicity stunt by the V-2 sect
to celebrate the heretical Joint Declaration on Justification with the
Lutherans is yet another example of how bad willed Australian
"Catholics" are. I think it's really just a celebration of
Halloween - October 31 (and the "principles" of Halloween -
"do what thou wilt") - by the V-2 sect!!! The fact that the Joint
Declaration was signed on Halloween in 1999 shows how Antichrist the
whole affair is. How in-your-face-Antichrist does it have to get
before people wake up and see how the Catholic Church's buildings are
being raped by apostates?!!
God Bless,
Chris White
Praying
Alright, I'm confused, and I would really
appreciate it if you could enlighten me on this point:
When we pray the Rosary, do we dedicate it to Our Lady, or to God? Do we offer
the Rosary to Our Lady only, or do we have to offer it to God? I'm confused!
Do we have to pray it with the belief that whatever grace of favor we might
receive from praying it, we receive it from Our Lady, or from God?
I'm confused! This has always confused me, because, it goes without saying that
we only adore God in the Holy Trinity alone, and not any Saint or even Our
Lady, but, then they also say that when we pray to any Saint or even to Our
Lady, that we Catholics do not expect to receive any graces or favors from the
power of the Saints of from Our Lady, but that they intercede for us and obtain
from God whatever we ask from them, not that they of their own power grant us
said grace or favor; but then how do we reconcile that with the Rosary? I don't
get it!
This is why I have hesitated to pray the Rosary, because I just realized these
things and now I don't know what to think or the beliefs we should or should
not have when we pray the Rosary.
Could you please help me with this?
AB
MHFM: When we pray to the Blessed
Virgin, she prays to God for us. Yet the
connection between the Mother of God and God Himself is so powerful and strong
and intimate, that it’s automatic. It’s
not as if one needs to draw a mental separation: well, I pray to Our Lady, who
will in turn pray to God for me. No,
it’s instantaneous and automatic. We
pray to Our Lady; she grants us graces.
The same is true when we pray to other saints, who are in possession of
the Beatific Vision. Yet it’s true to an
even greater and more powerful degree with Our Lady.
Rosary
To whom it may concern,
My name is Amanda… I live in a very small
town in North Carolina. I desire to become catholic. I read a catholic bible, I
pray the rosary.. In fact the doctors told me I could never have any more
children. After saying the rosary to the Holy mother, I became pregnant. I live
in a southern baptist community, and there isnt much help for me. I feel its
imperative that I become catholic. I dream about it, I feel led to it. Please help me … Thank you
Amanda
MHFM: It’s great to hear about your interest. You should
continue to pray the Rosary each day, more than five decades a day if
possible. You should obtain basic package with the main books and DVDs we
sell. We recommend the basic catechism and the books we offer from St.
Louis De Montfort on the Rosary and True
Devotion to Mary. A few other lives of the saints might really help.
This file explains the steps one needs to take to convert. If you contact us here, we can also help you
further.
Comment
Thank you so much for posting your
debate with David Moore. In my opinion, this is your finest debate!
It was very educational, and you both should be congratulated for conducting
yourselves in a professional manner and staying on topic. I think it was
quite clear that when Mr Moore was challenged with irrefutable and overwhelming evidence
- he had concede that he either had no answer, or at the very least he had
to admit the text was "difficult." I REALLY hope you
debate him again in the future on other topics: such as scipture
alone and the true presence of the Eucharist (both of which were briefly
touched on.) In most cases, Mr Moore seemed sincere and was willing to
admit when you caught him in contradictions. Ultimately it was obvious
that the Catholic position was shown to be correct, and anyone with a shred of
honesty will admit that Brother Peter clearly won this debate.
God bless the MHFM, and continue your great
work!
- Ed
Noises
Dear
Brothers,
Those are astounding videos on the heretics JP2 and Reginald Foster. They are
really just like very bad comedians, only they are pretending to be real
"pope" and "priest"!!! Those weird noises of JP2 remind me
of your exorcism tape, how the possesed person was making pig noises, etc.
"Fr." Reginald Foster treats hell like it's a joke, but you can see
him physically squirm as he wrestles with his conscience…
That was a fascinating debate with the heretic David Moore on the heresies
of Faith Alone and Eternal Security. It touched on many important points. It did sadden me though that Mr. Moore was
obstinate in the face of his own confusion about what many scriptures mean. If
God is the God of understanding, then surely he would enable us to understand
his words in the Bible. Catholics understand that Jesus made St. Peter the Pope
in order to explain the true meaning of scriptures (amongst many other duties).
Perhaps it was providential that St. Peter, the first Pope, was the one who
wrote of St. Paul’s Epistles:
2 Peter 3:16 - As also in all his epistles,
speaking in them of these things; in which are certain things hard to be
understood, which the unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other
scriptures, to their own destruction.
Eternal Security is like saying that Adam,
made in the state of grace/justice, could never have committed the Original
Sin, or to say, “oh, now that I’m an American citizen, it is ipso facto
impossible for me to break the law!!!”
At 0:45 of video 5, David said, “I
really do believe it’s a question of have you ever seen God or not.” If that
were so, then how come Satan, who really, truly, substantially saw God, and
stood in His presence – how is it that Lucifer became Satan the Devil, if it’s
simply a question of whether one has “seen” God or not?! Obviously even angels
can be damned!
Faith Alone is like people who believe that
by simply imagining something, it will happen. If I were to imagine a house to
live in, would that then appear? No. I would need to physically work at
building it…. It seems to me that Protestants, like David Moore, almost
secretly worship the Bible! I think this because that is where God seems to
begin and end for them – in the Bible! Our God, the True God, the Catholic God,
the Lord Jesus Christ, actually made everything and uses it according to His
will, and not according to man’s desires. Protestants seem to begin with the initial
assumption that all you need for salvation is the Bible, but we know that the
entire Catholic Church is needed for salvation. If God were actually their
authority, they (Protestants) would believe what the Bible says about St.
Peter, etc. Also, I’m guessing that about half the NT is admonitions and
encouragements for the faithful to continue in justice and grace. If we cannot
lose salvation, then half of the NT is superfluous.
…In his closing statement David said,
“The Catholic Church would have to be 100% right about everything.” And if the
Catholic Church was established by God Himself, with a rock as the keeper of
the Keys to the Kingdom, we would expect it to be right about everything, as it
truly is and always has been. Why is it that Protestants all acknowledge the
elaborate Jewish system and its destruction (of the temple, etc.), but they
deny the Christian system, the Catholic Church, the new Israel?! Oh I forgot,
they are PROTESTants, head-butting the rocks like Jews!!!
Thank you Brothers and God Bless,
Chris White
MHFM: Thanks for the comments. We think that there is more hope for his
conversion than for many Protestants out there.
About
Subject: About the sola fide debate
Part 7 was simply the best. Since Mr. Moore
sees no difference between venial and mortal sins, he should see no difference
between fornicating just one time or a thousand times.
C
Comment
Your recent debate once again proves as you stated, that many points are
"ignored" when people are trying to justify their thinking. Out of
ignorance and their Vail of spiritual blindness, they choose from an al-a-cart
menu to manifest their own reality. Ignoring what they can not understand
merely because they are excluded from its interpretation (blindness). Unfortunately,
their false interpretation out of pride, leads only to eternal damnation.
I believe deep down, these folks know they are wrong. Many people continue down
the wrong path none the less, while few, fight the fight to have the Vail
lifted to see the truth.
God Bless MHFM,
Tom
Comment
Great job on the 11-part debate with David
Moore on the issue of whether the Bible teaches "justification by faith
alone" or "eternal security". The debate showed
clearly both of those Protestant beliefs are totally
unscriptural, and I think Mr. Moore (if indirectly) did concede that the
Catholic views Bro. Peter showed in this debate are correct.
It is sad to realize that this
man, who expressed many times how very careful he is to NOT
sin, especially in a grave manner… IS sinning in a
mortal, death-dealing manner by disobeying Jesus… by joining a false
religion started by A MAN who was riddled with evil (Luther), and by NOT
adhering to the ONLY true religion on Earth which Jesus Christ founded.
For example, Mr. Moore agreed with
Bro. Peter about the scriptures where even St. Paul expresses fears that
HE---the GREAT Apostle to the Gentiles---could become
REPROBATE-------well, maybe Mr. Moore could understand it this
way: HAD "PROTESTANTISM" EXISTED AT THE TIME OF ST.
PAUL, AND HAD ST. PAUL ABANDONED THE TRUE FAITH CHRIST TAUGHT---THE
CATHOLIC FAITH----in order to become a "protestant", then in
that case St. Paul's worst fears would have been realized, for he WOULD
have become a REPROBATE, and fallen into heresy and died in this most
wretched and vile state of mortal sin, and Hell would have been his
eternity.
Maybe it is because protestants------just
like Vatican 2 "catholics" and other apostates, heretics and
schismatics----ARE in these tragic delusions that they lack the grace to see
the only one true church of the traditional Catholic Faith........for mortal
sin blocks grace. But miracles can happen, they do happen every
day---and I believe that if a reprobate and sinner like me can come to see the
truth, than others can.....but clinging to such clearly non-Biblical
"pacifiers" of "justification by faith alone"/"eternal
security" has to end, since such pacifiers are filled with
death-dealing poison. Same goes for the V2 "Catholics"---- let
go of your baby blankets, and embrace the only truth that can help you get
into Heaven----TRADITIONAL
Catholicism.
That's why the grace of final perseverance
is the most important thing to pray/ask for… Once again Thank
You! and great job on this debate.
A
Innocent III
Subject:
Innocent III
Hey Brothers,
I am sorry if you already have this quote in your material somewhere, I could
not find it on your site or in your books. Maybe I did not look hard enough.
This is from Denzinger 410 and it has to do with there being a difference
between a person dying with only original sin as opposed to actual sin. I think
I understand it right.
(Denz. 410) Innocent III "The effect of Baptism (and the Character)":
"Original, therefore, which is committed without consent, is remitted
without consent through the power of the sacrament; but actual, which is
contracted with consent, is not mitigated in the slightest without consent...
The punishment of original sin is deprivation of the vision of God, but the
punishment of actual sin is the torments of everlasting hell..."
I thought this was relevant to the belief that some schismatics have that
unbaptized infants suffer the same punishment as those who die in actual mortal
sin.
Also it proves that those with original sin cannot be in Heaven because they
lose the vision of God. This may not be ex cathedra but it reiterates
Dogma. Please correct me if I am missing
something or I am not enterpreting something correctly.
Nate
MHFM: We don’t generally use that
citation to prove the point about unbaptized infants not suffering the fires of
Hell. That’s because it comes from a
letter of Pope Innocent III called Ex
Parte Tua. That letter is not
infallible. That letter also teaches the
error that original sin was remitted by circumcision. That error, that original sin was remitted by
circumcision, was contradicted by the infallible teaching of the Council of
Trent. We cover this in our book: EENS, in section 17, in the process of refuting an objection
raised for “baptism of desire.”
That being said, we think that the
quote does add something. Even though it
doesn’t come from an infallible document, it shows that another pope held the
same position: that unbaptized infants go to a part of Hell where there is no
fire. It’s something additional to
consider, along with the more authoritative statements which demonstrate the
point.
JP2
Crazy
JP2 Video…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TIoelyZ5qvQ
C
John XXIII
DEAR BROTHER DIMOND
I HAVE BEEN GOING THROUGH YOUR WEBSITE AND FIND YOUR INFORMATION RELEVANT TO
OUR TIMES AND I DO WANT TO HAVE MY FAMILY AND I'S SOULS SAVED HOWEVER IF THE
LATE POPE JOHN XXIII WAS ACTUALLY AN ANTIPOPE WHY IS HIS BODY LAYING IN A STATE
OF INCORRUPT NATURE AND IF EVERY CHURCH IS USING THE NEW MASS IS TAKING
COMMUNION VALID AND ARE MY CONFESSION VALID?
A VERY MUCH UPSET CATHOLIC
TERRY MORIER
FROM CANADA
MHFM: As we point out in our book (The Truth about What Really Happened to the Catholic Church after
Vatican II), and in our section on John XXIII: The Scandals and Heresies of John XXIII [PDF File]:
After his death, the Vatican sent for
Gennar Goglia, who with his colleagues embalmed John XXIII. Goglia injected ten liters of embalming fluid
into John XXIII’s wrist and stomach to neutralize any putrefaction. This explains why John XXIII’s body didn’t
decompose like normal bodies. In January
2001, John XXIII’s body was exhumed and placed in a new bullet-proof crystal
coffin now on display in St. Peter’s basilica.
John XXIII’s face and hands were also covered in wax. (citations in section)
This is the only reason that John XXIII (who was a very wicked
heretic) did not decay like normal people.
As far as your other question goes, the New Mass is definitely invalid
and it’s a grave sin to continue to go there.
The confessions to priests ordained in the New Rite of Ordination are
not valid, but if the priest was ordained in the old rite and says the proper
words it could have been valid. That’s
covered in our material.
Liturgy
Dear Brothers
"HIGH CHURCH" NON-CATHOLICS
Some so-called Traditionalist
Catholic websites and blogspots salivate in, and glorify the
"Tridientine" liturgy, supposedly celebrated in a most pristine way,
by various Anglican/Episcopalian clergy and groups. Truly, brothers, are not
these liturgies celebrated by heretics fit only for the garbage bins, whether
velvet lined or not?
More
seriously, such Traditionalists claim that they are any different to
Novus Ordo Catholics who vigorously pursue ecumenical practices?
Sincerely,
Joe. M
MHFM: It’s certainly true that many
traditionalists don’t have the faith, but instead glory only or primarily in
the external, aesthetical and emotional aspects of Catholicism. They enjoy the chanting and the singing and
the liturgy but don’t really care about the faith and the truth. In that way, many of them are very similar to
high-Church Anglicans. They just have a
slightly more traditional or conservative inclination. We definitely believe that the comparison is
appropriate.
Debate
MHFM: A new debate that some of our readers might
find interesting will hopefully be posted soon.
Astounding
Thought
you might be interested in this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7JBQvIC7YQ
Astonishing indeed. Well, at least he's
honest in his heresies.
MHFM: That’s just astounding
heresy. The guy is totally evil. That’s the Vatican II apostasy for you. He’s a senior Vatican priest. Also, we wonder how many false
traditionalists – who say they cannot judge that Benedict XVI is a heretic –
would say the same about this apostate.
College
MHFM,
I would like to ask your opinion on college parties. My parents as well as
the people who invited me to a party say that its fine, they understand I don't
approve of getting drunk so just come and don't drink, you can just
socialize. I see two problems with it. One, it is an approximate
occasion of many sins (alcohol, immodest dress, these parties easily induce
many to sins of the flesh). Secondly, even though they say they know I
don't want to be a part of drinking I still think that my going is giving them
scandal. I feel my attendance shows I don't drink personally but it’s
fine if someone else chooses to do so, which would be wrong. What do you
think about it? Several of them know my views on many things.
Kenneth Connelly
MHFM: One should definitely not go to
such parties. It is an occasion of sin,
as you said. But additionally, to be in
such a mortally sinful atmosphere where the entire occasion is basically
defined by mortal sin is to be implicated in it. It would have to be one of the worst things a
person could do – not in the sense that there aren’t worse mortal sins, but in
terms of putting oneself in a situation where one’s soul is apt to be
ruined.
Former
I am a former employee of EWTN who was
terminated because of my support of true Catholic faith and sacraments. I
assure you that you are correct. They are modernists who are afficted with
conciliar papolatry.
E
Comment
That article you posted about
"Cardinal George" and "Archbishop Dolan" can only be
described as a "puke page" because seeing this idiotic face in the
photo, the sliminess, the malevolence so obvious in this apostate's
visage and countenance, could only make one want to puke.
At this point, I can't help but
feeling that anyone who can fall for these most noxious and pestilent enemies
of Christ ANTICS deserve everything they get: total spiritual blindness,
etc. Still, since I was a blind fool myself, until very
recently when I was miraculously led to your website and information (the
truth) I will pray for all those poor deceived hapless souls still
"accepting" these V2 apostates and their incredibly EVIL
counter-church, since the Holy Ghost will blow wherever He wills, and
there may be a certain number of Mary's true children still out
there, somewhere, whom God intends to save....
As for the bad news on
"president" obama's (what a side-show freak!) "National
Emergency'" re: "swine flu"----- can any one out there say
"FASCISM"??? My own health is so incredibly damaged from
a "flu shot" I got last winter (yes I was a big-time fool for
allowing it) that I have to admit my life will probably (except for a
miracle, which I am still praying for) never be the same.
It's even hard for me to pray, much less clean the house and fulfill all
my duties as a house-wife, much less WORK, as I always used to
do.....be warned---beware----do not get any of these "flu
shots" because from my own personal experience, I would advise
that they are designed to incapacitate, and even to
kill.............Sincerely,
Topic
Subject: Great job on audio praying to
Saints
Brothers Thanks for all the information
James
Topic
Thank you for the pro life video. I had a
miscarriage earlier in the year. I could accept that this soul was in a part of
hell where there was no hellfire, but had still been haunted as to why our Almighty
God let it happen. Now I can see that if this child had been born, its future
sins would probably put him/her at a worse place in hell. Thanks again. This is
a hard topic to frame as so many do want to believe these unborn souls go
straight to heaven. I'm very glad God gave you the grace to make this video.
May The Holy Trinity continue to bless MHFM!
Christina Kalix
Comment
Great video again guys, I just wanted to
make a few comments, abortion is of the devil and he has a reason for it
just like the same reason he tries to get all of us into hell. That
is his one and only objective to ruin souls, that being said if he gets
man to promulgate abortion but the unbaptized babies go to heaven anyway,
his purpose is defeated! Oh yes, I know the devil is defeated anyway
but many souls are lost in this great battle that Our Lady predicted at
Fatima.
Remember what Mary said to the children
about WWll, that most will go to hell. The devil wouldn't
persist in something that has no effect for him {devil}, the ruining of
souls. Remember that these devils were once Angels but were cast out
of Heaven, Angels and devils are very highly intelligent beings, more
intelligent than we are. Plain and simple Jesus says that you need water
and the HOLY SPIRIT to remove original sin. Remember the devil will always
do the opposite of what JESUS teaches or does!!! The problem here is that
the dogmas taught by the True Catholic Church are so linked together that
to deny one you deny them all, you can't mix good and evil theology!
With the
BLESSED HOLY TRINITY everything has its order and reason even if we don't
understand it, we are finite and He is infinity!!! May the Queen of
Heaven, with the Great Rosary and the scapular save us all.
Todd
EWTN
Subject: What would Jesus do?
Did you pray and seek God's guidance before
you wrote this website? Just wondering. Do you actually watch EWTN
before you trash it. I wonder what Jesus
would do. He spoke kindly even to Mary Magdaline.
Della
MHFM: The heresies that we cover from
EWTN are documented. You need to wake
up. The people on EWTN accept Vatican II
and false ecumenism. They are
modernists. Jesus spoke kindly to Mary
Magdalene because He knew that she had the good will to change. But He condemned other obstinate sinners and
false teachers in strong words when it was appropriate.
EWTN
and the Charismatic Movement [link to section]
New Video
Comments
… Thank you for posting the video on JP2
teaching that "Man is the Way". It becomes more and more
apparent how the world has put man in the place of God.
The near misses are incredible. Thank you for posting them.
The Lord Monckton speech is startling. The end truly is near!
Vatican 2 thumbs up for Karl Marx?! How do they answer for the Gulags when they
silence Bp. Williamson on the "Holocaust" - oh, I forgot - the Gulags
were not aimed at Jews, so it's ok to slaughter 100,000,000 people (in their mind)!!!
The video on abortion and the Pelagian heretics is excellent. It is very easy
to see how wrong the modern day abortionist heretics are, and also how they are
worse than the Pelagians, since they reject the necessity of any kind of
baptism (even though there is only one). Your reference to the denial of
Original Sin is also very helpful in understanding this issue. Thank you.
God Bless,
Chris White
Letter
[NOTE: For those it might interest, this is a letter we recently
sent to a person who is still a supporter of the Vatican II sect. This person is considering the full truth of
the traditional Catholic faith (i.e., sedevacantism, etc.), but is not
convinced.]
As an addendum to the last e-mail, you
really should get our big book, The Truth
about What Really Happened to the Catholic Church after Vatican II, if you
haven't seen it - in addition to our other books. The evidence is covered
there. It contains their worst heresies, a history of their false ecumenism,
hundreds of photos, the heresies in Vatican II, etc. (By the way, Benedict
XVI's endorsement of Vatican II alone would prove that he's not the pope.)
You also probably believe in heresy on the dogma Outside the Church There is No
Salvation. If so, that's another big
reason that you still are unable to see the truth. You really should get that
book as well.
The fact that you would say that most of the heresies come from PCT [Benedict
XVI’s book, Principles of Catholic
Theology] seems to reveal that you aren't very familiar with the material
we've put out. Some significant heresies
do come from that book, but they constitute only a tiny fraction of the
heresies. We have a whole section on
Benedict XVI's post-election heresies. For instance, one of his worst heresies
(among dozens) is his recent declaration that a schismatic leader is a
"pastor in the Church of Christ."
Also, from what we gathered, you seem to like popular music. That is all sinful garbage which blocks out
grace. You really should stop listening
to it. In addition, if you don't pray
the full Rosary each day (all 15 decades), you should. It's critical.
Finally, and I'm saying this to help, you say that you hang around with your
girlfriend. Well, unless a person is seriously considering marriage and perhaps
soon, having a long-standing girlfriend is very dangerous and usually an unwise
thing to do. Almost always people fall
into sins of the flesh that way. If you
are committing sins that way (and even deep kissing between unmarried persons
is a mortal sin), and not praying the full Rosary, then God will pull grace
from you and you will be unable to see the truth. Wisdom is chaste (James 3:17).
Frankly, some of the things you have said reveal that you are still in a
spiritual fog. The fact that you need
more proof, after hearing the debate and seeing some of the things we've
covered, is a very bad sign. You need to realize that the people you think are
Catholic [like the guy we debated, other prominent figures in the Vatican II
sect, etc.] are very evil people. That's
no exaggeration. I know that might shock
you, but it's the truth. They are
totally apostate unbelievers headed straight for Hell. They hold that
anti-Catholic Protestants are not even heretics. You heard him say it when he
was asked about it in the debate. That’s
almost satanic. That means that the
Catholic faith is meaningless.
That is a total mockery of everything Catholic, all the dogmas, Our Lady, Our
Lord, etc. It reveals that they don't
possess one whiff of faith. So, by surrounding yourself with those types,
even if you are just reading them all the time or listening to them or thinking
that they cannot be on the wrong path, it can brainwash a person. It can sort of give you a community feeling
that this group is okay, when it is not.
It can negatively impact you in a huge way. The way to find the truth and analyze things
correctly is to prescind completely from what all of your friends and
clique-members think. It is to analyze, in solitude, what God
thinks. Consider the truth without any
regard for the opinions of the people around you; for they are totally
deceived.
-MHFM
Comment
Dear
Brothers:
I
never had the chance to thank you for the 3 part-series of videos dealing with
the sins of the flesh against purity. Nicely done! I did not know that [these
things were] so bad. I knew the church regarded it (or at least used to) as a
sin, but I thought it was only venial.
Nowadays,
if you go to a Psychologist, he will say it´s only normal. Even many of the Protestant sects (with their
changeable morality) bought the idea that´s part of own´s
"exploration" and a way of acquiring "practice". The same
mentality that encourages people to accept and even try to embrace
homosexuality. In my youth, my parish priest (novus ordo) treated the whole
masturbation subject as venial and a chapter or live. He was also against
infant baptism (a total heretic, a protestant under a priest´s clothes). When I
told him I wanted to be a Priest he told me that first I needed to
"experience" live, go out, date, kiss... I don´t think some guy like
that will ever threaten someone with the pains of hell.
To
be frank with you, I live in a city that is as close to hell as can be (Rio de
Janeiro)… I now walk around with my rosary inside my pocket. Every time I see
something that disturbs me… I just place my hand on it and ask for strength…
It
seemed impossible at first, but it´s not so hard after someone watches Brother
Michael´s masterpiece video "Death and the Journey to Hell". That´s a
very inspiring material. The best I´ve ever seen on this topic. If you guys
want to attract people to your page, this video (along with Creation and
Miracles) is by far the best option, since even Traditionalists (FSSPX alike)
and conservative newchurchmen can feel attracted to it, without touching at
first glance on sedevacantism and the whole baptism of desire issue. This
may be one of your earliest works, but I don´t think it will ever get old. Deo
gratias that you did not follow the trend and took easy on the issue with fear
of insulting or scaring people away. After the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus lost
nearly all of his followers, and even inquired the twelve if they were planning
to run away too. But He did not care. He knew all too well that Truth is far
more important than damaged egos.
Fatima
Dear
MHFM,
The Vatican II
sect remains the Vatican II sect until it is deposed, and sadly
these events are forever violent and catastrophic as Catholic history
clearly illustrates. Since the atmosphere at the Vatican, at present, by
most reports coming out of Rome, tense, on both sides, those that side
with the present administration, and those who are plotting to overthrow them,
from several fronts-religious and political- it can logically be
computed that the third secret of Fatima, unrevealed in totality to
the world, has a date yet in the future. Moreso, the complete
message must be revealed to the world. There is no way out of this
since the Blessed Mother has commanded that it be done, and it will be done,
completely and correctly. What the Queen demands, the Queen gets!
It's not complicated. It's regal obedience. The 'etc...' after the
dogma of the faith in Portugal remains silent, and squashed, moreso, after
sister Lucia disappeared from the scene, I suppose, suffering violent,
torturous death-deliberate poisoning- as some conspiricists have
propounded- hence, replaced by phony Lucy, by and for the Vatican II
agenda. Our Lady of Fatima is the penultimate thorn of the Vatican II sect and
their worldwide plot of destructing the Catholic Church by creating a
new theology, and new Church, by the aegis of Vatican II quasi-authority
as your ministry clears elucidates by providing the true teachings of
the Roman Catholic Church; undefiled, pure, and holy as handed
down from the time of Peter. If most Catholics only realized that
throughout the life of sister Lucia those in heaven never left her side and
communicated with her when necessary. Sister Lucia was that conduit to
this evil world the Blessed Mother used, and sister Lucia administered humbly
without retardation, and assurance. Her supposed silence since the early
50's, til her supposed death a few years past, sans revelations from heaven is
inordinate in sister Lucia's unique position as seer, and revealer in this era.
For sister Lucia to remain silent all that period of time is absolutely without
precedence as long as she walked, and devoutly prayed in this evil
world. The last revealing secret of Fatima, undisclosed at this time,
begins with a loud defiance with heretic Roncalli , who we know rubbed
shoulders with those openly opposed to the Roman Catholic Church; communists,
Rosicrusians, Masons, Protestants-the minions of evil. By openly
proclaiming the Fatima seers, "...prophets of doom..."
Roncalli revealed not only his pride, but that 'something' in the
future spelled worse catastrophy than what the world had
previously went through. Roncalli was in blatant denial of
Catholic truth, and revelation-divine and private. Roncalli reviled the
Fatima message and their seers as much as the masons of Ourem. The
infiltration of the Church was complete in his eyes, and man would rule the day
from the Chair of Peter bringing good news, not of Christ, but of man,
and The Blessed Mother's message at Fatima would never see the light of day
til' the end of time-so Roncalli and his successors thought. The bad
fruit, and the root of this plague, Vatican II, is dying, and the fetid odor
emanating from Ratzinger and his disilusioned sect begs an end. Through
your revealing efforts, and those opposed to Vatican II continue, hope remains,
and Love in Christ, and His true Church prevails. God Bless
MHFM.
D
MHFM: Thanks for the interest. One point: we don't believe that the Vatican
II sect has revealed any part of the real Third Secret of Fatima.
Death
Subject: God did not make death but God is
the one who kills and makes alive
I have a question.
In the Wisdom of Solomon 1:13 it states that: "God did not make
death" however in Deuteronomy 32:39 that: "God is the one who kills
and makes alive." How do we reconcile these two apparently contradictory
views of God and death?
Thanks,
Ken
MHFM: God did not make death because God made man immortal. Death only came into existence as a result of
the sin of Adam. Since death now exists
as a result of man’s sin, God kills and makes alive.
Comment
This morning I was listening to The Laura
Ingram show. She says she's a Catholic. Today her guest Ray Arroyo said the
"Popes" move to absorb Anglicans is a triumph of Orthodoxy. Some of
the Anglicans are feeling out of sorts because their religion is being overrun
by liberals. So, the schismatics have found a new home where they can
practice their false religion. Annexing false religions to create a
conglomerate of false faith seems like push towards someone's idea of
a new world order. I wonder who's next?
Hmmm...When I googled Mr. Arroyo to get the spelling of his name his blog
popped up and he is a big EWTN supporter. The page that was brought up
discussed how the V2" Bishops" were very pro government healthcare.
To me that means pro socialism. From a Catholic standpoint I don't know how to
react to the healthcare issue. Certainly Capitalism has its issues but to broaden
the scope of Socialism always is cause for alarm especially if there is
separation of church and state. Unless I
am corrected, at first glance I would have to reject US Government Healthcare.
Matthew
MHFM: Arroyo is EWTN’s main host. He is a TOTAL apostate. He fully embraces the worst of the false
ecumenism, commenting with glee on synagogue trips, Assisi-abominations and
many others.
Huh?
Hi, i can see why you are upset with
Benedict. But i can assure you that his outward appearance of toleration is
just for show. Political correctness is in fashion now a days. Believe me,
Benedict, in his heart, is just as intolerant as you are. Look at where he came
from? He was head of the Holy Office, the very seat of the Inquisition. Rest
assured, Benedict would just as soon see every non catholic burned at the
stake. But to buy time, he is putting on sheeps clothing. thanks for your
time. your friend wayne
MHFM: You are obviously confused. When he was the head of the Vatican II sect’s
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Benedict XVI was every bit the
apostate that he is now. In our material
we cover loads of his outrageous pre-“election” heresies.
Benedict XVI (The Heresies of
Benedict XVI File) [link to section]
Baptism
Hello,
First, thanks for all the information your monastery has made available - I've
only recently converted and your site is very helpful in these first days as a Catholic.
This brings me to my question: I asked my Catholic fiance to baptize me, which
she did, and all went well except that she preferred to use "Holy
Spirit" in place of "Holy Ghost". Besides that, everything else
was identical to the form as stated on your website. Is this a valid baptism?
Thanks for your time,
Steve Stanley
MHFM: Yes, both Holy Spirit and Holy Ghost are acceptable. We’re glad to hear about the interest.
The Way
From our video, John
Paul II preached the Gospel of the Antichrist: that every man is God.
Comment
... I grew up in the "Novus Ordo"
church. Until I discovered your web site I never knew the Traditional
Catholic Church existed. Though I knew something was wrong with the
"Novus Ordo" church, I couldn't leave "The Catholic Church"
and I didn't know why. When I first started examining your materials, I
didn't want to be taken a fool. I didn't want to be deceived.
I began the process of ensuring the quotes you provided in your books were accurate
and in context by verifying your citations. I have purchased many of the
books you have referenced in your materials and I have verified many of the
citations. I don't necessarily agree with everything you say, but most of it, yes.
There is more of the Truth of Jesus Christ in your materials than I have ever
seen before in my entire life. I have found only one quote that was
questionable, and that may have been a matter of interpretation as the original
language of the document in unknown. I thank you for your work and your
efforts. May God bless you with unfailing faith and may you see His face
in Heaven.
Receiving your material has absolutely
changed my life, though I must say I still have a long way to go... Thank you
for the valuable service you have provided.
Sincerely
James B. Patterson III
V-2 “converts”
In many of the debates regarding the
Vatican II sect, you raised the valid question "Can a Protestant convert
into a Neo-Cath without abjuring heresies like Sola Fide?"
I guess that question should be made once
again in light of the recent news. In any direction this newchurch is a simply
a joke. They either refuse converts, or, when they decide to accept mass
conversions, they do it in the wrong way and by the wrong reasons.
It seems to me all an Anglican has to do to
"become" Catholic is to be against gay marriage, gay priests and
woman priests. Those are relevant points, no doubt about that, but they are
primary disciplinary and/or moral issues, not about faith.
So the question remains: Can a displeased
Anglican "convert" to the new religion while still believing in
Anglican Theology?
PS: People nowadays have very soft skin and
easily become offended by the truth. And in a paradox, they don´t realize that
they themselves are being offensive. How could someone accuse you guys of not
being polite, when the person in question who first wrote said people
(including you) were silent on the issue. By the way: Isn´t true that you guys
once send your material to every priest and bishop in the United States of
America? If that is silence, I wonder what a scandal would be.
That being said, I believe both the content
and the tone used in your answer seemed totally adequate to me.
CK
MHFM: Yes, does anyone really believe that these “converts”
accept the defined dogma Outside the Church There is No Salvation? Of course not. Does anyone really believe that they have
become convinced that their former Anglican friends and colleagues, who don’t
accept all of Catholic dogma, are in heresy and schism? No.
They have decided to visibly join the Vatican II sect only
because they no longer felt comfortable where they were. It’s only because they no longer got the warm
fuzzy spiritual feeling – which defines their false religion – in a “Church”
that allowed women “priests” and active homosexuality. So they’ve just moved over slightly to a
group that’s a bit more in line with their personal thinking. And that’s probably only because the Vatican
II sect is also allowing them to be under an “ordinary” from among their ranks
– so that they feel as Anglican as possible – in addition to keeping their
previous “liturgical traditions” and married “priestly” lifestyle.
Near misses
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQ24Mw_r0eo&feature=player_embedded
MHFM: This first one is amazing. One can only conclude that God miraculously
intervened to keep the child unharmed.
It’s also very interesting that the child fell only an instant before
train came. If it had fallen thirty
seconds before that, it probably could have been removed from danger. It seems like a concatenation of events which
lined up to show God’s miraculous power.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BO2rW1alVv8&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNqWPswYYaA&feature=player_embedded
Book
Yesterday
I had lunch with a friend for her birthday and she gave me a copy of Brother
Michael Dimond's book about Padre Pio. I've already read it and it is the
best book I've ever read!
Dolores
Molter
MHFM: Thanks for the interest. It’s not the best book, but it has value and
we’re glad that you have benefited from it.
Not too harsh
I thought your response to Emmanuel T’s
question was right on point. It did not strike me as some kind of a harsh
attack in anyway, rather you answered the question directly, and in a way which
suggests you accepted it on face, as written, and did not attack the questioner
at all. You approached it as though Emmanuel’s question was borne of a
sincere concern along the lines of “someone ought to tell Rome, for if only
they knew” (as opposed to say sarcasm), in that I took your answer to be
patient and reassuring. For example how could he characterize you
guys (and you easily could have interpreted his question as a direct attack) as
“silent and helpless”? That assertion is patently ridiculous. Yet
you explained to him in a matter of fact way, how a Catholic should view the
situation in such a way that a real Catholic could take comfort.
What is it with people like “S”, so
numerous nowadays, who think it is rude, or some kind of a personal attack, to
say that one’s opinion is wrong, or that a particular statement is ridiculous?
I think this modern attitude is reflective
of both the “self esteem” movement and the somewhat older relativist movement (the
“truth isn’t knowable, if it is even real), and this of course comes directly
from the false and condemned notion that Religious Liberty is somehow a “good
thing”. What “S” seems to really be saying is “don’t tell me the truth,
it might hurt my feelings”.
I’m reminded of the social etiquette rule
that one should never discuss “religion and politics”. These
subjects tend to force people into head on confrontations with truth in a way
that small talk seldom does. The fact that these topics make most
uncomfortable, is evidence that most are not of goodwill. They don’t want
to know. If you tell them you are “mean spirited”, not charitable.
Charity has come to mean something else. Usually it means giving other
people’s money away to fund the result someone’s vice.
Bill Mulligan
Book
Dear MHFM,
Thank you for compiling the book about the Bible proving the Catholic
Church. It is an excellent resource for anyone seeking the true Biblical
Church.
Sincerely,
Matthew Falcon
Plan
Subject: New Vatican Plan
You see the news? 'New Vatican Plan Lets
Anglicans Convert Easier'...there's your "Heresy of the Week"
...
Benedict never disappoints you guys, does he?
PLP
Comment
… the last e-mail exchange of someone
accusing you of being too "harsh", was very troubling to me.
One of my own vices that I have been praying and working to overcome is
my "human respect" vice. I think I am being "charitable"
to people by sugar coating words - instead of being honest and revealing their
wicked ideas or speech as such - and it has nothing to do with being
charitable, but being a coward....you were accurate in calling the motivation
behind her false accusation as "human respect" and not out of
charity.
Anyway..... her comment just really
bothered me.
T
Comment
Subject: “S” regarding Emmanuel T
I'm pretty certain that the "S"
stands for "satan" in the "re:emmanuel t " writer
today---you were right on the mark… in reading in between the lines of emmanuel
t's insulting "question" (accusation)---- all I have to say to people
like "S" is: you'd better hurry up and get onto the RIGHT
side of this battle BEFORE it's all over and too late, once Mary has
totally crushed the enemy's head, and he is dead, forever…
Anne K
Sent
I don't know what to think about the state
of the soul of Captain Lou Albano! He just died recently, October 14 at
the age of 76. I knew he lost a lot of weight during the '90s after a
heart attack. As a big fan of the Super Mario Brothers Super Show, which
he played Mario in both live action and animated segments, I contacted him via
the internet and sent him some of your material. He said "Yeah, that
interesting. I don't like that they're [Rome] is cow tailing to certain
groups like the you-know-whos. I'll certainly look into it." I
certainly hope he did. I hope he did not have to answer for appearing in
that "Girls Just Wanna Have Fun" video with Cyndi Lauper, which
encouraged girls to exhibit wild behavior and turn a blind eye to their parents
request! And some people say this song became a theme song for girls
everywhere! That's truly evil. Cyndi Lauper who has a homosexual
sister is a big supporter of the evil LGBT agenda. She even wrote the
foreword to his autobiography. Too bad such a great talent doing the
devil's bidding like that! But Captain Lou had to be a
conservative! I just know he did! It doesn't seem to fit who he was
as a man to be anything but that! I pray he found the true faith before
his recent death…
-Michael
Rudnicki
MHFM: We’re glad you sent him the material. A Catholic cannot consider someone among the
faithful departed unless there is evidence that he or she died as a real
Catholic.
Expose
Dear brothers michael and peter,
pls expose in your website the evils and lies of the wacky vatican 2 regarding
this news though every traditional catholics know that this union is another
abominable act but we have to condemn it publicly and unmask the deception and
lies .. claiming for "universal salvation" and going against
Salvation Dogma .. keep up the excellent apostolate for the glory of God! -
sedevacantist from the Philippines
MHFM: It will be
interesting to see what the actual “constitution” says when it comes out.
Harsh?
Subject: Rude Response
"What if someone were to go to Rome in
the Vatican and denounce them all as heretics and tell them they are going
against the Church?"
Your rude response to Emmanuel T's
interesting question was full of mistaken assumptions, and was laced with
unwarranted hostility:
Your assertion... is totally wrong.
It’s ridiculous for you to suggest...
But it’s absurd for you to imply...
[Y]our assertion reveals that you have an
incorrect outlook...
Down South, we would say, "Where's
your hometraining, boy?"
It is unfortunate for you and your readers
that your lack of graciousness is so obvious. It is more than
just immature, it looks like paranoia.
You are not helping the cause. You need to
pray more.
And cut out the caffeine! ;)
S
MHFM: No, you are completely wrong. The response was totally warranted. You’re getting lost in the shuffle of some of
his more mild language, and ignoring what he is actually asserting. He didn’t simply ask a question; he made
serious accusations. You people let
major insults to the Catholic faith or to true Catholics pass as long as they
are couched in some mild language. True
Catholics can focus and zero in on the truth when people like you cannot. Words matter.
Not surprisingly, you only quoted his question, not what he actually
asserted.
If you look carefully at what he is actually asserting, it’s
very strong. It’s a major insult to true
Catholics. In fact, it’s a direct slap
in the face to all the true Catholics who have spent much time and effort (and
even much of their lives) opposing the Vatican II sect and its apostate
antipopes. He’s basically saying: you do
nothing. You are helpless. He asserts that those who don’t go to Rome
are “remaining silent” (i.e., doing nothing and possibly denying the faith and
committing mortal sin by omission).
That’s no small accusation. But
his assertion that Catholics opposing the apostasy do nothing doesn’t matter to
you because truth doesn’t matter to you.
It’s all about appearing to be nice to people. (We wouldn’t be surprised in the least if you
are a BOD salvation-in-any-religion apostate.)
His statement was false, uncalled for, and it deserved such a
response. Hence, your criticism of our response
reveals that you lack a Catholic understanding.
You are too bogged down by human respect. Thus, you cannot focus in on the key
points. In addition, this individual, if
we recall correctly, has demonstrated bad will numerous times in the past.
Why?
I wanted to ask you, what you thought would
happen, if any sedevacantist were to go to Rome and try to tell everyone there
or maybe even Ratzinger, all that they have done, or ask them what are they
doing? What if someone were to go to Rome in the Vatican and denounce them all
as heretics and tell them they are going against the Church?
Why hasn't anyone attempted to do this? Or
have there actually been some people that have attempted to do something like
this, to go there and try to get them to see what they have done?
Don't you think something like this should
be done, instead of just remaining silent and living helplessly without doing
something like this?
I would really like to know your thoughts
about this.
Emmanuel T.
MHFM: To sum up your e-mail: it’s
much ado about nothing. Your assertion
that people are remaining silent is totally wrong. People are spreading the truth in every
medium: through the internet, mail, video, audio, etc. in public. It’s ridiculous for you to suggest there is some
kind of need for Catholics to travel to Rome to talk to (and condemn) the
apostates in person. If people want to
do that, we don’t have any problem with it.
But it’s absurd for you to imply that it’s some sort of obligation. That’s like saying: you should go visit
the notorious abortionist and try to reason with him and tell him that
it’s wrong to take a life. Or: you
really need to have dinner with the head of the “Church” of Satan and tell him
that it’s dark and evil to worship the Devil.
They are fully aware of what they are doing. It’s enough to condemn the activity publicly.
You ask how they would react.
They would respond by repeating their heresies. They would respond by
saying that you don't have a “proper understanding” of Catholic teaching. They would tell you that you are not
submissive to “the Magisterium,” “the pope” and “the council” (i.e., Vatican
II). They would probably tell you about "the development of
doctrine," and say that you "misunderstand" those dogmas
you are quoting. (By the way, that sounds a lot like what the
sedevacantists who deny the salvation dogma say, doesn’t it?)
Many people have written letters to
Antipope Benedict XVI about his modernism, his heresies, and his false
ecumenism. People in Rome have seen our
material. Heretics are in control of the
buildings in Rome. That’s just the
situation. They know what they are doing
and they are modernist apostates precisely because they want to be. That’s the situation that God has allowed,
the one He predicted.
Lastly, your assertion that people
are “living helplessly” reveals that you have an incorrect outlook on
things. You are giving way too much
emphasis to externals, almost equating it with the possession and practice of
the faith. Catholics can find the truth
they need to be Catholic and save their souls.
That’s what matters. That’s
certainly not helpless. It’s just the
opposite: helpful unto salvation, for those of good will. It’s only helpless if you equate Catholicism
with being in possession of certain buildings, etc.
Comment
Each day is a continued thank you for
opening my eyes to the truth.
P
Sovereignty
Subject: MUST MUST WATCH - Actual VIDEO of
Lord Monckton Saying, "Obama Poised to Cede Sovereignty in
Copenhagen"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMe5dOgbu40
K
New Church
I just realized MHFM has a lot on u-tube
and last night i re-listened to the debate you had with wm. golle back in
06....you know when I first heard this last Feb/March 09, when I first
came upon your info online, it was one of the very first things I listened
to but I remember it not making much sense to me as I did not have enough
context or background info on the issues you cover in general. Well listening to it again last night, I
was amazed at how very clearly and succinctly you Brothers expressed and
defended all the facts in your material. But what amazed me most was that
this character golle basically spent almost all of his portion of the 3 hour
debate screeching like a woman something unintelligible about the "Roman
Clergy"---I mean it was REALLY bizarre--- then I read where it says
golle is FROM THE CAMDEN DIOCESE AND WORKS FOR THE CAMDEN DIOCESE CATHOLIC STAR
HERALD--- well--- suddenly------the whole scenario all snapped right into
focus. I mean, the hocus pocus that goes on around here with
newchurchers has got to be some of the worst planet-wide. Trying to bring
even a little light into this area can be quite a challenge.
For many years since we moved here in
97, my husband kept saying to me (about the "Catholic" church
around S. jersey) "they're trying to bring in a new
religion" but I didn't understand it, and nor really did he!, until we
stumbled across your website….
Interest
Hello Sir / Madam,
I'm a Catholic here in the Archdiocese of Cebu, Philippines; 21 years of age. I
was deeply troubled about the new mass. I really put emphasis on the Eucharist
as a climax of my Catholic life. It's so sad to hear that there's no priest or
bishop here offering traditional Catholic mass.
Is there any way that traditional mass be
reinstated here in the archdiocese or parish?
Sp
MHFM: Thanks for the interest. All the bishops of the Vatican II sect are
heretics and not Catholic. Therefore,
one should not be looking for them to reinstate Catholic things in their
“dioceses.” Before receiving traditional
sacraments, one must be convinced on all issues (no baptism of desire, no
salvation outside the Church, a rejection of the Vatican II antipopes, no NFP,
etc.). Also, one must be convinced
to never attend the invalid New Mass again.
You should look at our Where to go to Mass or confession today? for guidelines on receiving sacraments in our
time. Also, one should pray the Rosary each day, all 15 decades if
possible.
RU-486
Dear Brothers` Michael and Peter,
The `morning after` abortion pill RU486 translated into:
RU stands for `are you`.
4 stands for "for".
86 is a mafia term for killing someone, as in, "the boss said to 86
him". In the Numeric Greek Concordance, the number `86` represents
the word meaning, "HADES-THE ABODE FOR THE DEAD".
Consequently, RU486 states, " ARE YOU SENDING YOUR BABY TO THE ABODE OF
THE DEAD"?...
With best wishes,
To Tell The Truth
MHFM: Some people also think that RU-486 means “are you
antichrist?” They believe this because
they believe that the peace symbol is a broken upside-down cross representing
Antichrist. And on a clock the numbers
4, 8 and 6 would visually represent the peace symbol.


Comment
Comment: False traditionalist backs down
from sedevacantism debate
Dear Brothers Michael and Peter,
Ave Maria!
… I received my copy of the latest video
you have posted on that false traditionalist who backs down from the
sedevacantism debate. I would like to comment that I really am amazed at
how the Devil works these days. Truly I can safely say what the Lord says
in the vision of Pope Leo XIII regarding the Last Days when Lucifer boasts to
God and he could destroy the Church... that he only need time and additional
power should be granted to him on behalf of all those who render their services
to the Devil. We recall that God agreed to this that time and power
would be granted to Lucifer as Pope Leo XIII recalls…
This video only proves how powerful
Lucifer has become and he can use 'pseudo-traditionalist'
catholics .. quoting Scriptures, but his lips vomit the poisonous
venom of lies directly coming from hell to blaspheme the Holy Ghost!!! ... and
to our surprise, unlike the catholics of previous generations who would
cry HERESY and cause commotion and public disturbance, this very apostate would
in fact gain a number of followers complimenting his very
heresies and wage war against the defenders of the True Faith. This
generation is the worst and we all deserve this supreme punishment as all the
crimes of previous generations since the creation of Adam would not equal with
the crimes humanity has had ever done in our generation… We are
reminded by Revelation that in the last days, the Beast of the Apocalypse is in
the mood to wage his final war against the seed of Her who was flown into the
wilderness. The Beast is in the mood since he considers himself powerful
enough to crush the remainder (remnants) of the One, True Church of Christ ...
the Catholic Church, but of course we know the Blessed Mother will vanquish
Lucifer but since these are the last days the trials of our Faith will also
exceed all imaginable trials the Church members has ever had. That leads
us to believe literally "in the last days, deception were so profound that even
the elect would be deceived, if it were possible" (Matt 24)
Well done brothers michael and peter...
words are not enough to show my appreciation to your excellent apostolate,
though all praises and glories must be directed to God alone…
In Jesus and Mary,
Joey, a sedevacantist from the
Philippines
Comment
… re: the unqualified COWARD who RAN
AWAY from debating you: wonderful job shining a strobe light of Catholic
truth onto this most cowardly cockroach who has been vainly attempting to gnaw
away at the truths of the Church with his lying falsehoods---I have to admit,
that it's kind of fun to watch the cockroaches run, thanks again!
It's nice to watch THEM (but THIS guy is the ULTIMATE loser!) get a little
sand kicked in their eyes, now that evil modernists like him have
"had their fun" mocking the True Bride of Christ over so
many decades.
As for that absolutely ridiculous phony
appearance he so vainly dons---the pipe, sideburns---how very TRAGIC for
him!!!----maybe he is trying to hide his lack of brain cells! and how
tragic for all people who claim to "think" like him, (if you
want to be generous and call what goes in his mind "thinking"!)
It is abundantly obvious that this pseudo-intellectual--and I do mean
pseudo, meaning FAKE---- is not even remotely any kind of intellectual at
all but is instead just another vapid AIRHEAD!! I find all these
modernists are airheads, ultimately, totally lacking in the power to
REASON.
Again, great job, and THANK YOU and all of
you at MHFM for exposing this particular creep, and ALL the other noxious
pestilent creeps like him... I will pray for this heretic’s and all heretics
like him, conversion… Beautiful dusting of snow on the fall foliage in the
photo---isn't snow a blessing-- this must be the first snow of the
season. All Praise to the Sacred Heart of Jesus and thank you for
defending the true Catholic religion!
A
Video Update
Tamiflu
Good morning,
I wanted to make a comment on the flu
situation. I am a medical transcriptionist and I type progress notes and
consultations all day on children in a children’s hospital. I receive
multiple reports a day on children who became ill, went to see their primary
care doctor, and because the illness was deemed not too late for it they are
put on Tamiflu. These children do not get better with this poison.
They end up in the hospital within a week, most in the ICU. Even if the
only other underlying medical problem they have is as common as seasonal
allergies, Tamiflu causes extreme difficulties in these children. Because
the doctors keep them on the Tamiflu throughout their hospital stay, the
children acquire more complications, eventually being sent home with new
underlying medical problems like seizures and chronic respiratory difficulties
to add to their allergies. I have also noticed that the only time the
doctors even consider the problem to be the Tamiflu is because the parents make
note that the worsening began when the Tamiflu regimen was started. If
parents do not speak up, the doctors get away with it. Also beware, I had
a specific case where a child had been placed on Tamiflu by the PCP for swine
flu, without being tested. The child became worse within a few days and
was admitted to the hospital. It was there that the child was found to be
flu negative and pneumonia positive, but they continued the Tamiflu regardless.
SF
Video
Dear MHFM
Thank you for your latest video regarding
Daniels miraculous transport, sins, and further exposing the errors of
V2. I found your commentary (on the enslavement of sins) to be very
accurate. "Lust wounds people, keeps them unhappy and enslaved..the
happiness they desire will not come by sins of the flesh." I think
many people find themself today "enslaved" to their sexual addictions
to pornography and lustful thoughts and actions through the internet.
It's also very sickening to see how QUICKLY the vatican was to congratulate
Obama on receiving the Nobel prize. I wouldnt expect them to oppose it,
but it would be better to say nothing at all - rather then show support for the
most pro-abortion/pro-gay president in history. On a side note, please
consider the fact that the USCCB has a long history of financially supporting
liberal organizations such as ACORN. So all V2 "catholics"
should know that part of their hard earned money given in the collection plate
is going to support liberal/progressive, ANTI-catholic "politically
correct" organizations.
Thank you,
Ed
Interesting
MHFM: Some arrogant,
pseudo-intellectual false traditionalist, who had criticized us, recently
backed down from our challenge to debate him on the sedevacantist issue. This was after he told someone that he could
refute us and that he’d be willing to debate.
We will probably have an update about that.
Comment
Dear
Brothers, I love your little update short videos. As always
they are so informative.
I also have enjoyed all the other videos you have recently presented. I wanted to tell you that I have read
the book "The Martyrs of the Coliseum" By Fr. AJ O'Reilly… It
was written back in 1874. It was such a fascinating book, so
descriptive and detailed… I am now re-reading it and am about halfway through
again, but now I highlight certain areas so I can easily reference them. Fr.O
'Reilly used such beautiful descriptive phrases. And the way he
brought out all the miracles God worked through the martyrs-how the lions
licked their feet, protected them from the Romans, the many conversions that
took place… And I am re-reading Secret of the Rosary.
God bless you for your work.
Sincerely,
Kathryn Rubio
P.S. Don't you think it 'odd' that California suffered the rains and
floods on Oct 13 (feast of Our Lady of Fatima's miracle of the sun) and
right after Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed a crazy bill for the "GAY
Harvey Milk" day on his birthday May 22. How sick! God is
punishing California, All that was missing was the fire and brimstone! And
Cleveland won the GAY Games for 2014! We should live so long!! We so have to pray the Rosary!!
Dancing
Dear Brothers,
Thank you for the reply to the email on dancing - it's such a big
enticement to lust and vanity, not piety!
Here is a scripture that could also be applied to dancing: 1 Corinthians 7:1 -
Now concerning the thing whereof you wrote to me: It is good for a man not to
touch a woman.
I remember a history class I took which argued that dancing is to be likened to
voodoo demonic possession!!! King Louis XIV, aka. "the Sun King"
(Sun-Worship) was a dancer. That's what made dancing "high-class."
The most renowned dancers had the most debauched lives imaginable. Rudolph
Nureyev constantly had little boys in his Limousine. Valsav Nijinsky, some
argue the greatest male dancer ever, said he "danced like God"
and believed that he was God (Antichrist). He was also a homosexual and he
had a wife simultaneously - he was admitted to a mental institution.
Immorality is second nature to these types of people. Many other example could
be given. If they are not doing drugs, then they are promoting the New World
Order (homosexuality, paganism, spiritism, etc.). Don't dance with the devil!!!
… Wherever there is dancing, there will be corruption. The quote of St. John
Vianney is brilliant:
“There is not a commandment of God which
dancing does not cause men to break… Mothers may indeed say: ‘Oh, I keep an eye
on their dress; you cannot keep guard over their heart. Go, you wicked parents, go down to Hell where
the wrath of God awaits you, because of your conduct when you gave free scope
to your children; go! It will not be
long before they join you, seeing that you have shown them the way so well…
Then you will see whether your pastor was right in forbidding those Hellish
amusements.’” (Abbé Francis Trocu, The Curé D’Ars, St. Jean-Marie-Baptiste Vianney,
p. 146)
Also, freemasonry’s main means of attack is
by destroying morals.
God Bless,
Chris White
Comment
… last week one of my really good friends
took her son to the doctor because he had been sick. The doctor rushed her son
to the hospital because the doctor claimed her son had swine flu. The hospital
released him a few hours later saying that he really had scarlet fever and a
normal case of the flu and simple antibiotics would be able to take care of the
problem.
M
Pro-abortion
… As you have been pointing out for some
years, the Vatican II sect IS IN FACT pro-abortion by means of omission. In the
same way they endorse divorce by giving annulments based on the most ridiculous
and idiotic grounds. People in the new church really need to wake up and see
the facts. It´s nearly impossible for Ratzinger not to know the Ted Kennedy´s
background; How could he be unaware? It´s just not realistic. It´s not
matter of being judgmental, but simply grasping the facts, realize what´s
really happening.
That young man from youtube… I wonder what
would be his mental shield against an utter undeniable fact like this text. Did
he ever reply to your letter? I was interested in seeing the follow-up, because
he does not strike me as a person of bad will, just some victim of the great
deception that surrounds us.
In a sense, I´m actually grateful that
Ratzinger is acting like this. I hope he organizes another inter-religious
meeting like the 2 Assisi events of John Paul II. The more open he is about his
heresies and betrayal of the faith, the bigger are the chances of poor
newchurchmen and false trads realizing the truth. What really concerns me is
when he acts like he´s very conservative or even traditional. Some people are
sooooo deluded they even think he´s going to change everything back, promoting
the so-called great restoration. Since people are so blinded and desperate, I
guess all it takes is to celebrate one or two tridentine mass every once in a
while, make a few brief conservative comments from time to time and quote a
pre-vatican II pope every six months and you become a Traditional in the eyes
of the blinded.
About 2 years ago I would say we should
refrain from judging, since we don´t know if he´s under pressure, being
manipulated, not well informed or whatever. But after so many expositions of
heresy and apostasy, it becomes difficult to conceal the facts. It´s a sad
truth, but there comes a point in which there´s no use in denying it. People
like Mr. William Golle would certainly say you´re making a big stretch in
saying he´s pro-choice, but I believe the facts speak for themselves. If a
mature and well informed person does not connect the dots, he or she can only
be of bad-will, or a total coward in terms of faith.
Thank you, Bother, for making me once again
open my eyes. Your material is indeed the best available…God bless you.
CK
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.
No, there was no response. Sadly,
he is of bad will.
Where?
I found your website by accident some time
ago, and ever since I have been reading all about the Church from your site and
in other websites and things like that.
I wanted to give you thanks, because it was through your website that I
realized what is really going on, and converted from the Novus Ordo sect, but
of course God is the one Who is ultimately responsible for the conversion of
peoples, but I give you thanks anyways.
But I still had some questions, that I haven't been able to find the answer to,
and which, when I try to tell Novus Ordinarians about sedevacantism so that
they get out of that sect and convert to the true Faith, they ask them to me
all the time and I don't really know how to answer them, so I wanted to see if
you could help me with them:
… How do I answer to their objection of "where is the Church"
… Rafael DeMontis from EL SALVADOR.
MHFM: The Church exists with the remnant of traditional
Catholics which maintains the fullness of the faith and holds all Catholic
dogmas (including the salvation and baptism dogmas) without compromise. The Church is visible in those individuals,
wherever they are.
Things were so bad in the Arian
crisis that St. Gregory Nazianz felt compelled to say what the Catholic remnant
today could very well say.
St. Gregory Nazianz (380): “Where are they who
revile us for our poverty and pride themselves in their riches? They
who define the Church by numbers and scorn the little flock?” (“Against
the Arians,” The Faith of the Early
Fathers, Vol. 2, p. 33)
Distribute
Dear MHFM,
Another way which I have not tried yet, but
will when my next order comes through, is to distribute
materials at car pool parking lots. One who has access to the Internet can
type in "car pool parking lots" and get information for these lots
across his or her state. I went on line and within twenty minutes had multiple
listings within 30 miles in each direction for locations that held around 500
cars. I am looking forward to trying this method with my next supply!
I have found that if you distribute information
in crowded parking lots and try to distribute more than ten booklets or other
info that parking lot security will come and confiscate the books. I
have had much better success with the smaller amounts.
Pass this on to your supporters!
Bob Bohr
Insert
Dear
Brothers Michael and Peter,
God bless you and all the wonderful work you are doing, I do not know if you
have seen this but on the very package of the H1N1 Vaccine manufactured by
Novartis 2009 we can read this…
H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccine Insert Admits It Causes Guillain-Barre Syndrome,
Vasculitis, Paralysis, Anaphylactic Shock And Death
John Ogaz
Stumbled
Another great job referring to the new
video guys keep up the good work. I have been reading since 1991
about the endtimes and as I said in previous e-mails always had a problem
with the v-2 mass for a long time even though the priest was a very
conservative priest and had the tabernacle in the center of the church,
when I stumbled upon your
website, which was a miracle for me you finished my journey to
the truth. I thank God for you all so much.
Todd
Update
Pagans
Subject: Pagans are innocent
Hello, I was just talking to my Dad about
the Aztecs and their paganism. He mentioned that they practiced this paganism
of sun worship and this worship and that and that they only practiced it out of
innocence. In other words it is not their fault that they practiced human
sacrifice to satan (!!!), because they were ignorant of Christ. Do
you know of any bible verses that could prove that pagans become pagans
because of their sins and not out of ignorance?
Jim
MHFM: The best thing to quote for him
are the dogmas of the Church. They give
us the authoritative understanding of Scripture and Tradition. However, the answer to your question is that
Scripture makes it quite clear that pagans are in darkness and that they
worship devils. They are outside the
pale of salvation.
2 Corinthians
4:3: “And if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost,
in whom the god of this world [Satan] hath blinded the minds of unbelievers,
that the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God,
should not shine unto them.”
2 Thessalonians 1:7-8- “And to you who are
troubled, rest with us when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven, with
the angels of his power: In a flame of
fire, giving vengeance to them who know not God, and who obey not the
gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ.”
Colossians
1:12-13: “Giving thanks to God the
Father, who hath made us worthy to be partakers of the lot of the saints in
light: Who hath delivered us from the
power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of the Son of His love.”
Ephesians 2:1-2- “And you, when you were dead in your offences, and
sins, Wherein in time past you walked according to the course of this world,
according to the prince of the power of this air, of the spirit that now
worketh on the children of unbelief.”
1 Corinthians 10:20- “But the things which the heathens sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils,
and not to God. And I would not that you should be made partakers with devils.
Psalm 95:5- “For all the gods of the Gentiles are devils: but the Lord made the
heavens.”
UFO
Hello,
I listened to an internet broadcast last night and the guest mentioned Our Lady
of Fatima. He made reference to the fact that the historical descriptions
of Her apparitions point to the fact that these were actually demonic
appearances reminiscent of UFO-type sightings. I'm sure you've heard
about this. Can you please explain.
Thank you.
Loretta Ursini
MHFM: They are nothing like UFO
accounts. It's a ridiculous statement on the guest's part. Fatima
predicted and delivered an undeniable miracle.
Waltz
"SF"
mentioned the Waltz in her e-mail about dancing. Pope Leo XII condemned the
Waltz….
B.O.D.
I gotta hand it to you, Brother Michael
Dimond, for putting up and documenting all of the heresies of Benedict XVI in your section Heresies of the Week of
Benedict XVI; I've seen the file you have on his previous heresies of the week,
which is quite a long file, and whenever I start reading it, moments later I
can't keep reading anymore, because his heresies, apostasies and schisms are
just so outrageous, so completely diametrically opposed to Catholic teaching,
and just so plain sick that I just can't take it anymore because I get fired up
with holy indignation and disgust at all this heresiearch says, and so I stop
reading them. But I'll make the effort to eventually read them all.
It takes a lot of effort and, I don't know, probably "spiritual
endurance", to put up with so much heresy and apostasy and then still
comment on it and present the correct teaching of the Church. Well done, not
many can do that.
But I also had one question for you: I've pretty much read all that you have
written on the so-called "baptisms" issue (I reject them), but I
think I haven't seen this quote been used by you to disprove "baptism of desire":
Pope
Paul III,
Council
of Trent,
Sess. 6, "Decree on Justification", Ch. 5-7, 1565, ex cathedra:
"People are disposed for that justice when, by that repentance ... they
are proposing to receive baptism ... This disposition and preparation precede
[do not result in] the actual justification ... The causes of this
justification are: ... the instrumental cause, the sacrament of baptism, which is the
sacrament of faith, without which justification comes to no one. ...
Consequently, in the process of justification, ... all these are infused at the
same time: faith, hope, and charity. For faith, unless hope is added to it, and
charity too, neither unites him perfectly with Christ nor makes him a living
member of his body. ... From apostolic tradition, catechumens seek this faith from the
church before the sacrament of baptism when they ask for the faith that gives
eternal life; and this, without hope and charity, faith cannot give."
So my question is: does this passage really disprove "baptism of
desire"? I've seen this passage been used by some people and websites to
disprove "baptism of desire", but I think I haven't seen it been used
by you.
Peck C.
MHFM: The key passages in chapter 7
of the Council of Trent’s decree on Justification are cited and discussed
throughout our book: EENS. In fact, the book
contains a section on the instrumental and efficient causes of Justification
(in Section 23). It quotes and discusses
the significance of what the Council had to say on that point. The declaration that water baptism is “the
Sacrament of Faith” is also very important.
It’s discussed throughout the book, especially in reference to the “One
Church of the Faithful” (Innocent III, Section 6).
The part of the chapter concerning
catechumens, and how they “beg for the faith,” is also quoted and expanded upon
numerous times in the book. It’s quoted
in Sections 6, 16, and 21. It’s an
extremely significant passage because it shows that the only time that Trent
uses the word “catechumens,” it teaches that they do not have the faith
which gives eternal life. They “beg” for
the faith which they don’t have and which is only granted in water baptism. That shows again that no one, including
unbaptized catechumens, has the faith or can be saved without water
baptism.
Comment
Thank you,
I have received your dvds and books. After carefully readying and studying your
material I have taken my name off my partish lists for anything to do the Novos
Nordos mass and am no longer attending any Nordos Ordos mass. I am done
with them. Please direct me to the true Catholic sacraments in my
area. I believe everything you have said in your material.
Sp
Dancing
Subject: Dancing
Dear Brothers,
Thank you for your continued support of
true Catholicism. I am aware of you through my parents who have been your
supporters for quite some time. My children even copy your daily quotes
on your home page for their daily penmanship exercises. I have seen a
great deal of improvement in their behavior since school started this year
because of it.
Now, please help me. I am at a loss
of words and feelings. All my “friends” at church have their children
involved in a dancing group called Scottish Country Dancing. They believe
it is wholesome and convinced me to join my children into it. I decided
to allow my children a chance at this socialization a couple of years ago.
It had me worried from the start that they are taught to keep their eyes on
each other and they must touch hands while dancing boys with girls of all
ages. It also bothered me that some of the older young ladies were quite
developed and bouncing in the faces of the young men they were partnered with,
due to the bouncing on your toes form of the dance. I intermittently took
my young children to class until December 2008. The last class before
their Christmas break the children were introduced to a form of dancing they
had not seen yet (at least mine hadn’t; the other children have been taking
this class for multiple years). This dance required the boys to put their
hands on the girls’ waists. I was appalled. I never took them back
and even stated my position to a few of these “friends.” They seemed to
think me prude. My then 9 yr old son shot a scared look in my direction
when he had to touch a girl’s waist after his father had been teaching him not
to touch girls. My then 11 yr old daughter was also uncomfortable; I saw
her squirm when the boy touched her. Have I taught my children
incorrectly all these years in thinking this just doesn’t feel right?
Just today another mother brought this topic
up in email and was concerned for her teenage son putting his hand on the
girls’ waists during the waltz. I am not one to speak up as I have not
been blessed with the gift of eloquent and clear speaking and the fund of
knowledge to post quotes and articles on the topics. I do, however, have
a fund of knowledge of the real world, as I was raised in public schools and
went to the dances from an early age and know what happens when boys and girls
learn it is okay to touch, regardless of having been a Catholic. That
said, please correct me if I am being overprotective. I responded in this
email chain today my opinions and what can happen with “chemistry,” etc.
I am now being lashed out at with responses from the eloquent speakers who can
find and understand articles and official statements made by the Church
regarding this issue. In one particular email, the person pasted quote
after quote about how all the Doctors of the Church forbid dance and they can
find that there was no exception to be made about the SCD. But in the
last paragraph of the email, this person clearly states that after their own
prayer and contemplation that they can see no wrong in this waltz with the boys
touching the girls and that they think Jesus would approve of this waltz.
I should note that some of the 10 to 12 yr old boys in our families are
beginning to express having crushes on certain 12 and 13 yr old girls. Is
it right, then, to throw them together like dancing? Won’t it only
encourage these “crushes?” or is my way of thinking only in the public
school/protestant world?... One of our water-believer families has already
fallen victim to the niceness of one of the BOD families. I should also
mention that my children haven’t even really been accepted by the children of the
other families. I would see the girls roll their eyes when their mothers
would tell them to go play with my daughter. I would also be the last to
find out, usually at last minute, while everyone else had ample time to
prepare, about picnics and get-togethers. My family is the “baby” of this
group of families; the rest having known each other and having been in each
others’ confidence for many years before I showed up. They are very apt
to listen to each other and not to my sad little opinions and they will do what
they will. So, for my own conscience, I have some questions. Didn’t
someone tell Sister Lucy of Fatima that she should not attend the dances during
festivities? As I am the only one who holds these opinions, am I just being
prude and ridiculous and should I change my mind and allow the dancing?
Or should I keep my position and just deal with being isolated from these
families?
SF
MHFM: That’s an important
question. The answer to your question is
that they absolutely should not be
involved in any such dancing. You are
not being overprotective. Those who
defend it are deceived. They are leading
their children down the wrong path. We
think that St. John Vianney summed it up:
“There is not a commandment of God which dancing does
not cause men to break… Mothers
may indeed say: ‘Oh, I keep an eye on their dress; you cannot keep guard over
their heart. Go, you wicked parents, go down
to Hell where the wrath of God awaits you, because of your conduct when you
gave free scope to your children; go! It
will not be long before they join you, seeing that you have shown them the way
so well… Then
you will see whether your pastor was right in forbidding those Hellish
amusements.’” (Abbé Francis Trocu, The Curé D’Ars,
St. Jean-Marie-Baptiste Vianney, p. 146)
The Fatima children stopped going to
dances after they saw Our Lady of Fatima.
By the way
MHFM: Yesterday we posted some
thoughts on some more “swine flu” propaganda which surrounded the death of a
14-year-old Naperville teen. (We are referring
to our post below under “Almost nobody.”)
Only a few hours after that post, an article came out. In total confirmation of our point, the
article said that they just discovered that the girl had a serious pre-existing
heart condition:
“A 14-year-old Naperville girl with Swine
Flu had a serious heart condition that contributed to her death, authorities
said today. The girl, Michelle Fahle,
died Thursday. The DuPage County coroner
said a pathology examination revealed the
girl had an undiagnosed progressive defect in her heart that made her
vulnerable to illness.” http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/1818273,chicago-swine-flu-fahle-101009.article
Facts
Dear Brothers` Michael and Peter,
Regarding the regular seasonal flu and `swine` flu with emphasis on their
potential lethality, all one must do is look to the southern hemisphere where
the flu outbreaks had peaked in august and you will note that there were no
mass casualties. Remember their seasons are the opposite of ours.
Consequently, our flu season will peak in february, and normally occuring flu
cases will be increasing over the next 5 months. It`s as simple as that.
Dr. James J. Lapinsky,D.C.
MHFM: Yes, that coincides with the
position that it’s all hype and propaganda to get people (or force them) to
take the vaccine.
Comment
Dear MHFM,
Wonderful follow-up video on the Shroud of Turin. I have your Creation
and Miracles DVD and the, "Jesus and The Shroud of Turin" DVD from
your website (which I highly recommend). The amount of bad will and
deceptive practices today are stunning. Readily apparent we are in the
last days when you see attack after attack on Catholic faith hundreds of times
a day.
God Bless you for your works.....
Bruce
Concerns
Subject: Some concerns
Hello,
First I would like to say that the book
UFOs Demonic Activity and Elaborate Hoaxes Meant to Deceive Mankind by Bro.
Michael Dimond is very resourceful. I'm very thankful for this resource, for
the whole UFO phenomenon has been sparking questions for me. I would also like to say that I notice that
Most Holy Family Monastery is pre-Vatican II. I would like to say a few things.
And I want to be as humble as possible when I say these things because I'm only
15 and I of course would only be strinking the surface of the issues...
Jesus established his Church on the Rock,
Peter. And on him the Church would be sturdy, for the "gates of hell
shall not prevail against it [the Church]" (Matthew 16:18). Jesus promised
that the Holy Spirit would lead the Church into all truth (John 16:13);
therefore the Church really is the "pillar and foundation of the
truth" (1 Tim. 3:15). With this in
mind, Christ also prayed that Peter’s faith would not fail (Luke 22:32),
and ordered him to tend and Christ’s sheep (John 21:15-17).
This leadership and union would never pass away, or else Christ's promise that
the gates of hell could never prevail against his Church (Matt.
16:18) would collapse. Jesus would be a liar. If the Church ever taught
error, it would cease to be Christ’s Church. So if Jesus Christ really did
establish the office of pope, as evident by His words to Peter, would that
office -- the unifying factor of all Christians -- cease? Would the Rock of the
Church, the chief steward of Christ's Kingdom, ever fail?
I would like to end by these words from
Cyprian of Carthage: On him he builds
the Church, and to him he gives the command to feed the sheep [John 21:17], and
although he assigns a like power to all the apostles, yet he founded a single
chair, and he established by his own authority a source and an intrinsic reason
for that unity.
...If someone does not hold fast to this
unity of Peter, can he imagine that he still holds the faith? If he should
desert the chair of Peter upon whom the Church was built, can he still be
confident that he is in the Church?"
(The Unity of the Catholic Church 4; 1st
edition [A.D. 251]).
Please return to your Home, the One Holy
Catholic and Apostolic Church established by Jesus on Peter
With concern,
Patric
MHFM:
"Now when he [the Pope] is explicitly a heretic, he falls ipso facto
from his dignity and out of the Church..." St. Francis De Sales (17th century), Catholic Doctor of the
Church, The Catholic Controversy, pp.
305-306:
The
Catholic Teaching that a heretic cannot be a valid pope and loses the papal
office automatically [PDF file]
The popes infallibly teach that
heretics cannot be popes. By denying that teaching, you deny the teaching
of the Catholic Church and the past popes. You need to listen to our
debates and look at the material. The post-Vatican II sect and its
antipopes teach that the Papacy is meaningless.
Every scripture you cite about the office of St. Peter is denied by
Benedict XVI. He holds that the office
of St. Peter is not binding and can be rejected. That’s why he’s not the pope.
Vatican II was a heretical false
council which rejects papal teaching. It
says that those who reject the Papacy, i.e., those who reject the Pope, are in
the Church. That’s not Catholic. Your position is not a
defense of the Papacy, but a denial of it. You are defending the very
anti-papal heretics who say that Protestants are going to Heaven.
You are confused and misled.
There have been many times without a pope. There have been over 40
antipopes in Church history. It’s predicted that there will be a great apostasy
and that the Church will be reduced to a remnant. That doesn’t contradict the promises of
Christ to His Church. Recognizing a
heretic as the pope, and a heretical sect as the Church, does contradict the
promises of Christ to His Church. You
need to educate yourself about Catholic teaching by looking at the material on
our site. You need to look at the
heresies of Benedict XVI, especially those which concern the Papacy and groups
(e.g., the “Orthodox”) which deny the Papacy.
He praises them all the time. He
teaches that they don’t need conversion to the Catholic faith. He teaches that they can reject the dogma of
Papacy and go to Heaven.
Almost nobody
Subject: “almost nobody dies of the flu”
and “deaths [are] associated with flu, but not necessarily caused by flu.”
Brothers,
Here is another good article on the
propaganda behind the "swine flu" scare.
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15585
Sincerely,
Howard
MHFM: We’ve been pointing out from the beginning that “swine
flu” doesn’t exist – until the vaccine is administered. It’s just a hoax in which regular flu and
other problems are falsely attributed to “swine flu.”
This is interesting. We
just came across this article: Naperville teen who died had swine
flu. Seeing the headline, we
said to ourselves: “This clearly gives the impression that ‘swine flu’ took a
life. Let’s see if they can really prove
or confirm that she died from ‘swine flu,’ as the headline suggests?”
Well, when you read the article, you discover this (as we expected):
“A 14-year-old
Naperville North High School student who died suddenly Thursday had swine flu,
health officials confirmed Friday. But
the DuPage County Health Department said it has not determined whether the H1N1
virus was the primary cause of freshman Michelle Fahle's death. Further testing
is in progress to "confirm a
possible underlying condition" that might have been a contributing
factor, the health department said in a statement.”
So, there are possible “underlying conditions.” That’s basically always the case when you
hear about a death which is supposedly from “swine flu.” But it gets more interesting. The article also mentioned that an autopsy
would be conducted to determine the actual cause of death. We were interested in that result. So, we looked up the autopsy results. Guess what?
They are inconclusive. They
cannot confirm what caused her death. In
fact, when you read this article, you not only see that the autopsy was unable
to determine the cause of death, but that Michelle had complained of “flu-like
symptoms” sometime before her death.
“Authorities said they are unsure what
caused Michelle's death but she had complained of flu-like symptoms in recent days, according to DuPage County
Coroner Pete Siekmann.” http://www.dailyherald.com/story/?id=327522
Why is this reference to “flu-like symptoms” significant? That’s because back in July the U.S. and
other nations stopped testing for and confirming
cases of “swine flu.” Instead, they
dishonestly and outrageously chalk up every flu-like symptom as “swine flu.”
U.S. and other nations stopped counting for "swine
flu" in July
Even before July it was a hoax; for only certain select
individuals could “confirm” a case. But
now they don’t even go through any semblance of a “process.” They
just attribute basically anything that touches upon a symptom close to flu to
“swine flu”! So, just because this
young woman complained of some flu-like symptoms, the national media is now
giving the country the impression that “swine flu” has taken a life. This is dishonest, of course; but it works. It effectively convinces the masses. They cannot even say for sure that she had
“swine flu” at all, since they don’t “confirm” cases anymore. As we mentioned at the beginning, it’s all
propaganda. Every year large numbers of
people die from all kinds of things.
People die from combinations of things, from the regular seasonal flu,
etc. But the lying propaganda will now
attribute anything it can to “swine flu.”