E-Exchanges
*This section of our website will contain some
less formal – and short – e-mail exchanges that we’ve had which we feel may be
of value to our readers. We will include
those portions of the exchanges we deem relevant and valuable. We often add bolding and underlining which
are not necessarily that of the other party.
This section also frequently includes, not only e-exchanges we have, but
notes, updates and comments by us.*
Confession
Dear Brothers,
I hope you can answer this question.
I'm having trouble resolving this. I
suddenly remembered something that happened long ago when I was a child. I believe I committed a mortal sin.
Obviously, I've been to confession since and I know it has been forgiven,
despite that I forgot about it. My
question is: Do I have to keep remembering it now and confess it the next
time I go to confession? or, if I remember it during confession do I
still have to confess it? The reason is,
is that it's embarrassing and I don't want to have to deal with it if I don't
have to. I not trying to get away with anything, it's just that I need to
know how to give myself peace. Please
help me. Thank you for all you do in you work! I pray for you.
C
MHFM: You do need to remember it and mention it the next time
you go to confession.
Comment
Brothers,
Congratulations on landing such a high profile media outlet as the History
Channel in this day and age of liberal false Catholics and their media. This is
one of the few times I wished I'd subscribed to television. Although I missed
the program last night, I had my folks record the show, hoping they would watch
and learn, being part of the world that is all about
"externals". I hope the show/DVD is a success even though the
network decided to air the show during the sixth/last game of the World Series…
God Bless your many works,
Tom
Update
Subject:
Update, etc.
Dear
Brothers,
That was a great quote of St. Theresa's from yesterday on how she saw hell and
that she was grieved at the fact that the Lutherans, all of whom go there, were
once of the Church because they were baptized (though not once they accepted
heresy).
That story about Moshe and the Ukraine is astounding. Thank you very much for
posting it.
Thank you for the update video (great pictures). The points you made about how
many false traditionalists will talk and talk without believing is interesting.
It made me think of Jesus' words when speaking of the neccessity to eat His
flesh and drink His blood, and how many were scandalized and left Him:
John 6:61,62 - Many therefore of his disciples, hearing it, said: This saying is hard, and who can hear it? But Jesus, knowing in himself, that his disciples murmured
at this, said to them: Doth
this scandalize you?
It seems to me that these types of false traditionalists, etc. are so concerned
about externals that they are shocked by words like "antichrist" and
also that they only believe in things that they can see, and so are tricked by
the V-2 sect's illusions. I think it's interesting that the very "Mystery
of Faith", the Holy Eucharist, is Our God, whole and entire, in Flesh,
Body and Blood, but UNSEEN, and so the necessity of eating necessitates
believing first in Him who is unseen, as is faith:
Hebrews 11:1 - Now faith is the substance of things to be hoped for, the
evidence of things that appear not.
The quote of St. Isaac Jogues is really brilliant. It shows how pure his
intention was in saving souls. Thank you for quoting that. Also, the points
about predestination are encouraging because so many people are just so
bad-willed.
God Bless,
Chris White
Galatians,
added
MHFM: This is an interesting point which has been added to our
article: Where does the Bible teach that Jesus is God?
Galatians 1:1- “Paul, an apostle, not of men, neither by man, but by Jesus
Christ, and God the Father, who raised him from the dead…”
Since Paul did not become an apostle by men or of man, but by
Jesus Christ, the obvious implication is that Jesus Christ is not just a
man. He is also God.
Video
Update
MHFM:
This video also discusses an extremely important quote from St. Isaac Jogues.
Crucifixes
barred
Subject: Regarding - Italy school
crucifixes 'barred'
Dear brothers at MHFM -
This email is regarding "Italy school
crucifixes barred." This is sad, really sad, that a (European court)
interferes in an Italian matter to not only ban crucifixes in Italian
schools, but then rewards the "victim" with a monetary
settlement? It never ceases to amaze me how progressives in this
generation can't wait to tear down and destroy every aspect of
Christianity, and turn their backs on their own Christian identity!
Western civilization seems to be on a deathwish to kill itself. Most
countries in Europe have a declining population (and under an invasion of
muslim immigrants, motivated on converting a declining Christian Europe into a
muslim Europe.) I fear that without a real Christian revival to regain
its identity, and a lot of prayer (including the rosary), we are going to see
the fall European society within a generation or two.
E
History
channel program
A good program and worth the time. I
was disappointed that they did not show you (as I am sure you mentioned)
talking about the 3rd secret and it had to be released by 1960. It would
make more sense then said Sister Lucia. It would not make sense to have
the 3rd secret talk about the assassination attempt of an (anti)pope 20 years
later. Father-Mister Andrew Apostate swallowed the Vatican story of
course. The Sister Lucia that we saw in 2000 kissing the Pope after
receiving communion was possibly brainwashed to swallow the V2 crap. Kissing
JP2 hand?? Muslims adore the
Blessed Mother. Why would they if they don't believe that she is the
mother of God? Of course trying to understand a false religion is not
easy. Anyway, I look forward to your DVD about Fatima…
William Sloan
MHFM: Thanks for the interest.
The “Sr. Lucia” who kissed John Paul II’s hand was not just
brainwashed. She was not the real Sr.
Lucy.
History
Show
Dear Brothers,
I thought EWTN's "Father" Andrew Apostoli (more like Andrew Apostate)
gave a typically-pathetic performance as a token Vatican II stooge in the
History Channel's program on the Fatima secrets. Apostoli did nothing but give
lip service to the Vatican II sect and its antipopes to whom he is so foolishly
devoted. Apostoli praised John Paul II, stated his acceptance of the false
third secret and the imposter Sr. Lucy, and Apostoli even went so far as to
utter a heresy when he stated that Our Lady appeared at Fatima as a gesture of
thanks and esteem for the Islamic religion. What a heretic! Anyone who still
watches and supports EWTN and their heretic "priests" really needs to
be honest, open their eyes and see through the lies and deceptions of men like
Andrew Apostoli. By the way, Brother Michael Dimond was in great form on the
program as a true, stalwart Roman Catholic -- unlike Apostoli and the other
interviewees. Thank you and may God bless you for sharing on national
television Our Lady's true message of Fatima.
Mike Dougherty
History
Dear Brother Michael,
I was very disappointed that they did not let you have more speaking time on
the show. They cut you off it seemed when details were going to make too much
sense to them! It seems that they want the world to still believe that the 3rd
secret has been revealed. Of course that would be expected since they on the
show were part of Vatican II or just plain skeptics. I cannot wait until you
have your new book out on Fatima and Sr. Lucia. I was very intrigued at the
fact that you said the Vatican document had, that they claimed was the third
secret, had about 60 lines instead of about 20 as in Sr. Lucia's real letter…
God Bless you and I thank the Holy Spirit for giving you wisdom.
Jodi
MHFM: In an audio discussion we will probably have some more
comments with thoughts about the show.
They did splice together a few quotes and used the portions they wanted
to.
History
Special
Brothers...
Concerning the
Fatima History Channel show last night, they showed Bro. Michael more than I
thought they would, and some people here that I been working with seemed
interested in the fact that he was going to be on the show.. If
anything, I think it adds credibility for the our movement...
(Just the mere fact of being on TV)- I liked that fact that the show
stated about a few times on why the secret was supposed to be released by
1960. I also liked on how they stated the Fatima message predicted the
reign of Pius XI, way before he even got elected !!.. They showed the vision of
Hell and quoted what the Seers description of Hell was…I did get upset
though on how they stated that "Sr. Lucia" got upset at those who
thought the 3rd secret wasn’t fully revealed- Also the spin on the theory
that the 3rd secret had maybe something to do with a possible missile
attack in the 60's / Cuba etc...I also didn’t like that they
showed "Lucia" and John Paul II being all buddy buddy...If only
they would have given Brother Dimond about 15 seconds to throw some light
on the imposter "Lucia"....Anyway at the final end of the show, some
guy came on and said, that in the end, it’s all about the salavation of
souls. By the way, I about fell out of my chair here at work when a
co worker turned around and told me he also watched the show and thought
there’s no way that the "Lucia" with John Paul II was the same person
compared to Sister Lucia that Mary appeared to.. I asked him he had any prior
knowledge of the imposter scenario and he answered no…
-Steve
MHFM: It’s interesting that the person you know concluded that
the “Lucia” with John Paul II was not the same person as the traditional,
pre-Vatican II Sr. Lucia. However, it’s
not surprising that he came to that conclusion.
If one believes in Fatima and is honest, one should come to that
conclusion. It’s simply a fact that the
post-Vatican II “Sr. Lucia” endorsed the modernist, post-Vatican II version of
Fatima. Therefore, one cannot accept her
if one holds a traditional view of Fatima or traditional conclusions about the
Third Secret of Fatima. The fact that so
many people do – and they do so obstinately – is another clear example of their
dishonesty.
Fatima
Special
Dear MHFM,
After about fifteen minutes into the
History Channel Third Secret of Fatima special, I was seeing that it was mostly
distortion and trying to lead the viewers down the wrong path. The sections
with Brother Dimond were all truthful statements about this miraculous
event in our Churches history. There were also many others that were on the
show that made truthful statements about Fatima. The HC took it upon themselves
to twist things around and make speculations. The most damaging of the
distortion or lies were;
1. The tie in between the Islamic religion
and our Lady of Fatima. This gave the impression that there may be some mutual
respect between Islam and Catholicism.
2. The "false" Sister Lucy made
out to be respectful of anti-Pope JPII. It showed her taking Communion
from him and kissing his hand.
3. The vision of hell made
out to be symbolic of WW I instead of showing that this literally was hell
and that was made perfectly clear by our Blessed Lady.
4.. Little emphasis was made on the secret
needing to be released by 1960 and the ramifications had if it been
released at that time to all the Vatican II changes starting with anti-Pope
John XXIII.
5. Not one word about the Rosary or
our Lady's message about immorality in dress, sins of the flesh and other
key warnings.
6. The overall impression that anti-Pope JP
II was the greatest Pope of all time even though he was an
anti-Christ.
There are several other major flaws that
the uninformed Catholic is going to take away from this program. This means the
release of the MHFM accurate DVD version of Fatima will show the lies
and distortions in this "Masonic" version and possibly bring
more people back to the true Catholic faith had this HC special not been aired
at all.
Your ardent supporter,
Bob Bohr
Show
Brothers:
I can't say that I'm surprised at the way
the History Channel chose to spin things, but at least you were able to point
out that the released "third secret" isn't the real
deal. Hopefully a few people who watched will find their way to your
material.
Respectfully…
M
Against
Racism
MHFM: The following quote is somewhat interesting. In fifteenth century Spain, a few were
endeavoring to forbid converted Jews (i.e., Christians who had Jewish blood)
from holding office. The pope at the
time, Pope Nicholas V, rightly came out against this attempt at racial
exclusion. Note: he did not condemn
excluding people for religious reasons, i.e.,
if a person doesn’t believe or if a convert’s faith is in question. Rather, he condemned racism and excluding
people solely because of their bloodlines.
“The immediate result was a bull issued by
Pope Nicholas [V] on 24 September 1449 under the significant title Humani Generis Enemicus (Enemy of the
Human Race), in which he denounced the idea of excluding Christians from office
simply because of their blood origins.
‘We decree and declare’, the pope went on, ‘that all Catholics are one
body in Christ according to the teaching of our faith.’” (Henry Kamen, The Spanish Inquisition – A Historical
Revision, Yale University Press, 1998, p. 34.)
Tonight’s
program
Brothers,
I searched the TV listings for today and tomorrow and I don't see the special
that Brother Michael is appearing on.
Did the times or dates get moved? I am really looking forward to seeing
it. I'm in Texas so maybe they are not showing it here. I don't think that
makes sense. Hopefully if I miss it I
will get to see it on the internet somewhere.
God Bless
Nate
MHFM: It’s listed for 9:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the History
Channel under the title “Nostradamus Effect: Fatima’s Lost Prophecy.” The description for the show says:
“The Vatican closely guards the secrets of
one of three prophecies that children in Fatima, Portugal, claimed to have
received from the Virgin Mary in 1917.”
Apparently it will air multiple times.
Product
MHFM:
This is something someone sent to us.
It’s a beauty product from “stem-cell” technology.
Question
Dear Brothers,
I have a New American Bible from years ago.
Should I dispose of it? Is there a proper way to get rid of it? I think on the
sleeve of the book jacket is an inverted triangle. Also, do you believe
in our Lady's appearance at Knock, Ireland in the late
1800's?
John Settimo
MHFM: We have no reason to conclude that the apparition at Knock
in the 1800s was false. Our recent post
concerned the false apparition occurring there now. Even if it isn’t the best, you don’t need to
necessarily get rid of the New American Bible you have. It can be used as a reference to compare
translations, etc.
Comment
Thank you for putting the comment about
halloween on your blog, this is what I was looking for, I knew for myself
it was a pagan ritual but it’s good to have the information regarding the
background and history of it. By the way I didn't let my kids
participate or hand out any candy and thats what the war was about between
my wife and I. It’s [difficult] trying to do the right thing in this
house hold when someone is so of this world. Keep up the good work I
pray for your perseverance and safety and I am looking forward to seeing
you on the history channel...
Todd
Ouija
boards
Concerning ouija boards, I heard a
story of some people that were trying to get the board to
communicate and they asked it various questions, but then someone
asked, Who is this?..All of a sudden all the dogs in the neighborhood started
barking, the candle in the room then melted fast, and it spelled out the
word B-e-e-l-z-e-b-u-b! Also someone I knew personally told me that
someone asked the spirit if it ever seen God before and it spelled out the word
H-a-t-e..... One girl said that she was at a party & she asked
the board if she should even be using it, and the board
answered 'NO', then she felt as if her fingers were melting into
the planchette, she then said her sense of hearing went out thus not being
able to hear other people in the room talking around her....These boards are
gateways to demonic possession along with having the devil occupy your
residence...Why anyone would want to fool or have anything like that in their home
is beyond me... People need to avoid these "games" at all
costs.
-Steve
Comment
Dear Brothers in Christ,
I've listened to your debate with Mr.
Moore. Of course your position in the debate was the correct one. As far as I
can see, the "faith alone" thing, from the standpoint of pure logic,
is a product of a faulty logic (of course, the Devil makes use of a faulty
logic all the time; faulty logic is one of its favorite tools). Namely, the condition of a necessity is not
the same as the condition of sufficiency. Thus, faith is necessary for
salvation, but is not sufficient; likewise the sacrament of baptism is
necessary for salvation, but is not sufficient.
Our Lord Jesus Christ insisted on faith
simply because it was lacking those days (nowadays the faith is apparently
non-existent save but in small remnant of true Catholics). But the insistence
on what is necessary does not imply that this is the only thing needed nor that
it is sufficient. You have substantiated your position with many quotes from
the Scriptures, but Mr. Moore could not find not even a single one to
substantiate "faith alone".
It is obvious truth that you also insist on
the True Faith these days simply because The One and Only Catholic Faith is
viciously attacked from many sides, the most wicked attack coming from V-2
sect… In essence, "faith
alone" is a blasphemy because it is evident that the OBEDIENCE
to the Word is of utmost importance--our Lord insisted on obedience as much as
on faith. One is obviously not obedient if he/she thinks that it is allowable
to sin gravely as long as one has The Faith. The final result of "faith
alone" is "faith none", because sin destroys faith, and vice
versa. Faith and sin are mutually excluded.
The "faith alone" is much the same thing as "love
alone" thing characteristic for V-2 satanic "theology". The
phony "love" of the V-2 adherents is as empty as the "faith
alone". In the end "love alone" turns out to be "love
none".
It is not a mere coincidence that V-2 and
other "christians" are kin with Buddhism and other emptiness-loving
man-made eastern philosophies. Yet
somehow I think that Mr. Moore has a potential to convert to The True Faith,
although at this moment he is of bad will. I don't know why I have this feeling.
Anyway, the feelings and all other human qualities have to be subdued to
the Truth. And to the prayer.
Thank you for an excellent debate. May our Most Holy Mother Mary and St. Joseph
keep you on the right path and show your holy efforts to our Lord.
Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia
Marriage
Pope Leo XIII, Dum Multa (# 2), Dec. 24,
1902: “It follows then that the marriage of Christians when fully accomplished…
cannot be dissolved for any reason other than
the death of either spouse, according to the holy words: ‘What God has joined,
let no man put asunder.’
Does the term "marriage of Christians" here imply that if two
non-Christians got married, and then were divorced, and then one of them
converted to Catholicism, the Catholic would be free to marry? Also, someone once told me that if two people
are married outdoors, ie. not in a church building, then it is not valid, this
seems ridiculous, but I'd like to hear it from you.
I am looking forward to the History channel special.
-A huge supporter.
MHFM: It only refers to “the marriage of Christians” because
there is the Pauline Privilege. The
Pauline Privilege applies when two unbaptized persons (thus two non-Christians)
are married, but one of them converts to the faith. If the other one (i.e., the remaining
unbaptized person) will neither convert nor live at peace with the new
Christian, then the marriage may be completely dissolved. That’s called the Pauline Privilege because
it has its roots in the epistle of St. Paul to the Corinthians (1 Cor.
7:12-17). That’s why Pope Leo qualifies
the statement with “the marriage of Christians.”
A marriage can be valid if it is outdoors.
Debate
Brothers: A very good debate with Mr.
Moore. I think Mr. Moore (I could be wrong) is of good will and is just
confused. I think he is confusing "faith" with being in a state
of grace. He agrees with you; he just does not know it. I would
hope that you praying for him that he convert to the true faith.
You responded to an e-mail from Ms. Kalix a
week ago or so about her miscarriage. Your words to her were
compassionate and on the money. It helped me deal with a miscarriage my
wife and I suffered a few years ago. The child may have been a monster
sinner and the miscarriage may have been the best things. I am learning
now to trust God in these things since He is a lot smarter than me.
I agree with you about the Halloween
situation. The feast of All Hallows Eve had some redeeming qualities a
long time ago. It is simply evil now...
William
MHFM: Thanks for the interest.
One could not say, however, that a person who rejects (and in fact
attacks) the Catholic faith is of good will.
He is not confused. He
understands Catholic teaching and rejects it.
He might have enough good will to eventually convert. That’s something for which we should hope and
pray; but a person who attacks the Catholic faith is demonstrating bad will at
the time he is rejecting Catholic teaching.
One must be convinced of that.
History
Channel
MHFM: Bro. Michael Dimond will be
appearing on the History Channel, in a special on the Third Secret of Fatima,
on Wednesday Nov. 4, at 9:00 p.m. Eastern Time.
Antipope “Beatification”
Dear MHFM,
It is truly a sign of end times when the anti-Christ
is going to be canonized a saint and Melanie Calvat of La Salette has not been
canonized. Could this be the last straw? If you read her life story in the book
Sister Mary of the Cross you can see that should have been canonized years ago
She lived everyday as a Saint and anti-Pope lived everyday as a "feel
good" pope. Catholics
of the world, wake up!
Your ardent supporter,
Bob Bohr
Halloween
I do not let my children participate in
halloween. I also do not turn on my porch light or hand out candy to other
children. I have seen many videos on Halloween and I wonder if people actually
know what "trick or treat" really means. The origin of
trick or treat came from the Druids about 2,200 years ago. The Druids were
priests in the ancient Celtic countries. What they believed is that on
Halloween, evil spirits would come back to visit the living. The Druids would
go house to house saying that the owner of the house had to leave some sort of
food out on the doorstep for the spirits as a treat or the Druids would trick
the household by placing a curse upon them or killing their children. Even
today, many humans including children are sacrificed on an evil altar on
halloween night.
Virtually every Catholic I know lets
their children dress up for halloween. If we dress our children up like saints
and send them out to participate in a pagan ritual, does this really honor the
saints???
May God bless you. Keep up the great
work.
Mary
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. We fully agree. People should not have anything to do with
Halloween. It’s very interesting that
almost every parent who claims to be Catholic will allow his or her children to
dress up for Halloween. It’s another
example of how liberal and out of touch with the faith and the truth almost
everyone is today.
New Rite of Exorcism
Subject: New Rite of Exorcism of Paul VI
Even though Father Amorth serves the
NewChurch, he makes an astonishing admission: The revised rite of exorcism is
worthless in the everlasting fight against evil. As if it wasn´t enough JP2
promulgated a new form of rosary that increases the number of Hail Marys by
each 1/3 to 66.6 instead of the usual 50.
… Lefebvre DID state on certain occasions
that the Vatican II Sacraments were deprived of validity, how about a similar
admission from the biggest expert on exorcisms in the world? Maybe it´s a first
step for many inside the Novus Ordo structure to see the light. First they
realize that the Vatican II sect replaced a time proven Exorcism rite with a
phony that won´t even tickle the Devil.
After accepting that, newchurchmen can move
one step forward and see the errors in the New Catechism. And finally see that the New Sacraments were
invalidated.
I also wanted to mention about a supposed
accusation that Paul VI was fooled by Bugnini during the reform of the Liturgy.
A lot of people in the Traditional circles (FSSPX) are moving to the position
that Paul VI was a good Pope who happened to be misled by evil men (the same scenario
they apply to JP2 and B16). If that is really the case, like they claim, then
why did Paul VI go anyway and promulgate the Novus Ordo, with very few
alterations? Why did he personally make Bugnini a Bishop? Seems like a
promotion to me. And why did he let the New Mass go ahead for almost ten years,
without ever wanting to do a recall
MHFM: Those who think that Paul VI
was good really need to look at our video or file on him: Paul VI (manifest heretic who claimed to be Pope
1963-1978) [link to
section]
Two questions
Hi, my name is Jorge and live in
Utah. I have a great respect for brother Michael Diamond and so I turn to
Most Holy Family Monastery for two concerns/questions that I have. The
first question is by far the most important… The two concerns are listed
below. Thank you so much for your time.
Question #1: What do you think about
the Diocese of Utah decreed that the Blood of Christ is suspended from mass
during Swine Flu epidemic.
Question #2: There is a picture
called "Jacinta 1972". In it contains the hour, date, time and
year of the great chastisement. I figured June 10, 1011 when WWIII will
occur. What's your comment on that?
Again, thanks for your time.
Jorge Rodriguez
MHFM: Thanks for the interest. To your first question, we think it’s
irrelevant that the Diocese of Utah made that move. That’s because the Body and Blood of Christ
are not present in the New Mass. It’s
invalid. Please consult our file: on the New Mass.
Regarding #2, it comes from the false
Bayside Messages. These false messages
contain numerous heresies and false prophecies.
They are not from God or the Blessed Virgin, but from the Devil: False Apparitions (Divine Mercy, Bayside, Medjugorje) [Link to Section]
SSPX
Dear
MHFM -
Just
wondering if the brothers at MHFM are aware of yesterday’s meeting between
Vatican and SSPX representatives? Apparently the SSPX reps are calling
out the Vatican over its false-ecumanism and vague/contradicting topics of V-2
documents. What are your opinions?
MHFM: We think it further expresses
the ridiculous, heretical and schismatic position of the SSPX. It has only been decades now, and they still
aren’t under the “authorities” and the “hierarchy” they regard as
Catholic. It’s absurd. At the same time they even have the audacity
to denounce people who correctly point out that the Vatican II sect doesn’t
have any authority. Their position is a
joke at this point.
The Society of St. Pius X [Link to Section]
It also highlights Benedict XVI’s
role as a deceiver in the last days. His
gross apostasy is there for all to see, but he fools the bad-willed by making
it look like he’s friendly in some way to tradition.
Interest
Dear Brothers and Sisters:
Years ago, I left the church after Vatican
II. I do not like the "New Mass ", and the majority of changes that
were made since that time. Since I have not found any Traditional Catholic
Churches in the area where I live, what can I do? I do not wish to return
to the "New Church" at present. Should I change to another
denomination? Any suggestions or advice would greatly be appreciated.
Thank you and God bless.
Gerard
MHFM: Thanks for the interest. You need to become a traditional
Catholic. The steps for how to do that are on our website. We
recommend that you obtain our basic package. One must be convinced of all
Catholic teachings before making the profession of faith and receiving
sacraments. Obviously one is not convinced of Catholic teachings if one
is considering becoming part of another denomination. We’re glad to hear
about the interest, but you should pray the Rosary and become convinced.
New Debate Posted
David Moore is a Protestant who studies the Bible
and attempts to refute Catholic teaching from it. He produces videos, articles and materials
which are dedicated to trying to disprove Catholic teaching from the
Bible. He challenged us to a
debate. So, we had a recorded debate
discussion on the topic of faith alone and eternal security. The total time for the debate discussion is 1
hour and 56 minutes.
It will be found permanently in our Traditional
Catholic Audios, Telephone Debates, and Refuting Protestantism sections.
Halloween
Brothers,
Here is an article describing the goings-on
at the white house. Though the article states that Obama was in plain clothes,
the picture of him on my Yahoo start-up page appears, to me, that he is dressed
up like a priest. No doubt a novus horror "priest."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091101/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_obamas_halloween
Sincerely,
Howard
JD
Dear Brothers,
This latest publicity stunt by the V-2 sect
to celebrate the heretical Joint Declaration on Justification with the
Lutherans is yet another example of how bad willed Australian
"Catholics" are. I think it's really just a celebration of
Halloween - October 31 (and the "principles" of Halloween -
"do what thou wilt") - by the V-2 sect!!! The fact that the Joint
Declaration was signed on Halloween in 1999 shows how Antichrist the
whole affair is. How in-your-face-Antichrist does it have to get
before people wake up and see how the Catholic Church's buildings are
being raped by apostates?!!
God Bless,
Chris White
Praying
Alright, I'm confused, and I would really
appreciate it if you could enlighten me on this point:
When we pray the Rosary, do we dedicate it to Our Lady, or to God? Do we offer
the Rosary to Our Lady only, or do we have to offer it to God? I'm confused!
Do we have to pray it with the belief that whatever grace of favor we might
receive from praying it, we receive it from Our Lady, or from God?
I'm confused! This has always confused me, because, it goes without saying that
we only adore God in the Holy Trinity alone, and not any Saint or even Our
Lady, but, then they also say that when we pray to any Saint or even to Our
Lady, that we Catholics do not expect to receive any graces or favors from the
power of the Saints of from Our Lady, but that they intercede for us and obtain
from God whatever we ask from them, not that they of their own power grant us
said grace or favor; but then how do we reconcile that with the Rosary? I don't
get it!
This is why I have hesitated to pray the Rosary, because I just realized these
things and now I don't know what to think or the beliefs we should or should
not have when we pray the Rosary.
Could you please help me with this?
AB
MHFM: When we pray to the Blessed
Virgin, she prays to God for us. Yet the
connection between the Mother of God and God Himself is so powerful and strong
and intimate, that it’s automatic. It’s
not as if one needs to draw a mental separation: well, I pray to Our Lady, who
will in turn pray to God for me. No,
it’s instantaneous and automatic. We
pray to Our Lady; she grants us graces.
The same is true when we pray to other saints, who are in possession of
the Beatific Vision. Yet it’s true to an
even greater and more powerful degree with Our Lady.
Rosary
To whom it may concern,
My name is Amanda… I live in a very small
town in North Carolina. I desire to become catholic. I read a catholic bible, I
pray the rosary.. In fact the doctors told me I could never have any more
children. After saying the rosary to the Holy mother, I became pregnant. I live
in a southern baptist community, and there isnt much help for me. I feel its
imperative that I become catholic. I dream about it, I feel led to it. Please help me … Thank you
Amanda
MHFM: It’s great to hear about your interest. You should
continue to pray the Rosary each day, more than five decades a day if
possible. You should obtain basic package with the main books and DVDs we
sell. We recommend the basic catechism and the books we offer from St.
Louis De Montfort on the Rosary and True
Devotion to Mary. A few other lives of the saints might really help.
This file explains the steps one needs to take to convert. If you contact us here, we can also help you
further.
Comment
Thank you so much for posting your
debate with David Moore. In my opinion, this is your finest debate!
It was very educational, and you both should be congratulated for conducting
yourselves in a professional manner and staying on topic. I think it was
quite clear that when Mr Moore was challenged with irrefutable and
overwhelming evidence - he had concede that he either had no answer, or at
the very least he had to admit the text was "difficult."
I REALLY hope you debate him again in the future on other
topics: such as scipture alone and the true presence of the
Eucharist (both of which were briefly touched on.) In most cases, Mr
Moore seemed sincere and was willing to admit when you caught him in
contradictions. Ultimately it was obvious that the Catholic position was
shown to be correct, and anyone with a shred of honesty will admit that Brother
Peter clearly won this debate.
God bless the MHFM, and continue your great
work!
- Ed
Noises
Dear
Brothers,
Those are astounding videos on the heretics JP2 and Reginald Foster. They are
really just like very bad comedians, only they are pretending to be real
"pope" and "priest"!!! Those weird noises of JP2 remind me
of your exorcism tape, how the possesed person was making pig noises, etc.
"Fr." Reginald Foster treats hell like it's a joke, but you can see
him physically squirm as he wrestles with his conscience…
That was a fascinating debate with the heretic David Moore on the heresies
of Faith Alone and Eternal Security. It touched on many important points. It did sadden me though that Mr. Moore was
obstinate in the face of his own confusion about what many scriptures mean. If
God is the God of understanding, then surely he would enable us to understand
his words in the Bible. Catholics understand that Jesus made St. Peter the Pope
in order to explain the true meaning of scriptures (amongst many other duties).
Perhaps it was providential that St. Peter, the first Pope, was the one who
wrote of St. Paul’s Epistles:
2 Peter 3:16 - As also in all his epistles,
speaking in them of these things; in which are certain things hard to be
understood, which the unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other
scriptures, to their own destruction.
Eternal Security is like saying that Adam,
made in the state of grace/justice, could never have committed the Original
Sin, or to say, “oh, now that I’m an American citizen, it is ipso facto
impossible for me to break the law!!!”
At 0:45 of video 5, David said, “I
really do believe it’s a question of have you ever seen God or not.” If that
were so, then how come Satan, who really, truly, substantially saw God, and
stood in His presence – how is it that Lucifer became Satan the Devil, if it’s
simply a question of whether one has “seen” God or not?! Obviously even angels
can be damned!
Faith Alone is like people who believe that
by simply imagining something, it will happen. If I were to imagine a house to
live in, would that then appear? No. I would need to physically work at
building it…. It seems to me that Protestants, like David Moore, almost
secretly worship the Bible! I think this because that is where God seems to
begin and end for them – in the Bible! Our God, the True God, the Catholic God,
the Lord Jesus Christ, actually made everything and uses it according to His
will, and not according to man’s desires. Protestants seem to begin with the
initial assumption that all you need for salvation is the Bible, but we know that
the entire Catholic Church is needed for salvation. If God were actually their
authority, they (Protestants) would believe what the Bible says about St.
Peter, etc. Also, I’m guessing that about half the NT is admonitions and
encouragements for the faithful to continue in justice and grace. If we cannot
lose salvation, then half of the NT is superfluous.
…In his closing statement David said,
“The Catholic Church would have to be 100% right about everything.” And if the
Catholic Church was established by God Himself, with a rock as the keeper of
the Keys to the Kingdom, we would expect it to be right about everything, as it
truly is and always has been. Why is it that Protestants all acknowledge the
elaborate Jewish system and its destruction (of the temple, etc.), but they
deny the Christian system, the Catholic Church, the new Israel?! Oh I forgot,
they are PROTESTants, head-butting the rocks like Jews!!!
Thank you Brothers and God Bless,
Chris White
MHFM: Thanks for the comments. We think that there is more hope for his
conversion than for many Protestants out there.
About
Subject: About the sola fide debate
Part 7 was simply the best. Since Mr. Moore
sees no difference between venial and mortal sins, he should see no difference
between fornicating just one time or a thousand times.
C
Comment
Your recent debate once again proves as you stated, that many points are
"ignored" when people are trying to justify their thinking. Out of
ignorance and their Vail of spiritual blindness, they choose from an al-a-cart
menu to manifest their own reality. Ignoring what they can not understand
merely because they are excluded from its interpretation (blindness).
Unfortunately, their false interpretation out of pride, leads only to eternal damnation.
I believe deep down, these folks know they are wrong. Many people continue down
the wrong path none the less, while few, fight the fight to have the Vail
lifted to see the truth.
God Bless MHFM,
Tom
Comment
Great job on the 11-part debate with David
Moore on the issue of whether the Bible teaches "justification by faith
alone" or "eternal security". The debate showed
clearly both of those Protestant beliefs are totally
unscriptural, and I think Mr. Moore (if indirectly) did concede that the Catholic
views Bro. Peter showed in this debate are correct.
It is sad to realize that this
man, who expressed many times how very careful he is to NOT
sin, especially in a grave manner… IS sinning in a
mortal, death-dealing manner by disobeying Jesus… by joining a false
religion started by A MAN who was riddled with evil (Luther), and by NOT
adhering to the ONLY true religion on Earth which Jesus Christ founded.
For example, Mr. Moore agreed with
Bro. Peter about the scriptures where even St. Paul expresses fears that
HE---the GREAT Apostle to the Gentiles---could become
REPROBATE-------well, maybe Mr. Moore could understand it this
way: HAD "PROTESTANTISM" EXISTED AT THE TIME OF ST.
PAUL, AND HAD ST. PAUL ABANDONED THE TRUE FAITH CHRIST TAUGHT---THE
CATHOLIC FAITH----in order to become a "protestant", then in
that case St. Paul's worst fears would have been realized, for he WOULD
have become a REPROBATE, and fallen into heresy and died in this most
wretched and vile state of mortal sin, and Hell would have been his
eternity.
Maybe it is because protestants------just
like Vatican 2 "catholics" and other apostates, heretics and
schismatics----ARE in these tragic delusions that they lack the grace to see
the only one true church of the traditional Catholic Faith........for mortal
sin blocks grace. But miracles can happen, they do happen every
day---and I believe that if a reprobate and sinner like me can come to see the
truth, than others can.....but clinging to such clearly non-Biblical
"pacifiers" of "justification by faith alone"/"eternal
security" has to end, since such pacifiers are filled with
death-dealing poison. Same goes for the V2 "Catholics"---- let
go of your baby blankets, and embrace the only truth that can help you get
into Heaven----TRADITIONAL
Catholicism.
That's why the grace of final perseverance
is the most important thing to pray/ask for… Once again Thank
You! and great job on this debate.
A
Innocent III
Subject:
Innocent III
Hey Brothers,
I am sorry if you already have this quote in your material somewhere, I could
not find it on your site or in your books. Maybe I did not look hard enough.
This is from Denzinger 410 and it has to do with there being a difference
between a person dying with only original sin as opposed to actual sin. I think
I understand it right.
(Denz. 410) Innocent III "The effect of Baptism (and the Character)":
"Original, therefore, which is committed without consent, is remitted
without consent through the power of the sacrament; but actual, which is
contracted with consent, is not mitigated in the slightest without consent...
The punishment of original sin is deprivation of the vision of God, but the
punishment of actual sin is the torments of everlasting hell..."
I thought this was relevant to the belief that some schismatics have that
unbaptized infants suffer the same punishment as those who die in actual mortal
sin.
Also it proves that those with original sin cannot be in Heaven because they
lose the vision of God. This may not be ex cathedra but it reiterates
Dogma. Please correct me if I am missing
something or I am not enterpreting something correctly.
Nate
MHFM: We don’t generally use that
citation to prove the point about unbaptized infants not suffering the fires of
Hell. That’s because it comes from a
letter of Pope Innocent III called Ex
Parte Tua. That letter is not
infallible. That letter also teaches the
error that original sin was remitted by circumcision. That error, that original sin was remitted by
circumcision, was contradicted by the infallible teaching of the Council of
Trent. We cover this in our book: EENS, in section 17, in the process of refuting an objection
raised for “baptism of desire.”
That being said, we think that the
quote does add something. Even though it
doesn’t come from an infallible document, it shows that another pope held the same
position: that unbaptized infants go to a part of Hell where there is no
fire. It’s something additional to
consider, along with the more authoritative statements which demonstrate the
point.
JP2
Crazy
JP2 Video…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TIoelyZ5qvQ
C
John XXIII
DEAR BROTHER DIMOND
I HAVE BEEN GOING THROUGH YOUR WEBSITE AND FIND YOUR INFORMATION RELEVANT TO
OUR TIMES AND I DO WANT TO HAVE MY FAMILY AND I'S SOULS SAVED HOWEVER IF THE
LATE POPE JOHN XXIII WAS ACTUALLY AN ANTIPOPE WHY IS HIS BODY LAYING IN A STATE
OF INCORRUPT NATURE AND IF EVERY CHURCH IS USING THE NEW MASS IS TAKING
COMMUNION VALID AND ARE MY CONFESSION VALID?
A VERY MUCH UPSET CATHOLIC
TERRY MORIER
FROM CANADA
MHFM: As we point out in our book (The Truth about What Really Happened to the Catholic Church after
Vatican II), and in our section on John XXIII: The Scandals and Heresies of John XXIII [PDF File]:
After his death, the Vatican sent for
Gennar Goglia, who with his colleagues embalmed John XXIII. Goglia injected ten liters of embalming fluid
into John XXIII’s wrist and stomach to neutralize any putrefaction. This explains why John XXIII’s body didn’t
decompose like normal bodies. In January
2001, John XXIII’s body was exhumed and placed in a new bullet-proof crystal
coffin now on display in St. Peter’s basilica.
John XXIII’s face and hands were also covered in wax. (citations in section)
This is the only reason that John XXIII (who was a very wicked
heretic) did not decay like normal people.
As far as your other question goes, the New Mass is definitely invalid
and it’s a grave sin to continue to go there.
The confessions to priests ordained in the New Rite of Ordination are
not valid, but if the priest was ordained in the old rite and says the proper
words it could have been valid. That’s
covered in our material.
Liturgy
Dear Brothers
"HIGH CHURCH" NON-CATHOLICS
Some so-called Traditionalist
Catholic websites and blogspots salivate in, and glorify the
"Tridientine" liturgy, supposedly celebrated in a most pristine way,
by various Anglican/Episcopalian clergy and groups. Truly, brothers, are not
these liturgies celebrated by heretics fit only for the garbage bins, whether
velvet lined or not?
More seriously, such Traditionalists
claim that they are any different to Novus Ordo Catholics who vigorously pursue
ecumenical practices?
Sincerely,
Joe. M
MHFM: It’s certainly true that many
traditionalists don’t have the faith, but instead glory only or primarily in
the external, aesthetical and emotional aspects of Catholicism. They enjoy the chanting and the singing and
the liturgy but don’t really care about the faith and the truth. In that way, many of them are very similar to
high-Church Anglicans. They just have a
slightly more traditional or conservative inclination. We definitely believe that the comparison is
appropriate.
Debate
MHFM: A new debate that some of our readers might
find interesting will hopefully be posted soon.
Astounding
Thought
you might be interested in this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7JBQvIC7YQ
Astonishing indeed. Well, at least he's
honest in his heresies.
MHFM: That’s just astounding
heresy. The guy is totally evil. That’s the Vatican II apostasy for you. He’s a senior Vatican priest. Also, we wonder how many false
traditionalists – who say they cannot judge that Benedict XVI is a heretic –
would say the same about this apostate.
College
MHFM,
I would like to ask your opinion on college parties. My parents as well
as the people who invited me to a party say that its fine, they understand I
don't approve of getting drunk so just come and don't drink, you can just
socialize. I see two problems with it. One, it is an approximate
occasion of many sins (alcohol, immodest dress, these parties easily induce
many to sins of the flesh). Secondly, even though they say they know I
don't want to be a part of drinking I still think that my going is giving them
scandal. I feel my attendance shows I don't drink personally but it’s
fine if someone else chooses to do so, which would be wrong. What do you
think about it? Several of them know my views on many things.
Kenneth Connelly
MHFM: One should definitely not go to
such parties. It is an occasion of sin,
as you said. But additionally, to be in
such a mortally sinful atmosphere where the entire occasion is basically
defined by mortal sin is to be implicated in it. It would have to be one of the worst things a
person could do – not in the sense that there aren’t worse mortal sins, but in
terms of putting oneself in a situation where one’s soul is apt to be
ruined.
Former
I am a former employee of EWTN who was
terminated because of my support of true Catholic faith and sacraments. I
assure you that you are correct. They are modernists who are afficted with
conciliar papolatry.
E
Comment
That article you posted about "Cardinal
George" and "Archbishop Dolan" can only be described as a
"puke page" because seeing this idiotic face in the photo, the
sliminess, the malevolence so obvious in this apostate's visage and
countenance, could only make one want to puke.
At this point, I can't help but
feeling that anyone who can fall for these most noxious and pestilent enemies
of Christ ANTICS deserve everything they get: total spiritual blindness,
etc. Still, since I was a blind fool myself, until very
recently when I was miraculously led to your website and information (the
truth) I will pray for all those poor deceived hapless souls still
"accepting" these V2 apostates and their incredibly EVIL
counter-church, since the Holy Ghost will blow wherever He wills, and there
may be a certain number of Mary's true children still out there,
somewhere, whom God intends to save....
As for the bad news on
"president" obama's (what a side-show freak!) "National
Emergency'" re: "swine flu"----- can any one out there say
"FASCISM"??? My own health is so incredibly damaged from
a "flu shot" I got last winter (yes I was a big-time fool for
allowing it) that I have to admit my life will probably (except for a
miracle, which I am still praying for) never be the same.
It's even hard for me to pray, much less clean the house and fulfill all
my duties as a house-wife, much less WORK, as I always used to
do.....be warned---beware----do not get any of these "flu
shots" because from my own personal experience, I would advise
that they are designed to incapacitate, and even to
kill.............Sincerely,
Topic
Subject: Great job on audio praying to
Saints
Brothers Thanks for all the information
James
Topic
Thank you for the pro life video. I had a
miscarriage earlier in the year. I could accept that this soul was in a part of
hell where there was no hellfire, but had still been haunted as to why our
Almighty God let it happen. Now I can see that if this child had been born, its
future sins would probably put him/her at a worse place in hell. Thanks again.
This is a hard topic to frame as so many do want to believe these unborn souls
go straight to heaven. I'm very glad God gave you the grace to make this video.
May The Holy Trinity continue to bless MHFM!
Christina Kalix
Comment
Great video again guys, I just wanted to
make a few comments, abortion is of the devil and he has a reason for it
just like the same reason he tries to get all of us into hell. That
is his one and only objective to ruin souls, that being said if he gets
man to promulgate abortion but the unbaptized babies go to heaven anyway,
his purpose is defeated! Oh yes, I know the devil is defeated anyway
but many souls are lost in this great battle that Our Lady predicted at
Fatima.
Remember what Mary said to the children
about WWll, that most will go to hell. The devil wouldn't
persist in something that has no effect for him {devil}, the ruining of
souls. Remember that these devils were once Angels but were cast out
of Heaven, Angels and devils are very highly intelligent beings, more
intelligent than we are. Plain and simple Jesus says that you need
water and the HOLY SPIRIT to remove original sin. Remember the devil will
always do the opposite of what JESUS teaches or does!!! The problem here
is that the dogmas taught by the True Catholic Church are so linked
together that to deny one you deny them all, you can't mix good and evil
theology! With the
BLESSED HOLY TRINITY everything has its order and reason even if we don't
understand it, we are finite and He is infinity!!! May the Queen of
Heaven, with the Great Rosary and the scapular save us all.
Todd
EWTN
Subject: What would Jesus do?
Did you pray and seek God's guidance before
you wrote this website? Just wondering. Do you actually watch EWTN
before you trash it. I wonder what Jesus
would do. He spoke kindly even to Mary Magdaline.
Della
MHFM: The heresies that we cover from
EWTN are documented. You need to wake
up. The people on EWTN accept Vatican II
and false ecumenism. They are
modernists. Jesus spoke kindly to Mary
Magdalene because He knew that she had the good will to change. But He condemned other obstinate sinners and
false teachers in strong words when it was appropriate.
EWTN
and the Charismatic Movement [link to section]
New Video
Comments
… Thank you for posting the video on JP2
teaching that "Man is the Way". It becomes more and more
apparent how the world has put man in the place of God.
The near misses are incredible. Thank you for posting them.
The Lord Monckton speech is startling. The end truly is near!
Vatican 2 thumbs up for Karl Marx?! How do they answer for the Gulags when they
silence Bp. Williamson on the "Holocaust" - oh, I forgot - the Gulags
were not aimed at Jews, so it's ok to slaughter 100,000,000 people (in their
mind)!!!
The video on abortion and the Pelagian heretics is excellent. It is very easy
to see how wrong the modern day abortionist heretics are, and also how they are
worse than the Pelagians, since they reject the necessity of any kind of
baptism (even though there is only one). Your reference to the denial of
Original Sin is also very helpful in understanding this issue. Thank you.
God Bless,
Chris White
Letter
[NOTE: For those it might interest, this is a letter we recently
sent to a person who is still a supporter of the Vatican II sect. This person is considering the full truth of
the traditional Catholic faith (i.e., sedevacantism, etc.), but is not
convinced.]
As an addendum to the last e-mail, you
really should get our big book, The Truth
about What Really Happened to the Catholic Church after Vatican II, if you
haven't seen it - in addition to our other books. The evidence is covered
there. It contains their worst heresies, a history of their false ecumenism,
hundreds of photos, the heresies in Vatican II, etc. (By the way, Benedict
XVI's endorsement of Vatican II alone would prove that he's not the pope.)
You also probably believe in heresy on the dogma Outside the Church There is No
Salvation. If so, that's another big
reason that you still are unable to see the truth. You really should get that
book as well.
The fact that you would say that most of the heresies come from PCT [Benedict
XVI’s book, Principles of Catholic
Theology] seems to reveal that you aren't very familiar with the material
we've put out. Some significant heresies
do come from that book, but they constitute only a tiny fraction of the heresies. We have a whole section on Benedict XVI's
post-election heresies. For instance, one of his worst heresies (among dozens)
is his recent declaration that a schismatic leader is a "pastor in the
Church of Christ."
Also, from what we gathered, you seem to like popular music. That is all sinful garbage which blocks out
grace. You really should stop listening
to it. In addition, if you don't pray
the full Rosary each day (all 15 decades), you should. It's critical.
Finally, and I'm saying this to help, you say that you hang around with your
girlfriend. Well, unless a person is seriously considering marriage and perhaps
soon, having a long-standing girlfriend is very dangerous and usually an unwise
thing to do. Almost always people fall
into sins of the flesh that way. If you
are committing sins that way (and even deep kissing between unmarried persons
is a mortal sin), and not praying the full Rosary, then God will pull grace
from you and you will be unable to see the truth. Wisdom is chaste (James 3:17).
Frankly, some of the things you have said reveal that you are still in a
spiritual fog. The fact that you need
more proof, after hearing the debate and seeing some of the things we've
covered, is a very bad sign. You need to realize that the people you think are
Catholic [like the guy we debated, other prominent figures in the Vatican II
sect, etc.] are very evil people. That's
no exaggeration. I know that might shock
you, but it's the truth. They are
totally apostate unbelievers headed straight for Hell. They hold that
anti-Catholic Protestants are not even heretics. You heard him say it when he
was asked about it in the debate. That’s
almost satanic. That means that the
Catholic faith is meaningless.
That is a total mockery of everything Catholic, all the dogmas, Our Lady, Our
Lord, etc. It reveals that they don't
possess one whiff of faith. So, by surrounding yourself with those types,
even if you are just reading them all the time or listening to them or thinking
that they cannot be on the wrong path, it can brainwash a person. It can sort of give you a community feeling
that this group is okay, when it is not.
It can negatively impact you in a huge way. The way to find the truth and analyze things
correctly is to prescind completely from what all of your friends and
clique-members think. It is to analyze, in solitude, what God
thinks. Consider the truth without any
regard for the opinions of the people around you; for they are totally
deceived.
-MHFM
Comment
Dear
Brothers:
I
never had the chance to thank you for the 3 part-series of videos dealing with
the sins of the flesh against purity. Nicely done! I did not know that [these
things were] so bad. I knew the church regarded it (or at least used to) as a
sin, but I thought it was only venial.
Nowadays,
if you go to a Psychologist, he will say it´s only normal. Even many of the Protestant sects (with their
changeable morality) bought the idea that´s part of own´s
"exploration" and a way of acquiring "practice". The same
mentality that encourages people to accept and even try to embrace
homosexuality. In my youth, my parish priest (novus ordo) treated the whole
masturbation subject as venial and a chapter or live. He was also against
infant baptism (a total heretic, a protestant under a priest´s clothes). When I
told him I wanted to be a Priest he told me that first I needed to
"experience" live, go out, date, kiss... I don´t think some guy like
that will ever threaten someone with the pains of hell.
To
be frank with you, I live in a city that is as close to hell as can be (Rio de
Janeiro)… I now walk around with my rosary inside my pocket. Every time I see
something that disturbs me… I just place my hand on it and ask for strength…
It
seemed impossible at first, but it´s not so hard after someone watches Brother
Michael´s masterpiece video "Death and the Journey to Hell". That´s a
very inspiring material. The best I´ve ever seen on this topic. If you guys
want to attract people to your page, this video (along with Creation and
Miracles) is by far the best option, since even Traditionalists (FSSPX alike)
and conservative newchurchmen can feel attracted to it, without touching at
first glance on sedevacantism and the whole baptism of desire issue. This
may be one of your earliest works, but I don´t think it will ever get old. Deo
gratias that you did not follow the trend and took easy on the issue with fear
of insulting or scaring people away. After the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus lost
nearly all of his followers, and even inquired the twelve if they were planning
to run away too. But He did not care. He knew all too well that Truth is far
more important than damaged egos.
Fatima
Dear
MHFM,
The Vatican II
sect remains the Vatican II sect until it is deposed, and sadly these events
are forever violent and catastrophic as Catholic history clearly
illustrates. Since the atmosphere at the Vatican, at present, by most
reports coming out of Rome, tense, on both sides, those that side with the
present administration, and those who are plotting to overthrow them, from
several fronts-religious and political- it can logically be
computed that the third secret of Fatima, unrevealed in totality to
the world, has a date yet in the future. Moreso, the complete
message must be revealed to the world. There is no way out of this
since the Blessed Mother has commanded that it be done, and it will be done,
completely and correctly. What the Queen demands, the Queen gets!
It's not complicated. It's regal obedience. The 'etc...' after the dogma
of the faith in Portugal remains silent, and squashed, moreso, after sister
Lucia disappeared from the scene, I suppose, suffering violent, torturous
death-deliberate poisoning- as some conspiricists have
propounded- hence, replaced by phony Lucy, by and for the Vatican II
agenda. Our Lady of Fatima is the penultimate thorn of the Vatican II sect and
their worldwide plot of destructing the Catholic Church by creating a
new theology, and new Church, by the aegis of Vatican II quasi-authority
as your ministry clears elucidates by providing the true teachings of
the Roman Catholic Church; undefiled, pure, and holy as handed
down from the time of Peter. If most Catholics only realized that
throughout the life of sister Lucia those in heaven never left her side and
communicated with her when necessary. Sister Lucia was that conduit to
this evil world the Blessed Mother used, and sister Lucia administered humbly
without retardation, and assurance. Her supposed silence since the early
50's, til her supposed death a few years past, sans revelations from heaven is
inordinate in sister Lucia's unique position as seer, and revealer in this era.
For sister Lucia to remain silent all that period of time is absolutely without
precedence as long as she walked, and devoutly prayed in this evil
world. The last revealing secret of Fatima, undisclosed at this time,
begins with a loud defiance with heretic Roncalli , who we know rubbed
shoulders with those openly opposed to the Roman Catholic Church; communists,
Rosicrusians, Masons, Protestants-the minions of evil. By openly
proclaiming the Fatima seers, "...prophets of doom..."
Roncalli revealed not only his pride, but that 'something' in the
future spelled worse catastrophy than what the world had
previously went through. Roncalli was in blatant denial of
Catholic truth, and revelation-divine and private. Roncalli reviled the
Fatima message and their seers as much as the masons of Ourem. The
infiltration of the Church was complete in his eyes, and man would rule the day
from the Chair of Peter bringing good news, not of Christ, but of man,
and The Blessed Mother's message at Fatima would never see the light of day
til' the end of time-so Roncalli and his successors thought. The bad
fruit, and the root of this plague, Vatican II, is dying, and the fetid odor
emanating from Ratzinger and his disilusioned sect begs an end. Through
your revealing efforts, and those opposed to Vatican II continue, hope remains,
and Love in Christ, and His true Church prevails. God Bless
MHFM.
D
MHFM: Thanks for the interest. One point: we don't believe that the Vatican
II sect has revealed any part of the real Third Secret of Fatima.
Death
Subject: God did not make death but God is
the one who kills and makes alive
I have a question.
In the Wisdom of Solomon 1:13 it states that: "God did not make
death" however in Deuteronomy 32:39 that: "God is the one who kills
and makes alive." How do we reconcile these two apparently contradictory
views of God and death?
Thanks,
Ken
MHFM: God did not make death because God made man immortal. Death only came into existence as a result of
the sin of Adam. Since death now exists
as a result of man’s sin, God kills and makes alive.
Comment
This morning I was listening to The Laura
Ingram show. She says she's a Catholic. Today her guest Ray Arroyo said the
"Popes" move to absorb Anglicans is a triumph of Orthodoxy. Some of
the Anglicans are feeling out of sorts because their religion is being overrun
by liberals. So, the schismatics have found a new home where they can
practice their false religion. Annexing false religions to create a
conglomerate of false faith seems like push towards someone's idea of
a new world order. I wonder who's next?
Hmmm...When I googled Mr. Arroyo to get the spelling of his name his blog
popped up and he is a big EWTN supporter. The page that was brought up
discussed how the V2" Bishops" were very pro government healthcare.
To me that means pro socialism. From a Catholic standpoint I don't know how to
react to the healthcare issue. Certainly Capitalism has its issues but to
broaden the scope of Socialism always is cause for alarm especially if there is
separation of church and state. Unless I
am corrected, at first glance I would have to reject US Government Healthcare.
Matthew
MHFM: Arroyo is EWTN’s main host. He is a TOTAL apostate. He fully embraces the worst of the false
ecumenism, commenting with glee on synagogue trips, Assisi-abominations and many
others.
Huh?
Hi, i can see why you are upset with
Benedict. But i can assure you that his outward appearance of toleration is
just for show. Political correctness is in fashion now a days. Believe me,
Benedict, in his heart, is just as intolerant as you are. Look at where he came
from? He was head of the Holy Office, the very seat of the Inquisition. Rest
assured, Benedict would just as soon see every non catholic burned at the
stake. But to buy time, he is putting on sheeps clothing. thanks for your
time. your friend wayne
MHFM: You are obviously confused. When he was the head of the Vatican II sect’s
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Benedict XVI was every bit the
apostate that he is now. In our material
we cover loads of his outrageous pre-“election” heresies.
Benedict XVI (The Heresies of
Benedict XVI File) [link to section]
Baptism
Hello,
First, thanks for all the information your monastery has made available - I've
only recently converted and your site is very helpful in these first days as a
Catholic. This brings me to my question: I asked my Catholic fiance to baptize
me, which she did, and all went well except that she preferred to use
"Holy Spirit" in place of "Holy Ghost". Besides that,
everything else was identical to the form as stated on your website. Is this a
valid baptism?
Thanks for your time,
Steve Stanley
MHFM: Yes, both Holy Spirit and Holy Ghost are acceptable. We’re glad to hear about the interest.
The Way
From our video, John
Paul II preached the Gospel of the Antichrist: that every man is God.
Comment
... I grew up in the "Novus Ordo"
church. Until I discovered your web site I never knew the Traditional
Catholic Church existed. Though I knew something was wrong with the
"Novus Ordo" church, I couldn't leave "The Catholic Church"
and I didn't know why. When I first started examining your materials, I
didn't want to be taken a fool. I didn't want to be deceived.
I began the process of ensuring the quotes you provided in your books were
accurate and in context by verifying your citations. I have purchased
many of the books you have referenced in your materials and I have verified
many of the citations. I don't necessarily agree with everything you say, but most
of it, yes. There is more of the Truth of Jesus Christ in your materials
than I have ever seen before in my entire life. I have found only one
quote that was questionable, and that may have been a matter of interpretation
as the original language of the document in unknown. I thank you for your
work and your efforts. May God bless you with unfailing faith and may you
see His face in Heaven.
Receiving your material has absolutely
changed my life, though I must say I still have a long way to go... Thank you
for the valuable service you have provided.
Sincerely
James B. Patterson III
V-2 “converts”
In many of the debates regarding the
Vatican II sect, you raised the valid question "Can a Protestant convert
into a Neo-Cath without abjuring heresies like Sola Fide?"
I guess that question should be made once
again in light of the recent news. In any direction this newchurch is a simply
a joke. They either refuse converts, or, when they decide to accept mass
conversions, they do it in the wrong way and by the wrong reasons.
It seems to me all an Anglican has to do to
"become" Catholic is to be against gay marriage, gay priests and
woman priests. Those are relevant points, no doubt about that, but they are
primary disciplinary and/or moral issues, not about faith.
So the question remains: Can a displeased
Anglican "convert" to the new religion while still believing in
Anglican Theology?
PS: People nowadays have very soft skin and
easily become offended by the truth. And in a paradox, they don´t realize that
they themselves are being offensive. How could someone accuse you guys of not
being polite, when the person in question who first wrote said people
(including you) were silent on the issue. By the way: Isn´t true that you guys
once send your material to every priest and bishop in the United States of
America? If that is silence, I wonder what a scandal would be.
That being said, I believe both the content
and the tone used in your answer seemed totally adequate to me.
CK
MHFM: Yes, does anyone really believe that these “converts”
accept the defined dogma Outside the Church There is No Salvation? Of course not. Does anyone really believe that they have
become convinced that their former Anglican friends and colleagues, who don’t
accept all of Catholic dogma, are in heresy and schism? No.
They have decided to visibly join the Vatican II sect only
because they no longer felt comfortable where they were. It’s only because they no longer got the warm
fuzzy spiritual feeling – which defines their false religion – in a “Church”
that allowed women “priests” and active homosexuality. So they’ve just moved over slightly to a
group that’s a bit more in line with their personal thinking. And that’s probably only because the Vatican
II sect is also allowing them to be under an “ordinary” from among their ranks
– so that they feel as Anglican as possible – in addition to keeping their
previous “liturgical traditions” and married “priestly” lifestyle.
Near misses
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQ24Mw_r0eo&feature=player_embedded
MHFM: This first one is amazing. One can only conclude that God miraculously
intervened to keep the child unharmed.
It’s also very interesting that the child fell only an instant before
train came. If it had fallen thirty
seconds before that, it probably could have been removed from danger. It seems like a concatenation of events which
lined up to show God’s miraculous power.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BO2rW1alVv8&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNqWPswYYaA&feature=player_embedded
Book
Yesterday
I had lunch with a friend for her birthday and she gave me a copy of Brother
Michael Dimond's book about Padre Pio. I've already read it and it is the
best book I've ever read!
Dolores
Molter
MHFM: Thanks for the interest. It’s not the best book, but it has value and
we’re glad that you have benefited from it.
Not too harsh
I thought your response to Emmanuel T’s
question was right on point. It did not strike me as some kind of a harsh
attack in anyway, rather you answered the question directly, and in a way which
suggests you accepted it on face, as written, and did not attack the questioner
at all. You approached it as though Emmanuel’s question was borne of a
sincere concern along the lines of “someone ought to tell Rome, for if only
they knew” (as opposed to say sarcasm), in that I took your answer to be
patient and reassuring. For example how could he characterize you
guys (and you easily could have interpreted his question as a direct attack) as
“silent and helpless”? That assertion is patently ridiculous. Yet
you explained to him in a matter of fact way, how a Catholic should view the
situation in such a way that a real Catholic could take comfort.
What is it with people like “S”, so
numerous nowadays, who think it is rude, or some kind of a personal attack, to
say that one’s opinion is wrong, or that a particular statement is ridiculous?
I think this modern attitude is reflective
of both the “self esteem” movement and the somewhat older relativist movement
(the “truth isn’t knowable, if it is even real), and this of course comes
directly from the false and condemned notion that Religious Liberty is somehow
a “good thing”. What “S” seems to really be saying is “don’t tell me the
truth, it might hurt my feelings”.
I’m reminded of the social etiquette rule
that one should never discuss “religion and politics”. These
subjects tend to force people into head on confrontations with truth in a way
that small talk seldom does. The fact that these topics make most
uncomfortable, is evidence that most are not of goodwill. They don’t want
to know. If you tell them you are “mean spirited”, not charitable.
Charity has come to mean something else. Usually it means giving other
people’s money away to fund the result someone’s vice.
Bill Mulligan
Book
Dear MHFM,
Thank you for compiling the book about the Bible proving the Catholic
Church. It is an excellent resource for anyone seeking the true Biblical
Church.
Sincerely,
Matthew Falcon
Plan
Subject: New Vatican Plan
You see the news? 'New Vatican Plan Lets
Anglicans Convert Easier'...there's your "Heresy of the Week"
...
Benedict never disappoints you guys, does he?
PLP
Comment
… the last e-mail exchange of someone
accusing you of being too "harsh", was very troubling to me. One
of my own vices that I have been praying and working to overcome is my
"human respect" vice. I think I am being "charitable"
to people by sugar coating words - instead of being honest and revealing their
wicked ideas or speech as such - and it has nothing to do with being
charitable, but being a coward....you were accurate in calling the motivation
behind her false accusation as "human respect" and not out of
charity.
Anyway..... her comment just really
bothered me.
T
Comment
Subject: “S” regarding Emmanuel T
I'm pretty certain that the "S"
stands for "satan" in the "re:emmanuel t " writer
today---you were right on the mark… in reading in between the lines of emmanuel
t's insulting "question" (accusation)---- all I have to say to people
like "S" is: you'd better hurry up and get onto the RIGHT
side of this battle BEFORE it's all over and too late, once Mary has
totally crushed the enemy's head, and he is dead, forever…
Anne K
Sent
I don't know what to think about the state
of the soul of Captain Lou Albano! He just died recently, October 14 at
the age of 76. I knew he lost a lot of weight during the '90s after a
heart attack. As a big fan of the Super Mario Brothers Super Show, which
he played Mario in both live action and animated segments, I contacted him via
the internet and sent him some of your material. He said "Yeah, that
interesting. I don't like that they're [Rome] is cow tailing to certain
groups like the you-know-whos. I'll certainly look into it." I
certainly hope he did. I hope he did not have to answer for appearing in
that "Girls Just Wanna Have Fun" video with Cyndi Lauper, which
encouraged girls to exhibit wild behavior and turn a blind eye to their parents
request! And some people say this song became a theme song for girls
everywhere! That's truly evil. Cyndi Lauper who has a homosexual
sister is a big supporter of the evil LGBT agenda. She even wrote the
foreword to his autobiography. Too bad such a great talent doing the devil's
bidding like that! But Captain Lou had to be a conservative! I just
know he did! It doesn't seem to fit who he was as a man to be anything
but that! I pray he found the true faith before his recent death…
-Michael
Rudnicki
MHFM: We’re glad you sent him the material. A Catholic cannot consider someone among the
faithful departed unless there is evidence that he or she died as a real
Catholic.
Expose
Dear brothers michael and peter,
pls expose in your website the evils and lies of the wacky vatican 2 regarding
this news though every traditional catholics know that this union is another
abominable act but we have to condemn it publicly and unmask the deception and
lies .. claiming for "universal salvation" and going against
Salvation Dogma .. keep up the excellent apostolate for the glory of God! -
sedevacantist from the Philippines
MHFM: It will be
interesting to see what the actual “constitution” says when it comes out.
Harsh?
Subject: Rude Response
"What if someone were to go to Rome in
the Vatican and denounce them all as heretics and tell them they are going
against the Church?"
Your rude response to Emmanuel T's
interesting question was full of mistaken assumptions, and was laced with
unwarranted hostility:
Your assertion... is totally wrong.
It’s ridiculous for you to suggest...
But it’s absurd for you to imply...
[Y]our assertion reveals that you have an
incorrect outlook...
Down South, we would say, "Where's
your hometraining, boy?"
It is unfortunate for you and your readers
that your lack of graciousness is so obvious. It is more than
just immature, it looks like paranoia.
You are not helping the cause. You need to
pray more.
And cut out the caffeine! ;)
S
MHFM: No, you are completely wrong. The response was totally warranted. You’re getting lost in the shuffle of some of
his more mild language, and ignoring what he is actually asserting. He didn’t simply ask a question; he made
serious accusations. You people let
major insults to the Catholic faith or to true Catholics pass as long as they
are couched in some mild language. True
Catholics can focus and zero in on the truth when people like you cannot. Words matter.
Not surprisingly, you only quoted his question, not what he actually
asserted.
If you look carefully at what he is actually asserting, it’s
very strong. It’s a major insult to true
Catholics. In fact, it’s a direct slap
in the face to all the true Catholics who have spent much time and effort (and
even much of their lives) opposing the Vatican II sect and its apostate
antipopes. He’s basically saying: you do
nothing. You are helpless. He asserts that those who don’t go to Rome
are “remaining silent” (i.e., doing nothing and possibly denying the faith and
committing mortal sin by omission). That’s
no small accusation. But his assertion
that Catholics opposing the apostasy do nothing doesn’t matter to you because
truth doesn’t matter to you. It’s all
about appearing to be nice to people.
(We wouldn’t be surprised in the least if you are a BOD salvation-in-any-religion
apostate.)
His statement was false, uncalled for, and it deserved such a
response. Hence, your criticism of our
response reveals that you lack a Catholic understanding. You are too bogged down by human
respect. Thus, you cannot focus in on
the key points. In addition, this
individual, if we recall correctly, has demonstrated bad will numerous times in
the past.
Why?
I wanted to ask you, what you thought would
happen, if any sedevacantist were to go to Rome and try to tell everyone there
or maybe even Ratzinger, all that they have done, or ask them what are they
doing? What if someone were to go to Rome in the Vatican and denounce them all
as heretics and tell them they are going against the Church?
Why hasn't anyone attempted to do this? Or
have there actually been some people that have attempted to do something like
this, to go there and try to get them to see what they have done?
Don't you think something like this should
be done, instead of just remaining silent and living helplessly without doing
something like this?
I would really like to know your thoughts
about this.
Emmanuel T.
MHFM: To sum up your e-mail: it’s
much ado about nothing. Your assertion
that people are remaining silent is totally wrong. People are spreading the truth in every
medium: through the internet, mail, video, audio, etc. in public. It’s ridiculous for you to suggest there is
some kind of need for Catholics to travel to Rome to talk to (and
condemn) the apostates in person.
If people want to do that, we don’t have any problem with it. But it’s absurd for you to imply that it’s
some sort of obligation. That’s like
saying: you should go visit the notorious abortionist and try to reason
with him and tell him that it’s wrong to take a life. Or: you really need to have dinner with the
head of the “Church” of Satan and tell him that it’s dark and evil to worship
the Devil. They are fully aware of what
they are doing. It’s enough to condemn
the activity publicly.
You ask how they would react.
They would respond by repeating their heresies. They would respond by
saying that you don't have a “proper understanding” of Catholic teaching. They would tell you that you are not submissive
to “the Magisterium,” “the pope” and “the council” (i.e., Vatican II).
They would probably tell you about "the development of doctrine," and
say that you "misunderstand" those dogmas you are quoting.
(By the way, that sounds a lot like what the sedevacantists who deny the
salvation dogma say, doesn’t it?)
Many people have written letters to
Antipope Benedict XVI about his modernism, his heresies, and his false
ecumenism. People in Rome have seen our
material. Heretics are in control of the
buildings in Rome. That’s just the
situation. They know what they are doing
and they are modernist apostates precisely because they want to be. That’s the situation that God has allowed,
the one He predicted.
Lastly, your assertion that people
are “living helplessly” reveals that you have an incorrect outlook on
things. You are giving way too much
emphasis to externals, almost equating it with the possession and practice of
the faith. Catholics can find the truth
they need to be Catholic and save their souls.
That’s what matters. That’s
certainly not helpless. It’s just the
opposite: helpful unto salvation, for those of good will. It’s only helpless if you equate Catholicism
with being in possession of certain buildings, etc.
Comment
Each day is a continued thank you for
opening my eyes to the truth.
P
Sovereignty
Subject: MUST MUST WATCH - Actual VIDEO of
Lord Monckton Saying, "Obama Poised to Cede Sovereignty in
Copenhagen"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMe5dOgbu40
K
New Church
I just realized MHFM has a lot on u-tube
and last night i re-listened to the debate you had with wm. golle back in
06....you know when I first heard this last Feb/March 09, when I first
came upon your info online, it was one of the very first things I listened
to but I remember it not making much sense to me as I did not have enough
context or background info on the issues you cover in general. Well listening to it again last night, I
was amazed at how very clearly and succinctly you Brothers expressed and
defended all the facts in your material. But what amazed me most was that
this character golle basically spent almost all of his portion of the 3 hour
debate screeching like a woman something unintelligible about the "Roman
Clergy"---I mean it was REALLY bizarre--- then I read where it says
golle is FROM THE CAMDEN DIOCESE AND WORKS FOR THE CAMDEN DIOCESE CATHOLIC STAR
HERALD--- well--- suddenly------the whole scenario all snapped right into
focus. I mean, the hocus pocus that goes on around here with
newchurchers has got to be some of the worst planet-wide. Trying to bring
even a little light into this area can be quite a challenge.
For many years since we moved here in
97, my husband kept saying to me (about the "Catholic" church
around S. jersey) "they're trying to bring in a new
religion" but I didn't understand it, and nor really did he!, until we
stumbled across your website….
Interest
Hello Sir / Madam,
I'm a Catholic here in the Archdiocese of Cebu, Philippines; 21 years of age. I
was deeply troubled about the new mass. I really put emphasis on the Eucharist
as a climax of my Catholic life. It's so sad to hear that there's no priest or
bishop here offering traditional Catholic mass.
Is there any way that traditional mass be
reinstated here in the archdiocese or parish?
Sp
MHFM: Thanks for the interest. All the bishops of the Vatican II sect are
heretics and not Catholic. Therefore,
one should not be looking for them to reinstate Catholic things in their
“dioceses.” Before receiving traditional
sacraments, one must be convinced on all issues (no baptism of desire, no
salvation outside the Church, a rejection of the Vatican II antipopes, no NFP,
etc.). Also, one must be convinced
to never attend the invalid New Mass again.
You should look at our Where to go to Mass or confession today? for guidelines on receiving sacraments in our
time. Also, one should pray the Rosary each day, all 15 decades if
possible.
RU-486
Dear Brothers` Michael and Peter,
The `morning after` abortion pill RU486 translated into:
RU stands for `are you`.
4 stands for "for".
86 is a mafia term for killing someone, as in, "the boss said to 86
him". In the Numeric Greek Concordance, the number `86` represents
the word meaning, "HADES-THE ABODE FOR THE DEAD".
Consequently, RU486 states, " ARE YOU SENDING YOUR BABY TO THE ABODE OF
THE DEAD"?...
With best wishes,
To Tell The Truth
MHFM: Some people also think that RU-486 means “are you
antichrist?” They believe this because
they believe that the peace symbol is a broken upside-down cross representing
Antichrist. And on a clock the numbers
4, 8 and 6 would visually represent the peace symbol.
Comment
Comment: False traditionalist backs down
from sedevacantism debate
Dear Brothers Michael and Peter,
Ave Maria!
… I received my copy of the latest video
you have posted on that false traditionalist who backs down from the
sedevacantism debate. I would like to comment that I really am amazed at
how the Devil works these days. Truly I can safely say what the Lord says
in the vision of Pope Leo XIII regarding the Last Days when Lucifer boasts to
God and he could destroy the Church... that he only need time and additional
power should be granted to him on behalf of all those who render their services
to the Devil. We recall that God agreed to this that time and power
would be granted to Lucifer as Pope Leo XIII recalls…
This video only proves how powerful
Lucifer has become and he can use 'pseudo-traditionalist'
catholics .. quoting Scriptures, but his lips vomit the poisonous
venom of lies directly coming from hell to blaspheme the Holy Ghost!!! ... and
to our surprise, unlike the catholics of previous generations who would
cry HERESY and cause commotion and public disturbance, this very apostate would
in fact gain a number of followers complimenting his very
heresies and wage war against the defenders of the True Faith. This
generation is the worst and we all deserve this supreme punishment as all the
crimes of previous generations since the creation of Adam would not equal with
the crimes humanity has had ever done in our generation… We are
reminded by Revelation that in the last days, the Beast of the Apocalypse is in
the mood to wage his final war against the seed of Her who was flown into the
wilderness. The Beast is in the mood since he considers himself powerful
enough to crush the remainder (remnants) of the One, True Church of Christ ...
the Catholic Church, but of course we know the Blessed Mother will vanquish
Lucifer but since these are the last days the trials of our Faith will also
exceed all imaginable trials the Church members has ever had. That leads
us to believe literally "in the last days, deception were so profound that even
the elect would be deceived, if it were possible" (Matt 24)
Well done brothers michael and peter...
words are not enough to show my appreciation to your excellent apostolate,
though all praises and glories must be directed to God alone…
In Jesus and Mary,
Joey, a sedevacantist from the
Philippines
Comment
… re: the unqualified COWARD who RAN
AWAY from debating you: wonderful job shining a strobe light of Catholic
truth onto this most cowardly cockroach who has been vainly attempting to gnaw
away at the truths of the Church with his lying falsehoods---I have to admit,
that it's kind of fun to watch the cockroaches run, thanks again!
It's nice to watch THEM (but THIS guy is the ULTIMATE loser!) get a little
sand kicked in their eyes, now that evil modernists like him have
"had their fun" mocking the True Bride of Christ over so
many decades.
As for that absolutely ridiculous phony
appearance he so vainly dons---the pipe, sideburns---how very TRAGIC for
him!!!----maybe he is trying to hide his lack of brain cells! and how
tragic for all people who claim to "think" like him, (if you
want to be generous and call what goes in his mind "thinking"!)
It is abundantly obvious that this pseudo-intellectual--and I do mean
pseudo, meaning FAKE---- is not even remotely any kind of intellectual at
all but is instead just another vapid AIRHEAD!! I find all these
modernists are airheads, ultimately, totally lacking in the power to
REASON.
Again, great job, and THANK YOU and all of
you at MHFM for exposing this particular creep, and ALL the other noxious
pestilent creeps like him... I will pray for this heretic’s and all heretics
like him, conversion… Beautiful dusting of snow on the fall foliage in the
photo---isn't snow a blessing-- this must be the first snow of the
season. All Praise to the Sacred Heart of Jesus and thank you for
defending the true Catholic religion!
A
Video Update
Tamiflu
Good morning,
I wanted to make a comment on the flu
situation. I am a medical transcriptionist and I type progress notes and
consultations all day on children in a children’s hospital. I receive
multiple reports a day on children who became ill, went to see their primary
care doctor, and because the illness was deemed not too late for it they are
put on Tamiflu. These children do not get better with this poison.
They end up in the hospital within a week, most in the ICU. Even if the
only other underlying medical problem they have is as common as seasonal
allergies, Tamiflu causes extreme difficulties in these children. Because
the doctors keep them on the Tamiflu throughout their hospital stay, the
children acquire more complications, eventually being sent home with new
underlying medical problems like seizures and chronic respiratory difficulties
to add to their allergies. I have also noticed that the only time the
doctors even consider the problem to be the Tamiflu is because the parents make
note that the worsening began when the Tamiflu regimen was started. If
parents do not speak up, the doctors get away with it. Also beware, I had
a specific case where a child had been placed on Tamiflu by the PCP for swine
flu, without being tested. The child became worse within a few days and
was admitted to the hospital. It was there that the child was found to be
flu negative and pneumonia positive, but they continued the Tamiflu regardless.
SF
Video
Dear MHFM
Thank you for your latest video regarding
Daniels miraculous transport, sins, and further exposing the errors of
V2. I found your commentary (on the enslavement of sins) to be very
accurate. "Lust wounds people, keeps them unhappy and enslaved..the
happiness they desire will not come by sins of the flesh." I think
many people find themself today "enslaved" to their sexual addictions
to pornography and lustful thoughts and actions through the internet.
It's also very sickening to see how QUICKLY the vatican was to congratulate
Obama on receiving the Nobel prize. I wouldnt expect them to oppose it,
but it would be better to say nothing at all - rather then show support for the
most pro-abortion/pro-gay president in history. On a side note, please
consider the fact that the USCCB has a long history of financially supporting
liberal organizations such as ACORN. So all V2 "catholics" should
know that part of their hard earned money given in the collection plate is
going to support liberal/progressive, ANTI-catholic "politically
correct" organizations.
Thank you,
Ed
Interesting
MHFM: Some arrogant,
pseudo-intellectual false traditionalist, who had criticized us, recently
backed down from our challenge to debate him on the sedevacantist issue. This was after he told someone that he could
refute us and that he’d be willing to debate.
We will probably have an update about that.
Comment
Dear
Brothers, I love your little update short videos. As always
they are so informative.
I also have enjoyed all the other videos you have recently presented. I wanted to tell you that I have read
the book "The Martyrs of the Coliseum" By Fr. AJ O'Reilly… It
was written back in 1874. It was such a fascinating book, so
descriptive and detailed… I am now re-reading it and am about halfway through
again, but now I highlight certain areas so I can easily reference them. Fr.O
'Reilly used such beautiful descriptive phrases. And the way he
brought out all the miracles God worked through the martyrs-how the lions
licked their feet, protected them from the Romans, the many conversions that
took place… And I am re-reading Secret of the Rosary.
God bless you for your work.
Sincerely,
Kathryn Rubio
P.S. Don't you think it 'odd' that California suffered the rains and
floods on Oct 13 (feast of Our Lady of Fatima's miracle of the sun) and
right after Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed a crazy bill for the "GAY
Harvey Milk" day on his birthday May 22. How sick! God is
punishing California, All that was missing was the fire and brimstone! And
Cleveland won the GAY Games for 2014! We should live so long!! We so have to pray the Rosary!!
Dancing
Dear Brothers,
Thank you for the reply to the email on dancing - it's such a big
enticement to lust and vanity, not piety!
Here is a scripture that could also be applied to dancing: 1 Corinthians 7:1 -
Now concerning the thing whereof you wrote to me: It is good for a man not to
touch a woman.
I remember a history class I took which argued that dancing is to be likened to
voodoo demonic possession!!! King Louis XIV, aka. "the Sun King"
(Sun-Worship) was a dancer. That's what made dancing "high-class."
The most renowned dancers had the most debauched lives imaginable. Rudolph
Nureyev constantly had little boys in his Limousine. Valsav Nijinsky, some
argue the greatest male dancer ever, said he "danced like God"
and believed that he was God (Antichrist). He was also a homosexual and he
had a wife simultaneously - he was admitted to a mental institution.
Immorality is second nature to these types of people. Many other example could
be given. If they are not doing drugs, then they are promoting the New World
Order (homosexuality, paganism, spiritism, etc.). Don't dance with the devil!!!
… Wherever there is dancing, there will be corruption. The quote of St. John
Vianney is brilliant:
“There is not a commandment of God which
dancing does not cause men to break… Mothers may indeed say: ‘Oh, I keep an eye
on their dress; you cannot keep guard over their heart. Go, you wicked parents, go down to Hell where
the wrath of God awaits you, because of your conduct when you gave free scope
to your children; go! It will not be
long before they join you, seeing that you have shown them the way so well…
Then you will see whether your pastor was right in forbidding those Hellish
amusements.’” (Abbé Francis Trocu, The Curé D’Ars, St. Jean-Marie-Baptiste Vianney,
p. 146)
Also, freemasonry’s main means of attack is
by destroying morals.
God Bless,
Chris White
Comment
… last week one of my really good friends
took her son to the doctor because he had been sick. The doctor rushed her son
to the hospital because the doctor claimed her son had swine flu. The hospital
released him a few hours later saying that he really had scarlet fever and a
normal case of the flu and simple antibiotics would be able to take care of the
problem.
M
Pro-abortion
… As you have been pointing out for some
years, the Vatican II sect IS IN FACT pro-abortion by means of omission. In the
same way they endorse divorce by giving annulments based on the most ridiculous
and idiotic grounds. People in the new church really need to wake up and see
the facts. It´s nearly impossible for Ratzinger not to know the Ted Kennedy´s
background; How could he be unaware? It´s just not realistic. It´s not
matter of being judgmental, but simply grasping the facts, realize what´s
really happening.
That young man from youtube… I wonder what
would be his mental shield against an utter undeniable fact like this text. Did
he ever reply to your letter? I was interested in seeing the follow-up, because
he does not strike me as a person of bad will, just some victim of the great
deception that surrounds us.
In a sense, I´m actually grateful that
Ratzinger is acting like this. I hope he organizes another inter-religious
meeting like the 2 Assisi events of John Paul II. The more open he is about his
heresies and betrayal of the faith, the bigger are the chances of poor
newchurchmen and false trads realizing the truth. What really concerns me is
when he acts like he´s very conservative or even traditional. Some people are
sooooo deluded they even think he´s going to change everything back, promoting
the so-called great restoration. Since people are so blinded and desperate, I
guess all it takes is to celebrate one or two tridentine mass every once in a
while, make a few brief conservative comments from time to time and quote a
pre-vatican II pope every six months and you become a Traditional in the eyes
of the blinded.
About 2 years ago I would say we should
refrain from judging, since we don´t know if he´s under pressure, being
manipulated, not well informed or whatever. But after so many expositions of
heresy and apostasy, it becomes difficult to conceal the facts. It´s a sad
truth, but there comes a point in which there´s no use in denying it. People
like Mr. William Golle would certainly say you´re making a big stretch in
saying he´s pro-choice, but I believe the facts speak for themselves. If a
mature and well informed person does not connect the dots, he or she can only
be of bad-will, or a total coward in terms of faith.
Thank you, Bother, for making me once again
open my eyes. Your material is indeed the best available…God bless you.
CK
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.
No, there was no response. Sadly,
he is of bad will.
Where?
I found your website by accident some time
ago, and ever since I have been reading all about the Church from your site and
in other websites and things like that.
I wanted to give you thanks, because it was through your website that I
realized what is really going on, and converted from the Novus Ordo sect, but
of course God is the one Who is ultimately responsible for the conversion of
peoples, but I give you thanks anyways.
But I still had some questions, that I haven't been able to find the answer to,
and which, when I try to tell Novus Ordinarians about sedevacantism so that
they get out of that sect and convert to the true Faith, they ask them to me
all the time and I don't really know how to answer them, so I wanted to see if
you could help me with them:
… How do I answer to their objection of "where is the Church"
… Rafael DeMontis from EL SALVADOR.
MHFM: The Church exists with the remnant of traditional
Catholics which maintains the fullness of the faith and holds all Catholic
dogmas (including the salvation and baptism dogmas) without compromise. The Church is visible in those individuals,
wherever they are.
Things were so bad in the Arian
crisis that St. Gregory Nazianz felt compelled to say what the Catholic remnant
today could very well say.
St. Gregory Nazianz (380): “Where are they
who revile us for our poverty and pride themselves in their riches? They
who define the Church by numbers and scorn the little flock?” (“Against
the Arians,” The Faith of the Early
Fathers, Vol. 2, p. 33)
Distribute
Dear MHFM,
Another way which I have not tried yet, but
will when my next order comes through, is to distribute
materials at car pool parking lots. One who has access to the Internet can
type in "car pool parking lots" and get information for these lots
across his or her state. I went on line and within twenty minutes had multiple
listings within 30 miles in each direction for locations that held around 500
cars. I am looking forward to trying this method with my next supply!
I have found that if you distribute information
in crowded parking lots and try to distribute more than ten booklets or other
info that parking lot security will come and confiscate the books. I
have had much better success with the smaller amounts.
Pass this on to your supporters!
Bob Bohr
Insert
Dear
Brothers Michael and Peter,
God bless you and all the wonderful work you are doing, I do not know if you
have seen this but on the very package of the H1N1 Vaccine manufactured by
Novartis 2009 we can read this…
H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccine Insert Admits It Causes Guillain-Barre Syndrome,
Vasculitis, Paralysis, Anaphylactic Shock And Death
John Ogaz
Stumbled
Another great job referring to the new
video guys keep up the good work. I have been reading since 1991
about the endtimes and as I said in previous e-mails always had a problem
with the v-2 mass for a long time even though the priest was a very
conservative priest and had the tabernacle in the center of the church,
when I stumbled upon your
website, which was a miracle for me you finished my journey to
the truth. I thank God for you all so much.
Todd
Update
Pagans
Subject: Pagans are innocent
Hello, I was just talking to my Dad about
the Aztecs and their paganism. He mentioned that they practiced this paganism
of sun worship and this worship and that and that they only practiced it out of
innocence. In other words it is not their fault that they practiced human
sacrifice to satan (!!!), because they were ignorant of Christ. Do
you know of any bible verses that could prove that pagans become pagans
because of their sins and not out of ignorance?
Jim
MHFM: The best thing to quote for him
are the dogmas of the Church. They give
us the authoritative understanding of Scripture and Tradition. However, the answer to your question is that
Scripture makes it quite clear that pagans are in darkness and that they
worship devils. They are outside the
pale of salvation.
2 Corinthians
4:3: “And if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost,
in whom the god of this world [Satan] hath blinded the minds of unbelievers,
that the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God,
should not shine unto them.”
2 Thessalonians 1:7-8- “And to you who are
troubled, rest with us when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven, with
the angels of his power: In a flame of
fire, giving vengeance to them who know not God, and who obey not the
gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ.”
Colossians
1:12-13: “Giving thanks to God the
Father, who hath made us worthy to be partakers of the lot of the saints in
light: Who hath delivered us from the
power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of the Son of His love.”
Ephesians 2:1-2- “And you, when you were dead in your offences, and
sins, Wherein in time past you walked according to the course of this world,
according to the prince of the power of this air, of the spirit that now
worketh on the children of unbelief.”
1 Corinthians 10:20- “But the things which the heathens sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils,
and not to God. And I would not that you should be made partakers with devils.
Psalm 95:5- “For all the gods of the Gentiles are devils: but the Lord made the
heavens.”
UFO
Hello,
I listened to an internet broadcast last night and the guest mentioned Our Lady
of Fatima. He made reference to the fact that the historical descriptions
of Her apparitions point to the fact that these were actually demonic
appearances reminiscent of UFO-type sightings. I'm sure you've heard
about this. Can you please explain.
Thank you.
Loretta Ursini
MHFM: They are nothing like UFO
accounts. It's a ridiculous statement on the guest's part. Fatima
predicted and delivered an undeniable miracle.
Waltz
"SF"
mentioned the Waltz in her e-mail about dancing. Pope Leo XII condemned the
Waltz….
B.O.D.
I gotta hand it to you, Brother Michael
Dimond, for putting up and documenting all of the heresies of Benedict XVI in your section Heresies of the Week of
Benedict XVI; I've seen the file you have on his previous heresies of the week,
which is quite a long file, and whenever I start reading it, moments later I
can't keep reading anymore, because his heresies, apostasies and schisms are
just so outrageous, so completely diametrically opposed to Catholic teaching,
and just so plain sick that I just can't take it anymore because I get fired up
with holy indignation and disgust at all this heresiearch says, and so I stop
reading them. But I'll make the effort to eventually read them all.
It takes a lot of effort and, I don't know, probably "spiritual
endurance", to put up with so much heresy and apostasy and then still
comment on it and present the correct teaching of the Church. Well done, not
many can do that.
But I also had one question for you: I've pretty much read all that you have
written on the so-called "baptisms" issue (I reject them), but I
think I haven't seen this quote been used by you to disprove "baptism of desire":
Pope
Paul III,
Council
of Trent,
Sess. 6, "Decree on Justification", Ch. 5-7, 1565, ex cathedra:
"People are disposed for that justice when, by that repentance ... they
are proposing to receive baptism ... This disposition and preparation precede
[do not result in] the actual justification ... The causes of this
justification are: ... the instrumental cause, the sacrament of baptism, which is the
sacrament of faith, without which justification comes to no one. ...
Consequently, in the process of justification, ... all these are infused at the
same time: faith, hope, and charity. For faith, unless hope is added to it, and
charity too, neither unites him perfectly with Christ nor makes him a living
member of his body. ... From apostolic tradition, catechumens seek this faith from the
church before the sacrament of baptism when they ask for the faith that gives
eternal life; and this, without hope and charity, faith cannot give."
So my question is: does this passage really disprove "baptism of
desire"? I've seen this passage been used by some people and websites to
disprove "baptism of desire", but I think I haven't seen it been used
by you.
Peck C.
MHFM: The key passages in chapter 7
of the Council of Trent’s decree on Justification are cited and discussed
throughout our book: EENS. In fact, the book
contains a section on the instrumental and efficient causes of Justification
(in Section 23). It quotes and discusses
the significance of what the Council had to say on that point. The declaration that water baptism is “the
Sacrament of Faith” is also very important.
It’s discussed throughout the book, especially in reference to the “One
Church of the Faithful” (Innocent III, Section 6).
The part of the chapter concerning
catechumens, and how they “beg for the faith,” is also quoted and expanded upon
numerous times in the book. It’s quoted
in Sections 6, 16, and 21. It’s an
extremely significant passage because it shows that the only time that Trent
uses the word “catechumens,” it teaches that they do not have the faith
which gives eternal life. They “beg” for
the faith which they don’t have and which is only granted in water baptism. That shows again that no one, including
unbaptized catechumens, has the faith or can be saved without water
baptism.
Comment
Thank you,
I have received your dvds and books. After carefully readying and studying your
material I have taken my name off my partish lists for anything to do the Novos
Nordos mass and am no longer attending any Nordos Ordos mass. I am done
with them. Please direct me to the true Catholic sacraments in my
area. I believe everything you have said in your material.
Sp
Dancing
Subject: Dancing
Dear Brothers,
Thank you for your continued support of
true Catholicism. I am aware of you through my parents who have been your
supporters for quite some time. My children even copy your daily quotes
on your home page for their daily penmanship exercises. I have seen a
great deal of improvement in their behavior since school started this year
because of it.
Now, please help me. I am at a loss
of words and feelings. All my “friends” at church have their children
involved in a dancing group called Scottish Country Dancing. They believe
it is wholesome and convinced me to join my children into it. I decided
to allow my children a chance at this socialization a couple of years ago.
It had me worried from the start that they are taught to keep their eyes on
each other and they must touch hands while dancing boys with girls of all
ages. It also bothered me that some of the older young ladies were quite
developed and bouncing in the faces of the young men they were partnered with,
due to the bouncing on your toes form of the dance. I intermittently took
my young children to class until December 2008. The last class before
their Christmas break the children were introduced to a form of dancing they
had not seen yet (at least mine hadn’t; the other children have been taking
this class for multiple years). This dance required the boys to put their
hands on the girls’ waists. I was appalled. I never took them back
and even stated my position to a few of these “friends.” They seemed to
think me prude. My then 9 yr old son shot a scared look in my direction
when he had to touch a girl’s waist after his father had been teaching him not
to touch girls. My then 11 yr old daughter was also uncomfortable; I saw
her squirm when the boy touched her. Have I taught my children
incorrectly all these years in thinking this just doesn’t feel right?
Just today another mother brought this
topic up in email and was concerned for her teenage son putting his hand on the
girls’ waists during the waltz. I am not one to speak up as I have not
been blessed with the gift of eloquent and clear speaking and the fund of
knowledge to post quotes and articles on the topics. I do, however, have
a fund of knowledge of the real world, as I was raised in public schools and
went to the dances from an early age and know what happens when boys and girls
learn it is okay to touch, regardless of having been a Catholic. That
said, please correct me if I am being overprotective. I responded in this
email chain today my opinions and what can happen with “chemistry,” etc.
I am now being lashed out at with responses from the eloquent speakers who can
find and understand articles and official statements made by the Church regarding
this issue. In one particular email, the person pasted quote after quote
about how all the Doctors of the Church forbid dance and they can find that
there was no exception to be made about the SCD. But in the last
paragraph of the email, this person clearly states that after their own prayer
and contemplation that they can see no wrong in this waltz with the boys
touching the girls and that they think Jesus would approve of this waltz.
I should note that some of the 10 to 12 yr old boys in our families are
beginning to express having crushes on certain 12 and 13 yr old girls. Is
it right, then, to throw them together like dancing? Won’t it only
encourage these “crushes?” or is my way of thinking only in the public
school/protestant world?... One of our water-believer families has already
fallen victim to the niceness of one of the BOD families. I should also
mention that my children haven’t even really been accepted by the children of
the other families. I would see the girls roll their eyes when their mothers
would tell them to go play with my daughter. I would also be the last to
find out, usually at last minute, while everyone else had ample time to
prepare, about picnics and get-togethers. My family is the “baby” of this
group of families; the rest having known each other and having been in each
others’ confidence for many years before I showed up. They are very apt
to listen to each other and not to my sad little opinions and they will do what
they will. So, for my own conscience, I have some questions. Didn’t
someone tell Sister Lucy of Fatima that she should not attend the dances during
festivities? As I am the only one who holds these opinions, am I just
being prude and ridiculous and should I change my mind and allow the dancing?
Or should I keep my position and just deal with being isolated from these
families?
SF
MHFM: That’s an important
question. The answer to your question is
that they absolutely should not be
involved in any such dancing. You are
not being overprotective. Those who
defend it are deceived. They are leading
their children down the wrong path. We
think that St. John Vianney summed it up:
“There is not a commandment of God which dancing does
not cause men to break… Mothers
may indeed say: ‘Oh, I keep an eye on their dress; you cannot keep guard over
their heart. Go, you wicked parents, go down
to Hell where the wrath of God awaits you, because of your conduct when you
gave free scope to your children; go! It
will not be long before they join you, seeing that you have shown them the way
so well… Then
you will see whether your pastor was right in forbidding those Hellish
amusements.’” (Abbé Francis Trocu, The Curé D’Ars,
St. Jean-Marie-Baptiste Vianney, p. 146)
The Fatima children stopped going to
dances after they saw Our Lady of Fatima.
By the way
MHFM: Yesterday we posted some
thoughts on some more “swine flu” propaganda which surrounded the death of a
14-year-old Naperville teen. (We are
referring to our post below under “Almost nobody.”) Only a few hours after that post, an article
came out. In total confirmation of our
point, the article said that they just discovered that the girl had a serious
pre-existing heart condition:
“A 14-year-old Naperville girl with Swine Flu
had a serious heart condition that contributed to her death, authorities said
today. The girl, Michelle Fahle, died
Thursday. The DuPage County coroner said
a pathology examination revealed the
girl had an undiagnosed progressive defect in her heart that made her
vulnerable to illness.” http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/1818273,chicago-swine-flu-fahle-101009.article
Facts
Dear Brothers` Michael and Peter,
Regarding the regular seasonal flu and `swine` flu with emphasis on their
potential lethality, all one must do is look to the southern hemisphere where
the flu outbreaks had peaked in august and you will note that there were no
mass casualties. Remember their seasons are the opposite of ours.
Consequently, our flu season will peak in february, and normally occuring flu
cases will be increasing over the next 5 months. It`s as simple as that.
Dr. James J. Lapinsky,D.C.
MHFM: Yes, that coincides with the
position that it’s all hype and propaganda to get people (or force them) to
take the vaccine.
Comment
Dear MHFM,
Wonderful follow-up video on the Shroud of Turin. I have your Creation
and Miracles DVD and the, "Jesus and The Shroud of Turin" DVD from
your website (which I highly recommend). The amount of bad will and
deceptive practices today are stunning. Readily apparent we are in the
last days when you see attack after attack on Catholic faith hundreds of times
a day.
God Bless you for your works.....
Bruce
Concerns
Subject: Some concerns
Hello,
First I would like to say that the book
UFOs Demonic Activity and Elaborate Hoaxes Meant to Deceive Mankind by Bro.
Michael Dimond is very resourceful. I'm very thankful for this resource, for
the whole UFO phenomenon has been sparking questions for me. I would also like to say that I notice that
Most Holy Family Monastery is pre-Vatican II. I would like to say a few things.
And I want to be as humble as possible when I say these things because I'm only
15 and I of course would only be strinking the surface of the issues...
Jesus established his Church on the Rock,
Peter. And on him the Church would be sturdy, for the "gates of hell
shall not prevail against it [the Church]" (Matthew 16:18). Jesus promised
that the Holy Spirit would lead the Church into all truth (John 16:13);
therefore the Church really is the "pillar and foundation of the
truth" (1 Tim. 3:15). With this in
mind, Christ also prayed that Peter’s faith would not fail (Luke 22:32),
and ordered him to tend and Christ’s sheep (John 21:15-17).
This leadership and union would never pass away, or else Christ's promise that
the gates of hell could never prevail against his Church (Matt.
16:18) would collapse. Jesus would be a liar. If the Church ever taught
error, it would cease to be Christ’s Church. So if Jesus Christ really did
establish the office of pope, as evident by His words to Peter, would that
office -- the unifying factor of all Christians -- cease? Would the Rock of the
Church, the chief steward of Christ's Kingdom, ever fail?
I would like to end by these words from
Cyprian of Carthage: On him he builds
the Church, and to him he gives the command to feed the sheep [John 21:17], and
although he assigns a like power to all the apostles, yet he founded a single
chair, and he established by his own authority a source and an intrinsic reason
for that unity.
...If someone does not hold fast to this
unity of Peter, can he imagine that he still holds the faith? If he should
desert the chair of Peter upon whom the Church was built, can he still be
confident that he is in the Church?"
(The Unity of the Catholic Church 4; 1st
edition [A.D. 251]).
Please return to your Home, the One Holy
Catholic and Apostolic Church established by Jesus on Peter
With concern,
Patric
MHFM:
"Now when he [the Pope] is explicitly a heretic, he falls ipso facto
from his dignity and out of the Church..." St. Francis De Sales (17th century), Catholic Doctor of the
Church, The Catholic Controversy, pp.
305-306:
The
Catholic Teaching that a heretic cannot be a valid pope and loses the papal
office automatically [PDF file]
The popes infallibly teach that
heretics cannot be popes. By denying that teaching, you deny the teaching
of the Catholic Church and the past popes. You need to listen to our
debates and look at the material. The post-Vatican II sect and its
antipopes teach that the Papacy is meaningless.
Every scripture you cite about the office of St. Peter is denied by
Benedict XVI. He holds that the office
of St. Peter is not binding and can be rejected. That’s why he’s not the pope.
Vatican II was a heretical false
council which rejects papal teaching. It
says that those who reject the Papacy, i.e., those who reject the Pope, are in
the Church. That’s not Catholic. Your position is not a
defense of the Papacy, but a denial of it. You are defending the very
anti-papal heretics who say that Protestants are going to Heaven.
You are confused and misled.
There have been many times without a pope. There have been over 40
antipopes in Church history. It’s predicted that there will be a great
apostasy and that the Church will be reduced to a remnant. That doesn’t contradict the promises of
Christ to His Church. Recognizing a
heretic as the pope, and a heretical sect as the Church, does contradict the
promises of Christ to His Church. You
need to educate yourself about Catholic teaching by looking at the material on
our site. You need to look at the
heresies of Benedict XVI, especially those which concern the Papacy and groups
(e.g., the “Orthodox”) which deny the Papacy.
He praises them all the time. He
teaches that they don’t need conversion to the Catholic faith. He teaches that they can reject the dogma of
Papacy and go to Heaven.
Almost nobody
Subject: “almost nobody dies of the flu”
and “deaths [are] associated with flu, but not necessarily caused by flu.”
Brothers,
Here is another good article on the
propaganda behind the "swine flu" scare.
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15585
Sincerely,
Howard
MHFM: We’ve been pointing out from the beginning that “swine
flu” doesn’t exist – until the vaccine is administered. It’s just a hoax in which regular flu and
other problems are falsely attributed to “swine flu.”
This is interesting. We
just came across this article: Naperville teen who died had swine
flu. Seeing the headline, we
said to ourselves: “This clearly gives the impression that ‘swine flu’ took a
life. Let’s see if they can really prove
or confirm that she died from ‘swine flu,’ as the headline suggests?”
Well, when you read the article, you discover this (as we
expected):
“A 14-year-old
Naperville North High School student who died suddenly Thursday had swine flu,
health officials confirmed Friday. But
the DuPage County Health Department said it has not determined whether the H1N1
virus was the primary cause of freshman Michelle Fahle's death. Further testing
is in progress to "confirm a
possible underlying condition" that might have been a contributing
factor, the health department said in a statement.”
So, there are possible “underlying conditions.” That’s basically always the case when you
hear about a death which is supposedly from “swine flu.” But it gets more interesting. The article also mentioned that an autopsy
would be conducted to determine the actual cause of death. We were interested in that result. So, we looked up the autopsy results. Guess what?
They are inconclusive. They
cannot confirm what caused her death. In
fact, when you read this article, you not only see that the autopsy was unable
to determine the cause of death, but that Michelle had complained of “flu-like
symptoms” sometime before her death.
“Authorities said they are unsure what
caused Michelle's death but she had complained of flu-like symptoms in recent days, according to DuPage County
Coroner Pete Siekmann.” http://www.dailyherald.com/story/?id=327522
Why is this reference to “flu-like symptoms” significant? That’s because back in July the U.S. and
other nations stopped testing for and
confirming cases of “swine flu.”
Instead, they dishonestly and outrageously chalk up every flu-like
symptom as “swine flu.”
U.S. and other nations stopped counting for "swine
flu" in July
Even before July it was a hoax; for only certain select
individuals could “confirm” a case. But
now they don’t even go through any semblance of a “process.” They
just attribute basically anything that touches upon a symptom close to flu to
“swine flu”! So, just because this
young woman complained of some flu-like symptoms, the national media is now
giving the country the impression that “swine flu” has taken a life. This is dishonest, of course; but it
works. It effectively convinces the
masses. They cannot even say for sure
that she had “swine flu” at all, since they don’t “confirm” cases anymore. As we mentioned at the beginning, it’s all
propaganda. Every year large numbers of
people die from all kinds of things.
People die from combinations of things, from the regular seasonal flu,
etc. But the lying propaganda will now
attribute anything it can to “swine flu.”
Red Cross
Subject: Mass
Vaccinations coming soon
Hello Brothers,
I took some Red Cross classes awhile back and was put on their email list. This
is what they recently sent me. Roger is the director of disaster services at
the Red Cross here in Sonoma County, CA.
---
“The Red Cross has long worked to prevent
disasters as well as to respond to them. We are looking to partner with the Sonoma County
Department
of Public Health in their program to provide swine flu (H1N1) inoculations. The
Mendocino DPH has not asked for assistance yet, but they have been told we are
ready to help.
I have told them that with our cadre of
well-trained paid and volunteer staff we would be able to assist them with
their inoculation plans. The first day
they plan to operate 3 Dispensing centers is Oct. 24, to be followed on Nov. 14
and Dec. 5. These dates may change, so let me know if you are interested in
helping at some point, and I’ll keep you informed. Sometimes there has been too much news about
the swine flu and sometimes there has been too little. What we do know is that
it is expected to re-surge this fall. While its first appearance in the spring
produced no more deaths than you expect during an ordinary flu season, it happened on top
of flu season which means a number of deaths were doubled. We do know that the
Center for disease control is very concerned about how strongly this may come
back and to see whether not it has migrated into a worse form.
The Sonoma County Department of public
health is sponsoring a series of free clinics for the public to receive these
immunization shots. They will be processing hundreds if not thousands of people
during these opportunities. Consequently they need our assistance in many ways.
We are asking our Disaster Health Service
staff to sign up in any way they want, but preferably to help give shots. This
is a change in normal Red Cross protocol and the approve change is entirely
appropriate for the situation.
We are looking for staff who can:
register people at the intake desk
server as runners or run errands
work traffic control
guide people to the appropriate stations
assist with feeding and snacks
and other chores as needed.
We were also probably need staffing
assistance here in the office to coordinate our response. On-the-job training will be provided for all
of you who choose to assist in this. We
are not working with sick clients, rather we are working to reduce the chances
of getting sick bur working with those who are well. On the other
hand Person Protection Equipment will be provided for anyone who wants it.
This is not the Mass Care, Sheltering, Casework, Logistics, etc.
training which we have given you. It is
Red Cross work which you joined us for. It is a little different from the norm,
but we remain FLEXIBLE.
Please let me know if you are interested in
being part of this.
Rodger”
New
Video
Holy Shroud
Subject: Holy Shroud
Dear Brothers Michael and Peter:
Another attack on the Holy Shroud:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/europe/10/07/italy.turin.shroud/index.html
It seems Luigi Garlaschelli has "proven" the Shroud is a fake by
making a "copy." It's remarkable that he was funded by the
Union of Rationalist Atheists and Agnostics (as an analogy, how reliable is
research into the benefits of milk consumption when said research is funded by
a dairy corporation). As far as I can tell, I can't see that he has
proven anything except that he has a method for capturing a 3D image on
cloth. It seems to me that this is like saying "I have proven this
dollar bill is fake by making another fake dollar bill." I saw your
video on the Holy Shroud and I'm convinced that the evidence of the Shroud's
authenticity overwhelms the questionable C14 tests in the 80's. In fact,
I'm going to watch it again…
Rational Atheist - sounds like a contradiction in terms.
PC
Ohio
MHFM: Yes, thanks for the
interest. We posted a video on this very
issue around the same time you sent your e-mail.
U.S. “bishops”
Subject:
U.S. “bishops” --- what a joke!
Wow,
those fakes and phonies and jokesters calling themselves the "u.s.
catholic bishops" (hah! ha!) are at it again (today's news post)---but I
can't figure out why they have to be so COMPULSIVE and REPETITIVE in RENOUNCING
THEIR BAPTISMAL VOWS to the entire planet again, and again---I mean, you'd
think once or twice of renouncing one's baptismal vows, thoroughly and
completely and publicly, and in no uncertain terms to the whole world, would be
quite enough to make their total apostasy from the Catholic Faith
very clear..
....however,
in light of their overly compulsive behavior to keep on renouncing ALL the vows
and promises they ever made to Jesus Christ, it really does throw into
even sharper relief the reasons why God had St. Louis Marie de Montfort
develop the "Total Consecration" and "Holy Slavery to Jesus
through Mary" for these the very last days----and the increasingly
obvious stark contrast between the FAKE, versus the "True Devotion"
to the Blessed Virgin Mary de Montfort so clearly prescribed.
What
a relief it must be to those relatively few SINCERE souls who ACTUALLY DO
want to find the true Kingdom of God on Earth today, and the VERY Narrow
Gate leading to Heaven, that there are still a few REAL Catholics around
(basically, you at MHFM and some of your readers including the few and
only True Catholics still left on Earth) who can help point them the
Way!
great
job on the new video today, and it looks like your having a lovely foliage
season in upstate---looking forward to Brother Michael's new video!
Please keep us in your prayers,
AMTK
MHFM: It’s quite a heresy. What do those people who consider themselves
“conservative” or “traditional” think when they see these heresies and still
maintain that these men are Catholic bishops?
It’s amazing. We also changed the
link from a news report to the actual press release of the Vatican II apostate
“bishops”:
V-2
"bishops" assure Jews: no conversion intended
The key
heretical paragraph: “The Jewish leaders wrote to
express their concern that paragraph 7 of the Note had formally characterized
Catholic-Jewish dialogue as an invitation, either explicit or implicit, to Jews
to abandon their faith in order to embrace Christianity. The bishops responded by saying that Catholic-Jewish dialogue "has
never been and never will be used by the Catholic Church as a means of
proselytism,” nor is it "a disguised invitation to baptism.”
Comment
Great job on the new video, how anyone
with common sense could go against the information in the video is most
definitely spiritually blind!!!...
Todd
Ignorance
How
on earth can anyone ever believe in invincible ignorance. Do they think that
their ignorance will save them from Gods judgement? They use the word
invincible, as if God is powerless against their Ignorance. Your Ignorance did
not create the universe, your ignorance is not going to judge you when you die,
your ignorance did not die on the cross for the sins of the world. Only Jesus
Christ can save you and he does this through the Catholic Church.
William
Books
Dear MHFM
I just wanted to make some short
comments. I really liked the book the dimond brothers sent
me a long while ago, titled THE TRUTH ABOUT WHAT REALLY HAPPENED TO THE
CATHOLIC CHURCH AFTER VATICAN 2. I use this book as a reference to look
things up. It is the one of the best books written by you. And I also liked the live audios on your
website titled WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AFTER
VATICAN 2, where brothers michael and peter discuss for 2 hrs the topics on the
church. Also in closing the original purpose of the consecration of Russia
to the immaculate heart of Mary was to prevent WORLD WAR 2. It is too late for that now. POPE PIUS
XI was the one who should have consecrated Russia back in 1929 or the
early 1930s. POPE PIUS XII did it late in 1952. We have already had
a period of peace since then and a possible WORLD WAR 3 delayed and averted.
People who have a opposite opinion on this are just simply wrong. Keep up
the great work you do!
MARK CA
MHFM: Thank you very much for the
comments. We feel that The Truth about What Really Happened to the
Catholic Church after Vatican II is a very important book. It’s very large; but we broke it down into
sections so that it’s easy to use, read and follow. A lot of time, study and work were put into
it. It contains thousands of the most
pertinent and powerful quotes, arguments, facts, photos, etc. It’s a study-guide and manual (the only book
of its kind) for all aspects of the Vatican II sect (the heresies of each
antipope, the counter arguments, the changes to the Mass and sacraments, the
history of antipopes, the historical precedents, the scandals of the
“hierarchy” of the V-2 sect, the false traditionalist arguments, etc.). We strongly encourage people to obtain it and
read it.
Audio
Dear
Brothers Dimond. I have tried listening to your program from Jan. 2009
"Debate on Baptism of Desire with ' traditionalist' Roger. There is
an error msg. that comes up that says it cannot be opened. Do you have
this debate on a disc or is there another way I could listen to it?
Thanks very much for any help you can give….. God bless you.
SML
MHFM: It’s probably because it’s a
windows media audio. We would recommend
downloading a windows media player.
Hopefully that works.
Comment
Dear
Brothers,
I found this article quite interesting about the Shroud of Turin and how
someone "duplicated" the image. They will stop at nothing to
attempt to obliterate the faith. Pay particular attention to the second
from the bottom paragraph, which states, "Garlaschelli received funding
for his work by an Italian association of atheists and agnostics but said it
had no effect on his results". Of course not!!!
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20091005/sc_nm/us_italy_shroud
God Bless you for your works,
Bruce
MHFM: Thanks, we posted a video on
that issue.
Update
Papacy follow-up
[Follow-up to a recent e-exchange]
Vatican I says that ".....after the
resurection Jesus conferred the JURISDICTION of the highest...." , yes the
jurisdiction was conferred , not the office, which had been bestowed before. There
is a difference between the office of the papacy and the jurisdiction of that
office.
Jay
MHFM: This is a prime example of bad will. You are totally wrong. Instead of simply admitting that you weren’t
aware of that teaching, you have chosen to obstinately fight for your false
position. You do that because you are a
liar. That’s also precisely why you are
a defender of the Vatican II sect and its apostate antipopes. God doesn’t grace you with the ability to see
the truth; for He sees that you are a dishonest person at heart. For that reason, He resists, rejects and
blinds you. You obviously didn’t know
about Vatican I’s teaching on when St. Peter became the pope. It’s okay for someone to be unaware of that
teaching. But instead of correcting
yourself when confronted with it, you obstinately fight for your false
position.
You say that the office was conferred before the Crucifixion,
but not the jurisdiction. You thus
create a false dichotomy between the office of the papacy and the jurisdiction
of the office. That’s totally wrong and
in fact heretical. It’s disproven simply
because the OFFICE is nothing other than the supreme and full JURISDICTION
(authority) over the flock. That’s what
it is. So when Vatican I said that “upon Simon Peter alone Jesus after His
resurrection conferred the jurisdiction of the highest pastor and rector
over his entire fold,” it is to say that the office was conferred upon
him. That’s undeniable from Vatican
I. There is no office (of the papacy)
without supreme and full jurisdiction over the flock. Your position is schismatic, and akin to
“Orthodoxy.”
In fact, notice that in the bolded portions below, the office of
the papacy or Chief Shepherd is inseparable from – and in fact defined by – the
power of JURISDICTION OVER THE ENTIRE FLOCK.
Pope Pius IX, First Vatican Council,
Session 4, Chap. 1: “So we teach and declare that according to the testimonies of the Gospel the primacy of
jurisdiction over the entire Church of God [NOTICE THAT THE OFFICE IS
DESCRIBED AS THE PRIMACY OF JURISDICTION] was
promised and was conferred
immediately and directly upon the blessed Apostle Peter by Christ the Lord. For
the one Simon, to whom He had before said: "Thou shalt be called
Cephas" [John 1:42], after he had given forth his confession with those
words: "Thou art Christ, Son of the living God" [Matt. 16:16], the
Lord spoke with these solemn words: "Blessed art thou, Simon Bar Jona;
because flesh and blood hath not revealed it to thee, but my Father who is in
heaven. And I say to thee: That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build
my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it: and I shall give
to thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven. And whatsoever thou shalt bind upon
earth, it shall be bound also in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose upon
earth, it shall be loosed also in heaven" [Matt. 16:17 ff.]. [against
Richerius etc. (see n. 1503)]. And upon Simon Peter alone Jesus after His
resurrection conferred the jurisdiction of the highest pastor and rector over
his entire fold, saying: "Feed my lambs," "Feed my
sheep" [ John 21:15 ff.]. To this teaching of Sacred Scriptures, so
manifest as it has been always understood by the Catholic Church, are opposed
openly the vicious opinions of those who perversely deny that the form of
government in His Church was established by Christ the Lord; that to Peter
alone, before the other apostles, whether individually or all together, was
confided the true and proper primacy of jurisdiction by Christ; or, of those
who affirm that the same primacy was not immediately and directly bestowed upon
the blessed Peter himself, but upon the Church, and through this Church upon
him as the minister of the Church herself.
[Canon]. If anyone then says that the
blessed Apostle Peter was not established by the Lord Christ as the chief of
all the apostles, and the visible head of the whole militant Church, or,
that the same received great honor but did not receive from the same our
Lord Jesus Christ directly and immediately the primacy in true and proper
jurisdiction: let him be anathema.”
[HERE WE SEE THAT THE OFFICE OF “CHIEF OF ALL THE APOSTLES” IS INSEPARABLE FROM
THE PRIMACY OF TRUE AND PROPER JURISDICTION.]
And, as we said before, you are further refuted by the fact that
Matthew 16 clearly employs the future tense in order to describe how Jesus WILL
give the keys of the Kingdom to St. Peter (i.e., after the Resurrection). We’re sick of the lying and dishonesty. We’re sick of people’s obstinate refusal to
accept the truth.
For those who don’t know, this person (Jay) obstinately fights for his lie for two reasons: 1) he wants to
argue that popes can deny Christ and remain popes. He thinks this is valuable for defending the
anti-papal apostate Antipope Benedict XVI.
2) He refuses to admit that he actually doesn’t understand papal
teaching and that he was refuted.
The notion that he was refuted is particularly galling for
Jay. That’s because he wrote in as if
he’s a defender of the papacy. The
truth, however, is that he is a defender of anti-papal apostates. It thus irks him that a sedevacantist –
someone he wrongly thinks denies the papacy – knows more about the papacy and
Vatican I than he does. But it of course
makes sense that his arguments would be refuted by those who are truly
dedicated to papal teaching.
Questions
Dear Sir,
I am a Turkish christian (age 41). I was
baptized in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit at a
Protestant Church back in 2004 (my wife was baptized in 2008) After a while
after my baptizm, I grew a very deep interest in Catholicism and bagan
attending the Saint Anthony Catholic Church in Istanbul, Turkey. Again, after a
while, because of some factors beyond my control, I had to leave the Catholic
church and ended up in the Protestant Church again.
Now we are back in the Catholic church
again because we detest almost everything related with the Protestantism. We
now know very well that salvation is only in the church which Christ himself
established, which is the Catholic church.
I am a very good reader, I spend almost all my spare times and also some
of my working hours on learning more about Christianity and apologetics.
Apologetics is very important to me because I live in a country where there are
very few Turkish christians and where the available christianity is dominated
by the Protestant crowd. I am in a position of defending my faith against the
muslims and against the Prostestant who are always ready to mock at my Catholic
faith (you know how Protestant reasoning works).
Anyway, I am writing to you now because
some things are worrying me at the church and although I am a simple man, I can
easily realize that the New Mass looks and sounds like a Protestant
celebration, with all those awkward songs, guitar and drum sounds. I used to
think that because I was an old-minded man, I made a problem out of some
trivial details. But after reading almost everything in your website and in
similar websites, I have come to understand that the source of the problem is
not me… I am trying to persuade myself that all what the Church teaches is
correct but I know deep inside my heart that many issues after the Vatican II,
such as salvation outside the church, are at odds with the former teachings. I
can not blindfold my eyes to the truth.
People both in the Protestant and Catholic
churches here love to preach about lovingkindness of Jesus Christ, how He is
full of love and mercy for us etc. But no one, including priests and pastors,
is willing to talk about hell and damnation. All we know is to raise our hands,
clap them and sing halleluja. No one seems interested in the possibility of
going to hell. We tend to pick up the nice words of the Lord and omit the
warnings.
As I told you before, maybe I am an old
fashioned man, maybe I read too much and keep myself preoccupied. I really do
not know. Meanwhile, one of the most important things to me in this life is to
be able to kneel down before the tabernacle and pray to the Lord. If I can not
do that, I feel very bad all day long. I need to kneel down in front of the
Blessed Sacrament and talkto my dear Lord. But now, I really am confused
because as I understand from what I have read in your website, new order is not
so valid as I though it to be and I now keep questioning myself if the Blessed
Sacrament is fully blessed. I also
wonder if my and my wife's baptisms are valid or not.
We are now cathechumens in the Catholic
church and I wonder if you recommend us that we should keep up with this
education till our Confirmation. And one
of the things that bothers me most is that this is not even a christian country
and I am unable to find a traditional catholic church. Even it is almost
impossible to find a catholic church in smaller cities of my country, let alone
a traditional one. What am I supposed to
do ?
Thank you
May the Lord bless you all.
Hakan Ergun Ozcan
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail and the
interest. You must get out of the New Mass and become convinced that the
Vatican II sect is not the Catholic Church. Before converting or
receiving sacraments, one must be convinced to never go to the New Mass
again. One must also hold the
traditional Catholic position on all the other issues. Leaving the
Catholic Church, as you did, is never a decision “beyond one’s control.” It’s something that needs to be confessed
once one converts. You should not follow
through with the New Mass/Vatican II church until Confirmation. Confirmation is not valid in the
Vatican II sect anyway. One needs to get out of there
immediately. These files answer your
questions about baptism and converting to the traditional Catholic faith.
Where to go to Mass or confession today?
New Video
Learned
Dear MHFM,
Thanks to you I have learned the "TRUE" Catholic faith over the last 1.5
years of listening, reading and studying not only your site, but the bible, the
teaching of the Papal office, your videos and audio/radio programs, your books,
as well as Catholic Dogma. I had been in the Novus Ordo since birth and
thank God every day for his guiding me to you site to explain the true Catholic
faith.
Bruce
Reading
We
have been reading and following your information for some time. It has changed
our spiritual life.
Tom
Comment
"Kblur" of "try it" e-exchange
strikes me as an extremely malevolent child of wrath... I hope all those people
who were not able to see Mr. Benny Hinn in England, who had some
unlooked-for time on their hands, surfed the web, found YOUR website,
learned the truth about Fatima, what happened to the Catholic Church during
this Great Apostasy, made the Profession of the Catholic Faith for
converts on your site, and started praying at least all 3 decades of Our Lady's
Most Holy Rosary every single day, and went to confession… It would be a great
opportunity to reverse the evils begun in that country there under
"King" Henry VIII, and ever since with the evils of
"protestantism" around the world…
thanks again for all your work at MHFM,
Sincerely,
K
Deceived
Subject: Kblur
The problem with this guy is he has been
deceived by the likes of the waco incident and types like this etc.
He doesn't understand that this time given to the devil is about 100 years
from 1917 to about 2017 but what he isn't seeing is the signs of the times
as Jesus tells us: how is it when you see the clouds coming you know
a storm is approaching but you don't see the signs of the times. You guys
are right he is chasing the fussy warm feeling of the vatican
ll debacle!!! Keep up the good work!
Todd
Banner
… this article… explains the happiness of
the anti-Christ ADL Jews after a highschool forbade the football team from
displaying Christian banners.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5g2ayvPp1qelo6trD8RZ6pfw7xSjwD9B3B5DO1
No doubt Abe Foxman and the Talmudists at ADL were behind this…
O
Book
Dear Brothers,
I have in the past heard about Santa
Margarita Maria Alacoque of the Sacred heart of Jesus but was not familiar with
this devotion at all, I had never seen books on it on sale in the said
“Catholic Book Shops” out here.
One day I went to a second hand book bazaar
and while looking through hips of books to find an old Bible, instead, after an
exhausting effort and just about to give up I suddenly put my hand on an 1928
edition book on Margarita Maria Alacoque whose author is R.P. Matéo
Grawley-Boevey apparently known world wide as Father Matéo. The
providential missionary at the time became very ill and was about to end his apostolic
mission, his superiors were forced to send him to Europe to recuperate.
On his way, by accident he stopped at
Paray-le-Monial . He kneeled in the chapel of the apparitions and prayed,
shortly thereafter, he felt a strange disturbance, he was cured. He did not
know what had happened, it is believed that he was pierced by an acute arrow of
Love. In the afternoon during the Holy Hour, the Sacred Heart of Jesus
inspired him to conquer the world with this vigil, family after family by
introducing it in every home. He was authorized by Pope Pius X to work in
this new mission.
Apart from the Holy Scriptures this is one
of the most beautiful and spiritually touching book that I ever read. It
consists of l2 vigil exercises for the first Friday of the month, between 11.00
pm and 12.00 pm Thursday/Friday where our Divine Lord, King of Love talks and
opens his Sacred Heart to the true faithful who await on Him, requesting
reparation for the sinful world, His enemies, the enemies of His Church and
especially for His once privileged friends who have abandoned Him in the
tabernacles. In turn, the faithful during that holy hour ask forgiveness, and
in this colloquium with Jesus the souls who are present console the Divine
Master. There are a further seven exercises for various other important
circumstances of the year in which includes our Blessed Mother.
It is written in the book = “Certainly,
holy Margarita Maria´s assiduous and fervour of her zeal won many souls for
this pious vigil to the Sacred Heart. Jesus said= "Advise and let the
whole world know that I will not put limits to my graces when these are
requested on behalf of my Sacred Heart”. But let us not lose sight of the final
objective which our Lord aims in the worship of His divine Heart, that is the
triumph of this Holy Heart, His Kingdom of Love in the world.
Within many religious institutions who were
dedicated to the cult of the Divine Heart these exercises were esteemed with
great veneration and approved in 1829 by Pius VIII, In 1834 S.S. Gregory XVI,
in 1886 by Pope Leo XIII and in 1911 S. S. Pius X.” This book touched me even to tears and I keep
on wondering, to whom did this little book belong, possibly to some very holy
priest or layman. Imagine, that such a treasure was thrown out and abandoned.
Dear Brothers, do you know anything about this book and if it can still be
found for sale, perhaps in USA. I would like to obtain more copies. Keep up the
good work
M. Fernanda da Silva
Demonic
For the past 2.5 years, I have
been subject to demonic oppression. While I have been prayed over, I have been
denied the formal rite of exorcism. I am willing to discuss this in detail
should you avail yourself of the possibility of this rite for a Catholic
struggling from the need for relief from this problem.
R
MHFM: The first thing you need to do
is get out of mortal sin and start to pray the full rosary each day. You
need to accept and embrace all the tenets of the traditional Catholic faith and
then make a good confession. Our steps
to convert and for those leaving the Novus Ordo has more on that point.
That should solve your problem. If it doesn't, get back to us. But that’s usually the problem with people:
they are in heresy or mortal sin.
Try it!
Subject: Try it!
Man you guys really need to get with the
FSSP! I can't tell you how the graces have flowed to me by just attending the
latin mass in accordance with Rome at the FSSP centers! So beautiful!
Benedict XVI is going to turn out to be one of the best popes the church has
ever had, wouldn't agree? Man has definetly got the faith!
You know if you two started listening to the church and the pope, and you
stopped looking at the skies for an apparition to fly by and drop you an
apocalyptic message so you could plan out an end-of-the-world scenario, then
you might be at peace, like Your Saviour would have wanted!!
When will you all wake up and realize that Fatima was the biggest hoax of the
20th century? I'm sorry but it's true! You can't drag that silliness on for
another hundred years!
All this time of your lives WASTED by preaching about an end that never comes?
How long are you two going to keep fooling yourselves? Doesn't it get old when
nothing ever happens? YOU'VE BEEN CONNED! Everyday you take worldly events and
try and apply them to Revelation? You guys are no different than them silly
protestants! But, hold on here a minute, maybe you guys are protestants? You
ain't with Rome? You preach against Rome! That makes you protestants!
Kblur
MHFM: You are so deceived.
All you care about are externals, some Latin, some incense, and
Gregorian chant. You don’t care one bit
about Our Lord Jesus Christ or His truth.
Catholic dogma… you don’t believe any of it. You only care about the sentimentality that
makes you feel good – an ephemeral feeling of spirituality without any real
belief in Christ. That’s precisely why
God allows you to be totally deceived.
That’s why he blinds you and allows you to think that you are a
Catholic, when in fact you are nothing more than an apostate.
You say that Benedict XVI has the faith… what planet are you
on? Look at the evidence, you
heretic. Oh, we forgot, you are of bad
will, so you have ignored the evidence.
Benedict
XVI (The Heresies of Benedict XVI File) [link
to section]
He denies all aspects of the Catholic faith. He denies the Papacy; he denies the necessity
of Christ; he teaches that false religions are good; he teaches that
Protestants and schismatics don’t need conversion; and on and on. If we recall correctly, aren’t you the same
person who said: sedevacantism = satanism?
Among your lies, you say that we apply worldly events to
Revelation every day. No, we don’t do
that. Since you have no regard for the
truth, it does not surprise us that you utter such a falsehood. We do believe that we are in the last days,
as anyone with eyes to see can recognize. Waiting for something to happen? No, but if you weren’t a completely blind
apostate you might recognize that the Counter Church has already been
constructed and it has been around now for a generation. But a person such as yourself, who thinks
that a man who praises Islam “has definitely got the faith,” of course wouldn’t
recognize it.
It also doesn’t surprise us that you reject Fatima. You think darkness is light and light is
darkness. You think heresy is
(definitely) faith and faith is heresy.
For that reason, it makes sense that you would consider such a clear
message from Heaven to be from Hell.
Fatima was confirmed by an undeniable miracle. It carries with it such an overwhelmingly
supernatural, spiritual and prayerful message.
The Catholic conversions, the good fruits and the devotion to the Rosary
which emanate from the study and application of its message are
undeniable. The true goodness and power
of its message – a message that doesn’t conflict with Church teaching at all –
are palpable to those with a true Catholic sense. They are immediately apparent to those love
the light, but not to the children of bad will and the children of pride.
Speaking of Protestantism, the apostate Benedict XVI says that
Protestantism isn’t even heresy. That’s
why he’s a Protestant and so are you.
Benedict XVI, The
Meaning of Christian Brotherhood, pp. 87-88: “The
difficulty in the way of giving an answer is a profound one. Ultimately it is due to the fact that there is no appropriate category in
Catholic thought for the phenomenon of Protestantism today (one
could say the same of the relationship to the separated churches of the
East). It is obvious that the old category of ‘heresy’ is no longer of any
value. Heresy, for Scripture and the early Church, includes the idea of a
personal decision against the unity of the Church, and heresy’s characteristic
is pertinacia, the obstinacy of him
who persists in his own private way.
This, however, cannot be regarded as an appropriate description of the
spiritual situation of the Protestant Christian. In the course of a now
centuries-old history, Protestantism has
made an important contribution to the realization of Christian faith,
fulfilling a positive function in the development of the Christian message
and, above all, often giving rise to a sincere and profound faith in the individual non-Catholic Christian,
whose separation from the Catholic affirmation has nothing to do with the pertinacia characteristic of heresy. Perhaps we may here invert a saying of
Protestantism
is the rejection of many dogmas of
the Catholic Faith. Protestantism is not
only heresy, but the most notorious collection of heresies with which the
Church ever had to contend.
Pope Pius XI, Rerum omnium perturbationem (# 4), Jan.
26, 1923: “… the heresies begotten by
the [Protestant] Reformation. It is
in these heresies that we discover the beginnings of that apostasy of
mankind from the Church, the sad and disastrous effects of which are
deplored, even to the present hour, by every fair mind.”
Finally, in addition to being heretics who accept Vatican II and
salvation outside the Church, the FSSP “priests” are ordained by “bishops” who
are made “bishops” in Paul VI’s new rite of ordination. That new rite cannot be considered
valid. See our file for the information
on that issue.
The
New Rite of Consecration of Bishops [PDF file]
This article explains
the changes that Paul VI made to the rite of consecrating bishops after Vatican
II.
Why the New Rite of Ordination is
Invalid [PDF
File]
This article explains
why the New Rite of Ordination – which was instituted by Paul VI on June 18,
1968 after Vatican II – is not valid.
Obelisk
Hi Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,
I am currently refuting protestant
commentators…. non- catholic commentators have raised the issue of the obelisk in St. Peters
Square, is proof that the Catholic Church has pagan roots.....
My question is "What were the
reasons for the popes at that time placing it in St. Peters Square? My
theory ?... is that it is a constant reminder to the world that it is
a battle between Christ and Satan, and hence the Cross and
inscription attached, by the popes of the time ...
Your comments appreciated..thanks
God bless,
David
MHFM: Just so our readers know, we have pointed out in the past
that there is a cross on top of the obelisk in St. Peter’s Square. It signifies the Church’s victory over
paganism, etc.
To your question, we believe that there are two probable
reasons. First, it is a fact that the
popes kept items, artifacts, monuments, statues, etc. from the ancient and
pagan world which were deemed to be of major historical significance. We have some other quotes on this point. It seems that they didn’t want to destroy all
of them because they considered them to be historically important. In the same way, they probably deemed that
monument to one of unique historical significance. That could be one reason for moving it into
the Square and placing a cross on top of it.
But additionally and probably more importantly, in the Book of
Daniel we read about the prophecy of the past kingdoms of the world being
destroyed and superseded by the kingdom of Christ.
Daniel
2:44- “But in the days of those kingdoms the God of heaven will set up a
kingdom that shall never be destroyed, and his kingdom shall not be
delivered up to another people, and it shall break in pieces, and shall
consume all these kingdoms, and itself shall stand for ever.”
In Daniel, we are clearly given a picture (and a prophecy) of
the various strong and powerful kingdoms of the earth being broken and
destroyed one by one; and then finally they are all replaced eternally by the
Kingdom of Christ, with His coming and the establishment of His Church. This kingdom shall not be destroyed. The obelisk is essentially an emblem of the
pagan world and the faded glory of its past kingdoms. Therefore, placing the Cross on top of it
signifies the Kingdom of Christ’s eternal victory over the transitory kingdoms
of man, in fulfillment of the prophecy of Daniel.
Disgusted
Dear Brothers in Christ,
One of the readers, Kit White, excellently
pointed out the supernatural stupidity and malevolence of both, the
protestant host and Monsignor, we could hear and watch in the video found by
the reader RDS. The statement of the
protestant host:"It's [baptism] not essential, but Christ has commanded it
to His believers..." in most direct way says that our Lord commanded
nonessential things. For a true believer in Jesus Christ there are absolutely
no nonessential commands issued by Him. So, these two brothers in stupidity,
protestant and "catholic", are saying they know better than God what
is essential for salvation and what is not. Is there a better illustration of
the words:"Advise not with fools, for they cannot love but such things as
please them" (Ecclesiasticus 8:20)
The way our Lord said:"Amen, amen I
say to thee, unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot
enter into the kingdom of God" leaves us not even a
smallest doubt about uttermost essentiality of water baptism. If the
stupidity of the mentioned "christian brothers" would be only natural
one, they could comprehend the clarity and importance of Jesus' words. Even a
naturally stupid atheist could see that, although (s)he does not believe in
Jesus.
I am disgusted with innumerable "catholics", in particular with false
traditionalists and sedevacantists, who are very busy with inventing the most
absurd and stupid apologies for their apostasy.
St. Joseph pray for us.
Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia
Encouraged
Subject: Faith in Nigeria
Dear Brothers,
I really get encouraged and
strengthened when ever i read the E-Exchanges. I was also happy over the way people told us
how they spread the materials .To be honest, here in my country, Nigeria, the
bad willed is just so much. People are not just interested the way they ought
to be. Here, they are highly interested in pursuing money that they don’t want
anything that would disturb their peace of mind. i.e., they don’t want anything
that would reduce the zeal at which they would go after this money. I read how
young people of 19, those in their 20s and most of all young ladies of such
ages getting interested in things of the faith but over here, it’s always
about going out with friends and enjoying themselves and for the young ladies,
marriage often seem to be their topmost priority while most elderly women
always think of what their husbands would say or do.
People in this part of the world just argue
and argue baselessly. We will continue
to try our best in our own little way in spreading the true faith even though
very few people are listening to us while we beg our brothers and sisters
in the faith to continue to pray for us for the grace of final perseverance and
conversion for others in this country of ours.
Thanks.
T.K
Salvation
Subject: No salvation vs. some salvation
Dear MHFM
Not all of the Catholic popes taught that
there is no salvation outside of the Catholic Church. Some of them taught
that there is ABSOLUTELY no salvation outside of the Catholic Church.
What part of NO and ABSOLUTELY don't they understand? If there was any
salvation at all outside of the Catholic Church, the correct wording would be,
"Outside of the Catholic Church there is SOME salvation. Yet they
insist that the No and Absolutely are "too rigorous" or "too
literal." Nobody could be that dumb, but there they are, or they
pretend to be in order not to be blamed for their cherished sins.
No human being with a lick of sense is that dumb without a good sinful reason.
Then there's the Vatican II issue of
passing judgment when the heretics stand there, lies flowing out of their
mouths in streams; lies published in their newspapers, books, articles and
encyclicals; Christ being rejected every waking moment, and to call them
heretics who will not be saved is "passing judgment." It has
nothing to do with passing judgment; it has to do with stating the obvious
facts and quoting Christ and His apostolic successors of nearly 2,000
years.
PM
Monsignor
Subject: Monsignor Debate
Dear Brothers,
That “Debate with Monsignor” video is
astounding. I watched it a second time to see how he tried to conceal the lies.
He’s like a serial killer just coldly going through the details of his latest
kill! Even the Protestants could see that he was so far gone as to be
laughable. Like you wrote, the Sedevacantist apostates and their heretical
priests believe the same thing, only they wouldn't admit it quite so
directly. I think the quote of the day summed up his apostate attitude
well, that the “Roman Catholic Church today” teaches that baptism is not
necessary for salvation:
Pope St. Pius X (1907), Against Modernist
Worship: “The chief stimulus in the domain of worship consists in the need of
adapting it [worship] to the uses and customs of peoples.” (Pascendi # 26)
An interesting point was when the host was
going through the list of reasons why they believe the Monsignor is correct.
The tenth point states, “Baptismal Regeneration makes salvation depend on
WATER.” The host, while pointing to the sentence says, “You know, if you’re
gonna be saved by baptism, you gotta have water, if you don’t have water then
you’re out of luck.” In typical protestant style he has listed huge chunks of scriptural
quotes for some of the other irrelevant points, but on this one, which is the
most blatant rejection of the truth, he has very conveniently
forgotten to have any scriptural basis for their heresy. Also, he says they
would be "out of luck," as though God's Providence is determined by
chance…
If the BOD apostates believe that
water baptism is impossible for all who are of good will, then they might as
well say that, “All things happen from absolute necessity. – Condemned,”
(Council of Constance, Errors of John Wycliffe, No. 27, Denz. 607) since
neither God nor men would act out of charity.
If they believe that it is impossible for
God (Matt. 19:26) to provide a baptizer and some water in all cases for a
person who is predestined, then they would probably also believe “That God
neither ought nor is able to prevent evil. - Condemned.” (Council of Sens,
Errors of Peter Abelard, No. 8, Denz. 375)
Later the host states, “I sure didn’t get
baptized to get saved. I got baptized out of obedience to Christ’s command.” In
other words, he’s saying that one need not be obedient to Christ’s commands for
salvation!
Another quote of the host speaking about
Monsignor, “he did say baptism is important, but it wasn’t essential, so why
even have it and that’s a good question if it’s not ah, if it’s not such a big
thing...” I’ve noticed that Protestants seem to enjoy asking questions
that they don’t or can’t answer. I suppose they’re too busy protesting
against Christ, like bleating goats, to care about the truth!
Further, “It’s [baptism] not essential, but
Christ has commanded it to His believers, as something that they should do, so
we need to perf...do it, because Christ has commanded it but it certainly isn’t
gonna get you saved as we’ve already stated.” So Noah going through the flood
and the Israelites walking through the Red Sea, which are types of baptism,
didn’t save them?!...
Finally, the horrible comment of the
Monsignor was when he was questioned on Islam and Pagan religions. “Q. Pagan
worshippers also who worship idols and stuff like that that haven’t heard about
Christ, they would go to Heaven? M.
(nodding affirmatively) That are living in good faith. Q. To their idols? M.
(pause) to whatever.”
How sad and outrageous. Thanks RDS for finding that.
God Bless Brothers,
Kit White
Baptism of Water
Subject:
Baptism of Water
Dear
Brother.
I
send you this youtube about the apparition of Our Lady of Coromoto
Patroness of Venezuela. In 1652 the indian "Cacique" named
Coromoto saw a moost beatiful Lady who gave him a message:
"Go to white men"s house and ask for water upon your head. SO YOU CAN
go to heaven" In spanish: "Vayan a la casa del hombre blanco y pidan
que les eche agua por la cabeza PARA QUE PUEDAN ir al cielo".
When I saw the youtube below I remembered your teaching about
Baptism of water. With greetings
ANTONIO
www.youtube.com/watch?v=mL3uKZdu0wM
Video
Subject: Video
Brothers, your new video on Martin Luther
and the denominations is a very powerful message to those that remain in the
true faith, and those who have either defected from, nor never knew the true
faith. A shame that countless followers of these sects do not have the
love of truth and continue to follow merely on outward appearances and enjoy
the eternal poison offered by Satan.
God Bless you and your work,
Tom Miles
Papacy
Subject: Papacy
I'm looking at your email section about St.
Peter. How can you say that He(Peter) wasn't pope at the time he denied Our Lord?
He was pope since Jesus built the church on him in, as related in the
gospels. Immediately after being made
pope he was called "satan", yet, he didn't become an antipope! He was
simply wrong and was corrected by Jesus.
Also the Catholic church does not start a new religion, it is the New
covenant of the old religion. God only has one religion: from the Garden of
Eden till the end of the world.
Jay
MHFM: No, you are quite wrong.
The First Vatican Council defined that Jesus made St. Peter the pope AFTER
His Resurrection, by the words in John 21:15-17: “Feed my lambs, etc.” He was not the pope before the
Resurrection. Jesus’ words in Matthew
16:18-20 promise St. Peter that He WILL (future) build His Church upon
him. They promise that He WILL (future)
give St. Peter the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven. That’s why St. Jerome’s Latin Vulgate uses
the future: aedificabo (I will build)
and dabo (I will give). Jesus did that after His Resurrection.
Pope Pius IX, Vatican Council I,
Session 4, Chap. 1: “And I say to thee: That thou art Peter, and upon this rock
I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it: and
I shall give to thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven. And whatsoever thou
shalt bind upon earth, it shall be bound also in heaven: and whatsoever thou
shalt loose upon earth, it shall be loosed also in heaven" [Matt. 16:17
ff.]. And upon Simon Peter alone Jesus after
His resurrection conferred the jurisdiction of the highest pastor and
rector over his entire fold, saying: "Feed my lambs," "Feed
my sheep" [ John 21:15 ff.].” (Denz. 1822)
Monsignor shocks
Dear
MHFM:
I came across this youtube video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2Pd6BqCSWE
of
Monsignor Jordan giving "catholic" answers on water baptism and
salvation outside the church to protestant questioners. The questioners can
hardly believe their ears, but have been told that the monsignor's views
represent Rome and his diocese. Most shocking of all, is there anything that
this wolf in sheep's clothing is saying openly that most "traditional
catholics" aren't also saying just under the surface?
I've decided to leave copies of your pamphlet Outside the Catholic Church there
is Absolutely No Salvation at places where protestants meet (without actually
going into their churches) so that any who may be honest and of good faith can
read what the Church really teaches and be converted.
-RDS
MHFM: That’s very interesting.
It’s exactly how the crowd of “baptism of desire” apostates in our day –
many of whom consider themselves to be “traditional Catholics” – would
answer. All of you sedevacantists who
love “baptism of desire” should watch that clip. Basically the same answers would come from
any of your heretical priests who deny the salvation and baptism dogmas.
Comment
Hi,
I loved the items I received in the
shipment. You do fantastic work.
Mary Ann Benedetto
Thoughts
Dear Brothers,
It is interesting considering Benedict XVI
and his experience with the spider to read two brief reflections in the O.T.
and see analogies.
Job 8:13-14 - "So is the end of
everyone who forgets God, and so shall the hope of the godless man
perish. His confidence is but a gossamer thread and his trust is a
spider's web."
Isaias 59:5-6 - "They hatch adders'
eggs, and weave spider's webs: whoever eats their eggs will die, if one of them
is pressed, it will hatch as a viper; their webs cannot serve as clothing, nor
can they cover themselves with their works."
"Their works are evil works, and deeds
of violence come from their hands."
Perhaps the spider was attempting to
whisper some truth into Benny's ear, but deterred, it moved away, but remained
in the palace after Benny's departure.
Donald Livingston
Luther
Dear Brothers,
Excellent videos on the shocking heretic
Martin Luther. Thank you. The pictures of the various sects and their heretical
patriarchs makes it very interesting too.
God Bless,
Kit White
Martin Luther, the Devil and Denominations
Gave
My neighbor had fallen away from the faith,
but I gave her a Padre Pio book and now she's praying the Rosary and wearing
the Brown Scapular again. And so is her mother! Please send me 50 more
books.
Jim Davis
Found
By surfing
the internet watching vids about Eucharistic miracles on youtube I found your
website. Thanks for all the
information. I`m a seminarian from The
Netherlands.
Over here we can celebrate the real Mass 3 times a week now (thank God)
God bless.
Keep the faith
In Cristo
Sven Volkers
MHFM: Thanks for the
interest. However, the seminary probably accepts baptism of desire
and salvation outside the Church. Therefore, one should not be part of
it.
Sacred Tradition
Subject: Sacred Tradition
Dear MHFM,
What is simply mindboggling is that
tradition, inspired by the Holy Ghost, gave us pope after holy pope, succession
after succession who warned us of the false christians entering the church
hierarchy with the intent to destroy Holy Mother Church from within, and how
obvious these wretched beings are now camped hungrily in the form of US bishops
spewing their wretched ecumenism of destruction in this country, and the
Modernist wolves in Rome scribing false documents engaging them, and the sheep
bow to this nonsense. One only has to read the exploits of, let's say,
Holy Pope Gregory VII, radical pontiff 11th century, to ingest the truth of how
to protect Holy Mother Church from infiltrators, then Jews, today, again the
Jews, pagans, masons, and since the onset of Vatican II,
Roncalli, Montini, Wojtyla, and German crony nationalist/globalist
Ratzinger to clearly see the apostasy trailing behind their
hideous tails the halls of Vatican City. Like in the past these contemporary
tyrants will fall. St. Michael, ora pro nobis! May Jesus guide you
in wisdom and action, and the Blessed Mother protect you with her supernatural
graces!
Reminded
Brothers,
The post about the "catholic"
newspaper reminded me of a recent advert posted by my local V2 parish. It was
for a catholic singles group that catered for "single, widowed, separated
and divorced catholics" I was brought up to believe that the latter two
groups were not single, just like my own mother who was divorced (not her
choice) who considered herself married and not free to marry or date anyone -
and never did.
While growing up my family laughed at how
the protestants changed the rules to enable them to get what they
wanted divorce , remarriage in church etc- it seems that V2 church are now
free to do the same.
Jim
Comment
Dear Brothers in Christ,
I would like to make a comment on some
opinions held by radical schismatic false traditionalists. The typical example
of such opinions is to take some erroneous statements made by a true pope and
say:"You see, this individual is a heretic and therefore he was not a true
pope and therefore every claimant to the See of Peter after this false pope was
also a false pope." Well, if this kind of "logic" would be
valid, then there is no way to avoid the conclusion that there wasn't any true
pope in the history at all, since the apostle Peter DID made a
"heresy" by deed. What this radical schismatic "traditionalists"
are doing is nothing else but calling our Lord Jesus Christ a liar, for they
are saying that The Catholic Church never existed. In that way they are
fittingly joined to modern day antipopes, and their adherents, false Catholics,
for those antipopes also denied the existence of The Catholic Church---for the
last 40+ years they were searching for the "unity of the church"
as if The Church is/was not One True Church from the very beginning.
The evilness of modern day antipopes--the ones followed after the last true
pope Pius XII--is unprecedented in the history of mankind and The Catholic
Church. Who does not see a clear-cut difference between weak, or even bad but
true popes, like Pius XII, and those satanic antipopes in the last 50+ years,
is utterly blind and of
utterly bad will. I'm not sure if it is
possible to find the dogma of The Church they, those antipopes, didn't deny.
Even to try to compare those antipopes to the worst but
true pope constitute dishonesty at the least and a mortal sin to the worst.
Thank you for your holy efforts, brothers Dimond. I always pray to our Most
Holy Mother and St. Joseph to support you and lead your thoughts and deeds
"ad maiorem Dei gloriam".
V
MHFM: Thank you for the e-mail.
We agree with your comments, except for one thing. St. Peter's denial of
Christ occurred before He became pope. The scandalous action in Galatians
2:11, which is also frequently attributed to him, was almost certainly not him,
as we've mentioned. The problem with these
radical schismatics is that they don’t have any Catholic sense or a real
dedication to the Catholic Church. They
have come across certain true principles (mostly from our material) but,
lacking an interior dedication to the Church which begets this Catholic sense,
they frequently misapply these principles and consequently fall into disastrous
errors. God allows them to stumble into
schism because they don’t study and pursue the Catholic faith in humility and
with a purity of intention. They think
that it’s no big deal to denounce a true pope as an antipope; whereas a
Catholic realizes that to do that requires clear and overwhelming proof. That’s why those same individuals usually
reject the canonizations of the Church.
They aren’t Catholic.
Another on Pius XII
MHFM: Another person wrote in complaining about the
Pius XII issue. The e-mail and our
response are in this file:
Relics
Dear Brothers,
Thanks so much for the excellent piece on
"father" Corapi. He fools many. Also great thanks for keeping up the
traditional Catholic calendar. I print it and hang it at work and home and give
copies away. I do, however, have a specific question I'd like an opinion on.
Can one go to a NO "church" to venerate a Saint's relics as long as
they don't attend mass or leave money in the donation box?... Thanks again for
all the hard work. May Our Lady guide and guard you always.
Christina
MHFM: One should avoid doing that.
Opened
Brother Michael and Peter, greetings...
I opened my local "Catholic"
paper today to see what kind of junk I could find. Well I see this small section headlined,
Courage, Encourage and Same-Sex Attraction.
It's a "Catholic" support group…
I didn't have a ton of time to spend on it but reading a letter from Father
Paul Check it’s a mental issue and never any mention of grave sin. Also, he
figures St. Paul may have been struggling with this when talking about the
thorn in his side. Unbelievable! The site is huge. It must have a lot of
customers. Sad.
Matthew Macheca
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. That’s really bad.
Contradiction
Subject: Holy Catholic Church
Most Holy Family Monastery
First off thank you for all the great work, I can't say it enough. I wanted to
comment on all the attacks you get from people in the Novus Ordo church. While
they profess to believe in universal salvation they clearly point out that you
are dangerous and you’re going to burn in hell for rejecting Vatican II but in
the same breath they treat other false churches that contradict every action of
catholic teaching and not only that reject the Blessed Mother as capable of
still having hope of salvation. It’s wonderful to be so blessed to see the
devil scrambling in panic, having his false church unveil itself with clear
contradiction and having souls he would almost consume question their faith again
when they say, only you who reject Vatican II will not be saved.
Keep up the good work it’s making a difference!!!
James
JD
Agreement
on Justification Marks 10 Years
http://www.zenit.org/article-26948?l=english
''...The declaration was the fruit of some 35 years of Lutheran-Catholic
dialogue since the issue of justification was one of the first points of controversy
raised by Martin Luther.... The president of the Vatican's council for
promoting Christian unity, Cardinal Walter Kasper, has expressed the hope that
the declaration will lead to more prayer in common. "May it encourage
us," he said, "to continue our theological dialogue, and building on
our common foundations, may it lead to an increase in joint witness to
the Gospel of Jesus Christ."
MHFM: Yes… more proof that their sect
accepts it.
Comment
Another way to share Most Holy Family
Monastery materials is to leave them in the newspaper baskets at Starbucks and
Peet's Coffee.
TD
Comment
Dear
MHFM:
I
thought this might be of interest to you. It pertains to a a radio
program from the 1940's called "The Juggler of Our Lady". I reference
it below in my email conversation with Renata (requires Real Player). If
you follow the progress of the main character (the poor juggler), he ends up
committing an act of sacrilege in the sanctuary of a Catholic Church.
This is portrayed in the radio program as being acceptable to our
Lady and a good thing. However, as my comments (below) indicate,
this was probably meant to prepare people for the modernism to come in the
vatican-two "church".
Here
is the program --> http://www.otr.net/r/famt/97.ram
… By
the way, I enjoyed your exposure of the fraud "Fr." Corapi. It
really showed the crapulent nature of this man and what he really stands for
(nothing!).
-John.
Renata:
I
checked out some of the selections on this website. Below is an interesting
program called, "The Juggler of Our Lady" (requires Real
Player). It is about a poor Juggler who encounters a monk and is invited
to live in a supposed Catholic monastery. Since he didn't have anything
to give our Lady for Christmas, he commits a sacrilege in the monastery chapel
by performing his juggling act. The program portrays this sacriledge as
an acceptable "gift" to our Lady. He could have prayed
reverently to our Lady in the Chapel or recited the Rosary. But,
no. He performs his juggling act in the sanctuary.
This
program, produced in 1947, was obviously designed to make people accept the
modernism that was to come in the vatican-two "church". By
portraying man's "gifts" as being an acceptable offering to God
(instead of the One, True Offering made by the priest), it clearly teaches the
doctrine of the antichrist. So, although this program sounds nice, it has
absolutely no value to Catholics and is just jewish-communist propaganda
-John.
Added
MHFM: The recent question about Pius
XII and heresy has been added to our sub-section. Note: shortly after we answered this
question, we added some important
points. That means that those
who saw this exchange shortly after it was posted might not have seen the full
response. For the full response to that
question, see the first entry in this file:
Akita
Dear Brothers,
I was wanting to get your input about the
apparitions of Akita, Japan. As you already know these apparitions took place in
the post-conciliar era and indicate a crisis in the Church. From everything I
can find on the subject the visionary appears to belong to a congregation that
celebrates the new Mass. What is your take on this particular apparition?
Thanks,
Brian
MHFM: It’s clearly a false
apparition. It occurs within a Novus
Ordo context. That’s sufficient to prove
that it’s false. It contains some
“conservative” Novus Ordo elements to keep people off balance and within the
Vatican II sect.
Bishops
After viewing the news article you posted
on the U.S. "Catholic" (gag) "Bishops"
(make me ill) in which they condemn any "proselytizing”…. what is
WRONG with these people? I mean, first of all, they have the satanic
symbol of the "4 Directions" used in sorcery on their letterhead… how
much more OBVIOUS does it have to be?
Anyone who cannot see from THIS document
that these most evil men are hypocrites and apostates and Christ-deniers and
Christ-haters, must simply have had a lobotomy (or two, or three).
These evil men condemn what they call "sheep-stealing":
meanwhile, THEY are busy stealing precious, irreplaceable, immortal
human souls out from the flock of Christ every single day (and God only knows
what these kind of people do by night!), while sending them all straight to
hell----------and THEY KNOW IT. Jesus, Mary, give us strength to
stand before the Son of Man----for He comes to judge us all.
Pius XII
Subject: Was Pius XII a heretic? Please help!
[I
have been arguing with someone] Before I held your position, that he was a
Pope, but now I am unsure and do not know what to say, this is what he wrote to
me,
"No, a pope cannot teach heresy in his
fallible documents! Why would you believe that unless you follow the
Dimonds? So according to your position,
as long as the pope does not intend to bind the faithful to his teachings, he
can be a heretic! Why was John XXIII an
antipope then? Answer me that one right now."
"I have another question for you, in addition to the John XXIII
question. If a pope does not lose
office for teaching heresy in his fallible capacity, then do you not give lip
service only to the dogma that heretics are outside the Church? Or do you
assert that a heretic who is outside the Church can still be pope, so long as
he doesn't try to bind all the faithful and invoke infallibility for his
heresy? Finally, if what you say is
true, then how many heresies can a pope teach in his fallible capacity? Can he teach one and still be pope? Seven?
Seventy times seven?
"You and they both believe that a pope can teach heresy in his fallible
capacity, essentially equating the dogma of infallibility with protecting a
pope from uttering heresy while binding the whole Church. It is so much
more than that. It means that whatever they utter ex cathedra is
completely true, yet you and the Dimonds only give lip service to this reality,
as most people do. And as a result of this you believe that a pope can
utter heresy in his fallible capacity, and that he would still be pope."
What are we to say to such questions. It
just seems to be that Pius XII was a heretic, does it not? Please, if you could
shed light on this for me would be much appreciated!
Thanks and God bless.
Regards,
V. Veikko
MHFM: His entire line of
argumentation is a straw man – that is, attributing to another a position he
doesn’t actually hold. We don’t believe
that someone who is a heretic in his fallible capacity remains the pope. We don’t say that. Since they cannot refute the position, they
must use straw-man argumentation. No
heretic can remain the pope, even if he only teaches the heresy in his fallible
capacity. (A true pope could never teach
heresy in an infallible capacity, of course.)
The point is that there isn’t sufficient evidence to
definitely conclude that Pius XII was a heretic, rather than someone who
was a terribly weak pope who made doctrinal errors. That’s because the errors which Pius XII
taught were not specific propositions which have been explicitly condemned by
the Magisterium by name. Rather, they are proven to be false and
incompatible with Catholic teaching by the positive dogmatic statements on
related subjects. As a result, these
errors become heresies once one puts together (or can be shown to be directly
obstinate against) all of the positive dogmatic evidence which contradicts
them. That doesn’t mean that someone
doesn’t sin for promoting them and neglecting to more carefully consult
Catholic teaching. It is simply to point
out that there is a difference, from the standpoint of manifest heresy, between
the promotion of such an error and the promotion of something that has been
explicitly and notoriously condemned by name in a dogmatic decree (e.g.,
Justification by faith alone).
In fact, notice that in the following decree of the Council of Constance, there is a distinction between propositions that are offensive to Catholic teaching, etc. and those which are notoriously heretical. They are “notoriously heretical” because they have previously been condemned by the Magisterium by name, in a manner which should be obvious to all. This proves that notoriety is not simply reserved for