E-Exchanges

*This section of our website will contain some less formal – and short – e-mail exchanges that we’ve had which we feel may be of value to our readers. We will include those portions of the exchanges we deem relevant and valuable. We often add bolding and underlining which are not necessarily that of the other party. This section also frequently includes, not only e-exchanges we have, but notes, updates and comments by us.*

On Abuse “study”

Nothing these guys come out with should surprise us anymore, but to paraphrase the obscure yet grammatically challenged James Heberley, it just keeps getting worser and worser. A quote from the article you linked regarding the $1.8 million study:

"Even though there was sexual abuse of many boys, that doesn't necessarily mean that the person had a homosexual identity".

Apparently $1.8 million doesn’t buy what it used to.  How can any sane person reach such a conclusion?  I guess one has to be some kind of an “expert”.  Any normal man will tell you (especially if he doesn’t carry the scars of a college education), as will any woman who knows a normal man; that to a normal man the thought of any sort of intimate contact with another man is disgusting… The very thought of such a thing is repugnant.  It is incomprehensible.

That aside, doesn’t the mere fact of having relations with one of the same sex make you “homosexual”?  If not, what does the term mean?   How can these guys put such nonsense forward without dying from shame?...

Bill Mulligan

Comment

Hi Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,

So the steps towards Antipope John Paul II's Beatification are complete...Consider this then.

The man who enforced the edicts of the apostate, non- Catholic Vatican II Council ( 1962-195), forbidding any nation to declare that Catholicism was its state religion, thus going counter to the statements of Pope Pius IX's Syllabus, that the notion of separation of church and state was a condemned idea.

And, as a result of this action, Catholicism was abrogated in 1984 ( interesting date), by the very person the Vatican II sect, the church of Satan, wishes to make a saint!

We are now witnessing the fruits of this very action, by the very people who laid the groundwork for the recent declaration that all crucifixes be removed from Italian classrooms , the very men who formulated this diabolic council, Antipopes JPII and Benedict XVI.  The European Union Court of Human Rights has declared that crucifixes thus displayed are unconstitutional.

To top it off, the present encumbant to the usurped throne of St. Peter, has just recently praised this socialistic, atheistic supranational organization in his encyclical of September, 2009, Caritas Veritatis!

Now that is ironic!

How much more proof do people need to prove that the Vatican II sect is not Catholic!

God Bless

David

Formal heretic

Thanks for the reply!  but what about Formal Heretic?

Alberto

MHFM: A formal heretic is simply a heretic: someone who knows about a Catholic dogma and obstinately persists in a position contrary to it.

Discernment

Hi Brothers,

Could you give me what the church teaches on St. Luke chapter 12 verses 51 to 53.  I understand this to be those who hold the truth faith to those that don't even like those in my family.  Thank you in advance.  Todd

Luke 12:51-53- “Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation. For there shall be from henceforth five in one house divided: three against two, and two against three. The father shall be divided against the son, and the son against his father, the mother against the daughter, and the daughter against the mother, the mother in law against her daughter in law, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.”

MHFM: It means that there will almost always be people in your house or in your family who will be of bad will. They will represent an obstacle to your salvation and the attempt to do God’s will. It also means that in order to be saved people must oppose, separate, ignore or offend such individuals when necessary. Those who do not do so when it’s required, but rather let their family members take them from the path to God, will be lost. Sadly, that’s the case with many people.

Many people waste too much time worrying about and getting involved in what bad-willed family members are doing and their problems. Instead of separating from them and not getting entangled in their lives – a course of action which will certainly offend those family members – so many do entangle themselves and attempt to “help out.” They do so either because of human respect or under the cover of concern for that person. Since these are people who reject the truth anyway, one should let them handle their own situations. By getting involved instead of putting their hands to plough and not looking back, they often fail to accomplish what God desired for them.

Question

… I have been ministered to by your site, which has the earmark of much devotion and service to all: thank you for your devoted lives, the time and effort you have sown for the salvation, illumination and ministry of others.

I have some sincere questions concerning the Virgin Mother and, until I found you site, was not inclined to ask a "modern" Catholic about it because there is so much mixture, as your site displays.  Being a devoted Biblical student, I am asking for direction and illumination from the scripture on the following attributes of the Virgin Mother that I have been unable to discover: Her virgin birth/immaculate conception; her sinlessness; and, where in the Bible we are directed to pray to her instead of Jesus.  If there is a booklet or book you can recommend or, if you can answer my questions personally, I would be grateful for any guidance you can offer.

Thank you for your time, assistance and consideration,

gigi veguilla

MHFM: Thanks for the interest. Your questions are covered in our book: The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church. That's what we'd recommend, along with our other books.

Comment

Dear Brothers,

That article on the V-2 propaganda "study" is shocking. Everyone knows the abusers are gay, but the more they try to hide it, then the more they make themselves look stupid! Also, it adds more influence to the misconception that celibacy is unnatural, as though the fact that human beings are born and live predominantly single is "unnatural"!!!...

The article on JPII's fast-track to "sainthood" does not surprise me. After all, if they waited even just a little bit longer, someone would probably start asking some awkward questions, like, "didn't he have a girlfriend," or "wasn't he the biggest heretic of all time and thus an Antipope? …

God Bless,

Chris White

Debate

MHFM: We recently engaged in a debate which some of our readers might find interesting. It will be posted soon.

“Wrong”

I looked thru your website and it is very nice except it has a few problems.  You guys are very wrong on your sedevacantist position and no salvation for all those outside the Catholic church thru no fault of their own.  May God help you get out of your errors.  Pride may be what is blinding you.

S

MHFM: Sorry, the Catholic Church does NOT teach that there are exceptions to Outside the Church There is No Salvation. Your statement is heretical. The dogmatic definitions not only don’t make any exceptions, but they positively exclude all exceptions. They use all exclusive language in every case, positively eliminating all exceptions: “nobody,” “every human creature,” “none,” etc. Your position is simply a rejection of Catholic dogma.

Pope Innocent III, Fourth Lateran Council, Constitution 1, 1215, ex cathedra: “There is indeed one universal Church of the faithful, outside of which nobody at all is saved, in which Jesus Christ is both priest and sacrifice.”

Pope Boniface VIII, Unam Sanctam, Nov. 18, 1302, ex cathedra:

“With Faith urging us we are forced to believe and to hold the one, holy, Catholic Church and that, apostolic, and we firmly believe and simply confess this Church outside of which there is no salvation nor remission of sin… Furthermore, we declare, say, define, and proclaim to every human creature that they by absolute necessity for salvation are entirely subject to the Roman Pontiff.”

Pope Clement V, Council of Vienne, Decree # 30, 1311-1312, ex cathedra:” Since however there is for both regulars and seculars, for superiors and subjects, for exempt and non-exempt, one universal Church, outside of which there is no salvation, for all of whom there is one Lord, one faith, and one baptism…”

Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, Sess. 8, Nov. 22, 1439:

“Whoever wishes to be saved, needs above all to hold the Catholic faith; unless each one preserves this whole and inviolate, he will without a doubt perish in eternity.”

Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, “Cantate Domino,” 1441, ex cathedra:

“The Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that all those who are outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans but also Jews or heretics and schismatics, cannot share in eternal life and will go into the everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels, unless they are joined to the Church before the end of their lives; that the unity of this ecclesiastical body is of such importance that only for those who abide in it do the Church’s sacraments contribute to salvation and do fasts, almsgiving and other works of piety and practices of the Christian militia produce eternal rewards; and that nobody can be saved, no matter how much he has given away in alms and even if he has shed blood in the name of Christ, unless he has persevered in the bosom and unity of the Catholic Church.”

Pope Leo X, Fifth Lateran Council, Session 11, Dec. 19, 1516, ex cathedra: “For, regulars and seculars, prelates and subjects, exempt and non-exempt, belong to the one universal Church, outside of which no one at all is saved, and they all have one Lord and one faith.”

Pope Pius IV, Council of Trent, Iniunctum nobis, Nov. 13, 1565, ex cathedra: “This true Catholic faith, outside of which no one can be saved… I now profess and truly hold…”

Pope Benedict XIV, Nuper ad nos, March 16, 1743, Profession of Faith: “This faith of the Catholic Church, without which no one can be saved, and which of my own accord I now profess and truly hold…”

Pope Pius IX, Vatican Council I, Session 2, Profession of Faith, 1870, ex cathedra: “This true Catholic faith, outside of which none can be saved, which I now freely profess and truly hold…”

As far as the sedevacantist position goes, you are quite mistaken about that as well. The Vatican II “popes” are without any doubt heretics, and the Church teaches that heretics are not popes.

Mass query

Subject: true Mass

Good day Brothers,

I am writing because my husband and I have read your books, watched your DVD's and see the darkness of V-2. Our eyes have been open and we are praying a 54 day novena for God's guidance in our new awareness in regards to our Catholic faith. We have called your Monastery four times looking for answers to churches where we can go to attend the true Mass and receive the true sacraments. We have been turned away each and every time telling us to do even more research. I understand the need for protection of such Holy information, but at the same time it should be your number one interest to save souls. You state at the end of your What Really Happened to the Catholic Church after Vatican 2 for us to call and we will be told where we can go to attend the true Mass. We feel it shouldn't be so secretive once we have done the research and come into awareness. You do as you feel is right and we will respect that, but please let us know what more to do so we can receive the answers to our questions. Thank you for all your work in spreading God's true word. God Bless!!

ew

MHFM: First of all, we object to your statement. Our whole work is for the salvation of souls. To imply the contrary is false and insulting. You have obviously benefitted from the work which was put together for the salvation of souls. We couldn’t give you a location because you were unfamiliar with, and/or unconvinced about, the invalidity of the New Rite of Ordination and the “priests” ordained in it. We cannot give a location to someone unless that person agrees on all core issues of the faith, as well as key issues in our day. One can’t just find traditional sacraments. In order to receive sacraments with benefit, one must agree to: not attending the New Mass ever again for any reason; a complete rejection of the Vatican II sect; a belief in the salvation dogma without exceptions, including the absolute necessity of water baptism and no “baptism of desire” or “invincible ignorance”; a rejection of NFP; an acknowledgment and agreement that he or she will not support any of the heretical priests who offend on any of these key points.

The person with whom you spoke also said that you protested, in confident/arrogant fashion, that you were basically familiar with the whole website. Yet you weren’t familiar with the New Rite of Ordination issue. So obviously you aren’t very familiar with the material yet. The New Rite of Ordination is a key issue – one that’s covered somewhat prominently in our material. It’s a key issue because if one isn’t aware of that information, he might be receiving invalid sacraments. He might also fail to re-confess mortal sins that were confessed to “priests” ordained in said invalid rite. So obviously it’s a big deal.

It’s not that the whole thing is extremely complicated or difficult. The point is that generally people don’t have the interest level in the faith which they need to have. They just want a traditional Mass location. They want to have their Mass and move on. Many of them are not even committed to a rejection of the New Mass. In other words, they would go back to it if they didn’t have another option. So obviously we cannot and will not give any locations to such individuals until they are fully convinced. One of the biggest problems today is “Mass alone” Catholics. That’s why, for most people, it’s all about finding a Mass – not about what a true Catholic must believe. They have a great interest in the Mass issue and where to go to Mass…. oh yeah, that’s pretty much all they are concerned about. Their interest in the critical issues of faith is minimal. That’s precisely the problem we have today.

Since you weren’t in full agreement yet, we could not provide you with a specific location for where to receive valid sacraments. That would be the case with anyone else who was not in full agreement. We’re glad that you have some interest, and we hope that you will be fully convinced sometime soon.

B.O.D.

Dear MHFM, 

What's amazing about the fantasy of 'baptism of desire and blood,' is that Satan who masquerades as the light of God tricks mankind so eloquently with priests posing as holy men of God, and how Satan effectively uses these human tools for destruction of men, year in and year out as he has along, but since his council, Vatican II, the speed of apostasy-mega fasttrack bad fruit.  When Jesus Christ commanded His apostles to go throughout the world and teach and baptize, it's really a given that the apostles possessed supernatural skills to communicate the faith and instruct mankind which is what they did, and then given free will each man chose whether to be baptized into the faith or not.  The early Church strictly demanded and forbade entrance into the Church by the physical act of baptism unless each was instructed properly through knowledge about the faith.  That had to happen first, and then as God directed, the act of baptism took place. 

Because of this gift of free will given to man by God, and God knows all things, the act of baptism  becomes necessary to enter into the kingdom.  As we all know there is only one entrance into the kingdom.  There is no other way in.  Those who refuse baptism, or those who didn't receive baptism while being instructed in the faith, and died before actually being baptized, God searched their hearts and found them not worthy of his kingdom.  In man's finite way of thinking, God's actions aren't good enough for man, and much to harsh, and so, out of disobedience to God, through Satan's prodding, man devises an appealing, feel good, method of  allowing easy entrance into the Holy Church through this fallacious belief in desire and blood, which in God's eyes are evil acts willingly accepted by man.  "Most men are damned and going to Hell," Jacinta stated to Lucia.  And so, today, millions of souls take the wide path to Hell, as opposed to the narrow, seemingly difficult, road to Heaven, accepting by the millions and millions this false belief in baptism of desire and blood as a form of mercy on mankind by a Loving God.  Diabolical!  As St. Augustine stated (paraphasing), "...take the literal interpretation, always." ...as it is written..."…. God Bless always!   

Material Heretic

To whom it may concern:

Is there such a thing as material heretic and formal heretic?  Or is this a modenist view? Is there an Ecumenical Council and or Ex Cathedra pronouncements about this?  

Thanks!

Alberto  

MHFM: There’s no such thing as a material heretic in the dogmatic teaching of the Church. There are heretics; there are schismatics; and there are Catholics. Material heretic is simply a name for a Catholic who is erring in good faith about a dogma. In other words, it’s another name for a mistaken Catholic. It’s a person who is holding a false position – one that is strictly incompatible with Catholic dogma. However, that person is not obstinate against that dogma. He would change his position immediately upon being informed of the true position. The “material heretic” is a Catholic.

That’s important to understand. For it really drives home the absurdity of the position that Benedict XVI is only a “material heretic.” It would mean that he’s just a mistaken Catholic, which is absurd, ridiculous and in fact impossible.

Wonder

Dear Brothers,

I just wonder how you can say that current pope, mass, .... is not valid.  The Pope was elected by the Bishops per the teachings of the  Holy Roman Catholic Church.  You get to live by the word of past Popes and teaching of the Church,  you get to live with the results of Dogma that is taught.  Happy living with the results of not a strict biblical interpretation?  People like yourselves make me sad.   You have an answers for everything but you don't have love of Christ.  I am so glad that I have read the scriptures and made up my own mind on what scripture says.  Christ has died for our sins, communion is for all, women should be priest, Lay people can run the church, Christ did not even want ordained priest as we know it today.  You teach "men's traditions as God Truth" .   Jesus would find you a bunch of "scribes" and will toss you out of the church.     Why don't you seek the truth of God and Get OVER ALL YOUR Legalisms.  You teach like the very scribes that Jesus despised.    Jesus wanted mercy and justice.  Not formalism and legal counting of sin.  You are blind to you holier than thou righteous attitudes.  

Saved by Faith, proven by acts of faith, and Loved by God even if I sin.  God has done it all, not by our actions are we saved so how can we lose our salvation by actions.  It is a free gift.  Faith proven by actions shows that we are saved.  Action with out faith proves nothing.   Move into the true spirit of Jesus.  Read Cor. 13 and start to love Jesus and get rid of all the "Catholic" junk.  Move to the Spirit of truth.  You hard hearts are full of your self-righteousness.          

Jeff Hvass

MHFM: You wonder? We wonder how you could wonder? It’s covered in detail in the material. You mention Catholic dogma. Did you look at the material we have? We show that Catholic dogma teaches that a heretic can’t be the pope. That’s the teaching of the popes themselves. It is rooted in the Catholic dogma that heretics are not inside the Church. It’s rooted in the dogma that heretics cannot rule in the Church, and that Catholics are not in communion with heretics.

Benedict XVI (The Heresies of Benedict XVI File) [link to section] –

The Catholic Teaching that a heretic cannot be a valid pope and loses the papal office automatically [PDF file]

However, based on the second half of your e-mail, it’s obvious that you don’t believe in any aspect of Catholic teaching whatsoever. So the evidence from Catholic teaching won’t persuade you in the slightest way. You accept the heretical idea of women “priests,” faith alone, and utter modernism. As you indicated in your e-mail, you want to be able to sin without consequences. You reject all of what Christ taught. Christ said most men are condemned (Mt. 7:13). The Bible condemns preaching a new Gospel (Gal. 1:8), which you do. It says that those who fail in one point are guilty of all. Your “accept-everything-in-love” modernism is apostasy and blasphemy. It’s condemned by Christ and the Bible, of course.

James 1:10-11- “And whosoever shall keep the whole law, but offend in one point, is become guilty of all. For he that said, Thou shalt not commit adultery, said also, Thou shalt not kill. Now if thou do not commit adultery, but shalt kill, thou art become a transgressor of the law.”

Pet

Dear Brothers in Christ,

I thought I read some time ago that it was sinful to care for a pet through extraordinary means. For example, if my dog gets cancer I shouldn't pay thousands of dollars to try to treat him. Is this true? Should he get a disease in the coming years should I just put him to sleep?

John Settimo

MHFM: In our opinion, if the animal is going to die within a few months anyway, then you shouldn't do it.  You could get another pet that's residing in a cage in an SPCA or somewhere else. They would love to have an owner.

However, if the operation will allow the pet to live for a year or years longer, then we believe you may pay to have it.

“Fr. C”

Subject: Comment on your video: Fr. John Corapi Exposed - 1

You are heretic for being critical of this good man. Examine your own conscience.

DB

MHFM: So, we’ve denied your “dogma” of human respect, phony Catholicism, and not exposing the false teachers who give you a warm spiritual feeling. We’re running out of ways to describe your bad will. Real Catholic truth – you don’t care one bit about it. You will almost certainly remain in your fog until your death, and it will probably only be lifted before the Judgment Seat of Christ. But then it will be too late. You will be condemned to Hell.

Does it even penetrate you that he believes that Muslims, Jews and Protestants can be saved? Are you alive? He accepts false ecumenism, which has been condemned as apostasy by the Catholic Church. No, you don’t care about that at all because you are not a Catholic. The facts that were covered don’t matter to you. All that matters to you is that someone you like has been insulted.

Found

Dear Brothers,

I can't tell you how much you and your ministry have spoken to me.  Your recent video on sadness was like a confirmation from God that you are doing his work.  I was raised Episcopalian, and after I was left adrift in the wake of the "episcopalypse", I was happy to remain a Protestant.  After all, they had the Bible on their side!  Then I found your website.  I found you videos on Vatican II to be fascinating, but when I saw the section "Refuting Protestantism", I scoffed.  Canon law might work for disputing Catholicism, but you couldn't use sola scriptura!  Your articles were such a shock to me!  They made so much SENSE!  They took all of the "problem verses" I had struggled with, and they explained them!  And using my trust KJV, no less!  My faith was completely re-directed.

I am still praying and studying about what I should do, and trying to find a church in my area I can go to.  (I mean, this is my immortal soul here!  I don't want to go damning it to hell on accident!)  But if it wasn't for your site, I would never have even considered the issues you pointed out!  I'd be incredibly ignorant!  "Was blind but now I see", I guess. ;) I'm sorry this letter was so long, but I just wanted to tell you what a blessing your site has been. By the Grace of our Lord Jesus Christ,

Scotty

New Video

Billboard

Hi MHFM,

In Rochester, NY a billboard comment. On the corner of Main Street and Alexander St there is a full size billboard that shows 2… men dressed in a full Priests attire. White collar and all.It READS "_ WE ARE GAY THATS WHY WE PRAY "_Come join us for service  and I can't look at it much more.The address is a LBGT/Pride something or other.

Then the next week I noticed a similar one in Saint Paul St and Driving Park Rd. Heaven Help Us

GOD Bless MHFM

Anthony

Interesting

Very interesting indeed

I never knew such a Catholic church existed. From your website i see you honour Padre Pio but he would have participated in the Vatican 2 church.

I was an Irish Catholic for 28yrs until 4yrs ago while photographing the West Bank. I meet two Christians in Jerusalem who tell me about Jesus in a way i never heard from a priest. Long story short i was born again and received the Holy Spirit. I noticed the change within me in an instant.

The true church of Christ is believers coming together to worship in Spirit and Truth.


Regards,

David

MHFM: Thanks for the interest, but you need to look at the information on our site which deals with the biblical proof for Catholicism. Christ founded a Church upon St. Peter. The views you have about being born again and what constitutes the Church of Christ are neither historical nor biblical.

Priest

Dear Brother Dimond,

 I was looking for a validly ordained priest for the sacrament of Penance when I called Most Holy Family Monastery in 2008. I talked to Brother Michael about possibly going to Fr. Zapp of Blessed Sacrament Church in Martinez, CA. We talked about the importance of asking the priest what he believes before receiving sacraments from him.

 I typed a letter about the Church's teaching on Salvation and handed it to one of the altar servers at… church. I asked him to give it to Fr. Zapp.

 Later on I did talk to Fr. Zapp. I asked him if he had read my letter. He said, "Yes." I said, "Do you believe the Church teaches no salvation without water baptism?"  He said, "No," and claimed that the Council of Trent teaches baptism of desire. He also cited the example of St. Emerentiana. He said the circumstances surrounding the death of this martyr saint prove that the Church does not teach absolutely no salvation without water baptism.

   I told him that I believe in absolutely no salvation without water baptism. I indicated to him that I would not be going to him for the sacraments. He said I would be falling into mortal sin by refusing to attend his mass because of the issue with the Salvation dogma.

   I remembered that Brother Peter's Salvation book has specific sections on both the Council of Trent and St. Emerentiana. Unfortunately, I did not have this book with me at the time. I did remember enough of the material, however, to realize that I needed to leave. Both of these detailed sections were extremely helpful in preparing me to handle arguments that baptism of desire advocates bring forth.

Thank you, Brother Peter.

Sincerely,
TD

MHFM: Yes, he’s an example of a heretic who should be avoided. Thanks for the interest. If you had asked him about souls being saved in false religions, he would he shown his total apostasy. As such, all they can do is repeat the same, tired, already-refuted arguments and distortions.

Sede priest

Dear Brothers Dimond,

Thank you for the work that you do.

We just want to let your readers know that there is now a sedevacantist priest in the Philippines…

I hope you help us publish this so the sedevacantists from the Philippines (though very, very few in number) may have the chance to attend the truly Traditional Mass offered by a truly Catholic priest not in union with BXVI and the Conciliar church.

Thank you very much, and let us keep one another in mutual prayers and support.

Sincerely,

Manila faithful, Philippines

MHFM: Thanks for the interest, but the fact that he’s a sedevacantist isn’t good enough.  He must also reject baptism of desire and Natural Family Planning.  You will almost certainly discover that he accepts baptism of desire and is a heretic.  Depending upon what he believes and/or how imposing or notorious he is, you might be able to receive sacraments from him; but one couldn't support him. And it could be the case that you shouldn’t go to him for the sacraments at all. It depends. Sadly, most of the sedevacantist priests today are almost as bad as Benedict XVI: they believe that souls can be saved in any religion.

Croatian pres

To MHFM,

The president of formerly Catholic Croatia S.M. (that is the self-professed communist iconoclast-knucklehead who wants to remove the crucifixes from all public places in my country) had a fairly cordial meeting with antipope B16 in the ''apostate occupied territory'' of  Vatican yesterday. They discussed several ''very important'' issues but had no time to discuss the topic of crucifix removal. My guess is that it was a nuisance to them and that they probably share the same opinion. Upon his return to Croatia comrade Mesic even said that he never had any disputes or troubles with the Vatican. I couldn't agree more. What dispute could there be between an atheist and an apostate, they practically have the same faith and share the same beliefs, i.e. they believe in nothing. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3O-to8SMkc&feature=player_embedded

P.S.  I've tried to watch Brother Michael's appearance on the History channel but without success. It seems as though this episode (of nine in the series so far) is also the only one that is not available for online viewing. I could easily find all the others (even the one that aired just yesterday) but the episode on Fatima is nowhere to be found. I am not implying anything but it is interesting....

Keep up the good work,

V. from Croatia

Comment

Brothers,

Your recent video on the Desolate Church; Matthew 23:38, "Behold, your house shall be left to you, desolate" is very inspiring and thought provoking. This is very true for VII/nonbelievers homes and even their bodies, the temple of God.  Adults/children of this generation that have not God create an emptiness that they try to fill with the material things of this world.  Their homes and cars get bigger and bigger as they try and fill their empty lives with more and more stuff.  I've heard it say that the bathrooms and showers are becoming bigger in attempt to not only accommodate their larger bodies, though as an attempt to possibly build a shrine in order to wash away their shamefulness (sins), if that were possible.  It's very humbling to visit a landfill site and see all the junk that once temporarily filled someone's material hunger for want, rather than need.

Because this country is ridding itself of anything to do with God, there is the vast increase in desolate homes and the next crises of desolate commercial property.  Years ago, as well today, I'd comment on what a waste it is that all the new commercial buildings are being built next to abandoned vacant buildings.  I think as a whole, the world is being conditioned by the anti-Christ (Satan) to believe bigger is better. When choosing the correct path to eternal salvation, the majority end up choosing the bigger path, leading to choosing the bigger gate rather than trying to enter the narrow gate. (Matthew 7:13, "Enter ye in at the narrow gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way that leadeth to destruction, and many there are who go in thereat")…

God Bless you all,
Tom

Comment

Subject: new video

Wow, awesome video, I think if we stayed in the realm of common sense more people would realize what is true and what is not!!!  … I just got off the phone with my mother who was poisoned by the 70's charismatic movement where you put aside all the facts and dogmas and go by this stupid feeling inside: I feel to do this, I feel to do that, are you kidding me.  I asked her where do the babies go that have been aborted, she said limbo, but I told her that they go to hell, apart of hell where there is no fire.  She refused to believe that because of the lovey, feely garbage. She drives me out of my mind, she side steps the simple and commonsense truth for a more 
complicated lie!!!!  Todd

Muslim domination

Hi salutations from Brazil!

I am really anxious about the new Fatima DVD that you are preparing. I´d like to say that your DVDs are a great help in showing my wife and family about the faith and the truth of what is really going on.

I wish you brothers many blessings and keep up the good works!!

By the way I would like to show a really scary video I found on youtube, which I already imagined something like this was going on, but this is really terrifying!!

(muslim future world domination)

Mark

MHFM: Thanks for the interest. Yes, that video is definitely worth watching. It’s an excellent presentation of the facts on that issue. The disparity between Western and Islamic fertility rates is clearly attributable to a number of things. Chief among them are of course the evil contraceptive/NFP mentality which has taken over the West, including almost all modern “Catholics” and Protestants. This mentality of course does not exist with the Muslims.

We believe that the facts covered in the video serve as another indication that we are in the final days. God is not going to allow the world to become a Muslim republic.

New Video

Subject: regarding your new “Sadness” video

Dear Brothers at MHFM,

Your new video touches on a point that many people should reflect on and think about as we approach Advent, and the holiday season.  To quote your video "man was created for God...and we can only be satisfied in Him."  This reminded me of a quote from Saint Augustine's "Confessions" that you will probably be familiar with.  A theme he often repeats through out the book "Yet man, this part of your creation, wishes to praise you.  For you have made us for yourself, and our hearts are restless until they rest in you."  We are encouraged and conditioned to be consumers, but ultimately we find that chasing after earthly treasures is self-defeating.  It's only through God and for God that we find true peace and happiness.

- Ed

The Cross

Dear MHFM, 

And why is antipope Benedict not demanding a retraction of the state sponsored school system in Italy imposing this hideous removal of God on the Cross, Crucifixes, from schools of learning?  Separation of church and state can only be learned from a true pontiff, St. Pope Pius X, who denounced separation of church and state as 'pernicious.'  Who are these people of Vatican II?  Devils, I say, wholeheartedly, as I bow before the Holy Ghost, third person of the Blessed Trinity, that I Love, and will fight to the death to repeal this hideous pastoral council of Lucifer with my last dying breath!  God Bless MHFM.

Video

Dear Brothers,

That is a great short video on sadness. It's so true how people seek consolations from creatures rather than waiting peacefully in God. I imagine the main grief and horror of hell (apart from the physical pains), as is said by many saints and the Catholic Church, is the eternal and extreme sadness and grief at having lost God.

That "Brother Metal" is really sad!!! He, "fell in love with heavy metal when he attended a Metallica concert some 15 years ago" - what a fool for going in the first place! And if he wants to "kill" the devil, why on earth would he "honor" the devil by using the "el diablo" hand signal. It's disgusting.

God Bless,

Chris White

Video

Subject: Sadness - video

Hi Bro. Michael and Peter Dimond,

Another great thought provoking video...well done; nice pictures as well...

God bless

David

“Out of context”

Hello,

I consider myself  a faithful catholic. In your video about the heresies of B16 Why is it that when you quote the writings of cardinal Ratsinger currently OUR POPE (us that are true Catholics) You take only a small portion of the text, and take it out of context, to according to you prove your point. You twist and play with the words, you are proving your self wrong by trying to make your point. This is not only a heresy you are committing if you are catholic, but also dishonest if you are not.

Between your quotes I was also reading the pages and they says the opposite of your comments. If you truly believe in Hell, you should reflect on your actions. The very doctrines that you claim to defend, are the same doctrines you are attacking. The more I read your website, the more you proved your error. Although I should say some stated facts in other videos are true.

I will truly pray for you "Diamond brothers" so that OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST forgive your grave Apostasy. But according to the work that you do,  I doubt that you are committing apostasy, since in order to do it you must first be Catholic. And obviously you are not. Since you are doing the work of Satan by going against the church. But remember THE GATES OF HELL WILL NOT PREVAIL AGAINST IT. He seduces man with pride.

My god enlighten you
Sergio Sanchez

MHFM: “… out of context….” Right… sure…. that’s what they all say. That’s why you don’t give any examples. We see how that kind of claim holds up in a debate. Such a lie doesn’t work with people who have read their speeches and their books. What you claim couldn’t be more false. People like you are so of bad will, so dishonest, SUCH LIARS and so attracted to the lie, that it’s almost beyond words. You deserve every bit of the apostate Counter Church that you’ve received. To give just one example which obliterates your lie and proves our point, let’s quote Benedict XVI’s book, Principles of Catholic Theology. This book contains numerous major denials of Vatican I. We will only focus on one of those denials. In fact, this book, in itself, provides all the proof we need to show that Benedict XVI is not a Catholic. In the quote below, we cited EXTRA CONTEXT simply because we know that COMPLETE LIARS like you will, when confronted with any heresy, lie and say that it’s “out of context.” Here it is:

Benedict XVI, Principles of Catholic Theology, 1982, pp. 197-198: “Against this background we can now weigh the possibilities that are open to Christian ecumenism. The maximum demands on which the search for unity must certainly founder are immediately clear. On the part of the West, the maximum demand would be that the East recognize the primacy of the bishop of Rome in the full scope of the definition of 1870 and in so doing submit in practice, to a primacy such as has been accepted by the Uniate churches. On the part of the East, the maximum demand would be that the West declare the 1870 doctrine of primacy erroneous and in so doing submit, in practice, to a primacy such as has been accepted with the removal of the Filioque from the Creed and including the Marian dogmas of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. As regards Protestantism, the maximum demand of the Catholic Church would be that the Protestant ecclesiological ministers be regarded as totally invalid and that Protestants be converted to Catholicism; the maximum demand of Protestants, on the other hand, would be that the Catholic Church accept, along with the unconditional acknowledgement of all Protestant ministries, the Protestant concept of ministry and their understanding of the Church and thus, in practice, renounce the apostolic and sacramental structure of the Church, which would mean, in practice, the conversion of Catholics to Protestantism and their acceptance of a multiplicity of distinct community structures as the historical form of the Church. While the first three maximum demands are today rather unanimously rejected by Christian consciousness, the fourth exercises a kind of fascination for it – as it were, a certain conclusiveness that makes it appear to be the real solution to the problem. This is all the more true since there is joined to it the expectation that a Parliament of Churches, a ‘truly ecumenical council’, could then harmonize this pluralism and promote a Christian unity of action. That no real union would result from this, but that its very impossibility would become a single common dogma, should convince anyone who examines the suggestion closely that such a way would not bring Church unity but only a final renunciation of it. As a result, none of the maximum solutions offers any real hope of unity.”

Notice that Benedict XVI specifically mentions, and then bluntly rejects, the traditional teaching of the Catholic Church that the Protestants and Eastern Schismatics must be converted to the Catholic Faith. He says that their conversion and acceptance of Vatican I (a dogmatic council) and the Papacy (a dogma) is NOT the way for unity. This is a total rejection of the Catholic Faith.

The only possible way that more context could contradict his blatant heresy is if Benedict XVI had said just the opposite somewhere else in the book – or if he clarified that he was only kidding. Of course, he says no such thing. And even if we suppose, for the sake of argument, that Benedict XVI had said just the opposite (namely, that all Protestants and schismatics must accept Vatican I and its definition of the Papacy for Christian unity), which he most assuredly does not do, it still would not exonerate him of heresy. That’s because you can’t affirm a dogma sometimes and deny it at other times. If you say you’re against abortion, and then go on in the same speech to favor it, you’re pro-abortion.

Any person with any honesty and good will can see that your claim and your e-mail are a pack of lies. You are not a Catholic. You are a total liar, and you don’t have the first clue what it means to accept the Catholic Church and the Papacy.

Benedict XVI (The Heresies of Benedict XVI File) [link to section]

Williamson

If the new nazis of Germany keep up their ungodly persecution of Bishop Williamson, I will join the SSPX. I already am a traditional Latin mass-goer and they are no longer excommunicated, and I usually like to be against what the worldly people are for.  What's your opinion?  

… forgive me if you already addressed this.  God bless you all.  

Susan 

MHFM: That’s ridiculous. Bishop Williamson is unfortunately an obstinate heretic and a schismatic. He’s not a real Catholic. He regards Antipope Benedict XVI and his apostate bishops as Catholics. He holds that the Catholic Church can be equated with an apostate non-Catholic sect. He also believes in salvation outside the Church, as Lefebvre did. He adheres to the false positions of the SSPX. They are covered in detail here:

The Society of St. Pius X [Link to Section]

So many people have such a secular orientation that if someone receives unjust persecution in that arena, they assume that he is therefore on the good side, even if he rejects Catholic teaching. That is a denial of Christ and His truth. It is to totally miss the point. Few people care about the Gospel and about the true faith of Christ.

Spies and Aliens

Subject: Spies and Aliens

Dear Brothers,

That London spy program is like Communist East Germany where there were apparently, 1 civilian spy for every 6 people!

How insane that the V-2 sect is searching for "aliens"! The V-2 sect is like one big "alien" space craft - alien to God!!!

Apocalypse 18:2 - And he cried out with a strong voice, saying: Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen: and is become the habitation of devils and the hold of every unclean spirit and the hold of every unclean and hateful bird.

God Bless,

Chris White

Comment

…. checking in with your site every day and studying all you have to offer really, really helps!  Thanks to you and all your readers!  I must be pretty slow, because it just occurred to me today that we've been in the very final stages of lucifer's ultimately FUTILE attempts to truly "exterminate" the true, traditional ancient Catholic FAITH.  He has failed:  the Immaculate Heart has triumphed:  truly her Immaculate Heart is our refuge and the way that leads us to God....looking forward to your Fatima DVD…

Anne 

Comment

Subject: Vatican joins search for Alien Life

Hi Bros, Michael and Peter Dimond,

So the Vatican II sect is going to join the search for "alien life"! 

 May I suggest, that since the term "alien"  may be defined as something "repugnant, foreign, not one's own etc.,  the present occupants of the Vatican might start their search right in the hallways of the very place they have usurped!

...they will not be disappointed in their results....

God Bless

David

Opinion

Dear MHFM, 

I can relate to Nestorianian thinking since it's so prevalent in American society.  Multitudes of Americans act as their own gods.  To paraphrase, "...each man to his castle...," is very much Nestorian.  That's why socialism and the socialists making inroads to Americanism will fail because of this American way of thinking.  In the end, however, the American system will fail because we failed Jesus Christ and accepted the Vatican II sect way of life, which is none other than Nestorian tinged with pantheism, heresy of all heresies with the head heresiarch, Ratzinger leading the way... 

D

Document

Subject: Heresies on ratzinger´s new document concerning Anglican "converts"

1-He makes no distinction between the Catholic Churches and the schismatics. 

2-He says the Church is a Sacrament, which was condemned.

3-Once again, he says that the elements of sanctification present in the sects guide the people there to the Catholic Church.

4-If they really need to follow the Catechism, then there´s no need to convert at all, since the Vatican II version considers the Protestants as being part of the Church.

CK

Cremation

Would it be wrong to take a job in sales selling cremation services if the reason for the person purchasing the program was due to the lower cost?

S.S.

MHFM: One should not take such a job.

By the way, here’s a quote from Antipope Benedict XVI on this point. He acknowledges that cremation was traditionally forbidden, and that the prohibition was abandoned by Vatican II.

Benedict XVI, God and the World, 2000, p. 436: “Q. Is it permissible to have dead bodies cremated, or is that just a heathen ritual? A. … Right up to the Second Vatican Council, cremation was subject to penalties. In view of all the circumstances of the modern world, the Church has abandoned this.”

Interest

Hi Brothers !!!

I am a daily visitor of your website which I find to be the BEST Catholic source of soul - saving information for today's times…

A Bracha

Watched

Dear MHFM,

I had the opportunity to watch the History Channel's overview of Fatima (if you can call it that, The Nostradamus Effect).  They tried to weave this into the false visionary (Nostradamus) and imply that he may have predicted the miracle.  True to History Channel format they presented so many deceptive comments and angles on the secret that it was more about the end of times by a nuclear war and how the supposed Catholic Church had indeed released the "real" 3rd secret.  I would like to commend Brother Michael for "presenting" his overview…  I eagerly await Brother Michael's DVD release on Fatima and know from his past publications his thoroughness and adherence to facts will make this the real overview of Fatima.

God Bless you for Your Works.......

Bruce

Prayer

Dear MHFM   

Here is a good prayer people should say many times per day.  JESUS, MARY, I LOVE THEE!   SAVE SOULS! Amen…. God bless in the sorrowful and Immaculate heart.                         

MARK

MHFM: Yes, it’s a very good prayer. We believe that we’ve mentioned it before on our website.

DVD

Subject: Fatima DVD

Dear Mhfm

Can't wait to order the fatima dvd. Very excited when I saw the cover. The picture on the cover looks great… Keep up the great work.

God Bless

Sean

John Paul II’s first homily

MHFM: This is from our video, John Paul II preached the Gospel of the Antichrist. In light of the question below, we thought it was appropriate.

Dissolves

http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/john_paul_ii_preached_the_gospel_of_the_antichrist.php

Dear Brothers.

I commend all work and effort that you've put in to your researches.

I am not quite sure, however, if I follow your logic and would like some clarification.

You said that Nestorius dissolves Christ by stating that "THE SON OF GOD UNITED HIMSELF IN A CERTAIN WAY WITH A MAN NAMED JESUS".

The way I understand this is that The Son of God (person 1 being God) united himself with another man Jesus (person 2 being a man named Jesus)  (Two people in one body?)

Then you go on to say that JPII says "the Son of God, incarnate in the womb of the Virgin Mary, ‘has in a certain way united himself with each man."

I don't see how this is the same as what Nestorius was saying and would like some clarification.

The way I understand the "anti" pope is that he is saying Jesus, the Son of God (person 1 - God and Man) unites himself with mankind. 

This, to me, doesn't dissolve Christ because he didn't say that person 1 (Christ) is different from person 2 (Jesus).  He said that person 1 (Christ Jesus) is united to all of humanity.

Is this correct?

Jeff

MHFM: As we point out in the video and in the article, it’s Nestorianism applied to every man. Nestorius dissolved Christ by teaching that the Son of God didn’t become man, but rather united Himself with a single man named Jesus. Hence, Nestorius held that Jesus was a man who carried or was united with God. According to his heresy, there were two persons in Christ: the Son of God and a mere man named Jesus.

Pope St. Leo the Great, Dogmatic Letter to Flavian, 449: “Let Nestorius, therefore, be anathematized… he made one person of the flesh, and another of the Godhead, AND DID NOT PERCEIVE THAT THERE WAS BUT ONE CHRIST…”

By dissolving or dividing Our Lord Jesus Christ into two persons, Nestorius’ Antichrist doctrine logically resulted in the worship of two Christs, and introduced, as a consequence, THE WORSHIP OF MAN!

Pope Vigilius, Second Council of Constantinople, 553: “The holy synod of Ephesus… has pronounced sentence against the heresy of Nestorius… and all those who might later… adopt the same opinions as he held… They express these falsehoods against the true dogmas of the Church, OFFERING WORSHIP TO TWO SONS, trying to divide that which cannot be divided, AND INTRODUCING TO BOTH HEAVEN AND EARTH THE OFFENCE OF THE WORSHIP OF MAN. But the sacred band of heavenly spirits worship along with us only one Lord Jesus Christ.”

John Paul II taught that the Son of God didn’t just unite Himself with a single man named Jesus (as Nestorius taught), but rather with EVERY SINGLE MAN. Thus, it is Nestorianism applied to all people on earth. That means that, in John Paul II’s doctrine, every single person is what Nestorius considered Jesus to be. According to John Paul II, every single man is actually two: a mere man and the Son of God. That’s precisely why he defined Christianity as the deep amazement at man. That’s why he said all of the other incredible things we cover in our video. His statements are in perfect line with how Nestorianism leads inescapably to the worship of man.

Antipope John Paul II, Redemptor Hominis (# 10), March 4, 1979: “IN REALITY, THE NAME FOR THAT DEEP AMAZEMENT AT MAN’S WORTH AND DIGNITY IS THE GOSPEL, THAT IS TO SAY: THE GOOD NEWS. IT IS ALSO CALLED CHRISTIANITY.”

All of the evidence is covered in the video and the article. But these two quotes show how he believes that the Word became flesh in every man.

Antipope John Paul II, Encyclical on the Holy Ghost (# 50): “’The Word became flesh.’ The Incarnation of God the Son signifies the taking up into unity with God not only of human nature, but in this human nature, in a sense, everything that is ‘flesh’: the whole of humanity ...”

Here Antipope John Paul II quotes the words of John 1:14, and says that the Word becoming flesh means the taking up of all flesh, the whole of humanity. This literally means that the Son of God became all flesh, the whole of humanity. And this is why Antipope John Paul II says the following:

Antipope John Paul II, Evangelium Vitae (# 104): “It is precisely in the ‘flesh’ of every person that Christ continues to reveal himself … so that rejection of human life, in whatever form that rejection takes, is really a rejection of Christ.”

John Paul II without any doubt taught Nestorianism; but he taught Nestorianism applied to every single man, not just one. His teaching was the dissolving of Jesus: the precise doctrine which the inspired Word of God (the Bible) says is the mark of Antichrist (1 John 4:2-3).

Apollo

I'm reading the first epistle of St. Paul to the Corinthians and the word apollo is used, could you tell me who is apollo or what the significance is with the name apollo.  Thanks Todd

MHFM: As we read in Acts 18, Apollo was a convert who was successful in converting many Jews. In 1 Corinthians 1, St. Paul is correcting the mistaken notion of some Corinthians. They began to consider as their master whoever baptized them. Thus, some said: “I indeed am of Paul: and I am of Apollo: and I of Cephas…” (1 Cor. 1:12). St. Paul rebuked them and explained that it is Christ whom they must worship, not the person who brought them into the faith.

Video Update

MHFM: This video also discusses an extremely important quote from St. Isaac Jogues.

Heretical priest

A few days ago I talked like 3 times over the phone with a sedevacantist priest who is affiliated/in communion with… all of those heretics, he's from Phoenix, well he said he's currently living in Phoenix, but he's really from Argentina.

So this guy is in favor of salvation by BOD/BOB, salvation for "invincibly ignorant" people who have never heard of the Church or of the Gospel ("as long as they live up to the dictates of their conscience a morally good life", or something like that), he believes in salvation for non-Catholics by "implicit" desires; he believes a non-baptized person can be in union/communion with the Church "in voto" or "by desire" and consequently be saved, and all of those similar things.

So I asked him: "Well what about the Athanasian Creed? It says we must have explicit Faith in the Trinity and the Incarnation if we wish to be saved, and the Council of Florence also used this Creed dogmatically." and other things like that.

So then he tells me: "We can't take what the Athanasian Creed says literally, or what the other dogmatic definitions say about no salvation outside the Church, we can't understand them just like that, we have to see what the theologians say about it."

So then I asked him: "Well didn't Vatican I say that dogmas are to be believed and understood as they are once declared by the Church?"

And then he said: "Yes, but we also have to go by what the theologians teach about that subject."

br

MHFM: What a surprise. You heard the unbelief, the heresy and the rejection of Catholic teaching right from the heretic’s mouth. The heretic couldn’t be more wrong. We must submit to what the Chair of St. Peter has defined. Furthermore, no sainted theologian taught the heresies that he holds. The definition of Vatican I and the following papal teaching confound his false outlook on how to understand Catholic teaching. To sum him up simply, he rejects papal infallibility. He doesn’t believe in what Christ promised to St. Peter alone. That’s why he sees no distinction between the Office of St. Peter and the teaching of fallible theologians.

Pope Benedict XIV, Apostolica (# 6), June 26, 1749: “The Church’s judgment is preferable to that of a Doctor renowned for his holiness and teaching.”

Errors of the Jansenists, #30: “When anyone finds a doctrine clearly established in Augustine, he can absolutely hold it and teach it, disregarding any bull of the pope.”- Condemned by Pope Alexander VIII

Pope Pius XII, Humani generis (# 21), Aug. 12, 1950: “This deposit of faith our Divine Redeemer has given for authentic interpretation not to each of the faithful, not even to theologians, but only to the Teaching Authority of the Church.’”

Additionally, it’s interesting to consider the following quote. Pope Leo XIII is talking about the protection that the Holy Ghost gives to the Bible and to the teaching of the Magisterium.

We all know that the inspiration and protection that the Holy Ghost gives to the Bible is unique. But Pope Leo XIII teaches that the Holy Ghost gives the same unique protection to the teaching of the Magisterium. Many forget or reject this truth. The only minor difference between the two is that the Magisterium is infallibly protected from error in whatever it teaches, even though the words aren’t necessarily inspired. Moreover, the Magisterium is our proximate rule of faith, while the Bible is a remote rule of faith. That means that the Magisterium’s definitions give us the true understanding of the Bible. They are the interpretation.

For a person with true faith, the Holy Ghost’s protection of the infallible papal decrees goes without saying. However, for a modern BOD apostate, it’s a revelation. That’s because they see no distinction between the infallible teaching of the Magisterium and the fallible teaching of theologians. Since Pope Leo XIII speaks of both in the same breath, it’s a very interesting quote. It (further) refutes the heretic you spoke with and his faithless outlook on how to understand Catholic teaching.

Pope Leo XIII, Providentissimus Deus (#14), Nov. 18, 1893: “… passages of Holy Scripture… in passages already defined, the private student may do work equally valuable, either by setting them forth more clearly to the flock and more skilfully to scholars, or by defending them more powerfully from hostile attack. Wherefore the first and dearest object of the Catholic commentator should be to interpret those passages which have received an authentic interpretation either from the sacred writers themselves, under the inspiration of the Holy Ghost (as in many places of the New Testament), or from the Church, under the assistance of the same Holy Spirit, whether by her solemn judgment or her ordinary and universal magisterium - to interpret these passages in that identical sense, and to prove, by all the resources of science, that sound hermeneutical laws admit of no other interpretation.”

Story

hi, i just found your web site. The articles i have read make sense.  I stopped going to v2 mass  after a great number of things happened.  One story, the liberal nun  had the kids cyo group go to six flags . when they got there it was gay day. my son got home at 1 in the morning , woke me up and said he had the worst day in his life. he was 16yrs old..  he said it was gay day at six flags and he and his friends had to follow the sexual pervert homosexuals around all day.  being exposed to their blatant perverted sexual behavior… i wouldn't even let my kids watch any tv shows with homo. agendas  etc.   and little did i know there was a homo. nun in charge of my kids religious formation. One of her nun friends wears men’s clothes, men’s hair cut. they call her (mister sister)  .  my child was put in danger by the church . it is a well known fact that the most horrid mutilating murders are done by homosexuals . and their preferred meeting place is the public bathrooms… i took the kids out of religion class and i tried to teach them at home.     i took bible studies on and off . the nun would say all kinds of heretical teachings , i would challenge her . i would bring documents exposing the lies she would tell, but i ended up being attacked by the others in the class. two of them belong to the local masonic lodge.  when i brought a document about what the masons were about, one of the men got so mad he started to come over the table at me . very eye opening.!  i could go on and on with storys   …. basically destroyed my faith when i was in 3rd grade when they changed the mass to v2.  closed the cath . school… i never was comfortable with the v2 mass and all the changes. they chopped up the beautiful hand carved ornate altar with an axe , and removed everything that lookeded catholic out of the church.  in its place they put up ugly stark furniture.  they stopped playing the organ and banged on guitars up and down the aisle.   the church building  is over a hundred years old. my dad had watched the altar being carved and put together when he was a small boy and then he saw them tear it down with an ax later in his life. the altar was so well made they had to use an axe .  we were helpless to stop any of it. the priest that was in charge of the destruction in the church was later defrocked years later for unsavory reasons… i wish i had known years ago that there is a remnant of the faith that i learned about… when i was in 1st grade.  i never would have exposed my family to the v2 church. it sickens me to think about all the years my kids were exposed to the corruption….  i feel like an orphan, nowhere to go no one to talk to.  to top it off the only catholic friend i could talk to about the faith… stopped going to v2 mass and she is thinking about going to a protestant church for the social aspect . all i can say any more is LORD HAVE MERCY , LORD HAVE MERCY, LORD HAVE MERCY .

                                     SINCERALLY,     

Question

I wanted to ask you… in the Bull Auctorem Fidei, in Denzinger #1515 (proposition #15)…

15. "The doctrine which proposes that the Church "must be considered as one mystical body composed of Christ, the head, and the faithful, who are its members through an ineffable union, by which in a marvelous way we become with Him one sole priest, one sole victim, one sole perfect adorer of God the Father, in spirit and in truth," understood in this sense, that no one belongs to the body of the Church except the faithful, who are perfect adorers in spirit and in truth,--heretical."

What was it condemning here?

MHFM: It was condemning the idea that the Church (and thus the faithful) is only comprised of those who are perfect adorers in spirit in truth. In other words, it is false to believe that the Church consists only and at all times of good or of perfect people. During the Middle Ages there were various heresies which proposed that only the elect are part of the Church; that is, that a person who is or will be damned was never part of the Church to begin with.

Confession

Dear Brothers,

I hope you can answer this question.  I'm having trouble resolving this. I suddenly remembered something that happened long ago when I was a child. I believe I committed a mortal sin.  Obviously, I've been to confession since and I know it has been forgiven, despite that I forgot about it. My question is:  Do I have to keep remembering it now and confess it the next time I go to confession?  or, if I remember it during confession do I still have to confess it? The reason is, is that it's embarrassing and I don't want to have to deal with it if I don't have to.  I not trying to get away with anything, it's just that I need to know how to give myself peace. Please help me.  Thank you for all you do in you work!  I pray for you.

C

MHFM: You do need to remember it and mention it the next time you go to confession.

Comment

Brothers,

Congratulations on landing such a high profile media outlet as the History Channel in this day and age of liberal false Catholics and their media. This is one of the few times I wished I'd subscribed to television. Although I missed the program last night, I had my folks record the show, hoping they would watch and learn, being part of the world that is all about "externals".  I hope the show/DVD is a success even though the network decided to air the show during the sixth/last game of the World Series…

God Bless your many works,
Tom

Update

Subject: Update, etc.

Dear Brothers,

That was a great quote of St. Theresa's from yesterday on how she saw hell and that she was grieved at the fact that the Lutherans, all of whom go there, were once of the Church because they were baptized (though not once they accepted heresy).

That story about Moshe and the Ukraine is astounding. Thank you very much for posting it.

Thank you for the update video (great pictures). The points you made about how many false traditionalists will talk and talk without believing is interesting. It made me think of Jesus' words when speaking of the neccessity to eat His flesh and drink His blood, and how many were scandalized and left Him:

John 6:61,62 - Many therefore of his disciples, hearing it, said: This saying is hard, and who can hear it? But Jesus, knowing in himself, that his disciples murmured at this, said to them: Doth this scandalize you?

It seems to me that these types of false traditionalists, etc. are so concerned about externals that they are shocked by words like "antichrist" and also that they only believe in things that they can see, and so are tricked by the V-2 sect's illusions. I think it's interesting that the very "Mystery of Faith", the Holy Eucharist, is Our God, whole and entire, in Flesh, Body and Blood, but UNSEEN, and so the necessity of eating necessitates believing first in Him who is unseen, as is faith:

Hebrews 11:1 - Now faith is the substance of things to be hoped for, the evidence of things that appear not.

The quote of St. Isaac Jogues is really brilliant. It shows how pure his intention was in saving souls. Thank you for quoting that. Also, the points about predestination are encouraging because so many people are just so bad-willed.

God Bless,

Chris White

Galatians, added

MHFM: This is an interesting point which has been added to our article: Where does the Bible teach that Jesus is God?

Galatians 1:1- “Paul, an apostle, not of men, neither by man, but by Jesus Christ, and God the Father, who raised him from the dead…”

Since Paul did not become an apostle by men or of man, but by Jesus Christ, the obvious implication is that Jesus Christ is not just a man. He is also God.

Crucifixes barred

Subject: Regarding - Italy school crucifixes 'barred'

Dear brothers at MHFM -

This email is regarding "Italy school crucifixes barred."  This is sad, really sad, that a (European court) interferes in an Italian matter to not only ban crucifixes in Italian schools, but then rewards the "victim" with a monetary settlement?  It never ceases to amaze me how progressives in this generation can't wait to tear down and destroy every aspect of Christianity, and turn their backs on their own Christian identity!  Western civilization seems to be on a deathwish to kill itself.  Most countries in Europe have a declining population (and under an invasion of muslim immigrants, motivated on converting a declining Christian Europe into a muslim Europe.)  I fear that without a real Christian revival to regain its identity, and a lot of prayer (including the rosary), we are going to see the fall European society within a generation or two.

E

History channel program

A good program and worth the time.  I was disappointed that they did not show you (as I am sure you mentioned) talking about the 3rd secret and it had to be released by 1960.  It would make more sense then said Sister Lucia.  It would not make sense to have the 3rd secret talk about the assassination attempt of an (anti)pope 20 years later.  Father-Mister Andrew Apostate swallowed the Vatican story of course.  The Sister Lucia that we saw in 2000 kissing the Pope after receiving communion was possibly brainwashed to swallow the V2 crap.  Kissing JP2 hand??  Muslims adore the Blessed Mother.  Why would they if they don't believe that she is the mother of God?  Of course trying to understand a false religion is not easy.  Anyway, I look forward to your DVD about Fatima…

William Sloan

MHFM: Thanks for the interest. The “Sr. Lucia” who kissed John Paul II’s hand was not just brainwashed. She was not the real Sr. Lucy.

History Show

Dear Brothers,

I thought EWTN's "Father" Andrew Apostoli (more like Andrew Apostate) gave a typically-pathetic performance as a token Vatican II stooge in the History Channel's program on the Fatima secrets. Apostoli did nothing but give lip service to the Vatican II sect and its antipopes to whom he is so foolishly devoted. Apostoli praised John Paul II, stated his acceptance of the false third secret and the imposter Sr. Lucy, and Apostoli even went so far as to utter a heresy when he stated that Our Lady appeared at Fatima as a gesture of thanks and esteem for the Islamic religion. What a heretic! Anyone who still watches and supports EWTN and their heretic "priests" really needs to be honest, open their eyes and see through the lies and deceptions of men like Andrew Apostoli. By the way, Brother Michael Dimond was in great form on the program as a true, stalwart Roman Catholic -- unlike Apostoli and the other interviewees. Thank you and may God bless you for sharing on national television Our Lady's true message of Fatima.

Mike Dougherty

History

Dear Brother Michael,

I was very disappointed that they did not let you have more speaking time on the show. They cut you off it seemed when details were going to make too much sense to them! It seems that they want the world to still believe that the 3rd secret has been revealed. Of course that would be expected since they on the show were part of Vatican II or just plain skeptics. I cannot wait until you have your new book out on Fatima and Sr. Lucia. I was very intrigued at the fact that you said the Vatican document had, that they claimed was the third secret, had about 60 lines instead of about 20 as in Sr. Lucia's real letter… God Bless you and I thank the Holy Spirit for giving you wisdom.

Jodi

MHFM: In an audio discussion we will probably have some more comments with thoughts about the show. They did splice together a few quotes and used the portions they wanted to.

History Special

Brothers...

     Concerning the Fatima History Channel show last night, they showed Bro. Michael more than I thought they would, and some people here that I been working with seemed interested in the fact that he was going to be on the show.. If anything, I think it adds credibility for the our movement... (Just the mere fact of being on TV)-  I liked that fact that the show stated about a few times on why the secret was supposed to be released by 1960.  I also liked on how they stated the Fatima message predicted the reign of Pius XI, way before he even got elected !!.. They showed the vision of Hell and quoted what the Seers description of Hell was…I did get upset though on how they stated that "Sr. Lucia" got upset at those who thought the 3rd secret wasn’t fully revealed-  Also the spin on the theory that the 3rd secret had maybe something to do with a possible missile attack in the 60's / Cuba etc...I also didn’t like that they showed "Lucia" and John Paul II being all buddy buddy...If only they would have given Brother Dimond about 15 seconds to throw some light on the imposter "Lucia"....Anyway at the final end of the show, some guy came on and said, that in the end, it’s all about the salavation of souls.  By the way, I about fell out of my chair here at work when a co worker turned around and told me he also watched the show and thought there’s no way that the "Lucia" with John Paul II was the same person compared to Sister Lucia that Mary appeared to.. I asked him he had any prior knowledge of the imposter scenario and he answered no…

-Steve

MHFM: It’s interesting that the person you know concluded that the “Lucia” with John Paul II was not the same person as the traditional, pre-Vatican II Sr. Lucia. However, it’s not surprising that he came to that conclusion. If one believes in Fatima and is honest, one should come to that conclusion. It’s simply a fact that the post-Vatican II “Sr. Lucia” endorsed the modernist, post-Vatican II version of Fatima. Therefore, one cannot accept her if one holds a traditional view of Fatima or traditional conclusions about the Third Secret of Fatima. The fact that so many people do – and they do so obstinately – is another clear example of their dishonesty.

Fatima Special

Dear MHFM,

After about fifteen minutes into the History Channel Third Secret of Fatima special, I was seeing that it was mostly distortion and trying to lead the viewers down the wrong path. The sections with Brother Dimond were all truthful statements about this miraculous event in our Churches history. There were also many others that were on the show that made truthful statements about Fatima. The HC took it upon themselves to twist things around and make speculations. The most damaging of the distortion or lies were;

1. The tie in between the Islamic religion and our Lady of Fatima. This gave the impression that there may be some mutual respect between Islam and Catholicism.

2. The "false" Sister Lucy made out to be respectful of anti-Pope JPII. It showed her taking Communion from him and kissing his hand.  

3. The vision of hell made out to be symbolic of WW I instead of showing that this literally was hell and that was made perfectly clear by our Blessed Lady.

4.. Little emphasis was made on the secret needing to be released by 1960 and the ramifications had if it been released at that time to all the Vatican II changes starting with anti-Pope John XXIII.

5. Not one word about the Rosary or our Lady's message about immorality in dress, sins of the flesh and other key warnings.

6. The overall impression that anti-Pope JP II was the greatest Pope of all time even though he was an anti-Christ.  

There are several other major flaws that the uninformed Catholic is going to take away from this program. This means the release of the MHFM accurate DVD version of Fatima will show the lies and distortions in this "Masonic" version and possibly bring more people back to the true Catholic faith had this HC special not been aired at all.

Your ardent supporter,

Bob Bohr  

Show

Brothers:

I can't say that I'm surprised at the way the History Channel chose to spin things, but at least you were able to point out that the released "third secret" isn't the real deal. Hopefully a few people who watched will find their way to your material.

Respectfully…

M

Against Racism

MHFM: The following quote is somewhat interesting. In fifteenth century Spain, a few were endeavoring to forbid converted Jews (i.e., Christians who had Jewish blood) from holding office. The pope at the time, Pope Nicholas V, rightly came out against this attempt at racial exclusion. Note: he did not condemn excluding people for religious reasons, i.e., if a person doesn’t believe or if a convert’s faith is in question. Rather, he condemned racism and excluding people solely because of their bloodlines.

“The immediate result was a bull issued by Pope Nicholas [V] on 24 September 1449 under the significant title Humani Generis Enemicus (Enemy of the Human Race), in which he denounced the idea of excluding Christians from office simply because of their blood origins. ‘We decree and declare’, the pope went on, ‘that all Catholics are one body in Christ according to the teaching of our faith.’” (Henry Kamen, The Spanish Inquisition – A Historical Revision, Yale University Press, 1998, p. 34.)

Tonight’s program

Brothers,

I searched the TV listings for today and tomorrow and I don't see the special that Brother Michael is appearing on. Did the times or dates get moved? I am really looking forward to seeing it. I'm in Texas so maybe they are not showing it here. I don't think that makes sense. Hopefully if I miss it I will get to see it on the internet somewhere.

God Bless
Nate

MHFM: It’s listed for 9:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the History Channel under the title “Nostradamus Effect: Fatima’s Lost Prophecy.” The description for the show says:

“The Vatican closely guards the secrets of one of three prophecies that children in Fatima, Portugal, claimed to have received from the Virgin Mary in 1917.”

Apparently it will air multiple times.

Product

MHFM: This is something someone sent to us. It’s a beauty product from “stem-cell” technology.

Question

Dear Brothers,

I have a New American Bible from years ago. Should I dispose of it? Is there a proper way to get rid of it? I think on the sleeve of the book jacket is an inverted triangle.  Also, do you believe in our Lady's appearance at Knock, Ireland in the late 1800's?        

John Settimo

MHFM: We have no reason to conclude that the apparition at Knock in the 1800s was false. Our recent post concerned the false apparition occurring there now. Even if it isn’t the best, you don’t need to necessarily get rid of the New American Bible you have. It can be used as a reference to compare translations, etc.

Comment

Thank you for putting the comment about halloween on your blog, this is what I was looking for, I knew for myself it was a pagan ritual but it’s good to have the information regarding the background and history of it.  By the way I didn't let my kids participate or hand out any candy and thats what the war was about between my wife and I.  It’s [difficult] trying to do the right thing in this house hold when someone is so of this world.  Keep up the good work I pray for your perseverance and safety and I am looking forward to seeing you on the history channel... 

Todd

Ouija boards

Concerning ouija boards, I heard a story of some people that were trying to get the board to communicate and they asked it various questions, but then someone asked, Who is this?..All of a sudden all the dogs in the neighborhood started barking, the candle in the room then melted fast, and it spelled out the word B-e-e-l-z-e-b-u-b!   Also someone I knew personally told me that someone asked the spirit if it ever seen God before and it spelled out the word H-a-t-e..... One girl said that she was at a party & she asked the board if she should even be using it, and the board answered 'NO', then she felt as if her fingers were melting into the planchette, she then said her sense of hearing went out thus not being able to hear other people in the room talking around her....These boards are gateways to  demonic possession along with having the devil occupy your residence...Why anyone would want to fool or have anything like that in their home is beyond me...  People need to avoid these "games" at all costs.

-Steve

Comment

Dear Brothers in Christ,

I've listened to your debate with Mr. Moore. Of course your position in the debate was the correct one. As far as I can see, the "faith alone" thing, from the standpoint of pure logic, is a product of a faulty logic (of course, the Devil makes use of a faulty logic all the time; faulty logic is one of its favorite tools). Namely, the condition of a necessity is not the same as the condition of sufficiency. Thus, faith is necessary for salvation, but is not sufficient; likewise the sacrament of baptism is necessary for salvation, but is not sufficient.

Our Lord Jesus Christ insisted on faith simply because it was lacking those days (nowadays the faith is apparently non-existent save but in small remnant of true Catholics). But the insistence on what is necessary does not imply that this is the only thing needed nor that it is sufficient. You have substantiated your position with many quotes from the Scriptures, but Mr. Moore could not find not even a single one to substantiate "faith alone".

It is obvious truth that you also insist on the True Faith these days simply because The One and Only Catholic Faith is viciously attacked from many sides, the most wicked attack coming from V-2 sect… In essence, "faith alone" is a blasphemy because it is evident that the OBEDIENCE to the Word is of utmost importance--our Lord insisted on obedience as much as on faith. One is obviously not obedient if he/she thinks that it is allowable to sin gravely as long as one has The Faith. The final result of "faith alone" is "faith none", because sin destroys faith, and vice versa. Faith and sin are mutually excluded. The "faith alone" is much the same thing as "love alone" thing characteristic for V-2 satanic "theology". The phony "love" of the V-2 adherents is as empty as the "faith alone". In the end "love alone" turns out to be "love none".

It is not a mere coincidence that V-2 and other "christians" are kin with Buddhism and other emptiness-loving man-made eastern philosophies. Yet somehow I think that Mr. Moore has a potential to convert to The True Faith, although at this moment he is of bad will. I don't know why I have this feeling. Anyway, the feelings and all other human qualities have to be subdued to the Truth. And to the prayer.

Thank you for an excellent debate. May our Most Holy Mother Mary and St. Joseph keep you on the right path and show your holy efforts to our Lord.

Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia

Marriage

Pope Leo XIII, Dum Multa (# 2), Dec. 24, 1902: “It follows then that the marriage of Christians when fully accomplished… cannot be dissolved for any reason other than
the death of either spouse, according to the holy words: ‘What God has joined, let no man put asunder.’

Does the term "marriage of Christians" here imply that if two non-Christians got married, and then were divorced, and then one of them converted to Catholicism,  the Catholic would be free to marry? Also, someone once told me that if two people are married outdoors, ie. not in a church building, then it is not valid, this seems ridiculous, but I'd like to hear it from you.

I am looking forward to the History channel special.
-A huge supporter.

MHFM: It only refers to “the marriage of Christians” because there is the Pauline Privilege. The Pauline Privilege applies when two unbaptized persons (thus two non-Christians) are married, but one of them converts to the faith. If the other one (i.e., the remaining unbaptized person) will neither convert nor live at peace with the new Christian, then the marriage may be completely dissolved. That’s called the Pauline Privilege because it has its roots in the epistle of St. Paul to the Corinthians (1 Cor. 7:12-17). That’s why Pope Leo qualifies the statement with “the marriage of Christians.”

A marriage can be valid if it is outdoors.

Debate

Brothers:  A very good debate with Mr. Moore.  I think Mr. Moore (I could be wrong) is of good will and is just confused.  I think he is confusing "faith" with being in a state of grace.  He agrees with you; he just does not know it.  I would hope that you praying for him that he convert to the true faith. 

You responded to an e-mail from Ms. Kalix a week ago or so about her miscarriage.  Your words to her were compassionate and on the money.  It helped me deal with a miscarriage my wife and I suffered a few years ago.  The child may have been a monster sinner and the miscarriage may have been the best things.  I am learning now to trust God in these things since He is a lot smarter than me.

I agree with you about the Halloween situation.  The feast of All Hallows Eve had some redeeming qualities a long time ago.  It is simply evil now...

William

MHFM: Thanks for the interest. One could not say, however, that a person who rejects (and in fact attacks) the Catholic faith is of good will. He is not confused. He understands Catholic teaching and rejects it. He might have enough good will to eventually convert. That’s something for which we should hope and pray; but a person who attacks the Catholic faith is demonstrating bad will at the time he is rejecting Catholic teaching. One must be convinced of that.

History Channel

MHFM: Bro. Michael Dimond will be appearing on the History Channel, in a special on the Third Secret of Fatima, on Wednesday Nov. 4, at 9:00 p.m. Eastern Time.

Antipope “Beatification”

Dear MHFM,

It is truly a sign of end times when the anti-Christ is going to be canonized a saint and Melanie Calvat of La Salette has not been canonized. Could this be the last straw? If you read her life story in the book Sister Mary of the Cross you can see that should have been canonized years ago She lived everyday as a Saint and anti-Pope lived everyday as a "feel good" pope. Catholics of the world, wake up!

Your ardent supporter,

Bob Bohr

Halloween

I do not let my children participate in halloween. I also do not turn on my porch light or hand out candy to other children. I have seen many videos on Halloween and I wonder if people actually know what "trick or treat" really means.  The origin of trick or treat came from the Druids about 2,200 years ago. The Druids were priests in the ancient Celtic countries. What they believed is that on Halloween, evil spirits would come back to visit the living. The Druids would go house to house saying that the owner of the house had to leave some sort of food out on the doorstep for the spirits as a treat or the Druids would trick the household by placing a curse upon them or killing their children. Even today, many humans including children are sacrificed on an evil altar on halloween night. 

Virtually every Catholic I know lets their children dress up for halloween. If we dress our children up like saints and send them out to participate in a pagan ritual, does this really honor the saints??? 

May God bless you. Keep up the great work.

Mary

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. We fully agree. People should not have anything to do with Halloween. It’s very interesting that almost every parent who claims to be Catholic will allow his or her children to dress up for Halloween. It’s another example of how liberal and out of touch with the faith and the truth almost everyone is today.

New Rite of Exorcism

Subject: New Rite of Exorcism of Paul VI

Even though Father Amorth serves the NewChurch, he makes an astonishing admission: The revised rite of exorcism is worthless in the everlasting fight against evil. As if it wasn´t enough JP2 promulgated a new form of rosary that increases the number of Hail Marys by each 1/3 to 66.6 instead of the usual 50. 

… Lefebvre DID state on certain occasions that the Vatican II Sacraments were deprived of validity, how about a similar admission from the biggest expert on exorcisms in the world? Maybe it´s a first step for many inside the Novus Ordo structure to see the light. First they realize that the Vatican II sect replaced a time proven Exorcism rite with a phony that won´t even tickle the Devil.

After accepting that, newchurchmen can move one step forward and see the errors in the New Catechism. And finally see that the New Sacraments were invalidated.  

I also wanted to mention about a supposed accusation that Paul VI was fooled by Bugnini during the reform of the Liturgy. A lot of people in the Traditional circles (FSSPX) are moving to the position that Paul VI was a good Pope who happened to be misled by evil men (the same scenario they apply to JP2 and B16). If that is really the case, like they claim, then why did Paul VI go anyway and promulgate the Novus Ordo, with very few alterations? Why did he personally make Bugnini a Bishop? Seems like a promotion to me. And why did he let the New Mass go ahead for almost ten years, without ever wanting to do a recall 

MHFM: Those who think that Paul VI was good really need to look at our video or file on him: Paul VI (manifest heretic who claimed to be Pope 1963-1978) [link to section]

Two questions

Hi, my name is Jorge and live in Utah.  I have a great respect for brother Michael Diamond and so I turn to Most Holy Family Monastery for two concerns/questions that I have.  The first question is by far the most important… The two concerns are listed below.  Thank you so much for your time.

Question #1:  What do you think about the Diocese of Utah decreed that the Blood of Christ is suspended from mass during Swine Flu epidemic.

Question #2:  There is a picture called "Jacinta 1972".  In it contains the hour, date, time and year of the great chastisement.  I figured June 10, 1011 when WWIII will occur.  What's your comment on that? 

Again, thanks for your time.

Jorge Rodriguez

MHFM: Thanks for the interest. To your first question, we think it’s irrelevant that the Diocese of Utah made that move. That’s because the Body and Blood of Christ are not present in the New Mass. It’s invalid. Please consult our file: on the New Mass.

Regarding #2, it comes from the false Bayside Messages. These false messages contain numerous heresies and false prophecies. They are not from God or the Blessed Virgin, but from the Devil: False Apparitions (Divine Mercy, Bayside, Medjugorje) [Link to Section]

SSPX

Dear MHFM -

Just wondering if the brothers at MHFM are aware of yesterday’s meeting between Vatican and SSPX representatives?  Apparently the SSPX reps are calling out the Vatican over its false-ecumanism and vague/contradicting topics of V-2 documents.  What are your opinions?

MHFM: We think it further expresses the ridiculous, heretical and schismatic position of the SSPX. It has only been decades now, and they still aren’t under the “authorities” and the “hierarchy” they regard as Catholic. It’s absurd. At the same time they even have the audacity to denounce people who correctly point out that the Vatican II sect doesn’t have any authority. Their position is a joke at this point.

The Society of St. Pius X [Link to Section]

It also highlights Benedict XVI’s role as a deceiver in the last days. His gross apostasy is there for all to see, but he fools the bad-willed by making it look like he’s friendly in some way to tradition.

Interest

Dear Brothers and Sisters:

Years ago, I left the church after Vatican II. I do not like the "New Mass ", and the majority of changes that were made since that time. Since I have not found any Traditional Catholic Churches in the area where I live, what can I do? I do not wish to return to the "New Church" at present. Should I change to another denomination? Any suggestions or advice would greatly be appreciated.

Thank you and God bless.

Gerard

MHFM: Thanks for the interest. You need to become a traditional Catholic.  The steps for how to do that are on our website.  We recommend that you obtain our basic package.  One must be convinced of all Catholic teachings before making the profession of faith and receiving sacraments.  Obviously one is not convinced of Catholic teachings if one is considering becoming part of another denomination.  We’re glad to hear about the interest, but you should pray the Rosary and become convinced. 

New Debate Posted

David Moore is a Protestant who studies the Bible and attempts to refute Catholic teaching from it. He produces videos, articles and materials which are dedicated to trying to disprove Catholic teaching from the Bible. He challenged us to a debate. So, we had a recorded debate discussion on the topic of faith alone and eternal security. The total time for the debate discussion is 1 hour and 56 minutes.

Debate is here

It will be found permanently in our Traditional Catholic Audios, Telephone Debates, and Refuting Protestantism sections.

Halloween

Brothers,

Here is an article describing the goings-on at the white house. Though the article states that Obama was in plain clothes, the picture of him on my Yahoo start-up page appears, to me, that he is dressed up like a priest. No doubt a novus horror "priest."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091101/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_obamas_halloween

Sincerely,

Howard

JD

Dear Brothers,

This latest publicity stunt by the V-2 sect to celebrate the heretical Joint Declaration on Justification with the Lutherans is yet another example of how bad willed Australian "Catholics" are. I think it's really just a celebration of Halloween - October 31 (and the "principles" of Halloween - "do what thou wilt") - by the V-2 sect!!! The fact that the Joint Declaration was signed on Halloween in 1999 shows how Antichrist the whole affair is. How in-your-face-Antichrist does it have to get before people wake up and see how the Catholic Church's buildings are being raped by apostates?!!

God Bless,

Chris White

Praying

Alright, I'm confused, and I would really appreciate it if you could enlighten me on this point:

When we pray the Rosary, do we dedicate it to Our Lady, or to God? Do we offer the Rosary to Our Lady only, or do we have to offer it to God? I'm confused!

Do we have to pray it with the belief that whatever grace of favor we might receive from praying it, we receive it from Our Lady, or from God?

I'm confused! This has always confused me, because, it goes without saying that we only adore God in the Holy Trinity alone, and not any Saint or even Our Lady, but, then they also say that when we pray to any Saint or even to Our Lady, that we Catholics do not expect to receive any graces or favors from the power of the Saints of from Our Lady, but that they intercede for us and obtain from God whatever we ask from them, not that they of their own power grant us said grace or favor; but then how do we reconcile that with the Rosary? I don't get it!

This is why I have hesitated to pray the Rosary, because I just realized these things and now I don't know what to think or the beliefs we should or should not have when we pray the Rosary.

Could you please help me with this?

AB

MHFM: When we pray to the Blessed Virgin, she prays to God for us. Yet the connection between the Mother of God and God Himself is so powerful and strong and intimate, that it’s automatic. It’s not as if one needs to draw a mental separation: well, I pray to Our Lady, who will in turn pray to God for me. No, it’s instantaneous and automatic. We pray to Our Lady; she grants us graces. The same is true when we pray to other saints, who are in possession of the Beatific Vision. Yet it’s true to an even greater and more powerful degree with Our Lady.

Rosary

To whom it may concern,

My name is Amanda… I live in a very small town in North Carolina. I desire to become catholic. I read a catholic bible, I pray the rosary.. In fact the doctors told me I could never have any more children. After saying the rosary to the Holy mother, I became pregnant. I live in a southern baptist community, and there isnt much help for me. I feel its imperative that I become catholic. I dream about it, I feel led to it. Please help me … Thank you

Amanda

MHFM: It’s great to hear about your interest.  You should continue to pray the Rosary each day, more than five decades a day if possible.  You should obtain basic package with the main books and DVDs we sell.  We recommend the basic catechism and the books we offer from St. Louis De Montfort on the Rosary and True Devotion to Mary.  A few other lives of the saints might really help.

This file explains the steps one needs to take to convert. If you contact us here, we can also help you further.

The Steps to convert to the traditional Catholic faith and for those leaving the New Mass - Baptism and Conditional Baptism - the Council of Trent's Profession of Faith for Converts

Comment

Thank you so much for posting your debate with David Moore.  In my opinion, this is your finest debate!  It was very educational, and you both should be congratulated for conducting yourselves in a professional manner and staying on topic.  I think it was quite clear that when Mr Moore was challenged with irrefutable and overwhelming evidence - he had concede that he either had no answer, or at the very least he had to admit the text was "difficult."  I REALLY hope you debate him again in the future on other topics:  such as scipture alone and the true presence of the Eucharist (both of which were briefly touched on.)  In most cases, Mr Moore seemed sincere and was willing to admit when you caught him in contradictions.  Ultimately it was obvious that the Catholic position was shown to be correct, and anyone with a shred of honesty will admit that Brother Peter clearly won this debate.

God bless the MHFM, and continue your great work!

- Ed

Noises

Dear Brothers,

Those are astounding videos on the heretics JP2 and Reginald Foster. They are really just like very bad comedians, only they are pretending to be real "pope" and "priest"!!! Those weird noises of JP2 remind me of your exorcism tape, how the possesed person was making pig noises, etc. "Fr." Reginald Foster treats hell like it's a joke, but you can see him physically squirm as he wrestles with his conscience…

That was a fascinating debate with the heretic David Moore on the heresies of Faith Alone and Eternal Security. It touched on many important points. It did sadden me though that Mr. Moore was obstinate in the face of his own confusion about what many scriptures mean. If God is the God of understanding, then surely he would enable us to understand his words in the Bible. Catholics understand that Jesus made St. Peter the Pope in order to explain the true meaning of scriptures (amongst many other duties). Perhaps it was providential that St. Peter, the first Pope, was the one who wrote of St. Paul’s Epistles:

2 Peter 3:16 - As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are certain things hard to be understood, which the unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, to their own destruction.

Eternal Security is like saying that Adam, made in the state of grace/justice, could never have committed the Original Sin, or to say, “oh, now that I’m an American citizen, it is ipso facto impossible for me to break the law!!!”

At 0:45 of video 5, David said, “I really do believe it’s a question of have you ever seen God or not.” If that were so, then how come Satan, who really, truly, substantially saw God, and stood in His presence – how is it that Lucifer became Satan the Devil, if it’s simply a question of whether one has “seen” God or not?! Obviously even angels can be damned!

Faith Alone is like people who believe that by simply imagining something, it will happen. If I were to imagine a house to live in, would that then appear? No. I would need to physically work at building it…. It seems to me that Protestants, like David Moore, almost secretly worship the Bible! I think this because that is where God seems to begin and end for them – in the Bible! Our God, the True God, the Catholic God, the Lord Jesus Christ, actually made everything and uses it according to His will, and not according to man’s desires. Protestants seem to begin with the initial assumption that all you need for salvation is the Bible, but we know that the entire Catholic Church is needed for salvation. If God were actually their authority, they (Protestants) would believe what the Bible says about St. Peter, etc. Also, I’m guessing that about half the NT is admonitions and encouragements for the faithful to continue in justice and grace. If we cannot lose salvation, then half of the NT is superfluous.

…In his closing statement David said, “The Catholic Church would have to be 100% right about everything.” And if the Catholic Church was established by God Himself, with a rock as the keeper of the Keys to the Kingdom, we would expect it to be right about everything, as it truly is and always has been. Why is it that Protestants all acknowledge the elaborate Jewish system and its destruction (of the temple, etc.), but they deny the Christian system, the Catholic Church, the new Israel?! Oh I forgot, they are PROTESTants, head-butting the rocks like Jews!!!

Thank you Brothers and God Bless,

Chris White

MHFM: Thanks for the comments. We think that there is more hope for his conversion than for many Protestants out there.

About

Subject: About the sola fide debate

Part 7 was simply the best. Since Mr. Moore sees no difference between venial and mortal sins, he should see no difference between fornicating just one time or a thousand times. 

C

Comment

Your recent debate once again proves as you stated, that many points are "ignored" when people are trying to justify their thinking. Out of ignorance and their Vail of spiritual blindness, they choose from an al-a-cart menu to manifest their own reality. Ignoring what they can not understand merely because they are excluded from its interpretation (blindness). Unfortunately, their false interpretation out of pride, leads only to eternal damnation.  I believe deep down, these folks know they are wrong. Many people continue down the wrong path none the less, while few, fight the fight to have the Vail lifted to see the truth.

God Bless MHFM,
Tom

Comment

Great job on the 11-part debate with David Moore on the issue of whether the Bible teaches "justification by faith alone" or "eternal security".  The debate showed clearly both of those Protestant beliefs are totally unscriptural, and I think Mr. Moore (if indirectly) did concede that the Catholic views Bro. Peter showed in this debate are correct. 

It is sad to realize that this man, who expressed many times how very careful he is to NOT sin, especially in a grave manner… IS sinning in a mortal, death-dealing manner by disobeying Jesus… by joining a false religion started by A MAN who was riddled with evil (Luther), and by NOT adhering to the ONLY true religion on Earth which Jesus Christ founded. 

For example, Mr. Moore agreed with Bro. Peter about the scriptures where even St. Paul expresses fears that HE---the GREAT Apostle to the Gentiles---could become REPROBATE-------well,  maybe Mr. Moore could understand it this way: HAD "PROTESTANTISM"  EXISTED AT THE TIME OF ST. PAUL, AND HAD ST. PAUL ABANDONED THE TRUE FAITH CHRIST TAUGHT---THE CATHOLIC FAITH----in order to become a "protestant", then in that case St. Paul's worst fears would have been realized, for he WOULD have become a REPROBATE, and fallen into heresy and died in this most wretched and vile state of mortal sin, and Hell would have been his eternity.  

Maybe it is because protestants------just like Vatican 2 "catholics" and other apostates, heretics and schismatics----ARE in these tragic delusions that they lack the grace to see the only one true church of the traditional Catholic Faith........for mortal sin blocks grace.  But miracles can happen, they do happen every day---and I believe that if a reprobate and sinner like me can come to see the truth,  than others can.....but clinging to such clearly non-Biblical "pacifiers" of "justification by faith alone"/"eternal security" has to end, since such pacifiers are filled with death-dealing poison.  Same goes for the V2 "Catholics"---- let go of your baby blankets, and embrace the only truth that can help you get into Heaven----TRADITIONAL Catholicism.       

That's why the grace of final perseverance is the most important thing to pray/ask for… Once again Thank You! and great job on this debate.

A

Innocent III

Subject: Innocent III

Hey Brothers,

I am sorry if you already have this quote in your material somewhere, I could not find it on your site or in your books. Maybe I did not look hard enough.
This is from Denzinger 410 and it has to do with there being a difference between a person dying with only original sin as opposed to actual sin. I think I understand it right.

(Denz. 410) Innocent III "The effect of Baptism (and the Character)": "Original, therefore, which is committed without consent, is remitted without consent through the power of the sacrament; but actual, which is contracted with consent, is not mitigated in the slightest without consent... The punishment of original sin is deprivation of the vision of God, but the punishment of actual sin is the torments of everlasting hell..."

I thought this was relevant to the belief that some schismatics have that unbaptized infants suffer the same punishment as those who die in actual mortal sin.
Also it proves that those with original sin cannot be in Heaven because they lose the vision of God. This may not be ex cathedra but it reiterates Dogma. Please correct me if I am missing something or I am not enterpreting something correctly.

Nate

MHFM: We don’t generally use that citation to prove the point about unbaptized infants not suffering the fires of Hell. That’s because it comes from a letter of Pope Innocent III called Ex Parte Tua. That letter is not infallible. That letter also teaches the error that original sin was remitted by circumcision. That error, that original sin was remitted by circumcision, was contradicted by the infallible teaching of the Council of Trent. We cover this in our book: EENS, in section 17, in the process of refuting an objection raised for “baptism of desire.”

That being said, we think that the quote does add something. Even though it doesn’t come from an infallible document, it shows that another pope held the same position: that unbaptized infants go to a part of Hell where there is no fire. It’s something additional to consider, along with the more authoritative statements which demonstrate the point.

JP2

Crazy JP2 Video…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TIoelyZ5qvQ

C

John XXIII

DEAR BROTHER DIMOND

I HAVE BEEN GOING THROUGH YOUR WEBSITE AND FIND YOUR INFORMATION RELEVANT TO OUR TIMES AND I DO WANT TO HAVE MY FAMILY AND I'S SOULS SAVED HOWEVER IF THE LATE POPE JOHN XXIII WAS ACTUALLY AN ANTIPOPE WHY IS HIS BODY LAYING IN A STATE OF INCORRUPT NATURE AND IF EVERY CHURCH IS USING THE NEW MASS IS TAKING COMMUNION VALID AND ARE MY CONFESSION VALID?

A VERY MUCH UPSET CATHOLIC

TERRY MORIER

FROM CANADA

MHFM: As we point out in our book (The Truth about What Really Happened to the Catholic Church after Vatican II), and in our section on John XXIII: The Scandals and Heresies of John XXIII [PDF File]:

After his death, the Vatican sent for Gennar Goglia, who with his colleagues embalmed John XXIII. Goglia injected ten liters of embalming fluid into John XXIII’s wrist and stomach to neutralize any putrefaction. This explains why John XXIII’s body didn’t decompose like normal bodies. In January 2001, John XXIII’s body was exhumed and placed in a new bullet-proof crystal coffin now on display in St. Peter’s basilica. John XXIII’s face and hands were also covered in wax. (citations in section)

This is the only reason that John XXIII (who was a very wicked heretic) did not decay like normal people. As far as your other question goes, the New Mass is definitely invalid and it’s a grave sin to continue to go there. The confessions to priests ordained in the New Rite of Ordination are not valid, but if the priest was ordained in the old rite and says the proper words it could have been valid. That’s covered in our material.

Liturgy

Dear Brothers

"HIGH CHURCH" NON-CATHOLICS

Some so-called Traditionalist Catholic websites and blogspots salivate in, and glorify the "Tridientine" liturgy, supposedly celebrated in a most pristine way, by various Anglican/Episcopalian clergy and groups. Truly, brothers, are not these liturgies celebrated by heretics fit only for the garbage bins, whether velvet lined or not?

More seriously, such Traditionalists claim that they are any different to Novus Ordo Catholics who vigorously pursue ecumenical practices? 

Sincerely,

Joe. M

MHFM: It’s certainly true that many traditionalists don’t have the faith, but instead glory only or primarily in the external, aesthetical and emotional aspects of Catholicism. They enjoy the chanting and the singing and the liturgy but don’t really care about the faith and the truth. In that way, many of them are very similar to high-Church Anglicans. They just have a slightly more traditional or conservative inclination. We definitely believe that the comparison is appropriate.

Debate

MHFM: A new debate that some of our readers might find interesting will hopefully be posted soon.

Astounding

Thought you might be interested in this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7JBQvIC7YQ

Astonishing indeed. Well, at least he's honest in his heresies.

MHFM: That’s just astounding heresy. The guy is totally evil. That’s the Vatican II apostasy for you. He’s a senior Vatican priest. Also, we wonder how many false traditionalists – who say they cannot judge that Benedict XVI is a heretic – would say the same about this apostate.

College

MHFM,

I would like to ask your opinion on college parties.  My parents as well as the people who invited me to a party say that its fine, they understand I don't approve of getting drunk so just come and don't drink, you can just socialize.  I see two problems with it.  One, it is an approximate occasion of many sins (alcohol, immodest dress, these parties easily induce many to sins of the flesh).  Secondly, even though they say they know I don't want to be a part of drinking I still think that my going is giving them scandal.  I feel my attendance shows I don't drink personally but it’s fine if someone else chooses to do so, which would be wrong.  What do you think about it?  Several of them know my views on many things.

Kenneth Connelly

MHFM: One should definitely not go to such parties. It is an occasion of sin, as you said. But additionally, to be in such a mortally sinful atmosphere where the entire occasion is basically defined by mortal sin is to be implicated in it. It would have to be one of the worst things a person could do – not in the sense that there aren’t worse mortal sins, but in terms of putting oneself in a situation where one’s soul is apt to be ruined.

Former

I am a former employee of EWTN who was terminated because of my support of true Catholic faith and sacraments. I assure you that you are correct. They are modernists who are afficted with conciliar papolatry.

E

Comment

That article you posted about "Cardinal George" and "Archbishop Dolan" can only be described as a "puke page" because seeing this idiotic face in the photo,  the sliminess, the malevolence so obvious in this apostate's visage and countenance,  could only make one want to puke. 

At this point,  I can't help but feeling that anyone who can fall for these most noxious and pestilent enemies of Christ ANTICS deserve everything they get:  total spiritual blindness, etc.  Still,  since I was a blind fool myself,  until very recently when I was miraculously led to your website and information (the truth)  I will pray for all those poor deceived hapless souls still "accepting" these V2 apostates and their incredibly EVIL counter-church,  since the Holy Ghost will blow wherever He wills, and there may be a certain number of  Mary's true children still out there,  somewhere,  whom God intends to save....

As for the bad news on "president" obama's (what a side-show freak!) "National Emergency'" re: "swine flu"----- can any one out there say "FASCISM"???  My own health is so incredibly damaged from a "flu shot" I got last winter (yes I was a big-time fool for allowing it) that I have to admit my life will probably (except for a miracle,  which I am still praying for)  never be the same.  It's even hard for me to pray,  much less clean the house and fulfill all my duties as a house-wife,  much less WORK,  as I always used to do.....be warned---beware----do not get any of these "flu shots"  because from my own personal experience,  I would advise that they are designed to incapacitate,  and  even to kill.............Sincerely,       

Topic

Subject: Great job on audio praying to Saints

Brothers Thanks for all the information

James

Topic

Thank you for the pro life video. I had a miscarriage earlier in the year. I could accept that this soul was in a part of hell where there was no hellfire, but had still been haunted as to why our Almighty God let it happen. Now I can see that if this child had been born, its future sins would probably put him/her at a worse place in hell. Thanks again. This is a hard topic to frame as so many do want to believe these unborn souls go straight to heaven. I'm very glad God gave you the grace to make this video. May The Holy Trinity continue to bless MHFM!

Christina Kalix

Comment

Great video again guys, I just wanted to make a few comments, abortion is of the devil and he has a reason for it just like the same reason he tries to get all of us into hell.  That is his one and only objective to ruin souls, that being said if he gets man to promulgate abortion but the unbaptized babies go to heaven anyway, his purpose is defeated!  Oh yes, I know the devil is defeated anyway but many souls are lost in this great battle that Our Lady predicted at Fatima.  

Remember what Mary said to the children about WWll, that most will go to hell.   The devil wouldn't persist in something that has no effect for him {devil}, the ruining of souls.  Remember that these devils were once Angels but were cast out of Heaven, Angels and devils are very highly intelligent beings, more intelligent than we are.  Plain and simple Jesus says that you need water and the HOLY SPIRIT to remove original sin. Remember the devil will always do the opposite of what JESUS teaches or does!!! The problem here is that the dogmas taught by the True Catholic Church are so linked together that to deny one you deny them all, you can't mix good and evil theology!  With the 
BLESSED HOLY TRINITY everything has its order and reason even if we don't understand it, we are finite and He is infinity!!!  May the Queen of Heaven, with the Great Rosary and the scapular save us all.  

Todd

EWTN

Subject: What would Jesus do?

Did you pray and seek God's guidance before you wrote this website?  Just wondering.  Do you actually watch EWTN before you trash it. I wonder what Jesus would do. He spoke kindly even to Mary Magdaline.

Della

MHFM: The heresies that we cover from EWTN are documented. You need to wake up. The people on EWTN accept Vatican II and false ecumenism. They are modernists. Jesus spoke kindly to Mary Magdalene because He knew that she had the good will to change. But He condemned other obstinate sinners and false teachers in strong words when it was appropriate.

EWTN and the Charismatic Movement [link to section]

New Video

Comments

… Thank you for posting the video on JP2 teaching that "Man is the Way". It becomes more and more apparent how the world has put man in the place of God.

The near misses are incredible. Thank you for posting them. 

The Lord Monckton speech is startling. The end truly is near!

Vatican 2 thumbs up for Karl Marx?! How do they answer for the Gulags when they silence Bp. Williamson on the "Holocaust" - oh, I forgot - the Gulags were not aimed at Jews, so it's ok to slaughter 100,000,000 people (in their mind)!!!

The video on abortion and the Pelagian heretics is excellent. It is very easy to see how wrong the modern day abortionist heretics are, and also how they are worse than the Pelagians, since they reject the necessity of any kind of baptism (even though there is only one). Your reference to the denial of Original Sin is also very helpful in understanding this issue. Thank you.

God Bless,

Chris White

Letter

[NOTE: For those it might interest, this is a letter we recently sent to a person who is still a supporter of the Vatican II sect. This person is considering the full truth of the traditional Catholic faith (i.e., sedevacantism, etc.), but is not convinced.]

As an addendum to the last e-mail, you really should get our big book, The Truth about What Really Happened to the Catholic Church after Vatican II, if you haven't seen it - in addition to our other books. The evidence is covered there. It contains their worst heresies, a history of their false ecumenism, hundreds of photos, the heresies in Vatican II, etc. (By the way, Benedict XVI's endorsement of Vatican II alone would prove that he's not the pope.)

You also probably believe in heresy on the dogma Outside the Church There is No Salvation. If so, that's another big reason that you still are unable to see the truth. You really should get that book as well.

The fact that you would say that most of the heresies come from PCT [Benedict XVI’s book, Principles of Catholic Theology] seems to reveal that you aren't very familiar with the material we've put out. Some significant heresies do come from that book, but they constitute only a tiny fraction of the heresies. We have a whole section on Benedict XVI's post-election heresies. For instance, one of his worst heresies (among dozens) is his recent declaration that a schismatic leader is a "pastor in the Church of Christ."

Also, from what we gathered, you seem to like popular music. That is all sinful garbage which blocks out grace. You really should stop listening to it. In addition, if you don't pray the full Rosary each day (all 15 decades), you should. It's critical.

Finally, and I'm saying this to help, you say that you hang around with your girlfriend. Well, unless a person is seriously considering marriage and perhaps soon, having a long-standing girlfriend is very dangerous and usually an unwise thing to do. Almost always people fall into sins of the flesh that way. If you are committing sins that way (and even deep kissing between unmarried persons is a mortal sin), and not praying the full Rosary, then God will pull grace from you and you will be unable to see the truth. Wisdom is chaste (James 3:17).

Frankly, some of the things you have said reveal that you are still in a spiritual fog. The fact that you need more proof, after hearing the debate and seeing some of the things we've covered, is a very bad sign. You need to realize that the people you think are Catholic [like the guy we debated, other prominent figures in the Vatican II sect, etc.] are very evil people. That's no exaggeration. I know that might shock you, but it's the truth. They are totally apostate unbelievers headed straight for Hell. They hold that anti-Catholic Protestants are not even heretics. You heard him say it when he was asked about it in the debate. That’s almost satanic. That means that the Catholic faith is meaningless.

That is a total mockery of everything Catholic, all the dogmas, Our Lady, Our Lord, etc. It reveals that they don't possess one whiff of faith.  So, by surrounding yourself with those types, even if you are just reading them all the time or listening to them or thinking that they cannot be on the wrong path, it can brainwash a person. It can sort of give you a community feeling that this group is okay, when it is not. It can negatively impact you in a huge way. The way to find the truth and analyze things correctly is to prescind completely from what all of your friends and clique-members think.  It is to analyze, in solitude, what God thinks. Consider the truth without any regard for the opinions of the people around you; for they are totally deceived.

-MHFM

Comment

Dear Brothers:

I never had the chance to thank you for the 3 part-series of videos dealing with the sins of the flesh against purity. Nicely done! I did not know that [these things were] so bad. I knew the church regarded it (or at least used to) as a sin, but I thought it was only venial.

Nowadays, if you go to a Psychologist, he will say it´s only normal. Even many of the Protestant sects (with their changeable morality) bought the idea that´s part of own´s "exploration" and a way of acquiring "practice". The same mentality that encourages people to accept and even try to embrace homosexuality. In my youth, my parish priest (novus ordo) treated the whole masturbation subject as venial and a chapter or live. He was also against infant baptism (a total heretic, a protestant under a priest´s clothes). When I told him I wanted to be a Priest he told me that first I needed to "experience" live, go out, date, kiss... I don´t think some guy like that will ever threaten someone with the pains of hell. 

To be frank with you, I live in a city that is as close to hell as can be (Rio de Janeiro)… I now walk around with my rosary inside my pocket. Every time I see something that disturbs me… I just place my hand on it and ask for strength…

It seemed impossible at first, but it´s not so hard after someone watches Brother Michael´s masterpiece video "Death and the Journey to Hell". That´s a very inspiring material. The best I´ve ever seen on this topic. If you guys want to attract people to your page, this video (along with Creation and Miracles) is by far the best option, since even Traditionalists (FSSPX alike) and conservative newchurchmen can feel attracted to it, without touching at first glance on sedevacantism and the whole baptism of desire issue.  This may be one of your earliest works, but I don´t think it will ever get old. Deo gratias that you did not follow the trend and took easy on the issue with fear of insulting or scaring people away. After the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus lost nearly all of his followers, and even inquired the twelve if they were planning to run away too. But He did not care. He knew all too well that Truth is far more important than damaged egos.  

Fatima

Dear MHFM,  

The Vatican II sect remains the Vatican II sect until it is deposed, and sadly these events are forever violent and catastrophic as Catholic history clearly illustrates.  Since the atmosphere at the Vatican, at present, by most reports coming out of Rome, tense, on both sides, those that side with the present administration, and those who are plotting to overthrow them, from several fronts-religious and political- it can logically be computed that the third secret of Fatima, unrevealed in totality to the world, has a date yet in the future.  Moreso, the complete message must be revealed to the world.  There is no way out of this since the Blessed Mother has commanded that it be done, and it will be done, completely and correctly.  What the Queen demands, the Queen gets!  It's not complicated.  It's regal obedience.  The 'etc...' after the dogma of the faith in Portugal remains silent, and squashed, moreso, after sister Lucia disappeared from the scene, I suppose, suffering violent, torturous death-deliberate poisoning- as some conspiricists have propounded- hence, replaced by phony Lucy, by and for the Vatican II agenda. Our Lady of Fatima is the penultimate thorn of the Vatican II sect and their worldwide plot of destructing the Catholic Church by creating a new theology, and new Church, by the aegis of Vatican II quasi-authority as your ministry clears elucidates by providing the true teachings of the Roman Catholic Church; undefiled, pure, and holy as handed down from the time of Peter.  If most Catholics only realized that throughout the life of sister Lucia those in heaven never left her side and communicated with her when necessary.  Sister Lucia was that conduit to this evil world the Blessed Mother used, and sister Lucia administered humbly without retardation, and assurance.  Her supposed silence since the early 50's, til her supposed death a few years past, sans revelations from heaven is inordinate in sister Lucia's unique position as seer, and revealer in this era. For sister Lucia to remain silent all that period of time is absolutely without precedence as long as she walked, and devoutly prayed in this evil world.  The last revealing secret of Fatima, undisclosed at this time, begins with a loud defiance with heretic Roncalli , who we know rubbed shoulders with those openly opposed to the Roman Catholic Church; communists, Rosicrusians, Masons, Protestants-the minions of evil.  By openly proclaiming the Fatima seers, "...prophets of doom..." Roncalli revealed not only his pride, but that 'something' in the future spelled  worse catastrophy than what the world had previously went through.  Roncalli was in blatant denial of Catholic truth, and revelation-divine and private.  Roncalli reviled the Fatima message and their seers as much as the masons of Ourem.  The infiltration of the Church was complete in his eyes, and man would rule the day from the Chair of Peter bringing  good news, not of Christ, but of man, and The Blessed Mother's message at Fatima would never see the light of day til' the end of time-so Roncalli and his successors thought.  The bad fruit, and the root of this plague, Vatican II, is dying, and the fetid odor emanating from Ratzinger and his disilusioned sect begs an end.  Through your revealing efforts, and those opposed to Vatican II continue, hope remains, and Love in Christ, and His true Church  prevails.  God Bless MHFM.

D

MHFM: Thanks for the interest. One point: we don't believe that the Vatican II sect has revealed any part of the real Third Secret of Fatima.

Death

Subject: God did not make death but God is the one who kills and makes alive

I have a question.

In the Wisdom of Solomon 1:13 it states that: "God did not make death" however in Deuteronomy 32:39 that: "God is the one who kills and makes alive." How do we reconcile these two apparently contradictory views of God and death?

Thanks,
Ken

MHFM: God did not make death because God made man immortal. Death only came into existence as a result of the sin of Adam. Since death now exists as a result of man’s sin, God kills and makes alive.

Comment

This morning I was listening to The Laura Ingram show. She says she's a Catholic. Today her guest Ray Arroyo said the "Popes" move to absorb Anglicans is a triumph of Orthodoxy. Some of the Anglicans are feeling out of sorts because their religion is being overrun by liberals.  So, the schismatics have found a new home where they can practice their false religion. Annexing false religions to create a conglomerate of false faith seems like push towards someone's idea of a new world order. I wonder who's next?

Hmmm...When I googled Mr. Arroyo to get the spelling of his name his blog popped up and he is a big EWTN supporter. The page that was brought up discussed how the V2" Bishops" were very pro government healthcare. To me that means pro socialism. From a Catholic standpoint I don't know how to react to the healthcare issue. Certainly Capitalism has its issues but to broaden the scope of Socialism always is cause for alarm especially if there is separation of church and state. Unless I am corrected, at first glance I would have to reject US Government Healthcare.

Matthew

MHFM: Arroyo is EWTN’s main host. He is a TOTAL apostate. He fully embraces the worst of the false ecumenism, commenting with glee on synagogue trips, Assisi-abominations and many others.

Huh?

Hi, i can see why you are upset with Benedict. But i can assure you that his outward appearance of toleration is just for show. Political correctness is in fashion now a days. Believe me, Benedict, in his heart, is just as intolerant as you are. Look at where he came from? He was head of the Holy Office, the very seat of the Inquisition. Rest assured, Benedict would just as soon see every non catholic burned at the stake. But to buy time, he is putting on sheeps clothing.  thanks for your time.  your friend  wayne

MHFM: You are obviously confused. When he was the head of the Vatican II sect’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Benedict XVI was every bit the apostate that he is now. In our material we cover loads of his outrageous pre-“election” heresies.

Benedict XVI (The Heresies of Benedict XVI File) [link to section]

Baptism

Hello,

First, thanks for all the information your monastery has made available - I've only recently converted and your site is very helpful in these first days as a Catholic. This brings me to my question: I asked my Catholic fiance to baptize me, which she did, and all went well except that she preferred to use "Holy Spirit" in place of "Holy Ghost". Besides that, everything else was identical to the form as stated on your website. Is this a valid baptism?

Thanks for your time,
Steve Stanley

MHFM: Yes, both Holy Spirit and Holy Ghost are acceptable. We’re glad to hear about the interest.

The Way

From our video, John Paul II preached the Gospel of the Antichrist: that every man is God.

Comment

... I grew up in the "Novus Ordo" church.  Until I discovered your web site I never knew the Traditional Catholic Church existed.  Though I knew something was wrong with the "Novus Ordo" church, I couldn't leave "The Catholic Church" and I didn't know why.  When I first started examining your materials, I didn't want to be taken a fool.  I didn't want to be deceived.  I began the process of ensuring the quotes you provided in your books were accurate and in context by verifying your citations.  I have purchased many of the books you have referenced in your materials and I have verified many of the citations.  I don't necessarily agree with everything you say, but most of it, yes.  There is more of the Truth of Jesus Christ in your materials than I have ever seen before in my entire life.  I have found only one quote that was questionable, and that may have been a matter of interpretation as the original language of the document in unknown.  I thank you for your work and your efforts.  May God bless you with unfailing faith and may you see His face in Heaven.

Receiving your material has absolutely changed my life, though I must say I still have a long way to go... Thank you for the valuable service you have provided.

Sincerely

James B. Patterson III

V-2 “converts”

In many of the debates regarding the Vatican II sect, you raised the valid question "Can a Protestant convert into a Neo-Cath without abjuring heresies like Sola Fide?"

I guess that question should be made once again in light of the recent news. In any direction this newchurch is a simply a joke. They either refuse converts, or, when they decide to accept mass conversions, they do it in the wrong way and by the wrong reasons.

It seems to me all an Anglican has to do to "become" Catholic is to be against gay marriage, gay priests and woman priests. Those are relevant points, no doubt about that, but they are primary disciplinary and/or moral issues, not about faith. 

So the question remains: Can a displeased Anglican "convert" to the new religion while still believing in Anglican Theology?

PS: People nowadays have very soft skin and easily become offended by the truth. And in a paradox, they don´t realize that they themselves are being offensive. How could someone accuse you guys of not being polite, when the person in question who first wrote said people (including you) were silent on the issue. By the way: Isn´t true that you guys once send your material to every priest and bishop in the United States of America? If that is silence, I wonder what a scandal would be.

That being said, I believe both the content and the tone used in your answer seemed totally adequate to me. 

CK

MHFM: Yes, does anyone really believe that these “converts” accept the defined dogma Outside the Church There is No Salvation? Of course not. Does anyone really believe that they have become convinced that their former Anglican friends and colleagues, who don’t accept all of Catholic dogma, are in heresy and schism? No.

They have decided to visibly join the Vatican II sect only because they no longer felt comfortable where they were. It’s only because they no longer got the warm fuzzy spiritual feeling – which defines their false religion – in a “Church” that allowed women “priests” and active homosexuality. So they’ve just moved over slightly to a group that’s a bit more in line with their personal thinking. And that’s probably only because the Vatican II sect is also allowing them to be under an “ordinary” from among their ranks – so that they feel as Anglican as possible – in addition to keeping their previous “liturgical traditions” and married “priestly” lifestyle.

Near misses

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQ24Mw_r0eo&feature=player_embedded

MHFM: This first one is amazing. One can only conclude that God miraculously intervened to keep the child unharmed. It’s also very interesting that the child fell only an instant before train came. If it had fallen thirty seconds before that, it probably could have been removed from danger. It seems like a concatenation of events which lined up to show God’s miraculous power.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BO2rW1alVv8&feature=player_embedded

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNqWPswYYaA&feature=player_embedded

Book

Yesterday I had lunch with a friend for her birthday and she gave me a copy of Brother Michael Dimond's book about Padre Pio.  I've already read it and it is the best book I've ever read!

Dolores Molter

MHFM: Thanks for the interest. It’s not the best book, but it has value and we’re glad that you have benefited from it.

Not too harsh

I thought your response to Emmanuel T’s question was right on point.  It did not strike me as some kind of a harsh attack in anyway, rather you answered the question directly, and in a way which suggests you accepted it on face, as written, and did not attack the questioner at all.  You approached it as though Emmanuel’s question was borne of a sincere concern along the lines of “someone ought to tell Rome, for if only they knew” (as opposed to say sarcasm), in that I took your answer to be patient and reassuring.   For example how could he characterize you guys (and you easily could have interpreted his question as a direct attack) as “silent and helpless”?  That assertion is patently ridiculous.  Yet you explained to him in a matter of fact way, how a Catholic should view the situation in such a way that a real Catholic could take comfort.

What is it with people like “S”, so numerous nowadays, who think it is rude, or some kind of a personal attack, to say that one’s opinion is wrong, or that a particular statement is ridiculous?

I think this modern attitude is reflective of both the “self esteem” movement and the somewhat older relativist movement (the “truth isn’t knowable, if it is even real), and this of course comes directly from the false and condemned notion that Religious Liberty is somehow a “good thing”.  What “S” seems to really be saying is “don’t tell me the truth, it might hurt my feelings”.

I’m reminded of the social etiquette rule that one should never discuss “religion and politics”.    These subjects tend to force people into head on confrontations with truth in a way that small talk seldom does.  The fact that these topics make most uncomfortable, is evidence that most are not of goodwill.  They don’t want to know.  If you tell them you are “mean spirited”, not charitable.  Charity has come to mean something else.  Usually it means giving other people’s money away to fund the result someone’s vice.

Bill Mulligan    

Book

Dear MHFM,

Thank you for compiling the book about the Bible proving the Catholic Church.  It is an excellent resource for anyone seeking the true Biblical Church.

Sincerely,
Matthew Falcon

Plan

Subject: New Vatican Plan

You see the news? 'New Vatican Plan Lets Anglicans Convert Easier'...there's your "Heresy of the Week"... Benedict never disappoints you guys, does he?

PLP

Comment

… the last e-mail exchange of someone accusing you of being too "harsh", was very troubling to me.  One of my own vices that I have been praying and working to overcome is my "human respect" vice.  I think I am being "charitable" to people by sugar coating words - instead of being honest and revealing their wicked ideas or speech as such - and it has nothing to do with being charitable, but being a coward....you were accurate in calling the motivation behind her false accusation as "human respect" and not out of charity.  

Anyway..... her comment just really bothered me.

T

Comment

Subject: “S” regarding Emmanuel T

I'm pretty certain that the "S" stands for "satan" in the "re:emmanuel t " writer today---you were right on the mark… in reading in between the lines of emmanuel t's insulting "question" (accusation)---- all I have to say to people like "S" is:  you'd better hurry up and get onto the RIGHT side of this battle BEFORE it's all over and too late,  once Mary has totally crushed the enemy's head, and he is dead, forever…

Anne K

Sent

I don't know what to think about the state of the soul of Captain Lou Albano!  He just died recently, October 14 at the age of 76.  I knew he lost a lot of weight during the '90s after a heart attack.  As a big fan of the Super Mario Brothers Super Show, which he played Mario in both live action and animated segments, I contacted him via the internet and sent him some of your material.  He said "Yeah, that interesting.  I don't like that they're [Rome] is cow tailing to certain groups like the you-know-whos.  I'll certainly look into it."  I certainly hope he did.  I hope he did not have to answer for appearing in that "Girls Just Wanna Have Fun" video with Cyndi Lauper, which encouraged girls to exhibit wild behavior and turn a blind eye to their parents request!  And some people say this song became a theme song for girls everywhere!  That's truly evil.  Cyndi Lauper who has a homosexual sister is a big supporter of the evil LGBT agenda.  She even wrote the foreword to his autobiography.  Too bad such a great talent doing the devil's bidding like that!  But Captain Lou had to be a conservative!  I just know he did!  It doesn't seem to fit who he was as a man to be anything but that!  I pray he found the true faith before his recent death…

-Michael Rudnicki

MHFM: We’re glad you sent him the material. A Catholic cannot consider someone among the faithful departed unless there is evidence that he or she died as a real Catholic.

Expose

Dear brothers michael and peter,

pls expose in your website the evils and lies of the wacky vatican 2 regarding this news though every traditional catholics know that this union is another abominable act but we have to condemn it publicly and unmask the deception and lies .. claiming for "universal salvation" and going against Salvation Dogma .. keep up the excellent apostolate for the glory of God! - sedevacantist from the Philippines

MHFM: It will be interesting to see what the actual “constitution” says when it comes out.

Harsh?

Subject: Rude Response

"What if someone were to go to Rome in the Vatican and denounce them all as heretics and tell them they are going against the Church?"

Your rude response to Emmanuel T's interesting question was full of mistaken assumptions, and was laced with unwarranted hostility:

Your assertion... is totally wrong.

It’s ridiculous for you to suggest...

But it’s absurd for you to imply...

[Y]our assertion reveals that you have an incorrect outlook...

Down South, we would say, "Where's your hometraining, boy?"

It is unfortunate for you and your readers that your lack of graciousness is so obvious. It is more than just immature, it looks like paranoia.

You are not helping the cause. You need to pray more.

And cut out the caffeine! ;)

S

MHFM: No, you are completely wrong. The response was totally warranted. You’re getting lost in the shuffle of some of his more mild language, and ignoring what he is actually asserting. He didn’t simply ask a question; he made serious accusations. You people let major insults to the Catholic faith or to true Catholics pass as long as they are couched in some mild language. True Catholics can focus and zero in on the truth when people like you cannot. Words matter. Not surprisingly, you only quoted his question, not what he actually asserted.

If you look carefully at what he is actually asserting, it’s very strong. It’s a major insult to true Catholics. In fact, it’s a direct slap in the face to all the true Catholics who have spent much time and effort (and even much of their lives) opposing the Vatican II sect and its apostate antipopes. He’s basically saying: you do nothing. You are helpless. He asserts that those who don’t go to Rome are “remaining silent” (i.e., doing nothing and possibly denying the faith and committing mortal sin by omission). That’s no small accusation. But his assertion that Catholics opposing the apostasy do nothing doesn’t matter to you because truth doesn’t matter to you. It’s all about appearing to be nice to people. (We wouldn’t be surprised in the least if you are a BOD salvation-in-any-religion apostate.)

His statement was false, uncalled for, and it deserved such a response. Hence, your criticism of our response reveals that you lack a Catholic understanding. You are too bogged down by human respect. Thus, you cannot focus in on the key points. In addition, this individual, if we recall correctly, has demonstrated bad will numerous times in the past.

Why?

I wanted to ask you, what you thought would happen, if any sedevacantist were to go to Rome and try to tell everyone there or maybe even Ratzinger, all that they have done, or ask them what are they doing? What if someone were to go to Rome in the Vatican and denounce them all as heretics and tell them they are going against the Church?

Why hasn't anyone attempted to do this? Or have there actually been some people that have attempted to do something like this, to go there and try to get them to see what they have done?

Don't you think something like this should be done, instead of just remaining silent and living helplessly without doing something like this?

I would really like to know your thoughts about this.

Emmanuel T.

MHFM: To sum up your e-mail: it’s much ado about nothing. Your assertion that people are remaining silent is totally wrong. People are spreading the truth in every medium: through the internet, mail, video, audio, etc. in public. It’s ridiculous for you to suggest there is some kind of need for Catholics to travel to Rome to talk to (and condemn) the apostates in person. If people want to do that, we don’t have any problem with it. But it’s absurd for you to imply that it’s some sort of obligation. That’s like saying: you should go visit the notorious abortionist and try to reason with him and tell him that it’s wrong to take a life. Or: you really need to have dinner with the head of the “Church” of Satan and tell him that it’s dark and evil to worship the Devil. They are fully aware of what they are doing. It’s enough to condemn the activity publicly.

You ask how they would react.  They would respond by repeating their heresies.  They would respond by saying that you don't have a “proper understanding” of Catholic teaching. They would tell you that you are not submissive to “the Magisterium,” “the pope” and “the council” (i.e., Vatican II).  They would probably tell you about "the development of doctrine," and say that you "misunderstand" those dogmas you are quoting.  (By the way, that sounds a lot like what the sedevacantists who deny the salvation dogma say, doesn’t it?)

Many people have written letters to Antipope Benedict XVI about his modernism, his heresies, and his false ecumenism. People in Rome have seen our material. Heretics are in control of the buildings in Rome. That’s just the situation. They know what they are doing and they are modernist apostates precisely because they want to be. That’s the situation that God has allowed, the one He predicted.

Lastly, your assertion that people are “living helplessly” reveals that you have an incorrect outlook on things. You are giving way too much emphasis to externals, almost equating it with the possession and practice of the faith. Catholics can find the truth they need to be Catholic and save their souls. That’s what matters. That’s certainly not helpless. It’s just the opposite: helpful unto salvation, for those of good will. It’s only helpless if you equate Catholicism with being in possession of certain buildings, etc.

Comment

Each day is a continued thank you for opening my eyes to the truth.

P

Sovereignty

Subject: MUST MUST WATCH - Actual VIDEO of Lord Monckton Saying, "Obama Poised to Cede Sovereignty in Copenhagen"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMe5dOgbu40

K

New Church

I just realized MHFM has a lot on u-tube and last night i re-listened to the debate you had with wm. golle back in 06....you know when I first heard this last Feb/March 09, when I first came upon your info online, it was one of the very first things I listened to but I remember it not making much sense to me as I did not have enough context or background info on the issues you cover in general. Well listening to it again last night, I was amazed at how very clearly and succinctly you Brothers expressed and defended all the facts in your material.  But what amazed me most was that this character golle basically spent almost all of his portion of the 3 hour debate screeching like a woman something unintelligible about the "Roman Clergy"---I mean it was REALLY bizarre--- then I read where it says golle is FROM THE CAMDEN DIOCESE AND WORKS FOR THE CAMDEN DIOCESE CATHOLIC STAR HERALD--- well--- suddenly------the whole scenario all snapped right into focus.  I mean, the hocus pocus that goes on around here with newchurchers has got to be some of the worst planet-wide.  Trying to bring even a little light into this area can be quite a challenge. 

For many years since we moved here in 97,  my husband kept saying to me (about the "Catholic" church around S. jersey)  "they're trying to bring in a new religion" but I didn't understand it, and nor really did he!, until we stumbled across your website….

Interest

Hello Sir / Madam,

I'm a Catholic here in the Archdiocese of Cebu, Philippines; 21 years of age. I was deeply troubled about the new mass. I really put emphasis on the Eucharist as a climax of my Catholic life. It's so sad to hear that there's no priest or bishop here offering traditional Catholic mass.

Is there any way that traditional mass be reinstated here in the archdiocese or parish?

Sp

MHFM: Thanks for the interest. All the bishops of the Vatican II sect are heretics and not Catholic. Therefore, one should not be looking for them to reinstate Catholic things in their “dioceses.” Before receiving traditional sacraments, one must be convinced on all issues (no baptism of desire, no salvation outside the Church, a rejection of the Vatican II antipopes, no NFP, etc.).  Also, one must be convinced to never attend the invalid New Mass again.

You should look at our Where to go to Mass or confession today? for guidelines on receiving sacraments in our time.  Also, one should pray the Rosary each day, all 15 decades if possible.

RU-486

Dear Brothers` Michael and Peter,

The `morning after` abortion pill RU486 translated into:

RU stands for `are you`.

4 stands for "for".

86 is a mafia term for killing someone, as in, "the boss said to 86 him".  In the Numeric Greek Concordance, the number `86` represents the word meaning, "HADES-THE ABODE FOR THE DEAD".

Consequently, RU486 states, " ARE YOU SENDING YOUR BABY TO THE ABODE OF THE DEAD"?...

With best wishes,

To Tell The Truth

MHFM: Some people also think that RU-486 means “are you antichrist?” They believe this because they believe that the peace symbol is a broken upside-down cross representing Antichrist. And on a clock the numbers 4, 8 and 6 would visually represent the peace symbol.

Comment

Comment: False traditionalist backs down from sedevacantism debate

Dear Brothers Michael and Peter,

Ave Maria!

… I received my copy of the latest video you have posted on that false traditionalist who backs down from the sedevacantism debate.  I would like to comment that I really am amazed at how the Devil works these days.  Truly I can safely say what the Lord says in the vision of Pope Leo XIII regarding the Last Days when Lucifer boasts to God and he could destroy the Church... that he only need time and additional power should be granted to him on behalf of all those who render their services to the Devil.  We recall that God agreed to this that time and power would be granted to Lucifer as Pope Leo XIII recalls…

This video only proves how powerful Lucifer has become and he can use 'pseudo-traditionalist' catholics .. quoting Scriptures, but his lips vomit the poisonous venom of lies directly coming from hell to blaspheme the Holy Ghost!!! ... and to our surprise, unlike the catholics of previous generations who would cry HERESY and cause commotion and public disturbance, this very apostate would in fact gain a number of followers complimenting his very heresies and wage war against the defenders of the True Faith.  This generation is the worst and we all deserve this supreme punishment as all the crimes of previous generations since the creation of Adam would not equal with the crimes humanity has had ever done in our generation…  We are reminded by Revelation that in the last days, the Beast of the Apocalypse is in the mood to wage his final war against the seed of Her who was flown into the wilderness.  The Beast is in the mood since he considers himself powerful enough to crush the remainder (remnants) of the One, True Church of Christ ... the Catholic Church, but of course we know the Blessed Mother will vanquish Lucifer but since these are the last days the trials of our Faith will also exceed all imaginable trials the Church members has ever had.  That leads us to believe literally "in the last days, deception were so profound that even the elect would be deceived, if it were possible" (Matt 24)

Well done brothers michael and peter... words are not enough to show my appreciation to your excellent apostolate, though all praises and glories must be directed to God alone…

In Jesus and Mary,

Joey, a sedevacantist from the Philippines 

Comment

… re: the unqualified COWARD who RAN AWAY from debating you: wonderful job shining a strobe light of Catholic truth onto this most cowardly cockroach who has been vainly attempting to gnaw away at the truths of the Church with his lying falsehoods---I have to admit, that it's kind of fun to watch the cockroaches run, thanks again!  It's nice to watch THEM (but THIS guy is the ULTIMATE loser!) get a little sand kicked in their eyes, now that evil modernists like him have "had their fun" mocking the True Bride of Christ over so many decades. 

As for that absolutely ridiculous phony appearance he so vainly dons---the pipe, sideburns---how very TRAGIC for him!!!----maybe he is trying to hide his lack of brain cells! and how tragic for all people who claim to "think" like him, (if you want to be generous and call what goes in his mind "thinking"!)  It is abundantly obvious that this pseudo-intellectual--and I do mean pseudo, meaning FAKE---- is not even remotely any kind of intellectual at all but is instead just another vapid AIRHEAD!!  I find all these modernists are airheads, ultimately, totally lacking in the power to REASON. 

Again, great job, and THANK YOU and all of you at MHFM for exposing this particular creep, and ALL the other noxious pestilent creeps like him... I will pray for this heretic’s and all heretics like him, conversion… Beautiful dusting of snow on the fall foliage in the photo---isn't snow a blessing-- this must be the first snow of the season.  All Praise to the Sacred Heart of Jesus and thank you for defending the true Catholic religion!  

A

Video Update

Tamiflu

Good morning,

I wanted to make a comment on the flu situation.  I am a medical transcriptionist and I type progress notes and consultations all day on children in a children’s hospital.  I receive multiple reports a day on children who became ill, went to see their primary care doctor, and because the illness was deemed not too late for it they are put on Tamiflu.  These children do not get better with this poison.  They end up in the hospital within a week, most in the ICU.  Even if the only other underlying medical problem they have is as common as seasonal allergies, Tamiflu causes extreme difficulties in these children.  Because the doctors keep them on the Tamiflu throughout their hospital stay, the children acquire more complications, eventually being sent home with new underlying medical problems like seizures and chronic respiratory difficulties to add to their allergies.  I have also noticed that the only time the doctors even consider the problem to be the Tamiflu is because the parents make note that the worsening began when the Tamiflu regimen was started.  If parents do not speak up, the doctors get away with it.  Also beware, I had a specific case where a child had been placed on Tamiflu by the PCP for swine flu, without being tested.  The child became worse within a few days and was admitted to the hospital.  It was there that the child was found to be flu negative and pneumonia positive, but they continued the Tamiflu regardless.

SF

Video

Dear MHFM

Thank you for your latest video regarding Daniels miraculous transport, sins, and further exposing the errors of V2.  I found your commentary (on the enslavement of sins) to be very accurate.  "Lust wounds people, keeps them unhappy and enslaved..the happiness they desire will not come by sins of the flesh."  I think many people find themself today "enslaved" to their sexual addictions to pornography and lustful thoughts and actions through the internet.  It's also very sickening to see how QUICKLY the vatican was to congratulate Obama on receiving the Nobel prize.  I wouldnt expect them to oppose it, but it would be better to say nothing at all - rather then show support for the most pro-abortion/pro-gay president in history.  On a side note, please consider the fact that the USCCB has a long history of financially supporting liberal organizations such as ACORN.  So all V2 "catholics" should know that part of their hard earned money given in the collection plate is going to support liberal/progressive,  ANTI-catholic "politically correct" organizations.

Thank you,

Ed

Interesting

MHFM: Some arrogant, pseudo-intellectual false traditionalist, who had criticized us, recently backed down from our challenge to debate him on the sedevacantist issue. This was after he told someone that he could refute us and that he’d be willing to debate. We will probably have an update about that.

Comment

Dear Brothers,   I love your little update short videos.  As always they are so informative.

I also have enjoyed all the other videos you have recently presented. I wanted to tell you that I have read the book "The Martyrs of the Coliseum" By Fr. AJ O'Reilly… It was written back in 1874.   It was such a fascinating book, so descriptive and detailed… I am now re-reading it and am about halfway through again, but now I highlight certain areas so I can easily reference them. Fr.O 'Reilly used such beautiful descriptive phrases.   And the way he brought out all the miracles God worked through the martyrs-how the lions licked their feet, protected them from the Romans, the many conversions that took place… And I am re-reading Secret of the Rosary.

God bless you for your work.

Sincerely,

Kathryn Rubio

P.S.  Don't you think it 'odd' that California suffered the rains and floods on Oct 13 (feast of Our Lady of Fatima's miracle of the sun) and right after Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed a crazy bill for the "GAY Harvey Milk" day on his birthday May 22.  How sick!  God is punishing California, All that was missing was the fire and brimstone! And Cleveland won the GAY Games for 2014! We should live so long!! We so have to pray the Rosary!!

Dancing

Dear Brothers,

Thank you for the reply to the email on dancing - it's such a big enticement to lust and vanity, not piety!

Here is a scripture that could also be applied to dancing: 1 Corinthians 7:1 - Now concerning the thing whereof you wrote to me: It is good for a man not to touch a woman.

I remember a history class I took which argued that dancing is to be likened to voodoo demonic possession!!! King Louis XIV, aka. "the Sun King" (Sun-Worship) was a dancer. That's what made dancing "high-class." The most renowned dancers had the most debauched lives imaginable. Rudolph Nureyev constantly had little boys in his Limousine. Valsav Nijinsky, some argue the greatest male dancer ever, said he "danced like God" and believed that he was God (Antichrist). He was also a homosexual and he had a wife simultaneously - he was admitted to a mental institution. Immorality is second nature to these types of people. Many other example could be given. If they are not doing drugs, then they are promoting the New World Order (homosexuality, paganism, spiritism, etc.). Don't dance with the devil!!!

… Wherever there is dancing, there will be corruption. The quote of St. John Vianney is brilliant:

“There is not a commandment of God which dancing does not cause men to break… Mothers may indeed say: ‘Oh, I keep an eye on their dress; you cannot keep guard over their heart. Go, you wicked parents, go down to Hell where the wrath of God awaits you, because of your conduct when you gave free scope to your children; go! It will not be long before they join you, seeing that you have shown them the way so well… Then you will see whether your pastor was right in forbidding those Hellish amusements.’” (Abbé Francis Trocu, The Curé D’Ars, St. Jean-Marie-Baptiste Vianney, p. 146)

Also, freemasonry’s main means of attack is by destroying morals.

God Bless,

Chris White

Comment

… last week one of my really good friends took her son to the doctor because he had been sick. The doctor rushed her son to the hospital because the doctor claimed her son had swine flu. The hospital released him a few hours later saying that he really had scarlet fever and a normal case of the flu and simple antibiotics would be able to take care of the problem.

M

Pro-abortion

… As you have been pointing out for some years, the Vatican II sect IS IN FACT pro-abortion by means of omission. In the same way they endorse divorce by giving annulments based on the most ridiculous and idiotic grounds. People in the new church really need to wake up and see the facts. It´s nearly impossible for Ratzinger not to know the Ted Kennedy´s background; How could he be unaware? It´s just not realistic.  It´s not  matter of being judgmental, but simply grasping the facts, realize what´s really happening.

That young man from youtube… I wonder what would be his mental shield against an utter undeniable fact like this text. Did he ever reply to your letter? I was interested in seeing the follow-up, because he does not strike me as a person of bad will, just some victim of the great deception that surrounds us. 

In a sense, I´m actually grateful that Ratzinger is acting like this. I hope he organizes another inter-religious meeting like the 2 Assisi events of John Paul II. The more open he is about his heresies and betrayal of the faith, the bigger are the chances of poor newchurchmen and false trads realizing the truth. What really concerns me is when he acts like he´s very conservative or even traditional. Some people are sooooo deluded they even think he´s going to change everything back, promoting the so-called great restoration. Since people are so blinded and desperate, I guess all it takes is to celebrate one or two tridentine mass every once in a while, make a few brief conservative comments from time to time and quote a pre-vatican II pope every six months and you become a Traditional in the eyes of the blinded. 

About 2 years ago I would say we should refrain from judging, since we don´t know if he´s under pressure, being manipulated, not well informed or whatever. But after so many expositions of heresy and apostasy, it becomes difficult to conceal the facts. It´s a sad truth, but there comes a point in which there´s no use in denying it. People like Mr. William Golle would certainly say you´re making a big stretch in saying he´s pro-choice, but I believe the facts speak for themselves. If a mature and well informed person does not connect the dots, he or she can only be of bad-will, or a total coward in terms of faith.

Thank you, Bother, for making me once again open my eyes. Your material is indeed the best available…God bless you.

CK

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. No, there was no response. Sadly, he is of bad will.

Where?

I found your website by accident some time ago, and ever since I have been reading all about the Church from your site and in other websites and things like that.

I wanted to give you thanks, because it was through your website that I realized what is really going on, and converted from the Novus Ordo sect, but of course God is the one Who is ultimately responsible for the conversion of peoples, but I give you thanks anyways.

But I still had some questions, that I haven't been able to find the answer to, and which, when I try to tell Novus Ordinarians about sedevacantism so that they get out of that sect and convert to the true Faith, they ask them to me all the time and I don't really know how to answer them, so I wanted to see if you could help me with them:

… How do I answer to their objection of "where is the Church"

… Rafael DeMontis from EL SALVADOR.

MHFM: The Church exists with the remnant of traditional Catholics which maintains the fullness of the faith and holds all Catholic dogmas (including the salvation and baptism dogmas) without compromise. The Church is visible in those individuals, wherever they are.

Things were so bad in the Arian crisis that St. Gregory Nazianz felt compelled to say what the Catholic remnant today could very well say.

St. Gregory Nazianz (380): “Where are they who revile us for our poverty and pride themselves in their riches? They who define the Church by numbers and scorn the little flock?” (“Against the Arians,” The Faith of the Early Fathers, Vol. 2, p. 33)

Distribute

Dear MHFM,

Another way which I have not tried yet, but will when my next order comes through, is to distribute materials at car pool parking lots. One who has access to the Internet can type in "car pool parking lots" and get information for these lots across his or her state. I went on line and within twenty minutes had multiple listings within 30 miles in each direction for locations that held around 500 cars. I am looking forward to trying this method with my next supply!

I have found that if you distribute information in crowded parking lots and try to distribute more than ten booklets or other info that parking lot security will come and confiscate the books. I have had much better success with the smaller amounts.

Pass this on to your supporters!

Bob Bohr   

Insert

Dear Brothers Michael and Peter,

God bless you and all the wonderful work you are doing, I do not know if you have seen this but on the very package of the H1N1 Vaccine manufactured by Novartis 2009 we can read this…

H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccine Insert Admits It Causes Guillain-Barre Syndrome, Vasculitis, Paralysis, Anaphylactic Shock And Death

John Ogaz

Stumbled

Another great job referring to the new video guys keep up the good work.  I have been reading since 1991 about the endtimes and as I said in previous e-mails always had a problem with the v-2 mass for a long time even though the priest was a very conservative priest and had the tabernacle in the center of the church, when I stumbled upon your 
website, which was a miracle for me you finished my journey to the truth.  I thank God for you all so much. 

Todd

Update

Pagans

Subject: Pagans are innocent

Hello, I was just talking to my Dad about the Aztecs and their paganism.  He mentioned that they practiced this paganism of sun worship and this worship and that and that they only practiced it out of innocence.  In other words it is not their fault that they practiced human sacrifice to satan (!!!), because they were ignorant of Christ.  Do you know of any bible verses that could prove that pagans become pagans because of their sins and not out of ignorance?

Jim 

MHFM: The best thing to quote for him are the dogmas of the Church. They give us the authoritative understanding of Scripture and Tradition. However, the answer to your question is that Scripture makes it quite clear that pagans are in darkness and that they worship devils. They are outside the pale of salvation.

2 Corinthians 4:3: “And if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost, in whom the god of this world [Satan] hath blinded the minds of unbelievers, that the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should not shine unto them.”

2 Thessalonians 1:7-8- “And to you who are troubled, rest with us when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven, with the angels of his power: In a flame of fire, giving vengeance to them who know not God, and who obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ.”

Colossians 1:12-13: “Giving thanks to God the Father, who hath made us worthy to be partakers of the lot of the saints in light: Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of the Son of His love.”

Ephesians 2:1-2- “And you, when you were dead in your offences, and sins, Wherein in time past you walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of this air, of the spirit that now worketh on the children of unbelief.”

1 Corinthians 10:20- “But the things which the heathens sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils, and not to God. And I would not that you should be made partakers with devils.

Psalm 95:5- “For all the gods of the Gentiles are devils: but the Lord made the heavens.”

UFO

Hello,

I listened to an internet broadcast last night and the guest mentioned Our Lady of Fatima.  He made reference to the fact that the historical descriptions of Her apparitions point to the fact that these were actually demonic appearances reminiscent of UFO-type sightings.  I'm sure you've heard about this.  Can you please explain. 

Thank you.  

Loretta Ursini

MHFM: They are nothing like UFO accounts.  It's a ridiculous statement on the guest's part.  Fatima predicted and delivered an undeniable miracle.

Waltz

"SF" mentioned the Waltz in her e-mail about dancing. Pope Leo XII condemned the Waltz….

B.O.D.

I gotta hand it to you, Brother Michael Dimond, for putting up and documenting all of the heresies of Benedict XVI in your section Heresies of the Week of Benedict XVI; I've seen the file you have on his previous heresies of the week, which is quite a long file, and whenever I start reading it, moments later I can't keep reading anymore, because his heresies, apostasies and schisms are just so outrageous, so completely diametrically opposed to Catholic teaching, and just so plain sick that I just can't take it anymore because I get fired up with holy indignation and disgust at all this heresiearch says, and so I stop reading them. But I'll make the effort to eventually read them all.

It takes a lot of effort and, I don't know, probably "spiritual endurance", to put up with so much heresy and apostasy and then still comment on it and present the correct teaching of the Church. Well done, not many can do that.

But I also had one question for you: I've pretty much read all that you have written on the so-called "baptisms" issue (I reject them), but I think I haven't seen this quote been used by you to disprove "baptism of desire":

Pope Paul III, Council of Trent, Sess. 6, "Decree on Justification", Ch. 5-7, 1565, ex cathedra: "People are disposed for that justice when, by that repentance ... they are proposing to receive baptism ... This disposition and preparation precede [do not result in] the actual justification ... The causes of this justification are: ... the instrumental cause, the sacrament of baptism, which is the sacrament of faith, without which justification comes to no one. ... Consequently, in the process of justification, ... all these are infused at the same time: faith, hope, and charity. For faith, unless hope is added to it, and charity too, neither unites him perfectly with Christ nor makes him a living member of his body. ... From apostolic tradition, catechumens seek this faith from the church before the sacrament of baptism when they ask for the faith that gives eternal life; and this, without hope and charity, faith cannot give."

So my question is: does this passage really disprove "baptism of desire"? I've seen this passage been used by some people and websites to disprove "baptism of desire", but I think I haven't seen it been used by you.

Peck C.

MHFM: The key passages in chapter 7 of the Council of Trent’s decree on Justification are cited and discussed throughout our book: EENS. In fact, the book contains a section on the instrumental and efficient causes of Justification (in Section 23). It quotes and discusses the significance of what the Council had to say on that point. The declaration that water baptism is “the Sacrament of Faith” is also very important. It’s discussed throughout the book, especially in reference to the “One Church of the Faithful” (Innocent III, Section 6).

The part of the chapter concerning catechumens, and how they “beg for the faith,” is also quoted and expanded upon numerous times in the book. It’s quoted in Sections 6, 16, and 21. It’s an extremely significant passage because it shows that the only time that Trent uses the word “catechumens,” it teaches that they do not have the faith which gives eternal life. They “beg” for the faith which they don’t have and which is only granted in water baptism. That shows again that no one, including unbaptized catechumens, has the faith or can be saved without water baptism.

Comment

Thank you,

I have received your dvds and books. After carefully readying and studying your material I have taken my name off my partish lists for anything to do the Novos Nordos mass and am no longer attending any Nordos Ordos mass.  I am done with them.  Please direct me to the true Catholic sacraments in my area.  I believe everything you  have said in your material.

Sp

Dancing

Subject: Dancing

Dear Brothers,

Thank you for your continued support of true Catholicism.  I am aware of you through my parents who have been your supporters for quite some time.  My children even copy your daily quotes on your home page for their daily penmanship exercises.  I have seen a great deal of improvement in their behavior since school started this year because of it.

Now, please help me.  I am at a loss of words and feelings.  All my “friends” at church have their children involved in a dancing group called Scottish Country Dancing.  They believe it is wholesome and convinced me to join my children into it.  I decided to allow my children a chance at this socialization a couple of years ago.  It had me worried from the start that they are taught to keep their eyes on each other and they must touch hands while dancing boys with girls of all ages.  It also bothered me that some of the older young ladies were quite developed and bouncing in the faces of the young men they were partnered with, due to the bouncing on your toes form of the dance.  I intermittently took my young children to class until December 2008.  The last class before their Christmas break the children were introduced to a form of dancing they had not seen yet (at least mine hadn’t; the other children have been taking this class for multiple years).  This dance required the boys to put their hands on the girls’ waists.  I was appalled.  I never took them back and even stated my position to a few of these “friends.”  They seemed to think me prude.  My then 9 yr old son shot a scared look in my direction when he had to touch a girl’s waist after his father had been teaching him not to touch girls.  My then 11 yr old daughter was also uncomfortable; I saw her squirm when the boy touched her.  Have I taught my children incorrectly all these years in thinking this just doesn’t feel right? 

Just today another mother brought this topic up in email and was concerned for her teenage son putting his hand on the girls’ waists during the waltz.  I am not one to speak up as I have not been blessed with the gift of eloquent and clear speaking and the fund of knowledge to post quotes and articles on the topics.  I do, however, have a fund of knowledge of the real world, as I was raised in public schools and went to the dances from an early age and know what happens when boys and girls learn it is okay to touch, regardless of having been a Catholic.  That said, please correct me if I am being overprotective.  I responded in this email chain today my opinions and what can happen with “chemistry,” etc.  I am now being lashed out at with responses from the eloquent speakers who can find and understand articles and official statements made by the Church regarding this issue.  In one particular email, the person pasted quote after quote about how all the Doctors of the Church forbid dance and they can find that there was no exception to be made about the SCD.  But in the last paragraph of the email, this person clearly states that after their own prayer and contemplation that they can see no wrong in this waltz with the boys touching the girls and that they think Jesus would approve of this waltz.  I should note that some of the 10 to 12 yr old boys in our families are beginning to express having crushes on certain 12 and 13 yr old girls.  Is it right, then, to throw them together like dancing?  Won’t it only encourage these “crushes?” or is my way of thinking only in the public school/protestant world?... One of our water-believer families has already fallen victim to the niceness of one of the BOD families.  I should also mention that my children haven’t even really been accepted by the children of the other families.  I would see the girls roll their eyes when their mothers would tell them to go play with my daughter.  I would also be the last to find out, usually at last minute, while everyone else had ample time to prepare, about picnics and get-togethers.  My family is the “baby” of this group of families; the rest having known each other and having been in each others’ confidence for many years before I showed up.  They are very apt to listen to each other and not to my sad little opinions and they will do what they will.  So, for my own conscience, I have some questions.  Didn’t someone tell Sister Lucy of Fatima that she should not attend the dances during festivities?  As I am the only one who holds these opinions, am I just being prude and ridiculous and should I change my mind and allow the dancing?  Or should I keep my position and just deal with being isolated from these families? 

SF

MHFM: That’s an important question. The answer to your question is that they absolutely should not be involved in any such dancing. You are not being overprotective. Those who defend it are deceived. They are leading their children down the wrong path. We think that St. John Vianney summed it up:

“There is not a commandment of God which dancing does not cause men to break… Mothers may indeed say: ‘Oh, I keep an eye on their dress; you cannot keep guard over their heart. Go, you wicked parents, go down to Hell where the wrath of God awaits you, because of your conduct when you gave free scope to your children; go! It will not be long before they join you, seeing that you have shown them the way so well… Then you will see whether your pastor was right in forbidding those Hellish amusements.’” (Abbé Francis Trocu, The Curé D’Ars, St. Jean-Marie-Baptiste Vianney, p. 146)

The Fatima children stopped going to dances after they saw Our Lady of Fatima.

By the way

MHFM: Yesterday we posted some thoughts on some more “swine flu” propaganda which surrounded the death of a 14-year-old Naperville teen. (We are referring to our post below under “Almost nobody.”) Only a few hours after that post, an article came out. In total confirmation of our point, the article said that they just discovered that the girl had a serious pre-existing heart condition:

“A 14-year-old Naperville girl with Swine Flu had a serious heart condition that contributed to her death, authorities said today. The girl, Michelle Fahle, died Thursday. The DuPage County coroner said a pathology examination revealed the girl had an undiagnosed progressive defect in her heart that made her vulnerable to illness.” http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/1818273,chicago-swine-flu-fahle-101009.article

Facts

Dear Brothers` Michael and Peter,

Regarding the regular seasonal flu and `swine` flu with emphasis on their potential lethality, all one must do is look to the southern hemisphere where the flu outbreaks had peaked in august and you will note that there were no mass casualties.  Remember their seasons are the opposite of ours.  Consequently, our flu season will peak in february, and normally occuring flu cases will be increasing over the next 5 months.  It`s as simple as that.

Dr. James J. Lapinsky,D.C.

MHFM: Yes, that coincides with the position that it’s all hype and propaganda to get people (or force them) to take the vaccine.

Comment

Dear MHFM,

Wonderful follow-up video on the Shroud of Turin.  I have your Creation and Miracles DVD and the, "Jesus and The Shroud of Turin" DVD from your website (which I highly recommend).  The amount of bad will and deceptive practices today are stunning.  Readily apparent we are in the last days when you see attack after attack on Catholic faith hundreds of times a day. 

God Bless you for your works.....

Bruce

Concerns

Subject: Some concerns

Hello,

First I would like to say that the book UFOs Demonic Activity and Elaborate Hoaxes Meant to Deceive Mankind by Bro. Michael Dimond is very resourceful. I'm very thankful for this resource, for the whole UFO phenomenon has been sparking questions for me. I would also like to say that I notice that Most Holy Family Monastery is pre-Vatican II. I would like to say a few things. And I want to be as humble as possible when I say these things because I'm only 15 and I of course would only be strinking the surface of the issues...

Jesus established his Church on the Rock, Peter. And on him the Church would be sturdy, for the "gates of hell shall not prevail against it [the Church]" (Matthew 16:18). Jesus promised that the Holy Spirit would lead the Church into all truth (John 16:13); therefore the Church really is the "pillar and foundation of the truth" (1 Tim. 3:15). With this in mind, Christ also prayed that Peter’s faith would not fail (Luke 22:32), and ordered him to tend and Christ’s sheep (John 21:15-17).

This leadership and union would never pass away, or else Christ's promise that the gates of hell could never prevail against his Church (Matt. 16:18) would collapse. Jesus would be a liar. If the Church ever taught error, it would cease to be Christ’s Church. So if Jesus Christ really did establish the office of pope, as evident by His words to Peter, would that office -- the unifying factor of all Christians -- cease? Would the Rock of the Church, the chief steward of Christ's Kingdom, ever fail?

I would like to end by these words from Cyprian of Carthage: On him he builds the Church, and to him he gives the command to feed the sheep [John 21:17], and although he assigns a like power to all the apostles, yet he founded a single chair, and he established by his own authority a source and an intrinsic reason for that unity.

...If someone does not hold fast to this unity of Peter, can he imagine that he still holds the faith? If he should desert the chair of Peter upon whom the Church was built, can he still be confident that he is in the Church?"

(The Unity of the Catholic Church 4; 1st edition [A.D. 251]).

Please return to your Home, the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church established by Jesus on Peter

With concern,

Patric

MHFM: "Now when he [the Pope] is explicitly a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church..." St. Francis De Sales (17^th century), Catholic Doctor of the Church, The Catholic Controversy, pp. 305-306: 

The Catholic Teaching that a heretic cannot be a valid pope and loses the papal office automatically [PDF file]

The popes infallibly teach that heretics cannot be popes.  By denying that teaching, you deny the teaching of the Catholic Church and the past popes.  You need to listen to our debates and look at the material.  The post-Vatican II sect and its antipopes teach that the Papacy is meaningless. Every scripture you cite about the office of St. Peter is denied by Benedict XVI. He holds that the office of St. Peter is not binding and can be rejected. That’s why he’s not the pope.

Vatican II was a heretical false council which rejects papal teaching. It says that those who reject the Papacy, i.e., those who reject the Pope, are in the Church.   That’s not Catholic.  Your position is not a defense of the Papacy, but a denial of it.  You are defending the very anti-papal heretics who say that Protestants are going to Heaven.

You are confused and misled.  There have been many times without a pope.  There have been over 40 antipopes in Church history.  It’s predicted that there will be a great apostasy and that the Church will be reduced to a remnant. That doesn’t contradict the promises of Christ to His Church. Recognizing a heretic as the pope, and a heretical sect as the Church, does contradict the promises of Christ to His Church. You need to educate yourself about Catholic teaching by looking at the material on our site. You need to look at the heresies of Benedict XVI, especially those which concern the Papacy and groups (e.g., the “Orthodox”) which deny the Papacy. He praises them all the time. He teaches that they don’t need conversion to the Catholic faith. He teaches that they can reject the dogma of Papacy and go to Heaven.

Important File

Almost nobody

Subject: “almost nobody dies of the flu” and “deaths [are] associated with flu, but not necessarily caused by flu.”

Brothers,

Here is another good article on the propaganda behind the "swine flu" scare.

http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15585

Sincerely,

Howard

MHFM: We’ve been pointing out from the beginning that “swine flu” doesn’t exist – until the vaccine is administered. It’s just a hoax in which regular flu and other problems are falsely attributed to “swine flu.”

This is interesting. We just came across this article: Naperville teen who died had swine flu. Seeing the headline, we said to ourselves: “This clearly gives the impression that ‘swine flu’ took a life. Let’s see if they can really prove or confirm that she died from ‘swine flu,’ as the headline suggests?”

Well, when you read the article, you discover this (as we expected):

“A 14-year-old Naperville North High School student who died suddenly Thursday had swine flu, health officials confirmed Friday. But the DuPage County Health Department said it has not determined whether the H1N1 virus was the primary cause of freshman Michelle Fahle's death. Further testing is in progress to "confirm a possible underlying condition" that might have been a contributing factor, the health department said in a statement.”

So, there are possible “underlying conditions.” That’s basically always the case when you hear about a death which is supposedly from “swine flu.” But it gets more interesting. The article also mentioned that an autopsy would be conducted to determine the actual cause of death. We were interested in that result. So, we looked up the autopsy results. Guess what? They are inconclusive. They cannot confirm what caused her death. In fact, when you read this article, you not only see that the autopsy was unable to determine the cause of death, but that Michelle had complained of “flu-like symptoms” sometime before her death.

“Authorities said they are unsure what caused Michelle's death but she had complained of flu-like symptoms in recent days, according to DuPage County Coroner Pete Siekmann.” http://www.dailyherald.com/story/?id=327522

Why is this reference to “flu-like symptoms” significant? That’s because back in July the U.S. and other nations stopped testing for and confirming cases of “swine flu.” Instead, they dishonestly and outrageously chalk up every flu-like symptom as “swine flu.”

U.S. and other nations stopped counting for "swine flu" in July

Even before July it was a hoax; for only certain select individuals could “confirm” a case. But now they don’t even go through any semblance of a “process.” They just attribute basically anything that touches upon a symptom close to flu to “swine flu”! So, just because this young woman complained of some flu-like symptoms, the national media is now giving the country the impression that “swine flu” has taken a life. This is dishonest, of course; but it works. It effectively convinces the masses. They cannot even say for sure that she had “swine flu” at all, since they don’t “confirm” cases anymore. As we mentioned at the beginning, it’s all propaganda. Every year large numbers of people die from all kinds of things. People die from combinations of things, from the regular seasonal flu, etc. But the lying propaganda will now attribute anything it can to “swine flu.”