E-Exchanges on the Catholic Church and other issues

 

*This section of our website will contain some less formal – and short – e-mail exchanges that we’ve had which we feel may be of value to our readers.  We will include those portions of the exchanges we deem relevant and valuable.  We often add bolding and underlining which are not necessarily that of the other party.  This section also frequently includes, not only e-exchanges we have, but notes, updates and comments by us.*


New Video

 

MHFM: This is a new video:

 

DO YOU BELIEVE ? [VIDEO]

 

New conversation posted

 

MHFM: This is a new conversation with Robert from Wales. He called in to attack our beliefs and defend Antipope Benedict XVI and Vatican II.

 

Conversation with Vatican II supporter from Wales - 1/3

Conversation with Vatican II supporter from Wales - 2/3

Conversation with Vatican II supporter from Wales - 3/3

 

Altar

 

Subject: “Beatification Altar”

 

Dear brothers:

 

The vatican just finished posting pictures of the "altar" where Cardinal John Henry Newman will be "beatified."

 

http://www.thepapalvisit.org.uk/News-and-Media/Latest-News/Images-of-the-Beatification-Altar

 

Is there anything about this weird "sanctuary" (other than the crucifix) that looks even remotely Catholic?

 

-RDS

 

Incredible

 

Subject: Incredible Creatures that Defy Evolution

 

Awesome videos!!!  I finished part two of three and I found the part where they talk about the incredible engineering it took to design a fighter jet and the things that it can do in flight but when it comes to the evolutionist the birds evolved, I find that simply astounding…

 

Todd

 

Beck

 

Glenn Beck stands on the platform at the "Restore Honor Rally" in Washington DC, with some leaders of all religions.  With Imam's and Rabbi's and a priest...and Protestant ministers....just as did John Paul II...at Assisi....

 

Nothing but lies...deceit and trickery....just wondering what your take on Mr. Beck is?

 

Sincerely

CD

  

EU

 

… I have re-watched your video End of the World.  And in that you show the paper from Pravda Russia Nov 3, 2009 (I think) where they say that the EU is Another form of communism.  I have tried to look it up on the Pravda website but cannot find it.  I would like to send it to everyone because I believe it is important that people know how evil the EU is.  So you have a link to this? Thank you and God bless you for all of your good work.

 

June

 

MHFM: Thanks for the interest.  This is one of a number of links one could consult: http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/4157

 

Feel

 

I feel the same way Brenda Roy feels regarding the conversation between brother peter and robert or anyone else like him for that fact, forget all the torture techniques that one could apply to a human being, just lock a true catholic in a room with a person like Robert and make the catholic person debate this obstinate lunatic for a short period of time, it will drive you crazy.  It’s like watching someone try to put a square block in a round hole and he just doesn't see that it won't work.  

 

Todd

 

Comment

 

Dear Brothers:

 

Thank you for sending the new 4-in-1 DVD with "Is the World About to End?" and the book, "The Bible Proves the Teaching of the Catholic Church."  So very generous of you to send them to me, and they arrived on the feast of St. Monica!  Bro. Peter's book is well written and very easy to understand.  The sequence of logic he uses is superb.  I have been unable to correspond for several weeks, though I have been reading the Website, and I am so glad to see you've been doing your usual marvelous work.  I am thinking especially of Joseph Ramirez, a man who has admirably lived up to the responsibility of bearing the name "Joseph," by confronting the dangerous and spiteful Bp. Williamson.  I would ask Mr. Mulligan if the person he is corresponding with is truly Bp. Williamson and not one of his lackeys or factotums.  If Williamson has forgotten, then he needs to be reminded: "The floor of hell is paved with the skulls of bishops."  —St. Athanasius

 

It is wonderful to hear Bro. Michael again in his new video discussing the latest heresies of the masonic usurper of St. Peter's Chair.  When B16 writes, "In these days when we remember the return to the *Father* of dear Brother Roger," people assume B16 is referring to our Father in Heaven.  We must not be fooled by this verbal manipulation.  If Ratzie meant God, then he should have used the proper designation: GOD.  But he did not.  There is another father, the father of lies.  So what B16 actually wrote is: "In these days when we remember the return to Lucifer of dear Brother Roger..."  And for these people, there is great joy in that.  They cannot wait to join lucifer!  They adore satan and serve him.  Really, these masons are becoming so obvious.

 

Thanks to Bro. Peter for the discussion with Robert from "Wales".  Bob's arguments were so absurd that I did laugh out loud; the way Bob changed topics constantly was comical.  Of course, being invincibly ignorant, Bob jumped right into the invincible ignorance song-and-dance yet again!  Robert must be pals with Mr. Windy from the Archdiocese of Chicago.

 

This quote from the invincibly ignorant Robert found on Audio 3 at 05:51 is typical of his babble: "Well, I believe in Heaven everyone is a Catholic, wherever they were in this life.  So if someone has got to Heaven under invincible ignorance, they will be Catholic in Heaven.  So Heaven, in that sense, is full of all Catholics!"  Robert continued to chatter and natter on nonstop like a pot full of bubble-and-squeak while Bro. Peter tried to speak!  As it turns out, Robert's rudeness is actually the least of his problems.

 

It is obvious Bob is spiritually lost.  But he also physically lost.  Literally.  He does not know where on earth he is located.  When he said, "It's getting late here in Great Britain," he gave himself away.  Fie-fi-fo-fum.  I have been friends with actual Welshmen born and bred.  From Cardiff.  No true Welshman says, "Here in Great Britain."  Great Britain?  Only an Englishman says that.  "Jolly good, old chap!" In any case, Bobby's accent is decidedly Brit; he sounds like he just left a meeting with Queen Lizzie Rothschild at BP:  Buckingham Palace, of course. (Bet you thought I meant BP as in British Petroleum.  Why, what a peculiar coincidence!  How odd.) 

 

Bob a Cymry?  Doubtful.  The only connection Bob has to Wales is that he tells lies the size of a school of whales.

 

Robert cares not one whit, not a farthing, not one pence for the ultimate destination of his soul.  Mired in the bog of Novus Ordo muck, what remains of his brains numbed by the fluoride of Vatican2, missing his beloved JP2, and living in the land of QE2, there is no room for logic in poor Bob's head.  It is sad to listen to someone like Robert.  Though he does not sound it—because he uses a soft, somewhat quivering, and sibilant voice—Bob is actually terribly arrogant.  As he proved when he said, a tad peckishly, to Bro. Peter, "I don't like your tone of voice."

 

Robert needs to understand that if he continues on this path, he will neither be allowed to meet nor stand beside the Recusants in eternity for he has thrown his lot on the side of that stinking Cromwell and fat Henry…

 

God bless you always,

Deidre Howard

 

DVDs

 

Dear Br. Peter and Michael,


A heartfelt thank you for all you have done and continue to do for souls…. Have you done any research on any of the apparitions of Our Blessed Mother, other than Fatima, i.e. La Sallete, Lourdes, Garabandal... We just finished watching the video on the "end of the world" and enjoyed the format (no music) Sometimes it is hard to hear the message with the background music, something to consider if you re-do any of the DVD's/CD's, especially for us "older folks" Our heads are full, our hearts sad, but we persevere knowing that the Church established by Jesus Christ will prevail, even if it is only a remnant! 

You remain in our prayers.
In His Will,
Jim & Linda  

 

Williamson

 

…  Bp. Williamson is indeed a most intelligent but foolish man to deny EENS.  Instead, he analyzes the dogma, which he no doubt was forced or influenced to do by the blind, foolish evil organization, the SSPX.  He does not have the faith of a child.  Children will blindly believe anything their parents tells them, and not try to analyze it.  The dogma of EENS is supposed to be accepted and not in the slightest way questioned or analyzed to render it meaningless.  That could be done to make any dogma worthless, but it cannot be done, for it is heretical.  If a child is told uncompromisingly the truth from age 5 on up, the simple sentence: "All non-Catholics go to Hell.", they will never question it.  It's just that simple.  A short sentence that Williamson should have been taught without compromise, the immutable truth: All non-Catholics go to Hell.  It can be more thoroughly explained to Catholic youth by their parents as they get a little older, such as dying a Catholic with no unconfessed mortal sins is the only way to ever hope to go to Heaven and a more thorough explanation of the Latin "Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus" (Such as it contradicts infallible bulls to say that it is possible for a man to be saved if he is not a member of the physical Church on Earth.) It could have saved the hell-bound fool, Williamson… But his faith just isn't strong enough to accept something so simple as what all toddlers should be told: "All non-Catholics go to Hell."  And there is no "however" or "but" at the end of that sentence.

 

-Michael Rudnicki

 

Gruner

 

Fr. Gruner… has an article about the 3rd Secret of Fatima in which it is declared that the secret revealed on June 26, 2000 was a perfidious hoax.  Yet it was revealed by the Vatican with under Pope JP II.  Well, how could any Pope et al in good standing deliver a perfidious hoax upon the entire world?  Why does Fr. Gruner still deny the whole sedavaticanism or whatever it's called?  Perhaps I'm overly simplistic, but if someone lies to my face I don't trust him anymore, and I'm sure not going to send him any money.  It was either the real message or it wasn't.  If it isn't, then whatever is sitting is the vatican is a dreadful liar.

 

Karl

 

MHFM: Gruner is, one must say, a most wicked heretic and a false prophet.  His soul is far darker than most people could ever imagine.  He spent his life misleading those who consider themselves conservative Catholics with dishonest defenses of the Vatican II sect and a promotion of the most wicked heretics in the world (JP2, etc.).  He led them right back to the Vatican II Counter Church and its Antichrist leaders whom Our Lady wanted them to reject.  He still frequently quotes Antipope John Paul II in a positive light!  The fact that anyone would even consider supporting such a despicable phony heretic, once that person is familiar with the facts about what’s happening, reveals the profound spiritual fog in which people remain.  He’s a complete heretic headed for Hell and he’s leading others there as well.  The notion of “two third secrets” or two texts of the third secret was all part of their compromised position to not accept the official version but at the same time not really condemn it.  It’s a microcosm of their larger compromise on the Vatican II sect.

 

Gruner, "Fr." Nicholas – Why would you say that he is a schismatic?

 

Heretic, Baptism

 

Brothers,

 

Bro. Peter's debate with Robert!!! from Wales brought a question to my mind. I thought I was familiar with all the materials MHFM has put forth regarding the Church's teaching on baptism. But Bro. Peter was asked if a non-Catholic was baptised, is he a Christian and Bro. Peter said "no." I think I know the proper context of what Bro. Peter meant, but I was hoping you could expound on this point in greater detail, mainly so I do not fall into error.

 

Regarding the "heavy-metal monk," I thought this guy was retiring, at least according to the last article posted on your website? Did the Vatican cut his retirement benefits or did the "monk's demons miss the music?

 

God bless you all there,

 

Howard

 

MHFM:  A heretic who is validly baptized does not become a member of the Church.  This also touches upon a finer theological point.  The Church teaches that a heretic can be validly baptized if he is baptized with water in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost.  But if a person is baptized as a heretic – for instance, if he rejects the dogma Outside the Church There is No Salvation – then his baptism, though valid, would confer no grace and would not unite him with the Church.  His heresy is an impediment to his reception of the grace of baptism.  He receives the character or the mark of baptism validly, but he does not receive the grace of baptism.  He doesn’t have his sins remitted and he is not justified, since he is outside the church.  Outside the Church there is no remission of sins.   

 

Pope Boniface VIII, Unam Sanctam, Nov. 18, 1302, ex cathedra:

“With Faith urging us we are forced to believe and to hold the one, holy, Catholic Church and that, apostolic, and we firmly believe and simply confess this Church outside of which there is no salvation nor remission of sin… Furthermore, we declare, say, define, and proclaim to every human creature that they by absolute necessity for salvation are entirely subject to the Roman Pontiff.

 

This is the express teaching of Pope St. Gregory the Great.

 

Pope St. Gregory the Great, Quia charitati, June 22, 601: “From the ancient institution of the Fathers we have learned that those who are baptized in the name of the Trinity, although amid heresy, whenever they return to holy Church, may be recalled to the bosom of their mother the Church either with the anointing of chrism, or the imposition of hands, or with a profession of faith alone…because the holy baptism, which they received among the heretics, at that time restores the power of cleansing in them when they have been united to the holy faith and the heart of the universal Church.” (Denz. 249)

 

Here we see Pope Gregory the Great explaining that those baptized as heretics are not cleansed, i.e., their sins are not remitted.  They are not cleansed by the baptism they received among the heretics until they remove the heresy and are united to the true faith.  The baptism they received is valid; they don’t need to be rebaptized, but it’s not efficacious for them until they remove the heresy.  At that point, they become justified by the power of the baptism they already received.  We also see this principle illustrated in Sess. 7 of the Council of Trent on the Sacraments in General:

 

Pope Paul III, Council of Trent, Sess. 7 on the Sacraments in General, Can. 6.: “If anyone shall say that the sacraments of the New Law do not contain the grace which they signify, or that they do not confer that grace on those who do not place an obstacle in the way, as though they were only outward signs of grace and justice… let him be anathema.” (Denz. 849)

 

Here we see that the sacraments do not confer the grace which they signify on those who place an obstacle in the way, such as heresy.  The above is also the teaching of Doctors of the Church.  This teaching does not contradict any of the other definitions of Trent, of course, such as Sess. 5 on Original Sin:

Pope Paul III, Council of Trent, Session 5:
"If anyone denies that by the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, which is conferred in baptism, the guilt of original sin is remitted, or even asserts that the whole of that which has the true and proper nature of sin is not taken away, but says that it is only touched in person or is not imputed, let him be anathema." (Denz. 792)

Notice that this anathematizes anyone who says that original sin is not remitted “by the grace” conferred in baptism.  Whenever grace is conferred in baptism, original sin is infallibly remitted, as in the cases of the baptism of infants and others who don’t place an obstacle in the way.  However, in the case described above (i.e., the baptism of a heretic) no grace is conferred at all.  As a result, original sin is not remitted.  Hence, we can see that the clause “by the grace” is very important.  It’s an example of the infallibility of dogmatic definitions and the protection the Holy Ghost gives to the teaching of the Church.

 

Empty Solutions

 

As I saw the Glenn Beck "take back America" rally this past Saturday, I couldn't help but think how SAD that there were about 100,000 people at this rally (and although Beck is a Mormon and it seemed that the rally was more of a 'protestant ' rally).  Wouldn't it have been better to have those 100,000 people saying the ROSARY and REALLY praying for a solution to this problem, to the one person Our Lady, who could help us, just has she helped at the Battle of Lepanto!   People just do not understand the trouble we are really in, and are always reaching for 'empty' solutions, that will not help. 

 

Hum…

 

MHFM: Yes, and while he says some true things, he’s very ecumenical and totally pro-Israel.  Getting his view on Israel is like listening to an Israeli cabinet member.  He realizes who’s in charge and the line he must take on that issue to remain in the mainstream.

 

Truth

 

Subject: Robert from Wales

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Robert is just another person among all the billions of souls since the time of Our Lord that are not willing to live up to something that the Church teaches.  The rejection of truth always comes down to the fact that there is something that the man or woman does not want to accept or is not willing to submit their will to.  Because such a person cannot either give up something sinful or does not want to think that someone they love within their family or friends may be lost to Hell forever, they will go anywhere to avoid the truth of it all.  Robert and all the others who reject truth, will talk endlessly without meaning... they will go anywhere to keep the race of running from truth going...so they don't have to really do anything or change anything… It is only bad will and ego that will ramble on as Robert does, going nowhere and making no sense whatsoever.  Anything to keep the illusion alive that everything is ok.  So very sad.

 

CD 

 

Videos

 

Subject: Is the World about to End?

 

Thank you for all of your work and effort in putting these videos together. I feel like I have learned a lot with a fresh new perspective on the book of revelation. Like other Christians wanting further understanding of the book of Revelation/Apocalypse, I have heard a few different explanations of the beast, trumpet judgements etc and yours seemed to make a lot of sense. Anyway, I believe your work should not go unrecognized and you should know you're not unappreciated. God bless.

 

Rigotto

 

MHFM: Thanks for the interest.  We hope you look into the material we have which demonstrates that the Catholic Church alone is Christ’s true Church; for it’s necessary for salvation to be a part of the one Church He established.

 

Search

 

Brother Peter Dimond, I am writing to you in my search for Truth.

God has been calling me to Him over the past 5 years (all my life actually, but significantly in these past five years). He has called me out of the world, and into holiness. However, although the call is strong, I am still not entirely sure to what place in Christianity He is calling me too.

I am currently fellowshipping with three Protestant churches of different denominations and I am working closely beside Anglicans, Presbyterians, and Catholics at a local Drop-in Centre.

I am in search of the One True Catholic Church, but I can not find Her!

I would appreciate any and all information you can give me.

And although I have NO INTENTION to settle for lukewarm mediocre Christianity, I would appreciate if you could share with me, what is the FOUNDATIONS of the Catholic Faith? That is to say, what is the absolute minimum required to receive Salvation, according to the Catholic Faith? Again I do NOT INTEND TO SETTLE at this level, God is calling me to holiness, and demanding 100% of myself to Him. But I would like to know what is the basic fundamental beliefs needed to be part of the One True Catholic Church.

May the Blessed God and Father of Our Lord Jesus Christ Bless you and Keep you and yours!

 

…Manasseh

 

MHFM: You will find the information about the true Catholic faith, and how one would convert to it, on our website and in the materials we have available.  You must get out of Protestantism or any affiliation with similar denominations.  There's only one true Church, and that's the Catholic Church.  The traditional faith is covered and explained on our site and in our materials.  You really need to look at them, and begin to pray the Rosary.  Please consult our section on how to convert.

 

Vatican II

 

Subject: … and we will not serve Lucifer

 

I understand if JPII was a madman, and all his 'teaching ' is nothing but open insults to God and Church, this Benedict is more dangerous and cunning; he uses ambiguous statements always leaving room for manipulating the truth. Any TRUE CATHOLIC POPE, if he claims to be a real Catholic, should PUBLICLY declare Vatican II VOID and NULL, invite a new Vatican II council banning all new theological 'editing' of Holy RCC dogma and traditional teaching, restoring the Gregorian Mass with High altars, restoring all Liturgical text of pre-Vatican II, reestablishing a NEW Inquisition for reevaluating all priests, clergy from bottom to top, excommunicating all who are NOT CATHOLIC. Unless pope does this- he is a heretic, he is an ENEMY to Christ, and we DEMAND the resignation of Benedict! No dialogue with this hateful people, who have a poison of snake in their hearts and sugar on their mouth, who kill Christ with 'washing of hands'- who are BLOODY and responsible for this universal paganism, sin, catastrophe and perpetual troubles mankind goes through in our modern time.  We ,'the spotless dove' of Christ, will NOT SERVE LUCIFER, wherever he is- even in the pretended RCC. In fact Holy Roman Catholic Church is there intact and all-powerful, as it is, as long as people like you are there...

 

Woody…

 

New Video & Article

 

MHFM: We have a new video and article on Benedict XVI’s recent heresies. 

 

Benedict XVI's Recent Heresies, Late August 2010 [video]

Benedict XVI's recent Heresies, Late August 2010 [article]

 

Heavy Metal

 

Subject: Heavy Metal Monk

 

Brothers in Christ,

 

I think it was amazing & quite telling that in the beginning it shows him flashing the satanic sign.

 

John

 

Christian

 

Subject: Alex Jones Non-Christian Video

 

I agree with you about alex Jones. Also he is buddies with David Icke who has called himself the son of God. You can find David making these statements if you look it up youtube. I followed Alex's channel and agree with his political views but if he is best buddies with a man that into reptilians and who calls himself the messiah I no that Alex is a non believer. I love the Lord and I am a Christian myself but I do take offense that you say the one true religion is Catholic. Honestly, I know it is a powerful religion but separating christians based on doctrinal belief and religion is not what we need today. We need to all go back to what Jesus wanted us to be. Christ Like hense Christian. I don't see any religion mentioned in the Bible and I don't believe I need a priest to intervene for me to be forgiven of my sins...

 

…Dezzy…

 

MHFM: Thanks for the interest, but your views on Christianity are not correct.  Christ founded one Church upon Peter (Mt. 16:18-20), and said you must hear it to be saved (Mt. 18:17).  He also taught baptismal regeneration (John 3:5), His real presence in the Eucharist (John 6), confession (John 20:23) and many other things that non-Catholics and Protestants reject.  By doing so, they reject the Gospel.  We have a book called The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church which demonstrates that the Catholic Church alone is the biblical faith.  You really should consult the sections on our website that are dedicated to refuting Protestantism.  You cannot unite with people who have different and contradictory beliefs on core issues of the Gospel.  To say that everyone should unite, despite such differences, is to render what Christ revealed on those matters meaningless.  One must say in charity that you can't be saved believing what you do.

 

With

 

Subject: Exchange with Robert

 

Dear brothers:

 

I found this section of your exchange with Robert quite extraordinary:

---

MHFM: "Since we can't judge and we don't know how God works, is it possible that God incarnated himself in one of the figures of a different religion without our knowledge?"

Robert: "Absolutely not."

MHFM: "On what basis do you exclude that possibility?"

Robert: "Because of the promises to St. Peter."

---

You had helped to lift him out of the darkness and muck and for those few seconds he seemed to stand upright on the dry ground where the sun was shining, but sadly (and almost certainly due to bad will) he slid back in and then went under.

 

-RDS

 

Revealing

 

Subject: Comment on your new conversation with Robert.  And 9/11

 

How is Robert going to say that he knows what the Catholic Church teaches when he doesn't even believe in the most basic laws of physics regarding 9/11?  People who are confronted with the laws of physics regarding the scientific impossibility of a "pancake" collapse choose not to believe the truth because of the reality it reveals to you. The individual lies to himself to believe in a reality based off of what he/she finds comfortable to believe in. The same case goes with people who are confronted with basic dogma because they know it contradicts what they have been programmed to believe, so they choose to lie to themselves.  You can definitely call these people out as liars.
 
It was revealing that Robert Chose to attack what you believe about 9/11 "theories" because he couldn't attack you at the clear definitions of Catholic dogma.
 
I also have a suggestion. I think you should make a video series about what really happened on 9/11 and the spiritual warfare connection. If people can't believe something so massively a lie on the secular level such as 9/11, what makes them think they will not fall for a greater spiritual deception such as Vatican II? Also I believe if you make a youtube series on 9/11, it can be pushed to reach alot more people to bring them into the knowledge of the One True Faith.
 
Keep up the great fight!
-Isaac

 

Read

 

Bro. Michael and Bro. Peter

 

The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church is the best book I have ever read.  It made a lot clear that I did not know.

 

Mary Ciaccio

 

Conversation

 

Robert’s conversation was a clear demonstration of an unwillingness to listen to the truth. As a modernist, Robert regurgitates the same puke over and over with a severe case of diarrhea of the mouth that spews the lies that were force fed to him by the Vatican II abomination during these last days. Robert is clueless of what the Church teaches, while unable to take a stand in his beliefs, he jumps around in the conversation like a Mexican jumping bean. Amazing the bad-will amongst Robert and his fellow Vatican II sect members, while playing the Saint and refusing to judge anything except going against the truth. God has already laid down the future consequences and judgment of those outside the True Faith through the Bible, the Popes and the Saints. I think the main point that Robert and other modernists fail to recognize is the seriousness of the end times we are currently in (that have been predicted throughout Catholic Church history) and the role that the Vatican II unusual suspects play in these last days.

God Bless,
Tom Miles

 

Shocking

 

Subject: Guy from Wales Shocking!

 

Dear Mhfm,

You ask the guy "Do you believe jewish rabbis who reject Christ could be in a state of Grace?" His answer "I'll leave that to God". What kind of an answer is that. First off he questions your salvation somewhere in that conversation/debate because you’re a traditionalist but a Jewish Rabbi he can't judge. But he has no problem judging you Bro Dimond. He didn't answer your point on Abortion. I can't understand it how people could be that stupid that’s what it is along with bad will. Truly drunk with the wine of the whore of babylon. Let’s hope the Mother Of God converts him to the Catholic Faith. But when he says things he knows "great Christian people" who don't believe the Catholic faith his conversion is slim.

God Bless

Sean

 

Meaningless

 

Subject: Wales V-2 man and radio show

 

This man was horrible with his bad will.  He knows that there is no salvation outside the Church and knows that Benedict-Ratzinger does not teach it.  As Bishop Dolan did (in his sermon you dissected about 3 years ago), he reduces the dogma to a meaningless formula.  The man is smart enough to understand the truth.  But his bad will gets in the way.  I cannot blame you, Brother Peter, for getting so irritable with the man.

 

Also, I really enjoyed listening to your archived radio shows.  I encourage you to have more and ask you to please make time to do them around your other activities.  Thank you.

 

“I.I.”

 

Re:  Robert

 

You are not only a heretic and apostate, you are an idiot.  There is no such thing as invincible ignorance.  If people are sincerely interested in God, it is extremely easy for them to have access to information to save their souls in this age of internet.  If people die in ignorance of the Faith, it is because they were not interested in God, which is why God sends such people to hell.  What you and others like you are saying is this:  God is not powerful enough to lead people of good will to the Faith.  This is not only blasphemy, it is a complete lack of faith.  This heresy is worse than a cancer devouring one's body; this heresy is a cancer devouring peoples' souls.  Wake up!

 

Brenda Roy

 

MHFM: The conversation was another example of how “baptism of desire” and “invincible ignorance” are, at this time, the foundation and attempted justification for all heresies and every rejection of Christ and His necessity.  We see again that even the most liberal and unbelieving heretic, such as Robert, invokes them in a futile attempt to put a “Catholic” face on religious indifferentism and apostasy.

 

Comment

 

Subject: B16 & his heresies

 

Please, do a follow-up DVD on him. Some very deluded people try to convince themselves (and even more sadly, others) that Ratzinger´s heresies are from a long forgotten (and forgiven) past. It´s always good to have at hand a new pack of recent heresies, in order to show that he did not change for the better at all. In fact, he seems to be getting worse. This new incident involving Brother Roger is really a card in the sleeve I´m going to use several times in future discussions. It´s as if B16 sent the heresy of the week as a gift package to you.

I am aware that your Fatima DVD covers him and some of his most recent heresies, but the man really deserves personal treatment. JP2 needed almost 30 years of Anti-Papacy to award him the dubious honor of having his heresies denounced on 2 DVDs, but B16 is managing to do what seemed impossible: To outrun JP2 in terms of heresies and apostasy... in half a decade! The guy is factory of heresies. And at the same time, creating the illusion that he´s a staunch defender of Catholic Doctrine, Moral and Discipline. What a deception.

 

I´m really starting to think he uses some form of Black Magic in order to deceive people. How can anyone with eyes to see not realize he´s a heretic? Or worse, to even believe he´s going to promote "the big restoration"? He could not care less about the necessity of the Catholic Faith. 

 

Brother Michael´s reasoning is just perfect. Ratzinger does not believe that the Faith of Rome is to be held. To him, a person can be outside the Church, found his Own Church/Community, lead them astray from the True Faith, and yet be a role model, die in the state of grace and be a Saint in Heaven. - Pause for throwing up - One does not have to read between the lines to find a deeper hidden meaning at all! This is just scandalous heresy, as manifest as one can get. A "pope" who believes that Protestants (as well as the Orthodox) are free to reject the Papacy and yet can achieve Salvation and Sainthood. 

 

To me, that was the most explicit denial of the Catholic Faith and demonstration of religious indifference EVER. And the bad will from the false trads and the defenders of V2 is beyond comprehension. Over the past months I´ve been trying to convince people. Most of the times, it´s a big frustration. One can see by their attitude how a Merciful, Loving and Caring God would still send them to Hell. They don´t really care about Jesus (despite what they may claim), so in similar fashion Jesus won´t care about them at Final Judgment. They will reap what they sow. They don´t give the slightest importance to the Truth and dismiss the facts without any concern. 

 

What´s worse is that they constantly try to scare me by saying that I am going to Hell (as if Hell was reserved only for sedevacantists, and in some cases, traditionalists). I had to borrow your argumentation. I always state something like: "Well, so what? According to your so called Popes, every religion creates Saints and Martyrs, I could be a Sedevacantist Saint, for all you know. You should also never try to convert a Protestant, by your logic, since he could be well on his way to sainthood, perhaps being even more saintly than you and I. Even if you were right, and don´t get me wrong, you AREN´T, I still accept all the dogmas about the papacy, unlike the protestants, who deny the papacy as a whole and yet can be saved and become Saints, according to your "popes". To say that Sedevacantists are going to Hell for being "out of the church" or "against the papacy" (when they only question the validity of the last FALSE claimants) and yet call Protestant Brothers, attend their services and believe they can be saved is just astonishing pharisaical hypocrisy." 

 

Conversation

 

Dear MHFM,

 

I recently downloaded audio clips of the recitation of the rosary so that i could listen to it while travelling, since I spend a lot of time traveling to college.  Is this ok? Is it equivalent to praying the rosary provided I meditate on the mysteries when they are being recited?

With Best Regards

Sam

 

MHFM: Thanks for the question.  No, listening to the Rosary being recited by others is not equivalent to praying it.  It’s necessary for you to recite the Rosary yourself.  Also, we do not recommend that people pray the Rosary while listening to a recording of others who are praying it.  It’s important for people to foster individual interior lives, and that comes with individual prayer to God and solitary time.  We would recommend that you pray the Rosary yourself while you are traveling. 

 

New Video

 

MHFM: This is a new video.

 

Bishop Richard Williamson Exposed - 1/2

Bishop Richard Williamson Exposed - 2/2

 

Conversation

 

Dear MHFM,  

   A few weeks ago I had a conversation with my mother and my sister (both Novus Ordo) about my decision to not attend a reception being given for a deceased friend of the family, the same individual from the e-exchange "Tea." I explained to them that I had no evidence that this individual had died holding the traditional Catholic faith. I said it would be uncharitable for me, a Catholic, to attend.

   My mother then asked, "Does this mean you would not attend the funerals of your own mother and sister?" I said, "Yes." My mother persisted, "Not even your own mother and sister?!" I tried to explain to her that the Novus Ordo service is not Catholic and the Church teaches that Catholics must not attend non Catholic services under pain of mortal sin. She expressed her unwillingness to believe that the Church had taught (and still does teach) this.

   My sister gave her own reply: "That just does not look good." I did not respond to this. My sister had already displayed negative sentiments toward the Salvation dogma when I presented it to her as a true Church teaching about two years ago (my mother also does not believe this core dogma). I probably should have tried to explain to my sister that not compromising the faith is of a higher priority than what looks good. It seems pointless to try to talk to her about this, however, if she's not going to believe that the Church teaches absolutely no salvation without baptism in water and the Spirit.

Sincerely,
TD

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  Yes, one should explain to her that what “looks good” is not what determines how a Catholic must act.  Moreover, those who form their decisions upon “what looks good” will not get to Heaven.

 

Comment

 

Subject: A Gulf Coast Article

 

Brothers,

 

I don't know if this has any interest or if it relates to the Apocalypse at all, so here is the headline:

 

Portions of the Gulf are So Toxic that Dolphins, Fish, Crabs, Stingrays and Other Animals are "Trying to Crawl Out of the Water"

 

http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=20744

 

Take care and God bless you all there at MHFM,

 

Howard

 

Comment

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Notorious heretic Bp. Williamson's attack on sedevacantists and “Feeneyites” is outrageous but is easily refuted. He wrote to Bill Mulligan: “One's all too frequent experience with sedevacantists and with Feeneyites is that the mind has shut down, and emotion, blocked emotion, has taken over.”

 

Three weak points are worth exposing in this sentence. 1) He cites his experience, rather than dogmas as his nexus. 2) He assumes mental relaxation is mental dysfunction (or "shut down" - it also could be reverse speech for "mouth: shut up"). 3) He talks of blocked emotion like a New Age psychoanalyst, i.e. that negative emotions, if suppressed, cause psychosomatic disorders. Each of these points are refuted very easily:

 

1) Pope St. Pius X, Pascendi - “For the Modernist believer, on the contrary, it is an established and certain fact that the reality of the divine does really exist in itself and quite independently of the person who believes in it. If you ask on what foundation this assertion of the believer rests, he answers: In the personal experience of the individual.”

 

2) Catechism of the Council of Trent, Article I, Faith excludes Curiosity: “For when God commands us to believe He does not propose for us to search into His divine judgments, or inquire into their reason and cause, but demands an unchangeable faith by which the mind rests content in the knowledge of eternal truth.”

 

3) Pope Leo XIII, Exeunte Iam Anno - “...even the philosophy of the ancients taught that every man should restrain his evil desires, and still more and with greater care those who from daily contact with the world have the greater temptations...For man has been born under this law, that the mind should rule the body, that the appetites should be restrained by sound sense and reason; and hence it follows that putting a curb upon our masterful passions is the noblest and greatest freedom.'

 

Pope Pius XI, Ad Salutem - “Here indeed is an ideal protrait of a Christian sovereign, nor will you find anywhere a nobler or more perfect one. But it cannot be reproduced by the man who trusts the guidance of human wisdom, which often is slowwitted, oftener blinded by the emotions.”

 

He then quotes Confucius, as though he were some kind of Church authority, and not in fact a pagan! It's a typical invincible ignorance heretics' tactic to cite some famous non-Catholic philosopher as though their natural wisdom is proof of their attaining the state of grace without having received the sacrament of baptism! Also, his reference to “Gordian knots” is mysterious. He seems to be implying that the Catholic faith is a Gordian knot (an extremely complicated problem that needs solving) rather than an extremely simple set of dogmatic truths that require a peaceful acceptance and belief. Also, the legendary Gordian knot was actually “solved “ by being cut by Alexander the Great, so that's how Catholics are to deal with occasions of sin such as heresies – cut them off! By implying that the Catholic faith is a Gordian knot, Bp. Williamson is saying that a) the Catholic faith is a problem, and b) it can only be “solved” by being cut off – such is what Vatican II tried to do – cut out the heart of the Catholic faith by dissecting and removing the dogmas. In reality, being the heretic and schismatic that he is, Bp. Williamson is cut off from the Body of Christ. Bp. Williamson is a Gordian knot of heresies! The sedevacantist "feneeyite" mind simply rests confidently and peacefully upon that rock which is Christ: the Truth. There is no need for a Catholic to be constantly wound up like a cockoo clock, trying to unblock emotions and untie Gordian knots!!! Both scripture and Tradition make it clear that there is no rest for the wicked, but there is abundant peace for the good…

 

Wisdom 3:9 - “They that trust in him, shall understand the truth: and they that are faithful in love shall rest in him: for grace and peace is to his elect.”

 

Isaias 57:2 - “Let peace come, let him rest in his bed that hath walked in his uprightness.”

 

Luke 10:6 - “And if the son of peace be there, your peace shall rest upon him; but if not, it shall return to you.”

There is no rest or peace for heretics, schismatics and apostates such as Bp. Williamson.

God Bless,

Chris White

 

Share

 

Subject: Mind Control

 

Hi MHFM,

If I may share a thought or two. Bishop Williamson is, hypothetically, learned in the ways of manipulating thoughts and feelings of people, by the use of his own words and actions. This is proven by his discussions with Joseph and Bill.

First, the discussion with Joseph Ramirez. The bishop referred to him as "my dear boy", even though he clearly is not a young child. Why? Other heretical clergymen have done this before. They do this in order to revert grown men back to a child like docility and sense of comfort. (Let us recall 1 Corinthians 13:11) The more docile the flock, the easier for them to be controlled. Heretics are not backed by the Lord's dogmas, so they need other means to keep their heretic trained flock in line: erroneous obedience.

Second, the letters to Bill Mulligan. The bishop discussed "emotions", a quote from Confucius, closed mindedness, and the Gordian knot. That is lot of things to talk about, if taken seriously. I may have to get my copy of the Analects (Confucius), and perhaps a biography of Alexander the Great (Gordian Knot). There are no dogmas to be found in those documents. If another manipulative man would say similar things, one would argue that he is speaking stylistically in order to sound smart, while avoiding the dogmatic definitions. Keep them busy, look under my left sleeve, then under my right sleeve, until they forget the dogma that is in question to begin with. This trick is similar to a performer's trick in a magic act, but has the same effect: intellectual diversion.

The Lord wants us to discuss His dogmas. The devil wants to keep us busy with something else, such as useless trivialities. True Catholics use dogmatic definitions to teach. Wicked heretics use the people's own thoughts and feelings to manipulate them. The question is, putting aside whatever good the Bishop has done, is he being manipulative intentionally, by training or by chance? We must equip ourselves against these tricks nonetheless. I hope he converts too. If not, at least it would do some good for SSPX and other like minded groups if he confronts the dogmas head on in a debate with one of the Dimond Brothers. Assuming he wins, it would be another feather on his cap, If he loses, he can find the true faith not only for himself but for others like him. What does he have to lose?

Finally, to control another person's mind one must first analyze it. Psychoanalysis therefore is a basis of mind control.

Ave Maria.

Sanjiv

 

Protestant

 

Subject: Protestant near death worship of man

 

A sad story

 

A networking acquaintance of mine posted on her facebook page that her friend was dying.  I said is she catholic and would she like a priest.

 

Answer was "No thank you, she has made peace with her minister" Not interested in making peace with God, but with the Protestant minister.  And these Protestants believe in universal salvation like v-2 Catholics.  "God is ready to take her to heaven" Very sad.

 

MHFM: Yes, the bad will remains to the end.  It’s at those moments that the seriousness of these issues comes into focus. 


Discussions

 

Brothers:

Thank you for the video exposing Bishop Williamson. I thought the use of the word "charade" was absolutely right on, but unfortunately, too many people are playing along with their game. Over this past weekend, I came to a decision: I'm no longer attending their Armada chapel and watch their heretical priests play this game of deception.

As I related in my last email, several discussions at the Armada, MI parish recently landed me a call from the prior, the now notorious heretic Steven McDonald. He called me about my promotion of the true dogmas on salvation and Holy Water Baptism at "his" parish, and my warning to one 17-year-old boy, who I knew was considering the priesthood with the SSPX, to put his possible vocation in God's hands and to NOT vow yourself to this heretical Society. The lad cried to his mama, Mama called Steven, and Steven was "rather disturbed" by this activity on my part. After a long phone conversation with Bishop Williamson the Second, he attempted to offer me a deal: Steven would read my (i.e. Bro Peter's Salvation book), and I would read a book of his chosing, and then we would talk. In exchange for this agreement, I would promise to refrain from telling "his" flock the truth about what is required to save their souls. He agreed that he would not formally impose his heresy on me by making some announcement or denying me Holy Communion. At first I agreed but the next day cancelled the agreement since it's wrong to obey men, rather than God, and his book would be dangerous to my faith. No deal, Father.

Please know, I have challenged this man to debate me publicly on three seperate occasions, which he refused. He doesn't want to "draw attention" to the issue. Translate: He wants to keep the Charade going. I've challenged two other men to debate me, both long-term false traditionalists, one of whom is a veteran lawyer. Decline, decline. I've offered these folks, including their "pastor" to play fair and debate me like gentlemen before the eye of the public, and they run and hide! All except for Steven--he chose at yesterday's Sunday Mass to play dirty, cowardly, and notoriously heretical from the pulpit.

The Gospel spoke of the ten lepers, and Steve remarked that Jesus wanted to teach us about "hierarchy and order." Great, no problem. But Father went on and on about how much confidence the people should have in him as their prior and the Society priests and bishops in general. He was almost claiming to be infallible, not even a hint that he could fall into error, or that we should always judge everything in light of Catholic dogma. The people, he seemed to be saying, don't need dogma, since they have the great SSPX priests such as himself. Have perfect confidence, Fr. Steve will bring you safely to glory. This "little messiah" complex of his then got stepped up as he lavished praise on Marcel Lefebve as the Great Hero who saved the true Mass AND Catholic tradition--where would we be without him?--as if God cannot raise up thousands of Champions of the Catholic faith at any time. But this was the last straw. Marcel Lefebvre was a manifest heretic,
McDonald loudly-praised this heretic as the Saviour of Catholic Tradition. Conclusion: Fr. McDonald is a manifest heretic. Goodbye SSPX, I'll pray for your conversion to Jesus Christ and the Roman Catholic Faith. He also quoted St. Bernard as saying something like, "the man who will not be led or guided is a fool."  I saw that as a weak, cowardly shot at me and you. What a gutless heretic.

Joseph Ramirez

 

Materials

 

… Your web site and WRITTEN materials and audio/visual resources are excellent media to provide the TRUTH about the ONE, HOLY, CATHOLIC, and APOSTOLIC CHURCH OF JESUS CHRISTJESUS IS THE ONLY WAY TO THE FATHER THE ONLY WAY, TRUTH AND LIFE   No one comes to the FATHER EXCEPT THROUGH THE SON.  No one knows the Father except the son and he to whom he reveals Him.  Your web site provides the magisterial teaching of the church through the true popes; THE  WRITTEN WORD OF GOD THROUGH THE BIBLE and APOSTOLIC TEACHING which hands down the teaching of JESUS CHRIST.  YOUR WEB PRESENTS THE POPES TEACHING THROUGH PAPAL ENCYCLICALS AND DOGMATIC TEACHINGS, EX-CATHEDRA AND PAPAL BULLS.  ALL TRUE CATHOLICS NEED TO KNOW THESE TEACHINGS DIVINELY INSPIRED THROUGH THE HOLY SPIRIT AS CHRIST PROMISED THAT THE GATES OF HELL SHALL NOT PREVAIL AGAINST THE CHURCH WHICH CHRIST ESTABLISHED THROUGH PETER.  PLEASE CONTINUE TO PRESENT MORE OF THESE PAPAL DOCUMENTS SO THAT CATHOLICS WILL HAVE THE TRUTH.  YOUR YOU TUBE CHANNEL IS EXCELLENT SOURCE OF INSTRUCTION

 

Anthony

 

Perhaps

 

Subject: Open Letter to Confused Catholics

 

Brothers,

 

Perhaps the SSPX should change the name of that document, "An Open Letter To Confused Catholics".   It should actually be called  "An Open Letter -   To Confuse Catholics"

 

Wj…

 

Comment

 

I was very pleased to see you´re taking a more active role in exposing the false traditionalists. It was about time for you to place Richard Williamson in his proper place and expose him (in all his absurdity) for what he truly is. You did an article on him years ago, but it was "buried" among other articles in one of the sections. A person had to deeply explore your material to find it. I hope someday you do something similar about Fellay.  If I may be so bold, and since you´re reformulating your main page, why not place a link to the BEWARE section in a window too, like you did to the youtube channel? That section is a must read, and I don´t think it gets the attention it deserves. 

 

The FFSPX, like so many other groups, realize there´s a real problem. However, they not fully perceive it for what it is, and end up offering false solutions and hope. The devil probably knew that at one point the Apostasy was going to be so manifest that he would have to establish a controlled opposition of his own. When I was a "traditionalist" (non-sedevacantist) I always knew the Tradition was going to be only a temporary home, a spiritual hotel shall we say, before I could study the matters more deeply and sort things out before finally deciding what to do with my life, and where to entrust my soul. After all, they had reverence and a good approach to the moral life (ok, aside from NFP, as I later found out through you) 

 

While I would not say the FSSPX was bad from day one, nowadays the people there are heterogeneous. It´s really a grey field. There are tares, but also potential wheat. Some are of good will, seeking refuge from the V-2 and searching for answers. Others are just accommodated. While others are moved just by thrill about the group promoting the Old Mass, opposing ecumenism and denouncing the Jews. At least that´s what they used to do. When Hell broke loose with Williamson and the Holocaust, they quickly removed most (if not all) of their online material exposing the Jewish Zionist propaganda. How blessed I was to discover your works and finally be instructed on the real problem and how a Catholic should deal with it.

 

While Bishop Williamson advocates for many true causes, he´s indeed a hypocrite of ridiculous proportions, plus a coward in some areas. I guess the reason so many people follow him is because they see pure evil around them, so they settle for someone who´s offering 25% or 50% of the Truth and they don´t know (of) any better. Williamson is learned, and all his knowledge was for nothing at the end of the day. It only served to feed his pride and typical FSSPX´s elitism (another reason why I could not stand them for very long). 

 

In your video Death and the Journey to Hell, there´s a part (among others) I can never forget. When you talk about the reality of many people going to Hell not because they were totally evil in an almost cartoonish caricature manner, but more of the case that they were not sufficiently good. Like the people in Hell saying "forever, and ever, and ever..." when I examine my conscience and reflect on my sins and faults I always repeat to myself (as a way of correction and warning) "not good enough, not enough, not enough...". I used to think that Williamson and his Society were good, but not good enough. But he reached such a low point, that a sincere Catholic must reject him as a bad and evil person, like he disgustingly fails to do in regards to JP2 and now B16.

 

A failure to reprove them, after seeing what they did, is indeed theological vomit. But to actually go in their DEFENSE as if they were GOOD is nothing less than a severe case of mental diarrhea. The false Resistance is really the devil´s assist plan. 

 

All in all, another fine audio file. Keep up the good work.  One last thing. There´s a gossip circulating that RW is suffering from a neurodegenerative disease. I don´t know for how long (in case the rumor is true), or how advanced it may be (he can still say Masses, that´s for sure). I don´t know if he was always a bad willed person (he certainly is for a few years), but this clinic condition could help explain his absurd and aberrational declarations. 

 

CK

 

Videos

 

Subject: Williamson videos

 

Very nice job with your Williamson videos.  I think you nail the essential problem of Williamson; that is intellectual pride, very well.

 

Not to bore you but I had some follow-up with him since I shared the recent line about “Gordian Knots” with you.  I pointed out to him that his line, that SdV and ENS “cut Gordian knots”, while “theology only unties them as best they can be” represented a concession to SdV and ENS.  His answer to me was basically to tell me that I don’t know what theology is.  That I don’t know what I don’t know, and that I have a slow mind but a quick tongue.   

 

Well I paraphrase; the actual words of the bishop are below.  While I am no “theologian”, his entire “argument”, all he has written against Sedevacantism can be reduced to a psychological prescription, that is: “these Romans are insane”.  However their insanity shields them from their otherwise manifest heresies, because they are not obstinate (they can’t be obstinate because they are insane, essentially innocent but crazy).   If you point out to him their high level of education, he will say that indeed that is precisely what made them insane; (presumably therefore they are less guilty than an otherwise ignorant person would be).  As far as I can discern, this is his entire case.  He will not touch “Feeneyism” other than the comments he made to Mr. Ramirez.   And he will not counter any dogmatic citations with argument.  He will gently tell you that it is cute that you are trying to tackle such weighty issues, you know, because you can’t possibly understand these matters, and then he’ll go back to psychoanalyzing the Roman offenders, and never answer your argument.  It is truly amazing that the shell can be that empty.  But sadly it appears to be.

 

Bill Mulligan

 

Valid

 

Dear MHFM,

Hi, I just want to ask if the 4th mystery of the Rosary is valid? as far as I know it was promulgated by anti-pope JP II right? thanks

Glenn

 

MHFM: No, the “Luminous Mysteries” are not part of the real Rosary and shouldn’t be included with it.

 

Questions

 

Subject: Comment - Stephen’s Questions

 

Dear Brothers Michael and Peter,

 

I would like to thank you for the straightforward reply and charitable act you made on Stephen's questions … Your answers [assist] him that is confused, wary and scared on the presented affairs of his soul, should he apply the remedies you recommended.  I find his email and questions very interesting and may prove helpful to others who are in similar situation.  I would like to comment and forward some of my insight, if I may:

1 - "Am I damned for all eternity because of the actions of the church leaders"    C - First, you have to clear the air by defining who these church leaders you refer to, if you refer to the Vatican II Sect and if you follow their actions – the answer is categorically yes, the reasons for this had been well explained by MHFM Brothers;

2- "… Is this the plan of God?"   C - To indicate God to plan evil situations is blasphemous and tantamount to ignorance of God's attributes … evil (absence of good) situations as mentioned by Stephen (invalid Mass, worthless adoration hours & devotion etc) are allowed by God to satisfy the just Justice of Almighty God that has been disrespected by unacceptable prayers and sacrifices to Him;

3- "Why would the Lord and through him the Holy Spirit, allow for entire populations to be duped and worship in an invalid way"   C – Since you refer to this worship done in Vatican II Church arena, this worship is in no way acceptable to God, hence God does not allow Himself to be worshipped in an invalid way as all abominable acts or worship and prayer go straight to him that asked for it – the devil.  God could never stand the slightest imperfection (the main reason why Purgatory was created) how much more invalid and sinful prayers?;

4- "… I just don’t think that God would allow so many of us who try to be devout to be duped or intentionally depraved of our worship and devotion"    C – "To be devout", this phrase in the Catholic sense should be understood as a soul following the Commandments of God through His established church on earth – the Catholic Church (not the Vatican II), hence if the soul deviates in the path by jumping out of the safe haven of the Catholic Church through apostasy, heresy or schism – that "to be devout" claim loses its dignity before God! … that soul regardless how sincere his devotions he thought he had … can never be considered devout at all.

 

Stephen, Brothers Michael and Peter have given you the best advice you can ever solicit on this planet earth and make sure that you remember this resounding command from Heaven through them – "Regarding the effort you’ve employed, that’s surely why you’ve come across this information.  God is giving you the grace and the opportunity to see the full truth.  It’s up to you to accept it.  If you don’t, one must say in charity that you will go to Hell."  And I concur that you will go to Hell if you do the opposite.

 

If a sincere Catholic dissects this email, the questions presented stem from the fact that Stephen indeed has very little knowledge on the attributes of God, the history of the Catholic Faith and the Catholic Church … should he be familiar with the history of many ancient heresies, apostasies and schisms of the past – somehow his questions would be narrowed to just a few and not be complicated.  In these most turbulent times of the world, the End of Days, I should say … one must not only content himself in various devotions and prayers he practices, but one MUST also feed his soul that is terribly hungry by spending enough time to study Catholic Faith.  I can safely say that if Stephen is familiar with the accounts surrounding the Catholic Church like preceding historic moments that paved the way for the birth of a number of heresies, apostasies and schisms he won't be surprised with the present situation of the Church.  The abominable bishop Arius was "holy", intelligent and very ascetic that's why numerous souls marched with him to wage war (with their heresies) to the death against St. Athanasius and the very few that hold the Catholic Faith; the founder of Islam in the 6th century did observe 40 days strict fasting and prayers in the desert before he claimed to have received visions from God to establish a new religion; how the great Christian Constantinople country fell and became the Islam Turkey;  the great Western Schism that paved the way for the three antipopes who ruled the Catholic Church for more than 40 years; the deChristianization of France with the evil French Revolution in the 18th century; the founder of Protestantism was a former monk; the persecutions of Catholics around the world that hold the traditional Catholic Faith … in the 20th century, thousands of our Catholic brethren where slain in Russia, Spain and Mexico by not complying with the Communist ruling states in fact the then Pope Pius XI cried against these atrocities and condemned the "Conspiracy of Silence" of the Western and European world for not joining the Catholic Church in condemning these evil acts in persecuting and murdering the Catholics - these are just a few of them …

 

God was pleased to wake me up on the Sedevacantism position and from that moment on I never turn my eyes again to Novus Ordo Sect and I had nothing to do with them; I came across with lots of "traditional catholic" sites until I discovered MHFM.  After that, I did not check other sites except one time… I was just reading a few lines of the works of [a] heretic… my head ached so hard that I could not continue reading it…

 

Yours in Jesus and Mary,

Joey from the Philippines

 

Heretic

 

Thanks for great job exposing this noxious pestilent heretic and arch-enemy of Christ the Lord… Sure he believes antichrist JPII and False Prophet B16 are "good [puuuuuuuuuke!] men"  [gag] because isn't that the freemasons' motto:  "making good men better men"? or some other garbage..........?  This nefarious evil-doer has got to be right up there with the likes of JPII whose body was probably possessed by some super high-powered DEMON........you know,  the same game of deception-------and how about those "vessels" I think it was of the Catholic religion he so enjoys filling with:  THE NEW POISONOUS FUMES OF EVERY MODERNIST HERESY?... that is what the battle is all about-------all about poisoning the would-be Catholic faithful to make sure they go to hell..........what a crying shame it seems to be working on so many people.  It's unbelievable today and completely OUTSIDE THE PALE that anyone who has even the tiniest modicum of rationality still falls for this after it's been SO THOROUGHLY EXPOSED.  There ARE no excuses:  period.

 

A.

 

Padre Pio

 

[On a recent] morning… while preparing to pay some bills, the check book couldn't be found… Thus, the hunt for the check book went into serious mode, lasting several hours, superseding all other plans on the "to do list" for the day.

   

While searching for the checkbook, I came across Padre Pio's booklet depicting his religious and miraculous life.  I asked him to please help me locate my missing item.  To my amazement, my prayer was answered almost immediately, within 20 minutes of my request, and the checkbook found exactly at the same place in my desk I had previously searched.  I am amazed and humbly grateful, as never before has my prayer been answered sooner.  I wish to acknowledge my thanks to God and Padre Pio, along with Brother Michael Dimond for writing the booklet...

 

Sincerely,

 

Kathleen Ryan

 

EENS

 

Dear Brothers,
                    

     Just to let you know that I told a 'traditional priest' that baptism of desire/blood was a heresy, as I thought he was an advocate of it. I gave him little by little some of your arguments in your excellent book 'Outside the church there is absolutely no salvation' (I actually translated those parts). The first time he was like shocked and said how scandalous and anti-traditional that idea was. So you see he didn't appreciate already your work. I convinced him to read it (the translated parts) by saying that I would like to have his opinion; and hoping that he would convert.
    I gave him 3 parts, given separately every week ; and what was astounding to see was that his arguments given to me each of these weeks refuting our position, was a different "objection/response" which you cover up in your book.
      It didn't help a bit as he still remains obstinate and says that I am a heretic and that you are totally wrong and making this up. He tried to convince me and debate by saying that all the theological teachings are for baptism of desire… that all of the catechisms were perfect. He said that all the saints were right..... (he contradicted himself many times)…

Thank you for what you do.
         

Sincerely

 

Austin…

 

Heretic

 

Subject: Heretic Williamson

 

Dear MHFM, 

 

How profound the truth, and how well and simple you explain the double-talking St. Pius X group, especially Bishop Richard Williamson and his bountiful, gibberish liberalism.  How he and his group embrace the sheer lies of heretical antipopes of Vatican II.  What does it matter to this bunch of heretics what a real pope, Boniface VIII proclaimed in Unam Sanctam in early 14th century upon the whole world-past, present, and future 'til the Son of Man cometh at the end?  What hypocrites of the cloth!  Keep up the militancy… God Bless You!...

 

Dea…

 

Hindrance

 

Subject: Hindrance

 

Dear MHFM, thank you for the new DVD. Today’s quote by St Thomas Aquinas and the story of St Francis converting the Sultan, they both use the exact term "provided there is no hindrance" the grace of God will come to those seeking the truth of God. What a gift this grace is! How many people are alive today that have no hindrance? What mercy God has shown me! I think this grace to pursue the truth was gifted to me by Our Lady after you encouraged me so strongly to pray the Rosary everyday. I try to pray as much of the Rosary everyday and each day I feel more and more like an alien.  Remember when we were kids, you used to hear the term "Oh he or she is such a saint"?

 

Now you would hear "oh that poor guy is crazy or some fanatic". I'm sure you know what compounding is. It's like a snowball going downhill. This is how fast the hearts of men are turning away from anything saintly.  I think it's this evil momentum Our Lady has been warning us about and why it's Our Lady that we must constantly turn to, for we have been commanded to have recourse to her…

 

God bless you MHFM,

 

Matthew

 

Comment

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Thanks for the book and the DVD with the 4 features! The one about the end of the world, I can't put into words; I tell people, you just have to see it…

 

Also, I was wondering, the St. Jude prayer that someone sent into your web-site, about 1 or 2 months ago, wouldn't that be in the category of "chain" prayers, the way the man wrote in, about answer to prayer must be posted (something to that effect).   Thanks

 

Sincerely,

 

Nancy

 

St. Francis, Baptism

 

Brothers,

This is an excerpt from one of the famous books on St Francis of Assisi. If having the desire alone could save, St Francis need not send his friars, isn't it?

God bless,
Jerome

 

CHAPTER XXIV (from Little Flowers of St Francis)

 

HOW ST FRANCIS CONVERTED TO THE FAITH THE SULTAN OF BABYLON

 

St Francis, urged by zeal for the faith of Christ and by a wish to suffer martyrdom, took with him one day twelve of his most holy brethren, and went beyond the sea with the intention of going straight to the Sultan of Babylon. They arrived in a province belonging to the Saracens, where all the passes were guarded by men so cruel, that no Christian who passed that way could escape being put to death. Now it pleased God that St Francis and his companions should not meet with the same fate; but they were taken prisoners, and after being bound and ill-treated, were led before the Sultan. Then St Francis standing before him, inspired by the Holy Spirit, preached most divinely the faith of Christ; and to prove the truth of what he said, professed himself ready to enter into the fire. Now the Sultan began to feel a great devotion towards him, both because of the constancy of his faith, and because he despised the things of this world (for he had refused to accept any of the presents which he had offered to him), and also because of his ardent wish to suffer martyrdom. From that moment he listened to him willingly, and begged him to come back often, giving both him and his companions leave to preach wheresoever they pleased; he likewise gave them a token of his protection, which would preserve them from all molestation.

 

At length St Francis, seeing he could do no more good in those parts, was warned by God to return with his brethren to the land of the faithful. Having assembled his companions, they went together to the Sultan to take leave of him. The Sultan said to him: "Brother Francis, most willingly would I be converted to the faith of Christ; but I fear to do so now, for if the people knew it, they would kill both me and thee and all thy companions. As thou mayest still do much good, and I have certain affairs of great importance to conclude, I will not at present be the cause of thy death and of mine. But teach me how I can be saved, and I am ready to do as thou shalt order." On this St Francis made answer: "My lord, I will take leave of thee for the present; but after I have returned to my own country, when I shall be dead and gone to heaven, by the grace of God, I will send thee two of my friars, who will administer to thee the holy baptism of Christ, and thou shalt be saved, as the Lord Jesus has revealed to me; and thou in the meantime shalt free thyself from every hindrance, so that, when the grace of God arrives, thou mayest be found well disposed to faith and devotion." The Sultan promised so to do; and did as he had promised. Then St Francis returned with his company of venerable and saintly brethren, and after a few years ending his mortal life, he gave up his soul to God. The Sultan, having fallen ill, awaited the fulfillment of the promise of St Francis, and placed guards in all the passes, ordering them if they met two brothers in the habit of St Francis to conduct them immediately to him. At the same time St Francis appeared to two of his friars, and ordered them without delay to go to the Sultan and save his soul, according to the promise he had made him. The two set out, and having crossed the sea, were conducted to the Sultan by the guards he had sent out to meet them. The Sultan, when he saw them arrive, rejoiced greatly, and exclaimed: "Now I know of a truth that God has sent his servants to save my soul, according to the promise which St Francis made me through divine revelation." Having received the faith of Christ and holy baptism from the said friars, he was regenerated in the Lord Jesus Christ; and having died of his disease, his soul was saved, through the merits and prayers of St Francis.

 

Received

 

Dear Brothers,

 

I Just received your Book and DVD you sent me, what a Nice Surprise !    I'm especially excited about seeing the whole Fatima one…

 

This Book is just Amazingly Filled with more information than I could have possibly guessed by just its size…. I'm constantly shocked by what passes as Christianity with most people these days...and the level of hate towards the Catholic Church.   This is Most Appreciated, can't wait to read it!...

  

Carol Delger  

 

Questions

 

Dear Brother Michael:
 
I have visited your site and have reviewed many of your articles.  First, I appreciate your efforts to educate and found most of your material very illuminating but I must confess, I also found some of it most disconcerting. Let me explain by way of questions for your review and comment if possible:
 
1.  I live in Rhode Island, the most Catholic State in the USA - per capita of our residents; and there are many churches but only one church in the whole State that offers a Latin Mass on Sunday.   I go to daily mass at my local Parish and of course the Vatican II mass is celebrated.  You claim the mass is invalid, if that is true, then why would the Lord permit that every single mass said throughout my State every morning is invalid? Does the Lord not want my salvation?  If there is no daily Latin Mass offerred throughout the entire State, what is a Catholic to do?  This is the case in most States in the USA.  Am I damned for all eternity because of the actions of the church leaders. How does obedience play into the equation.  Do I just stop going to mass every day?  Forgo all the hours of eucharistic adoration, with the invalid consecrated host? 
 
2.  Is every confession I go to invalid, every mass, every adoration?,   If the answer to these questions is yes because a Vatican II priest consecrated the host or performs the sarament, then most of the sacraments that are offerred are invalid thereby making my devout worship and dedication worthless.  Is this the plan of God?
 
3.  Why would the Lord and through him the Holy Spirit, allow for entire populations to be duped and worship in an invalid way when most of us are just trying to be obedient to the church and its' leaders?
 
4. Are you also suggesting that the Holy Spirit has permitted or ordained that the last 50 years of Popes would all be invalid? Is it becuase of end times?  When would a valid Pope be elected?  Benedict has been very supportive of allowing the Latin Mass to come back and he refuses to distribute communion in the hand, etc....What is a lay person to do? If everything you propose is correct then 99% of all Catholics in the world are worshipping incorrectly under the guise of obedience.  I just dont think that God would allow so many of us who try to be devout to be duped or intentionally depraved of our worship and devotion.
 
5.  Regarding the imposter  Sister Lucia.  I agree that the person pretending to be her is clearly someone different.  How was the conspiracy played out? How could the real Sister Lucia die or be killed and that information be kept a secret?  There are those who claim that Paul VI also had an imposter. When you look at the pictures of the early Paul VI and the later years Paul VI they are also clearly different people.   What does all this mean with all these antipopes, invalid mass, imposters?
 
I personally was a very bad sinner.  Over the last year or so, I have truly changed my life made amendments.  I say the rosary everyday, volunteer, go to daily mass, go to confession weekly, sometimes twice a week. I have spent literally hundreds of hours before the Blessed Sacrament.  I have consecrated myself to the Blessed Mother. I observe First Fridays, First Saturdays, I pray about 2-3 hours every day, read scripture, etc....  I can say that I feel the change in myself.  I have read the Imitation of Christ by Thomas Kempis, the Dark Night of the Soul, etc... I have experienced some form of purgation. I believe that I am or try to be in a state of grace.  How would this be possible if I am worshipping under false masses, etc?...  I am just trying to reconcile what is going on in the church and how I proceed.
 
Thank you and God Bless,
 
Stephen

 

MHFM: To your questions… 1. The Lord permits the invalid Masses as a punishment for people’s sins and for their bad will.  He sees that very few care about the faith itself; for that reason, He has allowed the real priests, Masses, etc. to disappear.  To give an example, we had to go out recently.  One of us got into a conversation about the faith with a person, which we sometimes do.  This individual claimed to be Catholic.  In giving her a DVD and discussing what’s been happening, the issue of false ecumenism and John Paul II’s prayer with idolaters and pagans came up.  The woman flatly denied that John Paul II could have possibly engaged in such an action.  In response, one of us explained that it’s a fact.  We also said that we have the proof on the DVD we just gave her.  All she needs to do is watch it.  She was obstinate, and she refused to believe that John Paul II did anything like that.  It wasn’t even clear if she would watch the DVD to see the proof.  The point is that, if this encounter had not occurred, she might not have heard about the Vatican II apostasy or what is really going on.  Through this encounter, she received a special opportunity to hear the truth.  However, whose fault is it that she hadn’t found out?  It’s obvious that God left her in the dark because He saw that she didn’t care about the truth and that she is of bad will.  For upon hearing the truth, she was not receptive; but rather she fought against it vigorously.  She even tried to deny an indisputable fact, and balked at looking at the visual proof.  That’s why God leaves countless people in the dark of the Novus Ordo.  They may seem nice on the outside; they might attend “Mass,” but inwardly their hearts strenuously rebel against His truth.  God sees all of it, and He sees that they are not of the truth.  Hence, there’s no need for Him to give them a special message concerning the full extent of what’s happening; for almost all of them would reject it anyway.  Everyone who is of the truth hears His voice (John 18:37).  Those who really care and have interest will be brought to the knowledge of the truth.  This is not to suggest that people shouldn’t try to aggressively evangelize or spread the truth to these individuals.  It is merely to point out that few of them will be inclined to search for the truth on their own, and thus it is often only through the special efforts and encouragement of others that they might investigate what’s happening. 

 

2.  Every mass you go to (assuming it’s the New Mass) is definitely invalid.  The same is true for every “adoration” session.  The confessions are invalid if they were made to priests ordained in Paul VI’s invalid new rite of ordination.  You ask if this is the plan of God.  We ask, do you believe in Outside the Church There is No Salvation, as the Church has taught?  Do you believe that people who engage in false ecumenism, such as Benedict XVI and his bishops, deny the faith?  Do you believe that all pagans, Jews, Muslims, heretics, etc. are lost?  If not, then you reject His faith.  Perhaps then you can see why God would allow you and many others to be deceived.

 

3.  The answer is that almost all of them are of bad will.  In addition, we are living through the Great Apostasy and the great spiritual deception.  Jesus said that the deception would be so profound that even the elect would be deceived, if that were possible (Matthew 24).  It’s clearly predicted in Scripture that the Mass will be taken away, and that there will be a profound deception.  So how can you think that it’s not possible?  This is covered in our material.  The Great Apostasy and a Counterfeit Church predicted in the New Testament and in Catholic Prophecy.  You need to look at it.

 

4.  These questions are addressed in our articles, DVDs, book and debates.  Please look at them.  You need to realize that few are saved even in Catholic times, and extremely few are saved today.  Here’s what Jacinta said about the time of World War II, which is nothing compared to the darkness of today:

 

Lucia found Jacinta sitting alone, still and very pensive, gazing at nothing.  ‘What are you thinking of, Jacinta?’  ‘Of the war that is going to come.  So many people are going to die.  And almost all of them are going to Hell.’” (Our Lady of Fatima, p. 94; p. 92 in some versions)

 

5.  Our video on Fatima and the Impostor Sr. Lucia addresses your questions on this topic.  Regarding the effort you’ve employed, that’s surely why you’ve come across this information.  God is giving you the grace and the opportunity to see the full truth.  It’s up to you to accept it.  If you don’t, one must say in charity that you will go to Hell.  You must never go to the invalid New Mass again.  You must also keep in mind that spiritual works or time spent without a pure intention or a submission to His faith lose all merit.  God wants obedience, rather than sacrifice.  In other words, if you accept heretics or reject His dogmas, your spiritual works will be worthless in His sight.

 

1 Kings 15:22-23: “And Samuel said: Doth the Lord desire holocausts and victims, and not rather that the voice of the Lord should be obeyed?  For obedience is better than sacrifices: and to hearken rather than to offer the fat of rams.  Because it is like the sin of witchcraft to rebel: and like the crime of idolatry, to refuse to obey.  Forasmuch as thou hast rejected the word of the Lord, the Lord hath also rejected thee from being king.”

 

If one rejects God’s truth, he cannot please Him.  To accept the Vatican II sect, in light of all the facts, is to deny God.

 

Effect

 

Hi, I just want to share something of interest.  My family was in the v2 until I became aware of the heretical teachings of the nun leading the religious ed. I removed my kids from the class and tried to teach the faith at home.  It was not easy.   Sadly they were already in their teens.    I am still very angry that my kids were exposed to the false teachings.   They are in their mid twenties now.   The effects of the v2 teachings apparent.    I have been sharing information from your web site and other sources  with them,  when possible .  Hoping they will do some research of the faith on their own. One of them called me a couple of weeks ago.  He said he was on his way to work and said a short prayer for discernment.  He was researching something and by chance (?) he was led   to articles on freemason, among others . He said he had read these types of  articles before , but that day the information all of a sudden started to fall in place and he got  a deeper understanding of the Catholic church  and other things that he had questions about , concerning his faith.  He was very excited, and said he wanted to talk to me in person about some other things that were revealed to him .I told him that the Lord answers prayers but sometimes in a way we don't expect. Discernment on his faith was not on his mind when he said his short prayer.  I am looking forward to his visit. I am  hopeful and thankful for this turn of events.  What books or dvds do you have that would be good for me to get for him. ( Errors of v2,  freemasons,  evolution. )  Thank you for your website and the information that you share.

 

Bw…

 

MHFM: That’s good news.  We would recommend the DVDs and books in our special package.  Death and the Journey into Hell is especially important for him to see, so that he seriously considers the necessity of getting his soul in order.  Lives of the saints are also important, in addition to of course encouraging him to pray the Rosary.  The life of St. Francis Paola (which we offer) is quite good for people who are new or coming into the faith.  His life is filled with extraordinary miracles and can get people excited about the power of the Catholic faith.

 

Response

 

Response to Stepup

   If you think an MHFM video was some sort of a joke you really need to back away from your own self confidence, consider that you may not know everything God wants you to know, and pray that God will give you the grace to convert to the one, true faith. You need to start taking an interest in the Rosary and the idea of reciting the Rosary.

   Do you care about saying the Hail Mary prayer? "Listen to what Our Lady revealed to Blessed Alan de la Roche, as he has recorded in his book on the dignity of the Rosary: 'Know, my son, and make all others know, that it is a probable and proximate sign of eternal damnation to have an aversion, a lukewarmness, or a negligence in saying the Angelical Salutation [Hail Mary prayer], which has repaired the whole world.'"
(St. Louis de Montfort, True Devotion to Mary, Trans. Fr. Frederick Faber, Rockford, Illinois, Tan Books and Publishers, Inc., 1941, 157.)

 
   If you attend the Novus Ordo "mass" ask yourself if this "mass" makes you care about saying the Hail Mary prayer.

TD

 

9/11 Mosque

 

Dimond brothers,
 
  Did you see ABC Nightline yesterday ? There was a Vatican II Priest pushing for that Muslim Mosque to get built at Ground Zero.
The name of the Priest is Father Kevin Madigan. You might want to put that on your latest news section on your website.
 
                                                                                                             God bless

H

 

MHFM: Wow, what a scandal… What apostasy.

 

Pervades

 

Dear Brothers,

That's a very interesting story from Joseph Ramirez on the heretic Bishop Williamson. It reveals the intellectual pride that pervades their whole organization. I remember when I was kicked out of the SSPX for distributing two small EENS flyers. The Rector of the Seminary (Holy Cross, Australia), imposing heretic Fr. Vincente Griego, said that the information on the flyer was "all twisted," or "taken out of context" - something to that effect. It doesn't require a theology degree to be a Catholic, but it certainly does require humility! Catholic dogmas are to believed as they are written.

Mark 10:15 - Amen I say to you, whosoever shall not receive the kingdom of God as a little child, shall not enter into it.


Proverbs 15:33 - The fear of the Lord is the lesson of wisdom: and humility goeth before glory.

John 12:40 - He hath blinded their eyes, and hardened their heart, that they should not see with their eyes, nor understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them.


God Bless,

Chris White

 

Damage

 

Hello I have been watching your videos on YouTube I am a Conservative Catholic. I had no idea what damage Vatican II has done until I watched your videos of the Heresies of Popes abominations of the new mass etc. Could not believe my eyes when I saw the Mass video I have never seen anything like that in my life…
 
But my question to you is what am I meant to do, where am I meant to go and Worship and where to go for Confession? I live in the England.
 
Also this a problem for me as I have believe that I am called to the Priesthood and have been considering joining the Priesthood and going to seminary but after watching these videos you have shown I am like so kind of confused of what to do now.
 
I have been telling people about this in my Church they too had no idea of these heresies and abominations taking place.
 
Looking forward for hearing from you.
 
Regards
 
Ste

 

MHFM: We’re glad to hear about your interest.  The first thing is to get out of the invalid New Mass and become convinced on all the issues.  A Catholic must never go to the New Mass again for any reason.  Pray the Rosary each day, and please continue to review the material.  You will see clearly that the Vatican II sect is not the Catholic Church.  Once convinced, a person can apply the guidelines on where to receive sacraments to the available options in their area (only considering certain priests ordained in a traditional way, of course).  A profession of faith, a good confession, etc. are all important.  But the first thing is to continue to familiarize yourself with the traditional Catholic faith and what a Catholic must know and believe about what is happening. 

 

Saw

 

Subject: Hello

 

Hi there. I saw your video on BP oil spill and tried to thumbs up it, and as you know, I couldn't. I then visited your channel and watched some more videos, (all of which I found extremely interesting). I really like your channel and the way you present the information. While I’m not Catholic, I believe the only way to salvation is through Jesus Christ, too. I'm really looking forward to watching your series, Is the World about to End?. Thanks in advance for the information you're putting out there.

 

Thepart…

 

MHFM: Thanks for the interest.  We hope you continue to look at the material.  We must emphasize that it's critical to embrace the one true faith of Christ.  Jesus taught that one must hear His Church and accept all of His teachings for salvation.  We have a book called The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church.  It demonstrates that the Catholic faith is the only true Christian faith.

 

Question

 

I have a question about your videos you have for sale (like the ones on JPII, Paul VI, The New Mass, JPII preaching antichrist, Council of apostasy, and benedict XVI).  Are the videos the newest versions (like 2nd edition and final edition. Like the ones you can watch for free on your website)?  I'd like to know before ordering (I hope they are the newest versions).  Thank you.

Sincerely, Ryan

 

MHFM: Yes, the videos/DVDs we offer are the newest versions.

 

Williamson vs.

 

Subject: Williamson vs. Ramirez

 

I had written you in the past, and shared some exchanges I had with Bp Williamson.  As was Joe Ramirez’s experience; I found in argument the Bishop skirts core issues and goes adhominum whenever a concrete Truth is cited.

 

However I think Mr. Ramirez touched a nerve in the Bishop.  It had been nearly a month since I heard from the Bishop, then out of the blue, yesterday morning, I got this:

 

Dear Bill,

 

Arguing is fine, as long as the mind is not being governed by emotions. One's all too frequent experience with sedevacantists and with Feeneyites is that the mind has shut down, and emotion, blocked emotion, has taken over. With such, argument is a waste of time.

 

Confucius he say, "He who speaks to a fool, wastes his words. He who does not speak to a wise man, wastes his man. The wise man wastes neither his words nor his man."

 

I don't know why minds shut down on sedevacantism or Feeneyism, but I know that they easily do.  Both cut Gordian knots. Theology unties them as best hey can be untied.

                                      God bless,             Bishop W.

 

The timing of the note, I mean after so much time, and sort of disconnected from the chain of our most recent dialogues, probably wasn’t a coincidence.   Maybe his conscience was tweaked?  Maybe he is arguing more to himself than to me.

 

Anyway, thought it was interesting.   I think such as Bp. Williamson are worthy of your prayers (as I suspect your prayers have great efficacy).  Prayer for his total conversion of course…

 

Bill Mulligan

 

Revealing

 

Dear brothers in Christ,


The letter from the reader Joseph Ramirez, about bishop Williamson, is quite revealing. The bishop's very phrase "to understand dogma correctly" is provocative enough to accuse bishop for heresy and mocking God. For how would it be possible to have a true Faith and at the same time suggest that God has spoken His Eternal Truth in a way that it is logically possible to understand it incorrectly?  If it would be possible, there would be no sin at all, for then every sinner could rightly say that he/she acted upon his/her own understanding of The Truth, and didn't break The Law according to this understanding. This would constitute modernism in extreme, and this is what bishop Williamson is promoting. In that respect he is indeed more dangerous than Novus Ordo heretics who openly accept modernism.

Bishop Williamson obviously is very fond of with playing with words. I would like to ask him what is the correct meaning of the word "correct"? If it is possible to understand the statement "no pagans, or heretics, or Jews would be saved unless..." incorrectly, to the point that it has the meaning "it is possible for pagans, heretics and Jews to be saved even if they die outside the Church", then it is obviously possible to understand the word "correctly" incorrectly.  So the bishop Williamson is pushing his flock to "deeper understanding". Well, I suppose I am allowed to think that "the deeper" has its extreme, that there is "the deepest". If the bishop Williamson has the true charity, why then he doesn't say this "deepest understanding" of the dogma, and thus make the end of discussion. Let him just translate each and every dogma to its "deepest understanding", and order each and every member of his flock to forget altogether the "shallow understanding" of the dogmas. For, what would be the use of "shallow understanding" at all? We don't need "shallow understanding", do we?

For example, I firmly believe the dogma that there is ONE God, and THREE Divine Persons, and each and every of the THREE Persons is The ONE and same God. I never pretended that I UNDERSTAND this dogma in a way as I understand many truths of the natural world. So, I suppose that bishop Williamson would like to give me the deepest understanding of this dogma, and other dogmas as well, and thus make an end to my quest of understanding.

To summarize: Bishop Williamson is just one of the countless Novus Ordarians wannabe traditionalist. He is representing the masonic doctrine of salvation, just like his fellow co-workers in Vatican. For, it is the masons who have the "circles of understanding", the "degrees", and all such satanic mumbo-jumbo doctrine, in order to confuse the people who long for The Truth, which is God. The truth is that the dogmas will always mean what they say. And according to the dogmas, the bishop Williamson is on the road to Hell.  Unless he embraces the dogmas as they are, he would perish eternally.

God bless MHFM

Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia

 

1 Timothy 4

 

Subject: 1 Timothy 4

 

Hello brothers,            
 
I had a quick question, I was trying to convince this protestant woman… I was using the bible proves the teachings of the Catholic Church. She was more interested in convincing me of her scripture alone view. She pointed out first timothy chapter 4 where it talks about the insincerity of liars whose consciences are seared, who forbid marriage and require abstinence from foods God created.  She says Paul is talking about priests. I think she took this scripture out of context but wanted to know what it meant could you please explain it to me. I have been giving out your dvds and I hope the people that i gave them to will listen. I find protestants very hard to convince. I got baptized and am working on living the full true faith... Thanks for all you do for us.

Veronica.

 

MHFM: Thanks for the interest.  There’s a lot of bad will out there.  The woman is completely wrong about the passage she brings up.  We should quote the passage, so that your question is clear to our readers.

 

1 Timothy 4:1-5 “Now the Spirit manifestly saith, that in the last times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to spirits of error, and doctrines of devils, Speaking lies in hypocrisy, and having their conscience seared, Forbidding to marry, commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving by the faithful, and by them that have known the truth.  For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be rejected that is received with thanksgiving: For it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer.”

 

There is a very definite meaning to this passage.  The passage speaks of the various dualist sects throughout Christian history.  Examples of these were the Gnostics, the Manicheans, the Cathars, etc.  These people believed in two gods: one evil and one good.  They held that the evil god was the god of matter, and the good god the god of the spirit.  These groups developed a theology which was destructive to any use of material things, to a greater or lesser degree depending upon the sect and their zeal for it.  Hence, they forbade marriage, abstained from meats, and preached poverty (for they believed that to own material things was evil).  The most devoted would even kill themselves to put an end to their material existence. 

 

There is no doubt that this is what the passage is referring to, as a careful study of Christian history will show.  These types of dualist heretics popped up again and again.  They became such a problem in the Middle Ages that the war against Cathar-dualist heretics in 1208 was called a crusade by Pope Innocent III (Carroll, A History of Christendom, Vol. 3, p. 175.)  So the passage is not remotely forbidding celibacy, which the Bible clearly teaches is superior to marriage.  See this file:

 

Refuting the Protestant rejection of the Catholic and Biblical teaching on celibacy

 

Some ask, why does the Church prohibit priests from marrying?  Catholic priests in the Roman Rite are forbidden to marry because the Bible teaches that the celibate state is superior to the marital state.  But it’s important to recognize that in the Eastern Rite married men can be ordained to the priesthood, but once ordained a man can’t be married.  So a celibate clergy is a disciplinary law, but one which is rooted in doctrine and biblical truth.  This discipline began to be enforced in the early Church.

 

Book, DVD

 

Dear Most Holy Family Monastery:

Thank you for the book and resources that you sent me.  "The Bible proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church" is an excellent resource - it is well-written and easy to understand - exactly what I've come to expect of MHFM.  The DVD is also very good especially "Is the World About to End" and "The Third Secret of Fatima"…

Thank you for all your hard work.

Sincerely

PC

 

E-mail

 

I watched one of your videos. I really hope it was some sort of joke. If not, you are undoubtedly insane to the point of no return...

 

Stepup…

 

New YouTube Design

 

MHFM: For those it might interest, we have a new design for Our You Tube Channel.

 

Williamson

 

Brothers:

Greetings. I met Bishop Williamson of the SSPX today at their priory in Armada, MI. My family and I came to the 7:15 am Mass and to my surprise he was the celebrant. I didn't think I would get a chance to talk to him, but after Mass he was calmly strolling the grounds, so I thought I would just go up and introduce myself, and let God lead from there. We exchanged small talk for a few minutes, and then I asked him bluntly, "Bishop, do you believe in salvation by invincible ignorance?" I asked him this question because I had heard that he "privately" holds the Church's dogma that outside the Church there is no salvation. His answer was a literal crash course in heresy, sophistry, and ad hominem attack. First, he clearly and forcefully DOES NOT hold the Church's dogmatic teaching that only water baptized believing Catholics can enter heaven. He took no time at all to reply to my question in the affirmative, and that, to him, the Catholic Church has always taught this idea. I then asked him to explain to me how invincible ignorance squares with Pope Eugene IV's dogmatic definition in Cantate Domino concerning Jews, pagans, heretics, and schismatics departing into everlasting fire unless they first reconcile with the Catholic Church before death, and that even shedding blood for the name of Christ cannot save them. His response can be summarized as the classic "you have to understand dogmas correctly," which, after his long-winded explanation, contained little if any understanding or correctness. I politely, with all respect, told him that he was wrong. The Bishop then became noticeably agitated and told me that "just reading the Dimond Brothers" does not make me some sort of expert, or some such thing. When I asked how he knew that I read your material, he said, "Oh, it's quite obvious!" He went on to condemn you as dangerous and wrong. "But Bishop" I said, "the Dimond Brothers simply point people back to the Church's infallible dogmas..." He cut me off, and tried to give some types of analogous commentary to support his position which made no sense to me.

He also felt the need not only to bash you for doing what he as a Bishop should have been doing all along, namely, holding, proclaiming, and defending Catholic dogma, but he went after me (in so many words) by emphasizing that since he and his priests are so well-trained and educated, I must be a dummy. (I almost stated that Catholicism is For Dummies like me, but I refrained for fear that he might think I was endorsing the heretical Novus Ordo book you recently exposed). He also referred to me as "my dear boy, as in "My dear boy, you really must be careful to not tell a Bishop that he is wrong!" Since I'm 52, I took it as a compliment, thanked him for his time, and left.

Brothers, these men are for real! Do we not have in the SSPX the "traditional" counterpart to the Vatican II sect? They claim to be the Catholic Church, just like the Vatican II sect, and even resemble the true Catholic Church more realistically with the Latin Mass, cassocks, devotions, and so on, but if they and their supporters die embracing their heresies, what will it all be worth? Pope Eugene IV specifically included heretics among those who will be consigned to eternal fire unless they reconcile with the Church. What a diabolical deception! So many generous people having lots of children so that they can be placed in the hands of false-traditionalist priests at SSPX schools and parishes, seminaries and novitiates, just to be raised up in heresy and fit for hell! This is truly atrocious!

I thank you again for your defense of holy Dogma, and I am honored to be so "obviously" associated with you.

Joseph Ramirez

 

MHFM: That’s a very interesting e-mail and story.  Thanks for sending it.  Perhaps the most revealing part of the exchange is when you made reference to the Bull Cantate Domino.  You asked him how his view could possibly conform to that dogmatic definition.  He responded by arguing essentially that one must “understand” the dogma if one is to conform it to his (heretical) position.  It is classic modernism, and it’s precisely what Vatican I condemns: departing from the definition once declared by the Church under the specious name of a “deeper understanding.”  His “understanding,” of course, clearly contradicts the actual words of the text.  All of this serves to expose their heretical unbelief; it demonstrates, once again, that they reject the dogma as it has been taught by the Church. 

 

Pope Pius IX, First Vatican Council, Sess. 3, Chap. 2 on Revelation, 1870, ex cathedra: “Hence, also, that understanding of its sacred dogmas must be perpetually retained, which Holy Mother Church has once declared; and there must never be a recession from that meaning under the specious name of a deeper understanding.”

 

2 Tim. 3:5

 

Subject: 2 Tim. 3:5

 

Dear Brothers:

 

Might not the scripture to which you referred, (paraphrasing) "In the last days there will be the appearance of religion, but the power thereof will be denied," also indicate the appearance of the Catholic religion via the Novus Ordo, which denies the true efficacy of the sacraments?  For example, to the world, the Catholic Church still appears to be the Church; the buildings are the same, there is still a "pope", cardinals, bishops, gregorian chant, pseudo sacraments, etc., however, all the sacraments, including the Mass, and even the doctrines have been changed just enough to be merely empty ceremonies posing as the real ones -- fooling, if possible, even the "elect?"

 

God Bless,

Perry

 

MHFM: We think that it probably has a number of applications.  However, we definitely think it applies to public figures, celebrities, etc. who say they are “blessed” or thank God yet live in a manner that’s completely incompatible with His most basic morality.  For example, they talk about how they are “blessed” yet go to immoral clubs or live lascivious lifestyles or participate in the production of impurity, etc.  They have the appearance of godliness, i.e., they mention His name, but deny His power or influence over the actions and lives of people and how they should conduct themselves. 

 

Bible references

 

Your teachings, showing with Bible references, the validity of Mary, Peter, and the Eucharist is beyond price.

 

Respectfully, Michael Holbrook

 

Comment

 

To the Drummer's comment:

Promise given made to St. Benedict regarding the destiny of his enemies:

"3) Everyone who persecutes his order and does not repent will see his days shortened or meet with an unfortunate end."

Let's pray that Drummer repent before it's too late because desiring the death of the Truth (the Catholic Faith) spread by Most Holy Family Monastery is a very evil thought.

I thought the person Seesyou who called you an "antichrist" was bad enough but considering this fool's comment, I might reconsider and say that this might have superceded it.  Why? Well because he/she not only hates the Truth, who is Christ (which in a sense would make him/her an antichrist), but also desires the death of… sound doctrine (the true Catholic Faith given by Christ) which is taught and spread by MHFM.  Drummer and all those who hate MHFM's wonderful work are fools and have nor fear nor love for God.

2 Timothy 4:3 "For there shall be a time, when they will not endure sound doctrine; but, according to their own desires..."


Proverbs 1:7 "The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom. Fools despise wisdom and instruction."

Galatians 6:7 "
God is NOT mocked."


Sincerely,
Bernardo

Comment

 

Dear Brothers Michael and Peter Dimond,

Subject :"you need to die''

...and you will need tomorrow, "Drummer," to eat those words with regret - is it because you 'march to the beat' of a different drum, than the rest of us Catholics who belong to the one true Church of Jesus Christ [ Outside of which There is No Salvation] - that you make such a flippant comment ?

...they say 'what goes round, comes round'  - so be careful, drummer, your wish doesn't come true - cf.,  to those who persecute the Benedictine Order and do not repent, will see their days shortened or meet with an unfortunate end!   8 - [

God bless,

David

 

Die

 

Subject: you need to die

 

Seriously…

 

Drummer…

 

USA

 

I see you never considered that USA might be the beast of hell? That is fine. I listened to most of your speeches, very intelligent and interesting. I used to be a believer. I think that USA has more points to win the place of, foretold by Bible, beast of doom. First nuclear attacks were made by US, the oil spill -USA, North American continent also comes out of the Sea; even more so than European.


Regards!

 

Esaul…

 

MHFM: We believe Europe is the beast out of the sea.  That’s because the Apocalypse connects the beast out of the sea with the fourth beast predicted by Daniel and its ten horns.  We discuss that in the video.  Daniel’s fourth beast was the Roman Empire.  It arose out of the Mediterranean Sea.  The new beast (which is a new form of the previous beast) is therefore the new Roman Empire (the European Union).  It also arises out of the Mediterranean Sea.  Moreover, as the video shows, many other things fit with the European Union.  You need to become a believer in God’s one true faith.  Salvation is the most important thing, and unless you embrace the true Catholic faith you can’t be saved.

 

B-16

 

Hello.

I saw this at euronews channel. "Pope" Benedict XVi celebrates a "mass" for the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary in St Thomas of Villanova in Italy where he spends his summer. The novus ordo priests that were handing out "communion" were giving it in the hand of the people. It didn't show benedict xvi doing this, but he was there too so it means he allows this. Grotesque show. Here is the link: http://www.euronews.net/nocomment/2010/08/16/pope-celebrates-assumption-mass/

God bless

 

I forgot to mention. Watch also the novus ordo "nun" in the background.  She also receives ""communion" in the hand

 

Eduard

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  There are numerous pictures of Antipope Benedict XVI giving “Communion” in the hand as well.

 

Comment

 

Dear brothers in Christ,

The image player on the top of your website is a good idea. It is very useful for reminding the readers of the many excellent videos you've produced, which uphold and nourish the Catholic Faith.

In response to a reader who wrote about ex-governor "Catholic" funeral, you wrote:"Could they indicate any more clearly that they hold the Catholic faith to be completely meaningless and unnecessary?"

To answer your rhetorical question-- I'm 100% sure they can. I have no idea what will it be, but I'm sure they'll think of something. The V2 sect is an inexhaustible fountain of wickedness. A believer in God is incapable to imagine the innumerable ways of mocking God coming from the pit of Hell.

May The Queen of Heaven protect the true Catholics.

Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia

 

Share

 

Hello Brothers Dimond,

Regarding the article: The day Metallica came to "church"

I want to share the following video of a motorcycle "catholic" mass in Schweinfurt/Germany, which featured even a metallica song for communion, to show it's not a distinct "feature" of non-catholic sects.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hWnayzMzSI starting at 5:15 (but the rest is also pretty abominable)

Greetings from Germany

Stefan

 

MHFM: That’s incredible.  Thanks for the e-mail.

 

Ex-Governor, “Mass

 

Subject: Ex-Governor dies & receives “Catholic” funeral “Mass”

 

Dear Brothers,

A few weeks ago there was a televised Novus Ordo (New Order) funeral service full of ceremony for what looks to be a high ranking Freemason.  Ex Nevada Governor Kenny Guinn was a “Catholic” and served the state of Nevada for many years.  The N.O. church was packed and the “Mass” was presided over by the effeminate sounding “Bishop” Pepe, who never once said that Guinn went to heaven, but rather said that Guinn was, “a man who had no denomination per say but like Abraham was a man of faith and belief.”  The service/ceremony was full of symbolic meaning, including the display of Military with the Honor Guard, Flags, the 21 Gun Salute and Scottish Bagpipes whenever the body was in “procession”.  All this was a tribute to their man who did his Freemasonic duty in spite of his “Catholic” façade.  He died keeping the secrets of the “Craft”.  His official burial was to take place in California!  Despite being a native Californian he ended up with a lot of fingers in the pies of Nevadans.  He was a past Superintendent of Schools; he was CEO of the Gas Company, and CEO of a bank among many other things.  From the varied sources, reference was made to the fact there was even still more work that lay ahead for him even though he was 72 years old!
 
As press reports of his death came in it was speculated that he was on the roof of his house (he has two in Nevada) possibly fixing the air conditioning or brushing leaves off during the record breaking high temperatures in July and may have suffered a stroke or heart attack while up there and fell off.  What in the world would a wealthy old man be doing fixing his own air conditioning or sweeping leaves off his sharply angled roof?  There wasn't wind, it was heat and the aerial photos of the house in question clearly showed a sloping rooftop with no wind or leaves.  The official autopsy which eventually came out stated: “The Clark County Coroner’s Office has released the autopsy results on former Nevada Governor Guinn.  The coroner says Guinn died from blunt force trauma to the chest and head after he fell from the roof of his home July 22.  The report also says the fall caused his heart to stop, and he was pronounced dead at University Medical Center at 11:07 am.  The cause of his death was ruled accidental.”

The links from Part I and part II of the disgusting display of a “Mass” along with the comments by the "Bishop" (and many other press releases) are here if you are interested in taking a look:  http://www.ktnv.com/Global/searchresults.asp?vendor=ez&qu=guinn

Reference to the bagpipes are here: http://www.mynews3.com/story.php?id=23900 and a brief video reference to them and the gun salute are here:  http://www.8newsnow.com/global/story.asp?s=12876475

By this very public and abominable display it would appear that he was indeed a Scottish rite 33rd degree Freemason and that his "Catholic" name was a ruse for the benefit of his wife and family and to keep up pretenses for covert activities as instructed by his fellow comrades.  His associates tell on themselves by publicly paying their respects and so doing, the “high ranking dignitaries” ally themselves to him and to Freemasonry. (Will they be wearing full insignia including their Aprons at the other service in California?)

These Freemasons and their incessant in our face slight of hand, out and out lying and fixation on symbols and numerology (note the publication of date and time of death) make me more furious and sickened by the day.  Grown men keeping secrets and playing with numbers and symbols, how stupid and ignorant can “smart men” be?  If they die in this atrocity they fully deserve what the Lord Jesus Christ gives them for their betrayal of Him and their true duty to their families and true countrymen. Poor Novus Ordo family, if they stay where they're at, they will not fare much better.

Anon.

 

MHFM: That’s very interesting.  It’s especially interesting that the Novus Ordo “bishop” explicitly identified him as a man of no denomination (i.e., he wasn’t Catholic), yet gave him a “Catholic” funeral anyway.  It’s another example of the almost never-ending stream of apostate actions by the Vatican II sect.  What a complete mockery of the faith.  Could they indicate any more clearly that they hold the Catholic faith to be completely meaningless and unnecessary?

 

Interest

 

Respected Brothers,


Greetings!


I think some of us are missing important youtube videos. I go to Internet parlour once a month to download MHFM pages and any new audio files I find. I tried to install youtube downloader in the parlour computer, didn’t succeed, maybe because of some restrictions. It would be kind of you to provide also the audio files for the videos you post. Also, right now I cannot order the books you sell… but I’ve downloaded the PDF files. I think you’ve provided most of the chapters of the book “The Truth about What Really Happened to the Catholic Church after Vatican II” in PDF. I read them, print them and share photocopies of them with at least one uncle in our village, who is serious about the Faith, may be more serious than me, I guess. I share what I read with my younger brother, also with my Godmother, who spontaneously speaks out many of the things I’ve read and which I’ve not told her before. I guess it is intelligence face to face with Faith. Example: I was talking about the invalidity of the new sacrament of ordination, she just said, “that’s why there is no grace in the sacrament of confession, and people fall again into the same mortal sins which they confess.” Also what Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre said about the salvation of pagans, she said something like, “when Catholics will have such difficulties in saving their souls, how much more difficult it will be for pagans… it was just wrong for him to say that.”

Brothers, we pray for you.  May many souls be saved through you and through everyone who is with you in the Apostolate.

With kind regards,
Sanjay.
From Orissa, India.

 

Interview

 

Subject: “Fr.” Breen interview – you tube [regarding item in News & Commentary]

 

NOXIOUX VILE TOXIC HERETIC for explaining to "all of us where we can go"..........well, it is straight to hell, according to these people, with their un-Godly beliefs they are spouting!  How sad that so late in the day of human history they are still so seemingly HOPELESSLY LOST!!!  It's obvious they could not care ONE FIG about souls, the Truth, The Catholic Faith:  this "Breen" is an ABSOLUTE POSTER CHILD for someone who has so thoroughly intoxicated himself on the wine of the fornication of the "new [counter] mass" of Vatican 2 and all its evil heresies......well, there really is NO EXCUSE AT ALL for people like this:  talk about wolves in sheep's clothing!  MHFM has made the truth abundantly available… and yet these blind guides still lead their hapless "flocks" STRAIGHT into the pits of hell, with NO MERCY AT ALL!  I guess severe, profound spiritual blindness and deception has punishments all its own:  like a further increase in that blindness... Saint Jude pray for us

 

MHFM: Since his story got a lot of attention, he will probably receive some very mild and insignificant discipline only as part of a public relations ploy to appease people who are upset by what he said.  However, he won’t be excommunicated, even though he supports contraception and all the rest.  Thus, it’s another example of how the Vatican II sect is not Catholic. 

 

Note

 

MHFM: Readers of our website probably noticed the new image screen/player near the top of our website.  We will begin to update it with new content hopefully toward the middle or end of next week.  The News & Commentary and E-Exchanges will continue to be updated as usual. 

 

Troubled

 

Dear Brothers:

 

I am very troubled by the fact that my local grocery store sells immoral products such as contraceptives and very perverse novels. It’s troubling too because I am a cashier at this store. As a Catholic I feel morally obligated to find another job rather than continue selling these things. Please advise me on this matter.

 

Sincerely,

Anonymous

 

MHFM: A Catholic must not sell those things.

 

Comment

 

Hi Brothers,

 

I just received your book “The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church.”  This is the best thing I’ve ever seen!  I’ve seen other books like it, but nothing this complete and convincing and backed up with facts.  All your stuff is good, but you really take the cake with this book.  This ought to show all the Protestants and other religions that they’re in the wrong boat.  I’m going to need to order a few hundred because we want to start handing these out to people.  I still like the Padre Pio book, but this is the best thing even for fallen away Catholics.  Thank you Brothers and MHFM.  God bless you! 

 

Don Primi

 

Austrians

 

Subject: 100,000 Austrians

 

The news article you published about 100,000 Austrians leaving the V-2 church is very revealing. Even though most of these people probably cannot identify all of the multiple issues about which the conciliar church has entered into heresy and apostasy, they know something is wrong. Besides, the conciliar church teaches that one may obtain salvation even if one is not a member of the Catholic Church. The same thing is happening in Latin America and in the United States and Canada where millions are leaving the conciliar church only to end up in false evangelical, pentecostal or other protestant sects or cults.

The V-2 church and its leaders, especially Roncalli, Montini, Wojtyla and Ratzinger have proven to be a disaster for the world.

EJP, M.D., D.D.

 

New Video and Article

 

MHFM: Bro. Michael Dimond checks in with a new video and article on the best-selling book, Catholicism for Dummies.  This video and article expose the heresies in Catholicism for Dummies.  Catholicism for Dummies was authored by “Fr.” John Trigilio, a featured speaker on EWTN.  It has also been promoted by Novus Ordo “apologist” Jimmy Akin and “Catholic Answers.”  For those reasons, the outrageous heresies in the book are all the more revealing about the apostate Vatican II sect.

 

Catholicism for Dummies Exposed [video]

 

 

Catholicism for Dummies Exposed [article]

 

SSPV

 

I was listening to Father Jenkins of the St. Pius V Society… [someone] asked him… whether or not it was correct to say that no one could be either in heaven or purgatory without sanctifying grace.  Father Jenkins responded that that was correct, that no one could be saved and be in either purgatory or heaven without having been in the state of sanctifying grace.  Then the [person] asked if the means of obtaining sanctifying grace was through the sacraments only.  Father Jenkins first said yes, then hesitated and changed his mind and said, "That would be denying the baptism of the blood and of desire, though.  God can save a person through any means."  I got so disgusted that I… did not listen further.  It is so upsetting because Father Jenkins, in most all other instances appears to be so orthodox in his beliefs.  He speaks of modesty, family, against indifferentism and the new ecumenism, having a prayer life, the sacraments, sanctity, etc...  It occurred to me that it could be that this caller was merely trying to get Father Jenkins to see the incongruity of his beliefs.  They are vehemently against what they call the heresy of "feeneyism."

 

I, too, used to be an attendee of their masses until I read their publication and saw their endorsement of the heresy of BOD.  Also, I was shocked to discover they did not even object to sending Catholics to public school.  When I confronted them about the two of you, [a supporter of theirs] Wes Steele warned me off of you, saying your monastery was illegitimate and that the two of you "appeared" out of nowhere and had gotten your degrees from secular universities in California.

 

I mention all this because this society rejects John Paul II and Benedict XVI, and all the other antipopes; and rightly calls the Novus Ordo a sect, not the Catholic Church.  Their followers really believe they have found a safe-haven, and feel secure and happy because they receive the sacraments regularly.  It is just like a family.  They have a bishop, priests, monastery, schools, nuns, picnics, pancake breakfasts, prayer support -- all the things the Church used to provide for everyone…. In a sacrament-starved environment, it appears as an oasis in the desert…. And yet, the poison of this BOD and BOB heresy undermines the entire faith and they are all oblivious to the fact that this heresy, particularly BOD, is the foundation for Vatican II and the basis for the very ecumenism they say they reject.  It is like sitting in someone's parlor and having tea and cakes with a huge, wild, "white elephant" standing next to the white wall. 

 

Perry

 

MHFM: Misinformation and lies are standard when such heretics mention us.  With regard to the question he answered, that’s mild compared to what they really believe.  If the questions got into specific religions and members of those religions, the wholesale apostasy would become apparent.  They believe that souls can be saved in any religion.  They also accept NFP.  It’s true to say that they essentially believe in universal salvation.  They couldn’t say that any person, or any number of people in any spiritual situation, is definitively in the state of damnation or lost.  Except for the Latin Mass, they are almost the same as the Novus Ordo.  It’s a massive façade, like Protestant false Christianity, with the darkness lurking within their false salvation message.  It springs up to rip apart true faith in Christ and His dogmas, rendering the entire Gospel and faith meaningless and empty.

 

Follow-up

 

Subject: Shark follow-up

 

Your points on the situation regarding the Baptism on the Beach story are valid.  However I think that prima fascia, the story is so extraordinary, that the boy was probably saved.  Having reached 18 years of age in 1959, in the US, it is almost certain that the boy was aware of the Incarnation and the Trinity.  In fact the Trinity is implicit in the form of Baptism.  So his consent to Baptism and his Act of Contrition seem evidence of cooperation and acceptance.

 

There are other facts of the case to which the story as printed in TIME don’t really do justice.  O’Neill’s courage (the girl rescuer) was almost supernatural.  The Shark, estimated from the bite radius was a great white some 18 feet long.  It was literally chomping him when she approached.  If you have ever seen video footage of these sharks attacking a seal or feeding on a dead whale, you’ll have some idea of what she confronted.  She pulled him away as the shark was repositioning for a better grip.  And then the shark, which never showed any interest in her, left.

 

It took her several minutes to drag him to shore through two foot swells.  Though there were other people, presumably men, on the beach, no one entered the water to help her. 

 

The other fact is that his wounds were massive and gruesome.   One leg was completely gone, one in shreds, and half his torso bitten through, shoulder to hip.  O’Neill’s courage and fortitude aside, it seems miraculous that he was alive long enough, and conscious, to consent to the baptism.   I think it speaks to election.  “I know mine and mine know me”.  Some souls, through the mystery of Grace, God just loves.  Perhaps it was some aspect of Kogler’s (the victim) interior disposition?  Anyway, I think it is OK to win one once in a while.  Maybe this was a win for God.  I know we can’t know anything with certitude about a particular soul (unless the real Church speaks through canonization), but I also think that some cases lead to probably conclusions.  Hard to imagine this happening today, 50 years and 45 years into Vatican II.

 

Bill Mulligan

 

MHFM: Yes, it makes sense that the article wouldn’t give all the details.  It also makes sense that, at that time, he was aware of the core truths of the Trinity and the Incarnation.  In the lives of the missionaries, there are many refreshing and amazing examples of how people were preserved just long enough to receive water baptism.  They serve to further contradict the lie of salvation without actual incorporation into the Church through baptism.  This shark story might very well have been another example.

 

Abomination

 

Subject: “Catholicism for Dummies” – abomination!

 

Dear Brothers,

 

That's a great video and article on the diabolical and outrageous book, “Catholicism for Dummies.” Thank you. It's one of the biggest selling books on the subject of “Catholicism,” and combined with the brand name, “...for Dummies,” its circulation is massive… Even a simple glance at the cover picture speaks volumes: 1. An old lady's hands – with arthritic joints, and 2. Holding Rosary beads – the hidden message is that Catholicism is a dying tradition, and that the Rosary is only for old women! It's like a catechism of Vatican II apostasy. Page 100 gets in the heresies of invincible ignorance (i.e. ”anonymous christians”) and baptism of desire in one hit, while page 94 says that all baptized, even heretics, are in the Catholic Church - heresy and schism! Page 9 opens a heretical can of ambiguous worms by stating that “all people are basically good.” Even though we are made in God's image, and man's fallen nature is not fundamentally or irredeemably evil (as Protestants believe), i.e. we still have free will, original sin has weakened our nature and will so that we are constantly inclined toward evil, and so most people will be lost to hell. Jesus said only “One is good, God.” (Matt. 19:17) It's the V-2 heresy of, “all 'good' people go to heaven” - it's universal salvation, religious indifferentism, apostasy! The book says “it's nice” to go to the gates of hell, i.e. Protestant services. That Judaism and Islam are “great religions,” when they are more guilty for spilling Catholic blood than any other religions. That NFP is sophisticated, when it's actually another New World Order population reduction tactic (viz. genocide). And that homosexuals are treated equally to heterosexuals by the Church, when God ionized Sodom and Gomorrah for their [homosexual] sins… 1+1=2, ask any 1st grader. If people can't see that the teachings in such trash as the book, “Catholicism for Dummies” are the same teachings that have produced unprecedented numbers of child molesting pedophile “priests,” then they'll enjoy being called dummies too! The End of the World has arrived – hold on to the true Catholic faith above everything else! Outside the true Catholic Church there is absolutely no salvation!!!

 

God Bless,

 

Chris White

 

NOPOPE

 

Brothers, I was watching a documentary on the Titanic called "Titanic: Secrets Revealed." There is talk of all the omens associated with the ship, with the biggest omen mocking God by saying the ship was unsinkable. At the 12:30 minute point in the film it talks about how in the Irish shipyard during construction, the Catholic workers saw in dismay the identity number (406063) on the massive ship hull reflecting in the water. The upside down reflection in the water looked like the word "NOPOPE". The workers wondered if the ship was unholy as well.



I find this an amazing coincidence that after 75 years the Titanic was discovered and photographed in 1985. That this photo and message of "NOPOPE" would be discovered during the reign of the Anti-Christ Anti-Pope John Paul II.

God Bless,
Tom Miles

Athanasius

 

MHFM: We thought this was a somewhat interesting quote.

 

“Besides, he [St. Athanasius] did not study what in itself constitutes the divine Persons, nor how they are distinct and how differentiated, one from another, nor how we can, by means of remote analogies, represent to ourselves the mysterious operations which give them their being.  A polemicist always in the heat of battle, Athanasius had neither the leisure nor, probably, the taste to treat these questions of profound religious philosophy.” (Tixeront, History of Dogmas, Vol. 2, p. 75.)

 

The point is that, in the opinion of this author, Athanasius didn’t necessarily get bogged down by deeper philosophical considerations or reasoning about secondary issues.   He focused on the core truths and the primary arguments to refute the heretics.  The wisdom in such an approach is that the best arguments are always, in the end, simple.  It’s certainly true that, in refuting the multi-faceted objections and distortions of heretics, deeper understanding and deeper analysis are often required and extremely effective.  In the end, however, the refutation returns to the simple point and the core divine truth.  Countless heretics deceive themselves by a vain dedication to their own thoughts and analysis – not in order to further expound the simple divine truths – but instead to consume their focus and move them away from the simple facts.  In this way, countless people are deceived.  The quote is not meant to suggest that Athanasius didn’t believe in or understand the distinction between the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost, which of course he did; nor, of course, is it in any way to suggest that deeper study and analysis are incompatible with true wisdom – not at all.  Rather, it is to comment on a mindset that must prevail in a defender of truth, even when he acquires a deeper understanding of a topic or deals with issues which some deem to be more involved.  

 

Flooded

 

Subject: Brenda’s comment

 

THIS IS WHY IN 1966 PAUL VI ABOLISHED THE INDEX OF FORBIDDEN BOOKS, SO THE WORLD COULD BE FLOODED WITH THESE HERETICAL PUTRID BOOKS LIKE CATHOLICISM FOR DUMMIES.  IT ANGERS ME SO MUCH THAT PEOPLE JUST THROW AWAY THEIR GOD GIVEN COMMON SENSE TO BECOME PARROTS FOR THESE EVIL SNAKES!  

 

TODD

 

Salvation issue

 

Dear Brother Dimond,

 

I have visited your web page because my friend, Juan… showed me the text you kindly sent him related to the salvation dogma. I recognize to have fallen into this error - thinking that some "special cases" of "which baptism "might occur - because of being ignorant myself. Thanks to Our Lady now I have learned the truth, always taught by the Holy Church and now shown in your web page. Thanks God. 

 

Please subscribe me to your newsletter…

 

In Jesu et Mariae

 

Jorge Zamora

 

Tea

 

Subject: Tea

 

Dear Brother Dimond,

   About two years ago I visited the home of an elderly couple with my mother and my sister. The husband was the son of someone who was a friend to my mother's relatives.

   Somehow, while I was speaking with the wife, she happened to mention that she had attended some sort of "Christian" school as a youth. I asked her if she had ever learned the Hail Mary prayer. She revealed to me that she had attended a protestant school but had still learned to say the Hail Mary. I asked her if she used to recite it often. She said that her teacher taught it to her class, and she would say it along with the class; but this was the only time she said it. She indicated that after a certain grade she stopped saying it, and she stopped saying it because her later teachers would no longer have the class recite this prayer.

   About a year later I again visited this same couple at their home. This time I asked the wife if she would like to receive some literature about the Bible and the Catholic Church in the mail. She said yes to that, gave me her address, and indicated that she would take a look at the material. I mailed her The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church along with my own note informing her that this book proves its main thesis in many areas using the King James Version of the Bible, a Protestant translation.  

   Just last month I learned that she had passed away due to an illness. I had not heard from her since I mailed the book to her. I never got the chance to ask whether she had read the book or what she thought of it. I do not know if this book caused her to convert to the traditional Catholic faith.

   The husband has invited my mother and myself to a tea in his wife's honor. As far as I am aware the husband is not a Catholic. Considering the fact that I do not know if this lady died as a Catholic, I believe I should not go. I believe this tea (reception), even though not immediately following a non Catholic funeral, is something that a Catholic should not attend.  Brother Dimond, any comments you might have on this matter would be appreciated.


Sincerely,
TD

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  No, you should not attend.  Since there is no evidence that she embraced the Catholic faith, one cannot consider her to have died as a Catholic.  In responding to the invitation, we would recommend telling the husband exactly what your thoughts are in a charitable way.  In other words, as a Catholic, you cannot have tea in honor of someone who did not die in the true faith; and you invite him to embrace the true faith to obtain his own salvation. 

 

BOD


Subject: Shark Story

 

With it being “Shark Week” on DSC Channel, I remembered as a kid reading about the fatal attack of a great white in San Francisco Bay in the 1950s.  I remember the victim was a guy named Kogler, and his girlfriend, named Shirley O’Neill had pulled him away from the shark and onto the beach.  Because it was witnessed by a soldier, the girl was given a medal by President Kennedy.    So these general details I remembered, so I thought I’d google the name Kogler to refresh my childhood memory of reading this story.  However this part of the story I did not read in the Time Life book article.   However this story appeared in TIME, the Magazine in 1959.

 

Miss O’Neill, in addition to possessing tremendous physical courage, apparently did not suffer from Baptism of Desire, or the “Soul of the Church” heresies:

 

Baptism on the Beach

Monday, May. 18, 1959

It was a sunny afternoon in San Francisco. Shirley O'Neill and Albert Kogler, 18-year-old freshmen at San Francisco State College, went for a swim off Baker's Beach, near the Golden Gate Bridge.

They were treading water about 50 yds. offshore when Al Kogler cried out. "I turned around," Shirley said later, "and saw this big grey thing flap up into the air. I don't know if it was a fin or a tail. I knew it was some kind of fish. There was thrashing in the water. He screamed again. He said, 'It's a shark! Get out of here!'"

Looking down on the ocean from the Presidio, San Francisco's history-encrusted Army post, Master Sergeant Leo P. Day saw what happened next. "I could see the boy in the foaming red water, shouting and signaling someone to 'go back, go back.' Then I saw the girl, swimming toward him, completely ignoring his warning. It was the greatest exhibition of courage I have ever seen."

Shirley reached Albert and seized his hand, "but when I pulled, I could see that his arm was just hanging by a thread." She slipped her arm around him and began to swim for the beach. When she was near enough, a fisherman threw her a line. After they were on the sand, Shirley, a Roman Catholic, scooped up some sea water and let it run over the head of her friend (who had never been baptized and belonged to no specific faith). "I baptize thee in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost,"* said Shirley, making the sign of the Cross, and whispered to Albert, "Is that all right?"

"O.K.," he gasped.

She told him to repeat after her the act of contrition: "0 my God, I am heartily sorry for having offended thee. I detest all my sins because I dread the loss of Heaven and the pains of Hell, but most of all because they offend thee, my God, who art all good and deserving of all my love."

Just before Albert Kogler lapsed into unconsciousness, he whispered: "I love God, and I love my mother and I love my father. Oh God, help me." Two hours later, in the Presidio's Letterman General Hospital, he died.

 

Bill Mulligan

 

MHFM: That’s a very interesting story.  There are only two comments we would make.  First, public swimming (almost certainly in immodest attire) in front of others is not an appropriate activity for people.  Second, in addition to having willingly received baptism, it would have been necessary for him to have accepted belief in the core mysteries of the Catholic faith (e.g., the Trinity and the Incarnation).  Since the young man seemed to have willingly and enthusiastically embraced baptism, as well as the act of contrition, it’s likely that he accepted core belief in the essential Catholic mysteries.  Therefore, he could have been saved by dying after baptism.

 

Comment

 

Subject: Brother Michael Dimond’s review/expose of the stupid book “Catholicism for Dummies”

 

It seems that this book is indeed aptly named:  for anyone would have to be a REAL DUMB-DUMB to actually fall for the stupid heresies in this book, and even BEGIN think they are Catholic!  My goodness!  It's as if the authors/publishers/promoters of this book are, by this horrendous outrage against THE FAITH, are literally BEGGING God Almighty to strike and decimate theml  Wow!  Truly satan is bold as he stalks the earth looking for his ill-fated prey, today, most of whom just tumble so easily into his grasp......

    I've heard of "Father Trigilio"--(gag)---of EWTN "fame"---or infamy---did you realize he has notoriously supported one of the very many FAKE V2 'Fatima' organizations, "Tradition,  Family,  Property" … Thankfully,  I have never even heard of the other "priest" involved in authoring this "book" and I thank God too I have never-ever even heard of this "Chris Brown" creep ---- must be some hideous vile "pop-culture" freak-- However I am praying for that poor girl who emailed MHFM about her pathetic addiction to him (whoever he is)---it is truly awful to witness the extremely dark evil the "youth culture" of today involves itself in!!  It makes you think that satan sure has it easy--------for now.  

 

A.

 

Papal Infallibility

 

Subject: Papal Infallibility

 

Dear Brothers:

If the modernist heretics only accept dogmas defined the Vatican Council in 1870, they would be denying the dogma of the Immaculate Conception that was defined in 1854 by Pope Pius IX, well before the Vatican Council.

EJP, M.D., D.D.

 

MHFM: Yes, their position doesn’t make any sense.

 

To do?

 

… I am not even Catholic. I am a seeker from Sweden, raised much like you in a "non-religious family" as you defined it some video I watched "the belief that God *probably* exists (and usually some holistic version) but no one cares and what matters is living a good life and only that." I am sure you can imagine and perhaps identify with the confusion of first realizing the truth of a higher being and beginning the search for truth, going through buddhism, sufism, Islam, Christianity, eastern Orthodoxy (which I halted for a good while) and then finally understand that the Catholic Church is the one true Church - and when delving deeper into that I find the Second Vatican Council, the catastrophic state of the Church and mass, the Tradionalists, which I immediately identified with, and then later the sedevacantists... Sigh, well, it's most confusing. I feel as if I am walking on a web of small lines hanging over the Abyss - blindfolded. And there's practically no Catholic (or Second Vatican Council sect if you wish) presence except for some Polish immigrants, and that's all lukewarm such and there's not a hint of traditionalism...

I don't really know why I am writing this... I just, what should I do?

 

MHFM: You should obtain a rosary and start to pray it.  The file on how to pray it is on our website.  We would also recommend reading some lives of the saints, to see the miraculous power of the one true faith (the Catholic faith).  We offer some of those books.  Jesus Christ was true God and true man.  That’s indisputable.  He founded one true Church; that’s indisputable.  There’s nothing more to think about.  You need to become Catholic.  Start to pray and familiarize yourself with the basic Catechism.  When convinced, take the steps to convert that are on our website.  But if you don’t start praying the Rosary each day and doing spiritual reading, you won’t have the grace to follow through with your conversion or be convinced of the faith.  We hope you take the steps.  Today is the day to act.

 

Anti-Catholic

 

Greetings!

 

Your expose on "Catholicism For Dummies" was right on the mark.  We had bought and briefly looked at an abridged copy; and promptly threw it away.  We might as well have been looking at an antiCatholic tract.  Another set of books you may want to warn people about is "Radio Replies"; it is a written account of a radio program run by three priests back before Vatican II.  They are set up in a question and answer mode; and yes, they do promote baptism of desire and universal salvation, even way back then.  They also mentioned that Noah's flood was a locallized event !!!  These books are very old, and they do have some valuable insights in them, but I cannot recommend that anyone buy them because they are heretical.

 

Brenda Roy

 

Read

 

Subject: Catholicism for Dummies

 

mhfm,
 
I read your article exposing the Catholicism for Dummies fraud and you did a very good job.  When you mentioned the fact that they taught there are only two ex cathedra pronouncements it shows how misinformed they are.  The idea that there are only two ex cathedra's is actually very common (at least in the state of Illinois).  That was taught in my RCIA back about two years ago, I was taught that at another parish and out of a book called The Complete Idiot's Guide to Catholicism when I was still Lutheran at the age of 14.  From what it seems the (flawed) rationale for this teaching is that ex cathedra was formally defined in 1870.  There were only two ex cathedra pronouncements after this date so those two are the only ones that count (so they say).  Every V-2 person I talk to doesn't see the illogic of having two infallible definitions on the Blessed Virgin but having no infallible definitions on such things as the Trinity, the incarnation, etc.  (The two infallible Novus Ordo definitions are Immaculate Conception and the Assumption, they are extremely important of course since they belong to the Deposit of Faith, however it would be strange if there were no other dogmatic definitions, especially on such things as the nature of God himself.)
 
Kenneth Connelly

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  In our experience with people in the Novus Ordo, we’ve also noticed that this is a common misconception.  However, we thought it was remarkable that the egregious error was promoted by one of EWTN’s “most respected” theological teachers.  The misconception betrays a completely modernist view of divine revelation.  Since they only believe that dogmas become true after they are proclaimed – for example, according to them, the definition on ex cathedra pronouncements only became true after it was proclaimed in 1870 – they only apply them to times after the definition in 1870.  A Catholic, however, understands that a dogmatic definition sets forth a truth of revelation that was given to the Church by Jesus Christ.  Thus, when a pope proclaims a dogma in 1870, or in 1441 (e.g., Outside the Church There is No Salvation), he is declaring that it was true without exception since the promulgation of the Gospel and the founding of the Church.  In other words, it was true throughout all of Church history. 

 

That means that every time in Church history before 1870, when the criteria for an ex cathedra pronouncement were met, the pope spoke infallibly from the Chair of Peter.  The divine protection did not come into existence in or after 1870.  In the same way, these modernists don’t believe the dogma Outside the Church There is No Salvation was true before its definition.  They actually don’t believe in it at all, but they will say things like: that statement at the Council of Florence was before they discovered this country, etc.  By such arguments they reveal their completely modernist understanding of dogma.  The dogma is a truth of revelation.  It was true before the first definition; the definition simply told us in a clear and authoritative fashion what Christ had already revealed about reality.  We also recognize that some of the modernists conclude that there have only been two ex cathedra pronouncements based on an arbitrary view of what words must be said for something to be infallible.  They believe that since the wording of the definitions of the Immaculate Conception and the Assumption were very similar and, in their view, more formal, only they fulfill the requirements.  This view is held by some in the traditionalist movement, including SSPX supporters, and it is not supported by the teaching of Vatican I.  

 

Finally, we will point out that the modernist position on this issue entails a further inconsistency.  If there were only two ex cathedra pronouncements in Church history (the Immaculate Conception and the Assumption) – and they are basing that on the language set forth at Vatican I in 1870 – they must exclude the very definition of Vatican I from what constitutes an ex cathedra pronouncement!  Otherwise, they would have three: 1) The Immaculate Conception, 2) Vatican I on papal infallibility and ex cathedra pronouncements, and 3) the Assumption.  Since they exclude the text in Vatican I, on what basis do they declare that the other two are indeed ex cathedra pronouncements, since Vatican I was the place where the criteria for what is ex cathedra were set forth?  It’s a mass of contradictions and illogical nonsense. 

 

Outrageous

 

Subject: Outrageous

 

Dear Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,

To say that both John Paul II and Benedict XVI, are, and have been, ' very holy men' and 'staunch defenders of the teachings of the Catholic faith' is simply ridiculous and outrageous!

Has Christine never read the… Heresies of both John Paul II and Benedict XVI?... -  She needs to, before she starts hopping onto her novus ordo 'high horse'- and attempting to preach to and correct  the converted, the few true Catholics who remain in the world today, who remain faithful to Christ and His Church, and are more than capable of rebuffing mindless, unsubstantiated accusations of "blasphemy"...

And, once having acquainted herself with the numerous heresies of her "popes", AND she refuses to budge - she becomes the blasphemer!

 ...having just put her foot in her mouth - the boot now appears to be on the other foot!

A 'sister in Christ' to me, she most definitely is not - as long as she remains stubbornly with the church of the Apostasy, and its Antipopes, which lacks ALL four marks of the Catholic Church, outside of which there is no salvation, and whose prayers God does not heed!

God bless,

David

 

Latest

 

Subject: Latest review of Catholicism for Dummies

 

Dear Brothers,


Good job on exposing a largely distributed book that is probably hurting already countless souls.  They don't even care!  I think they just want to sell books.  All of the heresies were terrible! But, the one that got me the most was the one on Hell and purgatory, not being real places!  How could they in right conscience put out such obvious lies.  The Dogma of hell is what saves so many sinners right at the beginning of their conversion.  Because they're not pure enough yet to avoid sin simply for the love of God but the fear of Hell keeps most of them from committing sins.  Now, take away the reality of hell and what do they have to fear?  This book is so dangerous it's ridiculous.  It’s simply a religion of the world it’s spelling out, where everyone is of God no matter what they do and whatever you do, don't offend anyone.

Nathan

 

How can?

 

Subject: Catholicism for dummies

 

Excellent video!

Their book should be called PROTESTANT Catholicism for dummies!!  How can they get away with such heresy!!  Saying jews and muslims are the same etc!!

And the GAYS!!! and now it is legal practically everywhere!  What happened to Sodom and Gomorrah??...

 

Hum….

 

Abominable

 

Subject: B-16 and Anti-Semitism

 

My compliments to Brother Michael Dimond for his recent article/audio. The "apologists" from Catholic Answers are simply clowns able to digest the most abominable heresies. 

The V-2 sect´s respect for the false and apostate Jewish religion is really sickening. I don´t know if you are aware of Father Dehon´s case. Simply put, Ratzinger put his canonization process on hold (not that the rat had any power to canonize him anyway) because some of his writings were discovered, in which he demonstrated "anti-semitic" ideas. 

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/15/AR2005061502305.html

 

CK

 

Comment

 

Subject: Christine

 

I think your answer to the shocked Christine was a slam-dunk.  However as she claimed that she could “go on and on for a very longtime”, I would like to invite her to do so.

 

People such as she seem to prefer unity, or consensus, or harmony, no matter how contrived or artificial to either truth or justice.   They are often quite disturbed by conflict, but they can rarely (never) cite a single fact (article of truth) or even a coherent idea in support of their position.   So Dear Christine do tell us something, and it doesn’t even have to be a very longtime, of why say John Paul II is good and holy.

 

In addition to His prayer for unity, Jesus also warned, “think ye not that I came to bring Peace on Earth, but rather the sword, to divide father against son etc…”  In isolation this verse, and Christine’s favorite verse seem contradictions.  In context they are perfectly harmonious.  

 

Bill Mulligan

 

John 17

 

Response to Christine Pineault

Christine you stated that Jesus said "That we may all be one." This is a misrepresentation of Jesus' words.  Even John Paul II and Benedict XVI misuse these words of Jesus.

Let's take a look at what is going on in Chapter 17 of St John's Gospel.  First off this is about Jesus' prayer to His Father in Heaven.  He was praying for for His Apostles as stated in John 17:6-11:
 
(6)"I have manifested thy name to the men whom thou hast given me out of the world.  Thine they were, and to me thou gavest them; and they have kept thy word. (7) Now they have known , that all things which thou hast given me, are from thee:  (8) Because the words which thou gavest me, I have given them,; and they have received them, and have known in very deed that I came out from thee, and they have believed that thou didst send me.  (9) I pray for them: I pray not for the world, but for them whom thou hast given me:  because they are thine: (10) And all my thifs are thine, and thine are mine; and I am glorified in them.  (11) And now I am not in the world, and these are in the world , and I come to thee, Holy Father, keep them in thy name whom thou hast given me; that they may be one as we also are one".

As you can see Jesus was not praying that His Apostles and the world were to be one but that the apostles were to be one.  You can even see that Jesus is speaking strictly about those who believe. 

The prayer of Jesus in the 17th Chapter of St John is nothing like the prayer of JPII and Benedict XVI, who are praying a diabolical and twisted version of Jesus' prayer. 

So you see the, "they" in Jesus' prayer is for His Apostles, NOT for unity for His Church and the world.

Paul Smith

 

Comment

 

Subject: pride, predestination, free will

 

Dear Brothers,

 

I was thinking that one of the main sources of pride today is an unfounded confidence in one's own salvation. For example, the Novus Ordites are taught that there is no hell, that those outside the Catholic Church can be saved, that all men are saved, etc. and so they have no fear of God punishing them for their sins. Radical schismatics seem to believe that, since the number of the elect is few, and there are only a few radical schismatics, then they must be of the elect, which makes them believe like many of the heretical sects, that all Catholics are of the elect. As a result they have no fear of God since they imagne they know for sure who is saved. The Church simply tells us how to judge things by the external forum, which helps to determine who definitely cannot be saved, such as Non-Catholics, but it cannot tell who is saved for sure, except for the saints. If anyone knew they were saved with 100% surety, unless by a special revelation from God, then they would lose all fear of God, be overcome by pride, and end up in hell! Since we all have free will which can resist grace or concupiscence at any time, and which can go from bad will to good will or vice versa whenever the person wants it to, then it's hard to tell who will be lost or saved amongst Catholics, unless they have some outstanding qualities, whether they be good or bad, but even then it may not be possible to judge whether such a one is saved or lost (I think this is how the Church views predestination, etc.).

 

Council of Trent, On Justification, CANON IV.-If any one saith, that man's free will moved and excited by God, by assenting to God exciting and calling, nowise co-operates towards disposing and preparing itself for obtaining the grace of Justification; that it cannot refuse its consent, if it would, but that, as something inanimate, it does nothing whatever and is merely passive; let him be anathema.

 

Council of Trent, On Justification, CANON XV.-If any one saith, that a man, who is born again and justified, is bound of faith to believe that he is assuredly in the number of the predestinate; let him be anathema.

 

Council of Trent, On Justification, CANON XVI.-If any one saith, that he will for certain, of an absolute and infallible certainty, have that great gift of perseverance unto the end,-unless he have learned this by special revelation; let him be anathema.

 

God Bless,

 

Chris White

 

Two new videos

 

MHFM: The first is a video response to a person who e-mailed us and argued that it’s ridiculous to claim that John Paul II taught that man is God.  The second is a related new video.

 

John Paul II did preach that man is God [video]

John Paul II's Anti-Catholic Mission [video]

 

Punishment?

 

Dear Brothers,

 

Over three months ago I sent you an e-mail on the subject of my mom attending my nephew's "First Communion" in the NO.  Around the same time my brother, whose son is the one receiving "First Communion" was seeing a doctor about some discomfort in his stomach.  It was finally determined that he has stomach cancer.  He has since had a gastrectomy.  He has been depressed for a long time and I had gone to visit him for a week.  During my stay he and I had a short conversation which he initiated about why this had to happen to him since it is rare for someone his age to have stomach cancer.  I will not state his age here but he is rather young.  He asked me if I think God is punishing him.  I was not sure how to answer his question.  I told him that it is possible.  I've tried in vain in the past to get him to be a traditional Catholic and to renounce worldly things.  Also this event in his life coincides with his son's "First Communion".  That leaves me to wonder whether God may in fact be punishing him for being bad-willed.  Additionally, the doctors say his prognosis is good if he takes care of himself.  So I wonder if God is allowing a good prognosis so he lives long enough to have plenty of time to ponder about his state in life. 

 

I'd appreciate your take on the matter.

 

Sylvestre

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  As you indicate, your brother has rejected the truth for some time.  He also lives in a fashion that’s incompatible with the state of grace.  It’s certain that God is displeased with him.  It’s probable that it’s a punishment.  At the same time, however, it’s a special blessing.  For we can see that the cancer is causing him to re-assess his spiritual situation.  When people are struck with calamities, it’s not uncommon that they are humbled and forced to evaluate themselves.  That’s when we hear that most people turn to God.  More often than not, however, they don’t fulfill what God wants.

 

If your brother had not been struck with this cancer, it seems that he would have continued merrily on his heretical path and ended up in Hell.  But now he’s getting a serious warning, and at the same time a chance to convert.  So, what would be the answer to give him if he poses that question again?  We would recommend saying: Yes, it’s probable that you are being specifically punished by God, and it’s certain that He is displeased with you.  At the same time, He’s giving you a special chance to wake up, to start being honest, and to convert.  It should be emphasized that it’s an outrage not only to reject the true faith, as he currently does, but to arrange for his child to receive the invalid host at the abominable New Mass.

 

Civil War

 

Subject: Civil War?

 

Hello, I don't know if I missed it, but I didn't see this article on your news page and I thought that it might interest you.

 

http://beforeitsnews.com/story/120/796/First_Signs_of_Civil_War_begin_in_the_US:_Sheriff_Tony_DeMeo_Threatens_Force_Against_Federal_Agents.html

 

- DC

 

MHFM: Yes, it’s an interesting video.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yoYtnoFn09Y&feature=player_embedded

 

Shocked

 

Peace be with you,

I just took a look at your website, and am very saddened and shocked by your teachings.  The prayer of Jesus before He died was "That we may all be one."  Everything your organization says and does is divisive, contrary to the prayer of Jesus.  Pope John-Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI were and are very holy men, staunch defenders of the teachings of the Catholic faith.  For you to call them anti-popes is blasphemous.  I could go on for a very long time, but I will simply say:  I will be praying for you.  God bless you.

Your sister in Christ,
Christine Pineault

 

MHFM: We can’t say that we are shocked or saddened by your bad will.  Of course we wish you were not as you are, and that you cared about truth.  However, when confronted by someone like you who displays no concern whatsoever for the facts and information presented, it stirs a Catholic more to righteous indignation than sympathetic pity.  The blasphemous thing is not a Catholic’s rejection of Antipopes John Paul II and Benedict XVI.  No, what is blasphemous is their endorsement of false religions that reject Jesus Christ.  Your blind acceptance of such apostasy, without the least consideration for the Catholic teachings backing up our position that they are antipopes who must be rejected, is also very blasphemous.  We would tell you to wake up, but you may be beyond that point.  

 

http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/heresy_of_antipopes_john_paul_ii_and_benedict_xvi.php

 

Typical of modernists, you also quote John 17 with the usual false signification, that Catholics should have communion with heretics to truly fulfill the Church’s unity.

 

Pope Pius XI, Mortalium Animos (# 7), condemning false ecumenism, Jan. 6, 1928: “For the authors who favor this view are accustomed, times almost without number, to bring forward these words of Christ: ‘That they all may be one… And there shall be one fold and one shepherd,’ (Jn. 17:21; 10:16) with this signification however: that Christ Jesus merely expressed a desire and prayer, which still lacks its fulfillment.  For they are of the opinion that the unity of faith and government, which is a note of the one true Church of Christ, has hardly up to the present time existed, and does not today exist.”

 

Why?

 

Hello. I'm noticing that I have some questions as I am listening to your very informative clips. I am going to write them all down as I go along here, and hope you'll be able to come back to me and have patience with me. Some may be answered later, and some may not, some I may remember to change, others not, as said, I hope you can have patience with me. Thank you very much…

 

… Who are the 40 plus anti-popes in Church history and what did they do?
… Why, really, would God create this ruse and condemn "believers" to hell when they could be a great counterbalance for the very evil in the world he wishes to punish it for? I mean, if anyone is standing up against the European suicide, war, abortion, gay marriage and so on, it is the Catholic Church... I don't get it. And don't give me something like "It's God, you're not supposed to get it….

 

Hampus…

 

MHFM: You will find the names of the antipopes in our Antipopes Section.  We recommend that you take a look at it.  We assume you are asking why God would create the deception of the Vatican II “Church.”  He didn’t create it; He allowed it.  He saw the bad will of men, their denial of the faith and His dogmas, and how they didn’t care about His truth or His commands.  So, He allowed it to be almost completely taken away in a massive deception; but He made sure the Church remained in a remnant.  When you consider the almost universal bad will out there, it makes perfect sense why He has allowed this situation to occur.  The dearth of good will is simply remarkable.  With regard to your claim that the “Catholic Church” stands up to abortion and gay “marriage,” you are obviously referring to the Vatican II sect and you are mistaken.  They facilitate abortion by enabling pro-abortionists to remain within their ranks.  If years ago they had excommunicated in a vigorous fashion every public supporter of abortion, it never would have been passed into law.  The Vatican II sect is responsible for it.  They also facilitate the homosexual abomination, by perverting the truth about the evil orientation.  They only mildly criticize the homosexual act.  They also allow homosexual perverts to run rampant in their perverted seminaries, and they give the supporters of the abomination a prominent place in their churches and universities.  Most importantly, however, even if they were thoroughly Catholic on these issues, it wouldn’t matter.  They deny Christ and embrace false religions.  Once you do that, nothing else matters.  That’s what you need to realize. 

 

Community

 

How does one overcome pride?

Also, I'd like to share something I've noticed, the V2 "Catholic" Churches around here are replacing all of their signs, they no longer say "St. X's Catholic Church", they now say "St. X's Catholic Community".  I suppose the official line will soon be "there are Catholic communities, Lutheran communities, etc, but only one Church".

 

Patrick

 

MHFM: Have a true devotion to Mary and regularly say three Hail Marys for the specific intention of true humility.  St. Louis De Montfort’s renewal of true devotion to Mary also has a week dedicated to self-knowledge.  Pride blinds people, especially by rendering them unable to see themselves.  Grace, on the other hand, gives one the ability to see things (including himself) as they are.  That’s why St. Louis’ first week of preparation for true devotion to Mary (the second period) deals with the issue of self-knowledge.  Accurate self-knowledge is crucial.  It enables one to see his faults, shortcomings, limitations, etc.  While it’s true that nothing good can be done without grace, a person who is interiorly humble almost instinctively refers good things to God.  It’s immediate and fluid.  He is not consumed with or focused on himself, even if he maturely recognizes his involvement in something good; whereas the prideful person is weighed down by himself.  It becomes his focus and burden, consuming his outlook, operation and thoughts.  He has trouble doing things without both the right and left hands knowing what he is doing (Matthew 6:3).  Certainly, spiritual reading can assist people in this area; however, if a person seriously struggles with this he really needs to reorient his spiritual focus and prayer life, with a special emphasis on the full Rosary.  Even though most don’t realize it, pride is the biggest problem today, including in countless heretics who might exteriorly be considered meek or patient or humble.  Their interior pride (a misguided view of their own spirituality or holiness or intellect) keeps them falsely confident in their dark spiritual plight; whereas if they possessed humility, they would accurately assess themselves, what they believe, how they compromise God’s truth for friends, etc.  We can’t tell you how many members of the Novus Ordo have called our monastery over the years.  The number of them that think they are extremely knowledgeable (experts) and dedicated Catholics, while in reality they know almost nothing about the real Catholic faith, is staggering.  Pride is their problem and it keeps them deceived.  That’s why the Fourth Lateran Council said that all heretics are tied together by pride.  Everyone who commits clear mortal sins is weighed down by pride, not primarily weakness.  They lack the first degree of humility, which causes a person to fear God enough to avoid what He forbids.

 

That’s very interesting about the Community signs. 

 

Changes

 

Subject: Latin vs. English

 

Quote from article,

 

“You can call it whatever you like, but it's not English,” said Father David Cooper, president of the Milwaukee Archdiocese Priests Alliance. “The language of prayer is supposed to be evocative, graceful, uplifting. This reads like clunk-clunk-clunk-bang-boom.”Anytime there are changes, people...angry and sad,”

 

Brothers, if he doesn’t like changes, then how come he didnt speak up during the 2nd Vat council when changes were taking place??   But what do you expect from a member of a religion where everyone just joins hands and sings a happy happy joy joy song and everyone can be saved regardless of where they are..

 

http://www.catholicculture.org/news/headlines/index.cfm?storyid=7115

 

Steve

 

New

 

Note: Very soon (perhaps within the next week or so) we hope to have a special new addition to our website.  We also have a new article and video that should be posted very soon.

 

If

 

I have been seen your webpage a several times and sometimes I visit your youtube channel.  If you have the truth and Catholic Church is full of heresy that mean that there is no any other Church, there is no Church any more... Where I and another believers, have to go now? I do not want join protestants or pentacostians clowns. Where can I go if I want see the Sunday Mass?? Where I can get the Eucharistia, if there is no Church???

Maybe I can join the Old Catholic Church (Staroktolicka Cirkev), they refuse the First Vatican Council in 1868 and they possibly keep rules as been before the Vatican I., so they're maybe original untouched Church. Or can I join the Orthodox Catholic Church? They are practise the same (unchanged) rituals for 2000 years, as is their affirmation. They had in history a many miracles too.
 
So WHAT NEXT? Where Can I follow the Lord Jesus Christ if his Church is no longer on Earth?
 
I am Roman Catholic and I should be respect the Pope without any questions, he's got "the key of heaven" and what he change on Earth will be changed in Heaven too. If he (the Pope) bring a new rules to Earth will be this rules accepted in Heaven too......?  I hope that your answers come soon.
 
Yours Faithfully
Peter Zmajkovic

 

MHFM: We must say that your question is indicative of a larger problem among alleged “Catholics” today.  You seem overwhelmingly and almost exclusively concerned with where you can go to church on Sunday.  That’s not what it means to be Catholic: just showing up at a church.  Your outlook displays a misguided focus: one that’s more concerned with fellowship with others than on God and His faith.  The Catholic faith is much more significant than where one goes on Sunday.  The faith is something that must be lived every day.  It’s not defined by a trip on Sunday.  First and foremost, you must accept the Catholic faith and all of its dogmas whole and undefiled.  Without the full Catholic faith, receiving the sacraments will not lead you to Heaven or to please God (Hebrews 11:6).

 

Your willingness to join the schismatic Old Catholic sect reveals that, at this time, you don’t have a firm belief in the Catholic faith.  Why would you do that if you believe, as the Catholic Church teaches, that there is no salvation outside the Church?  The Old Catholic sect is a non-Catholic sect that leads people to damnation.  Its followers have been excommunicated by the Church.  And if you dissent from the Catholic dogma Outside the Church There is No Salvation, while claiming in some way to adhere to Catholic truth, what makes you think that showing up at any church will please God, since you reject a dogma He has revealed? 

 

Not even a valid pope can change a Catholic dogma.  Matthew 16 does not grant a pope the power to overturn a truth of revelation.  The revelation of Jesus Christ cannot be changed.  You need to convert to the Catholic faith (i.e., come to a firm faith in all Catholic dogmas, so that you would never even consider leaving the Catholic Church) and completely reject the Vatican II sect.  That involves never going to the New Mass again, for any reason.  Once you are convinced, then we can assist you with where to receive sacraments; but one should not receive them until he has the proper faith and has made the profession of faith.  Please see our section on those converting or leaving the Novus Ordo.  Also, we recommend that you review the The Glossary of Terms and Principles [PDF], in addition to our other material.  It will assist you with key principles that contradict your current mindset; they demonstrate that your current ideas are incompatible with the Catholic faith of Christ.  Finally, we are not saying that the Catholic Church is full of heresy, but that the Vatican II “Church” is not the Catholic Church.  Our material makes that very clear.

 

Cannot

 

Dear Mr. Dimond,

Your lesson about the thief and where he went after his death also cannot be true and here is why. Paradise is where the tree of life is and that's in heaven with God.  How do I know?  Because of Rev. 2: 7 - it reads as follows:

"Revelation 2:7 (New American Standard Bible)

 7'(A)He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches (B)To him who overcomes, I will grant to eat of (C)the tree of life which is in the (D)Paradise of God.'"(NASB)

 

The Lord Jesus Christ said this to the thief:

 

"Luke 23:43 (New American Standard Bible)

 43And He said to him, "Truly I say to you, today you shall be with Me in (A)Paradise."(NASB)

 

Blessings!

 

Anita Hiltz

 

MHFM: No, you are not correct.  Your points are addressed and refuted in this video: The Good Thief, the Old Testament Saints, and the Necessity of Baptism [video]

 

Never

 

Dear Brothers,

 

I have never understood this story and some others like it in the Bible.  It appears to me that the Church is talking out of Both sides of its mouth when it comes to Communism vs. Capitalism ?   On one hand we are told to give up EVERYTHING and follow God.......and on the other hand we are told that would be stupid to not be able to support ourselves and fall into poverty, where we could never be Able to give to Charity? 

 

I'm sure there Must be More to the story than we see on the surface here, but we Never get the Details.

If it was Their (God given)  land, why did God kill   him, and yet,  tells us Private Property rights is a good thing ?? 

 

Thanks for any light you could shine on this,

 

Carol D.

 

“Ananias, with Saphira his wife, sold a piece of land, And by fraud kept back part of the price of the land… But Peter said: Ananias, why hath Satan tempted thy heart, that thou shouldst lie to the Holy Ghost, and by fraud keep part of the price of the land?... Thou has not lied to men, but to God. And Ananias hearing these words, fell down, and gave up the ghost.  And there came great fear upon all that heard it.” (Acts 5:1-5)

 

MHFM: We think you’re overreacting.  People should not come to such conclusions when presented with a verse they don’t immediately understand.  It’s not an endorsement of Communism.  Rather, the fathers believe that the Christians of that period had agreed to share their possessions and give all to the community.  The Haydock commentary explains it well.  It is believed that “the resolution which the faithful made of selling their property, and laying the price at the feet of the apostles, implied a vow of reserving nothing for themselves, but giving all to the community; and that the crime of Ananias and Saphira consisted in the violation of this vow; on which account they regarded them as sacrilegious, and plunderers of sacred things.”

   ---“Ananias, and his wife Saphira, had made a promise or vow, to put into the common stock the price of what they had to sell.  When they had sold the field, they resolved by mutual consent to keep for their private use part of the money, and to bring in the rest, as if they had received no more.  The whole price being promised, and by that means consecrated to God, St. Augustine calls it a sacrilegious fraud, and St. Chrysostom a theft of what was already made sacred to God.”

 

Found

 

Hello my name is René Pelchat… I am 47 years old single convert to what I thought was the catholic faith when I was 30. After reading a lot of catholic books, lives of saints, books on freemasonry and their infiltration into the church, etc, I felt that there was something wrong with the vatican II catholic church (I believed during many years in Medjugorje, marian movement of Priests, etc,).

 

In the last couple of years, I didn't understand why there was so much chaos in that church and so few people attending masses (most of them old people).  For instance, I was wondering why the catholic vatican II church was not talking and promoting the unbelievable miracles we have in our history (Our Lady of Guadalupe, the Saint Shroud of Turin -we know now by science that this is the Shroud of Jesus Christ, numerous Eucharistic miracles, etc.).  I was asking Jesus and the Virgin Mary in my prayers where is the Real Truth.  Well, thanks for your site and your discoveries I am beginning to be at peace now.

 

I would like to congratulate you and thank you for the immense effort you did by creating your site.

 

(Rene)

 

Comment

 

After listening once again to your talks with Greg Rossi and Will Golle, one sad thought stroke me: Both the radical schismatics (who cast down Saints, depose real pre-vatican II Popes and misread Church Law) and the radical defenders of the V2 apostasy suffer from the same problem that blinds them in similar fashion, even though they are on 2 extreme opposite sides: Pride. 

The radical schismatics pride themselves on their knowledge and make a fool of themselves. While most of the V2 defenders (aside from [Albrecht] and the pseudo-intellectual with the pipe) actually pride themselves on their IGNORANCE. This problem plagues the (fake?) V2 defender from Chicago, Lewis, Golle and Rossi. They can´t even tell who goes to Hell, or who is and who isn´t a Catholic, or when a Catholic ceases to be Catholic. 

 

I know it´s hard to find good help nowadays. But for you, it seems even harder to find worthy opponents. 

 

Question one

 

Question one:

 

Are you supposed to be afraid of God?

 

Ow…

 

MHFM: Yes, the most common theme in the Bible is that the fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom (Psalm 110:10), and that His mercy is only upon those who fear Him (Psalm 102:17; Lk. 1:50; 2 Cor. 5:11; etc.).  Therefore, those who don’t have a sufficient fear of God to obey His commandments and avoid gravely offending Him will not receive His mercy or forgiveness.  The fear of God is what causes sinners to turn from the broad road and begin to live a life of grace.  After people become more advanced in the spiritual life, their actions become motivated by the love of God, though a salutary fear of the Lord remains. 

 

Interesting

 

Thought this was an interesting article.  Even though they imbibe the V2 apostasy and are totally ignorant of the true faith they have correctly stated that, "Islam is of the devil".  This has been taught throughout the history of the Catholic Church.  They however seem to be doing this more in retaliation for what they falsely believe about 9/11 being an Islamic attack.  What is even more diabolical is the CNN reporter, "Rick Sanchez" and how he defends not only Islam but man in general and how we must respect all people.

 

-Bruce

 

“Christians To Burn Quran”

 

This is an outrageous story - but true. And it can only lead to the sort of narrow-minded anger and violence that peaceful people (of any religion) want no part of.



A CNN interview reveals that a US church has sparked off a huge controversy by mulling an ‘International Burn a Quran Day’ to observe the anniversary of the 9/11 terror attack. The Dove World Outreach Centre in Gainesville, Florida, will be hosting the event to remember the victims of the Sep 9, 2001 attack and has extended an invitation to all Christians to burn the Muslim holy book at its premises from 6 pm to 9 pm.  “We believe that Islam is of the devil, that it’s causing billions of people to go to hell, it is a deceptive religion, it is a violent religion and that is proven many, many times,” church pastor Terry Jones told CNN.

 

Youtube interview here.

 

MHFM: Yes, the complete apostate Rick Sanchez actually claims to be a Vatican II “Catholic.”  What a sick joke.

 

Talking

 

Dear Mhfm,

I know you got a recent e-mail from someone about Chris Brown.  I found this video about him.  It shows how one of his songs is talking about Lucifer.  [“Fallen Angel”]

God Bless

Sean

 

Note

 

MHFM: Our combo DVDs containing the new video, Is the World about to End?, are now available to ship from the monastery.  Orders for them will be shipped starting tomorrow.  We had previously made them available for order.

A few pictures of the Monastery

 

Question

 

Since you have done a good job of showing how recent popes are anti-popes, I was wondering, does your movement have an alternate pope?

Do you have a list of anti-popes? Also the black popes (Jesuits) and your view of these?

Since people's salvation depends on much of this and adhering to the truth of scripture, are you trying to reform the Catholic Church or are splitting from it?

I would appreciate your reply.

Thank you.

 

Courag…

 

MHFM: We are Catholics and we adhere to the traditional faith that the Church has always taught.  The true Catholic Church still exists, but in a remnant of traditional Catholics.  The Church doesn’t need to be reformed, but rather a massive apostasy has occurred in which almost all who claim to be Catholic are in fact non-Catholic.  They have left the Catholic Church.  What most people regard as the Catholic Church (the Vatican II sect) is in fact a counterfeit sect.  Our view of the Jesuits is that non-Catholics are deceived when they think that modern “Jesuits” run a world conspiracy.  That’s nonsense.  The modern so-called “Jesuits” are in fact heretics and apostates because they adhere to Vatican II and false ecumenism.  Traditionally, however, the Jesuit Order produced some of the greatest saints and missionaries.  They did an invaluable service in spreading the true faith and bringing the Gospel all over the world. 

 

People’s salvation depends on hearing, accepting, and following all of what Christ commanded.  You can’t do that as a non-Catholic.   That’s why it’s necessary for salvation to become a traditional Catholic.

 

JP2

 

Brothers,

 

The recent video on JPII is a clear message to those willing to listen.  The only problem is that there are not too many people willing or able to listen in this evil world today with all the modern technological distracting noise.  By externals, their worlds are conceived by many false signals and a spirit of "Jumping on the Band Wagon".  JPII's "New Truth" is just one of those false signals that is accepted in the V-2 Sect's "New Mass".  The "New Truth" is but "Another Lie" that adds fuel to the fire that has engulfed the Vatican II sect.  "Learn not the way of the heathen," Jeremiah 10:2…

 

When JPII died, he was first placed into a cedar coffin.  His face was covered with a white silk; this was the first time this was done...  Next the cedar coffin was sealed in an 800-pound coffin...then finally it was placed in another wooden coffin before being buried beneath St. Peter's Basilica. "...bearing a skull and crossbones.." Los Angeles Times.  Interesting to note is that JPII was buried in a trapezoidal-shaped coffin, the same seen in many vampire movies.

"The trapezoid has long been regarded in by occultists as the most satanic of shapes, especially adapted to enhance demonic manifestation.  This type of coffin is built to draw in and preserve evil, dark energy.  The idea was to attract enough vampire dark demonic energy, to draw sufficient quantities of energy, and to store that evil energy, so that, at a right moment, the dead man can come out of the coffin, as demonic resurrection," former satanist, Bill Schnoebelen…

 

God bless,

Tom Miles

 

Videos

 

Dear MHFM, 

 

Thanks for the prompt shipment of the Incredible Animals that Defy Evolution and other videos we received today-----WOW!!  these are ABSOLUTELY RIVETING!!  Our puppy Jesse was similarly glued to the TV screen,  particularly enjoying the baby chick peeping as it emerged from its awesome shell---(he kept barking and moving his head around at all kinds of angles and listening carefully with his little ears perked up!) ---personally I enjoyed the section on the hummingbirds the most as they are --- like all these animals---totally MIRACULOUS creatures of God! 

 

Great new videos on arch-evil JPII---great point in that yes he very carefully, methodically, made certain all his extreme-hell-inspired-antichrist-anticatholic program was explicitly put ON THE RECORD!!  [kind of like a serial killer].  He did this again and again as MHFM has so correctly pointed out.  Hindsight is 20/20----could what he was really up to (pure evil) possibly be any MORE OBVIOUS!...

 

Comment

 

Very nice clips you posted about on the 'God of Wonders' video… The verse that hits home in it was:

 

"For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities—His eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse."   Romans 1:20

 

What a slap in the face it is to God who shares his creation with us, and hear some say there still isn’t a God.  Those people don’t want there to be a God, so that way they can attempt to dupe themselves to live immorally without following God’s law along with trying to find some cheap way to cover their guilty consciences…

 

On the flip side, it’s nice for me to hear things during astronomy star gazing sessions while viewing the heavens, when someone says something like, 'How can there not be a God?'   Also Astronomy magazines cover story about 2-3 months ago had an article about our Sun, on how science and astronomers are struggling to find another star unique like our own sun. Out of the billions upon billions of stars out there, our sun is unique...Try to explain that one Darwin ??

 

Steve

 

Wonders

 

Subject: Wonders of God

 

Great videos, although I never believed in evolution, watching these videos really made me feel small.  St. Alphonsus Liguori uses the word, "worm" a lot in his writings to describe our nothingness in comparison to the Blessed Trinity.  The other thing that comes to my mind is His love and care for all of us, all these creations that God made were out of love for us.  The next and final reality to consider is our salvation, God closed the gates of heaven by his word, He could have done the same to open them but to show us His indescribable love for us, Jesus chose to suffer the most ignominious death possible… Can you imagine, Jesus does all this for Love of us and we slap Him in the face and run from Him, such ingratitude…

 

Todd

 

God of Wonders

 

MHFM: This is a link to an excellent video called God of Wonders.  It was our intention to carry this video.  However, the end contains heresy: the false salvation message of Protestantism.  So, we have linked to the first seven parts.  They deal with refuting evolution and demonstrating God’s power.  The footage is tremendous.

 

1) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWH7uVc0S4Y&feature=related

2) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7D4QD7lS9o&feature=related

3) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73QQ3XJWmmw&feature=related

4) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQH26-lDW3s&feature=related

5) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8J5MygZiRcM&feature=related

6) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIJMC8CAKKs&feature=related

7) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYRwpTEvVfc&feature=related

                   

Posting

 

Subject: God of Wonders video – amazing !

 

Dear Brothers,

 

What an amazing video, God of Wonders. Thank you for posting it. God's creation is such an endless source of natural miracles that it's no wonder St. Paul said people have no excuse for not believing in God (Romans 1:20). The series destroys the idea that the universe came about by chance because every single thing that exists is built in an organized way – that doesn't happen by accident! The footage is superb and if there is so much beauty coupled with practicality in nature, then one cannot even begin to imagine what heaven is like:

 

1 Corinthians 2:9 - But, as it is written: That eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither hath it entered into the heart of man, what things God hath prepared for them that love him.

I particularly enjoyed the section on snow flakes in video 3. It reminded me of how many servants of the Blessed Virgin Mary, when given the grace of seeing her up close, remarked that she glittered with a snow-like light. It also reminded me of the vision of hell that the children of Fatima were given and about how so many souls would fall into hell “like snow flakes.” It is remarkable that Protestants can see such glories in creation, but cling obstinately to their heresies, as though God, who so clearly demonstrates His love in nature, would abandon His creatures to a man-made system of salvation, such as is protestantism, and not build a permanent structure of salvation – the Catholic Church only. If we want to make it to heaven these days during the Antichrist Antipope Vatican II Great Apostasy, then we really need to put the Catholic faith first by holding uncompromisingly to Catholic dogmas, and to have a strong and consistent devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary and the Rosary. May Jesus and Mary help all Catholics to love God wholeheartedly, to be humble, and to walk the narrow path to life all the way to the end.

 

God Bless,

 

Chris White

     

Convert

 

I was looking into your site. I have been looking to convert from protestantism to the Holy Catholic Church in order that my soul might be saved. First is that possible? If it’s possible what would you recommend.  I live in Florida and there are no traditionalist organizations that teach extra ecclesiam nulla salus… please advise.

Thanks,

F...M….

 

MHFM: That’s great to hear.  What a person in your situation would do is follow these steps to convert: The Steps to convert to the traditional Catholic faith and for those leaving the New Mass - Baptism and Conditional Baptism - the Council of Trent's Profession of Faith for Converts.  Begin to pray the Rosary each day, do spiritual reading, and familiarize yourself with the basic catechism.  When one is fully convinced and prepared for a profession of faith, we can help you further with where to make a confession.

 

New Video

 

MHFM: This is a new video about the Great Western Schism and the Gates of Hell.

 

The Great Western Schism and the Gates of Hell - 1/4

The Great Western Schism and the Gates of Hell - 2/4

The Great Western Schism and the Gates of Hell - 3/4

The Great Western Schism and the Gates of Hell - 4/4

 

Soul

 

Dear MHFM,

 

I was reading St. Gertrude's current bulletin (July 25, 2010) just now and read in a reprint of St. Anthony's Messenger from October 1936 that someone with a sincerely held non-Catholic belief is really a member of the soul of the Catholic Church and will be saved. I was surprised to find this… Any comments?

 

Valerie Duffy

 

MHFM: Yes, it’s blatantly heretical. They deny Outside the Church There is No Salvation, just as we’ve pointed out all along.  Those who support, accept or agree with such heretical priests are not true Catholics.  The heresy was also being spread by priests in fallible sources prior to Vatican II.  See our book for a full discussion of these issues.

 

BOD

 

Dear MHFM, 

 

Council of Elvira completely debunks baptism of desire.  "Canon 4-Flamens who have been catechumens for three years and who have abstained from sacrifices may be baptized.  Canon 42-Those with a good reputation who seek to become Christians shall remain as catechumens for two years before being baptized.  Should they become seriously ill, they may request and receive baptism earlier."  Baptism, early 4th century Roman Catholicism was never an issue of desire saving those outside the Church unless baptized prior, properly, in the Church.  That would have been ludicrous thinking and totally insane. Furthermore, the idea of salvation outside the Church could save you somehow, equally as ludicrous and outrageous.  Thank you MHFM.  May your ministry bear great fruit.

 

Pop star

 

Subject: Pop star made a “Saint”

 

Hello Brothers!
 
Reading the e-exchange about that one female who loves Chris Brown so much, I decided to share another story with you. A student in Serbia decided to paint a religious icon, or picture, of the turbo-folk star Ceca Raznatovic, widow of the hypocrite Zeljko Raznatovic Arkan. It’s sad to see who the young people consider to be Saints these days. Words suchs as whore, prostitute, Turk, demon, sinner are all words that can be used to describe her. Not much different from the female pop stars in North America (Lady Gaga, etc.) I have attached the picture of the icon.
 
God Bless!

 

Daniel

 

New Church

 

I wanted to comment on Carlos' conversation with his fellow new church catholic regarding his understanding of americanism, the problem is these people don't use common sense and logic.  They also apply this so called blind faith to what Vatican ll teaches instead of applying critical thinking to the matter at hand.  Once the True Catholic Church solemnly declares a Truth {dogma} it can't be changed and it can't be changed because they are the teachings of Jesus Christ.  Could you imagine saying to Jesus, "you need to get with the times"!  The Church solemnly declares these truths so that the faithful become bound by these truths.  They have to hold these truths whole and inviolate to be a member of the catholic church.  This is the function of the Teaching Magisterium!   These people have a misunderstanding on what Jesus said to Peter regarding, "what you bind on earth will be bound in heaven and what you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven", this teaching doesn't apply to a divine truth, you can't change a truth because the truth is not subject to anything, it’s a rock!   

 

Todd

 

Repeating

 

Subject: Catholic Inquisition Myths Busted

 

… This is such a hot topic for so many protestants, to throw that at your face when the person knows so little about it – and is just repeating what that person’s minister or false opinion is about that time in the Church’s history.  In William Thomas Walsh’s book about Isabella, Queen of Spain, He details the problems that the Spaniards had to deal with regarding Muslim invasions and Jewish “false” converts once that rule was enacted (that all non-Catholics had to leave…)

 

Thanks…

 

Melanie and Bill

 

Regarding

 

Dear MHFM,

 

Regarding canon 16 of Council of Elvira, "...they are to be given neither to Jews nor to heretics, because there can be no companionship between faithful and infidel..." By this holy synod of holy early times antipope Benedict 16 stands condemned as obstinate heretic in 2010 of salvation history by visibly and openly kowtowing to the Jews in their condemned faith… As a Roman Catholic I condemn antipope Benedict 16, HERETIC!  St. Michael the Archangel, avenge us we pray most fervently.

 

Dea…

 

Schism

 

Could you please also make a video about The Great Schism of 1054? It would help a lot of people here from Eastern Europe.

Thank you and God Bless!

 

Eduard

 

MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.  In our Papacy section, there are audios that deal with the primary issue involved in the schism, the rejection of the Roman Pontiff’s primacy of jurisdiction.  The Bible teaches that Jesus made St. Peter the first pope [link to section].  The audios cover how the ancient Church, and the East, recognized the pope’s primacy of jurisdiction.

 

Impression

 

Your latest videos are spectacular, as always.  The Western Schism has left me with the distinct impression that God, in his infinite wisdom and careful planning,  allowed this disgrace to happen exactly in order to prove that what would come to pass in the Great Apostasy that we are living through is plausible.