E-Exchanges on
the Catholic Church and other issues
*This section of our website will contain some
less formal – and short – e-mail exchanges that we’ve had which we feel may be
of value to our readers. We will include
those portions of the exchanges we deem relevant and valuable. We often add bolding and underlining which
are not necessarily that of the other party.
This section also frequently includes, not only e-exchanges we have, but
notes, updates and comments by us.*
New Video
MHFM: This is a new video:
DO YOU BELIEVE ? [VIDEO]
New
conversation posted
MHFM: This is a new conversation with Robert from Wales.
He called in to attack our beliefs and defend Antipope Benedict XVI and Vatican
II.
Conversation
with Vatican II supporter from Wales - 1/3
Conversation
with Vatican II supporter from Wales - 2/3
Conversation
with Vatican II supporter from Wales - 3/3
Altar
Subject: “Beatification Altar”
Dear brothers:
The vatican just finished posting pictures
of the "altar" where Cardinal John Henry Newman will be
"beatified."
http://www.thepapalvisit.org.uk/News-and-Media/Latest-News/Images-of-the-Beatification-Altar
Is there anything about this weird
"sanctuary" (other than the crucifix) that looks even remotely Catholic?
-RDS
Incredible
Subject:
Incredible Creatures that Defy Evolution
Awesome
videos!!! I finished part two of three and I found the part where they
talk about the incredible engineering it took to design a fighter jet and the things
that it can do in flight but when it comes to the evolutionist the birds
evolved, I find that simply astounding…
Todd
Beck
Glenn Beck stands on the platform at the
"Restore Honor Rally" in Washington DC, with some leaders of all
religions. With Imam's and Rabbi's and a priest...and Protestant
ministers....just as did John Paul II...at Assisi....
Nothing but lies...deceit and
trickery....just wondering what your take on Mr. Beck is?
Sincerely
CD
EU
… I have re-watched your video End of
the World. And in that you show the paper from Pravda Russia Nov 3, 2009
(I think) where they say that the EU is Another form of communism. I have
tried to look it up on the Pravda website but cannot find it. I would
like to send it to everyone because I believe it is important that people know
how evil the EU is. So you have a link to this? Thank you and God bless
you for all of your good work.
June
MHFM: Thanks for the interest. This is one of a number of links one could consult:
http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/4157
Feel
I feel the same way Brenda Roy feels
regarding the conversation between brother peter and robert or anyone else like
him for that fact, forget all the torture techniques that one could apply to a
human being, just lock a true catholic in a room with a person like Robert and
make the catholic person debate this obstinate lunatic for a short period of
time, it will drive you crazy. It’s like watching someone try to put a
square block in a round hole and he just doesn't see that it won't
work.
Todd
Comment
Dear Brothers:
Thank you for sending the new
4-in-1 DVD with "Is the World About to End?" and the book, "The
Bible Proves the Teaching of the Catholic Church." So very generous of you to send them to me,
and they arrived on the feast of St. Monica!
Bro. Peter's book is well written and very easy to understand. The sequence of logic he uses is superb. I have been unable to correspond for several
weeks, though I have been reading the Website, and I am so glad to see you've
been doing your usual marvelous work. I
am thinking especially of Joseph Ramirez, a man who has admirably lived up to
the responsibility of bearing the name "Joseph," by confronting the
dangerous and spiteful Bp. Williamson. I would ask Mr. Mulligan if the person he is
corresponding with is truly Bp. Williamson and not one of his lackeys or
factotums. If Williamson has forgotten,
then he needs to be reminded: "The floor of hell is paved with the skulls
of bishops." —St. Athanasius
It is wonderful to hear Bro.
Michael again in his new video discussing the latest heresies of the masonic
usurper of St. Peter's Chair. When B16
writes, "In these days when we remember the return to the *Father* of dear
Brother Roger," people assume B16 is referring to our Father in
Heaven. We must not be fooled by this
verbal manipulation. If Ratzie meant
God, then he should have used the proper designation: GOD. But he did not. There is another father, the father of
lies. So what B16 actually wrote is:
"In these days when we remember the return to Lucifer of dear Brother
Roger..." And for these people,
there is great joy in that. They cannot
wait to join lucifer! They adore
satan and serve him. Really, these
masons are becoming so obvious.
Thanks to Bro. Peter for the
discussion with Robert from "Wales".
Bob's arguments were so absurd that I did laugh out loud; the way Bob
changed topics constantly was comical.
Of course, being invincibly ignorant, Bob jumped right into the
invincible ignorance song-and-dance yet again!
Robert must be pals with Mr. Windy from the Archdiocese of Chicago.
This quote from the invincibly
ignorant Robert found on Audio 3 at 05:51 is typical of his babble: "Well,
I believe in Heaven everyone is a Catholic, wherever they were in this
life. So if someone has got to Heaven
under invincible ignorance, they will be Catholic in Heaven. So Heaven, in that sense, is full of all
Catholics!" Robert continued to
chatter and natter on nonstop like a pot full of bubble-and-squeak while Bro.
Peter tried to speak! As it turns out,
Robert's rudeness is actually the least of his problems.
It is obvious Bob is
spiritually lost. But he also physically lost. Literally.
He does not know where on earth he is located. When he said, "It's getting late here in
Great Britain," he gave himself away.
Fie-fi-fo-fum. I have been
friends with actual Welshmen born and bred.
From Cardiff. No true Welshman
says, "Here in Great Britain."
Great Britain? Only an Englishman
says that. "Jolly good, old
chap!" In any case, Bobby's accent is decidedly Brit; he sounds like
he just left a meeting with Queen Lizzie Rothschild at BP:
Buckingham Palace, of course. (Bet you thought I meant BP as in British
Petroleum. Why, what a peculiar coincidence! How odd.)
Bob a Cymry? Doubtful.
The only connection Bob has to Wales is that he tells lies the size of a
school of whales.
Robert cares not one whit,
not a farthing, not one pence for the ultimate destination of his
soul. Mired in the bog of Novus Ordo
muck, what remains of his brains numbed by the fluoride of Vatican2,
missing his beloved JP2, and living in the land of QE2, there is no room for
logic in poor Bob's head. It is
sad to listen to someone like Robert.
Though he does not sound it—because he uses a soft, somewhat quivering,
and sibilant voice—Bob is actually terribly arrogant. As he proved when he said, a tad peckishly,
to Bro. Peter, "I don't like your tone of voice."
Robert needs to understand that
if he continues on this path, he will neither be allowed to meet nor stand
beside the Recusants in eternity for he has thrown his lot on the side of that
stinking Cromwell and fat Henry…
God bless you always,
Deidre Howard
DVDs
Dear Br. Peter and Michael,
A heartfelt thank you for all you have done and continue to do for souls…. Have
you done any research on any of the apparitions of Our Blessed Mother, other
than Fatima, i.e. La Sallete, Lourdes, Garabandal... We just finished watching
the video on the "end of the world" and enjoyed the format (no music)
Sometimes it is hard to hear the message with the background music, something
to consider if you re-do any of the DVD's/CD's, especially for us "older
folks" Our heads are full, our hearts sad, but we persevere knowing that
the Church established by Jesus Christ will prevail, even if it is only a
remnant!
You remain in our prayers.
In His Will,
Jim & Linda
Williamson
… Bp. Williamson is indeed a most
intelligent but foolish man to deny EENS. Instead, he analyzes the dogma,
which he no doubt was forced or influenced to do by the blind, foolish evil
organization, the SSPX. He does not have the faith of a child.
Children will blindly believe anything their parents tells them, and not try
to analyze it. The dogma of EENS is supposed to be accepted and not in
the slightest way questioned or analyzed to render it meaningless. That
could be done to make any dogma worthless, but it cannot be done, for it is
heretical. If a child is told uncompromisingly the truth from age 5 on
up, the simple sentence: "All non-Catholics go to Hell.", they will
never question it. It's just that simple. A short sentence that
Williamson should have been taught without compromise, the immutable truth: All
non-Catholics go to Hell. It can be more thoroughly explained to Catholic
youth by their parents as they get a little older, such as dying a
Catholic with no unconfessed mortal sins is the only way to ever hope to go to
Heaven and a more thorough explanation of the Latin "Extra Ecclesiam nulla
salus" (Such as it contradicts infallible bulls to say that it is possible
for a man to be saved if he is not a member of the physical Church on Earth.)
It could have saved the hell-bound fool, Williamson… But his faith just isn't
strong enough to accept something so simple as what all toddlers should be
told: "All non-Catholics go to Hell." And there is no
"however" or "but" at the end of that sentence.
-Michael Rudnicki
Gruner
Fr. Gruner… has an article about the 3rd
Secret of Fatima in which it is declared that the secret revealed on June 26,
2000 was a perfidious hoax. Yet it was revealed by the Vatican with under
Pope JP II. Well, how could any Pope et al in good standing deliver a
perfidious hoax upon the entire world? Why does Fr. Gruner still deny the
whole sedavaticanism or whatever it's called?
Perhaps I'm overly simplistic, but if someone lies to my face I don't
trust him anymore, and I'm sure not going to send him any money. It was
either the real message or it wasn't. If it isn't, then whatever is
sitting is the vatican is a dreadful liar.
Karl
MHFM: Gruner is, one must say, a most wicked heretic and a false
prophet. His soul is far darker than
most people could ever imagine. He spent
his life misleading those who consider themselves conservative Catholics with
dishonest defenses of the Vatican II sect and a promotion of the most wicked
heretics in the world (JP2, etc.). He
led them right back to the Vatican II Counter Church and its Antichrist leaders
whom Our Lady wanted them to reject. He
still frequently quotes Antipope John Paul II in a positive light! The fact that anyone would even consider
supporting such a despicable phony heretic, once that person is familiar with
the facts about what’s happening, reveals the profound spiritual fog in which
people remain. He’s a complete heretic
headed for Hell and he’s leading others there as well. The notion of “two third secrets” or two
texts of the third secret was all part of their compromised position to not accept
the official version but at the same time
not really condemn it. It’s a
microcosm of their larger compromise on the Vatican II sect.
Gruner,
"Fr." Nicholas – Why would you say that he is a schismatic?
Heretic, Baptism
Brothers,
Bro.
Peter's debate with Robert!!! from Wales brought a question to my mind. I
thought I was familiar with all the materials MHFM has put forth regarding the Church's
teaching on baptism. But Bro. Peter was asked if a non-Catholic was baptised,
is he a Christian and Bro. Peter said "no." I think I know the proper
context of what Bro. Peter meant, but I was hoping you could expound on this
point in greater detail, mainly so I do not fall into error.
Regarding
the "heavy-metal monk," I thought this guy was retiring, at least
according to the last article posted on your website? Did the Vatican cut his
retirement benefits or did the "monk's demons miss the music?
God
bless you all there,
Howard
MHFM:
A heretic who is validly baptized does not become a member of the
Church. This also touches upon a finer
theological point. The Church teaches
that a heretic can be validly baptized if he is baptized with water in the name
of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost. But if
a person is baptized as a heretic – for instance, if he rejects the dogma
Outside the Church There is No Salvation – then his baptism, though valid,
would confer no grace and would not unite him with the Church. His heresy is an impediment to his reception
of the grace of baptism. He receives the
character or the mark of baptism validly, but he does not receive the grace of
baptism. He doesn’t have his sins
remitted and he is not justified, since he is outside the church. Outside the Church there is no remission of
sins.
Pope
Boniface VIII, Unam Sanctam, Nov. 18, 1302, ex cathedra:
“With
Faith urging us we are forced to believe and to hold the one, holy, Catholic
Church and that, apostolic, and we firmly believe and simply confess this
Church outside of which there is no
salvation nor remission of sin… Furthermore, we declare, say, define,
and proclaim to every human creature that they by absolute necessity for
salvation are entirely subject to the Roman Pontiff.
This is the express teaching of Pope St. Gregory the Great.
Pope St.
Gregory the Great, Quia charitati,
June 22, 601: “From the ancient institution of the Fathers we have learned that
those who are baptized in the name of the Trinity, although amid heresy,
whenever they return to holy Church, may be recalled to the bosom of their
mother the Church either with the anointing of chrism, or the imposition of
hands, or with a profession of faith alone…because the holy baptism, which they received among the heretics, at that time
restores the power of cleansing in them when they have been united to the holy
faith and the heart of the universal Church.” (Denz. 249)
Here we see Pope Gregory the Great explaining that those baptized
as heretics are not cleansed, i.e., their sins are not remitted. They are not cleansed by the baptism they
received among the heretics until they remove the heresy and are united to the
true faith. The baptism they received is
valid; they don’t need to be rebaptized, but it’s not efficacious for them
until they remove the heresy. At that
point, they become justified by the power of the baptism they already
received. We also see this principle
illustrated in Sess. 7 of the Council of Trent on the Sacraments in General:
Pope
Paul III, Council of Trent, Sess. 7
on the Sacraments in General, Can. 6.: “If
anyone shall say that the sacraments of the New Law do not contain the grace
which they signify, or that they do not confer that grace on those who do
not place an obstacle in the way, as though they were only outward
signs of grace and justice… let him be anathema.” (Denz. 849)
Here we see that the sacraments do not confer the grace which
they signify on those who place an obstacle in the way, such as heresy. The above is also the teaching of Doctors of
the Church. This teaching does not
contradict any of the other definitions of Trent, of course, such as Sess. 5 on
Original Sin:
Pope
Paul III, Council of Trent, Session 5:
"If anyone denies that by the grace
of our Lord Jesus Christ, which is conferred in baptism, the guilt of original
sin is remitted, or even asserts that the whole of that which has the
true and proper nature of sin is not taken away, but says that it is
only touched in person or is not imputed, let him be anathema."
(Denz. 792)
Notice that this anathematizes anyone who says that original sin
is not remitted “by the grace”
conferred in baptism. Whenever grace is
conferred in baptism, original sin is infallibly remitted, as in the cases of
the baptism of infants and others who don’t place an obstacle in the way. However, in the case described above (i.e.,
the baptism of a heretic) no grace is conferred at all. As a result, original sin is not
remitted. Hence, we can see that the clause
“by the grace” is very important. It’s
an example of the infallibility of dogmatic definitions and the protection the
Holy Ghost gives to the teaching of the Church.
Empty Solutions
As I saw the Glenn Beck "take back
America" rally this past Saturday, I couldn't help but think how SAD that
there were about 100,000 people at this rally (and although Beck is a Mormon
and it seemed that the rally was more of a 'protestant ' rally). Wouldn't
it have been better to have those 100,000 people saying the ROSARY and REALLY
praying for a solution to this problem, to the one person Our Lady, who could
help us, just has she helped at the Battle of Lepanto! People just do
not understand the trouble we are really in, and are always reaching for
'empty' solutions, that will not help.
Hum…
MHFM: Yes, and while he says some
true things, he’s very ecumenical and totally pro-Israel. Getting his view on Israel is like listening
to an Israeli cabinet member. He realizes
who’s in charge and the line he must take on that issue to remain in the
mainstream.
Truth
Subject: Robert from Wales
Dear Brothers,
Robert is just another person among all the
billions of souls since the time of Our Lord that are not willing to live
up to something that the Church teaches. The rejection of truth always
comes down to the fact that there is something that the man or woman does not
want to accept or is not willing to submit their will to. Because
such a person cannot either give up something sinful or does not want to
think that someone they love within their family or friends may be lost
to Hell forever, they will go anywhere to avoid the truth of it all.
Robert and all the others who reject truth, will talk
endlessly without meaning... they will go anywhere to keep the race
of running from truth going...so they don't have to really do anything or
change anything… It is only bad will and ego that will ramble on as Robert
does, going nowhere and making no sense whatsoever. Anything to keep the
illusion alive that everything is ok. So very sad.
CD
Videos
Subject: Is the World about to End?
Thank you for all of your work and effort
in putting these videos together. I feel like I have learned a lot with a fresh
new perspective on the book of revelation. Like other Christians wanting
further understanding of the book of Revelation/Apocalypse, I have heard a few
different explanations of the beast, trumpet judgements etc and yours seemed to
make a lot of sense. Anyway, I believe your work should not go unrecognized and
you should know you're not unappreciated. God bless.
Rigotto
MHFM: Thanks for the interest.
We hope you look into the material we have which demonstrates that the
Catholic Church alone is Christ’s true Church; for it’s necessary for salvation
to be a part of the one Church He established.
Search
Brother Peter Dimond, I am writing to you
in my search for Truth.
God has been calling me to Him over the past 5 years (all my life actually, but
significantly in these past five years). He has called me out of the world, and
into holiness. However, although the call is strong, I am still not entirely
sure to what place in Christianity He is calling me too.
I am currently fellowshipping with three Protestant churches of different
denominations and I am working closely beside Anglicans, Presbyterians, and
Catholics at a local Drop-in Centre.
I am in search of the One True Catholic Church, but I can not find Her!
I would appreciate any and all information you can give me.
And although I have NO INTENTION to settle for lukewarm mediocre Christianity,
I would appreciate if you could share with me, what is the FOUNDATIONS of the
Catholic Faith? That is to say, what is the absolute minimum required to
receive Salvation, according to the Catholic Faith? Again I do NOT INTEND TO
SETTLE at this level, God is calling me to holiness, and demanding 100% of
myself to Him. But I would like to know what is the basic fundamental beliefs
needed to be part of the One True Catholic Church.
May the Blessed God and Father of Our Lord Jesus Christ Bless you and Keep you
and yours!
…Manasseh
MHFM: You will find the information about the true Catholic
faith, and how one would convert to it, on our website and in the materials we
have available. You must get out of
Protestantism or any affiliation with similar denominations. There's only one true Church, and that's the
Catholic Church. The traditional faith
is covered and explained on our site and in our materials. You really need to look at them, and begin to
pray the Rosary. Please consult our
section on how to convert.
Vatican II
Subject: … and we will not serve Lucifer
I understand if JPII was a madman, and all
his 'teaching ' is nothing but open insults to God and Church, this Benedict is
more dangerous and cunning; he uses ambiguous statements always leaving room
for manipulating the truth. Any TRUE CATHOLIC POPE, if he claims to be a real
Catholic, should PUBLICLY declare Vatican II VOID and NULL, invite a new
Vatican II council banning all new theological 'editing' of Holy RCC dogma and
traditional teaching, restoring the Gregorian Mass with High altars, restoring
all Liturgical text of pre-Vatican II, reestablishing a NEW Inquisition for
reevaluating all priests, clergy from bottom to top, excommunicating all who
are NOT CATHOLIC. Unless pope does this- he is a heretic, he is an ENEMY to
Christ, and we DEMAND the resignation of Benedict! No dialogue with this
hateful people, who have a poison of snake in their hearts and sugar on their
mouth, who kill Christ with 'washing of hands'- who are BLOODY and responsible
for this universal paganism, sin, catastrophe and perpetual troubles mankind
goes through in our modern time. We
,'the spotless dove' of Christ, will NOT SERVE LUCIFER, wherever he is- even in
the pretended RCC. In fact Holy Roman Catholic Church is there intact and
all-powerful, as it is, as long as people like you are there...
Woody…
New Video
& Article
MHFM: We have a new video and article on Benedict
XVI’s recent heresies.
Benedict
XVI's Recent Heresies, Late August 2010 [video]
Benedict XVI's recent Heresies,
Late August 2010 [article]
Heavy Metal
Subject:
Heavy Metal Monk
Brothers
in Christ,
I
think it was amazing & quite telling that in the beginning it shows him
flashing the satanic sign.
John
Christian
Subject: Alex Jones Non-Christian Video
I agree with you about alex Jones. Also he
is buddies with David Icke who has called himself the son of God. You can find
David making these statements if you look it up youtube. I followed Alex's
channel and agree with his political views but if he is best buddies with a man
that into reptilians and who calls himself the messiah I no that Alex is a non
believer. I love the Lord and I am a Christian myself but I do take offense that
you say the one true religion is Catholic. Honestly, I know it is a powerful
religion but separating christians based on doctrinal belief and religion is
not what we need today. We need to all go back to what Jesus wanted us to be.
Christ Like hense Christian. I don't see any religion mentioned in the Bible
and I don't believe I need a priest to intervene for me to be forgiven of my
sins...
…Dezzy…
MHFM: Thanks for the interest, but your views on Christianity
are not correct. Christ founded one Church
upon Peter (Mt. 16:18-20), and said you must hear it to be saved (Mt.
18:17). He also taught baptismal
regeneration (John 3:5), His real presence in the Eucharist (John 6),
confession (John 20:23) and many other things that non-Catholics and Protestants
reject. By doing so, they reject the
Gospel. We have a book called The Bible Proves the Teachings of the
Catholic Church which demonstrates that the Catholic Church alone is the
biblical faith. You really should
consult the sections on our website that are dedicated to refuting
Protestantism. You cannot unite with
people who have different and contradictory beliefs on core issues of the
Gospel. To say that everyone should
unite, despite such differences, is to render what Christ revealed on those
matters meaningless. One must say in
charity that you can't be saved believing what you do.
With
Subject: Exchange with Robert
Dear brothers:
I found this section of your exchange with
Robert quite extraordinary:
---
MHFM: "Since we can't judge and we
don't know how God works, is it possible that God incarnated himself in one of
the figures of a different religion without our knowledge?"
Robert: "Absolutely not."
MHFM: "On what basis do you exclude
that possibility?"
Robert: "Because of the promises to
St. Peter."
---
You had helped to lift him out of the
darkness and muck and for those few seconds he seemed to stand upright on the
dry ground where the sun was shining, but sadly (and almost certainly due to
bad will) he slid back in and then went under.
-RDS
Revealing
Subject: Comment
on your new conversation with Robert.
And 9/11
How is Robert going to say that he knows
what the Catholic Church teaches when he doesn't even believe in the most basic
laws of physics regarding 9/11? People who
are confronted with the laws of physics regarding the scientific impossibility
of a "pancake" collapse choose not to believe the truth because of
the reality it reveals to you. The individual lies to himself to believe in a
reality based off of what he/she finds comfortable to believe in. The same case
goes with people who are confronted with basic dogma because they know it
contradicts what they have been programmed to believe, so they choose to lie to
themselves. You can definitely call
these people out as liars.
It was revealing that Robert Chose to attack what you believe about 9/11
"theories" because he couldn't attack you at the clear definitions of
Catholic dogma.
I also have a suggestion. I think you should make a video series about what really
happened on 9/11 and the spiritual warfare connection. If people can't believe
something so massively a lie on the secular level such as 9/11, what makes them
think they will not fall for a greater spiritual deception such as Vatican II?
Also I believe if you make a youtube series on 9/11, it can be pushed to reach
alot more people to bring them into the knowledge of the One True Faith.
Keep up the great fight!
-Isaac
Read
Bro.
Michael and Bro. Peter
The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church is the best book I have ever read. It made a lot
clear that I did not know.
Mary
Ciaccio
Conversation
Robert’s conversation was a clear
demonstration of an unwillingness to listen to the truth. As a modernist,
Robert regurgitates the same puke over and over with a severe case of diarrhea
of the mouth that spews the lies that were force fed to him by the Vatican II
abomination during these last days. Robert is clueless of what the Church
teaches, while unable to take a stand in his beliefs, he jumps around in the
conversation like a Mexican jumping bean. Amazing the bad-will amongst Robert
and his fellow Vatican II sect members, while playing the Saint and refusing to
judge anything except going against the truth. God has already laid down the future
consequences and judgment of those outside the True Faith through the Bible,
the Popes and the Saints. I think the main point that Robert and other
modernists fail to recognize is the seriousness of the end times we are
currently in (that have been predicted throughout Catholic Church history) and
the role that the Vatican II unusual suspects play in these last days.
God Bless,
Tom Miles
Shocking
Subject: Guy from Wales Shocking!
Dear Mhfm,
You ask the guy "Do you believe jewish rabbis who reject Christ could be
in a state of Grace?" His answer "I'll leave that to God". What
kind of an answer is that. First off he questions your salvation somewhere in
that conversation/debate because you’re a traditionalist but a Jewish Rabbi he
can't judge. But he has no problem judging you Bro Dimond. He didn't answer
your point on Abortion. I can't understand it how people could be that stupid
that’s what it is along with bad will. Truly drunk with the wine of the whore
of babylon. Let’s hope the Mother Of God converts him to the Catholic Faith.
But when he says things he knows "great Christian people" who don't
believe the Catholic faith his conversion is slim.
God Bless
Sean
Meaningless
Subject: Wales V-2 man and radio show
This man was horrible with his bad
will. He knows that there is no salvation outside the Church and knows
that Benedict-Ratzinger does not teach it. As Bishop Dolan did (in his
sermon you dissected about 3 years ago), he reduces the dogma to a meaningless
formula. The man is smart enough to understand the truth. But his
bad will gets in the way. I cannot blame you, Brother Peter, for getting
so irritable with the man.
Also, I really enjoyed listening to your
archived radio shows. I encourage you to have more and ask you to please
make time to do them around your other activities. Thank you.
“I.I.”
Re:
Robert
You
are not only a heretic and apostate, you are an idiot. There is no such
thing as invincible ignorance. If people are sincerely interested in God,
it is extremely easy for them to have access to information to save their souls
in this age of internet. If people die in ignorance of the Faith, it is
because they were not interested in God, which is why God sends such people to
hell. What you and others like you are saying is this: God is not
powerful enough to lead people of good will to the Faith. This is not
only blasphemy, it is a complete lack of faith. This heresy is worse than
a cancer devouring one's body; this heresy is a cancer devouring peoples'
souls. Wake up!
Brenda
Roy
MHFM: The conversation was another
example of how “baptism of desire” and “invincible ignorance” are, at this
time, the foundation and attempted justification for all heresies and every
rejection of Christ and His necessity.
We see again that even the most liberal and unbelieving heretic, such as
Robert, invokes them in a futile attempt to put a “Catholic” face on religious
indifferentism and apostasy.
Comment
Subject: B16 & his heresies
Please, do a follow-up DVD on him. Some
very deluded people try to convince themselves (and even more sadly, others)
that Ratzinger´s heresies are from a long forgotten (and forgiven) past. It´s
always good to have at hand a new pack of recent heresies, in order to show
that he did not change for the better at all. In fact, he seems to be getting
worse. This new incident involving Brother Roger is really a card in the sleeve
I´m going to use several times in future discussions. It´s as if B16 sent the
heresy of the week as a gift package to you.
I am aware that your Fatima DVD covers him
and some of his most recent heresies, but the man really deserves personal
treatment. JP2 needed almost 30 years of Anti-Papacy to award him the dubious
honor of having his heresies denounced on 2 DVDs, but B16 is managing to do
what seemed impossible: To outrun JP2 in terms of heresies and apostasy... in
half a decade! The guy is factory of heresies. And at the same time, creating
the illusion that he´s a staunch defender of Catholic Doctrine, Moral and
Discipline. What a deception.
I´m really starting to think he uses some
form of Black Magic in order to deceive people. How can anyone with eyes to see
not realize he´s a heretic? Or worse, to even believe he´s going to promote
"the big restoration"? He could not care less about the necessity of
the Catholic Faith.
Brother Michael´s reasoning is just
perfect. Ratzinger does not believe that the Faith of Rome is to be held. To
him, a person can be outside the Church, found his Own Church/Community, lead
them astray from the True Faith, and yet be a role model, die in the state of
grace and be a Saint in Heaven. - Pause for throwing up - One does not have to
read between the lines to find a deeper hidden meaning at all! This is just
scandalous heresy, as manifest as one can get. A "pope" who believes
that Protestants (as well as the Orthodox) are free to reject the Papacy and
yet can achieve Salvation and Sainthood.
To me, that was the most explicit denial of
the Catholic Faith and demonstration of religious indifference EVER. And the
bad will from the false trads and the defenders of V2 is beyond comprehension.
Over the past months I´ve been trying to convince people. Most of the times,
it´s a big frustration. One can see by their attitude how a Merciful, Loving
and Caring God would still send them to Hell. They don´t really care about
Jesus (despite what they may claim), so in similar fashion Jesus won´t care
about them at Final Judgment. They will reap what they sow. They don´t give the
slightest importance to the Truth and dismiss the facts without any
concern.
What´s worse is that they constantly try to
scare me by saying that I am going to Hell (as if Hell was reserved only for
sedevacantists, and in some cases, traditionalists). I had to borrow your
argumentation. I always state something like: "Well, so what? According to
your so called Popes, every religion creates Saints and Martyrs, I could be a
Sedevacantist Saint, for all you know. You should also never try to convert a
Protestant, by your logic, since he could be well on his way to sainthood,
perhaps being even more saintly than you and I. Even if you were right, and
don´t get me wrong, you AREN´T, I still accept all the dogmas about the papacy,
unlike the protestants, who deny the papacy as a whole and yet can be saved and
become Saints, according to your "popes". To say that Sedevacantists
are going to Hell for being "out of the church" or "against the
papacy" (when they only question the validity of the last FALSE claimants)
and yet call Protestant Brothers, attend their services and believe they can be
saved is just astonishing pharisaical hypocrisy."
Conversation
Dear MHFM,
I recently
downloaded audio clips of the recitation of the rosary so that i could listen
to it while travelling, since I spend a lot of time traveling to college. Is this ok? Is it equivalent to praying the
rosary provided I meditate on the mysteries when they are being recited?
With Best Regards
Sam
MHFM: Thanks for the question. No, listening to the Rosary being recited by
others is not equivalent to praying it.
It’s necessary for you to recite the Rosary yourself. Also, we do not recommend that people pray
the Rosary while listening to a recording of others who are praying it. It’s important for people to foster
individual interior lives, and that comes with individual prayer to God and
solitary time. We would recommend that
you pray the Rosary yourself while you are traveling.
New Video
MHFM: This is a new video.
Bishop Richard Williamson Exposed - 1/2
Bishop Richard Williamson Exposed - 2/2
Conversation
Dear MHFM,
A few weeks ago I had a conversation with my mother and my sister
(both Novus Ordo) about my decision to not attend a reception being given for a
deceased friend of the family, the same individual from the e-exchange
"Tea." I explained to them that I had no evidence that this
individual had died holding the traditional Catholic faith. I said it would be
uncharitable for me, a Catholic, to attend.
My mother then asked, "Does this mean you would not attend
the funerals of your own mother and sister?" I said, "Yes." My
mother persisted, "Not even your own mother and sister?!" I tried to
explain to her that the Novus Ordo service is not Catholic and the Church
teaches that Catholics must not attend non Catholic services under pain of
mortal sin. She expressed her unwillingness to believe that the Church had
taught (and still does teach) this.
My sister gave her own reply: "That just does not look
good." I did not respond to this. My sister had already displayed negative
sentiments toward the Salvation dogma when I presented it to her as a true
Church teaching about two years ago (my mother also does not believe this core
dogma). I probably should have tried to explain to my sister that not
compromising the faith is of a higher priority than what looks good. It seems
pointless to try to talk to her about this, however, if she's not going to
believe that the Church teaches absolutely no salvation without baptism in
water and the Spirit.
Sincerely,
TD
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. Yes, one should explain to her that what
“looks good” is not what determines how a Catholic must act. Moreover, those who form their decisions upon
“what looks good” will not get to Heaven.
Comment
Subject: A Gulf Coast Article
Brothers,
I don't know if this has any interest or if
it relates to the Apocalypse at all, so here is the headline:
Portions of the Gulf are So Toxic that
Dolphins, Fish, Crabs, Stingrays and Other Animals are "Trying to Crawl
Out of the Water"
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=20744
Take care and God bless you all there at
MHFM,
Howard
Comment
Dear Brothers,
Notorious heretic Bp. Williamson's attack
on sedevacantists and “Feeneyites” is outrageous but is easily refuted. He
wrote to Bill Mulligan: “One's all too frequent experience with sedevacantists
and with Feeneyites is that the mind has shut down, and emotion, blocked
emotion, has taken over.”
Three weak points are worth exposing in
this sentence. 1) He cites his experience, rather than dogmas as his nexus. 2)
He assumes mental relaxation is mental dysfunction (or "shut down" -
it also could be reverse speech for "mouth: shut up"). 3) He talks of
blocked emotion like a New Age psychoanalyst, i.e. that negative emotions, if
suppressed, cause psychosomatic disorders. Each of these points are refuted
very easily:
1) Pope St. Pius X, Pascendi - “For the
Modernist believer, on the contrary, it is an established and certain fact that
the reality of the divine does really exist in itself and quite independently
of the person who believes in it. If you ask on what foundation this assertion
of the believer rests, he answers: In
the personal experience of the individual.”
2) Catechism of the Council of Trent,
Article I, Faith excludes Curiosity: “For when God commands us to believe He
does not propose for us to search into His divine judgments, or inquire into
their reason and cause, but demands an
unchangeable faith by which the mind rests content in the knowledge of eternal
truth.”
3) Pope Leo XIII, Exeunte Iam Anno -
“...even the philosophy of the ancients
taught that every man should restrain his evil desires, and still more and
with greater care those who from daily contact with the world have the greater
temptations...For man has been born under this law, that the mind should rule
the body, that the appetites should be restrained by sound sense and reason;
and hence it follows that putting a curb
upon our masterful passions is the noblest and greatest freedom.'
Pope Pius XI, Ad Salutem - “Here indeed is
an ideal protrait of a Christian sovereign, nor will you find anywhere a nobler
or more perfect one. But it cannot be reproduced by the man who trusts the
guidance of human wisdom, which often is slowwitted, oftener blinded by the emotions.”
He then quotes Confucius, as though he were
some kind of Church authority, and not in fact a pagan! It's a typical
invincible ignorance heretics' tactic to cite some famous non-Catholic
philosopher as though their natural wisdom is proof of their attaining the
state of grace without having received the sacrament of baptism! Also, his
reference to “Gordian knots” is mysterious. He seems to be implying that the
Catholic faith is a Gordian knot (an extremely complicated problem that needs
solving) rather than an extremely simple set of dogmatic truths that require a
peaceful acceptance and belief. Also, the legendary Gordian knot was actually
“solved “ by being cut by Alexander the Great, so that's how Catholics are to
deal with occasions of sin such as heresies – cut them off! By implying that
the Catholic faith is a Gordian knot, Bp. Williamson is saying that a) the
Catholic faith is a problem, and b) it can only be “solved” by being cut off –
such is what Vatican II tried to do – cut out the heart of the Catholic faith
by dissecting and removing the dogmas. In reality, being the heretic and
schismatic that he is, Bp. Williamson is cut off from the Body of Christ. Bp.
Williamson is a Gordian knot of heresies! The sedevacantist "feneeyite"
mind simply rests confidently and peacefully upon that rock which is Christ:
the Truth. There is no need for a Catholic to be constantly wound up like a
cockoo clock, trying to unblock emotions and untie Gordian knots!!! Both
scripture and Tradition make it clear that there is no rest for the wicked, but
there is abundant peace for the good…
Wisdom 3:9 - “They that trust in him, shall
understand the truth: and they that are faithful in love shall rest in him: for
grace and peace is to his elect.”
Isaias 57:2 - “Let peace come, let him rest
in his bed that hath walked in his uprightness.”
Luke 10:6 - “And if the son of peace be
there, your peace shall rest upon him; but if not, it shall return to you.”
There is no rest or peace for heretics,
schismatics and apostates such as Bp. Williamson.
God Bless,
Chris White
Share
Subject: Mind Control
Hi MHFM,
If I may share a thought or two. Bishop Williamson is, hypothetically, learned
in the ways of manipulating thoughts and feelings of people, by the use of his
own words and actions. This is proven by his discussions with Joseph and Bill.
First, the discussion with Joseph Ramirez. The bishop referred to him as
"my dear boy", even though he clearly is not a young child. Why?
Other heretical clergymen have done this before. They do this in order to
revert grown men back to a child like docility and sense of comfort. (Let us
recall 1 Corinthians 13:11) The more docile the flock, the easier for them to
be controlled. Heretics are not backed by the Lord's dogmas, so they need other
means to keep their heretic trained flock in line: erroneous obedience.
Second, the letters to Bill Mulligan. The bishop discussed
"emotions", a quote from Confucius, closed mindedness, and the
Gordian knot. That is lot of things to talk about, if taken seriously. I may
have to get my copy of the Analects (Confucius), and perhaps a biography of
Alexander the Great (Gordian Knot). There are no dogmas to be found in those
documents. If another manipulative man would say similar things, one would
argue that he is speaking stylistically in order to sound smart, while avoiding
the dogmatic definitions. Keep them busy, look under my left sleeve, then under
my right sleeve, until they forget the dogma that is in question to begin with.
This trick is similar to a performer's trick in a magic act, but has the same
effect: intellectual diversion.
The Lord wants us to discuss His dogmas. The devil wants to keep us busy with
something else, such as useless trivialities. True Catholics use dogmatic
definitions to teach. Wicked heretics use the people's own thoughts and
feelings to manipulate them. The question is, putting aside whatever good the
Bishop has done, is he being manipulative intentionally, by training or by
chance? We must equip ourselves against these tricks nonetheless. I hope he
converts too. If not, at least it would do some good for SSPX and other like
minded groups if he confronts the dogmas head on in a debate with one of the
Dimond Brothers. Assuming he wins, it would be another feather on his cap, If
he loses, he can find the true faith not only for himself but for others like
him. What does he have to lose?
Finally, to control another person's mind one must first analyze it.
Psychoanalysis therefore is a basis of mind control.
Ave Maria.
Sanjiv
Protestant
Subject: Protestant near death worship of
man
A sad story
A networking acquaintance of mine posted on
her facebook page that her friend was dying. I said is she catholic and
would she like a priest.
Answer was "No thank you, she has made
peace with her minister" Not interested in making peace with God, but with
the Protestant minister. And these Protestants believe in universal
salvation like v-2 Catholics. "God is ready to take her to
heaven" Very sad.
MHFM: Yes, the bad will remains to the end. It’s at those moments that the seriousness of
these issues comes into focus.
Discussions
Brothers:
Thank you for the video exposing Bishop Williamson. I thought the use of the
word "charade" was absolutely right on, but unfortunately, too many
people are playing along with their game. Over this past weekend, I came to a
decision: I'm no longer attending their Armada chapel and watch their heretical
priests play this game of deception.
As I related in my last email, several discussions at the Armada, MI parish
recently landed me a call from the prior, the now notorious heretic Steven
McDonald. He called me about my promotion of the true dogmas on salvation and
Holy Water Baptism at "his" parish, and my warning to one 17-year-old
boy, who I knew was considering the priesthood with the SSPX, to put his
possible vocation in God's hands and to NOT vow yourself to this heretical
Society. The lad cried to his mama, Mama called Steven, and Steven was
"rather disturbed" by this activity on my part. After a long phone
conversation with Bishop Williamson the Second, he attempted to offer me a
deal: Steven would read my (i.e. Bro Peter's Salvation book), and I would read
a book of his chosing, and then we would talk. In exchange for this agreement,
I would promise to refrain from telling "his" flock the truth about
what is required to save their souls. He agreed that he would not formally
impose his heresy on me by making some announcement or denying me Holy Communion.
At first I agreed but the next day cancelled the agreement since it's wrong to
obey men, rather than God, and his book would be dangerous to my faith. No
deal, Father.
Please know, I have challenged this man to debate me publicly on three seperate
occasions, which he refused. He doesn't want to "draw attention" to
the issue. Translate: He wants to keep the Charade going. I've challenged two
other men to debate me, both long-term false traditionalists, one of whom is a
veteran lawyer. Decline, decline. I've offered these folks, including their
"pastor" to play fair and debate me like gentlemen before the eye of
the public, and they run and hide! All except for Steven--he chose at
yesterday's Sunday Mass to play dirty, cowardly, and notoriously heretical from
the pulpit.
The Gospel spoke of the ten lepers, and Steve remarked that Jesus wanted to
teach us about "hierarchy and order." Great, no problem. But Father
went on and on about how much confidence the people should have in him as their
prior and the Society priests and bishops in general. He was almost claiming to
be infallible, not even a hint that he could fall into error, or that we should
always judge everything in light of Catholic dogma. The people, he seemed to be
saying, don't need dogma, since they have the great SSPX priests such as
himself. Have perfect confidence, Fr. Steve will bring you safely to glory.
This "little messiah" complex of his then got stepped up as he
lavished praise on Marcel Lefebve as the Great Hero who saved the true Mass AND
Catholic tradition--where would we be without him?--as if God cannot raise up
thousands of Champions of the Catholic faith at any time. But this was the last
straw. Marcel Lefebvre was a manifest heretic,
McDonald loudly-praised this heretic as the Saviour of Catholic Tradition.
Conclusion: Fr. McDonald is a manifest heretic. Goodbye SSPX, I'll pray for
your conversion to Jesus Christ and the Roman Catholic Faith. He also quoted
St. Bernard as saying something like, "the man who will not be led or guided
is a fool." I saw that as a weak, cowardly shot at me and you. What
a gutless heretic.
Joseph Ramirez
Materials
… Your web site and WRITTEN materials and
audio/visual resources are excellent media to provide the TRUTH about the ONE,
HOLY, CATHOLIC, and APOSTOLIC CHURCH OF JESUS CHRISTJESUS IS THE ONLY WAY TO
THE FATHER THE ONLY WAY, TRUTH AND LIFE No one comes to the
FATHER EXCEPT THROUGH THE SON.
No one knows the Father except the son and he to whom he reveals
Him. Your web site provides the
magisterial teaching of the church through the true popes; THE WRITTEN
WORD OF GOD THROUGH THE BIBLE and APOSTOLIC TEACHING which hands down
the teaching of JESUS CHRIST. YOUR WEB
PRESENTS THE POPES TEACHING THROUGH PAPAL ENCYCLICALS AND DOGMATIC
TEACHINGS, EX-CATHEDRA AND PAPAL BULLS.
ALL TRUE CATHOLICS NEED TO KNOW THESE TEACHINGS DIVINELY INSPIRED
THROUGH THE HOLY SPIRIT AS CHRIST PROMISED THAT THE GATES OF HELL SHALL NOT
PREVAIL AGAINST THE CHURCH WHICH CHRIST ESTABLISHED THROUGH PETER. PLEASE CONTINUE TO PRESENT MORE OF THESE
PAPAL DOCUMENTS SO THAT CATHOLICS WILL HAVE THE TRUTH. YOUR YOU TUBE CHANNEL IS EXCELLENT SOURCE OF
INSTRUCTION
Anthony
Perhaps
Subject: Open Letter to
Confused Catholics
Brothers,
Perhaps the SSPX should change
the name of that document, "An Open Letter To Confused
Catholics". It should actually be called "An Open
Letter - To Confuse Catholics"
Wj…
Comment
I
was very pleased to see you´re taking a more active role in exposing the false
traditionalists. It was about time for you to place Richard Williamson in his
proper place and expose him (in all his absurdity) for what he truly is. You
did an article on him years ago, but it was "buried" among other
articles in one of the sections. A person had to deeply explore your material
to find it. I hope someday you do something similar about Fellay. If I may be so bold, and since you´re
reformulating your main page, why not place a link to the BEWARE section in a
window too, like you did to the youtube channel? That section is a must read,
and I don´t think it gets the attention it deserves.
The
FFSPX, like so many other groups, realize there´s a real problem. However, they
not fully perceive it for what it is, and end up offering false solutions and
hope. The devil probably knew that at one point the Apostasy was going to be so
manifest that he would have to establish a controlled opposition of his
own. When I was a "traditionalist" (non-sedevacantist) I always
knew the Tradition was going to be only a temporary home, a spiritual hotel
shall we say, before I could study the matters more deeply and sort things out
before finally deciding what to do with my life, and where to entrust my soul.
After all, they had reverence and a good approach to the moral life (ok, aside
from NFP, as I later found out through you)
While
I would not say the FSSPX was bad from day one, nowadays the people there are
heterogeneous. It´s really a grey field. There are tares, but also potential
wheat. Some are of good will, seeking refuge from the V-2 and searching for
answers. Others are just accommodated. While others are moved just by thrill
about the group promoting the Old Mass, opposing ecumenism and denouncing the
Jews. At least that´s what they used to do. When Hell broke loose with
Williamson and the Holocaust, they quickly removed most (if not all) of their
online material exposing the Jewish Zionist propaganda. How blessed I was to
discover your works and finally be instructed on the real problem and how a
Catholic should deal with it.
While
Bishop Williamson advocates for many true causes, he´s indeed a hypocrite of
ridiculous proportions, plus a coward in some areas. I guess the reason so many
people follow him is because they see pure evil around them, so they settle for
someone who´s offering 25% or 50% of the Truth and they don´t know (of) any
better. Williamson is learned, and all his knowledge was for nothing at the end
of the day. It only served to feed his pride and typical FSSPX´s elitism
(another reason why I could not stand them for very long).
In
your video Death and the Journey to Hell, there´s a part (among others) I can
never forget. When you talk about the reality of many people going to Hell not
because they were totally evil in an almost cartoonish caricature manner, but
more of the case that they were not sufficiently good. Like the people in Hell
saying "forever, and ever, and ever..." when I examine my conscience and
reflect on my sins and faults I always repeat to myself (as a way of correction
and warning) "not good enough, not enough, not enough...". I used to
think that Williamson and his Society were good, but not good enough. But he
reached such a low point, that a sincere Catholic must reject him as a bad and
evil person, like he disgustingly fails to do in regards to JP2 and now B16.
A
failure to reprove them, after seeing what they did, is indeed theological
vomit. But to actually go in their DEFENSE as if they were GOOD is nothing less
than a severe case of mental diarrhea. The false Resistance is really the
devil´s assist plan.
All
in all, another fine audio file. Keep up the good work. One last thing. There´s a gossip circulating
that RW is suffering from a neurodegenerative disease. I don´t know for how
long (in case the rumor is true), or how advanced it may be (he can still say
Masses, that´s for sure). I don´t know if he was always a bad willed person (he
certainly is for a few years), but this clinic condition could help explain his
absurd and aberrational declarations.
CK
Videos
Subject: Williamson videos
Very nice job with your Williamson
videos. I think you nail the essential problem of Williamson; that is
intellectual pride, very well.
Not to bore you but I had some follow-up
with him since I shared the recent line about “Gordian Knots” with you. I
pointed out to him that his line, that SdV and ENS “cut Gordian knots”, while
“theology only unties them as best they can be” represented a concession to SdV
and ENS. His answer to me was basically to tell me that I don’t know what
theology is. That I don’t know what I don’t know, and that I have a slow
mind but a quick tongue.
Well I paraphrase; the actual words of the
bishop are below. While I am no “theologian”, his entire “argument”, all
he has written against Sedevacantism can be reduced to a psychological
prescription, that is: “these Romans are insane”. However their insanity
shields them from their otherwise manifest heresies, because they are not
obstinate (they can’t be obstinate because they are insane, essentially
innocent but crazy). If you point out to him their high level of
education, he will say that indeed that is precisely what made them insane;
(presumably therefore they are less guilty than an otherwise ignorant person
would be). As far as I can discern, this is his entire case. He
will not touch “Feeneyism” other than the comments he made to Mr. Ramirez.
And he will not counter any dogmatic citations with argument.
He will gently tell you that it is cute that you are trying to tackle such
weighty issues, you know, because you can’t possibly understand these matters,
and then he’ll go back to psychoanalyzing the Roman offenders, and never answer
your argument. It is truly amazing that the shell can be that
empty. But sadly it appears to be.
Bill Mulligan
Valid
Dear
MHFM,
Hi, I just want to ask if the 4th mystery of the Rosary is valid? as far as I
know it was promulgated by anti-pope JP II right? thanks
Glenn
MHFM: No, the “Luminous Mysteries” are
not part of the real Rosary and shouldn’t be included with it.
Questions
Subject:
Comment - Stephen’s Questions
Dear
Brothers Michael and Peter,
I would
like to thank you for the straightforward reply and charitable act you made on
Stephen's questions … Your answers
[assist] him that is confused, wary and scared on the presented affairs
of his soul, should he apply the remedies you recommended. I find his email and questions very
interesting and may prove helpful to others who are in similar situation. I would like to comment and forward some of
my insight, if I may:
1 - "Am
I damned for all eternity because of the actions of the church leaders" C - First, you
have to clear the air by defining who these church leaders you refer to, if you
refer to the Vatican II Sect and if you follow their actions – the answer is
categorically yes, the reasons for this had been well explained by MHFM
Brothers;
2- "…
Is this the plan of God?" C -
To indicate God to plan evil situations is blasphemous and tantamount to
ignorance of God's attributes … evil (absence of good) situations as mentioned
by Stephen (invalid Mass, worthless adoration hours & devotion etc) are
allowed by God to satisfy the just Justice of Almighty God that has been
disrespected by unacceptable prayers and sacrifices to Him;
3-
"Why would the Lord and through him the Holy Spirit, allow for entire
populations to be duped and worship in an invalid way" C – Since you refer
to this worship done in Vatican II Church arena, this worship is in no way
acceptable to God, hence God does not allow Himself to be worshipped in an
invalid way as all abominable acts or worship and prayer go straight to him
that asked for it – the devil. God could
never stand the slightest imperfection (the main reason why Purgatory was
created) how much more invalid and sinful prayers?;
4- "…
I just don’t think that God would allow so many of us who try to be devout to
be duped or intentionally depraved of our worship and devotion" C – "To be
devout", this phrase in the Catholic sense should be understood as a
soul following the Commandments of God through His established church on earth
– the Catholic Church (not the Vatican II), hence if the soul deviates in the
path by jumping out of the safe haven of the Catholic Church through apostasy,
heresy or schism – that "to be devout" claim loses its dignity
before God! … that soul regardless how sincere his devotions he thought he had
… can never be considered devout at all.
Stephen,
Brothers Michael and Peter have given you the best advice you can ever solicit
on this planet earth and make sure that you remember this resounding command
from Heaven through them – "Regarding
the effort you’ve employed, that’s surely why you’ve come across this
information. God is giving you the grace
and the opportunity to see the full truth.
It’s up to you to accept it. If
you don’t, one must say in charity that you will go to Hell." And
I concur that you will go to Hell if you do the opposite.
If a
sincere Catholic dissects this email, the questions presented stem from the
fact that Stephen indeed has very little knowledge on the attributes of God,
the history of the Catholic Faith and the Catholic Church … should he be
familiar with the history of many ancient heresies, apostasies and schisms of
the past – somehow his questions would be narrowed to just a few and not be
complicated. In these most turbulent
times of the world, the End of Days, I should say … one must not only content
himself in various devotions and prayers he practices, but one MUST also feed
his soul that is terribly hungry by spending enough time to study Catholic
Faith. I can safely say that if Stephen
is familiar with the accounts surrounding the Catholic Church like preceding
historic moments that paved the way for the birth of a number of heresies,
apostasies and schisms he won't be surprised with the present situation of the
Church. The abominable bishop Arius was
"holy", intelligent and very ascetic that's why numerous souls
marched with him to wage war (with their heresies) to the death against St.
Athanasius and the very few that hold the Catholic Faith; the founder of Islam
in the 6th century did observe 40 days strict fasting and prayers in
the desert before he claimed to have received visions from God to establish a
new religion; how the great Christian Constantinople country fell and became
the Islam Turkey; the great Western
Schism that paved the way for the three antipopes who ruled the Catholic Church
for more than 40 years; the deChristianization of France with the evil French
Revolution in the 18th century; the founder of Protestantism was a
former monk; the persecutions of Catholics around the world that hold the
traditional Catholic Faith … in the 20th century, thousands of our
Catholic brethren where slain in Russia, Spain and Mexico by not complying with
the Communist ruling states in fact the then Pope Pius XI cried against these
atrocities and condemned the "Conspiracy of Silence" of the Western
and European world for not joining the Catholic Church in condemning these evil
acts in persecuting and murdering the Catholics - these are just a few of them
…
God
was pleased to wake me up on the Sedevacantism position and from that moment on
I never turn my eyes again to Novus Ordo Sect and I had nothing to do with
them; I came across with lots of "traditional catholic" sites until I
discovered MHFM. After that, I did not
check other sites except one time… I was just reading a few lines of the works
of [a] heretic… my head ached so hard that I could not continue reading it…
Yours
in Jesus and Mary,
Joey
from the Philippines
Heretic
Thanks for great job exposing this noxious
pestilent heretic and arch-enemy of Christ the Lord… Sure he believes
antichrist JPII and False Prophet B16 are "good [puuuuuuuuuke!]
men" [gag] because isn't that the freemasons' motto:
"making good men better men"? or some other garbage..........?
This nefarious evil-doer has got to be right up there with the likes of
JPII whose body was probably possessed by some super high-powered
DEMON........you know, the same game of deception-------and how
about those "vessels" I think it was of the Catholic religion he
so enjoys filling with: THE NEW POISONOUS FUMES OF EVERY
MODERNIST HERESY?... that is what the battle is all about-------all about
poisoning the would-be Catholic faithful to make sure they go to
hell..........what a crying shame it seems to be working on so many
people. It's unbelievable today and completely OUTSIDE THE PALE that
anyone who has even the tiniest modicum of rationality still falls for
this after it's been SO THOROUGHLY EXPOSED. There ARE no excuses:
period.
A.
Padre Pio
[On a recent] morning… while preparing to
pay some bills, the check book couldn't be found… Thus, the hunt for the check
book went into serious mode, lasting several hours, superseding all other plans
on the "to do list" for the day.
While searching for the checkbook, I came
across Padre Pio's booklet depicting his religious and miraculous life. I
asked him to please help me locate my missing item. To my amazement, my
prayer was answered almost immediately, within 20 minutes of my request, and
the checkbook found exactly at the same place in my desk I had previously
searched. I am amazed and humbly grateful, as never before has my prayer
been answered sooner. I wish to acknowledge my thanks to God and Padre
Pio, along with Brother Michael Dimond for writing the booklet...
Sincerely,
Kathleen Ryan
EENS
Dear Brothers,
Just to let you know that I told a 'traditional priest' that
baptism of desire/blood was a heresy, as I thought he was an advocate of
it. I gave him little by little some of your arguments in your excellent book
'Outside the church there is absolutely no salvation' (I actually translated
those parts). The first time he was like shocked and said how scandalous and
anti-traditional that idea was. So you see he didn't appreciate already your
work. I convinced him to read it (the translated parts) by saying that I would
like to have his opinion; and hoping that he would convert.
I gave him 3 parts, given separately every week ;
and what was astounding to see was that his arguments given to me each of these
weeks refuting our position, was a different
"objection/response" which you cover up in your book.
It didn't help a bit as he still remains
obstinate and says that I am a heretic and that you are totally wrong and
making this up. He tried to convince me and debate by saying that all the
theological teachings are for baptism of desire… that all of the catechisms
were perfect. He said that all the saints were right..... (he contradicted
himself many times)…
Thank you for what you do.
Sincerely
Austin…
Heretic
Subject: Heretic Williamson
Dear MHFM,
How profound the truth, and how well and
simple you explain the double-talking St. Pius X group, especially Bishop
Richard Williamson and his bountiful, gibberish liberalism. How he
and his group embrace the sheer lies of heretical antipopes of Vatican
II. What does it matter to this bunch of heretics what a real pope,
Boniface VIII proclaimed in Unam Sanctam in early 14th century upon the whole
world-past, present, and future 'til the Son of Man cometh at the
end? What hypocrites of the cloth! Keep up the militancy… God Bless
You!...
Dea…
Hindrance
Subject:
Hindrance
Dear
MHFM, thank you for the new DVD. Today’s quote by St Thomas Aquinas and the
story of St Francis converting the Sultan, they both use the exact term
"provided there is no hindrance" the grace of God will come to those
seeking the truth of God. What a gift this grace is! How many people are alive
today that have no hindrance? What mercy God has shown me! I think this grace
to pursue the truth was gifted to me by Our Lady after you encouraged me so
strongly to pray the Rosary everyday. I try to pray as much of the Rosary
everyday and each day I feel more and more like an alien. Remember when
we were kids, you used to hear the term "Oh he or she is such a
saint"?
Now
you would hear "oh that poor guy is crazy or some fanatic". I'm sure
you know what compounding is. It's like a snowball going downhill. This is how
fast the hearts of men are turning away from anything saintly. I think
it's this evil momentum Our Lady has been warning us about and why it's Our
Lady that we must constantly turn to, for we have been commanded to have
recourse to her…
God
bless you MHFM,
Matthew
Comment
Dear Brothers,
Thanks for the book and the DVD with the 4
features! The one about the end of the world, I can't put into words; I tell
people, you just have to see it…
Also, I was wondering, the St. Jude
prayer that someone sent into your web-site, about 1 or 2 months ago,
wouldn't that be in the category of "chain" prayers, the way the man
wrote in, about answer to prayer must be posted (something to that effect).
Thanks
Sincerely,
Nancy
St. Francis, Baptism
Brothers,
This is an excerpt from one of the famous books on St Francis of Assisi. If
having the desire alone could save, St Francis need not send his friars, isn't
it?
God bless,
Jerome
CHAPTER XXIV (from Little Flowers of St
Francis)
HOW ST FRANCIS CONVERTED TO THE FAITH THE
SULTAN OF BABYLON
St Francis, urged by zeal for the faith of
Christ and by a wish to suffer martyrdom, took with him one day twelve of his
most holy brethren, and went beyond the sea with the intention of going
straight to the Sultan of Babylon. They arrived in a province belonging to the
Saracens, where all the passes were guarded by men so cruel, that no Christian
who passed that way could escape being put to death. Now it pleased God that St
Francis and his companions should not meet with the same fate; but they were
taken prisoners, and after being bound and ill-treated, were led before the
Sultan. Then St Francis standing before him, inspired by the Holy Spirit,
preached most divinely the faith of Christ; and to prove the truth of what he
said, professed himself ready to enter into the fire. Now the Sultan began to
feel a great devotion towards him, both because of the constancy of his faith,
and because he despised the things of this world (for he had refused to accept
any of the presents which he had offered to him), and also because of his
ardent wish to suffer martyrdom. From that moment he listened to him willingly,
and begged him to come back often, giving both him and his companions leave to
preach wheresoever they pleased; he likewise gave them a token of his
protection, which would preserve them from all molestation.
At length St Francis, seeing he could do no
more good in those parts, was warned by God to return with his brethren to the
land of the faithful. Having assembled his companions, they went together to
the Sultan to take leave of him. The Sultan said to him: "Brother Francis,
most willingly would I be converted to the faith of Christ; but I fear to do so
now, for if the people knew it, they would kill both me and thee and all thy
companions. As thou mayest still do much good, and I have certain affairs of
great importance to conclude, I will not at present be the cause of thy death
and of mine. But teach me how I can be saved, and I am ready to do as thou
shalt order." On this St Francis made answer: "My lord, I will take
leave of thee for the present; but after I have returned to my own country,
when I shall be dead and gone to heaven, by the grace of God, I will send thee two of my friars, who
will administer to thee the holy baptism of Christ, and thou shalt be saved,
as the Lord Jesus has revealed to me; and thou in the meantime shalt free
thyself from every hindrance, so that, when the grace of God arrives, thou
mayest be found well disposed to faith and devotion." The Sultan promised
so to do; and did as he had promised. Then St Francis returned with his company
of venerable and saintly brethren, and after a few years ending his mortal
life, he gave up his soul to God. The Sultan, having fallen ill, awaited the
fulfillment of the promise of St Francis, and placed guards in all the passes,
ordering them if they met two brothers in the habit of St Francis to conduct
them immediately to him. At the same time St Francis appeared to two of his
friars, and ordered them without delay to go to the Sultan and save his soul,
according to the promise he had made him. The two set out, and having crossed
the sea, were conducted to the Sultan by the guards he had sent out to meet
them. The Sultan, when he saw them arrive, rejoiced greatly, and exclaimed:
"Now I know of a truth that God has sent his servants to save my soul,
according to the promise which St Francis made me through divine revelation."
Having received the faith of Christ and holy baptism from the said friars, he
was regenerated in the Lord Jesus Christ; and having died of his disease, his
soul was saved, through the merits and prayers of St Francis.
Received
Dear
Brothers,
I
Just received your Book and DVD you sent me, what a Nice Surprise
! I'm especially excited about seeing the whole Fatima one…
This
Book is just Amazingly Filled with more information than I could have possibly
guessed by just its size…. I'm constantly shocked by what passes as
Christianity with most people these days...and the level of hate towards the
Catholic Church. This is Most Appreciated, can't wait to read
it!...
Carol
Delger
Questions
Dear Brother Michael:
I have visited your site and have reviewed many of your articles. First,
I appreciate your efforts to educate and found most of your material very
illuminating but I must confess, I also found some of it most disconcerting.
Let me explain by way of questions for your review and comment if possible:
1. I live in Rhode Island, the most Catholic State in the USA - per
capita of our residents; and there are many churches but only one church
in the whole State that offers a Latin Mass on Sunday. I go to
daily mass at my local Parish and of course the Vatican II mass is
celebrated. You claim the mass is invalid, if that is true, then why
would the Lord permit that every single mass said throughout my State every
morning is invalid? Does the Lord not want my salvation? If there is no daily
Latin Mass offerred throughout the entire State, what is a Catholic to
do? This is the case in most States in the USA. Am I damned for all
eternity because of the actions of the church leaders. How does obedience play
into the equation. Do I just stop going to mass every day? Forgo
all the hours of eucharistic adoration, with the invalid consecrated
host?
2. Is every confession I go to invalid, every mass, every
adoration?, If the answer to these questions is yes because
a Vatican II priest consecrated the host or performs the sarament,
then most of the sacraments that are offerred are invalid thereby making
my devout worship and dedication worthless. Is this the plan of God?
3. Why would the Lord and through him the Holy Spirit, allow for entire
populations to be duped and worship in an invalid way when most of us are
just trying to be obedient to the church and its' leaders?
4. Are you also suggesting that the Holy Spirit has permitted or
ordained that the last 50 years of Popes would all be invalid? Is it
becuase of end times? When would a valid Pope be elected?
Benedict has been very supportive of allowing the Latin Mass to come back and
he refuses to distribute communion in the hand, etc....What is a lay person
to do? If everything you propose is correct then 99% of all Catholics in
the world are worshipping incorrectly under the guise of obedience. I
just dont think that God would allow so many of us who try to be devout to be
duped or intentionally depraved of our worship and devotion.
5. Regarding the imposter Sister Lucia. I agree
that the person pretending to be her is clearly someone different. How
was the conspiracy played out? How could the real Sister Lucia die or be killed
and that information be kept a secret? There are those who
claim that Paul VI also had an imposter. When you look at the pictures of
the early Paul VI and the later years Paul VI they are also
clearly different people. What does all this mean with
all these antipopes, invalid mass, imposters?
I personally was a very bad sinner. Over the last year or so, I have
truly changed my life made amendments. I say the rosary everyday,
volunteer, go to daily mass, go to confession weekly, sometimes twice a week. I
have spent literally hundreds of hours before the Blessed Sacrament. I
have consecrated myself to the Blessed Mother. I observe First Fridays, First
Saturdays, I pray about 2-3 hours every day, read scripture,
etc.... I can say that I feel the change in myself. I have
read the Imitation of Christ by Thomas Kempis, the Dark Night of the Soul,
etc... I have experienced some form of purgation. I believe that I am or try to
be in a state of grace. How would this be possible if I am worshipping
under false masses, etc?... I am just trying to reconcile what is going
on in the church and how I proceed.
Thank you and God Bless,
Stephen
MHFM: To your questions… 1. The Lord
permits the invalid Masses as a punishment for people’s sins and for their bad
will. He sees that very few care about
the faith itself; for that reason, He has allowed the real priests, Masses,
etc. to disappear. To give an example,
we had to go out recently. One of us got
into a conversation about the faith with a person, which we sometimes do. This individual claimed to be Catholic. In giving her a DVD and discussing what’s been
happening, the issue of false ecumenism and John Paul II’s prayer with
idolaters and pagans came up. The woman
flatly denied that John Paul II could have possibly engaged in such an
action. In response, one of us explained
that it’s a fact. We also said that we
have the proof on the DVD we just gave her.
All she needs to do is watch it.
She was obstinate, and she refused to believe that John Paul II did
anything like that. It wasn’t even clear
if she would watch the DVD to see the proof.
The point is that, if this encounter had not occurred, she might not
have heard about the Vatican II apostasy or what is really going on. Through this encounter, she received a
special opportunity to hear the truth.
However, whose fault is it that she hadn’t found out? It’s obvious that God left her in the dark
because He saw that she didn’t care about the truth and that she is of bad
will. For upon hearing the truth, she
was not receptive; but rather she fought against it vigorously. She even tried to deny an indisputable fact,
and balked at looking at the visual proof.
That’s why God leaves countless people in the dark of the Novus Ordo. They may seem nice on the outside; they might
attend “Mass,” but inwardly their hearts strenuously rebel against His
truth. God sees all of it, and He sees
that they are not of the truth. Hence,
there’s no need for Him to give them a special message concerning the full
extent of what’s happening; for almost all of them would reject it anyway. Everyone who is of the truth hears His voice
(John 18:37). Those who really care and
have interest will be brought to the knowledge of the truth. This is not to suggest that people shouldn’t
try to aggressively evangelize or spread the truth to these individuals. It is merely to point out that few of them
will be inclined to search for the truth on their own, and thus it is often
only through the special efforts and encouragement of others that they might
investigate what’s happening.
2.
Every mass you go to (assuming it’s the New Mass) is definitely
invalid. The same is true for every
“adoration” session. The confessions are
invalid if they were made to priests ordained in Paul VI’s invalid new rite of
ordination. You ask if this is the plan
of God. We ask, do you believe in
Outside the Church There is No Salvation, as the Church has taught? Do you believe that people who engage in
false ecumenism, such as Benedict XVI and his bishops, deny the faith? Do you believe that all pagans, Jews,
Muslims, heretics, etc. are lost? If
not, then you reject His faith. Perhaps
then you can see why God would allow you and many others to be deceived.
3.
The answer is that almost all of them are of bad will. In addition, we are living through the Great
Apostasy and the great spiritual deception.
Jesus said that the deception would be so profound that even the elect
would be deceived, if that were possible (Matthew 24). It’s clearly predicted in Scripture that the
Mass will be taken away, and that there will be a profound deception. So how can you think that it’s not
possible? This is covered in our
material. The Great Apostasy and a
Counterfeit Church predicted in the New Testament and in Catholic Prophecy. You need to look at it.
4.
These questions are addressed in our articles, DVDs, book and
debates. Please look at them. You need to realize that few are saved even
in Catholic times, and extremely few are saved today. Here’s what Jacinta said about the time of
World War II, which is nothing compared to the darkness of today:
“Lucia found Jacinta sitting alone, still
and very pensive, gazing at nothing. ‘What
are you thinking of, Jacinta?’ ‘Of the
war that is going to come. So many people are going to die. And almost all of them are going to Hell.’”
(Our Lady of Fatima, p. 94; p. 92 in
some versions)
5.
Our video on Fatima and the Impostor Sr. Lucia addresses your questions
on this topic. Regarding the effort
you’ve employed, that’s surely why you’ve come across this information. God is giving you the grace and the opportunity
to see the full truth. It’s up to you to
accept it. If you don’t, one must say in
charity that you will go to Hell. You
must never go to the invalid New Mass again.
You must also keep in mind that spiritual works or time spent without a
pure intention or a submission to His faith lose all merit. God wants obedience, rather than
sacrifice. In other words, if you accept
heretics or reject His dogmas, your spiritual works will be worthless in His
sight.
1
Kings 15:22-23: “And Samuel said: Doth
the Lord desire holocausts and victims, and not rather that the voice of the
Lord should be obeyed? For obedience is better than sacrifices:
and to hearken rather than to offer the fat of rams. Because
it is like the sin of witchcraft to rebel: and like the crime of idolatry, to
refuse to obey. Forasmuch as thou hast rejected the word of the Lord, the Lord hath
also rejected thee from being king.”
If one rejects God’s truth, he cannot
please Him. To accept the Vatican II
sect, in light of all the facts, is to deny God.
Effect
Hi, I just want to share something of
interest. My family was in the v2 until I became aware of the
heretical teachings of the nun leading the religious ed. I removed my kids from
the class and tried to teach the faith at home. It was not easy.
Sadly they were already in their teens. I am still very
angry that my kids were exposed to the false teachings. They
are in their mid twenties now. The effects of the
v2 teachings apparent. I have been sharing information
from your web site and other sources with them, when
possible . Hoping they will do some research of the faith on
their own. One of them called me a couple of weeks ago. He said he
was on his way to work and said a short prayer for discernment. He was
researching something and by chance (?) he was led to articles on
freemason, among others . He said he had read these types of
articles before , but that day the information all of a sudden started to
fall in place and he got a deeper understanding of the Catholic
church and other things that he had questions about , concerning his faith.
He was very excited, and said he wanted to talk to me in person about some
other things that were revealed to him .I told him that the Lord
answers prayers but sometimes in a way we don't expect. Discernment
on his faith was not on his mind when he said his short prayer. I am
looking forward to his visit. I am hopeful and thankful for this
turn of events. What books or dvds do you have that would be good for me
to get for him. ( Errors of v2, freemasons, evolution. )
Thank you for your website and the information that you share.
Bw…
MHFM: That’s good news.
We would recommend the DVDs and books in our special package. Death
and the Journey into Hell is especially important for him to see, so that
he seriously considers the necessity of getting his soul in order. Lives of the saints are also important, in
addition to of course encouraging him to pray the Rosary. The life of St. Francis Paola (which we
offer) is quite good for people who are new or coming into the faith. His life is filled with extraordinary
miracles and can get people excited about the power of the Catholic faith.
Response
Response to Stepup
If you think an MHFM video was some sort of a joke you really need
to back away from your own self confidence, consider that you may not know
everything God wants you to know, and pray that God will give you the grace to
convert to the one, true faith. You need to start taking an interest in the
Rosary and the idea of reciting the Rosary.
Do you care about saying the Hail Mary prayer? "Listen to
what Our Lady revealed to Blessed Alan de la Roche, as he has recorded in his
book on the dignity of the Rosary: 'Know, my son, and make all others know,
that it is a probable and proximate sign of eternal damnation to have an aversion,
a lukewarmness, or a negligence in saying the Angelical Salutation [Hail
Mary prayer], which has repaired the whole world.'"
(St. Louis de Montfort, True Devotion to Mary, Trans. Fr. Frederick
Faber, Rockford, Illinois, Tan Books and Publishers, Inc., 1941, 157.)
If you attend the Novus Ordo "mass" ask yourself if this
"mass" makes you care about saying the Hail Mary prayer.
TD
9/11 Mosque
Dimond brothers,
Did you see ABC Nightline yesterday ? There was a Vatican II Priest
pushing for that Muslim Mosque to get built at Ground Zero.
The name of the Priest is Father Kevin Madigan. You might want to put that on
your latest news section on your website.
God bless
H
MHFM: Wow, what a scandal… What apostasy.
Pervades
Dear Brothers,
That's a very interesting story from Joseph Ramirez on the heretic Bishop
Williamson. It reveals the intellectual pride that pervades their whole organization.
I remember when I was kicked out of the SSPX for distributing two small EENS
flyers. The Rector of the Seminary (Holy Cross, Australia), imposing heretic
Fr. Vincente Griego, said that the information on the flyer was "all
twisted," or "taken out of context" - something to that effect.
It doesn't require a theology degree to be a Catholic, but it certainly does
require humility! Catholic dogmas are to believed as they are written.
Mark 10:15 - Amen I say to you, whosoever
shall not receive the kingdom of God as a little child, shall not enter into
it.
Proverbs 15:33 - The fear of the Lord is the lesson of wisdom: and humility
goeth before glory.
John 12:40 - He hath blinded their eyes,
and hardened their heart, that they should not see with their eyes, nor
understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them.
God Bless,
Chris White
Damage
Hello I have been watching your videos
on YouTube I am a Conservative Catholic. I had no idea what damage Vatican
II has done until I watched your videos of the Heresies of Popes
abominations of the new mass etc. Could not believe my eyes when
I saw the Mass video I have never seen anything like that in my life…
But my question to you is what am I meant to do, where am I meant to go and
Worship and where to go for Confession? I live in the England.
Also this a problem for me as I have believe that I am called to
the Priesthood and have been considering joining the Priesthood and
going to seminary but after watching these videos you have shown I am like so
kind of confused of what to do now.
I have been telling people about this in my Church they too had no
idea of these heresies and abominations taking place.
Looking forward for hearing from you.
Regards
Ste
MHFM: We’re glad to hear about your interest. The first thing is to get out of the invalid
New Mass and become convinced on all the issues. A Catholic must never go to the New Mass
again for any reason. Pray the Rosary
each day, and please continue to review the material. You will see clearly that the Vatican II sect
is not the Catholic Church. Once
convinced, a person can apply the guidelines on where to receive sacraments to
the available options in their area (only considering certain priests ordained
in a traditional way, of course). A
profession of faith, a good confession, etc. are all important. But the first thing is to continue to
familiarize yourself with the traditional Catholic faith and what a Catholic
must know and believe about what is happening.
Saw
Subject: Hello
Hi there. I saw your video on BP oil spill
and tried to thumbs up it, and as you know, I couldn't. I then visited your
channel and watched some more videos, (all of which I found extremely
interesting). I really like your channel and the way you present the
information. While I’m not Catholic, I believe the only way to salvation is
through Jesus Christ, too. I'm really looking forward to watching your series,
Is the World about to End?. Thanks in advance for the information you're putting
out there.
Thepart…
MHFM: Thanks for the interest.
We hope you continue to look at the material. We must emphasize that it's critical to
embrace the one true faith of Christ.
Jesus taught that one must hear His Church and accept all of His
teachings for salvation. We have a book
called The Bible Proves the Teachings of
the Catholic Church. It demonstrates
that the Catholic faith is the only true Christian faith.
Question
I
have a question about your videos you have for sale (like the ones on JPII, Paul
VI, The New Mass, JPII preaching antichrist, Council of apostasy, and benedict
XVI). Are the videos the newest versions (like 2nd edition and final
edition. Like the ones you can watch for free on your website)? I'd like
to know before ordering (I hope they are the newest versions). Thank you.
Sincerely, Ryan
MHFM: Yes, the videos/DVDs we offer are
the newest versions.
Williamson vs.
Subject: Williamson vs. Ramirez
I had written you in the past, and shared
some exchanges I had with Bp Williamson. As was Joe Ramirez’s experience;
I found in argument the Bishop skirts core issues and goes adhominum whenever a
concrete Truth is cited.
However I think Mr. Ramirez touched a nerve
in the Bishop. It had been nearly a month since I heard from the Bishop,
then out of the blue, yesterday morning, I got this:
Dear Bill,
Arguing is fine, as long as the mind is not
being governed by emotions. One's all too frequent experience with
sedevacantists and with Feeneyites is that the mind has shut down, and emotion, blocked
emotion, has taken over. With such, argument is a waste of time.
Confucius he say, "He who speaks to a
fool, wastes his words. He who does not speak to a wise man, wastes his man.
The wise man wastes neither his words nor his man."
I don't know why minds shut down on
sedevacantism or Feeneyism, but I know that they easily do. Both cut
Gordian knots. Theology unties them as best hey can be untied.
God
bless,
Bishop W.
The timing of the note, I mean after so
much time, and sort of disconnected from the chain of our most recent
dialogues, probably wasn’t a coincidence. Maybe his conscience was
tweaked? Maybe he is arguing more to himself than to me.
Anyway, thought it was interesting. I
think such as Bp. Williamson are worthy of your prayers (as I suspect your
prayers have great efficacy). Prayer for his total conversion of course…
Bill Mulligan
Revealing
Dear brothers in Christ,
The letter from the reader Joseph Ramirez, about bishop Williamson, is quite
revealing. The bishop's very phrase "to understand dogma correctly"
is provocative enough to accuse bishop for heresy and mocking God. For how
would it be possible to have a true Faith and at the same time suggest that God
has spoken His Eternal Truth in a way that it is logically possible to
understand it incorrectly? If it would
be possible, there would be no sin at all, for then every sinner could rightly
say that he/she acted upon his/her own understanding of The Truth, and didn't
break The Law according to this understanding. This would constitute modernism
in extreme, and this is what bishop Williamson is promoting. In that respect he
is indeed more dangerous than Novus Ordo heretics who openly accept modernism.
Bishop Williamson obviously is very fond of
with playing with words. I would like to ask him what is the correct meaning of
the word "correct"? If it is possible to understand the statement
"no pagans, or heretics, or Jews would be saved unless..."
incorrectly, to the point that it has the meaning "it is possible for
pagans, heretics and Jews to be saved even if they die outside the
Church", then it is obviously possible to understand the word "correctly"
incorrectly. So the bishop Williamson is
pushing his flock to "deeper understanding". Well, I suppose I am
allowed to think that "the deeper" has its extreme, that there is
"the deepest". If the bishop Williamson has the true charity, why
then he doesn't say this "deepest understanding" of the dogma, and
thus make the end of discussion. Let him just translate each and every dogma to
its "deepest understanding", and order each and every member of his
flock to forget altogether the "shallow understanding" of the dogmas.
For, what would be the use of "shallow understanding" at all? We
don't need "shallow understanding", do we?
For example, I firmly believe the dogma
that there is ONE God, and THREE Divine Persons, and each and every of the
THREE Persons is The ONE and same God. I never pretended that I UNDERSTAND this
dogma in a way as I understand many truths of the natural world. So, I suppose
that bishop Williamson would like to give me the deepest understanding of this
dogma, and other dogmas as well, and thus make an end to my quest of
understanding.
To summarize: Bishop Williamson is just one of the countless Novus Ordarians
wannabe traditionalist. He is representing the masonic doctrine of salvation,
just like his fellow co-workers in Vatican. For, it is the masons who have the
"circles of understanding", the "degrees", and all such
satanic mumbo-jumbo doctrine, in order to confuse the people who long for The
Truth, which is God. The truth is that the dogmas will always mean what they
say. And according to the dogmas, the bishop Williamson is on the road to
Hell. Unless he embraces the dogmas as
they are, he would perish eternally.
God bless MHFM
Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia
1 Timothy 4
Subject: 1 Timothy 4
Hello
brothers,
I had a quick question, I was trying to convince this protestant woman… I was
using the bible proves the teachings of the Catholic Church. She was more
interested in convincing me of her scripture alone view. She pointed out
first timothy chapter 4 where it talks about the insincerity of liars whose
consciences are seared, who forbid marriage and require abstinence from foods
God created. She says Paul is talking
about priests. I think she took this scripture out of context but wanted to know
what it meant could you please explain it to me. I have been giving out your
dvds and I hope the people that i gave them to will listen. I find protestants
very hard to convince. I got baptized and am working on living the full true
faith... Thanks for all you do for us.
Veronica.
MHFM: Thanks for the interest.
There’s a lot of bad will out there.
The woman is completely wrong about the passage she brings up. We should quote the passage, so that your
question is clear to our readers.
1 Timothy 4:1-5 “Now the Spirit manifestly saith,
that in the last times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to spirits
of error, and doctrines of devils, Speaking lies in hypocrisy, and having their
conscience seared, Forbidding to marry, commanding to abstain from meats,
which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving by the faithful, and by
them that have known the truth. For
every creature of God is good, and nothing to be rejected that is received with
thanksgiving: For it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer.”
There is a very definite meaning to this passage. The passage speaks of the various dualist
sects throughout Christian history.
Examples of these were the Gnostics, the Manicheans, the Cathars,
etc. These people believed in two gods:
one evil and one good. They held that
the evil god was the god of matter, and the good god the god of the
spirit. These groups developed a
theology which was destructive to any use of material things, to a greater or
lesser degree depending upon the sect and their zeal for it. Hence, they forbade marriage, abstained from
meats, and preached poverty (for they believed that to own material things was
evil). The most devoted would even kill
themselves to put an end to their material existence.
There is no doubt that this is what the passage is referring to,
as a careful study of Christian history will show. These types of dualist heretics popped up
again and again. They became such a
problem in the Middle Ages that the war against Cathar-dualist heretics in 1208
was called a crusade by Pope Innocent III (Carroll, A History of Christendom, Vol. 3, p. 175.) So the passage is not remotely forbidding
celibacy, which the Bible clearly teaches is superior to marriage. See this file:
Refuting the Protestant rejection of the Catholic and
Biblical teaching on celibacy
Some ask, why does the Church prohibit priests from
marrying? Catholic priests in the Roman
Rite are forbidden to marry because the Bible teaches that the celibate state
is superior to the marital state. But
it’s important to recognize that in the Eastern Rite married men can be
ordained to the priesthood, but once ordained a man can’t be married. So a celibate clergy is a disciplinary law,
but one which is rooted in doctrine and biblical truth. This discipline began to be enforced in the
early Church.
Book, DVD
Dear
Most Holy Family Monastery:
Thank you for the book and resources that you sent me. "The Bible
proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church" is an excellent resource - it
is well-written and easy to understand - exactly what I've come to expect of
MHFM. The DVD is also very good especially "Is the World About to
End" and "The Third Secret of Fatima"…
Thank you for all your hard work.
Sincerely
PC
E-mail
I watched one of your videos. I really hope
it was some sort of joke. If not, you are undoubtedly insane to the point of no
return...
Stepup…
New YouTube Design
MHFM: For those it might interest, we have a new
design for Our You Tube Channel.
Williamson
Brothers:
Greetings. I met Bishop Williamson of the SSPX today at their priory in Armada,
MI. My family and I came to the 7:15 am Mass and to my surprise he was the
celebrant. I didn't think I would get a chance to talk to him, but after Mass
he was calmly strolling the grounds, so I thought I would just go up and
introduce myself, and let God lead from there. We exchanged small talk for a
few minutes, and then I asked him bluntly, "Bishop, do you believe in
salvation by invincible ignorance?" I asked him this question because I
had heard that he "privately" holds the Church's dogma that outside
the Church there is no salvation. His answer was a literal crash course in
heresy, sophistry, and ad hominem attack. First, he clearly and forcefully DOES
NOT hold the Church's dogmatic teaching that only water baptized believing
Catholics can enter heaven. He took no time at all to reply to my question in
the affirmative, and that, to him, the Catholic Church has always taught this
idea. I then asked him to explain to me how invincible ignorance squares with
Pope Eugene IV's dogmatic definition in Cantate Domino concerning Jews, pagans,
heretics, and schismatics departing into everlasting fire unless they first
reconcile with the Catholic Church before death, and that even shedding blood
for the name of Christ cannot save them. His response can be summarized as the
classic "you have to understand dogmas correctly," which, after his
long-winded explanation, contained little if any understanding or correctness.
I politely, with all respect, told him that he was wrong. The Bishop then
became noticeably agitated and told me that "just reading the Dimond
Brothers" does not make me some sort of expert, or some such thing. When I
asked how he knew that I read your material, he said, "Oh, it's quite
obvious!" He went on to condemn you as dangerous and wrong. "But
Bishop" I said, "the Dimond Brothers simply point people back to the
Church's infallible dogmas..." He cut me off, and tried to give some types
of analogous commentary to support his position which made no sense to me.
He also felt the need not only to bash you
for doing what he as a Bishop should have been doing all along, namely,
holding, proclaiming, and defending Catholic dogma, but he went after me (in so
many words) by emphasizing that since he and his priests are so well-trained
and educated, I must be a dummy. (I almost stated that Catholicism is For
Dummies like me, but I refrained for fear that he might think I was endorsing
the heretical Novus Ordo book you recently exposed). He also referred to me as
"my dear boy, as in "My dear boy, you really must be careful to not
tell a Bishop that he is wrong!" Since I'm 52, I took it as a compliment,
thanked him for his time, and left.
Brothers, these men are for real! Do we not have in the SSPX the
"traditional" counterpart to the Vatican II sect? They claim to be
the Catholic Church, just like the Vatican II sect, and even resemble the true
Catholic Church more realistically with the Latin Mass, cassocks, devotions, and
so on, but if they and their supporters die embracing their heresies, what will
it all be worth? Pope Eugene IV specifically included heretics among those who
will be consigned to eternal fire unless they reconcile with the Church. What a
diabolical deception! So many generous people having lots of children so that
they can be placed in the hands of false-traditionalist priests at SSPX schools
and parishes, seminaries and novitiates, just to be raised up in heresy and fit
for hell! This is truly atrocious!
I thank you again for your defense of holy Dogma, and I am honored to be so
"obviously" associated with you.
Joseph Ramirez
MHFM: That’s a very interesting
e-mail and story. Thanks for sending
it. Perhaps the most revealing part of
the exchange is when you made reference to the Bull Cantate Domino. You asked
him how his view could possibly conform to that dogmatic definition. He responded by arguing essentially that one
must “understand” the dogma if one is to conform it to his (heretical)
position. It is classic modernism, and
it’s precisely what Vatican I condemns: departing from the definition once
declared by the Church under the specious name of a “deeper
understanding.” His “understanding,” of
course, clearly contradicts the actual words of the text. All of this serves to expose their heretical
unbelief; it demonstrates, once again, that they reject the dogma as it has
been taught by the Church.
Pope Pius IX, First Vatican Council, Sess.
3, Chap. 2 on Revelation, 1870, ex cathedra: “Hence, also, that understanding
of its sacred dogmas must be perpetually retained, which Holy Mother Church has
once declared; and there must
never be a recession from that meaning under the specious name of a deeper
understanding.”
2 Tim.
3:5
Subject: 2 Tim. 3:5
Dear Brothers:
Might not the scripture to which you
referred, (paraphrasing) "In the last days there will be the
appearance of religion, but the power thereof will be denied," also
indicate the appearance of the Catholic religion via the Novus Ordo, which denies
the true efficacy of the sacraments? For example, to the world, the
Catholic Church still appears to be the Church; the buildings are the same,
there is still a "pope", cardinals, bishops, gregorian chant,
pseudo sacraments, etc., however, all the sacraments, including the Mass,
and even the doctrines have been changed just enough to be merely empty
ceremonies posing as the real ones -- fooling, if possible, even the
"elect?"
God Bless,
Perry
MHFM: We think that it probably has a
number of applications. However, we
definitely think it applies to public figures, celebrities, etc. who say they
are “blessed” or thank God yet live in a manner that’s completely incompatible
with His most basic morality. For
example, they talk about how they are “blessed” yet go to immoral clubs or live
lascivious lifestyles or participate in the production of impurity, etc. They have the appearance of godliness, i.e.,
they mention His name, but deny His power or influence over the actions and
lives of people and how they should conduct themselves.
Bible references
Your teachings, showing with Bible
references, the validity of Mary, Peter, and the Eucharist is beyond price.
Respectfully, Michael Holbrook
Comment
To the Drummer's comment:
Promise given made to St. Benedict regarding the destiny of his enemies:
"3) Everyone who persecutes his
order and does not repent will see his days shortened or
meet with an unfortunate end."
Let's pray that Drummer repent before
it's too late because desiring the death of the Truth (the Catholic Faith)
spread by Most Holy Family Monastery is a very evil thought.
I thought the person Seesyou who called you an "antichrist" was bad
enough but considering this fool's comment, I might reconsider and say that this
might have superceded it. Why? Well because he/she not only hates the
Truth, who is Christ (which in a sense would make him/her an antichrist), but
also desires the death of… sound doctrine (the true Catholic Faith given by
Christ) which is taught and spread by MHFM. Drummer and all those who
hate MHFM's wonderful work are fools and have nor fear nor love for God.
2
Timothy 4:3 "For
there shall be a time, when they will not endure sound
doctrine; but, according to their own desires..."
Proverbs 1:7 "The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom. Fools
despise wisdom and instruction."
Galatians 6:7 "God
is NOT mocked."
Sincerely,
Bernardo
Comment
Dear Brothers Michael and Peter Dimond,
Subject :"you need to die''
...and you will need tomorrow, "Drummer," to eat those words with
regret - is it because you 'march to the beat' of a different drum, than the
rest of us Catholics who belong to the one true Church of Jesus Christ [
Outside of which There is No Salvation] - that you make such a flippant comment
?
...they say 'what goes round, comes round' - so be careful, drummer, your
wish doesn't come true - cf., to those who persecute the Benedictine
Order and do not repent, will see their days shortened or meet with an
unfortunate end! 8 - [
God bless,
David
Die
Subject: you need to die
Seriously…
Drummer…
USA
I see you never considered that USA might
be the beast of hell? That is fine. I listened to most of your speeches, very intelligent
and interesting. I used to be a believer. I think that USA has more points to
win the place of, foretold by Bible, beast of doom. First nuclear attacks were
made by US, the oil spill -USA, North American continent also comes out of the
Sea; even more so than European.
Regards!
Esaul…
MHFM: We believe Europe is the beast out of the sea. That’s because the Apocalypse connects the
beast out of the sea with the fourth beast predicted by Daniel and its ten
horns. We discuss that in the
video. Daniel’s fourth beast was the
Roman Empire. It arose out of the
Mediterranean Sea. The new beast (which
is a new form of the previous beast) is therefore the new Roman Empire (the
European Union). It also arises out of
the Mediterranean Sea. Moreover, as the
video shows, many other things fit with the European Union. You need to become a believer in God’s one
true faith. Salvation is the most
important thing, and unless you embrace the true Catholic faith you can’t be
saved.
B-16
Hello.
I saw this at euronews channel. "Pope" Benedict XVi celebrates a
"mass" for the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary in St Thomas of
Villanova in Italy where he spends his summer. The novus ordo priests that were
handing out "communion" were giving it in the hand of the people. It
didn't show benedict xvi doing this, but he was there too so it means he allows
this. Grotesque show. Here is the link:
http://www.euronews.net/nocomment/2010/08/16/pope-celebrates-assumption-mass/
God bless
I
forgot to mention. Watch also the novus ordo "nun" in the
background. She also receives
""communion" in the hand
Eduard
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. There are numerous pictures of Antipope
Benedict XVI giving “Communion” in the hand as well.
Comment
Dear brothers in Christ,
The image player on the top of your website
is a good idea. It is very useful for reminding the readers of the many
excellent videos you've produced, which uphold and nourish the Catholic Faith.
In response to a reader who wrote about ex-governor "Catholic"
funeral, you wrote:"Could they indicate any more clearly that they hold
the Catholic faith to be completely meaningless and unnecessary?"
To answer your rhetorical question-- I'm 100% sure they can. I have no idea
what will it be, but I'm sure they'll think of something. The V2 sect is an
inexhaustible fountain of wickedness. A believer in God is incapable to imagine
the innumerable ways of mocking God coming from the pit of Hell.
May The Queen of Heaven protect the true Catholics.
Vladimir from Zagreb, Croatia
Share
Hello Brothers Dimond,
Regarding the article: The day Metallica came to "church"
I want to share the following video of a
motorcycle "catholic" mass in Schweinfurt/Germany, which featured even
a metallica song for communion, to show it's not a distinct "feature"
of non-catholic sects.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hWnayzMzSI starting at 5:15 (but the
rest is also pretty abominable)
Greetings from Germany
Stefan
MHFM: That’s incredible.
Thanks for the e-mail.
Ex-Governor, “Mass
Subject:
Ex-Governor dies & receives “Catholic” funeral “Mass”
Dear Brothers,
A few weeks ago there was a televised Novus Ordo (New Order) funeral service
full of ceremony for what looks to be a high ranking Freemason. Ex Nevada
Governor Kenny Guinn was a “Catholic” and served the state of Nevada for many
years. The N.O. church was packed and the “Mass” was presided over by the
effeminate sounding “Bishop” Pepe, who never once said that Guinn went to heaven,
but rather said that Guinn was, “a man who had no denomination per say but like
Abraham was a man of faith and belief.” The service/ceremony was full of
symbolic meaning, including the display of Military with the Honor Guard,
Flags, the 21 Gun Salute and Scottish Bagpipes whenever the body was in
“procession”. All this was a tribute to their man who did his Freemasonic
duty in spite of his “Catholic” façade. He died keeping the secrets of
the “Craft”. His official burial was to take place in California!
Despite being a native Californian he ended up with a lot of fingers in the
pies of Nevadans. He was a past Superintendent of Schools; he was CEO of
the Gas Company, and CEO of a bank among many other things. From the
varied sources, reference was made to the fact there was even still more work
that lay ahead for him even though he was 72 years old!
As press reports of his death came in it was speculated that he was on the roof
of his house (he has two in Nevada) possibly fixing the air conditioning or
brushing leaves off during the record breaking high temperatures in July and
may have suffered a stroke or heart attack while up there and fell off.
What in the world would a wealthy old man be doing fixing his own air
conditioning or sweeping leaves off his sharply angled roof? There wasn't
wind, it was heat and the aerial photos of the house in question clearly showed
a sloping rooftop with no wind or leaves. The official autopsy which
eventually came out stated: “The Clark County Coroner’s Office has released the
autopsy results on former Nevada Governor Guinn. The coroner says Guinn
died from blunt force trauma to the chest and head after he fell from the roof
of his home July 22. The report also says the fall caused his heart to stop,
and he was pronounced dead at University Medical Center at 11:07 am. The
cause of his death was ruled accidental.”
The links from Part I and part II of the disgusting display of a “Mass” along
with the comments by the "Bishop" (and many other press releases) are
here if you are interested in taking a look:
http://www.ktnv.com/Global/searchresults.asp?vendor=ez&qu=guinn
Reference to the bagpipes are here: http://www.mynews3.com/story.php?id=23900
and a brief video reference to them and the gun salute are here:
http://www.8newsnow.com/global/story.asp?s=12876475
By this very public and abominable display it would appear that he was indeed a
Scottish rite 33rd degree Freemason and that his "Catholic" name was
a ruse for the benefit of his wife and family and to keep up pretenses for
covert activities as instructed by his fellow comrades. His associates
tell on themselves by publicly paying their respects and so doing, the “high
ranking dignitaries” ally themselves to him and to Freemasonry. (Will they be
wearing full insignia including their Aprons at the other service in
California?)
These Freemasons and their incessant in our face slight of hand, out and out
lying and fixation on symbols and numerology (note the publication of date and
time of death) make me more furious and sickened by the day. Grown men
keeping secrets and playing with numbers and symbols, how stupid and ignorant
can “smart men” be? If they die in this atrocity they fully deserve what
the Lord Jesus Christ gives them for their betrayal of Him and their true duty
to their families and true countrymen. Poor Novus Ordo family, if they stay
where they're at, they will not fare much better.
Anon.
MHFM: That’s very interesting.
It’s especially interesting that the Novus Ordo “bishop” explicitly
identified him as a man of no
denomination (i.e., he wasn’t Catholic), yet gave him a “Catholic” funeral
anyway. It’s another example of the
almost never-ending stream of apostate actions by the Vatican II sect. What a complete mockery of the faith. Could they indicate any more clearly that they
hold the Catholic faith to be completely meaningless and unnecessary?
Interest
Respected Brothers,
Greetings!
I think some of us are missing important youtube videos. I go to Internet
parlour once a month to download MHFM pages and any new audio files I find. I
tried to install youtube downloader in the parlour computer, didn’t succeed,
maybe because of some restrictions. It would be kind of you to provide also the
audio files for the videos you post. Also, right now I cannot order the books
you sell… but I’ve downloaded the PDF files. I think you’ve provided most of
the chapters of the book “The Truth about What Really Happened to the Catholic
Church after Vatican II” in PDF. I read them, print them and share photocopies
of them with at least one uncle in our village, who is serious about the Faith,
may be more serious than me, I guess. I share what I read with my younger
brother, also with my Godmother, who spontaneously speaks out many of the
things I’ve read and which I’ve not told her before. I guess it is intelligence
face to face with Faith. Example: I was talking about the invalidity of the new
sacrament of ordination, she just said, “that’s why there is no grace in the
sacrament of confession, and people fall again into the same mortal sins which
they confess.” Also what Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre said about the salvation of
pagans, she said something like, “when Catholics will have such difficulties in
saving their souls, how much more difficult it will be for pagans… it was just
wrong for him to say that.”
Brothers, we pray for you. May many souls be saved through you and
through everyone who is with you in the Apostolate.
With kind regards,
Sanjay.
From Orissa, India.
Interview
Subject:
“Fr.” Breen interview – you tube [regarding item in News & Commentary]
NOXIOUX
VILE TOXIC HERETIC for explaining to "all of us where we can
go"..........well, it is straight to hell, according to these people,
with their un-Godly beliefs they are spouting! How sad that so late in
the day of human history they are still so seemingly HOPELESSLY
LOST!!! It's obvious they could not care ONE FIG about souls,
the Truth, The Catholic Faith: this "Breen" is an
ABSOLUTE POSTER CHILD for someone who has so thoroughly intoxicated himself on
the wine of the fornication of the "new [counter] mass" of Vatican 2
and all its evil heresies......well, there really is NO EXCUSE AT ALL for
people like this: talk about wolves in sheep's clothing! MHFM
has made the truth abundantly available… and yet these blind guides still lead
their hapless "flocks" STRAIGHT into the pits of hell, with
NO MERCY AT ALL! I guess severe, profound spiritual blindness and
deception has punishments all its own: like a further increase in that
blindness... Saint Jude pray for us
MHFM: Since his story got a lot of
attention, he will probably receive some very mild and insignificant discipline
only as part of a public relations ploy to appease people who are upset by what
he said. However, he won’t be
excommunicated, even though he supports contraception and all the rest. Thus, it’s another example of how the Vatican
II sect is not Catholic.
Note
MHFM: Readers of our website probably
noticed the new image screen/player near the top of our website. We will begin to update it with new content
hopefully toward the middle or end of next week. The News & Commentary and E-Exchanges
will continue to be updated as usual.
Troubled
Dear Brothers:
I am very troubled by the fact that my
local grocery store sells immoral products such as contraceptives and very
perverse novels. It’s troubling too because I am a cashier at this store. As a
Catholic I feel morally obligated to find another job rather than continue
selling these things. Please advise me on this matter.
Sincerely,
Anonymous
MHFM: A Catholic must not sell those things.
Comment
Hi Brothers,
I just received your book “The Bible Proves
the Teachings of the Catholic Church.”
This is the best thing I’ve ever seen!
I’ve seen other books like it, but nothing this complete and convincing
and backed up with facts. All your stuff
is good, but you really take the cake with this book. This ought to show all the Protestants and
other religions that they’re in the wrong boat.
I’m going to need to order a few hundred because we want to start
handing these out to people. I still
like the Padre Pio book, but this is the best thing even for fallen away
Catholics. Thank you Brothers and
MHFM. God bless you!
Don Primi
Austrians
Subject: 100,000 Austrians
The news article you published about
100,000 Austrians leaving the V-2 church is very revealing. Even though most of
these people probably cannot identify all of the multiple issues about which
the conciliar church has entered into heresy and apostasy, they know something
is wrong. Besides, the conciliar church teaches that one may obtain salvation
even if one is not a member of the Catholic Church. The same thing is happening
in Latin America and in the United States and Canada where millions are leaving
the conciliar church only to end up in false evangelical, pentecostal or other
protestant sects or cults.
The V-2 church and its leaders, especially Roncalli, Montini, Wojtyla and
Ratzinger have proven to be a disaster for the world.
EJP, M.D., D.D.
New Video
and Article
MHFM: Bro. Michael Dimond checks in with a new
video and article on the best-selling book, Catholicism
for Dummies. This video and article
expose the heresies in Catholicism for Dummies. Catholicism
for Dummies was authored by “Fr.” John Trigilio, a featured speaker on
EWTN. It has also been promoted by Novus
Ordo “apologist” Jimmy Akin and “Catholic Answers.” For those reasons, the outrageous heresies in
the book are all the more revealing about the apostate Vatican II sect.
Catholicism for Dummies Exposed [video]
Catholicism
for Dummies Exposed [article]
SSPV
I was listening to Father Jenkins of the
St. Pius V Society… [someone] asked him… whether or not it was correct to say that
no one could be either in heaven or purgatory without sanctifying grace.
Father Jenkins responded that that was correct, that no one could be saved and
be in either purgatory or heaven without having been in the state of
sanctifying grace. Then the [person] asked if the means of obtaining
sanctifying grace was through the sacraments only. Father Jenkins first
said yes, then hesitated and changed his mind and said, "That would be
denying the baptism of the blood and of desire, though. God can save a
person through any means." I got so disgusted that I… did not listen
further. It is so upsetting because Father Jenkins, in most all other
instances appears to be so orthodox in his beliefs. He speaks of modesty,
family, against indifferentism and the new ecumenism, having a prayer
life, the sacraments, sanctity, etc... It occurred to me that it could be
that this caller was merely trying to get Father Jenkins to see the incongruity
of his beliefs. They are vehemently against what they call the
heresy of "feeneyism."
I, too, used to be an attendee of their
masses until I read their publication and saw their endorsement of the heresy
of BOD. Also, I was shocked to discover they did not even object to
sending Catholics to public school. When I confronted them about the two
of you, [a supporter of theirs] Wes Steele warned me off of you, saying your
monastery was illegitimate and that the two of you "appeared" out of
nowhere and had gotten your degrees from secular universities in California.
I mention all this because this society
rejects John Paul II and Benedict XVI, and all the other antipopes; and rightly
calls the Novus Ordo a sect, not the Catholic Church. Their followers
really believe they have found a safe-haven, and feel secure and happy because
they receive the sacraments regularly. It is just like a family.
They have a bishop, priests, monastery, schools, nuns, picnics, pancake
breakfasts, prayer support -- all the things the Church used to provide for
everyone…. In a sacrament-starved environment, it appears as an oasis in the
desert…. And yet, the poison of this BOD and BOB heresy undermines the entire
faith and they are all oblivious to the fact that this heresy, particularly
BOD, is the foundation for Vatican II and the basis for the very ecumenism they
say they reject. It is like sitting in someone's parlor and having tea
and cakes with a huge, wild, "white elephant" standing next
to the white wall.
Perry
MHFM: Misinformation and lies are
standard when such heretics mention us.
With regard to the question he answered, that’s mild compared to what
they really believe. If the questions
got into specific religions and members of those religions, the wholesale
apostasy would become apparent. They
believe that souls can be saved in any religion. They also accept NFP. It’s true to say that they essentially
believe in universal salvation. They
couldn’t say that any person, or any number of people in any spiritual
situation, is definitively in the state of damnation or lost. Except for the Latin Mass, they are almost
the same as the Novus Ordo. It’s a
massive façade, like Protestant false Christianity, with the darkness lurking
within their false salvation message. It
springs up to rip apart true faith in Christ and His dogmas, rendering the
entire Gospel and faith meaningless and empty.
Follow-up
Subject: Shark follow-up
Your points on the situation regarding the
Baptism on the Beach story are valid. However I think that prima fascia, the
story is so extraordinary, that the boy was probably saved. Having
reached 18 years of age in 1959, in the US, it is almost certain that the boy
was aware of the Incarnation and the Trinity. In fact the Trinity is
implicit in the form of Baptism. So his consent to Baptism and his Act of
Contrition seem evidence of cooperation and acceptance.
There are other facts of the case to which
the story as printed in TIME don’t really do justice. O’Neill’s courage
(the girl rescuer) was almost supernatural. The Shark, estimated from the
bite radius was a great white some 18 feet long. It was literally
chomping him when she approached. If you have ever seen video footage of
these sharks attacking a seal or feeding on a dead whale, you’ll have some idea
of what she confronted. She pulled him away as the shark was
repositioning for a better grip. And then the shark, which never showed
any interest in her, left.
It took her several minutes to drag him to
shore through two foot swells. Though there were other people, presumably
men, on the beach, no one entered the water to help her.
The other fact is that his wounds were
massive and gruesome. One leg was completely gone, one in shreds,
and half his torso bitten through, shoulder to hip. O’Neill’s courage and
fortitude aside, it seems miraculous that he was alive long enough, and
conscious, to consent to the baptism. I think it speaks to
election. “I know mine and mine know me”. Some souls, through the
mystery of Grace, God just loves. Perhaps it was some aspect of Kogler’s
(the victim) interior disposition? Anyway, I think it is OK to win one
once in a while. Maybe this was a win for God. I know we can’t know
anything with certitude about a particular soul (unless the real Church speaks
through canonization), but I also think that some cases lead to probably
conclusions. Hard to imagine this happening today, 50 years and 45 years
into Vatican II.
Bill Mulligan
MHFM: Yes, it makes sense that the article wouldn’t give all the
details. It also makes sense that, at
that time, he was aware of the core truths of the Trinity and the
Incarnation. In the lives of the
missionaries, there are many refreshing and amazing examples of how people were
preserved just long enough to receive water baptism. They serve to further contradict the lie of
salvation without actual incorporation into the Church through baptism. This shark story might very well have been
another example.
Abomination
Subject: “Catholicism for Dummies” –
abomination!
Dear Brothers,
That's a great video and article on the
diabolical and outrageous book, “Catholicism for Dummies.” Thank you. It's one
of the biggest selling books on the subject of “Catholicism,” and combined with
the brand name, “...for Dummies,” its circulation is massive… Even a simple
glance at the cover picture speaks volumes: 1. An old lady's hands – with
arthritic joints, and 2. Holding Rosary beads – the hidden message is that
Catholicism is a dying tradition, and that the Rosary is only for old women!
It's like a catechism of Vatican II apostasy. Page 100 gets in the heresies of
invincible ignorance (i.e. ”anonymous christians”) and baptism of desire in one
hit, while page 94 says that all baptized, even heretics, are in the Catholic
Church - heresy and schism! Page 9 opens a heretical can of ambiguous worms by
stating that “all people are basically good.” Even though we are made in God's
image, and man's fallen nature is not fundamentally or irredeemably evil (as
Protestants believe), i.e. we still have free will, original sin has weakened
our nature and will so that we are constantly inclined toward evil, and so most
people will be lost to hell. Jesus said only “One is good, God.” (Matt. 19:17)
It's the V-2 heresy of, “all 'good' people go to heaven” - it's universal
salvation, religious indifferentism, apostasy! The book says “it's nice” to go
to the gates of hell, i.e. Protestant services. That Judaism and Islam are
“great religions,” when they are more guilty for spilling Catholic blood than
any other religions. That NFP is sophisticated, when it's actually another New
World Order population reduction tactic (viz. genocide). And that homosexuals
are treated equally to heterosexuals by the Church, when God ionized Sodom and
Gomorrah for their [homosexual] sins… 1+1=2, ask any 1st grader. If people
can't see that the teachings in such trash as the book, “Catholicism for
Dummies” are the same teachings that have produced unprecedented numbers of
child molesting pedophile “priests,” then they'll enjoy being called dummies
too! The End of the World has arrived – hold on to the true Catholic faith
above everything else! Outside the true Catholic Church there is absolutely no
salvation!!!
God Bless,
Chris White
NOPOPE
Brothers, I was watching a documentary on the Titanic called "Titanic: Secrets Revealed." There is talk of all the omens associated with the ship, with the biggest omen mocking God by saying the ship was unsinkable. At the 12:30 minute point in the film it talks about how in the Irish shipyard during construction, the Catholic workers saw in dismay the identity number (406063) on the massive ship hull reflecting in the water. The upside down reflection in the water looked like the word "NOPOPE". The workers wondered if the ship was unholy as well.
I find this an amazing coincidence that after 75 years the Titanic was
discovered and photographed in 1985. That this photo and message of
"NOPOPE" would be discovered during the reign of the Anti-Christ
Anti-Pope John Paul II.
God Bless,
Tom Miles
Athanasius
MHFM: We thought this was a somewhat
interesting quote.
“Besides, he [St. Athanasius] did not study what in
itself constitutes the divine Persons, nor how they are distinct and how
differentiated, one from another, nor how we can, by means of remote analogies,
represent to ourselves the mysterious operations which give them their
being. A polemicist always in the heat of battle, Athanasius had neither the
leisure nor, probably, the taste to treat these questions of profound religious
philosophy.” (Tixeront, History of
Dogmas, Vol. 2, p. 75.)
The point is that, in the opinion of this author,
Athanasius didn’t necessarily get bogged down by deeper philosophical
considerations or reasoning about secondary issues. He focused on the core truths and the
primary arguments to refute the heretics.
The wisdom in such an approach is that the best arguments are always, in
the end, simple. It’s certainly true
that, in refuting the multi-faceted objections and distortions of heretics,
deeper understanding and deeper analysis are often required and extremely
effective. In the end, however, the
refutation returns to the simple point and the core divine truth. Countless heretics deceive themselves by a
vain dedication to their own thoughts and analysis – not in order to further
expound the simple divine truths – but instead to consume their focus and move
them away from the simple facts. In this
way, countless people are deceived. The
quote is not meant to suggest that Athanasius didn’t believe in or understand
the distinction between the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost, which of course
he did; nor, of course, is it in any way to suggest that deeper study and
analysis are incompatible with true wisdom – not at all. Rather, it is to comment on a mindset that
must prevail in a defender of truth, even when he acquires a deeper
understanding of a topic or deals with issues which some deem to be more
involved.
Flooded
Subject:
Brenda’s comment
THIS IS WHY IN
1966 PAUL VI ABOLISHED THE INDEX OF FORBIDDEN BOOKS, SO THE WORLD COULD BE
FLOODED WITH THESE HERETICAL PUTRID BOOKS LIKE CATHOLICISM FOR DUMMIES.
IT ANGERS ME SO MUCH THAT PEOPLE JUST THROW AWAY THEIR GOD GIVEN COMMON
SENSE TO BECOME PARROTS FOR THESE EVIL SNAKES!
TODD
Salvation issue
Dear Brother Dimond,
I have visited your web page because my
friend, Juan… showed me the text you kindly sent him related to the salvation
dogma. I recognize to have fallen into this error - thinking that some
"special cases" of "which baptism "might occur - because of
being ignorant myself. Thanks to Our Lady now I have learned the truth, always
taught by the Holy Church and now shown in your web page. Thanks God.
Please subscribe me to your newsletter…
In Jesu et Mariae
Jorge Zamora
Tea
Subject: Tea
Dear Brother Dimond,
About two years ago I visited the home of an elderly couple with
my mother and my sister. The husband was the son of someone who was a friend to
my mother's relatives.
Somehow, while I was speaking with the wife, she happened to
mention that she had attended some sort of "Christian" school as a
youth. I asked her if she had ever learned the Hail Mary prayer. She revealed
to me that she had attended a protestant school but had still learned to say
the Hail Mary. I asked her if she used to recite it often. She said that her
teacher taught it to her class, and she would say it along with the class; but
this was the only time she said it. She indicated that after a certain grade
she stopped saying it, and she stopped saying it because her later teachers
would no longer have the class recite this prayer.
About a year later I again visited this same couple at their home.
This time I asked the wife if she would like to receive some literature about
the Bible and the Catholic Church in the mail. She said yes to that, gave me
her address, and indicated that she would take a look at the material. I mailed
her The Bible Proves the Teachings of the Catholic Church along with my own
note informing her that this book proves its main thesis in many areas using
the King James Version of the Bible, a Protestant translation.
Just last month I learned that she had passed away due to an
illness. I had not heard from her since I mailed the book to her. I never got
the chance to ask whether she had read the book or what she thought of it. I do
not know if this book caused her to convert to the traditional Catholic faith.
The husband has invited my mother and myself to a tea in his wife's
honor. As far as I am aware the husband is not a Catholic. Considering the fact
that I do not know if this lady died as a Catholic, I believe I should not go.
I believe this tea (reception), even though not immediately following a non
Catholic funeral, is something that a Catholic should not attend. Brother Dimond, any comments you might have
on this matter would be appreciated.
Sincerely,
TD
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. No, you should not attend. Since there is no evidence that she embraced
the Catholic faith, one cannot consider her to have died as a Catholic. In responding to the invitation, we would
recommend telling the husband exactly what your thoughts are in a charitable
way. In other words, as a Catholic, you
cannot have tea in honor of someone who did not die in the true faith; and you
invite him to embrace the true faith to obtain his own salvation.
BOD
Subject: Shark
Story
With it being “Shark Week” on DSC Channel,
I remembered as a kid reading about the fatal attack of a great white in San
Francisco Bay in the 1950s. I remember the victim was a guy named Kogler,
and his girlfriend, named Shirley O’Neill had pulled him away from the shark
and onto the beach. Because it was witnessed by a soldier, the girl was
given a medal by President Kennedy. So these general details
I remembered, so I thought I’d google the name Kogler to refresh my childhood
memory of reading this story. However this part of the story I did not
read in the Time Life book article. However this story appeared in
TIME, the Magazine in 1959.
Miss O’Neill, in addition to possessing
tremendous physical courage, apparently did not suffer from Baptism of Desire,
or the “Soul of the Church” heresies:
Baptism on the Beach
Monday, May. 18, 1959
It was a sunny afternoon in San Francisco. Shirley O'Neill and Albert Kogler,
18-year-old freshmen at San Francisco State College, went for a swim off
Baker's Beach, near the Golden Gate Bridge.
They were treading water about 50 yds. offshore when Al Kogler cried out.
"I turned around," Shirley said later, "and saw this big grey
thing flap up into the air. I don't know if it was a fin or a tail. I knew it
was some kind of fish. There was thrashing in the water. He screamed again. He
said, 'It's a shark! Get out of here!'"
Looking down on the ocean from the Presidio, San Francisco's history-encrusted
Army post, Master Sergeant Leo P. Day saw what happened next. "I could see
the boy in the foaming red water, shouting and signaling someone to 'go back,
go back.' Then I saw the girl, swimming toward him, completely ignoring his
warning. It was the greatest exhibition of courage I have ever seen."
Shirley reached Albert and seized his hand, "but when I pulled, I could
see that his arm was just hanging by a thread." She slipped her arm around
him and began to swim for the beach. When she was near enough, a fisherman
threw her a line. After they were on the sand, Shirley, a Roman Catholic,
scooped up some sea water and let it run over the head of her friend (who had
never been baptized and belonged to no specific faith). "I baptize thee in
the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost,"* said Shirley, making
the sign of the Cross, and whispered to Albert, "Is that all right?"
"O.K.," he gasped.
She told him to repeat after her the act of contrition: "0 my God, I am
heartily sorry for having offended thee. I detest all my sins because I dread
the loss of Heaven and the pains of Hell, but most of all because they offend
thee, my God, who art all good and deserving of all my love."
Just before Albert Kogler lapsed into unconsciousness, he whispered: "I
love God, and I love my mother and I love my father. Oh God, help me." Two
hours later, in the Presidio's Letterman General Hospital, he died.
Bill Mulligan
MHFM: That’s a very interesting
story. There are only two comments we
would make. First, public swimming
(almost certainly in immodest attire) in front of others is not an appropriate
activity for people. Second, in addition
to having willingly received baptism, it would have been necessary for him to
have accepted belief in the core mysteries of the Catholic faith (e.g., the
Trinity and the Incarnation). Since the
young man seemed to have willingly and enthusiastically embraced baptism, as
well as the act of contrition, it’s likely that he accepted core belief in the
essential Catholic mysteries. Therefore,
he could have been saved by dying after baptism.
Comment
Subject:
Brother Michael Dimond’s review/expose of the stupid book “Catholicism for
Dummies”
It
seems that this book is indeed aptly named: for anyone would have to be a
REAL DUMB-DUMB to actually fall for the stupid heresies in this book, and
even BEGIN think they are Catholic! My goodness! It's as if the
authors/publishers/promoters of this book are, by this horrendous outrage
against THE FAITH, are literally BEGGING God Almighty to strike and decimate
theml Wow! Truly satan is bold as he stalks the earth looking
for his ill-fated prey, today, most of whom just tumble so easily into his
grasp......
I've
heard of "Father Trigilio"--(gag)---of EWTN "fame"---or
infamy---did you realize he has notoriously supported one of the very many FAKE
V2 'Fatima' organizations, "Tradition, Family, Property"
… Thankfully, I have never even heard of the other "priest"
involved in authoring this "book" and I thank God too I have
never-ever even heard of this "Chris Brown" creep ---- must
be some hideous vile "pop-culture" freak-- However I am praying
for that poor girl who emailed MHFM about her pathetic addiction to him
(whoever he is)---it is truly awful to witness the extremely dark evil the
"youth culture" of today involves itself in!! It makes you
think that satan sure has it easy--------for now.
A.
Papal Infallibility
Subject: Papal Infallibility
Dear Brothers:
If the modernist heretics only accept dogmas defined the Vatican Council in
1870, they would be denying the dogma of the Immaculate Conception that was
defined in 1854 by Pope Pius IX, well before the Vatican Council.
EJP, M.D., D.D.
MHFM: Yes, their position doesn’t make any sense.
To do?
… I am not even Catholic. I am a seeker
from Sweden, raised much like you in a "non-religious family" as you
defined it some video I watched "the belief that God *probably* exists (and
usually some holistic version) but no one cares and what matters is living a
good life and only that." I am sure you can imagine and perhaps identify
with the confusion of first realizing the truth of a higher being and beginning
the search for truth, going through buddhism, sufism, Islam, Christianity,
eastern Orthodoxy (which I halted for a good while) and then finally understand
that the Catholic Church is the one true Church - and when delving deeper into
that I find the Second Vatican Council, the catastrophic state of the Church
and mass, the Tradionalists, which I immediately identified with, and then
later the sedevacantists... Sigh, well, it's most confusing. I feel as if I am
walking on a web of small lines hanging over the Abyss - blindfolded. And
there's practically no Catholic (or Second Vatican Council sect if you wish)
presence except for some Polish immigrants, and that's all lukewarm such and
there's not a hint of traditionalism...
I don't really know why I am writing this... I just, what should I do?
MHFM: You should obtain a rosary and start to pray it. The file on how to pray it is on our
website. We would also recommend reading
some lives of the saints, to see the miraculous power of the one true faith
(the Catholic faith). We offer some of
those books. Jesus Christ was true God
and true man. That’s indisputable. He founded one true Church; that’s
indisputable. There’s nothing more to
think about. You need to become
Catholic. Start to pray and familiarize
yourself with the basic Catechism. When
convinced, take the steps to convert that are on our website. But if you don’t start praying the Rosary
each day and doing spiritual reading, you won’t have the grace to follow
through with your conversion or be convinced of the faith. We hope you take the steps. Today is the day to act.
Anti-Catholic
Greetings!
Your expose on "Catholicism For
Dummies" was right on the mark. We had bought and briefly looked at
an abridged copy; and promptly threw it away. We might as well have been
looking at an antiCatholic tract. Another set of books you may want to
warn people about is "Radio Replies"; it is a written account of a
radio program run by three priests back before Vatican II. They are set
up in a question and answer mode; and yes, they do promote baptism of desire
and universal salvation, even way back then. They also mentioned that
Noah's flood was a locallized event !!! These books are very old, and
they do have some valuable insights in them, but I cannot recommend that anyone
buy them because they are heretical.
Brenda Roy
Read
Subject: Catholicism for Dummies
mhfm,
I read your article exposing the Catholicism for Dummies fraud and you
did a very good job. When you mentioned the fact that they taught there are
only two ex cathedra pronouncements it shows how misinformed they are.
The idea that there are only two ex cathedra's is actually very common (at
least in the state of Illinois). That was taught in my RCIA back about
two years ago, I was taught that at another parish and out of a book called The
Complete Idiot's Guide to Catholicism when I was still Lutheran at the
age of 14. From what it seems the (flawed) rationale for this
teaching is that ex cathedra was formally defined in 1870. There were
only two ex cathedra pronouncements after this date so those two are the only
ones that count (so they say). Every V-2 person I talk to doesn't see the
illogic of having two infallible definitions on the Blessed Virgin but having
no infallible definitions on such things as the Trinity, the incarnation,
etc. (The two infallible Novus Ordo definitions are Immaculate Conception
and the Assumption, they are extremely important of course since they belong to
the Deposit of Faith, however it would be strange if there were no other
dogmatic definitions, especially on such things as the nature of God
himself.)
Kenneth Connelly
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.
In our experience with people in the Novus Ordo, we’ve also noticed that
this is a common misconception. However,
we thought it was remarkable that the egregious error was promoted by one of
EWTN’s “most respected” theological teachers.
The misconception betrays a completely modernist view of divine
revelation. Since they only believe that
dogmas become true after they are
proclaimed – for example, according to them, the definition on ex cathedra
pronouncements only became true after it was proclaimed in 1870 – they only
apply them to times after the definition in 1870. A Catholic, however, understands that a dogmatic
definition sets forth a truth of revelation that was given to the Church by
Jesus Christ. Thus, when a pope
proclaims a dogma in 1870, or in 1441 (e.g., Outside the Church There is No
Salvation), he is declaring that it was true without exception since the
promulgation of the Gospel and the founding of the Church. In other words, it was true throughout all of
Church history.
That means that every time in Church history before 1870, when
the criteria for an ex cathedra pronouncement were met, the pope spoke
infallibly from the Chair of Peter. The
divine protection did not come into existence in or after 1870. In the same way, these modernists don’t believe the dogma Outside the
Church There is No Salvation was true before its definition. They actually don’t believe in it at all, but
they will say things like: that statement at the Council of Florence was before they discovered this country,
etc. By such arguments they reveal their
completely modernist understanding of dogma.
The dogma is a truth of revelation.
It was true before the first definition; the definition simply told us
in a clear and authoritative fashion what
Christ had already revealed about reality.
We also recognize that some of the modernists conclude that there have
only been two ex cathedra pronouncements based on an arbitrary view of what
words must be said for something to be infallible. They believe that since the wording of the
definitions of the Immaculate Conception and the Assumption were very similar
and, in their view, more formal, only they fulfill the requirements. This view is held by some in the
traditionalist movement, including SSPX supporters, and it is not supported by
the teaching of Vatican I.
Finally, we will point out that the modernist position on this
issue entails a further inconsistency.
If there were only two ex cathedra pronouncements in Church history (the
Immaculate Conception and the Assumption) – and they are basing that on the
language set forth at Vatican I in 1870 – they must exclude the very definition
of Vatican I from what constitutes an ex cathedra pronouncement! Otherwise, they would have three: 1) The
Immaculate Conception, 2) Vatican I on papal infallibility and ex cathedra
pronouncements, and 3) the Assumption.
Since they exclude the text in Vatican I, on what basis do they declare
that the other two are indeed ex cathedra pronouncements, since Vatican I was
the place where the criteria for what is ex cathedra were set forth? It’s a mass of contradictions and illogical
nonsense.
Outrageous
Subject: Outrageous
Dear Bros. Michael and Peter Dimond,
To say that both John Paul II and Benedict XVI, are, and have been, ' very holy
men' and 'staunch defenders of the teachings of the Catholic faith' is simply
ridiculous and outrageous!
Has Christine never read the… Heresies of both John Paul II and Benedict
XVI?... - She needs to, before she starts hopping onto her novus ordo
'high horse'- and attempting to preach to and correct the converted, the
few true Catholics who remain in the world today, who remain faithful to Christ
and His Church, and are more than capable of rebuffing mindless,
unsubstantiated accusations of "blasphemy"...
And, once having acquainted herself with the numerous heresies of her
"popes", AND she refuses to budge - she becomes the blasphemer!
...having just put her foot in her mouth - the boot now appears to be on
the other foot!
A 'sister in Christ' to me, she most definitely is not - as long as she remains
stubbornly with the church of the Apostasy, and its Antipopes, which lacks ALL
four marks of the Catholic Church, outside of which there is no salvation, and
whose prayers God does not heed!
God bless,
David
Latest
Subject: Latest review of Catholicism for
Dummies
Dear Brothers,
Good job on exposing a largely distributed book that is probably hurting
already countless souls. They don't even care! I think they just
want to sell books. All of the heresies were terrible! But, the one that
got me the most was the one on Hell and purgatory, not being real places!
How could they in right conscience put out such obvious lies. The Dogma
of hell is what saves so many sinners right at the beginning of their
conversion. Because they're not pure enough yet to avoid sin simply for
the love of God but the fear of Hell keeps most of them from committing
sins. Now, take away the reality of hell and what do they have to
fear? This book is so dangerous it's ridiculous. It’s simply a
religion of the world it’s spelling out, where everyone is of God no matter
what they do and whatever you do, don't offend anyone.
Nathan
How can?
Subject:
Catholicism for dummies
Excellent
video!
Their book should be called PROTESTANT Catholicism for dummies!! How can they get away with such
heresy!! Saying jews and muslims are the same etc!!
And the GAYS!!! and now it is legal practically everywhere! What happened
to Sodom and Gomorrah??...
Hum….
Abominable
Subject: B-16 and Anti-Semitism
My compliments to Brother Michael Dimond
for his recent article/audio. The "apologists" from Catholic Answers
are simply clowns able to digest the most abominable heresies.
The V-2 sect´s respect for the false
and apostate Jewish religion is really sickening. I don´t know if you are aware
of Father Dehon´s case. Simply put, Ratzinger put his canonization process on
hold (not that the rat had any power to canonize him anyway) because some of
his writings were discovered, in which he demonstrated "anti-semitic"
ideas.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/15/AR2005061502305.html
CK
Comment
Subject: Christine
I think your answer to the shocked
Christine was a slam-dunk. However as she claimed that she could “go on
and on for a very longtime”, I would like to invite her to do so.
People such as she seem to prefer unity, or
consensus, or harmony, no matter how contrived or artificial to either truth or
justice. They are often quite disturbed by conflict, but they can
rarely (never) cite a single fact (article of truth) or even a coherent idea in
support of their position. So Dear Christine do tell us something,
and it doesn’t even have to be a very longtime, of why say John Paul II is good
and holy.
In addition to His prayer for unity, Jesus
also warned, “think ye not that I came to bring Peace on Earth, but rather the
sword, to divide father against son etc…” In isolation this verse, and
Christine’s favorite verse seem contradictions. In context they are
perfectly harmonious.
Bill Mulligan
John 17
Response
to Christine Pineault
Christine you stated that Jesus said "That we may all be one." This
is a misrepresentation of Jesus' words. Even John Paul II and Benedict
XVI misuse these words of Jesus.
Let's take a look at what is going on in Chapter 17 of St John's Gospel.
First off this is about Jesus' prayer to His Father in Heaven. He was
praying for for His Apostles as stated in John 17:6-11:
(6)"I have manifested thy name to the men whom thou hast given me out of
the world. Thine they were, and to me thou gavest them; and they have
kept thy word. (7) Now they have known , that all things which thou hast
given me, are from thee: (8) Because the words which thou gavest me, I
have given them,; and they have received them, and have known in very deed that
I came out from thee, and they have believed that thou didst send me. (9)
I pray for them: I pray not for the world, but for them whom thou
hast given me: because they are thine: (10) And all my thifs are
thine, and thine are mine; and I am glorified in them. (11) And now I am
not in the world, and these are in the world , and I come to thee, Holy Father,
keep them in thy name whom thou hast given me; that they may be one as we
also are one".
As you can see Jesus was not praying that His Apostles and the world were to be
one but that the apostles were to be one. You can even see that Jesus is
speaking strictly about those who believe.
The prayer of Jesus in the 17th Chapter of St John is nothing like the prayer
of JPII and Benedict XVI, who are praying a diabolical and twisted version of
Jesus' prayer.
So you see the, "they" in Jesus' prayer is for His Apostles, NOT
for unity for His Church and the world.
Paul Smith
Comment
Subject: pride, predestination, free will
Dear Brothers,
I was thinking that one of the main sources
of pride today is an unfounded confidence in one's own salvation. For example,
the Novus Ordites are taught that there is no hell, that those outside the
Catholic Church can be saved, that all men are saved, etc. and so they have no
fear of God punishing them for their sins. Radical schismatics seem to believe
that, since the number of the elect is few, and there are only a few radical
schismatics, then they must be of the elect, which makes them believe like many
of the heretical sects, that all Catholics are of the elect. As a result they
have no fear of God since they imagne they know for sure who is saved. The
Church simply tells us how to judge things by the external forum, which helps
to determine who definitely cannot be saved, such as Non-Catholics, but it
cannot tell who is saved for sure, except for the saints. If anyone knew they
were saved with 100% surety, unless by a special revelation from God, then they
would lose all fear of God, be overcome by pride, and end up in hell! Since we
all have free will which can resist grace or concupiscence at any time, and
which can go from bad will to good will or vice versa whenever the person wants
it to, then it's hard to tell who will be lost or saved amongst Catholics,
unless they have some outstanding qualities, whether they be good or bad, but
even then it may not be possible to judge whether such a one is saved or lost
(I think this is how the Church views predestination, etc.).
Council of Trent, On Justification, CANON
IV.-If any one saith, that man's free will moved and excited by God, by
assenting to God exciting and calling, nowise co-operates towards disposing and
preparing itself for obtaining the grace of Justification; that it cannot
refuse its consent, if it would, but that, as something inanimate, it does
nothing whatever and is merely passive; let him be anathema.
Council of Trent, On Justification, CANON
XV.-If any one saith, that a man, who is born again and justified, is bound of
faith to believe that he is assuredly in the number of the predestinate; let
him be anathema.
Council of Trent, On Justification, CANON
XVI.-If any one saith, that he will for certain, of an absolute and infallible
certainty, have that great gift of perseverance unto the end,-unless he have
learned this by special revelation; let him be anathema.
God Bless,
Chris White
Two new videos
MHFM: The first is a video response to
a person who e-mailed us and argued that it’s ridiculous to claim that John
Paul II taught that man is God. The
second is a related new video.
John Paul II
did preach that man is God [video]
John Paul II's Anti-Catholic Mission [video]
Punishment?
Dear Brothers,
Over three months ago I sent you an e-mail
on the subject of my mom attending my nephew's "First Communion" in
the NO. Around the same time my brother, whose son is the one receiving
"First Communion" was seeing a doctor about some discomfort in his
stomach. It was finally determined that he has stomach cancer. He
has since had a gastrectomy. He has been depressed for a long time and I
had gone to visit him for a week. During my stay he and I had a short
conversation which he initiated about why this had to happen to him since it is
rare for someone his age to have stomach cancer. I will not state his age
here but he is rather young. He asked me if I think God is punishing
him. I was not sure how to answer his question. I told him that it
is possible. I've tried in vain in the past to get him to be a
traditional Catholic and to renounce worldly things. Also this event in
his life coincides with his son's "First Communion". That
leaves me to wonder whether God may in fact be punishing him for being
bad-willed. Additionally, the doctors say his prognosis is good if he
takes care of himself. So I wonder if God is allowing a good
prognosis so he lives long enough to have plenty of time to ponder
about his state in life.
I'd appreciate your take on the matter.
Sylvestre
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail. As you indicate, your brother has rejected
the truth for some time. He also lives
in a fashion that’s incompatible with the state of grace. It’s certain that God is displeased with
him. It’s probable that it’s a
punishment. At the same time, however,
it’s a special blessing. For we can see
that the cancer is causing him to re-assess his spiritual situation. When people are struck with calamities, it’s
not uncommon that they are humbled and forced to evaluate themselves. That’s when we hear that most people turn to
God. More often than not, however, they
don’t fulfill what God wants.
If your brother had not been struck
with this cancer, it seems that he would have continued merrily on his heretical
path and ended up in Hell. But now he’s
getting a serious warning, and at the same time a chance to convert. So, what would be the answer to give him if
he poses that question again? We would
recommend saying: Yes, it’s probable that you are being specifically punished
by God, and it’s certain that He is displeased with you. At the same time, He’s giving you a special
chance to wake up, to start being honest, and to convert. It should be emphasized that it’s an outrage
not only to reject the true faith, as he currently does, but to arrange for his
child to receive the invalid host at the abominable New Mass.
Civil War
Subject:
Civil War?
Hello,
I don't know if I missed it, but I didn't see this article on your news page
and I thought that it might interest you.
http://beforeitsnews.com/story/120/796/First_Signs_of_Civil_War_begin_in_the_US:_Sheriff_Tony_DeMeo_Threatens_Force_Against_Federal_Agents.html
- DC
MHFM: Yes, it’s an interesting
video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yoYtnoFn09Y&feature=player_embedded
Shocked
Peace be with you,
I just took a look at your website, and am very saddened and shocked by your
teachings. The prayer of Jesus before He died was "That we may all
be one." Everything your organization says and does is divisive,
contrary to the prayer of Jesus. Pope John-Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI
were and are very holy men, staunch defenders of the teachings of the Catholic
faith. For you to call them anti-popes is blasphemous. I could go
on for a very long time, but I will simply say: I will be praying for
you. God bless you.
Your sister in Christ,
Christine Pineault
MHFM: We can’t say that we are
shocked or saddened by your bad will. Of
course we wish you were not as you are, and that you cared about truth. However, when confronted by someone like you
who displays no concern whatsoever for the facts and information presented, it
stirs a Catholic more to righteous indignation than sympathetic pity. The blasphemous thing is not a Catholic’s
rejection of Antipopes John Paul II and Benedict XVI. No, what is blasphemous is their endorsement
of false religions that reject Jesus Christ.
Your blind acceptance of such apostasy, without the least consideration
for the Catholic teachings backing up our position that they are antipopes who
must be rejected, is also very blasphemous.
We would tell you to wake up, but you may be beyond that point.
http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/heresy_of_antipopes_john_paul_ii_and_benedict_xvi.php
Typical of modernists, you also quote John 17 with the usual
false signification, that Catholics should have communion with heretics to
truly fulfill the Church’s unity.
Pope Pius XI, Mortalium Animos (# 7), condemning false ecumenism, Jan. 6, 1928: “For
the authors who favor this view are accustomed, times almost without number, to
bring forward these words of Christ: ‘That they all may be one… And
there shall be one fold and one shepherd,’ (Jn. 17:21; 10:16) with this signification however: that
Christ Jesus merely expressed a desire and prayer, which still lacks its
fulfillment. For they are of the opinion that the unity of faith and government,
which is a note of the one true Church of Christ, has hardly up to the present
time existed, and does not today exist.”
Why?
Hello. I'm noticing that I have some
questions as I am listening to your very informative clips. I am going to write
them all down as I go along here, and hope you'll be able to come back to me
and have patience with me. Some may be answered later, and some may not, some I
may remember to change, others not, as said, I hope you can have patience with
me. Thank you very much…
… Who are the 40 plus anti-popes in Church
history and what did they do?
… Why, really, would God create this ruse and condemn "believers" to
hell when they could be a great counterbalance for the very evil in the world
he wishes to punish it for? I mean, if anyone is standing up against the
European suicide, war, abortion, gay marriage and so on, it is the Catholic Church...
I don't get it. And don't give me something like "It's God, you're not
supposed to get it….
Hampus…
MHFM: You will find the names of the antipopes in our Antipopes
Section. We recommend that you take a
look at it. We assume you are asking why
God would create the deception of the Vatican II “Church.” He didn’t create it; He allowed it. He saw the bad will of men, their denial of
the faith and His dogmas, and how they didn’t care about His truth or His
commands. So, He allowed it to be almost
completely taken away in a massive deception; but He made sure the Church
remained in a remnant. When you consider
the almost universal bad will out there, it makes perfect sense why He has
allowed this situation to occur. The
dearth of good will is simply remarkable.
With regard to your claim that the “Catholic Church” stands up to
abortion and gay “marriage,” you are obviously referring to the Vatican II sect
and you are mistaken. They facilitate
abortion by enabling pro-abortionists to remain within their ranks. If years ago they had excommunicated in a
vigorous fashion every public supporter of abortion, it never would have been
passed into law. The Vatican II sect is
responsible for it. They also facilitate
the homosexual abomination, by perverting the truth about the evil
orientation. They only mildly criticize
the homosexual act. They also allow
homosexual perverts to run rampant in their perverted seminaries, and they give
the supporters of the abomination a prominent place in their churches and
universities. Most importantly, however,
even if they were thoroughly Catholic on these issues, it wouldn’t matter. They deny Christ and embrace false religions. Once you do that, nothing else matters. That’s what you need to realize.
Community
How does one overcome pride?
Also, I'd like to share something I've noticed, the V2 "Catholic"
Churches around here are replacing all of their signs, they no longer say
"St. X's Catholic Church", they now say "St. X's Catholic
Community". I suppose the official line will soon be "there are
Catholic communities, Lutheran communities, etc, but only one Church".
Patrick
MHFM: Have a true devotion to Mary and regularly say three Hail
Marys for the specific intention of true humility. St. Louis De Montfort’s renewal of true
devotion to Mary also has a week dedicated to self-knowledge. Pride blinds people, especially by rendering
them unable to see themselves. Grace, on
the other hand, gives one the ability to see things (including himself) as they
are. That’s why St. Louis’ first week of
preparation for true devotion to Mary (the second period) deals with the issue
of self-knowledge. Accurate
self-knowledge is crucial. It enables
one to see his faults, shortcomings, limitations, etc. While it’s true that nothing good can be done
without grace, a person who is interiorly humble almost instinctively refers
good things to God. It’s immediate and
fluid. He is not consumed with or
focused on himself, even if he maturely recognizes his involvement in something
good; whereas the prideful person is weighed down by himself. It becomes his focus and burden, consuming
his outlook, operation and thoughts. He
has trouble doing things without both the right and left hands knowing what he
is doing (Matthew 6:3). Certainly,
spiritual reading can assist people in this area; however, if a person
seriously struggles with this he really needs to reorient his spiritual focus
and prayer life, with a special emphasis on the full Rosary. Even though most don’t realize it, pride is
the biggest problem today, including in countless heretics who might exteriorly
be considered meek or patient or humble.
Their interior pride (a misguided view of their own spirituality or
holiness or intellect) keeps them falsely confident in their dark spiritual
plight; whereas if they possessed humility, they would accurately assess
themselves, what they believe, how they compromise God’s truth for friends,
etc. We can’t tell you how many members
of the Novus Ordo have called our monastery over the years. The number of them that think they are
extremely knowledgeable (experts) and dedicated Catholics, while in reality
they know almost nothing about the real Catholic faith, is staggering. Pride is their problem and it keeps them
deceived. That’s why the Fourth Lateran
Council said that all heretics are tied together by pride. Everyone who commits clear mortal sins is
weighed down by pride, not primarily weakness.
They lack the first degree of humility, which causes a person to fear
God enough to avoid what He forbids.
That’s very interesting about the Community signs.
Changes
Subject:
Latin vs. English
Quote
from article,
“You
can call it whatever you like, but it's not English,” said Father David Cooper,
president of the Milwaukee Archdiocese Priests Alliance. “The language of
prayer is supposed to be evocative, graceful, uplifting. This reads like
clunk-clunk-clunk-bang-boom.” “Anytime
there are changes, people...angry and sad,”
Brothers,
if he doesn’t like changes, then how come he didnt speak up during the 2nd Vat
council when changes were taking place?? But what do you expect from
a member of a religion where everyone just joins hands and sings a happy
happy joy joy song and everyone can be saved regardless of where they
are..
http://www.catholicculture.org/news/headlines/index.cfm?storyid=7115
Steve
New
Note: Very soon (perhaps within the
next week or so) we hope to have a special new addition to our website. We also have a new article and video that
should be posted very soon.
If
I
have been seen your webpage a several times and sometimes I visit your youtube
channel. If you have the truth
and Catholic Church is full of heresy that mean that there is no any other
Church, there is no Church any more... Where I and another
believers, have to go now? I do not want join protestants or pentacostians
clowns. Where can I go if I want see the Sunday Mass?? Where I can
get the Eucharistia, if there is no Church???
Maybe
I can join the Old Catholic Church (Staroktolicka Cirkev), they refuse the
First Vatican Council in 1868 and they possibly keep rules as been
before the Vatican I., so they're maybe original untouched Church.
Or can I join the Orthodox Catholic Church? They are
practise the same (unchanged) rituals for 2000 years, as
is their affirmation. They had in history a many miracles too.
So WHAT NEXT? Where Can I follow the Lord Jesus Christ if his Church is no
longer on Earth?
I am Roman Catholic and I should be respect the Pope without any
questions, he's got "the key of heaven" and what he change on Earth
will be changed in Heaven too. If he (the Pope) bring a new rules to
Earth will be this rules accepted in Heaven too......? I hope that your answers come soon.
Yours Faithfully
Peter Zmajkovic
MHFM: We must say that your question
is indicative of a larger problem among alleged “Catholics” today. You seem overwhelmingly and almost
exclusively concerned with where you can go to church on Sunday. That’s not what it means to be Catholic: just
showing up at a church. Your outlook
displays a misguided focus: one that’s more concerned with fellowship with
others than on God and His faith. The
Catholic faith is much more significant than where one goes on Sunday. The faith is something that must be lived
every day. It’s not defined by a trip on
Sunday. First and foremost, you must
accept the Catholic faith and all of its dogmas whole and undefiled. Without the full Catholic faith, receiving
the sacraments will not lead you to Heaven or to please God (Hebrews 11:6).
Your willingness to join the
schismatic Old Catholic sect reveals that, at this time, you don’t have a firm
belief in the Catholic faith. Why would
you do that if you believe, as the Catholic Church teaches, that there is no
salvation outside the Church? The Old
Catholic sect is a non-Catholic sect that leads people to damnation. Its followers have been excommunicated by the
Church. And if you dissent from the
Catholic dogma Outside the Church There is No Salvation, while claiming in some
way to adhere to Catholic truth, what makes you think that showing up at any
church will please God, since you reject a dogma He has revealed?
Not even a valid pope can change a
Catholic dogma. Matthew 16 does not
grant a pope the power to overturn a truth of revelation. The revelation of Jesus Christ cannot be
changed. You need to convert to the
Catholic faith (i.e., come to a firm faith in all Catholic dogmas, so that you
would never even consider leaving the Catholic Church) and completely reject
the Vatican II sect. That involves never
going to the New Mass again, for any reason.
Once you are convinced, then we can assist you with where to receive
sacraments; but one should not receive them until he has the proper faith and
has made the profession of faith. Please
see our section on those converting or leaving the Novus Ordo. Also, we recommend that you review the The Glossary of Terms and Principles [PDF], in addition to our
other material.
It will assist you with key principles that contradict your current
mindset; they demonstrate that your current ideas are incompatible with the
Catholic faith of Christ. Finally, we are not saying that the Catholic Church is
full of heresy, but that the Vatican II “Church” is not the Catholic
Church. Our material makes that very
clear.
Cannot
Dear Mr. Dimond,
Your lesson about the thief and where he went after his death also cannot be
true and here is why. Paradise is where the tree of life is and that's in
heaven with God. How do I know? Because of Rev. 2: 7 - it reads as
follows:
"Revelation 2:7 (New American
Standard Bible)
7'(A)He who has an ear, let him hear
what the Spirit says to the churches (B)To him who overcomes, I will grant to
eat of (C)the tree of life which is in the (D)Paradise of God.'"(NASB)
The Lord Jesus Christ said this to the
thief:
"Luke 23:43 (New American
Standard Bible)
43And He said to him, "Truly I
say to you, today you shall be with Me in (A)Paradise."(NASB)
Blessings!
Anita Hiltz
MHFM: No, you are not correct. Your points are addressed and refuted in this
video: The Good Thief, the Old Testament
Saints, and the Necessity of Baptism [video]
Never
Dear Brothers,
I have never understood this story and some
others like it in the Bible. It appears to me that the Church is talking
out of Both sides of its mouth when it comes to Communism vs. Capitalism
? On one hand we are told to give up EVERYTHING and follow God.......and on the
other hand we are told that would be stupid to not be able to support ourselves
and fall into poverty, where we could never be Able to give to
Charity?
I'm sure there Must be More to the story than
we see on the surface here, but we Never get the Details.
If it was Their (God given)
land, why did God kill
him,
and yet, tells us Private Property rights is a good thing ??
Thanks for any light you could shine on
this,
Carol D.
“Ananias, with Saphira his
wife, sold a piece of land, And by fraud kept back part of the price of the land…
But Peter said: Ananias, why hath Satan tempted thy heart, that thou shouldst
lie to the Holy Ghost, and by fraud keep part of the price of the land?... Thou
has not lied to men, but to God. And Ananias hearing these words,
fell down, and gave up the ghost. And there came great fear upon all that heard
it.” (Acts 5:1-5)
MHFM: We think you’re overreacting. People should not come to such conclusions
when presented with a verse they don’t immediately understand. It’s not an endorsement of Communism. Rather, the fathers believe that the
Christians of that period had agreed
to share their possessions and give all to the community. The Haydock commentary explains it well. It is believed that “the resolution which the faithful made of selling their property, and
laying the price at the feet of the apostles, implied a vow of reserving
nothing for themselves, but giving all to the community; and that the crime of
Ananias and Saphira consisted in the violation of this vow; on which account
they regarded them as sacrilegious, and plunderers of sacred things.”
---“Ananias, and his wife Saphira, had made a
promise or vow, to put into the common stock the price of what they had to
sell. When they had sold the field, they
resolved by mutual consent to keep for their private use part of the money, and
to bring in the rest, as if they had received no more. The whole price being promised, and by that
means consecrated to God, St. Augustine calls it a sacrilegious fraud, and St.
Chrysostom a theft of what was already made sacred to God.”
Found
Hello my name is René Pelchat… I am 47
years old single convert to what I thought was the catholic faith when I was
30. After reading a lot of catholic books, lives of saints, books on
freemasonry and their infiltration into the church, etc, I felt that there was
something wrong with the vatican II catholic church (I believed during many
years in Medjugorje, marian movement of Priests, etc,).
In the last couple of years, I didn't
understand why there was so much chaos in that church and so few people
attending masses (most of them old people).
For instance, I was wondering why the catholic vatican II church was not
talking and promoting the unbelievable miracles we have in our history (Our
Lady of Guadalupe, the Saint Shroud of Turin -we know now by science that this
is the Shroud of Jesus Christ, numerous Eucharistic miracles, etc.). I was asking Jesus and the Virgin Mary in my
prayers where is the Real Truth. Well,
thanks for your site and your discoveries I am beginning to be at peace now.
I would like to congratulate you and thank
you for the immense effort you did by creating your site.
(Rene)
Comment
After listening once again to your talks
with Greg Rossi and Will Golle, one sad thought stroke me: Both the radical
schismatics (who cast down Saints, depose real pre-vatican II Popes and misread
Church Law) and the radical defenders of the V2 apostasy suffer from the same
problem that blinds them in similar fashion, even though they are on 2 extreme
opposite sides: Pride.
The radical schismatics pride themselves on
their knowledge and make a fool of themselves. While most of the V2 defenders
(aside from [Albrecht] and the pseudo-intellectual with the pipe) actually
pride themselves on their IGNORANCE. This problem plagues the (fake?) V2
defender from Chicago, Lewis, Golle and Rossi. They can´t even tell who goes to
Hell, or who is and who isn´t a Catholic, or when a Catholic ceases to be
Catholic.
I know it´s hard to find good help
nowadays. But for you, it seems even harder to find worthy opponents.
Question one
Question one:
Are you supposed to be afraid of God?
Ow…
MHFM:
Yes, the most common theme in the Bible is that the fear of the Lord is the beginning of
wisdom (Psalm 110:10), and that His mercy
is only upon those who fear Him (Psalm 102:17; Lk. 1:50; 2 Cor. 5:11;
etc.). Therefore, those who don’t have a
sufficient fear of God to obey His commandments and avoid gravely offending Him
will not receive His mercy or forgiveness.
The fear of God is what causes sinners to turn from the broad road and
begin to live a life of grace. After
people become more advanced in the spiritual life, their actions become
motivated by the love of God, though a salutary fear of the Lord remains.
Interesting
Thought this was an interesting
article. Even though they imbibe the V2 apostasy and are totally
ignorant of the true faith they have correctly stated that, "Islam is
of the devil". This has been taught throughout the history of the
Catholic Church. They however seem to be doing this more in retaliation
for what they falsely believe about 9/11 being an Islamic attack. What is
even more diabolical is the CNN reporter, "Rick Sanchez" and how he
defends not only Islam but man in general and how we must respect all people.
-Bruce
“Christians To Burn Quran”
This is an outrageous story - but true. And
it can only lead to the sort of narrow-minded anger and violence that peaceful
people (of any religion) want no part of.
A CNN interview reveals that a US church
has sparked off a huge controversy by mulling an ‘International Burn a Quran
Day’ to observe the anniversary of the 9/11 terror attack. The Dove World
Outreach Centre in Gainesville, Florida, will be hosting the event to remember
the victims of the Sep 9, 2001 attack and has extended an invitation to all
Christians to burn the Muslim holy book at its premises from 6 pm to 9 pm. “We believe that Islam is of the devil, that
it’s causing billions of people to go to hell, it is a deceptive religion, it
is a violent religion and that is proven many, many times,” church pastor Terry
Jones told CNN.
MHFM: Yes, the complete apostate Rick Sanchez actually claims to
be a Vatican II “Catholic.” What a sick
joke.
Talking
Dear Mhfm,
I know you got a recent e-mail from someone about Chris Brown. I found this video about him. It shows how one of his songs is talking about
Lucifer. [“Fallen Angel”]
God Bless
Sean
Note
MHFM: Our combo DVDs containing the
new video, Is the World about to End?,
are now available to ship from the monastery.
Orders for them will be shipped starting tomorrow. We had previously made them available for
order.
A few pictures of
the Monastery
Question
Since you have done a good job of showing
how recent popes are anti-popes, I was wondering, does your movement have an
alternate pope?
Do you have a list of anti-popes? Also the black popes (Jesuits) and your view
of these?
Since people's salvation depends on much of this and adhering to the truth of
scripture, are you trying to reform the Catholic Church or are splitting from
it?
I would appreciate your reply.
Thank you.
Courag…
MHFM: We are Catholics and we adhere to the traditional faith
that the Church has always taught. The
true Catholic Church still exists, but in a remnant of traditional
Catholics. The Church doesn’t need to be
reformed, but rather a massive apostasy has occurred in which almost all who
claim to be Catholic are in fact non-Catholic.
They have left the Catholic Church.
What most people regard as the Catholic Church (the Vatican II sect) is
in fact a counterfeit sect. Our view of
the Jesuits is that non-Catholics are deceived when they think that modern
“Jesuits” run a world conspiracy. That’s
nonsense. The modern so-called “Jesuits”
are in fact heretics and apostates because they adhere to Vatican II and false
ecumenism. Traditionally, however, the
Jesuit Order produced some of the greatest saints and missionaries. They did an invaluable service in spreading
the true faith and bringing the Gospel all over the world.
People’s salvation depends on hearing, accepting, and following
all of what Christ commanded. You can’t
do that as a non-Catholic. That’s why
it’s necessary for salvation to become a traditional Catholic.
JP2
Brothers,
The recent video on JPII is a clear message
to those willing to listen. The only problem is that there are not too
many people willing or able to listen in this evil world today with all the
modern technological distracting noise. By externals, their worlds are
conceived by many false signals and a spirit of "Jumping on the Band
Wagon". JPII's "New Truth" is just one of those false
signals that is accepted in the V-2 Sect's "New Mass". The
"New Truth" is but "Another Lie" that adds fuel to the fire
that has engulfed the Vatican II sect. "Learn not the way of the
heathen," Jeremiah 10:2…
When JPII died, he was first placed into a
cedar coffin. His face was covered with a white silk; this was the first
time this was done... Next the cedar coffin was sealed in an 800-pound
coffin...then finally it was placed in another wooden coffin before being
buried beneath St. Peter's Basilica. "...bearing a skull and
crossbones.." Los Angeles Times. Interesting to note is that JPII
was buried in a trapezoidal-shaped coffin, the same seen in many vampire
movies.
"The trapezoid has long been regarded in by occultists as the most satanic
of shapes, especially adapted to enhance demonic manifestation. This type
of coffin is built to draw in and preserve evil, dark energy. The idea
was to attract enough vampire dark demonic energy, to draw sufficient
quantities of energy, and to store that evil energy, so that, at a right
moment, the dead man can come out of the coffin, as demonic resurrection,"
former satanist, Bill Schnoebelen…
God bless,
Tom Miles
Videos
Dear MHFM,
Thanks for the prompt shipment of the
Incredible Animals that Defy Evolution and other videos we received
today-----WOW!! these are ABSOLUTELY RIVETING!! Our puppy Jesse was
similarly glued to the TV screen, particularly enjoying the baby chick
peeping as it emerged from its awesome shell---(he kept barking and moving his
head around at all kinds of angles and listening carefully with his little ears
perked up!) ---personally I enjoyed the section on the hummingbirds the most as
they are --- like all these animals---totally MIRACULOUS creatures of
God!
Great new videos on arch-evil JPII---great
point in that yes he very carefully, methodically, made certain all
his extreme-hell-inspired-antichrist-anticatholic program was explicitly put ON
THE RECORD!! [kind of like a serial killer]. He did this again and
again as MHFM has so correctly pointed out. Hindsight is 20/20----could
what he was really up to (pure evil) possibly be any MORE OBVIOUS!...
Comment
Very nice clips you posted about on the
'God of Wonders' video… The verse that hits home in it was:
"For since the creation of the world
God's invisible qualities—His eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly
seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without
excuse." Romans 1:20
What a slap in the face it is to God who
shares his creation with us, and hear some say there still isn’t a
God. Those people don’t want there to be a God, so that way
they can attempt to dupe themselves to live immorally without following God’s
law along with trying to find some cheap way to cover their guilty
consciences…
On the flip side, it’s nice for me to
hear things during astronomy star gazing sessions while viewing the
heavens, when someone says something like, 'How can there not be a
God?' Also Astronomy magazines cover story about 2-3 months
ago had an article about our Sun, on how science and astronomers are struggling
to find another star unique like our own sun. Out of the billions upon billions
of stars out there, our sun is unique...Try to explain that one Darwin ??
Steve
Wonders
Subject:
Wonders of God
Great
videos, although I never believed in evolution, watching these videos really
made me feel small. St. Alphonsus Liguori uses the word, "worm"
a lot in his writings to describe our nothingness in comparison to the Blessed
Trinity. The other thing that comes to my mind is His love and care for
all of us, all these creations that God made were out of love for us. The
next and final reality to consider is our salvation, God closed the gates of
heaven by his word, He could have done the same to open them but to show us His
indescribable love for us, Jesus chose to suffer the most ignominious
death possible… Can you imagine, Jesus does all this for Love of us and we slap
Him in the face and run from Him, such ingratitude…
Todd
God of Wonders
MHFM: This is a link to an excellent
video called God of Wonders. It was our intention to carry this
video. However, the end contains heresy:
the false salvation message of Protestantism.
So, we have linked to the first seven parts. They deal with refuting evolution and
demonstrating God’s power. The footage
is tremendous.
1) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWH7uVc0S4Y&feature=related
2) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7D4QD7lS9o&feature=related
3) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73QQ3XJWmmw&feature=related
4) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQH26-lDW3s&feature=related
5) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8J5MygZiRcM&feature=related
6) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIJMC8CAKKs&feature=related
7) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYRwpTEvVfc&feature=related
Posting
Subject: God of Wonders video – amazing !
Dear Brothers,
What an amazing video, God of Wonders. Thank you for posting it. God's creation is such an
endless source of natural miracles that it's no wonder St. Paul said people
have no excuse for not believing in God (Romans 1:20). The series destroys the
idea that the universe came about by chance because every single thing that
exists is built in an organized way – that doesn't happen by accident! The
footage is superb and if there is so much beauty coupled with practicality in
nature, then one cannot even begin to imagine what heaven is like:
1 Corinthians 2:9 - But, as it is written:
That eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither hath it entered into the heart
of man, what things God hath prepared for them that love him.
I particularly enjoyed the section on snow
flakes in video 3. It reminded me of how many servants of the Blessed Virgin
Mary, when given the grace of seeing her up close, remarked that she glittered
with a snow-like light. It also reminded me of the vision of hell that the
children of Fatima were given and about how so many souls would fall into hell
“like snow flakes.” It is remarkable that Protestants can see such glories in
creation, but cling obstinately to their heresies, as though God, who so
clearly demonstrates His love in nature, would abandon His creatures to a
man-made system of salvation, such as is protestantism, and not build a
permanent structure of salvation – the Catholic Church only. If we want to make
it to heaven these days during the Antichrist Antipope Vatican II Great
Apostasy, then we really need to put the Catholic faith first by holding
uncompromisingly to Catholic dogmas, and to have a strong and consistent
devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary and the Rosary. May Jesus and Mary help all
Catholics to love God wholeheartedly, to be humble, and to walk the narrow path
to life all the way to the end.
God Bless,
Chris White
Convert
I was looking into your site. I have been looking
to convert from protestantism to the Holy Catholic Church in order that my soul
might be saved. First is that possible? If it’s possible what would you
recommend. I live in Florida and there
are no traditionalist organizations that teach extra ecclesiam nulla salus…
please advise.
Thanks,
F...M….
MHFM: That’s great to hear. What a person in your situation would do is
follow these steps to convert: The Steps to convert to the
traditional Catholic faith and for those leaving the New Mass - Baptism and
Conditional Baptism - the Council of Trent's Profession of Faith for Converts. Begin to pray the Rosary each day,
do spiritual reading, and familiarize yourself with the basic catechism. When one is fully convinced and prepared for
a profession of faith, we can help you further with where to make a confession.
New Video
MHFM: This is a new video about the
Great Western Schism and the Gates of Hell.
The Great Western Schism and the
Gates of Hell - 1/4
The Great Western Schism and the
Gates of Hell - 2/4
The Great Western Schism and the
Gates of Hell - 3/4
The Great Western Schism and the Gates
of Hell - 4/4
Soul
Dear MHFM,
I was reading St. Gertrude's current
bulletin (July 25, 2010) just now and read in a reprint of St. Anthony's
Messenger from October 1936 that someone with a sincerely held non-Catholic
belief is really a member of the soul of the Catholic Church and will be saved.
I was surprised to find this… Any comments?
Valerie Duffy
MHFM: Yes, it’s blatantly heretical.
They deny Outside the Church There is No Salvation, just as we’ve pointed out
all along. Those who support, accept or
agree with such heretical priests are not true Catholics. The heresy was also being spread by priests
in fallible sources prior to Vatican II.
See our book for a full discussion of these issues.
BOD
Dear MHFM,
Council of Elvira completely debunks
baptism of desire. "Canon 4-Flamens who have been catechumens for
three years and who have abstained from sacrifices may be baptized. Canon
42-Those with a good reputation who seek to become Christians shall remain as
catechumens for two years before being baptized. Should they become
seriously ill, they may request and receive baptism earlier."
Baptism, early 4th century Roman Catholicism was never an issue of desire
saving those outside the Church unless baptized prior, properly, in the
Church. That would have been ludicrous thinking and totally insane.
Furthermore, the idea of salvation outside the Church could save you
somehow, equally as ludicrous and outrageous. Thank you MHFM. May
your ministry bear great fruit.
Pop star
Subject:
Pop star made a “Saint”
Hello
Brothers!
Reading the e-exchange about that one female who loves Chris Brown so much, I
decided to share another story with you. A student in Serbia decided to paint a
religious icon, or picture, of the turbo-folk star Ceca Raznatovic, widow of
the hypocrite Zeljko Raznatovic Arkan. It’s sad to see who the young people
consider to be Saints these days. Words suchs as whore, prostitute, Turk,
demon, sinner are all words that can be used to describe her. Not much
different from the female pop stars in North America (Lady Gaga, etc.) I have
attached the picture of the icon.
God Bless!
Daniel
New Church
I wanted to comment on Carlos' conversation
with his fellow new church catholic regarding his understanding of americanism,
the problem is these people don't use common sense and logic. They also
apply this so called blind faith to what Vatican ll teaches instead of applying
critical thinking to the matter at hand. Once the True Catholic Church
solemnly declares a Truth {dogma} it can't be changed and it can't be changed
because they are the teachings of Jesus Christ. Could you imagine saying
to Jesus, "you need to get with the times"! The Church solemnly
declares these truths so that the faithful become bound by these truths.
They have to hold these truths whole and inviolate to be a member of the
catholic church. This is the function of the Teaching
Magisterium! These people have a misunderstanding on what Jesus
said to Peter regarding, "what you bind on earth will be bound in
heaven and what you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven", this
teaching doesn't apply to a divine truth, you can't change a truth because the
truth is not subject to anything, it’s a rock!
Todd
Repeating
Subject: Catholic Inquisition Myths Busted
… This is such a hot topic for so many
protestants, to throw that at your face when the person knows so little about
it – and is just repeating what that person’s minister or false opinion is
about that time in the Church’s history. In William Thomas Walsh’s book
about Isabella, Queen of Spain, He details the problems that the Spaniards had
to deal with regarding Muslim invasions and Jewish “false” converts once that
rule was enacted (that all non-Catholics had to leave…)
Thanks…
Melanie and Bill
Regarding
Dear MHFM,
Regarding canon 16 of Council
of Elvira, "...they are to be given neither to Jews nor to heretics,
because there can be no companionship between faithful and
infidel..." By this holy synod of holy early times antipope Benedict 16
stands condemned as obstinate heretic in 2010 of salvation history by visibly
and openly kowtowing to the Jews in their condemned faith… As a Roman
Catholic I condemn antipope Benedict 16, HERETIC! St. Michael the
Archangel, avenge us we pray most fervently.
Dea…
Schism
Could you please also make a video about
The Great Schism of 1054? It would help a lot of people here from Eastern
Europe.
Thank you and God Bless!
Eduard
MHFM: Thanks for the e-mail.
In our Papacy section, there are audios that deal with the primary issue
involved in the schism, the rejection of the Roman Pontiff’s primacy of
jurisdiction. The Bible teaches that Jesus made St. Peter the first pope [link to section]. The audios cover
how the ancient Church, and the East, recognized the pope’s primacy of
jurisdiction.
Impression
Your
latest videos are spectacular, as always.
The Western Schism has left me with the distinct impression that God, in
his infinite wisdom and careful planning, allowed this disgrace to happen
exactly in order to prove that what would come to pass in the Great Apostasy
that we are living through is plausible.